Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation

Recurrence of Primary Disease After Adult Liver Transplant - Risk Factors, Early Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention

Liver transplantation offers a new lease of life to patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the implantation of an exogenous allograft and the accompanying immunosuppression bring their own challenges. Moreover, the persistence of risk factors for the initial liver insult place the new graft at a higher risk of damage. With the increasing number of liver transplants along with the improvement in survival posttransplant, the recurrence of primary disease in liver grafts has become more common. Pre-2015, the most common disease to recur after transplant was hepatitis C. However, directly acting antivirals have nearly eliminated this problem. The greatest challenge of disease recurrence we now face are those of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. We focus on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of the recurrence of primary disease after transplant. We also discuss means of early identification, risk stratification, prevention, and management of recurrent primary disease after liver transplantation.

Con: Steroids Should Not Be Withdrawn in Transplant Recipients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) can recur following liver transplantation (LT) despite immunosuppressive therapy, with implications for graft survival. Although the evidence is not robust, disease recurrence seems to occur in the presence of less intense and/or steroid-free immunosuppression (IS) in particular in the case of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The main risk factor for AIH recurrence is the severity of disease activity in the explant and potential donor/recipient human leukocyte antigen D-related 3 (DR3) mismatch. The treatment for AIH recurrence includes reintroduction or increase in the dose of steroids with or without the addition of azathioprine. T cell-mediated rejection episodes are also more common in AILD. Steroid withdrawal is the common practice in LT for non-AILD, eliminating the risks associated with longterm exposure to steroids. In AILD, maintenance of steroids at a low dose in the long term may reduce the risk of disease recurrence and rejection. This strategy is safe when there is vigilance for steroid-related adverse effects. Alternatively, identifying patients who are at the greatest risk for disease recurrence and who would benefit from intensified IS might be an option.

Second-line Agents in Pediatric Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ten percent to 20% of children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) require second-line therapy to achieve remission. Although current guidelines exist on first-line management, evidence for second-line therapy in treatment-refractory patients is lacking. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of second-line treatments used in this population.

METHODS

Electronic and manual searches were used to identify potential studies for inclusion. Studies were selected based on reported response rates to second-line therapies in children who failed response to prednisone and azathioprine. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Meta-analysis using weighted estimate of response rates at 6 months was performed for each treatment option. Heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies of 76 pediatric patients with AIH were included in the review. Overall response rates at 6 months were estimated as 36% for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (N = 34, 95% confidence interval [CI] (16-57)), and 50% for tacrolimus (N = 4, 95% CI (0-100%)) and 83% for cyclosporine (N = 15, 95% CI (66%-100%)). Adverse effects were most frequent with cyclosporine (64% experiencing at least 1 adverse effect) followed by tacrolimus (54%) and MMF (48%). Pooled estimates of adverse events were 78% for cyclosporine (95% CI (54%-100%)), 42% for tacrolimus (95% CI (0%-85%)) and 45% for MMF (95% CI (25%-68%)). Sensitivity analyses were not performed due to small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine had the highest response rate at 6 months in children with standard-treatment-refractory AIH; however, it also had the highest rate of adverse events. MMF was the second most efficacious option with a low adverse effect rate.

Recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment modality for end stage liver disease caused by many etiologies including autoimmune processes. That said, the need for transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but not for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), has decreased over the years due to the availability of effective medical treatment. Autoimmune liver diseases have superior transplant outcomes than those of other etiologies. While AIH and PBC can recur after LT, recurrence is of limited clinical significance in most, but not all cases. Recurrent PSC, however, often progresses over years to a stage requiring re-transplantation. The exact incidence and the predisposing factors of disease recurrence remain debated. Better understanding of the pathogenesis and the risk factors of recurrent autoimmune liver diseases is required to develop preventive measures. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of incidence, diagnosis, risk factors, clinical course, and treatment of recurrent autoimmune liver disease (AIH, PBC, PSC) following LT.

Liver transplantation and autoimmune liver diseases

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage autoimmune liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis. Indications for LT for these diseases do not differ substantially from those used for other acute or chronic liver diseases. Despite the good outcomes reported, the recurrence of autoimmune liver disease is relatively common in the allograft. In addition, it has become apparent that autoimmunity and autoimmune liver disease can arise de novo after transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disorders. An awareness of the existence of recurrent autoimmune liver diseases and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after LT has important clinical implications because their management differs from the standard antirejection treatment and is similar to the management of classic autoimmune liver diseases in the native liver.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was the first chronic liver disease in which remission was achieved by immunosuppression. Prognosis is poor when left untreated. Since the original description in 1950 by Waldenström, the initially reported treatment option has remained until today and is the core of the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine. Immunosuppression as a treatment concept spans different situations including the induction and maintenance of remission, treatment of nonresponders, avoidance of side effects, perioperative treatment of liver transplantation candidates and the issue of withdrawal. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs such as transplantation immunosuppressants have been administered and reported in small series. In an attempt to optimize side effect management, a recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative for noncirrhotic AIH patients with lower steroid side effects. With an early diagnosis and effective therapy, only 4% of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH. After liver transplantation there is a considerable risk for graft loss because of recurrent AIH, and lifelong vigilance and therapeutic attention is important.

Living-donor liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome

AIM

  Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) following liver transplantation has been reported in 20-30% of cases, mainly of Western populations. The aim of this study was to review our experience of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Japanese patients with AIH.

METHODS

  Among 375 adult (age ≥18 years) LDLT performed at our center between 1996 and 2010, 16 (4.2%) were for patients with AIH (n = 12) or AIH-primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome (n = 4). The patient and donor characteristics and post-transplantation course were reviewed.

RESULTS

  All recipients were female with a median age of 48 years (range, 21-58). Low-dose methylprednisolone and calcineurin inhibitors were continued in all patients. Acute cellular rejection occurred in 10 (63%), which was more frequent than in our overall series of 28.5% (107/375 cases). Overall survival rate was 81.2% at 5 years. At the end of the follow up (median, 6.0 years [range, 0.1-9.6]), 13 patients were alive with normal liver function tests (aspartate transaminase, 18 ± 5 IU/mL; alanine transaminase, 16 ± 8 IU/mL). None of the survivors exhibited liver function test results suspicious for recurrent AIH, which might indicate liver biopsy.

CONCLUSION

  Survival after LDLT for AIH and overlap syndrome was excellent and there was no evidence of clinical recurrence. The recurrence rate of AIH after liver transplantation may differ among countries, and requires further investigation.

Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Autoimmune hepatitis can recur or appear de novo after liver transplantation, and it can result in hepatic fibrosis, graft loss, and re-transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the prevalence, manifestations, putative pathogenic mechanisms, outcomes, and management of these occurrences. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs in 8-12 % of transplanted patients at 1 year and 36-68 % at 5 years. Recurrence may be asymptomatic and detected only by surveillance liver test abnormalities or protocol liver tissue examination. Autoantibodies that characterized the original disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, increased serum immunoglobulin G level, and histological findings of interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, perivenular hepatocyte necrosis, pseudo-rosetting, and acidophil bodies typify recurrence. Premature corticosteroid withdrawal and pre-transplant severity of the original disease are possible risk factors. De novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in 1-7 % of patients 0.1-9 years after transplantation, especially in children. The appearance of autoantibodies may herald its emergence, and antibodies to glutathione-S-transferase T1 have been predictive of the disease. Recurrent disease may reflect recruitment of residual memory T lymphocytes and host-specific genetic predispositions, whereas de novo disease may reflect an allo-antigenic immune response and molecular mimicries that override self-tolerance. Treatment should be appropriate for autoimmune hepatitis and not based on anti-rejection drugs. Corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is the essential treatment. The substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine and switch of the calcineurin inhibitor or its replacement with rapamycin have also been used for refractory disease. Re-transplantation has been necessary in 8-23 %.

What is the prognosis after retransplantation of the liver?

In patients with failing liver grafts, hepatic retransplantation cannot be abandoned for the ethical and practical reasons that have been detailed previously. The current recommendations involve a strategy for risk stratification of retransplant candidates. The long-term patient and graft survival outcomes after ReLT are excellent and acceptable for the low and intermediate groups, respectively. However, pursuing ReLT in transplant candidates in the high-risk category cannot be recommended. Furthermore, ReLT should be reserved for centers equipped to manage the difficulties of the endeavor because it is a technically demanding operation that requires surgical expertise and excellent anesthesiology and critical care support both before and after transplantation.

Autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage acute and chronic autoimmune hepatitis. However, despite the good outcomes reported, disease recurrence is relatively common in the allograft. In addition, autoimmunity and autoimmune liver disease can arise de novo after transplantation for non-autoimmune liver disorders. Little is known about the mechanisms by which autoimmune diseases develop after liver transplantation, but genetic factors, molecular mimicry, impaired regulatory T-cell responses, and exposures to new alloantigens might be involved. Regardless of the pathogenic mechanisms, it is important to remain aware of the existence of recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation; these disorders are similar to classic autoimmune hepatitis and are therefore not treated with standard antirejection strategies.

Therapy of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis was the first chronic liver disease with a favourable response to drug therapy and a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Since its original description in 1950 and first treatment studies the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine has not been modified in principle. A timely diagnosis before cirrhosis develops, the avoidance of immunosuppressant side effect, non-responders to standard induction therapy, and adherence to therapy are the greatest challenges. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs have been tested in small series and include transplant immunosuppressants. A recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative in non-cirrhotic AIH patients capable of minimizing unwanted steroid effects. The ultimate treatment approach upon drug treatment failure is liver transplantation. Only four percent of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH but the risk for graft loss because of recurrence has to be considered and recurrent AIH treated after transplantation.

Current and future treatments of autoimmune hepatitis

Corticosteroid therapy induces clinical, laboratory and histological improvements in 80% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Prednisone, alone or at a lower dose in combination with azathioprine, increases the 20-year life expectancy to 80% and prevents or reduces hepatic fibrosis in 79% of patients. The combination regimen is preferred and treatment should be considered in all patients with active disease. The duration of therapy is finite and the medication should be discontinued after resolution of all manifestations of inflammatory activity, including the histological changes. Relapse after drug withdrawal occurs in 50-79% of patients, and it should be treated with long-term azathioprine (2 mg/kg daily). Salvage therapies for individuals intolerant of or refractory to the conventional regimens include high-dose corticosteroids, with or without high-dose azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus or ciclosporin. Liver transplantation should be considered in patients with hepatic failure unresponsive to corticosteroid treatment, decompensated cirrhosis with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of at least 15 points, or hepatocellular carcinoma that meets transplantation criteria. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs after transplantation in at least 17% of patients, and it typically improves after adjustments in the immunosuppressive regimen. Future therapies are likely to include mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, adoptive transfer of T regulatory cells, and cytokine manipulation. The emergence of new treatments will require the development of a collaborative network of clinical and basic investigators, as the complexity and specificity of current management problems require solutions that exceed the capabilities of single institutions.

Liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between April 2001 and November 2006, a total of 116 LT procedures were performed (73 DDLTs and 43 LDLTs) in 112 patients (4 retransplants). Of the 112 recipients, 16 patients (14.3%) were transplanted for AIH (15 DDLTs and 1 LDLT). All recipients received FK506- and steroid-based immunosuppressive regimens.

RESULTS

The male/female ratio was 3/13, median age was 22 years (range, 15 to 35), and the median MELD score was 25 (range, 11 to 40). Arterial reconstruction was needed in four DDLTs due to severe steroid-induced angiopathy. After a median follow-up period of 530 days (range, 11 to 2016), the overall patient and graft survival rates were 93.8%. Only one patient died following LDLT due to primary graft nonfunction. Histopathologic recurrence was seen in three patients (18.7%) and was successfully treated by optimizing immunosuppression. Markedly elevated serum CA19-9 levels (median, 1069; range, 217 to 2855) was seen in four patients (28%), malignancy was ruled out and all patients normalized serum CA19-9 levels within the first 3 months posttransplant. Steroids withdrawal failed in all recipients and was always accompanied with almost immediate elevation of liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, LT for AIH shows excellent long-term outcomes, patients are usually young women who present with acute deterioration and high MELD scores, and usually require long-term steroids to prevent rejection and disease recurrence. Some patients have markedly high CA19-9 in absence of malignancy. Some patients also have severe steroid-induced hepatic artery angiopathy necessitating arterial reconstruction during the transplant surgery.

Prospective analysis of nonadherence in autoimmune hepatitis: a common problem

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess nonadherence to medications, the relationship between nonadherence and medical outcome and the relationship between a psychiatric risk factor (posttraumatic stress) and nonadherence in patients with a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were obtained in children with autoimmune hepatitis, who had consented to prospective monitoring of adherence, during 1 year of follow-up in our pediatric liver program. An electronic monitoring device as well as posttransplant trough blood levels of tacrolimus was used to evaluate adherence. A validated self-report questionnaire was used to assess posttraumatic stress. The medical outcome measure was the maximal alanine transaminase (ALT) for each monitored patient.

RESULTS

Of 37 pediatric patients, 34 (15 posttransplant) enrolled. Fourteen (41%) used the monitoring device as directed. Monitor readings ranged between 28% and 94% of optimal adherence (100%). No patient took the medications exactly as prescribed. Electronic monitoring device readings correlated inversely with maximal ALT (P = 0.03, r = -0.59), and were also correlated with the tacrolimus level variability as a measure of adherence (P = 0.04, r = -0.72). Posttraumatic stress disorder questionnaire scores were correlated with both measures of adherence (for electronic monitoring, P = 0.02, r = -0.70, for tacrolimus levels, P = 0.03, r = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonadherence to immunosuppressants was common in this cohort, and it correlated with higher maximal ALT. Nonadherence is therefore an important risk factor for poor outcome in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Posttraumatic stress symptoms, which were correlated with nonadherence, may serve as a focus for adherence-improving interventions.

Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction

Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive inflammatory hepatitis of unknown etiology that is responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. The diagnosis of AIH should be guided by the descriptive criteria and scoring system set forth by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Standard therapy is prednisone with or without azathioprine (AZA). Combination therapy with prednisone and AZA is preferred, as it allows treatment with lower individual doses of each drug and is thus associated with fewer side effects. Treatment goals include complete biochemical, clinical, and histologic remission. Treatment outcomes include complete remission with or without relapse, incomplete response, or treatment failure. Treatment withdrawal, once remission has been attained, may be associated with relapse of disease. Recurrent relapse may be addressed with long-term, lower dose maintenance treatment with prednisone or AZA. Incomplete response is addressed by attempting high-dose immunosuppressive regimens or by considering investigational medical regimens. Treatment failure is also addressed by considering investigational medical regimens. Medication toxicity is addressed with dose reduction or drug discontinuation. Should the patient progress to decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplantation is an effective treatment for AIH. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation, a well-balanced diet, and exercise are advocated in patients with AIH. Cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus are promising agents among the new therapies for autoimmune hepatitis. Unfortunately, newer therapeutic agents have been studied in small numbers. Larger, controlled treatment trials are needed to expand the repertoire of therapeutics to treat patients with fewer side effects and to provide alternatives for patients who are refractory to conventional therapy.

Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease

Autoantibodies indicate an immune reactive state, but in liver disease they lack pathogenicity and disease specificity. Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies constitute the standard serological repertoire that should be assessed in all liver diseases of undetermined cause. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, liver cytosol type 1, nuclear antigens specific to primary biliary cirrhosis, and pore complex antigens constitute an investigational repertoire that promises to have prognostic and diagnostic value. These autoantibodies may emerge as predictors of treatment response and outcome. Antibodies to histones, doubled-stranded DNA, chromatin, and lactoferrin constitute a supplemental repertoire, and they support the immune nature of the liver disease. Final diagnoses and treatment strategies do not depend solely on serological markers. Autoantibodies are floating variables, and their behavior does not correlate closely with disease activity. There are no minimum levels of significant seropositivity, especially in children. Over-interpretation is the major pitfall in the clinical application of the serological results. New autoantibodies will emerge as the search for target antigens and key pathogenic pathways continues.

Autoimmune hepatitis type 1: safety and efficacy of prolonged medical therapy

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of prolonged medical therapy for up to four decades in a cohort of patients with AIH.

METHODS

Forty-two patients were followed long term in the Yale Liver Clinics who met the criteria of 'definite autoimmune hepatitis' as defined by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Records were reviewed for the dosage of immunosuppression, rate of relapse, steroid side effects, current status of liver function tests and evidence for cirrhosis and its complications.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16 years and ranged from 7 to 43 years. The median follow-up was 13.5 years. Steroid withdrawal resulted in a mean of 1.78 relapses/patient (range, 0-8). All but six patients responded well to prednisone and azathioprine and alanine aminotransferases were completely normal in 29 (81%) at last exam. Five patients have discontinued medication. Steroid side effects have been minimal (weight gain in eight, osteoporosis in three) except for one patient who recovered successfully from cryptococcal meningitis and another with aseptic necrosis of the hip. Progression to cirrhosis occurred in 54% with evidence of esophageal varices in 37% but none developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Only one patient has received a liver transplant, while five others are currently listed because of symptoms of ascites, encephalopathy or bleeding from esophageal varices.

CONCLUSIONS

AIH can be managed effectively over three to four decades with low-dose immunosuppression resulting in essentially normal lifestyles and minimal side effects. Liver transplantation with an increased risk of rejection and graft failure in this group can be avoided for long periods in most of these patients.

Rapamycin successfully treats post-transplant autoimmune hepatitis

Rapamycin (Rapa), one of the newer immunosuppressants has been found to control and prevent autoimmune features in animal models. This is the first report describing the successful control of post-transplant autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) with Rapa. Post-transplant AIH is diagnosed in the presence of raised transaminases, elevated immunoglobulin G, presence of autoantibodies and histologic changes consistent with AIH on liver biopsy. It may represent a recurrence of the original AIH that led to transplantation or present as a de novo AIH after liver transplant. Post-transplant AIH has conventionally been treated with Prednisolone (Pred) and Azathioprine (AZA). In this report, tailoring of immunosuppression after diagnosis of post-transplant AIH is described with special emphasis on those treated successfully with Rapa. Fifteen of 21 patients responded to treatment with an increase in dose of Pred and addition of AZA or Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) to calcineurin inhibitor. Five non-responders and one other patient with post-transplant AIH were treated with addition of Rapa. All six responded to treatment but drug was withdrawn in one patient. Adverse events were minimal. Rapa may prove to be an important addition in the control of autoimmune liver disease.

Transition of care between paediatric and adult gastroenterology. Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic disease of the liver with an excellent prognosis under medical therapy capable of reaching complete remission. The diagnosis of AIH relies on the exclusion of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic aetiologies of chronic hepatitis, or hepatic injury. Autoantibodies contribute to the diagnosis of AIH and have led to the serological subclassification into three distinct types. Also, immunogenetic associations suggest heterogeneity of the syndrome of AIH. Treatment is not based on serological types but is uniformly employed for all subtypes of AIH. Although 90% of patients respond to treatment, immunosuppressive drugs used in transplant medicine have been employed for patients with treatment failure. New drugs, such as budenoside, are being evaluated for the long-term treatment of AIH with a reduction in steroid side-effects. Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for patients who fail to reach remission and progress to cirrhosis and liver failure. In Europe, about 4% of cirrhotic patients with the diagnosis of AIH undergo transplantation. The diagnosis and awareness of the disease is designed to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation and other lessons of self-intolerance

Autoimmune hepatitis has been described as recurrent or de novo disease after transplantation. The legitimacy of these diagnoses and the bases for their occurrence are unknown. To better understand these aspects of allograft dysfunction, the purported pathogenic mechanisms of classical autoimmune hepatitis were reviewed and extrapolated to recurrent and de novo disease after transplantation. Loss of self-tolerance may relate to defects in the negative selection of autoreactive immunocytes and the clonal expansion of promiscuous lymphocytes that are cross-reactive to homologous antigens (molecular mimicry). Repopulation of the allograft with recipient antigen-presenting cells and the presence of primed promiscuous cytotoxic T cells within the recipient are likely factors for recurrent disease. Targets may be the same peptides that triggered the original disease, donor-derived class II antigens of the major histocompatibility complex, or homologous antigens associated with unidentified hepatotrophic viruses. De novo disease is probably due to similar mechanisms, but its predilection for children suggests that thymic dysfunction associated with cyclosporine treatment may be a factor. Corticosteroid therapy is effective in each condition. In conclusion, recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after transplantation are examples of self-intolerance. The mechanisms that perturb immunologic homeostasis in this human model of the classical disease must be studied more rigorously.

Retransplantation for hepatic allograft failure: prognostic modeling and ethical considerations

Retransplantation already accounts for 10% of all liver transplants performed, and this percentage is likely to increase as patients live long enough to develop graft failure from recurrent disease. Overall, retransplantation is associated with significantly diminished survival and increased costs. This review summarizes the current causes of graft failure after primary liver transplant, prognostic models that can identify the subset of patients for retransplantation with outcomes comparable to primary transplantation, and ethical considerations in this setting, i.e., outcomes-based versus urgency-based approaches.

Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution and affects all ages. Genetic factors strongly influence susceptibility, clinical expression, and treatment response. The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis has been codified by an international panel. An acute or fulminant presentation is recognized but not a cholestatic form. Subclassifications by predominant autoantibody profile have been proposed, but they lack etiologic and prognostic differences. Autoantibodies continue to be characterized to improve diagnostic specificity, predict outcome, and identify pertinent antigenic targets. Cytosolic enzymes are prime candidates as autoantigens. DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are the susceptibility alleles in Caucasoid Northern Europeans and North Americans, and they also affect clinical expression and treatment outcome. Other autoimmune promoters affecting cytokine production and immunocyte activation may act in synergy with the susceptibility alleles to affect disease behavior. Cell-mediated and antibody-dependent forms of cytotoxicity are probably interactive pathogenic mechanisms, and novel site-specific therapies are feasible because these mechanisms are defined. Potent new immunosuppressive agents are emerging from the transplantation arena, but prednisone alone or in combination with azathioprine remains the mainstay of treatment. Corticosteroid therapy is effective but not ideal.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis and cryptogenic chronic hepatitis in children

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and cryptogenic chronic hepatitis (CCH) are important causes of liver failure in children, frequently necessitating orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study is to review disease progression and potential differences between subgroups of children with AIH and CCH.

METHODS

The medical records of 65 children diagnosed with AIH or CCH between 1980 and 1998 were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age at presentation was 9 years, 8 months (range 4 months-19 years), and the median follow-up period was 8 years (range 3 months-18 years, 10 months). Forty-one patients (63%) were female. Twenty-eight patients were Hispanic, 28 were Caucasian, 8 were African-American, and 1 was Asian. Forty-three patients (66%) were diagnosed with type 1 AIH, 8 (12%) with type 2 AIH, and 14 (22%) with CCH. Forty patients (62%) underwent OLT (51% of those with type 1 AIH, 75% of those with type 2 AIH, and 86% of those with CCH). Thirteen (33%) of the transplanted patients experienced disease recurrence. African-American patients experienced a significantly higher rate of disease recurrence post-OLT than did Hispanic patients. Seven patients (11%) died, two without OLT, and five posttransplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

AIH and CCH frequently necessitate OLT in children. CCH is a more aggressive disease than Type 1 AIH among children with these disorders. Ethnicity influences the rate of disease recurrence after liver transplantation.

Autoimmune liver disease. Current standards, future directions

The diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis continues to evolve as new diagnostic tests and new therapies are added to the armamentarium. Also encouraging are the advances in the understanding of the human immune system and its involvement in the origin and course of auto immune diseases in general and in the variants of autoimmune liver disease. Promising changes are expected in the next few years as new medications become available to the practicing hepatologist. New immune tests may allow therapies to be customized to patients, and antiviral therapies may also eventually be used in the management of this autoimmune liver diseases.

Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation: diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and outcome

Approximately 20% to 30% of patients undergoing liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) develop features of recurrent disease. Diagnostic criteria for recurrent AIH are similar to those used in the nontransplanted liver and include, in varying combinations, biochemical, serological, and histological abnormalities and steroid dependency. However, these criteria are more difficult to apply in the liver allograft because of potential interactions between recurrent AIH and other complications of liver transplantation, particularly rejection, and the uncertain effects of long-term immunosuppression. In the absence of other reliable diagnostic markers, a number of studies have used the histological finding of chronic hepatitis as the main or sole criterion for diagnosing recurrent AIH. However, this also lacks diagnostic specificity because there are many other possible causes of chronic hepatitis in the liver allograft. In addition, approximately 20% to 40% of biopsies performed on patients as part of routine annual review have histological features of chronic hepatitis, for which no definite cause can be identified. Risk factors that have been associated with the development of recurrent AIH include suboptimal immunosuppression, HLA phenotype, disease type and severity in the native liver, and duration of follow up. In many cases in which recurrent AIH seems to be related to underimmunosuppression, biochemical and histological features rapidly resolve once adequate immunosuppression is restored. However, in other cases, recurrent AIH behaves more aggressively, with progression to cirrhosis and graft failure. Areas that require further study include developing uniform criteria for the diagnosis of recurrent AIH, identifying risk factors for severe recurrent disease, and determining optimal levels of immunosuppression that minimize the impact of disease recurrence without exposing patients to the risks of overimmunosuppression.

Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation

To determine the frequency, risk factors, and consequences of recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation, 41 patients with type 1 disease were monitored after surgery in accordance with a surveillance protocol. Tacrolimus or cyclosporine plus prednisone were administered to each patient, and liver biopsy examinations were performed at least annually according to protocol. Corticosteroid therapy was ultimately discontinued in only 2 patients. Recurrent disease was defined as the presence of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in liver tissue in the absence of other causes of allograft dysfunction. Autoimmune hepatitis recurred in 7 patients (17%), and the mean time to recurrence was 4.6 +/- 1 years. Recurrence was asymptomatic in 4 of 7 patients and detected only by surveillance liver biopsy assessment in 2 patients. Histological changes were mild, and there was no progression to cirrhosis during 4.9 +/- 0.9 years of observation. Five-year patient (86% v. 82%; P =.9) and graft (86% v. 67%; P =.5) survival rates were not statistically different between patients with and without recurrent disease. HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 occurred more commonly in patients with than without recurrence (100% v. 40%; P =.008) and healthy subjects (100% v. 49%; P =.01). Recurrent disease was unrelated to donor HLA status. In conclusion, recurrence after transplantation for type 1 autoimmune hepatitis is common. Its mild manifestations and favorable prognosis may reflect early detection by a surveillance protocol and/or continuous corticosteroid treatment. HLA-DR3- or HLA-DR4-positive recipients are at risk for recurrence regardless of donor HLA status.

Liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis

Publications about liver transplantation (LTX) for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have started to emerge, but many issues remain unresolved. We reviewed data on 32 patients transplanted for AIH to determine how pretransplantation and posttransplantation characteristics correlate with recipient outcome, including disease recurrence. Recipients were 37+/- 14 years old; 30 of 32 were women. Most had chronic disease (8 +/- 6 years); 25% had fulminant failure. The majority had ascites (91%), jaundice (88%), elevated prothrombin time (18 +/- 3 seconds), and hypoalbuminemia (2.7 +/- 0.6 g/dL). All had hypergammaglobulinemia (3.0 +/- 1.0 g/dL) and autoantibodies (72% antinuclear, 74% smooth muscle). Only one was HLA A1-B8-DR3 positive. Other autoimmune disorders affected 25% of patients; half improved after transplantation. Actuarial survival was 81% at 1 and 2 years posttransplantation. There was a high frequency of rejection (75% of recipients had 1.7 +/- 0.8 episodes), and 39% of rejections required OKT3. Among 24 recipients with long-term follow-up (27 +/- 14 months), histologically proven recurrent AIH occurred in 25%, 15 +/- 2 months posttransplantation; half (3 patients) required retransplantation 11 +/- 3 months after diagnosis. After retransplantation 2 of 3 patients had re-recurrence within 3 months; 1 received a third LTx. Recurrence occurred in 6 of 18 patients transplanted for chronic disease vs. 0 of 6 transplanted as fulminants (P = not significant [NS]). Patients with and without recurrence had similar rejection profiles. In summary, results of LTx for AIH are excellent. However, AIH patients have a high frequency of rejection and often require OKT3. Furthermore, severe recurrent AIH sometimes develops, particularly in chronic versus fulminant AIH patients and in those already retransplanted for recurrence. Multicenter studies could elucidate the best posttransplantation immunosuppressive regimens for AIH patients.

Disease recurrence following liver transplantation

Virtually all liver diseases that necessitate orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can recur, and recurrent disease has the potential to become the most serious problem facing transplantation in the future. In addition, recurrence following transplantation provides a model to study pathogenic mechanisms of these diseases. While some interventions (e.g., HBIG) have been shown to alter the natural history of recurrent disease, most of these disease processes are not modified by our currently available therapies. In addition, the role of different immunosuppressive protocols on disease recurrence requires further definition. As a varying proportion of the first generation of liver transplant patients develop severe recurrence and graft failure, policies of organ allocation for retransplantation will be challenged.

Clinicopathological analysis of liver allograft biopsies with late centrilobular necrosis: a comparative study in 54 patients

BACKGROUND

Centrilobular necrosis (CLN) in liver allografts can be a difficult lesion to interpret histologically. Although long recognized in association with developing chronic rejection, recent studies have described the lesion in association with a number of other disease processes. To clarify the histologic features that could allow a specific diagnosis to be made and to determine the outcome in different diagnostic groups, we assessed biopsies from 54 patients with CLN.

METHODS

Biopsies were classified as CLN with acute cellular rejection (ACR), CLN with hepatitis, CLN with developing chronic rejection (CR), and CLN of other etiology. Histologic features were assessed and then compared between groups, and clinical outcomes were noted.

RESULTS

Discriminating features for the different groups were as follows: CLN and ACR showed bile duct injury, endothelialitis, and acinar congestion. CLN and CR showed severe bile duct injury, bile duct loss, or centrilobular swelling. CLN and hepatitis was often a diagnosis of exclusion, although interface hepatitis was more common in this group. Cases of autoimmune hepatitis usually demonstrated plasma cell predominance in the portal and acinar inflammatory infiltrate. Significantly, there was considerable overlap in the histologic features between the groups, accounting for the diagnostic difficulty. Patients in whom the CLN was associated with CR or vascular complications generally required retransplantation or died, but in the groups with ACR and hepatitis, the outcome was more favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to most liver allograft biopsies showing late CLN, it is possible to make a specific diagnosis despite overlapping histologic features; this allows specific therapy to be instituted. Ultimately this is likely to contribute to improved graft survival.

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The literature data on the recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) is scanty.

METHODS

We analyzed the frequency of recurrent AIH in 47 patients who had been transplanted for AIH and survived at least 1 year after surgery. The following criteria were applied to diagnose recurrence: (1) positive autoantibodies in the titer> or =1:40; (2) hypertransaminasemia; (3) histological features of chronic hepatitis; (4) need of reintroduction or significant increase of steroids; and (5) lack of serum markers of viral hepatitis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients (1 male/12 females) developed recurrent AIH after an interval of 6-63 months after OLTX (mean 29 months). Mean AST level at recurrence was 542+/-129 U/L. Three patients from this group needed regrafting. Mismatch of DR3+ recipient and DR3- donor was not more common in the recurrent disease group (37%) compared to the nonrecurrence group (31%) (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of AIH after OLTX was diagnosed in a high proportion of patients and some of them required regrafting. DR3+ patients are not particularly prone to develop recurrence.

Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: utility in clinical practice

An accurate and functional system for grading acute liver allograft rejection is important for patient management, research, and communication. The Banff schema is a consensus document designed to provide an internationally accepted standard for this purpose. The aim of this study is to determine if application of the Banff schema would significantly alter the grading of acute liver allograft rejection compared with the Birmingham system. One hundred twenty-four post-liver transplantation biopsies performed by the Western Australian Liver Transplantation Service between 1992 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed by a pathologist and a hepatologist. Each was supplied with a brief clinical history before applying the Banff and Birmingham criteria. Results were compared with each other and to the diagnosis made at the time of the biopsy, which was based on the European grading system. Rejection was diagnosed by the reviewers in 61 of 124 biopsy specimens according to the criteria of Snover. The Banff schema and Birmingham system agreed on the grade of rejection in 22 of the 61 biopsy specimens. The Banff schema elevated the grade of rejection in 39 specimens by an increment of one. In no instance did the Banff schema reduce the grade. Comparison between the Banff schema and diagnosis made at the time of biopsy showed agreement in 39 specimens, whereas the Banff schema elevated the grade in 15 specimens and reduced the grade in 23 specimens. In comparison to the Birmingham system, the Banff schema elevated the grade of liver allograft rejection in the majority of biopsy specimens, and this has the potential to alter clinical management with the adoption of the Banff schema or if the systems are used interchangeably.

Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: evidence of recurrence of primary disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

After liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis, the long-term results and the incidence of recurrence of primary disease are unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we reviewed the clinical course of 25 patients transplanted for autoimmune hepatitis and followed for a mean of 5.3 years (2-8.5 years).

RESULTS

The actuarial 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 91% (+/-6%) and 83% (+/-8%). The actuarial 1-year rate of acute rejection was 50% (+/-10.2%), which was comparable to that of patients transplanted for primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Autoantibodies persisted in 77% of patients, at a lower titer than before liver transplantation. Ten patients were excluded from the study of autoimmune hepatitis recurrence, one because of an early postoperative death and nine because of hepatitis C virus infection acquired before or after liver transplantation. In the remaining 15 patients, who were free of hepatitis C virus infection, 5-year patient and graft survivals were 100% and 87%, respectively. Despite triple immunosuppressive therapy, three patients (20%) developed chronic hepatitis with histological and serological features of autoimmune hepatitis in the absence of any other identifiable cause. The disease was severe in two patients, leading to graft failure and asymptomatic in another, despite marked histological abnormalities. In one of these three patients, autoimmune hepatitis recurred on the second liver graft as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis have an excellent survival rate although severe primary disease may recur, suggesting the need for stronger post-operative immunosuppressive therapy.

Outcome of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation is not rare, but there is little information about its time of onset, risk factors, response to treatment and prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of recurrence and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis after transplantation.

METHODS

The records of patients transplanted in eight centers in our country between 1984 and 1996 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-three of the 2331 (1.8%) recipients fulfilled diagnostic criteria of autoimmune hepatitis at the time of transplantation. Sixteen patients were excluded from evaluation. Nine (33%) of the 27 patients evaluated fulfilled criteria for recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis, with a mean time of recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation of 2.6+/-1.5 years. Patients with recurrence had a longer follow-up time after transplantation (5.1 vs. 2.5 years, P=0.0012) and were receiving less immunosuppressive treatment. The estimated risk of recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis in the graft increased over time: 8% over the first year and 68% 5 years after transplantation. None of the seven patients with liver-kidney microsomal-positive antibodies recurred (P=0.059). Fifty percent of the patients failed to respond or responded only partially to therapy, although none of the patients have deteriorated clinically after 2.4+/-1.06 years of follow-up after recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis in the graft is a common event with an incidence that increases over time as immunosuppression is reduced. Although response to treatment is poor, patient and graft survival do not appear to be decreased.

Allograft rejection after liver transplantation for autoimmune liver diseases

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) may progress to liver failure, requiring liver transplantation as definitive therapy, and these immune-mediated disorders may predispose the patient to more frequent graft rejection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of preexisting AILD on the incidence of allograft rejection after liver transplantation. Sixty-three patients who underwent liver transplantation between March 1988 and December 1994 for AILDs that included autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 33) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; n = 30) were retrospectively compared with 47 patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis during the same time period. There was a lower incidence of acute allograft rejection in patients with AILD who received tacrolimus-based compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (50% v 85.5%; P = .02). However, patients with AILDs overall had a higher incidence of acute rejection than patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (81% v 46.8%; P < .001), regardless of the type of immunosuppression. In addition, steroid-resistant rejection occurred more frequently in patients with AILDs than in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (38.1% v 12.8%; P = .003). There was also a trend toward a higher incidence of chronic rejection in patients with AILDs compared with patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (11.1% v 2.1%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patient and graft survivals at 1 and 3 years were similar between patients with AILDs and alcoholic liver disease. Compared with alcoholic cirrhosis, preexisting AILDs are associated with a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection and a trend toward more frequent chronic rejection.

Defining the outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation

Successful immunosuppression withdrawal should benefit the natural history of organ transplantation patients. To identify the clinical hazards of removing drug treatment and possible characteristics that predict a favorable outcome in long-term liver recipients, immunosuppression was withdrawn completely and the clinicopathological outcome documented in 18 liver recipients. Indication for transplantation, HLA matching, early rejection history, and presence of microchimerism were examined as predictors of outcome. Chimerism was determined by polymerase chain reaction-based examination for donor-specific HLA-DRB1 alleles and Y-gene-specific nucleotide sequences. At 3 years, 5 patients (28%) remained completely off immunosuppression; 12 patients (67%) experienced histological graft changes: acute rejection in 4, portal tract inflammation/hepatitis in 7, and necrosis in 1. Hepatitis B or C viral infections did not account for the nonrejection patterns. Unmasking of systemic disorders occurred. Chimerism, demonstrated in 7 patients (39%), with skin the optimal tissue, was not associated with tolerance. Parameters associated with successful drug withdrawal were transplantation for non-immune-mediated liver disorders, fewer donor-recipient HLA A, B, and DR mismatches, and a low incidence of early rejection. Immunosuppression withdrawal is a feasible option in a proportion of selected liver recipients, but identification of tolerant patients remains imprecise.

Acute lobular hepatitis as the first manifestation of recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation and after reduction in immunosuppressive treatment is reported in a 43-year-old man. Diagnosis was based on biological, serological and morphological data, as well as on a complete biological recovery following steroid resumption. Recurrence was observed only 4 months after transplantation, when an abrupt increase in liver function tests was observed in association with a mainly lobular hepatitis in liver biopsy. Such a histological appearance has been previously described in the case of recurrence after immunosuppressive treatment weaning in non-transplanted patients. In contrast, this histological feature has not been reported in the rare transplanted patients in whom such recurrence has been observed. Thereafter, the evolution of the disease in our patient remained slow, likely dampened by the administration of cyclosporine and azathioprine. Morphological features are detailed, and importance of immunosuppressive therapy in patients transplanted for end-stage autoimmune hepatitis is emphasized.

Indications for and timing of liver transplantation

The tremendous success of OLT as a highly effective treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease has resulted in a rapid increase in the number of candidates for the procedure. Refinements in organ preservation, improvements in surgical technique and immunosuppression, and better postoperative management have contributed to improved survival rates. The discrepancy between the paucity of organs and the increasing numbers of potential recipients will continue to worsen until there are extraordinary breakthroughs in providing alternatives to human whole-organ livers, such as xenografts or cultured hepatocyte infusions. For now, the vast majority of patients with life-threatening liver disease are not likely to receive a liver graft. Thus, the issues of patient selection and timing of OLT have become even more relevant. Prompt referral to a transplant center is not only in the patient's best interest, but also it has been shown to be cost-effective. Over the last 30 years, it has become clear that hepatic malignancy, initially a common reason for OLT, should be an indication for transplantation only in highly selected individuals. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy needs to be defined, and proven treatment alternatives need to be developed. New antiviral agents may enable a large group of patients with chronic hepatitis B to be successfully transplanted, placing even greater demands on the already limited supply of donor livers. Hepatitis B appears to be species specific, and it is conceivable that xenotransplantation from a nonsusceptible donor species may confer protection to HBV reinfection, eliminating the problems of an inadequate donor supply. Until novel approaches, including xenotransplantation, gene therapy, or replacement of hepatic function by cultured hepatocyte infusions, become a widespread reality, future allocation policies may highlight outcome as well as urgency as a fundamental variable to determine if transplantation is reasonable. Survival rates have been shown to fall with advancing levels of urgency, resulting in a conflict between equity and efficacy in organ allocation. As waiting lists for liver transplantation continue to grow, it is becoming increasingly apparent that patients must be referred to a transplant center earlier in the course of liver disease.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Images