Infection-related mortality in Hispanic and non-Hispanic children with cancer

Racial Inequities in Sepsis Mortality Among Children in the United States

BACKGROUND

Racial inequities influence health outcomes in the United States, but their impact on sepsis outcomes among children is understudied. We aimed to evaluate for racial inequities in sepsis mortality using a nationally representative sample of pediatric hospitalizations.

METHODS

This population-based, retrospective cohort study used the 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database. Eligible children 1 month to 17 years old were identified using sepsis-related International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. We used modified Poisson regression to evaluate the association between patient race and in-hospital mortality, clustering by hospital and adjusting for age, sex and year. We used Wald tests to assess for modification of associations between race and mortality by sociodemographic factors, geographic region and insurance status.

RESULTS

Among 38,234 children with sepsis, 2555 (6.7%) died in-hospital. Compared with White children, mortality was higher among Hispanic (adjusted relative risk: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.14), Asian/Pacific Islander (1.17, 1.08-1.27) and children from other racial minority groups (1.27, 1.19-1.35). Black children had similar mortality to White children overall (1.02, 0.96-1.07), but higher mortality in the South (7.3% vs. 6.4%; P < 0.0001). Hispanic children had higher mortality than White children in the Midwest (6.9% vs. 5.4%; P < 0.0001), while Asian/Pacific Islander children had higher mortality than all other racial categories in the Midwest (12.6%) and South (12.0%). Mortality was higher among uninsured children than among privately insured children (1.24, 1.17-1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of in-hospital mortality among children with sepsis in the United States differs by patient race, geographic region and insurance status.

Mortality in pediatric oncology and stem cell transplant patients with bloodstream infections

Background

Bloodstream infections (BSI) continue to represent a significant source of morbidity for pediatric oncology patients, however less is known regarding this population's risk of death. We sought to evaluate the risk of BSI and death at a large pediatric cancer center.

Methods

We retrospectively collected inpatient data from pediatric oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients over a 9-year period. We performed univariate and multivariable modeling to assess risk of BSI and mortality examining the following variables: demographics, underlying malignancy, history of HSCT, central line type, and febrile neutropenia (FN).

Results

During the study period, 6763 admissions from 952 patients met inclusion criteria. BSI occurred in 367 admissions (5.4%) from 231 unique individuals. Risk factors for BSI include younger age, diagnoses of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis or acute myeloid leukemia, ethnicity, and history of HSCT. Mortality for those with BSI was 6.5%, compared to 0.7% without (OR 7.2, CI 4.1 - 12.7, p<0.0001). In patients with BSI, admissions with FN were associated with reduced mortality compared to admissions without FN (OR 0.21, CI 0.05 - 0.94, p=0.04). In both univariate and multivariable analysis, no other risk factor was significantly associated with mortality in patients with BSI.

Conclusion

BSI is a significant source of mortality in pediatric oncology and HSCT patients. While demographic variables contribute to the risk of BSI, they did not influence mortality. These findings highlight the importance of BSI prevention to reduce the risk of death in pediatric oncology patients. Future studies should focus on comprehensive BSI prevention.

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in paediatric critical care in the USA

In an era of tremendous medical advancements, it is important to characterise and address inequities in the provision of health care and in outcomes. There is a large body of evidence describing such disparities by race or ethnicity and socioeconomic position in critically ill adults; however, this important issue has received less attention in children and adolescents (aged ≤21 years). This Review presents a summary of the available evidence on disparities in outcomes in paediatric critical illness in the USA as a result of racism and socioeconomic privilege. The majority of evidence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in paediatric critical care originates from the USA and is retrospective, with only one prospective intervention-based study. Although there is mixed evidence of disparities by race or ethnicity and socioeconomic position in general paediatric intensive care unit admissions and outcomes in the USA, there are striking trends within some disease processes. Notably, there is evidence of disparities in management and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, asthma, severe trauma, sepsis, and oncology, and in families' perceptions of care. Furthermore, there is clear evidence that critical care research is limited by under-enrolment of participants from minority race or ethnicity groups. We advocate for rigorous research standards and increases in the recruitment and enrolment of a diverse range of participants in paediatric critical care research to better understand the disparities observed, including the effects of racism and poverty. A clearer understanding of when, where, and how such disparities affect patients will better enable the development of effective strategies to inform practice, interventions, and policy.

Hospitalization and mortality outcomes in the first 5 years after a childhood cancer diagnosis: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Children with cancer are frequently hospitalized. However, hospitalization and death by disease category are not well defined < 5 years from diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked cancer registry-hospital discharge-vital records to identify cancer cases < 20 years at diagnosis during 1987-2012 (n = 4,567) and comparison children without cancer, matched on birth year and sex (n = 45,582). Data linkage identified serious morbidities resulting in cancer- and non-cancer-related hospitalizations or deaths < 5 years from diagnosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to compare relative hospitalization and mortality by disease category and after excluding cancer-related outcomes. Among cancer cases, relative risks of these outcomes for children with solid tumors compared with children with leukemia/lymphoma were also estimated.

RESULTS

Greater rates of all-cause hospitalization (281.5/1,000 vs. 6.2/1,000 person years) and death (40.7/1,000 vs. 0.15/1,000 person years) were observed in childhood cancer cases than comparators and across all diagnosis categories. Increased hospitalization (31.0/1,000 vs. 6.2/1,000 person years; HR 5.0, 95% CI 4.5-5.5) and death (1.0/1,000 vs. 0.15/1,000 person years; HR 10.4, 95% CI 5.6-19.1) rates remained when cancer-related outcomes were excluded. Although HRs for hospitalization and death did not differ greatly by treatment era, absolute rates of hospitalization were greater (1987-1999: 233.3/1,000; 2000-2012: 320.0/1,000 person years) and death were lesser (1987-1999: 46.3/1,000; 2000-2012: 36.8/1,000 person years) in the later treatment era among cases. Children with solid tumors were less likely to have a cancer-related hospitalization than were those with leukemia/lymphoma (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Even after excluding cancer-related diagnoses, children with cancer experience greater rates of hospitalization and death in all disease categories. Results may guide future toxicity mitigation initiatives and inform anticipatory guidance for families of children with cancer.

Racial/Ethnic Minority Children With Cancer Experience Higher Mortality on Admission to the ICU in the United States

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether differences in survival exist between children of various racial/ethnic groups with cancer admitted to the PICU.

DESIGN

A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted using Virtual Pediatric Systems data from reporting centers. Demographic information, Pediatric Risk for Mortality III score, and outcome variables were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression modeling to assess for differences in mortality.

SETTING

One hundred thirty-five PICUs in the United States.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients with cancer admitted to PICUs in the United States.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

This study details the analysis of 23,128 PICU admissions of 12,232 unique oncology patients representing 3% of all PICU admissions with 1,610 deaths (7.0% case fatality). African American (8.5%) and Hispanic children (8.1%) had significantly higher mortality (p < 0.05) compared with Caucasian children (6.3%). Regional analysis showed Hispanic patients to have higher mortality in the West in the United States, whereas African American patients in the South in the United States had higher mortality. A pulmonary disease diagnosis in Hispanics increased odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.70), whereas a diagnosis of shock/sepsis increased risk for mortality in African Americans (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11-2.20) compared with Caucasians. There were no differences between races/ethnic groups in the rates of limitations of care. After controlling for Pediatric Risk of Mortality III, PICU length of stay, stem cell transplant status, readmissions, cancer type (solid, brain, hematologic), mechanical ventilation days, and sex, Hispanic (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.47) and African Americans (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14-1.66) had significantly higher odds of mortality compared with Caucasians.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that after controlling for severity and cancer type, a child's race, ethnicity, and region of presentation influence mortality in the PICU. This suggests that additional investigation is warranted along with a need to rethink our approach to the evaluation and treatment of critically ill African American and Hispanic children with cancer.

Differing interpretations of health care encounters: A qualitative study of non-Latinx health care providers' perceptions of Latinx patient behaviors

INTRODUCTION

Due to provider shortages, it is probable that non-Latinx health care providers (HCPs) will treat Latinx patients. Because of this discrepancy, both providers and patients are likely to experience barriers and cultural differences during medical encounters. This article discusses select cultural factors and behaviors such as language, communication styles, and health care practices of Latinx families through the lens of their non-Latinx HCPs. The purpose of this study was to examine how non-Latinx HCPs perceive and describe certain behaviors they observe during healthcare visits with Latinx patients and families, and to illustrate how those behaviors can alternatively be interpreted as representing Latinx cultural norms.

METHODS

This qualitative study used a template coding approach to examine narrative interviews conducted with 18 non-Latinx HCPs to report how they described interactions with and the behaviors of their Latinx patients. Template codes were based on well-established Latinx cultural norms (e.g., familismo, respeto, personalismo, simpatía, confianza).

RESULTS

Many HCP descriptions of Latinx patient behaviors were coded into the Latinx cultural values categories (familismo, personalismo, simpatía, respeto, and confianza) by the research team. Results suggest that HCPs were not aware of how several of their patients' behaviors may be culturally grounded, and that cultural differences between HCPs and their Latinx patients may exist.

DISCUSSION

Understanding how Latinx-specific cultural norms may be exhibited by Latinx patients and their families during healthcare encounters has potential to improve providers' understanding of patient behavior, helping to promote culturally congruent care for Latinxs.

A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer

PURPOSE

Few studies have compared follow-up-care models for adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCCs), though choice of model could impact medical test adherence, and health-related quality of life (QOL). This study compared two follow-up-care models, cancer-center-based versus community-based, for ASCCs in Alberta, Canada, to determine which model would demonstrate greater ASCC adherence to guideline-recommended medical screening tests for late effects, QOL, physical symptoms, and adherence to yearly follow-up.

METHODS

ASCC discharged to a community model (over 15 years) and those with comparable birth years (1973-1993) currently followed in a cancer center model were recruited via direct contact or multimedia campaign. Chart review identified chemotherapeutic and radiation exposures, and required medical late effect screening tests. ASCCs also completed questionnaires assessing QOL, physical symptoms, and follow-up behavior.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-six survivors participated (community (n = 86); cancer center (n = 70)). Primary analysis indicated that cancer center ASCCs guideline-recommended total test adherence percentage (Mdn = 85.4%) was significantly higher than the community model (Mdn = 29.2%, U = 3996.50, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in QOL for cancer center ASCCs (M = 83.85, SD = 20.55 versus M = 77.50, SD = 23.94; t (154) = 1.77, p = 0.078) compared to community-based ASCCs. Cancer center-based ASCCs endorsed from 0.4-7.1% fewer physical symptom clusters, and higher adherence to follow-up behavior in comparisons using effect sizes without p values.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the cancer center model's superiority for adherence to exposure-based medical late effect screening guidelines, cancer-specific follow-up behaviors, and the reporting of fewer physical complaints in ASCCs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

ASCCs followed in a cancer center model likely benefit from earlier late-effects detection and opportunities for early intervention.

A Systematic Review of Rates, Outcomes, and Predictors of Medication Non-Adherence Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer

Nonadherence to medications in cancer treatment protocols may be a particular concern among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and predictive of poor health outcomes, but data supporting this claim remain limited. The purpose of this article was to systematically review the rates, outcomes, and predictors of oral medication nonadherence among AYAs with cancer. PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE), CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched in 2018 using terms related to medication adherence and cancer. A total of 37,884 records representing 34,006 unique articles were identified and reviewed. Thirteen articles representing 12 studies met inclusion criteria and examined medication adherence among AYAs with cancer. Results of these studies suggest that 21%-60% of AYAs are nonadherent to oral medications, likely placing them at increased risk for poor health outcomes (i.e., relapse, infection/fever, and death). Psychosocial factors (i.e., knowledge, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, environmental context and resources, and emotion) were related to nonadherence and warrant future study. Of note, demographic, disease, and family composition variables did not predict nonadherence. Clinical implications as well as limitations and resulting future directions are discussed.

Fine Particulate Matter and Respiratory Healthcare Encounters among Survivors of Childhood Cancers

Some chemotherapies that treat childhood cancers have pulmonary-toxic properties that increase risk for adverse respiratory-health outcomes. PM_2.5 causes similar outcomes but its effect among pulmonary compromised cancer survivors is unknown. This case-crossover study identified the PM_2.5-associated odds for primary-respiratory hospitalizations and emergency department visits among childhood cancer survivors in Utah. We compared risk among chemotherapy-treated survivors to a cancer-free sample. We calculated 3-day-average PM_2.5 by ZIP code and county for event and control days. Conditional logistic regression estimated odds ratios. Models were stratified by cause of admission (infection, respiratory disease, asthma), previous chemotherapy, National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), and other variables. Results are presented per 10 µg/m³ of PM_2.5. 90% of events occurred at 3-day PM_2.5 averages <35.4 µg/m³, the NAAQS 24-h standard. For survivors, PM_2.5 was associated with respiratory hospitalizations (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.13⁻3.00) and hospitalizations from respiratory infection (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.06⁻4.14). Among chemotherapy-treated survivors, the PM_2.5-associated odds of respiratory hospitalization (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.14⁻3.61) were significantly higher than the cancer-free sample (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.57⁻1.25). This is the first study to report significant associations between PM_2.5 and respiratory healthcare encounters in childhood cancer survivors. Chemotherapy-treated survivors displayed the highest odds of hospitalization due to PM_2.5 exposure and their risk is significantly higher than a cancer-free sample.

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) in Pediatric Cancer

Objective

Family psychosocial risk screening is an important initial step in delivering evidence-based care and in addressing health disparities. There is currently no validated measure of family psychosocial risk in Spanish. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief parent report screener based on the trilevel Pediatric Preventative Psychosocial Risk Model (PPPHM; Universal, Targeted, and Clinical). The current article validates a Spanish version of the PAT (Version 3.0) in pediatric oncology.

Method

Spanish-speaking Hispanic primary caregivers of 79 children newly diagnosed with cancer participated in this 4-institution multisite investigation, completing Spanish versions of the PAT and validation measures using REDCap.

Results

Over 60% of the sample had a high school or lower level of education and they primarily identified as Hispanic in terms of acculturation. Internal consistency for the total score (KR20 = 0.76) and the Social Support, Child Problems, Sibling Problems, and Family Problems subscales was strong (KR20 = 0.69-0.79). Stress Reactions, Family Structure, and Family Beliefs subscales were lower (KR20 = 0.43-0.55). Moderate to strong correlations with the criteria measures provided validation for the total and subscale scores. Nearly two-thirds of the sample scored in the Targeted or Clinical range of the PPPHM. The PAT was successful in identifying clinical cases.

Conclusions

The Spanish version of the PAT can be used with families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. Elevated psychosocial risks were found and warrant particular attention in providing psychosocial care attentive to the needs of Spanish-speaking families.

Respiratory emergency department use from diagnosis through survivorship in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer often experience severe respiratory morbidity and mortality from the therapies used to treat their cancers. Few studies have examined respiratory outcomes among this population using emergency department (ED) visits as an objective measure of respiratory health.

METHODS

ED visits for respiratory conditions were identified for children and AYAs diagnosed with cancer, 0-25 years of age, from 1997 through 2012 (2535 cases) and compared with a birthdate-matched and sex-matched cohort without cancer drawn from the general population (7605 controls). Negative binomial regression with robust standard errors was used to estimate incidence rates, rate ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals for primary respiratory ED visits, combined and by diagnosis (asthma, respiratory disease, and respiratory infection) from 1997 through 2015. Analyses were performed for new cases (0 to <5 years from diagnosis) and survivors (5-18 years from diagnosis).

RESULTS

Subjects were followed for an average of 8 years (range, 0-18 years). Relative to the comparison cohort, cancer cases had higher incidence rates for all types of respiratory ED visits over both follow-up times. New cases had significantly higher RRs for any respiratory condition (RR, 4.14), respiratory disease (RR, 4.62), and respiratory infection (RR, 4.74). Among survivors, the RRs for any respiratory condition (RR, 2.00) and respiratory infection (RR, 2.10) were significantly elevated, although the magnitude tended to decline in survivorship. Demographic and clinical risk factors found to be associated with respiratory ED visits included Hispanic/other race/ethnicity, male sex, exposure to chemotherapy, diagnosis at a younger age, and a diagnosis of leukemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrated that children and AYAs with cancer face an increased burden of respiratory complications compared with a comparison cohort without cancer from diagnosis through survivorship.