The cysteine-free single mutant C32S of APEX2 is a highly expressed and active fusion tag for proximity labeling applications

APEX2-Mediated Proximity Protein Labeling in Dictyostelium

Largely due to its simplicity, while being more like human cells compared to other experimental models, Dictyostelium continues to be of great use to discover basic molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways underlying evolutionarily conserved biological processes. However, the identification of new protein interactions implicated in signaling pathways can be particularly challenging in Dictyostelium due to its extremely fast signaling kinetics coupled with the dynamic nature of signaling protein interactions. Recently, the proximity labeling method using engineered ascorbic acid peroxidase 2 (APEX2) in mammalian cells was shown to allow the detection of weak and/or transient protein interactions and also to obtain spatial and temporal resolution. Here, we describe a protocol for successfully using the APEX2-proximity labeling method in Dictyostelium. Coupled with the identification of the labeled proteins by mass spectrometry, this method expands Dictyostelium's proteomics toolbox and should be widely useful for identifying interacting partners involved in a variety of biological processes in Dictyostelium.

Proximity Labeling in Plants

Proteins are workhorses in the cell; they form stable and more often dynamic, transient protein-protein interactions, assemblies, and networks and have an intimate interplay with DNA and RNA. These network interactions underlie fundamental biological processes and play essential roles in cellular function. The proximity-dependent biotinylation labeling approach combined with mass spectrometry (PL-MS) has recently emerged as a powerful technique to dissect the complex cellular network at the molecular level. In PL-MS, by fusing a genetically encoded proximity-labeling (PL) enzyme to a protein or a localization signal peptide, the enzyme is targeted to a protein complex of interest or to an organelle, allowing labeling of proximity proteins within a zoom radius. These biotinylated proteins can then be captured by streptavidin beads and identified and quantified by mass spectrometry. Recently engineered PL enzymes such as TurboID have a much-improved enzymatic activity, enabling spatiotemporal mapping with a dramatically increased signal-to-noise ratio. PL-MS has revolutionized the way we perform proteomics by overcoming several hurdles imposed by traditional technology, such as biochemical fractionation and affinity purification mass spectrometry. In this review, we focus on biotin ligase-based PL-MS applications that have been, or are likely to be, adopted by the plant field. We discuss the experimental designs and review the different choices for engineered biotin ligases, enrichment, and quantification strategies. Lastly, we review the validation and discuss future perspectives.

Proximity Protein Labeling In Dictyostelium With Engineered Ascorbic Acid Peroxidase 2

To fully understand any cellular process, we not only need to identify the proteins implicated, but also how the protein network is structurally and spatially organized and changes over time. However, the dynamic nature of many protein interactions involved in cellular signaling pathways continues to be the bottleneck in mapping and studying protein networks. Fortunately, a recently developed proximity labeling method using engineered ascorbic acid peroxidase 2 (APEX2) in mammalian cells allows the identification of weak and/or transient protein interactions with spatial and temporal resolution. Here, we describe a protocol for successfully using the APEX2-proximity labeling method in Dictyostelium, using the cAMP receptor cAR1 as example. Coupled to the identification of the labeled proteins by mass spectrometry, this method expands Dictyostelium's proteomics toolbox and should be widely useful for identifying interacting partners involved in a variety of biological processes in Dictyostelium.

Advances in enzyme-mediated proximity labeling and its potential for plant research

Cellular processes rely on the intimate interplay of different molecules, including DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites. Obtaining and integrating data on their abundance and dynamics at high temporal and spatial resolution are essential for our understanding of plant growth and development. In the past decade, enzymatic proximity labeling (PL) has emerged as a powerful tool to study local protein and nucleotide ensembles, discover protein-protein and protein-nucleotide interactions, and resolve questions about protein localization and membrane topology. An ever-growing number and continuous improvement of enzymes and methods keep broadening the spectrum of possible applications for PL and make it more accessible to different organisms, including plants. While initial PL experiments in plants required high expression levels and long labeling times, recently developed faster enzymes now enable PL of proteins on a cell type-specific level, even with low-abundant baits, and in different plant species. Moreover, expanding the use of PL for additional purposes, such as identification of locus-specific gene regulators or high-resolution electron microscopy may now be in reach. In this review, we give an overview of currently available PL enzymes and their applications in mammalian cell culture and plants. We discuss the challenges and limitations of PL methods and highlight open questions and possible future directions for PL in plants.

Proximity-dependent biotinylation approaches to study apicomplexan biology

In the last 10 years, proximity-dependent biotinylation (PDB) techniques greatly expanded the ability to study protein environments in the living cell that range from specific protein complexes to entire compartments. This is achieved by using enzymes such as BirA* and APEX that are fused to proteins of interest and biotinylate proteins in their proximity. PDB techniques are now also increasingly used in apicomplexan parasites. In this review, we first give an overview of the main PDB approaches and how they compare with other techniques that address similar questions. PDB is particularly valuable to detect weak or transient protein associations under physiological conditions and to study cellular structures that are difficult to purify or have a poorly understood protein composition. We also highlight new developments such as novel smaller or faster-acting enzyme variants and conditional PDB approaches, providing improvements in both temporal and spatial resolution which may offer broader application possibilities useful in apicomplexan research. In the second part, we review work using PDB techniques in apicomplexan parasites and how this expanded our knowledge about these medically important parasites.

Recent progress in mass spectrometry-based strategies for elucidating protein-protein interactions

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental to various aspects of cell biology with many protein complexes participating in numerous fundamental biological processes such as transcription, translation and cell cycle. MS-based proteomics techniques are routinely applied for characterising the interactome, such as affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry that has been used to selectively enrich and identify interacting partners of a bait protein. In recent years, many orthogonal MS-based techniques and approaches have surfaced including proximity-dependent labelling of neighbouring proteins, chemical cross-linking of two interacting proteins, as well as inferring PPIs from the co-behaviour of proteins such as the co-fractionating profiles and the thermal solubility profiles of proteins. This review discusses the underlying principles, advantages, limitations and experimental considerations of these emerging techniques. In addition, a brief account on how MS-based techniques are used to investigate the structural and functional properties of protein complexes, including their topology, stoichiometry, copy number and dynamics, are discussed.

SLC38A2 Overexpression Induces a Cancer-like Metabolic Profile and Cooperates with SLC1A5 in Pan-cancer Prognosis

Cancer cells have dramatically increased demands for energy as well as biosynthetic precursors to fuel their restless growth. Enhanced glutaminolysis is a hallmark of cancer metabolism which fulfills these needs. Two glutamine transporters, SLC1A5 and SLC38A2, have been previously reported to promote glutaminolysis in cancer with controversial perspectives. In this study, we harnessed the proximity labeling reaction to map the protein interactome using mass spectrometry-based proteomics and discovered a potential protein-protein interaction between SLC1A5 and SLC38A2. The SLC1A5/SLC38A2 interaction was further confirmed by bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay. We further investigated the metabolic influence of SLC1A5 and SLC38A2 overexpression in human cells, respectively, and found that only SLC38A2, but not SLC1A5, resulted in a cancer-like metabolic profile, where the intracellular concentrations of essential amino acids and lactate were significantly increased as quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Finally, we analyzed the 5-year survival rates in a large pan-cancer cohort and found that the SLC1A5^hi /SLC38A2^lo group did not relate to a poor survival rate, whereas the SLC1A5^lo /SLC38A2^hi group significantly aggravated the lethality. Intriguingly, the SLC1A5^hi /SLC38A2^hi group resulted in an even worse prognosis, suggesting a cooperative effect between SLC1A5 and SCL38A2. Our data suggest that SLC38A2 plays a dominant role in reprogramming the cancer-like metabolism and promoting the cancer progression, whereas SLC1A5 may augment this effect when co-overexpressed with SLC38A2. We propose a model to explain the relationship between SLC1A5, SLC38A2 and SCL7A5, and discuss their impact on glutaminolysis and mTOR signaling.

Proximity-dependent labeling methods for proteomic profiling in living cells: An update

Characterizing the proteome composition of organelles and subcellular regions of living cells can facilitate the understanding of cellular organization as well as protein interactome networks. Proximity labeling-based methods coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) offer a high-throughput approach for systematic analysis of spatially restricted proteomes. Proximity labeling utilizes enzymes that generate reactive radicals to covalently tag neighboring proteins. The tagged endogenous proteins can then be isolated for further analysis by MS. To analyze protein-protein interactions or identify components that localize to discrete subcellular compartments, spatial expression is achieved by fusing the enzyme to specific proteins or signal peptides that target to particular subcellular regions. Although these technologies have only been introduced recently, they have already provided deep insights into a wide range of biological processes. Here, we provide an updated description and comparison of proximity labeling methods, as well as their applications and improvements. As each method has its own unique features, the goal of this review is to describe how different proximity labeling methods can be used to answer different biological questions. This article is categorized under: Technologies > Analysis of Proteins.

The cysteine-free single mutant C32S of APEX2 is a highly expressed and active fusion tag for proximity labeling applications

APEX2, an engineered ascorbate peroxidase for high activity, is a powerful tool for proximity labeling applications. Owing to its lack of disulfides and the calcium-independent activity, APEX2 can be applied intracellularly for targeted electron microscopy imaging or interactome mapping when fusing to a protein of interest. However, APEX2 fusion is often deleterious to the protein expression, which seriously hampers its wide utility. This problem is especially compelling when APEX2 is fused to structurally delicate proteins, such as multi-pass membrane proteins. In this study, we found that a cysteine-free single mutant C32S of APEX2 dramatically improved the expression of fusion proteins in mammalian cells without compromising the enzyme activity. We fused APEX2 and APEX2^C32S to four multi-transmembrane solute carriers (SLCs), SLC1A5, SLC6A5, SLC6A14, and SLC7A1, and compared their expressions in stable HEK293T cell lines. Except the SLC6A5 fusions expressing at decent levels for both APEX2 (70%) and APEX2^C32S (73%), other three SLC proteins showed significantly better expression when fusing to APEX2^C32S (69 ± 13%) than APEX2 (29 ± 15%). Immunofluorescence and western blot experiments showed correct plasma membrane localization and strong proximity labeling efficiency in all four SLC-APEX2^C32S cells. Enzyme kinetic experiments revealed that APEX2 and APEX2^C32S have comparable activities in terms of oxidizing guaiacol. Overall, we believe APEX2^C32S is a superior fusion tag to APEX2 for proximity labeling applications, especially when mismatched disulfide bonding or poor expression is a concern.