The intersection of vector biology, gene therapy, and hemophilia

Optimizing liver health before and after gene therapy for hemophilia A

ABSTRACT

Gene therapy for severe hemophilia A uses an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector and liver-specific promoters that depend on healthy hepatocyte function to achieve safe and long-lasting increases in factor VIII (FVIII) activity. Thus, hepatocyte health is an essential aspect of safe and successful gene therapy. Many people living with hemophilia A have current or past chronic hepatitis C virus infection, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis or steatohepatitis, or other conditions that may compromise the efficacy and safety of AAV-mediated gene therapy. In addition, gene therapy may induce an immune response to transduced hepatocytes, leading to liver inflammation and reduced FVIII activity. The immune response can be treated with immunosuppression, but close monitoring of liver function tests and factor levels is necessary. The long-term risk of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with gene therapy is unknown. Routine screening by imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma, preferable every 6 months, is essential in patients at high risk and recommended in all recipients of hemophilia A gene therapy. This paper describes our current understanding of the biologic underpinnings of how liver health affects hemophilia A gene therapy, and provides practical clinical guidance for assessing, monitoring, and managing liver health both before and after gene therapy.

Can hemophilia be cured? It depends on the definition

Over the years, the palette of treatment options for hemophilia has grown extensively, leading to an increased life expectancy and quality of life for people living with hemophilia. Nonetheless, it is frequently emphasized that none of the current treatment modalities provides a "cure." It is therefore hoped that innovative treatments such as gene therapy may bridge this void. However, the precise definition of a "cure" for hemophilia remains unclear. In this review, we show how the concept of cure is currently used in the field of hemophilia. We then relate the discussion on cure to debates surrounding the classification of hemophilia and philosophical debates on the concepts of health and disease.

Delivery of DNA-Based Therapeutics for Treatment of Chronic Diseases

Gene therapy and its role in the medical field have evolved drastically in recent decades. Studies aim to define DNA-based medicine as well as encourage innovation and the further development of novel approaches. Gene therapy has been established as an alternative approach to treat a variety of diseases. Its range of mechanistic applicability is wide; gene therapy has the capacity to address the symptoms of disease, the body's ability to fight disease, and in some cases has the ability to cure disease, making it a more attractive intervention than some traditional approaches to treatment (i.e., medicine and surgery). Such versatility also suggests gene therapy has the potential to address a greater number of indications than conventional treatments. Many DNA-based therapies have shown promise in clinical trials, and several have been approved for use in humans. Whereas current treatment regimens for chronic disease often require frequent dosing, DNA-based therapies can produce robust and durable expression of therapeutic genes with fewer treatments. This benefit encourages the application of DNA-based gene therapy to manage chronic diseases, an area where improving efficiency of current treatments is urgent. Here, we provide an overview of two DNA-based gene therapies as well as their delivery methods: adeno associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy and plasmid DNA (pDNA)-based gene therapy. We will focus on how these therapies have already been utilized to improve treatment of chronic disease, as well as how current literature supports the expansion of these therapies to treat additional chronic indications in the future.

A review of the rationale for gene therapy for hemophilia A with inhibitors: one-shot tolerance and treatment?

The therapeutic landscape for people living with hemophilia A (PwHA) has changed dramatically in recent years, but many clinical challenges remain, including the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII) that occur in approximately 30% of people with severe hemophilia A. Emicizumab, an FVIII mimetic bispecific monoclonal antibody, provides safe and effective bleeding prophylaxis for many PwHA, but clinicians still explore therapeutic strategies that result in immunologic tolerance to FVIII to enable effective treatment with FVIII for problematic bleeding events. This immune tolerance induction (ITI) to FVIII is typically accomplished through repeated long-term exposure to FVIII using a variety of protocols. Meanwhile, gene therapy has recently emerged as a novel ITI option that provides an intrinsic, consistent source of FVIII. As gene therapy and other therapies now expand therapeutic options for PwHA, we review the persistent unmet medical needs with respect to FVIII inhibitors and effective ITI in PwHA, the immunology of FVIII tolerization, the latest research on tolerization strategies, and the role of liver-directed gene therapy to mediate FVIII ITI.

Interspecies Scaling of Transgene Products for Viral Vector Gene Therapies: Method Assessment Using Data from Eleven Viral Vectors

The prediction of transgene product expression in human is important to guide first-in-human (FIH) dose selection for viral vector-based gene replacement therapies. Recently, allometric scaling from preclinical data and interspecies normalization of dose-response (D-R) relationship have been used to predict human transgene product expression of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors. In this study, we assessed two interspecies allometric scaling methods and two dose-response methods in predicting human transgene product expression of nine intravenously administered AAV vectors, one intramuscularly administered AAV vector, and one intravesical administered adenoviral vector. Among the four methods, normalized D-R method generated the highest prediction accuracy, with geometric mean fold error (GMFE) of 2.9 folds and 75% predictions within fivefold deviations of observed human transgene product levels. The vg/kg-based D-R method worked well for locally delivered vectors but substantially overpredicted human transgene product levels of some hemophilia A and B vectors. For both intravenously and locally administered vectors, the prediction accuracy of allometric scaling using body weight^-0.25 (AS by W^-0.25) was superior to allometric scaling using log(body weight) (AS by logW). This study successfully extended the use of allometric scaling and interspecies D-R normalization methods for human transgene product prediction from intravenous viral vectors to locally delivered viral vectors.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

[Gene therapy of Hemophilia: Recommendations from the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH)]

Gene therapy has recently become a realistic treatment perspective for patients with hemophilia. Reviewing the literature and our personal experience from clinical trials, we discuss key aspects of hemophilia A and B gene therapy with vectors derived from adeno-associated virus, including predictable results, risks, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes. Patient selection, informed consent, administration, and monitoring of gene therapy as well as data collection are explained. We also discuss the need for interdisciplinary cooperation with hepatology and other specialties. We emphasize structural and organizational requirements for treatment centers according to the hub-and-spoke model and recommend the use of electronic diaries to ensure safe and timely collection and exchange of data. Electronic diaries will play a key role as a primary source of data for pharmacovigilance, postmarketing clinical studies, national and international registries, as well as health technology and benefit assessment. Reimbursement aspects and the future of gene therapy in adolescents and children are also considered. In a rapidly evolving scientific environment, these recommendations aim to support treatment providers and payers to prepare for the implementation of gene therapy following marketing authorization.

Interspecies normalization of dose-response relationship for adeno-associated virus-mediated haemophilia gene therapy-Application to human dose prediction

AIMS

The aim of this study is to develop an approach to predict human dose-response relationship and first-in-human (FIH) dose for adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated haemophilia gene therapy.

METHODS

Preclinical dose-response relationships of 7 AAV vectors were normalized to a species-invariant scale using an exponent of 0.25, and the normalized dose-response relationship was then used for FIH dose prediction. The performance of this dose-response normalization approach for FIH dose prediction was compared to that of direct body weight-based dose (vg/kg) conversion and allometric scaling approaches.

RESULTS

A power regression analysis of normalized factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) showed a moderate-to-strong correlation between FVIII or FIX and vector dose across 3 species (R² ranged 0.59 to 0.89), indicating it was feasible to normalize dose-response in multiple species to a species-invariant scale. When the mean values of normalized FVIII or FIX at each dose level were used for regression, the R² values of the 7 vectors were improved to be >0.84. The FIH doses predicted by the 3 approaches were ranked as allometric scaling > dose-response normalization > direct vg/kg conversion for all vectors except for rAAV2-hAAT-FIX and scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco. Among the 7 vectors, dose-response normalization, direct vg/kg conversion and allometric scaling generated accurate FIH dose predictions for 2, 2 and 3 vectors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study first demonstrated that it is feasible to normalize dose-response relationship of AAV-mediated haemophilia gene therapy in multiple species to a species-invariant scale. The normalized dose-response relationship from preclinical species was successfully extrapolated to patients for FIH dose prediction.

From a bispecific monoclonal antibody to gene therapy: A new era in the treatment of hemophilia A

The treatment of hemophilia A has progressed amazingly in recent years. Emicizumab, a bispecific-humanized monoclonal antibody, is able to improve coagulation by bridging activated factor IX and factor X. Emicizumab is administered subcutaneously and much less often compared to factor VIII products. It has low immunogenicity, does not require dose adjustment, and can be administered regardless of the presence of factor VIII inhibitors. Thrombin generation assays but not factor VIII activity are indicated to guide and monitor the treatment. Emicizumab has enabled the conversion of patients with severe forms into patients with milder forms of hemophilia A. It has reduced the number of bleeding episodes compared to both on-demand and prophylactic substitution therapy and has an excellent safety profile. Gene therapy can elevate factor VIII plasma levels for many years after a single treatment course, could offer long-term protection from bleeding episodes, and minimize or eliminate the need for substitutive treatment with factor VIII concentrates. Gene therapy can provoke an immune response, manifested by an increase in common liver enzymes, that require immunotherapy. Long term monitoring is necessary to identify possible adverse effects. Future objectives are: the development of an ideal viral vector, the possibility of its re-administration, the use of gene therapy in hemophiliac children, and determining whether it can be successfully used to induce immune tolerance to factor VIII ceteri paribus. The future will determine the place of each type of treatment and group of patients for which it is indicated.

First-in-Patient Dose Prediction for Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Hemophilia Gene Therapy Using Allometric Scaling

In this study, the author compared the performance of two allometric scaling approaches and body-weight-based dose conversion approach for first-in-patient (FIP) dose prediction for adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated hemophilia gene therapy using preclinical and clinical efficacy data of nine AAV vectors. In general, body-weight-based direct conversion of effective doses in monkeys or dogs was more likely to underestimate FIP dose but worked for one bioengineered vector with a high transduction efficiency specifically in humans. In contrast, allometric scaling between gene efficiency factor (log GEF) and body weight (log W) was likely to overestimate FIP dose but worked for two vectors with capsid-specific T-cell responses in patients. The third approach, allometric scaling between log GEF and W^-0.25 was appropriate for FIP dose prediction in the absence of T-cell responses to AAV vectors or a dramatic difference in vector transduction efficiency between animals and humans.

Early stage clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder affecting about 1 in 5,000 males. The gold standard for prophylaxis and treatment of acute bleeding has been factor (F) VIII concentrate. A multitude of treatment modalities are now available and under clinical investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses ongoing/recently completed early-phase clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in patients with hemophilia A through April 2022. These new pipeline therapies are focused on addressing the safety and efficacy of new factor-related products, non-factor related products, and gene therapy options for hemophilia.

EXPERT OPINION

Current standard of care effectively prevents and treats acute bleeding and has significantly improved the quality of life in hemophilia. The biggest challenges in the improvement of care are treatment-related burden and the burden of cost in developing countries. New drugs under development are likely to enter practice by the end of this decade and address many of the unmet needs particularly of those with severe disease. Data is limited in unique populations (e.g. congenital/inherited FVIII inhibitors, non-severe hemophilia A, women/girls with hemophilia and children) which are important areas for future research; additional clinical trials and long-term outcome data are necessary prior to incorporating these new therapies in our treatment arsenal.

The Arrival of Gene Therapy for Patients with Hemophilia A

Historically, the standard of care for hemophilia A has been intravenous administration of exogenous factor VIII (FVIII), either as prophylaxis or episodically. The development of emicizumab, a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody mimicking activated FVIII, was a subsequent advance in treatment. However, both exogenous FVIII and emicizumab require repeated and lifelong administration, negatively impacting patient quality of life. A recent breakthrough has been the development of gene therapy. This allows a single intravenous treatment that could result in long-term expression of FVIII, maintenance of steady-state plasma concentrations, and minimization (or possibly elimination) of bleeding episodes for the recipient's lifetime. Several gene therapies have been assessed in clinical trials, with positive outcomes. Valoctocogene roxaparvovec (an adeno-associated viral 5-based therapy encoding human B domain-deleted FVIII) is expected to be the first approved gene therapy in European countries, including Italy, in 2022. Some novel challenges exist including refining patient selection criteria, managing patient expectations, further elucidation of the durability and variability of transgene expression and long-term safety, and the development of standardized 'hub and spoke' centers to optimize and monitor this innovative treatment. Gene therapy represents a paradigm shift, and may become a new reference standard for treating patients with hemophilia A.

Haemophilia gene therapy-Update on new country initiatives

INTRODUCTION

Gene therapy is emerging as a potential cure for haemophilia. Gene therapy is a one-time treatment that can elevate factor levels for many years and minimize or eliminate the need for clotting factor concentrate (CFC) replacement therapy. However, there is a paucity of reports on gene therapy efforts in countries outside of North America or Europe, especially in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC). All indications are that gene therapy will be one of standard care treatments for haemophilia in the future. Still, it may not be accessible to many countries due to various barriers and challenges. At the same time, each country may formulate solutions that may be used globally.

AIM

To summarize the approaches taken to establish haemophilia gene therapy in Japan, China, India, South Africa, and Brazil, and to describe the US-initiated multi-LMIC haemophilia gene therapy development program to include Peru, Vietnam, Thailand, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.

METHODS

A review of related published information or as accessible by each country's author.

RESULTS

Different starting conditions, differing input and level of support from the multitude of stakeholders, and strong leadership have led to various approaches for facilitating research and developing needed infrastructure and regulatory and financing models. Gene therapy programs are at various stages of development and include both adeno-associated viral and lentiviral vectors.

CONCLUSION

Global partnerships and collaboration, exchange of knowledge and experience, and alignment of processes across borders will promote further progress towards global access to gene therapy for haemophilia.