Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sonographer-guided frozen embryo transfer vs ultrasound-assisted frozen embryo transfer - A randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND

The use of ultrasound to guide placement of the embryo during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) is important, but there are times where a good image cannot be obtained. Having a trained sonographer perform the ultrasound may therefore improve the success of embryo transfer.

AIM

To determine whether the routine use of a sonographer to guide embryo transfer is superior to standard care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomised, controlled, prospective clinical study in a private infertility clinic. There were 113 women aged <38 years undergoing frozen embryo transfer (donor egg/embryo excluded) who were randomised to sonographer-guided embryo transfer or standard care (the doctor performs an ultrasound prior to embryo transfer and the patient holds the ultrasound probe). The primary outcome was visualisation of the air bubble, and secondary outcomes were distance of the air bubble from the fundal endometrium, pregnancy rate (gestational sac on ultrasound at seven weeks) and live birth rate.

RESULTS

The bubble was visualised in 100% of embryo transfers with a sonographer compared to 83% in the ultrasound-assisted group, and this was statistically significant (P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of distance from the fundal endometrium or in pregnancy rate and live birth rate.

CONCLUSION

Sonographer-guided embryo transfer leads to statistically higher rates of visualisation of the air bubble compared to ultrasound-assisted transfer.

Influence of targeted nursing-guided bladder filling on embryo transfer outcomes and patient comfort: A prospective open randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The success of assisted pregnancy relies heavily on the effectiveness of the embryo transfer process. Currently, embryo transfer is typically conducted with the assistance of abdominal ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of targeted nursing interventions on the embryo transfer procedure, its impact on pregnancy outcomes, and the level of patient comfort concerning bladder management throughout the procedure.

METHODS

A total of 247 patients who underwent embryo transfer at the Reproductive Center of Peking University People's Hospital from December 2019 to August 2020 were included in this study. These patients were categorized into two groups: the control group (n= 124) and the experimental group (n= 123). Within the control group, patients received conventional preoperative education, whereas those within the experimental group were subjected to targeted nursing interventions. Furthermore, patients in the experimental group were furnished with explicit instructions pertaining to the volume and timing of water intake. Multiple factors were assessed in this study, encompassing bladder filling, the quality of uterine imaging, the utilization of assistive devices during the surgical procedure, and pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, a post-operative questionnaire was administered to both groups to gauge their comfort levels regarding urinary retention.

RESULTS

Following the targeted nursing intervention, ultrasound scans indicated an increase in bladder depth (5.91 ± 1.76 vs. 5.40 ± 1.61, P= 0.02), resulting in clearer endometrial imaging (96.74% vs. 88.71%, P= 0.02). Additionally, the experimental group reported significantly higher levels of comfort with urine retention (P= 0.01) compared to the control group, and these differences held statistical significance. Furthermore, the pregnancy rate in the experimental group was greater than that in the control group (52.85% vs. 50.8%, P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the premise that pregnancy rates remain unaffected, the implementation of targeted nursing care has the potential to augment bladder filling, enhance the quality of endometrial imaging, reduce the requirement for instrument-assisted embryo transfers, and notably enhance the comfort of patients in relation to urine retention.

Interventions to optimize embryo transfer in women undergoing assisted conception: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Several interventions and techniques are suggested to improve the outcome of embryo transfer (ET) in assisted conception. However, there remains no consensus on the optimal practice, with high variations among fertility specialists.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aiming to identify effective interventions that could be introduced around the time of ET to improve reproductive outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception until March 2021 using a multi-stage search strategy of MeSH terms and keywords, and included all RCTs that evaluated an intervention in the 24-h period before/after ET in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate post-ET confirmed as viable pregnancy on ultrasound scan. We assessed the risk of bias in included trials and extracted data in duplicate. We pooled data using a random-effect meta-analysis and reported using risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. We explored publication bias and effect modifiers using subgroup analyses.

OUTCOMES

Our search yielded 3685 citations of which we included 188 RCTs (38 interventions, 59 530 participants) with a median sample size of 200 (range 26-1761). The quality of included RCTs was moderate with most showing a low risk of bias for randomization (118/188, 62.8%) and attrition (105/188, 55.8%) but there was a significant risk of publication bias (Egger's test P = 0.001). Performing ET with ultrasound guidance versus clinical touch (n = 24, RR 1.265, 95% CI 1.151-1.391, I2 = 38.53%), hyaluronic acid versus routine care (n = 9, RR 1.457, 95% CI 1.197-1.261, I2 = 46.48%) and the use of a soft versus hard catheter (n = 27, RR 1.122, 95% CI 1.028-1.224, I2 = 57.66%) led to higher clinical pregnancy rates. Other pharmacological add-ons also showed a beneficial effect including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF: n = 4, RR 1.774, 95% CI 1.252-2.512, I2 = 0), Atosiban (n = 7, RR 1.493, 95% CI 1.184-1.882, I2 = 68.27%) and hCG (n = 17, RR 1.232, 95% CI 1.099-1.382, I2 = 57.76%). Bed rest following ET was associated with a reduction in clinical pregnancy (n = 6, RR 0.857, 95% CI 0.741-0.991, I2 = 0.01%). Other commonly used interventions, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prophylactic antibiotics, acupuncture and cervical mucus removal, did not show a significant benefit on reproductive outcomes. Our effect estimates for other important outcomes, including miscarriage and live birth, were limited by the varied reporting across included RCTs.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Using ultrasound guidance, soft catheters and hyaluronic acid at the time of ET appears to increase clinical pregnancy rates. The use of Atosiban, G-CSF and hCG showed a trend towards increased clinical pregnancy rate, but larger trials are required before adopting these interventions in clinical practice. Bed rest post-ET was associated with a reduction in clinical pregnancy and should not be recommended.

Immersive virtual reality as tool to reduce anxiety during embryo transfer

The use of Virtual Reality (VR) has gained wide acceptance in several scientific fields. It represents an innovative technological tool providing the experience to be immersed in a non-physical world putting on head-mounted displays that surround the users with images and sounds. To date, VR has been mainly employed in the healthcare sector for educational aims, in order to provide the learners with a new method of delivering simulations. However, its application to real clinical practice has recently generated beneficial effects for patients, especially for those who experience symptoms of psychological burden. Infertile couples often struggle with anxiety and depression which have a strong impact on life quality. Furthermore, the perspective to undergo long treatments with uncertain results and an history of failed attempts may contribute to enhance patients' negative feelings during In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles until Embryo Transfer (ET). The role of VR in reducing pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography and oocytes retrieval, has been recently investigated with satisfactory results in terms of reducing pain and anxiety levels. However, to date, inconclusive outcomes have been reported on pregnancy rate. Our study would discuss the existent literature on VR applied to current medical practice and infertility, proposing its beneficial impact on women anxiety during IVF cycle with ET.

Statistical Modelling Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Single Centre Study

BACKGROUND

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) have been extensively used to treat infertility. Inaccurate prediction of a couple's fertility often leads to lowered self-esteem for patients seeking ART treatment and causes fertility distress.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study aimed to statistically analyze patient data from a single reproductive medical center over a period of 18 months, and to establish mathematical models that might facilitate accurate prediction of successful pregnancy when ART are used.

METHODS

In the present study, we analyzed clinical data prospectively collected from 760 infertile patients visiting the second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between June 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Various advanced statistical methods, including broken-line regression, were employed to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Age remained the most important factor affecting the outcome of IVF/ICSI. Using the broken-line regression model, the fastest clinical pregnancy declining age was between 25 and 32. Female infertility type was found to be a key predictor for the number of good-quality embryos and successful pregnancy, along with the antral follicle count (AFC), total number of embryos, recombinant follicle stimulating hormones (rFSH) dosage, estradiol (E2) on the trigger day, and total number of oocytes retrieved. rFSH dosage was also significantly associated with the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of frozen embryos.

CONCLUSION

The fastest clinical pregnancy declining age is ranged between 25 and 32, and female infertility type is evidenced as another key predictive factor for the cumulative outcome of ART.

Correlation between Ovarian Reserve and Incidence of Ectopic Pregnancy after In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

PURPOSE

To elucidate the correlation between ovarian reserve and the incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET) cycles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this observational study, 430 fresh IVF/ET cycles were examined from patient data of two university hospital infertility clinics. All included patients were positive for β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at 2 weeks after oocyte retrieval via controlled ovarian stimulation. For each cycle, information on age, duration of infertility, basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), days of ovarian stimulation, numbers of retrieved oocytes and transferred embryos, and pregnancy outcomes was collected. Patients with AMH lower than 1.0 ng/dL or basal FSH higher than 10 mIU/mL were classified into the decreased ovarian reserve (DOR) group, and the remaining patients were classified into the normal ovarian reserve (NOR) group.

RESULTS

In total, 355 cycles showed NOR, and 75 cycles DOR. There were no significant differences between the DOR and NOR groups regarding intrauterine (74.7% vs. 83.4%, respectively) or chemical (14.7% vs. 14.1%, respectively) pregnancies. The DOR group had a higher EP than that of NOR group [10.7% (8/75) vs. 2.5% (9/355), p=0.004]. In both univariate [odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-9.6, p=0.011] and multivariate (adjusted OR 5.1, 95 % CI 1.1-18.7, p=0.012) analysis, DOR was associated with a higher risk of EP.

CONCLUSION

DOR may be associated with a higher risk of EP in IVF/ET cycles with controlled ovarian stimulation. More careful monitoring may be necessary for pregnant women with DOR.

Embryo transfer techniques

Embryo transfer is the final and rate-limiting step of the assisted reproductive technique. Few advances have occurred in the last few decades with regard to this procedure. Studies conducted thus far have focused on factors and interventions taking place before, during and after this procedure. These factors are highly varied and range from methods to improve the psychological state of the patients to methods aimed at reducing uterine contractility and methods aimed at optimising the precise transfer of the embryo. The key question is which factors and interventions have thus far been proven to increase pregnancy rates and live birth rates. This paper aims to review the evidence relating to embryo transfer techniques in a systematic manner with a view to provide practical recommendations to practitioners involved in the procedure.

Accuracy and efficacy of embryo transfer based on the previous measurement of cervical length and total uterine length

PURPOSE

Aim of the study was to examine the accuracy of embryo transfer based on the previous measurement of cervical length and total uterine length.

METHODS

The study has taken place in an academic-assisted reproduction clinic. 248 patients with infertility requiring IVF/ICSI treatment have been included. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI cycles with antagonist protocol and were treated with controlled ovarian stimulation using recombinant FSH (100-400 IU/day). On the day of oocyte retrieval, all patients were given vaginally natural micronized progesterone in a dose of 200 mg/tds. All patients had transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length and endometrial cavity length prior to embryo transfer and measurement of embryo distance (intrauterine air bubbles) from fundal surface of uterine cavity and internal cervical os immediately after embryo transfer. Embryo transfer was performed on days 2-3. Primary outcome was to estimate the accuracy of embryo transfer based on the measurement of the embryo distance from middle of uterine cavity after embryo transfer and secondary outcome was to assess the effect of embryo distance from uterine fundus and internal cervical os to clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate was 42.7%. The mean embryo distance from the middle of endometrial cavity was 0.48 ± 0.02 cm, the mean embryo distance from the uterine fundus was 0.88 ± 0.32 cm, and from the internal cervical os was 1.67 ± 0.45 cm. Multiple regression analysis showed that the embryo distance from middle of cavity was related to endometrial cavity length and to the embryo distance from the fundus and it was not related to Cx length, total uterine length, embryo distance from internal Cx os, and embryo transfer length.

CONCLUSIONS

Embryo transfer with the previous measurement of total uterine length and estimation of embryo transfer length can be performed with very good accuracy by a single operator.

Do trained reproductive endocrinologists perform better than their trainees? Comparing clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates after transfer of single fresh blastocysts

PURPOSE

To compare clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates of single blastocyst transfers performed by attending physicians or fellows in reproductive endocrinology and infertility program.

METHODS

Retrospective study in an academic reproductive center. We evaluated 932 fresh single blastocyst transfer cycles performed by fellows in training (389 embryo transfers) and by attending physicians (543 embryo transfers).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the baseline characteristics and IVF cycle parameters between patients who had transfers performed by fellows or attending physicians. Transfers performed by attending physicians or fellows resulted in similar CPR (46.5 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.28) and LBR (38.3 vs. 34.2%, p = 0.11). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that even after adjusting for possible confounders (age, gravity, parity, baseline FSH, antral follicle count, dose of gonadotropins, stimulation protocol, and quality of embryo transferred), CPR (OR 0.81, CI 0.62-1.07) and LBR (OR 0.79, CI 0.6-1.05) in the two groups were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate after embryo transfer performed by attending staffs or fellows are comparable. This finding reassures fellowship programs that allowing fellows to perform embryo transfers does not compromise the outcome.

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in IVF

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer is a technique that can be used routinely, whether it improves IVF outcomes and whether it makes difficult transfers easier and more successful.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Non-randomized retrospective study conducted between 2012 and 2016 in the fertility center of the Diaconesses-Croix St-Simon hospital group. The outcomes of 3910 transfers, performed by 5 senior operators, under transabdominal ultrasound guidance are compared with those of 800 transfers, performed by 1 senior operator under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The criteria studied are the feasibility of the technique and the percentage of pregnancies per transfer in the two populations described, as well as in the difficult and very difficult transfer populations.

RESULTS

All the transfers were feasible under transvaginal ultrasound guidance without the use of forceps or additional instruments. The percentage of pregnancies per transfer is significantly increased, when the transfer is performed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance compared with that performed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, in the general population (38%, n=800 vs 30%, n=3910; P 0.0004) and in the reference population characterized by age <38 years and >6 oocytes collected per puncture (45%, n=490 vs 36%, n=1968; P 0.002). The percentage of pregnancies per transfer (P/T) is not significantly different in the populations of easy transfers (n 695, 38% P/T), difficult transfers (n 58, 46% P/T; P=ns) and very difficult transfers (n 47, 34% P/T; P=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Embryo transfer is a key stage in IVF, in which the quality of performance determines the outcome. In this study, transvaginal ultrasound guidance of the transfer, which is the reference procedure in gynaecological imaging, significantly increases the percentage of pregnancies per transfer, both in the general population and in the reference population, compared with transfers performed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. Transvaginal ultrasound facilitates the performance of difficult transfers and in particular achieves outcomes in these situations that are not significantly different from those of easy transfers. Visual monitoring of transcervical passage, which is rendered more precise and less traumatic and precision of embryo deposition are the factors that probably account for the improvement in outcomes.

Assessment of the uterus with three-dimensional ultrasound in women undergoing ART

BACKGROUND

A detailed assessment of the uterus forms a pivotal part of the ART treatment process. The emergence of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) has provided clinicians with a highly powerful tool in this respect. Assessments with 3D US range from the reconstruction of anatomical planes elusive to conventional US, to the objective measurement of anatomical volumes and vascularization parameters. However, despite the ever increasing number of publications emerging in the literature, the question of which aspects of 3D US are of most clinical value remains a topic of debate.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of this review is to dissect which aspects of the 3D US assessment of the uterus are supported by a strong level of evidence to date, and should therefore be incorporated into current routine clinical practice.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed database up to May 2016, using a combination of text words and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) pertaining to the 3D US assessment of the uterus. All articles published in the English language were screened to ascertain relevance to women of reproductive age; further citations were retrieved through manual reference list searching.

OUTCOMES

A multitude of predominantly observational studies were identified, which concerned a vast variety of 3D US uterine assessments. All articles unequivocally praised the non-invasive, cost-effective, highly acceptable and objective nature of 3D US. Studies regarding the value of assessing the endometrial volume and vascularization prior to embryo transfer appeared conflicting and inconsistent. Studies regarding the imaging of uterine pathology and identification of intratubal and intrauterine devices consistently reported high rates of diagnostic accuracy. A recent RCT did not show an improvement in clinical outcomes when comparing 3D versus 2D US during embryo transfer. However, preliminary studies suggested that 3D US is superior in determining the site of implantation, particularly in ambiguous cases such as interstitial and angular pregnancies. Finally, pilot studies have suggested that the further integration of 3D and possibly 4D US with surgical interventions of the uterus may be a promising prospect.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

3D US may prove to be an invaluable tool in the assessment of the uterus within the context of ART. Currently, the aim should be to highlight the aspects of 3D US that are most evidence-based and valuable for patients, and to incorporate these into routine clinical practice.

Large randomized trial comparing transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with a technique based on uterine length measurement before embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To compare in a randomized, non-inferiority trial the embryo transfer (ET) technique based on uterine length measurement before transfer (ULMbET) with transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (TA-UGET) in a large population of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

Patients undergoing IVF with ET with cleaving fresh embryos were randomized to receive ULMbET or TA-UGET. The transfer of one to three embryos on day 2-3 of culture was performed using a soft catheter either under transabdominal ultrasound guidance (TA-UGET group) or after measurement of the uterine cavity by transvaginal ultrasound and calculation of the discharge site (ULMbET group). The primary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate, and secondary outcomes included patient discomfort during ET.

RESULTS

A total of 1648 patients undergoing IVF were randomized to receive ULMbET (n = 828) or TA-UGET (n = 820) and were included in the analysis. Comparable clinical pregnancy rate (38.2% vs 38.9%), implantation rate (24.8% vs 25.2%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (33.1% vs 34.8%) were observed in ULMbET and TA-UGET groups. The discomfort intensity score and the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe discomfort during ET were significantly higher in the TA-UGET group (2.6 vs 1.5 visual analog scale points and 19.8% vs 1.2%; P = 0.045 and P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ULMbET technique leads to IVF results comparable to those obtained with UGET, but is better tolerated than is TA-UGET and is technically easier to perform for a single operator. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of dydrogesterone and progesterone for luteal-phase support (LPS) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching the following electronic databases: Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN Registry and WHO ICTRP.

RESULTS

The last search was performed in October 2015. Eight RCTs were considered eligible and were included in the review and meta-analyses. There was no relevant difference between oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone for LPS with respect to rate of ongoing pregnancy (risk ratio (RR), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.92-1.18); I(2) , 0%; seven RCTs, 3134 women), clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.93-1.23); I(2) , 34%; eight RCTs, 3809 women) or miscarriage (RR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.53-1.10); I(2) , 0%; seven RCTs, 906 clinical pregnancies). Two of the three studies reporting on dissatisfaction of treatment identified lower levels of dissatisfaction among women using oral dydrogesterone than among women using vaginal progesterone (oral dydrogesterone vs vaginal progesterone capsules: 2/79 (2.5%) vs 90/351 (25.6%), respectively; oral dydrogesterone vs vaginal progesterone gel: 19/411 (4.6%) vs 74/411 (18.0%), respectively). The third study showed no difference in dissatisfaction rate (oral dydrogesterone vs vaginal progesterone capsules: 8/96 (8.3%) vs 8/114 (7.0%), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral dydrogesterone seems to be as effective as vaginal progesterone for LPS in ART cycles, and appears to be better tolerated . Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women

BACKGROUND

Many women undergoing an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle will not achieve a live birth. Failure at the embryo transfer stage may be due to lack of good-quality embryo/s, lack of uterine receptivity, or the transfer technique itself. Numerous methods, including the use of ultrasound guidance for proper catheter placement in the endometrial cavity, have been suggested as more effective techniques of embryo transfer. This review evaluates the efficacy of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UGET) compared with 'clinical touch' (CTET), which is the traditional method of embryo transfer and relies on the clinician's tactile senses to judge when the transfer catheter is in the correct position.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether ultrasound guidance compared with clinical touch improves pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing embryo transfer during ART cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

For the 2016 update of this review, we ran updated searches in the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register (May 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library, May 2015), MEDLINE (2009 to May 2015), and EMBASE (2009 to May 2015). We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings: American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data from those selected. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. No outcomes were reported using continuous data. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the main findings using the GRADE working group methods.

MAIN RESULTS

This systematic review now has 21 included studies (four of which we added in the 2016 update), two studies awaiting assessment, and 47 excluded studies. In total, data for meta-analyses were available in 21 trials (n = 6218 women), of which only four reported live births.UGET was associated with an increased chance of a live birth/ongoing pregnancy compared with CTET (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.65; 13 trials; n = 5859 women; I(2) = 74%; low-quality evidence). Sensitivity analysis by including only trials with low risk of selection bias or by using a random-effects model did not alter the effect. We estimate that for women with a chance of a live birth/ongoing pregnancy of 23% using CTET, this would increase to between 28% and 33% using UGET. We considered the quality of the evidence using GRADE methodology to be low.UGET was associated with an increase in the chance of a clinical pregnancy (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.45; 20 trials; n = 6711 women; I(2) = 42%; moderate-quality evidence). We identified no differences between groups for the incidence of adverse events including multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage. These events were relatively rare, and sample sizes limited the ability to detect such differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests ultrasound guidance improves the chance of live birth/ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared with clinical touch, without increasing the chance of multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage. Methodological limitations included: only four studies reporting details of both computerised randomisation techniques and adequate allocation concealment, only four studies reported on the outcome of live birth, and none of the nine studies that reported on ongoing pregnancy reported on live birth, suggesting possible reporting bias. Adequate reporting of randomisation and allocation concealment will improve the quality of future studies. The primary outcome measure of future studies should be the reporting of live births per woman randomised.

Successful use of "Hour 1" transfer of sperm microinjected oocytes in natural cycles of poor responder women: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study

The aim of the study is to demonstrate the successful use of "Hour 1" transfer of sperm microinjected oocytes in natural cycles of poor responder women. Seventy women were selected from 92 consecutive poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) in a natural cycle at our Sterility and Assisted Reproduction Unit from September 2009 to July 2013, and randomly distributed in two homogeneous groups: Group A or B. Women in Group A (35) underwent transfer within 1 h after ICSI; Group B (35, control group) underwent transfer 3 days after ICSI. In Group A, seven clinical pregnancy and one miscarriage occurred; in Group B, eight clinical pregnancies and two miscarriages were observed. Pregnancy, miscarriage, term pregnancy and overall live birth rates' difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Difference between the two groups in terms of timing, type of delivery and newborn birthweight was not observed. Neither ectopic pregnancy nor multiple pregnancies occurred. "Hour 1" uterine transfer of ICSI oocytes, still to be considered with caution because of the relatively low number of observations of the pilot study, deserves further attention on a larger scale, and might be evaluated for clinical and financial effectiveness in other clinical settings.

Ovarian response is a better predictor of clinical pregnancy rate following embryo transfer than is thin endometrium or presence of an endometrioma

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether endometrial thickness and the presence of endometrioma are independent predictors of clinical pregnancy rate or simply associated with poor ovarian response (POR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study assessing the first cycle of all women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in a university hospital in Brazil between January 2011 and December 2012. Only the first cycle of each woman within the study period was considered. Women over 40 years of age and those who used clomiphene citrate during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or did not undergo embryo transfer were excluded from analysis. POR was defined as ≤ three oocytes retrieved and a thin endometrium was defined as endometrial thickness ≤ 7.0 mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. We performed a multiple regression analysis to identify which of the following parameters were independent predictors of clinical pregnancy: age, number of oocytes retrieved, endometrial thickness or the presence of endometrioma.

RESULTS

Within the study period, 787 women began COS, but 270 were excluded from analysis. Among the 517 women analyzed, those who achieved pregnancy were younger and yielded more oocytes. The proportion of POR was higher in women with a thin endometrium (17/57 (29.8%) vs 80/460 (17.4%); P = 0.03) and in women with endometrioma (15/39 (38.5%) vs 82/478 (17.2%); P = 0.002). The results of regression analysis showed that only age and the number of oocytes retrieved were independent predictors of pregnancy. Additionally, we observed higher clinical pregnancy rates in women with a thin endometrium from whom ≥ seven oocytes were retrieved (11/25 (44.0%)) compared to women with normal endometrial thickness (99/241 (41.1%)). Considering only women from whom ≥ four oocytes were retrieved, we observed reasonable pregnancy rates in those with a thin endometrium (14/40 (35.0%)) and in those with endometrioma (9/24 (37.5%)).

CONCLUSION

Both a thin endometrium and the presence of endometrioma are associated with POR but are not important independent predictors of clinical pregnancy. Good pregnancy rates can be observed when these conditions are present in women with a good ovarian response.

Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship of endometrial thickness (EnT) and endometrial pattern (EnP) to euploid embryo transfer (ET) outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Private academic clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Patients (n = 277; age 36.1 ± 4.0 years) whose embryos (n = 476) underwent aneuploidy screening with fresh (n = 176) or frozen (n = 180) ET from July 2010 to March 2014.

INTERVENTION(S)

The EnT and EnP were measured on trigger day and at ET. Patients were stratified by age and cycle type (fresh or frozen). Cycle data were combined at trigger day, but separated at ET day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Outcome measures were implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Analysis was conducted using χ(2) analysis and Fisher's exact test.

RESULT(S)

A total of 234 gestational sacs, 251 pregnancies, and 202 clinical pregnancies resulted from 356 cycles. The EnT (9.6 ± 1.8 mm; range: 5-15 mm) at trigger day (n = 241 cycles), as a continuous or categorical variable (≤8 vs. >8 mm), was not associated with implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or clinical pregnancy rate. The EnT at day of fresh ET (9.7 ± 2.2 mm; range: 4.4-17.9 mm) (n = 176 cycles) or frozen ET (9.1 ± 2.1 mm; range: 4.2-17.7 mm) (n = 180 cycles) was not associated with implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or clinical pregnancy rate. Type 3 EnP at trigger day was associated with increased serum progesterone at trigger and a decreased implantation rate, compared with type 2 EnP. The EnP at fresh or frozen ET was not associated with implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or clinical pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSION(S)

Within the study population, EnT was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes of euploid ETs. A type 3 EnP at trigger day suggests a prematurely closed window of implantation.