Regulation of DNA binding activity of the ligand-activated aryl hydrocarbon receptor by tyrosine phosphorylation

Investigating the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonist/Antagonist Conformational Switch Using Well-Tempered Metadynamics Simulations

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that mediates biological signals to control various complicated cellular functions. It plays a crucial role in environmental sensing and xenobiotic metabolism. Dysregulation of AhR is associated with health concerns, including cancer and immune system disorders. Upon binding to AhR ligands, AhR, along with heat shock protein 90 and other partner proteins undergoes a transformation in the nucleus, heterodimerizes with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), and mediates numerous biological functions by inducing the transcription of various AhR-responsive genes. In this manuscript, the 3-dimensional structure of the entire human AhR is obtained using an artificial intelligence tool, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are performed to study different structural conformations. These conformations provide insights into the protein's function and movement in response to ligand binding. Understanding the dynamic behavior of AhR will contribute to the development of targeted therapies for associated health conditions. Therefore, we employ well-tempered metadynamics (WTE-metaD) simulations to explore the conformational landscape of AhR and obtain a better understanding of its functional behavior. Our computational results are in excellent agreement with previous experimental findings, revealing the closed and open states of helix α1 in the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH domain) in the cytoplasm at the atomic level. We also predict the inactive form of AhR and identify Arginine 42 as a key residue that regulates switching between closed and open conformations in existing AhR modulators.

The complex biology of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in cancer and beyond

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling pathway is a complex regulatory network that plays a critical role in various biological processes, including cellular metabolism, development, and immune responses. The complexity of AHR signaling arises from multiple factors, including the diverse ligands that activate the receptor, the expression level of AHR itself, and its interaction with the AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT). Additionally, the AHR crosstalks with the AHR repressor (AHRR) or other transcription factors and signaling pathways and it can also mediate non-genomic effects. Finally, posttranslational modifications of the AHR and its interaction partners, epigenetic regulation of AHR and its target genes, as well as AHR-mediated induction of enzymes that degrade AHR-activating ligands may contribute to the context-specificity of AHR activation. Understanding the complexity of AHR signaling is crucial for deciphering its physiological and pathological roles and developing therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway. Ongoing research continues to unravel the intricacies of AHR signaling, shedding light on the regulatory mechanisms controlling its diverse functions.

Aromatic hydrocarbon receptors in mitochondrial biogenesis and function

Mitochondria are ubiquitous membrane-bound organelles that not only play a key role in maintaining cellular energy homeostasis and metabolism but also in signaling and apoptosis. Aryl hydrocarbons receptors (AhRs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that recognize a wide variety of xenobiotics, including polyaromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins, and activate diverse detoxification pathways. These receptors are also activated by natural dietary compounds and endogenous metabolites. In addition, AhRs can modulate the expression of a diverse array of genes related to mitochondrial biogenesis and function. The aim of the present review is to analyze scientific data available on the AhR signaling pathway and its interaction with the intracellular signaling pathways involved in mitochondrial functions, especially those related to cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Various evidence have reported the crosstalk between the AhR signaling pathway and the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), tyrosine kinase receptor signaling and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). The AhR signaling pathway seems to promote cell cycle progression in the absence of exogenous ligands, whereas the presence of exogenous ligands induces cell cycle arrest. However, its effects on apoptosis are controversial since activation or overexpression of AhR has been observed to induce or inhibit apoptosis depending on the cell type. Regarding the mitochondria, although activation by endogenous ligands is related to mitochondrial dysfunction, the effects of endogenous ligands are not well understood but point towards antiapoptotic effects and inducers of mitochondrial biogenesis.

Differential ligand-dependent activation and a role for Y322 in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated regulation of gene expression

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) mediates the toxic effects of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs), such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF). Non-traditional activators, including omeprazole (Omp), are thought to regulate AHR action through phosphorylation rather than binding to the receptor. In this study, we examined the ability of these compounds to induce AHR-dependent regulation of cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and CYP1B1 in T-47D human breast cancer cells. The role of Y322, a residue implicated in Omp-dependent activation of AHR was also investigated. All four compounds induced CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 mRNA expression, with Omp differing from the HAHs. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed ligand- and gene-selectivity in the recruitment patterns of AHR coactivators. We also found that residue Y322 of human AHR was important for maximum activation of AHR by 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, but required for 2,3,7,8-TCDF and Omp in an AHR-deficient MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. In summary, this study provides evidence for context- and ligand-selective differences in coactivator recruitment in AHR-regulated gene expression and reveal an important role of Y322 in AHR activation.

Molecular mechanisms of cold-induced CYP1A activation in rat liver microsomes

Cytochrome P4501A (the CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzymes) is known to metabolize anthropogenic xenobiotics to carcinogenic and mutagenic compounds. CYP1A1 transcriptional activation is regulated via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-dependent signal transduction pathway. CYP1A2 activation may occur through the AhR-dependent or AhR-independent signal transduction pathways. We used male Wistar rats to explore possible mechanisms of CYP1A activation induced by exposure to cold and the effects of the protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors genistein, herbimycin A, and geldanamycin on the properties of hepatic CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 proteins following exposure to cold and to classic CYP1A inducers. The molecular mechanisms of cold-induced CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 activation are different. The CYP1A2 activation apparently occurs at the post-transcriptional level. The CYP1A1 activation, whether caused by exposure to cold or by classic CYP1A inducers, is AhR-dependent and occurs at the transcriptional level. Protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors have no effect on benzo(a)pyrene-induced CYP1A expression but alter cold-induced CYP1A1 activity and the CYP1A1 mRNA level. Thus, treatment with herbimycin A or geldanamycin leads to an increase in CYP1A1 activity, while treatment with genistein increases CYP1A1 mRNA expression and decreases CYP1A2 activity. These data elucidate the molecular mechanisms of cold-induced CYP1A activation and the role of protein kinases in the regulation of CYP1A during exposure to cold. Our results can also help identify the differences between the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of the classic CYP1A inducers and the effects of cooling.

Suppression mechanisms of flavonoids on aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated signal transduction

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates biological and toxicological effects by binding to its agonists such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Previously we demonstrated that flavonoids suppressed the TCDD-induced DNA-binding activity of the AhR in a structure-dependent manner. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which flavonoids suppressed the AhR-mediated signal transduction in mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 cells. Flavones and flavonols suppressed the TCDD-induced nuclear translocation of the AhR and dissociation of its partner proteins, heat shock protein 90 and X-associated protein 2, whereas flavanones and catechins did not. Flavonoids of all these four subclasses suppressed the phosphorylation of both AhR and Arnt and the formation of a heterodimer consisting of these proteins. Since certain flavonoids are known to inhibit mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), we confirmed the contribution of MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) to the AhR-mediated signal transduction by using U0126, an inhibitor of MEK1/2. U0126 suppressed TCDD-induced phosphorylation of the AhR and Arnt followed by the DNA-binding activity of the AhR. Flavanones and catechins suppressed the TCDD-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2. The inhibition of MEK/ERK phosphorylation is one of the mechanisms by which flavanones and catechins suppress the AhR-mediated signal transduction in Hepa-1c1c7 cells.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor at the crossroads of multiple signaling pathways

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has long been recognized as a ligand-activated transcription factor responsible for the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Its role in the combinatorial matrix of cell functions was established long before the first report of an AHR cDNA sequence was published. It is only recently that other functions of this protein have begun to be recognized, and it is now clear that the AHR also functions in pathways outside of its well-characterized role in xenobiotic enzyme induction. Perturbation of these pathways by xenobiotic ligands may ultimately explain much of the toxicity of these compounds. This chapter focuses on the interactions of the AHR in pathways critical to cell cycle regulation, mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, differentiation and apoptosis. Ultimately, the effect of a particular AHR ligand on the biology of the organism will depend on the milieu of critical pathways and proteins expressed in specific cells and tissues with which the AHR itself interacts.

Sulfonation and phosphorylation of regions of the dioxin receptor susceptible to methionine modifications

Tagged murine dioxin receptor was purified from mammalian cells, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by capillary HPLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and -MS/MS. Several chromatographically distinct semitryptic peptides matching two regions spanning residues Glu(409)-Arg(424) and Ser(547)-Arg(555) of the dioxin receptor were revealed by de novo sequencing. Methionine residues at 418 and 548 were detected in these peptides as either unmodified or modified by moieties of 16 (oxidation) or 57 amu (S-carboxamidomethylation) or in a form corresponding to degradative removal of 105 amu from the S-carboxamidomethylated methionine. MS/MS spectra revealed that the peptides containing modified methionine residues also existed in forms with a modification of +80 amu on serine residues 411, 415, and 547. The MS/MS spectra of these peptide ions also revealed diagnostic neutral loss fragment ions of 64, 98, and/or 80 amu, and in some instances combinations of these neutral losses were apparent. Taken together, these data indicated that serines 411 and 547 of the dioxin receptor were sulfonated and serine 415 was phosphorylated. Separate digests of the dioxin receptor were prepared in H(2)(16)O and H(2)(18)O, and enzymatic dephosphorylation was subsequently performed on the H(2)(16)O digest only. The digests were mixed in equal proportions and analyzed by capillary HPLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and -MS/MS. This strategy confirmed assignment of sulfonation as the cause of the +80-amu modifications on serines 411 and 547 and phosphorylation as the predominant cause of the +80-amu modification of serine 415. The relative quantitation of phosphorylation and sulfonation enabled by this differential phosphatase strategy also suggested the presence of sulfonation on a serine other than residue 411 within the sequence spanning Glu(409)-Arg(424). This represents the first description of post-translational sulfonation sites and identification of a new phosphorylation site of the latent dioxin receptor. Furthermore this is only the second report of serine sulfonation of eukaryotic proteins. Mutagenesis studies are underway to assess the functional consequences of these modifications.

Role of cAMP in mediating AHR signaling

Regulation of the nuclear import of many transcription factors represents a step in gene regulation which is crucial for a number of cellular processes. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a basic helix-loop-helix protein of the PAS (PER-ARNT-SIM) family of transcriptional regulators is a cytosol-associated and ligand-activated receptor. The environmental toxin dioxin binds with high affinity to AHR rendering it nuclear and leading to the activation of AHR sensitive genes. However, the fact, that the AHR mediates a large variety of physiological events without the involvement of any known exogenous ligand, including liver and vascular system development, maturation of the immune system, regulation of genes involved in cellular growth, cell differentiation and circadian rhythm, speaks for an important role of AHR in cell biology independent of the presence of an exogenous ligand. Different approaches were applied to study mechanism(s) which render AHR nuclear and design its function in absence of exogenous ligands. We found that AHR is sensitive to cAMP signaling mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) which fundamentally differs from AHR signaling mediated by the exogenous ligand dioxin. It has been shown that PKA mediated signaling can be confined by compartmentalization of signaling components in microdomains conferring specificity to signaling by the ubiquitous second messenger cAMP. Moreover, A-kinase-anchoring proteins (AKAPs) and newly discovered cAMP receptors, Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP), may give us a further chance to enter into new dimensions of cAMP signal transmissions that potentially may bring us closer to AHR physiology.

Food flavonoid aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated agonistic/antagonistic/synergic activities in human and rat reporter gene assays

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor mediating the adverse effects of dioxins and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In this study, we investigated the genetic-, time-, dose-, species- and tissue-dependent AhR-mediated agonistic/antagonistic activities of three food flavonoids: quercetin, chrysin and genistein. To that end, four stably transfected cell lines were used in cell-based luciferase reporter gene assays: three lines were transformed with the ptKLuc vector harbouring four dioxin-responsive elements (DREs) upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter and the luciferase gene (HepG2-Luc, T-47D-Luc and H4IIE-ULg). The fourth is a patented cell line transformed with a different construct: H4IIE DR-CALUX((R)). Both H4IIE cells were compared for their genetic construction. Human hepatoma (HepG2-Luc) and human breast tumour (T-47D-Luc) cells were compared for tissue-dependent effects. Rat hepatoma (H4IIE-ULg) and human hepatoma (HepG2-Luc) cells were compared for species-dependent activities. We concluded that quercetin, chrysin and genistein act in a time-, dose-, species- and tissue-specific way. For example, genistein displayed agonistic activities when exposed to rat hepatoma cells during 6h but not after 24h. Flavonoids displayed agonistic/antagonistic activities in human breast tumour cells, depending on the exposure time, while in human hepatoma cells, only antagonistic activities of flavonoids were measured. In addition, we report, in all the cells, a synergy between an isoflavone and two food contaminants; the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 3-methylcholanthrene, a PAH. In rat cells, this synergy occurred when cells were exposed to flavonoids and contaminant for 6h, while it was observed in human cells only after 24h.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor cross-talks with multiple signal transduction pathways

Exposure to toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons raises a number of toxic and carcinogenic responses in experimental animals and humans mediated for the most part by the aryl hydrocarbon -- or dioxin -- receptor (AHR). The AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor whose central role in the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes has long been recognized. For quite some time now, it has become clear that the AHR also functions in pathways outside of its role in detoxification and that perturbation of these pathways by xenobiotic ligands may be an important part of the toxicity of these compounds. AHR activation by some of its ligands participates among others in pathways critical to cell cycle regulation, mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, immediate-early gene induction, cross-talk within the RB/E2F axis and mobilization of crucial calcium stores. Ultimately, the effect of a particular AHR ligand may depend as much on the adaptive interactions that it established with pathways and proteins expressed in a specific cell or tissue as on the toxic responses that it raises.

Role of mitogen-activated protein kinases in aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling

Human populations are increasingly exposed to a number of environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins. These compounds are activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) that controls the expression of many genes including those for detoxification enzymes. The regulatory mechanisms of AhR are multi-factorial and include phosphorylation by various protein kinases. Significant progress in the research of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) has been achieved in the last decade. Isolated reports have been published on the role of MAPKs in AhR functions and vice versa, with activation of MAPKs by AhR ligands. This mini-review summarizes current knowledge on the mutual interactions between MAPKs and AhR. The majority of studies has been done on cancer-derived cell lines that have impaired cell cycle regulation and lacks the complete detoxification apparatus. We emphasize the importance of the future studies that should be done on non-transformed cells to distinguish the role of MAPKs in cancer and normal cells. Primary cultures of human or rodent hepatocytes that are equipped with a fully functional biotransformation battery or xenobiotics-metabolizing extra-hepatic tissues should be the models of choice, as the results in our experiments confirm.

The dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor as a model for adaptive responses of bHLH/PAS transcription factors

This review examines the common theme of adaptive responses of bHLH/PAS proteins, using the dioxin receptor as a prototype. The bHLH/PAS family of transcriptional regulators are a group of key developmental and environmental stress sensing proteins. They employ a variety of post-translational control mechanisms to regulate their transcriptional output. Amongst this family, the dioxin receptor is best known for its ability to elicit toxic responses to dioxin and dioxin like chemicals even though it mediates more benign adaptive responses to non-toxic xenobiotics. We discuss what is known about dioxin receptor physiology, both adaptive and inherent, along with its molecular regulation and put this into the context of the wider bHLH/PAS family. We also raise the issue of its toxic responses, in particular the idea that it is the dysregulation of its poorly characterised housekeeping functions that leads to these outcomes.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and sexual differentiation of neuroendocrine functions

Historically, much of the research on health effects of environmental pollutants focused on ascertaining whether compounds were carcinogenic. More recent findings show that environmental contaminants also exert insidious effects by disrupting hormone action. Of particular concern are findings that developmental exposure to dioxins, chemicals that act through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway, permanently alters sexually differentiated neural functions in animal models. In this review, we focus on mechanisms through which dioxins disrupt neuroendocrine development as exemplified by effects on a brain region critical for ovulation in rodents. We also provide evidence that dysregulation of GABAergic neural development may be a general mechanism underlying a broad spectrum of effects seen after perinatal dioxin exposure.

Development and characterization of polyclonal antibodies against the aryl hydrocarbon receptor protein family (AHR1, AHR2, and AHR repressor) of Atlantic killifish Fundulus heteroclitus

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and AHR repressor (AHRR) proteins regulate gene expression in response to some halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The Atlantic killifish is a valuable model of the AHR signaling pathway, but antibodies are not available to fully characterize AHR and AHRR proteins. Using bacterially expressed AHRs, we developed specific and sensitive polyclonal antisera against the killifish AHR1, AHR2, and AHRR. In immunoblots, these antibodies recognized full-length killifish AHR and AHRR proteins synthesized in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, proteins expressed in mammalian cells transfected with killifish AHR and AHRR constructs, and AHR proteins in cytosol preparations from killifish tissues. Killifish AHR1 and AHR2 proteins were detected in brain, gill, kidney, heart, liver, and spleen. Antisera specifically precipitated their respective target proteins in immunoprecipitation experiments with in vitro-expressed proteins. Killifish ARNT2 co-precipitated with AHR1 and AHR2. These sensitive, specific, and versatile antibodies will be valuable to researchers investigating AHR signaling and other physiological processes involving AHR and AHRR proteins.

Regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signal transduction by protein tyrosine kinases

The involvement of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated signalling by omeprazole and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was investigated in hepatoma cells. Both omeprazole- and TCDD-dependent AhR signalling was attenuated by inhibition of c-src kinase, either by using pyrazolopyrimidine 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4 ]pyrimidine (PP1) and 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP2) inhibitors or by expression of dominant-negative c-src. These results indicate that the overall AhR function is modulated by c-src kinase activity. In contrast, a selective inhibition of omeprazole-mediated AhR signalling was revealed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, tyrphostins AG17 and AG879. Furthermore, omeprazole-dependent AhR activation was abolished by mutation of Tyr320 to Phe, suggesting that this residue is a putative phosphorylation site. TCDD-dependent AhR signalling was neither affected by tyrphostins nor by this mutation. Our results are consistent with activation of the AhR by omeprazole in a ligand-independent manner, via a signal transduction pathway that involves protein tyrosine kinases, and are different from the mechanism exerted by high-affinity ligands.

Evaluation of the role of c-Src and ERK in TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition in WB-F344 cells

TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) is the most potent tumor promoter ever tested in rodents. Although it is known that most of the effects of TCDD are mediated by binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the mechanisms leading to tumor promotion remain to be elucidated. Loss of contact-inhibition is one characteristic hallmark in tumorigenesis. In WB-F344 cells, TCDD induces a release from contact-inhibition which is manifested by a twofold increase in DNA-synthesis and cell number when TCDD (1 nmol L-1) is given to confluent cells. Because TCDD leads to phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and an increase in c-Src-activation in WB-F344 cells, we investigated the functional relevance of this observation. Pharmacological inhibition of c-Src using PP1 (10 micromol L-1) or genistein (10 micromol L-1) did not prevent TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition. In accordance, elevation of cyclin A-a previously identified target of TCDD and marker of S-phase entry-was not reduced in the presence of PP1 or genistein. Western blot analysis revealed that phosphorylation of the EGF-receptor downstream target ERK was not induced in response to TCDD. Furthermore, TCDD-dependent increase in DNA-synthesis was not inhibited by the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 (10 micromol L-1). Our data show that neither c-Src-activation, nor ERK-activation are required for TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition arguing against a functional role of EGF-receptor activation in response to TCDD in WB-F344 cells.

Phenylthiourea as a weak activator of aryl hydrocarbon receptor inhibiting 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced CYP1A1 transcription in zebrafish embryo

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that can be activated by a diverse synthetic and naturally-occurring chemicals, such as the halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) and the non-halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The liganded AHR modulates the genetic activity of a variety of xenobiotic-responsive genes, including cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1). The tyrosinase inhibitor 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU) is widely used in zebrafish research to suppress pigmentation in developing embryos/fry. Here we showed that 0.2 mM PTU induced a basal level of CYP1A1 transcription in zebrafish embryonic integument as early as 24 h postfertilization (hpf) stage. Subsequently, PTU induced CYP1A1 transcription in blood vessels at 36 hpf. During larval stage, the liver and all pharyngeal arch vessels of PTU-treated embryos exhibited CYP1A1 transcription as well. Comparing to TCDD, PTU induces CYP1A1 transcription with much lower efficacy in zebrafish embryos. Coincubating the embryos with PTU and TCDD led to repressing TCDD-induced CYP1A1 transcription. Mechanistic studies indicated that both of PTU- and TCDD-mediated CYP1A1 transcriptions are modulated by the same AHR-ARNT signaling pathway.

The role of protein tyrosine kinases in CYP1A1 induction by omeprazole and thiabendazole in rat hepatocytes

Benzimidazoles compounds like omeprazole (OME) and thiabendazole (TBZ) mediate CYP1A1 induction differently from classical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). To clarify the involvement of an intracellular signal pathway in CYP1A1 induction by OME and TBZ, the TBZ, OME and 3-MC signal-transducing pathways were compared by using specific protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors in primary culture of rat hepatocytes. The effect of OME and TBZ (75-250 microM) on cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) expression was therefore studied in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes after 24 h, 48 h and 72 h of exposure. Both compounds provoked a dose- and time-dependent increase in CYP1A1 (EROD activity, protein and mRNA levels), but OME was less effective at all the concentrations and times tested. The mechanism of benzimidazole-mediated induction of CYP1A1 was investigated by comparison with 3-MC, a prototypical AhR ligand. As expected, OME and TBZ were unable to displace [(3)H]-TCDD from its binding sites to the AhR in competitive binding studies. Moreover, classic tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin A (HA) inhibited the two benzimidazoles-mediated CYP1A1 inductions, but only partially inhibited the 3-MC-mediated one. Another two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Lavendustin A (LA) and genistein (GEN), had no effect on CYP1A1 induction by benzimidazoles and 3-MC. These results are consistent with the implication of a tyrosine kinase, most probably the Src tyrosine kinase, in the mechanism of CYP1A1 induction in rat hepatocytes.

Induction of CYP1A1 in primary rat hepatocytes by 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl: evidence for a switch circuit element

In vivo induction of CYP1A1 in hepatocytes by aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists is heterogeneous. Using immunohistochemistry, cells appear to be either induced or not induced as if the response of an individual cell is better represented as a switch. We have examined induction of CYP1A1 in vitro in primary rat hepatocytes to distinguish the responses of populations of cells and responses of individual cells. Cells were treated with various concentrations of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl. Concentration-response and time-course responses were determined for the population of cells by Western blotting for CYP1A1 protein and by real-time RT-PCR for CYP1A1 mRNA. Individual cell responses were visualized by immunocytochemistry (ICC) for protein and by in situ hybridization (ISH) for mRNA. CYP1A1 mRNA was quantified by frequency distribution analysis of grains observed on the ISH slides. Population responses showed time- and concentration-related increases in induction. Single cell responses appeared as all-or-none in the field, with cells appearing to be induced and others appearing to be not induced. Even at the highest concentrations (2.5 x 10(-7) M), some hepatocytes remained unresponsive. Distribution frequencies of single cell induction were more consistent with a switch with variable levels of induction in cells depending on treatment concentration. Combined with the reports from in vivo studies, our results support a switch with rheostat behavior for individual hepatocytes. Mechanistic studies in liver cell lines that are confirmed to exhibit switch-like induction of single cells will be necessary to assess the molecular pathways of this circuit element.

Protein kinase C delta is activated in mouse ovarian surface epithelial cancer cells by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)

Interactions between the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways are governed in cell and tissue-specific manners, albeit the physiological significance of which is unclear. This research sought to define the effects of TCDD on the PKC pathway using a mouse ovarian surface epithelial cancer cell line (ID8). Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) potentiated (1 nM) TCDD-induced 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity after 24h of treatment, and pre-treatment with (1 microM) of either a general PKC inhibitor (BisI) or PKCdelta-specific inhibitor (Rotterlin) abolished the potentiation indicating that activation of PKC enhances TCDD signal transduction. Western blot analysis revealed that unstimulated ID8 cells express PKCalpha, beta, epsilon, tau, lambda and RACK1. PKCgamma, eta, theta and DGKtheta were not detected. TCDD (1 nM) increased PKCdelta protein approximately eight-fold after 24h of treatment and this effect was dose-dependent (0.1-100 nM); other PKC isoforms and related signaling proteins tested were unaffected by TCDD treatment. Immunofluorescent microscopy revealed that TCDD (1 nM) promoted the subcellular redistribution of PKCdelta, from the cytoplasm and the nucleus to the perinuclear area after 2h of treatment, however, after 24h of treatment PKCdelta was observed in nuclear structures that resembled nucleoli. TCDD (1 nM) also increased total PKC and PKCdelta-specific kinase activities in biphasic time-responsive manners. Total PKC and PKCdelta-specific activities increased after 1-2h of treatment. Then TCDD increased the total PKC activity again after 12h of treatment, whereas, PKCdelta-specific activity resurged at 24h and remained elevated at 48 h after treatment. The results indicate that TCDD preferentially induces PKCdelta protein expression and phosphotransferase activity, and its membrane translocation, indicating a potential intracellular role for PKCdelta as an effector molecule for TCDD-mediated biological events in this ovarian cancer cell line.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) tyrosine 9, a residue that is essential for AhR DNA binding activity, is not a phosphoresidue but augments AhR phosphorylation

We delineate a mechanism by which dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin or TCDD)-mediated formation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) DNA binding complex is disrupted by a single mutation at the conserved AhR tyrosine 9. Replacement of tyrosine 9 with the structurally conservative phenylalanine (AhRY9F) abolished binding to dioxin response element (DRE) D, E, and A and abrogated DRE-driven gene induction mediated by the AhR with no effect on TCDD binding, TCDD-induced nuclear localization, or ARNT heterodimerization. The speculated role for phosphorylation at tyrosine 9 was also examined. Anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblotting could not detect a major difference between the AhRY9F mutant and wild-type AhR, but a basic isoelectric point shift was detected by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of AhRY9F. However, an antibody raised to recognize only phosphorylated tyrosine 9 (anti-AhRpY9) confirmed that AhR tyrosine 9 is not a phosphorylated residue required for DRE binding. Kinase assays using synthetic peptides corresponding to the wild-type and mutant AhR residues 1-23 demonstrated that a tyrosine at position 9 is important for substrate recognition at serine(s)/threonine(s) within this sequence by purified protein kinase C (PKC). Also, compared with AhRY9F, immunopurified full-length wild-type receptor was more rapidly phosphorylated by PKC. Furthermore, co-treatment of AhR-deficient cells that expressed AhRY9F and a DRE-driven luciferase construct with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and TCDD resulted in a 30% increase in luciferase activity compared with AhRY9F treated with TCDD alone. Overall, AhR tyrosine 9, which is not a phosphorylated residue itself but is required for DNA binding, appears to play a crucial role in AhR activity by permitting proper phosphorylation of the AhR.

The Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitor SP600125 is a ligand and antagonist of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor

Exposure of the immortalized human breast epithelial cell line MCF10A to the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor anthra[1,9-cd]pyrazol-6(2H)-one (SP600125) suppressed, in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50 is approximately 2 microM), the induction of CYP1A1 by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Cotreatment with SP600125 also suppressed the accumulation of TCDD-induced nuclear aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-DNA complexes, as assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Concentrations of SP600125 < or = 50 microM did not transform the AhR into a DNA-binding species when added to rat liver cytosol. However, addition of SP600125 to cytosol just before TCDD addition completely suppressed AhR transformation and DNA binding (IC50 approximately 7 microM). Sucrose gradient analyses using rat liver and murine hepatoma 1c1c7 extracts demonstrated that SP600125 competed with TCDD for binding to the AhR. These results suggest that SP600125 is an AhR ligand and functions as an AhR antagonist at concentrations used to pharmacologically inhibit JNK.

Functional activation of arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in primary T cells by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exerts diverse adverse health effects by activating the transcription factor arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR). The activated AhR induces the expression of various genes having xenobiotic responsive elements (XREs) in their enhancer regions, such as the gene for cytochrome P-450 1A1 (CYP1A1). The immune system is sensitively affected by TCDD, while the precise mechanism of how TCDD acts in each immune cell type remains to be determined. The results of previous studies on AhR activation in B cell lines, T cell clones, and thymocytes, which mainly consist of immature T cells, suggested that AhR in mature T cells is inactive, whereas that in B cells and immature T cells act functionally. In the present study, we investigated whether or not TCDD induces the CYP1A1 gene by functionally activating AhR in primary mature T cells in mice. When the splenocytes that contain mature T and B lymphocytes as their predominant cell types or the thymocytes were cultured in the presence of TCDD, each of them showed a similar magnitude of CYP1A1 induction with a peak induction at 4 h. Both mature T cells and B cells that had been separated from total splenocytes also showed CYP1A1 induction at the same magnitude with a peak induction at 4 h. Gene expression of CYP1A1 was observed at 0.1 nM or greater concentrations of TCDD in splenocytes and separated T cells. The induction of CYP1A1 in T cells was confirmed in mice exposed to TCDD. These results indicate that TCDD induces the functional activation of AhR in primary mature T cells in mice.

A dynamic role for the Ah receptor in cell signaling? Insights from a diverse group of Ah receptor interacting proteins

The aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor (AhR) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) transcription factor family. Consistent with the notion that PAS proteins are biological sensors, AhR binding to Ah toxicants induces or represses transcription of a wide range of genes and results in a cascade of toxic responses. However, an endogenous role for AhR in development and homeostasis is supported by (1) the discovery of low affinity, endogenous ligands; (2) studies demonstrating a role for the receptor in development of liver and vascular systems, that were established using mice lacking AhR expression; and (3) the presence of functional dioxin-responsive elements in promoter regions of genes involved in cellular growth and differentiation. A large body of recent literature has implicated AhR in multiple signal transduction pathways. AhR is known to interact with signaling pathways that are mediated by estrogen receptor and other hormone receptors, hypoxia, nuclear factor kappaB, and retinoblastoma protein. In addition, AhR complexes may affect cellular signaling through interactions with various other regulatory and signaling proteins, including PAS heterodimerization partners (ARNT), chaperone and immunophilin-like proteins (e.g. HSP90, XAP2/ARA9/AIP, p23), protein kinases and phosphatases (e.g. tyrosine kinases, casein kinase 2, protein kinase C), and coactivators (e.g. SRC-1, RIP 140, CBP/p300). Here we summarize the types of molecular cross talk that have been identified between AhR and cell signaling pathways.

Mutational analysis of the mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor tyrosine residues necessary for recognition of dioxin response elements

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a member of the basic helix-loop-helix/PER-ARNT-SIM transcription factor family, has been shown to regulate its dioxin response elements (DRE) binding ability, although no specific residues have been directly demonstrated to be phosphorylated. Of the 23 tyrosines in the mouse AhR, 19 are conserved across all mammalian species sequenced thus far. The studies presented here were conducted to examine tyrosine residue(s) that are both likely candidates of phosphorylation and necessary for DNA binding and/or transcriptional activity of the AhR. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of phosphatase-treated AhR indicated that the receptor is phosphorylated on serine/threonine and tyrosine residues. Computational analysis predicted several highly conserved tyrosine residues to be phosphorylated. Both the N terminus (amino acids 1-399) and the C terminus (amino acids 399-805) of the mouse receptor synthesized in vitro using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system are tyrosine phosphorylated as detected by antiphosphotyrosine antibodies. Furthermore, the N-terminal AhR bound DRE in a ligand-dependent manner similar to that by the full-length receptor, suggesting that phosphorylated tyrosines involved in DNA binding are likely located in the region between residues 1 and 399. Mouse AhR tyrosine (Y) residues were evaluated by phenylalanine (F) mutational analysis for both DNA binding (electrophoretic mobility shift assays; EMSAs) and ability to induce a DRE-driven reporter gene in transiently transfected AhR-deficient cells. Of the 12 tyrosine residues in the N-terminal AhR, only a tyrosine 9 mutant (AhRY9F) significantly decreased DRE binding as determined by EMSA. Similarly, only the AhRY9F mutant decreased the DRE-driven luciferase expression in AhR-deficient cells. Overall, these data strongly suggest that the putative posttranslational modification at, or mediated by, tyrosine 9, and not any other individual mouse AhR tyrosine residue, is necessary for AhR DRE binding and transcriptional activity.

P23 enhances the formation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-DNA complex

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that requires heterodimerization with its partner, the Ah receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt), for activation of transcription. The heterodimer specifically recognizes the dioxin response element (DRE), which contains a core sequence (5'-TNGCGTG-3'). This AhR/Arnt/DRE complex has been well characterized and can be observed readily by the gel shift assay. Human AhR and Arnt with a C-terminal histidine tag have been expressed functionally using a baculovirus expression system. However, after purification of these proteins using the metal resin, they are not able to bind the response element in a ligand-dependent manner unless crude extracts, such as the rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL), are reconstituted with these proteins. Proteins in the RRL are responsible for this restoration of the gel shift complex because the activity is sensitive to both heat and proteolytic treatments. We have examined whether hsp90 and p23 are among the protein factors in the RRL that are responsible for this activity. By performing fractionation studies using filtration devices and immunodepletion studies, we have selectively fractionated these proteins. Among all the fractions, the centricon-10 retentate, which contains 100% of p23 but no hsp90, possessed the most enriched activity. Purified bacterial-expressed p23 restored the gel shift complex; the mechanism was mediated at the heterodimerization step and was hsp90-dependent.

Functional role of AhR in the expression of toxic effects by TCDD

Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) is one of the xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (XMEs), which is induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The most potent inducer of CYP1A1 is 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). In addition, TCDD induces a broad spectrum of biochemical and toxic effects, such as teratogenesis, immunosuppression and tumor promotion. Most, if not all, of the effects caused by TCDD and other PAHs are known to be mediated by AhR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor or dioxin receptor) which has a high binding affinity to TCDD. The liganded AhR translocates from cytoplasm to nuclei where it switches its partner molecule from Hsp90 to Arnt. Thus formed AhR/Arnt heterodimer binds a specific DNA sequence designated XRE in the promoter region of the target genes including CYP1A1, UDP-glucuronosyl transferase and others to enhance their expression. Although it remains to be studied how AhR is involved in the other TCDD-induced biological effects such as teratogenesis and immunosuppression than induction of XMEs, it is believed that these adverse TCDD effects are caused by untimely activation of gene expression by ligand-activated AhR in the biological process. We summarize the present knowledge about functional role of AhR in TCDD-induced biological effects.

Characterization of the phosphorylation status of the hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2

The cytosolic Ah receptor (AhR) heterocomplex consists of one molecule of the AhR, a 90-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90) dimer, and one molecule of the hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP2). Serine residues 43,53,131-2, and 329 on XAP2-FLAG were identified as putative phosphorylation sites using site-directed mutagenesis followed by two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping analysis. Protein kinase CK2 (CK2) was identified as the 45-kDa kinase from COS 1 cell or liver extracts that was responsible for phosphorylation of serine 43 in the XAP2 peptide 39-57. Loss of phosphorylation at any or all of the serine residues did not significantly affect the ability of XAP2-FLAG to bind to the murine AhR in rabbit reticulocyte lysate or Hsp90 in COS-1 cells. Furthermore, all of these serine mutants were able to sequester murine AhR-YFP into the cytoplasm as well as wild-type XAP2. YFP-XAP2 S53A was unable to enter the nucleus, indicating a potential role of phosphorylation in nuclear translocation of XAP2.

DNA binding and protein interactions of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer that facilitate gene activation

Gene activation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and its DNA binding partner, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) requires a number of sequential steps that occur following the binding of ligand and entry of the AHR into the nuclear compartment. This includes heterodimerization of the AHR and ARNT, formation of the appropriate amino acid/nucleotide contacts at the GCGTG recognition site and interactions between either the AHR or ARNT with proteins that facilitate changes in chromatin structure. The majority of these steps are likely modulated by changes in both phosphorylation and oxidation status of the AHR, ARNT and associated proteins. Studies of both the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors and the nuclear hormone receptor family can provide significant insights into how this unique signaling pathway activates its target genes.

Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cell cycle regulation

Traditionally, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is considered to be a ligand-activated receptor and transcription factor responsible for the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Its role in the combinatorial matrix of cell functions was neatly established long before the first report of an AHR cDNA sequence was published. Only recently, other functions of this protein have begun to be recognized. This review addresses novel findings relating to AHR functions that have resulted from experimental approaches markedly outside traditional receptor analyses. Here we examine the aspects of AHR biology relevant to its role in cell cycle regulation, from the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases to the cross-talk between AHR and the RAS pathway and the functional significance of the interaction between AHR and the retinoblastoma protein. We have attempted to provide the reader with a balanced interpretation of the evidence, highlighting areas of consensus as well as areas still being contested.

Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) by aromatic hydrocarbons: role in the regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) function

The aromatic hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor (AHR) is the only known cellular receptor of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and of many other widespread environmental contaminants that cause diverse toxic effects in animals and humans. Most, if not all, the biological effects of TCDD are mediated by the activation of AHR, which is a ligand-activated transcription factor required for ligand-induced expression of several detoxification genes, including those encoding for cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1. Environmental agents also activate several mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, believed to modulate transcription factor function and to regulate gene expression. However, the contribution to TCDD toxicity resulting from cross-talk between AHR and MAPK pathways has yet to be determined. In this study, we show that TCDD and other AHR ligands induced the immediate activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases and the Jun N-terminal kinases, but not the p38 MAPKs. MAPK activation by TCDD did not require the AHR, since it occurred equally well in AHR-negative CV-1 cells and in Ahr (-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts as in AHR-positive cells. Distinct from serum factors and the tumor promoter TPA-induced MAPKs, which resulted in transcriptional activation of ELK or c-JUN, TCDD-stimulated MAPKs were critical for the induction of AHR-dependent gene transcription and CYP1A1 expression. These data indicate that AHR ligands elicit AHR-independent non-genomic events that are essential for AHR activation and function.

Posttranslational mechanisms regulate the mammalian circadian clock

We have examined posttranslational regulation of clock proteins in mouse liver in vivo. The mouse PERIOD proteins (mPER1 and mPER2), CLOCK, and BMAL1 undergo robust circadian changes in phosphorylation. These proteins, the cryptochromes (mCRY1 and mCRY2), and casein kinase I epsilon (CKIepsilon) form multimeric complexes that are bound to DNA during negative transcriptional feedback. CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimers remain bound to DNA over the circadian cycle. The temporal increase in mPER abundance controls the negative feedback interactions. Analysis of clock proteins in mCRY-deficient mice shows that the mCRYs are necessary for stabilizing phosphorylated mPER2 and for the nuclear accumulation of mPER1, mPER2, and CKIepsilon. We also provide in vivo evidence that casein kinase I delta is a second clock relevant kinase.