1
|
Berkowitz SA, Larson N, Bou-Assaf G, Laue T. Rapid high-resolution size distribution protocol for adeno-associated virus using high speed SV-AUC. Anal Biochem 2024; 689:115482. [PMID: 38342199 DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2024.115482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Simulated SV-AUC data for an adeno-associated virus (AAV) sample consisting of four components having closely spaced sedimentation coefficients were used to develop a high-speed protocol that optimized the size distribution analysis resolution. The resulting high speed (45K rpm) SV-AUC (hs-SV-AUC) protocol poses several experimental challenges: 1) the need for rapid data acquisition, 2) increased potential for optical artifacts from steep and fast moving boundaries and 3) the increased potential for convection. To overcome these challenges the protocol uses interference detection at low temperatures and data that are confined to a limited radial-time window. In addition to providing higher resolution AAV SV-AUC data and very short run times (<20 min after temperature equilibration), the need to match the sample and reference solvent composition and meniscus positions is relaxed making interference detection as simple to employ as absorbance detection. Finally, experimental data comparing hs-SV-AUC (at 45K rpm) with standard low-speed (15K rpm) SV-AUC on the same AAV sample demonstrate the size distribution resolution improvement. These experiments also validate the use of a radial-time window and show how quickly data can be acquired using the hs-SV-AUC protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas Larson
- Analytical Development, Biogen, 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - George Bou-Assaf
- Analytical Development, Biogen, 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Thomas Laue
- University of New Hampshire, 10 Kelsey Road, Lee, NH, 03861, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yarawsky AE, Gough ES, Zai-Rose V, Figueroa NI, Cunningham HM, Burgner JW, DeLion MT, Paul LN. BASIS: BioAnalysis SEDFIT integrated software for cGMP analysis of SV-AUC data. EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL : EBJ 2024; 53:111-121. [PMID: 38329496 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-024-01700-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV-AUC) has long been an important method for characterization of antibody therapeutics. Recently, SV-AUC has experienced a wave of new interest and usage from the gene and cell therapy industry, where SV-AUC has proven itself to be the "gold standard" analytical approach for determining capsid loading ratios for adeno-associated virus (AAV) and other viral vectors. While other more common approaches have existed in the realm of cGMP-compliant techniques for years, SV-AUC has long been used strictly for characterization, but not for release testing. This manuscript describes the challenges faced in bringing SV-AUC to a cGMP environment and describes a new program, "BASIS", which allows for 21 CFR Part 11-compliant data handling and data analysis using the well-known and frequently cited SEDFIT analysis software.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erik S Gough
- BioAnalysis, LLC, 3401 I Street Suite 206, Philadelphia, PA, 19134, USA
| | - Valeria Zai-Rose
- BioAnalysis, LLC, 3401 I Street Suite 206, Philadelphia, PA, 19134, USA
| | | | | | - John W Burgner
- BioAnalysis, LLC, 3401 I Street Suite 206, Philadelphia, PA, 19134, USA
| | - Michael T DeLion
- BioAnalysis, LLC, 3401 I Street Suite 206, Philadelphia, PA, 19134, USA
| | - Lake N Paul
- BioAnalysis, LLC, 3401 I Street Suite 206, Philadelphia, PA, 19134, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demeler B. Methods for the Design and Analysis of Analytical Ultracentrifugation Experiments. Curr Protoc 2024; 4:e974. [PMID: 38319042 PMCID: PMC10857736 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments play an integral role in the solution-phase characterization of biological macromolecules and their interactions. This unit discusses the design of sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium experiments performed with a Beckman Proteomelab XL-A or XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge and with a Beckman Optima AUC. Instrument settings and experimental design considerations are explained, and strategies for the analysis of experimental data with the UltraScan data analysis software package are presented. Special attention is paid to the strengths and weaknesses of the available detectors, and guidance is provided on how to extract maximum information from analytical ultracentrifugation experiments. © 2024 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borries Demeler
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuck P, To SC, Zhao H. An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011454. [PMID: 37669309 PMCID: PMC10503714 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV-AUC) is an indispensable tool for the study of particle size distributions in biopharmaceutical industry, for example, to characterize protein therapeutics and vaccine products. In particular, the diffusion-deconvoluted sedimentation coefficient distribution analysis, in the software SEDFIT, has found widespread applications due to its relatively high resolution and sensitivity. However, a lack of suitable software compatible with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) has hampered the use of SV-AUC in this regulatory environment. To address this, we have created an interface for SEDFIT so that it can serve as an automatically spawned module with controlled data input through command line parameters and output of key results in files. The interface can be integrated in custom GMP compatible software, and in scripts that provide documentation and meta-analyses for replicate or related samples, for example, to streamline analysis of large families of experimental data, such as binding isotherm analyses in the study of protein interactions. To test and demonstrate this approach we provide a MATLAB script mlSEDFIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schuck
- Laboratory of Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Samuel C. To
- Laboratory of Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Huaying Zhao
- Laboratory of Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brautigam CA. SViMULATE: a computer program facilitating interactive, multi-mode simulation of analytical ultracentrifugation data. EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL : EBJ 2023; 52:293-302. [PMID: 36890221 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-023-01637-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
The ability to simulate sedimentation velocity (SV) analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) experiments has proved to be a valuable tool for research planning, hypothesis testing, and pedagogy. Several options for SV data simulation exist, but they often lack interactivity and require up-front calculations on the part of the user. This work introduces SViMULATE, a program designed to make AUC experimental simulation quick, straightforward, and interactive. SViMULATE takes user-provided parameters and outputs simulated AUC data in a format suitable for subsequent analyses, if desired. The user is not burdened by the necessity to calculate hydrodynamic parameters for simulated macromolecules, as the program can compute these properties on the fly. It also frees the user of decisions regarding simulation stop time. SViMULATE features a graphical view of the species that are under simulation, and there is no limit on their number. Additionally, the program emulates data from different experimental modalities and data-acquisition systems, including the realistic simulation of noise for the absorbance optical system. The executable is available for immediate download.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad A Brautigam
- Departments of Biophysics and Microbiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schuck P, To SC, Zhao H. An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.14.540690. [PMID: 37425873 PMCID: PMC10327192 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.14.540690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV-AUC) is an indispensable tool for the study of particle size distributions in biopharmaceutical industry, for example, to characterize protein therapeutics and vaccine products. In particular, the diffusion-deconvoluted sedimentation coefficient distribution analysis, in the software SEDFIT, has found widespread applications due to its relatively high resolution and sensitivity. However, a lack of available software compatible with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) has hampered the use of SV-AUC in this regulatory environment. To address this, we have created an interface for SEDFIT so that it can serve as an automatically spawned module with controlled data input through command line parameters and output of key results in files. The interface can be integrated in custom GMP compatible software, and in scripts that provide documentation and meta-analyses for replicate or related samples, for example, to streamline analysis of large families of experimental data, such as binding isotherm analyses in the study of protein interactions. To test and demonstrate this approach we provide a MATLAB script mlSEDFIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schuck
- Laboratory of Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Samuel C. To
- Laboratory of Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Huaying Zhao
- Laboratory of Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uttinger MJ, Hundschell CS, Lautenbach V, Pusara S, Bäther S, Heyn TR, Keppler JK, Wenzel W, Walter J, Kozlowska M, Wagemans AM, Peukert W. Determination of specific and non-specific protein-protein interactions for beta-lactoglobulin by analytical ultracentrifugation and membrane osmometry experiments. SOFT MATTER 2022; 18:6739-6756. [PMID: 36040122 DOI: 10.1039/d2sm00908k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are essential for the understanding of biological processes. Specific protein aggregation is an important aspect for many biological systems. In particular, electrostatic interactions play the key role for protein-protein interactions, as many amino acids have pH-dependent charge states. Moreover, protein dissociation is directly related to the solution pH, ionic strength, temperature and protein concentration. The subtle interplay between different specific and non-specific interactions is demonstrated for beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) with a focus on low salt concentrations, thus mimicking technically relevant processing conditions. BLG is a well-characterized model system, proven to attain its monomer-dimer equilibrium strongly dependent upon the pH of the solution. In this manuscript, we present a unique combination of analytical ultracentrifugation and membrane osmometry experiments, which quantifies specific and non-specific interactions, i.e. in terms of the dimer dissociation constants and the second osmotic virial coefficient, at pH 3 and 7 and sodium chloride concentrations of 10 mM and 100 mM. This provides direct insight to protein-protein interactions for a system with a concentration-dependent monomer-dimer equilibrium. Moreover, using a coarse-grained extended DLVO model in combination with molecular dynamics simulations, we quantify non-specific monomer-monomer, monomer-dimer and dimer-dimer interactions as well as the binding free energy of BLG dimerization from theoretical calculations. The experimentally determined interactions are shown to be mainly governed by electrostatic interactions and further agree with free energy calculations. Our experimental protocol aims to determine non-specific and specific interactions for a dynamically interacting system and provides an understanding of protein-protein interactions for BLG at low salt concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Uttinger
- Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Haberstraße 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - C S Hundschell
- Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Department of Food Colloids, Technical University Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
| | - V Lautenbach
- Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Haberstraße 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - S Pusara
- Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - S Bäther
- Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Department of Food Colloids, Technical University Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
| | - T R Heyn
- Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Division of Food Technology, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - J K Keppler
- Laboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - W Wenzel
- Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - J Walter
- Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Haberstraße 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - M Kozlowska
- Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - A M Wagemans
- Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Department of Food Colloids, Technical University Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
| | - W Peukert
- Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Haberstraße 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kieserling H, Giefer P, Uttinger MJ, Lautenbach V, Nguyen T, Sevenich R, Lübbert C, Rauh C, Peukert W, Fritsching U, Drusch S, Maria Wagemans A. Structure and adsorption behavior of high hydrostatic pressure-treated β-lactoglobulin. J Colloid Interface Sci 2021; 596:173-183. [PMID: 33839350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS High hydrostatic pressure treatment causes structural changes in interfacial-active β-lactoglobulin (β-lg). We hypothesized that the pressure-induced structural changes affect the intra- and intermolecular interactions which determine the interfacial activity of β-lg. The conducted experimental and numerical investigations could contribute to the mechanistic understanding of the adsorption behavior of proteins in food-related emulsions. EXPERIMENTS We treated β-lg in water at pH 7 with high hydrostatic pressures up to 600 MPa for 10 min at 20 °C. The secondary structure was characterized with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and circular dichroism (CD), the surface hydrophobicity and charge with fluorescence-spectroscopy and ζ-potential, and the quaternary structure with membrane-osmometry, analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) and mass spectrometry (MS). Experimental analyses were supported through molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. The adsorption behavior was investigated with pendant drop analysis. FINDINGS MD simulation revealed a pressure-induced molten globule state of β-lg, confirmed by an unfolding of β-sheets with FTIR, a stabilization of α-helices with CD and loss in tertiary structure induced by an increase in surface hydrophobicity. Membrane-osmometry, AUC and MS indicated the formation of non-covalently linked dimers that migrated slower through the water phase, adsorbed more quickly due to hydrophobic interactions with the oil, and lowered the interfacial tension more strongly than reference β-lg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Kieserling
- Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Food Colloids, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Patrick Giefer
- Leibniz Institute for Materials Engineering-IWT, Particles and Process Engineering, Badgasteiner Str. 3, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
| | - Maximilian J Uttinger
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Haberstrasse 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Vanessa Lautenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Haberstrasse 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Thu Nguyen
- Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Food Colloids, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Robert Sevenich
- Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Food Biotechnology and Process Engineering, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christian Lübbert
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Haberstrasse 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Rauh
- Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Food Biotechnology and Process Engineering, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Peukert
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute of Particle Technology, Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Haberstrasse 9a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Udo Fritsching
- Leibniz Institute for Materials Engineering-IWT, Particles and Process Engineering, Badgasteiner Str. 3, 28359 Bremen, Germany; University of Bremen, Particles and Process Engineering, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
| | - Stephan Drusch
- Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Food Technology and Food Material Science, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Anja Maria Wagemans
- Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Food Colloids, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Juul-Madsen K, Zhao H, Vorup-Jensen T, Schuck P. Efficient data acquisition with three-channel centerpieces in sedimentation velocity. Anal Biochem 2019; 586:113414. [PMID: 31493371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.113414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Three-channel 3D printed centerpieces with two sample sectors next to a joint solvent reference sector were recently described as a strategy to double the throughput of sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation experiments [Anal. Chem. 91 (2019) 5866-5873]. They are compatible with Rayleigh interference optical detection in commercial analytical ultracentrifuges, but require the rotor angles of data acquisition to be repeatedly adjusted during the experiment to record data from the two sample sectors. Here we present an approach to automate this data acquisition mode through the use of a secondary, general-purpose automation software, and an accompanying data pre-processing software for scan sorting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Juul-Madsen
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Biophysical Immunology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Huaying Zhao
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas Vorup-Jensen
- Biophysical Immunology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Schuck
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
To SC, Brautigam CA, Chaturvedi SK, Bollard MT, Krynitsky J, Kakareka JW, Pohida TJ, Zhao H, Schuck P. Enhanced Sample Handling for Analytical Ultracentrifugation with 3D-Printed Centerpieces. Anal Chem 2019; 91:5866-5873. [PMID: 30933465 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The centerpiece of the sample cell assembly in analytical ultracentrifugation holds the sample solution between windows, sealed against high vacuum, and is shaped such that macromolecular migration in centrifugal fields exceeding 200 000g can proceed undisturbed by walls or convection while concentration profiles are imaged with optical detection systems aligned perpendicular to the plane of rotation. We have recently shown that 3D printing using various materials allows inexpensive and rapid manufacturing of centerpieces. In the present work, we expand this endeavor to examine the accuracy of the measured sedimentation process, as well as short-term durability of the centerpieces. We find that 3D-printed centerpieces can be used many times and can provide data equivalent in quality to commonly used commercial epoxy resin centerpieces. Furthermore, 3D printing enables novel designs adapted to particular experimental objectives because they offer unique opportunities, for example, to create well-defined curved surfaces, narrow channels, and embossed features. We present examples of centerpiece designs exploiting these capabilities for improved AUC experiments. This includes narrow sector centerpieces that substantially reduce the required sample volume while maintaining the standard optical path length; thin centerpieces with integrated window holders to provide very short optical pathlengths that reduce optical aberrations at high macromolecular concentrations; long-column centerpieces that increase the observable distance of macromolecular migration for higher-precision sedimentation coefficients; and three-sector centerpieces that allow doubling the number of samples in a single run while reducing the sample volumes. We find each of these designs allows unimpeded macromolecular sedimentation and can provide high-quality sedimentation data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel C To
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - Chad A Brautigam
- Departments of Biophysics and Microbiology , UT Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , Texas 75390 , United States
| | - Sumit K Chaturvedi
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - Mary T Bollard
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - Jonathan Krynitsky
- Office of Intramural Research , Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - John W Kakareka
- Office of Intramural Research , Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - Thomas J Pohida
- Office of Intramural Research , Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - Huaying Zhao
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| | - Peter Schuck
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chaturvedi SK, Schuck P. A Reappraisal of Sedimentation Nonideality Coefficients for the Analysis of Weak Interactions of Therapeutic Proteins. AAPS JOURNAL 2019; 21:35. [PMID: 30815745 PMCID: PMC6394620 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0307-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The study of weak or colloidal interactions of therapeutic proteins in different formulations allows prediction and optimization of protein stability. Various biophysical techniques have been applied to determine the second osmotic virial coefficient B2 as it reflects on the macromolecular distance distribution that governs solution behavior at high concentration. In the present work, we exploit a direct link predicted by hydrodynamic theory between B2 and the nonideality of sedimentation, commonly measured in sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation through the nonideality coefficient of sedimentation, kS. Using sedimentation equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation for independent measurement of B2, we have examined the dependence of kS on B2 for model proteins in different buffers. The data exhibit the expected linear relationship and highlight the impact of protein shape on the magnitude of the nonideality coefficient kS. Recently, measurements of kS have been considerably simplified allowing higher throughput and simultaneous polydispersity assessment at higher protein concentrations. Thus, sedimentation velocity may offer a useful approach to compare the impact of formulation conditions on weak interactions and simultaneously on higher-order structure of therapeutic proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit K Chaturvedi
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 13 South Drive, Bldg. 13, Rm 3N17, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA
| | - Peter Schuck
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 13 South Drive, Bldg. 13, Rm 3N17, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chassé MH, Muthurajan UM, Clark NJ, Kramer MA, Chakravarthy S, Irving T, Luger K. Biochemical and Biophysical Methods for Analysis of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 and Its Interactions with Chromatin. Methods Mol Biol 2017; 1608:231-253. [PMID: 28695514 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6993-7_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase I (PARP-1) is a first responder to DNA damage and participates in the regulation of gene expression. The interaction of PARP-1 with chromatin and DNA is complex and involves at least two different modes of interaction. In its enzymatically inactive state, PARP-1 binds native chromatin with similar affinity as it binds free DNA ends. Automodification of PARP-1 affects interaction with chromatin and DNA to different extents. Here we describe a series of biochemical and biophysical techniques to quantify and dissect the different binding modes of PARP-1 with its various substrates. The techniques listed here allow for high throughput and quantitative measurements of the interaction of different PARP-1 constructs (inactive and automodified) with chromatin and DNA damage models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie H Chassé
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.,Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Uma M Muthurajan
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA
| | | | | | - Srinivas Chakravarthy
- BioCAT, CSRRI and Department BCS, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas Irving
- BioCAT, CSRRI and Department BCS, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karolin Luger
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA. .,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA. .,Institute for Genome Architecture and Function, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Montecinos-Franjola F, Schuck P, Sackett DL. Tubulin Dimer Reversible Dissociation: AFFINITY, KINETICS, AND DEMONSTRATION OF A STABLE MONOMER. J Biol Chem 2016; 291:9281-94. [PMID: 26934918 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.699728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Tubulins are evolutionarily conserved proteins that reversibly polymerize and direct intracellular traffic. Of the tubulin family only αβ-tubulin forms stable dimers. We investigated the monomer-dimer equilibrium of rat brain αβ-tubulin using analytical ultracentrifugation and fluorescence anisotropy, observing tubulin in virtually fully monomeric and dimeric states. Monomeric tubulin was stable for a few hours and exchanged into preformed dimers, demonstrating reversibility of dimer dissociation. Global analysis combining sedimentation velocity and fluorescence anisotropy yielded Kd = 84 (54-123) nm Dimer dissociation kinetics were measured by analyzing the shape of the sedimentation boundary and by the relaxation of fluorescence anisotropy following rapid dilution of labeled tubulin, yielding koff in the range 10(-3)-10(-2) s(-1) Thus, tubulin dimers reversibly dissociate with moderately fast kinetics. Monomer-monomer association is much less sensitive than dimer-dimer association to solution changes (GTP/GDP, urea, and trimethylamine oxide).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Schuck
- the Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NHBLI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - Dan L Sackett
- From the Program in Physical Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD and
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Muthurajan U, Mattiroli F, Bergeron S, Zhou K, Gu Y, Chakravarthy S, Dyer P, Irving T, Luger K. In Vitro Chromatin Assembly: Strategies and Quality Control. Methods Enzymol 2016; 573:3-41. [PMID: 27372747 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin accessibility is modulated by structural transitions that provide timely access to the genetic and epigenetic information during many essential nuclear processes. These transitions are orchestrated by regulatory proteins that coordinate intricate structural modifications and signaling pathways. In vitro reconstituted chromatin samples from defined components are instrumental in defining the mechanistic details of such processes. The bottleneck to appropriate in vitro analysis is the production of high quality, and quality-controlled, chromatin substrates. In this chapter, we describe methods for in vitro chromatin reconstitution and quality control. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches and emphasize quality control steps that ensure reconstitution of a bona fide homogenous chromatin preparation. This is essential for optimal reproducibility and reliability of ensuing experiments using chromatin substrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Muthurajan
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - F Mattiroli
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - S Bergeron
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - K Zhou
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - Y Gu
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - S Chakravarthy
- Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - P Dyer
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - T Irving
- Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - K Luger
- University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States; Institute for Genome Architecture and Function, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pearson JZ, Krause F, Haffke D, Demeler B, Schilling K, Cölfen H. Next-Generation AUC Adds a Spectral Dimension: Development of Multiwavelength Detectors for the Analytical Ultracentrifuge. Methods Enzymol 2015; 562:1-26. [PMID: 26412645 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
We describe important advances in analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) hardware, which add new information to the hydrodynamic information observed in traditional AUC instruments. In contrast to the Beckman-Coulter XLA UV/visible detector, multiwavelength (MWL) detection is able to collect sedimentation data not just for one wavelength, but for a large wavelength range in a single experiment. The additional dimension increases the data density by orders of magnitude, significantly improving the statistics of the measurement and adding important information to the experiment since an additional dimension of spectral characterization is now available to complement the hydrodynamic information. The new detector avoids tedious repeats of experiments at different wavelengths and opens up new avenues for the solution-based investigation of complex mixtures. In this chapter, we describe the capabilities, characteristics, and applications of the new detector design with biopolymers as the focus of study. We show data from two different MWL detectors and discuss strengths and weaknesses of differences in the hardware and different data acquisition modes. Also, difficulties with fiber optic applications in the UV are discussed. Data quality is compared across platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Z Pearson
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Haffke
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Borries Demeler
- Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | - Helmut Cölfen
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Amyloid β Oligomeric Species Present in the Lag Phase of Amyloid Formation. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127865. [PMID: 26024352 PMCID: PMC4449029 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated amyloid β peptide (Aβ) is one of the main actors in AD pathogenesis. Aβ is characterized by its high tendency to self-associate, leading to the generation of oligomers and amyloid fibrils. The elucidation of pathways and intermediates is crucial for the understanding of protein assembly mechanisms in general and in conjunction with neurodegenerative diseases, e.g., for the identification of new therapeutic targets. Our study focused on Aβ42 and its oligomeric assemblies in the lag phase of amyloid formation, as studied by sedimentation velocity (SV) centrifugation. The assembly state of Aβ during the lag phase, the time required by an Aβ solution to reach the exponential growth phase of aggregation, was characterized by a dominant monomer fraction below 1 S and a population of oligomeric species between 4 and 16 S. From the oligomer population, two major species close to a 12-mer and an 18-mer with a globular shape were identified. The recurrence of these two species at different initial concentrations and experimental conditions as the smallest assemblies present in solution supports the existence of distinct, energetically favored assemblies in solution. The sizes of the two species suggest an Aβ42 aggregation pathway that is based on a basic hexameric building block. The study demonstrates the potential of SV analysis for the evaluation of protein aggregation pathways.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao H, Ghirlando R, Alfonso C, Arisaka F, Attali I, Bain DL, Bakhtina MM, Becker DF, Bedwell GJ, Bekdemir A, Besong TMD, Birck C, Brautigam CA, Brennerman W, Byron O, Bzowska A, Chaires JB, Chaton CT, Cölfen H, Connaghan KD, Crowley KA, Curth U, Daviter T, Dean WL, Díez AI, Ebel C, Eckert DM, Eisele LE, Eisenstein E, England P, Escalante C, Fagan JA, Fairman R, Finn RM, Fischle W, de la Torre JG, Gor J, Gustafsson H, Hall D, Harding SE, Cifre JGH, Herr AB, Howell EE, Isaac RS, Jao SC, Jose D, Kim SJ, Kokona B, Kornblatt JA, Kosek D, Krayukhina E, Krzizike D, Kusznir EA, Kwon H, Larson A, Laue TM, Le Roy A, Leech AP, Lilie H, Luger K, Luque-Ortega JR, Ma J, May CA, Maynard EL, Modrak-Wojcik A, Mok YF, Mücke N, Nagel-Steger L, Narlikar GJ, Noda M, Nourse A, Obsil T, Park CK, Park JK, Pawelek PD, Perdue EE, Perkins SJ, Perugini MA, Peterson CL, Peverelli MG, Piszczek G, Prag G, Prevelige PE, Raynal BDE, Rezabkova L, Richter K, Ringel AE, Rosenberg R, Rowe AJ, Rufer AC, Scott DJ, Seravalli JG, Solovyova AS, Song R, Staunton D, Stoddard C, Stott K, Strauss HM, Streicher WW, Sumida JP, Swygert SG, Szczepanowski RH, Tessmer I, Toth RT, Tripathy A, Uchiyama S, Uebel SFW, Unzai S, Gruber AV, von Hippel PH, Wandrey C, Wang SH, Weitzel SE, Wielgus-Kutrowska B, Wolberger C, Wolff M, Wright E, Wu YS, Wubben JM, Schuck P. A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0126420. [PMID: 25997164 PMCID: PMC4440767 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaying Zhao
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Rodolfo Ghirlando
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Carlos Alfonso
- Analytical Ultracentrifugacion and Light Scattering Facility, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Fumio Arisaka
- Life Science Research Center, Nihon University, College of Bioresource Science, Fujisawa, 252–0880, Japan
| | - Ilan Attali
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - David L. Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States of America
| | - Marina M. Bakhtina
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Retrovirus Research, and Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America
| | - Donald F. Becker
- Redox Biology Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, United States of America
| | - Gregory J. Bedwell
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States of America
| | - Ahmet Bekdemir
- Supramolecular Nanomaterials and Interfaces Laboratory, Institute of Materials, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Tabot M. D. Besong
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics, University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | | | - Chad A. Brautigam
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States of America
| | - William Brennerman
- Beckman Coulter, Inc., Life Science Division, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States of America
| | - Olwyn Byron
- School of Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G37TT, United Kingdom
| | - Agnieszka Bzowska
- Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02–089, Poland
| | - Jonathan B. Chaires
- JG Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States of America
| | - Catherine T. Chaton
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States of America
| | - Helmut Cölfen
- Physical Chemistry, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Keith D. Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States of America
| | - Kimberly A. Crowley
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States of America
| | - Ute Curth
- Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tina Daviter
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology Biophysics Centre, Birkbeck, University of London and University College London, London, WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom
| | - William L. Dean
- JG Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States of America
| | - Ana I. Díez
- Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30071, Spain
| | - Christine Ebel
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CNRS, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CEA, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
| | - Debra M. Eckert
- Protein Interactions Core, Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States of America
| | - Leslie E. Eisele
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12208, United States of America
| | - Edward Eisenstein
- Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States of America
| | - Patrick England
- Institut Pasteur, Centre of Biophysics of Macromolecules and Their Interactions, Paris, 75724, France
| | - Carlos Escalante
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23220, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey A. Fagan
- Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899, United States of America
| | - Robert Fairman
- Department of Biology, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania, 19041, United States of America
| | - Ron M. Finn
- Laboratory of Chromatin Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Fischle
- Laboratory of Chromatin Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Jayesh Gor
- Department of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | - Damien Hall
- Research School of Chemistry, Section on Biological Chemistry, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia
| | - Stephen E. Harding
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics, University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew B. Herr
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth E. Howell
- Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996–0840, United States of America
| | - Richard S. Isaac
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Shu-Chuan Jao
- Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
- Biophysics Core Facility, Scientific Instrument Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
| | - Davis Jose
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States of America
| | - Soon-Jong Kim
- Department of Chemistry, Mokpo National University, Muan, 534–729, Korea
| | - Bashkim Kokona
- Department of Biology, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania, 19041, United States of America
| | - Jack A. Kornblatt
- Enzyme Research Group, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada
| | - Dalibor Kosek
- Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic
| | - Elena Krayukhina
- Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565–0871, Japan
| | - Daniel Krzizike
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, United States of America
| | - Eric A. Kusznir
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Basel, 4070, Switzerland
| | - Hyewon Kwon
- Analytical Biopharmacy Core, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States of America
| | - Adam Larson
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Thomas M. Laue
- Department of Biochemistry, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, United States of America
| | - Aline Le Roy
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CNRS, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CEA, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrew P. Leech
- Technology Facility, Department of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Hauke Lilie
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Karolin Luger
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, United States of America
| | - Juan R. Luque-Ortega
- Analytical Ultracentrifugacion and Light Scattering Facility, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Jia Ma
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Carrie A. May
- Department of Biochemistry, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, United States of America
| | - Ernest L. Maynard
- Department of Biochemistry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States of America
| | - Anna Modrak-Wojcik
- Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02–089, Poland
| | - Yee-Foong Mok
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Instute of Molecular Science and Biotechnology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia
| | - Norbert Mücke
- Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | | | - Geeta J. Narlikar
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Masanori Noda
- Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565–0871, Japan
| | - Amanda Nourse
- Molecular Interaction Analysis Shared Resource, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, 38105, United States of America
| | - Tomas Obsil
- Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic
| | - Chad K. Park
- Analytical Biophysics & Materials Characterization, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States of America
| | - Jin-Ku Park
- Central Instrument Center, Mokpo National University, Muan, 534–729, Korea
| | - Peter D. Pawelek
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada
| | - Erby E. Perdue
- Beckman Coulter, Inc., Life Science Division, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States of America
| | - Stephen J. Perkins
- Department of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew A. Perugini
- Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Craig L. Peterson
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States of America
| | - Martin G. Peverelli
- Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Grzegorz Piszczek
- Biochemistry and Biophysics Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Gali Prag
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - Peter E. Prevelige
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States of America
| | - Bertrand D. E. Raynal
- Institut Pasteur, Centre of Biophysics of Macromolecules and Their Interactions, Paris, 75724, France
| | - Lenka Rezabkova
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Klaus Richter
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Integrated Protein Science, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Alison E. Ringel
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States of America
| | - Rose Rosenberg
- Physical Chemistry, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Arthur J. Rowe
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics, University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - Arne C. Rufer
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Basel, 4070, Switzerland
| | - David J. Scott
- Research Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, OX11 0FA, United Kingdom
| | - Javier G. Seravalli
- Redox Biology Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, United States of America
| | - Alexandra S. Solovyova
- Proteome and Protein Analysis, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
| | - Renjie Song
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12208, United States of America
| | - David Staunton
- Molecular Biophysics Suite, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford, Oxon, OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin Stoddard
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Katherine Stott
- Biochemistry Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, United Kingdom
| | | | - Werner W. Streicher
- Protein Function and Interactions, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark
| | - John P. Sumida
- Analytical Biopharmacy Core, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States of America
| | - Sarah G. Swygert
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States of America
| | - Roman H. Szczepanowski
- Core Facility, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, 02–109, Poland
| | - Ingrid Tessmer
- Rudolf Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ronald T. Toth
- Macromolecule and Vaccine Stabilization Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047, United States of America
| | - Ashutosh Tripathy
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States of America
| | - Susumu Uchiyama
- Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565–0871, Japan
| | - Stephan F. W. Uebel
- Biochemistry Core Facility, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Satoru Unzai
- Drug Design Laboratory, Graduate School of Medical Life Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, 230–0045, Japan
| | - Anna Vitlin Gruber
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - Peter H. von Hippel
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States of America
| | - Christine Wandrey
- Laboratoire de Médecine Régénérative et de Pharmacobiologie, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Szu-Huan Wang
- Biophysics Core Facility, Scientific Instrument Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
| | - Steven E. Weitzel
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States of America
| | - Beata Wielgus-Kutrowska
- Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02–089, Poland
| | - Cynthia Wolberger
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States of America
| | - Martin Wolff
- ICS-6, Structural Biochemistry, Research Center Juelich, 52428, Juelich, Germany
| | - Edward Wright
- Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996–0840, United States of America
| | - Yu-Sung Wu
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 19716, United States of America
| | - Jacinta M. Wubben
- Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Peter Schuck
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Zhao H, Brautigam CA, Ghirlando R, Schuck P. Overview of current methods in sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation. CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN PROTEIN SCIENCE 2013; Chapter 20:Unit20.12. [PMID: 23377850 PMCID: PMC3652391 DOI: 10.1002/0471140864.ps2012s71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Modern computational strategies have allowed for the direct modeling of the sedimentation process of heterogeneous mixtures, resulting in sedimentation velocity (SV) size-distribution analyses with significantly improved detection limits and strongly enhanced resolution. These advances have transformed the practice of SV, rendering it the primary method of choice for most existing applications of analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), such as the study of protein self- and hetero-association, the study of membrane proteins, and applications in biotechnology. New global multisignal modeling and mass conservation approaches in SV and sedimentation equilibrium (SE), in conjunction with the effective-particle framework for interpreting the sedimentation boundary structure of interacting systems, as well as tools for explicit modeling of the reaction/diffusion/sedimentation equations to experimental data, have led to more robust and more powerful strategies for the study of reversible protein interactions and multiprotein complexes. Furthermore, modern mathematical modeling capabilities have allowed for a detailed description of many experimental aspects of the acquired data, thus enabling novel experimental opportunities, with important implications for both sample preparation and data acquisition. The goal of the current unit is to describe the current tools for the study of soluble proteins, detergent-solubilized membrane proteins and their interactions by SV and SE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaying Zhao
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Biophysical and bioinformatic analyses implicate the Treponema pallidum Tp34 lipoprotein (Tp0971) in transition metal homeostasis. J Bacteriol 2012; 194:6771-81. [PMID: 23042995 DOI: 10.1128/jb.01494-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Metal ion homeostasis is a critical function of many integral and peripheral membrane proteins. The genome of the etiologic agent of syphilis, Treponema pallidum, is compact and devoid of many metabolic enzyme genes. Nevertheless, it harbors genes coding for homologs of several enzymes that typically require either iron or zinc. The product of the tp0971 gene of T. pallidum, designated Tp34, is a periplasmic lipoprotein that is thought to be tethered to the inner membrane of this organism. Previous work on a water-soluble (nonacylated) recombinant version of Tp34 established that this protein binds to Zn(2+), which, like other transition metal ions, stabilizes the dimeric form of the protein. In this study, we employed analytical ultracentrifugation to establish that four transition metal ions (Ni(2+), Co(2+), Cu(2+), and Zn(2+)) readily induce the dimerization of Tp34; Cu(2+) (50% effective concentration [EC(50)] = 1.7 μM) and Zn(2+) (EC(50) = 6.2 μM) were the most efficacious of these ions. Mutations of the crystallographically identified metal-binding residues hindered the ability of Tp34 to dimerize. X-ray crystallography performed on crystals of Tp34 that had been incubated with metal ions indicated that the binding site could accommodate the metals examined. The findings presented herein, coupled with bioinformatic analyses of related proteins, point to Tp34's likely role in metal ion homeostasis in T. pallidum.
Collapse
|
21
|
Zarate-Perez F, Bardelli M, Burgner JW, Villamil-Jarauta M, Das K, Kekilli D, Mansilla-Soto J, Linden RM, Escalante CR. The interdomain linker of AAV-2 Rep68 is an integral part of its oligomerization domain: role of a conserved SF3 helicase residue in oligomerization. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8:e1002764. [PMID: 22719256 PMCID: PMC3375335 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2012] [Accepted: 05/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The four Rep proteins of adeno-associated virus (AAV) orchestrate all aspects of its viral life cycle, including transcription regulation, DNA replication, virus assembly, and site-specific integration of the viral genome into the human chromosome 19. All Rep proteins share a central SF3 superfamily helicase domain. In other SF3 members this domain is sufficient to induce oligomerization. However, the helicase domain in AAV Rep proteins (i.e. Rep40/Rep52) as shown by its monomeric characteristic, is not able to mediate stable oligomerization. This observation led us to hypothesize the existence of an as yet undefined structural determinant that regulates Rep oligomerization. In this document, we described a detailed structural comparison between the helicase domains of AAV-2 Rep proteins and those of the other SF3 members. This analysis shows a major structural difference residing in the small oligomerization sub-domain (OD) of Rep helicase domain. In addition, secondary structure prediction of the linker connecting the helicase domain to the origin-binding domain (OBD) indicates the potential to form α-helices. We demonstrate that mutant Rep40 constructs containing different lengths of the linker are able to form dimers, and in the presence of ATP/ADP, larger oligomers. We further identified an aromatic linker residue (Y224) that is critical for oligomerization, establishing it as a conserved signature motif in SF3 helicases. Mutation of this residue critically affects oligomerization as well as completely abolishes the ability to produce infectious virus. Taken together, our data support a model where the linker residues preceding the helicase domain fold into an α-helix that becomes an integral part of the helicase domain and is critical for the oligomerization and function of Rep68/78 proteins through cooperative interaction with the OBD and helicase domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Zarate-Perez
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Martino Bardelli
- Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine at Guy's, King's and St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - John W. Burgner
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Maria Villamil-Jarauta
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Kanni Das
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Demet Kekilli
- Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Mansilla-Soto
- Center for Cell Engineering, Department of Human Genetics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - R. Michael Linden
- Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine at Guy's, King's and St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- UCL Gene Therapy Consortium, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carlos R. Escalante
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PKR is an interferon-induced kinase that plays a pivotal role in the innate immunity pathway for defense against viral infection. PKR is activated to undergo autophosphorylation upon binding to RNAs that contain duplex regions. Some highly structured viral RNAs do not activate and function as PKR inhibitors. In order to define the mechanisms of activation and inhibition of PKR by RNA, it is necessary to characterize the stoichiometries, affinities, and free energy couplings governing the assembly of the relevant complexes. We have found sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation to be particularly useful in the study of PKR-RNA interactions. Here, we describe protocols for designing and analyzing sedimentation velocity experiments that are generally applicable to studies of protein-nucleic acid interactions. Initially, velocity data obtained at multiple protein:RNA ratios are analyzed using the dc/dt method's to define the association model and to test whether the system is kinetically limited. The sedimentation velocity data obtained at multiple loading concentrations are then globally fitted to this model to determine the relevant association constants. The frictional ratios of the complexes are calculated using the fitted sedimentation coefficients to determine whether the hydrodynamic properties are physically reasonable. We demonstrate the utility of this approach using examples from our studies of PKR interactions with simple dsRNAs, the HIV TAR RNA, and the VAI RNA from adenovirus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jason Wong
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
This chapter describes the use of analytical ultracentrifugation in a Beckman XLA to study the self-association properties of tubulin and the interaction of tubulin with antimitotic drugs. Procedures for sample preparation, operation of the ultracentrifuge, and collection of data conform to standard modern methods. Analysis of sedimentation velocity data initially includes generation of g(s) sedimentation coefficient distributions with DCDT(+2) and determination of weight average sedimentation coefficients S(w). S(w) versus concentration data are then fit to isodesmic or indefinite assembly models to extract K(iso) values, the association constant for each successive assembly step. Alternatively the raw data can also be analyzed by direct boundary analysis methods using the program Sedanal. Direct boundary analysis also extracts the K(iso) value by fitting to the shape of the sedimentation boundary as a function of total concentration. While the fitting of weight average data as a function of protein or drug concentration to indefinite assembly models has been shown to be equivalent to direct boundary fitting of multiple data sets with Sedanal, direct boundary fitting is preferred because it robustly identifies the presence of irreversible aggregation or mechanisms that are more complex.
Collapse
|
24
|
Demeler B. Methods for the design and analysis of sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium experiments with proteins. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; Chapter 7:7.13.1-7.13.24. [PMID: 20393977 DOI: 10.1002/0471140864.ps0713s60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments play an integral role in the solution phase characterization of recombinant proteins and other biological macromolecules. This unit discusses the design of sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium experiments performed with a Beckman Optima XL-A or XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge. Optimal instrument settings and experimental design considerations are explained, and strategies for the analysis of experimental data with the UltraScan data analysis software package are presented. Special attention is paid to the strengths and weaknesses of the available detectors, and guidance is provided on how to extract maximum information from analytical ultracentrifugation experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borries Demeler
- Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schuck P. Some statistical properties of differencing schemes for baseline correction of sedimentation velocity data. Anal Biochem 2010; 401:280-7. [PMID: 20206114 DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2010] [Revised: 02/26/2010] [Accepted: 02/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
For the detailed analysis of sedimentation velocity data, the consideration of radial-dependent baseline offsets is indispensable. Two main approaches are data differencing ("delta-c" approach) and explicit inclusion of baseline parameters in the model ("direct boundary model" of the raw data). The current work aims to clarify the relationships between the two approaches. To this end, a simple model problem is examined. We show that the explicit consideration of the baseline in the model is equivalent to a differencing scheme where the average value is subtracted from all data points. Pairwise differencing in the delta-c approach always results in higher parameter uncertainty. For equidistant time points, the increase is smallest when the reference points are taken at intervals of 1/3 or 2/3 of the total number of time points. If the difference data are misinterpreted to be statistically independent samples, errors in the calculation of the parameter uncertainties can occur. Contrary to claims in the literature, we observe that there is no distinction in the approaches regarding their "model dependence"; both approaches arise from the integral or differential form of the same model, and both approaches can and should provide explicit estimates of the baseline values in the original data space for optimal discrimination between macromolecular sedimentation models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schuck
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly, Laboratory of Bioengineering and Physical Science, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stafford WF. Protein-protein and ligand-protein interactions studied by analytical ultracentrifugation. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 490:83-113. [PMID: 19157080 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-367-7_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
All biological processes involve molecular interactions that result in either binding, self-association, or hetero-associations of one form or another. It is important to understand that no interactions are completely all-or-none. Some approach all-or-none only when there is strong positive cooperativity. Examples will be given of typical biomolecular interactions and their expected dependence on concentration, in order to point out the relatively wide range of concentration over which these types of phenomena take place. This chapter is concerned both with the binding of low-molecular-weight ligands to macromolecules as well as interactions between macromolecules using analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) as a tool for measuring association properties of these systems. The theory of sedimentation of both ideal and nonideal interacting and noninteracting systems is discussed. Examples are given of each type of system along with a discussion of how each type of system can be analyzed. Several methods of data analysis are discussed.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cole JL, Lary JW, P Moody T, Laue TM. Analytical ultracentrifugation: sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium. Methods Cell Biol 2007; 84:143-79. [PMID: 17964931 DOI: 10.1016/s0091-679x(07)84006-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 276] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a versatile and powerful method for the quantitative analysis of macromolecules in solution. AUC has broad applications for the study of biomacromolecules in a wide range of solvents and over a wide range of solute concentrations. Three optical systems are available for the analytical ultracentrifuge (absorbance, interference, and fluorescence) that permit precise and selective observation of sedimentation in real time. In particular, the fluorescence system provides a new way to extend the scope of AUC to probe the behavior of biological molecules in complex mixtures and at high solute concentrations. In sedimentation velocity (SV), the movement of solutes in high centrifugal fields is interpreted using hydrodynamic theory to define the size, shape, and interactions of macromolecules. Sedimentation equilibrium (SE) is a thermodynamic method where equilibrium concentration gradients at lower centrifugal fields are analyzed to define molecule mass, assembly stoichiometry, association constants, and solution nonideality. Using specialized sample cells and modern analysis software, researchers can use SV to determine the homogeneity of a sample and define whether it undergoes concentration-dependent association reactions. Subsequently, more thorough model-dependent analysis of velocity and equilibrium experiments can provide a detailed picture of the nature of the species present in solution and their interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Cole
- National Analytical Ultracentrifugation Facility, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Berkowitz SA. Role of analytical ultracentrifugation in assessing the aggregation of protein biopharmaceuticals. AAPS J 2006; 8:E590-605. [PMID: 17025277 PMCID: PMC2761066 DOI: 10.1208/aapsj080368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2006] [Accepted: 06/22/2006] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In developing and manufacturing protein biopharmaceuticals, aggregation is a parameter that needs careful monitoring to ensure the quality and consistency of the final biopharmaceutical drug product. The analytical method of choice used to perform this task is size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). However, it is becoming more and more apparent that considerable care is required in assessing the accuracy of SEC data. One old analytical tool that is now reappearing to help in this assessment is analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC). Developments in AUC hardware and, more importantly, recent developments in AUC data analysis computer programs have converged to provide this old biophysical tool with the ability to extract very high resolution size information about the molecules in a given sample from a simple sedimentation velocity experiment. In addition, AUC allows sample testing to be conducted in the exact or nearly exact liquid formulation or reconstituted liquid formulation of the biopharmaceutical in the vial, with minimal surface area contact with extraneous materials. As a result, AUC analysis can provide detailed information on the aggregation of a biopharmaceutical, while avoiding many of the major problems that can plague SEC, thus allowing AUC to be used as an orthogonal method to verify SEC aggregation information and the associating properties of biopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Berkowitz
- Department of Analytical Development, Biogen Idec Inc, 14 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brockmann C, Diehl A, Rehbein K, Strauss H, Schmieder P, Korn B, Kühne R, Oschkinat H. The oxidized subunit B8 from human complex I adopts a thioredoxin fold. Structure 2005; 12:1645-54. [PMID: 15341729 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2004] [Revised: 05/28/2004] [Accepted: 06/22/2004] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Subunit B8 from ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) (CI-B8) is one of several nuclear-encoded supernumerary subunits that are not present in bacterial complex I. Its solution structure shows a thioredoxin fold with highest similarities to the human thioredoxin mutant C73S and thioredoxin 2 from Anabeana sp. Interestingly, these proteins contain active sites in the same area, where the disulfide bond of oxidized CI-B8 is located. The redox potential of this disulfide bond is -251.6 mV, comparing well to that of disulfides in other thioredoxin-like proteins. Analysis of the structure reveals a surface area that is exclusively composed of highly conserved residues and thus most likely a subunit interaction site within complex I.
Collapse
|
30
|
Vistica J, Dam J, Balbo A, Yikilmaz E, Mariuzza RA, Rouault TA, Schuck P. Sedimentation equilibrium analysis of protein interactions with global implicit mass conservation constraints and systematic noise decomposition. Anal Biochem 2004; 326:234-56. [PMID: 15003564 DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2003.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 314] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2003] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Sedimentation equilibrium is a powerful tool for the characterization of protein self-association and heterogeneous protein interactions. Frequently, it is applied in a configuration with relatively long solution columns and with equilibrium profiles being acquired sequentially at several rotor speeds. The present study proposes computational tools, implemented in the software SEDPHAT, for the global analysis of equilibrium data at multiple rotor speeds with multiple concentrations and multiple optical detection methods. The detailed global modeling of such equilibrium data can be a nontrivial computational problem. It was shown previously that mass conservation constraints can significantly improve and extend the analysis of heterogeneous protein interactions. Here, a method for using conservation of mass constraints for the macromolecular redistribution is proposed in which the effective loading concentrations are calculated from the sedimentation equilibrium profiles. The approach is similar to that described by Roark (Biophys. Chem. 5 (1976) 185-196), but its utility is extended by determining the bottom position of the solution columns from the macromolecular redistribution. For analyzing heterogeneous associations at multiple protein concentrations, additional constraints that relate the effective loading concentrations of the different components or their molar ratio in the global analysis are introduced. Equilibrium profiles at multiple rotor speeds also permit the algebraic determination of radial-dependent baseline profiles, which can govern interference optical ultracentrifugation data, but usually also occur, to a smaller extent, in absorbance optical data. Finally, the global analysis of equilibrium profiles at multiple rotor speeds with implicit mass conservation and computation of the bottom of the solution column provides an unbiased scale for determining molar mass distributions of noninteracting species. The properties of these tools are studied with theoretical and experimental data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Vistica
- Protein Biophysics Resource, Division of Bioengineering & Physical Science, ORS, OD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dam J, Schuck P. Calculating sedimentation coefficient distributions by direct modeling of sedimentation velocity concentration profiles. Methods Enzymol 2004; 384:185-212. [PMID: 15081688 DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(04)84012-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Dam
- Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schuck P. On the analysis of protein self-association by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation. Anal Biochem 2003; 320:104-24. [PMID: 12895474 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2697(03)00289-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 501] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation is one of the classical techniques for the study of protein interactions and protein self-association. Recent instrumental and computational developments have significantly enhanced this methodology. In this paper, new tools for the analysis of protein self-association by sedimentation velocity are developed, their statistical properties are examined, and considerations for optimal experimental design are discussed. A traditional strategy is the analysis of the isotherm of weight-average sedimentation coefficients s(w) as a function of protein concentration. From theoretical considerations, it is shown that integration of any differential sedimentation coefficient distribution c(s), ls-g(*)(s), or g(s(*)) can give a thermodynamically well-defined isotherm, as long as it provides a good model for the sedimentation profiles. To test this condition for the g(s(*)) distribution, a back-transform into the original data space is proposed. Deconvoluting diffusion in the sedimentation coefficient distribution c(s) can be advantageous to identify species that do not participate in the association. Because of the large number of scans that can be analyzed in the c(s) approach, its s(w) values are very precise and allow extension of the isotherm to very low concentrations. For all differential sedimentation coefficients, corrections are derived for the slowing of the sedimentation boundaries caused by radial dilution. As an alternative to the interpretation of the isotherm of the weight-average s value, direct global modeling of several sedimentation experiments with Lamm equation solutions was studied. For this purpose, a new software SEDPHAT is introduced, allowing the global analysis of several sedimentation velocity and equilibrium experiments. In this approach, information from the shape of the sedimentation profiles is exploited, which permits the identification of the association scheme and requires fewer experiments to precisely characterize the association. Further, under suitable conditions, fractions of incompetent material that are not part of the reversible equilibrium can be detected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schuck
- Protein Biophysics Resource, Division of Bioengineering and Physical Science, ORS, OD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosovitz MJ, Schuck P, Varughese M, Chopra AP, Mehra V, Singh Y, McGinnis LM, Leppla SH. Alanine-scanning mutations in domain 4 of anthrax toxin protective antigen reveal residues important for binding to the cellular receptor and to a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:30936-44. [PMID: 12771151 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m301154200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
A panel of variants with alanine substitutions in the small loop of anthrax toxin protective antigen domain 4 was created to determine individual amino acid residues critical for interactions with the cellular receptor and with a neutralizing monoclonal antibody, 14B7. Substituted protective antigen proteins were analyzed by cellular cytotoxicity assays, and their interactions with antibody were measured by plasmon surface resonance and analytical ultracentrifugation. Residue Asp683 was the most critical for cell binding and toxicity, causing an approximately 1000-fold reduction in toxicity, but was not a large factor for interactions with 14B7. Substitutions in residues Tyr681, Asn682, and Pro686 also reduced toxicity significantly, by 10-100-fold. Of these, only Asn682 and Pro686 were also critical for interactions with 14B7. However, residues Lys684, Leu685, Leu687, and Tyr688 were critical for 14B7 binding without greatly affecting toxicity. The K684A and L685A variants exhibited wild type levels of toxicity in cell culture assays; the L687A and Y688A variants were reduced only 1.5- and 5-fold, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Rosovitz
- Microbial Pathogenesis Section, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4350, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schuck P, Perugini MA, Gonzales NR, Howlett GJ, Schubert D. Size-distribution analysis of proteins by analytical ultracentrifugation: strategies and application to model systems. Biophys J 2002; 82:1096-111. [PMID: 11806949 PMCID: PMC1301916 DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75469-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 572] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Strategies for the deconvolution of diffusion in the determination of size-distributions from sedimentation velocity experiments were examined and developed. On the basis of four different model systems, we studied the differential apparent sedimentation coefficient distributions by the time-derivative method, g(s*), and by least-squares direct boundary modeling, ls-g*(s), the integral sedimentation coefficient distribution by the van Holde-Weischet method, G(s), and the previously introduced differential distribution of Lamm equation solutions, c(s). It is shown that the least-squares approach ls-g*(s) can be extrapolated to infinite time by considering area divisions analogous to boundary divisions in the van Holde-Weischet method, thus allowing the transformation of interference optical data into an integral sedimentation coefficient distribution G(s). However, despite the model-free approach of G(s), for the systems considered, the direct boundary modeling with a distribution of Lamm equation solutions c(s) exhibited the highest resolution and sensitivity. The c(s) approach requires an estimate for the size-dependent diffusion coefficients D(s), which is usually incorporated in the form of a weight-average frictional ratio of all species, or in the form of prior knowledge of the molar mass of the main species. We studied the influence of the weight-average frictional ratio on the quality of the fit, and found that it is well-determined by the data. As a direct boundary model, the calculated c(s) distribution can be combined with a nonlinear regression to optimize distribution parameters, such as the exact meniscus position, and the weight-average frictional ratio. Although c(s) is computationally the most complex, it has the potential for the highest resolution and sensitivity of the methods described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schuck
- Division of Bioengineering and Physical Science, Office of Research Services, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Advances in data analysis are broadening the applicability of ultracentrifugation to the characterization of macromolecular behavior in complex solution. The direct fitting of sedimentation velocity data to the Lamm equation is emerging as a very powerful means to characterize size distributions, improve the precision of data analysis and increase experimental throughput. With improvements in data acquisition and analysis, ultracentrifugation is poised to make significant contributions to our understanding of how macromolecules behave in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Laue
- Center to Advance Molecular Interaction Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824-3544, USA.
| |
Collapse
|