1
|
Hopkins MM, Antonopoulos IH, Parupudi A, Bee JS, Bain DL. Comparative Thermodynamics of the Reversible Self-Association of Therapeutic mAbs Reveal Opposing Roles for Linked Proton- and Ion-Binding Events. Pharm Res 2023; 40:1383-1397. [PMID: 36869246 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-023-03485-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reversible self-association (RSA) has long been a concern in therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) development. Because RSA typically occurs at high mAb concentrations, accurate assessment of the underlying interaction parameters requires explicitly addressing hydrodynamic and thermodynamic nonideality. We previously examined the thermodynamics of RSA for two mAbs, C and E, in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Here we continue to explore the mechanistic aspects of RSA by examining the thermodynamics of both mAbs under reduced pH and salt conditions. METHODS Dynamic light scattering and sedimentation velocity (SV) studies were conducted for both mAbs at multiple protein concentrations and temperatures, with the SV data analyzed via global fitting to determine best-fit models, interaction energetics, and nonideality contributions. RESULTS We find that mAb C self-associates isodesmically irrespective of temperature, and that association is enthalpically driven but entropically penalized. Conversely, mAb E self-associates cooperatively and via a monomer-dimer-tetramer-hexamer reaction pathway. Moreover, all mAb E reactions are entropically driven and enthalpically modest or minimal. CONCLUSIONS The thermodynamics for mAb C self-association are classically seen as originating from van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonding. However, relative to the energetics we determined in PBS, self-association must also be linked to proton release and/or ion uptake events. For mAb E, the thermodynamics implicate electrostatic interactions. Furthermore, self-association is instead linked to proton uptake and/or ion release, and primarily by tetramers and hexamers. Finally, although the origins of mAb E cooperativity remain unclear, ring formation remains a possibility whereas linear polymerization reactions can be eliminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi M Hopkins
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12850 E. Montview Blvd., C-238, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Formulation Development, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA
| | - Ioanna H Antonopoulos
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12850 E. Montview Blvd., C-238, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Biophysical Characterization, KBI Biopharma, Louisville, CO, 80027, USA
| | - Arun Parupudi
- Department of Dosage Form Design and Development, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
- Drug Product and Formulation Sciences, GSK Vaccines, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Jared S Bee
- Department of Dosage Form Design and Development, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
- Formulation and Drug Product Development, REGENXBIO Inc, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12850 E. Montview Blvd., C-238, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hudson WH, Vera IMSD, Nwachukwu JC, Weikum ER, Herbst AG, Yang Q, Bain DL, Nettles KW, Kojetin DJ, Ortlund EA. Cryptic glucocorticoid receptor-binding sites pervade genomic NF-κB response elements. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1337. [PMID: 29626214 PMCID: PMC5889392 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03780-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent repressors of NF-κB activity, making them a preferred choice for treatment of inflammation-driven conditions. Despite the widespread use of GCs in the clinic, current models are inadequate to explain the role of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) within this critical signaling pathway. GR binding directly to NF-κB itself-tethering in a DNA binding-independent manner-represents the standing model of how GCs inhibit NF-κB-driven transcription. We demonstrate that direct binding of GR to genomic NF-κB response elements (κBREs) mediates GR-driven repression of inflammatory gene expression. We report five crystal structures and solution NMR data of GR DBD-κBRE complexes, which reveal that GR recognizes a cryptic response element between the binding footprints of NF-κB subunits within κBREs. These cryptic sequences exhibit high sequence and functional conservation, suggesting that GR binding to κBREs is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of controlling the inflammatory response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Hudson
- Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
- Discovery and Developmental Therapeutics, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Ian Mitchelle S de Vera
- Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, 33458, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, 63104, USA
| | - Jerome C Nwachukwu
- Department of Integrated Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, 33458, USA
| | - Emily R Weikum
- Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
- Discovery and Developmental Therapeutics, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Austin G Herbst
- Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Qin Yang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, USA
| | - David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, USA
| | - Kendall W Nettles
- Department of Integrated Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, 33458, USA
| | - Douglas J Kojetin
- Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, 33458, USA
| | - Eric A Ortlund
- Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
- Discovery and Developmental Therapeutics, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hopkins MM, Bain DL. Biophysical Analysis of Human Neuropeptide Y: Mutations in the Hairpin Core Reveal Unusual Thermal Stability Linked to Higher‐Order Self‐Association. FASEB J 2018. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.792.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi M. Hopkins
- Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCO
| | - David L. Bain
- Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hopkins MM, Lambert CL, Bee JS, Parupudi A, Bain DL. Determination of Interaction Parameters for Reversibly Self-Associating Antibodies: A Comparative Analysis. J Pharm Sci 2018; 107:1820-1830. [PMID: 29571738 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a major class of biotherapeutics and are the fastest growing category of biologic drugs on the market. However, mAb development and formulation are often impeded by reversible self-association (RSA), defined as the dynamic exchange of monomers with native-state oligomers. Here, we present a comparative analysis of the self-association properties for 5 IgG mAbs, under matched conditions and using orthogonal methods. Concentration-dependent dynamic light scattering and sedimentation velocity studies revealed that the majority of mAbs examined exhibited weak to moderate RSA. However, because these studies were carried out at mAb concentrations in the mg/mL range, we also observed significant nonideality. Noting that nonideality frequently masks RSA and vice versa, we conducted direct boundary fitting of the sedimentation velocity data to determine stoichiometric binding models, interaction affinities, and nonideality terms for each mAb. These analyses revealed equilibrium constants from micromolar to millimolar and stoichiometric models from monomer-dimer to isodesmic. Moreover, even for those mAbs described by identical models, we observed distinct kinetics of self-association. The accuracy of the models and their corresponding equilibrium constants were addressed using sedimentation equilibrium and simulations. Overall, these results serve as the starting point for the comparative dissection of RSA mechanisms in therapeutic mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi M Hopkins
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045
| | - Cherie L Lambert
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045
| | - Jared S Bee
- Analytical Sciences Department, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
| | - Arun Parupudi
- Analytical Sciences Department, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
| | - David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quirk S, Hopkins MM, Bureau H, Lusk RJ, Allen C, Hernandez R, Bain DL. Mutational Analysis of Neuropeptide Y Reveals Unusual Thermal Stability Linked to Higher-Order Self-Association. ACS Omega 2018; 3:2141-2154. [PMID: 29619413 PMCID: PMC5876621 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-residue peptide, abundant in the central and peripheral nervous system. The peptide interacts with membrane-bound receptors to control processes such as food intake, vasoconstriction, and memory retention. The N-terminal polyproline sequence of NPY folds back onto a C-terminal α-helix to form a hairpin structure. The hairpin undergoes transient unfolding to allow the monomer to interact with its target membranes and receptors and to form reversible dimers in solution. Using computational, functional, and biophysical approaches, we characterized the role of two conserved tyrosines (Y20 and Y27) located within the hydrophobic core of the hairpin fold. Successive mutation of the tyrosines to more hydrophobic phenylalanines increased the thermal stability of NPY and reduced functional activity, consistent with computational studies predicting a more stable hairpin structure. However, mutant stability was high relative to wild-type: melting temperatures increased by approximately 20 °C for the single mutants (Y20F and Y27F) and by 30 °C for the double mutant (Y20F + Y27F). These findings suggested that the mutations were not just simply enhancing hairpin structure stability, but might also be driving self-association to dimer. Using analytical ultracentrifugation, we determined that the mutations indeed increased self-association, but shifted the equilibrium toward hexamer-like species. Notably, these latter species were not unique to the NPY mutants, but were found to preexist at low levels in the wild-type population. Collectively, the findings indicate that NPY self-association is more complex than previously recognized and that the ensemble of NPY quaternary states is tunable by modulating hairpin hydrophobicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Quirk
- Archeus
Bioscience, 7094 Peachtree
Industrial Blvd., Norcross, Georgia 30071, United
States
| | - Mandi M. Hopkins
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12850 E Montview Blvd., Aurora, Colorado 80045, United
States
| | - Hailey Bureau
- Center
for Computational and Molecular Science and Technology, School of
Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute
of Technology, 901 Atlantic
Dr, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
| | - Ryan J. Lusk
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12850 E Montview Blvd., Aurora, Colorado 80045, United
States
| | - Caley Allen
- Department
of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
| | - Rigoberto Hernandez
- Center
for Computational and Molecular Science and Technology, School of
Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute
of Technology, 901 Atlantic
Dr, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
- Department
of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
| | - David L. Bain
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12850 E Montview Blvd., Aurora, Colorado 80045, United
States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bain DL, Brenowitz M, Roberts CJ. An Opportunity for Industry–Academia Partnership: Training the Next Generation of Industrial Researchers in Characterizing Higher Order Protein Structure. J Pharm Sci 2016; 105:3483-3486. [DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Revised: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
7
|
De Angelis RW, Maluf NK, Yang Q, Lambert JR, Bain DL. Glucocorticoid Receptor-DNA Dissociation Kinetics Measured in Vitro Reveal Exchange on the Second Time Scale. Biochemistry 2015; 54:5306-14. [PMID: 26267475 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent live cell imaging studies have revealed that interactions of GR with chromatin are highly dynamic, with average receptor residence times of only seconds. These findings were surprising because early kinetic studies found that GR-DNA interactions in vitro were much slower, having calculated residence times of minutes to hours. However, these latter analyses were conducted at a time when it was possible to work with only either partially purified holoreceptor or its purified but isolated DNA binding domain. Noting these limitations, we reexamined GR-DNA dissociation kinetics using a highly purified holoreceptor shown to be amenable to rigorous study. We first observe that GR-DNA interactions in vitro are not slow as previously thought but converge with in vivo behavior, having residence times of only seconds to tens of seconds. This rapid exchange is seen at six individual response elements and the multisite MMTV promoter used in live cell imaging. Second, GR dissociation rates are identical for all response elements. Thus, previously observed differences in receptor affinity toward these sequences are not due to differences in off rate but in on rate. Finally, dissociation kinetics are biphasic in character. A minimal kinetic model consistent with the data is that in which DNA-bound GR interconverts between states on a second time scale, with dissociation occurring via a multistep process. We speculate that receptor interconversion in this time frame can be recognized by the coregulatory proteins that interact with GR, leading to unique transcriptional responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolando W De Angelis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and ‡Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - Nasib K Maluf
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and ‡Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - Qin Yang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and ‡Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - James R Lambert
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and ‡Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and ‡Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bain DL, De Angelis RW, Connaghan KD, Yang Q, Degala GD, Lambert JR. Dissecting Steroid Receptor Function by Analytical Ultracentrifugation. Methods Enzymol 2015; 562:363-89. [PMID: 26412661 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include the androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and progesterone receptor (PR). Each receptor controls distinct sets of genes associated with development, metabolism, and homeostasis. Although a qualitative understanding of how individual receptors mediate gene expression has come into focus, quantitative insight remains less clear. As a step toward delineating the physical mechanisms by which individual receptors activate their target genes, we have carried out a systematic dissection of receptor interaction energetics with their multisite regulatory elements. Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) has proved indispensable in these studies, in part by revealing the energetics of receptor self-association and its thermodynamic coupling to DNA binding. Here, we discuss these findings in the context of understanding specificity of receptor-mediated gene control. We first highlight the role of sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium in addressing receptor assembly state, and present a comparative analysis across the receptor family. We then use these results for understanding how receptors assemble at multisite regulatory elements, and hypothesize how these findings might play a role in receptor-specific gene regulation. Finally, we examine receptor behavior in a cellular context, with a view toward linking our in vitro studies with in vivo function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| | - Rolando W De Angelis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Qin Yang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Gregory D Degala
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - James R Lambert
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao H, Ghirlando R, Alfonso C, Arisaka F, Attali I, Bain DL, Bakhtina MM, Becker DF, Bedwell GJ, Bekdemir A, Besong TMD, Birck C, Brautigam CA, Brennerman W, Byron O, Bzowska A, Chaires JB, Chaton CT, Cölfen H, Connaghan KD, Crowley KA, Curth U, Daviter T, Dean WL, Díez AI, Ebel C, Eckert DM, Eisele LE, Eisenstein E, England P, Escalante C, Fagan JA, Fairman R, Finn RM, Fischle W, de la Torre JG, Gor J, Gustafsson H, Hall D, Harding SE, Cifre JGH, Herr AB, Howell EE, Isaac RS, Jao SC, Jose D, Kim SJ, Kokona B, Kornblatt JA, Kosek D, Krayukhina E, Krzizike D, Kusznir EA, Kwon H, Larson A, Laue TM, Le Roy A, Leech AP, Lilie H, Luger K, Luque-Ortega JR, Ma J, May CA, Maynard EL, Modrak-Wojcik A, Mok YF, Mücke N, Nagel-Steger L, Narlikar GJ, Noda M, Nourse A, Obsil T, Park CK, Park JK, Pawelek PD, Perdue EE, Perkins SJ, Perugini MA, Peterson CL, Peverelli MG, Piszczek G, Prag G, Prevelige PE, Raynal BDE, Rezabkova L, Richter K, Ringel AE, Rosenberg R, Rowe AJ, Rufer AC, Scott DJ, Seravalli JG, Solovyova AS, Song R, Staunton D, Stoddard C, Stott K, Strauss HM, Streicher WW, Sumida JP, Swygert SG, Szczepanowski RH, Tessmer I, Toth RT, Tripathy A, Uchiyama S, Uebel SFW, Unzai S, Gruber AV, von Hippel PH, Wandrey C, Wang SH, Weitzel SE, Wielgus-Kutrowska B, Wolberger C, Wolff M, Wright E, Wu YS, Wubben JM, Schuck P. A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0126420. [PMID: 25997164 PMCID: PMC4440767 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaying Zhao
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Rodolfo Ghirlando
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Carlos Alfonso
- Analytical Ultracentrifugacion and Light Scattering Facility, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Fumio Arisaka
- Life Science Research Center, Nihon University, College of Bioresource Science, Fujisawa, 252–0880, Japan
| | - Ilan Attali
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - David L. Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States of America
| | - Marina M. Bakhtina
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Retrovirus Research, and Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America
| | - Donald F. Becker
- Redox Biology Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, United States of America
| | - Gregory J. Bedwell
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States of America
| | - Ahmet Bekdemir
- Supramolecular Nanomaterials and Interfaces Laboratory, Institute of Materials, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Tabot M. D. Besong
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics, University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | | | - Chad A. Brautigam
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States of America
| | - William Brennerman
- Beckman Coulter, Inc., Life Science Division, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States of America
| | - Olwyn Byron
- School of Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G37TT, United Kingdom
| | - Agnieszka Bzowska
- Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02–089, Poland
| | - Jonathan B. Chaires
- JG Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States of America
| | - Catherine T. Chaton
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States of America
| | - Helmut Cölfen
- Physical Chemistry, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Keith D. Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States of America
| | - Kimberly A. Crowley
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States of America
| | - Ute Curth
- Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tina Daviter
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology Biophysics Centre, Birkbeck, University of London and University College London, London, WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom
| | - William L. Dean
- JG Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States of America
| | - Ana I. Díez
- Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30071, Spain
| | - Christine Ebel
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CNRS, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CEA, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
| | - Debra M. Eckert
- Protein Interactions Core, Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States of America
| | - Leslie E. Eisele
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12208, United States of America
| | - Edward Eisenstein
- Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States of America
| | - Patrick England
- Institut Pasteur, Centre of Biophysics of Macromolecules and Their Interactions, Paris, 75724, France
| | - Carlos Escalante
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23220, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey A. Fagan
- Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899, United States of America
| | - Robert Fairman
- Department of Biology, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania, 19041, United States of America
| | - Ron M. Finn
- Laboratory of Chromatin Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Fischle
- Laboratory of Chromatin Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Jayesh Gor
- Department of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | - Damien Hall
- Research School of Chemistry, Section on Biological Chemistry, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia
| | - Stephen E. Harding
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics, University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew B. Herr
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth E. Howell
- Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996–0840, United States of America
| | - Richard S. Isaac
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Shu-Chuan Jao
- Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
- Biophysics Core Facility, Scientific Instrument Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
| | - Davis Jose
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States of America
| | - Soon-Jong Kim
- Department of Chemistry, Mokpo National University, Muan, 534–729, Korea
| | - Bashkim Kokona
- Department of Biology, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania, 19041, United States of America
| | - Jack A. Kornblatt
- Enzyme Research Group, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada
| | - Dalibor Kosek
- Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic
| | - Elena Krayukhina
- Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565–0871, Japan
| | - Daniel Krzizike
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, United States of America
| | - Eric A. Kusznir
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Basel, 4070, Switzerland
| | - Hyewon Kwon
- Analytical Biopharmacy Core, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States of America
| | - Adam Larson
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Thomas M. Laue
- Department of Biochemistry, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, United States of America
| | - Aline Le Roy
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CNRS, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
- CEA, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrew P. Leech
- Technology Facility, Department of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Hauke Lilie
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Karolin Luger
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, United States of America
| | - Juan R. Luque-Ortega
- Analytical Ultracentrifugacion and Light Scattering Facility, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Jia Ma
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Carrie A. May
- Department of Biochemistry, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, United States of America
| | - Ernest L. Maynard
- Department of Biochemistry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States of America
| | - Anna Modrak-Wojcik
- Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02–089, Poland
| | - Yee-Foong Mok
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Instute of Molecular Science and Biotechnology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia
| | - Norbert Mücke
- Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | | | - Geeta J. Narlikar
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Masanori Noda
- Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565–0871, Japan
| | - Amanda Nourse
- Molecular Interaction Analysis Shared Resource, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, 38105, United States of America
| | - Tomas Obsil
- Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic
| | - Chad K. Park
- Analytical Biophysics & Materials Characterization, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States of America
| | - Jin-Ku Park
- Central Instrument Center, Mokpo National University, Muan, 534–729, Korea
| | - Peter D. Pawelek
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada
| | - Erby E. Perdue
- Beckman Coulter, Inc., Life Science Division, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States of America
| | - Stephen J. Perkins
- Department of Structural and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew A. Perugini
- Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Craig L. Peterson
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States of America
| | - Martin G. Peverelli
- Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Grzegorz Piszczek
- Biochemistry and Biophysics Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
| | - Gali Prag
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - Peter E. Prevelige
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States of America
| | - Bertrand D. E. Raynal
- Institut Pasteur, Centre of Biophysics of Macromolecules and Their Interactions, Paris, 75724, France
| | - Lenka Rezabkova
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Klaus Richter
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Integrated Protein Science, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Alison E. Ringel
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States of America
| | - Rose Rosenberg
- Physical Chemistry, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Arthur J. Rowe
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics, University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - Arne C. Rufer
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Basel, 4070, Switzerland
| | - David J. Scott
- Research Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, OX11 0FA, United Kingdom
| | - Javier G. Seravalli
- Redox Biology Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, United States of America
| | - Alexandra S. Solovyova
- Proteome and Protein Analysis, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
| | - Renjie Song
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12208, United States of America
| | - David Staunton
- Molecular Biophysics Suite, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford, Oxon, OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin Stoddard
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158, United States of America
| | - Katherine Stott
- Biochemistry Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, United Kingdom
| | | | - Werner W. Streicher
- Protein Function and Interactions, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark
| | - John P. Sumida
- Analytical Biopharmacy Core, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States of America
| | - Sarah G. Swygert
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States of America
| | - Roman H. Szczepanowski
- Core Facility, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, 02–109, Poland
| | - Ingrid Tessmer
- Rudolf Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ronald T. Toth
- Macromolecule and Vaccine Stabilization Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047, United States of America
| | - Ashutosh Tripathy
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States of America
| | - Susumu Uchiyama
- Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565–0871, Japan
| | - Stephan F. W. Uebel
- Biochemistry Core Facility, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Satoru Unzai
- Drug Design Laboratory, Graduate School of Medical Life Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, 230–0045, Japan
| | - Anna Vitlin Gruber
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - Peter H. von Hippel
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States of America
| | - Christine Wandrey
- Laboratoire de Médecine Régénérative et de Pharmacobiologie, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Szu-Huan Wang
- Biophysics Core Facility, Scientific Instrument Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
| | - Steven E. Weitzel
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States of America
| | - Beata Wielgus-Kutrowska
- Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02–089, Poland
| | - Cynthia Wolberger
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States of America
| | - Martin Wolff
- ICS-6, Structural Biochemistry, Research Center Juelich, 52428, Juelich, Germany
| | - Edward Wright
- Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996–0840, United States of America
| | - Yu-Sung Wu
- Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 19716, United States of America
| | - Jacinta M. Wubben
- Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Peter Schuck
- Dynamics of Macromolecular Assembly Section, Laboratory of Cellular Imaging and Macromolecular Biophysics, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
De Angelis RW, Yang Q, Bain DL. Glucocorticoid Receptor-DNA Dissociation Kinetics Measured in vitro Reveal Exchange on the Second Timescale. Biophys J 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
11
|
Connaghan KD, Yang Q, Miura MT, Moody AD, Bain DL. Homologous steroid receptors assemble at identical promoter architectures with unique energetics of cooperativity. Proteins 2014; 82:2078-87. [PMID: 24648119 DOI: 10.1002/prot.24563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2014] [Revised: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 03/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The receptors bind largely identical response elements in vitro, yet regulate distinct gene networks in vivo. This paradox raises the issue of how transcriptional specificity is achieved, particularly if multiple receptor populations are competing for identical sites. Noting that receptor-DNA energetics are a primary force in driving transcriptional activity, differences in interaction energetics among the receptors might underlie receptor-specific transcriptional control. Thermodynamic dissections support this premise-upon assembling at an identical promoter architecture, individual receptors exhibit vast differences in cooperative and self-association energetics. More intriguingly, these parameters distribute in a way that mirrors the evolutionary divergence of the steroid receptor family. For example, the closely related progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors (PR and GR) display little or no self-association but strong intersite cooperativity, whereas the more distantly related estrogen receptor (ER-α) shows inverse behavior. These findings suggest that receptors view genomic promoter architectures as a collection of affinity landscapes; receptors select from this landscape via their unique interaction energetics. To test this idea, we analyzed the cooperative binding energetics of the above three receptors using an array of promoters. We find that cooperativity is not only receptor-specific but also highly promoter-specific. Thus PR shows maximal cooperativity at promoters with closely spaced and in phase binding sites. GR cooperativity is maintained over greater distances, is larger energetically, and shows markedly different phase dependency. Finally, ER-α appears incapable of cooperativity regardless of promoter architecture, consistent with its more distant phylogeny.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bain DL, Connaghan KD, Maluf NK, Yang Q, Miura MT, De Angelis RW, Degala GD, Lambert JR. Steroid receptor-DNA interactions: toward a quantitative connection between energetics and transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 42:691-700. [PMID: 24064251 PMCID: PMC3902896 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise an evolutionarily conserved family of transcription factors. Although the qualitative aspects by which individual receptors regulate transcription are well understood, a quantitative perspective is less clear. This is primarily because receptor function is considerably more complex than that of classical regulatory factors such as phage or bacterial repressors. Here we discuss recent advances in placing receptor-specific transcriptional regulation on a more quantitative footing, specifically focusing on the role of macromolecular interaction energetics. We first highlight limitations and challenges associated with traditional approaches for assessing the role of energetics (more specifically, binding affinity) with functional outcomes such as transcriptional activation. We next demonstrate how rigorous in vitro measurements and straightforward interaction models quantitatively relate energetics to transcriptional activity within the cell, and follow by discussing why such an approach is unexpectedly effective in explaining complex functional behavior. Finally, we examine the implications of these findings for considering the unique gene regulatory properties of the individual receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA and Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
De Angelis RW, Yang Q, Miura MT, Bain DL. Dissection of androgen receptor-promoter interactions: steroid receptors partition their interaction energetics in parallel with their phylogenetic divergence. J Mol Biol 2013; 425:4223-35. [PMID: 23917122 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2013] [Revised: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 07/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and progesterone receptor (PR). Phylogenetic studies demonstrate that AR, GR, MR, and PR are most closely related, falling into subgroup 3C. ER is more distantly related, falling into subgroup 3A. To determine the quantitative basis by which receptors generate their unique transcriptional responses, we are systematically dissecting the promoter-binding energetics of all receptors under a single "standard state" condition. Here, we examine the self-assembly and promoter-binding energetics of full-length AR and a mutant associated with prostate cancer, T877A. We first demonstrate that both proteins exist only as monomers, showing no evidence of dimerization. Although this result contradicts the traditional understanding that steroid receptors dimerize in the absence of DNA, it is fully consistent with our previous work demonstrating that GR and two PR isoforms either do not dimerize or dimerize only weakly. Moreover, both AR proteins exhibit substantial cooperativity between binding sites, again as seen for GR and PR. In sharp contrast, the more distantly related ER-α dimerizes so strongly that energetics can only be measured indirectly, yet cooperativity is negligible. Thus, homologous receptors partition their promoter-binding energetics quite differently. Moreover, since receptors most closely related by phylogeny partition their energetics similarly, such partitioning appears to be evolutionarily conserved. We speculate that such differences in energetics, coupled with different promoter architectures, serve as the basis for generating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolando W De Angelis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Connaghan KD, Miura MT, Maluf NK, Lambert JR, Bain DL. Analysis of a glucocorticoid-estrogen receptor chimera reveals that dimerization energetics are under ionic control. Biophys Chem 2012; 172:8-17. [PMID: 23333595 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2012.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2012] [Revised: 12/11/2012] [Accepted: 12/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Steroid receptors assemble at DNA response elements as dimers, resulting in coactivator recruitment and transcriptional activation. Our work has focused on dissecting the energetics associated with these events and quantitatively correlating the results with function. A recent finding is that different receptors dimerize with large differences in energetics. For example, estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) dimerizes with a ΔG=-12.0 kcal/mol under conditions in which the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) dimerizes with a ΔG≤-5.1 kcal/mol. To determine the molecular forces responsible for such differences, we created a GR/ER chimera, replacing the hormone-binding domain (HBD) of GR with that of ER-α. Cellular and biophysical analyses demonstrate that the chimera is functionally active. However, GR/ER dimerization energetics are intermediate between the parent proteins and coupled to a strong ionic linkage. Since the ER-α HBD is the primary contributor to dimerization, we suggest that GR residues constrain an ion-regulated HBD assembly reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bain DL, Yang Q, Connaghan KD, Robblee JP, Miura MT, Degala GD, Lambert JR, Maluf NK. Glucocorticoid receptor-DNA interactions: binding energetics are the primary determinant of sequence-specific transcriptional activity. J Mol Biol 2012; 422:18-32. [PMID: 22698871 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2012] [Revised: 05/31/2012] [Accepted: 06/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. A long-standing question has focused on how GR and other receptors precisely control gene expression. One difficulty in addressing this is that GR function is influenced by multiple factors including ligand and coactivator levels, chromatin state, and allosteric coupling. Moreover, the receptor recognizes an array of DNA sequences that generate a range of transcriptional activities. Such complexity suggests that any single parameter-DNA binding affinity, for example-is unlikely to be a dominant contributor to function. Indeed, a number of studies have suggested that for GR and other receptors, binding affinity toward different DNA sequences is poorly correlated with transcriptional activity. As a step toward determining the factors most predictive of GR function, we rigorously examined the relationship between in vitro GR-DNA binding energetics and in vivo transcriptional activity. We first demonstrate that previous approaches for assessing affinity-function relationships are problematic due to issues of data transformation and linearization. Thus, the conclusion that binding energetics and transcriptional activity are poorly correlated is premature. Using more appropriate analyses, we find that energetics and activity are in fact highly correlated. Furthermore, this correlation can be quantitatively accounted for using simple binding models. Finally, we show that the strong relationship between energetics and transcriptional activity is recapitulated in multiple promoter contexts, cell lines, and chromatin environments. Thus, despite the complexity of GR function, DNA binding energetics are the primary determinant of sequence-specific transcriptional activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Robblee JP, Miura MT, Bain DL. Glucocorticoid receptor-promoter interactions: energetic dissection suggests a framework for the specificity of steroid receptor-mediated gene regulation. Biochemistry 2012; 51:4463-72. [PMID: 22587663 DOI: 10.1021/bi3003956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. A number of studies have shown that steroid receptors regulate distinct but overlapping sets of genes; however, the molecular basis for such specificity remains unclear. Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated that under identical solution conditions, three other steroid receptors [the progesterone receptor A isoform (PR-A), the progesterone receptor B isoform (PR-B), and estrogen receptor α (ER-α)] differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics. For example, PR-A and PR-B generate similar dimerization free energies but differ significantly in their extents of intersite cooperativity. Conversely, ER-α maintains an intersite cooperativity most comparable to that of PR-A yet dimerizes with an affinity orders of magnitude greater than that of either of the PR isoforms. We have speculated that these differences serve to generate receptor-specific promoter occupancies, and thus receptor-specific gene regulation. Noting that GR regulates a unique subset of genes relative to the other receptors, we hypothesized that the receptor should maintain a unique set of interaction energetics. We rigorously determined the self-association and promoter binding energetics of full-length, human GR under conditions identical to those used in our earlier studies. We find that unlike all other receptors, GR shows no evidence of reversible self-association. Moreover, GR assembles with strong intersite cooperativity comparable to that seen only for PR-B. Finally, simulations show that such partitioning of interaction energetics allows for receptor-specific promoter occupancies, even under conditions where multiple receptors are competing for binding at identical sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Robblee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cochrane DR, Jacobsen BM, Connaghan KD, Howe EN, Bain DL, Richer JK. Progestin regulated miRNAs that mediate progesterone receptor action in breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 355:15-24. [PMID: 22330642 PMCID: PMC4716679 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2011] [Revised: 11/23/2011] [Accepted: 12/29/2011] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Progesterone receptors (PRs) mediate response to progestins in the normal breast and breast cancer. To determine if liganded PR regulate microRNAs (miRNAs) as a component of their action, we profiled mature miRNA levels following progestin treatment. Indeed, 28 miRNAs are significantly altered by 6h of progestin treatment. Many progestin-responsive genes are putative targets of progestin-regulated miRNAs; for example, progestin treatment decreases miR-29, thereby relieving repression of one of its direct targets, the gene encoding ATPase, Na(+)/K(+) transporting, beta 1 polypeptide (ATP1B1). Thus, liganded PR regulates ATP1B1 through sites in the promoter and the 3'UTR, to achieve maximal tight hormonal regulation of ATP1B1 protein via both transcriptional and translational control. We find that ATP1B1 serves to limit migration and invasion in breast cancer cells. Lastly, we demonstrate that PR itself is regulated by a progestin-upregulated miRNA, miR-513a-5p, providing a novel mechanism for tight control of PR protein expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn R. Cochrane
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA
| | - Britta M. Jacobsen
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA
| | - Keith D. Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA
| | - Erin N. Howe
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA
| | - David L. Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA
| | - Jennifer K. Richer
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moody AD, Miura MT, Connaghan KD, Bain DL. Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics. Biochemistry 2012; 51:739-49. [PMID: 22201220 DOI: 10.1021/bi2017156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Steroid receptors define a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent work has demonstrated that the receptors regulate distinct but overlapping gene networks, yet the mechanisms by which they do so remain unclear. We previously determined the microscopic binding energetics for progesterone receptor (PR) isoform assembly at promoters containing multiple response elements. We found that the two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) share nearly identical dimerization and intrinsic DNA binding free energies but maintain large differences in cooperative free energy. Moreover, cooperativity can be modulated by monovalent ion binding and promoter layout, suggesting that differences in cooperativity might control isoform-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor function. To determine whether cooperative binding energetics are common to other members of the steroid receptor family, we dissected the thermodynamics of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α):promoter interactions. We find that the ER-α intrinsic DNA binding free energy is identical to that of the PR isoforms. This was expected, noting that receptor DNA binding domains are highly conserved. Unexpectedly, ER-α generates negligible cooperativity-orders of magnitude less than predicted based on our studies of the PR isoforms. However, analysis of the cooperativity term suggests that it reflects a balance between highly favorable cooperative stabilization and unfavorable promoter bending. Moreover, ER-α cooperative free energy is compensated for by a large increase in dimerization free energy. Collectively, the results demonstrate that steroid receptors differentially partition not only cooperative energetics but also dimerization energetics. We speculate that this ability serves as a framework for regulating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor-specific gene regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amie D Moody
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moody AD, Robblee JP, Bain DL. Dissecting the linkage between transcription factor self-assembly and site-specific DNA binding: the role of the analytical ultracentrifuge. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 796:187-204. [PMID: 22052491 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-334-9_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
A long-standing goal of biomedical research has been to determine the quantitative mechanisms responsible for gene regulation and transcriptional activation. These events occur through numerous protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, many of which are allosterically coupled. For systems where highly purified protein is available, analytical ultracentrifugation provides a means to study these linked reactions, allosteric or otherwise. Sedimentation velocity is an ultracentrifugation technique that provides rigorous insight into protein self-association, homogeneity, and gross structure. Because self-association is often in dynamic equilibrium with other reactions such as DNA binding, an explicit and independent analysis of each interaction is critical to revealing mechanism. This chapter details a protocol for using sedimentation velocity to dissect the linkage between transcription factor self-association and site-specific DNA binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amie D Moody
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moody AD, Miura MT, Connaghan KD, Bain DL. Thermodynamic Dissection of Estrogen Receptor-Promoter Interactions Reveals that Steroid Receptor Family Members Differentially Partition their Binding Energetics. Biophys J 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
21
|
Connaghan KD, Moody AD, Robblee JP, Lambert JR, Bain DL. From steroid receptors to cytokines: the thermodynamics of self-associating systems. Biophys Chem 2011; 159:24-32. [PMID: 21696881 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2011] [Revised: 04/19/2011] [Accepted: 04/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Since 1987, the Gibbs Conference on Biothermodynamics has maintained a focus on understanding the quantitative aspects of gene regulatory systems. These studies coupled rigorous techniques with exact theory to dissect the linked reactions associated with bacterial and lower eukaryotic gene regulation. However, only in the last ten years has it become possible to apply this approach to clinically relevant, human gene regulatory systems. Here we summarize our work on the thermodynamics of human steroid receptors and their interactions with multi-site promoter sequences, highlighting results not available from more traditional biochemical and structural approaches. Noting that the Gibbs Conference has also served as a vehicle to promote the broader use of thermodynamics in understanding biology, we then discuss collaborative work on the hydrodynamics of a cytokine implicated in tumor suppression, prostate derived factor (PDF).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Connaghan KD, Heneghan AF, Miura MT, Bain DL. Na(+) and K(+) allosterically regulate cooperative DNA binding by the human progesterone receptor. Biochemistry 2010; 49:422-31. [PMID: 20000807 DOI: 10.1021/bi901525m] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cooperativity is a common mechanism used by transcription factors to generate highly responsive yet stable gene regulation. For the two isoforms of human progesterone receptor (PR-A and PR-B), differences in cooperative DNA binding energetics may account for their differing transcriptional activation properties. Here we report on the molecular origins responsible for cooperativity, finding that it can be activated or repressed with Na(+) and K(+), respectively. We demonstrate that PR self-association and DNA-dependent cooperativity are linked to a monovalent cation binding event and that this binding is coupled to modulation of receptor structure. K(+) and Na(+) are therefore allosteric effectors of PR function. Noting that the apparent binding affinities of Na(+) and K(+) are comparable to their intracellular concentrations and that PR isoforms directly regulate the genes of a number of ion pumps and channels, these results suggest that Na(+) and K(+) may additionally function as physiological regulators of PR action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Connaghan-Jones KD, Moody AD, Bain DL. Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a tool for analyzing the energetics of protein-DNA interactions. Nat Protoc 2008; 3:900-14. [PMID: 18451798 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
A major goal in biomedical research is to determine the mechanisms responsible for gene regulation. However, the promoters and operators that control transcription are often complex in nature, containing multiple-binding sites with which DNA-binding proteins can interact cooperatively. Quantitative DNase footprint titration is one of the few techniques capable of resolving the microscopic binding affinities responsible for the macroscopic assembly process. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol for carrying out a footprint titration experiment. We then describe how to quantify the resultant images to generate individual-site binding curves. Finally, we derive basic equations for binding at each site and present an overview of the fitting process, applying it to the anticipated results. Users should anticipate that the footprinting experiment will take 3-5 d starting from DNA template isolation to image acquisition and quantitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan-Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Connaghan-Jones KD, Heneghan AF, Miura MT, Bain DL. Thermodynamic dissection of progesterone receptor interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter: monomer binding and strong cooperativity dominate the assembly reaction. J Mol Biol 2008; 377:1144-60. [PMID: 18313072 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2007] [Revised: 01/17/2008] [Accepted: 01/18/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Progesterone receptors (PRs) play critical roles in eukaryotic gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which they assemble at their promoters are poorly understood. One of the few promoters amenable to analysis is the mouse mammary tumor virus gene regulatory sequence. Embedded within this sequence are four progesterone response elements (PREs) corresponding to a palindromic PRE and three half-site PREs. Early mutational studies indicated that the presence of all four sites generated a synergistic and strong transcriptional response. However, DNA binding analyses suggested that receptor assembly at the promoter occurred in the absence of significant cooperativity. Taken together, the results indicated that cooperative interactions among PREs could not account for the observed functional synergy. More broadly, the studies raised the question of whether cooperativity was a common feature of PR-mediated gene regulation. As a step toward obtaining a quantitative and, thus, predictive understanding of receptor function, we have carried out a thermodynamic dissection of PR A-isoform interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Utilizing analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative footprinting, we have resolved the microscopic energetics of PR A-isoform binding, including cooperativity terms. Our results reveal a model contrary to that inferred from previous biochemical investigations. Specifically, the binding unit at a half-site is not a receptor dimer but is instead a monomer; monomers bound at half-sites are capable of significant pairwise cooperative interactions; occupancy of all three half-sites is required to cooperatively engage the palindromic-bound dimer; and finally, large unfavorable forces accompany assembly. Overall, monomer binding accounts for the majority of the intrinsic binding energetics and cooperativity contributes an approximately 1000-fold increase in receptor-promoter stability. Finally, the partitioning of cooperativity suggests a framework for interpreting in vivo transcriptional synergy. These results highlight the insight available from rigorous analysis and demonstrate that receptor-promoter interactions are considerably more complex than typically envisioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan-Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, C-238, University of Colorado Denver, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Denver, CO 80262, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Heneghan AF, Connaghan-Jones KD, Miura MT, Bain DL. Coactivator assembly at the promoter: efficient recruitment of SRC2 is coupled to cooperative DNA binding by the progesterone receptor. Biochemistry 2007; 46:11023-32. [PMID: 17845055 DOI: 10.1021/bi700850v] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
A largely unsolved problem in eukaryotic gene regulation focuses on the mechanisms by which DNA-bound transcription factors recruit coactivators to a promoter. Recent work has suggested that promoter DNA acts as an allosteric ligand, serving not only to bind and localize transcription factors but also to trigger structural changes within the proteins in order to elicit coactivator recruitment. Unfortunately, a quantitative and molecular understanding of this phenomenon remains unclear. We have previously resolved the microstate interaction energetics of progesterone receptor A-isoform (PR-A) assembly at multiple promoters; here we extend this work to the role of PR-A in mediating promoter-dependent recruitment of the coactivator, SRC2. Quantitative footprinting and statistical thermodynamic modeling of PR-A:promoter interactions in the presence and absence of coactivator demonstrate that receptor binding to a single response element is maximally coupled to a 2-fold enhancement in SRC2 binding. By contrast, PR-A assembly at multiple response elements is linked to an additional 6- to 10-fold increase in SRC2 affinity. This effect arises due to a coupled reaction between SRC2 uptake and enhanced cooperative interactions between adjacently bound PR-A dimers. Put another way, increased coactivator levels stabilize a higher-order receptor-promoter complex. These results may thus not only offer a mechanism for explaining the weak transcriptional activity seen for promoters containing a single binding site and the synergistically strong activity seen for multisite promoters but also suggest that in vivo fluctuations of coactivator levels might serve as a physiological regulator of assembly for PR-A (and for other nuclear receptors) at the promoter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron F Heneghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Small lipophilic molecules such as steroidal hormones, retinoids, and free fatty acids control many of the reproductive, developmental, and metabolic processes in eukaryotes. The mediators of these effects are nuclear receptor proteins, ligand-activated transcription factors capable of regulating the expression of complex gene networks. This review addresses the structure and structural properties of nuclear receptors, focusing on the well-studied ligand-binding and DNA-binding domains as well as our still-emerging understanding of the largely unstructured N-terminal regions. To emphasize the allosteric interdependence among these subunits, a more detailed inspection of the structural properties of the human progesterone receptor is presented. Finally, this work is placed in the context of developing a quantitative and mechanistic understanding of nuclear receptor function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Connaghan-Jones KD, Heneghan AF, Miura MT, Bain DL. Thermodynamic analysis of progesterone receptor-promoter interactions reveals a molecular model for isoform-specific function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:2187-92. [PMID: 17277083 PMCID: PMC1892943 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608848104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Human progesterone receptors (PR) exist as two functionally distinct isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The proteins are identical except for an additional 164 residues located at the N terminus of PR-B. To determine the mechanisms responsible for isoform-specific functional differences, we present here a thermodynamic dissection of PR-A-promoter interactions and compare the results to our previous work on PR-B. This analysis has generated a number of results inconsistent with the traditional, biochemically based model of receptor function. Specifically, statistical models invoking preformed PR-A dimers as the active binding species demonstrate that intrinsic binding energetics are over an order of magnitude greater than is apparent. High-affinity binding is opposed, however, by a large energetic penalty. The consequences of this penalty are 2-fold: Successive monomer binding to a palindromic response element is thermodynamically favored over preformed dimer binding, and DNA-induced dimerization of the monomers is largely abolished. Furthermore, PR-A binding to multiple PREs is only weakly cooperative, as judged by a 5-fold increase in overall stability. Comparison of these results to our work on PR-B demonstrates that whereas both isoforms appear to have similar DNA binding affinities, PR-B in fact has a greatly increased intrinsic binding affinity and cooperative binding ability relative to PR-A. These differences thus suggest that residues unique to PR-B allosterically regulate the energetics of cooperative promoter assembly. From a functional perspective, the differences in microscopic affinities predict receptor-promoter occupancies that accurately correlate with the transcriptional activation profiles seen for each isoform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D. Connaghan-Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
| | - Aaron F. Heneghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
| | - Michael T. Miura
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
| | - David L. Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
- *To whom correspondence should be addressed at:
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, C-238, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Connaghan-Jones KD, Heneghan AF, Miura MT, Bain DL. Hydrodynamic analysis of the human progesterone receptor A-isoform reveals that self-association occurs in the micromolar range. Biochemistry 2006; 45:12090-9. [PMID: 17002309 DOI: 10.1021/bi0612317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Human progesterone receptors exist as two functionally distinct isoforms, an 83 kDa A-receptor (PR-A) and a 99 kDa B-receptor (PR-B). The isoforms are identical except that PR-B has an additional 164 amino acids at its N-terminus. We have previously characterized the hydrodynamics and solution assembly energetics of PR-B [Heneghan, A. F., et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 9528-9537], and here we present an analysis of PR-A. At micromolar concentrations of the receptor, sedimentation velocity studies demonstrate that PR-A undergoes a concentration-dependent change in its sedimentation coefficient distribution, indicative of a self-associating system. Global analysis of data sets collected at multiple PR-A concentrations supports the presence of a hydrodynamically homogeneous 3.50 S monomer species in equilibrium with a 7.15 S dimer species. Sedimentation equilibrium analysis demonstrates that self-association can be rigorously described by a monomer-dimer assembly reaction and a dimerization free energy of -7.6 +/- 0.6 kcal/mol. Both the PR-A monomer and dimer are structurally asymmetric, although the extent of asymmetry is significantly decreased for the dimer, indicative of quaternary-induced hydrodynamic compaction. Limited proteolysis studies suggest that PR-A asymmetry arises from an ensemble of partially folded conformations within the N-terminal half of the molecule. Finally, comparison to our previous work on PR-B self-association energetics demonstrates that it dimerizes, under identical solution conditions, with an affinity at least 8-fold weaker than that of PR-A. Thus, residues unique to the B-isoform destabilize receptor assembly energetics. Importantly, the physical and chemical driving forces underlying isoform-specific dimerization suggest that B-unique amino acids modulate the energetics through an allosteric mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan-Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Heneghan AF, Connaghan-Jones KD, Miura MT, Bain DL. Cooperative DNA binding by the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor: thermodynamic analysis reveals strongly favorable and unfavorable contributions to assembly. Biochemistry 2006; 45:3285-96. [PMID: 16519523 PMCID: PMC2505112 DOI: 10.1021/bi052046g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Progesterone receptors (PR) play critical roles in eukaryotic gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which they assemble at multisite promoters are poorly understood. Here we present a thermodynamic analysis of the interactions of the PR B-isoform (PR-B) with promoters containing either one or two progesterone response elements (PREs). Utilizing quantitative footprinting, we have resolved the microscopic energetics of PR-B binding, including cooperativity terms. The results of this analysis challenge a number of assumptions found in traditional models of receptor function. First, PR-B interactions at a single PRE can be equally well described by mechanisms invoking either the receptor monomer or the dimer as the active DNA binding species. If, as is commonly accepted, PR-B interacts with response elements only as a preformed dimer, then its intrinsic binding affinity is not the typically observed nanomolar but is rather picomolar. This high affinity binding is opposed, however, by a large energetic penalty. The penalty presumably pays for costly structural rearrangements of the receptor dimer and/or response element that are needed to form the protein-DNA complex. If PR-B assembles at a single response element via successive monomer binding reactions, then this penalty minimizes cooperative interactions between adjacent monomers. When binding to two response elements, the receptor exhibits strong intersite cooperativity. Although this phenomenon has been observed before, the present work demonstrates that the energetics reach levels seen in highly cooperative systems such as lambda cI repressor. This first quantitative dissection of cooperative receptor-promoter interactions suggests that PR-B function is more complex than traditionally envisioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron F Heneghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heneghan AF, Berton N, Miura MT, Bain DL. Self-association energetics of an intact, full-length nuclear receptor: the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor dimerizes in the micromolar range. Biochemistry 2005; 44:9528-37. [PMID: 15996107 DOI: 10.1021/bi050609i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We are focused on understanding the mechanisms underlying eukaryotic gene regulation, using the human progesterone receptor (PR) and its interactions with its DNA response elements as a model system. An understanding of PR function is complicated by the presence of two transcriptionally distinct isoforms, an 83 kDa A-receptor (PR-A) and a 99 kDa B-receptor (PR-B). The two isoforms are identical except the B-receptor contains an additional 164 residues at its N-terminus. As a first step toward understanding the principles by which the two isoforms assemble at complex promoters, we examined the energetics of PR-B self-association using sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium methods. Full-length human PR-B was purified to 95% homogeneity from baculovirus-infected insect cells. Using a fluorescence hormone binding assay, we determined the purified protein to be highly active in its ability to bind ligand. Sedimentation velocity studies of hormone-bound PR-B at pH 8.0, 4 degrees C, and 50 mM NaCl demonstrate that it undergoes a concentration-dependent change in its sedimentation coefficient, existing as a 4.0S species at submicromolar concentrations but forming a 5.7S species at higher concentrations. These results strongly suggest that PR-B undergoes self-association in the micromolar range. This hypothesis was examined rigorously using sedimentation equilibrium. Global analysis of the sedimentation equilibrium data demonstrated that PR-B self-association was well described by a monomer-dimer model with a dimerization free energy of -7.2 +/- 0.7 kcal/mol. The role of NaCl in regulating PR-B dimerization was examined by carrying out sedimentation velocity and equilibrium studies under high salt conditions. At 300 mM NaCl, PR-B is exclusively monomeric in the micromolar range, thus revealing a significant ionic contribution to the assembly energetics. Further, the monomer sediments as a structurally homogeneous, but highly asymmetric, 4.0S species. Limited proteolysis of PR-B demonstrated that the hydrodynamic asymmetry is due in part to an extended, nonglobular conformation localized to the N-terminal region of PR-B. In contrast, the DNA binding domain (DBD) and hormone binding domain (HBD) exist as independent structural units, and the activation function N-terminal to the DBD (AF-1) shows moderate structure. These results represent the first rigorous analysis of the self-assembly energetics of an intact nuclear receptor and suggest that PR function is more complex than envisioned by traditional models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron F Heneghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Martin SL, Branciforte D, Keller D, Bain DL. Trimeric structure for an essential protein in L1 retrotransposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:13815-20. [PMID: 14615577 PMCID: PMC283504 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2336221100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2003] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Two proteins are encoded by the mammalian retrotransposon long interspersed nuclear element 1 (LINE-1 or L1); both are essential for retrotransposition. The function of the protein encoded by the 5'-most ORF, ORF1p, is incompletely understood, although the ORF1p from mouse L1 is known to bind single-stranded nucleic acids and function as a nucleic acid chaperone. ORF1p self-associates by means of a long coiled-coil domain in the N-terminal region of the protein, and the basic, C-terminal region (C-1/3 domain) contains the nucleic acid binding activity. The full-length and C-1/3 domains of ORF1p were purified to near homogeneity then analyzed by gel filtration chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation. Both proteins were structurally homogeneous and asymmetric in solution, with the full-length version forming a stable trimer and the C-1/3 domain remaining a monomer. Examination of the full-length protein by atomic force microscopy revealed an asymmetric dumbbell shape, congruent with the chromatography and ultracentrifugation results. These structural features are compatible with the nucleic acid binding and chaperone activities of L1 ORF1p and offer further insight into the functions of this unique protein during LINE-1 retrotransposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra L Martin
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology and Program in Molecular Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Takimoto GS, Tung L, Abdel-Hafiz H, Abel MG, Sartorius CA, Richer JK, Jacobsen BM, Bain DL, Horwitz KB. Functional properties of the N-terminal region of progesterone receptors and their mechanistic relationship to structure. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003; 85:209-19. [PMID: 12943706 DOI: 10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00197-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Progesterone receptors (PR) are present in two isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The B-upstream segment (BUS) of PR-B is a 164 amino acid N-terminal extension that is missing in PR-A and is responsible for the functional differences reported between the two isoforms. BUS contains an activation function (AF3) which is defined by a core domain between residues 54-154 whose activity is dependent upon a single Trp residue and two LXXLL motifs. We have also identified sites both within and outside of BUS that repress the strong synergism between AF3 and AF1 in the N-terminal region and AF2 in the hormone binding domain. One of these repressor sites is a consensus binding motif for the small ubiquitin-like modifier protein, SUMO-1 (387IKEE). The DNA binding domain (DBD) structure is also important for function. When BUS is linked to the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, AF3 activity is substantially attenuated, suggesting that binding to a DNA response element results in allosteric communication between the DBD and N-terminal functional regions. Lastly, biochemical and biophysical analyses of highly purified PR-B and PR-A N-terminal regions reveal that they are unstructured unless the DBD is present. Thus, the DBD stabilizes N-terminal structure. We propose a model in which the DBD through DNA binding, and BUS through protein-protein interactions, stabilize active receptor conformers within an ensemble distribution of active and inactive conformational states. This would explain why PR-B are stronger transactivators than PR-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn S Takimoto
- Department of Medicine, Molecular Biology Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is a 300-kDa homodimer that can exist as an NAD+-dependent dehydrogenase (XD) or as an O2-dependent oxidase (XO) depending on the oxidation state of its cysteine thiols. Both XD and XO undergo limited cleavage by chymotrypsin and trypsin. Trypsin selectively cleaved both enzyme forms at Lys184, while chymotrypsin cleaved XD primarily at Met181 but cleaved XO at Met181 and at Phe560. Chymotrypsin, but not trypsin, cleavage also prevented the reductive conversion of XO to XD; thus the region surrounding Phe560 appears to be important in the interconversion of the two forms. Size exclusion chromatography showed that disulfide bond formation reduced the hydrodynamic volume of the enzyme, and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of chymotrypsin-digested XO showed significant, disulfide bond-mediated, conformational heterogeneity in the N-terminal third of the enzyme but no evidence of disulfide bonds between the N-terminal and C-terminal regions or between XOR subunits. These results indicate that intrasubunit disulfide bond formation leads to a global conformational change in XOR that results in the exposure of the region surrounding Phe560. Conformational changes within this region in turn appear to play a critical role in the interconversion between the XD and XO forms of the enzyme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L McManaman
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bain DL, Lietman T, Rasmussen S, Kalman S, Fan J, Lammel C, Zhang JZ, Dawson CR, Schachter J, Stephens RS. Chlamydial genovar distribution after community wide antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis 2001; 184:1581-8. [PMID: 11740734 DOI: 10.1086/324661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2000] [Revised: 07/31/2001] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Major outer membrane protein sequences, determined from Chlamydia-positive eye swab samples collected in 2 Egyptian villages, were used to analyze the epidemiology of trachoma in an endemic setting. Samples were collected during the 1999 Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma trial, in which residents of villages were mass treated with either oral azithromycin or topical tetracycline and were followed up for nearly 2 years. Three genovar families (A, Ba, and C) and 12 genovars were detected, with 2 genovars (A1 and Ba1) comprising almost 75% of the samples. The presence of >1 genovar within households was common, with > or =24% of households having >1 genovar. Evidence consistent with reinfection and persistence as mechanisms of communitywide continued presence of trachoma was provided by data for individuals infected with rare genovars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bain
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bain DL, Franden MA, McManaman JL, Takimoto GS, Horwitz KB. The N-terminal region of human progesterone B-receptors: biophysical and biochemical comparison to A-receptors. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:23825-31. [PMID: 11328821 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m102611200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
To understand the basis for functional differences between the two human progesterone receptors (PR), we have carried out a detailed biochemical and biophysical analysis of the N-terminal region of each isoform. Extending our previous work on the A-isoform (Bain, D. L, Franden, M. A., McManaman, J. L., Takimoto, G. S., and Horwitz, K. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 7313-7320), here we present studies on the N-terminal region of the B-isoform (NT-B) and compare its properties to its A-receptor counterpart (NT-A). As seen previously with NT-A, NT-B is quantitatively monomeric in solution, yet undergoes N-terminal-mediated assembly upon DNA binding. Limited proteolysis, microsequencing, and sedimentation analyses indicate that the B-isoform exists in a non-globular, extended conformation very similar to that of NT-A. Additionally, the 164 amino acids unique to the B-isoform (BUS) appear to be in a more extended conformation relative to sequences common to both receptors and do not exist as an independent structural domain. However, sedimentation studies of NT-A and NT-B show differences in the ensemble distribution of their conformational states. We hypothesize that isoform-specific functional differences are not due to structural differences, per se. Rather, the transcriptional element BUS, or possibly other transcription factors, causes a redistribution of the conformational ensemble by stabilizing a more functionally active set of conformations in NT-B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bain
- Department of Medicine and The Molecular Biology Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bain DL, Berton N, Ortega M, Baran J, Yang Q, Catalano CE. Biophysical characterization of the DNA binding domain of gpNu1, a viral DNA packaging protein. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:20175-81. [PMID: 11279084 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m100517200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Terminase enzymes are common to double-stranded DNA viruses. These enzymes "package" the viral genome into a pre-formed capsid. Terminase from bacteriophage lambda is composed of gpA (72.4 kDa) and gpNu1 (20.4 kDa) subunits. We have described the expression and biochemical characterization of gpNu1DeltaK100, a construct comprising the N-terminal 100 amino acids of gpNu1 (Yang, Q., de Beer, T., Woods, L., Meyer, J., Manning, M., Overduin, M., and Catalano, C. E. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 465-477). Here we present a biophysical characterization of this construct. Thermally induced loss of secondary and tertiary structures is fully reversible. Surprisingly, although loss of tertiary structure is cooperative, loss of secondary structure is non-cooperative. NMR and limited proteolysis data suggest that approximately 30 amino acids of gpNu1DeltaK100 are solvent-exposed and highly flexible. We therefore constructed gpNu1DeltaE68, a protein consisting of the N-terminal 68 residues of gpNu1. gpNu1DeltaE68 is a dimer with no evidence of dissociation or further aggregation. Thermally induced unfolding of gpNu1DeltaE68 is reversible, with concomitant loss of both secondary and tertiary structure. The melting temperature increases with increasing protein concentration, suggesting that dimerization and folding are, at least in part, coupled. The data suggest that gpNu1DeltaE68 represents the minimal DNA binding domain of gpNu1. We further suggest that the C-terminal approximately 30 residues in gpNu1DeltaK100 adopt a pseudo-stable alpha-helix that extends from the folded core of the protein. A model describing the role of this helix in the assembly of the packaging apparatus is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Graham JD, Bain DL, Richer JK, Jackson TA, Tung L, Horwitz KB. Thoughts on tamoxifen resistant breast cancer. Are coregulators the answer or just a red herring? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2000; 74:255-9. [PMID: 11162933 DOI: 10.1016/s0960-0760(00)00101-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The antiestrogen tamoxifen is an effective treatment for estrogen receptor positive breast cancers, slowing tumor growth and preventing disease recurrence, with relatively few side effects. However, many patients who initially respond to treatment, later become resistant to treatment. Tamoxifen has both agonist and antagonist activities, which are manifested in a tissue-specific pattern. Development of tamoxifen resistance can be characterized by an increase in the partial agonist properties of the antiestrogen in the breast, resulting in loss of growth inhibition and even inappropriate tumor stimulation. Nuclear receptor function is modulated by transcriptional coregulators, which either enhance or repress receptor activity. Using a mixed antagonist-biased two-hybrid screening strategy, we identified two such proteins: the human homolog of the nuclear receptor corepressor, N-CoR, and a novel coactivator, L7/SPA (Switch Protein for Antagonists). In transcriptional studies N-CoR suppressed the agonist properties of tamoxifen and RU486, while L7/SPA increased agonist effects. We speculated that the relative level of these coactivators and corepressors might determine the balance of agonist and antagonist properties of mixed antagonists such as tamoxifen. Using quantitative RT-PCR we therefore measured the levels of transcripts encoding these coregulators, as well as the corepressor SMRT, and the coactivator SRC-1, in a small cohort of tamoxifen resistant and sensitive breast tumors. The results suggest that tumor sensitivity to mixed antagonists may be governed by a complex set of transcription factors, which we are only now beginning to understand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Graham
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, 80262, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The development of tamoxifen resistance and consequent disease progression are common occurrences in breast cancers, often despite the continuing expression of estrogen receptors (ER). Tamoxifen is a mixed antagonist, having both agonist and antagonist properties. We have suggested that the development of tamoxifen resistance is associated with an increase in its agonist-like properties, resulting in loss of antagonist effects or even inappropriate tumor stimulation. Nuclear receptor function is influenced by a family of transcriptional coregulators, that either enhance or suppress transcriptional activity. Using a mixed antagonist-biased two-hybrid screening strategy, we identified two such proteins: the human homolog of the nuclear receptor corepressor, N-CoR, and a novel coactivator, L7/SPA (Switch Protein for Antagonists). In transcriptional studies, N-CoR suppressed the agonist properties of tamoxifen and RU486, and L7/SPA increased agonist effects. We speculated that the relative levels of these coactivators and corepressors may determine the balance of agonist and antagonist properties of mixed antagonists, such as tamoxifen. Using quantitative RT-PCR, we, therefore, measured the levels of transcripts encoding these coregulators, as well as the corepressor SMRT, and the coactivator SRC-1, in a small cohort of tamoxifen-resistant and sensitive breast tumors. The results suggest that tumor sensitivity to mixed antagonists may be governed by a complex set of transcription factors, which we are only now beginning to understand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Graham
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bain DL, Franden MA, McManaman JL, Takimoto GS, Horwitz KB. The N-terminal region of the human progesterone A-receptor. Structural analysis and the influence of the DNA binding domain. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:7313-20. [PMID: 10702302 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of the N-terminal region in nuclear receptor function was addressed by a biochemical and biophysical analysis of the progesterone receptor A-isoform lacking only the hormone binding domain (NT-A). Sedimentation studies demonstrate that NT-A is quantitatively monomeric, with a highly asymmetric shape. Contrary to dogma, the N-terminal region is structured as demonstrated by limited proteolysis. However, N-terminal structure is strongly stabilized by the DNA binding domain, possibly explaining the lack of structure seen in isolated activation domains. Upon DNA binding, NT-A undergoes N-terminal mediated assembly, suggestive of DNA-induced allostery, and consistent with changes in protease accessibility of sites outside the DNA binding domain. Microsequencing reveals that protease-accessible regions are limited to previously identified phosphorylation motifs and to functional domain boundaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bain
- Department of Medicine and Molecular Biology Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
We were interested in measuring the proportion of anaesthetic interventions in routine practice that are supported by evidence in the literature. We surveyed our hospital practice, asking anaesthetists to nominate a primary problem (if any) and their chosen intervention. Each intervention was classified into one of four levels according to the strength of the evidence recovered from the literature. We found that 96.7% were evidence-based (levels I-IV), including 32% supported by randomized, controlled trials (levels I and II). These results are similar to recent studies in other specialties and refute the claim that only 10-20% of treatments have any scientific foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P S Myles
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
A cryogenic gel mobility shift technique was developed in which a mixture of protein and DNA samples at equilibrium is rapidly quenched and electrophoresed at -40 degrees C. The rapid and sustained drop in temperature results in almost complete stabilization of the equilibrium species distribution. Autoradiogram analysis of relative abundances for the bound and free DNA sites is carried out over a range of initial binding ratios to yield the binding curve and equilibrium constant as in the usual gel-shift assay. Validity of this technique for determining equilibrium populations of the interacting species is based upon two testable assumptions: (i) The equilibrium species distribution does not change during the cryogenic quench procedure. (ii) This equilibrium distribution is also constant during electrophoresis of the sample. Evidence supporting these assumptions was obtained using lambda cI repressor and a 570-bp DNA fragment containing the repressor binding site OR1. The resolved free energy for this interaction (delta G1) was shown to be independent of the quench procedure, duration of the quench stage, residence time in the gel wells, and duration of low-temperature electrophoresis. The technique yielded a free energy that was in close agreement with those from filter binding and DNAse footprint titration methods. This cryogenic version of the gel-shift method may prove especially useful in cases like that of lambda cI/OR1 binding, for which conventional gel-shift methodology has not been feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bain
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Perrin MH, Sutton S, Bain DL, Berggren WT, Vale WW. The first extracellular domain of corticotropin releasing factor-R1 contains major binding determinants for urocortin and astressin. Endocrinology 1998; 139:566-70. [PMID: 9449626 DOI: 10.1210/endo.139.2.5757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The CRF receptors are members of a 7-transmembrane receptor family that includes GH-releasing hormone (GRF), calcitonin, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), secretin, and PTH receptors. To determine the structural features of the CRF receptor that may influence ligand recognition, a series of mutant receptors was analyzed for binding to astressin, a CRF antagonist, and to urocortin, a CRF agonist. Mutant receptors included chimeras between the CRF-R1 and GRF-R or Activin IIB-R, a single membrane spanning receptor serine/threonine kinase. Binding to the mutant receptors was assessed using 125I-[DTyr1] astressin (Ast*) and 125I-[Tyr0]-rat urocortin (Ucn*). There was no binding to a chimeric receptor in which the first extracellular domain (E1c) (i.e. the N-terminal region) of the CRF-R1 was replaced by that of the GRF-R. The complementary chimera in which E1 domain of the GRF-R was replaced by that of the CRF-R1 bound astressin and urocortin with Ki values approximately 10 nM, compared with inhibitory binding dissociation constant (Ki) values of approximately 2-4 nM for the wild-type CRF-R1. The chimera in which E1 of the activin IIB receptor was replaced by E1 of the CRF-R1 bound astressin with a Ki approximately 4 nM. A chimera in which both the first and fourth extracellular domains of the CRF-R1 replaced the corresponding domains of the GRF-R bound astressin with Ki approximately 4 nM and urocortin with a Ki approximately 2 nM. A chimera in which all four extracellular domains of the CRF receptor replaced those of the GRF-R bound astressin and urocortin with Ki values approximately 4 nM and approximately 1 nM, respectively. In conclusion, the major determinants for high affinity binding of CRF agonists and antagonists to CRF-R1 are found in the first extracellular domain of the receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Perrin
- The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037-1099, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jackson TA, Richer JK, Bain DL, Takimoto GS, Tung L, Horwitz KB. The partial agonist activity of antagonist-occupied steroid receptors is controlled by a novel hinge domain-binding coactivator L7/SPA and the corepressors N-CoR or SMRT. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:693-705. [PMID: 9171233 DOI: 10.1210/mend.11.6.0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Steroid receptor antagonists, such as the antiestrogen tamoxifen or the antiprogestin RU486, can have inappropriate agonist-like effects in tissues and tumors. To explain this paradox we postulated that coactivators are inadvertently brought to the promoters of DNA-bound, antagonist-occupied receptors. The human (h) progesterone receptor (PR) hinge-hormone binding domain (H-HBD) was used as bait in a two-hybrid screen of a HeLa cDNA library, in which the yeast cells were treated with RU486. We have isolated and characterized two interesting steroid receptor-interacting proteins that regulate transcription in opposite directions. The first is L7/SPA, a previously described 27-kDa protein containing a basic region leucine zipper domain, having no known nuclear function. When coexpressed with tamoxifen-occupied estrogen receptors (hER) or RU486-occupied hPR or glucocorticoid receptors (hGR), L7/SPA increases the partial agonist activity of the antagonists by 3- to 10-fold, but it has no effect on agonist-mediated transcription. The interaction of L7/SPA with hPR maps to the hinge region, and indeed, the hPR hinge region squelches L7/SPA-dependent induction of antagonist-mediated transcription. Interestingly, pure antagonists that lack partial agonist effects, such as the antiestrogen ICI164,384 or the antiprogestin ZK98299, cannot be up-regulated by L7/SPA. We also isolated, cloned, and sequenced the human homolog (hN-CoR) of the 270-kDa mouse (m) thyroid/retinoic acid receptor corepressor. Binding of hN-CoR maps to the hPR-HBD. mN-CoR, and a related human corepressor, SMRT, suppress RU486 or tamoxifen-mediated partial agonist activity by more than 90%. This suppression is completely squelched by overexpression of the hPR H-HBD. Additionally, both corepressors reverse the antagonist-dependent transcriptional up-regulation produced by L7/SPA. Our data suggest that the direction of transcription by antagonist-occupied steroid receptors can be controlled by the ratio of coactivators to corepressors recruited to the transcription complex by promoter-bound receptors. In normal tissues and in hormone-resistant breast cancers in which the agonist activity of mixed antagonists predominates, steroid receptors may be preferentially bound by coactivators. This suggests a strategy by which such partial agonist activity can be eliminated and by which candidate receptor ligands can be screened for this activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Jackson
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Abstract
The nuclear receptors belong to a superfamily of proteins, many of which are ligand-regulated, that bind to specific DNA sequences and control specific gene transcription. Recent data show that, in addition to contacting the basal transcription machinery directly, nuclear receptors inhibit or enhance transcription by recruiting an array of coactivator or corepressor proteins to the transcription complex. In this review we define the properties of these putative coregulatory factors; we describe the basal and coregulatory factors that are currently known to interact with nuclear receptors; we suggest various mechanisms by which coactivators and corepressors act; we discuss issues that are raised by the presence of multiple, perhaps competing, coregulatory factors; and we speculate how these additional regulatory layers may explain the heterogeneity of hormone responses that are observed in normal and malignant tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Horwitz
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bain DL, Ackers GK. Self-association and DNA binding of lambda cI repressor N-terminal domains reveal linkage between sequence-specific binding and the C-terminal cooperativity domain. Biochemistry 1994; 33:14679-89. [PMID: 7993896 DOI: 10.1021/bi00253a005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The effects of temperature, protons, and KCl on self-assembly and site-specific binding of lambda cI N-terminal domains with operator sites OR were studied to assess the roles of these domains in DNA binding and cooperativity of the natural system. Domain self-assembly was studied using sedimentation equilibrium while domain-OR interactions were analyzed by quantitative DNase footprint titration. The self-assembly reactions were modeled best as a monomer-dimer-tetramer stoichiometry. Compared with intact cI, the monomer-dimer assembly is energetically weak and is largely independent of pH and KCl. The van't Hoff enthalpy of dimerization was found to be large and positive (+ 10.8 kcal/mol), in sharp contrast to that of intact cI (i.e., -16.1 kcal/mol; Koblan & Ackers, 1991a), indicating that different driving forces dominate the respective assembly processes. The interactions of OR with N-terminal domains were noncooperative under all conditions studied. Binding at each site is accompanied by a negative enthalpy (large at site 1, small at sites 2 and 3). Identical values for salt release and proton absorption were found for the three sites. Comparisons with the analogous thermodynamic parameters from our previous studies indicate that N-terminal domains exhibit different linkages to pH, KCl, and T from those of intact cI-OR interactions. This implies that the domains do not act independently within the intact repressor. Since the linkage differences are dependent upon which site the proteins are binding, the C-terminal domain must play a role in repressor discrimination between specific sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bain
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- K S Koblan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lane P, Vichi P, Bain DL, Tritton TR. Temperature dependence studies of adriamycin uptake and cytotoxicity. Cancer Res 1987; 47:4038-42. [PMID: 3607749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
In order to learn whether a direct relationship exists between cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of Adriamycin, we have compared the temperature dependencies of these two processes in L1210 cells. We find that the equilibrium concentration of drug taken inside the cells varies smoothly with temperature between 37 degrees C and 0 degree C. Even at 0 degree C, however, there is still measurable uptake of the drug into cells. The cytotoxicity index (cloning in soft agar), on the other hand, does not parallel the uptake temperature dependence. Cytotoxicity rapidly diminishes as the temperature of drug exposure is lowered; at all temperatures below about 20 degrees C, Adriamycin is not active. In contrast, other cytotoxic anticancer drugs like mitomycin C, bleomycin, and ARK 73-21 (a platinum analogue) retain cytotoxic potency at low temperatures. The inability of Adriamycin to kill cells at low temperature persists even at very high drug concentrations where substantial quantities of drug enter the cells. The low temperature impotence is not a result of inoperative enzymes which could metabolize Adriamycin to an alkylating species or electron donor to oxygen, since NADH and NADPH dependent reductase activities show linear Arrhenius behavior with no indication of low temperature inactivity. Using purified L1210 plasma membranes with bound Adriamycin as a fluorescence polarization probe, we find evidence of a phase change in the cell surface occurring at the same temperature as the loss of biological activity (approximately equal to 20 degrees C). We conclude that Adriamycin induced cytotoxicity is not dictated solely by uptake, in apparent contradiction with mechanisms requiring an intracellular target. Moreover, the loss of cytotoxicity below 20 degrees C appears to be linked to a structural change in the cell surface membrane, supporting a role other than transport for this membrane in transducing Adriamycin action.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ostrowski LE, Ahsan A, Suthar BP, Pagast P, Bain DL, Wong C, Patel A, Schultz RM. Selective inhibition of proteolytic enzymes in an in vivo mouse model for experimental metastasis. Cancer Res 1986; 46:4121-8. [PMID: 3089587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Peptide aldehyde transition state analogue inhibitors of serine and cysteine proteases have been used to selectively inhibit proteases for which prior evidence supports a role in tumor cell metastasis. These enzymes include cathepsin B, urokinase plasminogen activator (PA), and thrombin. The inhibition constants of the peptidyl aldehyde inhibitors show that they are highly selective for a particular targeted serine or cysteine protease. The inhibitors are introduced by i.p. injection or by miniosmotic pumps into syngeneic C57BL/6 mice also given injections of B16-F10 melanoma cells, and the number of metastatic foci in the lung was determined. While the injection protocol gave an initially high but changing in vivo concentration of inhibitor over time, the minipump implant gave a constant steady state concentration of inhibitor over 5-7 days. Minipump infusion of leupeptin (acetylleucylleucylargininal), a strong inhibitor of cathepsin B at a steady state plasma concentration 1000-fold greater than its Ki(cathepsin B), gave no significant decrease in lung colonization by the B16 tumor cells. Ep475, a stoichiometric irreversible peptide inhibitor of cathepsin B-like proteases, also did not significantly inhibit metastatic foci formation. Introduction of selective inhibitors of urokinase PA, tert-butyloxycarbonylglutamylglycyl-argininal and H-glutamylglycylargininal at concentrations near its Ki, produced no significant decrease in mouse lung colonization. The selective thrombin inhibitor D-phenylalanylprolylargininal infused to a steady state concentration 100-fold greater than its Ki dramatically increased B16 melanoma colonization of mouse lung. The results indicate that neither secreted cathepsin B-like nor urokinase PA have roles in B16 colonization of mouse lung, while thrombin may have a role in preventing metastasis. These experiments do not eliminate roles for a cathepsin B-like enzyme or urokinase PA in the initial steps of the metastatic process.
Collapse
|