Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a study of 25 cases and comparison with stage III-IV ovarian papillary serous carcinoma

[CUP syndrome-diagnostics from the perspective of pathology]

PROBLEM

Histologic and immunohistologic workup of tumor material from metastases of a previously unknown primary tumor is important for identifying their origin, but is often insufficient for this purpose without clinical oncologic and radiologic evaluation.

PROCEDURE

In the initial cancer of unknown primary (CUP) situation, histologic and immunohistochemical workup together with clinicoradiologic correlations contribute significantly to the identification of the primary tumor. There are now accepted guidelines to follow when there is an initial CUP situation. Molecular diagnostic tools can be used to investigate changes at the nucleic acid level, which can provide clues about the primary tumor, including potential targets for therapy. If, despite broad and interdisciplinary diagnostics, it is not possible to identify the primary tumor, the diagnosis is CUP syndrome. If a true CUP situation is present, it is important to assign the tumor to a tumor class or a specific therapy-sensitive subgroup as best as possible so that the best possible treatment can be given. However, for a final assignment to a primary tumor or a final classification as CUP, a comparison with medical oncological and imaging findings is indispensable.

CONCLUSION

When CUP is suspected, close interdisciplinary collaboration between pathology, medical oncology, and imaging is essential to achieve a viable classification as CUP or identification of a presumptive primary tumor, in the interest of providing the most specific and effective therapy for affected individuals.

[Peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to CUP syndrome : Diagnosis and indications for multimodal treatment]

CLINICAL PROBLEM

Peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to cancer of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome is a rare entity for which there are no uniform treatment recommendations or guidelines. The median survival time is 3 months.

DIAGNOSIS

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ¹⁸F‑FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT are valid imaging modalities for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The sensitivity of all techniques is highest for large, macronodular peritoneal carcinomatosis manifestations. A limitation of all imaging techniques is limited and small-nodular peritoneal carcinomatosis. Also, peritoneal metastasis in the small bowel mesentery or diaphragmatic domes can only be visualized with low sensitivity. Therefore, exploratory laparoscopy should be considered as the next diagnostic step. In half of these cases an unnecessary laparotomy can be avoided, because the laparoscopy revealed diffuse, small-nodule involvement of the small bowel wall and thus an irresectable situation.

TREATMENT

In selected patients, performing complete cytoreduction followed by hyperthermic intra-abdominal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a good therapeutic option. Therefore, the identification of the extent of peritoneal tumor manifestation as accurately as possible is important for the definition of the increasingly complex oncological therapy strategies.

An emerging role of the 5' termini of mature tRNAs in human diseases: Current situation and prospects

The fundamental biological roles of a class of small noncoding RNAs (sncRNAs), derived from mature tRNAs or pre-tRNAs, in human diseases have received increasing attention in recent years. These ncRNAs are called tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs) or tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs). tRFs mainly include tRF-1, tRF-5, tRF-3 and tRNA halves (tiRNAs or tRHs), which are produced by enzyme-specific cleavage of tRNAs. Here, we classify tRF-5 and 5' tiRNAs into the same category: 5'-tRFs and review the biological functions and regulatory mechanisms of 5'-tRFs in cancer and other diseases (metabolic diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, pathological stress injury and virus infection) to provide a new theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases.

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma: a primer for radiologists

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare primary peritoneal tumor characterized by a unique range of clinical features and imaging findings. Though it shares many clinical, histologic, and imaging features with serous ovarian carcinoma, it remains a distinct clinical entity. Although less common than its primary ovarian counterpart, PPSC is characterized by a prognosis that is often equally poor with presentations common in late stages of disease. Key imaging modalities used in the evaluation of PPSC include ultrasound, CT, MRI, and PET/CT. For radiologists, an understanding of the pertinent imaging findings, pathologic correlations, and clinical features of PPSC is essential for arriving at the correct diagnosis and guiding the subsequent appropriate management of this complex malignancy.

Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study

Background

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare tumor that lacks a prognostic prediction model. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of PPSC patients.

Methods

Patients confirmed to have PPSC between 2004 and 2012 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen for meaningful independent prognostic factors to construct a nomogram model for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS among patients with PPSC. The nomogram compared the discrimination, calibration, and net benefits with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system of PPSC patients.

Results

Eight variables were selected to establish the nomogram for PPSC. The established nomogram performed significantly better than the FIGO staging system (p < 0.05). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS of PPSC was 0.498, 0.306, and 0.152, respectively. Patients of old age, widowed marital status, grade high, FIGO IIIB, IIIC, or IV, lymph node metastasis, no lymphadenectomy, no surgery, and no chemotherapy got higher score which corresponds with higher risk and lower OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, histological grade, FIGO staging, lymph node metastasis, and lymphadenectomy (four or more) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PPSC.

Conclusions

PPSC patients have distinct characteristics with respect to their presentation and survival outcomes. A prognostic nomogram constructed by various clinical indicators can provide better and more accurate predictions for patients with PPSC.

Differences between primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and advanced serous ovarian carcinoma: a study based on the SEER database

Objective

This study aimed to compare clinical features and overall survival (OS) between patients with primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) and those with advanced serous ovarian carcinoma (ASOC) and to identify prognostic factors.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PPSC and ASOC from 2010 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare clinical features. The primary endpoint was OS. The Kaplan–Meier method and log–rank test were used to perform the survival analysis. Propensity score matching was also conducted. Univariate, multivariate and subgroup analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A total of 708 PPSC patients and 7610 ASOC patients were enrolled. The clinical features of PPSC patients were noticeably different from those of ASOC patients. The survival analysis showed that PPSC patients had poorer outcomes than ASOC patients. Even after the clinical features were balanced, PPSC patients still had poorer survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that older age, higher tumor grade and advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage were adverse prognostic factors in both groups, while surgery and chemotherapy were protective factors. A subgroup analysis demonstrated that most factors favored ASOC patients. The total distant metastasis rates of PPSC and ASOC were similar. Liver or lung metastasis was common, but bone and brain metastases were rare. A higher proportion of liver metastasis was observed in the ASOC group.

Conclusion

The clinical features and survival outcomes between PPSC patients and ASOC patients are clearly different, and PPSC is more aggressive than ASOC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-021-00788-y.

Narrative review on serous primary peritoneal carcinoma of unknown primary site: four questions to be answered

Serous peritoneal papillary carcinoma (SPPC) represents a particular cancer of unknown primary (CUP) entity that arises in the peritoneal surface lining the abdomen and pelvis without a discriminative primary tumor site. In this review, we discuss the validity of SPPC as a distinct entity. Clinically, patients with SPPC are older, have higher parity and later menarche, are more often obese and probably have poorer survival compared to those with primary ovarian cancer. Pathologically, SPPC is more anaplastic and multifocal, unlike primary ovarian cancer which is commonly unifocal. Biologically, it presents a higher expression of proliferative signals and similar cell cycle and DNA repair protein expression. These differences hint towards SPPC and primary ovarian cancer being as a spectrum of disease. Patients with SPPC are traditionally managed similarly to stage III–IV ovarian cancer. The recommended approach integrates aggressive cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy to remove the macroscopic tumor, eradicate the microscopic residual disease, and control the microscopic metastasis. However, the available evidence lacks proper randomized or prospective studies on SPPC and is limited to retrospective series. The diligent identification of SPPC is warranted to design specific clinical trials that eventually evaluate the impact of the new therapeutics on this distinct entity.

tRNA-derived fragment tRF-03357 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Background

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is one of the most common ovarian epithelial malignancies. tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs) have been identified as novel potential biomarkers and targets for cancer therapy. Nevertheless, the influence of tRFs on HGSOC remains unknown. This study aimed to identify HGSOC-associated tRFs and to investigate the function and mechanism of key tRFs in SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cells.

Methods

The tRF profiles in HGSOC patients and controls were investigated using small RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed tRFs were verified by real-time PCR, and a key tRF was evaluated in a function study.

Results

A total of 27 tRFs were differentially expressed between HGSOC patients and controls. Differentially expressed tRFs were mainly involved in the functions of protein phosphorylation, transcription and cell migration and the pathway of cancer, and the MAPK and Wnt signaling pathways. Real-time PCR verified that tRF-03357 and tRF-03358 were significantly increased in the HGSOC serum samples and SK-OV-3 cells compared to their expression levels in the controls. Importantly, tRF-03357 promoted SK-OV-3 cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Moreover, tRF-03357 was predictively targeted, and significantly downregulated HMBOX1.

Conclusion

This study suggests that tRF-03357 might promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion, partly by modulating HMBOX1 in HGSOC.

MicroRNA signatures discriminate between uterine and ovarian serous carcinomas

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian malignancies occur in 5% of women presenting with endometrial cancer and 10% of patients presenting with ovarian malignancy. When a high-grade serous carcinoma concurrently involves both ovary and endometrium, pathological determination of whether they are synchronous primaries or metastatic tumors from one primary site can be challenging. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are 22-nucleotide noncoding RNAs that are aberrantly expressed in cancer cells and may inherit their cellular lineage characteristics. We explored possible differential miRNA signatures that may separate high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma from primary endometrial serous carcinoma. Forty-seven samples of histologically pure high-grade serous carcinoma of both uterine (16 case) and ovarian primaries (31 cases) were included. Expression of 384 mature miRNAs was analyzed using ABI TaqMan Low-Density Arrays technology. A random forest model was used to identify miRNAs that together could differentiate between uterine and ovarian serous carcinomas. Among 150 miRNAs detectable at various levels in the study cases, a panel of 11-miRNA signatures was identified to significantly discriminate between ovarian and uterine serous carcinoma (P < .05). A nested cross-validated convergent forest plot using 6 of the 11 miRNA signature was eventually established to classify the tumors with 91.5% accuracy. In conclusion, we have characterized a miRNA signature panel in this exploratory study that shows significant discriminatory power in separating primary ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma from its endometrial counterpart.

Diagnosis and management of metastatic neoplasms with unknown primary

In cancer of unknown primary (CUP), metastases are clinically and histologically confirmed, but the primary tumor site remains elusive after extensive work-up. CUPs make up for 2-3% of all epithelial malignancies. The two prevailing histologies are adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas, whereas squamous cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas and rare histologies account for the remaining 10%. The diagnostic work-up in CUP relies strongly on a detailed immunohistological (IHC) analysis in order to characterize the tumor type, nowadays aided by molecular techniques. Diagnostics also include a thorough clinical examination, a basic lab draw with the most relevant tumor markers, and cross sectional imaging. Additional PET-CT is recommended in cervical lymph nodes suggestive of head and neck cancer and in limited metastases potentially treatable in curative intent. As for treatment, it is paramount to identify patients who fall into one of the six well defined "favorable" subset categories, namely extragonadal germ cell tumors, adenocarcinoma with isolated unilateral axillary lymph nodes in female patients, squamous cell carcinoma with neck lymph nodes, squamous cell carcinoma with inguinal lymph nodes, serous papillary peritoneal carcinomatosis in females and blastic bone metastasis in males with elevated PSA. These subsets are distinct both regarding the required treatment and the comparably favorable prognosis. Within the remaining "unfavorable" group, patients of colon and renal cancer type should be identified based on IHC and clinical picture, since the prognosis of these patients seems to improve with the use of therapy tailored to the presumed primary as well. For the few patients with limited metastases it should be assessed whether they are candidates for surgery, radiotherapy or surgery followed by irradiation in curative intent. The remaining majority of patients are treated with empiric palliative chemotherapy, typically a platinum - paclitaxel combination, though the level of evidence for this therapy recommendation is low. Gemcitabine alone or in combination can be used as an alternative. Decoding of the molecular profiles in CUP offers the prospect of targeted therapy with novel agents. However, there appears to be no uniform molecular pattern for CUP, and the observed molecular diversity thus poses a challenge to respective clinical trials.

Prognostic Factors in Patients Undergoing Primary Cytoreductive Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to investigate factors related to overall survival in advanced stage ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer and to identify strong and weak prognostic factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 190 patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery between 2003 and 2013.

RESULTS

Median overall survival duration was founded 58 months (95% CI 49-67). Five-year overall survival ratio was 48.5%. Presence of tumour at upper abdomen, suboptimal cytoreduction (residual >1 cm), surgery without lymphadenectomy, and presence of peritoneal ascites more than 1 L had a significantly negative effect on overall survival, but not histological grade and CA-125 level, by univariate Cox analysis. Age and presence of tumour in the upper abdomen were independent poor prognostic factors according to multivariate Cox model (HR 1.025; 95% CI 1.009-1.040 and HR 1.533; 95% CI 1.039-2.263, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study supports that the presence of tumour in the upper abdomen is the most important independent poor prognostic factor in patients with performed primary surgery for advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer. Upper abdominal metastasis is the most important predictive factor for optimal cytoreduction (P <0.001, HR 6.567; 95% CI 3.059-14.096).

Long-term survival of high-grade primary peritoneal papillary serous adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

Background

Primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma (PPPSC) is an uncommon disease which has a high malignancy and a poor prognosis.

Case presentation

We report here a long-term survival case of PPPSC with postoperative lung metastasis. A 62-year-old female patient with PPPSC was administered two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and six cycles of platinum-based (docetaxel + carboplatin) intraperitoneal chemotherapy postoperatively. The patient reached a complete remission at the completion of primary treatment. Malignant thoracic effusion and lung metastasis developed 5 months after the treatment. The patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery plus hyperthermic intrapleural chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Up to present, the patient has been survived with tumor for over 86 months with a good performance status, with only encapsulated effusion found at the latest follow-up. As a relatively new regime, the application of CRS + HIPEC in our patient has been proved example for MPE management, although more large-scale studies are needed to substantiate its efficiency and safety.

Should All Cases of High-Grade Serous Ovarian, Tubal, and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomas Be Reclassified as Tubo-Ovarian Serous Carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION

The dualistic theory of ovarian carcinogenesis proposes that epithelial "ovarian" cancer is not one entity with several histological subtypes but a collection of different diseases arising from cells of different origin, some of which may not originate in the ovarian surface epithelium.

METHODS

All cases referred to the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre with an ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer between April 2006 and April 2012 were identified from the West Midlands Cancer Registry. Tumors were classified into type I (low-grade endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, and low-grade serous) and type II (high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, and undifferentiated) cancers.

RESULTS

Ovarian (83.5%), tubal (4.3%), or primary peritoneal carcinoma (12.2%) were diagnosed in a total of 583 woman. The ovarian tumors were type I in 134 cases (27.5%), type II in 325 cases (66.7%), and contained elements of both type I and type II tumors in 28 cases (5.7%). Most tubal and primary peritoneal cases, however, were type II tumors: 24 (96.0%) and 64 (90.1%), respectively. Only 16 (5.8%) of the ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas were stage I at diagnosis, whereas 240 (86.6%) were stage III+. Overall survival varied between the subtypes when matched for stage. Stage III low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinomas had a significantly better survival compared to clear cell and mucinous cases, P = 0.0134. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the high-grade serous ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinomas when matched for stage (stage III, P = 0.3758; stage IV, P = 0.4820).

CONCLUSIONS

Type II tumors are more common than type I and account for most tubal and peritoneal cancers. High-grade serous carcinomas, whether classified as ovarian/tubal/peritoneal, seem to behave as one disease entity with no significant difference in survival outcomes, therefore supporting the proposition of a separate classification of "tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma".

Demographic clinical and prognostic characteristics of primary ovarian, peritoneal and tubal adenocarcinomas of serous histology--a prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVES

Invasive serous adenocarcinomas may present as primary ovarian (POC), primary fallopian tube (PFC) or primary peritoneal (PPC) carcinomas. Whether they are variants of the same malignancy or develop through different pathways is debated.

METHODS

Population-based prospectively collected data on POC (n=1443), PPC (n=268) and PFC (n=171) cases was obtained from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (2005-2013). Chi-square, Fisher's or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox-regression were used as appropriate. Statistical tests were 2-sided. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

PPC cases were older (P<0.0001), had a later age at menarche (P=0.02), a higher percentage were multi-parous (≥two children vs. no children) OR 1.70 (1.01-2.49) and both PPC and PFC tended to have a higher BMI (>35 vs. >18.5-25) than POC cases. PFC cases were diagnosed in earlier stages (P<0.001). In advanced stages a lower proportion had preoperative carcinosis or ascites, and a higher percentage had macro-radical surgery or lymphadenectomy compared to POC. In contrast, more PPC cases had post-operative carcinosis; whereas a lower proportion had lymphadenectomy or macro-radical surgery compared to POC. PPC had a significantly lower overall survival than POC, HR=1.24 (1.04-1.47).

CONCLUSION

We found differences in risk pattern profiles among the three groups, especially for PPC. Furthermore, the severity of stage specific disease differed significantly according to location, resulting in a lower overall survival for PPC. These differences warrant further research to determine to what extent PPC is a distinct disease entity.

[Surgical options in cancer of unknown primary (CUP)]

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) comprises a relatively frequently occurring group of heterogeneous malignant tumors in the clinical routine, which currently has an abysmal prognosis for affected patients. Based on the improved diagnostic tools it is now possible to identify subgroups of patients with different clinical prognoses. New therapies adapted to these identified subgroups are becoming increasingly more relevant.

AIM

This review aims to evaluate the role of surgery and different surgical options in the therapy of patients with CUP.

RESULTS

For the treatment of patients with CUP it is important to identify subgroups of patients with a better prognosis. Surgical resection of CUP metastasis is a therapy option leading to a prolonged survival in (1) women with papillary peritoneal adenocarcinomatosis, (2) women with axillary lymph node metastasis of adenocarcinoma, (3) patients with cervical lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma, (4) patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis, (5) patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas with midline distribution (e.g. extragonadal germ cell syndrome) and (6) patients with small resectable tumors.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is an important therapy option in different subgroups of patients with CUP. Together with multimodal therapy, adjusted according to the identified most likely origin of the primary tumor, it is possible to prolong patient survival.

Prognosis for advanced-stage primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma and serous ovarian cancer in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC) or papillary serous ovarian cancer (PSOC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study and included two study groups: one with stage III/IV PSPC (n = 38) patients and the other with PSOC (n = 53) patients. Patients were matched for histologic subtype (serous tumor), tumor stage, tumor grade, residual disease at the end of debulking surgery (primary or interval), and age (±5 years).

RESULTS

Mean age was significantly greater for patients with PSPC (63.03 ± 11.88 years) than for patients with PSOC (55.92 ± 12.56 years, p = 0.008). Optimal debulking surgery was performed initially in 71.9% of PSPC patients and 66.0% of PSOC patients. In addition, 93.9% of PSPC patients and 92.3% of PSOC patients were treated with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. The frequency of high-grade tumors was significantly higher in the PSPC (100%) than in the PSOC group (68.3%; p < 0.001). Progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in the PSPC [median 12 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-16.7] and PSOC groups (median 16.7 months, 95% CI 12.9-20.4; p = 0.470). Overall survival was shorter in the PSPC (median 62 months, 95% CI 19.6-104.4) than in the PSOC group (median 77.5 months, 95% CI 69.7-85.2; p = 0.006, log-rank statistic).

CONCLUSION

PFS was similar for advanced-stage PSPC and PSOC patients. Since the PSPC patients tended to be older and have more high-grade tumors, OS was shorter for PSPC than for POSC patients. Thus, management of the two types of cancer should not differ.

Rare form of extraovarian primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma with solitary cystic lesion mimicking a liver tumor; report of a case

Extraovarian primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (EOPPC) has a similar clinical presentation to that of ovarian cancer in advanced stages, such as peritoneal dissemination and a large amount of ascites, while EOPPC with a solitary tumor is very rare. We report here a 47-year-old Japanese woman with solitary form of EOPPC mimicking a liver tumor. Ovaries of both sides had no malignant lesion, which was histologically confirmed. Histological examination revealed that the tumor was located at the right diaphragm and partially invaded into the liver, and papillary or ductal proliferation of the tumor cells with an occasional appearance of psammoma bodies was detected. Immunohistologically, the tumor cells were positive for CA 125 and Ber-EP4 and negative for D2-40 or calretinin, ruling out the possibility of mesothelioma, and the diagnosis of the tumor was EOPPC. After the operation, the patient received chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, but died 10 months later due the progression of recurrence. The present case is very rare form of EOPPC without any ascites or peritoneal dissemination.

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. A multi-institutional study of 36 patients

AIM

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare condition, histologically identical to ovarian serous carcinoma and often diagnosed at late stage. There is not any standardized treatment for PPSC. A retrospective multicentric study was performed in French speaking centers to evaluate cytoreduction surgery and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from different origins. The manuscript's aim was to study the particular population with PPSC.

METHODS

Between September 1997 and July 2007, 36 patients with PPSC from 9 institutions underwent 39 procedures.

RESULTS

Mortality and morbidity rates were 5.6% and 20.6% respectively. The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years are respectively 93.6, 71.5 and 57.4%. The median overall survival was not reached. By univariate analysis, the only factor that had prognostic value was PCI (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in patients with PPSC.

Ovarian cancer stroma: pathophysiology and the roles in cancer development

Ovarian cancer represents one of the cancers with the worst prognostic in adult women. More than half of the patients who present with clinical signs such as abdominal bloating and a feeling of fullness already show advanced stages. The majority of ovarian cancers grow as cystic masses, and cancer cells easily spread into the pelvic cavity once the cysts rupture or leak. When the ovarian cancer cells disseminate into the peritoneal cavity, metastatic nests may grow in the cul-de-sac, and in more advanced stages, the peritoneal surfaces of the upper abdomen become the next largest soil for cancer progression. Ascites is also produced frequently in ovarian cancers, which facilitates distant metastasis. Clinicopathologic, epidemiologic and molecular studies on ovarian cancers have improved our understanding and therapeutic approaches, but still further efforts are required to reduce the risks in the patients who are predisposed to this lethal disease and the mortality of the patients in advanced stages. Among various molecules involved in ovarian carcinogenesis, special genes such as TP53, BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been well investigated. These genes are widely accepted as the predisposing factors that trigger malignant transformation of the epithelial cells of the ovary. In addition, adnexal inflammatory conditions such as chronic salpingitis and ovarian endometriosis have been great research interests in the context of carcinogenic background of ovarian cancers. In this review, I discuss the roles of stromal cells and inflammatory factors in the carcinogenesis and progression of ovarian cancers.

Intramammary lymph node metastasis in a patient with ovarian carcinoma and a brief review of the literature

Metastasis from serous carcinoma of the ovary usually occurs in the subdiaphragmatic region. Metastasis to the breast and/or axillary-intramammary lymph node is very rare. It usually occurs in advanced disease, and it is important to distinguish a primary breast cancer from an ovarian cancer metastasis since the management of these two entities is totally different. Here we present a patient with metastasis to the breast and intramammary lymph nodes from ovarian serous carcinoma 25 months after diagnosis.

Serous papillary peritoneal carcinoma: unknown primary tumour, ovarian cancer counterpart or a distinct entity? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Serous peritoneal papillary carcinoma (SPPC), though managed according to ovarian cancer therapeutic principles, has been variably considered as an ovarian cancer counterpart, a peritoneal malignancy with distinct characteristics or a cancer of unknown primary (CUP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed all publications studying molecular pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management and outcome of at least 10 patients with SPPC from 1980 to 2008 in anglophone medical journals and critically analysed the data.

RESULTS

Molecular profiling of CUP was performed in eight papers reporting on 211 patients with stage III/IV SPPC by means of immunohistochemistry or PCR-based assays. Twenty-five clinical series, mostly retrospective, reported management and outcome of 579 patients with SPPC, in several cases matched to advanced ovarian cancer controls. Though we did not identify statistically significant differences in molecular biology, clinical presentation, management and outcome of SPPC and ovarian cancer cases, some subtle differences emerged: patterns of loss of heterozygosity at several chromosomal loci differed from those seen in ovarian cancer, while the overexpression of the HER2 oncogene was encountered more often. Serous peritoneal tumours affected older patients and were more frequently multifocal or exhibited virulent clonal expansion in metastatic sites. Diffuse micronodular spread formed a high total load of malignancy in omental, peritoneal surfaces, difficult to debulk optimally. Despite effective chemotherapeutic cytoreduction and occasional long-term remissions, SPPC patients survived 2-6 months less than ovarian cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SPPC should not be classified in the poor-risk CUP category, in view of the therapeutic and prognostic differences. Still, the assimilation of the SPPC entity by ovarian cancer hindered further research into its genotypic and phenotypic characteristics that may differ from ovarian cancer. Subgroup analyses of large ovarian cancer trials may shed light in this issue.

Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems

Ovarian serous carcinomas have been graded using various systems. Recently, a 2-tier system in which tumors are subdivided into low grade and high grade has been proposed. This approach is simplistic, reproducible, and based on biologic evidence indicating that both tumors develop via different pathways. Low-grade serous carcinomas exhibit low-grade nuclei with infrequent mitotic figures. They evolve from adenofibromas or borderline tumors, have frequent mutations of the KRAS, BRAF, or ERBB2 genes, and lack TP53 mutations (Type I pathway). The progression to invasive carcinoma is a slow step-wise process. Low-grade tumors are indolent and have better outcome than high-grade tumors. In contrast, high-grade serous carcinomas have high-grade nuclei and numerous mitotic figures. Identification of a precursor lesion in the ovary has been elusive and therefore the origin of ovarian carcinoma has been described as de novo. More recently, studies have suggested that a proportion seem to originate from intraepithelial carcinoma in the fallopian tube. The development of these tumors is rapid (Type II pathway). Most are characterized by TP53 mutations and lack mutations of KRAS, BRAF, or ERBB2. Although both types of serous carcinomas evolve along different pathways, rare high-grade serous carcinomas seem to arise through the Type I pathway. Immunohistochemical stains for p53, p16, and Ki-67 for distinction of low-grade from high-grade tumors are of limited value but can be helpful in selected instances. This review provides an update on the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic features of these 2 types of serous carcinomas and addresses some of the diagnostic problems that are encountered in routine practice.

Potentially important microRNA cluster on chromosome 17p13.1 in primary peritoneal carcinoma

MicroRNAs are a group of small non-coding RNAs approximately 22 nucleotides in length. Recent work has shown differential expression of mature microRNAs in human cancers. We characterized the alteration in expression of a select group of microRNAs in primary peritoneal carcinoma relative to matched cases of ovarian serous carcinoma. MicroRNA expression was analysed using semi-quantitative stem-loop RT-PCR on a set of 34 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Protein expression of p53 and bcl-2 was quantified in the corresponding tissue microarray. We provide definitive evidence that there is downregulation of a select group of microRNAs in tumours meeting Gynaecological Oncology Group criteria for primary peritoneal carcinoma relative to ovarian serous carcinoma. Specifically, we show decreased p53 expression and downregulation of miR-195 and miR-497 from the microRNA cluster site at chromosome 17p13.1 in primary peritoneal carcinoma relative to ovarian serous carcinoma. miR-195 and miR-497 may have potential roles as tumour-suppressor genes in primary peritoneal tumourigenesis.

Subdividing ovarian and peritoneal serous carcinoma into moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated does not have biologic validity based on molecular genetic and in vitro drug resistance data

Serous carcinoma of the ovary has been traditionally graded as well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated (ie, a 3-tier system). A new 2-tier system grades serous carcinomas into low or high grade. Recent morphologic and molecular studies have shown that invasive well-differentiated serous carcinoma, referred to by us as "invasive low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma," is clearly distinct from high-grade serous carcinoma from the standpoint of pathogenesis and clinicopathologic features. As high-grade serous carcinoma is histologically heterogeneous, the goal of this study was to determine, based on molecular and drug resistance data, whether further subclassification of high-grade serous carcinomas into additional grades (moderately and poorly differentiated) has biologic validity. One hundred eleven ovarian and peritoneal high-grade serous carcinomas further subclassified as moderately and poorly differentiated types using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system were analyzed for TP53 mutations and in vitro extreme drug resistance to 10 chemotherapeutic drugs. Seventy-six and 35 cases were subclassified as moderately and poorly differentiated, respectively. A TP53 mutation was present in 84% of moderately and 70% of poorly differentiated types of high-grade serous carcinomas, respectively (P=0.21), and there were no significant differences in the frequency of extreme drug resistance for each of the 10 drugs tested (P values ranging from 0.14 to >0.99). Although additional investigation is warranted, this study suggests that subclassification of high-grade serous carcinoma into moderately and poorly differentiated is not relevant. Accordingly, they can be simply classified as high-grade serous carcinoma.

Advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma: clinicopathological and prognostic factor analyses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors favoring a positive prognosis for advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC).

METHODS

Twenty-four cases meeting the criteria for PPC were analyzed retrospectively for the clinicopathologic profiles. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expressions of p53, Top2alpha, Ki-67 and Her-2/neu. Then all these clinicopathological factors and molecular markers were correlated with the prognosis.

RESULTS

There were 15 cases of primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PPSPC), 6 cases of mixed epithelial carcinoma (MEC) and 3 cases of malignant mixed Mullerian tumor (MMMT). All patients underwent cytoreductive surgery with optimal debulking achieved in 3 cases. Among those receiving first-line chemotherapy, 13 patients received the TP regimen (paclitaxel-cisplatin or carboplatin) and 7 patients received the PAC regimen (cisplatin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide). The median overall survival of all patients was 42 months, while the breakdown for survival time for patients with PPSPC, MMT and MEC was 44, 13 and 19 months, respectively. The expressions of p53, Top2alpha and Ki-67 were all demonstrated in 11 cases respectively. None showed the expression of Her-2/neu. There were significant differences in the median survival between patients with PPSPC and those with MMMT (44 months vs 13 months, P<0.05), also between patients receiving TP combination and those receiving the PAC regimen (75 months vs 28 months, P<0.05). Another significant difference in the median progression-free survival (PFS) was identified between patients with positive p53 immunostaining and those with negative p53 immunostaining (15 months vs 47 months, P<0.05), whereas age, menopausal status, residual tumor size and the other molecular factors did not significantly impact survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PPC should be treated with a comprehensive management plan including appropriate cytoreductive surgery and responsive chemotherapy. Overestimating an optimal debulking surgery may not benefit survival. The pathologic subtype, chemotherapy regimen and p53 overexpression were significant prognostic factors.

Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: clinical and laboratory characteristics

BACKGROUND

Primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma (PPPSC) is an uncommon primary malignancy of the peritoneum. The aim of our study is to present the characteristics of such a rare entity through our case series.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study of nine cases of PPPSC who were treated between January 2002 and April 2007 in METAXA Memorial Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece. Medical files and histopathological diagnosis of each patient were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 63 years ranging from 44 up to 74 years. Clinically PPPSC presented with general abdominal discomfort in all of the patients. Three out of nine patients presented with constipation, 5/9 with distention, and 7/9 with ascites. All of the patients referred loss of appetite with weight gaining due to ascites. All the patients had pathological values of CA125 (over 35 U/ml) ranging from 125 up to 1,255 U/ml with median value 565 U/ml. Optimal debulking was possible in 3/9 of patients who were consequently treated with standard taxol-platin chemotherapy. Complete response was achieved in one woman. The median disease-free survival was 7 months and the median overall survival rate was 2.5 years.

CONCLUSION

PPPSC mimics ovarian papillary serous carcinoma regarding the clinical and laboratory characteristics but it has worse prognosis.

Platinum resistance and impaired survival in patients with advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma: matched-case comparison with patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare chemotherapy response and survival of patients with advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) vs those with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).

STUDY DESIGN

From 1998 to 2004, 43 PPC patients were identified and matched to 129 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV EOC by criteria abstracted from medical records. Primary endpoints were chemotherapy response, platinum resistance, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

All patients received primary platinum-taxane chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in achieving a clinical complete response. PPC patients were more likely to be platinum resistant at 6 months and had significantly impaired PFS and OS. After multivariate analysis, PPC was independently associated with a worse prognosis for both survival endpoints.

CONCLUSION

PPC was associated with a similar initial response but a higher rate of platinum resistance and shorter PFS and OS. Consideration of these results may be useful for patient counseling, trial stratification, and molecular comparisons.

Immunohistochemical identification of primary peritoneal serous cystadenocarcinoma mimicking advanced colorectal carcinoma: a case report

Primary peritoneal cystadenocarcinoma is a rare tumor of similar histogenic origin as primary ovarian carcinoma. We present a case of primary peritoneal serous cystadenocarcinoma mimicking advanced colorectal cancer in a 68 yr-old African American female. Radiology, endoscopy and cytology yielded only inconclusive findings. Immunohistochemical analysis of percutaneously obtained ascitic fluid provided a correct diagnosis of primary peritoneal cystadenocarcinoma. The discovery of serous ascites at the time of laparotomy confirmed a diagnosis of primary peritoneal serous cystadenocarcinoma. Final surgical pathology reconfirmed the diagnosis of primary peritoneal cystadenocarcinoma. This case demonstrates the utility of immunohistochemistry for accurately diagnosing patients with inconclusive findings in the setting of peritoneal carcinomatosis and primary peritoneal cystadenocarcinoma.

Long-term survival after paclitaxel plus platinum-based combination chemotherapy for extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: is it different from that for ovarian serous papillary cancer?

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (EPSPC) and ovarian serous papillary cancer (OSPC). Only the patients treated with initial surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and having FIGO stage IIIC disease with omental and/or peritoneal involvement were analyzed. Thirty-two patients with EPSPC and 43 with OSPC were included in this study. The median age, mean CA-125, and volume of ascitis were higher in patients with EPSPC. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to other prognosticators. The median overall survival (OS) durations were 30 months (95% CI 24.8-35.3) in patients with EPSPC and 28 months (95% CI 21.1-34.9) in those with OSPC (P= 0.35). The 3-year OS rates in the patients and controls were 28% and 31%, respectively (P= 0.84). In patients with EPSPC, only optimal cytoreduction was significantly related to progression-free survival and OS durations as a prognostic factor. In the EPSPC group, 65.5% of the patients (19/29) had lymphatic involvement, compared to 88.4% (38/43) in the OSPC group (P= 0.02). As an adjuvant therapy, the paclitaxel plus platinum-based combination regimen had similar effects on survival in the EPSPC and OSPC groups.

Serous adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid mesentery arising in cystic endosalpingiosis

This case report describes a Mullerian serous adenocarcinoma arising within a multoloculated cyst lined by ciliated serous-type epithelium located in the sigmoid mesentery. Twenty years previously the patient underwent a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy. The ovaries contained bilateral serous cystadenofibromas, and multiple cysts lined by ciliated serous-type epithelium were present in the omentum. The resection specimen 20 years later contained a 14 cm multiloculated cyst located in the sigmoid mesentery. This was lined largely by benign ciliated serous-type epithelium but a focus of well differentiated serous adenocarcinoma projected into the lumen. Two further peritoneal cysts were present, both of which were lined by ciliated serous-type epithelium. There was a coincidental renal cell carcinoma. This is a unique case of multiple omental, peritoneal, and retroperitoneal cysts (classified as cystic endosalpingiosis), one of which developed a focus of serous adenocarcinoma. Although rarely serous adenocarcinomas, similar to those occurring within the ovary, arise in the retroperitoneum, this is the first reported occurrence in association with a pre-existing benign lesion.

Primary peritoneal carcinoma--Uterine involvement and hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency of uterine involvement in primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) and to describe selected clinical characteristics in patients with and without hysterectomy.

METHODS

All incident cases of histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary or peritoneum, diagnosed in Israeli Jewish women between March 1 1994 and June 30, 1999, were identified within the framework of a nationwide epidemiological study of these neoplasms. The study population was accrued through an active search of all newly diagnosed patients in all the departments of gynecology in Israel. The data of 81 PPC patients included in the present study were abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Hysterectomy was performed in 48 patients. These patients had a lower mean age (62.4 +/- 9.4 vs. 66.9 +/- 10.4; P = 0.05) at diagnosis and a higher rate of < or =2 cm residual disease (54.2% vs.24.2%; P = 0.02). Of those with hysterectomy, microscopic involvement was verified in all those with macroscopic involvement. Overall microscopic involvement was present in 28 (58.3%) of the patients who underwent hysterectomy. In the majority of them, only the serosa was involved. Macroscopic uterine involvement was present in 27 (33.3%) patients but in only 12% it was >2 cm. The median survival in patients with hysterectomy was 36 months and in those without hysterectomy 29 months, this difference was statistically not significant (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that in an unselected group of PPC patients 33% have any macroscopic uterine involvement. The therapeutic value of routine hysterectomy at the initial operation for PPC should be further investigated.

Peritoneal serous papillary adenocarcinoma: report of four cases

We report four cases of peritoneal serous papillary adenocarcinoma (PSPC), a rare disease; all patients had ascites and high levels of serum CA125. Clinical and radiological examinations could not differentiate the disease from peritoneal metastatic tumors and mesothelioma, and histopathological analysis including immunochemistry on the specimen obtained at laparotomy or laparoscopy was necessary for the diagnosis. One patient lived for 58 months with cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, and another is still living after 20 months by chemotherapy alone. In patients with peritoneal tumors of unknown origin and a high level of serum CA125, taking PSPC into consideration in the differential diagnosis, histopathological examination should be performed.

Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in women of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

OBJECTIVE

Prophylactic surgical removal of the ovaries has been offered for many years as a potential preventative of ovarian cancer in women deemed to be at increased hereditary risk for this disease. Now, it is possible to test for specific mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes that render members of hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families susceptible to cancer. Widespread intra-abdominal carcinomatosis, which mimics metastatic ovarian serous carcinoma, has been reported following oophorectomy in individuals at increased hereditary risk. This study was undertaken to examine and report particularly the occurrence of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis, as well as other cancers, following prophylactic oophorectomy in patients who carry cancer susceptibility mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and to assess the cumulative risks for this disease in order to assist in developing appropriate surgical interventions, based on currently available information, and to counsel patients who choose prophylactic surgery, concerning the potential prognosis, thereafter.

METHODS

The Creighton University Hereditary Cancer Institute registry was searched for members of HBOC syndrome families who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomy. The histories and results of DNA testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carried in their families were recorded, tabulated and examined, and the aggregate data are reported along with pertinent details of those individuals who developed neoplastic diseases after prophylactic oophorectomy. All available histologic and cytologic materials of patients who were diagnosed with intra-abdominal carcinomatosis were reviewed, and life-table calculations were performed to assess cumulative risks for this disease following prophylactic oophorectomy.

RESULTS

From 72 HBOC syndrome families that carried either BRCA1 or BRCA2 cancer-associated mutations, 238 individuals who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomy were recorded in our registry between January 1985 and December 2002. During a mean follow-up of 9.3 years, cancers were diagnosed in 27 subjects, including 16 individuals with breast cancer and five patients with intra-abdominal carcinomatosis. Breast cancers were stage I in 10 of 12 proven carriers of cancer-associated mutations. All five cases of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis were serous carcinomas, and all occurred in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Histologic review of the prophylactically removed ovaries found borderline lesions in two cases, one with possible early stromal invasion. Two of the five patients who developed intra-abdominal carcinomatosis were among 78 patients in this series who were diagnosed and treated for breast cancer before prophylactic oophorectomy. A 3.5% cumulative risk for all mutation carriers and a 3.9% cumulative risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers were calculated through 20 years of follow-up after prophylactic oophorectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in our series was diagnosed only in BRCA1 mutation carriers. The calculated cumulative risks of developing intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in members of HBOC syndrome families, specifically those who carry deleterious mutations, are well below the estimated risks of ovarian cancer published in the literature for similar patients. Breast cancers, which tended to be small and localized, were the most common malignancy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers after prophylactic oophorectomy.

Prognosis of stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma

AIMS

To study the prognosis of patients with stage IIIC/IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC) (study group) compared with that of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) (control group).

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study including a study group of 37 patients who were matched with a control group of 37 patients. Patients were matched for the histologic subtype (serous tumor), tumor stage, tumor grade, residual disease at the end of debulking surgery (initial or interval) and age (+/-5 years).

RESULTS

Debulking surgery was performed initially or at interval surgery in respectively, 10 and 27 patients in the study group and 17 and 20 in the control group. All patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (combined with paclitaxel in 33) in both groups. The overall survival rate at 3 years in the study and control groups was, respectively, 60% versus 55% (NS). However, event-free survival rates at 3 years (CI 95%) were statistically different (respectively, 29% in the study group versus 16% in the control group: p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal disease is more bulky in patients with PSPC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more often required to achieve optimal debulking surgery in PSPC. Overall survival of patients with PSPC is similar to that of their EOC counterparts. Thus, the management of PSPC should not be different from that of advanced stage EOC.

Expression of Cox-2, CD34, Bcl-2, and p53 and survival in patients with primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and primary ovarian serous carcinoma

The objective of this study was to compare the immunohistochemical profile and clinical course of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPC) and primary ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC). These entities are virtually indistinguishable morphologically, but their differential molecular and clinical features are incompletely characterized. Twenty-nine cases of high-grade, high-stage PPC and 96 cases of stage matched OSCs were compared. PPC was identified based on the criteria proposed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. The tumors were staged according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria for ovarian cancer and graded according to World Health Organization criteria. Expression of Cox-2, CD-34, bcl-2, and p53 was compared in the two tumors and correlated with clinical data including stage, age, race, and overall survival. Although the median survival, using Kaplan-Meier test, of patients with OSC (1060 days, 35.3 months) was longer than those with PPC (708 days, 23.6 months) the difference was not statistically significant. However, Cox-2 expression was correlated with microvessel density in PPC (p=0.026) and OSC cases (p=0.005), and high expression of Cox-2 correlated with lower survival rate in OSC cases (p=0.045) but not in PPC cases (p=0.12). These findings, coupled with the morphologic overlap existing between OSC and PPC, support the view that they represent related pathologic entities.

Comparison between primary peritoneal and epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to characterize primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) compared with ovarian carcinoma (OvC).

STUDY DESIGN

Within the framework of a nationwide epidemiologic Israeli study, 95 PPC patients were identified and compared with 117 FIGO stage III-IV epithelial OvC patients matched by age and continent of birth. Data were abstracted from medical records and personal interviews.

RESULTS

Our data confirm the similarities between PPC and OvC. A higher rate of abdominal distention, volume of ascites, and malignant cells in ascitic fluid and lower rate of pelvic palpable mass and personal breast cancer history were found in the PPC compared with the OvC group. The overall survival was similar in both groups (30-33 months). In optimally cytoreduced patients, survival was better in the OvC group. Diameter of residual disease was associated with better survival only in the OvC group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical differences do not enable a preoperative distinction between the neoplasms.

Peritoneal carcinoma in women with genetic susceptibility: implications for Jewish populations

Women from families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer, specifically those who carry cancer-associated mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at increased life-time risk for peritoneal carcinoma, even after previous surgery to remove the ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus. Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and the associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are particularly prevalent in women of Jewish lineage, and specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations have been linked with peritoneal carcinoma and HBOC syndrome in Jewish populations, especially those of Ashkenazi descent. This review presents the currently available data and looks forward toward further and better understanding of peritoneal carcinoma in women with inherited susceptibility. Over 90% of peritoneal cancer in patients from HBOC syndrome kindreds and associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are serous carcinomas, which is equivalent with the proportion of ovarian cancers that are serous carcinomas in similar patients. The best indications are that while many peritoneal carcinomas in genetically susceptible women may arise directly from malignant transformation of the peritoneum, others might represent metastases from primary ovarian or fallopian tube carcinomas. Although the incidence of borderline ovarian tumors may not be increased in HBOC syndrome kindreds and those who carry cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, these individuals could be susceptible to malignant transformation of borderline lesions of the ovaries and peritoneum. Moreover, recent reports raise the question of possibly increased risk in Jewish carriers of germline BRCA1 mutations for uterine papillary serous carcinoma, which could be the source of metastasis to the peritoneum in some cases. The penetrance of cancer-associated BRCA1 mutations for ovarian cancer is estimated to be 11%-54%, and for BRCA2 mutations the penetrance for ovarian cancer is 11%-23%. So far, available screening methods appear to be insufficient for early detection of many ovarian cancers. Prophylactic oophorectomy has been found to reduce the risk for ovarian cancer in women from HBOC kindreds and those who carry cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, leaving a residual risk for peritoneal carcinomatosis of well less than 5%. Therefore, surgical removal of the ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus, after child-bearing has been completed and by early in the fifth decade of life, are appropriate prophylactic procedures in women whose genetic susceptibility puts them at increased risk for cancers of mullerian tract origin, including ovarian and fallopian tube carcinomas and possibly serous carcinoma of the uterus. Hysterectomy, as well as salpingo-oophorectomy, removes the gynecologic organs targeted for malignant transformation in genetically susceptible women and simplifies decisions regarding hormone replacement therapy and chemical prophylaxis and treatment of breast cancer. Unless a transabdominal operative approach is otherwise indicated, laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal techniques are well suited for intra-abdominal exploration, cytology, biopsies and prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy in women with hereditary susceptibility to gynecologic cancer.

Molecular similarities between primary peritoneal and primary ovarian carcinomas

The objective of this paper was to characterize expression patterns of biologic markers to distinguish papillary serous peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) from papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (POC). Immunohistochemical analysis of HER-2/neu, p53, bcl-2, and nm23-H1 expression was performed on archival paraffin-embedded tissues. Antigen expression was compared at ovarian and extra-ovarian sites. Thirty-two PPC cases were compared to 18 POC cases. Mean age, stage, grade, and survival outcome were comparable between the two groups. Antigen expression patterns were not significantly different between PPC and POC for the four markers studied. In all cases, nm23-H1 was expressed. Conversely, bcl-2 was expressed at only a single tissue site in three of 32 (9.4%) PPC cases and in one of 18 (5.6%) POC cases. Eleven of 32 (34.4%) PPC cases overexpressed HER-2/neu, vs. four of 18 (22.2%) POC cases. P53 staining results were positive in 23 of 32 (71.9%) PPC and 13 of 18 (72.2%) POC cases. Intrapatient antigen expression was identical at primary and metastatic tumor sites in 50% of the POC and 48.4% of the PPC cases. We conclude that PPC and POC have a comparable immunohistochemical phenotype for these four molecular markers, which is reflected by their similar clinical courses.

Gene expression patterns in ovarian carcinomas

We used DNA microarrays to characterize the global gene expression patterns in surface epithelial cancers of the ovary. We identified groups of genes that distinguished the clear cell subtype from other ovarian carcinomas, grade I and II from grade III serous papillary carcinomas, and ovarian from breast carcinomas. Six clear cell carcinomas were distinguished from 36 other ovarian carcinomas (predominantly serous papillary) based on their gene expression patterns. The differences may yield insights into the worse prognosis and therapeutic resistance associated with clear cell carcinomas. A comparison of the gene expression patterns in the ovarian cancers to published data of gene expression in breast cancers revealed a large number of differentially expressed genes. We identified a group of 62 genes that correctly classified all 125 breast and ovarian cancer specimens. Among the best discriminators more highly expressed in the ovarian carcinomas were PAX8 (paired box gene 8), mesothelin, and ephrin-B1 (EFNB1). Although estrogen receptor was expressed in both the ovarian and breast cancers, genes that are coregulated with the estrogen receptor in breast cancers, including GATA-3, LIV-1, and X-box binding protein 1, did not show a similar pattern of coexpression in the ovarian cancers.

Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum coexisting with or after endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum (PSCP) coexisting with, or after, endometrial carcinoma (EC) is an extremely rare condition with no documented patient series. The aim of this investigation was to describe our experience in treating five patients diagnosed with PSCP synchronously with EC and two others who developed PSCP metachronously after EC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed and analyzed the clinical and pathological data of seven patients diagnosed and managed over a 10-year period. The diagnosis of PSCP was mostly based on the inclusionary criteria of the Gynecologic Oncology Group [1]. Disease stages were determined using the FIGO criteria for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and endometrial carcinomas [2]. The treatment for PSCP was similar to that for advanced EOC and immunohistochemical studies were performed using archival material for PSCP and EC in order to determine p53, Bcl-2, HER2, and estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER, PR) status. Germline mutation analyses were performed for the two most common mutations pertaining to BRCA1 and the one most common mutation pertaining to BRCA2 genes only.

RESULTS

Five patients with PSCP and synchronous EC initially underwent surgical treatment. The remaining two underwent surgery originally for EC and, thereafter, for metachronous PSCP. All seven patients had advanced stages (III or IV) of PSCP and stage I only EC. At the time of analysis, four patients were alive. p53, Bcl-2, ER, and PR were found to have been expressed in various rates in both or one of the neoplasms. However, no HER2 was found to have been expressed, either in PSCP or in EC. All germline mutation analyses were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in this study show that PSCP can occur either synchronously or metachronously with lower stage EC that is associated with advanced disease stages. We suggest that this clinical form of PSCP with synchronous or metachronous EC is a very aggressive and lethal clinical form and differs markedly from the vast majority of multiple gynecologic neoplasms of the upper genital canal diagnosed in the ovarian-endometrial group, of which EOC are mostly diagnosed as stage I diseases with high-rate cures.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma with associated peritoneal carcinomatosis

Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) is a recently described entity, defined as a noninvasive, cytologically malignant lesion that replaces the endometrial surface epithelium. EIC frequently coexists with uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is hypothesized to be its precursor lesion. However, the clinical significance and biologic potential of finding EIC without USC is not known. We report three postmenopausal women with EIC alone who were found to have multiple, synchronous foci of extrauterine serous carcinoma at presentation. Because the clinical findings in these patients simulated primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PSC), we compared the clinicopathologic features of these cases with a group of nine bona fide PSCs for which exhaustively sectioned endometria, fallopian tubes, and ovaries were available for review. The average age of the EIC patients was 73 years. Two patients presented with abdominal distention and one with vaginal bleeding. Hysterectomy in each case showed endometrial polyps with EIC, but without invasive USC, in a background of atrophic endometrium. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and staging showed serous carcinoma involving the ovarian hilum, the surfaces of the fallopian tubes and ovaries, in addition to peritoneal carcinomatosis. p53 overexpression was observed in both EIC and the extrauterine deposits of serous carcinoma in each case. The average age of the PSC patients was 66 years. All nine patients presented with abdominal distention. EIC was not identified in any of the hysterectomy specimens. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies, omentectomies, and peritoneal biopsies showed peritoneal carcinomatosis, including bulky peritoneal tumor deposits, but only minimal ovarian surface involvement. p53 overexpression was observed in seven cases. These findings indicate that EIC without coincident USC can be associated with invasive, extrauterine serous carcinomatosis. We did not, however, find any significant differences between the clinicopathologic features of primary extrauterine serous carcinomas (PSCs) and those associated with EIC. We conclude that the finding of EIC in an endometrial curettage specimen should prompt a thorough search for an invasive uterine and/or extrauterine serous carcinoma. Conversely, an endometrial origin should be excluded in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.