A new triphenylethylene compound, Fc-1157a. II. Antitumor effects

Oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer and its embedded mechanism: breast cancer resistance to conventional drugs and related therapies, a review

Traditional medication and alternative therapies have long been used to treat breast cancer. One of the main problems with current treatments is that there is an increase in drug resistance in the cancer cells owing to genetic differences such as mutational changes, epigenetic changes and miRNA (microRNA) alterations such as miR-1246, miR-298, miR-27b and miR-33a, along with epigenetic modifications, such as Histone3 acetylation and CCCTC-Binding Factor (CTCF) hypermethylation for drug resistance in breast cancer cell lines. Certain forms of conventional drug resistance have been linked to genetic changes in genes such as ABCB1, AKT, S100A8/A9, TAGLN2 and NPM. This review aims to explore the current approaches to counter breast cancer, the action mechanism, along with novel therapeutic methods endowing potential drug resistance. The investigation of novel therapeutic approaches sheds light on the phenomenon of drug resistance including genetic variations that impact distinct forms of oestrogen receptor (ER) cancer, genetic changes, epigenetics-reported resistance and their identification in patients. Long-term effective therapy for breast cancer includes selective oestrogen receptor modulators, selective oestrogen receptor degraders and genetic variations, such as mutations in nuclear genes, epigenetic modifications and miRNA alterations in target proteins. Novel research addressing combinational therapies including maytansine, photodynamic therapy, guajadiol, talazoparib, COX2 inhibitors and miRNA 1246 inhibitors have been developed to improve patient survival rates.

Cellular and molecular basis of therapeutic approaches to breast cancer

In recent decades, there has been a significant amount of research into breast cancer, with some important breakthroughs in the treatment of both primary and metastatic breast cancers. It's a well-known fact that treating breast cancer is still a challenging endeavour even though physicians have a fantastic toolset of the latest treatment options at their disposal. Due to limitations of current clinical treatment options, traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, and surgical options are still required to address this condition. In recent years, there have been several developments resulting in a wide range of treatment options. This review article discusses the cellular and molecular foundation of chemotherapeutic drugs, endocrine system-based treatments, biological therapies, gene therapy, and innovative techniques for treating breast cancer.

Computer-Aided Ligand Discovery for Estrogen Receptor Alpha

Breast cancer (BCa) is one of the most predominantly diagnosed cancers in women. Notably, 70% of BCa diagnoses are Estrogen Receptor α positive (ERα+) making it a critical therapeutic target. With that, the two subtypes of ER, ERα and ERβ, have contrasting effects on BCa cells. While ERα promotes cancerous activities, ERβ isoform exhibits inhibitory effects on the same. ER-directed small molecule drug discovery for BCa has provided the FDA approved drugs tamoxifen, toremifene, raloxifene and fulvestrant that all bind to the estrogen binding site of the receptor. These ER-directed inhibitors are non-selective in nature and may eventually induce resistance in BCa cells as well as increase the risk of endometrial cancer development. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop novel drugs with alternative ERα targeting mechanisms that can overcome the limitations of conventional anti-ERα therapies. Several functional sites on ERα, such as Activation Function-2 (AF2), DNA binding domain (DBD), and F-domain, have been recently considered as potential targets in the context of drug research and discovery. In this review, we summarize methods of computer-aided drug design (CADD) that have been employed to analyze and explore potential targetable sites on ERα, discuss recent advancement of ERα inhibitor development, and highlight the potential opportunities and challenges of future ERα-directed drug discovery.

Flexible small molecular anti-estrogens with N,N-dialkylated-2,5-diethoxy-4-morpholinoaniline scaffold targets multiple estrogen receptor conformations

Estrogen mediates various cellular processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, growth and mammary gland function. Estrogen Receptors (ERs) are expressed in 70% of breast cancers. Consequently, estrogen mediated ER signaling plays a critical role in breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. ERs are ligand-triggered transcription factors. However, in the absence of a cognate estrogenic ligand, ERs can be activated by a variety of other extracellular signals. Tamoxifen, an anti-estrogen that selectively targets ER, induces substantial regression of breast tumors and an increase in disease-free survival. Tamoxifen mimics estrogen effects in other tissues thereby providing some beneficial effects including reduced risk of osteoporosis. However, breast cancers that initially respond well to tamoxifen tend to develop resistance and resume growth despite the continued presence of the antagonist. Library of compounds with substituted morpholinoaniline scaffold, a set of structurally divergent potential ER antagonists that fit the tamoxifen pharmacophore, were designed to target ER Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) and to recruit co-regulator proteins including BRCA1 over a range of conformational changes. Two of the lead compounds in the library, BR46 and BR47, were found to inhibit estrogen induced cell proliferation and cell viability. Discovery of novel lead molecules targeting ligand binding pockets of hER has provided structural clues toward the development of new breed of small molecule therapeutics for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancers and would complement already existent anti-estrogen therapy.

Oral administration of the broad-spectrum antibiofilm compound toremifene inhibits Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation in vivo

We here report on the in vitro activity of toremifene to inhibit biofilm formation of different fungal and bacterial pathogens, including Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida dubliniensis, Candida krusei, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. We validated the in vivo efficacy of orally administered toremifene against C. albicans and S. aureus biofilm formation in a rat subcutaneous catheter model. Combined, our results demonstrate the potential of toremifene as a broad-spectrum oral antibiofilm compound.

Phase III randomized trial of toremifene versus tamoxifen for Japanese postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is used as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer in Japan. For Japanese patients, however, only limited data are available on the efficacy and safety profile of toremifene. To establish the long term efficacy and safety of toremifene for Japanese patients, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing toremifene and tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The subjects were postmenopausal Japanese patients who had undergone surgery for node-negative breast cancer. Toremifene or tamoxifen was administered for 2 years. The primary endpoint was demonstration of the non-inferiority of toremifene compared with tamoxifen in respect of 5-year survival. Secondary endpoints were cumulative overall survival, cumulative disease-free survival, effects on lipid profiles, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were well-balanced. Median follow-up was 66.5 months. Five-year survival was similar for toremifene and tamoxifen (97.0 vs. 96.9 %; 90 % confidence interval -3.9 to 4.1), indicating that toremifene is not inferior to tamoxifen for postmenopausal Japanese patients with early breast cancer. Cumulative overall survival and cumulative disease-free survival were also very similar for toremifene and tamoxifen (97.5 vs. 97.3 %, log-rank test P = 0.9458; 88.4 vs. 90.6 %, log-rank test P = 0.3359, respectively). Adverse events in both groups were similar and mostly mild or moderate. Thus, both are equally effective and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the efficacy and safety of toremifene and tamoxifen are equivalent for postmenopausal Japanese patients with early breast cancer.

IGFBP-3 sensitizes antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells through interaction with GRP78

IGFBP-3 is known to possess intrinsic biological activities such as anti-tumor property in addition to its IGF/IGF-R axis-dependent actions in a variety of human cancers including breast cancer. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the intrinsic biological actions of IGFBP-3 on breast cancer cells, we performed yeast two-hybrid screening and found GRP78, known to cause drug-resistance, as a binding partner of IGFBP-3. Overexpression of IGFBP-3 in antiestrogen-resistant LCC9 cells showed that IGFBP-3 interacted with GRP78, resulting in disruption of the GRP78-caspase-7 complex, thereby activating caspase-7, and further inducing apoptosis. Combination of overexpression of IGFBP-3 and application of siRNAs against GRP78 led to decrease in cell viability upon ICI 182,780 treatment. These data suggest that IGFBP-3 could sensitize antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells to ICI 182,780 by preventing the anti-apoptotic function of GRP78.

Toremifene versus tamoxifen for advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) can both be used as treatments for advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of TOR with TAM in patients with advanced breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register was searched (1 July 2011) using the codes for "toremifene", "fareston", "tamoxifen, "nolvadex, and "breast cancer". We also searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) (from inception to 1 July 2011), EMBASE (via Ovid) (from inception to 1 July 2011), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 7, 2011), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal (1 July 2011). In addition, we screened the reference lists of relevant trials or reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety, or both of TOR with TAM in women with advanced breast cancer. Trials that provided sufficient data on one of the following items: objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events, were considered eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality. Two review authors independently extracted the following details: first author, publication year, country, years of follow-up, treatment arms, intention-to-treat (ITT) population size, menopausal status of patients, hormone receptor status, response criteria, efficacy and safety outcomes of TOR and TAM arms. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, where possible, and response and adverse events were analysed as dichotomous variables. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis unless there was significant between-study heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 2061 patients from seven RCTs were included for final analysis, with 1226 patients in the TOR group and 835 patients in the TAM group. The ORR for the TOR group was 25.8% (316/1226) whereas, the ORR for the TAM group was 26.9% (225/835). The pooled risk ratio (RR) suggested that the ORRs were not statistically different between the two groups (RR 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.18, P = 0.83). The median TTP was 6.1 months for the TOR group and 5.8 months for the TAM group. The median OS was 27.8 months for the TOR group and 27.6 months for the TAM group. There were no significant differences in TTP and OS between the two therapeutic groups (for TTP: HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.24; for OS: HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.20). The frequencies of most adverse events were also similar in the two groups, while headache seemed to occur less in the TOR group than in the TAM group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.74, P = 0.02). There was no significant heterogeneity between studies in most of the above meta-analyses. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

TOR and TAM are equally effective and the safety profile of the former is at least not worse than the latter in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. Thus, TOR may serve as a reasonable alternative to TAM when anti-oestrogens are applicable but TAM is not the preferred choice for some reason.

Graphene as a nanocarrier for tamoxifen induces apoptosis in transformed cancer cell lines of different origins

A cationic amphiphile, cholest-5en-3β-oxyethyl pyridinium bromide (PY(+) -Chol), is able to efficiently disperse exfoliated graphene (GR) in water by the physical adsorption of PY(+) -Chol on the surface of GR to form stable, dark aqueous suspensions at room temperature. The GR-PY(+) -Chol suspension can then be used to solubilize Tamoxifen Citrate (TmC), a breast cancer drug, in water. The resulting TmC-GR-PY(+) -Chol is stable for a long time without any precipitation. Fluorescence emission and UV absorption spectra indicate the existence of noncovalent interactions between TmC, GR, and PY(+) -Chol in these suspensions. Electron microscopy shows the existence of segregated GR sheets and TmC 'ribbons' in the composite suspensions. Atomic force microscopy indicates the presence of 'extended' structures of GR-PY(+) -Chol, which grows wider in the presence of TmC. The slow time-dependent release of TmC is noticed in a reconstituted cell culture medium, a property useful as a drug carrier. TmC-GR-PY(+) -Chol selectively enhanced the cell death (apoptosis) of the transformed cancer cells compared to normal cells. This potency is found to be true for a wide range of transformed cancer cells viz. HeLa, A549, ras oncogene-transformed NIH3T3, HepG2, MDA-MB231, MCF-7, and HEK293T compared to the normal cell HEK293 in vitro. Confocal microscopy confirmed the high efficiency of TmC-GR-PY(+) -Chol in delivering the drug to the cells, compared to the suspensions devoid of GR.

Excellent outcomes with adjuvant toremifene or tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Fareston (toremifene) and tamoxifen, both selective estrogen receptor modulators, are therapeutically equivalent treatments for metastatic breast cancer. We hypothesized that toremifene as compared with tamoxifen given as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer would result in equivalent survival with an improved side effect profile, therefore, providing superior therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

The North American Fareston versus Tamoxifen Adjuvant trial assigned 1813 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive invasive breast cancer to adjuvant treatment with either tamoxifen or toremifene. The primary outcomes evaluated were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 59 months. The baseline characteristics of the 2 treatment groups were well-balanced. On the basis of intent-to-treat, 5-year actuarial DFS was not significantly different between tamoxifen and toremifene (91.2% [standard error of the mean [SE] 1.2%] vs 91.2% [SE 1.1%], respectively). Similarly, 5-year actuarial OS was not significantly different between tamoxifen and toremifene (92.7% [SE 1.1%] vs 93.7% [SE 1.0%], respectively). Controlling for patient age, tumor size, and tumor grade, a Cox multivariate survival analysis found no difference between patients randomized to toremifene versus tamoxifen in terms of OS (OR = 0.951; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.623-1.451, P = .951) or DFS (OR = 1.037; 95% CI, 0.721-1.491, P = .846). Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy enjoyed excellent DFS and OS. No significant differences were found between treatment with either tamoxifen or toremifene. Treatment of HR-positive patients with either tamoxifen or toremifene is appropriate.

Effect of combined therapy with the antiestrogen agent toremifene and local hyperthermia on breast cancer cells implanted in nude mice

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effects of combined treatment with the antiestrogen agent toremifene (TOR) and local hyperthermia (LHT) on the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line.

METHODS

BALB/c mice implanted with MCF-7 cells were divided into six treatment groups: a control group, a TOR30 group (given 30 mg/kg/day), a TOR120 group (given 120 mg/kg/day), an LHT group (43.5 degrees C), a TOR30 + LHT group, and a TOR120 + LHT group. The effects of the treatments on tumor cells, estrogen receptor (ER) expression, and cell cycle kinetics were measured after 21 days. We calculated the apoptotic index and vascular density inside the tumors and evaluated the efficacy of the transmigration of TOR into the tumors.

RESULTS

The antitumor effects were significantly greater in both combined therapy groups than in any of the single therapy groups. Estrogen receptor expression was weaker in the combined therapy groups than in the single therapy groups, and there were more G0/G1-phase cells and fewer S-phase cells in both combined therapy groups than in the single therapy groups. The apoptotic index was increased and the tumor vascular density was decreased in the combined therapy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We attributed the effects of this combined therapy to the induction of apoptosis, the decrease in vascular density, and the increase and decrease in G0/G1-phase and S-phase cells, respectively, in the tumors.

Steroid hormone receptors and coregulators in endocrine-resistant and estrogen-independent breast cancer cells

Resistance to hormonal therapy is often a problem in the treatment of breast cancer patients. It has been suggested that resistance could be explained by altered nuclear hormone receptor or coregulator levels or inappropriately increased agonist activity of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). To test these hypotheses, we have established novel MCF-7 cell line-derived in vitro models of anti-estrogen- and progestin-resistant and estrogen-independent breast cancer by long-term culture in the presence of toremifene and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and in the absence of estradiol, respectively. Using cell growth and multiprobe ribonuclease protection assays, the expression of 5 nuclear hormone receptors and 9 coregulators as well as the alterations in the cell proliferation and target gene transcription in response to hormonal treatments were studied. Progesterone receptor (PR) expression was decreased and silencing mediator for retinoid acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) and amplified in breast cancer-1 (AIB1) expression increased in anti-estrogen-resistant cells. Estrogen caused PR and ERbeta upregulation in all cell lines, but we did not observe increased agonist activity of anti-estrogen measured by regulation of these estrogen target genes. Basal ERalpha levels and estrogenic growth response were decreased and p300/CBP-associated factor (pCAF) and AIB1 upregulated by estrogen in progestin-resistant cells, but coregulator levels were unchanged. Estrogen-independent cells were still estrogen-responsive and PR, nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) and SMRT expression was increased whereas steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1a) and CBP-related protein p300 (p300) expression decreased. Their growth was inhibited by toremifene, but estradiol was able to abrogate this effect, which might have interesting clinical implications concerning the use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

The efficacy of tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells is enhanced by a medical nutriment

Avemar, a fermented wheat germ extract, has been applied in the supplementary therapy of human cancers. Because tamoxifen is commonly used in the therapy of ER+ breast cancer, in this study the combined effect of tamoxifen and Avemar treatment was investigated on MCF-7 breast cancer cells, in order to detect a possible agonistic or antagonistic action. Cytotoxicity was measured by MTT assay, the percentage of mitoses and apoptotic cells was determined morphologically, apoptosis and S-phase was measured by flow cytometry, and estrogen-receptor activity was determined by semiquantitative measurement of the estrogen-responsive pS2 gene mRNA production. Tamoxifen (1 nM) alone had no effect on the percentage of the apoptotic cell fraction and significantly reduced the percentage of the S-phase, compared to untreated cells. Avemar (625 microg/mL) significantly increased apoptosis after 48 hours of treatment. Tamoxifen together with Avemar significantly increased apoptosis already 24 hours after starting treatment but had only a slight (not significant) effect on mitosis and S-phase. Estrogen-receptor activity of MCF-7 cells was enhanced by Avemar, decreased by tamoxifen, and was further decreased by combined tamoxifen and Avemar treatment. As apoptosis increased when Avemar was added to tamoxifen treatment, the use of supplementary therapy with Avemar in the case of ER+ breast tumors may enhance the therapeutic effects of tamoxifen.

Toremifene and tamoxifen are equally effective for early-stage breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials 12-93 and 14-93

BACKGROUND

Toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of tamoxifen, developed to improve its risk-benefit profile. The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) conducted two complementary randomized trials for peri- and postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer to compare toremifene versus tamoxifen as the endocrine agent and simultaneously investigate a chemotherapy-oriented question. This is the first report of the endocrine comparison after a median follow-up of 5.5 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1035 patients were available for analysis: 75% had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumors, the median number of involved axillary lymph nodes was three and 81% received prior adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Toremifene and tamoxifen yielded similar disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS): 5-year DFS rates of 72% and 69%, respectively [risk ratio (RR)=0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.76-1.18]; 5-year OS rates of 85% and 81%, respectively (RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.78-1.36). Similar outcomes were observed in the ER-positive cohort. Toxicities were similar in the two treatment groups with very few women (<1%) experiencing severe thromboembolic or cerebrovascular complications. Quality of life results were also similar. Nine patients developed early stage endometrial cancer (toremifene, six; tamoxifen, three).

CONCLUSIONS

Toremifene is a valid and safe alternative to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer.

Crossover trial for lipid abnormality in postmenopausal breast cancer patients during selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) administrations

The objective of this study was to evaluate the different profiles of serum lipids resulting from the administration of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Postmenopausal primary breast cancer patients (n = 197) with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive who were treated at our department or in other related medical institutions from April 1997 through March 2001 were given adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant therapy included 1 year's administration of tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg or toremifene (TOR) 40 mg. The profiles of serum lipids such as total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and triglyceride (TG) were observed. After 1 year administration TC had significantly decreased (p < 0.001) both in the TAM group and the TOR group, but no significant difference was found between these groups (p = 0.249). HDL had significantly decreased in the TAM group (p < 0.001), while it had significantly increased in the TOR group (p < 0.001), and a significant difference was found between the groups (p < 0.001). TG had significantly increased in the TAM group (p < 0.001) but significantly decreased in the TOR group (p < 0.001). The medication was switched in those who still had abnormal lipid metabolism and given to them for another year. After 1 year from the crossover TC and HDL had increased to the levels of before administration (p < 0.001) and TG had decreased in those (n = 57) whose medication was switched from TAM to TOR. While TC had decreased and TG had increased in those (n = 23) whose medication was switched from TOR to TAM (p < 0.001). The above findings have suggested that TOR provides better profiles of lipid metabolism than TAM.

Effects of toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) on serum lipids in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer

This study clarified the difference in the effects on serum lipids between toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM). To remove influencing factors, we investigated adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive patients with breast cancer without lymph node metastasis. The subjects were 65 patients who were enrolled in a multicenter randomized comparative study between April 1997 and March 2001. As adjuvant therapy, 20 mg of TAM or 40 mg of TOR was administered for 1 year. The levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1), apolipoprotein A(Apo B), and lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) were measured prior to administration and 3, 6, and 12 months after the start of administration. TC, LDL-C, Lp(a) and Apo B significantly decreased from the third month of administration compared with values before the start of administration in both the TOR and TAM groups. HDL-C significantly increased from the third month only in the TOR group. TG significantly increased in the TAM group but significantly decreased in the TOR group in the 12th month of administration. When these two groups were compared, HDL-C was significantly higher (p < 0.01) and TG was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the TOR group in the 12th month. Improvement of abnormal values of TG, HDL-C and LDL-C was better in the TOR group than in the TAM group after administration for 12 months. The effect on lipid metabolism showed different profiles between the two selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and TOR gave better results than TAM.

Endometrial K-ras mutations in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen or toremifene

PURPOSE

Long-term use of tamoxifen is associated with a two- to threefold increased risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Toremifene is another triphenylethylene antiestrogen, which is as effective as tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer. Thus far, its use has not been associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. K-ras codon 12 mutations seem to be important in endometrial carcinogenesis, and these mutations have been found in endometrial samples of patients on tamoxifen. The present study was undertaken to investigate if there is any difference in the frequency of endometrial K-ras mutations among patients treated with tamoxifen or toremifene.

METHODS

Endometrial samples were taken from 23 postmenopausal breast cancer patients (tamoxifen, n = 11; toremifene, n = 12) before and after 36 months of treatment. DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using a routine proteinase K digestion protocol. K-ras mutations in codon 12 were screened using real-time PCR and melting curve analysis in LightCycler equipment. Wild-type PNA oligomer was used to increase the sensitivity of the assay.

RESULTS

All baseline samples contained wild-type K-ras, while 10/23 (43%) of the follow-up samples carried a codon 12 mutation. Mutations were identified in 3 of the 11 in the tamoxifen group and in 7 of the 12 in the toremifene group. Seven were transitions (G-->A), and three were transversions (two G-->T, one G-->C). One of the mutations in the toremifene group was associated with a polypoid endometrium. All the other mutations were found in an atrophic (n = 6) or proliferative (n = 3) endometrium.

CONCLUSIONS

Both tamoxifen and toremifene induce endometrial K-ras codon 12 mutations. The significance of this finding to endometrial carcinogenesis remains to be elucidated.

Drug delivery systems for oestrogenic hormones and antagonists: the need for selective targeting in estradiol-dependent cancers

The pleiotropic activity of oestrogens and their mechanism of action via their binding to the two oestrogen receptors alpha (ER alpha) and beta (ER beta) subtypes in the different tissues where oestrogens exert their action have been briefly described. The fate of these compounds trapped into different galenic forms is discussed with regard to their therapeutic applications. Firstly, the advantages and disadvantages of the different forms (pills, i.v. forms and transdermal patches) used in contraception are compared. Secondly, the therapeutic use of formulated oestrogens for the post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is analysed through the various results obtained in different trials. The link between HRT and the risks of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease is underlined. Finally, comparing the activity of selective oestrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen and pure anti-oestrogens such as RU58668 and ICI182780, we analysed the reasons leading to the need for a tumor targeting of the latters, but not of the former for the treatment of oestrogen-dependent breast cancer. Different injectable and biodegradable formulations, that lead to a remarkable anti-tumor efficiency in xenografts, have been recently developed and we believe that they may represent promising new administration ways of added therapeutic values for anti-oestrogens. Such devices could be extended to the delivery of other anti-cancer drugs with more aggressive activities than anti-oestrogens.

Estrogenic effects of toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

Intrinsic estrogenicities of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) toremifene 60 mg daily or 200 mg daily and tamoxifen 20 mg daily (TOR60, TOR200 and TAM20) were compared in a randomized clinical study in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The study was open label in three parallel groups. Variables for analysis were serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol (E2), antithrombin III (AT III), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and vaginal cytology. Clinical efficacy and safety have been reported earlier. A total of 648 patients were randomized (221 to TOR60, 212 to TOR200 and 215 to TAM20). Sera were available for the analysis from 148, 165 and 156 and for vaginal cytology from 98, 93 and 86 patients, respectively. All treatment regimens showed tissue-specific and dose-dependent estrogen agonist effect. In the primary measure of in vivo estrogenicity, effect on hypothalamus-pituitary-axis, all three treatment regimens decreased serum FSH (p < 0.001). TOR200 was more potent than the two other treatments (p < 0.05), but surprisingly, TAM20 was more estrogenic than TOR60 (p < 0.001). As could be expected in postmenopausal women, the treatments had no effect on mean serum E2 concentrations and decrease of serum LH was similar to that of FSH. Estrogenic effect on the liver was seen as dose-dependent increase of SHBG with statistically significant differences between the treatment groups (p < 0.001). Trends of transient ASAT elevations in TOR200 group (p = 0.07) and in all treatment groups AT III decrease (p = 0.1) were seen in the beginning of the treatment. TOR60 or TAM20 did not have an effect on mean ASAT values, and AT III decreased in TAM20 group more than in the two other groups (p = 0.1 compared to TOR60 and p < 0.05 compared to TOR200). Estrogenic effects on vaginal superficial cells were higher in TOR60 and TOR200 groups when compared to TAM20 (p < 0.05). Toremifene and tamoxifen had tissue-specific and partially dose-dependent estrogenic effects in hypothalamus-pituitary-axis, in the liver and in the vaginal epithelium of postmenopausal women. In some tissues tamoxifen 20 may be more estrogenic than toremifene 60 mg/day.

The use of selective estrogen receptor modulators and selective estrogen receptor down-regulators in breast cancer

Tamoxifen is one of the most effective treatments for breast cancer through its ability to antagonize estrogen-dependent growth by binding estrogen receptors (ERs) and inhibiting proliferation of breast epithelial cells. However, tamoxifen has estrogenic agonist effects in other tissues such as bone and endometrium due to liganded ER activating target genes in these different types of cell. Several novel anti-estrogen compounds have been developed which have a reduced agonist profile on breast and gynaecological tissues. These compounds offer the potential for enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity compared with tamoxifen. In advanced breast cancer clinical data exist for two groups of agents: the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), further divided into "tamoxifen-like" (e.g. toremifene, droloxifene and idoxifene) and "fixed ring" compounds (e.g. raloxifene, arzoxifene and EM-800), and the selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs; e.g. fulvestrant (ICI 182780), SR 16234 and ZK 191703) also termed "pure anti-estrogens". In phase II trials in tamoxifen-resistant metastatic breast cancer the SERMs show low objective response rates (range 0-15%), suggesting cross resistance with tamoxifen. Randomized phase III trials for toremifene and idoxifene in over 1500 patients showed no significant difference compared with tamoxifen. Fewer clinical data exist for the "fixed ring" SERMs and it remains unclear whether any clinical advantage exists for the "fixed ring" SERMs over tamoxifen as first-line therapy. The main advantage for SERMs such as tamoxifen and raloxifene probably remains in early-stage disease (adjuvant therapy or prevention). Fulvestrant and the other SERDs have a high affinity for the estrogen receptor (ER) compared to tamoxifen, but none of its agonist activities. Of the SERDs, only fulvestrant has entered the clinic and this new agent is showing promising clinical activity in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Recently published phase III studies have shown fulvestrant to be at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in patients whose disease has relapsed or progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Surprisingly, however, in a phase III trial versus tamoxifen for the first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer fulvestrant did not attain the requirements for equivalence to tamoxifen, and in terms of time-to-treatment failure was inferior (5.9 versus 7.8 months for fulvestrant and tamoxifen, respectively; P=0.029). Future clinical studies will evaluate fulvestrant in the neoadjuvant setting together with its optimal sequencing in relation to tamoxifen and other endocrine therapies in advanced disease.

Current status of estrogen receptors

Increasing knowledge on structure and function of estrogen receptors is providing information on the mechanism of action of estrogen agonists, as well as antagonists, and in understanding their tissue-selective action. However, there are still many factors associated with estrogen response which are poorly understood. Therefore, the task of designing a tissue-selective estrogen for use as a pharmaceutical in estrogen-dependent disorders remains an uncertain game. This review provides information on the current status of estrogen receptors for a better understanding.

Hydroxymatairesinol, a novel enterolactone precursor with antitumor properties from coniferous tree (Picea abies)

The potential for the extraction of the plant lignan hydroxymatairesinol (HMR) in large scale from Norway spruce (Picea abies) has given us the opportunity to study the metabolism and biological actions of HMR in animals. HMR, the most abundant single component of spruce lignans, was metabolized to enterolactone (ENL) as the major metabolite in rats after oral administration. The amounts of urinary ENL increased with the dose of HMR (from 3 to 50 mg/kg), and only minor amounts of unmetabolized HMR isomers and other lignans were found in urine. HMR (15 mg/kg body wt po) given for 51 days decreased the number of growing tumors and increased the proportion of regressing and stabilized tumors in the rat dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary tumor model. HMR (50 mg/kg body wt) did not exert estrogenic or antiestrogenic activity in the uterine growth test in immature rats. HMR also showed no antiandrogenic responses in the growth of accessory sex glands in adult male rats. Neither ENL nor enterodiol showed estrogenic or antiestrogenic activity via a classical alpha- or beta-type estrogen receptor-mediated pathway in vitro at < 1.0 microM. HMR was an effective antioxidant in vitro.

Safety and efficacy results of a randomized trial comparing adjuvant toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Finnish Breast Cancer Group

PURPOSE

In this multicenter trial, toremifene 40 mg/d was compared with tamoxifen 20 mg/d, both given orally for 3 years to postmenopausal, axillary node-positive women after breast surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The first 899 patients (toremifene, n = 459; tamoxifen, n = 440) of the total of 1,480 patients accrued to the trial were included in this scheduled safety analysis. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 years.

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were well balanced with respect to patient and disease characteristics. The subjective side-effect profile was similar in both treatment groups. Slightly more vascular complications (deep vein thromboses, cerebrovascular events, and pulmonary embolisms) were seen among tamoxifen-treated patients (5.9%) as compared with toremifene-treated patients (3.5%) (P: =.11), whereas bone fractures (P: =.09) and vaginal leukorrhea (P: =.05) were more common in the toremifene group. The number of subsequent second cancers was similar. The breast cancer recurrence rate was 23.1% (n = 106) in the toremifene group and 26.1% (n = 115) in the tamoxifen group (P: =.31). When only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancer were considered (n = 556), the risk for breast cancer recurrence was nonsignificantly lower among the toremifene-treated women, with a hazards ratio of 0.74 (90% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.04; P: =.14). The mean time to breast cancer recurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The side-effect profile of toremifene resembles that of tamoxifen. The efficacy of toremifene seems to be no less than that of tamoxifen. The trend for fewer breast cancer recurrences in the ER-positive subgroup is encouraging, but a longer follow-up is needed to confirm this.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators: structure, function, and clinical use

The sex hormone estrogen is important for many physiologic processes. Prolonged stimulation of breast ductal epithelium by estrogen, however, can contribute to the development and progression of breast cancer, and treatments designed to block estrogen's effects are important options in the clinic. Tamoxifen and other similar drugs are effective in breast cancer prevention and treatment by inhibiting the proliferative effects of estrogen that are mediated through the estrogen receptor (ER). However, these drugs also have many estrogenic effects depending on the tissue and gene, and they are more appropriately called selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). SERMs bind ER, alter receptor conformation, and facilitate binding of coregulatory proteins that activate or repress transcriptional activation of estrogen target genes. Theoretically, SERMs could be synthesized that would exhibit nearly complete agonist activity on the one hand or pure antiestrogenic activity on the other. Depending on their functional activities, SERMs could then be developed for a variety of clinical uses, including prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, treatment and prevention of estrogen-regulated malignancies, and even for hormone replacement therapy. Tamoxifen is effective in patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer and in the adjuvant setting. The promising role for tamoxifen in ductal carcinoma-in-situ or for breast cancer prevention is evolving, and its use can be considered in certain patient groups. Other SERMs are in development, with the goal of reducing toxicity and/or improving efficacy, and future agents have the potential of providing a new paradigm for maintaining the health of women.

Is ICI 182,780 an antiprogestin in addition to being an antiestrogen?

The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 has been shown to have antiprogestin activity in reporter gene constructs. Cell lines, naturally devoid of progesterone receptors (PR) were transfected with either the A or B forms of the human PR and a luciferase construct driven by a progesterone-response element (PRE). Because this system is an artificial one, our purpose was to determine whether these observations could be made in a human breast cancer cell line, naturally containing PR. We further evaluated the dose-response of ICI 182,780 and RU-486 (mifepristone) on PR and estrogen receptors (ER) in the presence of either progesterone, norgestrel or estradiol. These effects were measured using immunoassays for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and human glandular kallikrein (hK2) and pS2. We found that ICI 182,780 blocked progesterone-stimulated PSA and hK2 production 100% at 10(-5) M, which decreased significantly by 10-6 M. This inhibition did not occur when norgestrel was the progestin used. RU-486 showed 100% blockade for both progestins at all concentrations used. We concluded that the antiprogestin activity of ICI 182,780 exists for progesterone only. This weak antiprogestin activity may be unlikely to have significant clinical implications.

Antiestrogens--tamoxifen, SERMs and beyond

Estrogens play a central role in reproductive physiology. The cellular effects of estrogens are mediated by binding to nuclear receptors (ER) which activate transcription of genes involved in cellular growth control. At least two such receptors, designated ERalpha and ERbeta, mediate these effects in conjunction with a number of coactivators. These receptors can directly interact with other members of the steroid receptor superfamily. A complex cross-talk exists between the estrogen-signaling pathways and the downstream signaling events initiated by growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factors. Estrogens are also a causative factor in the pathogenesis of a variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases, including breast cancer, endometrial cancer, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids, among others. Antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen, are widely used for the treatment of breast cancer. Tamoxifen produces objective tumor shrinkage in advanced breast cancer, reduces the risk of relapse in women treated for invasive breast cancer, and prevents breast cancer in high-risk women. Although, initially developed as an antiestrogen, tamoxifen can also prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis as well as reduce cholesterol, due to its estrogen-agonist effects. Its estrogen-agonist activity, however, can lead to significant side-effects such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolic phenomena. This has led to the concept of "ideal" selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), drugs that would have the desired, tissue selective, estrogen-agonist or -antagonist effects. Raloxifene is a SERM which has the desirable mixed agonist/antagonist effects of tamoxifen but does not cause uterine stimulation. "Pure" antiestrogens may provide very potent estrogen-antagonist drugs, but are likely to be devoid of beneficial effects on bone and lipids. Future drug development efforts should focus on developing superior SERMs that have a greater efficacy against ER-positive tumors and do not cause hot flashes or thromboembolism, and explore combination strategies to simultaneously target hormone-dependent as well as hormone-independent breast cancer.

The evolving role of specific estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs)

Estrogens are the most effective therapy for women with postmenopausal problems. However, relatively few women use estrogen and then often for a limited time because of the fear of its carcinogenic effects on the uterus and breast; in addition, estrogen is not advised for women who have had breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are agents with antagonist action on the uterus and breast and agonist action on the bones, cardiovascular system, and brain. Unlike estrogens, however, existing SERMs do not help alleviate the vasomotor and urogenital problems associated with menopause. A comprehensive review of the literature published from January 1995 to June 1999 was conducted. Reports were identified using Medline and Cancer Lit. The effect of menopausal problems on the health of women and the socioeconomic effects of menopause are discussed. All currently available and investigational SERMs are reviewed and discussed, including their mechanism of action, metabolism, dose scheduling, antitumor activity, and potential role in maintaining the health of menopausal women and in preventing breast cancer.

Meta-analysis of trials comparing toremifene with tamoxifen and factors predicting outcome of antiestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Meta-analysis of all clinical data was conducted to compare toremifene 40-60 mg/day (TOR) with tamoxifen 20-40 mg/day (TAM) in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive or ER unknown advanced breast cancer and assess factors predicting treatment outcome. Data from five randomized parallel group studies (all studies) were combined. Efficacy variables were the response rate in all studies and also the time to treatment failure and survival in the three major studies (pivotal studies). Of the 1421 patients, 725 received TOR and 696 TAM. Response rates were 24.0% and 25.3%, respectively (p = 0.675) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference -5.3 to 3.4. Of the 1157 patients in the pivotal studies, 75% had progressed and 50% expired. Median treatment times were 4.9 months in TOR and 5.3 months in TAM groups (p = 0.762, hazard ratio 0.98 with 95% CI 0.87-1.11). Median survival times were 31.0 (TOR) and 33.1 (TAM) months (p = 0.758, hazard ratio 0.98 with 95% CI 0.83-1.15). All results are consistent with the criteria of statistical equivalence between TOR and TAM. More patients in TAM (20%) than in TOR (14%, p = 0.007) discontinued the treatment prematurely but overall the treatments were well tolerated. As the treatments were equally effective all data were analyzed together for predictive factors. High tumor ER concentration, long disease free time, soft tissue metastases, few metastatic sites, and good performance status all independently predicted longer survival (p<0.001). Previous adjuvant tamoxifen predicted shorter survival (p = 0.008). Objective response to treatment or disease stabilization for at least 12 months both predicted prolonged survival (p = 0.001). TOR 60 mg/day and TAM are equally effective and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Probability of survival may be predicted based on patient characteristics and on the initial response to the treatment.

New Hormonal Therapies for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: There has been an explosion in the development of hormonal therapies for the treatment of breast cancer. Several new agents have been approved for the treatment of breast cancer in the metastatic setting, and trials are ongoing in the adjuvant and prevention setting to improve hormonal therapy for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: The literature on new hormonal therapies for the treatment of breast cancer is reviewed, with an emphasis on newer agents. RESULTS: Two antiestrogens are now approved in the United States for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Other antiestrogens have activity in metastatic breast cancer as well as in osteoporosis. Newer pure antiestrogens may overcome resistance to tamoxifen. Several aromatase inhibitors are available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Many hormonal agents are now available for both adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Developments will depend on clarifying mechanisms of resistance to antiestrogens and identifying new classes of agents that lack cross-resistance to standard therapy.

Cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose toremifene for patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer. The Japan Toremifene Cooperative Study Group

BACKGROUND

Multi-combination chemotherapy consisting of anthracyclines has been effective but has not invariably prolonged the survival period in advanced/recurrent breast cancer. The possibility has been discussed that chemoendocrine therapy combined with endocrine agents is more effective.

METHODS

In order to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a new endocrine therapy for advanced/recurrent breast cancer, we ran a pilot study during the period from July 1994 to July 1996.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer were treated with chemoendocrine therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/body) p.o. daily for 14 days, with adriamycin (40 mg/m2) i.v. and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/body) i.v. on day 1 (repeated every 3 weeks for 9 weeks) (CAF therapy), and high-dose toremifene (120 mg/body) p.o. daily. Of 20 evaluable patients, two showed complete response (10%), eight partial response (40%), six no change (30%) and four progressive disease (20%). The overall response rate was 50%, and the median duration of response was 69.5 days (28-133+ days). The major toxicities were drug-induced alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicity and hematological toxicity, but these were clinically well tolerated. No serious cardiac, liver or renal symptom was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, we consider the addition of high-dose toremifene to the CAF therapy to be useful in the treatment of advanced and recurrent breast cancer.

A phase III comparison of two toremifene doses to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Eastern European Study Group

Efficacy and safety of toremifene 60 and 240 mg daily (TOR60 and TOR240) are compared to 40 mg tamoxifen daily (TAM40) in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER) positive or ER unknown breast cancer. The study is randomized and open label in three parallel groups. Primary efficacy variables are response rate and time to progression. WHO and ECOG criteria were used for measurable and nonmeasurable disease assessment, respectively. Safety was reported according to WHO criteria. Altogether 463 patients were randomized (157 to TOR60, 157 to TOR240, and 149 to TAM40). By data cut-off, after 20.5 months median follow-up time, over 70% of the patients had experienced disease progression. Response rates are 20.4%, 28.7%, and 20.8% in TOR60. TOR240, and TAM40, respectively. TOR60 and TAM40 show statistically equivalent efficacy and the difference between TOR240 and TAM40 is not significant (P = 0.112). Median times to progression are 4.9 (TOR60), 6.1 (TOR240), and 5.0 (TAM40) months and the corresponding hazard ratios (TAM:TOR) 1.015 and 1.124. Again, TOR60 and TAM40 are statistically equivalent and the difference between TOR240 and TAM40 is not significant (P = 0.374). All treatments were well tolerated. As a conclusion, TOR60 and TAM40 show equivalent clinical efficacy and tolerability. The higher dose of toremifene slightly but not statistically significantly improves response rate and time to progression. In postmenopausal women, toremifene 60 mg daily is an effective and safe treatment of advanced ER-positive or ER-unknown breast cancer.

Toremifene. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer

The triphenylethylene antiestrogen toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of the antiestrogen tamoxifen, an agent which has been widely and successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of toremifene as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (estrogen receptor status positive or unknown) have shown this drug to have similar antitumour activity to that of tamoxifen. In multicentre comparative trials, objective responses (complete and partial) occurred in 20 to 29% of patients treated with toremifene (60 to 240 mg/day) and in 19 to 37.5% of tamoxifen (20 or 40 mg/day) recipients. The duration of response, time to disease progression and median overall survival time were generally similar in both treatment groups. Toremifene is well tolerated. Most drug-related adverse effects are mild or moderate in severity and rarely necessitate discontinuation of therapy. The tolerability profile of toremifene is similar to that reported for tamoxifen, the most common adverse effects being hot flushes, sweating, nausea and/or vomiting, dizziness, oedema, and vaginal discharge and/or bleeding. Thus, toremifene provides an equally effective and well tolerated alternative to tamoxifen for the first-line endocrine therapy of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Preclinical studies showing toremifene to have a lower carcinogenic potential than tamoxifen indicate that toremifene may be a preferable agent for long term treatment regimens; however, these findings require confirmation in the clinical setting.

Comparison of toremifene and tamoxifen in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized double-blind, the 'nordic' phase III study

The study was planned to compare, in a prospective double-blind randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have not had prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. Four hundred and fifteen post-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive or ER-unknown advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive daily either 60 mg TOR or 40 mg TAM. The patients were stratified to measurable and non-measurable but evaluable groups. They were assessed for response to therapy, time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), response duration, overall survival and drug toxicity. Two hundred and fourteen patients were randomized into TOR and 201 into TAM treatment. The response rate (complete + partial) was 31.3% for TOR and 37.3% for TAM (P = 0.215). The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 6% difference was -15.1% to 3.1%. The median TTP was 7.3 months for TOR and 10.2 months for TAM (P = 0.047). The 95% CI for the hazard ratio of 0.80 was 0.64-1.00. A percentage of the TOR patients (9.8%) and the TAM patients (18.9%) discontinued the treatment prematurely (P = 0.011) for various reasons. Consequently, the median TTF of 6.3 vs 8.5 months did not differ significantly (P = 0.271). The hazard ratio was 0.89 and the subsequent 95% CI 0.73-1.09. The median overall survival was 33.0 months for TOR and 38.7 months for TAM (P = 0.645). The hazard ratio was 0.94 with 95% CI of 0.73-1.22. The transient difference in TTP may be related to an imbalance in ER content of the tumours. When only patients with ER-positive tumours were considered (n = 238), no difference between two treatments was seen (P = 0.578). TAM was associated with an overall slightly higher frequency of adverse drug reactions than TOR (44.3 vs 39.3%) and a higher discontinuation rate due to these events (3.5% vs 0.9%). Treatment-emerged moderate dizziness (P = 0.026) and cataracts (P = 0.026) were more frequent among TAM than among TOR patients. In conclusion, TOR (60 mg day(-1)) and TAM (40 mg day(-1)) are equally effective and safe in the treatment of advanced post-menopausal ER-positive or ER-unknown breast cancer.

Toremifene, a novel antiestrogen, can overcome hsp27-induced drug resistance in human breast cancer cells

Human breast cancer cell lines derived from MDA-MB-231 were constructed to express hsp27 constitutively. The elevated presence of this protein resulted in an enhanced ability to survive a heat shock and exposure to doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic agent. Hsp27 expression was unable to protect cells from doxorubicin if they were cultured in the presence of toremifene. Flow cytometry analysis indicated that wells exposed to both toremifene and doxorubicin accumulate at G2 + M. Protective effects of hsp27 were overcome by addition of an estrogen antagonist at clinically nontoxic levels. Addition of toremifene to chemotherapeutic regimes may enhance the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin.

New endocrine therapies for breast cancer

How do the new endocrine therapies stand up to the aims of modern endocrine therapy outlined in Table 1? We wish to see increased efficacy, decreased toxicity and improved general health in women taking a new agent. None of the new non-steroidal anti-oestrogens have shown unequivocal evidence of improved efficacy in the clinic to mirror their improved profiles over tamoxifen in preclinical studies. We know that toremifene is equivalent to tamoxifen, but we do not have any phase III data from the other four compounds in development. The specific steroidal antioestrogen, ICI 182,780, looks very promising, but is early in its developmental programme. The new aromatase inhibitors are likely to prove equal to tamoxifen or progestagens, but it is disappointing that improved oestrogen suppression has not led, to date, to improved efficacy. No comment can be made about adjuvant or preventative therapy for any of the new agents, although trials are planned for the new aromatase inhibitors in this clinical situation. Currently, the antiprogestins are disappointing and we will need to wait a considerable time for new agents in preclinical testing to reach the clinic. Many of the new agents are associated with decreased toxicity. It is likely that the NSAEs will be equitoxic with tamoxifen. The steroidal antioestrogen looks particularly non-toxic as do the new aromatase inhibitors, and thus we have an advance in terms of reduced toxicity. The effects of the new agents on the uterus, lipids and bone are in the early stages of testing. Raloxifene, ICI 182,780 and the new aromatase inhibitors are expected to have no proliferative effects on the endometrium, but only the new NSAEs are expected to have beneficial cardiovascular and skeletal effects. If the steroidal anti-oestrogens and new aromatase inhibitors become adjuvant therapies of choice, other agents to prevent osteoporosis and cardiovascular events may also have to be administered.

Anti-oestrogen stimulation of ERBB2 ectodomain shedding from BT-474 human breast cancer cells with ERBB2 gene amplification

Oestrogen has previously been shown to downregulate the expression of ERBB2 oncogene in human breast cancer cells, which contain a normal non-amplified ERBB2 gene. However, amplified ERBB2 seems to escape from hormonal regulation. We studied shedding of the extracellular domain (ectodomain, ECD) of the ERBB2 encoded protein in BT-474 human breast cancer cells treated with oestrogen or anti-oestrogen. Oestrogen-responsiveness of these cells has been previously demonstrated by stimulation of cell growth and expression of pS2, a marker gene known to be regulated by oestrogen receptor at transcriptional level. The concentration of the soluble ECD in the culture medium was increased by the anti-oestrogen toremifene as a function of time. In contrast, the level of ERBB2 mRNA and protein in cell lysates was not stimulated, but was transiently suppressed by toremifene. In the presence of oestrogen, the level of ECD remained low. The increased shedding of ECD in the presence of toremifene, without parallel change in ERBB2 transcripts (4.8 and 2.3 kb) and in cellular ERBB2 protein level, suggests that toremifene specifically contributes to the shedding of the ERBB2 ectodomain. These results show that shedding of ECD is an additional level of regulation of ERBB2 by the anti-oestrogen toremifene. This may contribute to resistance to growth inhibition by anti-oestrogens of breast cancers which overexpress ERBB2.