The effects of infection prevention regimens on early infectious complications in marrow transplant patients: a four arm randomized study

Clinical impact and early prediction of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

OBJECTIVE

Although antipseudomonal agents are administered in high-risk patients, no reports have focused on the risk of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a cohort of adult allo-HSCT recipients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia, focusing on a comparison between carbapenem-sensitive (CS) and CR P. aeruginosa after initiating conditioning chemotherapy at our institute between January 2005 and December 2020. The incidence, all-cause 30-d mortality of P. aeruginosa bacteraemia, and risk factors for carbapenem resistance among patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia in allo-HSCT recipients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia were included, with an incidence of 3.84/100 recipients (CS = 1.92 vs. CR = 1.92). The all-cause 30-d mortality was significantly higher in CR P. aeruginosa bacteraemia (CS = 4.2% vs. CR = 39.1%; P = 0.003). The factor significantly associated with CR P. aeruginosa bacteraemia was carbapenem use for at least 3 d within 30 d before the onset of bacteraemia (odds ratio = 8.92; 95% confidence interval: 1.35-58.90). Inappropriate antimicrobial selection was significantly more frequent in CR P. aeruginosa bacteraemia (CS = 0% vs. CR = 29.2%; P ˂ 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Empirical combination therapy with reference to antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in each institution should be considered when CR P. aeruginosa bacteraemia is suspected in allo-HSCT recipients based on the risk of carbapenem exposure.

Outpatient intensive induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

To improve patient quality of life and reduce health care costs, many conditions formerly thought to require inpatient care are now treated in the outpatient setting. Outpatient induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may confer similar benefits. This possibility prompted a pilot study to explore the safety and feasibility of intensive outpatient initial or salvage induction chemotherapy administration for adults with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients with no significant organ dysfunction and a treatment-related mortality (TRM) score corresponding to a day 28 mortality rate of <5% to 10% were eligible for study. Patients were treated as outpatients with daily evaluation by providers and only admitted to the hospital if mandated by complications. Twenty patients were consented, and 17 were treated. Eight patients received initial induction chemotherapy and 9 received salvage induction chemotherapy. Fourteen patients completed induction chemotherapy administration in the outpatient setting (82.4%; exact 95% confidence interval [CI], 55.8-95.3). Three patients were admitted during the course of chemotherapy administration, 2 for neutropenic fever and 1 for grade 3 mucositis. No patients died within 14 days of the initiation of induction chemotherapy (exact 95% CI, 0-22.9). Results of this pilot study suggest it is feasible to complete outpatient induction chemotherapy in select patients with AML and high-risk MDS. A team including nurses, social workers, medical providers, and pharmacists was key to the successful implementation of outpatient induction.

Effect of laminar air flow and building construction on aspergillosis in acute leukemia patients: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The preventive effect of laminar air flow (LAF) on aspergillosis has been observed in patients with hematological malignancies. However, the short follow-up period limits the interpretation of study results.

Methods

To assess the preventive effect of long-term LAF use on aspergillosis in its long-term use, we retrospectively analyzed 124 acute leukemia patients at our hospital between January 2005 and March 2016. We compared the incidence of aspergillosis before (May 2008) and during the construction of a new building (June 2008–January 2010) and in the early (February 2010–March 2014) and late (April 2014–March 2016) periods after moving to a new hematology ward with an LAF system. The 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycosis Study Group criteria were used for the diagnosis of aspergillosis.

Results

Fourteen patients were diagnosed with possible, probable, or definite aspergillosis. Cumulative incidence rates of aspergillosis at day 180 were 12.4, 24.9, 9.3, and 25.1% before construction, during construction, in the early period after moving to a new ward, and in the late period after moving to a new ward, respectively (p = 0.106). Multivariate analysis showed that the LAF system tended to reduce the risk of aspergillosis in the early period (before construction vs. early period; hazards ratio (HR) = 1.97, p = 0.463 and during construction vs. early period;HR = 3.42, p = 0.184), but the risk increased in the late period (late vs. early period, HR = 5.65, p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Building construction might increase the risk of aspergillosis. Short-term LAF use might reduce aspergillosis risk, but its long-term use is inadequate, although we could not exclude the possibility of increased risks in the recent period due to continued improvements in the different areas of our hospital. Strict maintenance, more effective LAF system, and optimization of aspergillosis prophylaxis may be necessary.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is frequently utilized in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) patients, its impact on morbidity and mortality is uncertain. This study investigates the role of quinolone prophylaxis after AHSCT in recent years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 291 consecutive adult patients who underwent AHSCT for malignant disorders, between June 2013 and January 2015. Outcomes were compared between patients who received norfloxacin prophylaxis and those who did not. The endpoints were mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days after transplant, frequency of ICU admissions, and incidence and type of bacteremia.

RESULTS

Of 291 patients, 252 patients received norfloxacin prophylaxis and 39 patients did not. The mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days as well as the median number of days of hospitalization following AHSCT did not differ between the two groups. No differences were noted in the frequency of ICU admission, incidence of septic shock, and duration of ICU stay. Patients who did not receive prophylaxis had a significantly higher rate of neutropenic fever (97%) than patients who received prophylaxis (77%) (p = 0.005). The patients with prophylaxis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of gram-positive bacteremia as compared to those without prophylaxis (p = 0.002). Frequency of Clostridium difficile infection was similar during and post-prophylaxis. More antibiotic use was noted among patients without prophylaxis [97%; median 9 (range, 5-24) days] compared to patients with prophylaxis [79%; median 7 (range, 3-36) days, p = 0.04].

CONCLUSION

Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever and antibiotic use in AHSCT, it did not alter mortality or morbidity.

Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) and other infectious complications are some of the most serious treatment-related toxicities of chemotherapy for cancer, with a mortality rate of 2% to 21%. The two main types of prophylactic regimens are granulocyte (macrophage) colony-stimulating factors (G(M)-CSF) and antibiotics, frequently quinolones or cotrimoxazole. Current guidelines recommend the use of colony-stimulating factors when the risk of febrile neutropenia is above 20%, but they do not mention the use of antibiotics. However, both regimens have been shown to reduce the incidence of infections. Since no systematic review has compared the two regimens, a systematic review was undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of G(M)-CSF compared to antibiotics in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, databases of ongoing trials, and conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology (1980 to December 2015). We planned to include both full-text and abstract publications. Two review authors independently screened search results.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylaxis with G(M)-CSF versus antibiotics for the prevention of infection in cancer patients of all ages receiving chemotherapy. All study arms had to receive identical chemotherapy regimes and other supportive care. We included full-text, abstracts, and unpublished data if sufficient information on study design, participant characteristics, interventions and outcomes was available. We excluded cross-over trials, quasi-randomised trials and post-hoc retrospective trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the results of the search strategies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and analysed data according to standard Cochrane methods. We did final interpretation together with an experienced clinician.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, we included no new randomised controlled trials. We included two trials in the review, one with 40 breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and G-CSF compared to antibiotics, a second one evaluating 155 patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving GM-CSF or antibiotics.We judge the overall risk of bias as high in the G-CSF trial, as neither patients nor physicians were blinded and not all included patients were analysed as randomised (7 out of 40 patients). We considered the overall risk of bias in the GM-CSF to be moderate, because of the risk of performance bias (neither patients nor personnel were blinded), but low risk of selection and attrition bias.For the trial comparing G-CSF to antibiotics, all cause mortality was not reported. There was no evidence of a difference for infection-related mortality, with zero events in each arm. Microbiologically or clinically documented infections, severe infections, quality of life, and adverse events were not reported. There was no evidence of a difference in frequency of febrile neutropenia (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 2.84). The quality of the evidence for the two reported outcomes, infection-related mortality and frequency of febrile neutropenia, was very low, due to the low number of patients evaluated (high imprecision) and the high risk of bias.There was no evidence of a difference in terms of median survival time in the trial comparing GM-CSF and antibiotics. Two-year survival times were 6% (0 to 12%) in both arms (high imprecision, low quality of evidence). There were four toxic deaths in the GM-CSF arm and three in the antibiotics arm (3.8%), without evidence of a difference (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.30 to 5.69; P = 0.71; low quality of evidence). There were 28% grade III or IV infections in the GM-CSF arm and 18% in the antibiotics arm, without any evidence of a difference (RR 1.55; 95% CI 0.86 to 2.80; P = 0.15, low quality of evidence). There were 5 episodes out of 360 cycles of grade IV infections in the GM-CSF arm and 3 episodes out of 334 cycles in the cotrimoxazole arm (0.8%), with no evidence of a difference (RR 1.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 6.42; P = 0.55; low quality of evidence). There was no significant difference between the two arms for non-haematological toxicities like diarrhoea, stomatitis, infections, neurologic, respiratory, or cardiac adverse events. Grade III and IV thrombopenia occurred significantly more frequently in the GM-CSF arm (60.8%) compared to the antibiotics arm (28.9%); (RR 2.10; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.12; P = 0.0002; low quality of evidence). Neither infection-related mortality, incidence of febrile neutropenia, nor quality of life were reported in this trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As we only found two small trials with 195 patients altogether, no conclusion for clinical practice is possible. More trials are necessary to assess the benefits and harms of G(M)-CSF compared to antibiotics for infection prevention in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

METHODS

We collected reports from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, along with references cited therein. We included prospective, randomized studies on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in HSCT recipients.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials with 1453 autologous and allogeneic HSCT recipients were included. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis was compared with placebo or no prophylaxis in 10 trials and with non-absorbable antibiotics in two trials. Systemic antibiotics other than fluoroquinolones were evaluated in five of these 12 trials. Four trials evaluated the effect of the addition of antibiotics for gram-positive bacteria to fluoroquinolones. One trial compared two different systemic antibiotic regimens: fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. As a result, systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the incidence of febrile episodes (OR 0.16; 95%CI 0.09-0.30), clinically or microbiologically documented infection (OR 0.38; 95%CI 0.22-0.63) and bacteremia (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.16-0.59) without significantly affecting all-cause mortality or infection-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis successfully reduced the incidence of infection. However, there was no significant impact on mortality. The clinical benefits of prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones were inconclusive because of the small number of clinical trials evaluated.

The use of intravenous antibiotics at the onset of neutropenia in patients receiving outpatient-based hematopoietic stem cell transplants

Empirical antibiotics at the onset of febrile neutropenia are one of several strategies for management of bacterial infections in patients undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) (empiric strategy). Our HSCT program aims to perform HSCT in an outpatient setting, where an empiric antibiotic strategy was employed. HSCT recipients began receiving intravenous antibiotics at the onset of neutropenia in the absence of fever as part of our institutional policy from 01 Jan 2009; intravenous Prophylactic strategy. A prospective study was conducted to compare two consecutive cohorts [Year 2008 (Empiric strategy) vs. Year 2009 (Prophylactic strategy)] of patients receiving HSCT. There were 238 HSCTs performed between 01 Jan 2008 and 31 Dec 2009 with 127 and 111 in the earlier and later cohorts respectively. Infection-related mortality pre- engraftment was similar with a prophylactic compared to an empiric strategy (3.6% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.24), but reduced among recipients of autologous HSCT (0% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03). Microbiologically documented, blood stream infections and clinically documented infections pre-engraftment were reduced in those receiving a prophylactic compared to an empiric strategy, (11.7% vs. 28.3%; p = 0.001), (9.9% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.003) and (18.2% vs. 33.9% p = 0.007) respectively. The prophylactic use of intravenous once-daily ceftriaxone in patients receiving outpatient based HSCT is safe and may be particularly effective in patients receiving autologous HSCT. Further studies are warranted to study the impact of this Prophylactic strategy in an outpatient based HSCT program.

Outpatient management following intensive induction chemotherapy for myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot study

Due to infectious and bleeding risks, adults with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes typically remain hospitalized after remission induction chemotherapy until blood count recovery. Here, we explored the medical and financial effects of discharge immediately after chemotherapy completion with close outpatient follow up. Within 12 months, 15 patients fulfilling both medical and logistical criteria were discharged early, whereas 5 patients meeting medical criteria only served as inpatient controls. No patient died. Patients discharged early spent a median of 8 days (range 3-36 days), or 54% of their study time, as outpatients. These patients required less time on intravenous antibiotics (6 vs. 16 days; P=0.11), received fewer red blood cell transfusions (0.25 vs. 0.48 units/day; P=0.08), and incurred lower median daily charges ($3,270 vs. $5,467; P=0.01) than controls. Thus, early discharge of selected patients appears, safe and may reduce cost and resource utilization. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00844441).

Performing allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic SCT in the outpatient setting: effects on infectious complications and early transplant outcomes

This retrospective single-center study compared the incidence, spectrum and effect of infections in 1045 consecutive allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) performed between 1995 and 2006 in the inpatient (IP) or outpatient (OP) setting. We analyzed 374 allo-HSCT (196 IP and 178 OP) and 671 auto-HSCT (163 IP and 508 OP). The incidence of infection was lower both in auto-OP (25% OP vs 33% IP, P=0.042) and allo-OP cohorts (42.7% OP vs 55.6% IP, P=0.012). The mean number of infections per transplant was lower in both auto-OP (0.39 OP vs 0.57 IP, P=0.05) and in allo-OP cohorts (0.78 OP vs 1.09 IP, P=0.018). The 100-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) for OP auto-HSCT was 4.72% and for IP 3.95% (P=0.68). The 100-day NRM for OP allo-HSCT was lower at 14.1% than it was for IP at 22.6% (P=0.041). Time to onset of first infection and spectrum of infections was similar in all groups. We conclude that performing allo- and auto-HSCT in the OP setting results in short-term outcomes, including infections complications that are comparable to the standard IP setting.

The impact of a change in antibacterial prophylaxis from ceftazidime to levofloxacin in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used during the initial phases of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for more than two decades. However, the optimal regimen in terms of both cost and clinical effectiveness is unclear. We retrospectively compared the clinical and microbiological impact of a change in antibiotic prophylaxis practice from ceftazidime (n=216 patients with HCT in 2000-2002) to levofloxacin (n=219 patients, August 2002-2005) in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning. Levofloxacin prophylaxis was associated with fever and a change in antibiotics during neutropenia, but this strategy was not associated with any adverse outcomes. Patients receiving levofloxacin had lower rates of significant bacteremia than did those receiving ceftazidime (day 100, 19.2 vs 29.6%, P=0.02). The use of levofloxacin was associated with lower antibiotic acquisition costs. There was no deleterious impact caused by levofloxacin prophylaxis on survival, emergence of antibiotic resistance, detection of Clostridium difficile Ag in stool specimens, incidence of viridans group streptococcal bacteremia or Pseudomonas infections. There was a trend toward lower rates of bacteriuria, wound and bacterial respiratory infections in the levofloxacin than in the ceftazidime group, but these differences were not statistically significant. These data support the use of levofloxacin as prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic HCT when prophylaxis is used.

A randomized comparison of empiric or pre-emptive antibiotic therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We performed a randomized comparison of pre-emptive and empiric antibiotic therapy for adult patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation. One hundred and fifty-three patients were randomized to receive cefepime either pre-emptively on the day that neutropenia (ANC<1.0 x 10(9) cells/l) developed irrespective of the presence of fever, or at onset of fever and neutropenia (empiric). Although there was no difference between the two arms in the proportion of patients developing fever or in the median number of days of fever, the time to onset of fever was a mean of 1 day longer in each patient on the pre-emptive arm (log rank P<0.001). The number of patients with bloodstream infections was significantly reduced in those receiving pre-emptive therapy (16/75) compared to the empiric arm (31/76) (P<0.01) but this did not translate into an appreciable clinical benefit as measured by days of hospitalization, time to engraftment, use of additional antimicrobial agents or mortality at 30 days. This study does not support the use of pre-emptive intravenous antibiotic therapy in adult stem cell transplant recipients.

Invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: high rate of recurrence and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Limited data exist regarding the incidence and factors associated with outcome of invasive Pseudomonal infections in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). A retrospective analysis of cases of invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and factors associated with outcome was performed. P. aeruginosa invasive infection occurred in 95 of 5772 patients (1.65%) a median of 63 days after HCT (range 5-1435). Only 28% of infections occurred during periods of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count<500 cells/mm(3)). Infection-attributable mortality during the initial episode of infection was 35.8%. Factors associated with initial mortality included the presence of a copathogen and high-dose steroid use. Ten (16.4%) of those who survived the initial infection experienced a recurrence of P. aeruginosa infection at a median of 9 days (range 3-17) after stopping antibiotics and 60% of those died as a result of recurrent infection a median of 1 day (range 1-7) after onset of recurrence. Grade 3-4 graft-versus-host disease was associated with a higher risk of recurrent infection. The risk of recurrence was not influenced by the presence of copathogens. Thus, invasive P. aeruginosa infections are associated with high recurrence rates and mortality in this immunocompromised population. Aggressive attempts to reduce immunosuppression and to treat copathogens may help during the initial infection.

Prophylaxis of early bacterial infections after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT): a matched-pair study comparing oral fluoroquinolones and intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam

The safety and efficacy of early bacterial prophylaxis with piperacillin-tazobactam were prospectively evaluated in 51 autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) recipients. The results were compared with those obtained in 51 control patients receiving oral fluoroquinolones in a retrospective matched-pair control study. Overall, 76% of the study group and 98% of the control group developed at least one febrile episode during neutropenia (P=0.002). Time from neutropenia to the first febrile episode (FFE) was significantly longer in the study group than in the control group (P=0.04). Once a febrile episode appeared, the duration of fever was significantly longer in cases than in controls (median of 5 and 2 days respectively, P<0.001), and led to a more frequent use of empirical amphotericin B (AmB), not statistically significant (P=0.13). However, the total time of antibiotic administration was significantly greater in the control than in the study group (P=0.05). The duration of AmB treatment shows a trend toward a longer duration in the control than in study group (P=0.2). Overall, 86% of the Gram-positive bacteremia and 85% of the Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to the tested antibiotics. Our study suggests that a subgroup of patients could benefit from prophylaxis with piperacillin-tazobactam without increasing toxicity or bacterial resistance.

Home care versus hospital care of patients with hematological malignancies and chemotherapy-induced cytopenia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review study is to examine the accumulating evidence of safety of home care, with regard to infection-related morbidity and mortality, for patients with chemotherapy-induced cytopenia, in light of previous studies on the necessity of protective isolation (PI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The existing literature on PI, and home care of cytopenic patients after chemotherapy, published in the English language, based on a Medline search, is reviewed.

RESULTS

The studies published so far on home care versus hospital care are all non-randomized studies and confirm that home care of cytopenic patients is safe, in terms of morbidity and mortality due to infections. On the other hand, the majority of studies on the comparison of PI with standard hospital care conclude that an infection-preventive effect of PI exists. The pooled statistics performed confirmed that such an effect of PI exists regarding the occurrence of severe infections, although no benefit to mortality has been shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding home care, only the results of a prospective, randomized study of sufficient power will enable definitive conclusions to be drawn as to whether home care is equally safe as hospital-based care with PI.

Combating infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Infections with a diverse group of microorganisms remain the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Importantly, the epidemiology of infectious complications has shifted substantially with changes in antimicrobial prophylaxis, conditioning regimens and graft manipulation, such that invasive mould infections and late viral infections are now the over-riding concerns. New antivirals and antifungals have entered clinical practice and hold considerable promise for improved outcomes.

Reflections on gut decontamination in hematology

In Europe, but decontamination (GD) is largely used in the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in departments of oncohematology treating neutropenic patients, in particular those patients subject to profound (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <100/mm3) and prolonged (>10 days) neutropenia, such as patients undergoing bone marrow allografting or induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Initially, treatment was in the form of non-absorbable antibiotics, but this has been partially superseded by quinolone-containing regimens, in particular in the centers participating in EORTC trials. In the last two EORTC trials comparing different regimens for the treatment of febrile neutropenia, 57-73% of the patients were receiving GD. A French epidemiologic study, performed prospectively and consecutively in 36 oncohematology centers, has recently shown that 45% of febrile neutropenic patients receive digestive decontamination (DD) at the onset of their first febrile episode. The value of GD has been the subject of much controversy. Numerous trials, some of which were controlled, were performed in neutropenic patients in the 1980s, prior to trials of GD in intensive care units, but did not lead to a consensus in the medical community of the value of GD. Moreover, GD is not, or is infrequently, used in the USA. Apart from trials involving the quinolones, very few studies have been published during the last 10 years. Despite this, policies have not changed greatly in the various centers. The CLIOH group has gathered the opinions of experts invited to a multidisciplinary meeting that took place in Paris in October 1996. The text that follows summarizes the reflections arising from this forum. It should be noted that this meeting was not designed to be a consensus conference, but rather to re-examine the correlation between the data in the literature and actual clinical practice and to highlight the main problems posed by DD in current oncohematology. The experts were separated into three working groups, each of which has drafted a report which appears in the text below.

Prevention of infections in bone marrow transplant recipients

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is increasingly used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and congenital diseases. The number of patients receiving a BMT increased from approximately 5000 in 1989 to 12,000 in 1995. Infectious complications are the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in the peritransplant period in patients undergoing autologous BMT. Additionally, infectious complications are a serious cause of complications in recipients of matched sibling allogeneic BMT, unrelated BMT, and related mismatched BMT.

Infection control and bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of malignancies is on the increase. Unfortunately, there are no well-validated infection control guidelines for this highly susceptible population.

METHODS

Literature was reviewed concerning infection risks and interventions to decrease risks for bone marrow transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Definitive information was generally lacking. However, basic "common sense" infection control recommendations for bone marrow transplantation were made in the following areas: air ventilation systems, design issues, environmental services, patient care issues, barrier precautions, nosocomial surveillance, and discharge planning. Recommendations must be tailored to each facility or setting.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that validation of many of these recommendations is necessary to provide optimum care for bone marrow transplant recipients.

Allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation without protective isolation in adults with malignant disease

Bone-marrow transplant (BMT) patients are severely immunocompromised immediately after the procedure and they are commonly nursed in strict protective isolation to reduce the risk of both infection and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We have studied a consecutive series of patients to see whether protective isolation is of benefit as prophylaxis against infectious complications of BMT. 50 consecutive patients who had malignant disease and received their first BMT from siblings or unrelated donors were nursed in standard single rooms with visitors instructed to wash their hands. A subset of 20 patients living locally spent a median of 25 days in hospital after BMT; they also spent some time at home on a median of 8 days before engraftment and 3 patients went home on more than 90% of their hospital days. 16 patients (32%) had positive bacterial cultures and/or focal infection. Gram-positive bacteraemia was found in 12 subjects (24%) but there were no gram-negative or deep fungal infections. Grade II or III acute GvHD developed in 17 patients (34%). There were no deaths from infection or acute GvHD. Transplant-related mortality was 6% in the first 100 days and 18% overall with a median follow-up of 22 months. Our mortality data compare favourably with those from institutions with strict isolation procedures. We conclude that BMT may be safely completed in some institutions without either protective isolation or the need to confine patients continuously in hospital.

Immunomodulatory and antimicrobial efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infection are major complications of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Since intravenous immunoglobulin has shown benefit in several immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, we studied its antimicrobial and immunomodulatory role after marrow transplantation.

METHODS

In a randomized trial of 382 patients, transplant recipients given immunoglobulin (500 mg per kilogram of body weight weekly to day 90, then monthly to day 360 after transplantation) were compared with controls not given immunoglobulin. By chance, the immunoglobulin group included more patients with advanced-stage neoplasms; otherwise, the study groups were balanced for prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Control patients seronegative for cytomegalovirus who received seronegative blood products remained seronegative, but seronegative patients who received immunoglobulin and screened blood had a passive transfer of cytomegalovirus antibody (median titer, 1:64). Among the 61 seronegative patients who could be evaluated, none contracted interstitial pneumonia; among the 308 seropositive patients evaluated, 22 percent of control patients and 13 percent of immunoglobulin recipients had this complication (P = 0.021). Control patients had an increased risk of gram-negative septicemia (relative risk = 2.65, P = 0.0039) and local infection (relative risk = 1.36, P = 0.029) and received 51 more units of platelets than did immunoglobulin recipients. Neither survival nor the risk of relapse was altered by immunoglobulin. However, among patients greater than or equal to 20 years old, there was a reduction in the incidence of acute GVHD (51 percent in controls vs. 34 percent in immunoglobulin recipients; P = 0.0051) and a decrease in deaths due to transplant-related causes after transplantation of HLA-identical marrow (46 percent vs. 30 percent; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Passive immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin decreases the risk of acute GVHD, associated interstitial pneumonia, and infections after bone marrow transplantation.

Supportive care of the marrow transplant recipient: the Seattle Experience

It is now almost 2 decades after the first successful human marrow transplants from HLA-identical siblings for the treatment of life-threatening hematologic diseases. Results have improved, especially for patients transplanted earlier in the course of disease. However, major problems remain in supporting patients through the transplant. More effective and less toxic conditioning regimens are needed. Acceleration of hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution by use of various cytokines holds promise for decreasing infectious morbidity and mortality. Improved regimens to control acute and chronic GVHD and prevent opportunistic infections will play a major role in the advancement of supportive care of the marrow transplant recipient.

Intravenous immune globulin prophylaxis in recipients of a marrow transplant

Bone marrow transplantation is a worldwide activity involving more than 250 transplant centers in more than 40 countries. The ultimate success of the procedure depends in large measure on supportive care of the transplant recipient. A major component of this supportive care is the prevention of opportunistic infections. This article reviews the nature of immunoglobulin class and subclass deficiency after marrow transplantation and the role of intravenous immune globulin in preventing infections and associated complications.