Low incidence of invasive fungal infections after bone marrow transplantation in patients receiving amphotericin B inhalations during neutropenia

Inhaled Antifungal Agents for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Bronchopulmonary Invasive Mold Infections

Pulmonary mold infections are life-threatening diseases with high morbi-mortalities. Treatment is based on systemic antifungal agents belonging to the families of polyenes (amphotericin B) and triazoles. Despite this treatment, mortality remains high and the doses of systemic antifungals cannot be increased as they often lead to toxicity. The pulmonary aerosolization of antifungal agents can theoretically increase their concentration at the infectious site, which could improve their efficacy while limiting their systemic exposure and toxicity. However, clinical experience is poor and thus inhaled agent utilization remains unclear in term of indications, drugs, and devices. This comprehensive literature review aims to describe the pharmacokinetic behavior and the efficacy of inhaled antifungal drugs as prophylaxes and curative treatments both in animal models and humans.

Role of inhaled antibacterials in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia

Inhaled antibiotics are not usually considered outside the setting of cystic fibrosis or Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis. However, because they deliver high drug concentrations at the site of infection with negligible systemic absorption and toxicity, they are logical compliments to standard intravenous therapy for severe nosocomial pneumonias -- particularly those caused by multiresistant organisms. Older studies that have shown marginal or no benefit have either applied inhaled antibiotics indiscriminately to low risk populations, or have used crude delivery systems, such as hand atomizers or poured it into the endotracheal tube. Although inhaled antibiotics cannot be recommended for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia at this time, a few studies involving prophylaxis have shown promising trends, particularly in high-risk patients with predisposing conditions. The greatest potential of inhaled antibiotics lies in the treatment of severe healthcare-associated pneumonia caused by a multiresistant organism. The method of delivery is extremely important. Trials that have shown the most benefit, even against pathogens most difficult to eradicate and in damaged lungs, have used optimized delivery systems. Most authorities recommend using ultrasonic or vibrating disk nebulizers to generate particle sizes between 1 and 5 microm that are crucial for deposition in terminal bronchioles and alveoli. Inhaled liposomal amphotericin has also demonstrated encouraging results in animal trials. Recently, inhaled phytochemicals were successfully employed in the treatment of a patient with primary pulmonary tuberculosis. When used selectively in high-risk patients, or in the treatment of established pneumonia, inhaled antibiotics have not been associated with development of resistant organisms.

In vitro characterization of nebulizer delivery of liposomal amphotericin B aerosols

Pharmaceutical aerosols have the potential to prevent pulmonary infectious diseases. Liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB, Ambisome, Astellas Pharma US, Deerfield, IL, USA) is approved as an intravenous infusion for empiric treatment of presumed fungal infections in neutropenic, febrile patients, as well as patients infected with Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, and other fungal pathogens. In this study, four different nebulizers were tested for their ability to deliver LAMB in aerodynamic droplet-size ranges relevant to lung deposition by an inertial sampling technique Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and fine particle fraction percent <3.3 μm (FPF(3.3)) and <5.8 μm (FPF(5.8)) were determined by cascade impaction during a 2 min sampling period for each of three trials of all nebulizers. The MMADs for all nebulizers ranged from 1.72 ± 0.11 μm to 2.89 ± 0.12 μm; FPF(3.3) and FPF(5.8) were approximately 80% and 90%, respectively. Although all nebulizers appear acceptable for delivery of LAMB, the Pari LC Star and the Aeroeclipse II were considered the best in terms of delivery of aerosol efficiently and the proportion suitable for lung deposition. Additional research on pulmonary delivery and clinical tolerability is warranted.

A phospholipid-apolipoprotein A-I nanoparticle containing amphotericin B as a drug delivery platform with cell membrane protective properties

Amphotericin B (AMB), a potent antifungal agent, has been employed as an inhalable therapy for pulmonary fungal infections. We recently described a novel nano-sized delivery vehicle composed of phospholipid (PL) and apolipoprotein A-I, NanoDisk (ND), to which we added AMB as a payload (ND-AMB). The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether ND-AMB, compared to other formulations, preserves lung cell integrity in vitro, as AMB can be toxic to mammalian cells and reduce lung function when inhaled. Epithelial integrity was assessed by measuring K(+) ion flux across a model airway epithelium, Calu-3 cells. In this assay ND-AMB was at least 8-fold less disruptive than AMB/deoxycholate (DOC). Cell viability studies confirmed this observation. Unexpectedly, the ND vehicle restored the integrity of a membrane compromised by prior exposure to AMB. An alternative formulation of ND-AMB containing a high load of AMB per ND was not protective, suggesting that ND with a low ratio of AMB to PL can sequester additional AMB from membranes. ND-AMB also protected HepG2 cells from the cytotoxicity of AMB, as determined by cellular viability and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. This study suggests that ND-AMB may be safe for administration via inhalation and reveals a unique activity whereby ND-AMB protects lung epithelial membranes from AMB toxicity.

Nebulization of four commercially available amphotericin B formulations in persistently granulocytopenic rats with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: evidence for long-term biological activity

The nebulization of amphotericin B desoxycholate (AMB-DOC), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) has been investigated. Particle sizes of generated aerosol droplets were measured. Pulmonary amphotericin B deposition and amphotericin B concentration in blood directly after nebulization and at six weeks after nebulization was measured in healthy rats. The efficacy of nebulized amphotericin B formulations was evaluated in persistently granulocytopenic rats with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Treatment was given either after or before fungal inoculation. The endpoint was survival of animals. Aerosol particle sizes, expressed as the values for the mass median diameter were 1.38, 2.43, 0.90 and 2.29 μm for AMB-DOC, L-AMB, ABLC and ABCD, respectively. Amphotericin B concentrations in the lungs directly after nebulization exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration of Aspergillus fumigatus and amphotericin B was still detected in lungs of rats at six weeks after nebulization. Treatment, started at 16 h after fungal inoculation, resulted in a significantly prolonged survival as compared with sham-treated rats for all four formulations. Prophylactic treatment at one week before fungal inoculation resulted in a significantly prolonged survival for all four formulations. Aerosol treatment given at two weeks before inoculation was effective only for AMB-DOC and L-AMB, whereas treatment given at six weeks resulted in a significantly prolonged survival for L-AMB only. All commercially available amphotericin B preparations could be nebulized efficiently and may be of value in the prophylactic treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

A review on the clinical use of inhaled amphotericin B

BACKGROUND

Despite the systemic toxicity of amphotericin B (AMB), it still has a place in treatment or prophylactic regimes of fungal infections.

METHODS

A strategy for minimizing the potential of systemic side effects is to bring it in direct contact with the body site most likely to be infected, such as the administration of AMB as an aerosol. Nebulized amphotericin has been used in humans since 1959. However, due to a lack of sufficient data regarding efficacy, its use is still not established. Little is known about the optimal dose, frequency, duration of administration, and the pharmacokinetics of inhaled AMB in humans.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this review, published data regarding inhaled AMB are summarized, including available descriptions regarding preparation, dose, efficacy, and toxicity, and its place in therapy is discussed. The results from the studies that were reviewed in this article indicate that inhaled AMB may have a place in the prophylactic regimens of patients with prolonged neutropenia and in lung transplant recipients. Furthermore, nebulized (liposomal) AMB may have a place in the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in patients with corticosteroid-dependent ABPA.

Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology

There is no widely accepted standard for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology assigned a committee of hematologists and infectious disease specialists to develop recommendations. Literature data bases were systematically searched for clinical trials on antifungal prophylaxis. The studies identified were shared within the committee. Data were extracted by two of the authors (OAC and MSi). The consensus process was conducted by email communication. Finally, a review committee discussed the proposed recommendations. After consensus was established the recommendations were finalized. A total of 86 trials were identified including 16,922 patients. Only a few trials yielded significant differences in efficacy. Fluconazole 400 mg/d improved the incidence rates of invasive fungal infections and attributable mortality in allogeneic stem cell recipients. Posaconazole 600 mg/d reduced the incidence of IFI and attributable mortality in allogeneic stem cell recipients with severe graft versus host disease, and in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome additionally reduced overall mortality. Aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B reduced the incidence rate of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Posaconazole 600 mg/d is recommended in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome or undergoing allogeneic stem cell recipients with graft versus host disease for the prevention of invasive fungal infections and attributable mortality (Level A I). Fluconazole 400 mg/d is recommended in allogeneic stem cell recipients until development of graft versus host disease only (Level A I). Aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B is recommended during prolonged neutropenia (Level B II).

Amphotericin B Formulations and Drug Targeting

Amphotericin B is a low-soluble polyene antibiotic which is able to self-aggregate. The aggregation state can modify its activity and pharmacokinetical characteristics. In spite of its high toxicity it is still widely employed for the treatment of systemic fungal infections and parasitic disease and different formulations are marketed. Some of these formulations, such as liposomal formulations, can be considered as classical examples of drug targeting. The pharmacokinetics, toxicity and activity are clearly dependent on the type of amphotericin B formulation. New drug delivery systems such as liposomes, nanospheres and microspheres can result in higher concentrations of AMB in the liver and spleen, but lower concentrations in kidney and lungs, so decreasing its toxicity. Moreover, the administration of these drug delivery systems can enhance the drug accessibility to organs and tissues (e.g., bone marrow) otherwise inaccessible to the free drug. During the last few years, new AMB formulations (AmBisome, Abelcet, and Amphotec) with an improved efficacy/toxicity ratio have been marketed. This review compares the different formulations of amphotericin B in terms of pharmacokinetics, toxicity and activity and discusses the possible drug targeting effect of some of these new formulations.

Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management in immunocompromised patients

Morbidity and mortality caused by invasive Aspergillus infections are increasing. This is because of the higher number of patients with malignancies treated with intensive immunosuppressive therapy regimens as well as their improved survival from formerly fatal bacterial infections, and the rising number of patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell or organ transplantation. Early initiation of effective systemic antifungal treatment is essential for a successful clinical outcome in these patients; however, clinical clues for diagnosis are sparse and early microbiological proof of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is rare. Clinical diagnosis is based on pulmonary CT scan findings and non-culture based diagnostic techniques such as galactomannan or DNA detection in blood or bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Most promising outcomes can be expected in patients at high risk for aspergillosis in whom antifungal treatment has been started pre-emptively, backed up by laboratory and imaging findings. The gold standard of systemic antifungal treatment is voriconazole, which has been proven to be significantly superior to conventional amphotericin B and has led to a profound improvement of survival rates in patients with cerebral aspergillosis. Liposomal amphotericin B at standard dosages appears to be a suitable alternative for primary treatment, while caspofungin, amphotericin B lipid complex or posaconazole have shown partial or complete response in patients who had been refractory to or intolerant of primary antifungal therapy. Combination therapy with two antifungal compounds may be a promising future strategy for first-line treatment. Lung resection helps to prevent fatal haemorrhage in single patients with pulmonary lesions located in close proximity to larger blood vessels, but is primarily considered for reducing the risk of relapse during subsequent periods of severe immunosuppression. Strict reverse isolation appears to reduce the incidence of aspergillosis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients and patients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing aggressive anticancer therapy. Well designed, prospective randomised studies on infection control measures effective to prevent aspergillosis are lacking. Prophylactic systemic antifungal treatment with posaconazole significantly improves survival and reduces IA in acute myeloid leukaemia patients and reduces aspergillosis incidence rates in patients with intermediate-to-severe graft-versus-host reaction emerging after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Voriconazole prophylaxis may be suitable for prevention of IA as well; however, the results of large clinical trials are still awaited.

Safety of aerosolized amphotericin B

Aerosolized delivery of a number of antimicrobial agents has been studied. Despite a theoretical soundness behind this strategy, full consideration of the potential toxicities associated with this mode of administration is imperative. Aerosolized amphotericin B, as both deoxycholate and lipid formulations, has been studied in a variety of high-risk patient populations for prophylaxis and treatment against fungal infections. Although available data remain inconclusive regarding the clinical efficacy of this therapy, variability among results may be due to lack of standardization of administration methods and doses. Akin to the lack of clinical consensus, data regarding the tolerability of this means of amphotericin B delivery are conflicting. This variability may again be accounted for by the lack of standardized means for aerosolized administration. Owing to uncertain clinical benefit and concern for pulmonary toxicities, the use of aerosolized amphotericin B should be limited to clinical investigations at this time.

Unlabeled uses of nebulized medications

PURPOSE

The uses, dosing recommendations, benefits, and disadvantages of unlabeled drugs administered by nebulization are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Nebulization is gaining popularity as a treatment alternative, and many drugs are used unlabeled in a nebulized form, including the opioids, lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, amphotericin B, and colistin. The opioids are frequently used to treat dyspnea in end-stage diseases. Common dosages include 1-2 mg every two hours as needed for hydromorphone and 25-50 microg every two hours for fentanyl citrate. Lidocaine can be used to relieve bronchoconstriction and cough symptoms as well as acting as a local anesthetic. It is typically given in a dose between 20 and 160 mg. Nebulized magnesium sulfate can be used in managing acute asthma and is given in dosages between 125 and 250 mg every 20 minutes, with no more than four consecutive doses. Nebulized amphotericin B can be used to prevent infections in immunocompromised patients. A typical amphotericin B regimen is 25 mg every 24 hours. Nebulized colistin is being studied in the prevention and treatment of gram-negative infections and in patients awaiting lung transplants. Colistin is often given as 75 mg every 12 hours to combat infections.

CONCLUSION

Unlabeled nebulization of opioids, lidocaine, magnesium, amphotericin B, and colistin is an alternative method of treatment for patients with pulmonary problems or infections or for those undergoing bronchoscopy. More research is needed to develop guidelines for their use since nebulization may provide benefits to many patients who otherwise cannot be treated or would be at risk of systemic adverse effects of the drugs.

Inhaled amphotericin B for prophylaxis against invasive Aspergillus infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the available literature describing the use of inhaled amphotericin B for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus spp. infections.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted (1966-July 2006) using the key terms amphotericin B, inhaled amphotericin B, Aspergillus spp., invasive aspergillosis, solid-organ transplant, neutropenia, and inhalation. Review of the reference lists of the identified articles was also performed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Study selection included published trials, case reports, and case series of humans with hematologic disease and solid-organ transplant who used inhaled amphotericin B in the prevention of invasive Aspergillus infections.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Inhaled amphotericin B has been evaluated for the prevention of invasive aspergillosis (IA) infections in neutropenic patients and certain solid-organ transplant recipients. Use of inhaled amphotericin B seems to reduce the incidence of IA in these patients; however, some of the clinical evidence was limited by factors such as small sample sizes, lack of statistical analyses, and lack of power to detect a difference between prophylaxis and control groups. Although the clinical evidence supporting the use of inhaled amphotericin B has some limitations, its use still may be beneficial for the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus infections, especially in solid-organ transplant recipients where the evidence is strongest.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive Aspergillus infections are becoming more prevalent in high-risk populations (eg, patients with malignancies, following bone marrow transplantation, or following solid-organ transplantation). The mortality rates associated with IA are great in these populations, making prophylaxis an important consideration. Inhaled amphotericin B has recently come into vogue as an option for prophylaxis against IA. Some of the data available supports the use of inhaled amphotericin B for the prevention of IA while providing evidence of fewer drug interactions and toxicities associated with other antifungal agents.

Aerosolised antibiotics: a critical appraisal of their use

Aerosolised antimicrobial agents have been used in clinical practice since the 1950s. The main advantage of this route of administration is the targeted drug delivery to the site of infection in the lung. Exploitation of this targeted delivery can yield high concentrations at the site of infection/colonisation while minimising systemic toxicities. It is important to note that the ability of a drug to reach the target area in the lung effectively is dependent on a number of variables, including the nebuliser, patient technique, host anatomy and disease-specific factors. The most convincing data to support the use of aerosolised antimicrobials has been generated with tobramycin solution for inhalation (TOBI, Chiron Corp.) for maintenance treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. In addition to cystic fibrosis, the use of aerosolised antimicrobials has also been studied for the treatment or prevention of a number of additional disease states including non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia and prophylaxis against pulmonary fungal infections. Key studies evaluating the benefits and shortcomings of aerosolised antimicrobial agents in these areas are reviewed. Although the theory behind aerosolised administration of antibiotics seems to be sound, there are limited data available to support the routine use of this modality. Owing to the gaps still existing in our knowledge base regarding the routine use of aerosolised antibiotics, caution should be exercised when attempting to administer antimicrobials via this route in situations falling outside clearly established indications such as the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis or Pneumocystis pneumonia.

Suitability of Caspofungin for Aerosol Delivery

BACKGROUND

Aerosolized antifungal therapy is a promising route of drug delivery for pulmonary aspergillosis due to attainment of high localized concentrations. Caspofungin, a new antifungal agent with proven efficacy against invasive aspergillosis, has ideal potential for aerosolization.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine in vitro the suitability of caspofungin for aerosol administration by characterizing factors that influence efficacy and airway tolerance of aerosol delivery: physicochemical properties, aerodynamics of drug particles, and efficiency of nebulizing systems.

DESIGN

Physicochemical characteristics of caspofungin solutions (10 mg/mL and 30 mg/mL) were analyzed: osmolality, pH, viscosity, and surface tension. A time-of-flight aerosol spectrometer API Aerosizer was used to determine aerosol particle size and distribution. Drug output was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Nebulizer efficiency was measured by drug output and respirable fraction (percentage of aerosolized particles with a 1 to 5 mum aerodynamic diameter) and compared among three jet nebulizer/compressor systems: device 1, Micromist (Hudson RCI; Temecula, CA)/Pulmo-Aide (model 5650D; DeVilbiss; Somerset, PA); device 2, Sidestream MS 2400/Envoy model IRC 1192 (Invacare; Elyria, OH); and device 3, Pari LC Star/Proneb Ultra (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Midlothian, VA).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Caspofungin requires 0.9% NaCl rather than sterile water as the diluent and addition of 0.3N NaOH buffer to adjust acidity of solutions (pH 6.17 to 6.26) in order to achieve optimal physicochemical properties for airway tolerability (osmolality, 150 to 550 milliosmol per kilogram; chloride ion, 31 to 300 mmol/L; and pH 7.4). The drug output rate increased with higher concentrations of drug solution: device 1, 4.0 mg/min vs 12.5 mg/min; device 2, 5.4 mg/min vs 14.7 mg/min; and device 3, 2.3 mg/min vs 12 mg/min, respectively. The percentage of particles within the respirable range varies depending on device and concentration of drug solutions (10 mg/mL vs 30 mg/mL): device 1, 85% vs 38%; device 2, 44% vs 57%; and device 3, 83% vs 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Caspofungin solution with adjustments appears to have physicochemical and aerodynamic characteristics suitable for aerosolization when used with either the Pari LC Star/Proneb Ultra or Micromist/Pulmo-Aide devices. Further in vivo testing is warranted.

Design of aerosolized amphotericin b formulations for prophylaxis trials among lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Emphasis has been placed on the need for antifungal prophylaxis when transplanted organs are directly exposed to the environment. In lung transplantation, one strategy for prevention has been aerosolization of polyenes into the lung. Despite widespread use of amphotericin B aerosols, there are still few studies on how to validate their effectiveness or optimize pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

We compared results of several of our own studies of lung transplant recipients receiving formulations of amphotericin B with results of other studies.

RESULTS

Recent aerosol studies suggest that aerosols of a lipid formulation of amphotericin B are safe and better tolerated than is amphotericin B deoxycholate. Their use in prophylaxis is associated with very few pulmonary fungal infections.

CONCLUSION

This safe drug delivery at a local body site to directly protect the transplanted organ without systemic antifungal drug exposure is attractive from a cost and toxicity standpoint. However, careful multicenter, comparative studies are still needed to ensure that this strategy is consistently successful.

Amphotericin B

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunodeficient individuals (such as AIDS patients) and in transplant recipients or tumor patients undergoing immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Amphotericin B is one of the oldest, yet most efficient antimycotic agents. However, its usefulness is limited due to dose-dependent side-effects, notably nephrotoxicity. In order to improve its safety margin, new pharmaceutical formulations of amphotericin B have been designed especially to reduce its detrimental effects on the kidneys. Since the 1980s, a wide variety of new amphotericin B formulations have been brought forward for clinical testing, many of which were approved and reached market value in the 1990s. This review describes and discusses the molecular genetics, pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical aspects of amphotericin B itself and many of its innovative formulations.

Pharmacological agents in development for invasive aspergillosis

The urgent medical need for new potent antifungal agents in the management of invasive aspergillosis (IA) has resulted in the development of several compounds which may be of value in the future for the treatment or prophylaxis of IA. In the past years, several novel types of drugs have been discovered and developed, some of which are already in late-stage clinical trials and ready to enter the market. This paper discusses the antifungal agents, classified by their mode of action, that are currently available and the agents which are still in development for treatment or prevention of IA.

Novel modes of antifungal drug administration

Administration of antifungals by routes other than that for which the agent was designed or approved have been utilised in attempts to provide directed therapy, reduce adverse effects and improve drug penetration into selected infection sites, such as the central nervous system, lungs and peritoneum. The most widely investigated agent utilising a novel method of drug delivery is amphotericin B. Dose forms for this agent include topicals (aerosol, nasal spray, irrigations, pastes, absorbable sponges, impregnated bone cement and gelatin), oral dosage forms (solutions, suspensions, tablets and so on) and ophthalmic preparations (drops, ointments and injections). Amphotericin B has been administered by routes such as oral, endobronchial, intrathecal, intracisternal, intra-articular, intraperitoneal, ophthalmic and as an antibiotic 'line lock'. Nystatin has been administered as an aerosol, percutaneous paste and bladder washes. Azoles, such as miconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole and posaconazole, have been administered by novel methods but to a lesser degree. Most of these reports involve miconazole. The dose forms and routes of administration for azoles have included irrigants (bladder, joint), ophthalmic preparations (eye drops, intraocular injections, ointments), impregnated bone cement, endobronchial and intrathecal administration. Finally, both methylene blue (bladder washes) and flucytosine (peritoneal lavage, ophthalmic eye drops) have also been employed. Adequate evaluations of both the safety and efficacy of these therapies are most often hindered by prior or concomitant antifungal therapies, comorbidities and the lack of controlled clinical trials. In addition, the availability of newer treatment options, which demonstrate significant improvement in drug distribution and treatment-related adverse effects make many such novel modes of administration less practical or necessary. In contrast, the inhalation of antifungal aerosols, such as amphotericin B, is rapidly becoming a viable prophylactic option.

Aspergillus infections in transplant recipients

Aspergillus infections are occurring with an increasing frequency in transplant recipients. Notable changes in the epidemiologic characteristics of this infection have occurred; these include a change in risk factors and later onset of infection. Management of invasive aspergillosis continues to be challenging, and the mortality rate, despite the use of newer antifungal agents, remains unacceptably high. Performing molecular studies to discern new targets for antifungal activity, identifying signaling pathways that may be amenable to immunologic interventions, assessing combination regimens of antifungal agents or combining antifungal agents with modulation of the host defense mechanisms, and devising diagnostic assays that can rapidly and reliably diagnose infections represent areas for future investigations that may lead to further improvement in outcomes.

Comparative safety of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B deoxycholate as aerosolized antifungal prophylaxis in lung-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Aerosolized administrations of amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in lung transplant recipients were compared for safety and tolerability. The incidence of invasive fungal infections in patients receiving aerosolized amphotericin B formulations as sole prophylaxis was determined.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blinded trial was conducted with 100 subjects. AmBd and ABLC were administered postoperatively by nebulizer at doses of 25 mg and 50 mg, respectively, which were doubled in mechanically ventilated patients. The planned treatment was once every day for 4 days, then once per week for 7 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events and invasive fungal infections were quantitated for 2 months after study drug initiation.

RESULTS

Intent-to-treat analysis revealed study drug was discontinued for intolerance in 6 of 49 (12.2%) and 3 of 51 (5.9%) patients in the AmBd- and ABLC-treated groups, respectively (p=0.313). Subjects receiving AmBd were more likely to have experienced an adverse event (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.10, 4.24, p=0.02). Primary prophylaxis failure within 2 months of study drug initiation was observed in 7 of 49 (14.3%) AmBd-treated patients and 6 of 51 (11.8%) ABLC-treated patients. No fungal pneumonias were observed. Only two (2%) patients experienced documented primary prophylaxis failure with Aspergillus infections within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Both aerosol AmBd and ABLC appear to be associated with a low rate of invasive pulmonary fungal infection in the early posttransplant period. Patients receiving ABLC were less likely to experience a treatment-related adverse event.

Evidence-based assessment of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies

Invasive fungal infection is an increasing source of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly those with prolonged and severe neutropenia (absolute white blood cell count < 100/microL). Early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is difficult, suggesting that antifungal prophylaxis could be the best approach for neutropenic patients undergoing intensive myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Consequently, antifungal prophylaxis has been extensively studied for more than 20 years. Nonabsorbable polyenes reduce superficial mycoses but are not effective in preventing or treating invasive fungal infections. Intravenous amphotericin B and the newer azoles were used in numerous clinical trials, but the value of antifungal prophylaxis in defined risk groups with cancer is still open to discussion. Recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants and patients with a relapsed leukemia are high-risk patient populations. In addition, certain risk factors are well defined, for example, neutropenia more than 10 days, corticosteroid therapy, sustained immunosuppression, and graft-versus-host disease. In contrast to study efforts, evidence-based recommendations on the clinical use of antifungal prophylaxis according to risk groups are rare. The objective of this review of 50 studies accumulating more than 9000 patients is to assess evidence-based criteria with regard to the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients.

Antifungal pharmacotherapy for invasive mould infections

The incidence of invasive mould infections is increasing and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among the most prevalent of these infections are those caused by Aspergillus and Fusarium species. Invasive disease caused by moulds frequently presents as a pulmonary infection, but haematogenous infection can occur. Some moulds cause cutaneous disease through either direct inoculation of the skin or secondary spread to the skin after dissemination from another body site. Early diagnosis can often be difficult and, unfortunately, diagnosis occurs late in the course of illness in many cases. Treatment options have historically been limited by the need for intravenous administration (amphotericin B), significant toxicities (amphotericin B), lack of reliable in vitro activity (e.g., amphotericin B in Fusarium and Scedosporium apiospermum infections) and relative lack of clinical experience with newer agents. The recent approval of voriconazole (Vfend, Pfizer) introduces a treatment option that demonstrates both in vitro and in vivo activity against a variety of moulds. With the recent development of the new echinocandin class of antifungal agents and newer broad-spectrum azole antifungal agents with in vitro mould activity, there is a renewed emphasis on fungal treatment strategies. Antimould therapy presents challenges in adverse effect avoidance and management, drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic considerations. Furthermore, combination therapy is being explored with these various new antifungal agents. The administration of an optimal fungicidal therapy early in the course of the illness and control of the underlying disease are vital to prevent complications and mortality from these tenacious mycoses.

Fungal infections in nontransplant patients with hematologic malignancies

Fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. Candida and Aspergillus species are the most important opportunistic fungal pathogens in this patient population. Dimorphic fungi can cause serious infection in immunocompetent persons, but infection is more likely to be disseminated in patients with compromised cell-mediated immunity. Cryptococcus neoformans and Pneumosystis carinii typically cause infections in persons with severe T-cell suppression. The frequency of rare pathogenic fungi commonly resistant to amphotericin B has significantly increased over the past 20 years among patients with hematologic malignancies. Examples of such emerging pathogens include Trichosporon, Fusarium, and Scedosporium species, and dark-walled molds. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of the major fungal pathogens in nontransplant patients with hematologic malignancies.

Aspergillus infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: have we made any progress?

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is common in allogeneic SCT recipients, with an incidence of 4-10%. The majority of these infections are diagnosed several months after SCT and they are frequently associated with GVHD. The diagnosis is difficult and often delayed. Established IA is notoriously difficult to treat with a death rate of 80-90%. This review summarises recent data on this problem to assess whether there has been any progress. Effective prophylactic measures are still lacking. Severe immunosuppression is the main obstacle to the success of therapy. Recent and ongoing developments in diagnostic measures and new antifungal agents may improve treatment results to some extent, but Aspergillus infections still remain a formidable problem in allogeneic transplantation. Further studies in this field will focus on the role of various cytokines and combinations of antifungal agents.

Amphotericin B disposition after aerosol inhalation in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Bronchopulmonary fungal infections continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients, and amphotericin B remains the drug of choice for prophylaxis of most fungal infections. Unfortunately, intravenous amphotericin B has numerous serious adverse effects; thus, nebulized amphotericin B could decrease the incidence of adverse effects seen with the intravenous formulation and provide high local concentrations in the lung tissue. We performed a prospective pilot study to characterize the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), lung tissue, and plasma concentrations of amphotericin B following inhalation administration to lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

Amphotericin B 30 mg was administered by nebulizer prior to a routine bronchoscopy. Amphotericin B concentrations in BAL samples from the upper and lower lobes, transbronchial biopsies, and plasma (obtained by drawing a blood sample 30 min after the amphotericin B inhalation) were analyzed by HPLC.

RESULTS

Eight patients were enrolled in the study (mean age 50.0 +/- 16.1 y; number of years posttransplant 3.0 +/- 1.9; type of transplant 5 double-lung, 3 single-lung). The mean amphotericin B concentration in the upper and lower lobe BAL samples were 0.68 +/- 0.36 and 0.50 +/- 0.31 microgram/mL, respectively. Amphotericin B concentrations, detected in only 2 of 5 biopsy samples, were 0.118 and 0.03 microgram/g. Amphotericin B was detected in the plasma of only 1 patient (0.19 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrated that detectable concentrations of amphotericin B can be attained in both the upper and lower BAL samples following aerosol administration. However, the frequency of the dose and duration of treatment still need to be determined in a larger study.

Safety of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) may be more efficacious than conventional amphotericin B in the prevention of fungal infections in animal models, but experience with aerosolized ABLC in humans is lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, noncomparative study designed to evaluate safety of aerosolized ABLC in lung or heart-lung transplant recipients.

RESULTS

A total of 381 treatments were administered to 51 patients. Complete spirometry records were available for 335 treatments (69 in intubated patients, 266 in extubated patients). ABLC was subjectively well tolerated in 98% of patients. Pulmonary mechanics worsened by 20% or more posttreatment in less than 5% of all treatments. There were no significant adverse events related to study medication in any patient, and 1-year survival for all enrolled patients was 78%.

CONCLUSION

Administration of nebulized ABLC is safe in the short-term and well-tolerated in lung transplant recipients. Additional prospective, randomized studies are needed to determine the efficacy of aerosolized ABLC alone or in conjunction with systemic therapies in the prevention of fungal infections in lung transplant recipients.

Aerosol delivery of amphotericin B desoxycholate (Fungizone) and liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome): aerosol characteristics and in-vivo amphotericin B deposition in rats

In the treatment or prophylaxis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, it may be attractive to administer the antifungal agent amphotericin directly to the pulmonary route via aerosol inhalation. In this study, we describe the aerosol characteristics of aerosolized nonliposomal amphotericin B (Fungizone) and liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome), and the in-vivo aerosol deposition. Aerosols were generated with a Collison nebulizer. Aerosol amphotericin concentrations and mass median diameters were measured. In-vivo pulmonary deposition was evaluated by measuring amphotericin concentrations in lungs of treated rats. Whole body aerosol deposition was determined by measuring radioactivity in tissues of rats after treatment with radiolabelled liposomes. For Fungizone and AmBisome, aerosol amphotericin concentrations were 24.5+/-4.9 and 23.8+/-3.0 microg L(-1), respectively. The values for the median mass diameter were 1.38 and 2.26 microm for Fungizone and 2.43 and 1.97 microm for AmBisome. Amphotericin concentrations in lungs after 60-min nebulization of Fungizone or AmBisome were 24.2+/-6.4 and 21.7+/-2.6 microg g(-1), respectively. After nebulization of radiolabelled liposomes, no radioactivity was retrieved from tissues other than the lungs or the gastrointestinal tract. Nebulization of either Fungizone or AmBisome leads to respirable aerosols and results in a substantial lung tissue concentration of amphotericin and low systemic exposure of amphotericin B. Aerosol administration of either Fungizone or AmBisome may be an attractive approach to prevent or treat pulmonary aspergillosis.

Aspergillosis in bone marrow transplant recipients

Invasive aspergillosis in bone marrow transplant recipient is associated with a high mortality. Diagnosis is often delayed because the inflammatory response is blunted by immunosuppression. The gold standard of tissue biopsy is often considered too in invasive as the procedure is often complicated by bleeding and secondary infection. Recent finding on non-invasive tests such as serial measurement of peripheral blood galactomannan antigen or DNA appears to be promising. However, the limited availability of such tests and requirement for expertise are still hampering their use in routine clinical management. More often than not, initiation of antifungal therapy is empirical and based on suggestive radiological changes. Amphotericin B remains the gold standard of therapy but liposconal preparation may prove to be less nephrotoxic and equally effective. Treatment outcome depends more on the acceleration of the recovery of the immune system and the reduction of anti-GVHD therapy than the antifungal agent followed by surgical resection. The efficacy of many reported anti-aspergillosis prophylactic regimen has not been proved in randomized control trials. Despite the absence of data, such policy should still be considered in transplant units with high incidence of aspergillus or undergoing renovation.

Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group

Systemic fungal infections are a major problem in bone marrow transplant recipients who have prolonged neutropenia or who receive high-dose corticosteroids. Prophylaxis with Fluconazole or low-dose amphotericin B reduces, but does not eliminate these infections. To determine which prophylactic agent is better, we performed a prospective randomized study. Patients undergoing allogeneic (related or unrelated) or autologous marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive Fluconazole (400 mg/day p. o. or i.v.) or amphotericin B (0.2 mg/kg/day i.v.) beginning 1 day prior to stem cell transplantation and continuing until recovery of neutrophils to >500/microl. Patients were removed from their study drug for drug-associated toxicity, invasive fungal infection or suspected fungal infection (defined as the presence of fever >38 degrees C without positive culture while on broad-spectrum anti-bacterial antibiotics). Proven or suspected fungal infections were treated with high-dose amphotericin B (0.5-0.7 mg/kg/day). Patients were randomized at each institution and stratified for the type of transplant. The primary end-point of the study was prevention of documented fungal infection; secondary endpoints included fungal colonization, drug toxicity, duration of hospitalization, duration of fever, duration of neutropenia, duration and total dose of high-dose amphotericin B and overall survival to hospital discharge. From July 1992 to October 1994, a total of 355 patients entered into the trial with 159 patients randomized to amphotericin B and 196 to Fluconazole. Patient groups were comparable for diagnosis, age, sex, prior antibiotic or antifungal therapy, use of corticosteroids prior to transplantation and total duration of neutropenia. Amphotericin B was significantly more toxic than Fluconazole especially in related allogeneic transplantation where 19% of patients developed toxicity vs 0% of Fluconazole recipients (p < 0.05). Approximately 44% of all patients were removed from prophylaxis for presumed fungal infection. Proven fungal infections occurred in 4.1% and 7.5% of Fluconazole and amphotericin-treated patients, respectively. Proven fungal infections occurred in 9.1% and 14.3% of related allogeneic marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively, and 2.1% and 5.6% of autologous marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively (P > 0.05). In this prospective trial, low-dose amphotericin B prophylaxis was as effective as Fluconazole prophylaxis, but Fluconazole was significantly better tolerated.

Aerosolized antimicrobial therapy in acutely ill patients

Recent data are sparking renewed interest in therapy with aerosolized antimicrobials in critically ill patients as well as other populations such as those with neutropenia, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and cystic fibrosis. Pneumonia is a common complication in these patients and is associated with substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Clinical trials evaluated aerosolized antimicrobials for the prevention and treatment of pneumonia in hospitalized patients. In addition, factors that affect the pulmonary deposition of aerosolized drugs in mechanically ventilated patients were identified.

Emerging Issues in Nosocomial Fungal Infections

Nosocomial fungal infections remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. As immunodeficient populations increase, the incidence of nosocomial fungal infections continues to rise. Although a wide variety of new and emerging fungi can cause nosocomial infections, Candida species remain the major etiologic agent. Candida species vary in their epidemiology and therapy. New diagnostic, epidemiologic, and therapeutic tools have been developed and are discussed in this review. They include the use of polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic methods, recent advances in antifungal susceptibility testing, and comparative therapeutic and prophylactic trials. As advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy continue, nosocomial fungal infections and the morbidity and mortality associated with them can be reduced.

Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis

Aspergillus fumigatus is one of the most ubiquitous of the airborne saprophytic fungi. Humans and animals constantly inhale numerous conidia of this fungus. The conidia are normally eliminated in the immunocompetent host by innate immune mechanisms, and aspergilloma and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, uncommon clinical syndromes, are the only infections observed in such hosts. Thus, A. fumigatus was considered for years to be a weak pathogen. With increases in the number of immunosuppressed patients, however, there has been a dramatic increase in severe and usually fatal invasive aspergillosis, now the most common mold infection worldwide. In this review, the focus is on the biology of A. fumigatus and the diseases it causes. Included are discussions of (i) genomic and molecular characterization of the organism, (ii) clinical and laboratory methods available for the diagnosis of aspergillosis in immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts, (iii) identification of host and fungal factors that play a role in the establishment of the fungus in vivo, and (iv) problems associated with antifungal therapy.

Treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic children

Fungal infections have emerged as one of the most significant complications of antineoplastic therapy and marrow transplantation in children. Morbidity and mortality associated with fungal infections are high. Recent trends indicate that the incidence and spectrum of fungal infections are increasing, partly because of the increase in the number of children receiving intensive chemotherapy and marrow transplantation, but also because of the successful management of bacterial and viral infections. Though many factors may contribute to risk for developing a fungal infection, prolonged neutropenia is the most important. Until recently, options for antifungal therapy were limited. Advances include less toxic formulations of amphotericin B and an expanding armamentarium of azoles as well as new antifungal compounds. This review addresses the therapeutic options available for treatment of fungal infections in immunocompromised children.

Pulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To define the prevalence of colonization and infection of the lower respiratory tract (LRT) with Aspergillus in lung transplant recipients with and without cystic fibrosis (CF).

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Large university lung transplant center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The postoperative course of 31 CF and 53 non-CF double lung or double lobar transplant recipients receiving allografts from April 1991 to February 1996 was reviewed. All recipients were subjected to surveillance bronchoscopy and biopsy at predetermined intervals and when clinically indicated. BAL fluid (BALF) and biopsy material were examined by appropriate fungal culture and staining techniques. Infection was defined by the finding of tissue-invasive disease on biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

Seven of the 31 CF recipients (22%) had Aspergillus isolated from cultures of sputum prior to transplantation. Following transplantation, 15 CF recipients (48%) had Aspergillus isolated from either sputum or BALF, including 4 of the 7 recipients identified with the fungus prior to transplantation. By contrast, 21 of the 53 non-CF recipients (40%) had Aspergillus isolated from the LRT following transplantation, none having had the fungus isolated prior to transplantation. The prevalence of Aspergillus did not differ between these groups (p = 0.51). Infections with Aspergillus occurred in 4 of the CF recipients (27%) and did not differ from the 3 infections (14%) identified in the non-CF recipients (p = 0.36). However, three of the four infections in the CF recipients involved the healing bronchial anastomosis and occurred prior to postoperative day 60. All three of these recipients had Aspergillus preoperatively. Postoperative infection was more common in the CF recipients having Aspergillus preoperatively than in those CF recipients without preoperative Aspergillus (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolation of Aspergillus from the LRT following double lung transplantation is common and generally not associated with tissue-invasive disease. Those CF recipients with Aspergillus isolated in cultures of sputum preoperatively are at risk for postoperative infections with this agent. The healing bronchial anastomosis is particularly vulnerable.

Efficacy of deoxycholate amphotericin B and unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B in prophylaxis of experimental Aspergillus fumigatus endocarditis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare in vivo the protective efficacy of unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) with that of deoxycholate amphotericin B (D-AmB) in experimental endocarditis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the rabbit model of experimental Aspergillus fumigatus endocarditis, two doses of each antifungal agent (1.5 mg/kg each) were administered intravenously at 4 hours and at 30 minutes before challenge with an inoculum of A. fumigatus. Three days later, the animals were sacrificed, and the aortic vegetations were analyzed.

RESULTS

All 19 animals that did not receive chemoprophylaxis acquired endocarditis. In contrast, endocarditis developed in 2 of 10 animals pretreated with D-AmB (P < 0.01) and 3 of 8 animals pretreated with L-AmB (P < 0.01). Both D-AmB and L-AmB prevented the development of endocarditis due to A. fumigatus and decreased the concentration of fungi in the aortic vegetations by more than 1 log10.

CONCLUSION

In the rabbit experimental model of Aspergillus endocarditis, D-AmB and L-AmB were equally effective in reducing the incidence of the infection and the tissue burden of fungi.

Antifungal prophylaxis during neutropenia and immunodeficiency

Fungal infections represent a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with almost all types of immunodeficiencies. These infections may be nosocomial (aspergillosis) or community acquired (cryptococcosis), or both (candidiasis). Endemic mycoses such as histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and penicilliosis may infect many immunocompromised hosts in some geographic areas and thereby create major public health problems. With the wide availability of oral azoles, antifungal prophylactic strategies have been extensively developed. However, only a few well-designed studies involving strict criteria have been performed, mostly in patients with hematological malignancies or AIDS. In these situations, the best dose and duration of administration of the antifungal drug often remain to be determined. In high-risk neutropenic or bone marrow transplant patients, fluconazole is effective for the prevention of superficial and/or systemic candidal infections but is not always able to prolong overall survival and potentially selects less susceptible or resistant Candida spp. Primary prophylaxis against aspergillosis remains investigative. At present, no standard general recommendation for primary antifungal prophylaxis can be proposed for AIDS patients or transplant recipients. However, for persistently immunocompromised patients who previously experienced a noncandidal systemic fungal infection, prolonged suppressive antifungal therapy is often indicated to prevent a relapse. Better strategies for controlling immune deficiencies should also help to avoid some potentially life-threatening deep mycoses. When prescribing antifungal prophylaxis, physicians should be aware of the potential emergence of resistant strains, drug-drug interactions, and the cost. Well-designed, randomized, multicenter clinical trials in high-risk immunocompromised hosts are urgently needed to better define how to prevent severe invasive mycoses.

Prevention of infections in bone marrow transplant recipients

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is increasingly used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and congenital diseases. The number of patients receiving a BMT increased from approximately 5000 in 1989 to 12,000 in 1995. Infectious complications are the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in the peritransplant period in patients undergoing autologous BMT. Additionally, infectious complications are a serious cause of complications in recipients of matched sibling allogeneic BMT, unrelated BMT, and related mismatched BMT.

Tolerance and efficacy of Amphotericin B inhalations for prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in haematological patients

The tolerance of aerosolised amphotericin B as prophylaxis against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis was investigated in 61 granulocytopenic periods in 42 patients treated for a haematologic malignancy. Each patient was to receive amphotericin B in doses escalating to 10 mg three times daily (t.i.d.), but only 20 (48%) patients managed to complete the scheduled regimen. One patient tolerated the full dose initially, but had to discontinue treatment when dyspnea developed as a result of pneumonia and acute respiratory distress. Another 22 patients (52%) experienced side effects, including eight (19%) who reported mild coughing and dyspnea but who tolerated the full dose and three (7%) patients whose dose was reduced to 5 mg t.i.d. Another six (14%) patients could tolerate only 5 mg t.i.d., and five (12%) others stopped treatment because of intolerance. Elderly patients (p < 0.05) and those with a history of chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (p = 0.09) were more likely to develop side effects during inhalation. Twelve (28%) patients developed proven of possible invasive fungal infections, but no correlation was established between infection and the total amount of amphotericin B inhaled. Inhalation of aerosolised amphotericin B is poorly tolerated and does not appear useful in preventing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in granulocytopenic patients.

Prior fungal infection is not a contraindication to bone marrow transplant in patients with acute leukemia

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess the feasibility of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in patients with acute leukemia who have had prior documented invasive fungal infection within 5 months pretransplant treated aggressively with systemic amphoteric in B and, when applicable, surgical resection of the infected tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients with acute leukemia at our institution who underwent BMT between August 1992 and April 1994 after being treated for a severe fungal infection. We evaluated criteria for diagnosis of fungal infection, timing of infection in relation to BMT, and antifungal treatment modalities. We determined peritransplant complications, evidence for recurrence of fungal infection during BMT, morbidity related to antifungal drug therapy, and overall outcome in each patient.

RESULTS

Fungal infection developed in eight patients. Sites of involvement included lung, liver, spleen, and skin. All patients were treated with systemic amphotericin B. Some also underwent surgical resection of infected tissue following clinical control of infection. All patients underwent BMT. Seven of eight patients engrafted and survived BMT. One patient died of recurrent pulmonary mucormycosis. Three patients are alive and free of leukemia and fungal disease. Four patients died of noninfectious causes and had no evidence of fungal disease at the time of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive therapy of prior fungal infection followed by ongoing anti-fungal prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients may allow BMT without reactivation of the fungus. Reports of larger series of such patients as well as studies of the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis of fungal infections are needed.

[Preventive antimycotic therapy of neutropenic and immunosuppressed patients]

Fungal infections are of increasing importance in severely neutropenic and immunosuppressed patients because of their high incidence and their high mortality once systemic dissemination has occurred. Various prophylactic strategies have been developed that include environmental measures as well as topical and systemic antimycotic prophylaxis. In this review the causative pathogens and patients at risk for developing fungal infections will be identified. Specific strategies will be discussed for each patient population and suggestions made for areas of future research.