Comparative study of the efficacy of fluconazole versus amphotericin B/flucytosine in surgical patients with systemic mycoses

Candida Infectious Endocarditis and Implantable Cardiac Device Infections

Intravascular diseases due to Candida species, including endocarditis and cardiac device-associated infections, are rare yet devastating manifestations of invasive candidiasis affecting an already vulnerable population. Despite their significant associated morbidity and mortality, limited prospective data exist to inform the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to these entities. Herein, we review the existing literature pertaining to the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of infectious endocarditis, rhythm management device infections, and circulatory support device infections caused by Candida species and suggest areas for future research.

Comparative effectiveness of amphotericin B, azoles and echinocandins in the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND + OBJECTIVES: The echinocandins, amphotericin B preparations, voriconazole and fluconazole are approved for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, though it remains unclear which agent is most effective. In order to answer this question, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated these agents in comparison.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched from database inception to 8 October 2020. RCTs comparing triazoles, echinocandins or amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis or candidemia were included. Random effect Bayesian network meta-analysis methods were used to compare treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs met inclusion criteria. Of the 3528 patients included from these trials, 1531 were randomised to receive an echinocandin, 944 to amphotericin B and 1053 to a triazole. For all forms of invasive candidiasis, echinocandins were associated with the highest rate of treatment success when compared to amphotericin B (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04-1.92) and the triazoles (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.35-2.51). Rank probability analysis favoured echinocandins as the most effective choice 98% of the time. Overall survival did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with invasive candidiasis, echinocandins had the best clinical outcomes and should remain the first-line agents in the treatment of invasive candidiasis.

Diagnosis and Management of Intraabdominal Infection: Guidelines by the Chinese Society of Surgical Infection and Intensive Care and the Chinese College of Gastrointestinal Fistula Surgeons

The Chinese guidelines for IAI presented here were developed by a panel that included experts from the fields of surgery, critical care, microbiology, infection control, pharmacology, and evidence-based medicine. All questions were structured in population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes format, and evidence profiles were generated. Recommendations were generated following the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system or Best Practice Statement (BPS), when applicable. The final guidelines include 45 graded recommendations and 17 BPSs, including the classification of disease severity, diagnosis, source control, antimicrobial therapy, microbiologic evaluation, nutritional therapy, other supportive therapies, diagnosis and management of specific IAIs, and recognition and management of source control failure. Recommendations on fluid resuscitation and organ support therapy could not be formulated and thus were not included. Accordingly, additional high-quality clinical studies should be performed in the future to address the clinicians' concerns.

Oropharyngeal candidiasis in head and neck cancer patients in Iran: Species identification, antifungal susceptibility and pathogenic characterization

OBJECTIVE

Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is the most frequent opportunistic fungal infection in head and neck cancer patients. This study was done to identify the Candida species, which cause OPC, and to evaluate their antifungal susceptibility pattern and pathogenic characteristics in Iranian head and neck cancer patients treated by radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The oral clinical samples were determined by culturing on CHROMagar, carbohydrate assimilation and ITS sequencing methods. Biofilm formation, phospholipase and proteinase activity and antifungal susceptibility were examined too.

RESULTS

Among 54 patients with confirmed OPC, 39 (72.22%) patients were male and 15 (27.77%) were female. The most frequently Candida species from a total of 60 isolates was C. albicans (53.3%), followed by C. tropicalis (21.66%), C. glabrata (15%), C. kefyr (5%) and C. dubliniensis (1.66%). All the isolates were high-producers of biofilm. All of Candida isolates were proteinase positive and 47 isolates (81.04%) represented phospholipase activity. The maximum and minimum rates of antifungal resistance belonged to ketoconazole (93.75% of C. albicans and 89.28% of Candida non-albicans) and fluconazole (62.50% and 42.85% of C. albicans and Candida non-albicans), respectively. The most effective antifungal against all candida isolates was fluconazole.

CONCLUSION

Our data can estimate abundance of OPC in male and female head and neck cancer patients and is helpful to use effective strategies for antifungal treatment, prophylaxis, and preventive therapies in these patients.

Fungicidal versus fungistatic therapy of invasive Candida infection in non-neutropenic adults: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to determine whether fungicidal versus fungistatic pharmacotherapy of invasive candidiasis/candidemia yields superior outcomes. Data sources included MEDLINE (1966-June 2017), EMBASE (1980-June 2017), PubMed (1966-June 2017), Global Health-Ovid (inception to June 2017), LILACS Virtual Health Library (inception to June 2017) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to 2nd quarter 2017). The ClinicalTrial.gov database, the SCOPUS database, SIGLE (System for Information on Grey Literature) and Google Scholar were also utilised to search for relevant studies. Randomised studies of any pharmacotherapy of invasive candidiasis including candidemia using a fungicidal (amphotericin B or echinocandin compound) versus a fungistatic (triazole) compound in adolescent or adult non-neutropenic patients. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled odds ratios demonstrated an advantage of fungicidal therapy with respect to early therapeutic success (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.03, p < 0.0001, I² = 0%) and persistence or recurrence of infection (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.74, p = 0.0005, I² = 0%) but no advantage for late survival (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.21, p = 0.77, I² = 0%). Fungicidal therapy of invasive candidiasis and candidemia is associated with a higher probability of early therapeutic success and decreased probability of persistent or recurrent infection. However, there is no improvement in survival.

"De-escalation" strategy using micafungin for the treatment of systemic Candida infections: budget impact in France and Germany

Background

The incidence of azole-resistant Candida infections is increasing. Consequently, guidelines for treating systemic Candida infection (SCI) recommend a “de-escalation” strategy: initial broad-spectrum antifungal agents (e.g., echinocandins), followed by switching to fluconazole if isolates are fluconazole sensitive, rather than “escalation” with initial fluconazole treatment and then switching to echinocandins if isolates are fluconazole resistant. However, fluconazole may continue to be used as first-line treatment in view of its low acquisition costs. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the budget impact of the de-escalation strategy using micafungin compared with the escalation strategy in France and Germany.

Methods

A budget impact model was used to compare de-escalation to escalation strategies. As well as survival, clinical success (resolution/reduction of symptoms and radiographic abnormalities associated with fungal infection), was considered, as was mycological success (eradication of Candida from the bloodstream). Health economic outcomes included cost per health state according to clinical success and mycological success, and budget impact. A 42-day time horizon was used.

Results

For all patients with SCI, the budget impact of using de-escalation rather than escalation was greater, but improved rates of survival, clinical success and mycological success were apparent with de-escalation. In patients with fluconazole-resistant isolates, clinical success rates and survival were improved by ~72% with de-escalation versus escalation, producing cost savings of €6,374 and €356 per patient in France and Germany, respectively; improvements of ~72% in mycological success rates with de-escalation versus escalation did not translate into cost savings.

Conclusion

Modeling provides evidence that when treating SCI in individuals at risk of azole-resistant infections, de-escalation from micafungin has potential cost savings associated with improved clinical success rates.

Synergistic combinations of antifungals and anti-virulence agents to fight against Candida albicans

Candida albicans, one of the pathogenic Candida species, causes high mortality rate in immunocompromised and high-risk surgical patients. In the last decade, only one new class of antifungal drug echinocandin was applied. The increased therapy failures, such as the one caused by multi-drug resistance, demand innovative strategies for new effective antifungal drugs. Synergistic combinations of antifungals and anti-virulence agents highlight the pragmatic strategy to reduce the development of drug resistant and potentially repurpose known antifungals, which bypass the costly and time-consuming pipeline of new drug development. Anti-virulence and synergistic combination provide new options for antifungal drug discovery by counteracting the difficulty or failure of traditional therapy for fungal infections.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Therapy of Fungal Infections in Surgery

Over the past decade, the incidence of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections caused byCandidastrains has risen, while the implicated species have changed.Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, andCandida glabrataall have increased in incidence. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveal that, between 1980 and 1990,Candidaemerged as the sixth most common nosocomial pathogen (7.2.%) and was the fourth most common pathogen in nosocomial bloodstream infections, surpassed only by coagulase-negative staphylococci,Staphylococcus aureus, and enterococci. The incidence of candidemia is dramatically higher in high-risk critical-care units: 25% of cases occur in surgical intensive-care units (ICUs) versus 25% in bone marrow transplantation units, 20% in medical ICUs, 20% in general medical wards, and 10% in oncology-hematology units. Burns and gastrointestinal surgery predispose to nosocomial candidemia. Independent risk factors include prior therapy with multiple antibiotics, isolation ofCandidafrom sites other than blood, and prior hemodialysis. Crude mortality exceeds 55% and is associated with older age and concomitant renal failure, hepatic failure, acute respiratory diseases, or postoperative shock. In addition to extreme vigilance for early recognition ofCandidasepsis in critically ill surgical patients, the high risk for candidemia probably necessitates fungal surveillance cultures and initiation of preemptive antifungal therapy in high-risk surgical patients.

An Italian consensus for invasive candidiasis management (ITALIC)

INTRODUCTION

Invasive candidiasis (IC) has primarily been studied in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, although, in reality, a vast majority of these infections occur outside of the ICU. The recent publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines also deal with the non-ICU population, but many uncertainties remain on the management of IC, particularly in non-critically ill patients.

METHODS

The Italian Society of Antimicrobial Therapy, Società Italiana di Terapia Antimicrobica (SITA), produced practical, hospital-wide recommendations on the management of Candida infection in non-immunocompromised patients in the hospital ward.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our focus is on patient stratification in terms of risk factors for IC and of clinical severity, emphasising a high index of suspicion to ensure early diagnosis, early treatment and de-escalation when a patient is clinically stable, in order to optimise resource allocation.

A research agenda on the management of intra-abdominal candidiasis: results from a consensus of multinational experts

INTRODUCTION

intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) may include Candida involvement of peritoneum or intra-abdominal abscess and is burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates in surgical patients. Unfortunately, international guidelines do not specifically address this particular clinical setting due to heterogeneity of definitions and scant direct evidence. In order to cover this unmet clinical need, the Italian Society of Intensive Care and the International Society of Chemotherapy endorsed a project aimed at producing practice recommendations for the management of immune-competent adult patients with IAC.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel of 22 members (surgeons, infectious disease and intensive care physicians) was convened and assisted by a methodologist between April 2012 and May 2013. Evidence supporting each statement was graded according to the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Diseases (ESCMID) grading system.

RESULTS

Only a few of the numerous recommendations can be summarized in the Abstract. Direct microscopy examination for yeast detection from purulent and necrotic intra-abdominal specimens during surgery or by percutaneous aspiration is recommended in all patients with nonappendicular abdominal infections including secondary and tertiary peritonitis. Samples obtained from drainage tubes are not valuable except for evaluation of colonization. Prophylactic usage of fluconazole should be adopted in patients with recent abdominal surgery and recurrent gastrointestinal perforation or anastomotic leakage. Empirical antifungal treatment with echinocandins or lipid formulations of amphotericin B should be strongly considered in critically ill patients or those with previous exposure to azoles and suspected intra-abdominal infection with at least one specific risk factor for Candida infection. In patients with nonspecific risk factors, a positive mannan/antimannan or (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result should be present to start empirical therapy. Fluconazole can be adopted for the empirical and targeted therapy of non-critically ill patients without previous exposure to azoles unless they are known to be colonized with a Candida strain with reduced susceptibility to azoles. Treatment can be simplified by stepping down to an azole (fluconazole or voriconazole) after at least 5-7 days of treatment with echinocandins or lipid formulations of amphotericin B, if the species is susceptible and the patient has clinically improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific recommendations were elaborated on IAC management based on the best direct and indirect evidence and on the expertise of a multinational panel.

Management of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients

Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at increased risk of encountering bloodstream infections (BSIs) with Candida spp., associated with an elevated crude mortality rate. This supports the significance of early detection of infection and identification of the most effective management approach. A review of the various antifungal treatments and an evaluation of the diverse management approaches for invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients is necessary for guiding evidence-based decision-making. Different early detection schemes for invasive candidiasis are well documented in the literature. Other than the common use of blood cultures, new methods entail the use of risk prediction scores and biomarker tests. Regarding management strategies, different options are currently supported. These include prophylaxis, empirical therapy, pre-emptive therapy, and treatment of culture-documented infections. The choice of treatment is greatly dependent on several factors related to the patient and/or to the surrounding environment. Attention needs to be given to previous exposure to azoles, epidemiological data on dominant Candida spp. in local ICUs, severity of illness and associated morbidities. This paper summarises the most recent literature as well as the guidelines issued by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The objective is to identify the best diagnosis and management approaches for serious Candida infections in critically ill patients. In addition, this article addresses an important aspect associated with managing candidaemia in critically ill patients pertaining to the decision for intravenous catheter removal.

Diagnosis and therapy of Candida infections: joint recommendations of the German Speaking Mycological Society and the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy

Invasive Candida infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised and hospitalised patients. This article provides the joint recommendations of the German-speaking Mycological Society (Deutschsprachige Mykologische Gesellschaft, DMyKG) and the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy (PEG) for diagnosis and treatment of invasive and superficial Candida infections. The recommendations are based on published results of clinical trials, case-series and expert opinion using the evidence criteria set forth by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Key recommendations are summarised here: The cornerstone of diagnosis remains the detection of the organism by culture with identification of the isolate at the species level; in vitro susceptibility testing is mandatory for invasive isolates. Options for initial therapy of candidaemia and other invasive Candida infections in non-granulocytopenic patients include fluconazole or one of the three approved echinocandin compounds; liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole are secondary alternatives because of their less favourable pharmacological properties. In granulocytopenic patients, an echinocandin or liposomal amphotericin B is recommended as initial therapy based on the fungicidal mode of action. Indwelling central venous catheters serve as a main source of infection independent of the pathogenesis of candidaemia in the individual patients and should be removed whenever feasible. Pre-existing immunosuppressive treatment, particularly by glucocorticosteroids, ought to be discontinued, if feasible, or reduced. The duration of treatment for uncomplicated candidaemia is 14 days following the first negative blood culture and resolution of all associated symptoms and findings. Ophthalmoscopy is recommended prior to the discontinuation of antifungal chemotherapy to rule out endophthalmitis or chorioretinitis. Beyond these key recommendations, this article provides detailed recommendations for specific disease entities, for antifungal treatment in paediatric patients as well as a comprehensive discussion of epidemiology, clinical presentation and emerging diagnostic options of invasive and superficial Candida infections.

Overview of treatment options for invasive fungal infections

The introduction of several new antifungals has significantly expanded both prophylaxis and treatment options for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Relative to amphotericin B deoxycholate, lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B have significantly reduced the incidence of nephrotoxicity, but at a significant increase in drug acquisition cost. Newer, broad-spectrum triazoles (notably voriconazole and posaconazole) have added significantly to both the prevention and treatment of IFIs, most notably Aspergillus spp. (with voriconazole) and the treatment of some emerging fungal pathogens. Finally, a new class of parenteral antifungals, the echinocandins, is employed most frequently against invasive candidal infections. While the role of these newer agents continues to evolve, this review summarizes the activity, safety and clinical applications of agents most commonly employed in the treatment of IFIs.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the tolerability and hepatotoxicity of antifungals in empirical and definitive therapy for invasive fungal infection

To evaluate the tolerability and liver safety profiles of the systemic antifungal agents commonly used for the treatment of invasive fungal infection, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published before 31 August 2009. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data. We used the beta-binomial model to account for variation across studies and the maximum likelihood method to estimate the pooled risks. We identified 39 studies with more than 8,000 enrolled patients for planned comparisons. The incidence rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions and liver injury associated with antifungal therapy ranged widely. The pooled risks of treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions were above 10% for amphotericin B formulations and itraconazole, whereas they were 2.5% to 3.8% for fluconazole, caspofungin, and micafungin. We found that 1.5% of the patients stopped itraconazole treatment due to hepatotoxicity. Furthermore, 19.7% of voriconazole users and 17.4% of itraconazole users had elevated serum liver enzyme levels, although they did not require treatment discontinuation, whereas 2.0% or 9.3% of fluconazole and echinocandin users had elevated serum liver enzyme levels but did not require treatment discontinuation. The results were similar when we stratified the data by empirical or definitive antifungal therapy. Possible explanations for antifungal agent-related hepatotoxicity were confounded by antifungal prescription to patients with a high risk of liver injury, the increased chance of detection of hepatotoxicity due to prolonged treatment, or the pharmacological entity.

Antifungal treatment for invasive Candida infections: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of mortality among patients at risk. Treatment guidelines vary on optimal treatment strategies. We aimed to determine the effects of different antifungal therapies on global response rates, mortality and safety.

METHODS

We searched independently and in duplicate 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2009. We selected any randomized trial assessing established antifungal therapies for confirmed cases of invasive candidiasis among predominantly adult populations. We performed a meta-analysis and then conducted a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison to differentiate treatment effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses included dosage forms of amphotericin B and fluconazole compared to other azoles.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 11 studies enrolling a total of 965 patients. For our primary analysis of global response rates, we pooled 7 trials comparing azoles to amphotericin B, Relative Risk [RR] 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.78-0.96, P = 0.007, I2 = 43%, P = 0.09. We also pooled 2 trials of echinocandins versus amphotericin B and found a pooled RR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.99-1.23, P = 0.08). One study compared anidulafungin to fluconazole and yielded a RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.06-1.51) in favor of anidulafungin. We pooled 7 trials assessing azoles versus amphotericin B for all-cause mortality, resulting in a pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.05, P = 0.17, I2 = 0%, P = 0.96). Echinocandins versus amphotericin B (2 trials) for all-cause mortality resulted in a pooled RR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.20, P = 0.93). Anidulafungin versus fluconazole resulted in a RR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.48-1.10, P = 0.34). Our mixed treatment comparison analysis found similar within-class effects across all interventions. Adverse event profiles differed, with amphotericin B exhibiting larger adverse event effects.

CONCLUSION

Treatment options appear to offer preferential effects on response rates and mortality. When mycologic data are available, therapy should be tailored.

Treatment of invasive candidal infections: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare available antifungal treatments for invasive candidiasis, a leading cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared different antifungal agents for the treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis. Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were microbiological failure, treatment failure, and adverse events. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.

RESULTS

Of the 15 included trials, 9 compared fluconazole with other drugs (amphotericin B, itraconazole, or a combination of fluconazole and amphotericin B), 4 compared echinocandins with other drugs (fluconazole, amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B), 1 compared micafungin and caspofungin, and 1 compared amphotericin B plus fluconazole and voriconazole. No difference in mortality was observed with fluconazole vs amphotericin B (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72-1.17); however, the rate of microbiological failure increased in the fluconazole arm (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07). Anidulafungin decreased the rate of microbiological failure compared with fluconazole (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.86) with fewer adverse events. Caspofungin was comparable to amphotericin B in mortality and efficacy, with fewer adverse events requiring discontinuation (RR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.36). Micafungin was comparable to liposomal amphotericin B in mortality.

CONCLUSION

All assessed antifungal agents showed similar efficacy, but the rate of microbiological failure increased with fluconazole vs amphotericin B or anidulafungin. Amphotericin B is associated with a higher rate of adverse events than fluconazole and echinocandins.

Combination antifungal therapy: what can and should we expect?

Invasive fungal infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Recent advances in antifungal development have afforded us more pharmacologic compounds to choose from when managing these fungal infections. The role of combination antifungal therapy has been well established for fungal infections such as cryptococcal meningitis. The availability of new antifungals, increased incidence of mould infections and high mortality among certain affected populations, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, has stimulated interest in the clinical use of combination antifungal therapy. In this paper, we review supporting evidence for the use of combination antifungals in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis, invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis and zygomycosis. Several controlled clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of combination antifungal approaches for patients with cryptococcal meningitis and invasive candidiasis, but variable effects when using different agents in combination have been reported. Randomized prospective studies of combination antifungal therapy in mould infections are lacking but some series provide supportive evidence for this approach. We also describe limitations of the data and these study designs, including the fact that we still need randomized controlled multicenter studies of combination antifungal therapy for mould infections. Trials in this area should be performed with efficiency and economics in mind, and could potentially use surrogate markers as end points. Therefore, we suggest future investigations of combination antifungal therapy should include a randomized, comparative trial of primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis.

Combination antifungal therapy: the new frontier

The past decade has seen a significant increase in the incidence of invasive fungal infections. The antifungal armamentarium for the treatment of serious fungal infections remains limited. A possible approach to overcoming antifungal drug resistance and high mortality rates seen in severe fungal infections is to combine two or three classes of antifungals, especially if the drugs have different mechanisms of action. Combinations of new agents along with more traditional antifungals have now been shown to possess some synergistic or at least additive activity against many fungi in in vitro and animal studies. On the other hand, caution is still needed since some antifungal combinations have also demonstrated antagonistic activity. Well-controlled clinical trials are still required to define the most efficacious antifungal regimen. Furthermore, these trials should also evaluate the side-effect potential of combination regimens and the pharmacoeconomic impact these regimens may have.

Treatment of solid organ transplant patients with invasive fungal infections: should a combination of antifungal drugs be used?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Combined antifungal drug therapy is widely used in severe invasive mycoses in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We have reviewed the available data in the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

No single randomized study on antifungal combination therapy in SOT patients has been performed. Existing information does not support the use of combination therapy in invasive candidiasis in SOT patients. Indeed, initial combination therapy with amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine is recommended for SOT patients with central nervous system cryptococcosis, mainly with increased white blood cell counts in the cerebrospinal fluid or with altered mental status. No impact on outcome was observed with combination therapy in Scedosporium infections in SOT patients. The combination of voriconazole and terbinafine may be an attractive option for S. prolificans infections. A prospective study of voriconazole plus caspofungin as initial therapy for invasive aspergillosis in SOT patients found that combination therapy was independently associated with reduced mortality in patients with renal failure and in those with Aspergillus fumigatus infection, even when adjusted for other factors predictive of mortality in the study population.

SUMMARY

Combination therapy should be considered for severe forms of invasive fungal infections in SOT patients; however, multicenter studies of such patients are urgently needed.

Clinical trials of antifungal prophylaxis among patients undergoing surgery

Invasive mycoses have emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Epidemiological studies have shown that surgery services have the highest rate of Candida infections in the hospital. In addition to classical risk factors, heavy Candida colonization, recurrent gastrointestinal perforations, and acute pancreatitis are frequently associated with invasive candidiasis. Because prompt initiation of antifungal therapy is critical for cure but difficult to accomplish, prevention of fungal infections may play an important role in this clinical setting; however, few prophylactic or preemptive studies have been done to date. The choice, route of administration, and dose of the antifungal and comparator regimens and the use of clinically relevant and robust study end points are critical for the trial design. Various criteria have been used to identify patients at risk of candidiasis: surgical condition, presence of multiple risk factors, colonization indexes, or expected length of stay in the intensive care unit. Some are not selective enough, and others are time consuming and expensive. Rigorous selection of high-risk patients is crucial to optimize the risk-benefit ratio of preventive antifungal strategies. The aim is to maximize chances of reducing morbidity and mortality while minimizing treatment costs, exposure of low-risk patients to adverse events, and emergence of resistant fungal strains.

[Intra-abdominal mycoses]

The incidence of invasive mycoses in patients undergoing abdominal surgery amounts to approximately 8% and shows an upward trend in epidemiological studies. The lethality of these systemic mycoses, which are mostly based on Candida infections constitutes up to 60%. The development of a sytemic mycosis is marked by exogenic, endogenic and iatrogenic risk factors and typically displays tissue invasion after an initial fungal contamination or systemic dissemination via fungal sepsis. Fungal peritonitis is generally a monoinfection with Candida spp., where Candida albicans outweighs in 70% of cases. Aspergillus spp. are only detected abdominally in rare cases. The histological verification of a fungal invasion is regarded as proof of the existence of an invasive mycosis, but typical macroscopic findings with corresponding cultural findings can also confirm the diagnosis. Systemic mycosis requires an early initiation of a consistent antimycotic therapy as well as definitive surgical eradication of the focus in order to reduce high lethal rate. Resistances or incorrect dosages can be validated objectively by means of histological monitoring of the antimycotic therapy, thus affording early recognition of the need to change the substance class.

Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections

The persistence of high morbidity and mortality from systemic fungal infections despite the availability of novel antifungals points to the need for effective treatment strategies. Treatment of invasive fungal infections is often hampered by drug toxicity, tolerability, and specificity issues, and added complications often arise due to the lack of diagnostic tests and to treatment complexities. Combination therapy has been suggested as a possible approach to improve treatment outcome. In this article, we undertake a historical review of studies of combination therapy and also focus on recent studies involving newly approved antifungal agents. The limitations surrounding antifungal combinations include nonuniform interpretation criteria, inability to predict the likelihood of clinical success, strain variability, and variations in pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals used in combination. The issue of antagonism between polyenes and azoles is beginning to be addressed, but data regarding other drug combinations are not adequate for us to draw definite conclusions. However, recent data have identified potentially useful combinations. Standardization of assay methods and adoption of common interpretive criteria are essential to avoid discrepancies between different in vitro studies. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess whether combination therapy improves survival and treatment outcome in the most seriously debilitated patients afflicted with life-threatening fungal infections.

Oral Fluconazole for Empiric Treatment of Prolonged Fever in Neutropenic Patients

Neutropenic patients who continue to be febrile despite adequate broad-spectrum antibacterial treatment require empirical antifungal therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral fluconazole for empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with persistent fever. A prospective cohort design was used. The study sample included 250 consecutive patients with high-risk stage II, III, or responding metastatic breast cancer who received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous peripheral blood progenitor stem cell transplantation. Those with neutropenic fever lasting more than 72 hours despite broad-spectrum antibacterial coverage were treated with fluconazole. Treatment was continued until fever dropped and/or neutrophil count recovered with blood cultures remaining negative. Antifungal treatment was required in 173 patients (69%). There were no cases of documented deep systemic fungal infection. Two patients (<1%) had positive blood cultures for fungi. None of the patients experienced toxicity related to fluconazole. There was one transplant-related death. Thirty-one patients (18%) were unable to complete the oral fluconazole protocol because of severe mucositis, and they received intravenous fluconazole at the same dose, with similar efficacy. Oral fluconazole is a safe and effective alternative to amphotericin B for empirical early antifungal treatment in persistent neutropenic fever in breast cancer patients undergoing HDC with autologous stem cell support. Further study of oral fluconazole and amphotericin B as empirical agents in other groups of patients with persistent neutropenic fever is warranted.

Early diagnosis of candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine a method for the early diagnosis of candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients in order to reduce mortality.

METHODS

A prospective study in non-neutropenic critically patients in whom Candida spp. were detected, was made in an intensive care unit (ICU) during an 8-year period from 3389 patients admitted. A diagnostic and therapeutic protocol was designed. Invasive candidiasis was defined according to dissemination and multifocality.

RESULTS

Candida spp. were found in 145 cases (4.3%): 120 (83%) were considered as invasive candidiasis and 25 as colonisation (17%). The hospital mortality was 46% (67/145). A post-mortem study was carried out in 54% (36/67) of hospital deaths. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated species (87%), followed by Candida glabrata (18%). There were 24 candidemias and three cases of endophtalmitis. Digestive and respiratory samples and non-C. albicans yeasts were risk factors for invasive candidiasis. The mortality rate was related statistically to invasive candidiasis and inversely to the appropriate antifungal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive candidiasis is related to digestive and respiratory samples and to the presence of non-C. albicans species. A simpler definition of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients will permit more rapid and accurate specific antifungal therapy.

Indicaciones del tratamiento antifúngico en pacientes ingresados en servicios de medicina intensiva*

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the indications for antifungal treatment in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain and determines the frequency at which each individual drug is prescribed.

METHODS

Observational, multicenter study including all patients admitted to 64 ICUs on 23 March, 22 June, and 16 November, 1999. The use of antifungal agents and the criteria for indicating antifungal therapy were assessed. Patients were classified as colonized or infected by fungi.

RESULTS

In 180 (11.5%) of the 1562 patients included in the study, 219 courses of treatment with antifungal agents were prescribed (antifungal therapy rate of 14 per 100 patients). Fluconazole was the antifungal agent most frequently used, both in infected and colonized patients. The most common reasons for prescribing antifungal therapy were as follows: candiduria (21.9%), severe sepsis with no response to antibiotic therapy (19.6%), and evidence of fungi in two or more non-invasive sites (16.9%). Candidemia was the reason for antifungal treatment in 17 (7.9%) cases. Proven fungal infections accounted for 21.1% of indications. Variables significantly associated with the use of antifungal agents included underlying disease, severity of illness according to the APACHE II score, chronic liver disease, solid tumor, immunosuppression, and organ transplantation. Significant extrinsic risk factors for antifungal therapy included treatment with corticoids, chemotherapy, mechanical ventilation, urgent and/or elective surgery, and previous use of antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 11.5% of patients included in the study were given one or more treatment courses with antifungal agents. Antifungal treatment was prescribed in proved fungal infections in only 21.1% of cases. Fluconazole was the antifungal agent most frequently used.

Antifungal therapy--state of the art at the beginning of the 21st century

The most relevant information on the present state of the art of antifungal chemotherapy is reviewed in this chapter. For dermatomycoses a variety of topical antifungals are available, and safe and efficacious systemic treatment, especially with the fungicidal drug terbinafine, is possible. The duration of treatment can be drastically reduced. Substantial progress in the armamentarium of drugs for invasive fungal infections has been made, and a new class of antifungals, echinocandins, is now in clinical use. The following drugs in oral and/or intravenous formulations are available: the broad spectrum polyene amphotericin B with its new "clothes"; the sterol biosynthesis inhibitors fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole; the glucan synthase inhibitor caspofungin; and the combination partner flucytosine. New therapy schedules have been studied; combination therapy has found a significant place in the treatment of severely compromised patients, and the field of prevention and empiric therapy is fast moving. Guidelines exist nowadays for the treatment of various fungal diseases and maintenance therapy. New approaches interfering with host defenses or pathogenicity of fungal cells are being investigated, and molecular biologists are looking for new targets studying the genomics of pathogenic fungi.

[Treatment approach for fungal infections in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units: results of a multicenter survey]

INTRODUCTION

Two consensus conferences taking place in the United States and Spain were organized to optimize diagnosis and treatment of Candida spp. infections. Among other results, clinical scenarios in which early prescription of antifungal agents is indicated were identified.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the criteria followed by physicians for prescribing antifungal agents in critically ill patients in our country and to investigate adherence to the guidelines proposed by the consensus conferences.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed and directed to 4th- and 5th-year residents in intensive care medicine and to specialists in intensive care with training in infectious diseases or other medical areas. Four case reports for which expert consensus indicates early antifungal treatment were included in the questionnaire; 1) recurrent peritonitis secondary to perforation of the digestive tract, with mixed flora including fungi; 2) persistent febrile syndrome in a patient with multiple mucosal fungal colonizations treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics; 3) candiduria and pyuria in a febrile patient; and 4) candidemia.

RESULTS

A total of 135 questionnaires from 45 different ICUs were returned (60% response rate). In the candidemia and fungal peritonitis examples, early treatment with antifungal agents was indicated in 100% and 85.9% of responses, respectively, whereas for sepsis with multifocal candidiasis and candiduria associated with pyuria and fever, early treatment was prescribed in only 41.5% and 55.6% of responses, respectively. There were no significant differences in response with regard to degree of training of the physicians surveyed. Fluconazole prescription predominated, mainly at doses of 400 mg/day, in mixed peritonitis, disseminated candidiasis and candiduria, whereas amphotericin B lipid formulations were preferentially indicated in cases of candidemia. Antifungal treatment (early or late) was prescribed in all responses for candidemia, in 95.5% for mixed peritonitis (fungi and bacteria), in 79.5% for multifocal candidiasis in patients with persistent sepsis, and in 77.9% for candiduria with fever and pyuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to recommendations from the consensus conferences was high among intensive medicine specialists, with no differences according to level of training in infectious diseases.

Combination antifungal therapy againstCandidaspecies: the new frontier-are we there yet?

In the past decade, we have seen a significant increase in the incidence of invasive fungal infections. In addition, opportunistic fungal infections resistant to antifungal agents have become increasingly common and their frequency will more than likely continue to increase. The antifungal armamentarium for the treatment of serious fungal infections remains limited. A possible approach to overcoming antifungal drug resistance and high mortality rates seen in severe fungal infections is to combine two or three classes of antifungals, especially if the drugs have different mechanisms of action. The unique properties of newer antifungals now provide us with the opportunity to investigate antifungal combinations that may become the standard of care for serious fungal infections. Combinations of new agents along with more traditional antifungals have now been shown to possess some synergistic or at least additive activity against Candida in clinical trials. On the other hand, caution is still needed since other antifungal combinations have demonstrated antagonistic activity in vitro. Well-controlled clinical trials are needed to define the most efficacious antifungal regimen. Furthermore, these trials should also evaluate the side effect potential of combination regimens and the pharmacoeconomic impact these regimens may have. Thus, while much optimism exists for combination therapy, there is much yet to be done.

Fluconazole vs. amphotericin B for the management of candidaemia in adults: a meta-analysis

The incidence of bloodstream infections caused by Candida species is rising. Few published studies have compared the efficacy of fluconazole with that of amphotericin B. We performed a meta-analysis of the prospective studies that compared fluconazole and amphotericin B for the treatment of candidaemia in adults. Data on total mortality, candidaemia-attributable mortality, efficacy, microbiological failure, and toxicity were extracted from eligible studies. All studies appeared homogeneous with respect to the outcome measures. Most patients were at relatively low risk for death as evidenced by the low average physiologic score and the lack of intense immunosuppression. The odds ratios (OR) of treatment with amphotericin B versus fluconazole and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were as follows: total mortality (OR, 1.06; CI, 0.89-1.25), candidaemia-attributable mortality (OR, 1.0; CI, 0.70-1.45), clinical response (OR, 1.14; CI, 0.93-1.39) and microbiological failure according to all Candida species (OR, 0.99; CI, 0.78-1.26). A trend favouring amphotericin B was seen in mycological eradication of non-albicans Candida species (OR, 0.70; CI, 0.47-1.06). Finally, amphotericin B was more toxic than fluconazole (OR, 2.94; CI, 2.14-4.4). In conclusion, fluconazole is as efficacious and less toxic than amphotericin B in stable, not severely immunosuppressed candidaemic patients at low risk for death. However, fluconazole may be less effective than amphotericin B in candidaemias caused by some non-albicans Candida species.

Rationale for combination antifungal therapy

The relentless increase of invasive fungal infections and poor outcomes associated with available antifungal agents prompted the search for better therapeutic strategies. Combining antifungal drugs was recommended as a means to enhance efficacy in a variety of invasive infections including cryptococcosis, candidiasis, and aspergillosis. With the exception of cryptococcal meningitis, data from controlled clinical trials supporting such combinations are sparse. Moreover, little consensus exists regarding which combinations are synergistic or antagonistic in vitro and in vivo. Based on available data, several principles underlie these combinations.

Fungicidal effect of antimicrobial peptide, PMAP-23, isolated from porcine myeloid against Candida albicans

The antifungal activity and mechanism of a 23-mer peptide, PMAP-23, derived from pig myeloid was investigated. PMAP-23 displayed strong antifungal activity against yeast and mold. To investigate the antifungal mechanism of PMAP-23, fluorescence activated flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy were performed. Candida albicans treated with PMAP-23 showed higher fluorescence intensity by propidium iodide(PI) staining, which was similar to that of Melittin than untreated cells. Confocal microscopy showed that the peptide was located in the plasma membrane. The action of peptides against fungal cell membranes was examined by treating prepared protoplasts of C. albicans with the peptide and lipid vesicle titration test. The result showed that the peptide prevented the regeneration of fungal cell walls and induced release of the fluorescent dye trapped in the artificial membrane vesicles, indicating that the peptide exerts its antifungal activity by acting on the plasma lipid membrane.

Antifungal pharmacodynamics: review of the literature and clinical applications

Invasive fungal infections are seen with growing frequency, likely due to increases in numbers of patients at risk of infection. Optimal selection and dosing of antifungal agents are important, as these infections are often refractory to available therapy. In contrast to antibacterials, studies examining the pharmacodynamic properties of antifungals and their application in treating invasive disease often are lacking. Agents administered for invasive infections are amphotericin B, flucytosine, and azole antifungals. Several drugs are under investigation, such as posiconazole, voriconazole, and the echinocandins, and preliminary pharmacodynamic data likely will help shape dosing regimens. Clinical trials that investigated dosage and administration, as well as the potential benefits of combination and sequential therapy, are addressed. In addition, antifungal susceptibility and animal models of infection are discussed.

Effects of fluconazole on viable cell count in experimental intraperitoneal Candida abscesses

We investigated the effects of fluconazole in experimental intraperitoneal Candida abscesses in neutropenic mice treated with cyclophosphamide to assess a clinically appropriate method for the application of fluconazole in fungal infections in patients with neutropenia. The efficacy of fluconazole in fungal infection was investigated in treatments started immediately after Candida albicans inoculation and before C. albicans inoculation (preventive use of fluconazole). In this intraabdominal fungal abscess model, it was confirmed that fungi in already formed abscess were not reduced in number by fluconazole, even when those fungi were susceptible to fluconazole. Fluconazole was effective with both administration methods. We conclude from this study that the effect of the preventive use of fluconazole was equivalent to the effect when treatment was started immediately after fungal inoculation.

Fluconazole in transplant recipients: options and limitations

Fluconazole is currently a first-line agent used for therapy of non-critically ill patients with candidal infection. Its efficacy, the availability of an oral formula, and its relatively low toxicity make it a very attractive drug for use in many clinical situations. The advisability of prophylaxis and empirical treatment in transplant patients is a difficult issue for the following reasons: the potential emergence of resistance to the azoles, the lack of solid data establishing its advantage over placebo and/or oral nonabsorbable antifungal agents in some of the clinical conditions encountered, its ineffectiveness against molds, and its cost. Judicious use of fluconazole where its efficacy has been well established would provide the best therapy for patients and would limit the emergence of potential pathogens. As new antifungal agents are approved for clinical use, appropriate clinical trials will need to be designed and conducted in order for clinicians to make rational decisions in selecting the most appropriate drug for the specific indication. Prophylaxis and treatment with fluconazole in various transplant situations is reviewed.

Emerging Issues in Nosocomial Fungal Infections

Nosocomial fungal infections remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. As immunodeficient populations increase, the incidence of nosocomial fungal infections continues to rise. Although a wide variety of new and emerging fungi can cause nosocomial infections, Candida species remain the major etiologic agent. Candida species vary in their epidemiology and therapy. New diagnostic, epidemiologic, and therapeutic tools have been developed and are discussed in this review. They include the use of polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic methods, recent advances in antifungal susceptibility testing, and comparative therapeutic and prophylactic trials. As advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy continue, nosocomial fungal infections and the morbidity and mortality associated with them can be reduced.

Nosocomial fungal infections: candidemia

Candida species are frequently encountered as part of the human commensal flora. Colonization mostly precedes candidemia and is an independent risk factor for the development of candidemia. Genotyping methods showed the similarity between colonizing and infecting strains, thus making endogenous origin likely, though exogenous sources like total parenteral nutrition also have been described. Health care workers (HCWs) play an important role in the transmission of yeasts. Candida species are frequently isolated from the hands of HCWs and can be transmitted from hands to patients. Granulocytopenia and damage of the mucosal lining resulting from intensive chemotherapy due to cancer, the increasing use of broad spectrum antibiotics, and the use of intravenous catheters are other important risk factors for the development of candidemia. Candidemia is associated with a high mortality and prolonged hospitalization. Therefore, and because of the high frequency of dissemination, all candidemias should be treated. Amphotericin B was considered the standard drug for the systemic treatment of candidemia. Fluconazole has been shown to be an effective and safe alternative in non-neutropenic patients. 5-Fluorocytosine has been used in combination with amphotericin B in the treatment of deep-seated infections. Liposomal formulations of amphotericin B and other new antifungal drugs currently are under investigation. C. albicans is the most frequently isolated Candida species, although the proportion of infections caused by non-C. albicans species is increasing. Also, there are reports of development of resistance to amphotericin B. C. lusitaniae is known for primary resistance and the development of resistance to amphotericin B. Development of resistance to fluconazole is mainly seen in AIDS patients with recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis who receive longer courses of therapy.

Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous fluconazole for the prevention of intra-abdominal Candida infections in high-risk surgical patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Two university-affiliated hospitals in Switzerland.

PATIENTS

Forty-nine surgical patients with recurrent gastrointestinal perforations or anastomotic leakages.

INTERVENTIONS

Prophylaxis with intravenous fluconazole (400 mg per day) or placebo continued until resolution of the underlying surgical condition.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were evaluated daily, and specimens for culture were obtained three times per week during prophylaxis. The primary study end points were the frequency of and the time to intra-abdominal Candida infections. Secondary end points were the frequency of candidiasis (intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal) and the emergence or persistence of Candida colonization. Among patients who were not colonized at study entry, Candida was isolated from surveillance cultures during prophylaxis in 15% of the patients in the fluconazole group and in 62% of the patients in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.96; p = .04). Candida peritonitis occurred in one of 23 patients (4%) who received fluconazole and in seven of 20 patients (35%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.93; p = .02). In addition, one catheter-related Candida albicans sepsis occurred in a fluconazole-treated patient. Thus, overall, candidiasis developed in two fluconazole patients and seven placebo patients (relative risk, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 1.06; p = .06). C. albicans accounted for 87% of the Candida species isolated before or during prophylaxis, and all C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole. Fluconazole was well tolerated, and adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents colonization and invasive intra-abdominal Candida infections in high-risk surgical patients.

Antifungal agents. Part I. Amphotericin B preparations and flucytosine

Traditionally, amphotericin B has been the cornerstone of antifungal treatment. Toxicity, however, is a major dose-limiting factor of amphotericin B deoxycholate. Nevertheless, it continues to have a major role in the treatment of deep-seated mycotic infections. Recently, less nephrotic lipid formulations, including amphotericin B lipid complex, amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate, and liposomal amphotericin B, have been introduced. The pharmacologic properties, main indications, recommended dosages, related costs, and adverse effects of these various preparations are summarized in this review. Orally administered flucytosine is useful in certain infections, particularly cryptococcal meningitis, but it should be used with caution in patients with renal insufficiency.

Hematogenous Candidiasis in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Management

Hematogenous candidiasis is a life-threatening infection that occurs in critically ill patients. The incidence has increased dramatically over the past decade and Candida species are currently the fourth most common organism recovered from blood cultures in hospitalized patients. Numerous risk factors have been identified that predispose a patient to the development of hematogenous candidiasis. Diagnosis is often difficult in the clinical setting. Pharmacologic options for the management of hematogenous candidiasis includes amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine. Evidence from clinical trials indicate that fluconazole is as effective and better tolerated than amphotericin B for the management of hematogenous candidiasis in critically ill patients.

Antibiotics for the acute abdomen

Antibiotics are only an adjunct to proper surgical therapy for the treatment of the acute abdomen associated with bacterial secondary peritonitis. Upon presentation, all patients require a preoperative dose of antibiotics for prophylaxis against infection of remaining sterile tissues. Patients found intraoperatively to have an established peritoneal infection benefit from an immediate postoperative course of therapeutic antibiotics. A regimen that adequately covers facultative and aerobic gram-negative bacilli and anaerobic organisms is essential. The duration of therapeutic antibiotics is probably best decided on an individual patient basis. The goal of antibiotics is to reduce the concentration of bacteria invading tissues. The pathogens of bacterial peritonitis are influenced by such factors as the patient's pre-existing chronic diseases, state of acute physiologic debilitation, immunocompetence, recent antibiotic use, recent hospitalization, and neutralization of gastric acidity. Intraoperative peritoneal cultures are most useful in patients suspected of having impaired local host defenses. In these patients, all identified organisms, such as Enterococcus or Candida, may be potential pathogens. The common practice of administering empiric and prolonged courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients who manifest persistent signs of inflammation may be more harmful than beneficial. These patients warrant an exhaustive search for extra-abdominal and intraperitoneal sources of new infection. Otherwise, such use of antibiotics may continue to promote the selection of bacteria that are highly resistant to conventional antibiotics and permit the overgrowth of organisms commonly seen with tertiary peritonitis. The best chance of resolving bacterial peritonitis is through early, aggressive surgical management complemented by short courses of potent antibiotics and appropriate physiologic support. Through these efforts, the clinician tries to help the systemic inflammatory response to benefit the host and not become unregulated, result in MOFS, and produce a high mortality.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in superficial and systemic mycoses

The bis triazole agent fluconazole is used widely in the treatment of superficial and deep mycoses. A single oral dose of fluconazole 150 mg gives a mean long term clinical cure rate of 84 +/- 5% and is considered a valuable alternative to other topical antifungal drugs for vaginal candidiasis. A clinical cure rate of 90.4% for oropharyngeal candidiasis was obtained with 100mg daily for a minimum of 14 days; however, as for the other azoles the rate of relapse was large (40%) in immunocompromised patients. A daily dose of 100mg for at last 3 weeks gave satisfying outcomes for oesophageal candidiasis. Most patients (71 to 86%) with signs and symptoms of urinary tract candidiasis show beneficial clinical results when given oral fluconazole 50mg for several weeks. Fluconazole 50 to 150 mg given for weeks or months results in over 90% clinical cure or improvement for cutaneous mycosis including tinea, pityriasis, cryptococcosis and candidiasis. Prolonged (6 to 12 months) fluconazole 150 mg once a week is needed to treat onychomycosis successfully. Higher oral doses (200 to 400 mg daily) for long periods are generally used to treat deep mycoses such as meningitis, ophthalmitis, pneumonia, hepatosplenic mycosis and endocarditis. Fluconazole is effective for treating the fungal peritonitis which can complicate continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). A regimen of 50 mg intraperitoneally or 100 mg orally was used in these patients with impaired renal function. The dosage schedules used to treat disseminated fungal infections due to systemic mycoses with different or multiple foci of infections vary widely, with doses of 50 to 400 mg given orally or intravenously for between 1 week and several months. The most recent clinical reports have investigated the use of prophylaxis with fluconazole 100 to 400 mg daily, in immunocompromised patients. Fluconazole is found in body fluids such as vaginal secretions, breast milk, saliva, sputum and cerebrospinal fluid at concentrations comparable with those determined in blood after single or multiple doses. There is an excellent linear plasma concentration-dose relationship, but the mycological and clinical responses do not appear to be well correlated with the dose. A total maximum daily dose of 1600 mg is recommended to avoid neurological toxicity. Data from pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients, mainly those with AIDS, and using a 1-compartment model give very constant parameters similar to those obtained in healthy individuals. Bioavailability, measured in HIV-positive patients and those with AIDS, exceeded 93% for tablets, suspension and suppositories. The time to reach peak plasma concentrations (tmax) was 2.4 to 3.7 hours. The peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) obtained after a 100 mg oral dose was 2 mg/L. Areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) obtained in different studies all correlate well with the dose (r = 0.926). The AUC determined after 200 and 25 mg suppositories were similarly well correlated. Hypochlorhydria does not affect the absorption of fluconazole, neither does food intake, race (Japanese or Caucasian) or gastrointestinal resection. Binding to plasma protein is low (11.14%) and is increased to 23% in cancer patients. Fluconazole is rapidly distributed to the tissue, where it accumulates. Tissues fall into 1 of 4 groups of increasing drug concentration: blood, bone and brain have the lowest concentrations, and spleen has the highest. The volume of distribution (Vd) remains stable at 46.3 +/- 7.9L and is considered to be an 'invariant' parameter across species. Fluconazole is poorly metabolised and is mainly eliminated unchanged in the urine. The percentage of the dose recovered in the urine in 48 hours is close to 60%. Concentrations in the urine are high and the half-life (t1/2) is long (37.2 +/- 5.5h) in patients, mainly those with AIDS, which is not significantly different from the t1/2 (31.4 +/- 4.7 hours) in healthy individuals. (ABSTRACT TRUN

Large-scale multicentre study of fluconazole in the treatment of hospitalised patients with fungal infections. Multicentre European Study Group

The purpose of this prospective, open-label, noncomparative, multicentre study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluconazole in the treatment of hospitalised patients with mycoses. A total of 587 patients with diagnosed fungal infections were enrolled. Fluconazole was given orally or intravenously in a 200 or 400 mg loading dose, followed by 100 or 200 mg once daily. The most common candidal infections were fungemia, esophageal candidiasis, bronchopulmonary candidiasis, peritonitis, oropharyngeal candidiasis, urinary tract infection and deep wound infection. Meningitis was the most common cryptococcal infection. Of the 291 evaluable patients with candidiasis, 96% (70/73) of AIDS patients and 79% (171/218) of non-AIDS patients were clinically cured or improved. Of the 36 evaluable patients with cryptococcosis, 69% (20/29) of AIDS patients and 100% (7/7) of non-AIDS patients responded clinically. The overall mycological eradication rate was 85%; eradication was similar in patients with and without AIDS. Most adverse events during fluconazole therapy were mild to moderate in severity. This investigation confirms the results of previous studies demonstrating high response rates to fluconazole therapy in AIDS and non-AIDS patients with fungal infections. Even during long-term therapy treatment-limiting adverse events were uncommon with fluconazole.

A randomized study comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B/5-flucytosine for the treatment of systemic Candida infections in intensive care patients

In this prospective, randomized study fluconazole and amphotericin B/5-flucytosine were compared in the treatment of systemic candidiasis. Seventy-two non-neutropenic intensive care patients with systemic Candida infections were enrolled. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive fluconazole (400 mg on the first day then 200 mg) and 36 were randomized to amphotericin B/5-flucytosine (1.0-1.5 mg/kg body weight every other day and 3 x 2.5 g flucytosine/day) for 14 days following the diagnosis. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcome in regard to the treatment of pneumonia and sepsis: 18/28 of the patients were treated successfully with fluconazole and 17/27 with amphotericin B/5-flucytosine. For the treatment of peritonitis, however, amphotericin B/5-flucytosine was more effective than fluconazole (55% vs. 25%). Furthermore, amphotericin B/5-flucytosine was found to be superior to fluconazole with regard to pathogen eradication (86% vs. 50%). Fluconazole was associated with less toxicity than amphotericin B/5-flucytosine.