Pulmonary toxicity during infusion of liposomal amphotericin B in two patients with acute leukemia

Preparation and In Vitro Evaluation of Alginate Microparticles Containing Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Candida Infections

Invasive candidiasis (IC) remains as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Amphotericin B (AmB) is one of the most effective antifungal agents commonly used to treat this infection. However, it induces severe side effects such as nephrotoxicity, cardiac alterations, nausea, fever, and liver damage. The utilization of drug delivery systems has been explored to overcome these limitations. Several AmB lipid formulations have been developed and are currently available in the market. Although they have the ability to reduce the main side effects of free AmB, their high cost, necessity of repeated intravenous injections for successful treatment, and incidence of pulmonary toxicity have limited their use. In the last decades, alginate has gained significant interest in drug delivery applications as a cost-effective strategy to improve the safety and therapeutic effect of toxic drugs. In this work, the clinically relevant drug AmB was encapsulated into alginate microparticles using the emulsification/external gelation method. We hypothesize that this synthesis strategy may positively impact the antifungal efficacy of AmB-loaded MCPs toward Candida albicans cells while reducing the toxicity in human lung cells. To prove this hypothesis, the ability of the microplatform to disrupt the cellular membrane potential was tested and its antifungal effectiveness toward Candida albicans cells was evaluated using the cell counting and plate count methods. Moreover, the toxicity of the microplatform in human lung cells was evaluated using CellTiter 96® AQueous cell viability assay and qualitative diffusion analysis of acridine orange. Our results demonstrated that the platform developed in this work was able to induce antifungal toxicity against Candida albicans yeast cells at the same level of free AmB with minimal toxicity to lung cells, which is one of the main side effects induced by commercial drug delivery systems containing AmB. Overall, our data provides convincing evidence about the effectiveness of the alginate-based microplatform toward Candida albicans cells. In addition, this vehicle may not require several infusions for a successful treatment while reducing the pulmonary toxic effect induced by commercial lipid formulations.

Immunological and Toxicological Considerations for the Design of Liposomes

Liposomes hold great potential as gene and drug delivery vehicles due to their biocompatibility and modular properties, coupled with the major advantage of attenuating the risk of systemic toxicity from the encapsulated therapeutic agent. Decades of research have been dedicated to studying and optimizing liposomal formulations for a variety of medical applications, ranging from cancer therapeutics to analgesics. Some effort has also been made to elucidate the toxicities and immune responses that these drug formulations may elicit. Notably, intravenously injected liposomes can interact with plasma proteins, leading to opsonization, thereby altering the healthy cells they come into contact with during circulation and removal. Additionally, due to the pharmacokinetics of liposomes in circulation, drugs can end up sequestered in organs of the mononuclear phagocyte system, affecting liver and spleen function. Importantly, liposomal agents can also stimulate or suppress the immune system depending on their physiochemical properties, such as size, lipid composition, pegylation, and surface charge. Despite the surge in the clinical use of liposomal agents since 1995, there are still several drawbacks that limit their range of applications. This review presents a focused analysis of these limitations, with an emphasis on toxicity to healthy tissues and unfavorable immune responses, to shed light on key considerations that should be factored into the design and clinical use of liposomal formulations.

Pleuropulmonary Changes Induced by Drugs in Patients with Hematologic Diseases

Patients with hematologic diseases who are being treated with therapy drugs, or receive radiation therapy or blood transfusions may develop a host of potentially fatal infectious and noninfectious pulmonary complications [1]. The increased complexity of multimodality and high-dose treatment regimens with the intended benefit of augmented antineoplastic efficacy and prolonged disease-free survival, the use of a panel of novel drugs to treat malignant and nonmalignant hematologic conditions (e.g., azacytidine, bortezomib, cladribine, dasatinib, fludarabine, imatinib, lenalidomide, rituximab, and thalidomide), total body irradiation (TBI) and hematopietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have increased the incidence of severe sometimes life-threatening pulmonary complications.

Infiltrative lung diseases: complications of novel antineoplastic agents in patients with hematological malignancies

Infiltrative lung disease is a well-known complication of antineoplastic agents in patients with hematological malignancies. Novel agents are constantly being added to available treatments. The present review discusses different pulmonary syndromes, pathogenesis and management of these novel agents.

Engraftment syndrome after nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: incidence and effects on survival

Engraftment syndrome (ES) encompasses a constellation of symptoms that occur during neutrophil recovery after both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Although it is well characterized after conventional myeloablative procedures, limited data exist on this complication after nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT. The clinical manifestations, incidence, and risk factors associated with ES were investigated in a consecutive series of patients undergoing cyclophosphamide/fludarabine-based nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT from a related HLA-compatible donor. Fifteen (10%) of 149 patients (median age, 53 years; range, 27-66 years) developed ES; the onset of symptoms occurred at a median of 10 days (range, 3-14 days), and they consisted of fever (100%), cough (53%), diffuse pulmonary infiltrates (100%), rash (13%), and room air hypoxia (87%). ES was more likely to develop in patients who received empiric amphotericin formulations after transplant conditioning (Fisher exact test; P=.007). In a multivariate analysis, older patient age, female sex, and treatment with amphotericin were predictors for the development of ES. Intravenous methylprednisolone led to the rapid resolution of ES; however, transplant-related mortality was significantly higher (cumulative incidence, 49% versus 16%; P=.0005), and median survival was significantly shorter (168 versus 418 days; P=.005) in patients with ES compared with non-ES patients. In conclusion, ES occurs commonly after cyclophosphamide/fludarabine-based nonmyeloablative transplantation and responds rapidly to corticosteroid treatment, but it is associated with a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality and with shorter overall survival.

Therapy of systemic fungal infections

The incidence of both community-acquired and nosocomial fungal infections has significantly increased over the past several decades. The major factors for this increase are a heightened use of antibiotics, a growing population of the elderly and of immunocompromised patients as a result of HIV, cancer, and organ transplantation. In this article, we will review the indications, efficacy, and safety of the polyenes, imidazoles, triazoles, and other systemic antifungals in development that are used for systemic fungal infections.

Amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet, Enzon Pharmaceuticals) has become the dominant marketed lipid amphotericin B compound to emerge since the approval of these agents from the mid-1990s onwards. This agent is a 1:1 combination of amphotericin B and a lipid moiety consisting of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyrisoyl phosphatidylcholine, which exists in a ribbon-like molecular structure. ABLC undergoes rapid reticuloendothelial uptake from the circulation and achieves significantly higher tissue concentrations in the liver, spleen and lung compared to comparably dosed conventional amphotericin B. ABLC is approved by the FDA for all mycoses in amphotericin B-intolerant or -refractory infection. Randomised, controlled trials of amphotericin B have shown comparable efficacy in candidiasis and an improved outcome in invasive aspergillosis versus historical controls. ABLC has demonstrated a reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity and infusion reactions versus amphotericin B. Comparative studies against other lipid formulations are quite limited and have shown variable differences in infusion toxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and clinical efficacy. Postapproval experience has shown substantial efficacy for less common mycotic pathogens including zygomycosis. The precise position of ABLC versus both other lipid formulations and expanding formulary of new antifungal agents is in flux. Future studies which examine its clinical efficacy, role in combination therapy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness in these complex patients are needed.

Triad of acute infusion-related reactions associated with liposomal amphotericin B: analysis of clinical and epidemiological characteristics

We investigated the clinical characteristics and treatment of patients with a distinctive triad of acute infusion-related reactions (AIRRs) to liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) via single-center and multicenter analyses. AIRRs occurred alone or in combination within 1 of 3 symptom complexes: (1) chest pain, dyspnea, and hypoxia; (2) severe abdomen, flank, or leg pain; and (3) flushing and urticaria. The frequency of AIRRs in the single-center analysis increased over time. Most AIRRs (86%) occurred within the first 5 min of infusion. All patients experienced rapid resolution of symptoms after intravenous diphenhydramine was administered. The multicenter analysis demonstrated a mean overall frequency of 20% (range, 0%-100%) of AIRRs among 64 centers. A triad of severe AIRRs to L-AMB may occur in some centers; most of these reactions may be effectively managed by diphenhydramine administration and interruption of L-AMB infusion.

Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever

BACKGROUND

Patients with neutropenia and persistent fever are often treated empirically with amphotericin B or liposomal amphotericin B to prevent invasive fungal infections. Antifungal triazoles offer a potentially safer and effective alternative.

METHODS

In a randomized, international, multicenter trial, we compared voriconazole, a new second-generation triazole, with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 837 patients (415 assigned to voriconazole and 422 to liposomal amphotericin B) were evaluated for success of treatment. The overall success rates were 26.0 percent with voriconazole and 30.6 percent with liposomal amphotericin B (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -10.6 to 1.6 percentage points); these rates were independent of the administration of antifungal prophylaxis or the use of colony-stimulating factors. There were fewer documented breakthrough fungal infections in patients treated with voriconazole than in those treated with liposomal amphotericin B (8 [1.9 percent] vs. 21 [5.0 percent], P=0.02). The voriconazole group had fewer cases of severe infusion-related reactions (P<0.01) and of nephrotoxicity (P<0.001). The incidence of hepatotoxicity was similar in the two groups. Patients receiving voriconazole had more episodes of transient visual changes than those receiving liposomal amphotericin B (22 percent vs. 1 percent, P<0.001) and more hallucinations (4.3 percent vs. 0.5 percent, P<0.001). Parenteral voriconazole was changed to the oral formulation in 22 percent of the voriconazole group, with a reduction in the mean duration of hospitalization by one day in all patients (P=0.17) but by two days in patients at high risk (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Voriconazole is a suitable alternative to amphotericin B preparations for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever.

Pulmonary reactions during treatment with amphotericin B: review of published cases and guidelines for management

Acute respiratory events occasionally have been observed during the infusion of amphotericin B. Herein we analyze the 21 cases that have been reported, including a fatal reaction observed by us. Some useful guidelines are provided that likely will allow treatment to be continued safely for patients who have experienced such reactions.

Amphotericin B--not so terrible

OBJECTIVE

To describe a patient who developed adverse reactions to two different lipid formulations of amphotericin B: liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD, Amphocil), yet tolerated amphotericin B deoxycholate (Fungizone) despite renal toxicity.

CASE SUMMARY

A 72-year-old woman with acute myelomonocytic leukemia was treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate for suspected pulmonary aspergillosis; the drug was well tolerated but resulted in renal failure. Antifungal therapy was then changed to liposomal amphotericin B. Within 10 minutes of liposomal amphotericin B infusion, the patient developed severe dyspnea, chest pain, and a feeling of imminent death. On the following day, liposomal amphotericin B was switched to amphotericin B colloidal dispersion. Again, within 10 minutes of this infusion, the patient developed fever, chills, hypotension, severe chest pain, dsypnea, and a feeling of imminent death. The patient refused any further treatment with these drugs and insisted on switching back to amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was then administered for 10 days and was well tolerated.

DISCUSSION

Severe adverse reactions, such as anaphylaxis, cardiac toxicity, and respiratory failure, following administration of all three lipid formulations of amphotericin B have been reported. In most reported cases, switching to a different lipid formulation of amphotericin B was well tolerated. This is in contrast to our case, where a severe reaction was repeated when another lipid preparation was given, necessitating switching back to amphotericin B deoxycholate despite its nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In some patients, paradoxically, lipid formulations of amphotericin B may be less tolerable than conventional amphotericin B.

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil) vs fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: data of a prematurely stopped clinical trial

We conducted an open label, randomised clinical trial to compare amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD, Amphocil) 2 mg/kg/day intravenously with fluconazole 200 mg/day orally, for the prevention of fungal disease in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. In the event of unresolved fever after 4 days of empirical antibacterial therapy, patients in both treatment groups were to receive ABCD, 4 mg/kg/day. However, the study had to be stopped in an early phase, due to severe side-effects of ABCD. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, 12 patients were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic ABCD, which was administered for a mean of 13.9 days. Fluconazole prophylaxis was given to 12 patients for a mean of 21.2 days. Therapeutic ABCD, 4 mg/kg, was initiated in four patients because of suspected fungal infection, all of whom had initially received fluconazole. A high rate of infusion-related toxicity of ABCD was observed. Chills occurred in 15/16 ABCD recipients (94%), accompanied by a temperature rise of >/=2 degrees C in 4/16 patients and of >/=1 degrees C but <2 degrees C in 10/16 patients. Other ABCD-related adverse events were hypotension (4/16), nausea with vomiting (5/16), tachycardia (7/16), headache (3/16) and dyspnoea (3/16). For premedication patients received: antihistamines (12/16), hydrocortisone (9/16) and/or morphine (6/16). ABCD was discontinued in 8/16 patients (50%) due to side-effects, which ultimately dictated early termination of the study. We conclude that ABCD is not suitable for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients due to severe infusion-related side-effects. Subject numbers were too low for conclusions on variables of antifungal efficacy.

Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group

BACKGROUND

In patients with persistent fever and neutropenia, amphotericin B is administered empirically for the early treatment and prevention of clinically occult invasive fungal infections. However, breakthrough fungal infections can develop despite treatment, and amphotericin B has substantial toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing liposomal amphotericin B with conventional amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy.

RESULTS

The mean duration of therapy was 10.8 days for liposomal amphotericin B (343 patients) and 10.3 days for conventional amphotericin B (344 patients). The composite rates of successful treatment were similar (50 percent for liposomal amphotericin B and 49 percent for conventional amphotericin B) and were independent of the use of antifungal prophylaxis or colony-stimulating factors. The outcomes were similar with liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B with respect to survival (93 percent and 90 percent, respectively), resolution of fever (58 percent and 58 percent), and discontinuation of the study drug because of toxic effects or lack of efficacy (14 percent and 19 percent). There were fewer proved breakthrough fungal infections among patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B (11 patients [3.2 percent]) than among those treated with conventional amphotericin B (27 patients [7.8 percent], P=0.009). With the liposomal preparation significantly fewer patients had infusion-related fever (17 percent vs. 44 percent), chills or rigors (18 percent vs. 54 percent), and other reactions, including hypotension, hypertension, and hypoxia. Nephrotoxic effects (defined by a serum creatinine level two times the upper limit of normal) were significantly less frequent among patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B (19 percent) than among those treated with conventional amphotericin B (34 percent, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal amphotericin B is as effective as conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with fever and neutropenia, and it is associated with fewer breakthrough fungal infections, less infusion-related toxicity, and less nephrotoxicity.

Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a small unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in neutropenic patients

The safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a small unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) administered for empirical antifungal therapy were evaluated for 36 persistently febrile neutropenic adults receiving cancer chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. The protocol was an open-label, sequential-dose-escalation, multidose pharmacokinetic study which enrolled a total of 8 to 12 patients in each of the four dosage cohorts. Each cohort received daily doses of either 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg of amphotericin B in the form of AmBisome/kg of body weight. The study population consisted of patients between the ages of 13 and 80 years with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500/mm3) who were eligible to receive empirical antifungal therapy. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerance by frequent laboratory examinations and the monitoring of infusion-related reactions. Efficacy was assessed by monitoring for the development of invasive fungal infection. The pharmacokinetic parameters of AmBisome were measured as those of amphotericin B by high-performance liquid chromatography. Noncompartmental methods were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. AmBisome administered as a 1-h infusion in this population was well tolerated and was seldom associated with infusion-related toxicity. Infusion-related side effects occurred in 15 (5%) of all 331 infusions, and only two patients (5%) required premedication. Serum creatinine, potassium, and magnesium levels were not significantly changed from baseline in any of the dosage cohorts, and there was no net increase in serum transaminase levels. AmBisome followed a nonlinear dosage relationship that was consistent with reticuloendothelial uptake and redistribution. There were no breakthrough fungal infections during empirical therapy with AmBisome. AmBisome administered to febrile neutropenic patients in this study was well tolerated, was seldom associated with infusion-related toxicity, was characterized by nonlinear saturation kinetics, and was effective in preventing breakthrough fungal infections.

Safety and toxicity of amphotericin B in glucose 5% or intralipid 20% in neutropenic patients with pneumonia or fever of unknown origin: randomised study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the feasibility of treatment, safety, and toxicity of intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate prepared in either glucose or intralipid for empirical antimycotic treatment of neutropenic cancer patients.

DESIGN

Single centre stratified, randomised non-blinded phase II study.

SETTING

University hospital providing tertiary clinical care.

SUBJECTS

51 neutropenic patients (leukaemia (35), lymphoma (11), solid tumours (5)) with refractory fever of unknown origin (24) or pneumonia (27).

INTERVENTIONS

Amphotericin B 0.75 mg/kg/day in 250 ml glucose 5% solution or mixed with 250 ml intralipid 20%, given on eight consecutive days then alternate days, as a 1-4 hour infusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility of treatment, subjective tolerance (questionnaire), and objective toxicity (common toxicity criteria of the National Cancer Institute).

RESULTS

Study arms were balanced for age, sex, underlying malignancy, renal and liver function, and pre- and concomitant treatment with antibiotics and nephrotoxic agents. No statistically significant or clinically relevant differences were found between the treatment groups for: daily or cumulative dose and duration of treatment with amphotericin B; incidence and time of dose modifications or infusion duration changes related to toxicity; dose or duration of symptomatic support with opiates, antipyretics, or antihistamines; renal function; subjective tolerance; most common toxicity scores; course of infection; and incidence of treatment failures. Patients treated with amphotericin B in intralipid were given fewer diuretics (P<0.05) and therefore had more peripheral oedema (P<0.01) and needed less potassium supplementation (P<0.05) than patients given amphotericin in glucose. Acute respiratory events were more common in the intralipid arm (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Amphotericin B 0.75 mg/kg/day in intralipid given on eight consecutive days then alternate days provides no benefit and is associated with potential pulmonary side effects possibly because of fat overload or an incompatibility of the two drugs.

Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) compared with amphotericin B both followed by oral fluconazole in the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis

OBJECTIVE

Amphotericin B deoxycholate initial therapy and fluconazole maintenance therapy is the treatment of choice for AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. However, the administration of amphotericin B is associated with considerable toxicity. A potential strategy for reducing the toxicity and increasing the therapeutic index of amphotericin B is the use of lipid formulations of this drug.

DESIGN AND METHODS

HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis were randomized to treatment with either liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) 4 mg/kg daily or standard amphotericin B 0.7 mg/kg daily for 3 weeks, each followed by fluconazole 400 mg daily for 7 weeks. During the first 3 weeks, clinical efficacy was assessed daily. Mycological response was primarily evaluated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures at days 7, 14, 21 and 70.

RESULTS

Of the 28 evaluable patients, 15 were assigned to receive AmBisome and 13 to receive amphotericin B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The time to and the rate of clinical response were the same in both arms. AmBisome therapy resulted in a CSF culture conversion within 7 days in six out of 15 patients versus one out of 12 amphotericin B-treated patients (P = 0.09), within 14 days in 10 out of 15 AmBisome patients versus one out of nine amphotericin B patients (P = 0.01), and within 21 days in 11 out of 15 AmBisome patients versus three out of eight amphotericin B patients (P = 0.19). When Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to compare time to CSF culture conversion, AmBisome was more effective (P < 0.05; median time between 7 and 14 days for AmBisome versus > 21 days for amphotericin B). AmBisome was significantly less nephrotoxic.

CONCLUSIONS

A 3-week course of 4 mg/kg AmBisome resulted in a significantly earlier CSF culture conversion than 0.7 mg/kg amphotericin B, had equal clinical efficacy and was significantly less nephrotoxic when used for the treatment of primary episodes of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis.

Liposomal amphotericin B as early empiric antimycotic therapy of pneumonia in granulocytopenic patients

Twenty-three neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies and febrile pulmonary infiltrates were empirically treated with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in addition to broad-spectrum antibiotics. AmBisome was given on alternate days in two different dosages: 3 mg kg-1 in patients with pneumonia but without radiological signs or other evidence of Aspergillus infection and 5 mg kg-1 in pneumonia patients with suspected Aspergillus infection. The main objectives of this study were to compare the response and lethality of pneumonias treated early with empirically AmBisome with a historical group (treatment with conventional amphotericin B only in case of proven/highly probable aspergillosis) and to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of AmBisome 5 mg kg-1 in cases of proven/probable aspergilloses. Six out of seven (86%) patients without initially suspected aspergilloses receiving AmBisome 3 mg kg-1 responded completely. Twelve out of 16 patients with initial radiological signs of aspergillosis receiving AmBisome 5 mg kg-1 were evaluable. Body temperature normalized in 10/12 (83%) patients; eight experienced complete and two partial regression of their infiltrations and 9/10 patients with proven/probable aspergillosis responded. Acute AmBisome-related reactions were seen in three patients from each group; loss of potassium was noted in five subjects in each group and slightly increased plasma creatinine was found in two patients in the 5 mg kg-1 group. Altogether, the response of all pneumonia patients treated with early empirical AmBisome compared with the historical group was 17/19 vs. 49/72 (89% vs. 68%, NS); among those with proven/probable aspergilloses 11/12 vs. 7/17 (92% vs. 41%, P = 0.008) patients responded. Pneumonia lethality was 1/19 in the AmBisome-treated patients compared with 23/72 in the historical group (5% vs. 32%, P = 0.01); and among those with proven/probable aspergilloses it was 1/12 vs. 10/17 (8% vs. 59%, P = 0.008). In conclusion, early empiric treatment with AmBisome 3 mg kg-1 and 5 mg kg-1 on alternate days was well tolerated and greatly reduced the lethality of proven/probable Aspergillus pneumonias.