1
|
Tsai T, Chiang P, Yap W, Huang Y, See A, Hung S, Lu C, Lin C, Chang TJ, Kao H, Chang K. Postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone in pN1 oral cavity cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2024; 9:e1260. [PMID: 38751691 PMCID: PMC11094775 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with pN1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Methods A literature search through major databases was conducted until January 2023. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different survival outcomes were extracted and pooled. Results Ten studies published between 2005 and 2022, with a pooled patient population of 2888, were included in this meta-analysis. Due to differences in study design and reported outcomes, the studies were categorized into distinct groups. In pN1 patients without extranodal extension (ENE), PORT was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94). In pN1 patients without ENE and positive margins, PORT improved OS (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.89) and was associated with a lower regional recurrence rate (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.83). However, in pN1 patients without ENE, positive margins, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, there were no significant differences observed between the PORT and observation groups in either 5-year OS (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.07-3.41) or 5-year disease-free survival (RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.07-2.06). Conclusions The current study demonstrated that PORT has the potential to improve OS in pN1 disease. However, the decision of whether to administer PORT still hinges on diverse clinical scenarios, and additional research is necessary to furnish a more conclusive resolution. Level of Evidence 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung‐You Tsai
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Pin‐Chun Chiang
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Wing‐Keen Yap
- Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital‐Linkou Medical Center, Department of Radiation OncologyChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Yenlin Huang
- Department of Anatomic PathologyChang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou BranchTaoyuanTaiwan
- Institute of Stem Cell and Translation Cancer ResearchChang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou BranchTaoyuanTaiwan
- School of MedicineNational Tsing‐Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
| | - Anna See
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgerySingapore General HospitalSingapore
| | - Shao‐Yu Hung
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryChang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou BranchTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Chuieng‐Yi Lu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryChang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou BranchTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Chien‐Yu Lin
- Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital‐Linkou Medical Center, Department of Radiation OncologyChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Tung‐Chieh Joseph Chang
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
- Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital‐Linkou Medical Center, Department of Radiation OncologyChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Huang‐Kai Kao
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryChang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou BranchTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Kai‐Ping Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
- College of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Riggenbach E, Waser M, Mueller SA, Aebersold DM, Giger R, Elicin O. Oncologic outcome with versus without target volume compartmentalization in postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1362025. [PMID: 38590644 PMCID: PMC10999524 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The volume treated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a mediator of toxicity affecting quality of life. Current guidelines only allow for very limited reduction of PORT volumes. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of de-intensified PORT for patients with OCSCC by refined compartmentalization of the treatment volume. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study identified 103 OCSCC patients treated surgically from 2014 to 2019 with a loco-regional risk profile qualifying for PORT according to guidelines. PORT was administered only to the at-risk compartment and according to a refined compartmentalization concept (CC). Oncological outcome of this CC cohort was compared to a historical cohort (HC) of 98 patients treated before the CC was implemented. Results Median follow-up time was 4.5 and 4.8 years in the CC and HC cohorts, respectively. In the CC cohort, a total of 72 of 103 patients (70%) had a pathological risk profile that allowed for further compartmentalization and, hence, received a reduced treatment volume or omission of PORT altogether. Loco-regional control at 3 and 5 years was 77% and 73% in the CC cohort versus 78% and 73% in the HC (p = 0.93), progression-free survival was 72% and 64% versus75% and 68% (p = 0.58), respectively. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was seen in other outcome measures. Conclusions De-intensified PORT limiting the treatment volume to the at-risk compartment or avoiding PORT altogether for low-risk patients with OCSCC does not seem to compromise disease control in this retrospective comparison. Based on these hypothesis-generating findings, a prospective study is being planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Waser
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simon A. Mueller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Z, Zhang WB, Wang Y, Mao C, Guo CB, Peng X. Neck management of pathological N1 oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 52:735-743. [PMID: 36376175 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
This study was performed to compare the effects of neck dissection procedures on the prognosis of patients with pathological N1 (pN1) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), analyse factors affecting the prognosis, and provide a neck management strategy for clinical N1 (cN1) oral cancer. The study patients were divided into two groups according to the neck dissection: a selective neck dissection (SND) group (n = 85) and a radical or modified radical neck dissection (RND/MRND) group (n = 22). There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates at local, regional, and distant sites between the SND and RND/MRND groups. The 5-year overall survival was 68.3% for SND and 65.2% for RND/MRND patients (P = 0.590), while the 5-year disease-specific survival was 70.4% for SND and 75.7% for RND/MRND patients (P = 0.715). Histological grade and postoperative radiotherapy were independent predictors of the outcome for SND patients. For histological grade II/III cases, 5-year overall survival (P = 0.004) and disease-specific survival (P = 0.002) outcomes differed significantly between patients treated with and without postoperative radiotherapy, with worse survival for patients not treated with radiotherapy. Therefore, SND appears appropriate for cN1 OSCC patients, and postoperative radiotherapy is recommended for those with histological grade II or III tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Chen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratoryfor Dental Materials
| | - W-B Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratoryfor Dental Materials
| | - Y Wang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratoryfor Dental Materials
| | - C Mao
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratoryfor Dental Materials
| | - C-B Guo
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratoryfor Dental Materials
| | - X Peng
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratoryfor Dental Materials.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kämmerer PW, Tribius S, Cohrs L, Engler G, Ettl T, Freier K, Frerich B, Ghanaati S, Gosau M, Haim D, Hartmann S, Heiland M, Herbst M, Hoefert S, Hoffmann J, Hölzle F, Howaldt HP, Kreutzer K, Leonhardt H, Lutz R, Moergel M, Modabber A, Neff A, Pietzka S, Rau A, Reichert TE, Smeets R, Sproll C, Steller D, Wiltfang J, Wolff KD, Kronfeld K, Al-Nawas B. Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity or Oropharynx and Solitary Ipsilateral Lymph Node Metastasis (pN1)—A Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061833. [PMID: 36980719 PMCID: PMC10047283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Evaluation of impact of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity/oropharynx (OSCC) of up to 4 cm (pT1/pT2) and solitary ipsilateral lymph node metastasis (pN1). A non-irradiated group with clinical follow-up was chosen for control, and survival and quality of life (QL) were compared; (2) Methods: This prospective multicentric comprehensive cohort study included patients with resected OSCC (pT1/pT2, pN1, and cM0) who were allocated into adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) or observation. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and QL after surgery; (3) Results: Out of 27 centers, 209 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 3.4 years. An amount of 137 patients were in the observation arm, and 72 received adjuvant irradiation. Overall survival did not differ between groups (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98 [0.55–1.73], p = 0.94). There were fewer neck metastases (HR 0.34 [0.15–0.77]; p = 0.01), as well as fewer local recurrences (HR 0.41 [0.19–0.89]; p = 0.02) under adjuvant RT. For QL, irradiated patients showed higher values for the symptom scale pain after 0.5, two, and three years (all p < 0.05). After six months and three years, irradiated patients reported higher symptom burdens (impaired swallowing, speech, as well as teeth-related problems (all p < 0.05)). Patients in the RT group had significantly more problems with mouth opening after six months, one, and two years (p < 0.05); (4) Conclusions: Adjuvant RT in patients with early SCC of the oral cavity and oropharynx does not seem to influence overall survival, but it positively affects progression-free survival. However, irradiated patients report a significantly decreased QL up to three years after therapy compared to the observation group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peer W. Kämmerer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery—Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Silke Tribius
- Hermann-Holthusen-Institute for Radiation Oncology, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lena Cohrs
- Department of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Gabriel Engler
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University of Giessen and Marburg, UKGM, Campus Marburg, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Ettl
- Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kolja Freier
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str., 66424 Homburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Schillingallee 35, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Shahram Ghanaati
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Martin Gosau
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Haim
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Hartmann
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuel Herbst
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Rhabanusstraße 4, 55118 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hoefert
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Osianderstraße 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Hölzle
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstraße 33, 35392 Gießen, Germany
| | - Kilian Kreutzer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Henry Leonhardt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Rainer Lutz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstraße 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Moergel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery—Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ali Modabber
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Andreas Neff
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University of Giessen and Marburg, UKGM, Campus Marburg, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Pietzka
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Andrea Rau
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstraße 8, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Torsten E. Reichert
- Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Smeets
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Sproll
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Steller
- Department of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jörg Wiltfang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
- Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Langerstraße 3, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Kai Kronfeld
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Bilal Al-Nawas
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery—Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adjuvant Radiotherapy Significantly Increases Neck Control and Survival in Early Oral Cancer Patients with Solitary Nodal Involvement: A National Cancer Registry Database Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153742. [PMID: 34359643 PMCID: PMC8345217 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We assessed the role of adjuvant radiotherapy on neck control and survival in patients with early oral cancer with solitary nodal involvement. We identified pT1-2N1 oral cancer patients with or without adjuvant radiotherapy from the 2007-2015 Taiwan Cancer Registry database. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on 5-year neck control, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analysis. Of 701 patients identified, 505 (72.0%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 196 (28.0%) had surgery alone. Patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were more likely to be aged <65 years, pT2 stage, poorly graded and without comorbid conditions (all, p < 0.05). The 5-year OS and DFS differed significantly by receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy. Multivariable analysis showed adjuvant radiotherapy significantly associated with better 5-year OS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-0.97; p = 0.0288) and DFS (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84; p = 0.0016). Stratified analysis indicated the greatest survival advantage for both 5-year OS and DFS in those with pT2 classification (p = 0.0097; 0.0009), and non-tongue disease (p = 0.0195; 0.0158). Moreover, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly protected against neck recurrence (aHR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.51; p < 0.0001). Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improved neck control and survival in these early oral cancer patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Margalit DN, Sacco AG, Cooper JS, Ridge JA, Bakst RL, Beadle BM, Beitler JJ, Chang SS, Chen AM, Galloway TJ, Koyfman SA, Mita C, Robbins JR, Tsai CJ, Truong MT, Yom SS, Siddiqui F. Systematic review of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria. Head Neck 2021; 43:367-391. [PMID: 33098180 PMCID: PMC7756212 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this systematic review are to (a) evaluate the current literature on the impact of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes and (b) identify the optimal evidence-based postoperative therapy recommendations for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. METHODS An analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Prospective studies and methodology-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses of postoperative therapy for SCCHN were identified by searching Medline (OVID) and EMBASE (Elsevier) using controlled vocabulary terms (ie, National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings [MeSH], EMTREE). Study screening and selection was performed with Covidence software and full-text review. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriate use of postoperative therapy, and the modified Delphi method was used to come to consensus. RESULTS A total of 5660 studies were identified and screened using the title and abstract, leading to 201 studies assessed for relevance using full-text review. After limitation to the eligibility criteria, 101 studies from 1977 to 2020 were identified, including 77 with oncologic endpoints and 24 with function and quality of life endpoints. All studies reported staging prior to the implementation of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-8). CONCLUSIONS Prospective clinical studies and systematic reviews identified through the PRISMA systematic review provided good evidence for consensus statements regarding the appropriate use of postoperative therapy for resected SCCHN. Further research is needed in domains where consensus by the expert panel could not be achieved for the appropriateness of specific postoperative therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle N. Margalit
- Dana‐Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Beth M. Beadle
- Stanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carol Mita
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Minh T. Truong
- Boston University School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sue S. Yom
- University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu T, David M, Batstone M, Clark J, Low TH, Goldstein D, Hope A, Hosni A, Chua B. The utility of postoperative radiotherapy in intermediate-risk oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 50:143-150. [PMID: 32616305 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in improving outcomes remains debatable for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with pathological intermediate-risk factors (IRFs) after surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 432 intermediate-risk OSCC patients defined by histological reporting of close margin (<5mm), early nodal disease (pN1), depth of invasion/tumour thickness ≥5mm, perineural invasion, and/or lymphovascular invasion. Outcomes measured were disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). PORT was associated with an improvement in 5-year DFS on univariable analysis (80% vs 71%; P=0.044), but this did not remain significant on multivariable analysis. PORT was not associated with differences in DSS or OS. The surgical salvage rate was similar in the PORT and surgery-only groups (41% vs 47%; P=0.972). Perineural invasion was found to be an independent predictor of inferior DSS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.19), DFS (HR 1.89), and OS (HR 1.97). Significantly worse outcomes were observed for patients with ≥4 concurrent IRFs. The application of PORT was associated with lower rates of recurrence, but the benefit was less apparent on mortality. Patients with perineural invasion and multiple concurrent IRFs were found to be at greatest risk, representing a subset of intermediate-risk OSCC patients who may benefit from PORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Liu
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
| | - M David
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Batstone
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - J Clark
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - T-H Low
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - B Chua
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Evers C, Ostheimer C, Sieker F, Vordermark D, Medenwald D. Benefit from surgery with additional radiotherapy in N1 head and neck cancer at the time of IMRT: A population-based study on recent developments. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229266. [PMID: 32101560 PMCID: PMC7043743 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, the role of adjuvant irradiation in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with N1-lymph node status is not clarified. OBJECTIVES To assess the population-based effect of recent developments in radiotherapy such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in relation to overall survival (OS) together with surgery in N1 HNC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used 9,318 HNC cases with pT1/2 N0/1 disease from German cancer registries. Time of diagnosis ranged from January 2000 to December 2014, which we divided into three periods: (low [LIA] vs intermediate [IA] vs high [HIA] IMRT availability period) based on usage of IMRT in Germany. For each period, we examined a possible association between treatment (surgery vs. surgery and radiotherapy) in terms of OS. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression (models adjusted for HPV-related cancer site). RESULTS Temporal analysis revealed increasing usage of IMRT in Germany. In patients with N1 tumours, a comparison of patients treated with and without radiotherapy during the HIA period showed a superiority of the combined treatment as opposed to surgery alone (HR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.35-0.85, p = 0.003). The survival analyses related to treatments in terms of period underlined the superiority of surgery plus radiotherapy between periods IA and HIA (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION The advent of IMRT, additional radiotherapy may present a survival advantage in patients with N1 HNC when combined with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Evers
- Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
| | - Christian Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
| | - Frank Sieker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
| | - Daniel Medenwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ivaldi E, Di Mario D, Paderno A, Piazza C, Bossi P, Iacovelli NA, Incandela F, Locati L, Fallai C, Orlandi E. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for early oral cavity cancer (pT1-2,N0-1): A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 143:67-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
10
|
Wu SY, Wu ATH, Liu SH. MicroRNA-17-5p regulated apoptosis-related protein expression and radiosensitivity in oral squamous cell carcinoma caused by betel nut chewing. Oncotarget 2018; 7:51482-51493. [PMID: 27285985 PMCID: PMC5239490 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Betel nut chewing is associated with oral cavity cancer. Radiotherapy is one of the therapeutic approaches. Here, we used miR-17-5p antisense oligonucleotides (AS-ODNs) and human apoptosis protein array to clarify which apoptosis-related proteins are increased or decreased by miR-17-5p in betel nut chewing- oral squamous cell carcinoma OC3 cells. Furthermore, miR-17-5p AS-ODN was used to evaluate the radio-sensitization effects both in vitro and in vivo. An OC3 xenograft tumor model in severe combined immunodeficiency mice was used to determine the effect of miR-17-5p AS ODN on tumor irradiation. We simultaneously detected the relative expressions of 35 apoptosis-related proteins in irradiated OC3 cells that were treated with miR-17-5p AS-ODN or a control ODN. Several proteins, including p21, p53, TNF RI, FADD, cIAP-1, HIF-1α, and TRAIL R1, were found to be up- or downregulated by miR-17-5p in OC3 cells; their expression patterns were also confirmed by Western blotting. We further clarified the role of p53 in irradiated OC3 cells, using a p53 overexpression strategy. The results revealed that the enhancement of p53 expression significantly enhanced radiation-induced G2/M arrest of the OC3 cells. In the in vivo study, treatment of miR-17-5p AS-ODN before irradiation significantly enhanced p53 expression and reduced tumor growth. These results suggest that miR-17-5p increases or decreases apoptosis-related proteins in irradiated OC3 cells; its effect on p53 protein expression contributes to the modulation of the radiosensitivity of the OC3 cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szu-Yuan Wu
- Institute of Toxicology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Biotechnology, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Alexander T H Wu
- The Ph.D. Program for Translational Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shing-Hwa Liu
- Institute of Toxicology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Predicting Radiotherapy Necessity in Tongue Cancer Using Lymph Node Yield. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75:1062-1070. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
12
|
Barzan L, Talamini R, Franchin G, Pin M, Silvestrini M, Grando G, Galla S, Savignano MG, Armas G, Margiotta F, Vanoni V, Magri E, Grandi C. Effectiveness of selective neck dissection in head and neck cancer: The experience of two Italian centers. Laryngoscope 2015; 125:1849-55. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.25296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Revised: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Barzan
- Unit of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera “S. Maria degli Angeli”; Pordenone
| | | | - Giovanni Franchin
- Unit of Epidemioplogy and Biostatistics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS; Aviano
| | - Marco Pin
- Unit of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera “S. Maria degli Angeli”; Pordenone
| | | | - Giuseppe Grando
- Unit of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera “S. Maria degli Angeli”; Pordenone
| | | | | | | | - Francesco Margiotta
- Unit of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera “S. Maria degli Angeli”; Pordenone
| | - Valentina Vanoni
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliera “S. Chiara”; Trento Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pietschmann S, von Bueren AO, Henke G, Kerber MJ, Kortmann RD, Müller K. An individual patient data meta-analysis on characteristics, treatments and outcomes of the glioblastoma/gliosarcoma patients with central nervous system metastases reported in literature until 2013. J Neurooncol 2014; 120:451-7. [PMID: 25160993 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1596-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Dissemination of high-grade gliomas (WHO IV) has been investigated poorly so far. We conducted an extensive analysis of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)/gliosarcoma (GS) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases reported in literature until April 2013. PubMed and Web of Science searches for peer-reviewed articles pertaining to GBM/GS patients with metastatic disease were conducted using predefined keywords. Additionally, we performed hand search following the references from the selected papers. Cases in which the metastases exclusively occurred outside the CNS were excluded. 110 publications reporting on 189 patients were eligible. There was a significant increase in the number of reported cases over the last decades. We calculated a median overall survival from diagnosis of metastasis (from initial diagnosis of GBM/GS) of 3.0 ± 0.3 (11 ± 0.7) months. On univariate analyses, gender, age, the histological subtype, the time interval between initial diagnosis and the occurrence of metastases and the location of CNS metastasis (intracranial versus spinal and parenchymal versus leptomeningeal, respectively) did not influence survival after diagnosis of metastasis. There was no substantial treatment progress over the recent decades. GBM/GS with CNS metastasis are associated with a dismal prognosis. Crucial treatment progress is not evident. A central registry should be considered to consecutively gain more information about the ideal therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pietschmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu SY, Lin KC, Chiou JF, Jeng SC, Cheng WH, Chang CI, Lin WC, Wu LL, Lee HL, Chen RJ. MicroRNA-17-5p post-transcriptionally regulates p21 expression in irradiated betel quid chewing-related oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 189:675-83. [PMID: 23780339 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0347-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2012] [Accepted: 03/06/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Betel nut chewing is associated with oral cavity cancer in Taiwan. OC3 is an oral carcinoma cell line that was established from cells collected from a long-term betel nut chewer who does not smoke. After we found that microRNA-17-5p (miR-17-5p) is induced in OC3 cells, we used this cell line to examine the biological role(s) of this microRNA in response to exposure to ionizing radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A combined SYBR green-based real-time PCR and oligonucleotide ligation assay was used to examine the expression of the miR-17 polycistron in irradiated OC3 cells. The roles of miR-17-5p and p21 were evaluated with specific antisense oligonucleotides (ODN) that were designed and used to inhibit their expression. Expression of the p21 protein was evaluated by Western blotting. The clonogenic assay and annexin V staining were used to evaluate cell survival and apoptosis, respectively. Cells in which miR-17-5p was stably knocked down were used to create ectopic xenografts to evaluate in vivo the role of miR-17-5p. RESULTS A radiation dose of 5 Gy significantly increased miR-17-5p expression in irradiated OC3 cells. Inhibition of miR-17-5p expression enhanced the radiosensitivity of the OC3 cells. We found that miR-17-5p downregulates radiation-induced p21 expression in OC3 cells and, by using a tumor xenograft model, it was found that p21 plays a critical role in increasing the radiosensitivity of OC3 cells in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSION miR-17-5p is induced in irradiated OC3 cells and it downregulates p21 protein expression, contributing to the radioresistance of OC3 cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-Y Wu
- Department of Radiation-oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
The evolving role of selective neck dissection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 270:1195-202. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2153-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2012] [Accepted: 08/06/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|