Decreasing rates of major lower-extremity amputation in people with diabetes but not in those without: a nationwide study in Belgium

The effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

Negative pressure injury is one of the auxiliary methods of treating diabetes foot ulcers. It has been shown to be superior to conventional techniques in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Nevertheless, the results of observational research are still scarce. A systematic review of RCTs and observations was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and security of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) treatment for diabetes foot ulcers. Three English e-databases have been found for NPWT research. The meta-analyses of the comparative studies provided point estimates of results. Intermediate results were given as median and binary values were given in the form of odds ratios (OR). Seventeen trials, 13 RCTs and four randomized, controlled trials were found in the survey. Of these, 831 were treated with NPWT, 834 were treated with standard therapy. A total of 14 studies have been conducted to investigate the influence of NPWT on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers(DFU). In the study, NPWT was shown to speed up the healing of the wound in DFU patients(OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.72, 3.85 p < 0.0001). A subgroup analysis showed that NPWT was associated with an acceleration of the wound healing rate in 10 RCT trials (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.58, 3.89 p < 0.001). In the four nRCT trials, NPWT was also shown to speed up the healing of the wound(OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.03, 8.42 p = 0.04). In 11 studies, the influence of NPWT on amputations of diabetes mellitus (DM) foot ulcers was investigated. The results showed that NPWT was associated with a reduction in amputations (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.74 p = 0.0002).In a subgroup of RCT trials, nine RCT trials showed a reduction in amputations(OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43, 0.87 p = 0.007). In both nRCT trials, NPWT also showed a reduction in amputations (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00, 0.24 p = 0.001). Generally speaking, NPWT can help to heal the wound and lower the risk of amputations in people with diabetes. The subgroup analysis showed similar results for the RCT and non-RCT trials. NPWT can be used to treat diabetes foot ulcers caused by diabetes.

Lower Extremity Amputation Rates in People With Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Population Based Cohort Study in Zwolle Region, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

Lower extremity amputations are a major complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). In a previous Dutch study, the incident rate of major amputations was 89.2 per 100 000 person years. The primary aim of this study was to describe the lower extremity amputation rates in people with DM in the Zwolle region, where preventive and curative footcare is organised according to the guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). The secondary aim was to evaluate outcomes and underlying characteristics of these people.

METHODS

This was a retrospective regional population based cohort study. Data from all people with DM treated in primary and secondary care, living in the region Zwolle were collected. All amputations in the period 2017 to 2019 were analysed. Comparisons were made between those with and without an amputation.

RESULTS

In the analysis 5 915 people with DM were included, with a mean age of 67.8 (IQR 57.9, 75.9) years. Of those people, 47% were women and the median HbA1c was 53 (IQR 47, 62) mmol/mol. Over the three year study period 68 amputations were performed in 59 people: 46 minor, 22 major. This translated into an average annual crude amputation incidence rate of non-traumatic major and minor amputations of 41.5 and 86.9 per 100 000 person years among people with diabetes. Compared with those not undergoing amputations, those who underwent an amputation were more often men, older, mainly had T2DM, were treated in secondary care, had higher diastolic blood pressure, worse diabetic footcare profile, longer DM duration and higher HbA1c. At the end of the follow up, 111 people died: 96 (1.6%) without and 15 (25.4%) with amputations (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study provides detailed insight into the rate of amputations in Dutch people with diabetes in the region Zwolle. Compared with previous Dutch estimates, these data suggest a considerable decrease in the major amputation incidence rate.

Global trends in the incidence of hospital admissions for diabetes-related foot disease and amputations: a review of national rates in the 21st century

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Diabetic foot disease (DFD) is a leading cause of hospital admissions and amputations. Global trends in diabetes-related amputations have been previously reviewed, but trends in hospital admissions for multiple other DFD conditions have not. This review analysed the published incidence of hospital admissions for DFD conditions (ulceration, infection, peripheral artery disease [PAD], neuropathy) and diabetes-related amputations (minor and major) in nationally representative populations.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed publications between 1 January 2001 and 5 May 2022 using the terms 'diabetes', 'DFD', 'amputation', 'incidence' and 'nation'. Search results were screened and publications reporting the incidence of hospital admissions for a DFD condition or a diabetes-related amputation among a population representative of a country were included. Key data were extracted from included publications and initial rates, end rates and relative trends over time summarised using medians (ranges).

RESULTS

Of 2527 publications identified, 71 met the eligibility criteria, reporting admission rates for 27 countries (93% high-income countries). Of the included publications, 14 reported on DFD and 66 reported on amputation (nine reported both). The median (range) incidence of admissions per 1000 person-years with diabetes was 16.3 (8.4-36.6) for DFD conditions (5.1 [1.3-7.6] for ulceration; 5.6 [3.8-9.0] for infection; 2.5 [0.9-3.1] for PAD) and 3.1 (1.4-10.3) for amputations (1.2 [0.2-4.2] for major; 1.6 [0.3-4.3] for minor). The proportions of the reported populations with decreasing, stable and increasing admission trends were 80%, 20% and 0% for DFD conditions (50%, 0% and 50% for ulceration; 50%, 17% and 33% for infection; 67%, 0% and 33% for PAD) and 80%, 7% and 13% for amputations (80%, 17% and 3% for major; 52%, 15% and 33% for minor), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

These findings suggest that hospital admission rates for all DFD conditions are considerably higher than those for amputations alone and, thus, the more common practice of reporting admission rates only for amputations may substantially underestimate the burden of DFD. While major amputation rates appear to be largely decreasing, this is not the case for hospital admissions for DFD conditions or minor amputation in many populations. However, true global conclusions are limited because of a lack of consistent definitions used to identify admission rates for DFD conditions and amputations, alongside a lack of data from low- and middle-income countries. We recommend that these areas are addressed in future studies.

REGISTRATION

This review was registered in the Open Science Framework database ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4TZFJ ).

Global estimates of diabetes-related amputations incidence in 2010-2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

This study sought to provide up-to-date pooled global estimates of diabetes-related amputation incidence from 2010 to 2020.

METHODS

Embase and Medline databases were searched for studies reporting the incidence rate (IR) of diabetes-related amputations from 2010 to 2020. IR estimates of diabetes-related amputations with associated 95% confidence interval (CI) per 100,000 individuals with diabetes were calculated.

RESULTS

23 studies were included, reporting 505,390 diabetes-related lower extremity amputations. IR of minor amputations was 139.97 (95% CI 88.18-222.16) per 100,000 individuals with diabetes, among patients with type 1 diabetes was 148.59 (95% CI 65.00-339.68) and in type 2 diabetes was 75.53 (95% CI 29.94-190.54). IR of major amputations was 94.82 (95% CI 56.62-158.80) per 100,000 individuals with diabetes, among patients with type 1 diabetes was 100.76 (95% CI 53.71-189.01) and among type 2 diabetes was 40.58 (95% CI 11.03-149.28). There were 83.84 annual amputations (95% CI 41.67-168.65) per 100,000 women with diabetes and 178.04 (95% CI 81.16-390.55) per 100,000 men.

CONCLUSIONS

Globally, annual incidence of diabetes-related amputations from 2010 to 2020 has shown to disproportionately affect men and individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus, although its incidence is not uniform across countries.

Temporal trends in patients with peripheral artery disease influenced by diabetes mellitus in Germany

INTRODUCTION

In patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Because huge efforts are made to improve medical care of patients with DM including chronic disease programs, the aim of the present study was to investigate temporal trends regarding the clinical burden of DM on PAD patients within a 15-year observational period.

METHODS

We analyzed all patients hospitalized because of PAD between 2005 and 2019 in Germany stratified regarding DM.

RESULTS

Overall, 2 654 871 hospitalizations of PAD patients (865 823 with DM) were included. Hospitalizations based on PAD inclined from 142 778 in 2005 to 190 135 in 2019 (β 3956 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3034-4878, p < .001) with simultaneous increase of hospitalizations of PAD patients with DM (2005: 41609 (29.1%) versus 2019: 65 302 (34.3%); β 2019 per year [95% CI 1593-2446], p < .001). Amputation rates (β -0.42 [95% CI -0.44 to -0.40]; p < .001) as well as in-hospital case-fatality rate (2005: 4.7%, 2019: 2.8%; β -0.64 [95% CI -0.69 to -0.59]; p < .001) decreased in diabetic PAD patients during the observational time. In spite of improved morbidity and mortality in the last years of the observational period, patients with DM still suffered from an increased risk for morbidity and mortality during the observational period compared to nondiabetic PAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the progress in DM treatments, DM still was associated with an unfavorable clinical patient profile and remained a substantial risk factor for morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients with PAD and DM in Germany between 2005 and 2019.

Temporal trends in major, minor and recurrent lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Belgium from 2009 to 2018

AIMS

This study assessed temporal trends in the incidence of lower extremity amputations (LEA) in Belgium from 2009 to 2018, and subsequent secondary amputation rates.

METHODS

Nationwide data on LEA were collected. Sex- and age-adjusted annual incidence rates were calculated. Time trends were analysed in negative binomial models. The incidence of secondary interventions, defined as either any ipsilateral reamputation or any contralateral amputation, was studied with death as competing risk.

RESULTS

41 304 amputations were performed (13 247 major, 28 057 minor). In individuals with diabetes, the amputation rate (first amputation per patient per year) decreased from 143.6/100.000 person-years to 109.7 (IRR 0.97 per year, 95 %CI 0.96-0.98, p < 0.001). The incidence of major LEAs decreased from 56.2 to 30.7 (IRR 0.93, 95 %CI 0.91-0.94, p < 0.001); the incidence of minor amputations showed a non-significant declining trend in women (54.3 to 45.0/100 000 person years, IRR 0.97 per year, 95 %CI 0.96-0.99), while this remained stable in men with diabetes (149.2 to 135.3/100 000 person years, IRR 1.00 per year, 95 %CI 0.98-1.01). In individuals without diabetes, the incidence of major amputation didn't change significantly, whereas minor amputation incidence increased (8.0 to 10.6, IRR 1.04, 95 %CI 1.03-1.05, p < 0.001). In individuals with diabetes, one-year secondary intervention rates were high (31.3% after minor, 18.4% after major LEA); the incidence of secondary amputations didn't change.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant decline in the incidence rate of major LEA was observed in people with diabetes. This decline was not accompanied by a significant rise in minor LEA. The incidence of secondary interventions remained stable.

Trends of Non-Traumatic Lower-Extremity Amputation and Type 2 Diabetes: Spain, 2001-2019

(1) Background: To examine trends in the incidence (2001–2019), clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes following major and minor non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Spain, assessing possible sex differences. (2) Methods: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate incidence trends, and multivariable logistic regression to estimate factors associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM). (3) Results: LEA was coded in 129,059 patients with T2DM (27.16% in women). Minor LEAs accounted for 59.72% of amputations, and major LEAs comprised 40.28%. The adjusted incidences of minor and major LEAs were higher in men than in women (IRR 3.51; 95%CI 3.46–3.57 and IRR 1.98; 95%CI 1.94–2.01, respectively). In women, joinpoint regression showed that age-adjusted incidence of minor LEAs remained stable over time, and for major LEAs, it decreased from 2006 to 2019. In men, incidences of minor and major LEAs decreased significantly from 2004 to 2019. In-hospital mortality (IHM) increased with age and the presence of comorbidity, such as heart failure (OR 5.11; 95%CI 4.61–5.68, for minor LEAs and OR 2.91; 95%CI 2.71–3.13 for major LEAs). Being a woman was associated with higher IHM after minor and major LEA (OR 1.3; 95%CI 1.17–1.44 and OR 1.18; 95%CI 1.11–1.26, respectively). (4) Conclusions: Our data showed major sex differences indicating decreasing and increasing LEA trends among men and women, respectively; furthermore, women presented significantly higher IHM after minor and major LEA procedures than men.

Lower Limb Amputation Rates in Germany

Background and Objectives: The current epidemiology of lower limb amputations is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine (1) lower extremity amputation rates as a function of age, gender, and amputation level between 2015 and 2019, (2) main diagnoses indicating amputation, (3) revision rates after lower extremity amputation. Materials and Methods: Lower extremity amputation rates were quantified based on annual Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS) and International Classifications of Disease (ICD)-10 codes from all German medical institutions between 2015 through 2019, provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). Results: In 2019, 62,016 performed amputations were registered in Germany. Out of these 16,452 procedures (26.5%) were major amputations and 45,564 patients (73.5%) underwent minor amputations. Compared to 2015, the incidence of major amputations decreased by 7.3% to 24.2/100,000 inhabitants, whereas the incidence of minor amputation increased by 11.8% to 67.1/100,000 inhabitants. Highest incidence was found for male patients aged 80-89 years. Patients were mainly diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease (50.7% for major and 35.7% for minor amputations) and diabetes mellitus (18.5% for major and 44.2% for minor amputations). Conclusions: Lower limb amputations remain a serious problem. Further efforts in terms of multidisciplinary team approaches and patient optimization strategies are required to reduce lower limb amputation rates.

Foot Ulcer and Risk of Lower Limb Amputation or Death in People With Diabetes: A National Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe incidence of foot ulceration and amputation-free survival associated with foot ulceration status in a national population-based cohort study of people with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study population included 233,459 people with diabetes who were alive in Scotland on 1 January 2012 identified from the national population-based register (national prevalence 4.9%). Characteristics of patients identified from linked hospital and mortality records during follow-up to the end of November 2017 were compared by outcome. Cox regression was used to assess the association between history of foot ulcer and amputation-free survival.

RESULTS

The population included 23,395 people with type 1 diabetes and 210,064 people with type 2 diabetes. In total there were 13,093 (5.6%) people who had a previous foot ulceration, 9,023 people who developed a first ulcer, 48,995 who died, and 2,866 who underwent minor or major amputation during follow-up. Overall incidence of first-time foot ulcers was 7.8 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI7.6-7.9) and 11.2 (11.0-11.4) for any ulcer. Risk factors for reduced amputation-free survival included social deprivation, mental illness, and being underweight in addition to conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were 2.09 (1.89-2.31) for type 1 diabetes and 1.65 (1.60-1.70) for type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of foot ulceration in a population-based study of people with diabetes was 11.2 per 1,000 person-years. Foot ulceration is associated with lower amputation-free survival rate, a potential measure of effectiveness of care among people with diabetes. Mental illness and social deprivation are also highlighted as risk factors.

National Rates of Lower Extremity Amputation in People With and Without Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population: a Ten Year Study in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

Population level data from Asia on amputation rates in people with and without diabetes are extremely limited. Hence it is unclear how the rising diabetes prevalence in Asia has affected the amputation burden. The present study examined national amputation rates in people with and without diabetes in Singapore from 2008 to 2017 in the context of increasing diabetes prevalence and health system changes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using national population data for ages 16 - 100 years obtained from the Ministry of Health Singapore administrative datasets. Age sex standardised major and toe/ray amputation rates per 100 000 people with diabetes and per 100 000 people without diabetes were calculated. Rates were calculated overall and in each ethnic group (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Others), with trends over time calculated using joinpoint trend analysis. In addition, age specific rates, relative risk (RR) of amputation in diabetics compared with non-diabetics and proportion of amputations in the population attributable to diabetes were also calculated.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, the database included 3.6 million unique individuals, of whom 75% were Chinese, 8.6% Malay, 7.9% Indian, and 8.4% Others. Of those, 413 486 (11%) had diabetes. Major amputation rates in people with diabetes remained stable (2008: 99.5/100 000; 2017: 95.0/100 000 people with diabetes, p = .91) as did toe/ray amputation rates. Rates in people without diabetes were substantially lower, with major amputation rates decreasing significantly (2008: 3.0/100 000; 2017: 2.1/100 000 people without diabetes, 3% annual reduction, p = .048). Diabetes related amputation rates were highest in Malays and lowest in Chinese. Diabetes related major amputation rates declined significantly among Chinese (3.1% annual reduction, p < .038). While the RR for amputations in diabetes remained stable, the proportion of major amputations attributable to diabetes increased from 63.6% in 2008 to 81.7% in 2017 (3% annual increase, p = .003).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes related major and toe/ray amputation rates have remained stable but relatively high in Singapore compared with other countries, and the proportion of amputations attributable to diabetes has increased over time. More research is needed to understand the aetiopathological, sociocultural, and health system factors that may underlie the continued high rates of diabetes related amputations in this population.

Incidence of lower limb amputation in people with and without diabetes: a nationwide 5-year cohort study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to investigate the incidence and time trend of lower limb amputation (LLA) among people with and without diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective population-based cohort study was based on the national claims data in Japan, comprising a total population of 150 million. Data of all individuals who had LLA from April 2013 to March 2018 were obtained. We analysed the sex-adjusted and age-adjusted annual LLA rate (every fiscal year) in people with and without diabetes for major and minor amputation. To test for time trend, Poisson regression models were fitted.

RESULTS

In the 5-year period, 30 187 major and 29 299 minor LLAs were performed in Japan. The sex-adjusted and age-adjusted incidence of major and minor LLAs was 9.5 (people with diabetes, 21.8 vs people without diabetes, 2.3, per 100 000 person-years) and 14.9 (people with diabetes, 28.4 vs people without diabetes, 1.9, per 100 000 person-years) times higher, respectively, in people with diabetes compared with those without. A significant decline in the annual major amputation rate was observed (p<0.05) and the annual minor amputation rate remained stable (p=0.63) when sex, age and people with and without diabetes were included as dependent variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of the national statistics of LLAs in Japan. The incidence of major and minor LLAs was 10 and 15 times higher, respectively, in people with diabetes compared with those without. A significant decline in the major amputation rate was observed, and the annual minor amputation rate remained stable during the observation period. This information can help to create an effective national healthcare strategy for preventing limb amputations, which affect the quality of life of patients with diabetes and add to the national healthcare expenditure.

Evaluating the Impact of the Diabetes Mellitus Strategy for the National Health System: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

(1) Background: Diabetes mellitus is a significant public health problem. Macrovascular complications (stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and lower limb amputations (LLAs) represent the leading cause of morbi-mortality in DM. This work aims to evaluate the impact of the approval of the Diabetes Mellitus Strategy of the National Health System (SDM-NHS) on hospitalizations for those macrovascular complications related to DM; (2) Methods: Interrupted time series applying segmented regression models (Negative Binomial) adjusted for seasonality to data from hospital discharge records with a primary or secondary diagnosis of DM (code 250 ICD9MC); (3) Results: Between 2001 and 2015, there have been 7,302,750 hospital discharges with a primary or secondary diagnosis of DM. After the approval of the SDM-NHS, all the indicators showed a downward trend, modifying the previous trend in the indicators of AMI and LLA. The indicators of stroke and AMI also showed an immediate reduction in their rates; (4) Conclusions: After the approval of the SDM-NHS, an improvement has been observed in all the indicators of macrovascular complications of DM evaluated, although it is difficult to establish a causal relationship between the strategy and the effects observed. Interrupted time series is applicable for evaluating the impact of interventions in public health when experimental designs are not possible.

Reduction in Diabetes-Related Major Amputation Rates After Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Model: An Evaluation in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND

Diabetes-related lower limb amputations (LLAs) are a major complication that can be reduced by employing multidisciplinary center frameworks such as the Toe and Flow model (TFM). In this study, we investigate the LLAs reduction efficacy of the TFM compared to the standard of care (SOC) in the Canadian health-care system.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the anonymized diabetes-related LLA reports (2007-2017) in Calgary and Edmonton metropolitan health zones in Alberta, Canada. Both zones have the same provincial health-care coverage and similar demographics; however, Calgary operates based on the TFM while Edmonton with the provincial SOC. LLAs were divided into minor and major amputation cohorts and evaluated using the chi-square test, linear regression. A lower major LLAs rate was denoted as a sign for higher efficacy of the system.

RESULTS

Although LLAs numbers remained relatively comparable (Calgary: 2238 and Edmonton: 2410), the Calgary zone had both significantly lower major (45%) and higher minor (42%) amputation incidence rates compared to the Edmonton zone. The increasing trend in minor LLAs and decreasing major LLAs in the Calgary zone were negatively and significantly correlated (r = -0.730, p = 0.011), with no significant correlation in the Edmonton zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Calgary's decreasing diabetes-related major LLAs and negative correlation in the minor-major LLAs rates compared to its sister zone Edmonton, provides support for the positive impact of the TFM. This investigation includes support for a modernization of the diabetes-related limb preservation practice in Canada by implementing TFMs across the country to combat major LLAs.

Malnutrition according to the 2018 GLIM criteria is highly prevalent in people with a diabetic foot ulcer but does not affect outcome

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition in people admitted for a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and to assess the relationship between malnutrition and DFU severity and outcome.

METHODS

This prospective, observational cohort study included individuals consecutively admitted for a DFU between July 2016 and September 2019. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria determined the prevalence of malnutrition. The SINBAD score reflected DFU severity. Outcome was evaluated at discharge and at 6 months. The independent contribution of nutritional status on DFU severity and outcome was investigated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were included. Malnutrition, as defined by the GLIM criteria, was diagnosed in 26 cases; malnutrition was moderate in 9 and severe in 17. DFU severity differed significantly between subjects with malnutrition versus without malnutrition (SINBAD: 3.85 vs. 3.81, p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis showed that severe malnutrition (p = 0.015) and hemoglobin level (p = 0.003) were independently linked to DFU severity. At 6-month follow-up, 39 DFU were healed, 36 patients had undergone an amputation (32 minor, 4 major) and 8 had died. No differences were noted in outcome at discharge or at 6 months according to nutritional status.

CONCLUSIONS

In 24% of patients, malnutrition was diagnosed. Severely malnourished individuals presented with more severe ulcers. However, malnutrition had no impact on the short-term outcome of a DFU.

Quantifying Step Count and Oxygen Consumption with Portable Technology during the 2-Min Walk Test in People with Lower Limb Amputation

Step counts and oxygen consumption have yet to be reported during the 2-min walk test (2MWT) test in persons with lower-limb amputations (LLA). The purpose of this study was to determine step counts and oxygen consumption during the 2MWT in LLA. Thirty-five men and women walked for two minutes as quickly as possible while wearing activity monitors (ActiGraph Link on the wrist (LW) and ankle (LA), Garmin vivofit^®3 on the wrist (VW) and ankle (VA), and a modus StepWatch on the ankle (SA), and a portable oxygen analyzer. The StepWatch on the ankle (SA) and the vivofit3 on the wrist (VW) had the least error and best accuracy of the activity monitors studied. While there were no significant differences in distance walked, oxygen consumption (VO₂) or heart rate (HR) between sexes or level of amputation (p > 0.05), females took significantly more steps than males (p = 0.034), and those with unilateral transfemoral amputations took significantly fewer steps than those with unilateral transtibial amputations (p = 0.023). The VW and SA provided the most accurate step counts among the activity monitors and were not significantly different than hand counts. Oxygen consumption for all participants during the 2MWT was 8.9 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min, which is lower than moderate-intensity activity. While some may argue that steady-state activity has not yet been reached in the 2MWT, it may also be possible participants are not walking as fast as they can, thereby misclassifying their performance to a lower standard.

Modern multidisciplinary team approach is crucial in treatment for critical limb threatening ischemia

The aim of this study was to provide a brief overview of the history the multidisciplinary team approach, highlighting the benefit to the patient with critical limb threatening ischemia in relation to health care economics. Furthermore, we provided a description of the requisites and key components, showing how to build a multidisciplinary team.

Amputations of Lower Limb in Subjects with Diabetes Mellitus: Reasons and 30-Day Mortality

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot is one of the leading causes of patient disability worldwide. Lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) resulting from this disease massively decrease quality of life, the function of the patient, and incur significant healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to assess trends in the number of amputations, the diagnosis at discharge, and diagnosis-related mortality after LEA procedures in a nationwide population.

METHODS

Datasets of the National Heath Fund containing information about all services within the public healthcare system in Poland, spanning the years 2010-2019, were analyzed. The source of data regarding mortality was the database of the Polish Ministry of Digital Affairs.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2019, the annual number of amputations in patients with diabetes increased significantly from 5,049 to 7,759 (p for trend < 0.000001). However, the number of amputations in patients with diabetes calculated as a number per 100,000 diabetics decreased significantly (p for trend < 0.0005) during this period. Amputations in patients with diabetes accounted for a majority of all amputations; the mean percentage of amputations in patients with diabetes was 68.6% of all amputations (from 61.1% in 2010 to 71.4% in 2019, p for trend < 0.0000001). The most common disease diagnosed at discharge after LEA in diabetic patients was diabetes itself. Vascular pathologies, such as soft-tissue/bone/joint infections and ulcerations, were the next most common. The 30-day mortality rate after LEA was rather high in patients with, as well as without, diabetes (depending on the cause for amputation 3.5-34% and 2.2-28.99%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of LEA in patients with diabetes in Poland increased substantially between 2010 and 2019 along with an increasing number of diabetics. Vascular pathologies, infections, and ulcerations were the most common causes of LEA. The 30-day mortality rate after amputation was rather high and varied depending on the diagnoses at discharge.

Twenty years with diabetes and amputations: a retrospective population-based cohort study

AIM

To investigate the trends in non-traumatic lower limb amputation in people with and without diabetes.

METHODS

From the Danish National Patient Register, all people with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes (n = 462 743) as well as a group of people without diabetes from the general population (n = 1 388 886) were identified and separated into three groups based on diabetes type. Among these, 17 265 amputations were identified between 1997 and 2017 and stratified into trans-femoral amputations, trans-tibial amputations and amputations below the ankle using surgical codes. Annual changes were described using least-squares linear regression.

RESULTS

The yearly mean decrease in incidence rate of amputation per 1000 person-years was -0.032 [95% CI: -0.062, -0.001], -0.022 [-0.032, -0.012] and -0.006 [-0.009, -0.003] for trans-femoral amputation, -0.072 [-0.093, -0.052], -0.090 [-0.102, -0.078] and -0.015 [-0.016, -0.013] for trans-tibial amputation, and -0.055 [-0.080, -0.020], -0.075 [-0.090, -0.060] and -0.011 [-0.014, -0.007] for amputation below the ankle in people with type 1 diabetes, people with type 2 diabetes and people without diabetes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Over recent decades, the incidence of amputation has decreased significantly in people with diabetes and in the general population without diabetes.

Secular trends in rates of hospitalisation for lower extremity amputation and 1 year mortality in people with diabetes in Hong Kong, 2001-2016: a retrospective cohort study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to describe trends in rates of hospitalisation for lower extremity amputation (LEA) and 1 year mortality rates after LEA in people with diabetes in Hong Kong between 2001 and 2016.

METHODS

The Hong Kong Diabetes Surveillance Database is a territory-wide population-based diabetes cohort (N = 770,078) identified from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority electronic medical system. We identified LEA events using ICD-9 procedure codes and 1 year mortality after LEA from linkage to the Hong Kong Death Registry. Joinpoint regression models were used to describe the trends.

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2016, 6113 hospitalisations for LEAs in men and 4149 in women were recorded in the Hong Kong Diabetes Surveillance Database. The rates of minor LEAs declined by 48.6% (average annual per cent change [AAPC]: -3.8; 95% CI -5.7, -1.9) in men and by 59.5% (AAPC: -6.3; 95% CI -10.6, -1.8) in women. The rates of major LEAs declined by 77.9% (AAPC: -8.0; 95% CI -9.6, -6.5) in men and by 79.3% (AAPC: -10.4; 95% CI -13.1, -7.6) in women. The cumulative 1 year mortality rates after minor and major LEAs were 18.5% and 41.8% in men, and 21.3% and 42.0% in women, respectively, for the whole period. No change was detected in 1 year mortality rates during the surveillance in both sexes.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Although hospitalisation rates for LEAs have declined overall in people with diabetes, there were no improvements in 1 year mortality rates after LEA. Continuous efforts are needed to further prevent LEAs and improve the survival rate of people undergoing LEAs. Graphical abstract.

Less amputations for diabetic foot ulcer from 2008 to 2014, hospital management improved but substantial progress is still possible: A French nationwide study

Objective

To assess the improvement in the management of diabetes and its complications based on the evolution of hospitalisation rates for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and lower extremity amputation (LEA) in individuals with diabetes in France.

Methods

Data were provided by the French national health insurance general scheme from 2008 to 2014. Hospitalisations for DFU and LEA were extracted from the SNIIRAM/SNDS French medical and administrative database.

Results

In 2014, 22,347 hospitalisations for DFU and 8,342 hospitalisations for LEA in patients with diabetes were recorded. Between 2008 and 2014, the standardised rate of hospitalisation for DFU raised from 508 to 701/100,000 patients with diabetes. In the same period, the standardised rate of LEA decreased from 301 to 262/100,000 patients with diabetes. The level of amputation tended to become more distal. The proportion of men (69% versus 73%) and the frequency of revascularization procedures (39% versus 46%) increased. In 2013, the one-year mortality rate was 23% after hospitalisation for DFU and 26% after hospitalisation for LEA.

Conclusions

For the first time in France, the incidence of a serious complication of diabetes, i.e. amputations, has decreased in relation with a marked improvement in hospital management.

National and State-Level Trends in Nontraumatic Lower-Extremity Amputation Among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries With Diabetes, 2000-2017

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes is a leading cause of nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (NLEA) in the U.S. After a period of decline, some national U.S. data have shown that diabetes-related NLEAs have recently increased, particularly among young and middle-aged adults. However, the trend for older adults is less clear.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

To examine NLEA trends among older adults with diabetes (≥67 years), we used 100% Medicare claims for beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A and B, also known as fee for service (FFS). NLEA was defined as the highest-level amputation per patient per calendar year. Annual NLEA rates were estimated from 2000 to 2017 and stratified by age-group, sex, race/ethnicity, NLEA level (toe, foot, below-the-knee amputation [BKA], or above-the-knee amputation [AKA]), and state. All rates were age and sex standardized to the 2000 Medicare population. Trends over time were assessed using Joinpoint regression and annual percent change (APC) reported.

RESULTS

NLEA rates (per 1,000 people with diabetes) decreased by half from 8.5 in 2000 to 4.4 in 2009 (APC -7.9, P < 0.001). However, from 2009 onward, NLEA rates increased to 4.8 (APC 1.2, P < 0.01). Trends were similar across most age, sex, and race/ethnic groups, but absolute rates were highest in the oldest age-groups, Blacks, and men. By NLEA type, overall increases were driven by increases in rates of toe and foot NLEAs, while BKA and AKA continued to decline. The majority of U.S. states showed recent increases in NLEA, similar to national estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of the U.S. Medicare FFS population shows that recent increases in diabetes-related NLEAs are also occurring in older populations but at a less severe rate than among younger adults (<65 years) in the general population. Preventive foot care has been shown to reduce rates of NLEA among adults with diabetes, and the findings of the study suggest that those with diabetes-across the age spectrum-could benefit from increased attention to this strategy.

Diabetes Update 2020: das Wichtigste für die ärztliche Praxis

Bei der virtuellen Veranstaltung Diabetes Update 2020 wurden zahlreiche neue Erkenntnisse und Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik, Therapie und Management des Diabetes und benachbarter Themen vorgestellt, von denen die Bereiche Typ-2-Diabetes, Diabetes und Herz, Diabetes und Schwangerschaft sowie Impfungen im aktuellen Heft von Der Diabetologe in separaten Beiträgen ausführlich beschrieben werden. Im Folgenden sollen die aus Sicht des Autors wichtigsten und für die Praxis relevantesten Neuigkeiten aus den anderen referierten diabetesbezogenen Themengebieten in aller Kürze wiedergegeben werden.

Population-based secular trends in lower-extremity amputation for diabetes and peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The evolving clinical burden of limb loss secondary to diabetes and peripheral artery disease remains poorly characterized. We sought to examine secular trends in the rate of lower-extremity amputations related to diabetes, peripheral artery disease or both.

METHODS

We included all individuals aged 40 years and older who underwent lower-extremity amputations related to diabetes or peripheral artery disease in Ontario, Canada (2005-2016). We identified patients and amputations through deterministic linkage of administrative health databases. Quarterly rates (per 100 000 individuals aged ≥ 40 yr) of any (major or minor) amputation and of major amputations alone were calculated. We used time-series analyses with exponential smoothing models to characterize secular trends and forecast 2 years forward in time.

RESULTS

A total of 20 062 patients underwent any lower-extremity amputation, of which 12 786 (63.7%) underwent a major (above ankle) amputation. Diabetes was present in 81.8%, peripheral artery disease in 93.8%, and both diabetes and peripheral artery disease in 75.6%. The rate of any amputation initially declined from 9.88 to 8.62 per 100 000 between Q2 of 2005 and Q4 of 2010, but increased again by Q1 of 2016 to 10.0 per 100 000 (p = 0.003). We observed a significant increase in the rate of any amputation among patients with diabetes, peripheral artery disease, and both diabetes and peripheral artery disease. Major amputations did not significantly change among patients with diabetes, peripheral artery disease or both.

INTERPRETATION

Lower-extremity amputations related to diabetes, peripheral artery disease or both have increased over the last decade. These data support renewed efforts to prevent and decrease the burden of limb loss.

NPWT in diabetic foot wounds-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

PURPOSE

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an adjunct modality in diabetic foot ulcerations (DFUs). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown its advantage over standard approaches; however, data from observational studies remain scarce.We performed a systematic review of observational non-RCTs evaluating NPWT efficacy and safety in patients with DFU.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for observational studies involving NPWT. The results of single-arm studies were presented as percentages of patients with the outcome of interest. A meta-analysis of comparative studies provided point estimates of outcomes. Continuous outcomes were reported as either weighted or standardized mean differences and dichotomous data as relative risks (RR).

RESULTS

The search identified 16 relevant observational studies, 12 single-arm, and 4 comparative, reporting on a total of 18,449 patients with DFU, of whom 1882 were managed with NPWT. In the NPWT-treated patients, ulcers were larger (average size range 6.6-27.9 cm²), as compared with controls (≤3 cm²). The pooled results showed healing and major amputation in 51% and 5% of NPWT patients, respectively. The meta-analysis of comparative studies revealed lower risk of major amputation [RR = 0.23 (0.07; 0.80)] in NPWT-treated patients. The pooled results for healing rate and risk of any amputation were inconclusive due to large between-study heterogeneity. Overall, 6 deaths out of 158 patients were reported, none of them related to NPWT. Serious adverse events occurred in 6% of patients on NPWT.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review of observational studies provided supportive evidence that NWPT is an efficient and safe adjunct treatment in the management of DFUs.

Major amputations in type 2 diabetes between 2001 and 2015 in Spain: regional differences

Background

To analyze the trend of lower extremity major amputations (MA) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the Regions of Spain from year 2001 until 2015.

Methods

Descriptive study of 40,392 MA. Data were obtained from the national hospital discharge database in patients with T2DM. The incidence rate was calculated in each Region, in addition to the incidence ratios (IR) between annual incidence and incidence of the year 2001. The length of hospital stay and mortality risks were analyzed using regression models adjusted for sex, age and smoking.

Results

The major amputations incidence rate per 100,000 person-years was 0.48 in Spain; Canary Islands showed the highest incidence (0.81). The trend was a slight decrease or stability of the incidence in all Regions except in the Canary Islands (IR₂₀₁₅ = 2.0 [CI95% = 1.5, 2.6]) and in Madrid (IR₂₀₁₅ = 0.1 [CI95% = 0.1, 0.2]). Mortality after major amputations was 10% in Spain; Cantabria suffered the highest risk of death [1.7 (CI95% = 1.4; 2.1), p < 0.001] and La Rioja the lowest risk (0.5 [CI95% = 0.2; 0.9]; p = 0.026). The longest hospital stay was registered in the Canary Islands [(CI95% = 11.4;13.3], p < 0.001)], and the shortest in the Valencian Community [(CI95% = − 7.3; − 5.8), p < 0.001)].

Conclusion

MA in T2DM followed a growing trend in the Canary Islands, which diverged from the downward trend in Spain. The variability of mortality and hospital stay, suggest to review the clinical management in some Regions. Sudden incidence decrease in Madrid suggests checking the record procedures of hospital discharges.

[Expert assessment of lower extremity prosthetics]

Although the number of major amputations is declining throughout Germany, more than 57,000 surgical procedures for amputation still take place. As a consequence of high prosthetic care costs, these often lead to disputes before the social court in which expert medical opinions are required. With knowledge of the legal norms, the remit of the expert opinion can be fulfilled. The expert begins with evaluation of the patient's file and a search of the contested parts. The investigation includes a medical history, in addition to a physical examination, in order to be able to comment on the disputed beneficial use of the therapeutic appliance and respond to questions of proof. Questionnaires may be helpful.

Negative pressure wound therapy use in diabetic foot syndrome-from mechanisms of action to clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Diabetes and its complications constitute a rising medical challenge. Special attention should be given to diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) due to its high rate of associated amputation and mortality. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a frequently used supportive modality in a diabetic foot with ulcerations (DFUs).

DESIGN

Here, we reviewed the current knowledge concerning the tissue and molecular mechanisms of NPWT action with an emphasis on diabetes research followed by a summary of clinical DFU studies and practice guidelines.

RESULTS

Negative pressure wound therapy action results in two types of tissue deformations-macrodeformation, such as wound contraction, and microdeformation occurring at microscopic level. Both of them stimulate a wound healing cascade including tissue granulation promotion, vessel proliferation, neoangiogenesis, epithelialization and excess extracellular fluid removal. On the molecular level, NPWT results in an alteration towards more pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory conditions. It increases expression of several key growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor 2, while expression of inflammatory cytokinesis reduced. The NPWT application also alters the presence and function of matrix metalloproteinases. Clinical studies in DFU patients showed a superiority of NPWT over standard therapy in terms of efficacy outcomes, primarily wound healing and amputation rate, without a rise in adverse events. International guidelines point to NPWT as an important adjuvant therapy in DFU whose use is expected to increase.

CONCLUSIONS

This current knowledge improves our understanding of NPWT action and its tailoring for application in diabetic patients. It may inform the development of new treatments for DFU.