1
|
Vandenput L, Johansson H, McCloskey EV, Liu E, Schini M, Åkesson KE, Anderson FA, Azagra R, Bager CL, Beaudart C, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Biver E, Bruyère O, Cauley JA, Center JR, Chapurlat R, Christiansen C, Cooper C, Crandall CJ, Cummings SR, da Silva JAP, Dawson-Hughes B, Diez-Perez A, Dufour AB, Eisman JA, Elders PJM, Ferrari S, Fujita Y, Fujiwara S, Glüer CC, Goldshtein I, Goltzman D, Gudnason V, Hall J, Hans D, Hoff M, Hollick RJ, Huisman M, Iki M, Ish-Shalom S, Jones G, Karlsson MK, Khosla S, Kiel DP, Koh WP, Koromani F, Kotowicz MA, Kröger H, Kwok T, Lamy O, Langhammer A, Larijani B, Lippuner K, McGuigan FEA, Mellström D, Merlijn T, Nguyen TV, Nordström A, Nordström P, O'Neill TW, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ohlsson C, Orwoll ES, Pasco JA, Rivadeneira F, Schott AM, Shiroma EJ, Siggeirsdottir K, Simonsick EM, Sornay-Rendu E, Sund R, Swart KMA, Szulc P, Tamaki J, Torgerson DJ, van Schoor NM, van Staa TP, Vila J, Wareham NJ, Wright NC, Yoshimura N, Zillikens MC, Zwart M, Harvey NC, Lorentzon M, Leslie WD, Kanis JA. A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies. Osteoporos Int 2024; 35:469-494. [PMID: 38228807 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-07012-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
The relationship between self-reported falls and fracture risk was estimated in an international meta-analysis of individual-level data from 46 prospective cohorts. Previous falls were associated with an increased fracture risk in women and men and should be considered as an additional risk factor in the FRAX® algorithm. INTRODUCTION Previous falls are a well-documented risk factor for subsequent fracture but have not yet been incorporated into the FRAX algorithm. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in an international meta-analysis, the association between previous falls and subsequent fracture risk and its relation to sex, age, duration of follow-up, and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS The resource comprised 906,359 women and men (66.9% female) from 46 prospective cohorts. Previous falls were uniformly defined as any fall occurring during the previous year in 43 cohorts; the remaining three cohorts had a different question construct. The association between previous falls and fracture risk (any clinical fracture, osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture) was examined using an extension of the Poisson regression model in each cohort and each sex, followed by random-effects meta-analyses of the weighted beta coefficients. RESULTS Falls in the past year were reported in 21.4% of individuals. During a follow-up of 9,102,207 person-years, 87,352 fractures occurred of which 19,509 were hip fractures. A previous fall was associated with a significantly increased risk of any clinical fracture both in women (hazard ratio (HR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-1.51) and men (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.41-1.67). The HRs were of similar magnitude for osteoporotic, major osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture. Sex significantly modified the association between previous fall and fracture risk, with predictive values being higher in men than in women (e.g., for major osteoporotic fracture, HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.27-1.84) in men vs. HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.20-1.45) in women, P for interaction = 0.013). The HRs associated with previous falls decreased with age in women and with duration of follow-up in men and women for most fracture outcomes. There was no evidence of an interaction between falls and BMD for fracture risk. Subsequent risk for a major osteoporotic fracture increased with each additional previous fall in women and men. CONCLUSIONS A previous self-reported fall confers an increased risk of fracture that is largely independent of BMD. Previous falls should be considered as an additional risk factor in future iterations of FRAX to improve fracture risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Vandenput
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helena Johansson
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- MRC and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Enwu Liu
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marian Schini
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kristina E Åkesson
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Orthopedics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Fred A Anderson
- GLOW Coordinating Center, Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Rafael Azagra
- Department of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Health Centre Badia del Valles, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
- GROIMAP (Research Group), Unitat de Suport a La Recerca Metropolitana Nord, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
- PRECIOSA-Fundación Para La Investigación, Barberà del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Charlotte Beaudart
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
- Department of Aging Medicine and Aging Research, University Hospital, Zurich, and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Centre On Aging and Mobility, University of Zurich and City Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Biver
- Division of Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Bruyère
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jane A Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacqueline R Center
- Skeletal Diseases Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, School of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Roland Chapurlat
- INSERM UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon1, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | | | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carolyn J Crandall
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven R Cummings
- San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - José A P da Silva
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Bess Dawson-Hughes
- Bone Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center On Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adolfo Diez-Perez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar and CIBERFES, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alyssa B Dufour
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John A Eisman
- Skeletal Diseases Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, School of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Petra J M Elders
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Serge Ferrari
- Division of Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Yuki Fujita
- Center for Medical Education and Clinical Training, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Saeko Fujiwara
- Department of Pharmacy, Yasuda Women's University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Claus-Christian Glüer
- Section Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Kiel, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Inbal Goldshtein
- Maccabitech Institute of Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - David Goltzman
- Department of Medicine, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Vilmundur Gudnason
- Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
- University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Jill Hall
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Didier Hans
- Interdisciplinary Centre of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) & University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mari Hoff
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Rheumatology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rosemary J Hollick
- Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Epidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Martijn Huisman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Masayuki Iki
- Department of Public Health, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Graeme Jones
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Magnus K Karlsson
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sundeep Khosla
- Robert and Arlene Kogod Center On Aging and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Douglas P Kiel
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fjorda Koromani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A Kotowicz
- IMPACT (Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, St Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - Heikki Kröger
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Kuopio Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Timothy Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Olivier Lamy
- Centre of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Arnulf Langhammer
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Bagher Larijani
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kurt Lippuner
- Department of Osteoporosis, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fiona E A McGuigan
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dan Mellström
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Geriatric Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Thomas Merlijn
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tuan V Nguyen
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
| | - Anna Nordström
- School of Sport Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences, Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Nordström
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Terence W O'Neill
- National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine, Graz, Austria
| | - Claes Ohlsson
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Drug Treatment, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eric S Orwoll
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Julie A Pasco
- IMPACT (Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, St Albans, VIC, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie Schott
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, U INSERM 1290 RESHAPE, Lyon, France
| | - Eric J Shiroma
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute On Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Eleanor M Simonsick
- Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute On Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Reijo Sund
- Kuopio Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Karin M A Swart
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pawel Szulc
- INSERM UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon1, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Junko Tamaki
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - David J Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Natasja M van Schoor
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tjeerd P van Staa
- Centre for Health Informatics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Joan Vila
- Statistics Support Unit, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Nicole C Wright
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Noriko Yoshimura
- Department of Preventive Medicine for Locomotive Organ Disorders, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - MCarola Zillikens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Zwart
- PRECIOSA-Fundación Para La Investigación, Barberà del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
- Health Center Can Gibert del Plà, Catalan Institute of Health, Girona, Spain
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
- GROIMAP/GROICAP (Research Groups), Unitat de Suport a La Recerca Girona, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Girona, Spain
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Geriatric Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pai SN, Jeyaraman N, Jeyaraman M, Shyam A. Osteoporosis - An Imminent Ethical and Legal Debacle? J Orthop Case Rep 2023; 13:1-3. [PMID: 37753139 PMCID: PMC10519322 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i09.3852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by a decrease in bone density. Its prevalence is on the rise and is only going to continue to rise further. Fragility fractures such as neck of femur fracture fractures and intertrochanteric fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopedic surgeons today. Yet, the management of these fragility fractures has unfortunately fallen short of addressing the etiology behind the fracture. Orthopedic surgeons routinely perform arthroplasty or osteosynthesis for stabilization of these fractures, but rarely do they address the coexisting osteoporosis. We explore the factors, leading to this scenario, the practical hurdles faced, the ethical and legal considerations on the matter, and the road ahead. We believe that this is a topic which should be discussed further among orthopedic surgeons to arrive at practical solutions and change in perspectives. The aim of this article was to encourage a debate on the matter, increase awareness about the current situation, and help change the trend in the management of osteoporosis in developing countries like India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satvik N Pai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HOSMAT Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Naveen Jeyaraman
- Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Madhan Jeyaraman
- Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ashok Shyam
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R, Bogini R, Caputi AP, Cianferotti L, Frediani B, Gatti D, Gonnelli S, Iolascon G, Lenzi A, Leone S, Michieli R, Migliaccio S, Nicoletti T, Paoletta M, Pennini A, Piccirilli E, Rossini M, Tarantino U, Brandi ML. Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1137671. [PMID: 37143730 PMCID: PMC10151776 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field. Purpose This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline. Methods The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations. Results Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively. Conclusions The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Porcu
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Lenzi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Leone
- AMICI Onlus, Associazione Nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell’Intestino, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Michieli
- Italian Society of General Medicine and Primary Care Società Italiana di Medicina Generale e delle cure primarie (SIMG), Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Foro Italico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Nicoletti
- CnAMC, Coordinamento nazionale delle Associazioni dei Malati Cronici e rari di Cittadinanzattiva, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paoletta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pennini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reinold J, Braitmaier M, Riedel O, Haug U. Potential of Health Insurance Claims Data to Predict Fractures in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Epidemiol 2022; 14:1111-1122. [PMID: 36237823 PMCID: PMC9552670 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s379002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In older adults, fractures are associated with mortality, disability, loss of independence and high costs. Knowledge on their predictors can help to identify persons at high risk who may benefit from measures to prevent fractures. We aimed to assess the potential of German claims data to predict fractures in older adults. Patients and Methods Using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (short GePaRD; claims data from ~20% of the German population), we included persons aged ≥65 years with at least one year of continuous insurance coverage and no fractures prior to January 1, 2017 (baseline). We randomly divided the study population into a training (80%) and a test sample (20%) and used logistic regression and random forest models to predict the risk of fractures within one year after baseline based on different combinations of potential predictors. Results Among 2,997,872 persons (56% female), the incidence per 10,000 person years of any fracture in women increased from 133 in age group 65–74 years (men: 71) to 583 in age group 85+ (men: 332). The maximum predictive performance as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) across models was 0.63 in men and 0.60 in women and was achieved by combining information on drugs and morbidities. AUCs were lowest in age group 85+. Conclusion Our study showed that the performance of models using German claims data to predict the risk of fractures in older adults is moderate. Given that the models used data readily available to health insurance providers in Germany, it may still be worthwhile to explore the cost–benefit ratio of interventions aiming to reduce the risk of fractures based on such prediction models in certain risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Reinold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany,Correspondence: Jonas Reinold, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Achterstraße 30, Bremen, 28359, Germany, Tel +49 421 218-56868, Fax +49 421 218-56821, Email
| | - Malte Braitmaier
- Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany
| | - Oliver Riedel
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany,Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geusens P, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Zillikens MC, Willems H, Lems WF, van den Bergh J. How to implement guidelines and models of care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2022; 36:101759. [PMID: 35729036 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In subjects older than 50 years, the presence of clinical risk factors (CRFs) for fractures or a recent fracture is the cornerstone for case finding. In patients who are clinically at high short- and long-term risk of fractures (those with a recent clinical fracture or with multiple CRFs), further assessment with bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), imaging of the spine, fall risk evaluation and laboratory examination contributes to treatment decisions according to the height and modifiability of fracture risk. Treatment is available with anti-resorptive and anabolic drugs, and from the start of treatment a lifelong strategy is needed to decide about continuous, intermittent, and sequential therapy. Implementation of guidelines requires further initiatives for improving case finding, public awareness about osteoporosis and national policies on reimbursement of assessment and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Geusens
- Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra
- Department of Internal Medicine-Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - M Carola Zillikens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Hanna Willems
- Department of Geriatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Willem F Lems
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Joop van den Bergh
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medisch Cenrum, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL Venlo, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sahota A, Desai H, Hershkovica O, Sahota O. Poor Attendance for bone densitometry in patients at high risk of subsequent fragility fractures. J Clin Densitom 2022; 25:380-383. [PMID: 34973896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) are considered the most effective model for the prevention of subsequent fractures however, the uptake of these services has shown to be suboptimal. 6,528 patients were identified and referred on for bone densitometry assessment over a 6 yr period, however, 21% of these patients did not attend, with a trend towards a higher re-fracture rate in those that did not attend compared to those that did. The presence of a fragility fracture increases the risk of further fractures. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) are considered the most effective model for the prevention of subsequent fractures, although the uptake amongst patients invited for bone densitometry assessment has shown to be suboptimal. The UK has one of the most comprehensive numbers of FLS, however the proportion and characteristics of patients identified through the FLS that do not respond to bone densitometry invitation, in the UK, remains unclear. We report the 6 yr. findings from the Nottingham FLS. The Nottingham Fracture Liaison Service (N-FLS) systematically identifies those adults aged 50 yr. and older with fragility fractures presenting to the fracture clinic and where appropriate, arranges referral for bone densitometry assessment. Routine clinical data is collected onto the N-FLS database. Patient characteristics, between January 2012 and December 2017, were examined of those referred for bone densitometry examination, comparing those that attended to those that did not attend (DNA). Deprivation scores for each patient were calculated using the English indices of deprivation 2015 (1-Most deprived; 5- Least deprived). Follow up data was available for those attending from 2016 onwards, which allowed an assessment of re-fracture. Over the 6 yr period, 6,528 patients as identified by the N-FLS were referred on for bone densitometry assessment. 1,386 patients (21%) did not attend (DNA) for bone densitometry assessment. The proportion was similar for each of the years. High prevalence of non-attendance was in females [1032 patients (74%)] and the most deprived individuals [398 patients (29%), which were significant when compared to those that did attend, p=0.042]. 826 patients were referred in 2016. Median follow-up time was 2.46 yr. (IQR 0.16-3.00 yr.). 52 (7%) patients, in this group, sustained a subsequent fracture (35 patients in the group that did not attend for bone density assessment and 17 in those that attend, p=0.092). Nottingham FLS have identified patients with fragility fractures that are at high-risk of further fractures. Despite a dedicated FLS, 21% of those invited for bone densitometry assessment, did not attend for their appointment, over the 6 yr. period, similar proportion each year. There was a significantly higher proportion of those identified as 'most deprived' not attending for a bone densitometry, compared to those who attended. Sub-analysis in those aged 75 yr. and over, showed a high non-attendance in this group. Further qualitative studies are necessary to explore this patient group in detail, who remain at high risk of re-fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arunpreet Sahota
- Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Henal Desai
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Orly Hershkovica
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Opinder Sahota
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK; Division of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) , Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen JL, Tai TW, Chou CY, Ku CK, Chien LN, Huang TW, Tang CH. Incidence of different types of subsequent fractures and related mortality in Taiwan. Arch Osteoporos 2022; 17:55. [PMID: 35364728 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01098-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Hip fracture is the most common type of fracture to occur within 2 years after an initial fracture. Mortality risk increases when a subsequent fracture occurs. The occurrence of subsequent fracture is significantly higher in patients with hip fractures than others. Prevention of subsequent fracture is of paramount important. PURPOSE Osteoporotic fracture significantly increases risk of subsequent fracture. In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (NHIRD) to analyze data on fractures in a group at high risk of osteoporosis. We aimed to distinguish differences in subsequent fracture types and their relationship with mortality. METHODS We enrolled patients aged ≥ 50 years old who were diagnosed with an initial fracture classified as hip, vertebral, upper end of the humerus, or wrist. Data from 2 years of follow-up were analyzed. Risks of subsequent fracture events and mortality were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation and assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS We included 375,836 patients from the 2011-2015 NHIRD. Patients with initial hip fracture had the highest incidence of subsequent fracture at both 1- and 2-year follow-up (7.0% and 10.9%). Subsequent fractures occurred mainly at the hip. Conversely, other patients had a higher proportion of subsequent vertebral fracture. Patients with subsequent fracture classified as hip, vertebral, and upper end of the humerus had significantly higher cumulative mortality rates than that of patients who had no subsequent fracture, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.64 (95% CI = 1.57-1.71, p < 0.01), 1.06 (95% CI = 1.00-1.12, p = 0.04), 1.31 (95% CI = 1.17-1.46, p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION Patients who experienced an initial hip fracture are at greatest risk of subsequent fracture, most commonly the hip. Occurrence of subsequent fractures was associated with an increased mortality risk. Thus, there is a need for early intervention following initial hip fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiun-Liang Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzi, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Wei Tai
- Department of Orphopedics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Che-Yi Chou
- Division of Nephrology, Asia University Hospital, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Ko Ku
- Medical Affairs, Amgen Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Nien Chien
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsan-Wen Huang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzi, Chiayi, Taiwan. .,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
| | - Chao-Hsuin Tang
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sun X, Chen Y, Gao Y, Zhang Z, Qin L, Song J, Wang H, Wu IXY. Prediction Models for Osteoporotic Fractures Risk: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. Aging Dis 2022; 13:1215-1238. [PMID: 35855348 PMCID: PMC9286920 DOI: 10.14336/ad.2021.1206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Osteoporotic fractures (OF) are a global public health problem currently. Many risk prediction models for OF have been developed, but their performance and methodological quality are unclear. We conducted this systematic review to summarize and critically appraise the OF risk prediction models. Three databases were searched until April 2021. Studies developing or validating multivariable models for OF risk prediction were considered eligible. Used the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool to appraise the risk of bias and applicability of included models. All results were narratively summarized and described. A total of 68 studies describing 70 newly developed prediction models and 138 external validations were included. Most models were explicitly developed (n=31, 44%) and validated (n=76, 55%) only for female. Only 22 developed models (31%) were externally validated. The most validated tool was Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. Overall, only a few models showed outstanding (n=3, 1%) or excellent (n=32, 15%) prediction discrimination. Calibration of developed models (n=25, 36%) or external validation models (n=33, 24%) were rarely assessed. No model was rated as low risk of bias, mostly because of an insufficient number of cases and inappropriate assessment of calibration. There are a certain number of OF risk prediction models. However, few models have been thoroughly internally validated or externally validated (with calibration being unassessed for most of the models), and all models showed methodological shortcomings. Instead of developing completely new models, future research is suggested to validate, improve, and analyze the impact of existing models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuemei Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Yancong Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Yinyan Gao
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Zixuan Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Lang Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Jinlu Song
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Huan Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| | - Irene XY Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Changsha 410000, China
- Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. IXY Wu, Xiangya School of Public health, Central South University, Xiangya School of Public health, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Möller S, Skjødt MK, Yan L, Abrahamsen B, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Rubin KH, Leslie WD. Prediction of imminent fracture risk in Canadian women and men aged 45 years or older: external validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM). Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:57-66. [PMID: 34596704 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06165-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) identifies individuals at high imminent risk of major osteoporotic fractures. We validated FREM on 74,828 individuals from Manitoba, Canada, and found significant fracture risk stratification for all FREM scores. FREM performed better than age alone but not as well as FRAX® with BMD. INTRODUCTION The FREM is a tool developed from Danish public health registers (hospital diagnoses) to identify individuals over age 45 years at high imminent risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fracture (HF). In this study, our aim was to examine the ability of FREM to identify individuals at high imminent fracture risk in women and men from Manitoba, Canada. METHODS We used the population-based Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Program registry, and identified women and men aged 45 years or older undergoing baseline BMD assessment with 2 years of follow-up data. From linked population-based data sources, we constructed FREM scores using up to 10 years of prior healthcare information. RESULTS The study population comprised 74,828 subjects, and during the 2 years of observation, 1612 incident MOF and 299 incident HF occurred. We found significant fracture risk stratification for all FREM scores, with AUC estimates of 0.63-0.66 for MOF for both sexes and 0.84 for women and 0.65-0.67 for men for HF. FREM performed better than age alone but not as well as FRAX® with BMD. The inclusion of physician claims data gave slightly better performance than hospitalization data alone. Overall calibration for 1-year MOF prediction was reasonable, but HF prediction was overestimated. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the FREM algorithm shows significant fracture risk stratification when applied to an independent clinical population from Manitoba, Canada. Overall calibration for MOF prediction was good, but hip fracture risk was systematically overestimated indicating the need for recalibration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sören Möller
- Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
- Research unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Michael K Skjødt
- Research unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Lin Yan
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Bo Abrahamsen
- Research unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Lisa M Lix
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Katrine Hass Rubin
- Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Research unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jin W, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Che Z, Gao M. The Effect of Individual Musculoskeletal Conditions on Depression: Updated Insights From an Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:697649. [PMID: 34513871 PMCID: PMC8426633 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.697649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Few longitudinal studies have systematically investigated whether or how individual musculoskeletal conditions (IMCs) convey risks for negative psychological health outcomes, and approaches to assess such risk in the older population are lacking. In this Irish nationally representative longitudinal prospective study of 6,715 individuals aged 50 and above, machine learning algorithms and various models, including mediation models, were employed to elaborate the underlying mechanisms of IMCs leading to depression and to develop an IMC-induced negative psychological risk (IMCPR) classification approach. Resultantly, arthritis [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.233 (1.700-2.927)], osteoporosis [1.681 (1.133-2.421)], and musculoskeletal chronic pain [MCP, 2.404 (1.838-3.151)] were found to increase the risk of depression after 2 years, while fracture and joint replacement did not. Interestingly, mediation models further demonstrated that arthritis per se did not increase the risk of depression; such risk was augmented only when arthritis-induced restrictions of activities (ARA) existed [proportion of mediation: 316.3% (ARA of usual), 213.3% (ARA of social and leisure), and 251.3% (ARA of sleep)]. The random forest algorithm attested that osteoarthritis, not rheumatoid arthritis, contributed the most to depressive symptoms. Moreover, bone mineral density was negatively associated with depressive symptoms. Systemic pain contributed the most to the increased risk of depression, followed by back, knee, hip, and foot pain (mean Gini-Index: 3.778, 2.442, 1.980, 1.438, and 0.879, respectively). Based on the aforementioned findings, the IMCPR classification approach was developed using an interpretable machine learning model, which stratifies participants into three grades. Among the IMCPR grades, patients with a grade of "severe" had higher odds of depression than those with a "mild" [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 4.055 (2.907-5.498)] or "moderate" [3.584 (2.101-5.883)] grade. Females with a "severe" grade had higher odds of depression by 334.0% relative to those with a "mild" grade, while males had a relative risk of 258.4%. In conclusion, the present data provide systematic insights into the IMC-induced depression risk and updated the related clinical knowledge. Furthermore, the IMCPR classification approach could be used as an effective tool to evaluate this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenyi Jin
- Department of Orthopedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zilin Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yubiao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhifei Che
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Mingyong Gao
- Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Skjødt MK, Möller S, Hyldig N, Clausen A, Bliddal M, Søndergaard J, Abrahamsen B, Rubin KH. Validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) in predicting major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures using administrative health data. Bone 2021; 147:115934. [PMID: 33757901 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of osteoporotic fractures remains largely insufficient, and effective means to identify patients at high, short-term fracture risk are needed. The FREM tool is available for automated case finding of men and women aged 45 years or older at high imminent (1-year) risk of osteoporotic fractures, based on administrative health data with a 15-year look-back. The aim of this study was to validate the performance of FREM, and the effect of applying a shorter look-back period. We also evaluated FREM for 5-year fracture risk prediction. METHODS Using Danish national health registers we generated consecutive general population cohorts for the years 2014 through 2018. Within each year and across the full time period we estimated the individual fracture risk scores and determined the actual occurrence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fractures. Risk scores were calculated with 15- and 5-year look-back periods. The discriminative ability was evaluated by area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were estimated applying a calculated risk cut-off of 2% for MOF and 0.3% for hip fractures. RESULTS Applying a 15-year look-back, AUC was around 0.75-0.76 for MOF and 0.84-0.87 for hip fractures in 2014, with minor decreases in the subsequent fracture cohorts (2015 to 2018). Applying a 5-year look-back generated similar results, with only marginally lower AUC. In the 5-year risk prediction setting, AUC-values were 0.70-0.72 for MOF and 0.81-0.84 for hip fractures. Generally, PPVs were low, while NPVs were very high. CONCLUSION FREM predicts the 1- and 5-year risk of MOF and hip fractures with acceptable vs excellent discriminative power, respectively, when applying both a 15- and a 5-year look-back. Hence, the FREM tool may be applied to improve identification of individuals at high imminent risk of fractures using administrative health data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Skjødt
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, DK-4300 Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Nana Hyldig
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Anne Clausen
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mette Bliddal
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jens Søndergaard
- The Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Bo Abrahamsen
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, DK-4300 Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Katrine Hass Rubin
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Heden 16, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Iconaru L, Moreau M, Baleanu F, Kinnard V, Charles A, Mugisha A, Surquin M, Benoit F, Karmali R, Paesmans M, Body JJ, Bergmann P. Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1093-1101. [PMID: 33411010 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05772-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Multiple factors increase the risk of an imminent fracture, including a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and the fracture site. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate treatment. INTRODUCTION The risk of a recurrent fragility fracture is maximal during the first 2 years following an incident fracture. In this prospective cohort study, we looked at the incidence of recurrent fractures within 2 years after a first incident fracture and we assessed independent clinical risk factors (CRFs) increasing this imminent fracture risk. METHODS A total of 3560 postmenopausal women recruited from 2007 to 2013 were surveyed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures. We identified patients who sustained a fracture during the first 2 years following a first incident fragility fracture. We quantified the risk of a new fracture and assessed independent CRFs, associated with an imminent fracture at various sites. RESULTS A recent fracture was a significant CRF for an imminent fracture (OR (95% CI): 3.7 (2.4-5.7) [p < 0.0001]). The incidence of an imminent fracture was higher in subjects above 80 years (p < 0.001). Other CRFs highly predictive in a multivariate analysis were osteoporosis diagnosis (p < 0.01), a central fracture as the index fracture (p < 0.01), and the presence of comorbidities (p < 0.05), with likelihood ratios of 1.9, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively. An imminent fracture was better predicted by a central fracture (p < 0.01) than by a major osteoporotic fracture. The hazard ratio was the highest for a central fracture. CONCLUSION In patients with a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and fracture site were associated with an imminent fracture risk. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate and most appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Iconaru
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - M Moreau
- Data Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Baleanu
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium
| | - V Kinnard
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Charles
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Mugisha
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Surquin
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Benoit
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Karmali
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Paesmans
- Data Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J J Body
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - P Bergmann
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McCloskey EV, Borgstrom F, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Javaid MK, Lorentzon M, Kanis JA. Short time horizons for fracture prediction tools: time for a rethink. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1019-1025. [PMID: 33914103 PMCID: PMC7611752 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05962-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Fredrik Borgstrom
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mohamed K Javaid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen B, Luo Z, Feng X, Pan K, Liu Q, Yang Y. Effect of high-quality care on limb function recovery and quality of life after osteoporotic hip fracture surgery in the elderly. JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS 2021; 21:272-278. [PMID: 34059572 PMCID: PMC8185254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of high-quality care on limb function recovery and quality of life (QOL) after osteoporotic hip fracture (OHF) surgery in the elderly. METHODS 116 elderly patients with OHF enrolled in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were assigned into observation group (high-quality care, n=58) and control group (routine care, n=58). After one month of intervention, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Barthel Index (BI) were used to evaluating limb function and self-care ability, pain intensity numerical rating scale (PINRS) for pain assessment, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS) for emotion assessment. Besides, postsurgical complications, QOL and patient satisfaction were examined. RESULTS HHS and BI were higher in observation group (P<0.05); PINRS, SAS and SDS were lower in observation group (P<0.05); incidence of postsurgical complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05); QOL and patient satisfaction in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION High-quality care promotes the recovery of limb function, the QOL and the satisfaction of elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biying Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China
| | - Zhen Luo
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China
| | - Xiaolei Feng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China
| | - Kaixia Pan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China
| | - Qiuqin Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China
| | - Yexiang Yang
- Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China,Corresponding author: Yexiang Yang, Department of Joint and Trauma Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, P.R. China E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Legrand MA, Chapurlat R. Imminent fracture risk. Joint Bone Spine 2020; 88:105105. [PMID: 33171311 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.105105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mélanie A Legrand
- Department of Rheumatology, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, 5, Place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France; INSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
| | - Roland Chapurlat
- Department of Rheumatology, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, 5, Place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France; INSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Monocrotophos, an organophosphorus insecticide, induces cortical and trabecular bone loss in Swiss albino mice. Chem Biol Interact 2020; 329:109112. [PMID: 32360284 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Till now monocrotophos (MCP) has been addressed as a neurotoxic stressor. Limited studies investigate its aftermath on bone pathologies. Given the fact that MCP is a propensely used insecticide in developing countries, this study investigates its potential to mirror osteoporotic features and bone loss incurred in a rodent model. Briefly, Swiss albino mice were orally gavaged daily with varying doses of MCP for 8 weeks. Musculoskeletal changes were analyzed through micro-computed tomography and histology. A series of in vitro and ex vivo cell culture experiments were performed on MC3T3E-1 and primary osteoclast cultures. Results highlight that oral gavaging with MCP causes bone loss from the cortico-trabecular interface by decreasing the osteoblast and increasing the osteoclast number. Results from in vitro studies establish that MCP treatment increases the TRAP-positive multinucleated cell number during osteoclast differentiation. Ex-vivo experiments with MCP-treated animal sera further substantiate the in vivo claims with significant decreases seen in cell viability, proliferation, mineralization and differentiation studies. In conclusion MCP induces osteoclastogenesis (bone loss) on direct stimulation and alters the circulating factors in MCP-treated serum. Holistically, this work would be of potential significance to patients suffering from pesticide induced osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
17
|
Su Y, Lam FMH, Leung J, Cheung WH, Ho SC, Kwok T. The Predictive Value of Sarcopenia and Falls for 2-Year Major Osteoporotic Fractures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Calcif Tissue Int 2020; 107:151-159. [PMID: 32472390 PMCID: PMC7382674 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-020-00709-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the associations of sarcopenia and previous falls with 2-year major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) in community-dwelling older adults. Four thousand Chinese men and women ≥ 65 years recruited from Hong Kong communities were prospectively followed up. Measures of muscle mass, grip strength, gait speed and falls in the previous year were recorded at baseline, the 2nd year and the 4th year visit for each subject. The associations of fall history, sarcopenia and its components with 2-year MOFs were evaluated using generalized linear mixed models. Poor grip strength and poor gait speed were significantly associated with a higher 2-year MOFs risk, with an adjusted OR (95% CI) per one SD decrease of 1.48 (1.17, 1.87) and 1.17 (1.00, 1.36), respectively. Falls in the previous year was a significant predictor for 2-year MOFs risk, with an adjusted OR (95% CI) per one added fall of 1.85 (1.40, 2.44) in men and 1.26 (1.01, 1.58) in women. The adjusted OR (95% CI) of height adjusted appendicular lean muscle mass (ALM/height2) per one SD decrease and sarcopenia for 2-year MOFs risk were 1.34 (0.87, 2.06) and 1.72 (0.92, 3.21) in men, and were 0.73 (0.57, 0.93) and 0.76 (0.39, 1.47) in women, respectively (P for interaction by gender = 0.012 and 0.017, respectively). Poor sarcopenia-related physical performance and falls in the previous year were significant predictors for 2-year MOFs in community-dwelling older adults. The predictive value of ALM by DXA for near-term fracture risk is limited and different across genders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Su
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Freddy M H Lam
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jason Leung
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wing-Hoi Cheung
- Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Suzanne C Ho
- Division of Epidemiology, The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Timothy Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fragility Fractures: A Review and Analysis of the American Orthopaedic Association's Own the Bone Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:E430-E438. [PMID: 31770343 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of the Own the Bone database which is a fracture liaison service designed to improve recognition and treatment of osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE To use the Own the Bone (OTB) database to 1) examine the specific demographics of patients presenting with a low-energy clinical vertebral fracture (VFX) and 2) compare demographic and fracture-specific risk factors between patients with clinical VFX versus patients with nonvertebral low-energy fracture (NVFX). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Large database studies have described risk factors for developing VFX. It is well described that a history of previous VFX portends an increased risk of future VFX. Few studies have reported cohorts from a fracture liaison service such as the OTB initiative. METHODS 35,039 unique cases of fragility fracture occurred between 2009 and 2016 and were included in analysis. VFX accounted for 3395 (9.9%) of the presenting fractures at OTB enrollment. The demographics, lifestyle factors, medication use, and fracture-specific data for patients in the OTB registry with vertebral fractures were summarized and then statistically compared to those with nonvertebral fragility fractures. RESULTS The majority of VFX patients were Caucasian, postmenopausal women (74.4%). There was an increased likelihood of presenting with a vertebral fracture in patients who sustained a previous VFX after the age of 50, while patients who sustained a prior nonvertebral fracture (NVFX) were more likely to present with a subsequent NVFX. After controlling for patients with a history of fracture after the age of 50, VFX patients (vs. NVFX) were more likely to be age 70-79, class 1 obesity, with a history of taking anti-osteoporotic prescription medications. CONCLUSIONS Multiple factors were associated with a significantly increased risk of VFX compared with NVFX. Understanding the risk factors unique to fragility VFX is a critical component for targeting "at-risk" patients and preventing future osteoporosis-related fractures and their consequences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED Advancing age, female sex, recent prior fracture and falls, and specific comorbidities and medications contribute to imminent (within 1-2 years) risk of fracture in Medicare enrollees. Clinician awareness of these risk factors and their dynamic nature may lead to improved osteoporosis care for elderly patients. PURPOSE The burden of osteoporotic fracture disproportionately affects the elderly. Growing awareness that fracture risk can change substantially over time underscores the need to understand risk factors for imminent (within 1-2 years) fracture. This study assessed predictors of imminent risk of fracture in the US Medicare population. METHODS Administrative claims data from a random sample of Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed for patients aged ≥ 67 years on January 1, 2011 (index date), with continuous coverage between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2011, excluding patients with non-melanoma cancer or Paget's disease. Incident osteoporotic fractures were identified during 12 and 24 months post-index. Potential predictors were age, sex, race, history of fracture, history of falls, presence of osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), mood/anxiety disorders, polyinflammatory conditions, difficulty walking, use of durable medical equipment, ambulance/life support, and pre-index use of osteoporosis medications, steroids, or central nervous system medications. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate predictors of fracture risk in the two follow-up intervals. RESULTS Among 1,780,451 individuals included (mean age 77.7 years, 66% female), 8.3% had prior fracture and 6.1% had a history of falls. During the 12- and 24-month follow-up periods, 3.0% and 5.4% of patients had an incident osteoporotic fracture, respectively. Imminent risk of fracture increased with older age (double/triple), female sex (> 80%), recent prior fracture (> double) and falls, and specific comorbidities and medications. CONCLUSIONS Demographics and factors including fall/fracture history, comorbidities, and medications contribute to imminent risk of fracture in elderly patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Chao CT, Lee YH, Li CM, Han DS, Huang JW, Huang KC. Advanced Age and Chronic Kidney Disease Modify the Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Elderly. Rejuvenation Res 2019; 23:333-340. [PMID: 31423906 DOI: 10.1089/rej.2019.2202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) predisposes older adults to the development of frailty. However, previous studies have not explored factors that may influence the association between MetS and the risk of frailty in this population. Community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years of age) were prospectively identified and enrolled between 2013 and 2016. MetS and frailty were defined based on the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures criteria, respectively. Multiple logistic regression with frailty/prefrailty as the dependent variable was used to examine the relationship between MetS and frailty/prefrailty, supplemented by subgroup analyses of the influence of aging and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Among 2862 elderly (73.4 ± 6.7 years), 17.5% and 17.3%, respectively, had MetS and frailty/prefrailty, among whom 74 (2.6%) and 420 (14.7%) had frailty and prefrailty. The presence of MetS (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, p < 0.001), higher age (OR 1.05, p < 0.001), and CKD (OR 1.42, p = 0.006) were associated with a significantly higher risk of frailty/prefrailty. Furthermore, among those ≥80 years of age, the association between MetS and frailty/prefrailty disappeared (p = 0.329). Among those with CKD, the presence of MetS was significantly associated with a progressively higher risk of frailty/prefrailty (for stage 3 or higher and for stage 3b or higher, OR 6.4 and 12.4, p < 0.001 and = 0.009, respectively). In conclusion, aging and CKD modified the association between MetS and frailty. These findings may assist in devising case-specific care plans for elderly with MetS by refocusing our attention on those at high risk of developing frailty/prefrailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Ter Chao
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Geriatric and Community Medicine Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsuan Lee
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Geriatric and Community Medicine Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Ming Li
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Geriatric and Community Medicine Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Der-Sheng Han
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Geriatric and Community Medicine Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jenq-Wen Huang
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Ching Huang
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Geriatric and Community Medicine Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital BeiHu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van den Berg P, van Haard PMM, Geusens PP, van den Bergh JP, Schweitzer DH. Challenges and opportunities to improve fracture liaison service attendance: fracture registration and patient characteristics and motivations. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:1597-1606. [PMID: 31129686 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05016-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This questionnaire-based study evaluated the reasons for attendance or non-attendance at the fracture liaison service in patients with a recent fracture. Frailty, male sex, living alone, and low education were associated with non-attendance, and the information perceived by the patient was associated with attendance. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to evaluate hospital registration- and patient-related factors associated with attendance or non-attendance to the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). METHODS Out of 1728 consecutive patients registered with a recent fracture at hospital entry, and after exclusion of 440 patients because of death, residence in a nursing home, already on osteoporosis treatment, or recent DXA, 1288 received an FLS invitation. We evaluated the hospital registration of fractures at entry and exit of the hospital. A questionnaire was sent to all invited patients to evaluate factors related to non-attendance (including age, gender, frailty, living alone, income, education, extrinsic motivations (impact of perceived information) and intrinsic motivations (patient's own perceived views and opinions) and to attendance (personal impact of clinical professionals' advice). RESULTS There were 278 more hospital exit codes than entry codes. Of the 1288 invited patients, 745 returned analyzable questionnaires (537 attenders and 208 non-attenders). Non-attendance was associated with male gender (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.35, 3.21), frailty (OR: 1.62, CI: 1.08, 2.45), living alone (OR:2.05, CI: 1.48, 2.85), low education (OR: 1.82, CI: 1.27, 2.63), not interested in bone strength (OR: 1.85, CI: 1.33, 2.63), and being unaware of increased subsequent fracture risk (OR: 1.75, CI: 1.08, 2.86). Information perceived by the patient was significantly associated with attendance (OR: 3.32, CI: 1.75, 6.27). CONCLUSION Fracture entry registration inaccuracies, male gender, frailty, living alone, having low general education, or low interest in bone health and subsequent fracture risk were independently associated with FLS non-attendance. Adequately perceived advice (to have a bone densitometry and attend the FLS) was strongly associated with FLS attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P van den Berg
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumasurgery, Fracture Liaison Service, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - P M M van Haard
- Department of Medical Laboratories, Association of Clinical Chemistry, Reinier the Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - P P Geusens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - J P van den Bergh
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre Noord-Limburg and Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - D H Schweitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Reinier the Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hannan MT, Weycker D, McLean RR, Sahni S, Bornheimer R, Barron R, Travison TG, Kiel DP. Predictors of Imminent Risk of Nonvertebral Fracture in Older, High-Risk Women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study. JBMR Plus 2019; 3:e10129. [PMID: 31346561 PMCID: PMC6636767 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis treatment decisions are often based solely on BMD or on 10-year fracture risk; little is known about factors increasing imminent fracture risk. Understanding factors contributing to imminent risk of fracture is potentially useful for personalizing therapy, especially among those at high risk. Our aim was to identify predictors of nonvertebral fracture for 1- and 2-year periods in women at high risk for fracture. The Framingham Osteoporosis Study cohort included 1470 women (contributing 2778 observations), aged ≥65 years with BMD hip T-score ≤ -1.0, or history of fragility fracture (irrespective of T-score). Nonvertebral fractures were ascertained prospectively over 1 year and 2 years following a baseline BMD scan. Potential risk factors included age, anthropometric variables, comorbidities/medical history, cognitive function, medications, history of fracture, self-rated health, falls in the past year, smoking, physical performance, hip BMD T-score, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score, and caffeine and alcohol intakes. Predictive factors with p value ≤ 0.10 in bivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were subsequently considered in multivariable models. Mean baseline age was 75 years (SD 6.0). During 1-year follow-up, 89 nonvertebral fractures occurred; during 2-year follow-up, 176 fractures occurred. Of the variables considered in the bivariate models, significant predictors of nonvertebral fractures included age, history of fracture, self-rated health, falls in the prior year, BMD T-score, ADL, renal disease, dementia, and current use of nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or antidepressants. In multivariable models, significant independent risk factors were history of fracture, self-rated health, hip BMD T-score, and use of nitrates. Significant 1-year results were attenuated at the 2-year follow-up. In addition to the traditional factors of BMD and fracture history, self-rated health and use of nitrates were independently associated with imminent risk of fracture in older, high-risk women. These specific risk factors thus may be useful in identifying which women to target for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian T Hannan
- Institute for Aging ResearchHebrew SeniorLifeDepartment of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | | | - Robert R McLean
- Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA, and Institute for Aging ResearchHebrew SeniorLifeBostonMAUSA
| | - Shivani Sahni
- Institute for Aging ResearchHebrew SeniorLifeDepartment of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | | | | | - Thomas G Travison
- Institute for Aging ResearchHebrew SeniorLifeDepartment of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Douglas P Kiel
- Institute for Aging ResearchHebrew SeniorLifeDepartment of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Adachi JD, Berger C, Barron R, Weycker D, Anastassiades TP, Davison KS, Hanley DA, Ioannidis G, Jackson SA, Josse RG, Kaiser SM, Kovacs CS, Leslie WD, Morin SN, Papaioannou A, Prior JC, Shyta E, Silvia A, Towheed T, Goltzman D. Predictors of imminent non-vertebral fracture in elderly women with osteoporosis, low bone mass, or a history of fracture, based on data from the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:53. [PMID: 31098708 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0598-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Using data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, several risk factors predictive of imminent (2-year) risk of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture among high-risk women were identified, including history of falls, history of low-trauma fracture, poorer physical function, and lower T score. Careful consideration should be given to targeting this population for therapy. PURPOSE Fracture risk assessment has focused on a long-term horizon and populations with a broad risk range. For elderly women with osteoporosis or low bone mass, or a history of fragility fractures ("high-risk women"), risk prediction over a shorter horizon may have greater clinical relevance. METHODS A repeated-observations design and data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study were employed. Study population comprised women aged ≥ 65 years with T score (total hip, femoral neck, spine) ≤ - 1.0 or prior fracture. Hazard ratios (HR) for predictors of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture during 2-year follow-up were estimated using multivariable shared frailty model. RESULTS The study population included 3228 women who contributed 5004 observations; 4.8% experienced low-trauma non-vertebral fracture during the 2-year follow-up. In bivariate analyses, important risk factors included age, back pain, history of falls, history of low-trauma fracture, physical function, health status, and total hip T score. In multivariable analyses, only four independent predictors were identified: falls in past 12 months (≥ 2 falls: HR = 1.9; 1 fall: HR = 1.5), low-trauma fracture in past 12 months (≥ 1 fracture: HR = 1.7), SF-36 physical component summary score (≤ 42.0: HR = 1.6), and total hip T score (≤ - 3.5: HR = 3.7; > - 3.5 to ≤ - 2.5: HR = 2.5; > - 2.5 to ≤ - 1: HR = 1.3). CONCLUSIONS Imminent risk of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture is elevated among high-risk women with a history of falls or low-trauma fracture, poorer physical function, and lower T score. Careful consideration should be given to identifying and targeting this population for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudie Berger
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Derek Weycker
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA.
| | | | | | - David A Hanley
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AL, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Erinda Shyta
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA
| | - Amanda Silvia
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Banefelt J, Åkesson KE, Spångéus A, Ljunggren O, Karlsson L, Ström O, Ortsäter G, Libanati C, Toth E. Risk of imminent fracture following a previous fracture in a Swedish database study. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:601-609. [PMID: 30680431 PMCID: PMC6422949 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04852-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the imminent risk of a future fracture within 1 and 2 years following a first fracture in women aged 50 years and older and assessed independent factors associated with risk of subsequent fractures. The study highlights the need to intervene rapidly after a fracture to prevent further fractures. INTRODUCTION This study aims to determine the imminent risk of subsequent fractures within 1 and 2 years following a first fracture and to assess independent factors associated with subsequent fractures. METHODS Retrospective, observational cohort study of women aged ≥ 50 years with a fragility fracture was identified from Swedish national registers. Clinical/demographic characteristics at the time of index fracture and cumulative fracture incidences up to 12 and 24 months following index fracture were calculated. Risk factors for subsequent fracture were identified using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS Two hundred forty-two thousand one hundred eight women (mean [SD] age 74 [12.5] years) were included. The cumulative subsequent fracture incidence at 12 months was 7.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-7.2) and at 24 months was 12.0% (95% CI, 11.8-12.1). The rate of subsequent fractures was highest in the first month (~ 15 fractures per 1000 patient-years) and remained steady between 4 and 24 months (~ 5 fractures/1000 patient-years). Higher age was an independent risk factor for imminent subsequent fractures (at 24 months, sub-distribution hazard ratio [HR], 3.07; p < 0.001 for women 80-89 years [reference 50-59 years]). Index vertebral fracture was a strong independent risk factor for subsequent fracture (sub-distribution HR, 2.72 versus hip fracture; p < 0.001 over 12 months; HR, 2.23; p < 0.001 over 24 months). CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the need to intervene rapidly after any fragility fracture in postmenopausal women. The occurrence of a fragility fracture provides healthcare systems with a unique opportunity to intervene to reduce the increased risk of subsequent fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - K E Åkesson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - A Spångéus
- Linköping University, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - O Ljunggren
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - O Ström
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - C Libanati
- UCB Biopharma Sprl, Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Toth
- UCB Biopharma Sprl, Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pinedo-Villanueva R, Charokopou M, Toth E, Donnelly K, Cooper C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Libanati C, Javaid MK. Imminent fracture risk assessments in the UK FLS setting: implications and challenges. Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:12. [PMID: 30712158 PMCID: PMC6398567 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0569-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
With the recognition that a sentinel fracture leads to a high imminent risk of fracture, we discuss the implications and challenges of using imminent fracture risk in the secondary fracture prevention setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Cyrus Cooper
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Muhammad K Javaid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Outcomes comparison between hip fracture surgery and elective hip replacement: a propensity score-matched analysis on administrative data. Eur Geriatr Med 2018; 10:61-66. [PMID: 32720286 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-018-0146-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased life expectancy causes higher prevalence of chronic diseases and greater frailty among older persons. Osteoarthritis and hip fracture are the leading causes of disability among the older persons in high income countries. Recent studies showed that patients undergoing hip fracture surgery have an increased risk of mortality and developing complications. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of in-hospital mortality events, complications, and 30-hospital readmissions among patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (HFS) and elective hip replacement (EHR). METHODS The study considered all hospital admissions for HFS and EHR performed from 2006 to 2015 in Abruzzo region, Italy. Data were collected from hospital discharge records. To compare outcomes between HFS and EHR, a propensity score matching procedure was performed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for primary and secondary outcomes were computed using logistic regression models. RESULTS A total of 32,248 patients were selected: 23,075 underwent HFS and 9173 underwent EHR. After matching, 18,078 patients were included in the analyses (9039 patients who underwent HFS and 9039 patients who underwent HER). In the matched population, HFS patients showed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.58-2.61) and 30-day hospital readmission (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.85-2.09). A sensitivity analysis performed on patients younger than 65 years of age confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of Italian patients, hip fracture surgery was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission when compared to elective hip replacement.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine the importance of recent fracture as a predictor of imminent fracture risk, review the importance of prior fracture type and timing, and identify risk factors for recurrent osteoporotic fracture. RECENT FINDINGS Prior fracture type and timing impact risk of subsequent fracture that is largely independent of bone mineral density. Site of re-fracture is similar to original major osteoporotic fracture. Incidence of recurrent major osteoporotic fracture is greatest within the first year. Other risk factors include those that pertain to individual characteristics. Approved osteoporosis therapies reduce risk of recurrent fracture. Prior fracture timing, type, and individual characteristics are important components of predicting the risk of future fracture. Initiation of osteoporosis medication therapy should be started after initial fracture to reduce the risk of future fracture, though these medications typically take 6-12 months to have an effect, during which time is the highest rate of imminent re-fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda D Schnell
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Faculty Office Tower 820D, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Faculty Office Tower 820D, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Faculty Office Tower 820D, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The risk factors of vertebral refracture after kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a study protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19:195. [PMID: 29961425 PMCID: PMC6027566 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2123-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is the first-line treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) that can immediately relieve pain and allow the quick recovery of lost mobility. However, some studies reported that after PKP, the incidence of vertebral refracture, particularly adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF), was high. Our previous meta-analysis suggested that the risks for vertebral refracture and AVF did not increase after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in OVCF patients. Despite the negative results of our meta-analysis, there is still significant evidence regarding the relationship between kyphoplasty and AVF, so a new prospective cohort study is warranted. In addition, in our previous retrospective study, we found that advanced age, female sex and low oestradiol (E2) concentrations might be related to the occurrence of postoperative vertebral refracture after PKP. To sufficiently evaluate the probable factors involved in the occurrence of postoperative vertebral refracture, we designed this prospective study. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study of patients admitted for PKP to treat painful OVCFs. The baseline data, including demographic information, lifestyle, bone metabolic status, sex hormone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels, and clinical characteristics will be collected at the time of enrolment. Surgical features of PKP will be recorded on the operation day. Lifestyle, bone metabolic status, sex hormone levels, and SHBG levels will be assessed during the follow-up period at 1 m, 3 m, 12 m, and 24 m postoperatively. Patients suffering from acutely aggravated back pain will be referred to an orthopaedist, and refractured vertebrae will be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The primary outcome will be the incidence of vertebral refracture. Multivariate analyses will be carried out to evaluate the variables that are independently correlated with vertebral refracture. DISCUSSION To evaluate the risk of postoperative refracture preoperatively and to identify the surgical points related to postoperative refracture, this study will explore the risk factors related to vertebral refracture after PKP. The results may provide new information about defining OVCF patients suitable for PKP treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR-ROC-17011562 . Registered on July 4th, 2017.
Collapse
|