Urinary antigens as markers of papillary toxicity. I. Identification and characterization of rat kidney papillary antigens with monoclonal antibodies

Urinary biomarker detection of melamine- and cyanuric acid-induced kidney injury in rats

Oral coexposure of rats to melamine (MEL) and cyanuric acid (CYA) results in a dose-dependent increase in the formation of MEL-CYA crystals in the kidney. The aim of this study was to determine if urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury could be used to noninvasively detect renal damage associated with crystal formation in the kidneys of MEL- and CYA-exposed rats. Urine was obtained on days 0 (predose), 2, 4, 14, and 28 from male and female Fischer 344 rats fed a diet supplemented with 0, 120, 180, or 240 ppm each of MEL and CYA. A number of urinary protein biomarkers (kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, osteopontin, albumin, alpha-GST, GST-Yb1, renal papillary antigen 1 [RPA-1], and clusterin) were measured using a multiplex assay system. The results showed that RPA-1 (distal tubule and collecting duct injury biomarker) was elevated on day 28 at the 120 ppm dose and higher in male rats and at the 180 ppm dose and higher in female rats; however, other urinary protein biomarkers were significantly elevated only at the 240 ppm dose. Significant elevation in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels, and severe renal damage evidenced by histopathology, were observed after 28 days of exposure to the highest dose, despite the fact that MEL-CYA crystals were observable at the 120 and 180 ppm doses. These data indicate that RPA-1 may serve as a noninvasive urinary biomarker for the detection and monitoring of obstructive nephropathy associated with MEL-CYA exposure.

Preclinical perspective of urinary biomarkers for the detection of nephrotoxicity: what we know and what we need to know

The assessment of kidney damage is a challenge and must incorporate assessment of the functional capacity of the kidney, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the kidney's role. Multiple parameters have been used for many years to measure renal functionality to assess renal damage. It is astonishing that, beside histopathology, the most common traditional parameters are serum based. However, urine is also used to obtain additional information regarding the health status of the kidneys. Since 2008, several novel urinary protein biomarkers have been qualified by the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency in conjunction with the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium in a specially developed qualification process. Subsequently, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency accepted the qualification of these seven urinary biomarkers. This review will give an overview of the state-of-the-art detection based on urinary biomarkers, which will enhance toxicological research in the future. In addition, the qualification process that leads to acceptance of these biomarkers will be described because of its uniqueness and importance for the field of biomarker research.

Biomarkers of Collecting Duct Injury in Han-Wistar and Sprague-Dawley Rats Treated with N-Phenylanthranilic Acid

N-phenylanthranilic acid is a chloride channel blocker that causes renal papillary necrosis in rats. Studies were conducted in two strains of male rats to evaluate novel biomarkers of nephrotoxicity. Han-Wistar rats were given daily oral doses of 50, 350, or up to 700 mg/kg/day of NPAA, and Sprague-Dawley rats were given 50 or 400 mg/kg/day of NPAA. Rats were euthanized on days 8 and 15. The candidate kidney injury biomarkers renal papillary antigen-1 (RPA-1, for collecting duct injury), clusterin (for general kidney injury), α-glutathione-S-transferase (a proximal tubular marker), and µ-glutathione-S-transferase (a distal tubular marker) were measured in urine by enzyme immunoassay. Characteristic degeneration and necrosis of the collecting duct and renal papilla were observed in Han-Wistar rats at the high dose on day 8 and at the mid and high doses on day 15, and in Sprague-Dawley rats given the high dose on days 8 and 15. Increases in urinary RPA-1, and to a lesser extent urine clusterin, were generally associated with the presence of collecting duct injury and were more sensitive than BUN and serum creatinine. On the other hand, decreases in α-glutathione-S-transferase without proximal tubule lesions in both strains and decreases in µ-glutathione-S-transferase in Sprague-Dawley rats only were not associated with morphological proximal or distal tubule abnormalities, so both were of less utility. It was concluded that RPA-1 is a new biomarker with utility in the detection of collecting duct injury in papillary necrosis in male rats.

A mutant Ahr allele protects the embryonic kidney from hydrocarbon-induced deficits in fetal programming

BACKGROUND

The use of experimental model systems has expedited the elucidation of pathogenetic mechanisms of renal developmental disease in humans and the identification of genes that orchestrate developmental programming during nephrogenesis.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted studies to evaluate the role of AHR polymorphisms in the disruption of renal developmental programming by benzo(a)pyrene (BaP).

METHODS

We used metanephric cultures of C57BL/6J (C57) mice expressing the Ahr(b-1) allele and B6.D2N-Ahr(d)/J (D2N) mice expressing a mutant allele deficient in ligand binding (Ahr(d)) to investigate molecular mechanisms of renal development. Deficits in fetal programming were evaluated in the offspring of pregnant mice treated with BaP during nephrogenesis.

RESULTS

Hydrocarbon challenge of metanephri from C57 mice altered Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (Wt1) mRNA splice variant ratios and reduced mRNAs of the Wt1 transcriptional targets syndecan-1 (Sdc1) paired box gene 2 (Pax2), epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr), and retinoic acid receptor, alpha (Rarα). These changes correlated with down-regulation of effectors of differentiation [secreted frizzled-related sequence protein 1 (Sfrp1), insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (Igf1r), wingless-related MMTV-integration site 4 (Wnt4), Lim homeobox protein 1 (Lhx1), E-cadherin]. In contrast, metanephri from D2N mice were spared hydrocarbon-induced changes in Wt1 splice variant ratios and deficits of differentiation. We observed similar patterns of dysmorphogenesis and progressive loss of renal function at postnatal weeks 7 and 52 in the offspring of pregnant C57 but not D2N mice gavaged with 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg BaP on gestation days 10-13.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support a functional link between AHR and WT1 in the regulation of renal morphogenesis and raise important questions about the contribution of human AHR polymorphisms to the fetal origins of adult-onset kidney disease.

Comparison of the course of biomarker changes and kidney injury in a rat model of drug-induced acute kidney injury

OBJECTIVE

To aid in evaluating the performance of biomarkers, we measured kidney injury biomarkers in rat models of drug-induced acute kidney injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Rats were treated with site-specific nephrotoxins, puromycin, gentamicin, cisplatin, or 2-bromoethylamine. Fifteen biomarkers (β-2-microglobulin, calbindin, clusterin, cystatin-C, KIM-1, GST-α, GST-μ, NGAL, osteopontin, EGF, TIMP-1, VEGF, albumin, RPA-1, and urinary total protein) were examined in comparison with BUN, serum creatinine, and NAG. Some biomarkers, which were different depending in each nephrotoxin, showed ability to detect the prodromal stage of drug-induced kidney injury. Characteristic changing patterns of biomarkers were also found depending on the specific lesion site in the kidney.

CONCLUSION

These data suggested that establishment of a suitable biomarker panel would facilitate detection of site-specific kidney injury with high sensitivity.

Application of Dolichos biflorus in immunoassay detection of kidney collecting duct biomarkers

Currently there are no biomarkers for detecting collecting duct damage in man. Antibodies to several collecting duct-specific antigens exist but sandwich assays have been difficult to establish due to the need for two different antibodies to the same protein. We hypothesized that a collecting duct-specific lectin could be used in combination with a collecting duct-specific antibody to negate the need for two different antibodies. The collecting duct specificity of selected antibodies (NiCa II 13C2, Pap XI 3C7, HuPaP VII 2B11 and aquaporin 2), was verified by immunohistochemistry. Aquaporin 2 and Pap XI 3C7 were used successfully in setting up assays with the lectin Dolichos biflorus, using the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. Antigen expression was highest in the papillae of rat and human kidney (corresponding to the greatest density of collecting ducts) and was also present in normal urine. We propose that further qualification and validation would lead to an assay for detecting collecting duct damage in man.

Characterization of Renal Papillary Antigen 1 (RPA-1), a Biomarker of Renal Papillary Necrosis

Renal papillary necrosis (RPN) is a relatively common toxicity observed in preclinical drug safety testing. It is also observed in a variety of human diseases. RPN is difficult to diagnose without expensive scanning methods or histopathology. A noninvasive biomarker that could be detected at early stages of kidney damage would be of great value both to preclinical drug safety testing and in the clinic. An antibody raised to an unknown epitope of an antigen in rat kidney papilla was found to be specific for collecting duct cells in the kidney; this was termed renal papillary antigen 1 (RPA-1). In this study, the authors show that RPA-1 is an early biomarker of RPN in two different rat models of toxicity: 2-bromoethanamine (BEA) and N-phenylanthranilic acid (NPAA). RPA-1 can be detected in urine at early stages of toxicity and correlates well with the histopathology observed. We also characterized the biochemical properties of RPA-1 and found that the antigen is a high molecular weight membrane bound glycoprotein, with the epitope likely to be carried on an N-linked carbohydrate structure. This study demonstrates that RPA-1 is an excellent marker of RPN that can be used to detect this toxicity in preclinical safety testing.

Cell-specific biomarkers in renal medicine and research

Histopathology is the gold standard for defining renal injury, but it is invasive, time-consuming and expensive, plus it is seldom used in subjects with mild renal injury. Using biomarkers linked to distinct, defined cell types and tissues provides a direct link to histopathology without its drawbacks, plus it provides increased sensitivity, and specificity. The nephron consists of several sections, each with its own specific biomarkers; therefore, by the use of a battery of tests injuries can be localised to distinct areas of it. Using urine samples simplifies repeated sampling from the same subject or animal leading to better defined toxicokinetics and disease monitoring.Serum creatinine is the most widely used renal biomarker in spite of its known shortcomings. Cell-specific biomarkers are more specific and sensitive and have been known for over 40 years, but they are still underused in renal medicine and research. In particular, while many studies have shown cell-specific biomarkers to be valuable in diagnosis, there are few studies where they have been used to guide therapy or linked to quantitative changes in the kidney. Furthermore, the great majority of cell-specific biomarkers are from the proximal tubule, which may have hindered research into the study of conditions where the distal tubules are affected. Recently, the range of biomarkers and their applications has been expanded by the introduction of indicators of cellular regeneration.This chapter will discuss how using biomarkers with a known cellular origin, renal effects may be found earlier and at lower levels of injury. Their use in both renal medicine and drug research will be presented. Knowledge of these existing markers lays the foundation for evaluation, comparison, and characterisation of new markers that will be identified in the future.

Differences in immunolocalization of Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 in kidneys of gentamicin-, cisplatin-, and valproic acid-treated rats: potential role of iNOS and nitrotyrosine

The present study compared the immunolocalization of Kim-1, renal papillary antigen (RPA)-1, and RPA-2 with that of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitrotyrosine in kidneys of gentamicin sulfate (Gen)- and cisplatin (Cis)-treated rats. The specificity of acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarkers, iNOS, and nitrotyrosine was evaluated by dosing rats with valproic acid (VPA). Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were injected subcutaneously (sc) with 100 mg/kg/day of Gen for six or fourteen days; a single intraperitoneal (ip) dose of 1, 3, or 6 mg/kg of Cis; or 650 mg/kg/day of VPA (ip) for four days. In Gen-treated rats, Kim-1 was expressed in the epithelial cells, mainly in the S1/S2 segments but less so in the S3 segment, and RPA-1 was increased in the epithelial cells of collecting ducts (CD) in the cortex. Spatial expression of iNOS or nitrotyrosine with Kim-1 or RPA-1 was detected. In Cis-treated rats, Kim-1 was expressed only in the S3 segment cells, and RPA-1 and RPA-2 were increased in the epithelial cells of medullary CD or medullary loop of Henle (LH), respectively. Spatial expression of iNOS or nitrotyrosine with RPA-1 or RPA-2 was also identified. These findings suggest that peroxynitrite formation may be involved in the pathogenesis of Gen and Cis nephrotoxicity and that Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 have the potential to serve as site-specific biomarkers for Gen or Cis AKI.

Immunolocalization of Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 in kidney of gentamicin-, mercury-, or chromium-treated rats: relationship to renal distributions of iNOS and nitrotyrosine

Immunohistochemical studies for kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1), renal papillary antigen-1 (RPA-1), and renal papillary antigen-2 (RPA-2) were conducted to explore their relationship to inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitrotyrosine expression. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to gentamicin (100 mg/kg/day Gen, sc, for 3 days), mercury (0.25 mg Hg/kg, iv, single dose), or chromium (5 mg Cr/kg, sc, single dose) and kidney tissue was examined 24 hours or 72 hours after the last dose of the nephrotoxicant. Another group of kidneys was evaluated 24 hours after rats were administered 3 daily doses (50, 100, 150, 200, or 300 mg/kg/day) of Gen. Gen- and Cr-treated rats exhibited increased immunoreactivity of Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 largely in the S1/S2 segments and to a lesser extent in the S3 segments of the proximal tubule of the kidney, whereas Hg-treated rats showed increased immunoreactivity of Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 in the S3 segments. Up-regulation of Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 expression correlated with injured tubular epithelial cells and also correlated with immunoreactivity of iNOS and nitrotyrosine. It is possible that iNOS activation with nitrotyrosine production in injured nephron segments may be involved in the induction of Kim-1, RPA-1, and RPA-2 following exposure to nephrotoxicants.

New technologies around biomarkers and their interplay with drug development

What conductors are to their orchestras, biomarkers are to their associated technologies. Building fundamental science, supporting early diagnosis of diseases and following their progression, improving efficacy and safety of treatments, optimizing patient selection and adapting dosing of drugs, helping decide which therapy is most appropriate; these are examples of a few contexts in which biomarkers are key players. Technology development can definitely not escape being associated with these steps. In other words, today's biomarkers are the thermometers of tomorrow's therapies. This review provides an overview of recently established platforms as well as new and upcoming technologies for biomarker development in the context of drug development. The roles as well as the pros and cons of different disciplines such as genetics, genomics, proteomics, metabonomics, and assay development will be discussed.

Promises of Biomarkers in Drug Development ? A Reality Check

Biomarkers have been a buzz word in drug development for the last 5 years. But where do we stand now? This perspective article will demonstrate to which extent biomarkers have impacted drug development and the use of drugs. In particular, the different types of biomarkers, their identification, validation and use in different phases of drug development from drug discovery, to approval, to clinical application will be discussed as well as the state-of-the-art biomarker technologies and promising future methods. The high interest in biomarkers has generated the need for development of new technologies and refinement of existing ones. Besides discussing their perspectives of applications, the present article also illustrates the future of biomarker development in terms of qualification for regulatory use and co-development.

Histologically defined biomarkers in toxicology

Histopathology is the gold standard when defining toxicological effects, but it is invasive, time consuming and expensive. Using biomarkers linked to distinct, defined cell types and tissues may provide a direct link to histopathology without its drawbacks and it also provides increased sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, as histological testing is often impractical in human subjects, using biomarkers with a known histological distribution may fill the need of localising toxic injury to distinct organs or tissues. This paper discusses how, by using biomarkers with a known cellular origin (histologically defined biomarkers), toxic effects may be found earlier and at lower doses of compound, leading to potential savings in drug development.

Novel biomarker platforms in toxicology

About 75% of the costs of developing new drugs are expended on unsuccessful compounds and, in spite of billions spent on toxicity and other testing, post-launch withdrawal of compounds owing to toxicity still occurs. Novel biomarkers are seen as a means of reducing this expenditure by enabling better decision making. This article will review the value of some of these biomarkers and barriers to their introduction.:

Assessment of renal injury in vivo

The ICH S7A (Safety Pharmacology for Human Pharmaceuticals) guidelines specify that potential adverse pharmacologic effects of a test substance on renal function should be evaluated in supplemental studies when there is a cause for concern (ICH, 2001). For the most part, this can easily be accomplished by examination of the appropriate analytes in urine and blood collected as part of the routine preclinical safety studies. This review will serve as an overview of the selection, interpretation and limitations of standard clinical pathology methods (serum chemistry and urinalysis) for assessment of renal function in such studies, as well as provide some information on emerging biomarkers of renal function.