1
|
Gyftopoulos S, Hanly A, Subhas N, Raje N, Chang CY. Multiple myeloma: What is the most cost-effective imaging strategy for initial detection of bone lesions? Skeletal Radiol 2025; 54:1081-1091. [PMID: 39466393 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04810-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the cost-effectiveness of different imaging modalities for initial detection of multiple myeloma (MM)-defining bone lesions. METHODS A Markov model from the health care system perspective for patients with MGUS was used to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of five imaging techniques: skeletal survey (SS), low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), positron emission computed tomography (PETCT), and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) with and without diffusion (DIFF). Model inputs, including probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from comprehensive literature review. Costs were estimated in 2024 U.S. dollars, effectiveness was measured in quality adjusted life years (QALYs), willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY, and timeframe of the simulation was 20 years. Model analyses included Monte Carlo microsimulation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). RESULTS The most cost-effective imaging strategy was dependent on the number of patient risk factors for progression from MGUS to myeloma. At a WTP threshold of $100,000, for patients with no risk factors for progression, LDCT amassed the greatest net monetary benefit (NMB) ($1,030,913.57) while incurring the second lowest costs ($44,870.73). For patients with 1 or 2 risk factors for progression, WBMRI + DIFF amassed the greatest NMB (1 risk factor: $802,637.30, 2 risk factors: $664,430.36). WBMRI and PETCT were absolutely dominated in all cases. PSA also found that the most cost-effective strategy was dependent on the WTP threshold. CONCLUSION Our model suggests that LDCT and WBMRI + DIFF can be the most cost-effective imaging strategies for the initial diagnosis of MM in patients, depending on the number of risk factors for progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soterios Gyftopoulos
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnau Hanly
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Naveen Subhas
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Noopur Raje
- Department of Medicine Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Connie Y Chang
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DE Almeida M, Gregório H, Pereira A, Queiroga FL. The Diagnostic Yield of Whole-body Computed Tomography in Dogs and Cats in the Oncology Setting. In Vivo 2025; 39:1293-1302. [PMID: 40295013 PMCID: PMC12041982 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2025] [Revised: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/05/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Clinical staging has become essential in veterinary oncology. It is crucial for creating effective treatment plans and predicting outcomes. Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) can serve as a comprehensive staging examination, offering a detailed view of a patient's internal anatomy. This retrospective study aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of WBCT in diagnosing cancer in dogs and cats. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed medical records of cats and dogs that underwent a WBCT scan between January 2016 and May 2023. Only cases with a confirmed cytological or histological diagnosis of the primary tumor and complete medical records were considered. We collected data on histological diagnoses and diagnostic methods used. RESULTS Our study included 57 animals that underwent WBCT for cancer-related reasons. Metastases were detected in 14 dogs, with four showing metastases in multiple locations, five in the lungs, three in the lymph nodes, one in the skeleton, and one in the liver, yielding a diagnostic rate of 31.8%. In cats, metastases were detected in six cases (five in the lungs and one in the lymph nodes), with a diagnostic yield of 46.2%. WBCT identified metastasis in over 35% of cases, including those outside the thoracic and abdominal cavities, indicating potentially greater accuracy than radiography and ultrasound. CONCLUSION WBCT is an effective and safe method for tumor staging and oncological diagnosis in dogs and cats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria DE Almeida
- Anicura CHV Porto Hospital Veterinário, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Hugo Gregório
- Anicura CHV Porto Hospital Veterinário, Porto, Portugal
- CESPU, Institute for Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies, Gandra, Portugal
- Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| | - André Pereira
- Anicura CHV Porto Hospital Veterinário, Porto, Portugal
| | - Felisbina L Queiroga
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal;
- Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Koutoulidis V, Malandrakis P, Fotiou D, Spiliopoulou V, Filippatos C, Migkou M, Kanellias N, Theodorakakou F, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Kastritis E, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos LA, Gavriatopoulou M. Yearly Assessment of Bone Disease in Patients with Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma Identifies Early Progression Events and Should Be the Standard Clinical Practice. J Clin Med 2025; 14:2224. [PMID: 40217676 PMCID: PMC11989443 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14072224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2025] [Revised: 03/16/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) represents an intermediate stage between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM), with a significant risk of progression. Bone disease is a key feature of MM, often marking the transition to symptomatic disease. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is an easily accessible and highly sensitive imaging modality for detecting osteolytic lesions, providing an advantage over conventional skeletal surveys. In our real-world cohort, we prospectively evaluated the role of WBLDCT in the early identification of bone progression in patients with SMM based on the recommendations by the International Myeloma Working Group. A total of 113 patients were monitored with annual WBLDCT assessments; 36.3% progressed to symptomatic MM, with 9.7% progressing solely with bone lesions, highlighting the importance of early detection. Therefore, integrating annual WBLDCT assessments into clinical practice for SMM patients is essential to facilitate treatment strategies and prevent disease-related complications. This is even more important in the upcoming era of early treatment initiation for patients with SMM at high risk for progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Vassilis Koutoulidis
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (V.K.); (L.-A.M.)
| | - Panagiotis Malandrakis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Despina Fotiou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Vasiliki Spiliopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Charalampos Filippatos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Magdalini Migkou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Nikolaos Kanellias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Foteini Theodorakakou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
- Department of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Lia-Angela Moulopoulos
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (V.K.); (L.-A.M.)
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (I.N.-S.); (P.M.); (D.F.); (V.S.); (C.F.); (M.M.); (N.K.); (F.T.); (E.E.-P.); (E.K.); (E.T.); (M.-A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cicero KI, Banerjee R, Kwok M, Dima D, Portuguese AJ, Chen D, Chalian M, Cowan AJ. Illuminating the Shadows: Innovation in Advanced Imaging Techniques for Myeloma Precursor Conditions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025; 15:215. [PMID: 39857099 PMCID: PMC11765077 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Revised: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), the asymptomatic precursors to multiple myeloma, affect up to 5% of the population over the age of 40. Bone involvement, a myeloma-defining event, represents a major source of morbidity for patients. Key goals for the management of myeloma precursor conditions include (1) identifying patients at the highest risk for progression to MM with bone involvement and (2) differentiating precursor states from active myeloma requiring treatment. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) have improved sensitivity for the detection of myeloma bone disease compared to traditional skeletal surveys, and such advanced imaging also provides this field with better tools for detecting early signs of progression. Herein, we review the data supporting the use of advanced imaging for both diagnostics and prognostication in myeloma precursor conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara I. Cicero
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (K.I.C.); (R.B.); (M.K.); (D.D.); (A.J.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| | - Rahul Banerjee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (K.I.C.); (R.B.); (M.K.); (D.D.); (A.J.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| | - Mary Kwok
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (K.I.C.); (R.B.); (M.K.); (D.D.); (A.J.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| | - Danai Dima
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (K.I.C.); (R.B.); (M.K.); (D.D.); (A.J.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| | - Andrew J. Portuguese
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (K.I.C.); (R.B.); (M.K.); (D.D.); (A.J.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| | - Delphine Chen
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA; (D.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Majid Chalian
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA; (D.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Andrew J. Cowan
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; (K.I.C.); (R.B.); (M.K.); (D.D.); (A.J.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Michalska-Foryszewska A, Rogowska A, Kwiatkowska-Miernik A, Sklinda K, Mruk B, Hus I, Walecki J. Role of Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: A Potential Opportunity for Quantitative Imaging and Radiomics? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4099. [PMID: 39682285 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2024] [Revised: 12/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/05/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most prevalent hematologic malignancy, particularly affecting the elderly. The disease often begins with a premalignant phase known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), solitary plasmacytoma (SP) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Multiple imaging modalities are employed throughout the disease continuum to assess bone lesions, prevent complications, detect intra- and extramedullary disease, and evaluate the risk of neurological complications. The implementation of advanced imaging analysis techniques, including artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics, holds great promise for enhancing our understanding of MM. The integration of advanced image analysis techniques which extract features from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or positron emission tomography (PET) images has the potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy for MM. This innovative approach may lead to the identification of imaging biomarkers that can predict disease prognosis and treatment outcomes. Further research and standardized evaluations are needed to define the role of radiomics in everyday clinical practice for patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Michalska-Foryszewska
- Radiological Diagnostics Center, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Rogowska
- Hematology Clinic, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kwiatkowska-Miernik
- Radiological Diagnostics Center, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Sklinda
- Radiological Diagnostics Center, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Mruk
- Radiological Diagnostics Center, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Iwona Hus
- Hematology Clinic, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jerzy Walecki
- Radiological Diagnostics Center, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu Y, Huang W, Yang Y, Cai W, Sun Z. Recent advances in imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) for quantitative assessment of multiple myeloma. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 2024; 14:208-229. [PMID: 39309415 PMCID: PMC11411189 DOI: 10.62347/nllv9295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant blood disease, but there have been significant improvements in the prognosis due to advancements in quantitative assessment and targeted therapy in recent years. The quantitative assessment of MM bone marrow infiltration and prognosis prediction is influenced by imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) quantitative parameters. At present, the primary imaging methods include computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). These methods are now crucial for diagnosing MM and evaluating myeloma cell infiltration, extramedullary disease, treatment effectiveness, and prognosis. Furthermore, the utilization of AI, specifically incorporating machine learning and radiomics, shows great potential in the field of diagnosing MM and distinguishing between MM and lytic metastases. This review discusses the advancements in imaging methods, including CT, MRI, and PET/CT, as well as AI for quantitatively assessing MM. We have summarized the key concepts, advantages, limitations, and diagnostic performance of each technology. Finally, we discussed the challenges related to clinical implementation and presented our views on advancing this field, with the aim of providing guidance for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongshun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First HospitalBeijing 100034, China
| | - Wenpeng Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First HospitalBeijing 100034, China
| | - Yihan Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First HospitalBeijing 100034, China
| | - Weibo Cai
- Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Zhaonan Sun
- Department of Medical Imaging, Peking University First HospitalBeijing 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vicentini JRT, Bredella MA. Whole body imaging in musculoskeletal oncology: when, why, and how. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:281-295. [PMID: 35809098 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04112-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The use of whole-body imaging has become increasingly popular in oncology due to the possibility of evaluating total tumor burden with a single imaging study. This is particularly helpful in cases of widespread disease where dedicated regional imaging would make the evaluation more expensive, time consuming, and prone to more risks. Different techniques can be used, including whole-body MRI, whole-body CT, and PET-CT. Common indications include surveillance of cancer predisposing syndromes, evaluation of osseous metastases and clonal plasma cell disorders such as multiple myeloma, and evaluation of soft tissue lesions, including peripheral nerve sheath tumors. This review focuses on advanced whole-body imaging techniques and their main uses in musculoskeletal oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao R T Vicentini
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, YAW 6, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Miriam A Bredella
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, YAW 6, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pop VS, Tomoaia G, Parvu A. Modern imaging techniques for monitoring patients with multiple myeloma. Med Pharm Rep 2022; 95:377-384. [PMID: 36506611 PMCID: PMC9694753 DOI: 10.15386/mpr-2215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone disease is a serious problem for many patients, often causing pathological bone fractures. A spinal collapse is a condition that affects the quality of life. It is the most frequent feature of multiple myeloma (MM), used in establishing the diagnosis and the need to start treatment. Because of these complications, imaging plays a vital role in the diagnosis and workup of myeloma patients. For many years, conventional radiography has been considered the gold standard for detecting bone lesions. The main reasons are the wide availability, low cost, the relatively low radiation dose and the ability of this imaging method to cover the entire bone system. Because of its incapacity to evaluate the response to therapy, more sophisticated techniques such as whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT), whole-body magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are used. In this review, some of the advantages, indications and applications of the three techniques in managing patients with MM will be discussed. The European Myeloma Network guidelines have recommended WBLDCT as the imaging modality of choice for the initial assessment of MM-related lytic bone lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold-standard imaging modality for the detection of bone marrow involvement. One of the modern imaging methods and PET/CT can provide valuable prognostic data and is the preferred technique for assessing response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad Stefan Pop
- Hematology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Hematology Department, “Prof. Dr. Ioan Chiricuta” Oncological Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Gheorghe Tomoaia
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania,Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrada Parvu
- Hematology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Hematology Department, “Prof. Dr. Ioan Chiricuta” Oncological Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bernstein ZS, Kim EB, Raje N. Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Biologic and Clinical Implications. Cells 2022; 11:cells11152308. [PMID: 35954151 PMCID: PMC9367243 DOI: 10.3390/cells11152308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells localized within the bone marrow. Bone disease with associated osteolytic lesions is a hallmark of MM and develops in the majority of MM patients. Approximately half of patients with bone disease will experience skeletal-related events (SREs), such as spinal cord compression and pathologic fractures, which increase the risk of mortality by 20–40%. At the cellular level, bone disease results from a tumor-cell-driven imbalance between osteoclast bone resorption and osteoblast bone formation, thereby creating a favorable cellular environment for bone resorption. The use of osteoclast inhibitory therapies with bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab, have been shown to delay and lower the risk of SREs, as well as the need for surgery or radiation therapy to treat severe bone complications. This review outlines our current understanding of the molecular underpinnings of bone disease, available therapeutic options, and highlights recent advances in the management of MM-related bone disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S. Bernstein
- Center for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - E. Bridget Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Noopur Raje
- Center for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Floccinaucinihilipilification: is there a continuing role for the radiographic skeletal survey? Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:5-9. [PMID: 33893515 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03780-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
11
|
Shapiro YN, O'Donnell EK. Oncologist perspective: role of imaging in myeloma. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:123-133. [PMID: 34272993 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03856-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
With major advancements in treatments for multiple myeloma (MM), it is critical that we evaluate our methods for both diagnosing MM and monitoring its progression over time. Imaging methods, such as conventional skeletal x-ray, low-dose whole-body CT, MRI, and PET-CT, provide valuable information that influences our clinical decision-making. In this review, we will evaluate the role of these imaging techniques throughout the MM disease course, from diagnosis to follow-up after therapy, and also provide appropriate recommendations.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pierro A, Posa A, Astore C, Sciandra M, Tanzilli A, Petrosino A, del Balso MS, Fraticelli V, Cilla S, Iezzi R. Whole-Body Low-Dose Multidetector-Row CT in Multiple Myeloma: Guidance in Performing, Observing, and Interpreting the Imaging Findings. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:1320. [PMID: 34947851 PMCID: PMC8707516 DOI: 10.3390/life11121320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a hematological malignancy of plasma cells usually detected due to various bone abnormalities on imaging and rare extraosseous abnormalities. The traditional approach for disease detection was based on plain radiographs, showing typical lytic lesions. Still, this technique has many limitations in terms of diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. The new approach to assess osteolytic lesions in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma is based on total-body low-dose CT. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a guide for radiologists in performing and evaluating a total-body low-dose CT in patients with multiple myeloma, both newly-diagnosed and in follow-up (pre and post treatment).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Pierro
- Department of Radiology, “A. Cardarelli” Regional Hospital, ASReM, Contrada Tappino, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.P.); (M.S.); (M.S.d.B.)
| | - Alessandro Posa
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.T.); (A.P.); (R.I.)
| | - Costanzo Astore
- Radiology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, L.go A. Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Mariacarmela Sciandra
- Department of Radiology, “A. Cardarelli” Regional Hospital, ASReM, Contrada Tappino, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.P.); (M.S.); (M.S.d.B.)
| | - Alessandro Tanzilli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.T.); (A.P.); (R.I.)
| | - Antonella Petrosino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.T.); (A.P.); (R.I.)
| | - Maria Saveria del Balso
- Department of Radiology, “A. Cardarelli” Regional Hospital, ASReM, Contrada Tappino, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.P.); (M.S.); (M.S.d.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Fraticelli
- Hematology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, L.go A. Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Phisics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, L.go A. Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.T.); (A.P.); (R.I.)
- Radiology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, L.go A. Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baldi D, Tramontano L, Alfano V, Punzo B, Cavaliere C, Salvatore M. Whole Body Low Dose Computed Tomography Using Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector With Spectral Shaping: Protocol Optimization and Literature Review. Dose Response 2020; 18:1559325820973131. [PMID: 33456411 PMCID: PMC7783892 DOI: 10.1177/1559325820973131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
For decades, the main imaging tool for multiple myeloma (MM) patient's management has been the conventional skeleton survey. In 2014 international myeloma working group defined the advantages of the whole-body low dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) as a gold standard, among imaging modalities, for bone disease assessment and subsequently implemented this technique in the MM diagnostic workflow. The aim of this study is to investigate, in a group of 30 patients with a new diagnosis of MM, the radiation dose (CT dose index, dose-length product, effective dose), the subjective image quality score and osseous/extra-osseous findings rate with a modified WBLDCT protocol. Spectral shaping and third-generation dual-source multidetector CT scanner was used for the assessment of osteolytic lesions due to MM, and the dose exposure was compared with the literature findings reported until 2020. Mean radiation dose parameters were reported as follows: CT dose index 0.3 ± 0.1 mGy, Dose-Length Product 52.0 ± 22.5 mGy*cm, effective dose 0.44 ± 0.19 mSv. Subjective image quality was good/excellent in all subjects. 11/30 patients showed osteolytic lesions, with a percentage of extra-osseous findings detected in 9/30 patients. Our data confirmed the advantages of WBLDCT in the diagnosis of patients with MM, reporting an effective dose for our protocol as the lowest among previous literature findings.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gavriatopoulou M, Βoultadaki A, Koutoulidis V, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Bourgioti C, Malandrakis P, Fotiou D, Migkou M, Kanellias N, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Kastritis E, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos LA. The Role of Low Dose Whole Body CT in the Detection of Progression of Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2020; 10:93. [PMID: 32978365 PMCID: PMC7519647 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-00360-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, characterized by plasma cell bone marrow infiltration and end-organ involvement. Smoldering MM (SMM) is an intermediate clinical entity between MGUS and MM, with a risk of progression to symptomatic disease 10% per year. Bone disease is the most frequent symptom of MM, with ~90% of patients developing bone lesions throughout their disease course. Therefore, imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and management. Whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) is widely available and has been incorporated in the latest diagnostic criteria of the IMWG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of WBLDCT in the early identification of lesions in patients with SMM who progress solely with bone disease. In total, 100 asymptomatic patients were consecutively assessed with WBLDCT from July 2013 until March 2020 at baseline, 1-year after diagnosis and every 1 year thereafter. Ten percent of patients were identified as progressors with this single imaging modality. This is the first study to evaluate prospectively patients with SMM at different time points to identify early bone lesions related to MM evolution. Serial WBLDCT studies can identify early myeloma evolution and optimize disease monitoring and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Andriani Βoultadaki
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vassilis Koutoulidis
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Charis Bourgioti
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Malandrakis
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Despina Fotiou
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Magdalini Migkou
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kanellias
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, General Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Lia-Angela Moulopoulos
- 1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Romano A, Cerchione C, Conticello C, Martinelli G, Di Raimondo F. How we manage smoldering multiple myeloma. Hematol Rep 2020; 12:8951. [PMID: 33042502 PMCID: PMC7520850 DOI: 10.4081/hr.2020.8951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Smoldering myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic stage characterized by bone marrow plasma cells infiltration between 10-60% in absence of myeloma-defining events and organ damage. Until the revision of criteria of MM to require treatment, two main prognostic models, not overlapping each other, were proposed and used differently in Europe and in US. Novel manageable drugs, like lenalidomide and monoclonal antibodies, with high efficacy and limited toxicity, improvement in imaging and prognostication, challenge physicians to offer early treatment to highrisk SMM. Taking advantage from the debates offered by SOHO Italy, in this review we will update the evidence and consequent clinical practices in US and Europe to offer readers a uniform view of clinical approach at diagnosis, follow-up and supportive care in the SMM setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Romano
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ematologia, Università degli Studi di Catania
| | - Claudio Cerchione
- Hematology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola (FC)
| | - Concetta Conticello
- U.O.C. di Ematologia, Azienda Policlinico Rodolico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinelli
- Hematology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola (FC)
| | - Francesco Di Raimondo
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ematologia, Università degli Studi di Catania
- U.O.C. di Ematologia, Azienda Policlinico Rodolico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hemke R, Yang K, Husseini J, Bredella MA, Simeone FJ. Organ dose and total effective dose of whole-body CT in multiple myeloma patients. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49:549-554. [PMID: 31612246 PMCID: PMC7021660 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03292-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate organ dose and total effective dose of whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) performed on different CT-scanner models in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and to compare it to the effective dose of radiographic skeletal survey and representative diagnostic CTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 228 patients (47.4% females, mean age 67.9 ± 10.4 years, mean weight 81.8 ± 22.4 kg) who underwent WBLDCT for the work-up or surveillance of MM. Patients were scanned using one of six multi-detector CT-scanners. Organ doses and total effective doses per scan were calculated using a commercially available dose-management platform (Radimetrics, Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany). The median effective dose was compared to radiographic skeletal survey and representative diagnostic CTs. RESULTS The mean effective dose of our WBLDCT-protocol was 4.82 mSv. A significantly higher effective dose was observed in females compared to males (4.95 vs. 4.70 mSv, P = 0.002). Mean organ dose ranged from 3.72 mSv (esophagus) to 13.09 mSv (skeleton). Mean effective dose varied amongst different CT-scanners (range 4.34-8.37 mSv). The median effective dose of WBLDCT was more than twice the dose of a skeletal survey (4.82 vs. 2.04 mSv), 23% higher than a diagnostic contrast-enhanced chest CT (3.9 mSv), 46% lower than a diagnostic contrast-enhanced abdomen/pelvis CT (9.0 mSv), and 45% lower than a lumbar spine CT (8.7 mSv). CONCLUSIONS WBLDCT in MM has a higher effective dose than a radiographic skeletal survey, but a lower effective dose than diagnostic CTs of lumbar spine, abdomen and pelvis. This underlines the broad applicability of WBLDCT in the management of MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hemke
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA ,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kai Yang
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging Physics, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Jad Husseini
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Miriam A. Bredella
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - F. Joseph Simeone
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| |
Collapse
|