PRRT genomic signature in blood for prediction of 177Lu-octreotate efficacy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1155-1169. [PMID: 29484451 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3967-6]

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs): Genetic and environmental biomarkers for risk of occurrence and prognosis

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, representing approximately 10 % of all Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. While most pNENs are sporadic, a subset is associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) or von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). pNENs are further classified into functioning and non-functioning tumors, with distinct clinical behaviors, prognoses, and treatment approaches. This review explores genetic and environmental biomarkers that influence the risk, prognosis, and therapeutic responses in pNENs. The epidemiology of pNENs reveals an increasing incidence, primarily due to advancements in imaging techniques. Genetic factors play a pivotal role, with germline mutations in MEN1, VHL, and other genes contributing to familial pNENs. Somatic mutations, including alterations in the mTOR pathway and DNA maintenance genes such as DAXX and ATRX, are critical in sporadic pNENs. These mutations, along with epigenetic dysregulation and transcriptomic alterations, underpin the diverse clinical and molecular phenotypes of pNENs. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation profiles, can stratify pNEN subtypes and predict disease progression. Environmental and lifestyle factors, such as diabetes, smoking, and chronic pancreatitis, have been linked to an increased risk of sporadic pNENs. While the association between these factors and tumor progression is still under investigation, their potential role in influencing therapeutic outcomes warrants further study. Advances in systemic therapies, including somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have improved disease management. Biomarkers such as Ki-67, somatostatin receptor expression, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status are being evaluated for their predictive value. Novel approaches, including the use of circulating biomarkers (NETest, circulating tumor cells, and ctDNA) and polygenic risk scores, offer promising avenues for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the need for large, well-annotated datasets and validated biomarkers. Future research should integrate multi-omics approaches and leverage liquid biopsy technologies to refine diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. Interdisciplinary collaborations and global consortia are crucial for overcoming current limitations and translating research findings into clinical practice. These insights hold promise for improving prevention, early detection, and tailored treatments, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Prediction of lesion-based response to PRRT using baseline somatostatin receptor PET

Aim

The heterogeneous expression of somatostatin receptors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) leads to significant intra-individual variability in tracer uptake during pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT for patients receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This study aims to evaluate the lesion-based relationship between receptor-mediated tracer uptake and the functional response to PRRT.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients with metastatic GEP-NET (12 pancreatic and 20 non-pancreatic), all treated with [177Lu]Lu-octreotate (4 cycles, with a mean of 7.9 GBq per cycle). [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was performed at baseline and 3 months after the final PRRT cycle. Tumor uptake was quantified using the standardized uptake value (SUV). For each patient, 2 to 3 well-delineated tumor lesions were selected as target lesions. SUVmax, SUVmean (automated segmentation with a 50% SUVmax threshold), and corresponding tumor-to-liver ratios (SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L) were calculated. Functional tumor response was assessed based on the relative change in metabolic tumor volume (%ΔTVPET). The correlation between baseline SUV parameters and lesion-based functional response was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation.

Results

A total of 71 lesions were included in the analysis. The mean baseline SUVmax and SUVmean were 28.1 ± 15.9 and 13.6 ± 5.1, respectively. Three months after PRRT completion, the mean %ΔTVPET was 39.6 ± 52.1%. Baseline SUVmax and SUVmean demonstrated a poor correlation with lesion-based response (p = 0.706 and p = 0.071, respectively). In contrast, SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L were significantly correlated with lesion-based response (SUVmeanT/L: p = 0.011, r = 0.412; SUVmaxT/L: p = 0.004, r = 0.434). Among patient characteristics-including primary tumor origin, baseline tumor volume, and metastatic sites-only pancreatic origin was significantly associated with functional tumor volume reduction (ΔTVPET%: 56.8 ± 39.8 in pancreatic vs. 28.4 ± 50.1 in non-pancreatic NET; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

The lesion-based molecular response to PRRT correlates with pretreatment somatostatin receptor PET uptake, particularly when expressed as tumor-to-liver SUV ratios (SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L).

Assessment of response to PRRT including anatomical and molecular imaging as well as novel biomarkers

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for both oncological and hormone control and is a widely accepted standard of care treatment for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Its use is anticipated to increase significantly, and this demands accurate tools and paradigms to assess treatment response post PRRT. This article outlines the current role and future developments of anatomical, molecular imaging and biomarkers for response assessment to PRRT, highlighting the challenges and provides perspectives for the need to focus on a multimodality, multidisciplinary and individualised approach for patients with this complex heterogeneous disease.

A neuroendocrine biomarker revolution from monoanalyte to multianalyte biomarkers in non-functioning gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arise from neuroendocrine cells in a wide variety of organs. One of the most affected disease sites is the gastrointestinal system, which originates the gastro-entero-pancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs), a heterogenous group of malignancies that are rapidly increasing in incidence. These tumors can be functioning, with secretory activity leading to identifiable clinical syndromes, or non-functioning, with no secretory activity but with local symptoms of tumor growth and metastasis. A limitation in biomarkers is a crucial unmet need in non-secretory NEN management, as clinical decision-making is made more difficult by obstacles in tumor classification, prognostic evaluation, assessment of treatment response and surveillance. The objective of this review is to present existing and novel biomarkers for NENs that can function as prognostic factors and monitor disease progression or regression longitudinally, with a special emphasis on innovative research into novel multianalyte biomarkers.

Mid-Treatment Response to 177-Lutetium Dotatate Predicts Overall Outcome in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs) often require both peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and subsequent chemotherapy. However, no mid-PRRT predictors are available to identify patients who will not benefit from subsequent PRRT to limit their radiation exposure. Our aim is to characterize patients for whom subsequent PRRT is less efficacious on the basis of mid-PRRT evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with WD-NET who underwent ≥four PRRT cycles. Data gathered included demographics, tumor grade, stage, and response (partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], and progressive disease [PD]) on the basis of RECIST 1.1 criteria and 68Ga-dotatate positron emission tomography-computerized tomography pretreatment, after second and fourth treatment cycle, 6 months after fourth cycle, and at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (51.6% women; age at diagnosis 66.0 ± 1.65 years), with pancreatic NET (PNET; n = 24), small intestine NET (n = 13), or other NET (n = 14), received PRRT, resulting in PR (n = 21), SD (n = 23), and PD (n = 3). Of the patients reaching PR after PRRT, most reached PR after two treatments (70.4%), with only 11.8% PR occurring between subsequent cycles (P = .001). Furthermore, patients with PR at mid-treatment had higher PR rates after PRRT completion than those with SD (P = .007). Patients harboring PNET who achieved PR had a more pronounced reduction of tumor burden in additional cycles than patients who did not (25.6% v 1.5%; P = .03, respectively). On the multivariable model, adjusted for grade and primary site, PR at mid-treatment evaluation was associated with a 20.9 adjusted odds ratio for additional PR at PRRT completion (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Mid-PRRT assessment predicts subsequent PRRT response in patients with WD-NET, especially those with PNET, informing personalized management and consideration of reduced bone marrow radiation exposure in high-risk patients.

Update in the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a diverse group of neoplasms that can occur in various areas throughout the body. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) most often arise in the gastrointestinal tract, termed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Although GEP-NETs are still uncommon, their incidence and prevalence have been steadily increasing over the past decades. The primary treatment for GEP-NETs is surgery, which offers the best chance for a cure. However, because GEP-NETs are often slow-growing and do not cause symptoms until they have spread widely, curative surgery is not always an option. Significant advances have been made in systemic and locoregional treatment options in recent years, including peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy with α and β emitters, somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and targeted molecular therapies.

Genomic Landscape of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Implications for Clinical Practice

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are the second most prevalent neoplasms of the pancreas with variable prognosis and clinical course. Our knowledge of the genetic alterations in patients with pNETs has expanded in the past decade with the availability of whole-genome sequencing and germline testing. This review will focus on potential clinical applications of the genetic testing in patients with pNETs. For somatic testing, we discuss the commonly prevalent somatic mutations and their impact on prognosis and treatment of patients with pNET. We also highlight the relevant genomic biomarkers that predict response to specific treatments. Previously, germline testing was only recommended for high-risk patients with syndromic features (MEN1, VHL, TSC, and NF1), we review the evolving paradigm of germline testing in pNETs as recent studies have now shown that sporadic-appearing pNETs can also harbor germline variants.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Beta Labeled Radiopeptides

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of administrating a radiolabeled octreotide derivative that targets somatostatin receptors present on the cell membrane of neuroendocrine tumor cells. Although PRRT was initially performed with 90Y-peptides, currently 177Lu-peptides represent the predominant form of treatment. PRRT results in significant tumor and symptomatic control in patients. Like with other available systemic therapies, responses are relatively short-lived. Several new peptides and strategies to improve the efficacy and tolerability of PRRT have been proposed. A critical step is individualizing treatments based on specific dosimetric estimates for the tumor and normal organs, and determining tissue radiosensitivity.

Biochemical Markers for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Traditional Circulating Markers and Recent Development-A Comprehensive Review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms presenting unique challenges in diagnosis and management. Traditional markers such as chromogranin A (CgA), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) have limitations in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Specific circulating markers such as serotonin and its metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and various gastrointestinal hormones such as gastrin, glucagon, somatostatin, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) have a role in identifying functional NENs. Recent advances in molecular and biochemical markers, also accounting for novel genomic and proteomic markers, have significantly improved the landscape for the diagnosis and monitoring of NENs. This review discusses these developments, focusing on both traditional markers such as CgA and NSE, as well as specific hormones like gastrin, insulin, somatostatin, glucagon, and VIP. Additionally, it covers emerging genomic and proteomic markers that are shaping current research. The clinical applicability of these markers is highlighted, and their role in improving diagnostic accuracy, predicting surgical outcomes, and monitoring response to treatment is demonstrated. The review also highlights the need for further research, including validation of these markers in larger studies, development of standardized assays, and integration with imaging techniques. The evolving field of biochemical markers holds promise for improving patient outcomes in the treatment of NENs, although challenges in standardization and validation remain.

Evaluation of a blood miRNA/mRNA signature to follow-up Lu-PRRT therapy for G1/G2 intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Background

177Lu-oxodotreotide peptide receptor therapy (LuPRRT) is an efficient treatment for midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of variable radiological response. Several clinical, biological, and imaging parameters may be used to establish a relative disease prognosis but none is able to predict early efficacy or toxicities. We investigated expression levels for mRNA and miRNA involved in radiosensitivity and tumor progression searching for correlations related to patient outcome during LuPRRT therapy.

Methods

Thirty-five patients received LuPRRT for G1/G2 midgut NETs between May 2019 and September 2021. Peripheral blood samples were collected prior to irradiation, before and 48 h after the second and the fourth LuPRRT, and at 6-month follow-up. Multiple regression analyses and Pearson correlations were performed to identify the miRNA/mRNA signature that will best predict response to LuPRRT.

Results

Focusing on four mRNAs and three miRNAs, we identified a miRNA/mRNA signature enabling the early identification of responders to LuPRRT with significant reduced miRNA/mRNA expression after the first LuPRRT administration for patients with progressive disease at 1 year (p < 0.001). The relevance of this signature was reinforced by studying its evolution up to 6 months post-LuPRRT. Moreover, nadir absolute lymphocyte count within the first 2 months after the first LuPRRT administration was significantly related to low miRNA/mRNA expression level (p < 0.05) for patients with progressive disease.

Conclusion

We present a pilot study exploring a miRNA/mRNA signature that correlates with early hematologic toxicity and therapeutic response 12 months following LuPRRT. This signature will be tested prospectively in a larger series of patients.

Enhancing precision: A predictive model for 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment response in neuroendocrine tumors using quantitative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and clinicopathological biomarkers

Purpose: This study aims to elucidate the role of quantitative SSTR-PET metrics and clinicopathological biomarkers in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Methods: A retrospective analysis including 91 NET patients (M47/F44; age 66 years, range 34-90 years) who completed four cycles of standard 177Lu-DOTATATE was conducted. SSTR-avid tumors were segmented from pretherapy SSTR-PET images using a semiautomatic workflow with the tumors labeled based on the anatomical regions. Multiple image-based features including total and organ-specific tumor volume and SSTR density along with clinicopathological biomarkers including Ki-67, chromogranin A (CgA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were analyzed with respect to the PRRT response. Results: The median OS was 39.4 months (95% CI: 33.1-NA months), while the median PFS was 23.9 months (95% CI: 19.3-32.4 months). Total SSTR-avid tumor volume (HR = 3.6; P = 0.07) and bone tumor volume (HR = 1.5; P = 0.003) were associated with shorter OS. Also, total tumor volume (HR = 4.3; P = 0.01), liver tumor volume (HR = 1.8; P = 0.05) and bone tumor volume (HR = 1.4; P = 0.01) were associated with shorter PFS. Furthermore, the presence of large lesion volume with low SSTR uptake was correlated with worse OS (HR = 1.4; P = 0.03) and PFS (HR = 1.5; P = 0.003). Among the biomarkers, elevated baseline CgA and ALP showed a negative association with both OS (CgA: HR = 4.9; P = 0.003, ALP: HR = 52.6; P = 0.004) and PFS (CgA: HR = 4.2; P = 0.002, ALP: HR = 9.4; P = 0.06). Similarly, number of prior systemic treatments was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.4; P = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 1.2; P = 0.05). Additionally, tumors originating from the midgut primary site demonstrated longer PFS, compared to the pancreas (HR = 1.6; P = 0.16), and those categorized as unknown primary (HR = 3.0; P = 0.002). Conclusion: Image-based features such as SSTR-avid tumor volume, bone tumor involvement, and the presence of large tumors with low SSTR expression demonstrated significant predictive value for PFS, suggesting potential clinical utility in NETs management. Moreover, elevated CgA and ALP, along with an increased number of prior systemic treatments, emerged as significant factors associated with worse PRRT outcomes.

Gene Abnormalities and Modulated Gene Expression Associated with Radionuclide Treatment: Towards Predictive Biomarkers of Response

Molecular radiotherapy (MRT), also known as radioimmunotherapy or targeted radiotherapy, is the delivery of radionuclides to tumours by targeting receptors overexpressed on the cancer cell. Currently it is used in the treatment of a few cancer types including lymphoma, neuroendocrine, and prostate cancer. Recently reported outcomes demonstrating improvements in patient survival have led to an upsurge in interest in MRT particularly for the treatment of prostate cancer. Unfortunately, between 30% and 40% of patients do not respond. Further normal tissue exposure, especially kidney and salivary gland due to receptor expression, result in toxicity, including dry mouth. Predictive biomarkers to select patients who will benefit from MRT are crucial. Whilst pre-treatment imaging with imaging versions of the therapeutic agents is useful in demonstrating tumour binding and potentially organ toxicity, they do not necessarily predict patient benefit, which is dependent on tumour radiosensitivity. Transcript-based biomarkers have proven useful in tailoring external beam radiotherapy and adjuvant treatment. However, few studies have attempted to derive signatures for MRT response prediction. Here, transcriptomic studies that have identified genes associated with clinical radionuclide exposure have been reviewed. These studies will provide potential features for seeding multi-component biomarkers of MRT response.

Sequencing of Somatostatin-Receptor-Based Therapies in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Most well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) express high levels of somatostatin receptors, particularly subtypes 2 and 5. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) bind to somatostatin receptors and are used for palliation of hormonal syndromes and control of tumor growth. The long-acting SSAs octreotide long-acting release and lanreotide are commonly used in the first-line metastatic setting because of their tolerable side effect profile. Radiolabeled SSAs are used both for imaging and for treatment of NETs. 177Lu-DOTATATE is a β-emitting radiolabeled SSA that has been proven to significantly improve progression-free survival among patients with progressive midgut NETs and is approved for treatment of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs. A key question in management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs is the sequencing of 177Lu-DOTATATE in relation to other systemic treatments (such as everolimus) or liver-directed therapies. This question is particularly complicated given the heterogeneity of NETs and the near absence of randomized trials comparing active treatment options. This state-of-the-art review examines the evidence supporting use of somatostatin-receptor-targeted treatments within the larger landscape of NET therapy and offers insights regarding optimal patient selection, assessment of benefit versus risk, and treatment sequencing.

Prediction of 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy Outcomes in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Using Semi-Automatic Tumor Delineation on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

BACKGROUND

Treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) results in favorable response only in a subset of patients. We investigated the prognostic value of quantitative pre-treatment semi-automatic 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT analysis in NET patients treated with PRRT.

METHODS

The medical records of 94 NET patients who received at least one cycle of PRRT at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. On each pre-treatment 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, the total tumor volume (TTV), maximum tumor standardized uptake value for the patient (SUVmax), and average uptake in the lesion with the lowest radiotracer uptake (SUVmin) were determined with a semi-automatic tumor delineation method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the patients were compared based on optimal cutoff values for the imaging parameters.

RESULTS

On Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression, significantly shorter PFS was observed in patients with lower SUVmax, lower SUVmin, and higher TTV. On multivariate Cox regression, lower SUVmin and higher TTV remained predictive of shorter PFS. Only higher TTV was found to be predictive of shorter OS on Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. In a post hoc Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with at least one high-risk feature (low SUVmin or high TTV) showed shorter PFS and OS, which may be the most convenient parameter to measure in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor volume and lowest lesion uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can predict disease progression following PRRT in NET patients, with the former also predictive of overall survival. NET patients at risk for poor outcomes following PRRT can be identified with semi-automated quantitative analysis of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.

The Quest for Circulating Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: a Clinical Perspective

OPINION STATEMENT

Given the considerable heterogeneity in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), it appears unlikely that a sole biomarker exists capable of fully capturing all useful clinical aspects of these tumors. This is reflected in the abundant number of biomarkers presently available for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of NEN patients. Although assessment of immunohistochemical and radiological markers remains paramount and often obligatory, there has been a notable surge of interest in circulating biomarkers over the years given the numerous benefits associated with liquid biopsies. Currently, the clinic primarily relies on single-analyte assays such as the chromogranin A assay, but these are far from ideal because of limitations such as compromised sensitivity and specificity as well as a lack of standardization. Consequently, the quest for NEN biomarkers continued with the exploration of multianalyte markers, exemplified by the development of the NETest and ctDNA-based analysis. Here, an extensive panel of markers is simultaneously evaluated to identify distinct signatures that could enhance the accuracy of patient diagnosis, prognosis determination, and response to therapy prediction and monitoring. Given the promising results, the development and implementation of these multianalyte markers are expected to usher in a new era of NEN biomarkers in the clinic. In this review, we will outline both clinically implemented and more experimental circulating markers to provide an update on developments in this rapidly evolving field.

Targeted radionuclide therapy in endocrine-related cancers: advances in the last decade

Targeted radionuclide therapy plays an increasingly important role in managing endocrine-related tumors and significantly advances the therapeutic landscape for patients with these diseases. With increasing FDA-approved therapies and advances in the field, come an increased knowledge of the potential for long-term toxicities associated with these therapies and the field must develop new strategies to increase potency and efficacy while individualizing the selection of patients to those most likely to respond to treatment. Novel agents and modalities of therapy are also being explored. This review will discuss the current landscape and describe the avenues for growth in the field currently being explored.

Monitoring and Surveillance of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Radioligand Therapy

Radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a standard of care for adult patients with somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Taking advantage of this precision nuclear medicine approach requires diligent monitoring and surveillance, from the use of diagnostic SSTR-targeted radioligand imaging for the selection of patients through treatment and assessments of response. Published evidence-based guidelines assist the multidisciplinary healthcare team by providing acceptable approaches to care; however, the sheer heterogeneity of GEP-NETs can make these frameworks difficult to apply in individual clinical circumstances. There are also contradictions in the literature regarding the utility of novel approaches in monitoring and surveilling patients with GEP-NETs receiving RLT. This article discusses the emerging evidence on imaging, clinical biochemistry, and tumor assessment criteria in the management of patients receiving RLT for GEP-NETs; additionally, it documents our own best practices. This allows us to offer practical guidance on how to effectively implement monitoring and surveillance measures to aid patient-tailored clinical decision-making.

Can Ki-67 predict radiotherapy response in neuroendocrine tumors? Retrospective analysis of a monocentric series of patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of radiotherapy (RT) in neuroendocrine neoplasms is still unknown, and outcomes could be improved by a better insight in RT response predictors. This retrospective analysis investigates the potential correlation between Ki-67 and RT response to evaluate its role as biological marker of radiosensitivity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from patients treated at an Italian NET-referral center between 2015 and 2020 were retrieved. Inclusion criteria included: histologically-proven diagnosis of NEN, Ki-67 status, indication (symptomatic and/or ablative) and at least one post-RT radiological assessment.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients and 63 different treatment lines were included. Primary tumors presented Ki-67 values < 3% in 21% of cases, between 3 and 20% in 45% and >20% in the remaining 33%. Almost all patients were metastatic at the time of RT, which was performed with symptomatic purpose in 43% of cases. At a median time of three months, a complete response on the target lesion was observed in nine cases (14%), a partial response in 17 (27%), stability in 23 (37%) and local progression in 14 (22%). With median FU of 22.8 months, OS does not show statistically significant differences among three Ki-67 groups. Considering all lines of therapy, the relationship between ORR and Ki-67, did not show statistically significant differences, even following adjustments for drug types and delivered RT doses.

CONCLUSION

No association between Ki67 and local tumor response to RT could be observed in the present cohort, regardless of whether the evaluation was performed on a categorical or continuous scale.

Consensus report of the 2021 National Cancer Institute neuroendocrine tumor clinical trials planning meeting

Important progress has been made over the last decade in the classification, imaging, and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NENs), with several new agents approved for use. Although the treatment options available for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have greatly expanded, the rapidly changing landscape has presented several unanswered questions about how best to optimize, sequence, and individualize therapy. Perhaps the most important development over the last decade has been the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE for treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, raising questions around optimal sequencing of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) relative to other therapeutic options, the role of re-treatment with PRRT, and whether PRRT can be further optimized through use of dosimetry among other approaches. The NET Task Force of the National Cancer Institute GI Steering Committee convened a clinical trial planning meeting in 2021 with multidisciplinary experts from academia, the federal government, industry, and patient advocates to develop NET clinical trials in the era of PRRT. Key clinical trial recommendations for development included 1) PRRT re-treatment, 2) PRRT and immunotherapy combinations, 3) PRRT and DNA damage repair inhibitor combinations, 4) treatment for liver-dominant disease, 5) treatment for PRRT-resistant disease, and 6) dosimetry-modified PRRT.

Promising targetable biomarkers in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

INTRODUCTION

In the treatment scenario of PanNETs-targeted therapies are desired but limited, as rarity and heterogeneity on PanNETs pose limitations to their development.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature review searching for promising druggable biomarkers and potential treatments to be implemented in the next future. We focused on treatments which have already reached clinical experimentation, although in early phases. Six targets were identified, namely Hsp90, HIFa, HDACs, CDKs, uPAR, and DDR. Even though biological rational is strong, so far reported efficacy outcomes are quite disappointing. The reason of that should be searched in the patients' heterogeneity, lack of biomarker selection, poor knowledge of interfering mechanisms as well as difficulties in patients accrual. Moreover, different ways to assess treatment efficacy should be considered, other than response rate, in light of the more indolent nature of NETs.

EXPERT OPINION

Development of targeted treatments in PanNETs is still an uncovered area, far behind other more frequent cancers. Rarity of NETs led to accrual of unselected populations, possibly jeopardizing the drug efficacy. Better patients' selection, both in terms of topography, grading and biomarkers is crucial and will help understanding which role targeted therapies can really play in these tumors.

Established and novel circulating neuroendocrine tumor biomarkers for diagnostic, predictive and prognostic use

The management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represents a clinical challenge due to heterogeneity of their clinical behaviour, molecular biology and response to treatment. Over the years, several circulating biomarkers have been developed for the early diagnosis and follow-up of NETs. The specific secretory products of tumors associated with a secretory syndrome (functioning tumors) may be used as diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers while the most common non-specific circulating biomarkers, that may be increased in both functioning and non-functioning tumors, are chromogranin A and the neuron specific enolase. However, the diagnostic accuracy as well as the prognostic and predictive value of these biomarkers are limited and novel techniques of multianalyte analysis of regulators of tumor biology have been developed. The NETest has been most extensively studied and proved to be useful in NET diagnosis, early detection of post-operative recurrence and prediction of response to treatment but further investigation establishing higher level of evidence is required for implementation in clinical practice.

Precision medicine in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Where are we in 2023?

Precision medicine describes a target-related approach to tailoring diagnosis and treatment of the individual patient. While this personalized approach is revoluzionizing many areas of oncology, it is quite late in the field of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), in which there are few molecular alterations to be therapeutically targeted. We critically reviewed the current evidence about precision medicine in GEP NENs, focusing on potential clinically relevant actionable targets for GEP NENs, such as the mTOR pathway, MGMT, hypoxia markers, RET, DLL-3, and some general agnostic targets. We analysed the main investigational approaches with solid and liquid biopsies. Furthermore, we reviewed a model of precision medicine more specific for NENs that is the theragnostic use of radionuclides. Overall, currently no true predictive factors for therapy have been validated so far in GEP NENs, and the personalized approach is based more on clinical thinking within a NEN-dedicated multidisciplinary team. However, there is a robust background to suppose that precision medicine, with the theragnostic model will yield new insights in this context soon.

The prognostic role of whole-body volumetric 68 GA-DOTATATE PET/computed tomography parameters in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor treated with 177 LU-DOTATATE

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and quantitative 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/computed tomography parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), DOTATATE tumor volume (DTV), total lesion DOTATATE (TLD) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Our retrospective study included 21 patients with GEP-NETs treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE between January 2017 and January 2022. SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVmax/spleenSUVmax (SUVmax/Sx), DTV, TLD, SUVmean/spleenSUVmean (SUVmean/Sm), TLD/Sm values were calculated and recorded for all patients before and after 177 Lu-DOTATATE treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 319 metastases were detected in the patients included in the study, and a total of 68 target lesions were selected. In univariant Cox regression analysis, TLD/Sm percent change (∆TLD/Sm) was found to be statistically significant on overall survival (OS) ( P  = 0.044). The 3-year survival in nonresponders was 50% ( P  = 0.034) based on ∆SUVmax/Sx values, 50% ( P  = 0.002) based on RECIST values, 50% based on ∆TDTV + new lesion values ( P  = 0.033), and according to ∆TTLD + new lesion values, it was 66% ( P  = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

In our study, we showed that SUVmax/Sx, RECIST, ∆TDTV + new lesion, and ∆TTLD + new lesion parameters can predict OS in the evaluation of response to treatment.

Circulating hsa-miR-5096 predicts 18F-FDG PET/CT positivity and modulates somatostatin receptor 2 expression: a novel miR-based assay for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare diseases encompassing pancreatic (PanNETs) and ileal NETs (SINETs), characterized by heterogeneous somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) expression. Treatments for inoperable GEP-NETs are limited, and SSTR-targeted Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) achieves variable responses. Prognostic biomarkers for the management of GEP-NET patients are required. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is a prognostic indicator of aggressiveness in GEP-NETs. This study aims to identify circulating and measurable prognostic miRNAs associated with ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT status, higher risk and lower response to PRRT.

Methods

Whole miRNOme NGS profiling was conducted on plasma samples obtained from well-differentiated advanced, metastatic, inoperable G1, G2 and G3 GEP-NET patients enrolled in the non-randomized LUX (NCT02736500) and LUNET (NCT02489604) clinical trials prior to PRRT (screening set, n= 24). Differential expression analysis was performed between ¹⁸F-FDG positive (n=12) and negative (n=12) patients. Validation was conducted by Real Time quantitative PCR in two distinct well-differentiated GEP-NET validation cohorts, considering the primary site of origin (PanNETs n=38 and SINETs n=30). The Cox regression was applied to assess independent clinical parameters and imaging for progression-free survival (PFS) in PanNETs. In situ RNA hybridization combined with immunohistochemistry was performed to simultaneously detect miR and protein expression in the same tissue specimens. This novel semi-automated miR-protein protocol was applied in PanNET FFPE specimens (n=9). In vitro functional experiments were performed in PanNET models.

Results

While no miRNAs emerged to be deregulated in SINETs, hsa-miR-5096, hsa-let-7i-3p and hsa-miR-4311 were found to correlate with ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in PanNETs (p-value:<0.005). Statistical analysis has shown that, hsa-miR-5096 can predict 6-month PFS (p-value:<0.001) and 12-month Overall Survival upon PRRT treatment (p-value:<0.05), as well as identify ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT positive PanNETs with worse prognosis after PRRT (p-value:<0.005). In addition, hsa-miR-5096 inversely correlated with both SSTR2 expression in PanNET tissue and with the ⁶⁸Gallium-DOTATOC captation values (p-value:<0.05), and accordingly it was able to decrease SSTR2 when ectopically expressed in PanNET cells (p-value:<0.01).

Conclusions

hsa-miR-5096 well performs as a biomarker for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and as independent predictor of PFS. Moreover, exosome-mediated delivery of hsa-miR-5096 may promote SSTR2 heterogeneity and thus resistance to PRRT.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy Response Assessment

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has become an integral part of management of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Gallium-68- and lutetium-177-labeled somatostatin receptor analogues have replaced yttrium-90- and 111-indium-based tracers. Several newer targeted therapies are also being used in clinical and research settings. It is imperative to accurately evaluate the response to these agents. The characteristics of NENs and the response patterns of the targeted therapies make response assessment in this group challenging. This article provides an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the various biomarkers available for response assessment.

Interim Analysis of a Prospective Validation of 2 Blood-Based Genomic Assessments (PPQ and NETest) to Determine the Clinical Efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Reliable biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are lacking. We validated the role of 2 circulating biomarkers: the PRRT prediction quotient (PPQ) as a predictive marker for response and the NETest as a monitoring biomarker. Furthermore, we evaluated whether tissue-based genetic alterations are effective in predicting progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with 177Lu-DOTATATE-treated somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs (n = 67; median age, 66 y; 52% female; 42% pancreatic, 39% small-bowel; 78% grade 1 or 2). All cases were metastatic (89% liver) and had received 1-8 prior treatments (median, 3), including somatostatin analogs (91%), surgery (55%), or chemotherapy (49%). Treatment response included PFS. According to RECIST, version 1.1, responders had stable disease or a partial response (disease-control rate) and nonresponders had progression. Blood was collected before each cycle and at follow-up. Samples were deidentified and assayed and underwent masked analyses. The gene expression assays included RNA isolation, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and multialgorithm analyses. The PPQ (positive predicts a responder; negative predicts a nonresponder) at baseline was determined. The NETest (0-100 score) was performed. Statistics were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U testing (2-tailed) or Kaplan-Meier survival testing (PFS). In patients with archival tumor tissue, next-generation sequencing was performed through an institutional platform (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets). Results: Forty-one patients (61%) were responders. PPQ accurately predicted 96% (64/67). The hazard ratio for prediction was 24.4 (95% CI, 8.2-72.5). Twelve-month disease control was 97% for PPQ-positive patients versus 26% for PPQ-negative patients (P < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival was not reached in those predicted to respond (PPQ-positive, n = 40) but was 8 mo in those predicted not to respond (PPQ-negative, n = 27). The NETest result in responders was 67 ± 25 at baseline and significantly (P < 0.05) decreased (-37 ± 44%) at follow-up. The NETest result in nonresponders was 44 ± 23 at baseline and significantly (P < 0.05) increased (+76% ± 56%) at progression. Overall, the NETest changes (increases or decreases) were 90% accurate. Thirty patients underwent next-generation sequencing. Tumors were microsatellite-stable, and the median mutational burden was 1.8. Alterations involved mainly the mTOR/PTEN/TSC pathway (30%). No relationship was associated with PRRT response. Conclusion: Our interim analysis confirmed that PPQ is an accurate predictor of 177Lu-DOTATATE responsiveness (radiosensitivity) and that NETest changes accurately correlated with treatment response. Tissue-based molecular genetic information had little value in PRRT prediction. Blood-based gene signatures may improve the management of patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE by providing information on tumor radiosensitivity and disease course, thus allowing individualized strategies.

Systemic Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Patients with metastatic or advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) carry poorer prognoses relative to patients with other NETs due to bulkier and often, more proliferative baseline disease. Patients with these tumors also possess more approved treatment options relative to patients with other NETs, making therapeutic sequencing nuanced. As such, defining optimal therapeutic sequencing and developing more potent cytoreductive treatments for patients are significant areas of research need in the field. Herein this review, we discuss the current systemic therapy landscape, our approach to therapeutic sequencing in the clinic and ongoing studies seeking to define optimal sequencing of systemic therapies, and novel therapeutics in development, for patients with pancreatic NETs. We limit the scope of this latter topic to agents with preclinical or clinical rationale over the last 8 years to provide a contemporary view of the drug development landscape and focus primarily on new types of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus immunotherapy combinations.

Relevance of Volumetric Parameters Applied to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in NET Patients Treated with PRRT

BACKGROUND

this study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of volumetric parameters on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 39 NET patients (21 male, 18 female; mean age 60.7 y) within the FENET-2016 trial (CTiD:NCT04790708). PRRT was proposed with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC alone or combined with [⁹⁰Y]Y-DOTATOC. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was performed at baseline and 3 months after PRRT. For each PET/CT, we calculated SUVmax, SUVmean, somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume (SRETV), and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSRE), as well as their percentage of changes (Δ), both for liver (_L) and for total tumor burden (_WB). Early clinical response (3 months after PRRT) and PFS were evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and institutional NET board.

RESULTS

Early clinical response identified 9 partial response (PR), 25 stable disease (SD), and 5 progressive disease (PD). Post-SRETV_WB and ΔSRETV_WB were progressively increased among response groups (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). Likewise, median post-SRETV_L was significantly higher in PD patients (p = 0.03). SUVmax and TLSRE did not correlate with early clinical response. Median PFS was 31 months. Patients with ΔSRETV_WB lower than -4.17% as well as those with post-SRETV_WB lower than 34.8 cm³ showed a longer PFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.06, respectively). Finally, multivariate analysis identified ΔSRETV_WB as an independent predictor for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

our results could strengthen the importance of evaluating the burden of disease on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in NET patients treated with PRRT.

Exploring new frontiers in prostate cancer research: Report from the 2022 Coffey-Holden prostate cancer academy meeting

INTRODUCTION

The 2022 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, "Exploring New Frontiers in Prostate Cancer Research," was held from June 23 to 26, 2022, at the University of California, Los Angeles, Luskin Conference Center, in Los Angeles, CA.

METHODS

The CHPCA Meeting is an annual discussion-oriented scientific conference organized by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, that focuses on emerging and next-step topics deemed critical for making the next major advances in prostate cancer research and clinical care. The 2022 CHPCA Meeting included 35 talks over 10 sessions and was attended by 73 academic investigators.

RESULTS

Major topic areas discussed at the meeting included: prostate cancer diversity and disparities, the impact of social determinants on research and patient outcomes, leveraging real-world and retrospective data, development of artificial intelligence biomarkers, androgen receptor (AR) signaling biology and new strategies for targeting AR, features of homologous recombination deficient prostate cancer, and future directions in immunotherapy and nuclear theranostics.

DISCUSSION

This article summarizes the scientific presentations from the 2022 CHPCA Meeting, with the goal that dissemination of this knowledge will contribute to furthering global prostate cancer research efforts.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

The concept of using a targeting molecule labeled with a diagnostic radionuclide for using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography imaging with the potential to demonstrate that tumoricidal radiation can be delivered to tumoral sites by administration of the same or a similar targeting molecule labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide termed "theranostics." Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is a well-established second/third-line theranostic treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated (neuro-)endocrine neoplasms (NENs). PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE was approved by the regulatory authorities in 2017 and 2018 for selected patients with low-grade well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs. It improves progression-free survival as well as quality of life of GEP NEN patients. Favorable symptomatic and biochemical responses using PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE have also been reported in patients with functioning metastatic GEP NENs like metastatic insulinomas, Verner Morrison syndromes (VIPomas), glucagonomas, and gastrinomas and patients with carcinoid syndrome. This therapy might also become a valuable therapeutic option for inoperable low-grade bronchopulmonary NENs, inoperable or progressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and medullary thyroid carcinomas. First-line PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE and combinations of this therapy with cytotoxic drugs are currently under investigation. New radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands include SSAs coupled with alpha radiation emitting radionuclides and somatostatin receptor antagonists coupled with radionuclides.

A Clinical Guide to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-[DOTA⁰,Tyr³]-octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) has become an established second- or third-line treatment option for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Clinical evidence of the efficacy of PRRT in tumor control has been proven and lower risks of disease progression or death are seen combined with an improved quality of life. When appropriate patient selection is performed, PRRT is accompanied by limited risks for renal and hematological toxicities. Treatment of NET patients with PRRT requires dedicated clinical expertise due to the biological characteristics of PRRT and specific characteristics of NET patients. This review provides an overview for clinicians dealing with NET on the history, molecular characteristics, efficacy, toxicity and relevant clinical specifics of PRRT.

Optimisation of radioligand therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: Current and evolving evidence

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with radioligand therapy (RLT) for example, ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is generally well-tolerated and prolongs time to progression in most patients. However, approximately 20% of patients are nonresponders. In addition, complete responses are rare (<5% of patients), and durable responses beyond 3-4 years are uncommon. This article will discuss factors which may improve the outcomes of PRRT by using biomarkers to identify patients at high risk to be nonresponders (imaging and liquid biomarkers) and will examine mechanisms to potentially improve/optimise current RLT treatment strategies. These include mechanisms to potentiate the effects of RLT, increase tumour absorbed dose, overcoming radio-resistance and upregulation of somatostatin receptors, although larger studies will be required to demonstrate which techniques are going to be most efficacious in clinical practice.

[68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE-avid tumor volume, uptake and inflammation-based index correlate with survival in neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE PRRT

To meet the increasing demand for PRRT in the treatment of patients with inoperable/disseminated well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and to guide optimization strategies, adequate and accessible predictive tools that allow to stratify patients who will benefit from treatment from those who will not are becoming indispensable. Previously, we have investigated the role of baseline [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET tumor uptake and volumetric parameters and a blood-derived inflammatory biomarker, the inflammation-based index (IBI), for outcome prediction in NET patients treated with [⁹⁰Y]Y-DOTATOC. In this retrospective study in 83 NET patients treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in a routine clinical setting, we aimed to evaluate the generalizability of our previous findings to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment combined with a pre-therapeutic [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET. A semi-automatic customized SUV threshold-based approach was used for tumor delineation. The previously identified SUV_mean cut-off of 13.7 for better survival could not be applied to this patient cohort. Instead, a more optimal cut-off could be identified: an SUV_mean lower or equal than 11.2 was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) 2.28; P = 0.008). Also in line with our previous study, a [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE-avid tumor volume (TV) higher than 672 mL and an elevated baseline IBI were correlated with worse OS (HR 3.13 (P = 0.0001) and HR 2.00 (P = 0.034), respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed independent associations between OS and baseline IBI (P = 0.032), SUV_mean (P = 0.027) and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE-avid TV (P = 0.001). Taking baseline IBI, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE-avid TV and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE uptake into account may help guide PRRT treatment decisions.

Neuroendocrine Tumors and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: When Is the Right Time?

Since its approval in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has become a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Lutetium-177-DOTATATE, the only approved agent, is indicated for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors. Although patient selection appears straightforward with somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography, there is considerable complexity when deciding which patients to treat and when to start PRRT. Herein, we review the many factors that affect patient selection, focusing on the optimal patients to treat. Although significant effort has been expended to determine which patients benefit the most from PRRT, a validated predictive biomarker remains elusive. Although PRRT has been used for more than 2 decades in Europe and standards of care exist for safe treatment, there remain numerous questions regarding when PRRT should be used relative to other treatments. It is important to remember that multidisciplinary discussions are essential. Currently, there are a number of ongoing studies looking to assess the efficacy of PRRT compared with other treatment options and to optimize treatment through combination therapy, different dosing strategies, or use of different radionuclides and radioligands.

[Modern molecular and imaging diagnostics in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

New molecular diagnostic and radiologic imaging techniques can be used to assess the extent, risk of recurrence, prognosis and response to treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). They therefore represent a decisive help in setting the indications for surgical treatment, especially in advanced stages.

METHODS

This article presents a narrative assessment of the options and evidence for modern molecular and radiologic imaging diagnostics of pNENs based on the current literature.

RESULTS

While circulating DNA, circulating tumor cells and microRNAs have not yet become established in everyday clinical practice, the current literature suggests a promising role for the so-called NETest. Recent studies demonstrated its possible importance for the surgical management of pNENs. Besides [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA-PET and [18]FDG-PET, which remain the gold standards for imaging NENs, radiomics represent an exciting alternative to biopsies and will possibly play an increasingly important role in the future.

DISCUSSION

There are new promising alternatives to chromogranin A, which has been clinically widespread since the 1970s despite several drawbacks, to map the extent, risk of recurrence, prognosis and response to treatment of pancreatic pNENs. In terms of personalized medicine, modern molecular and radiological diagnostics should play an increasing role for indicating and planning surgical treatment and for follow-up in the future.

Induction therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE procures long-term survival in locally advanced or oligometastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm patients

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE induces objective response in up to 57% of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs). Therefore, PRRT may comprise a downstaging option for panNEN patients who are not eligible for upfront curative surgery or are at high risk for recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the potency of induction PRRT for locally advanced panNENs and to evaluate the effect of surgery after PRRT on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of panNEN patients treated with induction 177Lu-DOTATATE.

RESULTS

After PRRT, 26 out of 49 patients underwent pancreatic surgery with curative intent (PRRT + surgery). Partial objective response was obtained in 62% of the PRRT + surgery group versus 26% of the patients not undergoing panNEN surgery (PRRT-only group, p = 0.02). Downstaging in tumour-vessel interface was observed in 38% of all patients with at least one involved vessel. Median OS was 14.7 years (95% CI 5.9-23.6) for the PRRT + surgery group compared to 5.5 years (95% CI 4.5-6.5) for the PRRT-only group (p = 0.003). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, surgery was not significantly associated with OS after propensity score adjustment with cumulative activity, performance status, tumour size after PRRT, and tumour grade. Median progression-free survival was 5.3 years (95% CI 2.4-8.1) for the PRRT + surgery group and 3.0 years (95% CI 1.6-4.4) for the PRRT-only group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Early administration of PRRT followed by surgery is associated with favourable long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced or oligometastatic panNEN and can be considered for selected patients with vascular involvement and/or increased risk of recurrence.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy: The European Perspective

This review presents efforts in Europe over the last few years with respect to standardization of quantitative imaging and dosimetry and comprises the results of several European research projects on practices regarding radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs). Because the European Union has regulatory requirements concerning dosimetry in RPTs, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine released a position paper in 2021 on the use of dosimetry under these requirements. The importance of radiobiology for RPTs is elucidated in another position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Furthermore, how dosimetry interacts with clinical requirements is described, with several clinical examples. In the future, more efforts need to be undertaken to increase teaching and standardization efforts and to incorporate radiobiology for further individualizing patient treatment, with the aim of improving the outcome and safety of RPTs.

EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine

With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.

Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects

A new era of precision diagnostics and therapy for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms began with the approval of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging followed by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). With the transition from SSTR-based γ-scintigraphy to PET, the higher sensitivity of the latter raised questions regarding the direct application of the planar scintigraphy-based Krenning score for PRRT eligibility. Also, to date, the role of SSTR PET in response assessment and predicting outcome remains under evaluation. In this comprehensive review article, we discuss the current role of SSTR PET in all aspects of neuroendocrine neoplasms, including its relation to conventional imaging, selection of patients for PRRT, and the current understanding of SSTR PET-based response assessment. We also provide a standardized reporting template for SSTR PET with a brief discussion.

PRRT: identikit of the perfect patient

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been strengthened since the publication of NETTER-1. Nevertheless, the correct positioning in the therapeutic algorithm is debated, and no optimal sequence has yet been standardized. Possible criteria to predict the response to PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) have been proposed. The aim of this review is to define the perfect identity of the eligible patient who can mostly benefit from this therapy. Possible predictive criteria which have been analysed were: primary tumor site, grading, tumor burden, FDG PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake. Primary tumor site and ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake do not play a pivotal role in predicting the response, while tumor burden, FDG PET uptake and grading seem to represent predictive/prognostic factors for response to PRRT. The heterogeneity in trial designs, patient populations, type of radionuclides, previous therapies and measurement of outcomes, inevitably limits the strength of our conclusions, therefore care must be taken in applying these results to clinical practice. In conclusion, the perfect patient, selected by ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake, will likely have a relatively limited liver tumor burden, a ki67 index <20% and will respond to PRRT irrespective to primary tumor. Nevertheless, we have mostly prognostic than predictive factors to predict the efficacy of PRRT in individual patients, while a promising tool could be the NETest. However, to date, the identikit of the perfect patient for PRRT is a puzzle without some pieces and still we cannot disregard a multidisciplinary discussion of the individual case to select the patients who will mostly benefit from PRRT.

Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine?

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEPNEN) comprises clinically as well as prognostically diverse tumour entities often diagnosed at late stage. Current classification provides a uniform terminology and a Ki67-based grading system, thereby facilitating management. Advances in the study of genomic and epigenetic landscapes have amplified knowledge of tumour biology and enhanced identification of prognostic and potentially predictive treatment subgroups. Translation of this genomic and mechanistic biology into advanced GEPNEN management is limited. 'Targeted' treatments such as somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are treatment options but predictive tools are lacking. The inability to identify clonal heterogeneity and define critical oncoregulatory pathways prior to therapy, restrict therapeutic efficacy as does the inability to monitor disease status in real time. Chemotherapy in the poor prognosis NEN G3 group, though associated with acceptable response rates, only leads to short-term tumour control and their molecular biology requires delineation to provide new and more specific treatment options.The future requires an exploration of the NEN tumour genome, its microenvironment and an identification of critical oncologic checkpoints for precise drug targeting. In the advance to personalised medical treatment of patients with GEPNEN, clinical trials need to be based on mechanistic and multidimensional characterisation of each tumour in order to identify the therapeutic agent effective for the individual tumour.This review surveys advances in NEN research and delineates the current status of translation with a view to laying the basis for a genome-based personalised medicine management of advanced GEPNEN.

Overview and Current Status of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective form of treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, delivering modest objective tumor response rates but notable survival and symptomatic benefits. The first PRRT approved by the US Food and Drug Administration was lutetium 177-DOTATATE and is for use in adults with somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The treatment paradigm typically leads to significant improvement in symptomology coupled with an extended period of progression-free survival. Side effects are limited, with a small fraction of individuals experiencing clinically significant long-term renal or hematologic toxicity.

A multigenomic liquid biopsy biomarker for neuroendocrine tumor disease outperforms CgA and has surgical and clinical utility

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers are key tools in cancer management. In neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), Chromogranin A (CgA) was considered acceptable as a biomarker. We compared the clinical efficacy of a multigenomic blood biomarker (NETest) to CgA over a 5-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational, prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational, comparative cohort assessment. Cohort 1: NETest evaluation in NETs (n = 1684) and cancers, benign diseases, controls (n = 731). Cohort 2: (n = 1270): matched analysis of NETest/CgA in a sub-cohort of NETs (n = 922) versus other diseases and controls (n = 348). Disease status was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). NETest measurement: qPCR [upper limit of normal (ULN: 20)], CgA (EuroDiagnostica, ULN: 108 ng/ml).

STATISTICS

Mann-Whitney U-test, AUROC, chi-square and McNemar' test.

RESULTS

Cohort 1: NETest diagnostic accuracy was 91% (P < 0.0001) and identified pheochromocytomas (98%), small intestine (94%), pancreas (91%), lung (88%), gastric (80%) and appendix (79%). NETest reflected grading: G1: 40 ± 1, G2 (50 ± 1) and G3 (52 ± 1). Locoregional disease levels were lower (38 ± 1) than metastatic (52 ± 1, P < 0.0001). NETest accurately stratified RECIST-assessed disease extent: no disease (21 ± 1), stable (43 ± 2), progressive (62 ± 2) (P < 0.0001). NETest concordance with imaging (CT/MRI/⁶⁸Ga-SSA-PET) 91%. Presurgery, all NETs (n = 153) were positive (100%). After palliative R1/R2 surgery (n = 51) all (100%) remained elevated. After curative R0-surgery (n = 102), NETest levels were normal in 81 (70%) with no recurrence at 2 years. In the 31 (30%) with elevated levels, 25 (81%) recurred within 2 years. Cohort #2: NETest diagnostic accuracy was 87% and CgA 54% (P < 0.0001). NETest was more accurate than CgA for grading (chi-square = 7.7, OR = 18.5) and metastatic identification (chi-square = 180, OR = 8.4). NETest identified progressive disease (95%) versus CgA (57%, P < 0.0001). Imaging concordance for NETest was 91% versus CgA (46%) (P < 0.0001). Recurrence prediction after surgery was NETest-positive in >94% versus CgA 11%.

CONCLUSION

NETest accurately diagnoses NETs and is an effective surrogate marker for imaging, grade, metastases and disease status compared to CgA. A multigenomic liquid biopsy is an accurate biomarker of NET disease.

Theranostics in oncology: What radiologists want to know

Combination of radioligand imaging and therapy, so called radiotheranostics, is a novel tool of precision oncology with proven clinical value. In-depth knowledge of functional imaging nuances is critically needed for precise prognostication and guidance of management. Here, we review theranostic applications with up to Phase III type evidence for outcome improvement: Imaging and therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) exploiting high levels of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression and radiotheranostics of prostate cancer targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). This narrative review focusses on these two applications and elucidates patient selection and response assessment by radioligand scintigraphy and/or positron emission tomography. Furthermore, we provide a brief outlook on future applications for novel targets outside of NEN and prostate cancer.