Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy

The Association between "Knee Movement" Method and Traditional Radiograph Positioning Procedure with the Incidence of True Lateral Knee Radiograph Achieved

Introduction

This study aimed to find the association between the Knee Movement or KM method versus the traditional lateral knee radiograph positioning procedure and the incidence of true lateral knee radiographs achieved.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study of patients with knee problems that underwent lateral knee radiograph using the knee movement method (KM method), starting from March 2022 until August 2022. Fifty knee radiograph results using the KM method (KM group) were compared to retrospective data from fifty knee radiograph from the patients before March 2022 using the traditional method of lateral knee radiograph as the control (TM group). The data were analysed using the Chi-Square test to see if the KM method is associated with more true lateral knee radiograph results achieved compared to the traditional procedure.

Results

Fifty patients in the KM method group had 80% (n=40) true lateral knee radiographs and 20% (n=10) untrue lateral knee radiographs, while in the Traditional Procedure group from the retrospective data of 50 patients had 44% (n=22) true lateral knee radiographs and 56% (n=28) untrue lateral knee radiographs (P<0.05). There is no significant association between the type of procedure applied with the types of error (P=0.432). Nevertheless, it helps us as it gives a gross picture that most of the errors are under-rotation of the knee, either from the KM method Group 90% (n=9) or the Traditional procedure Group 79% (n=22).

Conclusion

The KM method was associated with achievement of a more true and accurate lateral knee radiograph. Additional studies with a larger sample should be done to evaluate the reliability of this method.

The accuracy of digital templating in the preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasties: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Accurately predicting the implant size in total knee arthroplasties could increase the efficiency of the operation, decrease the costs associated with the procedure and result in improved patient outcomes. To substantiate its continued use, digital templating must demonstrate itself to be an accurate tool in predicting component size in order for surgeons to confidently use it to optimize the procedure.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed and identified 16 studies within the Pubmed, Ebsco and Ovid-Embase databases, with 1189 TKR prostheses included for analysis. A quality of evidence assessment was performed on each study depending on the study design. A random effects meta-analysis model was used to pool overall implant accuracy and the reported inter-rater agreement when performing digital templating and displayed in a forest plot. Meta-regression was used analyze potential factors that may affect the accuracy of digital templating.

RESULTS

The pooled proportion of accurate templates with 0 margin of error was found to be 56% (52-61, 95CI), which increases to 96% (0.94-0.98, 95CI) when allowing for a 1 size margin of error. Subgroup analysis between femoral and tibial components concluded no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the continued use of digital templating for planning total knee arthroplasties and recommends further subgroup analysis of patient age, body mass index and sex against accuracy. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Database under ID: CRD420222367461. No funding was provided for the completion of this systematic review.

BACKGROUND

Templating in the preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasties is a vital step in ensuring maximum operative efficiency. A method that can accurately predict the required implant size within 1 size could improve theatre turnover, decrease costs and benefit patient outcomes. The current literature on the accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasties lacks a systematic review calculating the overall accuracy of the process, this study aims to address this gap.

The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a frequently performed procedure; the objective is restoration of native hip biomechanics and achieving functional range of motion (ROM) through precise positioning of the prosthetic components. Advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based navigation are valuable tools in both the preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. The aim of this study is to provide a thorough overview on the applications of CT scans in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings of primary THA. Preoperative planning using CT-based 3D imaging enables greater accuracy in prediction of implant sizes, leading to enhancement of surgical workflow with optimization of implant inventory. Surgeons can perform a more thorough assessment of posterior and anterior acetabular wall coverage, acetabular osteophytes, anatomical landmarks, and thus achieve more functional implant positioning. Intraoperative CT-based navigation can facilitate precise execution of the preoperative plan, to attain optimal positioning of the prosthetic components to avoid impingement. Medial reaming can be minimized preserving native bone stock, which can enable restoration of femoral, acetabular, and combined offsets. In addition, it is associated with greater accuracy in leg length adjustment, a critical factor in patients' postoperative satisfaction. Despite the higher costs and radiation exposure, which currently limits its widespread adoption, it offers many benefits, and the increasing interest in robotic surgery has facilitated its integration into routine practice. Conducting additional research on ultra-low-dose CT scans and examining the potential for translation of 3D imaging into improved clinical outcomes will be necessary to warrant its expanded application.

Analyzing the Accuracy of Digital Sizing on Long-Leg Alignment X-rays by Using a 1-Inch Ball Bearing: A Cheap and Effective Method

Background and objective Sizing on digital films is important for implants and planning deformity correction. CT is the most accurate digital measurement method. We use a 1-inch ball bearing (cost: $1) to size our long-leg standing films (LLSFs) when planning deformity correction. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of digital measurements calibrated by this method. Methods We conducted An IRB-approved study involving 25 patients having both an LLSF with a 1-inch ball bearing taped to the inner mid-thigh and a CT scanogram. The longest distance in the axial cut of the bilateral ankle, knee, and femoral heads of the CT images were compared to the same anatomic locations on LLSFs calibrated with the ball bearing using the online digital planning software DetroitBonesetter (DBS) and measurements from our Picture Archiving Communication Software (PACS). Five observers performed each measurement. Results The average measurement differences between the gold standard CT scan and LLSFs calibrated with DBS were as follows: 0.110 ± 0.432 mm (femoral head); 2.173 ± 0.0619 mm (knee); and 3.671 ± 0.30 mm (ankle). In PACS, they were as follows: 5.470 ± 0.381 mm (femoral head); 6.248 ± 0.712 mm (knee); and 1.806 ± 0.548 mm (ankle). The intraclass correlation coefficient for 600 measurements by five observers was 0.972. Conclusions The $1 ball-bearing sizing on DBS using LLSFs provides accuracy to <1 mm for the femoral head, 2 mm at the knee, and 3.7 mm at the ankle. It was significantly better than the PACS system for both the femoral head and knee (<0.001), while PACS was better at the ankle (<0.001).

Predictability of implant sizes during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using an image-free hand-held robotic system

The use of appropriately sized implants is critical for achieving optimal gap balance following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Inappropriately sized implants could result in several complications. Robot-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) using CT-based pre-operative planning predicts implant sizes with high accuracy. There is scant literature describing the accuracy of image-free RA-TKA in predicting implant sizes. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of an image-free robotic system in predicting implant sizes during RA-TKA. Patients who underwent cruciate-retaining RA-TKA for primary osteoarthritis, using an image-free hand-held robotic system were studied. The predicted and implanted sizes of the femoral component, tibial component and polyethylene insert, for 165 patients, were recorded. Agreement between robot-predicted and implanted component sizes was assessed in percentages, while reliability was assessed using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient. The accuracy of the robotic system was 63% (weighted-kappa = 0.623, P < 0.001), 94% (weighted-kappa = 0.911, P < 0.001) and 99.4% (weighted-kappa = 0.995, P < 0.001), in predicting exact, ± 1 and ± 2 sizes of the femoral component, respectively. For the tibial component, an accuracy of 15.8% (weighted-kappa = 0.207, P < 0.001), 55.8% (weighted-kappa = 0.378, P < 0.001) and 76.4% (weighted-kappa = 0.568, P < 0.001) was noted, for predicting exact, ± 1 and ± 2 sizes respectively. An accuracy of 88.5%, 98.2% and 100%, was noted for predicting exact, ± 1 and ± 2 sizes of the polyethylene insert respectively. Errors in predicting accurate implant sizes could be multi-factorial. Though the accuracy of image-free RA-TKA with respect to alignment and component positioning is established, the surgeon's expertise should be relied upon while deciding appropriate implant sizes.

Development and validation of multiple linear regression models for predicting total hip arthroplasty acetabular prosthesis

PURPOSE

To establish a multivariate linear equation to predict the diameter (outer diameter) of the acetabular prosthesis used in total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A cohort of 258 individuals who underwent THA at our medical facility were included in this study. The independent variables encompassed the patients' height, weight, foot length, gender, age, and surgical access. The dependent variable in this study was the diameter of the acetabular prosthesis utilized during the surgical procedure. The entire cohort dataset was randomly partitioned into a training cohort and a validation cohort, with a ratio of 7:3, employing the SPSS 26.0 software. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between the patients' height, weight, foot length, gender, age, surgical access, and the diameter of the acetabular prosthesis in the training cohort. Additionally, a multiple linear regression equation was developed using the independent variables from the training cohort and the diameter of the acetabular prosthesis as the dependent variable. This equation aimed to predict the diameter of the acetabular prosthesis based on the patients' characteristics. The accuracy of the equation was evaluated by substituting the data of the validation cohort into the multiple linear equation. The predicted acetabular prosthesis diameters were then compared with the actual diameters used in the operation.

RESULTS

The correlation analysis conducted on the training cohort revealed that surgical access (r = 0.054) and age (r = -0.120) exhibited no significant correlation with the diameter of the acetabular prosthesis utilized during the intraoperative procedure. Conversely, height (r = 0.687), weight (r = 0.654), foot length (r = 0.687), and sex (r = 0.354) demonstrated a significant correlation with the diameter of the acetabular prosthesis used intraoperatively. Furthermore, a predictive equation, denoted as Y (acetabular prosthesis diameter in mm) = 20.592 + 0.548 × foot length (cm) + 0.083 × height (cm) + 0.077 × weight (kg), was derived. This equation accurately predicted the diameter within one size with an accuracy rate of 64.94% and within two sizes with an accuracy rate of 94.81%.

CONCLUSION

Anthropometric data can accurately predict the diameter of acetabular prosthesis during total hip arthroplasty.

Enhancing Precision and Efficiency in Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis of Computer-Assisted Measurements with a Novel Software Tool versus Manual Measurements for Lower Leg Geometry

(1) Background: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate measurement software in comparison with manual measurements using inter-observer and intra-observer variability on radiographs in the preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty. (2) Methods: Two independent observers retrospectively measured the mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA), the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), the joint line convergence angle (JLCA), the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), the mechanical lateral distal tibial angle (mLDTA), the hip-knee angle or mechanical tibial-femoral axis angle (HKA), and the anatomical-mechanical angle (AMA) on 55 long-leg anteroposterior radiographs manually twice, followed by measurements using dedicated software. Variability between manual and computer-aided planning was assessed, and all measurements were performed a second time after 14 days in order to assess intra-observer variability. (3) Results: Concerning intra-observer variability, no statistically significant difference was observed regarding the software-based measurements. However, significant differences were noted concerning intra-observer variability when measuring the mLDFA and AMA manually. Testing for statistical significance regarding variability between manual and software-based measurements showed that the values varied strongly between manual and computer-aided measurements. Statistically significant differences were detected for mLPFA, mLDFA, mMPTA, and mLPTA on day 1, and mLPFA, mMPTA, and mLPTA on day 15, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Preoperative planning of leg axis angles and alignment using planning software showed less inter- and intra-observer variability in contrast to manual measurements, and results differed with respect to manual planning. We believe that the planning software is more reliable and faster, and we would recommend its use in clinical settings.

Imprecise prediction of implant sizes with preoperative 2D digital templating in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To analyze the match between preoperatively determined implant size (2D templating) and intraoperatively used implant size in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Also examined were the factors that might influence templating accuracy (gender, surgeon experience, obesity, etc.).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was retrospective and conducted in a specialized ENDOCERT arthroplasty center. Digital templating was done with the MediCAD software. If the planned and implanted TKA components (both femur and tibia) were the same size, the match was classified "exact." A deviation of ± one size (at the femur or tibia or both) was classified "accurate." A deviation of ± two or more sizes (at the femur or tibia or both) was classified "inaccurate." Obesity, gender, implant type and surgeon experience were investigated for potential influence on templating accuracy. Chi-square tests and Cohen's weighted kappa test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 482 cases [33.6% male, 66.4% female, age 69 ± 11, body mass index (BMI) 30.3 ± 5.8] were included. When the femur and tibia were taken together, exact size match was observed in 34% (95% CI 29.9-38.3%) of cases, accurate size match in 57.5% (95% CI 53-61.8%) and inaccurate size match in 8.5% (95% CI 6.3-11.2%). Inaccurate size match prolonged operative time (p = 0.028). Regarding the factors potentially influencing templating accuracy, only gender had a significant influence, with templating being more accurate in men (p = 0.004). BMI had no influence on accuracy (p = 0.87). No effect on accuracy was observed for implant type and surgeon experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of 2D size templating in TKA is low, even in a specialized ENDOCERT arthroplasty center. The study findings challenge the usefulness of preoperative 2D size templating and highlight the importance of more reliable templating methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (retrospective observational study).

Preoperative Virtual Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery Using a Computed Tomography-based 3-dimensional Model With Variation in Reference Points and Target Alignment to Predict Femoral Component Sizing

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the size differences of 19 different femoral component placements from the standard position in total knee arthroplasty using 3-dimensional virtual surgery.

Methods

Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the computed tomography data of 101 varus osteoarthritic knees. The distal femoral bone was cut perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (MA) in the coronal plane. Twenty different component placements consisting of 5 cutting directions (perpendicular to MA, 3° and 5° extension relative to MA [3°E-MA and 5°E-MA, respectively], and 3° and 5° flexion relative to MA [3°F-MA and 5°F-MA, respectively]) in the sagittal plane, 2 rotational alignments (clinical epicondylar axis [CEA] and surgical epicondylar axis [SEA]), and 2 rotational types of anterior reference guide (central [CR] and medial [MR]) were simulated.

Results

The mean anteroposterior dimension of femur ranged from 54.3 mm (5°F-MA, SEA, CR) to 62.5 mm (5°E-MA, CEA, MR). The largest and smallest differences of anteroposterior dimension from the standard position (3°F-MA, SEA, and CR) were 7.1 ± 1.3 mm (5°E-MA, CEA, and MR) and −1.2 ± 0.2 mm (5°F-MA, SEA, and CR), respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that flexion cutting direction, SEA, and CR were associated with smaller component size.

Conclusions

The femoral component size can be affected easily by not only cutting direction but also the reference guide type and the target alignment. Our findings could provide surgeons with clinically useful information to fine-tune for unintended loose or tight joint gaps by adjusting the component size.

Correlation of short knee and full-length X-rays in evaluating coronal plane alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Background

Coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would influence the implant survival. Coronal alignment could be measured on short and full-length X-rays. The goal of the current study was to assess the correlation of short and full-length X-rays to accurate prediction of the true Hip-Knee-Ankle alignment after TKA in the Iranian population.

Methods

Lateral distal femoral and medial proximal tibial angles, FTA, HKA, in 180 Iranian patients (243 knees without extra-articular deformities) were measured and compared on short and full-length standing X-rays of primary TKA pre/postoperatively.

Results

The correlation between the preoperative FTA-short and FTA-long, FTA-short and HKA, and FTA-long and HKA values in degrees were fair, good and good (r = 0.64) (r = 0.73), (r = 0.76), respectively. This correlation for postoperative aMPTA and mMPTA (r = 0.73), and FTA-short and HKA (r = 0.76) values were good and significant (P = 0.001). Also, assessing coronal alignment based on short and full-length measurements would result in varying pre/postoperative alignments (varus, neutral and valgus).

Conclusion

Full length X-rays could not be replaced by short knee X-rays to asses true coronal alignment in TKA; considerable portion of our cases were missorted as varus, neutral or valgus based on the FTA versus the HKA. Intraoperative fixed 5° valgus angle cut of distal femur did not result in postoperative favorable neutral alignment in all cases.

Level of evidence

IV.

Demographic Data Reliably Predicts Total Hip Arthroplasty Component Size

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiographic templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been shown to be inaccurate, although essential for streamlining operating room efficiency. Although demographic data have shown to predict total knee arthroplasty component sizes, the unique contour and design among femoral stem implants have limited a similar application for hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether demographic data may predict cementless THA size independent of the stem design.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 1,653 index cementless metaphyseal-fitting THAs were reviewed between 2007 and 2019. This included 12 unique femoral component designs, 6 acetabular component designs, 60 femur size-design combinations, and 23 acetabular size-design combinations. Implanted component sizes and patient demographic data were collected, including gender, height, weight, laterality, age, race, and ethnicity. Multivariate linear regressions were formulated to predict implanted femur and acetabular component sizes from the demographic data.

RESULTS

There was a significant linear correlation between gender, implant model, age, height, and weight for femur (R² = 0.778; P < .001) and acetabular (R² = 0.491; P < .001) sizes. Calculated femur and acetabular component sizes averaged within 0.97 and 0.95 sizes of those implants, respectively. Femur and acetabular sizes were predicted within 1 size 79.1% and 78.2% and within 2 sizes 94.3% and 94.6% of the time, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate regression models were created based on specific demographics data to predict femur and acetabular component sizes. The model allows for simplified preoperative planning and potential cost savings implementation. A free phone application named EasyTJA was constructed for ease of implementation.

The impact of femoral bone quality on cementless total hip pre-operative templating

INTRODUCTION

Accurate templating is an integral part of pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Templating of cementless implant accuracy has been average. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Dorr femoral classification on the accuracy of pre-operative digital templating.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of cementless THA pre-operative planning using one implant design. A total of 210 primary THA were reviewed. A total of 102 cementless THAs matched the exclusion and inclusion criteria, using one implant combination, were analyzed by an orthopaedic resident and a fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeon. Each x-ray was evaluated and assigned a femoral Dorr classification. Accuracy of templating was determined by comparing the templated size with the actual implant size both for the femoral and acetabular components.

RESULT

Out of the 102 cases, exact templating size was achieved in 35.3% for the acetabulum, 25.5% for the femur, and only in 9.8% for both components. Reasonable templating, ± one of the actual size, was achieved in 78.4% for the acetabulum, 74.5% for the femur, and 60.8% for both components. Use of Dorr femoral type classification did not result in better templating accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative hip cementless templating using digital x-rays with double marker method do not improve accuracy compared to other methods available for templating. Accounting for bone quality using the Dorr femoral classification did not improve accuracy.

Prediction of Knee Prosthesis Using Patient Gender and BMI With Non-marked X-Ray by Deep Learning

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective for severe osteoarthritis and other related diseases. Accurate prosthesis prediction is a crucial factor for improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after TKA. Current studies mainly focus on conventional manual template measurements, which are inconvenient and inefficient.

Methods

In this article, we utilize convolutional neural networks to analyze a multimodal patient data and design a system that helps doctors choose prostheses for TKA. To alleviate the problems of insufficient data and uneven distribution of labels, research on model structure, loss function and transfer learning is carried out. Algorithm optimization based on error correct output coding (ECOC) is implemented to further boost the performance.

Results

The experimental results show the ECOC-based model reaches prediction accuracies of 88.23% and 86.27% for femoral components and tibial components, respectively.

Conclusions

The results verify that the ECOC-based model for prosthesis prediction in TKA is feasible and outperforms existing methods, which is of great significance for templating.

The accuracy and reliability of preoperative digital 2D templating in prosthesis size prediction in uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and the inter- and intra-observer reliability of preoperative digital 2D templating in prosthesis size prediction for the planning of cemented or uncemented THA.

This study was registered in the NIHR PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42020216649) and conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search of electronic databases in March 2021 found 29 papers overall. The quality of evidence was assessed using the IHE Quality Appraisal of Case Series Studies Checklist and the CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. A meta-analysis was conducted, and the accuracy was presented as proportions and the inter- and intra-observer reliability were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Accuracy within one prosthesis size (±1) for cemented stems was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.95), cemented cups 0.78 (95% CI 0.67–0.89), uncemented stems 0.74 (95% CI 0.66–0.82) and uncemented cups 0.73 (95% CI 0.67–0.79) (test of group differences: p = 0.010). Inter-observer reliability (ICC) for uncemented cups was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91), uncemented stems 0.86 (95% CI 0.81–0.91), cemented stems 0.69 (95% CI 0.54–0.84) and cemented cups 0.68 (95% CI 0.55–0.81) (test of group differences: p = 0.004). Due to lack of data, intra-observer reliability (ICC) could only be calculated for uncemented prostheses, which for the stems was 0.90 (95% CI 0.88–0.92) and for the cups was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.90) (test of group differences: p = 0.124).

The accuracy of preoperative digital templating is greater for cemented prostheses, but the inter-observer reliability is greater for uncemented prostheses. The intra-observer reliability showed a high level of agreement for uncemented prostheses.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1020-1039. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210048

Handheld computer-navigated constrained total knee arthroplasty for complex extra-articular deformities

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to assess the postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes of patients with complex extra-articular deformities (EADs) undergoing computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for constrained total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with modular stem extensions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2015 to July 2018, ten patients with EADs scheduled for constrained TKA were enrolled retrospectively. The preoperative average deviation from neutral (= 180°) mechanical axis was 15.3° (range of coronal alignment: 150.9° varus-202.9° valgus). Alignment was assessed using an accelerometer-based handheld CAS system. On long-leg films, the positions of the components and possible stems were analysed and templated preoperatively. The average follow-up was 3.3 years (range: 2.0-4.6 years).

RESULTS

The postoperative mechanical axis was within ± 3.0° from neutral in nine patients. In all patients, the Knee Society score (KSS) and range of motion improved significantly. A constrained condylar and a rotating hinge prosthesis were used in five patients each. In eight patients, the 100-mm cementless stem that was preferred by the authors was found to be unusable for the femur or the tibia in the planning stage. For the femur, a cementless 100-mm stem was used in three, and a cemented 30-mm stem in five patients; a femoral stem was not usable in two patients. For the tibia, a cementless 100-mm stem was used in six, and a cemented 30-mm stem in two patients; a monoblock rotating hinge tibia was used in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex EADs were excellently managed during constrained TKA implantation using the handheld CAS system. Templating allowed the possible stem lengths to be identified and prevented anatomical conflict with the CAS-configured mechanical alignment. Limb alignment and function improved significantly after surgery. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.

Accuracy of one-dimensional templating on linear EOS radiography allows template-directed instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is routinely performed on two-dimensional standard X-ray images and allows template-directed instrumentation. To date, there is no report on one-dimensional (1D) anteroposterior (AP) templating not requiring specific templating software. We aim to describe a novel technique and explore its reliability, accuracy and potential cost-savings.

METHODS

We investigated a consecutive series of TKAs at one institution between January and July 2019. Patients with preoperative low-dose linear AP EOS radiography images were included. Implant component sizes were retrospectively templated on the AP view with the hospitals imaging viewing software by two observers who were blinded to the definitive implant size. Planning accuracy as well as inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated. Cost-savings were estimated based on the reduction of trays indicated by the 1D templating size estimations.

RESULTS

A total of 141 consecutive TKAs in 113 patients were included. Accuracy of 1D templating was as follows: exact match in 53% femoral and 63% tibial components, within one size in 96% femoral and 98% tibial components. Overall 58% of TKA components were planned correctly and 97% within one size. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was good (κ = 0.66) and very good (κ = 0.82), respectively. This templating process can reduce instrumentation from six to three trays per case and therefore halve sterilisation costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The new 1D templating method using EOS AP imaging predicts component sizes in TKA within one size 97% of the time and can halve the number of instrumentation trays and sterilisation costs.

Pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?

INTRODUCTION

Pre-operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source-to-image distance (SID), object-to-image distance (OID) and different imaging conditions is not well described. This study aims to quantify the range of effects manipulation of radiographic parameters can have on image magnification across different body habitus and imaging conditions.

METHODS

A simple phantom study was performed. A 25 mm ECM was placed at eight different OID values along the anterior-posterior phantom plane at three different SID values and imaging conditions, and X-rays were obtained. On each radiograph, the ECM was measured using a line calliper tool by three radiographers and recorded. The MF was calculated and recorded.

RESULTS

The smallest observed image MF was 1.16, for an 8 cm OID, 120 cm SID with the ECM placed within the central ray and the X-ray detector in bucky underneath the X-ray table. The largest image MF was 1.40 for a 15 cm OID, 100 cm SID with the X-ray detector placed underneath an emergency department imaging trolley.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital pre-operative templating for THA relies on accurate radiographic positioning and is dependent of the patient body habitus, radiographic parameters and imaging conditions selected by the radiographer. The use of appropriately positioned ECMs - placed medially between the patient's internally rotated legs at the level of the greater trochanter, lowers the potential for magnification inaccuracies.

Preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty: reliability of axial alignment using a three-dimensional planning approach

BACKGROUND

Preoperative templating of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can nowadays be performed three-dimensionally with software solutions using computed tomography (CT) datasets. Currently there is no consensus concerning the axial orientation of TKA components in three-dimensional (3D) planning.

PURPOSE

To assess intra-/inter-observer reliability of detection of different bony landmarks in planning axial component alignment using axial CT images and 3D reconstructions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determination of four predefined axial femoral and tibial axes was calculated using data from CT scans. Axes determination was performed on the axial slices and on the 3D reconstruction using preoperative planning software. In summary, 61 datasets were analyzed by one medical student (intra-observer reliability) and 15 datasets were analyzed by four different observers independently (inter-observer reliability).

RESULTS

For the femur, clinical epicondylar axis and posterior condylar axis showed the best reliability with an inter-observer variability of 0.7° and 0.5°, respectively. For the tibia, posterior condylar axis provided best reliability (inter-observer variability: 1.7°). Overall variability was greater for tibial than for femoral axes. Reliability of axis determination was more accurate using axial CT slices rather than 3D reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

The femoral clinical epicondylar axis is highly reliable. Landmarks for the tibia are not as easily identifiable as for the femur. The tibial posterior condylar axis presents the axis with highest reliability. Based on these results, clinical epicondylar axis for orientation of the femoral TKA component and posterior condylar axis for the tibial implant, both defined on axial slices can be recommended.

Is analog preoperative planning still applicable?-comparison of accuracy of analog and computer preoperative planning methods in total hip arthroplasty

Background

Preoperative planning is an integral part of total hip arthroplasty and has a significant impact on surgical technique and clinical outcome. The variety of types and sizes of endoprosthesis components makes the procedure more demanding and generates a need for accurate preoperative planning. The objective of this study was to analyze an analog method of preoperative planning of primary total hip arthroplasty based on templates overlaying on preoperative radiograms and compare its accuracy for predicting the size, both the stem and cup, with computer planning methods.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study based on 360 X-ray images of hip joints in 348 patients qualified for total hip arthroplasty between 2018 and 2019. The study group consisted of 136 men and 212 women, with an average age of 65 years (56 to 85 years). Material included both cementless and cemented endoprostheses.

Results

In the analyzed material, the accuracy of cup planning using the analog method was 85% (P<0.001) and 77% (P<0.001) in the planning of stem size. However, using the computer method, planning accuracy was 82% (P<0.001) for the cup and 72% (P<0.001) for the stem.

Conclusions

Both methods of preoperative planning remain effective. The analog method of preoperative planning is simple, precise, and repeatable in choosing the type and size of endoprosthesis components with an accuracy of 85% and 77% for the cup and stem respectively. The accuracy of planning depends on the type of endoprosthesis and in the case of the cemented endoprosthesis, it is lower than in cementless.

Alignment of the hindfoot in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes

AIMS

Patients with a deformity of the hindfoot present a particular challenge when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The literature contains little information about the relationship between TKA and hindfoot alignment. This systematic review aimed to determine from both clinical and radiological studies whether TKA would alter a preoperative hindfoot deformity and whether the outcome of TKA is affected by the presence of a postoperative hindfoot deformity.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search terms consisted of "total knee arthroplasty/replacement" combined with "hindfoot/ankle alignment". Inclusion criteria were all English language studies analyzing the association between TKA and the alignment of the hindfoot, including the clinical or radiological outcomes. Exclusion criteria consisted of TKA performed with a concomitant extra-articular osteotomy and case reports or expert opinions. An assessment of quality was conducted using the modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019106980).

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were found to be eligible for review. They included six prospective and ten retrospective studies, and one case-control study. The effects of TKA showed a clinical improvement in the hindfoot deformity in three studies, but did not if there was osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle (one study) or a persistent deformity of the knee (one study). The radiological alignment of the hindfoot corrected in 11 studies, but did not in the presence of a rigid hindfoot varus deformity (in two studies). The effects of a hindfoot deformity on TKA included a clinical association with instability of the knee in one study, and a shift in the radiological weightbearing axis in two studies. The mean MINORS score was 9.4 out of 16 (7 to 12).

CONCLUSION

TKA improves both the function and alignment of the hindfoot in patients with a preoperative deformity of the hindfoot. This may not apply if there is a persistent deformity of the knee, a rigid hindfoot varus deformity, or OA of the ankle. Moreover, a persistent deformity of the hindfoot may adversely affect the stability and longevity of a TKA. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to the moderate methodological quality of the studies which were included. Therefore, further prospective studies are needed in order to determine at which stage correction of a hindfoot deformity is required to optimize the outcome of a TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):87-97.

Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty

Background

Preoperative radiographic templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be inaccurate. Patient demographic data, such as gender, height, weight, age, and race, may be more predictive of implanted component size in TKA.

Materials and methods

A multivariate linear regression model was designed to predict implanted femoral and tibial component size using demographic data along a consecutive series of 201 patients undergoing index TKA. Traditional, two-dimensional, radiographic templating was compared to demographic-based regression predictions on a prospective 181 consecutive patients undergoing index TKA in their ability to accurately predict intraoperative implanted sizes. Surgeons were blinded of any predictions.

Results

Patient gender, height, weight, age, and ethnicity/race were predictive of implanted TKA component size. The regression model more accurately predicted implanted component size compared to radiographically templated sizes for both the femoral (P = 0.04) and tibial (P < 0.01) components. The regression model exactly predicted femoral and tibial component sizes in 43.7 and 43.7% of cases, was within one size 90.1 and 95.6% of the time, and was within two sizes in every case. Radiographic templating exactly predicted 35.4 and 36.5% of cases, was within one size 86.2 and 85.1% of the time, and varied up to four sizes for both the femoral and tibial components. The regression model averaged within 0.66 and 0.61 sizes, versus 0.81 and 0.81 sizes for radiographic templating for femoral and tibial components.

Conclusions

A demographic-based regression model was created based on patient-specific demographic data to predict femoral and tibial TKA component sizes. In a prospective patient series, the regression model more accurately and precisely predicted implanted component sizes compared to radiographic templating.

Level of evidence

Prospective cohort, level II.

The accuracy of external calibration markers in digital templating using the double marker and single marker method: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Digital templating is an essential step in the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous studies have suggested that templating with the double marker method may be more accurate than a single marker method in the general population and in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy in the preoperative component selection between the King Mark calibration device and the conventional metal ball method. Additionally, we examined whether King Mark offered any advantage over the standard metal ball in the preoperative selection of component sizes for obese patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent preoperative digital templating for THA in our center from January 2014 to January 2016 with King Mark device and marker ball. We compared the preoperative template component size and offset with the intraoperative definite implant size. The accuracy was defined as the difference between preoperative and intraoperative component sizes. The overall accepted calibration was defined as an exact match ± one size. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to the calibration method: standard marker ball technique and King Mark technique.

RESULTS

126 THA underwent digital calibration. 79 patients underwent a preoperative templating using the King Mark calibration device. 47 patients were templated using a conventional marker ball. The overall adequate preoperative planning of the acetabular cup (exact or ± 1 size match) in the King Mark group did not differ from the single marker method (74.7% and 74.5%, respectively, p = 0.979). No significant difference was noted in the overall accepted calibration of the femoral stem (exact or ± 1 size match) between the marker ball group and the King Mark group (58.2% and 70.2%, respectively, p = 0.179). The King Mark group showed a better preoperative planning for the stem's offset compared to the marker ball group (77.2% % and 61.7%, respectively, p = 0.062). For the obese patient cohort, no significant difference was noted between the King Mark group and the marker ball group in the exact prediction of the acetabular cup and the femoral stem, (p = 0.31 and p = 0.15, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no difference between the King Mark method and the conventional metal ball method in the ability to accurately predict component sizes. In the subgroup of obese patients, the King Mark technique offered no advantage for accurately predicting component sizes.

Fluoroscopic Intraoperative Images Produce Higher Image Quality and Decrease Total Radiation Exposure Compared to Radiographic X-ray Images in Patients After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND/AIM

Proper radiographic documentation of implant alignment is needed to analyse malrotation and malpositioning. We examined whether intraoperative fluoroscopic images can achieve more accurate image quality than postoperative radiographic X-ray images.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively analysed 30 consecutive patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared intraoperative fluoroscopic images with postoperative radiographic X-ray images. Radiation exposure was documented.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopic anterior-posterior images could achieve accurate image quality in 77% compared to 60% in radiographic images (p=0.016) and 54% compared to 34% on lateral view, respectively (p=0.008). Very good intra-observer correlation for fluoroscopic images could be achieved for femoral α angle with 0.84. Radiation exposure was 0.087+/-0.128 mGy.

CONCLUSION

We observed significantly better image quality in fluoroscopic images than in radiographic X-ray images. The observed radiation exposure is lower than those expected for radiographic X-ray images. We conclude that fluoroscopic images can produce higher image quality and decreased radiation exposure.

Algorithm based automatic templating is less accurate than manual digital templating in total knee arthroplasty

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial automatic digital templating algorithm compared to manual digital templating in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study also evaluated if race and the presence of a standardized calibration marker on preoperative radiographs effect the accuracy of digital templating. One hundred twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were included in the study. Patient demographics, etiology of arthritis, and the presence of a standardized calibration marker on preoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs was recorded. Manual digital templating and the use of the "auto-knee" templating algorithm with "Traumacad" software was performed and recorded. Intraoperative sizes of the actual implants used were recorded. Pearson χ2 test was used to evaluate the accuracy of auto versus manual templating. Manual templating was within 1 size of the implant used intraoperatively for femoral and tibial implants 97.6% and 94.2% of the time, respectively. The "auto-knee" algorithm was within one size of the implant used for femoral and tibial implants 51.2% and 71.2% of the time, respectively. The presence of a standardized calibration marker on the AP view did not change accuracy of templating for both components. There was no difference in accuracy of templating between races. We caution surgeons from exclusively using an automatic algorithm as it is less accurate than manual templating for TKA.

Prospective Comparison of Available Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Sizing Equations

BACKGROUND

Several studies have proposed regression equations that can increase the accuracy of predicting femur and tibia component sizes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared available regression equations in their ability to prospectively predict component size in a unique patient series.

METHODS

Demographic data and implanted femur and tibia TKA component sizes were collected on a consecutive 382 patients undergoing index TKA. Equations by Bhowmik-Stoker et al, Ren et al, Sershon et al, and Miller et al were identified that used age, race, ethnicity, gender, height, weight, or body mass index. Equation outputs were converted to implant-corrected sizes and compared to the implanted component.

RESULTS

Femur and tibia sizes were accurately predicted within 1 size 88% and 92%, 84% and 86%, and 79% and 92% for Bhowmik-Stoker et al, Sershon et al, and Miller et al, respectively. Ren et al was within 1 tibia size 88% of the time. Adding one more common implant size improved this accuracy by an average of 9.1% and 6.6% for the femur and tibia, respectively. For femur components, Bhowmik-Stoker et al outperformed Sershon et al by 0.14 sizes (P < .001) and Miller et al by 0.21 sizes (P < .001) on average. For tibia components, Bhowmik-Stoker et al outperformed Sershon et al by 0.09 sizes (P = .028) and Ren et al by 0.11 sizes (P = .005) on average.

CONCLUSION

Equations by Bhowmik-Stoker et al more accurately predicted implanted TKA size. In cases of greater uncertainty, the practicing surgeon may err on having more common TKA sizes available.

Pre-operative templating in THA. Part II: a CT-based strategy to correct architectural hip deformities

INTRODUCTION

Pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains inaccurate due to improper magnification and alignment. We aimed to describe an improved templating strategy using computed tomography (CT) to predict component sizes and offsets with greater accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed 184 CT images acquired for pre-operative templating of primary THA. We aimed to restore native (pre-arthritic) femoral offset and limb length, by raising the head center to the level of the templated cup center cranio-caudally, but maintaining the pathologic (pre-operative) head center medio-laterally (except in medialized hips). Acetabular offset (AO) and femoral offset (FO) were measured on pre-operative CT scans, during acetate templating, and on post-operative true antero-posterior radiographs.

RESULTS

The post-operative offsets were within ± 5 mm from templated estimates in 174 hips (91%) for AO, in 116 hips (61%) for FO, in 111 hips (58%) for GO, and in 134 hips (70%) for neck cut level. The post-operative hip architecture reproduced the templated hip architecture within ±5 mm in 77 hips (40%). The agreement between planned and post-operative parameters was moderate for stem size (0.57), cup size (0.62), AO (0.50), but fair for FO (0.45). The AO decreased in most arthritic types, notably in lateralized hips (6.6 mm), but remained unchanged in medialized hips. The FO increased in most arthritic types (1.8-3.1 mm) but remained unchanged in medialized and lateralized hips.

CONCLUSIONS

We described a strategy for pre-operative templating in THA. Despite the accuracy of CT, the authors found significant variations between planned and post-operative reconstructions, which suggest that pre-operative templating should only be used as an approximate guide.

Agreement in component size between preoperative measurement, navigation and final implant in total knee replacement

Background

One of the possible causes of dissatisfaction reported by many patients after total knee replacement (TKR) is the lack of agreement between component size and bone structure. To avoid this complication and facilitate the procedure, preoperative planning with digitized templates is recommended. Surgical navigation indicates the best position and the most adequate size of arthroplasty and may therefore replace preoperative radiographic measurement. The objective of the study was to check agreement between the sizes of TKR components measured before surgery with digitized templates, the size recommended by the navigation and sizes actually implanted.

Methods

In 103 patients scheduled for TKR, preoperative full-limb radiography was performed to measure the mechanical and anatomical axes of the limb, femur and tibia. The most adequate size of the femoral and tibial components was planned by superimposing digitized templates. The size recommended in navigation and the size of the finally implanted components were also recorded.

Results

A high level of agreement was found between the sizes of femoral and tibial components measured by X-rays and in navigation (0.750 and 0.772, respectively) (intraclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha). Agreement between the sizes recommended by X-rays and navigation and those finally implanted was 0.886 for the femur and 0.891 for the tibia. Agreement levels were not different in cases with prior deformities of limb axis.

Conclusions

The high level of agreement found in component sizes between radiographic measurement with digitized templates and navigation suggests that preoperative X-ray measurement is not needed when navigation is used for placement of implants during TKR.

The translational potential of this article

Computer-assisted surgery may avoid preoperative measurement with templates in TKR.

Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for streamlining operating room efficiency and reducing costs. Digital templating and patient-specific instrumentation have shown some value in TKA but require additional costs and resources. The purpose of this study was to validate a previously published algorithm that uses only demographic variables to accurately predict TKA tibial and femoral component sizes.

METHODS

Four hundred seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing elective primary TKA were prospectively enrolled. Four surgeons were included, three of which were unaffiliated with the retrospective cohort study. Patient sex, height, and weight were entered into our published Arthroplasty Size Prediction mobile application. Accuracy of the algorithm was compared with the actual sizes of the implanted femoral and tibial components from 5 different implant systems. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for inaccurate outliers for our model.

RESULTS

When assessing accuracy to within ±1 size, the accuracies of tibial and femoral components were 87% (412/474) and 76% (360/474). When assessing accuracy to within ±2 sizes of predicted, the tibial accuracy was 97% (461/474), and the femoral accuracy was 95% (450/474). Risk factors for the actual components falling outside of 2 predicted sizes include weight less than 70 kg (odds ratio = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [1.21-5.06], P = .01) and use of an implant system with <2.5 mm incremental changes between femoral sizes (odds ratio = 5.50, 95% confidence interval [3.33-9.11], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective series of patients validates a simple algorithm to predict component sizing for TKA with high accuracy based on demographic variables alone. Surgeons can use this algorithm to simplify the preoperative planning process by reducing unnecessary trays, trials, and implant storage, particularly in the community or outpatient setting where resources are limited. Further assessment of components with less than 2.5-mm differences between femoral sizes is required in the future to make this algorithm more applicable worldwide.

Correlation of Short Knee Radiographs and Full-length Radiographs in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The clinical success and longevity of a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in large part depend on our ability to control coronal alignment. However, controversy exists regarding which radiographs to use for the most accurate interpretation. The study assesses the accuracy of coronal alignment measurements using a single short knee radiograph (SKR) in comparison with full-length radiographs (FLRs).

METHODS

Using our institutional database, we retrieved radiographs of all patients who have had pre- and postoperative FLRs for their primary TKA in 2014. The following measurements were obtained on both short and long radiographs: femoral-tibial angle (FTA), anatomic lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, condylar-plateau angle, and condylar-plateau distance. A reliability analysis was conducted between the pre- and postoperative SKRs and FLRs using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Radiographs of 236 limbs were included in the analysis. The FTA showed an ICC of 0.84 and 0.69 on the pre- and postoperative radiographs, respectively. Good ICC was seen in the lateral distal femoral angle in both the pre- and postoperative radiographs; these were 0.70 and 0.67, respectively. Also, the medial proximal tibial angle showed good to excellent correlation, with an ICC of 0.83 on the preoperative and 0.66 on the postoperative radiographs.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates that SKRs could be an appropriate substitute for FLRs for the evaluation of primary TKA coronal alignment, especially in the postoperative assessment of these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Is computerised 3D templating more accurate than 2D templating to predict size of components in primary total hip arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) and computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3D) measures.

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen consecutive primary THAs were analysed. The preoperative diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in all cases. The 2D templating and the 3D templating were performed by two different residents. All templating results were available for the orthopaedic surgeon performing the procedure. Accuracies with regard to the predicted and actual implant sizes were determined for each procedure. Implantation of the size as planned was defined as "exact", whereas the use of components within one size larger or smaller (±1) as planned were defined as "accurate."

RESULTS

The 3D templating was significantly more accurate in predicting implant sizing compared to 2D templating for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The difference was statistically significant for the cup templating (''exact'' p = 0.02; ''accurate'' p = 0.01) and for the stem templating (''exact'' p = 0.04; ''accurate'' p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the superiority of 3D templating over 2D templating in predicting implant size.

Influence of calibration on digital templating of hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Digital templating for total joint replacement is the current standard. For image calibration, external calibration markers (ECM) are used. However, there are concerns regarding the precision of the method. This study aimed to identify the direct influence of calibration errors on digital templating.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 post-operative radiographs with unilateral total hip arthroplasty was performed. The magnification factor of the ECM and of the internal prosthetic femoral head (ICM) as a reference value was calculated for each radiograph. Two blinded observers performed templating of the contralateral hip using a randomized list for all radiographs and both markers. The component size templated by the ECM magnification was compared to the reference by the ICM magnification.

RESULTS

Mean magnification factors of ICM and ECM differed significantly (p = 0.006). The absolute difference was 5.2% (range 0.0-23.3%, SD 4.8%). Templating of the acetabular or the femoral component showed no significant differences (p = 0.120, p = 0.599). Differences of more than one size were found in 26% of the acetabular components and 14% of the femoral components and differences over two sizes in 10% respectively 3%. Correlation coefficients for magnification error and size differences of acetabular components were - 0.645 (p < 0.001) and for the femoral component - 0.607 (p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

The calibration error of external calibration markers in digital templating for hip replacement influences component sizes significantly. Thus, correct positioning of ECM is of utmost importance.

Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative

PURPOSE

Patients-specific instruments (PSI) for implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be used to predict the implant size for both the femur and the tibia component. This study aims to determine the impact of approval of the PSI planning for TKA on the frequency of, and reason for intraoperative changes of implant sizes.

METHODS

The clinical records of 293 patients operated with MRI- (90.4 %) and CT-based (9.6 %) PSI were reviewed for actual used implant size. Preoperative default planning from the technician and approved planning by the operating surgeon were compared with the intraoperative implanted component size for both the femur and tibia. Intraoperative reason for not following the default sizes was outdated. Furthermore, MRI- and CT-based PSI were compared for these outcomes.

RESULTS

In 93.9 and 91.1 % for, respectively, the femur and tibia (n.s.), the surgeon planned size was implanted during surgery. The predicted size of the femur (p < 0.00) and the tibia (p < 0.00) component planned by a technician differed from the implanted component sizes in 62 (21.2 %) and 51 (17.4 %) patients, respectively. In 17 cases, the femoral component size was adapted intraoperative based on the expert opinion of the operating surgeon. In 26 cases, the tibia component was changed during the surgery because of a mediolateral overhang, sclerotic bone, medial or lateral release, limited extension and/or fixed varus deformity. The results between the MRI- and CT-based PSI did not differ (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

PSI is a tool to help the surgeon to achieve the best possible results during TKA. The planning made by a technician should always be validated and approved by the operating surgeon who has the ultimate responsibility regarding the operation. With PSI, the operating surgeon is able to minimize intraoperative implant size errors in advance to improve operating room efficiency with possible lowering hospital costs per procedure.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Accuracy of C-arm measurements in assessment of paediatric femoral fracture shortening

PURPOSE

Spica casting of femoral shaft fractures is standard practice for young children. In 1983, Dr. Rang published an illustration demonstrating that radiographs can be misleading when measuring femoral fracture shortening. Today, fluoroscopy is used to determine shortening after closed reduction and spica casting. This paper aims to determine the accuracy of fluoroscopy when measuring 25 mm of shortening in a femur fracture sawbone model.

METHODS

Magnification, elevation and angulation were evaluated using a femur fracture sawbone model with a fixed overlap of 25 mm. Two C-arm machines used in clinical practice were studied: the OEC 9900 Elite GE C-arm and the Fluoroscan InSight mini C-arm.

RESULTS

The OEC 9900 Elite GE C-arm demonstrated a 1.75 × magnification. The Fluoroscan InSight mini C-arm demonstrated a 2.5 × magnification. An 11% and a 17% magnification with elevation of the femur to 8 cm occurred using the OEC 9900 Elite GE and the Fluoroscan InSight mini C-arm respectively. Changing the tube angulation from 0° to 60° resulted in a 36% and 16% change in measured femur fracture shortening on the OEC C-arm and Fluoroscan mini C-arm respectively.

CONCLUSION

C-arm images are inaccurate. When measuring 25 mm of shortening of a paediatric femur fracture, each machine has a unique amount of magnification that should be determined and accounted for in clinical practice. Elevation of the femur above the C-arm receiver and angulation of the femur further increase the inaccuracies when measuring 25 mm of fracture shortening. Images perpendicular to the fracture are most accurate.

Can Demographic Variables Accurately Predict Component Sizing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

As health care reform drives providers to reduce costs and improve efficiencies without compromising patient care, preoperative planning has become imperative. The purpose of this study is to determine whether height, weight, and gender can accurately predict total knee arthroplasty (TKA) sizing.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 3491 primary TKAs performed by 2 surgeons was reviewed. Height, weight, gender, implant, preoperative templating sizes, and final implant sizes were collected. Implant-specific dimensions were collected from vendors. Using height, weight, and gender, a multivariate linear regression was performed with and without the inclusion of preoperative templating. Accuracy of the model was reported for commonly used implants.

RESULTS

There was a significant linear correlation between height, weight, and gender for femoral (R² = 0.504; P < .001) and tibial sizes (R² = 0.610; P < .001). Adding preoperative templating to the regression analysis increased the overall model fit for both the femoral (R² = 0.756; P < .001) and tibial sizes (R² = 0.780; P < .001). Femoral and tibial sizes were accurately predicted within 1 size of the final implant 71%-92% and 81%-97% using demographics alone or 85%-99% and 90%-99% using both templating and demographics, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This novel TKA templating model allows final implants to be predicted to within 1 size. The model allows for simplified preoperative planning and potential implementation into a cost-savings program that limits inventory and trays required for each case.

Radiographic Evaluation of Alignment Following TKA, a Systematic Review

Postoperative assessment is of paramount importance in primary total knee arthroplasty. A thorough postoperative analysis helps the surgeon anticipate any postoperative potential issues and correlate the preoperative planning with the postoperative result, and provides better understanding of the importance of surgical principles of primary total knee arthroplasty. In addition, postoperative analysis helps the surgeon understand surgical errors and improve future outcomes. Standard radiographs, with a known magnification, should be obtained for postoperative total knee arthroplasty evaluation. Although imaging evaluation of knee arthroplasty is usually limited to conventional radiographs, examples of the utility of computed tomography are also illustrated, and suggested imaging strategies discussed.

Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal anterior femoral flare and torsion. Anatomic bases for metaphyseally fixed short stems design

PURPOSE

The use of femoral stems with a short metaphyseal fixation may lead to fractures or subsidence. Such failures may be related to a mismatch between the torsions or the sagittal flares of the stem and the femur. The goal of our study was to perform a 3D analysis of the proximal metaphyseal femur anatomy with a special focus on the anterior proximal flare and torsion. Such data may help to detect the outlier patients for whom a short metaphyseal fixation should be avoided.

METHODS

A prospective study included 80 consecutive patients who underwent a primary cementless THA with a 3D CT-scan based pre-operative planning. A femoral frame was determined in order to analyse the proximal metaphyseal torsion and flares of the femur.

RESULTS

The mean metaphyseal torsion was 21.6° ± 7° at 5 mm above the lesser trochanter (LT) and 34.7° ± 8.8 at 15 mm under LT generating a differential torsion of 13° around the LT. The mean flare index was 4.3 ± 0.9 medially, 3.7 ± 0.8 laterally, 2 ± 0.6 anteriorly and 3.1 ± 0.6 posteriorly. The anterior flare was the only flare significantly correlated to the bone density, to the age and to the femoral off-set: the higher the anterior flare index, the younger the patient, the higher the bone density and the higher the femoral offset. The anterior flare was not significantly correlated to the femoral anteversion, the metaphyseal torsion and the coronal neck-shaft angle.

CONCLUSION

The proximal femoral metaphysis presents a highly variable anterior flare and torsion that may explain a mismatch between the femur and the femoral stem, consequently generating a risk of subsidence or fracture when using shortly fixed stems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Digital Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Digital templating is becoming more prevalent in orthopedics. Recent investigations report high accuracy using digital templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the effect of body mass index (BMI) on templating accuracy is not well described.

METHODS

Digital radiographs of 603 consecutive patients (645 hips) undergoing primary THA by a single surgeon were digitally templated using OrthoView (Jacksonville, FL). A 25-mm metallic sphere was used as a calibration marker. Preoperative digital hip templates were compared with the final implant size. Hips were stratified into groups based on BMI: BMI <30 (315), BMI 30-35 (132), BMI 35-40 (97), and BMI >40 (101).

RESULTS

Accuracy between templating and final size did not vary by BMI for acetabular or femoral components. Digital templating was within 2 sizes of the final acetabular and femoral implants in 99.1% and 97.1% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Digital templating is an effective means of predicting the final size of THA components. BMI does not appear to play a major role in altering THA digital templating accuracy.

A novel digital templating methodology for arthroplasty: experience from patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of a novel digital templating methodology for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out on 77 hips in 58 patients who had undergone uncemented THA for ONFH. Preoperative radiographs were templated using a 2-step procedure: (i) calculation of basic cup and stem sizes based on the anatomical morphology; (ii) adjustment of the basic sizes to account for variables such as femoral external rotation, osteoporotic changes in the femur, osteosclerotic changes in the acetabulum, and the type of stem. Basic and adjusted sizes were compared with the actual sizes of the implants used.

RESULTS

Before adjustment, the overall accuracy was 69% and 70% for stem size and the cup respectively. Among all the cases, 31 femoral components (40%) and 17 acetabular components (22%) required adjustment. After adjustment, the accuracy of templating for stem and cup sizes in these adjusted cases improved from 52% to 87% (p = 0.002), and 41% to 82%, respectively (p = 0.032). And the overall templating accuracy improved to 83% on the stem side (p = 0.038) and 79% on the cup side (p = 0.195).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative digital templating was useful in predicting cup and stem sizes in patients with ONFH. Radiographic signs of femoral rotation or osteoporotic changes call for appropriate adjustment to improve the accuracy of templating for THA.

Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty: Additional anteroposterior hip view increases the accuracy

AIM

To analyze planning total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an additional anteroposterior hip view may increases the accuracy of preoperative planning in THA.

METHODS

We conducted prospective digital planning in 100 consecutive patients: 50 of these procedures were planned using pelvic overview only (first group), and the other 50 procedures were planned using pelvic overview plus antero-posterior (a.p.) hip view (second group). The planning and the procedure of each patient were performed exclusively by the senior surgeon. Fifty procedures with retrospective analogues planning were used as the control group (group zero). After the procedure, the planning was compared with the eventually implanted components (cup and stem). For statistic analysis the χ² test was used for nominal variables and the t test was used for a comparison of continuous variables.

RESULTS

Preoperative planning with an additional a.p. hip view (second group) significantly increased the exact component correlation when compared to pelvic overview only (first group) for both the acetabular cup and the femoral stem (76% cup and 66% stem vs 54% cup and 32% stem). When considering planning ± 1 size, the accuracy in the second group was 96% (48 of 50 patients) for the cup and 94% for the stem (47 of 50 patients). In the analogue control group (group zero), an exact correlation was observed in only 1/3 of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Digital THA planning performed by the operating surgeon and based on additional a.p. hip view significantly increases the correlation between preoperative planning and eventual implant sizes.

Radiographic templating of total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of pre-operative digital templating to minimize complications including limb length discrepancy (LLD), intraoperative fractures and early dislocations in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 23 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for intracapsular femoral fractures with pre-operative digital templating and 48 patients without templating.

RESULTS

The mean post-operative LLD was significantly lower in patients who had pre-operative templating than in the control group (6.7 vs. 11.5 mm, p = 0.023). Only three patients (13 %) with templating had LLD greater than 1.5 cm, compared to the 15 patients (31 %) without templating (p = 0.17). In eight cases the final femoral stem size matched the templated size, while 19 patients were within two size increments. Complications included one dislocation and one intra-operative fracture in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that careful pre-operative planning may reduce LLD in patients undergoing THA due to intracapsular hip fractures.

Preoperative Planning in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Preoperative planning is of paramount importance in primary total knee arthroplasty. A thorough preoperative analysis helps the surgeon envision the operation, anticipate any potential issues, and minimize the risk of premature implant failure. Obtaining a thorough history is critical for appropriate patient selection. The physical examination should evaluate the integrity of the soft tissues, the neurovascular status, range of motion, limb deformity, and the status of the collateral ligaments to help determine the soft-tissue balancing and constraint strategy required. Standard radiographs, with a known magnification, should be obtained for preoperative total knee arthroplasty templating. Routine standing AP, lateral, and skyline radiographs of the knee can help the surgeon plan the bone cuts and tibial slope as well as the implant size and position at the time of surgery. In certain circumstances, such as severe coronal deformities, bone deficiencies, and/or extra-articular deformities, additional measures are frequently necessary to successfully reconstruct the knee. Constrained implants, metal augments, and bone graft must be part of the surgeon's armamentarium.

Pre-operative digital templating in cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fractures

Pre-operative digital templating allows the surgeon to foresee any anatomical anomalies which may lead to intra-operative problems, and anticipate appropriate instruments and implants required during surgery. Although its role is well-established in successful elective total hip arthroplasty, little work has been done on its use in hip hemiarthroplasty in neck of femur fractures. We describe our initial experience of digital templating in 40 consecutive patients who have undergone cemented hip hemiarthroplasty, assessing templating accuracy between templated implant sizes to actual implant sizes. 81% of implanted heads were templated to within two head sizes, and 89% of implanted stems were templated to within two sizes. Although there was a moderately strong correlation of 0.52 between templated and actual head sizes, this correlation was not demonstrated in femoral stem sizes. Mean leg length discrepancy was -2.5mm (S.D. 8.5), and the mean difference in femoral offset between the operated and non-operated hip was -1mm (S.D. 4.4). Digital templating is a useful adjunct to the surgeon in pre-operative planning of hip hemiarthroplasty in the restoration of leg length and femoral offset. However, its accuracy is inferior to that of elective total hip arthroplasty.

2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Preoperative digital templating in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) helps to determine the need of non-standard implants, prophesies the bony resections and helps to anticipate the intraoperative plan. Templating within the process of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is fairly new and 2D planning has not been compared to PSI templating.

METHODS

94 patients underwent unilateral primary TKA with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based preoperative templating and PSI cutting blocks. Parallel to this, three observers templated all cases using digital planning on standard preoperative x-rays. The examiners templated all cases independently and were blinded to the component sizes used intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Three-dimensional (3D) templating was accurate in predicting the correct implant size in 100% of the cases. The femoral and tibial two-dimensional (2D) digital templating varied from 43.6% to 59.5% and 52.1% to 68% of the cases. When allowing ±1 difference, femoral 2D digital templating varied from 93.6% to 97.8% of the cases and ranged from 94.6% to 98.9% on the tibial side. All observers show "very good" correlation. The coefficient indicates a very good agreement in between the three observers.

CONCLUSION

3D templating has very high accuracy for the actual implant size prediction. Compared to this, 2D digital templating is an accurate method to approximately (±1 size) determine the size of TKA components. However, we judge this technique accurate enough, that 2D templating allows launching Template-directed instrumentation (TDI), while the examiner does not need a high level of clinical experience.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Within the process of digital planning, the surgeonmight focus evenmore on the upcoming operation.

Template-Directed Instrumentation Reduces Cost and Improves Efficiency for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Economic Decision Analysis and Pilot Study

Template-directed instrumentation (TDI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may streamline operating room (OR) workflow and reduce costs by preselecting implants and minimizing instrument tray burden. A decision model simulated the economics of TDI. Sensitivity analyses determined thresholds for model variables to ensure TDI success. A clinical pilot was reviewed. The accuracy of preoperative templates was validated, and 20 consecutive primary TKAs were performed using TDI. The model determined that preoperative component size estimation should be accurate to ±1 implant size for 50% of TKAs to implement TDI. The pilot showed that preoperative template accuracy exceeded 97%. There were statistically significant improvements in OR turnover time and in-room time for TDI compared to an historical cohort of TKAs. TDI reduces costs and improves OR efficiency.