Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer. Cases when found are often advanced with vascular invasion, and radical resection is often difficult. Despite curative resection, the postoperative recurrence rate of patients with histological lymph node metastasis is high, and their prognosis is poor. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish multidisciplinary treatment that combines chemotherapy and surgical resection. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced ICC is unclear. In this report, a case of locally advanced ICC in which pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved after NAC is described.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 79-year-old woman was admitted to a local hospital with appetite loss. Computed tomography showed a 100 × 90 mm low-contrast tumor in the left hepatic lobe and segment 1 with invasion to the inferior vena cava (IVC), and several lymph nodes along the left gastric artery and lesser curvature were enlarged. Therefore, she was treated with a combined chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin. After four courses, the tumor size decreased to 30 × 60 mm without invasion to the IVC. Left hepatectomy extending to segment 1 with bile duct resection combined with middle hepatic vein resection (H1234-B-MHV), dissection of regional lymph nodes and pyloroplasty were performed. After radical resection, pCR was achieved. She is alive with no evidence of disease, 2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case, a patient with locally advanced ICC achieved pCR to NAC. NAC may be effective for ICC. Patients who achieve pCR may have a better prognosis.

EZH2 as a potential therapeutic target for gastrointestinal cancers

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers continue to be a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Understanding the molecular pathways associated with cancer progression and severity is essential for creating effective cancer treatments. In cancer research, there is a notable emphasis on Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a key player in gene expression influenced by its irregular expression and capacity to attach to promoters and alter methylation status. This review explores the impact of EZH2 signaling on various GI cancers, such as colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, hepatocellular, esophageal, and cholangiocarcinoma. The primary function of EZH2 signaling is to facilitate the accelerated progression of cancer cells. Additionally, EZH2 has the capacity to modulate the reaction of GI cancers to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Numerous pathways, including long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs, serve as upstream regulators of EZH2 in these types of cancer. EZH2's enzymatic activity enables it to attach to target gene promoters, resulting in methylation that modifies their expression. EZH2 could be considered as an independent prognostic factor, with increased expression correlating with a worse disease prognosis. Additionally, a range of gene therapies including small interfering RNA, and anti-tumor agents are being explored to target EZH2 for cancer treatment. This comprehensive review underscores the current insights into EZH2 signaling in gastrointestinal cancers and examines the prospect of therapies targeting EZH2 to enhance patient outcomes.

Lymph Node Dissection in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Critical and Updated Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic spread of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is common and negatively impacts survival. However, the precise role of lymph node dissection (LND) in oncologic outcomes for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains to be established.

METHODS

Updated evidence on the preoperative diagnosis and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis is reviewed, as well as the potential benefit of LND in patients with iCCA.

RESULTS

The ability to accurately determine nodal status for iCCA with current imaging modalities is equivocal. LND has prognostic value for both survival and disease recurrence. However, execution rates of LND are highly varied in the literature, ranging from 26.9 to 100%. At least 6 lymph nodes should be examined from nodal stations of the hepatoduodenal ligament and hepatic artery as well as based on the location of the primary tumor. Neoadjuvant therapies may be beneficial if lymph node metastases at diagnosis are suspected. Surgeons performing a minimally invasive approach should focus on increasing LND rates and harvesting ≥ 6 lymph nodes. Lymph node negativity is required in patients with iCCA being considered for liver transplantation under investigational protocols.

CONCLUSION

Despite an upward trend in the LND rate, the reality is that only 10% of patients with iCCA receive an adequate LND. This review underscores the importance of routinely increasing the rate of adequate LND in these patients in order to achieve accurate staging, appropriately select patients for adjuvant therapy, and improve the prognosis of clinical outcomes. While prospective data is lacking, the therapeutic impact of LND remains unknown.

Role of routine lymph node dissection alongside resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The global incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is soaring. Due to often delayed presentation, only a narrow spectrum of the disease is usually surgically resectable. To more accurately stage the disease, reduce recurrence, and improve overall survival, surgical teams are increasingly performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (LND) as well. This procedure has its associated morbidity, while there is no consensus or formal guidelines on its role in this setting. Hence, there is a need to better delineate the evidence for performing LND alongside surgical resection of the ICCA.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of LND in improving prognostication and survival post-resection of ICCA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for all studies involving LND, ICCA, and surgical resection using several keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tags, and appropriate synonyms. All clinical studies comparing curative intent resection of ICCA with LND vs resection without LND were included, while single-arm case series, studies with insufficient data, and duplicates were excluded. We included all English-language studies from the different academic databases up till early December 2022. The primary outcome measures were set for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies that fulfilled the selection criteria comprising 11413 patients with surgically-resectable ICCA, of whom 6424 (56.3%) underwent hepatectomy with LND while the remainder underwent hepatectomy only. In patients who underwent LND, on average, 27.7% of the resected lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease. Overall, the results showed that performing LND did not significantly improve OS or DFS. However, the effect of LND on OS showed a degree of variability by geographical region, in Eastern and Western countries. As LND is increasingly being performed, further time-based analysis was undertaken to identify time-dependent changes in the role of LND. An increasing adoption of LND was not associated with improved OS. Furthermore, no roles were identified for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or increasing lymph node retrieval in improving OS either.

CONCLUSION

LND might aid in staging, prognosticating, and deciding further management of resected ICCA, but does not improve OS and DFS and is unsuitable for high-risk patients unlikely to benefit from further treatments.

Proposal for a new N-stage classification system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

The number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) is not considered in the nodal status (N classification) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in the current 8thEdition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. The aim of this study was to find out the optimal cut-off point based on the number of MLNs and establish a modified AJCC staging system for ICC according to the new N category.

Methods

A total of 675 ICC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The optimal cut-off value of MLNs affecting survival was determined by X-tile software. The relative discriminative power was assessed by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Results

The proposed new nodal category subdivided patients into three groups (N0, no MLN; N1, 1-3 MLNs; and N2, ≥ 4 MLNs) with significantly different overall survival (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the new nodal category was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001). Both the C-index and AIC for our modified staging system were better than those for the 8th AJCC edition (0.574 [95% confidence interval 0.533-0.615] versus 0.570 [95% confidence interval 0.527-0.613], and 853.30 versus 854.21, respectively).

Conclusion

The modified AJCC staging system based on the number of MLNs may prove to be a useful alternative for predicting survival of ICC patients in clinical practice.

The influence of the extent of lymph node metastasis on the prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose

Reports showed that some of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) may also gain survival benefit undergone resection. However, the effect of the extent of LNM on prognosis and surgical indication is barely discussed.

Methods

From September 1994 to November 2018, primary ICC patients undergone initial curable surgery were enrolled. Based on the extent of LNM, we divided these patients into 4 groups, including patients with no LNM (group N0), LNM to hepatoduodenal ligament or common hepatic artery (region A, group A), LNM to gastrohepatic lymph nodes for left liver ICC and periduodenal and peripancreatic lymph node for right liver ICC (region B, group B), or LNM beyond these regions (region C, group C). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all groups.

Results

A total of 133 patients were enrolled. There were 56, 21, 17, and 39 patients in groups N0, A, B, and C, respectively. There was significant difference between groups N0 and C in RFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.002). When we compared group N0 + A + B with group C, we also found that RFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.007) were significantly different. In multivariable analysis, the extent of LNM was an independent risk factor for RFS (P < 0.050).

Conclusion

ICC patients with the LNM to regions A and B could still achieve good prognosis with resection. Surgery should be carefully considered when LNM to region C.

Lymph Node Examination and Patterns of Nodal Metastasis Among Patients with Left- Versus Right-Sided Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Major Curative-Intent Resection

BACKGROUND

We sought to investigate whether the unique lateral patterns of lymphatic drainage impacted lymphadenectomy (LND), lymph node metastasis (LNM), and long-term survival of patients after curative hemi-hepatectomy for left- versus right-sided intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent curative hemi-hepatectomy for left- or right-sided ICC were collected from 15 high-volume centers worldwide, as well as from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Among 697 patients identified from the multi-institutional database, patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy for left-sided ICC (n = 363, 52.1%) were more likely to have an increased number of LND versus patients with right-sided ICC (n = 334, 47.9%) (median, left 5 versus right 3, p = 0.012), although the frequency (left 66.4% versus right 63.8%, p = 0.469) and station (beyond station no. 12, left 25.3% versus right 21.1%, p = 0.293) were similar. Consequently, left-sided ICC was associated with higher incidence of LNM (left 33.3% versus right 25.7%, p = 0.036), whereas the station and number of LNM were not different (both p > 0.1). There was no difference in OS (median, left 34.9 versus right 29.6 months, p = 0.130) or DFS (median, left 14.5 versus right 15.2 months, p = 0.771) among patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy for left- versus right-sided ICC, which were also verified in the SEER dataset. LNM beyond station no. 12 was associated with even worse long-term survival versus LNM within station no. 12 among patients with either left- or right-sided ICC after curative-intent resection (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The unique lateral patterns of lymphatic drainage were closely related to utilization of LND, as well as LNM of left- versus right-sided ICC.

Surgical Strategies for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC)

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a tumor entity presenting features of hepatocellular and cholangiocellular epithelial differentiation. Due to the likeness between cHCC-CC, HCC and CC, accurate pretherapeutical diagnosis is challenging and advanced stages are prevalent. Radical oncological surgery is the only curative therapeutical option in patients with cHCC-CC. To reach this goal a profound understanding of this rare liver tumor is crucial. Factors such as clinicopathological characteristics, growth patterns and biological behavior are of central importance. To explore onco-surgical strategies and aspects for complete resection of cHCC-CC and to answer important key questions, an extensive review of the literature was conducted to answer the following questions: What are the best surgical options? Is there a significance for nonanatomical resections? Is there a prognostic value of concomitant lymphadenectomy? What about multimodal concepts in local advanced cHCC-CC? The role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) including the role of robotic liver surgery for cHCC-CC will be discussed. While liver transplantation (LT) is standard for patients with unresectable HCC, the role of LT in cHCC-CC patients is still controversial. How can patients with high risk for early tumor recurrence be identified to avoid aggressive surgical treatment without clinical benefit? The comprehensive understanding of this challenging liver tumor will help to improve future treatment options for these patients.

Modelling metastatic colonization of cholangiocarcinoma organoids in decellularized lung and lymph nodes

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a type of liver cancer with an aggressive phenotype and dismal outcome in patients. The metastasis of CCA cancer cells to distant organs, commonly lung and lymph nodes, drastically reduces overall survival. However, mechanistic insight how CCA invades these metastatic sites is still lacking. This is partly because currently available models fail to mimic the complexity of tissue-specific environments for metastatic CCA. To create an in vitro model in which interactions between epithelial tumor cells and their surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) can be studied in a metastatic setting, we combined patient-derived CCA organoids (CCAOs) (n=3) with decellularized human lung (n=3) and decellularized human lymph node (n=13). Decellularization resulted in removal of cells while preserving ECM structure and retaining important characteristics of the tissue origin. Proteomic analyses showed a tissue-specific ECM protein signature reflecting tissue functioning aspects. The macro and micro-scale mechanical properties, as determined by rheology and micro-indentation, revealed the local heterogeneity of the ECM. When growing CCAOs in decellularized lung and lymph nodes genes related to metastatic processes, including epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell plasticity, were significantly influenced by the ECM in an organ-specific manner. Furthermore, CCAOs exhibit significant differences in migration and proliferation dynamics dependent on the original patient tumor and donor of the target organ. In conclusion, CCA metastatic outgrowth is dictated both by the tumor itself as well as by the ECM of the target organ. Convergence of CCAOs with the ECM of its metastatic organs provide a new platform for mechanistic study of cancer metastasis.

Adequate lymph node dissection is essential for accurate nodal staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based study

PURPOSE

To comprehensively investigate the implications of lymph node dissection (LND) and the prognostic impact of the number of lymph node (LN) metastases on survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) using a large-scale study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection for ICC between 2004 and 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between different groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analyses were performed to balance potential confounding factors. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify prognostic factors of survival outcomes. Restricted cubic splines fitted in the Cox proportional hazard regression models were also conducted to examine associations between continuous variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 1028 patients were enrolled. There were 652 (63.4%) patients undergoing LND, with lymph node metastasis (LNM) confirmed in 212 (32.5%) cases. Patients receiving LND did not show better survival outcomes than those receiving non-LND (NLND). We divided the LND group into two subgroups: patients with LNM (+) and those without LNM (-). Among these three groups, patients with LNM experienced the worst CSS and OS, while NLND patients had similar survival times to LNM (-) patients. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated that an increased number of LNM was associated with a decreased chance of survival (p < 0.001). Patients who received LND were further categorized as having no nodal metastasis (N0), 1-2 LNM (N1), or ≥3 LNM (N2) according to the number of LNM. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the mortality risk of patients with N0, N1, and N2 disease (median CSS, N0 50.0 vs. N1 22.0 vs. N2 14.0 months; median OS, N0 46.0 vs. N1 21.0 vs. N2 14.0 months, all p < 0.01) increased significantly, except for patients who had <6 LNs harvested. On multivariable survival analysis, a higher nodal stage (N1 vs. N0: CSS, hazard ratio [HR] 2.135, 95% CI 1.636-2.788, p < 0.001; OS, HR 2.100, 95% CI 1.624-2.717, p < 0.001; N2 vs. N0: CSS, HR 4.027, 95% CI 2.791-5.811, p < 0.001; OS, HR 3.678, 95% CI 2.561-5.282, p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic risk factor for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of a clear survival benefit of LND in patients with ICC, a significant positive association between the number of LNM and poor outcomes was observed. We still suggest adequate LND by examining at least six LNs to ensure precise staging. On this basis, the recently proposed nodal classification of N0, N1, and N2 stages may also allow better prognostic stratification of ICC patients.

Surgery

This chapter provides a comprehensive background from basic to applied knowledge of surgical anatomy which is necessary for the surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. Significant advances that have been made in the surgical treatment of CCA were examined. For instance, in-depth details are provided for appropriate preoperative assessment and treatment to optimize patient status and to improve the outcome of surgical treatment(s). Comprehensive details are provided for the surgical techniques and outcomes of treatments for each type of CCA with clear illustrations and images. This chapter also describes the role of minimally invasive surgery and liver transplantation in CCA treatment.

Laparoscopic vs. open anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly malignant and invasive cancer originating from biliary epithelial cells. The current study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

After screening, 95 patients who underwent anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at our center were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the surgical approach; the baseline characteristics, pathological findings, surgical outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or pathological findings between the two groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, the intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay were more favorable in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group than the open anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). The two groups differed significantly in the extent of liver resection, with a lower lymph node dissection rate and lymph node yield in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The median postoperative follow-up times were 10.7 and 13.8 months in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy and open anatomical hepatectomy groups, respectively. Regarding the long-term follow-up results, OS and DFS were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors for OS were CA-199, CEA, HGB, tumor diameter, and T stage, and those for DFS were CA-199 (P < 0.05), and T stage (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. Compared with open anatomical hepatectomy, laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy provides better short-term outcomes and a comparable long-term prognosis.

Effect of lymph node resection on prognosis of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

The literature from January 2009 to December 2021 was searched to determine the comparative study of lymph node dissection and non-lymph node dissection in patients with ICC.

Results

Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.80, p = 0.10; OR = 0.93, p = 0.71; OR = 0.80, p = 0.21) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.89, p = 0.73; OR = 0.92, p = 0.81; OR = 0.85, p = 0.62).

Conclusions

Lymph node dissection does not seem to have a positive effect on the overall survival and disease-free survival.

Prognostic impact of the metastatic lymph node number in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a poor prognostic factor after radical surgery. However, unlike other biliary tract malignancies, the nodal stage of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma only reflects the presence of metastatic lymph nodes, not the number of metastatic lymph nodes. This study aimed to identify the prognostic impact of the metastatic lymph node number in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The data from 87 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who had undergone hepatectomy with 5 or more harvested lymph nodes and covering stations 12 and 8 based on the previous criteria from January 2006 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The hazard ratio according to the increasing metastatic lymph node number was calculated with other known prognostic factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The patients were then divided into 3 groups according to the metastatic lymph node number (N0 [n = 45]: no metastatic lymph nodes; N⁺ <4 [n = 32]: 1 to 3 metastatic lymph nodes; N⁺ ≥4 [n = 10]: ≥4 metastatic lymph nodes). Disease-free survival and overall survival were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The metastatic lymph node number was a prognostic factor of oncologic survival (disease-free survival: hazard ratio = 1.18 [1.05-1.32], P = .005; overall survival: hazard ratio = 1.21 [1.06-1.37], P = .004). Survival analysis revealed significantly poorer outcomes with an increasing metastatic lymph node number (disease-free survival: N0 vs N⁺ <4 vs N⁺ ≥4: 36.0 [0.0-76.0] vs 8.0 [0.0-16.9] vs 2.0 [0.0-5.1] months, P < .001; overall survival: N0 vs N⁺ <4 vs N⁺ ≥4: 69.0 [24.5-113.5] vs 28.0 [18.9-37.1] vs 11.0 [6.4-15.6] months, P < .001). In post hoc analysis, a significant difference was found between adjacent groups (disease-free survival and overall survival: N⁺ <4 vs N⁺ ≥4, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

With proper lymph node dissection, the number of metastatic lymph nodes is a prognostic factor of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Moving forward in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

Despite being the second most frequent primary liver tumor in humans, early diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are still unsatisfactory. In fact, survival after 5 years is expected in less than one fourth of patients diagnosed with this disease. Rare incidence, late appearance of symptoms and heterogeneous biology are all factors contributing to our limited knowledge of this cancer and determining its poor prognosis in the clinical setting. Several efforts have been made in the last decades in order to achieve an improved classification/understanding with regard to the diverse CCA forms. Location within the biliary tree has helped to distinguish between intrahepatic, perihilar and distal CCA types. Sequence analysis contributed to identifying several characteristic genetic aberrations in CCA that may also serve as possible targets for therapy. Novel findings are expected to significantly improve the management of this malignancy in the near future. In this changing scenario our review focuses on the current and future strategies for CCA treatment. Both systemic and surgical treatments are discussed in detail. The results of the main studies in this field are reported, together with the ongoing trials. The current findings suggest that an integrated multidisciplinary approach to this malignancy would be helpful to improve its outcome.

Tips and tricks for the diagnosis and management of biliary stenosis-state of the art review

Biliary stenosis may represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge resulting in a delay in diagnosis and initiation of therapy due to the frequent difficulty in distinguishing a benign from a malignant stricture. In such cases, the diagnostic flowchart includes the sequential execution of imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasound, while endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed to collect tissue for histopathological/cytological diagnosis or to treat the stenosis by insertion of stent. The execution of percutaneous transhepatic drainage with subsequent biopsy has been shown to increase the possibility of tissue diagnosis after failure of the above techniques. Although the diagnostic yield of histopathology and imaging has increased with improvements in endoscopic ultrasound and peroral cholangioscopy, differential diagnosis between malignant and benign stenosis may not be easy in some patients, and strictures are classified as indeterminate. In these cases, a multidisciplinary workup including biochemical marker assays and advanced technologies available may speed up a diagnosis of malignancy or avoid unnecessary surgery in the event of a benign stricture. Here, we review recent advancements in the diagnosis and management of biliary strictures and describe tips and tricks to increase diagnostic yields in clinical routine.

The role of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Lymph node dissection (LND) is of great significance in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend routine LND in ICC, the effects of LND remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the role of LND and some related issues and of in ICC.

METHODS

Patients were identified in two Chinese academic centers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Of 232 patients, 177 (76.3%) underwent LND, and 71 (40.1%) had metastatic lymph nodes. A minimum of 6 lymph nodes were dissected in 66 patients (37.3%). LND did not improve the prognosis of ICC. LNM > 3 may have worse OS and DFS than LNM 1-3, especially in the LND >  = 6 group. For patients who did not underwent LND, the adjuvant treatment group had better OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportions of patients who underwent LND and removed >  = 6 lymph nodes were not high enough. LND has no definite predictive effect on prognosis. Patients with 4 or more LNMs may have a worse prognosis than patients with 1-3 LNMs. Adjuvant therapy may benefit patients of nLND.

The role of lymph node dissection and a new N-staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a study from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend routine lymph node dissection (LND) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the role of LND remains controversial, and the node (N) stage is oversimplified.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results research data 18 (SEER 18). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias, and Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival (OS). The best cutoff values were found using X-tile software.

RESULTS

Of 2037 patients included in SEER 18, 1147 underwent LND (56.3%); 389 (34.3%) had pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis (LNM), and 316 (27.6%) had at least 6 LNDs. The median OS was worse for LND patients (34 months vs. 40 months, respectively), and this result remained after PSM. Male sex, age ≥60 years, tumor size > 5 cm, and LNM were independent prognostic risk factors for ICC. LNM ≥3 was associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few LNDs met the requirements per the guidelines. LND does not improve OS in ICC, and the best approach to LND and a better N staging method should be explored further.

Primary tumor resection improves survival in patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a population study

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of surgery on the survival and prognosis of patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Patients with multifocal ICCA were selected from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database between 2010 and 2016. Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in survival between the surgery group and the non-surgery group. We applied the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In total, 580 patients were enrolled in our study, including 151 patients who underwent surgery and 429 patients who did not. The median survival time of surgical patients was longer than non-surgical patients (OS: 25 months vs. 8 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 40 months vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year survival rate in the surgery group was significantly higher than those in the non-surgery group (5-year OS rate: 12.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate:26.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the OS (HR:0.299, 95% CI: 0.229–0.390, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR:0.305, 95% CI:0.222–0.419, p < 0.001) of patients undergoing surgical resection were significantly improved. Meanwhile, after propensity score matching (PSM) of the original data, we come to the same conclusion.

Effect of Tumor Size on Long-Term Survival After Resection for Solitary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

The relationship between tumor size and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of tumor size for solitary ICC after resection and explore optimal cut-off values in different subgroups.

Methods

Patients with solitary ICC who underwent liver resection from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and Shandong Provincial Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic ability of tumor size. The log-rank test was used to determine the optimal cut-off values, and a minimum P was regarded as the optimal one in different subgroups.

Results

Large tumor size groups had worse overall survival (OS) than small tumor size groups. Cox regression analysis suggested that tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for OS for solitary ICC after resection. Subgroup analysis showed tumor size was associated with OS for both solitary ICC with and without vascular invasion (VI). Furthermore, the optimal cut-off values for solitary ICC with and without VI were found to be 8 and 3 cm, respectively, which could divide the patients into two groups with significant differences in OS.

Conclusion

Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for solitary ICC after resection. The existing American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system could be improved if the cut-off value of the T1 stage was changed to 8 cm and if the T2 stage incorporated a tumor size with a cut-off value of 3 cm. Further studies with more cases are needed to validate these findings.

Prognostic significance of and risk prediction model for lymph node metastasis in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: do all require lymph node dissection?

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis portends a worse prognosis following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); however, lymphadenectomy is not routinely performed, as its role remains controversial. Herein, we developed a risk model for LN metastasis by identifying its predictive factors and assessed a subset of patients who might not benefit from LN dissection (LND).

METHODS

210 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for ICC were retrospectively reviewed. A preoperative risk model for LN metastasis was developed following identification of its preoperative predictive factors using the recursive partitioning method.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, CA 19-9 level of >120 U/mL, an enlarged LN on computed tomography, and a tumor location abutting the Glissonean pedicles were independent predictors of LN metastasis. The preoperative risk model classified the patients according to their risk: high, intermediate, and low risks at a rate of LN metastasis on final pathology of 60.9%, 35%, and 2.3%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis among the low-risk patients, performance of LND had no survival advantage over non-performance of LND.

CONCLUSION

Routine LND for preoperatively diagnosed ICC should be recommended to patients at an intermediate and a high risk of developing LN metastasis but may be omitted for low-risk patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: approaching clinical practice consensus?

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare with limited evidence-based guidelines. This retrospective study evaluates the use of chemotherapy in patients with resected ICC.

Methods

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program database was used to identify patients with resected ICC. Patients were stratified by date of diagnosis (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014), T, and N stage. Multivariable logistic regression models identified predictors of chemotherapy use. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify survival trends.

Results

One thousand and two hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy utilization increased over time (33% to 41%, P≤0.05). Chemotherapy use increased in lymph node (LN) positive patients [32% to 60% in 2010-2014; (P≤0.05) and T3/T4 disease (40% to 60% in 2010-2014; P≤0.01], but not in patients with LN negative or T1/T2 disease. LN positivity was associated with utilization of chemotherapy in 2005-2009 and 2010-2014. Overall survival increased from 32 to 41 months (P≤0.05). In LN positive patients, chemotherapy was associated with a decreased hazard ratio of death (P≤0.05) and T3/T4 disease was associated with an increased hazard ratio of death (P≤0.05).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy use in ICC has increased. More LN positive or patients with T3/T4 tumors are receiving chemotherapy, which may explain the improvement in overall survival.

Endoscopic Ultrasound/Fine Needle Aspiration Is Effective for Lymph Node Staging in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Presence of malignant regional lymph nodes (MRLNs) precludes curative oncological resection or liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Limited data support the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)/fine needle aspiration (FNA) for detection of MRLNs in extrahepatic CCA, but there are no data for its role in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the staging impact of EUS for CCA, including analysis by subtype.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We identified consecutive patients with CCA who underwent EUS staging at a single tertiary care center from October 2014 to April 2018. Among this cohort, we abstracted clinical demographic, radiographical, procedural, cytopathological, and surgical data. STATA 15 software was used for comparative analysis calculations (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). The study cohort included 157 patients; 24 (15%), 124 (79%), and 9 (6%) with intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal CCA, respectively. EUS was able to identify regional lymph nodes (RLNs) in a higher percentage of patients compared to cross-sectional imaging (86% vs. 47%; P < 0.001). FNA was performed in 133 (98.5%) patients with RLNs, with a median of three passes per node. EUS-FNA identified MRLN in 27 of 31 (87.1%) patients ultimately found to have MRLNs. For iCCA, EUS detected a higher percentage of RLN compared to cross-sectional imaging (83% vs. 50%; P = 0.048), with MRLNs identified in 4 (17%) patients. Among the entire cohort, identification of at least one MRLN by EUS was associated with lower median survival (353 vs. 1,050 days; P < 0.001) and increased risk of death (hazard ratio = 4.1; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is effective for identifying MRLN in patients with CCA, and should be routinely incorporated into staging of all CCA subtypes given the impact of MRLN on prognosis and management decisions.

[Long-term results of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma depending tumor dimensions, vascular invasion, lymph node metastases, cellular differentiation and quality of resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 46 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer. Extended hemihepatectomy was made in 14 patients (30.4%), resection of two and three liver segments - in 17 cases (36.9%), standard hemihepatectomy - in 15 patients (32.6%). Liver resection was combined with extrahepatic bile duct resection in 5 (10.9%) patients. Liver resection was followed by biopsy of specimens. Dimension and number of tumors, differentiation grade, resection margin, liver capsule invasion, vascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases were analyzed. Forty-four (95.6%) patients were followed-up in long-term postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.2 (Dell Inc., USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 (IBM Corp., USA) software package. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 software.

RESULTS

Median survival was 37 months, 1-year - 75.9% (60.9-90.9%), 3-year - 57.6% (35.5-79.6%), 5-year - 36% (8.2-63.7%). Median survival after R1 resection was 37 months, R2 resection - 12 months. Median survival was not achieved in R0 group. We found significant differences in overall survival depending on quality of resection. Tumor dimension over 5 cm, low-grade adenocarcinoma, microvascular invasion and lymph node metastases were associated with impaired postoperative survival. However, differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The main surgical strategy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be ensuring microscopically negative resection margin.

Clinical implication of tumor site in terms of node metastasis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical implication of lymph node (LN) dissection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is still controversial, and LN metastasis (LNM) based on tumor site has not been confirmed yet.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery at 10 tertiary referral centers were identified and divided into peripheral (PP) and near second confluence level tumor (NC) groups on the basis of the distance from the second confluence and oncological outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of 179 patients, 121 patients with LND were divided into the NC (n = 89) and PP groups (n = 32) on the basis of 4.5 cm from the second confluence. NC group showed higher LNM rate than PP group (46.1 vs 21.9%, p = 0.016) and NC was a risk factor for LNM (odds ratio: 4.367; 95% confidence interval: 1.234-15.453, p = 0.022). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (38.0% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.777) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (22.8% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.742) showed no differences between the PP and NC groups. In the NC group, N1 patients showed worse 5-year OS (12.7% vs 39.0%, p = 0.004) and RFS (8.8% vs 28.6%, p = 0.004) than the N0 patients. In the PP group, discordant results in 5-year OS (48.9% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.462) and RFS (41.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.056) were found between the N0 and N1 patients.

CONCLUSION

The NC group was an independent risk factor for LNM and LNM worsened prognosis in NC group for ICCA. In the PP group, LND should not be omitted because of high LNM rate and insufficient oncologic evidence.

Liver resection and transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing worldwide. Although several advances have been made in the past decades to better understand this complex malignancy and to develop new treatment strategies, the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. Liver resection (LR) is the mainstay of treatment but only a minority of patients are amenable to surgery. In most cases, patients with iCCA will require a major hepatectomy for complete resection of the tumour. This may be contraindicated or increase the surgical burden in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. Lymphadenectomy with a minimal harvest of 6 lymph nodes is considered adequate, as microscopic nodal metastases have been shown in more than 40% of patients. Current 5-year overall survival following LR is in the range of 25%-40%. For locally advanced disease not amenable to upfront LR, neoadjuvant locoregional therapies may be used with the aim of converting these patients to resectability or even to transplantation in well-selected cases. Recent studies have shown that liver transplantation (LT) might be a treatment option for patients with unresectable very-early iCCA (i.e. ≤2 cm), with survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. In patients with unresectable, advanced tumours, confined to the liver who achieve sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment, LT may be considered an option within prospective protocols. The role of adjuvant therapies in iCCA is still under debate. Herein, we review the recent advances in the surgical treatment of iCCA and examine its correlation with locoregional therapies, adjuvant and neo-adjuvant strategies.

Number and Station of Lymph Node Metastasis After Curative-intent Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Impact Prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prognostic implication of the number and station of LNM, and the minimal number of LNs needed for evaluation to accurately stage patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

BACKGROUND

Impact of the number and station of LNM on long-term survival, and the minimal number of LNs needed for accurate staging of ICC patients remain poorly defined.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent curative-intent resection for ICC was collected from 15 high-volume centers worldwide. External validation was performed using the SEER registry. Primary outcomes included overall (OS), disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 603 patients who underwent curative-intent resection, median and 5-year OS were 30.6 months and 30.4%. Patients with 1 or 2 LNM had comparable worse OS versus patients with no nodal disease (median OS, 1 LNM 18.0, 2 LNM 20.0 vs no LNM 45.0 months, both P < 0.001), yet better OS versus patients with 3 or more LNM (median OS, 1-2 LNM 19.8 vs ≥3 LNM 16.0 months, P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, a proposed new nodal staging with N1 (1-2 LNM) (Ref. N0, HR 2.40, P < 0.001) and N2 (≥3 LNM) [Ref. N0, hazard ratio (HR) 3.85, P < 0.001] categories were independently associated with incrementally worse OS. Patients with no nodal metastasis, 1-2 LNM and ≥3 LNM also had an increasingly worse disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival (both P < 0.05). Total number of LNs examined ≥6 had the greatest discriminatory power relative to OS among patients with 1-2 LNM, and patients with ≥3 LNM in both the multi-institutional (area under the curve 0.780) and SEER database (area under the curve 0.820) (n = 1036). Among patients who underwent an adequate regional lymphadenectomy (total number of LNs examined ≥6), LNM beyond the HDL was associated with worse OS versus LNM within the HDL only (median OS, 14.0 vs 24.0 months, HR 2.41, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Standard lymphadenectomy of at least 6 LNs is strongly recommended and should include examination beyond station 12 to have the greatest chance of accurate staging. The proposed new nodal staging of N0, N1, and N2 should be considered to stratify outcomes among patients after curative-intent resection of ICC.

Prognostic value of site-specific metastases for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER database analysis

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and increasing incidence. Due to its asymptomatic manifestation, ICC often progresses to a metastatic stage on diagnosis. The current study attempted to evaluate the prognostic value of site-specific metastases in patients with metastatic ICC.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015) was queried and metastatic ICC patients were classified according to the metastatic sites. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival comparisons and multivariate analysis was performed to elicit characteristics independently associated with survival.A total of 1567 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Compared with those with multiple-site metastases, patients with single-site metastases had better prognostic outcomes. Among the single-site metastases, regional lymph nodes metastases had the best prognosis; liver metastases had better prognostic outcomes than bone metastases; no significant difference was found between lung and bone or liver metastasis. Local treatment of primary tumor might benefit patients with isolated lymph nodes metastases and few exceptional cases of patients with liver metastases.Different metastatic sites have distinct impact on the survival outcomes of patients with advanced ICC and highly selected subset of them might benefit from the local treatment of the primary tumor.

Predictive utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct

Aim of the study

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) can present at various stages of the disease. Each stage needs different treatment. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been described as predictive markers for several tumors. There has been no investigation on the role of NLR and PLR in IPNB.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 112 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection for IPNB between January 2007 and December 2011. All clinical parameters and survival were analyzed for their association with NLR and PLR.

Results

For prediction of malignancy, the best respective cut-off for NLR and PLR was 2.74 and 130, with area under the ROC curve being 0.662 and 0.763. For micro-papillary IPNB, both markers well predict malignancy and lymph node involvement. The respective area under the ROC curve of NLR and PLR for prediction of malignancy was 0.78 and 0.88. Both markers had an area under the ROC curve for prediction of lymph node involvement of 1.0. The median overall survival of those with PLR < 130 was 86.4 months compared with 45.0 months for those with PLR > 130 (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

NLR and PLR seem likely candidates for predicting malignancy, lymph node involvement, and survival of the patients. PLR performed better than NLR for all predictions. The markers worked very well for micro-papillary IPNB; however, we recommend using these markers in conjunction with the radiologic appearance of tumors.

Nodal CTV selection according to primary tumour location and pT stage for biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

To assist radiation oncologists in determining the elective nodal CTV for biliary tract cancer, we aimed to provide the rules for selection of the CTV for each subsite of biliary tract with respect to the pT stage, based on the analysis of the incidence and location of metastatic lymph nodes.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the rate of pathological nodal involvement of each individual lymph node station (LNS) as a function of the primary tumour pT stage (pT1-2 vs. pT3-4) separately for right intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (rIHC), left/hilar intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma l/hIHC), proximal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (pEHC), middle extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (mEHC), distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (dEHC) and gall bladder cancer (GBC). A 5% or higher risk of involvement was assumed to justify inclusion of the LNS in the CTV.

RESULTS

Coeliac LNS, which is usually included in the CTV in clinical practice, has a low risk of involvement and can presumably be omitted for pT1-2 GBC, for dEHC irrespective of pT stage and for mEHC. Para-aortic and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) LNS that are usually omitted have a high risk of involvement. Para-aortic LNS should be considered for inclusion for all the subsites except for pT1-2 dEHC, and SMA LNS for all the subsites except for pT1-2 dEHC, pT1-2 GBC and pEHC. Left gastric artery, lesser curvature and paracardial LNS should be considered for inclusion for l/hIHC.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides an evidence-based strategy for nodal CTV selection in biliary tract cancer according to primary tumour location and pT stage.

A radiomics approach based on support vector machine using MR images for preoperative lymph node status evaluation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose: Accurate lymph node (LN) status evaluation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients is essential for surgical planning. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for preoperative LN status evaluation in ICC patients.

Methods and Materials: A group of 106 ICC patients, who were diagnosed between April 2011 and February 2016, was used for prediction model training. Image features were extracted from T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images. A support vector machine (SVM) model was built by using the most LN status-related features, which were selected using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm. The mRMR method ranked each feature according to its relevance to the LN status and redundancy with other features. An SVM score was calculated for each patient to reflect the LN metastasis (LNM) probability from the SVM model. Finally, a combination nomogram was constructed by incorporating the SVM score and clinical features. An independent group of 42 patients who were diagnosed from March 2016 to November 2017 was used to validate the prediction models. The model performances were evaluated on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Results: The SVM model was constructed based on five selected image features. Significant differences were found between patients with LNM and non-LNM in SVM scores in both groups (the training group: 0.5466 (interquartile range (IQR), 0.4059-0.6985) vs. 0.3226 (IQR, 0.0527-0.4659), P<0.0001; the validation group: 0.5831 (IQR, 0.3641-0.8162) vs. 0.3101 (IQR, 0.1029-0.4661), P=0.0015). The combination nomogram based on the SVM score, the CA 19-9 level, and the MR-reported LNM factor showed better discrimination in separating patients with LNM and non-LNM, comparing to the SVM model alone (AUC: the training group: 0.842 vs. 0.788; the validation group: 0.870 vs. 0.787). Favorable clinical utility was observed using the decision curve analysis for the nomogram.

Conclusion: The nomogram, incorporating the SVM score, CA 19-9 level and the MR-reported LNM factor, provided an individualized LN status evaluation and helped clinicians guide the surgical decisions.

Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Small (≤ 3 cm) Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still under debate. The aims of this study were to compare the lymph node (LN) status and its correlation with survival among patients with ICC stratified by tumor size.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional series of 259 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery was carried out. Patients were stratified into Small-ICC (≤ 3 cm) and Large-ICC (> 3 cm) based on tumor size.

RESULTS

There were 53 and 206 patients in Small-ICC and Large-ICC groups, respectively. The incidence of LND was 62% among Small-ICC patients and 78% among Large-ICC patients (p = 0.016). LN metastases were identified in 30.3% and 38.5% of Small-ICC and Large-ICC patients, respectively (p = 0.37). No differences in terms of number of harvested LN and LN metastases were identified comparing Small- and Large-ICC patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 52.6% for Small-ICC and 36.2% for Large-ICC (p = 0.024). The 5-year OS according to the LN status (N0 vs N+) was 84.8% and 36.0% (p = 0.032) in Small-ICC, and 45.7% and 12.1% in Large-ICC (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

While Small-ICC patients with no LN metastasis had a good long-term survival, the LN resulted in an important variable associated with survival also for patients in this group. Moreover, the incidence of LN metastasis did not differ when comparing Small-ICC and Large-ICC patients, suggesting that LND is mandatory in the surgical treatment of ICC regardless of tumor size.

Oncologic Impact of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a malignancy of the intrahepatic biliary tree. Although surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for this tumor, the impact of lymph node dissection during hepatectomy is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the impact of lymph node dissection during surgical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Records from 170 patients who underwent radical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from January 2000 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients who underwent R1 resection or had distant metastasis at the time of surgery were excluded. Using propensity score matching (matched factors: differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and T stage), the patients were divided into two groups: no dissection (n = 34) or lymph node dissection (n = 34). Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was a marginally significant difference between the two groups with respect to the disease-free survival (no dissection vs. lymph node dissection: 20.0 [4.2-35.8] months vs. 64.0 [27.3-120.8] months, p = 0.077). Overall survival was significantly longer in the lymph node dissection group (no dissection vs. lymph node dissection: 44.0 [31.1-56.9] months vs. 90.0 [51.1-158.9] months, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Radical surgery including an adequate lymph node dissection area and suitable harvested lymph nodes appears to improve oncologic outcomes for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Surgical resection of lymph node positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may not improve survival

BACKGROUND

Nodal positivity is a predictor of poor survival following resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical resection on survival in patients with lymph node (LN) positive ICC.

METHODS

An augmented version of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was utilized to identify patients with LN-positive ICC without distant metastases from 2000 to 2014. Patients were stratified by treatment: chemotherapy alone or surgical resection with/without chemotherapy. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

169 patients who underwent treatment for LN-positive ICC were identified. 88% underwent surgical resection and 12% underwent chemotherapy alone. The median survival for patients who underwent surgical resection was not different from patients treated with chemotherapy alone (19 months 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 17-33 versus 20 months CI 10-27, p = 0.323). A cox-proportional hazard ratio model demonstrated that black race was associated with worse survival (p < 0.05), while surgical resection was not independently associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection for patients with LN-positive ICC may not improve survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Pathologic LN evaluation should be performed prior to surgical resection, to improve patient selection and ensure receipt of optimal therapy.

Nonanatomic resection is not inferior to anatomic resection for primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score analysis

Whether anatomic resection (AR) achieves better outcomes than nonanatomic resection (NAR) in patients with primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is unclear. Data were retrieved for all consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for primary ICC from January 2007 to July 2017. The prognoses of the patients without direct invasion to contiguous organs or extrahepatic metastasis who underwent AR or NAR were compared. 85 patients underwent AR, and 65 patients underwent NAR. operation time were slightly decreased in the NAR group. The risk of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) IV in the AR group was significant higher than that in the NAR group. Cox regression analysis showed lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 29 pairs of patients were compared. The survival curves showed the NAR group had slightly improved DFS and OS than the AR group before and after matching. Thus, we conclude NAR was not inferior to AR in improving the survival outcomes for patients with primary solitary ICC lesions without direct invasion to contiguous organs or extrahepatic metastasis. Furthermore, patients may benefit from NAR.

Impact of tumor localization on the outcomes of surgery for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) shows differing clinical outcomes depending on its localization.

METHODS

We reviewed the surgical outcomes of 104 ICC patients who underwent liver resection at our institution. We divided ICC into hilar type (HICC) and peripheral type (PICC) depending on positive contact with the hepatic hilum on preoperative computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

The survival outcomes were significantly poorer in HICC patients. HICCs showed a larger tumor size and more frequent bile duct invasion, lymph node metastasis, and non-curative resection than PICC. Resections for HICC had greater blood loss and required a longer operation time, larger hepatectomy, and more frequent extrahepatic bile duct resection. HICCs, even if small in size, also showed a greater tendency to metastasize to the lymph nodes of the hepatoduodenal ligament. Univariate analysis of the ICCs in our current cohort revealed that tumor size, multiple tumors, bile duct invasion, lymph node metastasis, non-curative resection, and HICC are associated with a poorer overall survival outcome. Multivariate analysis indicated that multiple tumors and non-curative resection were independent prognostic factors for survival. Among the curative resection cases, however, survival did not differ significantly between HICC and PICC. The accuracy rate of our CT-based classification for the pathological classification was 81.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

HICC shows more frequent bile duct invasion and lymph node metastasis, requires more extensive surgery, and has a higher rate of non-curative resection than PICC. However, if curative resection is achieved, the survival outcomes are expected to be equivalent between HICC and PICC.

Current survival and treatment trends for surgically resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare and aggressive disease with an increasing incidence in the United States, and there is no level 1 evidence to help guide treatment decisions. We sought to determine national trends in surgical and medical management of patients with resected ICC, and more specifically, the role of lymphadenectomy (LAD) and utilization of chemotherapy.

Methods

An augmented version of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer database registry was used to identify all surgically resected ICC patients from 2000 to 2014. We evaluated the incidence and adequacy of LAD, and receipt of chemotherapy over time. Next, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the predictors of LAD and receipt of chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

We identified 1,263 patients who underwent resection for ICC. Lymph nodes (LNs) were removed in 49% of patients, however, only 10% of patients received adequate LAD by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria (≥6 nodes). LN metastases were found in 29% of patients who underwent nodal evaluation. Chemotherapy was administered to 40% of patients, was utilized more frequently over time (P<0.05), and was associated with improved survival in node positive patients (P<0.05). Patients who did not have LNs evaluated were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy than those who did. Lastly, OS for the entire cohort improved over time (P<0.05).

Conclusions

After analyzing the treatment and outcomes of resectable ICC, we concluded: (I) LN evaluation at the time of surgical resection remains inadequate; (II) utilization of chemotherapy has increased over time; (III) the lack of LAD likely results in under-staging and underutilization of chemotherapy; and (IV) despite less than ideal surgical and medical therapy median OS continues to improve.

Resection for intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer: new advances

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most prevalent primary liver neoplasm after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), corresponding to 10% to 15% of cases. Pathologies that cause chronic biliary inflammation and bile stasis are known predisposing factors for development of ICC. The incidence and cancer-related mortality of ICC is increasing worldwide. Most patients remain asymptomatic until advance stage, commonly presenting with a liver mass incidentally diagnosed. The only potentially curative treatment available for ICC is surgical resection. The prognosis is dismal for unresectable cases. The principle of the surgical approach is a margin negative hepatic resection with preservation of adequate liver remnant. Regional lymphadenectomy is recommended at time of hepatectomy due to the massive impact on outcomes caused by lymph node (LN) metastasis. Multicentric disease, tumor size, margin status and tumor differentiation are also important prognostic factors. Staging laparoscopy is warranted in high-risk patients to avoid unnecessary laparotomy. Exceedingly complex surgical procedures, such as major vascular, extrahepatic bile ducts and visceral resections, ex vivo hepatectomy and autotransplantation, should be implemented in properly selected patients to achieve negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy may be used in initially unresectable lesions in order to downstage and allow resection. Despite optimal surgical management, recurrence is frustratingly high. Adjuvant chemotherapy with radiation associated with locoregional treatments should be considered in cases with unfavorable prognostic factors. Selected patients may undergo re-resection of tumor recurrence. Despite the historically poor outcomes of liver transplantation for ICC, highly selected patients with unresectable disease, especially those with adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy, may be offered transplant. In this article, we reviewed the current literature in order to highlight the most recent advances and recommendations for the surgical treatment of this aggressive malignancy.

Challenges of surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare malignancy arising from biliary tract epithelium within bile ducts proximal to the secondary biliary radicles. The majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease at presentation. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative option, but poses unique challenges due to the large size and aggressive behavior of these tumors. Areas covered: The goal of surgical management of iCCA is margin negative (R0) hepatic resection with preservation of adequate size liver remnant and function. Data regarding role of staging laparoscopy, margin status, portal lymphadenectomy, and vascular resection for iCCA are reviewed. Perioperative systemic therapy may have value, although prospective data have been lacking. Recurrence rates remain high even after R0 resection; among patients with recurrent disease limited to the liver, re-resection or locoregional therapies may play a role. Liver transplantation may be an option for select patients with very early-stage iCCA, although this should be done on a protocol-only basis. Expert commentary: Appropriate preoperative patient selection and surgical technique are paramount to ensure optimal oncologic outcomes for patients with resectable iCCA. Improving systemic and locoregional therapy options may help decrease recurrence rates and improve long-term survival for this aggressive malignancy.

Prognostic impact of perihepatic lymph node metastases in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although perihepatic lymph node metastases (PLNMs) are known to be a poor prognosticator for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), optimal management remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for PLNMs, and the survival impact of their number and location in patients with resectable CRLMs.

METHODS

Data on patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy during 2003-2014 were analysed retrospectively. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall (OS) survival were calculated according to presence, number and location of PLNMs. Risk factors for PLNM were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1485 patients, 174 underwent lymphadenectomy, and 54 (31·0 per cent) had PLNM. Ten patients (5·7 per cent) who had lymphadenectomy and 176 (13·4 per cent) who did not underwent repeat hepatectomy. Survival of patients with PLNM was significantly poorer than that of patients without (RFS: 5·3 versus 13·8 months, P < 0·001; OS: 20·5 versus 71·3 months; P < 0·001). Median OS was significantly better in patients with para-aortic versus hepatoduodenal ligament PLNMs (58·2 versus 15·5 months; P = 0·011). Patients with three or more PLNMs had significantly worse median OS than those with one or two (16·3 versus 25·4 months; P = 0·039). The presence of primary tumour lymph node metastases (odds ratio 2·35; P = 0·037) and intrahepatic recurrence requiring repeat hepatectomy (odds ratio 5·61; P = 0·012) were significant risk factors for PLNM on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy and those with primary tumour lymph node metastases are at significant risk of PLNM. Although PLNM is a poor prognostic factor independent of perihepatic lymph node station, patients with one or two PLNMs have a more favourable outcome than those with more PLNMs.

Hepatocholangiocarcinoma/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: are they contraindication or indication for liver transplantation? A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncommon primary hepatic malignancies such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) were generally considered contraindications for liver transplantation(LT), and studies comparing the efficacy of LT and resection (LR) for ICC/HCC-CC were scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival outcomes of ICC/HCC-CC patients treated by LT and LR in a propensity score-matched population.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study from 1995 to 2015. Consecutive patients with the pathological diagnosis of ICC or HCC-CC in the surgical specimens were included. All patients had either hepatectomy or LT with curative intent. Factors associated with survival were identified with multivariate analysis using cox-regression model. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed.

RESULT

There were 181 patients diagnosed to have ICC/HCC_CC. Nine patients received LT (all with incidental ICC/HCC-CC) and 172 received hepatectomy. The median follow-up period was 27.5 months. The median age was 60 years (range 3-86); Hepatitis B and C carrier status was found in 48.1 and 2.3% of the patients, respectively. The median tumor size was 6 cm and 71.3% of them had solitary tumor. Microvascular invasion was present in 47% of the patients. After propensity score matching, there were 54 (9 in LT and 45 in LR group) patients for analysis. Cox-regression analysis showed that early AJCC (7th) staging and LT were the independent factors associated with overall survival. Patients in the LT group had significantly better overall survival (5-year OS 77.8 vs 36.6%, log-rank p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

ICC/HCC-CC are uncommon tumors with poor long-term oncological outcomes despite curative hepatectomy. Liver transplantation might be a better treatment option for patients with early ICC/HCC-CC.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients without indications of lymph node metastasis not benefit from lymph node dissection

Background: To investigate the necessity of routine lymph node dissection (LND) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients without indications of lymph node metastasis (LNM) preoperatively. Methods: 422 consecutive ICC patients who undergone curative resection from January 2009 to December 2014 were enrolled and categorized as two groups (hepatectomy only or hepatectomy plus LND). Clinicopathologic data was compared between the groups by χ² or Fisher’s exact test. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and differences were analyzed using the log-rank test. Cox regression model was adopted for multivariable analysis. Results: The median OS time of all 422 patients was 41.4 months. One-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 67%, 47%, and 35%, respectively. A total of 73 patients had undergone curative resection combined with LND, of whom 20.5% (15/73) were confirmed lymph node positive pathologically. The clinicopathologic characteristics between LND and control groups showed no significant differences. Of the 422 patients, 271 patients had recurrence. The recurrence rates were 65.8% for the LND group and 63.9% for the non-LND group. Survival analysis revealed that, neither the OS (LND vs. non-LND: 32.2 months vs. 46.2 months; p = 0.16) nor the RFS (LND vs. non-LND: 23.1 months vs. 17.0 months; p = 0.09) had significant difference. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size, tumor number, carbohydrate antigen19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase were independent predictive factors for OS and RFS. Conclusion: Routine LND may not improve survival in resectable ICC patients with negative LNM diagnosis before operation.

Successful radical surgical resection of initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by downsizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin: a case report

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a subtype of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, downsizing chemotherapy has been applied to initially unresectable BTCs, including ICC.

Case presentation

We report a case of liver resection in a 23-year-old woman who was diagnosed with initially unresectable ICC attached to the inferior vena cava, with portal vein (PV) cavernous transformation. Positron emission tomography (PET) showed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the para-aortic lymph nodes. Upon using downsizing chemotherapy (the combination of gemcitabine [GEM] and cisplatin [CDDP]), the size of tumor reduced by 55% and FDG uptake in the para-aortic lymph node metastases disappeared. A right hemihepatectomy was performed, along with dissection of lymph nodes, including the para-aortic lymph nodes. The PV cavernous transformation was preserved to maintain collateral flow as much as possible, as it was considered to originate from a congenital anomaly. Pathological examination revealed that R0 resection was performed and that there were no viable neoplastic cells remaining in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient is alive at 31 months after initial treatment, with a local recurrence.

Conclusion

Downsizing chemotherapy with GEM plus CDDP followed by radical surgical resection is an attractive treatment for initially unresectable BTC.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is unclear. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival among patients undergoing resection of ICC using a multi-institutional database.

METHODS

1154 ICC patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy between 1990 and 2015 were identified from 14 institutions. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Following resection, 347 (30%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, most commonly a gemcitabine-based regimen (n = 184, 52%). Patients with T2/T3/T4 disease were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy compared with patients with T1a/T1b disease (OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.89-3.23; P < 0.001). Among patients who did and did not receive adjuvant therapy, patients with T2/T3/T4 tumors had a 5-year OS of 37% (95%CI 28.9-44.4) versus 30% (95%CI 23.8-35.6), respectively (p = 0.006). Similarly patients with N1 disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy tended to have improved 5-year OS (18.3%, 95%CI 9.0-30.1 vs. no adjuvant therapy 12%, 95%CI 3.9-24.4; P = 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

While adjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the prognosis of all ICC patients following surgical resection, it was associated with a potential survival benefit in subgroups of patients at increased risk for recurrence, such as those with advanced tumors.

The differential organogenesis and functionality of two liver-draining lymph nodes in mice

The liver is an immunological organ. However, fundamental knowledge concerning liver-draining lymph nodes (LNs), which have been newly identified in mice as the portal and celiac LNs, is still lacking. Here, we revealed that the portal LN and celiac LN drain liver lymph through different lymphatic vessels. Although both the portal LN and celiac LN possess typical structures, they have different cell compositions. Interestingly, these two LNs form at different times during fetal development. Moreover, the organogenesis of the celiac LN, but not the portal LN, is controlled by the transcription factor NFIL3. Furthermore, the portal LN and celiac LN also perform different functions. The celiac LN is the predominant site of liver antiviral immune responses, whereas the portal LN functions in the in situ induction of dietary antigen-specific regulatory T cells. In conclusion, the portal LN and celiac LN are two independent liver-draining LNs with different organogenesis histories and separate functions in maintaining immune homeostasis in the liver.

A Prognostic Index to Identify Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Who Could Benefit From Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin

Biliary tract cancer is a heterogenous group. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been the standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer, but there is lack of evidence on treatment in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). We analyzed 29 patients with only IHC who received gemcitabine plus cisplatin between June 2010 and February 2013. The median age was 63 years (range, 40-78 years), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of all patients was <2. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 4.3 and 7.3 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that platelet count (≤180 × 10 per liter), metastatic site of more than 2, and albumin level (≤3.5 g/dL) were independent prognostic factors for decreased OS. OS was estimated based on the number of adverse prognostic factors: zero or 1 (good prognostic group), 2 (intermediate group), or 3 (poor prognostic group). The median OS for good (n = 15), intermediate (n = 10), and poor (n = 4) prognostic group was 10.5, 6.1, and 1.6 months, respectively (P < 0.005). Relatively better prognosis of the good prognosis group comparing to other prognosis groups can be expected from the prognostic model established in this study by analyzing patients with IHC treated with gemcitabine.