Percutaneous Cryoablation versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy of Renal T1A Tumors: a Single-Center Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Is Ablation Suitable For Small Renal Masses? A Meta-Analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare perioperative and oncology outcomes of ablation and partial nephrectomy in small renal masses (SRMs).

METHODS

We conduct this meta-analysis strictly according to the PRISMA standard, and the quality evaluation follows the AMSTAR standard. Four databases, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. The search time range is from database creation to November 2023. Stata16 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Weighted mean difference (WMD) represented continuity variables, odds ratio or relative risk (OR/RR) represented dichotomies variables, and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies, including 6030 patients. Results showed that patients undergoing partial nephrectomy were younger (WMD = -5.45 years, 95%CI [-7.44, -3.46], P < 0.05), had longer operation time (WMD = 64.91 min, 95%CI [44.47, 85.34], P < 0.05), had longer length of stay (WMD = 2.91 days, 95%CI [2.04, 3.78], P < 0.05), and had more estimated blood loss (WMD = 97.76 ml, 95%CI [69.48, 126.04]. P < 0.05), the overall complication rate was higher (OR = 1.84, 95%CI [1.48, 2.29], P < 0.05), the major complication rate was higher (OR = 1.98, 95%CI [1.36, 2.88], P < 0.05), and the recurrence rate was lower (OR = 0.32, 95%Cl [0.20, 0.50], P < 0.05). However, there were no differences between ablation and partial nephrectomy in cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 2.07, 95%CI [0.61, 7.04], P > 0.05), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.24, 95%CI [0.58, 2.65], P > 0.05), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 2.68, 95%CI [0.91, 7.88], P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing partial nephrectomy are younger, have longer operation time and length of stay, and have higher complication rate. However, there was no significant difference in CSS, OS, and RFS between partial nephrectomy and ablation, but more well-designed, high-quality studies are needed to confirm this.

Combining Transarterial Embolization and Percutaneous Cryoablation for Early-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma: Embolization Materials and Impacts of Tumor Size

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to compare the complication rates of different embolization materials (absolute ethanol and gelatin sponges) used for combined transarterial embolization (TAE) and to investigate the impact of tumor size on operative time and cryoneedle use during percutaneous cryoablation (PCA).

METHODS

We treated 27 patients (9 women and 18 men; mean age, 74 years) with 28 early-stage (T1a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lesions using combined TAE and PCA between September 2018 and January 2021. During TAE, 15 lesions in 14 patients were embolized using mixed absolute ethanol and iodized oil. The remaining 13 lesions (in 13 patients) were embolized using a gelatin sponge followed by iodized oil. The PCA was performed within 3 to 21 days of the TAE. We compared complications between the TAE subgroups (i.e., absolute ethanol and gelatin sponge) and assessed potential correlations between tumor size and the operative time of the PCA.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully treated by combined TAE-PCA. Local control was achieved for all patients (monitoring period, 1-48 months; median, 28 months). Although the effect of TAE did not differ between subgroups, a significantly higher number of patients in the absolute ethanol group experienced intraprocedural pain than in the gelatin sponge group (p < 0.05). The operative time of the PCA was significantly correlated with the size of the RCC lesion (p < 0.01). The number of cryoneedles used for the PCA was also correlated with the size of the RCC lesion (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

For TAE prior to PCA for early-stage RCC, gelatin sponges can replace absolute ethanol to reduce intraprocedural pain. Tumor size correlates with operative time and the number of cryoneedles needed for PCA, which suggests the total medical cost for PCA therefore varies based on the tumor's size.

Early-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma Locoregional Therapies: Current Approaches and Future Directions

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common primary renal malignancy. Prevalence of RCC in developed countries has slowly increased. Although partial or total nephrectomy has been the first-line treatment for early-stage RCC, improved or similar safety and treatment outcomes with locoregional therapies have challenged this paradigm. In this review, we explore locoregional techniques for early-stage RCC, including radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and microwave ablation with a focus on procedural technique, patient selection, and safety/treatment outcomes. Furthermore, we discuss future advances and novel techniques, including radiomics, combination therapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and catheter-directed techniques.

Perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of percutaneous ablation versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal tumors: outcomes from a pooled analysis

The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive pooled analysis aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation (PCA) versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN), including robotic and laparoscopic approaches, in patients diagnosed with cT1 renal tumors. We conducted a comprehensive search across four major electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, targeting studies published in English up to April 2024. The primary outcomes evaluated in this analysis included perioperative outcomes, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes. A total of 2449 patients across 17 studies were included in the analysis. PCA demonstrated superior outcomes compared to MIPN in terms of shorter hospital stays (WMD: - 2.13 days; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: - 3.29, - 0.97; p = 0.0003), reduced operative times (WMD: - 109.99 min; 95% CI: - 141.40, - 78.59; p < 0.00001), and lower overall complication rates (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.74; p = 0.0001). However, PCA was associated with a higher rate of local recurrence when compared to MIPN (OR: 3.81; 95% CI: 2.45, 5.92; p < 0.00001). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in major complications, estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, creatinine variation, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival between the two treatment modalities. PCA presents a notable disadvantage regarding local recurrence rates in comparison to MIPN. However, PCA offers several advantages over MIPN, including shorter durations of hospital stay, reduced operative times, and lower complication rates, while achieving similar outcomes in other oncologic metrics.

Percutaneous ablation versus robotic‑assisted partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes

This investigation sought to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of percutaneous ablation (PCA) versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) among individuals diagnosed with cT1 renal tumors. This study rigorously followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on studies published in English through February 2024. We focused on evaluating primary outcomes, specifically perioperative outcomes, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes. In this analysis, data from 1534 patients across 13 studies were evaluated. PCA was found to have advantageous outcomes in comparison to RAPN regarding hospital stay durations, with a Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) of - 2.03 days (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -3.78 to - 0.27; p = 0.02), operative times (WMD: -106.75 min; 95% CI: - 170.78 to - 42.72; p = 0.001), and overall complication rates (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.89; p = 0.01). Conversely, PCA showed a higher incidence of local recurrence compared to RAPN, with an OR of 3.20 (95% CI: 1.91 to 5.35; p < 0.00001). Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments in terms of major complications, declines in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR), variations in creatinine levels, overall survival rates, and recurrence-free survival. While PCA exhibits higher local recurrence rates than RAPN, it also presents significant advantages, such as shorter hospital stays, decreased operative durations, and lower complication rates. This juxtaposition underscores the urgent need for further, more rigorous research to substantiate these findings.

Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Following Percutaneous Cryoablation vs. Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Tumours: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) can be an alternative to partial nephrectomy (PN) in selected patients with stage T1 renal tumours. Existing meta-analyses regarding ablative techniques compared both laparoscopic and PCA with PN. That is why we decided to perform a meta-analysis that focused solely on PCA. The aim of this study was to compare the complications and functional and oncological outcomes between PCA and PN. A systematic literature search was performed in January 2024. Data for dichotomous and continuous variables were expressed as pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Effect measures for the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were expressed as pooled hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Among 6487 patients included in the 14 selected papers, 1554 (23.9%) and 4924 (76.1%) underwent PCA and PN, respectively. Compared with the PN group, patients undergoing PCA had significantly lower overall and major postoperative complication rates. There was no difference in renal function between PCA and PN groups. When analysing collective data for cT1 renal carcinoma, PCA was associated with worse LRFS compared with PN. However, subgroup analysis revealed that in the case of PCA, LRFS was not decreased in patients with cT1a tumours. Moreover, patients undergoing robotic-assisted PN had improved LRFS compared with those undergoing PCA. No significant differences were observed between PCA and PN in terms of MFS and CSS. Finally, PCA was associated with worse OS than PN in both collective and subgroup analyses. In conclusion, PCA is associated with favourable postoperative complication rates relative to PN. Regarding LRFS, PCA is not worse than PN in cT1a tumours but has a substantially relevant disadvantage in cT1b tumours. Also, RAPN might be the only surgical modality that provides better LRFS than PCA. In cT1 tumours, PCA shows MFS and CSS comparable to PN. Lastly, PCA is associated with a shorter OS than PN.

The long-term outcomes of local tumor destruction versus partial nephrectomy for cT1a non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and development of prognostic nomograms

PURPOSE

There is a lack of authoritative opinions on local tumor destruction (LTD) for clinical T1a (cT1a) non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). We aim to compare the outcomes of cT1a nccRCC after partial nephrectomy (PN) or LTD and explore prognostic factors.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cT1a nccRCC receiving LTD or PN between 2000 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for patients receiving LTD and PN. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, competing risk regression models, and subgroup analysis were used to compare outcomes and identify prognostic factors. Prognostic nomograms were established and evaluated based on the multivariate models.

RESULTS

A total of 3664 cT1a nccRCC patients were included. The LTD group had poorer overall survival (OS) and similar cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared with the PN group before and after PSM (p < 0.05), while the other-cause mortality rate of the LTD group was higher than that of the PN group. Age, marital status, household income, prior tumor history, interval between diagnosis and treatment, treatments, and tumor size were identified as independent predictive factors for OS. Age, tumor size, prior tumor history, and histological type were identified as independent predictive factors for CSS. Then the nomograms predicting OS and CSS were constructed based on these prognostic factors, which showed excellent performance in risk stratification and accuracy.

CONCLUSION

LTD could achieve comparable cancer-control effects as PN among cT1a nccRCC patients. The OS and CSS nomograms worked effectively for prognosis assessment.

Economic evaluation of percutaneous cryoablation vs conventional surgery in extra-abdominal desmoid tumours in the Spanish healthcare system

BACKGROUND

Desmoid tumours (DTs) or deep fibromatosis are benign soft-tissue tumours, sometimes locally aggressive, requiring intervention on some cases. Surgery has been the gold standard, but new less invasive techniques such as percutaneous cryoablation have proved their effectiveness, reducing health resources and complications. The study aimed to compare the total cost of percutaneous cryoablation and conventional surgery for patients with extra-abdominal and/or abdominal wall DTs, candidates for local ablative treatment in Spain.

METHODS

A cost-analysis model was developed. An expert panel provided data about resource consumption for the percutaneous cryoablation technique and validated the epidemiology used for target population estimation. Unitary resources cost (€ 2022) derived from local cost databases. A retrospective analysis of 54 surgical cases in 3 Spanish hospitals was performed to estimate the cost of conventional surgery based on the cost of the Diagnosis-Related group (DRG) codes identified on this patient sample, weighted by each DRG proportion. The total cost for each alternative included intervention cost and complications cost, considering debridement required in 4.5% of cases with percutaneous cryoablation and minor surgery for surgical site infection in 18.0% for conventional surgery.

RESULTS

The total cost for percutaneous cryoablation (€ 5774.78/patient-year) was lower than the total cost for conventional surgery (€ 6780.98/patient-year), yielding cost savings up to € 80,002 in 1 year for the entire cohort of 80 patients with DTs eligible for intervention estimated in Spain. One-way sensitivity analyses confirmed the results' robustness.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous cryoablation versus conventional surgery would yield cost savings for the management of DT patients in Spain.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This manuscript provides insight into the economic impact derived from the savings related to the use of percutaneous cryoablation for desmoid-type tumours from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System, providing useful information for the health decision-making process.

KEY POINTS

• Desmoid tumours are locally aggressive and may require local therapy. • Percutaneous cryoablation procedure is less invasive than the conventional surgery. • Cost comparison shows savings associated to percutaneous cryoablation use.

A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of full economic analyses of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in adults' thoracic and abdominopelvic indications. Authors used Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed to conduct a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fully published economic articles in English were included. Methodology and reporting quality were assessed using standardized tools. Majority of studies (28/33) were on oncology procedures. Radical prostatectomy was the most reported procedure (16/33). Twenty-eight studies used quality-adjusted life years, and five used complication rates as outcomes. Nine used primary and 24 studies used secondary data. All studies used modeling. In 81% of studies (27/33), RAS was cost-effective or potentially cost-effective compared to comparator procedures, including radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy. Societal perspective, longer-term time-horizon, and larger volumes favored RAS. Cost-drivers were length of stay and equipment cost. From societal and payer perspectives, robotic-assisted surgery is a cost-effective strategy for thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.Clinical trial registration This study is a systematic review with no intervention, not a clinical trial.

Minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatments for T1 renal cell cancer in patients over 75 years: a comparison of outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation

PURPOSE

To compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) for treatment of T1 renal cell cancer (RCC) in patients older than 75 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective national multicenter study included all patients older than 75 years treated for a T1 RCC by RPN or PTA between January 2010 and January 2021. Patients' characteristics, tumor data, and perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients for 209 procedures (143 RPN and 66 PTA) were included. In the PTA group, patients were older (80.4 ± 3.7 vs. 79 ± 3.7 years (p = 0.01)); frailer (ASA score (2.43 ± 0.6 vs. 2.17 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01)); and more frequently had a history of kidney surgery (16.7% [11/66] vs. 5.6% [8/143] (p = 0.01)) than in the RPN group. Tumors were larger in the RPN group (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 0.9 cm (p < 0.01)). Operation time, length of hospital stay, and increase of creatinine serum level were higher in RPN (respectively 92.1 ± 42.7 vs. 150.7 ± 61.3 min (p < 0.01); 1.7 ± 1.4 vs. 4.2 ± 3.4 days (p < 0.01); 1.9 ± 19.3% vs. 10.1 ± 23.7 (p = 0.03)). Disease-free survival and time to progression were similar (respectively, HR 2.2; 95% CI 0.88-5.5; p = 0.09; HR 2.1; 95% CI 0.86-5.2; p = 0.1). Overall survival was shorter for PTA that disappeared after Cox adjusting model (HR 3.3; 95% CI 0.87-12.72; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Similar oncological outcomes are observed after PTA and RPN for T1 RCC in elderly patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous thermal ablation have similar oncological outcomes for T1a kidney cancer in patients over 75 years; however, operative time, decrease in renal function, and length of hospital stay were lower with ablation.

KEY POINTS

• After adjusting model for age and ASA score, similar oncological outcomes are observed after percutaneous thermal ablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell cancer in elderly patients. • Operation time, length of hospital stay, and increase of creatinine serum level were higher in the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy group.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment option for small renal masses, comparable to partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

The standard therapy for small renal masses (SRMs) remains partial nephrectomy (PN), which is associated with relatively high morbidity and complication rate. Therefore, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) emerges as an alternative therapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and oncological outcomes of PRFA versus PN.

METHODS

A multicenter non-inferiority study with retrospective analysis of 291 patients with SRMs (N0M0), who underwent PN or PRFA (2:1), recruited prospectively from two hospitals in the Andalusian Public Health System, Spain, between 2014 and 2021. Comparisons of treatment features were evaluated using the t test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher test, and Cochran-Armitage trend test. Kaplan-Meier curves depicted overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates in the overall study population.

RESULTS

A total of 291 consecutive patients were identified; 111 and 180 patients underwent PRFA and PN, respectively. Median follow-up time was 38 and 48 months, and mean hospitalization days were 1.04 and 3.57 days, respectively. The variables underpinned with high surgical risk were significantly increased in PRFA compared to those in PN (mean age was 64.56 and 57.47 years, the solitary kidney presence was 12.6% and 5.6%, ASA score ≥ 3 was 36% and 14.5%, respectively). The rest of oncological outcomes were comparable amongst PRFA and PN. Patients undergoing PRFA did not improve OS, LRFS, and MFS compared to those undergoing PN. Limitations comprise retrospective design and limited statistical power.

CONCLUSION

PRFA for SMRs in high-risk patients is non-inferior in terms of oncological outcomes and safety compared to PN.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our study has a direct clinical application as it proves that radiofrequency ablation is an effective and uncomplicated therapeutic option for patients with small renal masses.

KEY POINTS

•There are non-inferiority results in overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival between PRFA and PN. •Our two-center study showed that PRFA is non-inferior to PN in oncological outcomes. •Contrast-enhanced power ultrasound-guided PRFA provides an effective therapy for T1 renal tumors.

Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management

The two primary nephron-sparing interventions for treating renal masses such as renal cell carcinoma are surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) and image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation. Nephron-sparing surgery, such as PN, has been the standard of care for treating many localized renal masses. Although uncommon, complications resulting from PN can range from asymptomatic and mild to symptomatic and life-threatening. These complications include vascular injuries such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and/or renal ischemia; injury to the collecting system causing urinary leak; infection; and tumor recurrence. The incidence of complications after any nephron-sparing surgery depends on many factors, such as the proximity of the tumor to blood vessels or the collecting system, the skill or experience of the surgeon, and patient-specific factors. More recently, image-guided percutaneous renal ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for small renal tumors, with comparable oncologic outcomes to those of PN and a low incidence of major complications. Radiologists must be familiar with the imaging findings encountered after these surgical and image-guided procedures, especially those indicative of complications. The authors review cross-sectional imaging characteristics of complications after PN and image-guided thermal ablation of kidney tumors and highlight the respective management strategies, ranging from clinical observation to interventions such as angioembolization or repeat surgery. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Chung and Raman in this issue.

Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation for cT1a renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that partial nephrectomy (PN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) yield comparable outcomes for patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although the cost-effectiveness of both treatments still needs to be assessed.

PURPOSE

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of PN and PCA for patients with cT1a RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision analysis was created over a 5-year span from a healthcare payer's perspective computing expected costs and outcomes of PN and PCA in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER). After each treatment, the following states were modelled using data from the recent literature: procedural complications, no evidence of disease (NED), local recurrence, metastases, and death from RCC- or non-RCC-related causes. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PCA and PN yielded health benefits of 3.68 QALY and 3.67 QALY. Overall expected costs were $20,491 and $26,478 for PCA and PN. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PCA was more cost-effective than PN in 84.78% of Monte Carlo simulations. PCA was more cost-effective until its complication risk was at least 38% higher than PN. PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than that of PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than that of PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than that of PN. PCA remained cost-effective until its procedural cost is above $13,875.

CONCLUSION

PCA appears to be more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, although the currently available evidence is of limited quality. PCA may be the better treatment strategy in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC-mortality in clinically plausible ranges.

KEY POINTS

• For patients with cT1a RCCs, PCA yields a comparable health benefit at lower costs compared to PN, making PCA the dominant and therefore more cost-effective treatment strategy over PN. • PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than PN. • PCA is more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, and it remained so in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC mortality.

Assessing Trifecta Achievement after Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration

Background and Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation (PCA) of small renal masses (SRMs) using Trifecta outcomes in a large cohort of patients who were not eligible for surgery. Materials and methods: All PCAs performed in four different centers between September 2009 and September 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided in two different groups depending on masses dimensional criteria: Group-A: diameter ≤ 25 mm and Group-B: diameter > 25 mm. Complications rates were reported and classified according to the Clavien−Dindo system. The estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated before PCA and during follow-up schedule. Every patient received a Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) evaluation on the first postoperative day. Radiological follow-up was taken at 3, 6, and 12 months for the first year, then yearly. Radiological recurrence was defined as a contrast enhancement persistence and was reported in the study. Finally, Trifecta outcome, which included complications, RFS, and preservation of eGFR class, was calculated for every procedure at a median follow-up of 32 months. Results: The median age of the patients was 74 years. Group-A included 200 procedures while Group-B included 140. Seventy-eight patients were eligible for Trifecta evaluation. Trifecta was achieved in 69.6% of procedures in Group-A, 40.6% in Group-B (p = 0.02). We observed an increased rate of complication in Group-B (13.0% vs. 28.6; p < 0.001). However, 97.5% were <II Clavien−Dindo grade. No differences were found between the two groups regarding eGFR before and after treatment. Further, 24-months RFS rates were respectively 98.0% for Group-A and 92.1% in Group-B, while at 36 months were respectively 94.5% and 87.5% (p = 0.08). Conclusions: PCA seems to be a safe and effective treatment for SRM but in the need of more strict dimensional criteria to achieve a higher possible success rate.

Differential efficacy of ablation therapy versus partial nephrectomy between clinical T1a and T1b renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the differential clinical outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. those treated with ablation therapy (AT) such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation for cT1b compared to cT1a renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for articles published before August 2021. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PN with those who underwent AT for cT1a and/or cT1b renal tumors.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 studies comprising 13,996 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. In both cT1a and cT1b renal tumors, there was no significant difference in the percent decline of estimated glomerular filtration rates or in the overall/severe complication rates between PN and AT. Compared to AT, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence in both patients with cT1a and cT1b tumors (cT1a: pooled risk ratio [RR]; 0.43, 95% confidence intervals [CI]; 0.28-0.66, cT1b: pooled RR; 0.41, 95%CI; 0.23-0.75). Subgroup analyses regarding the technical approach revealed no statistical difference in local recurrence rates between percutaneous AT and PN in patients with cT1a tumors (pooled RR; 0.61, 95%CI; 0.32-1.15). In cT1b, however, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence (pooled RR; 0.45, 95%CI; 0.23-0.88). There was no difference in distant metastasis or cancer mortality rates between PN and AT in patients with cT1a, or cT1b tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

AT has a substantially relevant disadvantage with regards to local recurrence compared to PN, particularly in cT1b renal tumors. Despite the limitations inherent to the nature of retrospective and unmatched primary cohorts, percutaneous AT could be used as a reasonable alternative treatment for well-selected patients with cT1a renal tumors.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy Versus Focal Therapy for Small Renal Masses

Background

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) and focal therapy (FT) are popular trends for small renal masses (SRMs). However, there is currently no systematic comparison between MIPN and FT of SRMs. Therefore, we systematically study the perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes of MIPN and FT in SRMs.

Methods

We have searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for articles between MIPN (robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) and FT {radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation (CA), irreversible electroporation, non-thermal [irreversible electroporation (IRE)] ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)}. We calculated pooled mean difference (MD), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (CRD42021260787).

Results

A total of 26 articles (n = 4,420) were included in the study. Compared with MIPN, the operating time (OP) of FT had significantly lower (SMD, −1.20; CI, −1.77 to −0.63; I2 = 97.6%, P &lt; 0.0001), estimated blood loss (EBL) of FT had significantly less (SMD, −1.20; CI, −1.77 to −0.63; I2 = 97.6%, P &lt; 0.0001), length of stay (LOS) had shorter (SMD, −0.90; CI, −1.26 to −0.53; I2 = 92.2%, P &lt; 0.0001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of FT was significantly lower decrease (SMD, −0.90; CI, −1.26 to −0.53; I2 = 92.2%, P &lt; 0.0001). However, FT possessed lower risk in minor complications (Clavien 1–2) (OR, 0.69; CI, 0.45 to 1.07; I2 = 47%, P = 0.023) and overall complications (OR, 0.71; CI, 0.51 to 0.99; I2 = 49.2%, P = 0.008). Finally, there are no obvious difference between FT and MIPN in local recurrence, distant metastasis, and major complications (P &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion

FT has more advantages in protecting kidney function, reducing bleeding, shortening operating time, and shortening the length of stay. There is no difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, and major complications. For the minimally invasive era, we need to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of all aspects to make comprehensive choices.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021260787).