Management of sepsis in neutropenic cancer patients: 2018 guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) and Intensive Care Working Party (iCHOP) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Essential Review of Oncological Emergencies

Innovations in oncology have expanded treatment eligibility, leading to a rise in cancer patients requiring critical care. This necessitates that all critical care clinicians possess a fundamental knowledge of prevalent oncological conditions and identify emergent scenarios requiring immediate action. This article will explore key oncological complications and their management approaches.

Optimal cut-off value of procalcitonin and procalcitonin/albumin ratio for predicting bacteremia among patients living with cancer: a test-negative case-control study

Objective: The occurrence of bacteremia is critically important for the survival of cancer patients. Therefore, our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of procalcitonin (PCT) and the procalcitonin to albumin ratio (PAR) in predicting bacteremia among this population.Methods: In this retrospective test-negative case-control study, we included 903 hospitalized cancer patients, divided into two groups: the bacteremia-positive group (BSI group, n = 384) and the bacteremia-negative group (non-BSI group, n = 519). We assessed the diagnostic significance of PCT and PAR through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and determined the optimal cut-off values using Youden's index.Results: Both the duration of hospital stay and the 30-day mortality rate were significantly higher in the BSI group. The areas under the curve (AUC) for PAR and PCT were 0.749 (95% CI: 0.715-0.782) and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.708-0.776), respectively, indicating higher levels in the BSI group. The optimal cut-off values for predicting bacteremia were 0.72 for PAR and 1.32 for PCT. PAR showed the highest specificity (92.7%) and positive predictive value (PPV = 83.4%), while PCT demonstrated the highest sensitivity (51.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV = 71.6%).Discussion: This study is the first in the literature to suggest that PAR and PCT are valuable biomarkers for diagnosing bacteremia in cancer patients. The identified cut-off values offer practical thresholds for bacteremia diagnosis.

Evaluating the impact of training on therapeutic radiographer awareness of the signs and symptoms of neutropenic sepsis in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Neutropenic sepsis is a life-threatening combination of neutropenia and infection. Patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy are at a high risk of neutropenic sepsis and thus are likely to present in a clinical setting. This study aimed to evaluate levels of Therapeutic Radiographers' understanding of sepsis signs and response pathways along with the impact of a training session on this.

METHODS

A teaching session at the trust was conducted by the Sepsis Lead Nurse and utilised a range of active learning techniques including scenario-based questions and a sepsis game. Pre and post-training questionnaires were completed by participants which comprised of multiple-choice questions related to sepsis identification and response. Respondents were asked to rate their confidence in each answer. This enabled scoring to award penalties for higher levels of confidence in incorrect answers and reward high confidence in correct answers. Lower levels of confidence attracted or lost smaller marks.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant (p < 0.0002) improvement in questionnaire scores after the training session from 42% to 66%. Lower scores on the pre-test responses mainly related to incorrect selection of responses to scenario questions.

CONCLUSION

This service evaluation has highlighted a lack of sepsis awareness amongst Therapeutic Radiographers. It also demonstrates that an active learning based training session can significantly improve understanding of sepsis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Sepsis training utilising scenario and response questions should be provided to Therapeutic Radiographers more frequently who are likely to work with patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes in Patients With Septic Shock After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Septic shock remains a potentially life-threatening complication among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. There is a paucity of information on the clinical characteristics, outcome and prognostic factors of septic shock patients after allo-HSCT. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of septic shock after allo-HSCT and its associated health outcomes and to evaluate the role of patient demographics, transplantation-related laboratory and clinical variables associated with the short-term mortality of septic shock after allo-HSCT. We retrospectively studied 242 septic shock patients from 6105 consecutive patients allografted between 2007 and 2021. We assessed 29 risk factors as candidate predictors and used multivariable logistic regression to establish clinical model. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The median age of the subjects was 34 (IQR 24 to 45) years. A total of 148 patients (61.2%) had positive blood cultures. Gram-negative bacilli accounted for 61.5% of the positive isolates, gram-positive cocci accounted for 12.2%, and fungi accounted for 6.1%. Coinfections were found in 30 (20.3%) patients. Escherichia coli was the dominant isolated pathogen (31.1%), followed by Pseudomonas spp. (12.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.1%). With a median follow-up of 34 (IQR: 2 to 528) days, a total of 142 (58.7%) patients died, of whom 118 (48.8%) died within the first 28 days after septic shock diagnosis, 131 (54.1%) died within 90 days, and 141 (58.3%) died within 1 year. A large majority of deaths (83.1% [118/142]) occurred within 28 days of septic shock diagnosis. Finally, 6 independent predictive variables of 28-day mortality were identified by multivariable logistic regression: time of septic shock, albumin, bilirubin, PaO2/FiO2, lactate, and sepsis-induced coagulopathy. Patients with late onset shock had higher 28-day mortality rates (64.6% versus 25.5%, P < .001) and more ICU admission (32.6% versus 7.1%, P < .001) than those with early onset shock. We highlight the poor survival outcomes in patients who develop septic shock, emphasizing the need for increasing awareness regarding septic shock after allo-HSCT. The information from the current study may help to assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients.

Causes of death and nomogram for patients with oncologic hepato-biliary-pancreatic disorders: A large-cohort study

The improvement of digestive cancer survival results in increased morbidity of noncancerous comorbidities. This study aimed at clarifying causes of death (COD) and predicting overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with liver cancer, gallbladder cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer. We used the Surveillance, Epidemic, and End Results database to extract information. Nomograms of multivariate Cox regression was used to predict OS of cancer patients. The models were evaluated using the concordance indexes (C-indexes), the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves. Respectively 58,895, 15,324, 30,708, and 109,995 cases with cancer of liver, gallbladder, bile duct or pancreas were retrieved between 2000 and 2020. Approximately 80% deaths occurred within 1 years after cancer diagnosis. Sequence in noncancerous COD proportion was diverse, while diseases of heart always accounted for a great part. Risks of death from most noncancerous COD were significantly higher than that of the cancer-free population. Nomograms were developed by predictors of interest such as age, therapy and TNM stage. The concordance indexes of nomograms were 0.756, 0.729, 0.763, and 0.760 respectively, well-calibrating to the reality. The 0.5-, 1-, and 2-year areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were about 0.800, indicating good reliability and accuracy. Noncancerous COD accounted for larger part in gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Noncancerous COD showed an upward trend as follow-up time extended and the majorities were diseases of heart, cerebrovascular disease, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. The novel OS-nomograms can provide personalized prognosis information with satisfactory accuracy.

Postmarketing Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Sacituzumab govitecan is widely used for the treatment of breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma, but available information regarding adverse events (AEs) is limited. We aim to explore the AE induced by sacituzumab govitecan by mining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The association between sacituzumab govitecan and AEs was evaluated using the information component. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for all identified signals to explore the risk factors associated with AEs leading to hospitalization. In total, 1,884 reports related to sacituzumab govitecan were retrieved, and 114 AE signals involving 20 systems were identified. The median time for onset of AEs was ~ 6-7 days after initiating treatment with sacituzumab govitecan, with over 80% of AEs occurring within 30 days. Subgroup analysis revealed that 14 signals were reported in men and 110 in women. There were 58 signals reported in patients under 65 following the use of sacituzumab govitecan, 59 signals in patients over 65, and 31 signals were present in both groups. Multivariable analysis showed that being male and the occurrence of colitis, pneumonitis, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, sepsis, dehydration, and diarrhea were risk factors leading to hospitalization with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89. Additionally, sensitivity analysis revealed that this study had good robustness. This is the first retrospective analysis based on FAERS to review the safety of sacituzumab govitecan. The results highlight the need to closely monitor adverse reactions such as neutropenia, diarrhea, colitis, and sepsis when using sacituzumab govitecan.

[Cancer patients in the emergency department]

A growing number of patients are living with cancer or have a history of cancer leading to increasing adverse effects of treatment or disease necessitating emergency department (ED) consultation. Long-term cancer survivors are at higher risk of comorbidities causing a substantial increase in health care resource utilization. The most frequent reasons for cancer-related ED visits are dyspnea, fever, pain, gastrointestinal or neurological symptoms leading to high hospital and intensive care unit admission rates. Acute respiratory failure in cancer patients necessitates timely diagnostic testing, whereby computed tomography is superior to chest X‑ray. Delay in intensive care unit (ICU) admission or mechanical ventilation increases mortality. Febrile neutropenia is an emergency with urgent need for antibiotic treatment. Treatment of neutropenic and nonneutropenic patients with sepsis does not differ. Cardiovascular disease is now the second leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. Immunotherapy can lead to substantial and in some patients life-threatening complications that may not easily be recognized in the ED. Cancer-specific emergencies such as leukostasis, tumorlysis or hypercalcemia rarely present to ED and require interdisciplinary care. The constantly growing cancer population is likely to increase ED utilization. Knowledge about cancer treatment and disease-associated complications is crucial for emergency physicians. Palliative care education should secure appropriate end-of-life care avoiding futile interventions.

Kinetics and Role of Pancreatic Stone Protein and Midregional Proadrenomedullin as Predictors of Sepsis and Bacteremia in Children with Hematological Malignancies

Background

To investigate the kinetics and prognostic value of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) and mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) during episodes of febrile neutropenia (FN) in children with hematological malignancies.

Material and methods

We evaluated prospectively a total of 70 FN episodes in 70 children with acute leukemias and lymphomas. CRP, PSP, and MR-proADM levels were measured at the onset of the febrile episode (day 1), day 3, and day 7. The outcome and survival of children were evaluated during the study period until day 28. The performance of each marker in identifying sepsis or severe sepsis was assessed as an area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. ROC curves were used for each biomarker to derive cut-offs for sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing sepsis from non-sepsis.

Results

During the 2-year study period, 70 febrile neutropenia episodes in 70 children with hematological malignancies were enrolled. Of 70 episodes of febrile neutropenia, in 17 (24%), a bacterial/fungal infection was documented. Criteria for sepsis were fulfilled for 31 (44%) and 7 (10%) patients were admitted to PICU. The median values of all biomarkers on day 1 differed significantly between patients with and without sepsis. PSP, MR-proADM, and CRP specificity were 0.82, 0.70, and 0.57, respectively. The sensitivity of PSP, MR-proADM, and CRP were 0.84, 0.74, and 0.88, respectively.

Conclusions

PSP and MR-proADM are promising biomarkers for early diagnosis of sepsis during FN episodes in children with hematological malignancies. However, PSP has a higher sensitivity and specificity.

Sepsis and acute respiratory failure in patients with cancer: how can we improve care and outcomes even further?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Care and outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer have improved over the past decade. This selective review will discuss recent updates in sepsis and acute respiratory failure among patients with cancer, with particular focus on important opportunities to improve outcomes further through attention to phenotyping, predictive analytics, and improved outcome measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of cancer diagnoses in intensive care units (ICUs) is nontrivial and increasing. Sepsis and acute respiratory failure remain the most common critical illness syndromes affecting these patients, although other complications are also frequent. Recent research in oncologic sepsis has described outcome variation - including ICU, hospital, and 28-day mortality - across different types of cancer (e.g., solid vs. hematologic malignancies) and different sepsis definitions (e.g., Sepsis-3 vs. prior definitions). Research in acute respiratory failure in oncology patients has highlighted continued uncertainty in the value of diagnostic bronchoscopy for some patients and in the optimal respiratory support strategy. For both of these syndromes, specific challenges include multifactorial heterogeneity (e.g. in etiology and/or underlying cancer), delayed recognition of clinical deterioration, and complex outcomes measurement.

SUMMARY

Improving outcomes in oncologic critical care requires attention to the heterogeneity of cancer diagnoses, timely recognition and management of critical illness, and defining appropriate ICU outcomes.

A New Scoring System for Predicting Mortality in Hematological Malignancies with Sepsis: A Derivation and Validation Study

Objective

This study aimed to derive and validate a prognostic scoring system to identify patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) and sepsis who have a high mortality rate.

Methods

Cohorts for derivation and validation were created from all data. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, the independent variables connected to 28-day mortality in the derivation cohort were found. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the predictive power and determine their cutoff points. These risk variables were given a score weighted by risk prediction function, and a new scoring system was also developed. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and sensitivity and specificity for mortality of the risk category of the new scoring system were compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

Results

90 (45.22%) of the 199 patients passed away within 28 days. Ninety-nine patients made up the derivation cohort, with 47 (47.47%) fatalities. Ages in the non-survival group were higher (61.47 ± 14.53 vs 55.13 ± 15.66) than in the survival group. As independent predictors of death, multivariable analysis identified SOFA score (OR 1.442, 95% CI 1.035, 2.009), age (OR 1.242, 95% CI 1.026, 1.503), and prothrombin time (PT) (OR 1.213, 95% CI 1.030, 1.430). The AUROC with 95% CI of the new scoring system and its sensitivity and specificity to mortality were virtually all superior to SOFA score in both derivation and validation cohorts: AUROC (0.757 vs 0.716), Sensitivity (75 vs 67.3%), and Specificity (68.1% vs 63.8%) are the Derivation cohort; Validation cohort: Sensitivity (91.2% vs 84.2%), AUROC (0.792 vs 0.733), and Specificity (58.1% vs 58.1%). The model was correctly calibrated, according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Conclusion

The new scoring system was more accurate in predicting 28-day mortality among patients with HMs and sepsis than the SOFA score.

High risk of non-cancer mortality in bladder cancer patients: evidence from SEER-Medicaid

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate non-cancer causes of death and associated risk factors after bladder cancer (BC) diagnosis.

METHODS

Eligible BC patients were obtained from the SEER database. SEER*Stat software 8.3.9.2 was used to calculate the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). The proportions of different non-cancer cause of death were calculated and analyzed in different follow-up periods. Multivariate competing risk model was used to analyze the risk factors for death of BC and non-cancer diseases.

RESULTS

In total, 240,954 BC patients were included and 106,092 patients experienced death, with 37,205 (35.07%), 13,208 (12.45%) and 55,679 (52.48%) patients experienced BC, other cancer and non-cancer disease-related deaths, respectively. Overall SMR for BC patients who died from non-cancer diseases was 2.42 (95% CI [2.40-2.44]). Cardiovascular diseases were the most common non-cancer cause of death, followed by respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, and infectious diseases. Multivariate competing risk analysis identified the following high-risk factors for non-cancer mortality: age > 60 years, male, whites, in situ stage, pathological type of transitional cell carcinoma, not receiving treatment (including surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation), and widowed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading non-cancer cause of death in BC patients, followed by respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus and infectious diseases. Physicians should pay attention to the risk of death from these non-cancer diseases. Also, physicians should encourage patients to engage in more proactive self-surveillance and follow up.

Tigecycline as salvage treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with haematological malignancies-a retrospective single-centre analysis of 200 cases

Tigecycline has been used to treat patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of tigecycline as salvage treatment of FN. Patients records from 09/2004 to 04/2019 were reviewed. Cases were eligible if fever persisted/recurred (p/r-FN) after 3 days of second-line treatment with a carbapenem, and were divided into three groups: switch to tigecycline (TGC group), switch to other antibiotics (OAB group), and no switch (W&W group). The primary endpoint was response rate (defervescence for ≥ 7 days or at least until discharge); the key secondary endpoint was 30-day mortality rate. Two hundred cases from 176 patients (median 59 years; 53.5% men) treated were included, mostly acute myeloid leukaemias (61.0%). 45.5% of cases were in the TGC group (in combination with an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic, mostly ceftazidime [95.6%]); 35.5% were in the OAB and 19.0% in the W&W group. There was no significant difference in response rates (TGC, 73.6%; OAB, 62.0%; W&W, 78.9%; p = 0.12) or 30-day mortality rates (TGC, 7.7%; OAB, 7.0%; W&W, 5.3%; p = 0.94). Tigecycline plus an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic does not improve response or 30-day mortality rate compared to other antibiotics in patients with p/r-FN. Also, in some cases, no switch in antibiotics may be necessary at all.

Non cancer causes of death after gallbladder cancer diagnosis: a population-based analysis

Mortality from non cancer causes in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) still unclear. This study evaluated the causes and risk factors of non cancer death during different follow-up periods after GBC diagnosis. Non cancer causes of death for GBC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were analyzed and standardized mortality rates (SMR) for each non cancer death were calculated. Predictors for non cancer death were identified through multivariate competing risk analysis. A total 11,927 GBC patients were identified for further analysis, 9393 died during follow up. The largest proportion of non cancer deaths occurred > 3 years after diagnosis (39.4%). Most common non cancer cause were cardiovascular disease (43.3%), followed by other cause of death (34.4%) and infectious diseases (8.6%). Compared with US general population, GBC patients has higher risk of death from disease of heart (SMR, 1.58; 95%CI, 1.41-1.75), septicemia (SMR,3.21; 95%CI, 2.27-4.40), diabetes mellitus (SMR,1.97; 95%CI, 1.43-2.63), alone with other causes. Non cancer causes accounted for a significant proportion of deaths during the follow-up period after GBC diagnosis. The risk of non cancer death is higher in GBC patients than in the general population. Our study provides comprehensive assessment of death from non cancer cause in GBC patients, which has important implications for health management in GBC patients.

Microbiology and prognostic prediction model of bloodstream infection in patients with hematological malignancies

Background

In recent years, with the continuous development of treatments for hematological malignancies (HMs), the remission and survival rates of patients with HMs have been significantly improved. However, because of severe immunosuppression and long-term recurrent neutropenia during treatment, the incidence and mortality of bloodstream infection (BSI) were all high in patients with HMs. Therefore, we analyzed pathogens' distribution and drug-resistance patterns and developed a nomogram for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with BSIs among HMs.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 362 patients with positive blood cultures in HMs were included from June 2015 to June 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. They were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 253) and the validation cohort (n = 109) by 7:3. A nomogram for predicting 30-day mortality after BSIs in patients with HMs was established based on the results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression. C-index, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the nomogram.

Results

Among 362 patients with BSIs in HMs, the most common HM was acute myeloid leukemia (48.1%), and the most common pathogen of BSI was gram-negative bacteria (70.4%). The final nomogram included the septic shock, relapsed/refractory HM, albumin <30g/l, platelets <30×10⁹/l before BSI, and inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment. In the training and validation cohorts, the C-indexes (0.870 and 0.825) and the calibration plots indicated that the nomogram had a good performance. The decision curves in both cohorts showed that the nomogram model for predicting 30-day mortality after BSI was more beneficial than all patients with BSIs or none with BSIs.

Conclusion

In our study, gram-negative bacterial BSIs were predominant in patients with HMs. We developed and validated a nomogram with good predictive ability to help clinicians evaluate the prognosis of patients.

Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline has been demonstrated to correlate with higher stages of disease and to be a prognostic factor in numerous cancers. However, its function as a prognostic factor for mycosis fungoides (MF) has not been yet clarified.

OBJECTIVE

Our work aimed to assess the association of the NLR with different stages of MF and to outline whether higher values of this marker are related to a more aggressive MF.

METHODS

We retrospectively calculated the NLRs in 302 MF patients at the moment of diagnosis. The NLR was obtained using the complete blood count values.

RESULTS

The median NLR among patients with early stage disease (low-grade IA-IB-IIA) was 1.88, while the median NLR for patients with high-grade MF (IIB-IIIA-IIIB) was 2.64. Statistical analysis showed positive associations of advanced MF stages with NLRs higher than 2.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis demonstrates that the NLR represents a cheap and easily available parameter functioning as a marker for advanced MF. This might guide physicians in recognizing patients with advanced stages of disease requiring a strict follow-up or an early treatment.

High prevalence of pre-existing sarcopenia in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit for sepsis or septic shock

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We aimed to evaluate body composition (BC) by computed tomography (CT) in hematologic malignancy (HM) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed BC and its impact on outcome of 186 patients at the 3rd lumbar (L3) and 12th thoracic vertebral levels (T12) using CT-scan performed before ICU admission.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 58.0 [47; 69] years. Patients displayed adverse clinical characteristics at admission with median [q1; q3] SAPS II and SOFA scores of 52 [40; 66] and 8 [5; 12], respectively. The mortality rate in the ICU was 45.7%. Overall survival rates at 1 month after admission in the pre-existing sarcopenic vs. non pre-existing sarcopenic patients were 47.9% (95% CI [37.6; 61.0]) and 55.0% (95% CI [41.6; 72.8]), p = 0.99), respectively, at the L3 level and 48.4% (95% CI [40.4; 58.0]) vs. 66.7% (95% CI [51.1; 87.0]), p = 0.062), respectively, at the T12 level.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is assessable by CT scan at both the T12 and L3 levels and is highly prevalent in HM patients admitted to the ICU for severe infections. Sarcopenia may contribute to the high mortality rate in the ICU in this population.

Pre-Chemotherapy Dental Screening: Is There Additional Diagnostic Value for a Panoramic Radiograph?

BACKGROUND

The oral cavity is a potential source of infectious complications in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy (CT). Pre-chemotherapy oral examination to identify foci of infection is recommended, but it is unclear whether this should include panoramic radiography. The present study aimed to evaluate the additional diagnostic merit of panoramic radiography as part of pre-CT oral screening.

METHODS

Patients with solid tumors scheduled to receive a myelosuppressive CT were eligible. The foci definition followed the guidelines of the Dutch Association of Maxillofacial Surgery. Oral foci assessed by clinical evaluation and panoramic radiography were compared.

RESULTS

In 33 out of 93 patients (35.5%), one or more foci were identified by clinical examination, whereas in 49.5% of patients, panoramic radiography showed pathology. In 19 patients, an oral focus was missed by clinical examination only, whereas in 11 patients, panoramic radiography indicated periodontal bone loss, but advanced periodontitis was not substantiated by clinical examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Panoramic radiographs complement clinical examinations and have additional diagnostic value. Nevertheless, the additional merit seems small, and the clinical relevance may vary depending on the anticipated risk of developing oral complications and the need for detailed diagnosis and rigorous elimination of oral foci prior to the start of cancer therapy.

CE: Febrile Neutropenia in the Chemotherapy Patient

ABSTRACT

Febrile neutropenia is a serious complication of chemotherapy treatment and may present as the only clinical sign of infection. If not addressed in a timely manner, it may progress to multisystem organ failure and may be fatal. Initial assessment of fever in those receiving chemotherapy requires prompt administration of antibiotics, ideally within one hour of presentation. Depending on the clinical status of the patient, antibiotic treatment may occur in the inpatient or outpatient setting. Nurses play an important role in the identification and treatment of patients at high risk for febrile neutropenia through assessment and adherence to clinical practice guidelines. In addition, nurses play an active role in patient education regarding risk factors, protective measures, and signs and symptoms of infection in the immunocompromised oncology patient.

Emerging Concepts Impacting Head and Neck Cancer Surgery Morbidity

All treatment modalities for head and neck cancer carry with them a risk of adverse events. Head and neck surgeons are faced with significant challenges to minimize associated morbidity and manage its sequelae. Recognizing situations in which a surgical complication is an adverse event inherent to the procedure can alleviate the psychologic impact a complication might have on the treatment team and minimize external and internal pressures. Focusing on the complications that can be effectively modified, future complications can be avoided. Also, some surgical morbidities may not be preventable, necessitating the option to reconsider whether the incidents should be labeled toxic reactions rather than a complication. This discussion highlights some of the areas in which additional research is needed to achieve the goal of minimizing the impact of surgical morbidity.

Utility of plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of infectious diseases in patients with hematological disorders

BACKGROUND

Plasma cell-free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing has been used as a non-invasive and comprehensive method for the etiological diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, only a handful of studies have described the real-world utility of this technique in patients with hematological disorders, a cohort of patients that are distinctive due to neutropenia and weakened immune functions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the results of plasma cell-free DNA sequencing performed on 184 and 163 specimens collected from hematological patients suspected of infections with (Group I) or without (Group II) neutropenia, respectively. The diagnostic performance and the clinical impact of plasma sequencing were comparatively evaluated to conventional microbiological tests and a composite reference standard (conventional tests combined with the clinical assessment).

RESULTS

The overall positive detection rate of plasma cell-free DNA sequencing was significantly higher than that of conventional microbiological tests (72.6% vs.31.4%, P < 0.001). The positive rate of conventional microbiological tests in Group I was lower than that in Group II (25.5% vs. 38.0%, P = 0.012). Combining plasma sequencing with conventional tests yielded a positive detection rate of 75.0% and 74.8% for these two groups, respectively. Using the composite reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of plasma sequencing were 89.1% and 65.1%, respectively. The proportions of the positive impact of cell-free DNA sequencing results in the Group I were higher than in the Group II in terms of both diagnosis and treatment (diagnosis: 54.3% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.013; treatment: 45.7% vs.30.7%, P = 0.004). A total of 73 patients (21.0%) benefited from plasma sequencing through adjustment of the antibiotic regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of conventional microbiological tests was low in patients with neutropenia. Combining conventional tests with plasma cell-free DNA sequencing significantly improved the detection rate for pathogens and optimized antibiotic treatment. Our findings on the clinical impact warrant confirmation through larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of this testing strategy remains unknown and requires further exploration.

The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Cancer

INTRODUCTION

This guideline was written by a multidisciplinary committee with mandated members of the Dutch Society for Infectious Diseases, Dutch Society for Hematology, Dutch Society for Medical Oncology, Dutch Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Dutch Society for Medical Microbiology, and Dutch Society for Pediatrics. The guideline is written for adults and pediatric patients.

METHOD

The recommendations are based on the answers to nine questions formulated by the guideline committee. To provide evidence-based recommendations we used all relevant clinical guidelines published since 2010 as a source, supplemented with systematic searches and evaluation of the recent literature (2010-2020) and, where necessary, supplemented by expert-based advice.

RESULTS

For adults the guideline distinguishes between high- and standard-risk neutropenia based on expected duration of neutropenia (> 7 days versus ≤ 7 days). Where possible a distinction has been made between pediatric and adult patients.

CONCLUSION

This guideline was written to aid diagnosis and management of patients with febrile neutropenia due to chemotherapy in the Netherlands. The guideline provides recommendation for children and adults. Adults patient are subdivided as having a standard- or high-risk neutropenic episode based on estimated duration of neutropenia. The most important recommendations are as follows. In adults with high-risk neutropenia (duration of neutropenia > 7 days) and in children with neutropenia, ceftazidime, cefepime, and piperacillin-tazobactam are all first-choice options for empirical antibiotic therapy in case of fever. In adults with standard-risk neutropenia (duration of neutropenia ≤ 7 days) the MASCC score can be used to assess the individual risk of infectious complications. For patients with a low risk of infectious complications (high MASCC score) oral antibiotic therapy in an outpatient setting is recommended. For patients with a high risk of infectious complications (low MASCC score) antibiotic therapy per protocol sepsis of unknown origin is recommended.

Third-generation cephalosporin resistant gram-negative bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy; an 11-year multi-centre retrospective study

Objectives

Among patients with haematological malignancy, bacteraemia is a common complication during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Resistance of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) to third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) is increasing. In order to explore the value of using surveillance cultures to guide empirical treatment e.g. choosing between carbapenem versus ceftazidime- we aimed to assess the distribution of pathogens causing bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy, and the proportion of 3GC-resistant GNB (3GC-R GNB) bacteraemia that was preceded by 3GC-R GNB colonization.

Methods

Using 11 years of data (2008–2018) from the Dutch national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system, we assessed the prevalence of 3GC-R GNB in episodes of bacteraemia, and the proportion of 3GC-R GNB bacteraemia that was preceded by 3GC-R GNB colonization. Colonization was defined as availability of any GNB surveillance isolate in the year before, independent of the causative micro-organism (time-paired isolates).

Results

We included 3887 patients, representing 4142 episodes of bacteraemia. GNB were identified in 715/4142 (17.3%), of which 221 (30.9%) were 3GC-R GNB. In 139 of these 221 patients a time-paired surveillance culture was available. In 76.2% (106/139) of patients these surveillance cultures already showed 3GC-R GNB isolates in the year prior to the culture date of the 3GC-R GNB positive blood isolate.

Conclusions

This multi-centre study shows that in patients with haematological malignancy, the majority of 3GC-R GNB bacteraemia is preceded by 3GC-R GNB colonization. Prospective clinical studies are needed to assess the safety and benefits of the use of surveillance-cultures to guide empirical therapy to restrict the empirical use of carbapenems in this population.

What Causes Death in Esophageal Cancer Patients Other Than the Cancer Itself: A Large Population-Based Analysis

Background: Researches on noncancer causes of death in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are not in-depth. The objective of this paper is to broadly and deeply explore the causes of death in patients with EC, especially noncancer causes.

Methods: Information about the demographics, tumor-related characteristics, and causes of death of patients with EC who met the inclusion criteria were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Calculated standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for all causes of death at different follow-up times and performed subgroup analyses.

Results: In total, 63,560 patients with EC were retrieved from the public database. And 52,503 died during the follow-up period. Most deaths were due to EC itself within 5 years after diagnosis, but over 10 years, 59% EC patients died from noncancer causes. Cardiovascular disease was the major noncancer cause of death in patients with EC, accounting for 43%. Suicide and self-injury (2%) of EC patients should not be ignored. During the 1-year follow-up period, patients with EC had statistically highest risk of death from septicemia (SMR: 7.61; 95% CI: 6.38-9.00). Within more than 10 years after EC diagnosis, more and more patients died from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (SMR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.79-3.10).

Conclusions: Although most patients with EC still died from the cancer itself, the role of noncancer causes of death should not be underestimated. These prompt clinicians to pay more attention to the risk of death caused by these noncancer causes, which can provide relevant measures in advance to intervene.

Cui Bono? Identifying Patient Groups That May Benefit From Granulocyte Transfusions in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology

INTRODUCTION

Granulocyte transfusions have long been used to bridge the time to neutrophil recovery in patients with neutropenia and severe infection. Recent randomized controlled trials did not prove a beneficial effect of granulocyte transfusions, but were likely underpowered and suffered from very heterogeneous study populations.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients treated with granulocyte transfusions at our pediatric center from 2004 to 2019. To identify parameters that predict the success of granulocyte transfusions, we stratified patients in 3 groups. Patients in group 1 cleared their infection, whereas patients in group 2 succumbed to an infection in neutropenia despite granulocyte transfusions. A third group included all patients who died of causes that were not related to infection.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that patients without respiratory or cardiocirculatory insufficiency are enriched in group 1 and more likely to benefit from granulocyte transfusions than patients who already require these intensive care measures. The effect of granulocyte transfusions correlates with the cell dose per body weight applied per time. With our standard twice weekly dosing, patients with a body weight below 40 kg are more likely to achieve a sufficient leukocyte increment and clear their infection in comparison to patients with a higher body weight.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that future studies on the benefits of granulocyte transfusions stratify patients according to clinical risk factors that include the need for respiratory or cardiocirculatory support and strive for a sufficient dose density of granulocyte transfusions.

Pathogen detection by metagenomic next generation sequencing during neutropenic fever in patients with hematological malignancies

Background

Febrile neutropenia (FN) following chemotherapy is a major cause of morbidity during cancer treatment. The performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of circulating cell-free DNA from plasma may be superior to blood culture (BC) diagnostics for identification of causative pathogens. The aim of this study was to validate mNGS (DISQVER test) for the detection of pathogens in hematologic patients with FN.

Methods

We collected paired whole blood specimens from central venous catheter and peripheral vein during FN for BC and mNGS testing. We repeated paired sampling at the earliest after 3 days of fever, which was defined as one FN episode. All clinical data were retrospectively reviewed by an infectious disease expert panel. We calculated percent positive agreement (PPA), percent negative agreement (PNA), percent overall agreement (POA), and sensitivity and specificity.

Results

We analyzed a total of 98 unselected FN episodes in 61 patients who developed predominantly FN after conditioning therapy for allogeneic (n = 22) or autologous (n = 21) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Success rate of mNGS was 99% (97/98). Positivity rate of mNGS was 43% (42/97) overall and 32% (31/97) excluding viruses compared to 14% (14/98) in BC. PPA, PNA and POA between mNGS and BC were 84.6% (95% CI, 54.6% to 98.1%), 63.1% (51.9% to 73.4%) and 66% (55.7% to 75.3%), respectively. Sensitivity for bacteria or fungi was 40% (28.0% to 52.9%) and 18.5% (9.9% to 30.0%), respectively.

Conclusion

Pathogen detection by mNGS (DISQVER) during unselected FN episodes shows twofold higher sensitivity and a broader pathogen spectrum than BC.

Prognostic Impact of Neutropenia in Cancer Patients with Septic Shock: A 2009–2017 Nationwide Cohort Study

Simple Summary

The prognostic impact of neutropenia on mortality in cancer patients with septic shock remains controversial despite recent advances in cancer and sepsis management. This study aimed to determine whether neutropenia could be related to an increase in short-term and long-term mortality. This population-based, case–control study used data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. Adult cancer patients who presented to the emergency department with septic shock from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were evaluated as short-term and long-term outcomes. After adjustment for confounders, neutropenia was independently associated with decreased 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. Neutropenia did not increase mortality in cancer patients with septic shock, suggesting that neutropenia may not be used as a single triage criterion for withholding intensive care in cancer patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock.

Abstract

(1) Background: Neutropenia’s prognostic impact on mortality in cancer patients with septic shock remains controversial despite recent advances in cancer and sepsis management. This population-based, case–control study aimed to determine whether neutropenia could be related to an increase in short-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: This population-based, case–control study used data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. Adult cancer patients who presented to the emergency department with septic shock from 2009 to 2017 were included. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were evaluated as short-term and long-term outcomes. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and neutropenia. (3) Results: In 43,466 adult cancer patients with septic shock, the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 52.1% and 81.3%, respectively. In total, 6391 patients had neutropenic septic shock, and the prevalent cancer type was lung cancer, followed by leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, stomach cancer, and colon cancer. Furthermore, 30-day and 1-year mortality was lower in patients with neutropenia than in those without neutropenia. After adjustment for confounders, neutropenia was independently associated with decreased 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. (4) Conclusions: In cancer patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock, the presence of neutropenia did not increase mortality. This suggests that neutropenia may not be used as a single triage criterion for withholding intensive care in cancer patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock.

A novel prognostic model for malignant patients with Gram-negative bacteremia based on real-world research

Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) is a common complication in malignant patients. Identifying risk factors and developing a prognostic model for GNB might improve the survival rate. In this observational and real-world study, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors and outcomes of GNB in malignant patients. Multivariable regression was used to identify risk factors for the incidence of GNB, while Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors. A prognostic model was constructed based on Cox regression analysis and presented on a nomogram. ROC curves, calibration plots, and Kaplan–Meier analysis were used to estimate the model. It comprised 1004 malignant patients with Bloodstream infection (BSI) in the study cohort, 65.7% (N = 660) acquired GNB. Multivariate analysis showed gynecologic cancer, hepatobiliary cancer, and genitourinary cancer were independent risk factors related to the incidence of GNB. Cox regression analysis raised that shock, admission to ICU before infection, pulmonary infection, higher lymphocyte counts, and lower platelet counts were independent risk factors for overall survival (OS). The OS was significantly different between the two groups classified by optimal cut-off value (log-rank, p < 0.001). Above all, a nomogram was created based on the prognostic model, which was presented on a website freely. This real-world study was concentrated on the malignant patients with GNB and proved that shock, admission to ICU before infection, pulmonary infection, higher lymphocyte counts, and lower platelet counts were related to the death of these patients. And a prognostic model was constructed to estimate the risk score of mortality, further to reduce the risk of death.

The Potential Contribution of Dental Foci and Oral Mucositis to Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Treated With Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy for Solid Tumors and Lymphoma

Introduction

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potential life-threatening complication of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, particularly when induced by infection. There is evidence that FN can originate from the oral cavity, but its contribution to FN is largely understudied in patients treated for solid tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of FN in these patients and to evaluate its relation with dental foci and oral mucositis.

Material and Methods

A prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted. Patients diagnosed with solid tumors and lymphoma scheduled to be treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy with an intermediate risk of developing FN were included. A pre-chemotherapy dental examination was performed and patients were followed during and after chemotherapy regimen. During subsequent hospital visits for chemotherapy administration, the oral cavity was inspected and oral mucositis (OM) was scored using the CTC-AE version 3.0. When patients presented with fever, a comprehensive full body examination including laboratory/microbiological/imaging investigation was performed.

Results

Eighty-eight patients were included. Pre-chemotherapy, 39 patients (44.3%) were diagnosed with a dental focus. During chemotherapy, 46 patients developed OM (53.4%), of which 15 patients had a maximum score of grade II (ulcerative mucositis). Ten patients developed FN during the follow-up period. Patients with FN more often suffered from ulcerative OM compared to patients without FN; both FN and mucositis risk was associated with the myelotoxicity of chemotherapy. However, no relation could be established between the presence of dental foci prior to chemotherapy and the development of FN (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

A significant relation was identified between ulcerative OM and FN, but no robust conclusions could be drawn with respect to a relationship between the presence of dental foci and FN.

Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Patients with or without Cancer Admitted to the ICU for Septic Shock: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction: Cancer patients are at high risk of developing septic shock (SSh) and are increasingly admitted to ICU given their improved long-term prognosis. We, therefore, compared the prognosis of cancer and non-cancer patients with SSh. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective cohort study (2013−2019) on patients admitted to ICU for SSh. We compared the clinical characteristics and management and studied short- and long-term mortality with ICU and in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival according to cancer status. Results: We analyzed 239 ICU stays in 210 patients, 59.5% of whom were men (n = 125), with a median age of 66.5 (IQR 56.3−77.0). Of the 121 cancer patients (57.6% of all patients), 70 had solid tumors (33.3%), and 51 had hematological malignancies (24.3%). When comparing ICU stays of patients with versus without cancer (n = 148 vs. n = 91 stays, respectively), mortality reached 30.4% (n = 45) vs. 30.0% (n = 27) in the ICU (p = 0.95), and 41.6% (n = 59) vs. 35.6% (n = 32) in hospital (p = 0.36), respectively. ICU length of stay (LOS) was 5.0 (2.0−11.3) vs. 6.0 (3.0−15.0) days (p = 0.27), whereas in-hospital LOS was 25.5 (13.8−42.0) vs. 19.5 (10.8−41.0) days (p = 0.33). Upon multivariate analysis, renal replacement therapy (OR = 2.29, CI95%: 1.06−4.93, p = 0.03), disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR = 5.89, CI95%: 2.49−13.92, p < 0.01), and mechanical ventilation (OR = 7.85, CI95%: 2.90−21.20, p < 0.01) were associated with ICU mortality, whereas malignancy, hematological, or solid tumors were not (OR = 1.41, CI95%: 0.65−3.04; p = 0.38). Similarly, overall cancer status was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.99, CI95%: 0.98−4.03, p = 0.06); however, solid cancers were associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.52, CI95%: 1.12−5.67, p = 0.03). Lastly, mortality was not significantly different at 365-day follow-up between patients with and without cancer. Conclusions: In-hospital and ICU mortality, as well as LOS, were not different in SSh patients with and without cancer, suggesting that malignancies should no longer be considered a barrier to ICU admission.

Cause of Death During Renal Cell Carcinoma Survivorship: A Contemporary, Population-Based Analysis

Background

As the survival rates of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continue to increase, noncancer causes of death cannot be ignored. The cause-specific mortality in patients with RCC is not well understood.

Objective

Our study aimed to explore the mortality patterns of contemporary RCC survivors.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients with RCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) to compare the death rates in patients with RCC with those in the general population.

Results

A total of 106,118 patients with RCC, including 39,630 who died (27%), were included in our study. Overall, compared with the general US population, noncancer SMRs were increased 1.25-fold (95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.22 to 1.27; observed, 11,235), 1.19-fold (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.24; observed, 2,014), and 2.24-fold (95% CI, 2.11 to 2.38; observed, 1,110) for stage I/II, III, and IV RCC, respectively. The proportion of noncancer causes of death increased with the extension of survival time. A total of 4,273 men with stage I/II disease (23.13%) died of RCC; however, patients who died from other causes were 3.2 times more likely to die from RCC (n = 14,203 [76.87%]). Heart disease was the most common noncancer cause of death (n = 3,718 [20.12%]; SMR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.19–1.27). In patients with stage III disease, 3,912 (25.98%) died from RCC, and 2,014 (13.37%) died from noncancer causes. Most patients (94.99%) with stage IV RCC died within 5 years of initial diagnosis. Although RCC was the leading cause of death (n = 12,310 [84.65%]), patients with stage IV RCC also had a higher risk of noncancer death than the general population (2.24; 95% CI, 2.11–2.38).

Conclusions

Non-RCC death causes account for more than 3/4 of RCC survivors among patients with stage I/II disease. Patients with stage IV are most likely to die of RCC; however, there is an increased risk of dying from septicemia, and suicide cannot be ignored. These data provide the latest and most comprehensive assessment of the causes of death in patients with RCC.

Infection prevention requirements for the medical care of immunosuppressed patients: recommendations of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute

In Germany, guidelines for hygiene in hospitals are given in form of recommendations by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention, "KRINKO"). The KRINKO and its voluntary work are legitimized by the mandate according to § 23 of the Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz, "IfSG"). The original German version of this document was published in February 2021 and has now been made available to the international professional public in English. The guideline provides recommendations on infection prevention and control for immunocompromised individuals in health care facilities. This recommendation addresses not only measures related to direct medical care of immunocompromised patients, but also management aspects such as surveillance, screening, antibiotic stewardship, and technical/structural aspects such as patient rooms, air quality, and special measures during renovations.

Diagnostic performance of Neutrophil CD64 index, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for early sepsis in hematological patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with hematological diseases are immunosuppressed due to various factors, including the disease itself and treatments, such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and are susceptible to infection. Infections in these patients often progress rapidly to sepsis, which is life-threatening.

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index, compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), for the identification of early sepsis in patients with hematological diseases.

METHODS

This was a prospective analysis of patients with hematological diseases treated at the Fuxing Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University, between March 2014 and December 2018. The nCD64 index was quantified by flow cytometry and the Leuko64 assay software. The factors which may affect the nCD64 index levels were compared between patients with different infection statuses (local infection, sepsis, and no infection), and the control group and the nCD64 index levels were compared among the groups. The diagnostic efficacy of the nCD64 index, PCT, and hs-CRP for early sepsis was evaluated among patients with hematological diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients with hematological diseases (non-infected group, n = 50; locally infected group, n = 67; sepsis group, n = 90) and 26 healthy volunteers were analyzed. According to the absolute neutrophil count (ANC), patients with hematological diseases without infection were divided into the normal ANC, ANC reduced, and ANC deficiency groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the nCD64 index between these three groups (P = 0.586). However, there was a difference in the nCD64 index among the non-infected (0.74 ± 0.26), locally infected (1.47 ± 1.10), and sepsis (2.62 ± 1.60) groups (P < 0.001). The area under the diagnosis curve of the nCD64 index, evaluated as the difference between the sepsis and locally infected group, 0.777, which was higher than for PCT (0.735) and hs-CRP (0.670). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were also better for the nCD64 index than either PCT and hs-CRP.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate the usefulness of the nCD64 index as an inflammatory marker of early sepsis in hematological patients.

Differences in ICU Outcomes According to the Type of Anticancer Drug in Lung Cancer Patients

Purpose

We investigated the intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes of patients who used targeted therapy compared to those who received cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

This study was based on Korean administrative health insurance claims from 2015 to 2019. We extracted data on lung cancer patients (&gt;18 years old) who were admitted to the ICU after receiving chemotherapy.

Results

6,930 lung cancer patients who received chemotherapy within 30 days before ICU admission were identified; the patients received cytotoxic chemotherapy (85.4%, n = 5,919) and molecular targeted therapy (14.5%, n = 1,011). Grade 4 neutropenia was identified only in the cytotoxic chemotherapy group (0.6%). Respiratory failure requiring ventilator treatment was more common in the cytotoxic chemotherapy group than in the targeted therapy group (HR, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.99–3.63), and renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy was not significantly different between the two groups (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.36–1.80). Patients who received targeted chemotherapy stayed longer in the ICU than the cytotoxic chemotherapy. The 28-day mortality was 23.4% (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67–0.90, p &lt; 0.05) among patients who received targeted agents compared with 29.6% among patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Targeted chemotherapy for lung cancer may contribute to increasing access to critical care for lung cancer patients, which may play a role in improving critical care outcomes of lung cancer patients.

Prediction of prognosis in elderly patients with sepsis based on machine learning (random survival forest)

Background

Elderly patients with sepsis have many comorbidities, and the clinical reaction is not obvious. Thus, clinical treatment is difficult. We planned to use the laboratory test results and comorbidities of elderly patients with sepsis from a large-scale public database Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV to build a random survival forest (RSF) model and to evaluate the model’s predictive value for these patients.

Methods

Clinical information of elderly patients with sepsis in MIMIC IV database was collected retrospectively. Machine learning (RSF) was used to select the top 30 variables in the training cohort to build the final RSF model. The model was compared with the traditional scoring systems SOFA, SAPSII, and APSIII. The performance of the model was evaluated by C index and calibration curve.

Results

A total of 6,503 patients were enrolled in the study. The top 30 important variables screened by RSF were used to construct the final RSF model. The new model provided a better C-index (0.731 in the validation cohort). The calibration curve described the agreement between the predicted probability of RSF model and the observed 30-day survival.

Conclusions

We constructed a prognostic model to predict a 30-day mortality risk in elderly patients with sepsis based on machine learning (RSF algorithm), and it proved superior to the traditional scoring systems. The risk factors affecting the patients were also ranked. In addition to the common risk factors of vasopressors, ventilator use, and urine output. Newly added factors such as RDW, type of ICU unit, malignant cancer, and metastatic solid tumor also significantly influence prognosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00582-z.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Neutropenic Sepsis: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in patients with neutropenia; however, data on whether neutropenic sepsis is associated with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes are limited. Thus, this study was designed to clarify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with neutropenic sepsis compared with those of patients without neutropenic sepsis diagnosed based on the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance, a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with sepsis from September 2019 to February 2020. Eligible patients were divided into the neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count of less than 1,500/mL) and non-neutropenic groups. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2,074 patients were enrolled from 16 tertiary referral or university-affiliated hospitals. Of them, 218 (10.5%) had neutropenia. The neutropenia group was younger and had a lower proportion of patients with chronic diseases compared to the non-neutropenia group. However, solid tumors (50.0% vs. 34.1%; P > 0.001) and hematological malignancies (40.8% vs. 3.8%; P < 0.001) were more common in the neutropenia group. The neutropenia group had a higher incidence of septic shock (43.6% vs. 22.9%; P < 0.001) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (7 vs. 5; P < 0.001) than the non-neutropenia group. However, no significant differences in microbiologically confirmed infections and its pathogen distribution and the incidence of multidrug resistance were observed between the two groups. The neutropenic group had a higher hospital mortality than the non-neutropenic group (42.2% vs. 26.3%; P < 0.001), and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant difference in survival within 1 week after diagnosing sepsis (log-rank test, P = 0.002). The incidence of adverse events during intensive care unit admission was not different between the two groups. Among hospital survivors, the neutropenic group was more frequently discharged to home (72.2% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Neutropenic sepsis is associated with a higher-grade organ dysfunction during the diagnosis of sepsis and higher mortality without difference in the pathogen isolated.

Infectious diseases as a cause of death among cancer patients: a trend analysis and population-based study of outcome in the United States based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Background

Infectious diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. We aimed to determine the incidence of infectious diseases as a cause of death among cancer patients and analyze the trends and risk factors associated with mortality.

Methods

In total, 151,440 cancer patients who died from infectious diseases in the US diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were enrolled. A trend analysis of annual cancer deaths caused by infectious diseases was conducted. Cox proportional hazards model and survival decision tree model were performed.

Result

The most common infectious diseases were pneumonia and influenza (n = 72,133), parasitic and other infectious (n = 47,310) diseases, and septicemia (n = 31,119). The patients’ mean age was 66.33 years; majority of them were male (62%). The overall incidence from 1973 to 2014 showed an insignificant decrease (annual percentage change =  − 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] =  − 2.2–1.7, P = 0.8). Parasitic and other infectious diseases, including HIV (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.69–1.84), had the highest incidence, followed by septicemia (SIR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81–0.88), tuberculosis (SIR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.51–0.99), and pneumonia (SIR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.61–0.64). Based on the Cox regression analysis, old black male patients with intrahepatic tumor or acute leukemia of different grades, except the well-differentiated grade, had the highest risk of dying from infectious diseases.

Conclusion

Infectious diseases remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. Early recognition of risk factors and timely intervention may help mitigate the negative consequences on patients’ quality of life and prognosis, improving the prognosis and preventing early death from infection, which is preventable in most cases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13027-021-00413-z.

mNGS for identifying pathogens in febrile neutropenic children with hematological diseases

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in children with hematological diseases presenting with Febrile Neutropenic (FN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 49 hematological children with FN, and compared the results of mNGS with those of traditional pathogen detection (TPD) and the prognoses of mNGS positive group and negative group.

RESULTS

A total of 77 pathogenic strains were identified, of which 70 strains were detected by mNGS, 19 strains by TPD , and Aspergillus and G- bacterias were the predominant strains in FN children who developed bloodstream infections. 42 cases were in the mNGS-positive group, of which 17 were simple infections, 25 were mixed infections, and 7 were in the negative group; the TPD-positive group contained 19 cases, all of which were simple infections. The detection rate of total and mixed pathogens was higher than that of TPD, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). mNGS positive group was detected earlier than the negative group, and with lower mortality and drug-related adverse events (DRAE) , and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

For FN children with hematological diseases, early mNGS can effectively improve the efficacy of pathogen detection, and precise treatment after clarifying the pathogens can reduce mortality and avoid antibiotic abuse.

Intensive care nurses' awareness of identification of early sepsis findings

AIM

To determine intensive care nurses' awareness of identification of early sepsis findings.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of sepsis is increasing in intensive care units, and if not identified early, it increases morbidity, mortality and cost of care. Intervention within one hour after the diagnosis of sepsis increases survival. Nurses' ability to identify early findings of sepsis affects the time of diagnosis of sepsis.

DESIGN

The study used a cross-sectional design.

METHODS

The sample of the study consisted of 544 nurses working in adult intensive care units of hospitals in Turkey. The study data were collected online between 11 January-8 April 2021 using the snowball method. Data were statically analysed. All procedures of the study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

The nurses who had been working for 11 years or more, had worked with a patient diagnosed with sepsis in the last month and used a measurement tool in the diagnosis thought that it was significantly easier to determine the early warning findings of sepsis. In the study, the majority of nurses correctly identified the early findings of sepsis, but the rates of the correct responses to the variables of lactate >2 mM, leucopenia and hypothermia were low. Female gender, having a graduate degree, unit type, total work experience, having received training on sepsis and working with a patient diagnosed with sepsis in the last month made a significant difference in determining the early warning findings of sepsis accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses had a good rate of identifying early sepsis findings. Yet, they could not distinguish between early sepsis and late sepsis findings.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results of the study can support nursing practices in the diagnostic process by considering the factors affecting nurses' ability to distinguish early sepsis findings from late sepsis findings and to identify them correctly.

Do we overtreat patients with presumed neutropenic sepsis?

PURPOSE

Many aspects of the management of neutropenic sepsis remain controversial. These include the choice of empiric antibiotic, the duration of antibiotic therapy and the possibility that very low-risk cases may be managed safely with oral rather than intravenous therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study conducted in a district general hospital serving a population of 148 000 in south west Scotland.

RESULTS

Fifty one patients with cancer, whose neutrophil count was less than 1.0×10⁹/L within 21 days of their last chemotherapy, were admitted as a medical emergency in 2019. All received antibiotic because of presumed neutropenic sepsis. A total of 4 patients had positive blood cultures (group 1), 12 patients had a clinical focus of infection but no clear pathogen (group 2), while 35 patients had neither (group 3). Group 3 patients were more likely to have a solid tumour, less likely to be febrile, had shorter time to neutrophil recovery and higher Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer scores, though not all of these comparisons achieved statistical significance. Median intravenous plus oral antibiotic duration in group 3 patients was 9 days with median hospital stay of 7 days, raising the possibility of overtreatment. Retrospectively, 23 (66%) group 3 patients had MASSC Risk Index greater than 21 suggesting they were at low risk of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems likely that many low-risk neutropenic cancer patients with solid tumours could be managed as effectively and as safely with shorter courses of antibiotic, with oral rather than intravenous antibiotic, as outpatients rather than inpatients and with an overall positive impact on antimicrobial stewardship.

Prevalence and factors associated with sepsis and septic shock in oncological patients in intensive therapy

OBJECTIVES

to analyze factors associated with sepsis and septic shock in cancer patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

METHODS

cross-sectional, retrospective study with a quantitative approach, with a sample of 239 patients in an oncology hospital. Secondary data from medical records were used. The outcome variable was "presence of sepsis and/or septic shock"; and exposures: sex, length of stay, origin, use of invasive procedures and primary tumor site. Descriptive, bivariate analyzes and multiple logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

the prevalence of sepsis was 95% CI: 14.7-24.7 and septic shock of 95% CI: 37.7-50.3. In the multiple analysis, sepsis and/or septic shock were associated with hospital stay longer than seven days, being from the Emergency Department, presence of invasive procedures and hematological site.

CONCLUSIONS

sepsis and/or septic shock in cancer patients were associated with clinical characteristics and health care factors.

Prolonged Length of Stay in the Emergency Department and Mortality in Critically Ill Elderly Patients with Infections: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Background

This study aimed at investigating whether the length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) is associated with mortality in elderly patients with infections admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Delayed admission to the ICU may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in elderly patients with infections.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted with subjects over 65 years of age admitted to the ICU from 5 EDs. We recorded demographic data, clinical findings, initial laboratory results, and ED LOS. Outcomes were all-cause in-hospital mortality and hospital LOS. A multivariable regression model was applied to identify factors predictive of mortality.

Results

A total of 439 patients admitted to the ICU via the ED were included in this study, 132 (30.1%) of whom died in the hospital. The median (IQR) age was 78 (73, 83) years. In multivariable analysis, a history of malignancy (OR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.88–7.52; p < 0.001), high lactate level (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.01–1.27; p=0.039), and ED LOS (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; p=0.039) were independent risk factors for all-cause in-hospital admission. Elderly patients with an ED LOS >12 hours had a longer hospital LOS (p=0.018), and those with an ED LOS > 24 hours had a longer hospital LOS and higher mortality rate (p=0.044,  p=0.008).

Conclusions

This study shows that prolonged ED LOS is independently associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with infections requiring ICU admission. ED LOS should be considered in strategies to prevent adverse outcomes in elderly patients with infections who visit the ED.

Risk of infection according to the gamma globulin level in the 100 days following allogeneic stem cell transplantations

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is recommended in case of severe hypogammaglobulinemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the supposed increased risk of infection in case of hypogammaglobulinemia has not been confirmed in allo-HSCT. In this study, we assessed the relationship between the gamma globulin level and the risk of infection during the 100 days following the allo-HSCT.

METHODS

We gathered the weekly laboratory tests from day 7 to day 100 of 76 allograft patients, giving a total of 1 044 tests. 130 infections were documented clinically, by imaging, or microbiologically.

RESULTS

Average gamma globulin levels between D-7 and D100 did not differ between patients with or without infection (642 ± 232 and 671 ± 246 mg/dL, respectively, P = .65). Gamma globulin level <400 mg/dl was not associated with the occurrence of infection between the test studied and the next one (aOR 1.33 [0.84-2.15], P = .24). The gamma globulin level was not predictive of bacterial or fungal infections (AUC 0.54 [95%CI: 0.47-0.61]) nor of viral reactivations (AUC 0.51 [95%CI: 0.43-0.60]).

CONCLUSIONS

This confirmed that the humoral deficiency is a minor part of the immune deficiency in the 100 days post-transplant. This questions the relevance of the indications of immunoglobulin substitution during this period.

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and the Need for Organ Support Predict Mortality in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy resulting in increased definitive cure rates or extended disease-free survival in various malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. However, because of the high risk of severe complications of this therapy, up to 50% of patients may require being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) to manage life-threatening conditions. We aimed to evaluate the in-hospital mortality of allo-HSCT recipients admitted to the ICU and to identify those variables associated with in-hospital mortality. A 10-year (January 2010 to December 2019), single-center, retrospective study was conducted in Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona. We included all consecutive allo-HSCT patients who required admission to the ICU. Baseline and disease-related characteristics were registered. Severity scores and the need for organ support were also assessed on days 1, 3, and 5 of ICU admission. In-hospital mortality-associated independent variables were identified using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Three hundred twenty-three patients underwent allo-HSCT during the study period, of whom 82 (25%) were admitted to the ICU; 53 (65%) male, with a median age of 51 (38-59) years. Most patients received allo-HSCT for the treatment of lymphoma (20 patients [24%]) or acute leukemia (44 patients [54%]). The median Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 23 (17-28), and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on admission was 9 (7-11). Forty-nine (60%) patients died in the ICU, and 11 (13%) died in the hospital after being discharged from the ICU. Disease-related characteristics were not associated with mortality. Yet, SOFA score on day 1 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.04-1.02]; P = .002), the need for vasopressors on day 3 (HR: 2.35 [95% CI: 1.27-4.36]; P = .007), and a nondecreasing SOFA score on day 5 (HR: 2.13 [95% CI: 1.03-4.39]; P = .04), were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Mortality in allo-HSCT patients who require ICU admission remains high. In the present study, SOFA score, the need for vasopressors on day 3, and a nondecreasing SOFA score on day 5 predicted in-hospital mortality.

Predictive and risk factor analysis for bloodstream infection in high-risk hematological patients with febrile neutropenia: post-hoc analysis from a prospective, large-scale clinical study

OBJECTIVES

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a frequent complication observed in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). BSI risk factors and incidence vary depending on chemotherapy types and prophylactic antimicrobial agents. We clarified these issues by post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial cohort for severe FN in hematological malignancy.

METHODS

We performed an intention-to-treat analysis of 413 high-risk patients and 1272 blood culture sets.

RESULTS

Overall, 356 patients (86.2%) developed FN, and 20.8% had BSI complications. Prophylactic antimicrobials did not prevent complications of FN and BSI, but the incidence of BSIs of Gram-negative (GN) bacteria was lower than in the non-prophylaxis group (23.8% vs. 56.7%). Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) scores < 20 were significantly correlated with the incidence of BSI, whereas MASCC scores > 21 were not (41.7% vs. 17.2%). The only significant risk factors were hypotension and dehydration. axillary temperatures were higher in GN-caused BSIs than in Gram-positive-caused BSIs and in patients with negative blood culture results (38.7 °C vs. 38.2 °C vs. 38.0 °C). The higher the fever, the higher the incidence of BSI and GN bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

MASCC score and axillary temperature are strong predictors of BSI. Non-administration of prophylactic antimicrobials and GN-caused BSI are correlated.

THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN00010411.

Real-time TDM-based optimization of continuous-infusion meropenem for improving treatment outcome of febrile neutropenia in oncohaematological patients: results from a prospective, monocentric, interventional study

Objectives

To assess the role that real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided optimization of continuous-infusion (CI) meropenem may have in maximizing empirical treatment and in preventing breakthrough infection and/or colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) among oncohaematological patients with febrile neutropenia (FN).

Methods

A monocentric, interventional, prospective study was conducted. The pharmacodynamic (PD) target was a steady-state meropenem concentration-to-MIC ratio (C_ss/MIC) of 4–8. The primary endpoint was 14 day all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was the prevalence of CRE colonization in rectal swabs of patients rehospitalized within 3 months.

Results

Among the 75 patients enrolled, most (56%) had AML, almost half (37/75, 49.3%) underwent HSCT and one-third (32%) received meropenem as monotherapy. Meropenem dosages were adjusted in 30.1% of TDM reassessments. Gram-negative infections were microbiologically documented in 20.0% of patients. All of the 12 patients having infections caused by in vitro meropenem-susceptible pathogens attained the desired PD target and were cured. Three patients had infections caused by in vitro meropenem-resistant pathogens. Two of these achieved a C_ss/MIC target of 1 and were cured; the other one achieved a suboptimal PD target (0.59) and died. The 14 day all-cause mortality (10.7%) was significantly associated, at multivariate regression, with HSCT (OR 0.086, 95% CI 0.008–0.936, P = 0.044) and with augmented renal clearance (OR 10.846, 95% CI 1.534–76.672, P = 0.017). None of the patients who had hospital readmissions in the 3 month follow-up (63/75) had CRE colonization in rectal swabs.

Conclusions

Real-time TDM-guided CI meropenem may be a useful approach for attaining adequate exposure and preventing CRE emergence in FN oncohaematological patients.

[Toxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy : Overview and management of early and late onset side effects]

BACKGROUND

The transfusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‑cells has become established as a new treatment option in oncology; however, this is regularly associated with immune-mediated side effects, which can also run a severe course and necessitate a specific treatment and intensive medical treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature review was carried out on CAR T-cell therapy, toxicities and the management of side effects.

RESULTS

The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) regularly occur shortly after CAR T-cell treatment. The symptoms of CRS can range from mild flu-like symptoms to multiorgan failure. In addition to mild symptoms, such as disorientation and aphasia, ICANS can also lead to convulsive seizures and brain edema. The management of CRS and ICANS is based on the severity according to the grading of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT). Tocilizumab and corticosteroids are recommended for CRS and corticosteroids are used for ICANS. In the further course persisting hypogammaglobulinemia and cytopenia are frequent even months after the initial treatment and promote infections even months after CAR T‑cell therapy.

DISCUSSION

Potentially severe complications regularly occur after CAR T-cell therapy. An interdisciplinary cooperation between intensive care physicians, hematologists, neurologists and specialists in other disciplines is of decisive importance for the optimal care of patients after CAR T‑cell therapy.