Molecular basis for primary and secondary tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Two cases of imatinib induced oral pigmentation affecting the palate

BACKGROUND

Medication-related oral pigmentation is a unique yet benign finding in the dental setting. As new antineoplastic agents emerge, it is likely that this documented manifestation will continue to grow.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Here, we describe two case presentations of imatinib-related hyperpigmentation of the palate. Both patients had been on imatinib, an antineoplastic agent for 10-14 years and presented with asymptomatic diffuse blue-black discoloration of the hard palate. Both cases demonstrated biopsy-proven pigment changes localized to the superficial connective tissue with evidence of melanin and hemosiderin deposits. Of note, this is a benign finding that does not require intervention.

CONCLUSION

These two cases illustrate intraoral findings associated with imatinib. Increased awareness of this side effect will enable clinicians to appropriately council patients regarding the benign nature of this process.

Molecular Profiling of KIT/PDGFRA-Mutant and Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) with Clinicopathological Correlation: An 18-Year Experience at a Tertiary Center in Kuwait

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), identifying prototypical mutations in the KIT/PDGFRA oncogenes, or in rare alternate genes, is essential for prognostication and predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversely, wild-type GISTs (WT-GIST), which lack known mutations, have limited treatment options. Data on the mutational landscape of GISTs and their impact on disease progression are very limited in Kuwait. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, we investigated the spectrum and frequency of KIT, PDGFRA, and RAS-pathway-related mutations in 95 out of 200 GISTs diagnosed at Kuwait Cancer Center from 2005 to 2023 and assessed their correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Among the 200 tumors (median age 55 years; 15-91), 54% originated in the stomach, 33% in the small bowel, 7% in the colorectum, 1.5% in the peritoneum, and 4.5% had an unknown primary site. Of the 95 molecularly profiled cases, 88% had a mutation: KIT (61%), PDGFRA (25%), NF1 (2%), and one NTRK1 rearrangement. Ten WT-GISTs were identified (stomach = 6, small bowel = 2, and colorectum = 2). WT-GISTs tended to be smaller (median 4.0 cm; 0.5-8.0) (p = 0.018), with mitosis ≤5/5 mm2, and were of lower risk (p = 0.019). KIT mutations were an adverse indicator of disease progression (p = 0.049), while wild-type status did not significantly impact progression (p = 0.934). The genetic landscape in this cohort mirrors that of global studies, but regional collaborations are needed to correlate outcomes with genetic variants.

Emerging Targeted Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GISTs is morphologic analysis with an immunohistochemical evaluation plus genomic profiling to assess the mutational status of lesions. The majority of GISTs are driven by gain-of-function mutations in the proto-oncogene c-KIT encoding the tyrosine kinase receptor (TKR) known as KIT and in the platelet-derived growth factor-alpha receptor (PDGFRA) genes. Approved therapeutics are orally available as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting KIT and/or PDGFRA oncogenic activation. Among these, imatinib has changed the management of patients with unresectable or metastatic GISTs, improving their survival time and delaying disease progression. Nevertheless, the majority of patients with GISTs experience disease progression after 2-3 years of imatinib therapy due to the development of secondary KIT mutations. Today, based on the identification of new driving oncogenic mutations, targeted therapy and precision medicine are regarded as the new frontiers for GISTs. This article reviews the most important mutations in GISTs and highlights their importance in the current understanding and treatment options of GISTs, with an emphasis on the most recent clinical trials.

What Is the Significance of Lysosomal-Mediated Resistance to Imatinib?

The lysosomal sequestration of hydrophobic weak-base anticancer drugs is one proposed mechanism for the reduced availability of these drugs at target sites, resulting in a marked decrease in cytotoxicity and consequent resistance. While this subject is receiving increasing emphasis, it is so far only in laboratory experiments. Imatinib is a targeted anticancer drug used to treat chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), and a number of other malignancies. Its physicochemical properties make it a typical hydrophobic weak-base drug that accumulates in the lysosomes of tumour cells. Further laboratory studies suggest that this might significantly reduce its antitumor efficacy. However, a detailed analysis of published laboratory studies shows that lysosomal accumulation cannot be considered a clearly proven mechanism of resistance to imatinib. Second, more than 20 years of clinical experience with imatinib has revealed a number of resistance mechanisms, none of which is related to its accumulation in lysosomes. This review focuses on the analysis of salient evidence and raises a fundamental question about the significance of lysosomal sequestration of weak-base drugs in general as a possible resistance mechanism both in clinical and laboratory settings.

To Investigate Growth Factor Receptor Targets and Generate Cancer Targeting Inhibitors

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) regulates multiple pathways, including Mitogenactivated protein kinases (MAPKs), PI3/AKT, JAK/STAT pathway, etc. which has a significant role in the progression and metastasis of tumor. As RTK activation regulates numerous essential bodily processes, including cell proliferation and division, RTK dysregulation has been identified in many types of cancers. Targeting RTK is a significant challenge in cancer due to the abnormal upregulation and downregulation of RTK receptors subfamily EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR in the progression of cancer, which is governed by multiple RTK receptor signalling pathways and impacts treatment response and disease progression. In this review, an extensive focus has been carried out on the normal and abnormal signalling pathways of EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR and their association with cancer initiation and progression. These are explored as potential therapeutic cancer targets and therefore, the inhibitors were evaluated alone and merged with additional therapies in clinical trials aimed at combating global cancer.

Ripretinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an overview of current evidence and drug approval

Over the past 20 years, the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has acted as an important model in the advancement of molecularly targeted therapies for solid tumors. The success of imatinib has established it as a lasting therapy in the management of early-stage and advanced disease in the first-line setting. Imatinib resistance inevitably develops, resulting in the need for further lines of therapy. Ripretinib is an orally administered switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor, specifically developed to target both primary and secondary KIT and PDGFRα resistance mutations. Herein, the authors discuss the molecular rationale, the preclinical evidence and the clinical use of ripretinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the advanced stages of disease.

Changes in expression of lysosomal membrane proteins in leucocytes of cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Lysosomal sequestration of weak base drugs has been identified as one of the stress-related mechanisms that trigger in vitro lysosomal biogenesis controlled by transcription factor EB (TFEB). Whether such mechanism can induce lysosomal biogenesis in vivo is unknown. In this study, we addressed the question whether prolonged treatment with sunitinib (SUN) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (n = 22) and with imatinib (IM) in those with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 6) could induce lysosomal biogenesis in leukocytes. Lysosomal biogenesis was monitored using immunoblotting of three lysosomal membrane proteins: lysosome-associated membrane proteins 1 and 2 (LAMP1 and LAMP2) and vacuolar H+-ATPase, B2 subunit (ATP6V1B2). Present results indicate that prolonged treatment with SUN affects LAMP1 and LAMP2 expression only marginally in most patients. In contrast, changes in ATP6V1B2 expression were marked and resembled irregular oscillations. Very similar changes in the expression of lysosomal membrane proteins were also found in IM-treated patients. Conclusion: prolonged treatment of cancer patients with SUN and IM did not induce leucocyte lysosomal biogenesis but dramatically affected expression of ATP6V1B2.

Avapritinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: case series and review of the literature from a tertiary care center in India

The therapeutic landscape in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor has evolved. Avapritinib and ripretinib have now been approved by the US FDA for platelet-derived growth factor alpha D842V-mutant and refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients, respectively. Here we report five patients who have been on avapritinib under an expanded access program. Response assessment was available for four patients - a partial response in two patients and stable disease in one, while one patient had progressive disease. Though preliminary results of the VOYAGER trial have shown less activity of avapritinib and no significant difference in progression-free survival when compared with regorafenib, avapritinib may show some clinical benefit in a subset of patients refractory to approved therapies. We share our experience of five cases, with clinical benefit in three. We believe avapritinib should be further evaluated in clinical trials.

Nanomedicine and chemotherapeutics drug delivery: challenges and opportunities

Cancer is considered as one of the biggest threats to humans worldwide. Researchers suggest that tumour is not just a single mass, it comprises cancerous cells surrounded by noncancerous cells such as immune cells, adipocytes and cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the extracellular matrix (ECM) containing distinct components such as proteins, glycoproteins and enzymes; thus tumour microenvironment (TME) is partially complex. Multiple interactions happen in the dynamic microenvironment (ME) lead to an acidic, hypoxic and stiff ME that is considered as one of the major contributors to cancer progression and metastasis. Furthermore, TME involves in drug resistance mechanisms and affects enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) in tumours. In such a scenario, the first step to accomplish satisfying results is the identification and recognition of this ME. Then designing proper drug delivery systems can perform selectively towards cancerous cells. In this way, several targeting and stimuli/enzyme responsive drug delivery systems have been designed. More importantly, it is necessary to design a drug delivery system that can penetrate deeper into the tumours, efficiently and selectively. Various drug delivery systems such as exosomes and size-switchable nanocarriers (NCs) could decrease side effects and increase tumour treatment results by selective accumulation in tumours. In this review, TME features, current drug delivery approaches, challenges and promising strategies towards cancer treatment are discussed.

Prognostic Indicators for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are potentially malignancies that can occur anywhere in the digestive tract. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib have proven effective since the discovery of KIT and PDGFRA. The current version of NCNN, ESMO and EURACAN guidelines recognized that the three main prognostic factors are the mitotic rate, tumor size and tumor site. In addition, tumor rupture is also recognized as an independent risk factor. However, recent evidence shows that various types of gene mutations are associated with prognosis, and influencing factors such as gastrointestinal bleeding and high Ki67 index have been associated with poor prognosis. It shows that the current risk classification is still insufficient and controversial. With the emergence of more and more lack mutation in KIT/PDGFRA GISTs (KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs) or drug resistance genes, primary and secondary drug resistance problems are caused, which makes the treatment of late or metastatic GIST face challenges. Therefore, this article will review the clinicopathological characteristics of GIST, the special molecular subtypes and other factors that may affect prognosis. We will also explore reliable prognostic markers for better postoperative management and improve the prognosis of patients with GIST.

PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry

Although many kinds of therapies are applied in the clinic, drug-resistance is a major and unavoidable problem. Another disturbing statistic is the limited number of drug targets, which are presently only 20-25% of all protein targets that are currently being studied. Moreover, the focus of current explorations of targets are their enzymatic functions, which ignores the functions from their scaffold moiety. As a promising and appealing technology, PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) have attracted great attention both from academia and industry for finding available approaches to solve the above problems. PROTACs regulate protein function by degrading target proteins instead of inhibiting them, providing more sensitivity to drug-resistant targets and a greater chance to affect the nonenzymatic functions. PROTACs have been proven to show better selectivity compared to classic inhibitors. PROTACs can be described as a chemical knockdown approach with rapidity and reversibility, which presents new and different biology compared to other gene editing tools by avoiding misinterpretations that arise from potential genetic compensation and/or spontaneous mutations. PRTOACs have been widely explored throughout the world and have outperformed not only in cancer diseases, but also in immune disorders, viral infections and neurodegenerative diseases. Although PROTACs present a very promising and powerful approach for crossing the hurdles of present drug discovery and tool development in biology, more efforts are needed to gain to get deeper insight into the efficacy and safety of PROTACs in the clinic. More target binders and more E3 ligases applicable for developing PROTACs are waiting for exploration.

Targeted therapy and personalized medicine in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: drug resistance, mechanisms, and treatment strategies

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Since the discovery that the KIT and PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are the primary oncogenic drivers in the vast majority of GISTs, targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been the mainstay of treatment for this disease. Using molecular profiling of tumor specimens, researchers also discovered that KIT and PDGFRA mutations are non-random and occur in specific regions of the receptors, and furthermore, that particular genotypes predicted response or resistance to targeted therapy. Imatinib, the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat GIST, remains the first-line therapy in advanced GIST and the only therapy confirmed through clinical trials in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting for resectable disease. Resistance to imatinib is well described and is either primary or secondary. Primary resistance is associated with specific tumor genotypes, so genotyping of individual patient tumors helps guide decision-making into whether to offer imatinib and at what dose. Secondary resistance occurs due to the acquisition of secondary mutations during therapy. Currently, the main strategy to combat imatinib resistance is to switch to another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, because imatinib-resistant GIST is usually still oncogenically addicted to KIT/PDGFRA signaling. Surgery can also be used to combat resistant disease in select settings. Unfortunately, progression-free and overall survival remains dismal for patients who develop imatinib-resistant disease, and further research into alternative strategies is still needed.

Ripretinib (DCC-2618) Is a Switch Control Kinase Inhibitor of a Broad Spectrum of Oncogenic and Drug-Resistant KIT and PDGFRA Variants

Ripretinib (DCC-2618) was designed to inhibit the full spectrum of mutant KIT and PDGFRA kinases found in cancers and myeloproliferative neoplasms, particularly in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), in which the heterogeneity of drug-resistant KIT mutations is a major challenge. Ripretinib is a "switch-control" kinase inhibitor that forces the activation loop (or activation "switch") into an inactive conformation. Ripretinib inhibits all tested KIT and PDGFRA mutants, and notably is a type II kinase inhibitor demonstrated to broadly inhibit activation loop mutations in KIT and PDGFRA, previously thought only achievable with type I inhibitors. Ripretinib shows efficacy in preclinical cancer models, and preliminary clinical data provide proof-of-concept that ripretinib inhibits a wide range of KIT mutants in patients with drug-resistant GISTs.

Relationship between efficacy of sunitinib and KIT mutation of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

A large number of studies have shown that KIT mutations are closely related to the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). At the same time, sunitinib (SU) has become the second-line recommended drug for GISTs because of its efficacy. We initiated a systematic review to compare the efficacy of SU after failure of Imatinib (IM) in different KIT mutations.

METHODS

We searched for SU-treated patients with advanced GISTs after failed IM treatment by using databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, up to March 2018. We conducted statistical analyses to calculate the odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) using fixed-effects and random-effects models by Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

We included a total of 474 patients from 3 retrospective studies and 2 cohort studies. Patients with exon 9 mutations had higher clinical benefit (OR = 2.61, 95% CIs = 1.32-5.18, P = .006) rates and longer progression-free survival (progressive disease, HR = 0.51, 95% CIs = 0.36-0.72, P = .0001) compared with exon 11, but there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS, HR = 0.93, 95% CIs = 0.34-2.55, P = .89) and there was greater heterogeneity (Tau = 0.72, Chi = 21.45, df = 3, P < .001, I = 86%). Subgroup analysis suggests that race may be one of the sources of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The results show that efficacy of SU is closely associated with KIT genotypes in GISTs. Moreover, racial factor also directly affects the prognosis of different KIT mutational status, so GISTs patients of different genotypes might also consider the use of targeted drugs in consideration of ethnic differences.

Clinical relevance of circulating molecules in cancer: focus on gastrointestinal stromal tumors

In recent years, growing research interest has focused on the so-called liquid biopsy. A simple blood test offers access to a plethora of information, which might be extremely helpful in understanding or characterizing specific diseases. Blood contains different molecules, of which circulating free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are the most relevant. Conceivably, these molecules have the potential for tumor diagnosis, monitoring tumor evolution, and evaluating treatment response and pharmacological resistance. This review aims to present a state-of-the-art of recent advances in circulating DNA and circulating RNA in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). To date, progress in liquid biopsy has been scarce in GISTs due to several issues correlated with the nature of the pathology. Namely, heterogeneity in primary and secondary mutations in key driver genes has greatly slowed the development and application in GISTs, unlike in other tumor types in which liquid biopsy has already been translated into clinical practice. However, meaningful novel data have shown in recent years a significant clinical potential of ctDNA, CTCs, EVs and circulating RNA in GISTs.

Molecular modelling evaluation of exon 18 His845_Asn848delinsPro PDGFRα mutation in a metastatic GIST patient responding to imatinib

Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA) mutations occur in approximately 5-7% of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Over half of all PDGFRA mutations are represented by the substitution at position 842 in the A-loop of an aspartic acid (D) with a valine (V), recognized as D842V, conferring primary resistance to imatinib in vitro and in clinical observations due to the conformation of the kinase domain, which negatively affects imatinib binding. The lack of interaction between imatinib and the D842V PDGFRA mutated model has been established and widely confirmed in vivo. However, for the other PDGFRA mutations, the correlation between pre-clinical and clinical data is still unclear. An in silico evaluation of the p.His845_Asn848delinsPro mutation involving exon 18 of PDGFRA in a metastatic GIST patient responding to first-line imatinib has been provided. Docking analyses were performed, and the ligand-receptor interactions were evaluated with the jCE algorithm for structural alignment. The docking simulation and structural superimposition analysis show that PDGFRA p.His845_Asn848delinsPro stabilizes the imatinib binding site with the residues that are conserved in KIT. The in vivo evidence that PDGFRA p.His845_Asn848delinsPro is sensitive to imatinib was confirmed by the molecular modelling, which may represent a reliable tool for the prediction of clinical outcomes and treatment selection in GIST, especially for rare mutations.

Melanoma Cell Death Mechanisms

Over recent years, several new molecular and immunogenic therapeutic approaches to melanoma treatment have been approved and implemented in clinical practice. Mechanisms of resistance to these new therapies have become a major problem. Mutation-specific pharmacotherapy can result in simultaneous emergence of resistant clones at many separate body sites despite an initially positive therapeutic response. Additionally, treatments aimed at inducing apoptosis are subject to resistance due to escape through other known mechanisms of regulated cell death (RCD). In this review, we discuss the complexity in pharmacological manipulation of melanoma with c-Kit, BRAF, MEK, and/or mTOR mutant cell lines. This study also addresses melanoma evasion of cell death through modalities of RCD such as apoptosis, autophagy, and necroptosis. This study also examines new combination therapies which have been approved to target both cell cycle dysregulation and cell death pathways. Lastly, we recognize the importance of immunomodulation though manipulation of the body's natural killing mechanisms with CTLA4, PD1, and CSF1 inhibition. As we begin to recognize tumor cell activation of alternate pathways, evasion of programmed cell death, and manipulation of the tumor microenvironment, it is increasingly important to grasp the complexity of personalized therapy in melanoma treatment.

BPR1J373, a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor, effectively suppresses the growth of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a type of KIT‐driven cancer. KIT gene mutations are found in approximately 80% of GISTs, and most of these mutations occur in exon 9 and exon 11. Imatinib has been successfully used as a first‐line treatment for advanced GIST, with a significant improvement in progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival. However, disease progression might develop due to primary or secondary resistance to imatinib. Sunitinib and regorafenib have been approved as second‐ and third‐line treatments for advanced GIST patients, with median PFS values of 6.8 and 4.8 months, respectively. However, these relatively modest improvements in PFS underscore the need for more effective KIT inhibitors. BPR1J373 is a multitargeted kinase inhibitor that has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of KIT‐driven acute myeloid leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we found that BPR1J373 inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis by targeting KIT in GIST cells with KIT gene mutations. BPR1J373 also induced cell cycle arrest and senescent change in KIT‐mutant GIST48 cells, probably by targeting aurora kinase A. In the KIT‐null COS‐1 cell‐based system, BPR1J373 effectively inhibited KIT with single or double mutations of KIT developed in GIST. The antiproliferative effect was also consistently evident in GIST430 tumor‐grafted mice. The results suggest that BPR1J373 could be a potential anticancer drug for GIST and deserves further investigation for clinical applications.

Implementation of genomic medicine for gastrointestinal tumors

Genomic medicine is an approach to take advantage of genomic data in medical practice and health care. The advancement of sequencing technologies has enabled the determination of individual genomes as well as the genome in neoplasms. In the field of human cancer, understanding genomic alterations in tumors and variations associated with drug responses has paved the way towards the development of new drugs and personalized medicine. International collaborations of cancer genome analyses have accumulated a huge body of information about somatic mutations, and identified new driver mutations and pathways in a wide range of cancers. In particular, a growing body of evidence has shown that information about mutations in neoplasms helps to assess the efficacy and resistance of anti-cancer drugs. Information about germline mutations associated with hereditary cancer has been shown to benefit patients by enabling early detection of their tumors and disease-specific treatment, as well as reducing the risk for those at risk. To promote personalized medicine in a more cost-effective and personalized way, further inter-institutional, nationwide, and international collaboration is needed. This article summarizes the background and current situation of genomic medicine in the field of gastrointestinal tumors to help physicians and medical coworkers by assisting their better understanding of genomic medicine and strengthening their confidence of its clinical use.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitive PDGFRΑ mutations in GIST: Two cases and review of the literature

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract. Most GISTs harbor a c-KIT (80%) or a PDGFRα (10%) mutation that leads to constitutive activation of the tyrosine kinase receptor. Response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is dependent on mutational status of the tumor. The most common mutation in PDGFRα, D842V, is known to be imatinib resistant. Almost all other PDGFRα mutations are imatinib sensitive. We describe two patients with a PDGFRα exon 18 mutated GIST responding to treatment with TKIs. One of these patients has a p.M844_S847 deletion, not previously described in relation with TKI treatment response. Mutations in circulating tumor DNA were detectable with digital droplet PCR in serial plasma samples taken during treatment and correlated with treatment response of both patients. Computer 3D-modeling of the PDGFRα kinase domain of these two variants revealed no direct interference in imatinib or sunitinib binding and no effect in its activity in contrast to the reported structure of the imatinib resistant D842V mutation.

An overview is given of the literature regarding the evidence of patients with different PDGFRα mutated GISTs on response to TKIs. The findings emphasize the use of mutational analysis in GIST to provide patients personalized treatment. Detection of mutations in plasma is feasible and can provide real-time information concerning treatment response. We suggest to register GIST patients with these uncommon mutations in a prospective international database to understand the tumor biology and obtain more evidence of such mutations to predict treatment response.

Latest advances in adult gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common GI tract mesenchymal tumors. GIST patients are optimally managed by a precision medicine approach. Herein, we discuss the latest advances in precision medicine and ongoing clinical trials relevant to GIST. Circulating tumor DNA for detection of mutational changes could replace tissue biopsies and radiographic imaging once validated. Most GISTs are KIT/PDGFRα mutated, and despite the good clinical response to imatinib, treatment is generally not curative, more often due to secondary mutations. New mechanisms to bypass this resistance by inhibiting KIT downstream pathways and by targeting multiple KIT or PDGFRα mutations are being investigated. Immunotherapy for GIST patients is in its infancy. These approaches may lead to more effective, less toxic therapies.

Unravelling the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for targeted therapies in gastro-intestinal cancers part 2: Neuroendocrine tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumours

Until the 1990s, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of medical therapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Better understanding of the cancer cell molecular biology has led to the therapeutic revolution of targeted therapies, i.e. monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors directed against proteins that are specifically overexpressed or mutated in cancer cells. These agents, being more specific to cancer cells, were expected to be less toxic than conventional cytotoxic agents. However, their effects have sometimes been disappointing, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms, or to an activity restricted to some tumour settings, illustrating the importance of patient selection and early identification of predictive biomarkers of response to these therapies. Targeted agents have provided clinical benefit in many GI cancer types. Particularly, some GI tumours are considered chemoresistant and targeted therapies have offered a new therapeutic base for their management. Hence, somatostatin receptor-directed strategies, sorafenib, and imatinib have revolutioned the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), respectively, and are now used as first-line treatment in many patients affected by these tumours. However, these agents face problems of resistances and identification of predictive biomarkers from imaging and/or biology. We propose a comprehensive two-part review providing a panoramic approach of the successes and failures of targeted agents in GI cancers to unravel the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for these agents in GI oncology. In this second part, we will focus on NET, HCC, and GIST, whose treatment relies primarily on targeted therapies.

Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance

Background

The development of resistance is a problem shared by both classical chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients may respond well at first, but relapse is inevitable for many cancer patients, despite many improvements in drugs and their use over the last 40 years.

Review

Resistance to anti-cancer drugs can be acquired by several mechanisms within neoplastic cells, defined as (1) alteration of drug targets, (2) expression of drug pumps, (3) expression of detoxification mechanisms, (4) reduced susceptibility to apoptosis, (5) increased ability to repair DNA damage, and (6) altered proliferation. It is clear, however, that changes in stroma and tumour microenvironment, and local immunity can also contribute to the development of resistance. Cancer cells can and do use several of these mechanisms at one time, and there is considerable heterogeneity between tumours, necessitating an individualised approach to cancer treatment. As tumours are heterogeneous, positive selection of a drug-resistant population could help drive resistance, although acquired resistance cannot simply be viewed as overgrowth of a resistant cancer cell population. The development of such resistance mechanisms can be predicted from pre-existing genomic and proteomic profiles, and there are increasingly sophisticated methods to measure and then tackle these mechanisms in patients.

Conclusion

The oncologist is now required to be at least one step ahead of the cancer, a process that can be likened to ‘molecular chess’. Thus, as well as an increasing role for predictive biomarkers to clinically stratify patients, it is becoming clear that personalised strategies are required to obtain best results.

KIT over-expression by p55PIK-PI3K leads to Imatinib-resistance in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Imatinib is the first-line drug for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), as mutated KIT is closely associated with the occurrence of GIST. However, Imatinib resistance (IMA-resistance) occurs inevitably in most GIST patients. Although the over-expression of KIT in GIST is one of the major factors contributing to IMA-resistance, the underlying mechanism is still unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that p55PIK, an isoform of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), increases KIT expression, leading to IMA-resistance in GISTs by activating NF-κB signaling pathway. Furthermore, down-regulation of p55PIK significantly decreases KIT expression and re-sensitizes IMA-resistance-GIST cells to Imatinib in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, the expression of both p55PIK and KIT proteins is significantly increased in tumor samples from IMA-resistance-GIST patients, suggesting that p55PIK up-regulation may be important for IMA-resistance in the clinical setting. Altogether, our data provide evidence that p55PIK-PI3K signaling can contribute to IMA-resistance in GIST by increasing KIT expression. Moreover, p55PIK may be a novel potential drug target for treating tumors that develop IMA-resistance.

CD63 and GLUT-1 Overexpression Could Predict a Poor Clinical Outcome in GIST: A Study of 54 Cases with Follow-Up

Background and Goals. In light of current knowledge, it seems that alternations underlying GISTs are well explained, although all that is enhanced by various aspects on a daily basis. More recently, attention has been pointed towards exosomes as important particles able to modify healthy and also diseased tissues including cancer. The goal of the present study was an analysis of CD9, CD63, and GLUT-1 as a marker of hypoxia status within 54 cases of GIST and evaluation of their predictive value. Methods. 54 cases of patients suffering from GIST were enrolled into the study, predominantly in the gastric location. All operated cases had no Imatinib and other chemotherapies up to the day of operation. Expression of targeted proteins was performed by immunohistochemistry and, after that, the results with tabulated clinical data were compared by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model of statistical analysis. Results. Our results presented a marked dependence of worsening clinical outcome with high expression CD63 (p = 0.008) as well as with GLUT-1 (p = 0.014). We noted a strict correlation of GLUT-1 expression with CD63 expression (p = 0.03), which could confirm the thesis about the contribution of exosomes in intratumoural hypoxia status. The collected material did not confirm CD9 contribution. Conclusions. As presented here, CD63 and GLUT-1 have a prognostic value in GIST cases. The results confirm the other studies in this scope and can be used in future as an additional prognostic factor.

Regorafenib in Advanced and Refractory Gastrointestinal Cancers

The European Society for Medical Oncology’s (ESMO) 18th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer (WCGI) was held in Barcelona from 28th June–2nd July 2016. Presentations covered gastrointestinal (GI) cancers of every aetiology and site within the GI tract, as well as the major aspects of cancer management from screening to novel therapeutic options. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with their ability to block key mechanisms required for tumour growth, featured heavily in this year’s presentations at WCGI. Data on the oral TKI regorafenib featured prominently in both poster discussion tours and oral presentations, emphasising the continuing interest in the evolution of this therapy within the clinical arsenal of physicians tackling GI cancers.

p.(L576P) -KIT mutation in GIST: Favorable prognosis and sensitive to imatinib?

Exon 11 KIT mutations are found in a majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and are usually predictive of response to imatinib, a KIT, PDGFRA and ABL inhibitor. Exon 11 mutations with poor sensitivity to imatinib and poor outcome can be observed on rare occasions, including p.(L576P). In silico and in vitro studies suggested a decreased binding affinity for imatinib in p.(L576P) KIT mutations, thereby offering an explanation for their poor outcome and poor response to standard therapy. These observations were further corroborated with anecdotal case reports of refractoriness or non-durable response to imatinib therapy. However, we describe the favorable response to imatinib and outcome in 5 p.(L576P)-KIT mutant GIST patients treated at a tertiary sarcoma referral center. The sensitivity of p.(L576P)-KIT mutations to imatinib, and the prognostic impact of this mutation need to be further evaluated in a larger cohort. Based on our observations, p.(L576P) mutated GISTs should be treated with standard first line imatinib therapy.

PI3 kinase is indispensable for oncogenic transformation by the V560D mutant of c-Kit in a kinase-independent manner

Oncogenic mutants of c-Kit are often found in mastocytosis, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and acute myeloid leukemia. The activation mechanism of the most commonly occurring mutation, D816V in exon 17 of c-Kit, has been well-studied while other mutations remain fairly uncharacterized in this respect. In this study, we show that the constitutive activity of the exon 11 mutant V560D is weaker than the D816V mutant. Phosphorylation of downstream signaling proteins induced by the ligand for c-Kit, stem cell factor, was stronger in c-Kit/V560D expressing cells than in cells expressing c-kit/D816V. Although cells expressing c-Kit/V560D showed increased ligand-independent proliferation and survival compared to wild-type c-Kit-expressing cells, these biological effects were weaker than in c-Kit/D816V-expressing cells. In contrast to cells expressing wild-type c-Kit, cells expressing c-Kit/V560D were independent of Src family kinases for downstream signaling. However, the independence of Src family kinases was not due to a Src-like kinase activity that c-Kit/D816V displayed. Point mutations that selectively block the association of PI3 kinase with c-Kit/V560D inhibited ligand-independent activation of the receptor, while inhibition of the kinase activity of PI3 kinase with pharmacological inhibitors did not affect the kinase activity of the receptor. This suggests a lipid kinase-independent key role of PI3 kinase in c-Kit/V560D-mediated oncogenic signal transduction. Thus, PI3 kinase is an attractive therapeutic target in malignancies induced by c-Kit mutations independent of its lipid kinase activity.

Response to sunitinib of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a rare exon 12 PDGFRA mutation

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are commonly driven by activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA. Importantly, different mutations within these two genes can lead to very different levels of sensitivity or resistance to kinase inhibitor therapy. Due to rarity, sensitivity or resistance of exon 12 PDGFRA mutant GIST to kinase inhibitor therapy is not well defined.

Case summary

We report the case of a patient with a PDGFRA exon 12 mutated GIST. The patient experienced a very good response to imatinib in the neoadjuvant setting, but then relapsed while still on adjuvant imatinib. In this patient, we report a dramatic response to second line treatment with sunitinib, with complete resolution of two liver lesions at the time of first restaging.

Conclusions

This is the first report detailing a response to treatment with sunitinib of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with an uncommon exon 12 PDGFRA mutation. Based on the observed efficacy, GIST patients with this rare molecular subtype should be considered for sunitinib therapy.

Augmentation of multiple protein kinase activities associated with secondary imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors as revealed by quantitative phosphoproteome analysis

Mutations in the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase gene (KIT), which result in constitutive activation of the protein (KIT), are causally related to the development of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Imatinib, a targeted anticancer drug, exerts a therapeutic effect against GISTs by repressing the kinase activity of KIT. Long-term administration of this drug, however, causes the emergence of imatinib-resistant GISTs. We performed quantitative phosphoproteome analysis using a cell-based GIST model system comprising an imatinib-sensitive GIST cell line (GIST882), GIST882 under treatment with imatinib (GIST882-IM), and secondary imatinib-resistant GIST882 (GIST882-R). Phosphorylated peptides were purified from each cell line using titania-based affinity chromatography or anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation, and then subjected to LC-MS/MS based quantitative phosphoproteome analysis. Using this method we identified augmentation of the kinase activities of multiple elements of the signal transduction pathway, especially KIT and EGFR. Although, these elements were up-regulated in GIST882-R, no additionally mutated KIT mRNA was found in secondary imatinib-resistant GIST cells. Treatment of GIST882-R with imatinib in combination with gefitinib, an EGFR inhibitor, partially prevented cell growth, implying that EGFR may be involved in acquisition of secondary imatinib resistance in GIST.

BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

In this study, we performed a quantitative phosphoproteome analysis using a cell culture-based GIST model system. The goal of the study was to investigate the mechanism of acquired resistance in GISTs against imatinib, a molecularly targeted drug that inhibits kinase activity of the KIT protein and that has been approved for the treatment of GISTs. In imatinib-resistant GIST cells, we observed elevated expression of KIT and restoration of its kinase activity, as well as activation of multiple proliferative signaling pathways. Our results indicate that the effects of even so-called 'molecularly targeted' drugs, are broad rather than convergent, and that the mechanisms of action of such drugs during continuous administration are extremely complex.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor - an evolving concept

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The discovery that these tumors, formerly thought of smooth muscle origin, are indeed better characterized by specific activating mutation in genes coding for the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) CKIT and PDGFRA and that these mutations are strongly predictive for the response to targeted therapy with RTK inhibitors has made GISTs the typical example of the integration of basic molecular knowledge in the daily clinical activity. The information on the mutational status of these tumors is essential to predict (and subsequently to plan) the therapy. As resistant cases are frequently wild type, other possible oncogenic events, defining other "entities," have been discovered (e.g., succinil dehydrogenase mutation/dysregulation, insuline growth factor expression, and mutations in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway). The classification of disease must nowadays rely on the integration of the clinico-morphological characteristics with the molecular data.

Clinical efficacy of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of recent clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary resistance to imatinib, a selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a serious clinical problem in the control of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Here we report on a meta-analysis we performed to evaluate the efficacy of second-generation TKIs in the treatment of patients with imatinib-resistant GIST.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of second-generation TKIs were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE from 2000 to February 2014. Outcomes subjected to analysis were progression-free survival and overall survival. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.1.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Weighted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcomes. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used, depending on the degree of heterogeneity across the selected studies.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials were selected for meta-analysis. Among imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients, 541 received second-generation TKIs (sunitinib, nilotinib, or regorafenib) and 267 controls received placebo or best supportive care. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the TKI-treated group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24-0.59; P<0.0001). No statistically significant difference was detected in overall survival between the treatment group and the control group (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71-1.03; P=0.09). In the subgroup of patients who were resistant or intolerant to both imatinib and sunitinib, TKI therapy (nilotinib or regorafenib) improved progression-free survival (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.84; P=0.02) but not overall survival (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63-1.08; P=0.17). Regorafenib was shown to be effective in terms of progression-free survival across different subpopulations of patients who were resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib.

CONCLUSION

Second-generation TKIs (sunitinib, nilotinib, and regorafenib) are effective in improving progression-free survival but not overall survival in patients with GIST who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib or to imatinib and sunitinib. Regorafenib is promising as a third-line treatment option for patients with advanced GIST.

Analysis of serum protein biomarkers, circulating tumor DNA, and dovitinib activity in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

An exploratory translational analysis was conducted as part of a phase II study of dovitinib to assess the relevance of soluble serum proteins and circulating tumor (ct) DNA (ctDNA) as biomarkers in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Predose serum samples were collected from 30 patients on day 1 of cycle 1 and cycle 2. Serum levels of angiogenesis-related proteins were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and Beads, emulsions, amplification, and magnetics (BEAMing) assays were carried out to detect mutations in serum ctDNA.

RESULTS

Dovitinib increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)165 (1.26-fold, P = 0.006), VEGF-A (1.27-fold, P = 0.004), placental growth factor (6.0-fold, P = 0.002), fibroblast growth factor 23 (1.45-fold, P = 0.02), and interleukin 8 (1.75-fold, P = 0.04) levels, and decreased soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (sVEGFR)-2 levels (0.8-fold, P = 0.001). The changes in sVEGFR-2 were significantly associated with metabolic response determined by positron emission tomography (P = 0.02) and progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.02). Secondary kinase mutations were identified in the ctDNA of 11 patients (41%), and these patients all had mutations involving KIT exon 17. Patients with secondary KIT mutations had significantly worse overall survival {median, 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-7.2 months]} than those with no detectable secondary mutations [9.8 months (95% CI 9.6-10.0 months); hazard ratio = 2.7 (95% CI 1.0-7.3); P = 0.047].

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in sVEGFR-2 levels were associated with dovitinib-mediated antitumor activity. Genotyping of serum ctDNA with BEAMing is useful for the identification of resistant mutations potentially associated with poor prognosis in patients with GISTs.

Drug repurposing identifies a synergistic combination therapy with imatinib mesylate for gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare and therefore often neglected disease. Introduction of the kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate radically improved the clinical response of patients with GIST; however, its effects are often short-lived, with GISTs demonstrating a median time-to-progression of approximately two years. Although many investigational drugs, approved first for other cancers, have been subsequently evaluated for the management of GIST, few have greatly affected the overall survival of patients with advanced disease. We employed a novel, focused, drug-repurposing effort for GIST, including imatinib mesylate-resistant GIST, evaluating a large library of FDA-approved drugs regardless of current indication. As a result of the drug-repurposing screen, we identified eight FDA-approved drugs, including fludarabine phosphate (F-AMP), that showed synergy with and/or overcame resistance to imatinib mesylate. F-AMP induces DNA damage, Annexin V, and caspase-3/7 activities as the cytotoxic effects on GIST cells, including imatinib mesylate-resistant GIST cells. F-AMP and imatinib mesylate combination treatment showed greater inhibition of GIST cell proliferation when compared with imatinib mesylate and F-AMP alone. Successful in vivo experiments confirmed the combination of imatinib mesylate with F-AMP enhanced the antitumor effects compared with imatinib mesylate alone. Our results identified F-AMP as a promising, repurposed drug therapy for the treatment of GISTs, with potential to be administered in combination with imatinib mesylate or for treatment of imatinib mesylate-refractory tumors.

Reintroduction of imatinib in GIST

PURPOSE

This review examines the clinical evidence showing that imatinib can be prescribed to treat recurrence or progression of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in patients who interrupted first-line imatinib therapy in the adjuvant or advanced/metastatic setting.

METHODOLOGY

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Google using the following keywords: rechallenge/reinitiation/reintroduction + gastrointestinal + imatinib and rechallenge/reinitiation/reintroduction + imatinib.

RESULTS

The evidence indicates that the reintroduction of imatinib can benefit patients who experience GIST progression after interrupting treatment of advanced/metastatic disease, as well as patients who experience GIST recurrence after completing prescribed neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. Although reintroduction of imatinib may lead to suboptimal outcomes, as evidenced by higher rates of progressive disease compared to initial treatment, imatinib discontinuation does not appear to favor development of imatinib resistance, leaving dose escalation and third- or fourth-line imatinib treatment as viable options for patients.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that after initial start and interruption of imatinib therapy, reintroduction of imatinib therapy is efficacious and provides continued survival benefit in patients with GIST.

State of the Art in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequently diagnosed mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite their biological and clinical heterogeneity, the majority of these tumors are positive for the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT and are driven by KIT- or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-activating mutations. There are still uncertainties regarding their clinical and molecular characterization and the optimal treatment regimens, making it difficult to establish a universal treatment algorithm for these tumors.

SUMMARY

From a clinical perspective, the main difference between GISTs and other gastrointestinal neoplasms is that the benign or malignant behavior of GISTs cannot be predicted from histopathology, but instead relies on empirically established scoring systems. Clinical data suggest that malignant potential may be an inherent quality of some GISTs rather than a feature acquired by the tumor during disease progression. Thus, some patients may require prolonged anti-tumor treatment even after complete surgical removal of the tumor.

KEY MESSAGE

Although GISTs are the most frequently occurring mesenchymal neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract, no universal treatment algorithms exist. This paper reviews the current evidence that guides the management of GISTs.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The management of localized GISTs involves the use of surgical resection, with the inclusion of preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for locally advanced, primarily unresectable tumors and for resectable cases requiring extensive surgery. Imatinib is also indicated as adjuvant therapy after complete surgical removal of GISTs with a high estimated risk of recurrence unless specific mutations conferring imatinib resistance are present. The optimal duration of adjuvant treatment is still controversial. For patients with metastatic imatinib-sensitive GISTs, imatinib constitutes the first-line standard treatment. Molecular characterization of the tumor (with respect to the PDGFRA and KIT genes) is mandatory prior to imatinib therapy. Sunitinib and regorafenib are established as alternative treatments for patients demonstrating generalized disease progression on imatinib. New tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as ponatinib and crenolanib as well as drugs targeting alternative pathways are currently under investigation. Surgery and locally ablative treatments may be indicated in some metastatic patients.

Practical role of mutation analysis for imatinib treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has become the standard first line treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the advanced phase and adjuvant setting. We carried out an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the practical role of mutation analysis for imatinib treatment in patients with advanced GIST.

METHODS

Eligible studies were limited to imatinib treatment for patients with advanced GIST and reported on mutation analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using fixed-effects and random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 2834 patients from 3 randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies were included. The ORs of response rates in KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs were 3.504 (95% CI 2.549-4.816, p<0.001) and 3.521 (95% CI 1.731-7.165, p=0.001) compared with KIT exon 9-mutant and wild type GISTs, respectively. The HRs of progression-free survival in KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs were 0.365 (95% CI 0.301-0.444, p<0.001) and 0.375 (95% CI 0.270-0.519, p<0.001) compared with KIT exon 9-mutant and wild type GISTs. The HRs of overall survival in KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs were 0.388 (95% CI 0.293-0.515, p<0.001) and 0.400 (95% CI 0.297-0.538, p<0.001) compared with KIT exon 9-mutant and wild type GISTs. No statistical significant differences were found between KIT exon 9-mutant and wild type. The overall response rate in KIT-exon 11-mutant GISTs were 70.5% (65%-75.9%) compared with 57.1% (51%-63.2%) in KIT-positive GISTs. No evidence of publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced GIST harboring a KIT exon 11 mutation have the best response rate and long-term survival with imatinib treatment. Mutation analysis would be more helpful than KIT expression analysis to decide appropriate therapy for a specific patient.

Successful rechallenge in two patients with BRAF-V600-mutant melanoma who experienced previous progression during treatment with a selective BRAF inhibitor

The v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) gene is mutated at position 600 in about 50% of melanoma. Mutant BRAF activates the downstream effectors of the RAS-RAF-MEK-MAPK pathways and is a driver oncogene in these melanoma cells. Selective BRAF-V600 inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) have high antitumor activity against BRAF-V600-mutant melanoma with objective tumor response rates. Resistance, however, develops within less than a year in the majority of patients. Several different mechanisms have been found to mediate acquired resistance, but these do not involve the occurrence of secondary mutations in the BRAF gene. Two patients with BRAF-V600E mutant melanoma who had documented progression during treatment with dabrafenib/GSK1120212 and dabrafenib, respectively, were rechallenged with dabrafenib and vemurafenib after a treatment-free interval of 8 and 4 months during which further progression was documented. Both patients showed a marked clinical response and, in both, objective tumor regression (qualifying as a mixed and a partial response according to RECIST) was documented. These two case observations indicate that resistance to BRAF-selective inhibitors can be reversible following treatment interruption.

Imatinib for melanomas harboring mutationally activated or amplified KIT arising on mucosal, acral, and chronically sun-damaged skin

PURPOSE

Amplifications and mutations in the KIT proto-oncogene in subsets of melanomas provide therapeutic opportunities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of imatinib in metastatic mucosal, acral, or chronically sun-damaged (CSD) melanoma with KIT amplifications and/or mutations. Patients received imatinib 400 mg once per day or 400 mg twice per day if there was no initial response. Dose reductions were permitted for treatment-related toxicities. Additional oncogene mutation screening was performed by mass spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled (24 evaluable). Eight patients (33%) had tumors with KIT mutations, 11 (46%) with KIT amplifications, and five (21%) with both. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (range, 3.7 to 27.1 months). Best overall response rate (BORR) was 29% (21% excluding nonconfirmed responses) with a two-stage 95% CI of 13% to 51%. BORR was significantly greater than the hypothesized null of 5% and statistically significantly different by mutation status (7 of 13 or 54% KIT mutated v 0% KIT amplified only). There were no statistical differences in rates of progression or survival by mutation status or by melanoma site. The overall disease control rate was 50% but varied significantly by KIT mutation status (77% mutated v 18% amplified). Four patients harbored pretreatment NRAS mutations, and one patient acquired increased KIT amplification after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Melanomas that arise on mucosal, acral, or CSD skin should be assessed for KIT mutations. Imatinib can be effective when tumors harbor KIT mutations, but not if KIT is amplified only. NRAS mutations and KIT copy number gain may be mechanisms of therapeutic resistance to imatinib.

The C-kit receptor-mediated signal transduction and tumor-related diseases

As an important member of tyrosine kinase family, c-kit receptor causes specific expression of certain genes, regulates cell differentiation and proliferation, resists cell apoptosis, and plays a key role in tumor occurrence, development, migration and recurrence through activating the downstream signaling molecules following interaction with stem cell factor (SCF). The abnormality of SCF/c-kit signaling pathway is closely related to some certain tumors. The discovery of c-kit receptor-targeted drugs has promoted clinical-related cancer's diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, we review recent research progress on c-kit receptor-mediated signal transduction and its potential therapeutic application as a target in tumor-related diseases.

Drug repurposing for gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Despite significant treatment advances over the past decade, metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains largely incurable. Rare diseases, such as GIST, individually affect small groups of patients but collectively are estimated to affect 25 to 30 million people in the United States alone. Given the costs associated with the discovery, development, and registration of new drugs, orphan diseases such as GIST are often not pursued by mainstream pharmaceutical companies. As a result, "drug repurposing" or "repositioning," has emerged as an alternative to the traditional drug development process. In this study, we screened 796 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and found that two of these compounds, auranofin (Ridaura) and fludarabine phosphate, effectively and selectively inhibited the proliferation of GISTs, including imatinib-resistant cells. One of the most notable drug hits, auranofin, an oral, gold-containing agent approved by the FDA in 1985 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, was found to inhibit thioredoxin reductase activity and induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, leading to dramatic inhibition of GIST cell growth and viability. Importantly, the anticancer activity associated with auranofin was independent of imatinib-resistant status, but was closely related to the endogenous and inducible levels of ROS. Coupled with the fact that auranofin has an established safety profile in patients, these findings suggest for the first time that auranofin may have clinical benefit for patients with GIST, particularly in those suffering from imatinib-resistant and recurrent forms of this disease.

The G-quadruplex ligand, SYUIQ-FM05, targets proto-oncogene c-kit transcription and induces apoptosis in K562 cells

CONTEXT

N'-(7-Fluoro-5-N-methyl-10H-indolo[3,2-b]quinolin-5-ium)-N,N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine iodide (SYUIQ-FM05) is a semi-synthetic derivative of cryptolepine which is from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schlechter (Periplocaeae). This ligand inhibits telomerase activity by stabilizing the G-quadruplex structure and induces growth arrest in cancer cells.

OBJECTIVE

The anticancer activity of SYUIQ-FM05 via inhibiting c-kit transcription was investigated in leukemic cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cytotoxicity of SYUIQ-FM05 in K562 cells was evaluated using a cell viability assay and flow cytometry (FCM) at 0.4, 2.0, 10.0 and 20.0 nM. Under the same concentrations of SYUIQ-FM05 or 100 nM imatinib mesylate (IM), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) investigated transcription of c-kit and bcl-2, and western blotting analyzed the expression levels of c-Kit, total mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MEKs), phospho-MEK (p-MEK), total extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERKs), phospho-ERK (p-ERK), Bcl-2 and Bax.

RESULTS

SYUIQ-FM05 inhibited cellular growth with an IC(50) of 10.83 ± 0.05 nM in K562 cells. c-Kit transcription was suppressed 2.69-, 4.39-, 7.71- and 10.52-fold at 0.4, 2.0, 10.0 and 20.0 nM SYUIQ-FM05, respectively, which produced proportional loss of total c-Kit protein except IM. Both SYUIQ-FM05 and IM downregulated p-MEK and p-ERK. Furthermore, bcl-2 transcription was suppressed 1.58- and 1.86-fold at 10.0 and 20.0 nM SYUIQ-FM05, respectively, but 0.4 and 2.0 nM SYUIQ-FM05 had no effect. A decrease in Bcl-2 and an increase in Bax appeared in these treated cells.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that SYUIQ-FM05 could induce apoptosis in a leukemic cell line through inhibiting c-kit transcription, which supports the anticancer potency of SYUIQ-FM05 in c-Kit-positive leukemic cells.

Autophagy is involved in endogenous and NVP-AUY922-induced KIT degradation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a prototype of mutant KIT oncogene-driven tumor. Prolonged tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment may result in a resistant phenotype through acquired secondary KIT mutation. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90AA1) is a chaperone protein responsible for protein maturation and stability, and KIT is a known client protein of HSP90AA1. Inhibition of HSP90AA1 has been shown to destabilize KIT protein by enhancing its degradation via the proteasome-dependent pathway. In this study, we demonstrated that NVP-AUY922 (AUY922), a new class of HSP90AA1 inhibitor, is effective in inhibiting the growth of GIST cells expressing mutant KIT protein, the imatinib-sensitive GIST882 and imatinib-resistant GIST48 cells. The growth inhibition was accompanied with a sustained reduction of both total and phosphorylated KIT proteins and the induction of apoptosis in both cell lines. Surprisingly, AUY922-induced KIT reduction could be partially reversed by pharmacological inhibition of either autophagy or proteasome degradation pathway. The blockade of autophagy alone led to the accumulation of the KIT protein, highlighting the role of autophagy in endogenous KIT turnover. The involvement of autophagy in endogenous and AUY922-induced KIT protein turnover was further confirmed by the colocalization of KIT with MAP1LC3B-, acridine orange- or SQSTM1-labeled autophagosome, and by the accumulation of KIT in GIST cells by silencing either BECN1 or ATG5 to disrupt autophagosome activity. Therefore, the results not only highlight the potential application of AUY922 for the treatment of KIT-expressing GISTs, but also provide the first evidence for the involvement of autophagy in endogenous and HSP90AA1 inhibitor-induced KIT degradation.