A multicenter phase II study of S-1 for gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer

Systemic therapy for pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer: past developments and recent advances

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains among the most challenging malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly in pretreated patients. As most patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment, effective second-line and subsequent treatments are required. Although the addition of modified FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) to active symptom control improved the overall survival of patients with progressing advanced BTC despite gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment, its efficacy was modest. Moreover, most clinical trials demonstrated modest efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for molecularly unselected pretreated advanced BTC. Patients with advanced BTC carry a relatively high druggable genetic alteration rate and have shown promising responses to molecular-matched therapies targeting gene alterations such as FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, IDH1 mutation, and HER2 overexpression/amplification. Additionally, tumor-agnostic approaches, including BRAF V600E, NTRK fusion, and RET fusion, have expanded the treatment options for some patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy as mono- or combination therapy in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. Therefore, developmental efforts have shifted to immune checkpoint inhibitor and other combinations such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors or radiation. In addition to refining combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor, future research should focus on elucidating the tumor microenvironment. This review delineates the evolution of systemic therapies in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. By examining past developments and recent advances through prospective trials, it highlights novel approaches that may improve outcomes in this challenging disease.

Initial adjustments in the dosage and rest period of gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy for patients with incurable biliary tract cancer based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values may be crucial for treatment outcomes and the preservation of renal function

Background

Gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) combination therapy (GC therapy) is the standard 1st-line regimen for incurable biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, the correlation between dynamic changes in renal function and the outcomes of GC therapy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the association between renal function alterations and treatment outcomes after GC therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively examined 44 patients with incurable BTC who underwent GC therapy (January 2015 to December 2022). The patients were stratified according to their baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Changes in eGFR, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

The median baseline eGFRs were 65.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (low group, n=22) and 90.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (high group, n=22). No significant background differences were observed between the groups. During the 1st course, 86.4% and 54.5% of patients in the low and high groups underwent dose adjustments and/or administration postponement, which was found to be significantly greater in the low group. In the high group, eGFR decreased with an increase in the CDDP dose (100 mg =-12.0, 200 mg =-12.7, 300 mg =-25.9, and 400 mg =-25.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). In the low group, eGFR remained stable (100 mg =0.8, 200 mg =7.5, 300 mg =4.5, and 400 mg =-0.3 mL/min/1.73 m2). The decrease in the eGFR in the high group was significantly greater at each CDDP dose. However, the median OS and PFS were longer in the low group (OS: 16.3 vs. 9.2 months, P=0.02; PFS: 5.4 vs. 3.6 months, P=0.02). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the groups.

Conclusions

Adjusting GC therapy based on baseline estimated glomerular eGFR may be pivotal for therapeutic benefits and renal function protection in patients with incurable BTC.

Phase I/II study of nivolumab plus lenvatinib for advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1808/NCCH1817, SNIPE)

BACKGROUND

Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%.

RESULTS

In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Expressing Biliary Tract Cancer (HERB; NCCH1805): A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Treatment options for patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC) who progress on a gemcitabine-containing regimen are limited. In addition, the significance of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy in HER2-expressing BTC has not been sufficiently investigated.

METHODS

In this phase II trial, participants from five institutions in Japan were enrolled. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent BTC with centrally confirmed HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry [IHC]3+ or IHC2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+) or HER2-low (IHC2+ and ISH-, IHC1+, and IHC0 and ISH+) and were refractory or intolerant to a gemcitabine-containing regimen. The patients received 5.4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in HER2-positive BTC by an independent central review (threshold ORR, 15%; expected ORR, 40%).

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were enrolled and treated. Among these patients, 22 with HER2-positive disease comprised the primary efficacy population and had a confirmed ORR of 36.4% (90% CI, 19.6 to 56.1; P = .01), meeting the primary end point. Eight with HER2-low disease comprised the exploratory population and had a confirmed ORR of 12.5%. The most common ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were anemia (53.1%) and neutropenia (31.3%). Eight patients (25.0%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD), including two grade 5 events.

CONCLUSION

T-DXd showed promising activity in patients with HER2-positive BTC and a signal of efficacy in patients with HER2-low BTC. Although the safety profile was generally manageable, ILD requires careful monitoring and early intervention.

Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

Tucatinib and Trastuzumab for Previously Treated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (SGNTUC-019): A Phase II Basket Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tucatinib and trastuzumab in patients with previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC).

METHODS

SGNTUC-019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04579380) is an open-label phase II basket study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tucatinib and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-altered solid tumors. In the biliary tract cancer cohort, patients had previously treated HER2 overexpressing or amplified (HER2+) tumors (identified with local testing) with no prior HER2-directed therapy. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per investigator assessment. Patients were treated on a 21-day cycle with tucatinib (300 mg orally twice daily) and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks).

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled. As of data cutoff (January 30, 2023), the median duration of follow-up was 10.8 months. The cORR was 46.7% (90% CI, 30.8 to 63.0), with a disease control rate of 76.7% (90% CI, 60.6 to 88.5). The median duration of response and progression-free survival were 6.0 months (90% CI, 5.5 to 6.9) and 5.5 months (90% CI, 3.9 to 8.1), respectively. At data cutoff, 15 patients (50.0%) had died, and the estimated 12-month overall survival rate was 53.6% (90% CI, 36.8 to 67.8). The two most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pyrexia (43.3%) and diarrhea (40.0%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 18 patients (60.0%), with the most common being cholangitis, decreased appetite, and nausea (all 10.0%), which were generally not treatment related. TEAEs led to treatment regimen discontinuation in one patient, and there were no deaths due to TEAEs.

CONCLUSION

Tucatinib combined with trastuzumab had clinically significant antitumor activity and was well tolerated in patients with previously treated HER2+ mBTC.

Pemigatinib treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion detected by a liquid comprehensive genomic profiling test

The liquid CGP was useful for detecting FGFR2 fusion and the patient experienced typical side effects (nail disorders, hyperphosphatemia, and taste disorders) of pemigatinib that required treatment.

Clinical outcomes of second‑line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S‑1 treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in the KHBO1401‑3A study

Since the completion of the KHBO1401 study, which evaluated the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (GC) compared with GC plus S‑1 (GCS), GCS has become a standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, there are currently no data revealing second‑line therapy options after GCS. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients receiving second‑line chemotherapy for advanced BTC, refractory or intolerant to GCS, using data from the KHBO1401 study. Patients who received a second‑line treatment after GCS chemotherapy between July 2014 and February 2016 were retrospectively studied. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day of GCS treatment failure or the first day of second‑line chemotherapy to the final follow‑up date or until death from any cause. Among 83 patients refractory or intolerant to GCS chemotherapy, 51 (61%) received second‑line chemotherapy, including GCS (n=8), GC (n=15), GEM (n=6), GEM plus S‑1 (GS) (n=4) and S‑1 (n=18). The 6‑ and 12‑month OS rates were 66.7 and 44.4%, respectively, following second‑line chemotherapy, and 6.3 and 3.1%, respectively, in the best supportive care group (P<0.0001). In addition, the 12‑ and 24‑month OS rates were 59.3 and 36.2%, respectively, in the multidrug chemotherapy group, and 26.9 and 9.0%, respectively, in the single‑agent chemotherapy group (P=0.0191). These results suggested that second‑line combination chemotherapy is a viable treatment option for patients with advanced BTC that is refractory or intolerant to first‑line GCS therapy.

Correlation between efficacy endpoints in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated by systemic second-line therapies: Analysis of aggregated data from a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) are commonly used as endpoints for phase II trials. However, the ultimate goal is to bring survival benefit for the patients. We aimed to assess the correlation between ORR, median PFS and overall survival (OS) using aggregated data from a systematic review of second-line systemic therapies in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients.

METHODS

Clinical trials were identified using Medline database. Studies only enrolling patients with gallbladder cancer were not included. Searches were last updated on April 2020. Eligible studies reported OS, PFS and/or ORR data for BTC patients receiving second-line systemic chemotherapy. Pearson weighted correlation was estimated between OS and ORR and between median OS and PFS.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (N = 912 patients) were selected. There was a strong correlation between median OS/ORR in the overall analysis (r = 0.85; P < 0.0001), both for trials with chemotherapy (r = 0.90; P=0.0152) and targeted therapy (r = 0.84; P = 0.0006). In contrast, the correlation between median OS/PFS, albeit significant in the overall analysis (r = 0.80; P < 0.0001), remained significant only for targeted therapies in the sensitivity analysis (r = 0.83; P = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

ORR seems to be a more interesting intermediate endpoint in BTC in second line for both chemotherapy and targeted therapies, while PFS may be relevant only for targeted therapy trials. Further well-designed studies for surrogacy evaluation should be performed to confirm this observation.

The efficiency and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced biliary tract cancers based on gene profiles: A retrospectively controlled study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are potential agents to improve the survival of advanced biliary tract cancers (ABTCs). The current results are controversial because the predictors are imprecise. We present our primary experience with ABTCs based on gene landscape with exciting outcomes. ABTCs who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from October 2019 to March 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into chemotherapy group or immunotherapy group according to the treatment. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were response and toxicities. SSPS 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. A total of 33 patients were enrolled, including 25 in the chemotherapy group and 8 in the immunotherapy group. The median OS and PFS of the chemotherapy group were 2 and 4 months, respectively. The estimated median OS and PFS of immunotherapy were 10 + and 10 + months, respectively. The differences of OS and PFS between the 2 groups were significant (P = .000; P = .003). Stratified analysis showed that these differences were mainly from those patients with high expression of PD-L1 > 10%. The difference in the overall response was significant between 2 groups (χ2 = 9.275; P = .026). The difference in adverse events between the 2 groups was not significant. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were effective and safe for ABTCs with high expression of PD-L1. The threshold should be precise.

Favorable Management of Repeated Serous Retinal Detachment with Continued Tumor Response in a Patient with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma During Treatment with Pemigatinib: A Case Report

Pemigatinib is a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor (FGFRi) approved for the treatment of patients with previously treated biliary tract cancer with FGFR2 fusion. Although infrequent, ocular toxicity manifested as serous retinal detachment (SRD) has been observed and is regarded as a serious side effect. We herein report the case of a 54-year-old woman with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma-initiated pemigatinib after failure of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS). Although the patient experienced repeated SRD after pemigatinib, dose interruption and dose reduction of pemigatinib from 13.5 mg to 9 mg, and from 9 mg to 4.5 mg led to complete recovery of SRD, and continued tumor shrinkage.

Multicenter phase II trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: HERB trial

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker and a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. The drug's efficacy has been proven in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. The rate of HER2 positivity in biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported to be 5-20%, and case reports and clinical trials have suggested that HER2 inhibitors might be active in HER2-positive BTC. Here we describe the rationale and design of the phase II HERB trial that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent BTC. The primary end point will be the centrally assessed objective response rate in HER2-positive patients.

Second-line treatments in advanced biliary tract cancer: systematic literature review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety

Background: A systematic review was conducted to understand clinical, economic and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in second-line biliary tract cancer. Materials & methods: The review followed established recommendations. The feasibility of network meta-analysis revealed limited networks, thus synthesis was limited to a summary of reported ranges, percentiles and medians. Results: The review included 62 trials and observational studies highly variable with respect to key baseline characteristics. Commonly evaluated second-line treatments included fluoropyrimidine-, gemcitabine- and S-1-based regimens. Across active treatment arms, median overall survival ranged from 3.5 to 15.0 months (median: 6.9), median progression-free survival from 1.4 to 6.5 months (median: 2.9) and objective response from 0 to 36.4%. Outcomes were similar between study types, with a few notable outliers. Treatment-related/-emergent adverse events were infrequently reported; no studies reported economic or health-related quality-of-life outcomes. Conclusions: Biliary tract cancer is a difficult-to-treat disease with poor prognosis. Despite evolving treatment landscapes, more recent studies did not show clinical outcome improvement, highlighting an unmet need among advanced/metastatic patients.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: from conventional therapies to targeted drugs

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are rare, highly invasive tumors often diagnosed at an advanced disease stage with an associated poor prognosis. Surgery represents the only chance for curative-intent treatment, but recurrence rates remain high. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy are options for patients with resectable CCA to increase recurrence-free survival and overall survival, while palliative chemotherapy represents the treatment for unresectable disease. Global efforts are currently focused on the development of novel more effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A review was conducted in August 2021 using the PubMed database with the following keywords: 'cholangiocarcinoma,' 'chemotherapy,' and 'therapy.' Manuscripts reporting on first- and second-line chemotherapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment regimens, and targeted therapies currently being tested or employed in the management of CCA were examined.

EXPERT OPINION

The prognosis of CCA is negatively affected by several factors including a lack of reliable biomarkers leading to delayed diagnoses, high inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, and few effective chemotherapy regimens. In pursuit of more effective therapies, ongoing trials are testing both conventional and targeted drugs.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer

Background Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC.

A pilot study of Pan-FGFR inhibitor ponatinib in patients with FGFR-altered advanced cholangiocarcinoma

Background Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare, chemo resistant and are associated with a poor prognosis. Preclinical and early clinical work had demonstrated interesting anti-tumor activity from targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway. We hypothesized that ponatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against FGFR, would be active in BTC patients with FGFR alterations. Methods This was a multi-center, single institution pilot study of ponatinib in patients with advanced, refractory BTC with FGFR alterations. The primary end point was overall response rate, with secondary points of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessment. Results Twelve patients were enrolled prior to early termination of the trial. Partial responses were observed in 1 from 12 patients. Median PFS was 2.4 months and median OS was 15.7 months. All observed toxicities were manageable and reversible. Toxicities were mild, with lymphopenia (75%), rash (63%) and fatigue (50%) being the most frequent. No significant detriment in global QoL was observed. Conclusions Ponatinib as a single agent in FGFR altered BTC is tolerable with limited clinical activity. This is the first report of prospective assessment of FGFR inhibition in BTC using ponatinib, and the first study to report its effect on HRQoL. Further development of ponatinib will involve correlative studies to better refine patient selection, focus on combinations with other molecular targeted agents, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, and studies to better understand mechanisms of treatment resistance.

Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer in 2021

Biliary tract cancer refers to a group of malignancies including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. While surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, postoperative recurrence can sometimes occur. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used to prolong prognosis in some cases. Many unresectable cases are also treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy is widely introduced for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Evidence on chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer is recently on the increase. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is currently the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy in advanced cases. Recently, FOLFOX also demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment. In addition, efficacies of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors have been shown. In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine monotherapy has become the standard of care in Western countries. In addition to conventional cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. Genetic testing is used to check for genetic alterations and molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy are introduced based on tumor characteristics. In this article, we review the latest evidence of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

Targeted therapies for gallbladder cancer: an overview of agents in preclinical and clinical development

Introduction: Gallbladder cancer (GC) is a rare malignancy with a dismal prognosis. When diagnosed early enough, it can be cured by surgical removal. Unfortunately, only few GC patients can be amenable to surgery, though, with a high relapse rate. Conventional chemotherapy remains the golden standard for unresectable or metastatic GC, both in the first and second-line settings, even if leading to a fair outcome improvement.Areas covered: In recent years, according to the concept of 'precision medicine', new potential molecular targets have been examined. We provided a general outline of the current first- and second-line chemotherapies. New therapeutic possibilities are also reviewed, particularly HER2, EGFR, VEGF, TKI, MEK and BRAF inhibitors, and immunotherapy. Furthermore, published clinical trials are utilized to analyze the principal drug effectiveness in GC.Expert opinion: GC is characterized by vast cancer heterogeneity and individual's efficacy to different drugs. The ongoing trials have the potentiality of reshaping the landscape of systemic treatments for GC in the very next years. Nowadays, amongst therapeutic combinations, the addition of ICIs to chemotherapy has yielded encouraging results needing confirmation. In the next future, systematic implementation of gene profiling and further explorations of combination therapies will likely change the treatment scenario.

Combination chemotherapy with NAB® -paclitaxel and capecitabine for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (NAP-CAPABIL Pilot Study)

BACKGROUND

 Advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, with a 5-year overall survival of < 10%. Although preliminary evidence suggests a role of targeted treatments or immunotherapy in a subset of patients, chemotherapy remains the standard second-line treatment in the majority. We conducted a pilot study of second-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and nab-paclitaxel after failure of gemcitabine and platinum.

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically proven, unresectable biliary tract cancer, which had progressed on a gemcitabine/platinum doublet. In this single-arm, multicenter trial, all patients received capecitabine (825 mg/m² bd PO D1-14 q21d) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m² IV D1,8 q21d) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was feasibility of delivering the proposed regimen, with secondary objectives of disease control measures and QOL outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled between 2015 and 2016 from four cancer centers in NSW. Treatment was generally well tolerated with grade III toxicities in five patients (including infection, cholangitis, obstruction, and intestinal perforation) and no grade IV toxicity. Median treatment duration was 4.3 months, with a disease control rate of 80% (8/10), and median progression-free and overall survival of 5.7 and 12.1 months, respectively. Quality of life data and specimens for translational research have been collected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot study demonstrates that combination of capecitabine and nab-paclitaxel is feasible as a second-line treatment in ABTC. Adequate safety and promising early efficacy signals make further assessment of the combination in a formal phase II or III trial reasonable.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ACTRN12615000504516.

A randomized, double-blind, phase II study of oral histone deacetylase inhibitor resminostat plus S-1 versus placebo plus S-1 in biliary tract cancers previously treated with gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Effective second-line chemotherapy options are limited in treating advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Resminostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor. Such inhibitors increase sensitivity to fluorouracil, the active form of S-1. In the phase I study, addition of resminostat to S-1 was suggested to have promising efficacy for pre-treated BTCs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of resminostat plus S-1 in second-line therapy for BTCs.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive resminostat or placebo (200 mg orally per day; days 1-5 and 8-12) and S-1 group (80-120 mg orally per day by body surface area; days 1-14) over a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Among 101 patients enrolled, 50 received resminostat+S-1 and 51 received placebo+S-1. Median PFS was 2.9 months for resminostat+S-1 vs. 3.0 months for placebo+S-1 (HR: 1.154, 95% CI: 0.759-1.757, p = 0.502); median OS was 7.8 months vs. 7.5 months, respectively (HR: 1.049, 95% CI: 0.653-1.684, p = 0.834); the RR and DCR were 6.0% vs. 9.8% and 70.0% vs. 78.4%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs) of grade ≥ 3 occurring more frequently (≥10% difference) in the resminostat+S-1 than in the placebo+S-1 comprised platelet count decreased (18.0% vs. 2.0%) and decreased appetite (16.0% vs. 2.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Resminostat plus S-1 therapy improved neither PFS nor OS for patients with pre-treated BTCs. Addition of resminostat to S-1 was associated with higher incidence of TrAEs, but these were manageable (JapicCTI-183883).

Development of Possible Next Line of Systemic Therapies for Gemcitabine-Resistant Biliary Tract Cancers: A Perspective from Clinical Trials

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) compromises a heterogenous group of tumors with poor prognoses. Curative surgery remains the first choice for localized disease; however, most BTC patients have had unresectable or metastatic disease. The gold standard therapy for these patients is chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. There are no consensus guidelines for standard treatment in a second-line setting, although the data of the ABC-06 trial showed a slight survival benefit from oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy. Recent progress in comprehensive genomic profiling for advanced BTC (ABTC) has helped to clarify tumorigenesis and facilitate the coming era of precision medicine. Generally, targeted agents fail to show significant clinical benefits in unselected populations. Only fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)- and BRAF mutation-enriched populations have survival benefits from the corresponding inhibitors. Several interesting targeted agents for monotherapies or combination therapies with other compounds are currently ongoing or recruiting. Here, we review the published data from clinical trials of second-line therapies after the failure of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in ABTC. The results were stratified by different genetic alternations, as well as by chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: The 3rd English edition

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery launched the clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers (cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer) in 2007, then published the 2nd version in 2014.

METHODS

In this 3rd version, clinical questions (CQs) were proposed on six topics. The recommendation, grade for recommendation, and statement for each CQ were discussed and finalized by an evidence-based approach. Recommendations were graded as Grade 1 (strong) or Grade 2 (weak) according to the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

The 31 CQs covered the six topics: (a) prophylactic treatment, (b) diagnosis, (c) biliary drainage, (d) surgical treatment, (e) chemotherapy, and (f) radiation therapy. In the 31 CQs, 14 recommendations were rated strong and 14 recommendations weak. The remaining three CQs had no recommendation. Each CQ includes a statement of how the recommendations were graded.

CONCLUSIONS

This latest guideline provides recommendations for important clinical aspects based on evidence. Future collaboration with the cancer registry will be key for assessing the guidelines and establishing new evidence.

Fluropyrimidine single agent or doublet chemotherapy as second line treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer

Fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus platinum chemotherapy has been recently established as a second-line (L2) preferred option in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) (ABC-06 phase III trial). However, the overall survival (OS) benefit was limited and comparison with FP monotherapy was not available. Our aim was to assess the OS of patients treated with a FP monotherapy compared to a doublet with irinotecan or platinum in L2. We performed a retrospective analysis of two large multicenter prospective cohorts: a French cohort (28 centers) and an Italian cohort (9 centers). All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving FP-based L2 after gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. A subgroup analysis according to performance status (PS) and an exploratory analysis according to platinum sensitivity in L1 were planned. In the French cohort (n = 351), no significant OS difference was observed between the FP monotherapy and doublet groups (median OS: 5.6 vs 6.8 months, P = .65). Stratification on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS showed similar results in PS 0-1 and 2. Median OS was not different between FP monotherapy, platinum- and irinotecan-based doublets (5.6 vs 7.1 vs 6.7 months, P = .68). Similar findings were observed in the Italian cohort (n = 174) and in the sensitivity analysis in pooled cohorts (n = 525). No L2 regimen seemed superior over others in the platinum resistant/refractory or sensitive subgroups. Our results suggest that FP monotherapy is as active as FP doublets in aBTC in L2, regardless of the patient PS and country, and could be a therapeutic option in this setting.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of Axitinib Monotherapy for Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy Refractory Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (AX-BC Study)

LESSONS LEARNED

Axitinib exhibited marginal activity against gemcitabine-refractory unselected biliary tract cancer. Pretreated soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 may be a useful biomarker for axitinib treatment outcome. Ascites should be carefully monitored in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor therapy including axitinib in advanced biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND

There are no clear options for second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of axitinib, a potent selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3, in patients with GEM-refractory BTC.

METHODS

Patients refractory or intolerant to GEM-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Axitinib was administered orally at an initial dose of 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the threshold and expected values were set at 2 and 3 months, respectively. The target sample size was 32 patients.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled. The trial was interrupted for a total of 13 months for the evaluation of adverse events. Thirteen patients were previously treated with ≥2 regimens. The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-4.1). The median overall survival was 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-9.7). The response rate was 5.3% (95% CI: 0.0-15.3). Grade 3 ascites occurred in two patients. Baseline soluble VEGFR-2 levels were significantly associated with PFS.

CONCLUSION

Axitinib exhibited marginal activity against GEM-refractory BTC. Ascites should be carefully monitored in axitinib-treated patients with advanced BTC.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as salvage treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial

Background

No standard treatment is available for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) after first-line therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS). The objective of this study was to evaluate safety and anti-tumour activity of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) as salvage treatment in patients with previously treated advanced BTC.

Methods

In this two-stage phase 2 study, patients with advanced BTC who had disease progression or unacceptable toxicity after ≥3 cycles of GEMCIS were eligible. Primary endpoints were safety and efficacy (defined as objective response rate, ORR). In stage one, ten patients were treated with FOLFIRINOX every 2 weeks. In stage two, an additional 20 patients were enrolled at a starting dose as defined in stage one, provided that in stage ≥1 objective response or ≥2 stable diseases were observed and ≤3 patients had serious adverse events (SAEs) within the first 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Forty patients were screened for eligibility and 30 patients were enrolled. In stage one, one patient had a partial response and five patients had stable disease. One patient had a SAE during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and five patients required a dose reduction due to adverse events. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in stage one were neutropaenia, mucositis and diarrhoea. Stage two was initiated with FOLFIRINOX in an adapted dose. In stage two, grade 3–4 neutropaenia, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. The ORR, median PFS and OS in all patients were 10%, 6.2 and 10.7 months, respectively.

Conclusions

In patients with advanced BTC who progressed after or were intolerant to GEMCIS, FOLFIRINOX can be administered safely and could be considered as an option for salvage treatment in these patients.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02456714.

Apatinib for treating advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failed chemotherapy: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) originates from the secondary branch of the bile duct and the intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells, and is a rare pathological type of primary liver cancer. Recently, apatinib has been successfully used for a variety of malignancies.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 23-year-old female was noted with intermittent right upper abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and vomiting after eating for more than 1 month. The enhanced CT scan revealed multiple intrahepatic lesions, portal vein and right branch tumor emboli were present.

DIAGNOSIS

Combined with the patient's medical history and pathology and immunohistochemistry, the diagnosis was confirmed as locally advanced unresectable ICC (cT4N1M1, Stage IVB).

INTERVENTIONS

The disease progressed after six cycles of gemcitabine plus capecitabine chemotherapy. She received oral apatinib treatment since September 30, 2017. Due to related adverse reactions, the patient could not tolerate the treatment, and the subsequent reduction therapy was given.

OUTCOMES

On April 11, 2018, the review of CT evaluation suggested that the disease was progressed. Hence, in this patient, apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced ICC showed a progression-free survival with 6 months.

LESSONS

Apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced ICC is effective, and the adverse effects are tolerable. However, the efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of ICC need to be further confirmed by large sample of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Phase I study of resminostat, an HDAC inhibitor, combined with S-1 in patients with pre-treated biliary tract or pancreatic cancer

Resminostat is an oral hydroxamate inhibitor of class I, IIb, and IV histone deacetylases. S-1 is widely used to treat biliary tract cancer and pancreatic cancer in Japan. We performed a phase I study of resminostat combined with S-1 as second-line or later therapy in Japanese patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer. A total of 27 patients were enrolled. We determined the optimal regimen for resminostat/S-1 therapy in part 1, and investigated its safety and efficacy in part 2. In part 1, 17 patients were enrolled. One DLT (anorexia and stomatitis, respectively) occurred with each of regimens 2 and 3. In part 2, an additional 10 patients received regimen 3, which was selected in part 1. Regimen 3 was resminostat (200 mg/day on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12: 5 days on/2 days off) plus S-1 (80-120 mg/day according to body surface area on Days 1 to 14) repeated every 21 days. A total of 16 patients (13 with biliary tract cancer and 3 with pancreatic cancer) received regimen 3 and it was well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia and anorexia (11 patients each, 69%). The disease control rate was 81.3% (84.6% for biliary tract cancer and 66.7% for pancreatic cancer, respectively). Median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (5.5 and 2.3 months), while median overall survival was 8.8 months (10.2 and 4.7 months). In conclusion, regimen 3 was well tolerated by patients with pre-treated biliary tract or pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy and safety of trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancers refractory to gemcitabine

Gemcitabine‐based therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) with no second‐line treatment(s) established yet. Aberrant activation of the MAPK pathway in patients with BTC indicates its importance in BTC. Trametinib is a potent, highly selective, allosteric non‐competitive inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2. In this phase IIa open‐label, single‐arm study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced BTC refractory to gemcitabine‐based therapy. All patients received oral trametinib 2 mg once daily until progressive disease (PD), death, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to determine the 12‐week non‐PD rate. Secondary assessments included safety, progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival, and overall response rate. Targeted exome sequencing was used to identify biomarkers for sensitivity or resistance to trametinib monotherapy. Twenty patients (median age, 61.5 years) with carcinoma of gall bladder (40%), intrahepatic (25%) or extrahepatic (30%) bile duct, and ampulla of Vater (5%) were enrolled. The non‐PD rate at week 12 was 10% (95% confidence interval, 1.2‐31.7); it did not reach the threshold rate of 25%. Median PFS was 10.6 weeks (95% confidence interval, 4.6‐12.1) and 1‐year overall survival was 20.0%. Stable disease and PD were observed in 13 (65%) and seven (35%) patients, respectively. No new safety signals were reported. Although the primary end‐point was not met, prolonged PFS was observed in one patient having six somatic variants including synonymous NF1 exon 12 splice variant and a loss‐of‐function variant in ARID1A. Efforts to understand responsive mutations and sensitivity to targeted therapies are warranted. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01943864.

Phase II study of fixed dose-rate gemcitabine plus S-1 as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine plus platinum is considered standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. However, no standard second-line therapy has been established for this disease. According to reports, S-1 exerts anti-tumor effects on advanced biliary tract cancer and gemcitabine is more effective via fixed dose-rate administration. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination of fixed dose-rate gemcitabine and S-1 after failure of gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy.

METHODS

This single-arm phase II study (clinical trial number: UMIN000005918) set the response rate as the primary endpoint and used a MiniMax two-stage design with a null hypothesis < 7% and alternative hypothesis ≥ 25%. Thirty-five patients were needed to yield a power of 90% and α value of 0.05. Patients received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m², div, 100-min period, day 1) and S-1 (40 mg/m² twice daily, oral, days 1-7), every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable adverse events were observed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled, and 3 of 23 first-stage patients responded. The overall response rate was 9.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-19.2%]. The median overall and progression-free survival were 7.0 [95% CI: 5.3-8.6] and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-3.5), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (19.5%), neutropenia (19.5%), anemia (14.6%), thrombocytopenia (7.3%), and anorexia (4.8%).

CONCLUSION

Second-line fixed dose-rate gemcitabine plus S-1 was not sufficiently effective and tolerable in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin.

Phase 2 study of combination SPI-1620 with docetaxel as second-line advanced biliary tract cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

This multicentre, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SPI-1620, an analogue of endothelin-1, administered in combination with docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC).

METHODS

Eligible patients received continuous cycles of combination therapy with SPI-1620 (11 μg m^-2) and docetaxel (75 mg m^-2) intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression (PD) or intolerable toxicity. Tumour response was evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 2 cycles (6 weeks). The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, and overall survival (OS) that were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 30 enrolled patients, 25 patients had qualifying events (PD or death), 1 patient was nonevaluable, and 4 patients were censored at the time of their last tumour assessment. Our primary end point of PFS ⩾5 months was not reached. Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-2.8), ranging from 0.7 to 8.4 months. The ORR was 10.3% (95% CI: 0.02-0.27). Eleven additional patients achieved stable disease. The OS was 4.87 months. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia and neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of docetaxel to SPI-1620 in second-line ABTC did not meet the pre-specified primary end point of PFS ⩾5 months in unselected patient population.

Biliary cancer: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs. extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs. gallbladder cancers: classification and therapeutic implications

Biliary cancers (BCs) are a diverse group of tumors that arise from the bile duct epithelium and are divided into cholangiocarcinomas of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and cancer of the gallbladder. Despite improvements in treatment and diagnosis, BCs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage and associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Recent discoveries have allowed us to have a better understanding of the genomic diversity in BC, and identify genes that are likely contributing to its pathogenesis, proliferation and treatment resistance. Additionally, these advances have allowed us to reason that each anatomic group within BC behave as distinct diseases, with differences in prognosis and outcomes. Based on this knowledge, recent advances have allowed us to identify actionable mutations that form rational therapeutic targets with novel agents, where their relevance will be better understood through the completion of prospective clinical trials.

Efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 321 patients

Background:

We aimed to assess the efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) after failure of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS).

Methods:

We retrospectively examined patients with histologically documented advanced BTC who received first-line GEMCIS between December 2010 and June 2015. Among 748 patients treated with first-line GEMCIS, 321 (43%) subsequently received fluoropyrimidine-based second-line systemic chemotherapy.

Results:

Fluoropyrimidine monotherapy and fluoropyrimidine–platinum combination were used in 255 and 66 patients, respectively. In patients with measurable disease, the overall response rate (ORR) was 3% and disease control rate was 47%. After a median follow-up of 27.6 months (range, 0.9–70.4 months), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6–2.2) and 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.9–7.0), respectively. The ORR was significantly higher in patients who received fluoropyrimidine–platinum combination compared with those who received fluoropyrimidine alone (8 vs 1%, P=0.009), although the PFS (P=0.43) and OS (P=0.88) did not significantly differ between these groups.

Conclusions:

Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was modestly effective as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced BTC patients after failure of GEMCIS. Fluoropyrimidine–platinum combination therapy was not associated with improved survival outcomes, as compared with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy.

Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer, CAP-IRI: Safe and Effective Option

INTRODUCTION

Gall bladder cancer (GBC) has high prevalence in the Indo-Gangetic belt in India. While the first-line chemotherapy (CT1) has been established as gemcitabine-platinum doublet in advanced GBC, there is no standard recommendation or guidelines regarding feasibility of second-line therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who received second-line of chemotherapy (CT2) at our institution from July 2012 to December 2014. Patient records were examined for efficacy and toxicity of administered CT2, along with response rates (RR) and survival. Potential prognostic factors were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients received CT2 in the predefined period. Ninety-nine percent of patients had received a gemcitabine-based regimen as CT1 with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5 months before CT2. 51.7 % patients had undergone surgery prior with 5.7 % patients having received radiotherapy previously. Prior to beginning CT2, PS was 0/1 in 67.8 % patients, albumin was >4 g% in 40.2 % and CA 19.9 was raised in a majority (66.7 %) patients, respectively. As per institution protocol, a majority of patients (89.6 %) were administered CAP-IRI regimen. Overall RR and disease control rates (DCR) were 21.8 % and 41.3 %, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6 and 8 months, with no significant differences between CAP-IRI and other regimens. Adverse effects were tolerable, with dose reduced upfront in 23 % patients and 11.5 % patients during subsequent cycles of CT. ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0/1 was a significant prognostic variable for OS on multivariate analysis (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

CAP-IRI is a well-tolerated second-line chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with advanced GBC. Careful selection of patients is required when administering second-line chemotherapy to advanced GBC patients, with particular emphasis on ECOG PS.

Phase I clinical trial of a five-peptide cancer vaccine combined with cyclophosphamide in advanced solid tumors

We designed a phase I trial to investigate the safety, immune responses and clinical benefits of a five-peptide cancer vaccine in combination with chemotherapy. Study subjects were patients positive for HLA-A2402 with locally advanced, metastatic, and/or recurrent gastrointestinal, lung or cervical cancer. Eighteen patients including nine cases of colorectal cancer were treated with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide 4days before vaccination. Five HLA-A2402-restricted, tumor-associated antigen (TAA) epitope peptides from KOC1, TTK, URLC10, DEPDC1 and MPHOSPH1 were injected weekly for 4weeks. Treatment was well tolerated without any adverse events above grade 3. Analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes showed that the number of regulatory T cells dropped from baseline after administration of cyclophosphamide and confirmed that TAA-specific T cell responses were associated significantly with longer overall survival. This phase I clinical trial demonstrated safety and promising immune responses that correlated with vaccine-induced T-cell responses. Therefore, this approach warrants further clinical studies.

Prognostic Factors for the Selection of Patients Eligible for Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy (CT2) after the failure of first-line chemotherapy (CT1) for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has not been established. We investigated the favorable prognostic factors for CT2 to determine which patients could be expected to benefit from CT2.

METHODS

From a total of 168 patients who were treated with chemotherapy at our institution between January 2003 and December 2012, we retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who received CT2. Patients were treated with various chemotherapeutic combinations as CT1 and CT2. RESULts: The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received and CT2 was 10.2 and 5.5 months, respectively. Good performance status (PS), a serum albumin level >3.5 g/dl and metastasis to only 1 organ were independent prognostic factors that affected the OS of the patients who received CT2. Patients who had only 1 metastastic organ, a good PS and a serum albumin level >3.5 g/dl at the beginning of CT2 demonstrated prolonged survival compared to patients who did not exhibit these 3 factors (9.5 vs. 4.3 months, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

CT2 should be considered for patients with advanced BTC, especially for those who have only 1 metastatic organ and remain in generally good medical condition after the failure of CT1.

Second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of the gemcitabine-platinum combination: A large multicenter study by the Association des Gastro-Entérologues Oncologues

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on second-line chemotherapy (CT2) for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC). The aim of this multicenter study was to describe the CT2 regimens used, the response rates, and the outcomes of patients treated with various CT2 regimens.

METHODS

Patients who received CT2 for ABTC at 17 French institutions after the failure of the gemcitabine-platinum combination were retrospectively studied. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models were used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among 603 patients who received first-line chemotherapy (CT1) for ABTC, 196 received CT2: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan (n = 64), 5-FU and oxaliplatin (n = 21), 5-FU and cisplatin (n = 38), 5-FU or capecitabine (n = 40), sunitinib (n = 10), or other various regimens (n = 23). Among the 186 assessable patients, there were 22 partial responses and 70 stabilizations. After a median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median PFS and OS were 3.2 and 6.7 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between CT2 regimens. Fluoropyrimidine-based doublet chemotherapy was not superior to fluoropyrimidine alone in terms of OS and PFS. In a multivariate analysis, a performance status of 0 to 1, disease control with CT1, and a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level ≤ 400 IU/mL were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 32% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CT2 might provide disease control for selected patients with ABTC after the failure of gemcitabine-platinum, but the prognosis remains poor. No particular regimen seems superior to others, and this calls for new treatments. A good performance status, disease control with CT1, and a low level of CA 19-9 were associated with longer survival.

Concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin versus concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In the present study, we compared the efficacy and safety of concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin (CRSC) versus concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin alone (CRC) for the treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma (ACC).

METHODS

Between February 2006 and January 2009, 72 eligible patients with ACC were included and randomly divided into two groups. Thirty-six patients received CRSC with radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions over 6 weeks) beginning on day 1, S-1 (according to body surface area) for 28 days repeated every 6 weeks, and cisplatin (50 mg/m(2), intravenously on day 1) every 4 weeks for two cycles. The other 36 received CRC at the same cisplatin and radiotherapy dosage as for CRSC. The primary outcome was overall survival, whereas the secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 75 months (range 4-86 months) for the CRSC group and 66 months (range 3-87 months) for the CRC group (P = 0.039). The median corresponding progression-free survival was 66 months (range 3-75 months) and 58 months (range 3-71 months), respectively (P = 0.042). The toxicity profile was similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that CRSC might be more effective than CRC in patients with ACC with acceptable toxicity.

Phase I study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 combination therapy for patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

To develop a triplet regimen containing gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 (GPS), we assessed the recommended dose for patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancer in this phase I study.

METHODS

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated for the following two dose levels: gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) for level 1 and 1200 mg/m(2) for level 2 on day 1), cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) fixed dose on day 1), and S-1 (40-60 mg/day fixed dose twice a day for 7 days), every 2 weeks until progression. DLTs for each level were evaluated in six or more patients during the first two cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients were enrolled and 16 patients were evaluated. DLTs at level 1 were observed in two of 10 patients. At level 2, a DLT was observed in one of six patients. The main grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia and leukopenia, and a few non-hematological toxicities were observed. Among 14 patients with measurable lesions, the best response rate was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

GPS with a relative dose intensity corresponding to 90% of the standard gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen could be administered safely, and showed preliminary antitumor activity. Survival benefits will be studied subsequently.

Systemic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma: From chemotherapy to targeted therapies

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are rare tumors of the liver with poor prognosis. The standard of care in patients with unresectable tumors or metastatic disease is combination chemotherapy (CT) with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Targeted therapies inhibiting EGFR, VEGF, MEK and others are broadly tested in CCA but to date, the existing data from randomized and nonrandomized trials do not justify the application of small molecules outside of clinical trials. In clinical practice, many patients receive second-line CT after failure of gemcitabine/cisplatin, although there is so far no evidence to support second-line CT. This review summarizes current chemotherapy protocols and ongoing studies, including conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies.

Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review

The randomized NCRN phase III ABC-02 trial provided level-A evidence for first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine combination in advanced biliary cancer (ABC). This systematic literature review aims to evaluate the level of evidence for the use of second-line chemotherapy for patients with ABC in terms of overall survival (OS), response, toxicity and quality of life. Eligible studies were identified using Medline, ASCO, ESMO and the World Gastrointestinal Congress databases. Searches were last updated on 15 December 2013. Eligible studies reported survival and/or response data for patients with ABC receiving second-line systemic chemotherapy. This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (No. CRD42013004205). Five hundred and fifty-eight studies were identified from the searches in Medline (n = 342), ASCO (n = 160), ESMO (n = 27) and World Gastrointestinal Congress (n = 29). Twenty-five studies were eligible: 14 phase II clinical trials, 9 retrospective analyses and 2 case reports. In total, data from 761 patients were reported with median number of patients included in each study of 22 (range 9-96). The mean OS was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-8.2] [phase II: 6.6 (95% CI 5.1-8.1); retrospective analysis: 7.7 (95% CI 6.5-8.9)]. The mean progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate were 3.2 months (95% CI 2.7-3.7), 7.7% (95% CI 4.6-10.9) and 49.5% (95% CI 41.4-57.7), respectively. The best correlations were between OS and PFS for all studies (r = 0.54; P = 0.01) and between OS and PFS (r = 0.61; P = 0.04) and OS and RR (r = 0.62; P = 0.03) for phase II studies, respectively. Biliary tract cancer is known to be a chemo-responsive disease. There is insufficient evidence (level C) to recommend a second-line chemotherapy schedule in ABC, although the available data suggest that a cohort of patients may benefit. Further prospective and randomized studies are needed to clarify the relative value of second-line chemotherapy in this setting.

Curative resection of gallbladder cancer with liver invasion and hepatic metastasis after chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1: report of a case

A 62-year-old woman diagnosed with gallbladder cancer exhibiting broad liver invasion and metastasis to Couinaud's hepatic segments 4 and 8 (S4 and S8) consulted her regular doctor. Owing to the presence of liver metastases, she received treatment with gemcitabine plus S-1. After four cycles of chemotherapy, the size of the main lesion dramatically decreased and the two liver metastases disappeared. After six cycles of chemotherapy, the patient was referred to our hospital for surgical treatment. Upon admission, there was no evidence of any distant metastasis, based on a detailed radiological examination. Therefore, we performed cholecystectomy and central bisegmentectomy of the liver after obtaining the patient's informed consent. Pathological examination demonstrated viable cancer cells with granuloma formation and calcification in the gallbladder, as well as regenerative changes without viable cancer cells in S4 and S8 of the liver. Gemcitabine plus S-1 was again administered as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. One and a half years after the surgery, there were no signs of recurrence. In patients selected according to their response to chemotherapy, surgical treatment might therefore be effective against gallbladder cancer with metastasis.

A retrospective study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the treatment outcome of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who were refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. The tumor response and disease control rates were 1.7 and 58.3%, respectively. The median overall survival and time to progression were 6.7 months (95% CI 4.9-8.1) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.5-5.0), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (20%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (17%), nausea (2%), anorexia (2%), and liver dysfunction (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy showed moderate efficacy and safety as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer that is refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy.

Second-line therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: what should be the standard?

Biliary tract cancer is a rare malignant tumor. Accordingly, to perform prospective and randomized trials is difficult and the knowledge of its natural history and optimal management remains limited. Chemotherapy is commonly used to improve the outcome and to delay tumor progression in advanced disease. Only recently, cisplatin-gemcitabine combination was identified as the new standard first-line therapy. Despite the outcome improvement, disease progression is a constant and approximately half of patients failing upfront treatment maintain a good performance status and are willing to undergo further treatment. No standard salvage chemotherapy regimen has been identified yet. Experiences of salvage therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer are sparse and yielded disappointing results. Well designed multi-institutional randomized trials are warranted to clarify the role and the activity of a second-line therapy.