Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol

A perspective on the evolution of semi-quantitative MRI assessment of osteoarthritis: Past, present and future

OBJECTIVE

This perspective describes the evolution of semi-quantitative (SQ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing structural tissue pathologies in osteoarthritis (OA) imaging research over the last 30 years.

METHODS

Authors selected representative articles from a PubMed search to illustrate key steps in SQ MRI development, validation, and application. Topics include main scoring systems, reading techniques, responsiveness, reliability, technical considerations, and potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI).

RESULTS

Based on original research published between 1993 and 2023, this article introduces available scoring systems, including but not limited to Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) as the first system for whole-organ assessment of the knee and the now commonly used MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Specific systems for distinct OA subtypes or applications have been developed as well as MRI scoring instruments for other joints such as the hip, the fingers or thumb base. SQ assessment has proven to be valid, reliable, and responsive, aiding OA investigators in understanding the natural history of the disease and helping to detect response to treatment. AI may aid phenotypic characterization in the future. SQ MRI assessment's role is increasing in eligibility and safety evaluation in knee OA clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SQ MRI assessment in understanding structural aspects of disease onset and progression. SQ scoring has helped explain associations between structural tissue damage and clinical manifestations, as well as disease progression. While AI may support human readers to more efficiently perform SQ assessment in the future, its current application in clinical trials still requires validation and regulatory approval.

Modern low-field MRI

This narrative review explores recent advancements and applications of modern low-field (≤ 1 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in musculoskeletal radiology. Historically, high-field MRI systems (1.5 T and 3 T) have been the standard in clinical practice due to superior image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. However, recent technological advancements in low-field MRI offer promising avenues for musculoskeletal imaging. General principles of low-field MRI systems are being introduced, highlighting their strengths and limitations compared to high-field counterparts. Emphasis is placed on advancements in hardware design, including novel magnet configurations, gradient systems, and radiofrequency coils, which have improved image quality and reduced susceptibility artifacts particularly in musculoskeletal imaging. Different clinical applications of modern low-field MRI in musculoskeletal radiology are being discussed. The diagnostic performance of low-field MRI in diagnosing various musculoskeletal pathologies, such as ligament and tendon injuries, osteoarthritis, and cartilage lesions, is being presented. Moreover, the discussion encompasses the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of low-field MRI systems, making them viable options for imaging centers with limited resources or specific patient populations. From a scientific standpoint, the amount of available data regarding musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strengths is limited and often several decades old. This review will give an insight to the existing literature and summarize our own experiences with a modern low-field MRI system over the last 3 years. In conclusion, the narrative review highlights the potential clinical utility, challenges, and future directions of modern low-field MRI, offering valuable insights for radiologists and healthcare professionals seeking to leverage these advancements in their practice.

MRI underestimates presence and size of knee osteophytes using CT as a reference standard

OBJECTIVE

To explore the diagnostic performance of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the cross-sectional assessment of osteophytes (OPs) in all three knee compartments using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard.

METHODS

The Strontium Ranelate Efficacy in Knee Osteoarthritis (SEKOIA) trial explored the effect of 3 years of treatment with strontium ranelate in patients with primary knee OA. OPs were scored for the baseline visit only using a modified MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) scoring system in the patellofemoral (PFJ), the medial tibiofemoral (TFJ) and the lateral TFJ. Size was assessed from 0 to 3 in 18 locations. Descriptive statistics were used to describe differences in ordinal grading between CT and MRI. In addition, weighted-kappa statistics were employed to assess agreement between scoring using the two methods. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value as well as area under the curve (AUC) measures of diagnostic performance were employed using CT as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Included were 74 patients with available MRI and CT data. Mean age was 62.9 ± 7.5 years. Altogether 1,332 locations were evaluated. For the PFJ, MRI detected 141 (72%) of 197 CT-defined OPs with a w-kappa of 0.58 (95% CI [0.52-0.65]). In the medial TFJ, MRI detected 178 (81%) of 219 CT-OPs with a w-kappa of 0.58 (95% CI [0.51-0.64]). For the lateral compartment these numbers were 84 (70%) of 120 CT-OPs with a w-kappa of 0.58 (95% CI [0.50-0.66]).

CONCLUSION

MRI underestimates presence of osteophytes in all three knee compartments. CT may be helpful particularly regarding assessment of small osteophytes particularly in early disease.

Strategic application of imaging in DMOAD clinical trials: focus on eligibility, drug delivery, and semiquantitative assessment of structural progression

Despite decades of research efforts and multiple clinical trials aimed at discovering efficacious disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drugs (DMOAD), we still do not have a drug that shows convincing scientific evidence to be approved as an effective DMOAD. It has been suggested these DMOAD clinical trials were in part unsuccessful since eligibility criteria and imaging-based outcome evaluation were solely based on conventional radiography. The OA research community has been aware of the limitations of conventional radiography being used as a primary imaging modality for eligibility and efficacy assessment in DMOAD trials. An imaging modality for DMOAD trials should be able to depict soft tissue and osseous pathologies that are relevant to OA disease progression and clinical manifestations of OA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fulfills these criteria and advances in technology and increasing knowledge regarding imaging outcomes likely should play a more prominent role in DMOAD clinical trials. In this perspective article, we will describe MRI-based tools and analytic methods that can be applied to DMOAD clinical trials with a particular emphasis on knee OA. MRI should be the modality of choice for eligibility screening and outcome assessment. Optimal MRI pulse sequences must be chosen to visualize specific features of OA.

Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances

The breast experiences substantial changes in morphology and function during pregnancy and lactation which affects its imaging properties and may reduce the visibility of a concurrent pathological process. The high incidence of benign gestational-related entities may further add complexity to the clinical and radiological evaluation of the breast during the period. Consequently, pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is often a delayed diagnosis and carries a poor prognosis. This state-of-the-art pictorial review illustrates how despite currently being underutilized, technical advances and new clinical evidence support the use of unenhanced breast MRI during pregnancy and both unenhanced and dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) during lactation, to serve as effective supplementary modalities in the diagnostic work-up of PABC.

Assessment of bone marrow oedema-like lesions using MRI in patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis: comparison of different MRI pulse sequences

OBJECTIVE

To compare bone marrow oedema-like lesion (BML) volume in subjects with symptomatic patellofemoral (PF) knee osteoarthritis (OA) using four different MRI sequences and to determine reliability of BML volume assessment using these sequences and their correlation with pain.

METHODS

76 males and females (mean age 55.8 years) with symptomatic patellofemoral knee OA had 1.5 T MRI scans. PD fat suppressed (FS), STIR, contrast-enhanced (CE) T1W FS, and 3D T1W fast field echo (FFE) sequences were obtained. All sequences were assessed by one reader, including repeat assessment of 15 knees using manual segmentation and the measurements were compared. We used random-effects panel linear regression to look for differences in the log-transformed BML volume (due to positive skew in the BML volume distribution) between sequences and to determine associations between BML volumes and knee pain.

RESULTS

58 subjects had PF BMLs present on at least one sequence. Median BML volume measured using T1W FFE sequence was significantly smaller (224.7 mm3, interquartile range [IQR] 82.50-607.95) than the other three sequences. BML volume was greatest on the CE sequence (1129.8 mm3, IQR 467.28-3166.02). Compared to CE sequence, BML volumes were slightly lower when assessed using PDFS (proportional difference = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62, 1.01) and STIR sequences (proportional difference = 0.85; 95% CI 0.67, 1.08). There were strong correlations between BML volume on PDFS, STIR, and CE T1W FS sequences (ρs = 0.98). Correlations were lower between these three sequences and T1W FFE (ρs = 0.80-0.81). Intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent for proton density fat-suppressed, short-tau inversion recovery, and CE T1W FS sequences (0.991-0.995), while the ICC for T1W FFE was good at 0.88. We found no significant association between BML volumes assessed using any of the sequences and knee pain.

CONCLUSION

T1W FFE sequences were less reliable and measured considerably smaller BML volume compared to other sequences. BML volume was larger when assessed using the contrast enhanced T1W FS though not statistically significantly different from BMLs when assessed using PDFS and STIR sequences.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first study to assess BMLs by four different MRI pulse sequences on the same data set, including different fluid sensitive sequences and gradient echo type sequence.

How to effectively utilize imaging in disease-modifying treatments for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the radiologist's perspective

Introduction: One of the reasons for failures of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug clinical trials has been the radiography-based definition of structural eligibility criteria. Imaging, particularly MRI, has a critical role in planning and conducting clinical trials of osteoarthritis.Areas covered: A literature search was performed using keywords including 'osteoarthritis,' 'knee,' 'MRI,' 'intra-articular injection,' 'semiquantitative scoring,' 'clinical trial,' and other specific terms where relevant. The core concepts of using MRI in osteoarthritis clinical trials are explained focusing on knee osteoarthritis, including its role in determining patient eligibility and inclusion/exclusion criteria as well as outcome measures from the expert musculoskeletal radiologist's perspective. A brief overview of statistical analyses that should be deployed in clinical trials utilizing semiquantitative MRI analyses is discussed.Expert opinion: In order to increase chances to detect measurable efficacy effects, investigators should consider utilizing MRI from screening to outcome assessment. Recognition of several phenotypes of osteoarthritis helps in participant stratification and will lead to more targeted clinical trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria need to be defined using not only radiography but also MRI. Correct intra-articular injection of investigational compounds is critically important if intra-articular drug delivery is required, and such procedure should be performed and documented using appropriate imaging guidance.

Validation of a new topographic classification of bone marrow lesions in the knee: the six-letter system

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new six-item topographical classification of knee bone marrow lesions in coronal MRI images, to provide an easy-to-use aid to describe their location in a more reproducible and accurate way.

METHODS

This study was conducted in four phases. The first was to do a literature search for methods of describing bone marrow lesions in MRI of the knee. The second was creation of a six-area topographic classification of bone marrow lesions in coronal MRI of the knee. The third phase was selection of cases with bone marrow lesions on knee MRI performed in a single hospital between January of 2017 and December of 2018. The fourth phase was categorization of the bone marrow lesions' location according to the new proposed classification by three independent examiners, two orthopedic surgeons and one radiologist. Patient's demographic data and associated lesions were collected. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the proposed classification was then calculated.

RESULTS

MRI examination of 4000 patients were studied and in 520 patients a total of 666 bone marrow lesions were identified and their location classified using the new system. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliability analysis found a Fleiss' Kappa value of 0.96 (0.95-0.97) and 0.97 (0.96-0.97), respectively, confirming the high reproducibility of the proposed classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed six-location classification of bone marrow lesions is highly reproducible and can help researchers develop studies and share information in a more accurate and reliable way. The correct classification of bone marrow lesions can lead to a more accurate description of this pathology and help clinicians to propose appropriate therapies for this group of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

The effect of weight loss on the progression of meniscal extrusion and size in knee osteoarthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis (IDEA) trial

OBJECTIVE

Weight loss has beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but the mechanism is still unclear. Since meniscus extrusion is associated with knee pain, this study assessed whether weight loss by diet and/or exercise is associated with less progression in meniscus extrusion measures over time.

DESIGN

The Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis trial (IDEA) was a prospective, single-blind, randomized-controlled trial including overweight and obese older adults with knee pain and radiographic OA. Participants were randomized to 18-month interventions: exercise only, diet only or diet + exercise. In a random subsample of 105 participants, MRIs were obtained at baseline and follow-up. The medial and lateral menisci were segmented and quantitative position and size measures were obtained, along with semiquantitative extrusion measures. Linear and log-binomial regression were used to examine the association between change in weight and change in meniscus measures. Between-group differences were analyzed using an analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Weight loss was associated with less progression over time of medial meniscus extrusion as measured by the maximum (β: -24.59 μm, 95%CI: -41.86, -7.33) and mean (β: -19.08 μm, 95%CI: -36.47, -1.70) extrusion distances. No relationships with weight loss were observed for lateral meniscus position, medial or lateral meniscus size or semiquantitative measures. Change in meniscus position and size did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss was associated with beneficial modifications of medial meniscus extrusion over 18 months. This may be one of the mechanisms by which weight loss translates into a clinical benefit.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00381290.

Is superolateral Hoffa's fat pad hyperintensity a marker of local patellofemoral joint disease? - The MOST study

PURPOSE

To determine the relation of superolateral Hoffa's fat pad (SHFP) hyperintensity to cartilage damage and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) and tibiofemoral joint (TFJ).

METHODS

We used data from the 60 and 84-month study visits from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) study. SHFP hyperintensity and Hoffa-synovitis were graded from 0 to 3. Cartilage damage and BMLs were scored in the PFJ and TFJ. Structural damage was defined as: any cartilage damage, full-thickness cartilage damage and any BML. Worsening structural damage was defined as any increase in cartilage and BML scores. Logistic regression was used to determine the relation of SHFP hyperintensity and Hoffa-synovitis (>0) to structural damage, adjusting for age, sex and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

1,094 knees were included in the study. Compared to knees without SHFP hyperintensity, those with SHFP hyperintensity had 1.2 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.1-1.4), 1.7 (1.3-2.3) and 1.6 (1.3-1.9) times the prevalence of any cartilage damage, full-thickness cartilage damage, and BMLs in the lateral PFJ respectively, and 1.1 (1.0-1.2), 1.3 (1.0-1.8), and 1.2 (1.0-1.4) times the prevalence of any cartilage damage, full-thickness cartilage damage, and BMLs in the medial PFJ. SHFP hyperintensity was associated with worsening BMLs in the medial PFJ (RR: 1.4 (1.0-1.9)). In general, there was no relation between SHFP hyperintensity and TFJ outcomes. Hoffa-synovitis was associated both cross-sectionally and longitudinally with structural damage, regardless of definition, in all compartments.

CONCLUSION

SHFP hyperintensity may be a local marker of PFJ structural damage.

Effect of Knee Extensor Strength on Incident Radiographic and Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in Individuals With Meniscal Pathology: Data From the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

OBJECTIVE

High knee extensor strength may be important to protect against the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in populations at elevated risk, such as individuals with meniscal pathology. We investigated the extent to which high knee extensor muscle strength was associated with a decreased risk of developing radiographic or symptomatic knee OA in individuals with medial meniscal pathology.

METHODS

We studied knees that at the baseline visit of the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study had medial meniscal pathology but did not have radiographic knee OA (373 knees in 373 participants) or symptomatic knee OA (combination of radiographic knee OA and frequent knee symptoms; 531 knees in 531 participants). Isokinetic knee extensor strength was measured at baseline, and participants were followed for development of incident radiographic knee OA or incident symptomatic knee OA at 84 months. Separate binomial regression analyses with robust SEs adjusted for age, history of knee surgery, physical activity level, and clinic site were conducted for men and women.

RESULTS

High knee extensor strength (normalized by allometric scaling) was associated with a reduced risk of radiographic knee OA in women (relative risk [RR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.29-0.94) but not in men (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27-1.16). High knee extensor strength did not protect against the development of symptomatic knee OA, either in women or men.

CONCLUSION

The results only partly confirm the hypothesis that high knee extensor muscle strength protects against later development of knee OA in individuals with medial meniscal pathology.

Changes in patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint cartilage damage and bone marrow lesions over 7 years: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate changes in cartilage damage and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) on MRI in the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints (TFJs) over 7 years.

METHODS

The Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study is a cohort study of persons aged 50-79 years at baseline with or at high risk for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Knees were eligible for the current study if they had knee MRI (1.0T) assessed for cartilage damage and BMLs at the baseline and 84-month visits. Knees were categorized as having MRI-detected structural damage (cartilage and BMLs) isolated to the patellofemoral joint (PFJ), isolated to the TFJ, mixed or no damage at baseline and 84-months. We determined the changes in PFJ and TFJ structural damage over 7 years and used logistic regression to assess the relation of baseline compartment distribution to incident isolated PFJ, isolated TFJ and mixed damage.

RESULTS

Among 339 knees that had full-thickness cartilage loss isolated to the PFJ or TFJ at baseline, only 68 (20.1%) developed full-thickness cartilage loss in the other compartment while 271 (79.9%) continued to only have the initial compartment affected. Compared to knees without full-thickness cartilage damage (n = 582), those with isolated TFJ and PFJ full-thickness cartilage damage had 2.7 (1.5, 4.9) and 5.8 (3.6, 9.6) times the odds of incident mixed full-thickness cartilage damage, respectively. Similar results were seen when using other definitions of MRI-defined structural damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Most knees with structural damage at baseline do not develop it in the other compartment. Knees that develop mixed structural damage are more likely to start with it isolated to the PFJ.

An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis: lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies

OBJECTIVE

To introduce the most popular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis (OA) semi-quantitative (SQ) scoring systems to a broader audience with a focus on the most commonly applied scores, i.e., the MOAKS and WORMS system and illustrate similarities and differences.

DESIGN

While the main structure and methodology of each scoring system are publicly available, the core of this overview will be an illustrative imaging atlas section including image examples from multiple OA studies applying MRI in regard to different features assessed, show specific examples of different grades and point out pitfalls and specifics of SQ assessment including artifacts, blinding to time point of acquisition and within-grade evaluation.

RESULTS

Similarities and differences between different scoring systems are presented. Technical considerations are followed by a brief description of the most commonly utilized SQ scoring systems including their responsiveness and reliability. The second part is comprised of the atlas section presenting illustrative image examples.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that SQ assessment of OA by expert MRI readers is valid, reliable and responsive, which helps investigators to understand the natural history of this complex disease and to evaluate potential new drugs in OA clinical trials. Researchers have to be aware of the differences and specifics of the different systems to be able to engage in imaging assessment and interpretation of imaging-based data. SQ scoring has enabled us to explain associations of structural tissue damage with clinical manifestations of the disease and with morphological alterations thought to represent disease progression.

MR Imaging-based Semi-quantitative Methods for Knee Osteoarthritis

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based semi-quantitative (SQ) methods applied to knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been introduced during the last decade and have fundamentally changed our understanding of knee OA pathology since then. Several epidemiological studies and clinical trials have used MRI-based SQ methods to evaluate different outcome measures. Interest in MRI-based SQ scoring system has led to continuous update and refinement. This article reviews the different SQ approaches for MRI-based whole organ assessment of knee OA and also discuss practical aspects of whole joint assessment.

Treatment of bone marrow lesions (bone marrow edema)

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) or using older terminology 'Bone marrow edema' is characterised by excessive water signals in the marrow space on magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound; BMLs constitute a central component of a wide variety of inflammatory and non-inflammatory rheumatologic conditions affecting the musculoskeletal system: BMLs are not only considered significant sources of pain but also linked to increased disease activity in many musculoskeletal conditions (for example, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis). The purpose of this review is to summarise current knowledge about the treatment of BMLs, with an emphasis on the clinical and histological features of this entity in inflammatory and non-inflammatory disease. We also try to pair this hypothesis with the apparent beneficial effects of various treatment regimens, mainly within the group of bone antiresorptive drugs (calcitonin, bisphosphonates) on symptoms associated with BMLs.

No Association between Daily Walking and Knee Structural Changes in People at Risk of or with Mild Knee Osteoarthritis. Prospective Data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between objectively measured daily walking and knee structural change, defined either as radiographic worsening or as cartilage loss, in people at risk of or with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Participants from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) with Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0-2 and daily walking (measured with the StepWatch) at the 60-month visit were included. Participants had fixed-flexion, weight-bearing radiographs and knee magnetic resonance images (MRI) at 60 and 84 months. Radiographic worsening was read in both knees using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading, and MRI were read for 1 knee using the Whole-Organ MRI Score semiquantitative scoring. OR and 95% CI were calculated comparing those in the middle tertile against the lowest and highest tertiles of daily walking using logistic regression models and generalized estimating equations. Data on walking with moderate to vigorous intensity (min with > 100 steps/min/day) were associated to structural change using multivariate and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The 1179 study participants (59% women) were 67.0 years old (± 7.6), with a mean (± SD) body mass index of 29.8 kg/m(2) (± 5.3) who walked 6981 (± 2630) steps/day. After adjusting for confounders, we found no significant associations between daily walking and radiographic worsening or cartilage loss. More time spent walking at a moderate to vigorous intensity was not associated with either radiographic worsening or cartilage loss.

CONCLUSION

Results from the MOST study indicated no association between daily walking and structural changes over 2 years in the knees of people at risk of or with mild knee OA.

7th International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging report: "imaging in OA--now is the time to move ahead"

The 7th Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging was held in Reykjavik, Iceland, from July 9-12, 2014; attracting attendees from academia, pharmaceutical and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) industries, as well as a large number of young investigators. The Workshop program consisted of six modules, including imaging in osteoarthritis (OA), imaging and pain in OA, new techniques in imaging, risk factors and structural outcomes, anti-nerve growth factor (a-NGF) therapy, and joint replacement. A wealth of data was presented from OA researchers from all over the world and participants gained insightful knowledge on up-to-date research work focusing on imaging of OA. This paper presents a summary of the salient points from the workshop.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying the appropriate imaging modality and parameters will be critical for ensuring responsive, reproducible and reliable outcomes for clinical trials. Continued efforts from the OA research community are needed to establish the most effective use of imaging in OA clinical trials, including anti-NGF therapy and joint replacement trials, and to validate newer imaging techniques such as compositional MRI for use in the future clinical trials.

The role of radiology in the evolution of the understanding of articular disease

Both the clinical practice of radiology and the journal Radiology have had an enormous effect on our understanding of articular disease. Early descriptions of osteoarthritis (OA) appeared in Radiology. More recently, advanced physiologic magnetic resonance (MR) techniques have furthered our understanding of the early prestructural changes in patients with OA. Sodium imaging, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage, and spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame (or T1ρ) sequences have advanced understanding of the pathophysiology and pathoanatomy of OA. Many pioneering articles on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) also have been published in Radiology. In the intervening decades, our understanding of the natural history of RA has been altered by these articles. Many of the first descriptions of crystalline arthropathies, including gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition, and hydroxyapatite deposition disease, appeared in Radiology.

Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis

Imaging in clinical trials is used to evaluate subject eligibility, and/or efficacy of intervention, supporting decision making in drug development by ascertaining treatment effects on joint structure. This review focusses on imaging of bone and cartilage in clinical trials of (knee) osteoarthritis. We narratively review the full-text literature on imaging of bone and cartilage, adding primary experience in the implementation of imaging methods in clinical trials. Aims and constraints of applying imaging in clinical trials are outlined. The specific uses of semi-quantitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers of bone and cartilage in osteoarthritis trials are summarized, focusing on radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies having compared both imaging methodologies directly and those having established a relationship between imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes are highlighted. To make this review of practical use, recommendations are provided as to which imaging protocols are ideal for capturing specific aspects of bone and cartilage tissue, and pitfalls in their usage are highlighted. Further, the longitudinal sensitivity to change, of different imaging methods is reported for various patient strata. From these power calculations can be accomplished, provided the strength of the treatment effect is known. In conclusion, current imaging methodologies provide powerful tools for scoring and measuring morphological and compositional aspects of most articular tissues, capturing longitudinal change with reasonable to excellent sensitivity. When employed properly, imaging has tremendous potential for ascertaining treatment effects on various joint structures, potentially over shorter time scales than required for demonstrating effects on clinical outcomes.

Total knee arthroplasty MRI featuring slice-encoding for metal artifact correction: reduction of artifacts for STIR and proton density-weighted sequences

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to compare slice-encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) sequences versus optimized standard MRI sequences in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with TKA underwent 1.5-T MRI. Sequences optimized for metal implant imaging (SEMAC) were compared with standard sequences optimized with high bandwidth for STIR and proton density (PD)-weighted images. In 29 patients, CT was available as reference standard. Signal void and insufficient fat saturation were quantified. Qualitative criteria (anatomy, distortion, blurring, and noise) were assessed on a 5-point scale (1, no artifacts; 5, severe artifacts) by two readers. Abnormal imaging findings were noted. A Student t test and a Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistics.

RESULTS

Signal void areas and insufficient fat saturation were smaller for the SEMAC sequences than for the optimized standard sequences (p ≤ 0.005 for all comparisons). Depiction of anatomic structures was better on STIR with SEMAC versus standard sequences optimized with high bandwidth (score range, 2.9-3.7 vs 4.2-4.9) and on PD-weighted imaging with SEMAC versus standard sequences optimized with high bandwidth (score range, 2.5-3.5 vs 3.1-3.8), which was statistically significant (p < 0.001 to p = 0.007 for different structures). Distortion and noise were lower for SEMAC than for the standard sequences (p ≤ 0.001), whereas no technique had a clear advantage for blurring. Detection of abnormal imaging findings was markedly increased for the SEMAC technique (p < 0.001) and was most pronounced for STIR images (98 and 74 findings for STIR with SEMAC for readers 1 and 2, respectively, vs 37 and 37 findings for readers 1 and 2, respectively, for STIR with standard sequences optimized with high bandwidth). Sensitivity for detection of periprosthetic osteolysis was improved for STIR with SEMAC (100% and 86% for readers 1 and 2, respectively) compared with STIR with standard sequences optimized with high bandwidth (14% and 29% for readers 1 and 2, respectively).

CONCLUSION

SEMAC sequences showed a statistically significant artifact reduction. The detection of clinically relevant findings such as periprosthetic osteolysis was markedly improved.

Medial posterior meniscal root tears are associated with development or worsening of medial tibiofemoral cartilage damage: the multicenter osteoarthritis study

PURPOSE

To assess the association of meniscal root tear with the development or worsening of tibiofemoral cartilage damage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval and written informed consent from all subjects were obtained. A total of 596 knees with radiographically depicted osteoarthritis were randomly selected from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis study cohort. Cartilage damage was semiquantitatively assessed by using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) system (grades 0-6). Subjects were separated into three groups: root tear only, meniscal tear without root tear, and neither meniscal nor root tear. A log-binomial regression model was used to calculate the relative risks for knees to develop incident or progressing cartilage damage in the root tear group and the meniscal tear group, with the no tear group serving as a reference.

RESULTS

In the medial tibiofemoral joint, there were 37 knees with isolated medial posterior root tear, 294 with meniscal tear without root tear, and 264 without meniscal or root tear. There were only two lateral posterior root tears, and no anterior root tears were found. Thus, the focus was on the medial posterior root tear. The frequency of severe cartilage damage (WORMS ≥ 5) was higher in the group with root tear than in the group without root or meniscal tear (76.7% vs 19.7%, P < .0001) but not in the group with meniscal but no root tear (76.7% vs 65.2%, P = .055). Longitudinal analyses included 33 knees with isolated medial posterior root tear, 270 with meniscal tear, and 245 with no tear. Adjusted relative risk of cartilage loss was 2.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18, 3.48) for the root tear group and 1.84 (95% CI: 1.32, 2.58) for the meniscal tear group.

CONCLUSION

Isolated medial posterior meniscal root tear is associated with incident and progressive medial tibiofemoral cartilage loss.

Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging

PURPOSE

To compare the new "warp" sequence (slice-encoding metal artifact correction [SEMAC], view-angle tilting [VAT], and increased bandwidth) for the reduction of both through-plane and in-plane magnetic resonance (MR) artifacts with current optimized MR sequences in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board issued a waiver for this study. Forty patients with THA were prospectively included. SEMAC, VAT, and increased bandwidth were applied by using the warp turbo-spin-echo sequence at 1.5 T. Coronal short tau inversion-recovery (STIR)-warp and transverse T1-weighted warp (hereafter, T1-warp) images, as well as standard coronal STIR and transverse T1-weighted sequence images optimized with high bandwidth (STIR-hiBW and T1-hiBW), were acquired. Fifteen additional patients were examined to compare the T1-warp and T1-hiBW sequence with an identical matrix size. Signal void was quantified. Qualitative criteria (distinction of anatomic structures, blurring, and noise) were assessed on a five-point scale (1, no artifacts; 5, not visible due to severe artifacts) by two readers. Abnormal imaging findings were recorded. Quantitative data were analyzed with a t test and qualitative data with a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Signal void around the acetabular component was smaller for STIR-warp than STIR-hiBW images (21.6 cm2 vs 42.4 cm2; P=.0001), and for T1-warp than T1-hiBW images (17.6 cm2 vs 20.2 cm2; P=.0001). Anatomic distinction was better on STIR-warp compared with STIR-hiBW images (1.9-2.8 vs 3.6-4.6; P=.0001), and on T1-warp compared with T1-hiBW images (1.3-2.8 vs 1.8-3.2; P<.002). Distortion, blurring, and noise were lower with warp sequences than with the standard sequences (P=.0001). Almost half of the abnormal imaging findings were missed on STIR-hiBW compared with STIR-warp images (55 vs 105 findings; P=.0001), while T1-hiBW was similar to T1-warp imaging (50 vs 55 findings; P=.06).

CONCLUSION

STIR-warp and T1-warp sequences were significantly better according to quantitative and qualitative image criteria, but a clinically relevant artifact reduction was only present for STIR images.

Value of sagittal fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo of the knee joint as a limited protocol in evaluating internal knee derangements

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy and observer agreement in the assessment of internal knee derangement using sagittal fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo (FS PD-FSE) compared with combined sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo, dual-proton-density, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences and with arthroscopy.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients undergoing routine knee magnetic resonance (MR) imaging had additional imaging with sagittal FS PD-FSE sequences. Menisci, cruciate ligaments, extensor tendons (ETs), bone marrow, osteoarthritic changes, soft tissue edema, joint effusion, and incidental tumors were analyzed. Magnetic resonance images were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. Fifty patients underwent knee arthroscopy. Statistical analysis compared both imaging protocols with each other and with arthroscopy. Intrareader and interreader agreements were evaluated using κ analysis. Both protocols were compared with arthroscopy.

RESULTS

Intrareader agreement was very high except for readings of the posterior cruciate ligament, ETs, and cartilage. Intrareader agreement did not differ significantly between the 2 readers except for ETs, bone marrow, and cartilage. Interreader percent agreements were high using both protocols and were not significantly different between the 2 readers except for posterior cruciate ligament. Compared with arthroscopy, both methods showed almost identical results regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, except for cartilage where FS PD-FSE had increased sensitivity, whereas the combined protocol had increased specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Sagittal FS PD-FSE is comparable to our regular MR protocol in assessing internal knee derangement with an overall agreement of at least 93% on all sites except cartilage. It was also comparable to arthroscopy in assessing the cruciate ligaments and menisci, but had a low specificity for cartilaginous derangements. It can replace our 3 sagittal series comprising T1- and T2-weighted and proton-density-spin-echo sequences, hence saving time and cost.

Revision 1 size and position of the healthy meniscus, and its correlation with sex, height, weight, and bone area- a cross-sectional study

Background

Meniscus extrusion or hypertrophy may occur in knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, currently no data are available on the position and size of the meniscus in asymptomatic men and women with normal meniscus integrity.

Methods

Three-dimensional coronal DESSwe MRIs were used to segment and quantitatively measure the size and position of the medial and lateral menisci, and their correlation with sex, height, weight, and tibial plateau area. 102 knees (40 male and 62 female) were drawn from the Osteoarthritis Initiative "non-exposed" reference cohort, including subjects without symptoms, radiographic signs, or risk factors for knee OA. Knees with MRI signs of meniscus lesions were excluded.

Results

The tibial plateau area was significantly larger (p < 0.001) in male knees than in female ones (+23% medially; +28% laterally), as was total meniscus surface area (p < 0.001, +20% medially; +26% laterally). Ipsi-compartimental tibial plateau area was more strongly correlated with total meniscus surface area in men (r = .72 medially; r = .62 laterally) and women (r = .67; r = .75) than contra-compartimental or total tibial plateau area, body height or weight. The ratio of meniscus versus tibial plateau area was similar between men and women (p = 0.22 medially; p = 0.72 laterally). Tibial coverage by the meniscus was similar between men and women (50% medially; 58% laterally), but "physiological" medial meniscal extrusion was greater in women (1.83 ± 1.06mm) than in men (1.24mm ± 1.18mm; p = 0.011).

Conclusions

These data suggest that meniscus surface area strongly scales with (ipsilateral) tibial plateau area across both sexes, and that tibial coverage by the meniscus is similar between men and women.

Risk factors for medial meniscal pathology on knee MRI in older US adults: a multicentre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Meniscal pathology in which the aetiology is often unclear is a frequent finding on knee MRI. This study investigates potential risk factors for medial meniscal lesions or extrusion in middle-aged and elderly persons.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study using population-based subjects from Birmingham, Alabama and Iowa City, Iowa, USA (the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study). 644 men and women aged 50-79 years with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 0-2) but with normal medial meniscal status at baseline were studied. Paired baseline and 30-month 1.0 T knee MRI were scored for meniscal lesions and extrusion (pathology) and the following systemic, knee-specific and compartment-specific potential risk factors were evaluated: age, sex, body mass index, bony enlargement of finger joints, knee trauma, leg-length inequality and knee alignment.

RESULTS

Of 791 knees, 77 (9.7%) had medial meniscal pathology at 30 months follow-up. 61 of the 77 (81%) had no report of trauma during follow-up. Including all potential risk factors in the multivariable model, the adjusted OR for medial meniscal pathology was 4.14 (95% CI 2.06 to 8.31) for knee trauma during follow-up, 1.64 (1.00 to 2.70) for five or more bony enlargements of finger joints (vs ≤ 4) and 2.00 (1.18 to 3.40) for varus alignment (vs not varus) at baseline examination. Obesity was a risk factor for the development of meniscal extrusion, OR 3.04 (1.04 to 8.93) but not for meniscal lesions, OR 1.15 (0.52 to 2.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from knee trauma, possible generalised osteoarthritis, expressed as multiple bony enlargements of finger joints, varus alignment and obesity are risk factors for medial meniscal pathology.

Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most frequent form of arthritis, with major implications for individual and public health care without effective treatment available. The field of joint imaging, and particularly magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, has evolved rapidly owing to technical advances and the application of these to the field of clinical research. Cartilage imaging certainly is at the forefront of these developments. In this review, the different aspects of OA imaging and cartilage assessment, with an emphasis on recent advances, will be presented. The current role of radiography, including advances in the technology for joint space width assessment, will be discussed. The development of various MR imaging techniques capable of facilitating assessment of cartilage morphology and the methods for evaluating the biochemical composition of cartilage will be presented. Advances in quantitative morphologic cartilage assessment and semiquantitative whole-organ assessment will be reviewed. Although MR imaging is the most important modality in imaging of OA and cartilage, others such as ultrasonography play a complementary role that will be discussed briefly.

Morphometric differences between the medial and lateral meniscus in healthy men - a three-dimensional analysis using magnetic resonance imaging

The objective of this work was to characterize tibial plateau coverage and morphometric differences of the medial (MM) and lateral meniscus (LM) in a male reference cohort using three-dimensional imaging. Coronal multiplanar reconstructions of a sagittal double-echo steady state with water excitation magnetic resonance sequence (slice thickness: 1.5 mm, and in-plane resolution: 0.37 × 0.70 mm) were analyzed in 47 male participants without symptoms, signs or risk factors of knee osteoarthritis of the reference cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. The medial and lateral tibial (LT) plateau cartilage area and the tibial, femoral and external surfaces of the MM and LM were manually segmented throughout the entire knee. This process was assisted by parallel inspection of a coronal intermediately weighted turbo spin echo sequence. Measures of tibial coverage, meniscus size, and meniscus position were computed three-dimensionally for the total menisci, the body, and the anterior and the posterior horn. The LM was found to cover a significantly greater (p < 0.001) proportion of the LT plateau (59 ± 6.8%) than the MM of the medial plateau (50 ± 5.5%). Whereas the volume of both menisci was similar (2.444 vs. 2.438 ml; p = 0.92), the LM displayed larger tibial and femoral surface areas (p < 0.05) and a smaller maximal (7.2 ± 1.0 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1 mm; p < 0.01) and mean thickness (2.7 ± 0.3 vs. 2.8 ± 0.3 mm; p < 0.001) than the medial one. Also, the LM displayed less (physiological) extrusion than the medial one. These data may guide strategies for meniscal tissue engineering and transplantation aiming to restore normal joint conditions.

Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most important imaging modality for the evaluation of traumatic or degenerative cartilaginous lesions in the knee. It is a powerful noninvasive tool for detecting such lesions and monitoring the effects of pharmacologic and surgical therapy. The specific MR imaging techniques used for these purposes can be divided into two broad categories according to their usefulness for morphologic or compositional evaluation. To assess the structure of knee cartilage, standard spin-echo (SE) and gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequences, fast SE sequences, and three-dimensional SE and GRE sequences are available. These techniques allow the detection of morphologic defects in the articular cartilage of the knee and are commonly used in research for semiquantitative and quantitative assessments of cartilage. To evaluate the collagen network and proteoglycan content in the knee cartilage matrix, compositional assessment techniques such as T2 mapping, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (or dGEMRIC), T1ρ imaging, sodium imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging are available. These techniques may be used in various combinations and at various magnetic field strengths in clinical and research settings to improve the characterization of changes in cartilage.

Meniscal pathology on MRI increases the risk for both incident and enlarging subchondral bone marrow lesions of the knee: the MOST Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between meniscal pathology and incident or enlarging bone marrow lesions (BML) in knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The authors studied subjects from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study aged 50-79 years either with knee osteoarthritis or at high risk of the disease. Baseline and 30-months magnetic resonance images of knees (n=1344) were scored for subchondral BML. Outcome was defined as an increase in BML score in either the tibial or femoral condyle in medial and lateral compartments, respectively. The authors defined meniscal pathology at baseline as the presence of either meniscal lesions or meniscal extrusion. The risk of an increase in BML score in relation to meniscal status in the same compartment was estimated using a log linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, physical activity level and mechanical axis. In secondary analyses the investigators stratified by ipsilateral tibiofemoral cartilage status at baseline and compartments with pre-existing BML.

RESULTS

The adjusted relative risk of incident or enlarging BML ranged from 1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3 for mild medial meniscal pathology to 5.0; 95% CI 3.2 to 7.7 for major lateral meniscal pathology (using no meniscal pathology in the same compartment as reference). Stratification by cartilage or BML status at baseline had essentially no effect on these estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee compartments with meniscal pathology have a substantially increased risk of incident or enlarging subchondral BML over 30 months. Higher relative risks were seen in those with more severe and with lateral meniscal pathology.

Implementation of discrete element analysis for subject-specific, population-wide investigations of habitual contact stress exposure

There exist no large-series human data linking contact stress exposure to an articular joint's propensity for developing osteoarthritis because contact stress analysis for large numbers of subjects remains impractical. The speed and simplicity of discrete element analysis (DEA) for estimating contact stresses makes its application to this problem highly attractive, but to date DEA has been used to study only a small numbers of cases. This is because substantial issues regarding its use in population-wide studies have not been addressed. Chief among them are developing fast and robust methods for model derivation and the selection of boundary conditions, establishing accuracy of computed contact stresses, and including capabilities for modeling in-series structural elements (e.g., a meniscus). This article describes an implementation of DEA that makes it feasible to perform subject-specific modeling in articular joints in large population-based studies.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based semiquantitative and quantitative assessment in osteoarthritis

Whole organ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based semiquantitative (SQ) assessment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), based on reliable scoring methods and expert reading, has become a powerful research tool in OA. SQ morphologic scoring has been applied to large observational cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiologic studies as well as interventional clinical trials. SQ whole organ scoring analyzes all joint structures that are potentially relevant as surrogate outcome measures of OA and potential disease modification, including cartilage, subchondral bone, osteophytes, intra- and periarticular ligaments, menisci, synovial lining, cysts, and bursae. Resources needed for SQ scoring rely on the MRI protocol, image quality, experience of the expert readers, method of documentation, and the individual scoring system that will be applied. The first part of this article discusses the different available OA whole organ scoring systems, focusing on MRI of the knee, and also reviews alternative approaches. Rheumatologists are made aware of artifacts and differential diagnoses when applying any of the SQ scoring systems. The second part focuses on quantitative approaches in OA, particularly measurement of (subregional) cartilage loss. This approach allows one to determine minute changes that occur relatively homogeneously across cartilage structures and that are not apparent to the naked eye. To this end, the cartilage surfaces need to be segmented by trained users using specialized software. Measurements of knee cartilage loss based on water-excitation spoiled gradient recalled echo acquisition in the steady state, fast low-angle shot, or double-echo steady-state imaging sequences reported a 1% to 2% decrease in cartilage thickness annually, and a high degree of spatial heterogeneity of cartilage thickness changes in femorotibial subregions between subjects. Risk factors identified by quantitative measurement technology included a high body mass index, meniscal extrusion and meniscal tears, knee malalignment, advanced radiographic OA grade, bone marrow alterations, and focal cartilage lesions.

A comparison of dedicated 1.0 T extremity MRI vs large-bore 1.5 T MRI for semiquantitative whole organ assessment of osteoarthritis: the MOST study

OBJECTIVE

To date semiquantitative whole-organ scoring of knee osteoarthritis (OA) relies on 1.5 Tesla (T) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems. Less costly 1.0 T extremity systems have been introduced that offer superior patient comfort, but may have limitations concerning field-of-view and image quality. The aim of this study was to compare semi-quantitative (SQ) scoring on a 1.0 T system using 1.5 T MRI as the standard of reference.

METHODS

The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) is a longitudinal study of individuals who have or are at high risk for knee OA. A sample of 53 knees was selected in which MRI was performed on a 1.0 T extremity system as well as on a 1.5 T scanner applying a comparable sequence protocol. MRIs were read according to the Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) score. Agreement was determined using weighted kappa statistics. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were assessed using the 1.5 T readings as the reference standard. In addition the number of non-readable features was assessed.

RESULTS

Agreement (w-kappa) for seven main WORMS features (cartilage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes, meniscal damage and extrusion, synovitis, effusion) ranged between 0.54 (synovitis) and 0.75 (cartilage). Sensitivity ranged between 68.1% (meniscal damage) and 88.1% (effusion). Specificity ranged between 63.6% (effusion) and 96.4% (BMLs). Although the overall rate of non-readable features was very low, it was higher for the 1.0 T system (1.9% vs 0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Semiquantitative whole organ scoring can be performed using a 1.0 T peripheral scanner with a moderate to high degree of agreement and accuracy compared to SQ assessment using a 1.5 T whole body scanner. Our results are comparable to the published inter- and intra observer exercises obtained from 1.5 T systems. Sensitivity to change of longitudinal scoring was not evaluated in this cross-sectional design and should be investigated in future validation studies.

Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort

We studied whether contact stress estimates from knee magnetic resonance images (MRI) predict the development of incident symptomatic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) 15 months later in an at-risk cohort. This nested case-control study was conducted within a cohort of 3,026 adults, age 50 to 79 years. Thirty cases with incident symptomatic tibiofemoral OA by their 15 month follow-up visit were randomly selected and matched with 30 control subjects. Symptomatic tibiofemoral OA was defined as daily knee pain/stiffness and Kellgren-Lawrence Grade > or =2 on weight bearing, fixed-flexion radiographs. Tibiofemoral geometry was segmented on baseline knee MRI, and contact stresses were estimated using discrete element analysis. Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to examine the association between articular contact stress and case/control status. No significant intergroup differences were found for age, sex, BMI, weight, height, or limb alignment. However, the maximum articular contact stress was 0.54 +/- 0.77 MPa (mean +/- SD) higher in incident OA cases compared to that in control knees (p = 0.0007). The interaction between case-control status and contact stress was significant above 3.20 MPa (p < 0.0001). The presence of differences in estimated contact stress 15 months prior to incidence suggests a biomechanical mechanism for symptomatic tibiofemoral OA and supports the ability to identify risk by subject-specific biomechanical modeling.

MR imaging-based semiquantitative assessment in osteoarthritis

Whole-organ semiquantitative (SQ) assessment by expert readers has become a powerful research tool in understanding the natural history of osteoarthritis (OA). SQ morphologic scoring has been applied to observational large cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiologic studies in addition to interventional clinical trials. In comparison to quantitative and biochemical assessment of cartilage, SQ whole-organ scoring also analyzes additional joint structures that are potentially relevant as surrogate outcome measures for interventional approaches. Resources needed for SQ scoring rely on the MR imaging protocol, image quality, experience of the expert readers, method of documentation, and individual scoring system that is applied. This article discusses the different available OA whole-organ scoring systems, focusing on MR imaging of the knee, and also reviews alternative approaches.

MR imaging in osteoarthritis: hardware, coils, and sequences

Whole-organ assessment of a joint with osteoarthritis (OA) requires tailored MR imaging hardware and imaging protocols to diagnose and monitor degenerative disease of the cartilage, menisci, bone marrow, ligaments, and tendons. Image quality benefits from increased field strength, and 3.0-T MR imaging is used increasingly for assessing joints with OA. Dedicated surface coils are required for best visualization of joints affected by OA, and the use of multichannel phased-array coils with parallel imaging improves image quality and/or shortens acquisition times. Sequences that best show morphologic abnormalities of the whole joint include intermediate-weighted fast-spin echo sequences. Also quantitative sequences have been developed to assess cartilage volume and thickness and to analyze cartilage biochemical composition.

Meniscal tear in knees without surgery and the development of radiographic osteoarthritis among middle-aged and elderly persons: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

OBJECTIVE

Although partial meniscectomy is a risk factor for the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA), there is a lack of evidence that meniscal damage that is not treated with surgery would also lead to OA, suggesting that surgery itself may cause joint damage. Furthermore, meniscal damage is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between meniscal damage in knees without surgery and the development of radiographic tibiofemoral OA.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective case-control study nested within the observational Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study, which included a sample of men and women ages 50-79 years at high risk of knee OA who were recruited from the community. Patients who had no baseline radiographic knee OA but in whom tibiofemoral OA developed during the 30-month followup period were cases (n = 121). Control subjects (n = 294) were drawn randomly from the same source population as cases but had no knee OA after 30 months of followup. Individuals whose knees had previously undergone surgery were excluded. Meniscal damage was defined as the presence of any medial or lateral meniscal tearing, maceration, or destruction.

RESULTS

Meniscal damage at baseline was more common in case knees than in control knees (54% versus 18%; P < 0.001). The model comparing any meniscal damage with no meniscal damage (adjusted for baseline age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, and mechanical knee alignment) yielded an odds ratio of 5.7 (95% confidence interval 3.4-9.4).

CONCLUSION

In knees without surgery, meniscal damage is a potent risk factor for the development of radiographic OA. These results highlight the need for better understanding, prevention, and treatment of meniscal damage.

MRI in degenerative arthritides: structural and clinical aspects

Owing to the potential to image not only bone but also cartilage, bone marrow, and the surrounding internal soft tissue structures, MRI is particularly useful for the assessment of degenerative arthritides. Cartilage-sensitive MRI techniques have been shown to have a significant correlation with arthroscopic grading scores. MRI is also helpful in differentiating osteoarthritis from avascular necrosis, labral pathology, and pigmented villonodular synovitis. This chapter describes advanced imaging techniques, including driven equilibrium Fourier transform (DEFT) and steady-state free precision (SSFP) imaging, direct MRI arthrography, and 3D-T1rho-relaxation mapping.

Plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging diagnostics in osteoarthritis: validated staging and scoring

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disorder worldwide, and it has an enormous socioeconomic impact both in the United States and throughout the world. Conventional radiography is the simplest and least expensive imaging method for assessing osteoarthritis of the knee. Radiography is able to directly visualize osseous features of osteoarthritis, including marginal osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, and subchondral cysts, and it is used in clinical practice to confirm the diagnosis of osteoarthritis and to monitor progression of the disease. However, the assessment of joint-space width provides only an indirect estimate of cartilage thickness and meniscal integrity. Magnetic resonance imaging, with its unique ability to examine the joint as a whole organ, holds great promise with regard to the rapid advancement of knowledge about the disease and the evaluation of novel treatment approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging has been applied widely in quantitative morphometric cartilage assessment, and compositional measures have been introduced that evaluate chondral integrity. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging-based validated semiquantitative whole-organ scoring methods have been applied for cross-sectional and longitudinal joint evaluation. This review describes currently applied radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging staging and scoring methods for the assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee and focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of the two modalities with regard to their use in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies.

Osteoarthritis: current role of imaging

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent joint disease; it is increasingly common in the aging population of Western society and has a major health economic impact. Despite surgery and symptom-oriented approaches there is no efficient treatment. Conventional radiography has played a role in the past in confirming diagnosis and demonstrating late bony changes and joint space narrowing. MRI has become the method of choice in large research endeavors and may become important for individualized treatment planning. This article focuses on radiography and MRI, with insight into other modalities, such as ultrasound, scintigraphy, and CT. Their role in OA diagnosis, follow-up, and research is discussed.

Temporal assessment of bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in a canine model of knee osteoarthritis: impact of sequence selection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evolution of bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in a canine model of knee osteoarthritis (OA) using three different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences.

DESIGN

Three MRI sequences [coronal, T1-weighted three-dimensional fast gradient recalled echo (T1-GRE), sagittal fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient echo at a steady state (SPGR), and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo with fat saturation (T2-FS)] were performed at baseline, and at week 4, 8 and 26 in five dogs following transection of the anterior cruciate ligament. The same reader scored (0-3) subchondral BMLs twice, in blinded conditions, according to their extent in nine joint subregions, for all imaging sessions, and independently on the three MRI sequences. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots evaluated intra-reader repeatability. Readings scores were averaged and the nine subregions were summed to generate global BML scores.

RESULTS

BMLs were most prevalent in the central and medial portions of the tibial plateau. Intra-reader repeatability was good to excellent for each sequence (r(s)=0.87-0.97; P<0.001). Maximal intra-reader variability (24%) was reached on T2-FS and was associated to higher scores (P<0.05). Global BML scores increased similarly on all three sequences until week 8 (P<0.05). At week 26, score on T2-FS was decreased, being lower when compared to T1-GRE and SPGR (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this canine OA model, the extent of BMLs varies in time on different MRI sequences. Until the complex nature of these lesions is fully resolved, it is suggested that to accurately assess the size and extent of BMLs, a combination of different sequences should be used.

Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: data beyond the beauty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

MRI has revolutionized osteoarthritis research by providing semi-quantitative and quantitative imaging endpoints on most articular tissues. With the first image data of the Osteoarthritis Initiative now becoming publicly available, this article reviews recent developments in quantitative imaging of osteoarthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although radiography remains the standard for regulatory studies on disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs, there is no consensus on the optimal positioning and acquisition protocol. With MRI, semi-quantitative scoring systems for evaluation of multiple articular tissue changes have been developed and are currently investigated in the context of correlation with symptoms and of predicting structural progression of osteoarthritis. Most efforts on quantitative measurement of imaging endpoints have focused on cartilage morphology and composition, with higher field strength (3T), newer sequences, and new measurement endpoints being a driver of current innovation.

SUMMARY

The semi-quantitative and quantitative tools for analysis of articular structure are now available and permit comprehensive analysis of morphological and compositional tissue changes in osteoarthritis. These changes will need to be related to clinical outcomes (e.g. how a patient feels or functions) with current epidemiological studies, such as the Osteoarthritis Initiatives, providing the opportunity for clinical validation of these imaging biomarkers.

Accuracy and test-retest precision of quantitative cartilage morphology on a 1.0 T peripheral magnetic resonance imaging system

OBJECTIVE

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) of knee cartilage morphology is a powerful research tool but relies on expensive and often inaccessible 1.5 T whole-body equipment. Here we examine the reproducibility and accuracy of qMRI at 1.0 T by direct comparison with previously validated technology.

METHODS

Coronal images of the knee were obtained in six healthy and six osteoarthritic participants. Two data sets were acquired with a 1.5T whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system and two with a 1.0 T peripheral MRI system, with repositioning between scans. Proprietary software was used to analyze surface area, volume, and thickness of femoral and tibial cartilage.

RESULTS

At 1.0 T, precision errors for surface areas (root-mean-square (RMS) coefficient of variation (CV%)=1.7-2.6%) were higher than those at 1.5 T (1.0-2.1%). For volume and thickness, precision errors were 2.9-5.5% at 1.0 T compared to 1.6-3.4% at 1.5 T. High levels of agreement were found between the two scanners over all plates. With the exception of lateral femoral cartilage (volume and thickness), no statistically significant systematic bias was found between 1.0 T and 1.5 T.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reported study to show that knee cartilage morphology can be determined with a reasonable degree of accuracy and precision using a 1.0 T peripheral scanner. Peripheral MRI is less costly, can be performed in clinical offices, and is associated with higher patient comfort and tolerance than 1.5 T whole-body MRI. Implementation of qMRI with peripheral systems may thus permit its more widespread use in clinical research and patient care.

Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantitative image analysis technology has recently started to generate a great wealth of quantitative information on articular cartilage and bone physiology, pathophysiology and degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. This paper reviews semiquantitative scoring of changes of articular tissues (e.g. WORMS = whole-organ MRI scoring or KOSS = knee osteoarthritis scoring system), quantification of cartilage morphology (e.g. volume and thickness), quantitative measurements of cartilage composition (e.g. T2, T1rho, T1Gd = dGEMRIC index) and quantitative measurement of bone structure (e.g. app. BV/TV, app. TbTh, app. Tb.N, app. Tb.Sp) in osteoarthritis. For each of these fields we describe the hardware and MRI sequences available, the image analysis systems and techniques used to derive semiquantitative and quantitative parameters, the technical accuracy and precision of the measurements reported to date and current results from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in osteoarthritis. Moreover, the paper summarizes studies that have compared MRI-based measurements with radiography and discusses future perspectives of quantitative MRI in osteoarthritis. In summary, the above methodologies show great promise for elucidating the pathophysiology of various tissues and identifying risk factors of osteoarthritis, for developing structure modifying drugs (DMOADs) and for combating osteoarthritis with new and better therapy.