1
|
Maha R, Alison J, Michael S, Manvydas V. Triple assessment breast clinics: The value of clinical core biopsies. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:565-570. [PMID: 37550600 PMCID: PMC10961266 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple Assessment Breast Clinics are designed for rapid diagnosis of symptomatic patients. When there is no concordance between clinical and radiological assessment, clinicians perform clinical core biopsies. In patients with a clinically suspicious examination (S4, S5) and normal imaging, clinically guided core biopsy should be performed as per NCCP guidelines. However, substantial research does not exist on the diagnostic value or use of clinical core biopsies in non-suspicious palpable (S3) lesions and practices differ in each health system. AIMS The aim of this research was to assess the diagnostic value of clinical core biopsies in nonsuspicious, probably benign palpable breast lesions (S3) where image guided cores were not indicated (R1/R2). METHODS The cohort consisted of patients undergoing clinical core biopsies at a Symptomatic Breast Unit from January 2014 to 2019. Data regarding patient demographics, outcome of triple-assessment and incidence of malignancy were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and results were analysed using Minitab 2018. RESULTS Three hundred and sixty patients had a clinical core biopsy performed in this period. Clinical examination scores for these patients were S1/S2 (66), S3 (277), S4 (15), and S5 (2). Radiology Scores were R1/R2 (355) and R3(5). Two patients with clinical score S3 (0.6%) were diagnosed with breast cancer due to their clinical cores. Both patients had normal mass imaging. There was no association between uncertain palpable breast lesions (S3), and atypia or malignancy on biopsy results when breast imaging was normal (P = 0.43, χ2 test). CONCLUSION Despite clinical core biopsies being used in triple assessment, there is no certainty in their value except that there is high clinical suspicion. Imaging modalities are constantly improving and are already well established. When the patient is assigned a clinical score of S3 and has normal radiology, a clinical core biopsy is not required in most cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johnston Alison
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland
- Department of Breast Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland
| | - Sugrue Michael
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland
- Department of Breast Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland
| | - Varzgalis Manvydas
- Department of Breast Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland.
- University Of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCarthy AM, Fernandez Perez C, Beidas RS, Bekelman JE, Blumenthal D, Mack E, Bauer AM, Ehsan S, Conant EF, Wheeler BC, Guerra CE, Nunes LW, Gabriel P, Doucette A, Wileyto EP, Buttenheim AM, Asch DA, Rendle KA, Shelton RC, Fayanju OM, Ware S, Plag M, Hyland S, Gionta T, Shulman LN, Schnoll R. Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts. Implement Sci 2023; 18:65. [PMID: 38001506 PMCID: PMC10668465 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased breast density augments breast cancer risk and reduces mammography sensitivity. Supplemental breast MRI screening can significantly increase cancer detection among women with dense breasts. However, few women undergo this exam, and screening is consistently lower among racially minoritized populations. Implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics ("nudges") can promote evidence-based practices by improving clinician decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Nudges directed toward clinicians and patients may facilitate the implementation of supplemental breast MRI. METHODS Approximately 1600 patients identified as having extremely dense breasts after non-actionable mammograms, along with about 1100 clinicians involved with their care at 32 primary care or OB/GYN clinics across a racially diverse academically based health system, will be enrolled. A 2 × 2 randomized pragmatic trial will test nudges to patients, clinicians, both, or neither to promote supplemental breast MRI screening. Before implementation, rapid cycle approaches informed by clinician and patient experiences and behavioral economics and health equity frameworks guided nudge design. Clinicians will be clustered into clinic groups based on existing administrative departments and care patterns, and these clinic groups will be randomized to have the nudge activated at different times per a stepped wedge design. Clinicians will receive nudges integrated into the routine mammographic report or sent through electronic health record (EHR) in-basket messaging once their clinic group (i.e., wedge) is randomized to receive the intervention. Independently, patients will be randomized to receive text message nudges or not. The primary outcome will be defined as ordering or scheduling supplemental breast MRI. Secondary outcomes include MRI completion, cancer detection rates, and false-positive rates. Patient sociodemographic information and clinic-level variables will be examined as moderators of nudge effectiveness. Qualitative interviews conducted at the trial's conclusion will examine barriers and facilitators to implementation. DISCUSSION This study will add to the growing literature on the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed implementation strategies to promote evidence-based interventions. The design will facilitate testing the relative effects of nudges to patients and clinicians and the effects of moderators of nudge effectiveness, including key indicators of health disparities. The results may inform the introduction of low-cost, scalable implementation strategies to promote early breast cancer detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05787249. Registered on March 28, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie McCarthy
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | | | - Rinad S Beidas
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Blumenthal
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research On Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mack
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anna-Marika Bauer
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research On Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Ehsan
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Carmen E Guerra
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Linda W Nunes
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - E Paul Wileyto
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research On Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alison M Buttenheim
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Asch
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katharine A Rendle
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Rachel C Shelton
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sue Ware
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research On Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Martina Plag
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Hyland
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tracy Gionta
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert Schnoll
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research On Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim HJ, Choi WJ, Gwon HY, Jang SJ, Chae EY, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Kim HH. Improving mammography interpretation for both novice and experienced readers: a comparative study of two commercial artificial intelligence software. Eur Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00330-023-10422-8. [PMID: 37938383 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10422-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the improvement of mammography interpretation for novice and experienced radiologists assisted by two commercial AI software. METHODS We compared the performance of two AI software (AI-1 and AI-2) in two experienced and two novice readers for 200 mammographic examinations (80 cancer cases). Two reading sessions were conducted within 4 weeks. The readers rated the likelihood of malignancy (range, 1-7) and the percentage probability of malignancy (range, 0-100%), with and without AI assistance. Differences in AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed. RESULTS Mean AUROC increased in both novice (0.86 to 0.90 with AI-1 [p = 0.005]; 0.91 with AI-2 [p < 0.001]) and experienced readers (0.87 to 0.92 with AI-1 [p < 0.001]; 0.90 with AI-2 [p = 0.004]). Sensitivities increased from 81.3 to 88.8% with AI-1 (p = 0.027) and to 91.3% with AI-2 (p = 0.005) in novice readers, and from 81.9 to 90.6% with AI-1 (p = 0.001) and to 87.5% with AI-2 (p = 0.016) in experienced readers. Specificity did not decrease significantly in both novice (p > 0.999, both) and experienced readers (p > 0.999 with AI-1 and 0.282 with AI-2). There was no significant difference in the performance change depending on the type of AI software (p > 0.999). CONCLUSION Commercial AI software improved the diagnostic performance of both novice and experienced readers. The type of AI software used did not significantly impact performance changes. Further validation with a larger number of cases and readers is needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Commercial AI software effectively aided mammography interpretation irrespective of the experience level of human readers. KEY POINTS • Mammography interpretation remains challenging and is subject to a wide range of interobserver variability. • In this multi-reader study, two commercial AI software improved the sensitivity of mammography interpretation by both novice and experienced readers. The type of AI software used did not significantly impact performance changes. • Commercial AI software may effectively support mammography interpretation irrespective of the experience level of human readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Woo Jung Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| | - Hye Yun Gwon
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 22, Gwanpyeong-Ro 170-Gil, Dongan-Gu, Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 14068, South Korea
| | - Seo Jin Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Eun Young Chae
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Hee Jung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Joo Hee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Hak Hee Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pereslucha AM, Wenger DM, Morris MF, Aydi ZB. Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Review of Imaging Modalities with Special Focus on Pathology Concordance. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11050746. [PMID: 36900751 PMCID: PMC10000992 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11050746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer. It is characterized by a unique growth pattern making it difficult to detect on conventional breast imaging. ILC can be multicentric, multifocal, and bilateral, with a high likelihood of incomplete excision after breast-conserving surgery. We reviewed the conventional as well as newly emerging imaging modalities for detecting and determining the extent of ILC- and compared the main advantages of MRI vs. contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM). Our review of the literature finds that MRI and CEM clearly surpass conventional breast imaging in terms of sensitivity, specificity, ipsilateral and contralateral cancer detection, concordance, and estimation of tumor size for ILC. Both MRI and CEM have each been shown to enhance surgical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed ILC that had one of these imaging modalities added to their preoperative workup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia M Pereslucha
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Danielle M Wenger
- College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Michael F Morris
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
- Department of Radiology, Banner University Medical Center-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Zeynep Bostanci Aydi
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weigel S, Heindel W, Hense HW, Decker T, Gerß J, Kerschke L. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis. Radiology 2023; 306:e221006. [PMID: 36194110 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Background Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesized mammography (SM) reduces the diagnostic pitfalls of tissue superimposition, which is a limitation of digital mammography (DM). Purpose To compare the invasive breast cancer detection rate (iCDR) of DBT plus SM versus DM screening for different breast density categories. Materials and Methods An exploratory subanalysis of the TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography (TOSYMA) study, a randomized, controlled, multicenter, parallel-group trial recruited within the German mammography screening program from July 2018 to December 2020. Women aged 50-69 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to DBT plus SM or DM screening examination. Breast density categories A-D were visually assessed according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas. Exploratory analyses were performed of the iCDR in both study arms and stratified by breast density, and odds ratios and 95% CIs were determined. Results A total of 49 762 women allocated to DBT plus SM and 49 796 allocated to DM (median age, 57 years [IQR, 53-62 years]) were included. In the DM arm, the iCDR was 3.6 per 1000 screening examinations in category A (almost entirely fatty) (16 of 4475 screenings), 4.3 in category B (102 of 23 534 screenings), 6.1 in category C (116 of 19 051 screenings), and 2.3 in category D (extremely dense breasts) (six of 2629 screenings). The iCDR in the DBT plus SM arm was 2.7 per 1000 screening examinations in category A (12 of 4439 screenings), 6.9 in category B (154 of 22 328 screenings), 8.3 in category C (156 of 18 772 screenings), and 8.1 in category D (32 of 3940 screenings). The odds ratio for DM versus DBT plus SM in category D was 3.8 (95% CI: 1.5, 11.1). The invasive cancers detected with DBT plus SM were most often grade 2 tumors; in category C, it was 58% (91 of 156 invasive cancers), and in category D, it was 47% (15 of 32 invasive cancers). Conclusion The TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography trial revealed higher invasive cancer detection rates with digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography than digital mammography in dense breasts, relatively and absolutely most marked among women with extremely dense breasts. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT03377036 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lee and Moy in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Weigel
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| | - Walter Heindel
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| | - Hans-Werner Hense
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| | - Thomas Decker
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| | - Joachim Gerß
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| | - Laura Kerschke
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| | -
- From the Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography Münster, University of Münster and University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, D-48149 Münster, Germany (S.W., W.H., T.D.); Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.H.); and Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (J.G., L.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garrucho L, Kushibar K, Osuala R, Diaz O, Catanese A, del Riego J, Bobowicz M, Strand F, Igual L, Lekadir K. High-resolution synthesis of high-density breast mammograms: Application to improved fairness in deep learning based mass detection. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1044496. [PMID: 36755853 PMCID: PMC9899892 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1044496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Computer-aided detection systems based on deep learning have shown good performance in breast cancer detection. However, high-density breasts show poorer detection performance since dense tissues can mask or even simulate masses. Therefore, the sensitivity of mammography for breast cancer detection can be reduced by more than 20% in dense breasts. Additionally, extremely dense cases reported an increased risk of cancer compared to low-density breasts. This study aims to improve the mass detection performance in high-density breasts using synthetic high-density full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) as data augmentation during breast mass detection model training. To this end, a total of five cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN) models using three FFDM datasets were trained for low-to-high-density image translation in high-resolution mammograms. The training images were split by breast density BI-RADS categories, being BI-RADS A almost entirely fatty and BI-RADS D extremely dense breasts. Our results showed that the proposed data augmentation technique improved the sensitivity and precision of mass detection in models trained with small datasets and improved the domain generalization of the models trained with large databases. In addition, the clinical realism of the synthetic images was evaluated in a reader study involving two expert radiologists and one surgical oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Garrucho
- Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab, Facultat de Matemàtques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kaisar Kushibar
- Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab, Facultat de Matemàtques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Osuala
- Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab, Facultat de Matemàtques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oliver Diaz
- Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab, Facultat de Matemàtques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Catanese
- Unitat de Diagnòstic per la Imatge de la Mama (UDIM), Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Javier del Riego
- Área de Radiología Mamaria y Ginecólogica (UDIAT CD), Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Maciej Bobowicz
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Fredrik Strand
- Breast Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Laura Igual
- Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab, Facultat de Matemàtques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karim Lekadir
- Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab, Facultat de Matemàtques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clinical assessment of image quality, usability and patient comfort in dedicated spiral breast computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2022; 90:50-58. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
8
|
Shim S, Cester D, Ruby L, Bluethgen C, Marcon M, Berger N, Unkelbach J, Boss A. Fully automated breast segmentation on spiral breast computed tomography images. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13726. [PMID: 35946049 PMCID: PMC9588268 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The quantification of the amount of the glandular tissue and breast density is important to assess breast cancer risk. Novel photon‐counting breast computed tomography (CT) technology has the potential to quantify them. For accurate analysis, a dedicated method to segment the breast components—the adipose and glandular tissue, skin, pectoralis muscle, skinfold section, rib, and implant—is required. We propose a fully automated breast segmentation method for breast CT images. Methods The framework consists of four parts: (1) investigate, (2) segment the components excluding adipose and glandular tissue, (3) assess the breast density, and (4) iteratively segment the glandular tissue according to the estimated density. For the method, adapted seeded watershed and region growing algorithm were dedicatedly developed for the breast CT images and optimized on 68 breast images. The segmentation performance was qualitatively (five‐point Likert scale) and quantitatively (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] and difference coefficient [DC]) demonstrated according to human reading by experienced radiologists. Results The performance evaluation on each component and overall segmentation for 17 breast CT images resulted in DSCs ranging 0.90–0.97 and in DCs 0.01–0.08. The readers rated 4.5–4.8 (5 highest score) with an excellent inter‐reader agreement. The breast density varied by 3.7%–7.1% when including mis‐segmented muscle or skin. Conclusion The automatic segmentation results coincided with the human expert's reading. The accurate segmentation is important to avoid the significant bias in breast density analysis. Our method enables accurate quantification of the breast density and amount of the glandular tissue that is directly related to breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sojin Shim
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Cester
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lisa Ruby
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Bluethgen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Magda Marcon
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Berger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Boss
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3595-3636. [PMID: 35621681 PMCID: PMC9140155 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of breast cancer screening is to find cancers early to reduce mortality and to allow successful treatment with less aggressive therapy. Mammography is the gold standard for breast cancer screening. Its efficacy in reducing mortality from breast cancer was proven in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from the early 1960s to the mid 1990s. Panels that recommend breast cancer screening guidelines have traditionally relied on the old RCTs, which did not include considerations of breast density, race/ethnicity, current hormone therapy, and other risk factors. Women do not all benefit equally from mammography. Mortality reduction is significantly lower in women with dense breasts because normal dense tissue can mask cancers on mammograms. Moreover, women with dense breasts are known to be at increased risk. To provide equity, breast cancer screening guidelines should be created with the goal of maximizing mortality reduction and allowing less aggressive therapy, which may include decreasing the interval between screening mammograms and recommending consideration of supplemental screening for women with dense breasts. This review will address the issue of dense breasts and the impact on the stage of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis, and discuss options for supplemental screening.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kolchev A, Pasynkov D, Egoshin I, Kliouchkin I, Pasynkova O, Tumakov D. YOLOv4-Based CNN Model versus Nested Contours Algorithm in the Suspicious Lesion Detection on the Mammography Image: A Direct Comparison in the Real Clinical Settings. J Imaging 2022; 8:jimaging8040088. [PMID: 35448216 PMCID: PMC9031201 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging8040088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: We directly compared the mammography image processing results obtained with the help of the YOLOv4 convolutional neural network (CNN) model versus those obtained with the help of the NCA-based nested contours algorithm model. Method: We used 1080 images to train the YOLOv4, plus 100 images with proven breast cancer (BC) and 100 images with proven absence of BC to test both models. Results: the rates of true-positive, false-positive and false-negative outcomes were 60, 10 and 40, respectively, for YOLOv4, and 93, 63 and 7, respectively, for NCA. The sensitivities for the YOLOv4 and the NCA were comparable to each other for star-like lesions, masses with unclear borders, round- or oval-shaped masses with clear borders and partly visualized masses. On the contrary, the NCA was superior to the YOLOv4 in the case of asymmetric density and of changes invisible on the dense parenchyma background. Radiologists changed their earlier decisions in six cases per 100 for NCA. YOLOv4 outputs did not influence the radiologists’ decisions. Conclusions: in our set, NCA clinically significantly surpasses YOLOv4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Kolchev
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Mari State University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, 1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russia; (A.K.); (D.P.); (O.P.)
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Mari State University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, 1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russia
- Department of Fundamental Medicine, Mari State University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, 1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russia
- Institute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlevskaya St., Kazan 420008, Russia;
| | - Dmitry Pasynkov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Mari State University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, 1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russia; (A.K.); (D.P.); (O.P.)
- Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound, Kazan State Medical Academy—Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education”, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 36 Butlerov St., Kazan 420012, Russia
| | - Ivan Egoshin
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Mari State University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, 1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russia; (A.K.); (D.P.); (O.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ivan Kliouchkin
- Department of General Surgery, Kazan Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 49 Butlerov St., Kazan 420012, Russia;
| | - Olga Pasynkova
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Mari State University, Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation, 1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russia; (A.K.); (D.P.); (O.P.)
| | - Dmitrii Tumakov
- Institute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlevskaya St., Kazan 420008, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reutershan T, Effarah HH, Lagzda A, Barty CPJ. Numerical evaluation of high-energy, laser-Compton x-ray sources for contrast enhancement and dose reduction in clinical imaging via gadolinium-based K-edge subtraction. APPLIED OPTICS 2022; 61:C162-C178. [PMID: 35201049 PMCID: PMC10619702 DOI: 10.1364/ao.446189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Conventional x-ray sources for medical imaging utilize bremsstrahlung radiation. These sources generate large bandwidth (BW) x-ray spectra with large fractions of photons that impart a dose, but do not contribute to image production. X-ray sources based on laser-Compton scattering can have inherently small energy BWs and can be tuned to low dose-imparting energies, allowing them to take advantage of atomic K-edge contrast enhancement. This paper investigates the use of gadolinium-based K-edge subtraction imaging in the context of mammography using a laser-Compton source through simulations quantifying contrast and dose in such imaging systems as a function of laser-Compton source parameters. Our simulations indicate that a K-edge subtraction image generated with a 0.5% BW (FWHM) laser-Compton x-ray source can obtain an equal contrast to a bremsstrahlung image with only 3% of the dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Reutershan
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California – Irvine, CA, 92617
- Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California – Irvine, CA, 92697
| | - Haytham H. Effarah
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California – Irvine, CA, 92617
- Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California – Irvine, CA, 92697
| | - Agnese Lagzda
- Lumitron Technologies, Inc., 5201 California Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA
| | - C. P. J. Barty
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California – Irvine, CA, 92617
- Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California – Irvine, CA, 92697
- Lumitron Technologies, Inc., 5201 California Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pirikahu S, Lund H, Cadby G, Wylie E, Stone J. The impact of breast density notification on rescreening rates within a population-based mammographic screening program. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:5. [PMID: 35033155 PMCID: PMC8760641 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01499-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High participation in mammographic screening is essential for its effectiveness to detect breast cancers early and thereby, improve breast cancer outcomes. Breast density is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk and significantly reduces the sensitivity of mammography to detect the disease. There are increasing mandates for routine breast density notification within mammographic screening programs. It is unknown if breast density notification impacts the likelihood of women returning to screening when next due (i.e. rescreening rates). This study investigates the association between breast density notification and rescreening rates using individual-level data from BreastScreen Western Australia (WA), a population-based mammographic screening program. METHODS We examined 981,705 screening events from 311,656 women aged 40+ who attended BreastScreen WA between 2008 and 2017. Mixed effect logistic regression was used to investigate the association between rescreening and breast density notification status. RESULTS Results were stratified by age (younger, targeted, older) and screening round (first, second, third+). Targeted women screening for the first time were more likely to return to screening if notified as having dense breasts (Percentunadjusted notified vs. not-notified: 57.8% vs. 56.1%; Padjusted = 0.016). Younger women were less likely to rescreen if notified, regardless of screening round (all P < 0.001). There was no association between notification and rescreening in older women (all P > 0.72). CONCLUSIONS Breast density notification does not deter women in the targeted age range from rescreening but could potentially deter younger women from rescreening. These results suggest that all breast density notification messaging should include information regarding the importance of regular mammographic screening to manage breast cancer risk, particularly for younger women. These results will directly inform BreastScreen programs in Australia as well as other population-based screening providers outside Australia who notify women about breast density or are considering implementing breast density notification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Pirikahu
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, M431, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Helen Lund
- BreastScreen Western Australia, Women and Newborn Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Gemma Cadby
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, M431, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Wylie
- BreastScreen Western Australia, Women and Newborn Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, M431, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Majithia J, Haria P, Popat P, Katdare A, Chouhan S, Gala KB, Kulkarni S, Thakur M. Fat necrosis: A consultant's conundrum. Front Oncol 2022; 12:926396. [PMID: 36873302 PMCID: PMC9978799 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Fat necrosis of the breast is a benign non-suppurative inflammation of the adipose tissue and often mimics breast cancers, posing a diagnostic challenge for the clinician and radiologist. It has a myriad of appearances on different imaging techniques, ranging from the pathognomic oil cyst and benign dystrophic calcifications to indeterminate focal asymmetries, architectural distortions, and masses. A combination of different modalities can assist a radiologist in reaching a logical conclusion to avoid unnecessary interventions. The aim of this review article was to provide a comprehensive literature on the various imaging appearances of fat necrosis in the breast. Although a purely benign entity, the imaging appearances on mammography, contrast-enhanced mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging can be quite misleading, especially in post-therapy breasts. The purpose is to provide a comprehensive and all-inclusive review on fat necrosis with a proposed algorithm allowing a systematic approach to diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Purvi Haria
- Radiology Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Palak Popat
- Radiology Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aparna Katdare
- Radiology Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sonal Chouhan
- Radiology Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mohapatra S, Das P, Nayak R, Mishra A, Nayak B. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography in characterizing breast masses using the 5 th edition of BI-RADS: A retrospective study. CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_224_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
15
|
Biological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities in Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215391. [PMID: 34771552 PMCID: PMC8582527 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Mammographic density is an important risk factor for breast cancer; women with extremely dense breasts have a four to six fold increased risk of breast cancer compared to women with mostly fatty breasts, when matched with age and body mass index. High mammographic density is characterised by high proportions of stroma, containing fibroblasts, collagen and immune cells that suggest a pro-tumour inflammatory microenvironment. However, the biological mechanisms that drive increased mammographic density and the associated increased risk of breast cancer are not yet understood. Inflammatory factors such as monocyte chemotactic protein 1, peroxidase enzymes, transforming growth factor beta, and tumour necrosis factor alpha have been implicated in breast development as well as breast cancer risk, and also influence functions of stromal fibroblasts. Here, the current knowledge and understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms that lead to high mammographic density and the associated increased risk of breast cancer are reviewed, with particular consideration to potential immune factors that may contribute to this process.
Collapse
|
16
|
Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Eun NL, Kim JA. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment. Acta Radiol 2021; 62:1148-1154. [PMID: 32910685 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120956309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the 5th edition of BI-RADS was released, prior studies have compared BI-RADS and quantitative fully automated volumetric assessment, but with software packages that were not recalibrated according to the 5th edition. PURPOSE To investigate mammographic density assessment of automated volumetric measurements recalibrated according to the BI-RADS 5th edition compared with visual assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 4000 full-field digital mammographic examinations were reviewed by three radiologists for the BI-RADS 5th edition density category by consensus after individual assessments. Volumetric density data obtained using Quantra and Volpara software were collected. The comparison of visual and volumetric density assessments was performed in total and according to the presence of cancer. RESULTS Among 4000 examinations, 129 were mammograms of breast cancer. Compared to visual assessment, volumetric measurements showed higher category B (40.6% vs. 19.8%) in Quantra, and higher category D (40.4% vs. 14.7%) and lower category A (0.2% vs. 5.0%) in Volpara (P < 0.0001). All volumetric data showed a difference according to visually assessed categories and were correlated between the two volumetric measurements (P < 0.0001). The group with cancer showed a lower proportion of fatty breast than that without cancer: 17.8% vs. 46.9% for Quantra (P < 0.0001) and 9.3% vs. 21.5% for Volpara (P = 0.003). Both measurements showed significantly higher mean density data in the group with cancer than without cancer (P < 0.005 for all). CONCLUSION Automated volumetric measurements adapted for the BI-RADS 5th edition showed different but correlated results with visual assessment and each other. Recalibration of volumetric measurement has not completely reflected the visual assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyun Youk
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Mi Gweon
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Ju Son
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Na Lae Eun
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Ah Kim
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
den Dekker BM, Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Veldhuis WB, van Diest PJ, Duvivier KM, Lobbes MBI, Loo CE, Mann RM, Monninkhof EM, Veltman J, Pijnappel RM, van Gils CH. Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial. Radiology 2021; 301:283-292. [PMID: 34402665 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background High breast density increases breast cancer risk and lowers mammographic sensitivity. Supplemental MRI screening improves cancer detection but increases the number of false-positive screenings. Thus, methods to distinguish true-positive MRI screening results from false-positive ones are needed. Purpose To build prediction models based on clinical characteristics and MRI findings to reduce the rate of false-positive screening MRI findings in women with extremely dense breasts. Materials and Methods Clinical characteristics and MRI findings in Dutch breast cancer screening participants (age range, 50-75 years) with positive first-round MRI screening results (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, or 5) after a normal screening mammography with extremely dense breasts (Volpara density category 4) were prospectively collected within the randomized controlled Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial from December 2011 through November 2015. In this secondary analysis, prediction models were built using multivariable logistic regression analysis to distinguish true-positive MRI screening findings from false-positive ones. Results Among 454 women (median age, 52 years; interquartile range, 50-57 years) with a positive MRI result in a first supplemental MRI screening round, 79 were diagnosed with breast cancer (true-positive findings), and 375 had false-positive MRI results. The full prediction model (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC], 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.92), based on all collected clinical characteristics and MRI findings, could have prevented 45.5% (95% CI: 39.6, 51.5) of false-positive recalls and 21.3% (95% CI: 15.7, 28.3) of benign biopsies without missing any cancers. The model solely based on readily available MRI findings and age had a comparable performance (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.88; P = .15) and could have prevented 35.5% (95% CI: 30.4, 41.1) of false-positive MRI screening results and 13.0% (95% CI: 8.8, 18.6) of benign biopsies. Conclusion Prediction models based on clinical characteristics and MRI findings may be useful to reduce the false-positive first-round screening MRI rate and benign biopsy rate in women with extremely dense breasts. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01315015 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Imbriaco in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca M den Dekker
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Marije F Bakker
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Stéphanie V de Lange
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Paul J van Diest
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Claudette E Loo
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Ritse M Mann
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Jeroen Veltman
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | -
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wan S, Arhatari BD, Nesterets YI, Mayo SC, Thompson D, Fox J, Kumar B, Prodanovic Z, Hausermann D, Maksimenko A, Hall C, Dimmock M, Pavlov KM, Lockie D, Rickard M, Gadomkar Z, Aminzadeh A, Vafa E, Peele A, Quiney HM, Lewis S, Gureyev TE, Brennan PC, Taba ST. Effect of x-ray energy on the radiological image quality in propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography of the breast. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2021; 8:052108. [PMID: 34268442 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.8.5.052108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in developing and developed countries and is responsible for 15% of women's cancer deaths worldwide. Conventional absorption-based breast imaging techniques lack sufficient contrast for comprehensive diagnosis. Propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography (PB-CT) is a developing technique that exploits a more contrast-sensitive property of x-rays: x-ray refraction. X-ray absorption, refraction, and contrast-to-noise in the corresponding images depend on the x-ray energy used, for the same/fixed radiation dose. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between x-ray energy and radiological image quality in PB-CT imaging. Approach: Thirty-nine mastectomy samples were scanned at the imaging and medical beamline at the Australian Synchrotron. Samples were scanned at various x-ray energies of 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 60 keV using a Hamamatsu Flat Panel detector at the same object-to-detector distance of 6 m and mean glandular dose of 4 mGy. A total of 132 image sets were produced for analysis. Seven observers rated PB-CT images against absorption-based CT (AB-CT) images of the same samples on a five-point scale. A visual grading characteristics (VGC) study was used to determine the difference in image quality. Results: PB-CT images produced at 28, 30, 32, and 34 keV x-ray energies demonstrated statistically significant higher image quality than reference AB-CT images. The optimum x-ray energy, 30 keV, displayed the largest area under the curve ( AUC VGC ) of 0.754 ( p = 0.009 ). This was followed by 32 keV ( AUC VGC = 0.731 , p ≤ 0.001 ), 34 keV ( AUC VGC = 0.723 , p ≤ 0.001 ), and 28 keV ( AUC VGC = 0.654 , p = 0.015 ). Conclusions: An optimum energy range (around 30 keV) in the PB-CT technique allows for higher image quality at a dose comparable to conventional mammographic techniques. This results in improved radiological image quality compared with conventional techniques, which may ultimately lead to higher diagnostic efficacy and a reduction in breast cancer mortalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarina Wan
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Benedicta D Arhatari
- Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, Australia.,University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Parkville, Australia
| | - Yakov I Nesterets
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, Australia.,University of New England, School of Science and Technology, Armidale, Australia
| | - Sheridan C Mayo
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, Australia
| | - Darren Thompson
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, Australia.,University of New England, School of Science and Technology, Armidale, Australia
| | - Jane Fox
- Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Australia.,Monash Health, Department of Pathology, Clayton, Australia
| | - Beena Kumar
- Monash Health, Department of Pathology, Clayton, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Dimmock
- Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Australia
| | - Konstantin M Pavlov
- University of New England, School of Science and Technology, Armidale, Australia.,University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Monash University, School of Physics and Astronomy, Clayton, Australia
| | - Darren Lockie
- Maroondah BreastScreen, Eastern Health, Ringwood, Australia
| | - Mary Rickard
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Ziba Gadomkar
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Alaleh Aminzadeh
- University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Parkville, Australia
| | - Elham Vafa
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Andrew Peele
- Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, Australia
| | - Harry M Quiney
- University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sarah Lewis
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Timur E Gureyev
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia.,University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Parkville, Australia.,University of New England, School of Science and Technology, Armidale, Australia.,Monash University, School of Physics and Astronomy, Clayton, Australia
| | - Patrick C Brennan
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Al-Mousa DS, Rawashdeh M, Alakhras M, Spuur KM, AbuTaimai R, Brennan PC. Does mammographic density remain a radiological challenge in the digital era? Acta Radiol 2021; 62:707-714. [PMID: 32623914 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120938367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The low subject contrast between cancerous and fibroglandular tissue could obscure breast abnormalities. PURPOSE To investigate radiologists' performance for detection of breast cancer in low and high mammographic density (MD) when cases are digitally acquired. MATERIAL AND METHODS A test set of 60 digital mammography cases, of which 20 were cancerous, were examined by 17 radiologists. Mammograms were categorized as low (≤50%) or high (>50%) MD and rated for suspicion of malignancy using the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology (RANZCR) classification system. Radiologist demographics including cases read per year, age, subspecialty, and years of reporting were recorded. Radiologist performance was analyzed by the following metrics: sensitivity; specificity; area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), location sensitivity, and jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC) figure of merit (FOM). RESULTS Comparing high to low MD cases, radiologists showed a significantly higher sensitivity (P = 0.015), AUC (P = 0.003), location sensitivity (P = 0.002), and JAFROC FOM (P = 0.001). In high compared to low MD cases, radiologists with <1000 annual reads and radiologists with no mammographic subspecialty had significantly higher AUC, location sensitivity, and JAFROC FOM. Radiologists with ≥1000 annual reads and radiologists with mammography subspecialty demonstrated a significant increase in location sensitivity in high compared to low MD cases. CONCLUSION In this experimental situation, radiologists' performance was higher when reading cases with high compared to low MD. Experienced radiologists were able to precisely localize lesions in breasts with higher MD. Further studies in unselected screening materials are needed to verify the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana S Al-Mousa
- Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Mohammad Rawashdeh
- Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Maram Alakhras
- Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Kelly M Spuur
- School of Dentistry and Health Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Patrick C Brennan
- Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Seigneurin A, Exbrayat C, Molinié F, Croisier L, Poncet F, Berquet K, Delafosse P, Colonna M. Association of Mammography Screening With a Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality: A Modeling Study Using Population-Based Data From 2 French Departments. Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190:827-835. [PMID: 33043362 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that started from 1963 to 1991 reported a decrease of breast cancer mortality, associated with mammography screening. However, the effectiveness of population-based screening programs conducted currently might have changed due to the higher effectiveness of treatments for late-stage cancers and the better diagnostic performance of mammography. The main objective of this study was to predict the reduction of breast cancer mortality associated with mammography screening in the current French setting. We compared breast cancer mortality in 2 simulated cohorts of women, which differed from each other solely in a 70% biennial participation in screening from 50 to 74 years old. The microsimulation model used for predictions was calibrated with incidence rates of breast cancer according to stage that were observed in Isère and Loire-Atlantique departments, France, in 2007-2013. The model predicted a decrease of breast cancer mortality associated with mammography screening of 18% (95% CI: 5, 31) and 17% (95% CI: 3, 29) for models calibrated with data from Isère and Loire-Atlantique departments, respectively. Our results highlight the interest in biennial mammography screening from ages 50 to 74 years old to decrease breast cancer mortality in the current setting, despite improvements in treatment effectiveness.
Collapse
|
21
|
Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art. Radiology 2021; 299:36-48. [PMID: 33650905 PMCID: PMC7997616 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021201948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost. Intravenous iodinated contrast materials are used in CEM to enhance the visualization of tumor neovascularity. After injection, imaging is performed with dual-energy digital mammography, which helps provide a low-energy image and a recombined or iodine image that depict enhancing lesions in the breast. CEM has been demonstrated to help improve accuracy compared with digital mammography and US in women with abnormal screening mammographic findings or symptoms of breast cancer. It has also been demonstrated to approach the accuracy of breast MRI in preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer and in monitoring response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are early encouraging results from trials evaluating CEM in the screening of women who are at an increased risk of breast cancer. Although CEM is a promising tool, it slightly increases radiation dose and carries a small risk of adverse reactions to contrast materials. This review details the CEM technique, diagnostic and screening uses, and future applications, including artificial intelligence and radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxine S. Jochelson
- From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (M.S.J.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.)
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (M.S.J.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The effectiveness of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in dense breasts. Pol J Radiol 2021; 86:e159-e164. [PMID: 33828627 PMCID: PMC8018270 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2021.104834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Breast cancer is the most common cause of death from neoplastic disease in women. Among all breast anatomy types, glandular type is the most problematic concerning evaluation. While digital mammography still remains the basic diagnostic tool, one must be aware of its limitations in dense breasts. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has greatly improved sensitivity, its specificity is low. Moreover, there are contraindications for MRI for some patients, so a substitute has been searched for. This study was performed to check if contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) can be a viable option for patients with dense breasts. Material and methods The study involved 121 patients with abnormalities detected on base-line diagnostic imaging (ultrasound or mammography). The patients had subsequent examinations, both CESM and MRI performed within a maximum 2-month time interval. The sensitivity and specificity of both methods in the whole group as well as in specific breast structure types were measured and compared. Results Contrast enhancement was visible in all 121 cases on MRI, while on CESM lack of enhancement was noted in 13 cases. All of those 13 lesions turned out to be benign. There were 40 (33%) benign and 81 (69%) malignant tumours. The analysed group included 53 (44%) glandular type breast patients, 39 (32%) mixed type, and 29 (23%) fatty type. Although MRI proved to be slightly more effective in dense breasts, both methods showed similar results in the whole study group. Conclusion CESM can be used with confidence in patients with glandular breast type when MRI is not available or there are reported contraindications to MRI.
Collapse
|
23
|
The relationship between breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type among Chinese breast cancer patients from a large clinical dataset. BMC Med Imaging 2021; 21:43. [PMID: 33685388 PMCID: PMC7938487 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00565-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type among Chinese breast cancer patients included in a large clinical dataset. Methods A review of mammographic images acquired between July 2014 and June 2017 from a total of 9716 retrospectively registered breast cancer patients was conducted. Mammographic breast density was defined according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) 4-class density rating. Mammographic lesion types were defined according to the ACR BI-RADS, including mass, mass with calcifications, calcifications, architectural distortion/asymmetries, and architectural distortion/asymmetries with calcifications. Three experienced breast radiologists interpreted all mammograms. The chi-square (χ2) test and Pearson correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationship between breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type. Results A significant inverse relationship was observed between the BI-RADS breast density rating given by radiologists and patient age (r = − 0.521, p < 0.01). The breast density distribution in breast cancer patients from China reversed at the age of 55 years, and exhibited one age peak in the age 55–59 year group. The percentage of lesions with calcifications decreased with increasing age (p < 0.01), and increased with increasing breast density (p < 0.01). Conclusions In general, we identified a relationship between patient breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type. This finding may provide a basis for clinical diagnoses and support development of breast cancer screening programs in China.
Collapse
|
24
|
Heindel W, Bock K, Hecht G, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Kääb-Sanyal V, Siegmann-Luz K, Weigel S. [Systematic and quality-assured early diagnosis of sporadic breast cancer : Update on screening effects and scientific studies]. Radiologe 2021; 61:126-136. [PMID: 33492420 PMCID: PMC7851039 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00803-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A quality-assured mammography screening programme has been available since 2009, nationwide, to all women in Germany between the ages of 50 and 69. The programme is based on the European Guidelines. In this review article the authors summarize the current status of scientific assessments of this national early detection programme for breast cancer and provide an outlook regarding ongoing studies on effectiveness tests and further development. RESULTS We expect a decline in mortality rates relating to breast cancer as a result of successfully bringing diagnoses forward and a decrease in advanced breast cancer after a repeated screening. The extent will be shown in the current ZEBra study on mortality evaluation. CONCLUSION Potential for a further increase in the effectiveness of the systematic early detection of breast cancer can be identified in four areas: (1) More women should take advantage of the early detection opportunities offered by the medical insurance funds; so far, on average, only about 50% of the women between 50 and 69 who are entitled to a screening examination actually take part in the programme. (2) Entitlement to take part in the programme should be extended to women over 70. (3) The further development of digital mammography towards digital breast tomosynthesis promises to reduce the number of false positive recalls while at the same time increasing sensitivity. (4) There should be scientific studies relating to an extension of screening strategies for the small number of women in the entitlement range who have extremly dense breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Heindel
- Klinik für Radiologie und Referenzzentrum Mammographie Münster, Universität Münster (WWU) und Universitätsklinikum Münster (UKM), Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
| | - Karin Bock
- Referenzzentrum Mammographie Südwest, Bahnhofstraße 7, 35037, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Gerold Hecht
- Referenzzentrum Mammographie Nord, Heiligengeiststraße 28, 26121, Oldenburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal
- Geschäftsstelle der Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie, Goethestraße 85, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katja Siegmann-Luz
- Referenzzentrum Mammographie Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 106-108, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Stefanie Weigel
- Klinik für Radiologie und Referenzzentrum Mammographie Münster, Universität Münster (WWU) und Universitätsklinikum Münster (UKM), Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Early detection is of great importance for the successful treatment of breast cancer and for a good prognosis. Contrast-enhanced mammography and especially contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) show promising initial results and are a valuable addition to currently available methods. The advantage of these methods is that imaging of both breasts can be performed in a single examination with a single contrast agent application. The accuracy of CESM is similar to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), easily available at low costs, which is why this procedure is increasingly used in the diagnostic work up of breast cancer. CESM is also a good alternative to MRI if this cannot be performed due to contraindications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M Fallenberg
- Bereichsleitung: Diagnostische und interventionelle Senologie LMU, Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Campus Innenstadt/Großhadern, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wasner S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Emons J. [Fusion of mammography and ultrasonography]. Radiologe 2021; 61:166-169. [PMID: 33452568 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00796-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES Currently, the combination of mammography and sonography is the gold standard in breast diagnostics. If there are any uncertainties, further examinations such as breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, in studies, computer tomographic procedures can be used. These investigations are carried out separately. METHODICAL INNOVATION The combination of different imaging techniques in fusion devices promises a significant improvement in breast diagnostics. Advantages of the new imaging technique include the simultaneous acquisition of different image modalities with a fixed breast, which allows better spatial localization of the region of interest (ROI). This can also reduce the time and investigator effort and compensate for the weaknesses of one imaging technique with the strengths of a second imaging technique. The current state of research and the history of the fusion of ultrasound and mammography in breast diagnostics are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wasner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Gynäkologische Radiologie, Radiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - Julius Emons
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245060. [PMID: 33411847 PMCID: PMC7790234 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the high risk of missing lesions in mammography, the missed lesion rate is yet to be clinically established. Further, no breast phantoms with adjustable breast density currently exist. We developed a novel, adjustable-density breast phantom with a composition identical to that of actual breasts, and determined the quantitative relationship between breast density and the missed lesion rate in mammography. METHODS An original breast phantom consisting of adipose- and fibroglandular-equivalent materials was developed, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed. Breast density, which is the fraction by weight of fibroglandular to total tissue, was adjusted to 25%, 50%, and 75% by arbitrarily mixing the two materials. Microcalcification, mass lesions, and spiculated lesions, each with unique characteristics, were inserted into the phantom. For the above-mentioned fibroglandular densities, 50 positive and 50 negative images for each lesion type were used as case samples for the ROC study. Five certified radiological technologists participated in lesion detection. RESULTS The mass-lesion detection rate, according to the area under the curve, decreased by 18.0% (p = 0.0001, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] = 0.1258 to 0.1822) and 37.8% (p = 0.0003, 95% CI = 0.2453 to 0.4031) for breast densities of 50% and 75%, respectively, compared to that for a 25% breast density. A similar tendency was observed with microcalcification; however, spiculated lesions did not follow this tendency. CONCLUSIONS We quantified the missed lesion rate in different densities of breast tissue using a novel breast phantom, which is imperative for advancing individualized screening mammography.
Collapse
|
28
|
Lameijer JRC, Nederend J, Voogd AC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Duijm LEM. Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:48-56. [PMID: 32621785 PMCID: PMC7689830 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Our study was performed to determine the frequency of recall for bilateral breast lesions at screening mammography and compare its outcome with respect to unilateral recall. We included 329 132 screening mammograms (34 889 initial screens and 294 243 subsequent screens) from a Dutch screening mammography program between January 2013 and January 2018. During a 2‐year follow‐up, we collected radiological data, pathology reports and surgical reports of all recalled women. At bilateral recall, the lesion with the highest Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System score was used as the index lesion when comparing screening mammography characteristics at bilateral vs unilateral recall. A total of 9806 women were recalled at screening (recall rate, 3.0%). Bilateral recall comprised 2.8% (271/9806) of all recalls. Biopsy was more frequently performed after bilateral recall than unilateral recall (54.6% [148/271] vs 44.1% [4201/9535], P < .001), yielding a lower positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy after bilateral recall (42.6% vs 51.7%, P = .029). The PPV of recall was comparable for both groups (23.2% [63/271] vs 22.8% [2173/9535], P = .85). Invasive cancers after bilateral recall were larger than those diagnosed after unilateral recall (P = .02), but histological subtype, histologic grading, receptor status and proportions of lymph node positive cancers were comparable. Bilateral recall infrequently occurs at screening mammography. Biopsy is more frequently performed following bilateral recall, but the PPV of recall is similar for unilateral and bilateral recall. Invasive cancers of both groups show comparable pathological features except of a larger tumor size after bilateral recall. What's new? Data on bilateral breast cancer in a screened population is sparse, and information on bilateral recall is lacking. Based on more than 329,000 screening mammograms, our study shows that bilateral recall occurs infrequently at screening mammography, and that the majority of these recalls are false positives. Invasive cancer has comparable pathological features in bilateral and unilateral breast cancer patients, except larger tumour size after bilateral recall. Altogether, the results highlight the need for screening radiologists to pay vigorous attention to the contralateral breast after detecting a screening mammographic abnormality in order to facilitate a timely diagnosis of bilateral breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost R C Lameijer
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucien E M Duijm
- Department of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Breast Cancer Screening, Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ruth V, Kolditz D, Steiding C, Kalender WA. Investigation of spectral performance for single-scan contrast-enhanced breast CT using photon-counting technology: A phantom study. Med Phys 2020; 47:2826-2837. [PMID: 32155660 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Contrast-enhanced imaging of the breast is frequently used in breast MRI and has recently become more common in mammography. The purpose of this study was to make single-scan contrast-enhanced imaging feasible for photon-counting breast CT (pcBCT) and to assess the spectral performance of a pcBCT scanner by evaluating iodine maps and virtual non-contrast (VNC) images. METHODS We optimized the settings of a pcBCT to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio between iodinated contrast agent and breast tissue. Therefore, an electronic energy threshold dividing the x-ray spectrum used into two energy bins was swept from 23.17 keV to 50.65 keV. Validation measurements were performed by placing syringes with contrast agent (2.5 mg/ml to 40 mg/ml) in phantoms with 7.5 cm and 12 cm in diameter. Images were acquired at different tube currents and reconstructed with 300 μm isotropic voxel size. Iodine maps and VNC images were generated using image-based material decomposition. Iodine concentrations and CT values were measured for each syringe and compared to the known concentrations and reference CT values. RESULTS Maximal signal-to-noise ratios were found at a threshold position of 32.59 keV. Accurate iodine quantification (average root mean square error of 0.56 mg/ml) was possible down to a concentration of 2.5 mg/ml for all tube currents investigated. The enhancement has been sufficiently removed in the VNC images, so they can be interpreted as unenhanced CT images. Only minor changes of CT values compared to a conventional CT scan were observed. Noise was increased by the decomposition by a factor of 2.62 and 4.87 (7.5 cm and 12 cm phantoms) but did not compromise the accuracy of the iodine quantification. CONCLUSIONS Accurate iodine quantification and generation of VNC images can be achieved using contrast-enhanced pcBCT from a single CT scan in the absence of temporal or spatial misalignment. Using iodine maps and VNC images, pcBCT has the potential to reduce dose, shorten examination and reading time, and to increase cancer detection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veikko Ruth
- Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91052, Germany.,AB-CT - Advanced Breast-CT GmbH, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Daniel Kolditz
- AB-CT - Advanced Breast-CT GmbH, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | | | - Willi A Kalender
- Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91052, Germany.,AB-CT - Advanced Breast-CT GmbH, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ingman WV, Richards B, Street JM, Carter D, Rickard M, Stone J, Dasari P. Breast Density Notification: An Australian Perspective. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030681. [PMID: 32138307 PMCID: PMC7141298 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast density, also known as mammographic density, refers to white and bright regions on a mammogram. Breast density can only be assessed by mammogram and is not related to how breasts look or feel. Therefore, women will only know their breast density if they are notified by the radiologist when they have a mammogram. Breast density affects a woman’s breast cancer risk and the sensitivity of a screening mammogram to detect cancer. Currently, the position of BreastScreen Australia and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists is to not notify women if they have dense breasts. However, patient advocacy organisations are lobbying for policy change. Whether or not to notify women of their breast density is a complex issue and can be framed within the context of both public health ethics and clinical ethics. Central ethical themes associated with breast density notification are equitable care, patient autonomy in decision-making, trust in health professionals, duty of care by the physician, and uncertainties around evidence relating to measurement and clinical management pathways for women with dense breasts. Legal guidance on this issue must be gained from broad legal principles found in the law of negligence and the test of materiality. We conclude a rigid legal framework for breast density notification in Australia would not be appropriate. Instead, a policy framework should be developed through engagement with all stakeholders to understand and take account of multiple perspectives and the values at stake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy V. Ingman
- Adelaide Medical School Based at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5011, Australia;
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-8-8222-6141
| | | | - Jacqueline M. Street
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia;
| | - Drew Carter
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment, School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia;
| | - Mary Rickard
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia;
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
- The RPH Research Foundation, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
| | - Pallave Dasari
- Adelaide Medical School Based at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5011, Australia;
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Taylor-Phillips S, Stinton C. Double reading in breast cancer screening: considerations for policy-making. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190610. [PMID: 31617741 PMCID: PMC7055445 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In this article, we explore the evidence around the relative benefits and harms of breast cancer screening using a single radiologist to examine each female's mammograms for signs of cancer (single reading), or two radiologists (double reading). First, we briefly explore the historical evidence using film-screen mammography, before providing an in-depth description of evidence using digital mammography. We classify studies according to which exact version of double reading they use, because the evidence suggests that effectiveness of double reading is contingent on whether the two radiologists are blinded to one another's decisions, and how the decisions of the two radiologists are integrated. Finally, we explore the implications for future mammography, including using artificial intelligence as the second reader, and applications to more complex three-dimensional imaging techniques such as tomosynthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Stinton
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kim Y, Kang UB, Kim S, Lee HB, Moon HG, Han W, Noh DY. A Validation Study of a Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Assay to Diagnose Breast Cancer. J Breast Cancer 2019; 22:579-586. [PMID: 31897331 PMCID: PMC6933034 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Currently, the standard screening tool for breast cancer is screening mammography. There have been many efforts to develop a blood-based diagnostic assay for breast cancer diagnosis; however, none have been approved for clinical use at this time. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a novel blood-based proteomic test for aiding breast cancer diagnosis in a relatively large cohort of cancer patients. Methods A blood-based test using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) measured by mass spectrometry to quantify 3 peptides (apolipoprotein C-1, carbonic anhydrase 1, and neural cell adhesion molecule L1-like protein) present in human plasma was investigated. A total of 1,129 blood samples from 575 breast cancer patients, 454 healthy controls, and 100 patients with other malignancies were used to verify and optimize the assay. Results The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the MRM-based proteomic assay were 71.6%, 85.3%, and 77%, respectively; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.8323. The proteomic assay did not demonstrate diagnostic accuracy in patients with other types of malignancies including thyroid, pancreatic, lung, and colon cancers. The diagnostic performance of the proteomic assay was not associated with the timing of blood sampling before or after anesthesia. Conclusion The data demonstrated that an MRM-based proteomic assay that measures plasma levels of three specific peptides can be a useful tool for breast cancer screening and its accuracy is cancer-type specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumi Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Un-Beom Kang
- Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sungsoo Kim
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Genetic Engineering, Seoul National University College of Natural Science, Seoul, Korea.,Bertis Inc. Korea, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Han-Byoel Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeong-Gon Moon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Young Noh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Arnold M, Pfeifer K, Quante AS. Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany? PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217213. [PMID: 31120970 PMCID: PMC6532918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Risk stratification has so far been evaluated under the assumption that women fully adhere to screening recommendations. However, the participation in German cancer screening programs remains low at 54%. The question arises whether risk-stratified screening is economically efficient under the assumption that adherence is not perfect. METHOD We have adapted a micro-simulation Markov model to the German context. Annual, biennial, and triennial routine screening are compared with five risk-adapted strategies using thresholds of relative risk to stratify screening frequencies. We used three outcome variables (mortality reduction, quality-adjusted life years, and false-positive results) under the assumption of full adherence vs. an adherence rate of 54%. Strategies are evaluated using efficiency frontiers and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). RESULTS The reduced adherence rate affects both performance and cost; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios remain constant. The results of PSA show that risk-stratified screening strategies are more efficient than biennial routine screening under certain conditions. At any willingness-to-pay (WTP), there is a risk-stratified alternative with a higher likelihood of being the best choice. However, without explicit decision criteria and WTP, risk-stratified screening is not more efficient than biennial routine screening. Potential improvements in the adherence rates have significant health gains and budgetary implications. CONCLUSION If the participation rate for mammographic screening is as low as in Germany, stratified screening is not clearly more efficient than routine screening but dependent on the WTP. A more promising design for future stratified strategies is the combination of risk stratification mechanisms with interventions to improve the low adherence in selected high-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Arnold
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Munich Center of Health Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Pfeifer
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Anne S. Quante
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:608-619. [PMID: 30100155 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES High mammographic density reduces the diagnostic accuracy of screening mammography due to masking of tumors, resulting in possible delayed diagnosis and missed cancers. Women with high masking risk could be preselected for alternative screening regimens less susceptible to masking. In this study, various models to predict masking status are presented based on biometric and image-based parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS For a cohort of 67 nonscreen-detected (cancers detected via other means after a negative mammogram) and 147 screen-detected invasive cancers, quantitative volumetric breast density, BI-RADS density, and the distribution and appearance of dense tissue through statistical and texture metrics were measured. Age and Body Mass Index were recorded. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were computed to select those parameters that predicted nonscreen-detected cancers. Accuracy of the models was evaluated using the area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS Using BI-RADS density alone to predict masking risk yielded an AUC of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [0.57-0.70]). Age-adjusted BI-RADS density or volumetric breast density had AUCs of 0.72 [0.64-0.79] and 0.71 [0.62-0.78], respectively. A model extracted from the full pool of variables had an AUC of 0.75 [0.67-0.82]. CONCLUSION The optimal model predicts masking more accurately than density alone, suggesting that texture metrics may be useful in models to guide a stratified screening strategy.
Collapse
|
35
|
XU A, HE H, SHI Q, LI Z, ZHANG S. [Digital breast tomosynthesis in diagnosis of dense breast lesions]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2019; 48:186-192. [PMID: 31309757 PMCID: PMC8800639 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.04.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the value of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in diagnosis of dense breast lesions. METHODS Clinical and pathological data of 163 patients (58 benign lesions, 122 malignant lesions, and 180 lesions in total) with breast lesions undergoing surgical treatment in Shaoxing Central Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The lesions were classified into non-homogeneous dense gland type and extremely dense gland type according to BI-RADS creterion. Breast MRI and DBT examinations were performed before the surgery. ROC curve was generated and the diagnostic efficacy of two examination methods for dense breast lesions was evaluated with pathological results as the gold standard. The detection rate, diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant breast lesions were compared between two methods using chi-square test. The accuracy of lesion size preoperatively evaluated by MRI and DBT was analyzed by Pearson correlation. RESULTS The detection rate and diagnostic accuracy for benign breast lesions by MRI were higher than those by DBT (91.4% vs. 75.9%, χ2=5.098, P<0.05 and 89.7% vs. 67.2%, χ2=8.617, P<0.01). But there were no significant differences in detection rate and accuracy for malignant lesions by MRI and DBT (98.4% vs. 95.1%, χ2=2.068, P>0.05 and 94.3% vs. 91.8%, χ2=0.569, P>0.05). The areas under the ROC curves of MRI, DBT based on BI-RADS classification were 0.910 and 0.832, respectively (Z=1.860, P>0.05). The sensitivities of MRI, DBT to breast lesions were 93.3% and 86.7%, and the specificities were 68.3% and 79.1%. DBT and MRI measurements were positively correlated with pathological measurements (r=0.887 and 0.949, all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS DBT can effectively diagnose benign and malignant breast lesions under dense gland background, and it has similar diagnostic efficacy with MRI for breast malignant lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shengjian ZHANG
- 张盛箭(1975-), 男, 博士, 副主任医师, 主要从事分子影像学研究, E-mail:
,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9414-5611
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Nijnatten TJA, Smidt ML, Goorts B, Samiei S, Houben I, Kok EM, Wildberger JE, Robben SGF, Lobbes MBI. Can high school students help to improve breast radiologists in detecting missed breast cancer lesions on full-field digital mammography? J Cancer 2019; 10:765-771. [PMID: 30719176 PMCID: PMC6360429 DOI: 10.7150/jca.30494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate whether full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), evaluated by non-experienced high school students, improves detection of missed breast cancer lesions on FFDM, in the same cohort of patients. Methods: Non-experienced first- and second year high school students examined fourteen cases of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. These cases consisted of missed breast cancer lesions on FFDM by a breast radiologist. Sensitivity of assessment of the students on FFDM and CEM was analysed and compared with the initial results of the breast radiologists. Results: A total of 134 high school students participated in this study. Mean age was 12.8 years (range 10-14). Based on FFDM, mean overall sensitivity of the students was 29.2% (18.9 - 39.6%). When recombined CEM images were used, mean overall sensitivity of students improved to 82.6% (74.0 - 91.2%) (p=0.001). Mean overall sensitivity of FFDM exams evaluated by radiologists was 75.7% (64.2 - 87.3%), which was lower when compared to student's evaluations on recombined CEM exams, yet not statistically significant (p=0.098). Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced mammography evaluated by non-experienced high school students might improve detection rate of breast cancer when compared to evaluations of only full-field digital mammography by radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J A van Nijnatten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - B Goorts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - S Samiei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I Houben
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - E M Kok
- School of Health Professions Education, Department of Education Research and Development, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J E Wildberger
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - S G F Robben
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:377-390. [PMID: 30659696 PMCID: PMC6767440 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple studies in the first decade of the 21st century have established contrast-enhanced breast MRI as a screening modality for women with a hereditary or familial increased risk for the development of breast cancer. In recent studies, in women with various risk profiles, the sensitivity ranges between 81% and 100%, which is approximately twice as high as the sensitivity of mammography. The specificity increases in follow-up rounds to around 97%, with positive predictive values for biopsy in the same range as for mammography. MRI preferentially detects the more aggressive/invasive types of breast cancer, but has a higher sensitivity than mammography for any type of cancer. This performance implies that in women screened with breast MRI, all other examinations must be regarded as supplemental. Mammography may yield ~5% additional cancers, mostly ductal carcinoma in situ, while slightly decreasing specificity and increasing the costs. Ultrasound has no supplemental value when MRI is used. Evidence is mounting that in other groups of women the performance of MRI is likewise superior to more conventional screening techniques. Particularly in women with a personal history of breast cancer, the gain seems to be high, but also in women with a biopsy history of lobular carcinoma in situ and even women at average risk, similar results are reported. Initial outcome studies show that breast MRI detects cancer earlier, which induces a stage-shift increasing the survival benefit of screening. Cost-effectiveness is still an issue, particularly for women at lower risk. Since costs of the MRI scan itself are a driving factor, efforts to reduce these costs are essential. The use of abbreviated MRI protocols may enable more widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:377-390.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christiane K Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Linda Moy
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research / Department of Radiology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bokhof B, Khil L, Urbschat I, Gnas L, Hecht G, Heidinger O, Heindel W, Kieschke J, Weigel S, Hense H. Zeitliche Entwicklung der Programmsensitivität des deutschen Mammographie-Screening-Programms in Nordrhein-Westfalen und Niedersachsen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2018; 61:1517-1527. [DOI: 10.1007/s00103-018-2843-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
39
|
Zackrisson S, Lång K, Rosso A, Johnson K, Dustler M, Förnvik D, Förnvik H, Sartor H, Timberg P, Tingberg A, Andersson I. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1493-1503. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30521-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
40
|
Euler-Chelpin MV, Lillholm M, Napolitano G, Vejborg I, Nielsen M, Lynge E. Screening mammography: benefit of double reading by breast density. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 171:767-776. [PMID: 29974357 PMCID: PMC6133172 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4864-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The currently recommended double reading of all screening mammography examinations is an economic burden for screening programs. The sensitivity of screening is higher for women with low breast density than for women with high density. One may therefore ask whether single reading could replace double reading at least for women with low density. We addressed this question using data from a screening program where the radiologists coded their readings independently. METHODS Data include all screening mammography examinations in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 November 2012 to 31 December 2013. Outcome of screening was assessed by linkage to the Danish Pathology Register. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, number of interval cancers, and false positive-tests per 1000 screened women by both single reader and consensus BI-RADS density code. RESULTS In total 54,808 women were included. The overall sensitivity of double reading was 72%, specificity was 97.6%, 3 women per 1000 screened experienced an interval cancer, and 24 a false-positive test. Across all BI-RADS density codes, single reading consistently decreased sensitivity as compared with consensus reading. The same was true for specificity, apart from results across BI-RADS density codes set by reader 2. CONCLUSIONS Single reading decreased sensitivity as compared with double reading across all BI-RADS density codes. This included results based on consensus BI-RADS density codes. This means that replacement of double with single reading would have negative consequences for the screened women, even if density could be assessed automatically calibrated to the usual consensus level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- My von Euler-Chelpin
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Martin Lillholm
- Biomediq, Fruebjergvej 3, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - George Napolitano
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Mads Nielsen
- Biomediq, Fruebjergvej 3, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gandomkar Z, Tay K, Brennan PC, Kozuch E, Mello-Thoms C. Can eye-tracking metrics be used to better pair radiologists in a mammogram reading task? Med Phys 2018; 45:4844-4856. [PMID: 30168153 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a framework for optimal pairing of radiologists when reading mammograms based on their search patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four experienced and four less-experienced radiologists were asked to assess 120 cases (59 with cancers) while their eye positions were tracked. Fourteen eye-tracking metrics were extracted to quantify the differences among radiologists' visual search pattern. For each radiologist and metric, less-experienced radiologists and expert readers were ranked based on the level of similarities in gaze patterns (from the most different to the most similar). Less-experienced readers and experts were also ranked based on the values of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) after pairing (the best possible way of ranking). Using the Kendall's tau distance, rankings based on different metrics were compared with the best possible ranking. Using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the AUC values when pairing in the best way were compared with pairing based on different metrics. Finally, we investigated the robustness of pairing strategies against the small sample size. RESULTS For ranking the experienced radiologists, results from eight metrics were as good as the best possible ranking. For the less-experienced ones, only one metric resulted in a ranking comparable to the best possible way of ranking. The AUC values of pairings based on these metrics did not differ significantly from the best pairing scenario. Compared to the pairings based on the cognitive metrics, the ranking based on AUC values varied more greatly with the sample size, suggesting that it is less robust against the small sample size compared to the cognitive metrics. CONCLUSION Different pairings may have different effects on performance; some are detrimental while some improve the performance of the pair. Using the suggested cognitive metrics, we can optimize the pairings even with a small dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziba Gandomkar
- Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kevin Tay
- Medical Imaging Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Patrick C Brennan
- Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma Kozuch
- University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556, USA
| | - Claudia Mello-Thoms
- Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
de Lange SV, Bakker MF, Monninkhof EM, Peeters PHM, de Koekkoek-Doll PK, Mann RM, Rutten MJCM, Bisschops RHC, Veltman J, Duvivier KM, Lobbes MBI, de Koning HJ, Karssemeijer N, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH. Reasons for (non)participation in supplemental population-based MRI breast screening for women with extremely dense breasts. Clin Radiol 2018; 73:759.e1-759.e9. [PMID: 29759590 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine the willingness of women with extremely dense breasts to undergo breast cancer screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a research setting, and to examine reasons for women to participate or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2011 and 2015, 8,061 women (50-75 years) were invited for supplemental MRI as part of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01315015), after a negative screening mammography in the national population-based mammography screening programme. Demographics of participants and non-participants were compared. All invitees were asked to report reasons for (non)participation. Ethical approval was obtained. Participants provided written informed consent. RESULTS Of the 8,061 invitees, 66% answered that they were interested, and 59% eventually participated. Participants were on average 54-years old (interquartile range: 51-59 years), comparable to women with extremely dense breasts in the population-based screening programme (55 years). Women with higher socio-economic status (SES) were more often interested in participation than women with lower SES (68% versus 59%, p<0.001). The most frequently stated reasons for non-participation were "MRI-related inconveniences and/or self-reported contraindications to MRI" (27%) and "anxiety regarding the result of supplemental screening" (21%). "Expected personal health benefit" (68%) and "contribution to science" (43%) were the most frequent reasons for participation. CONCLUSION Of women invited for MRI because of extremely dense breasts, 59% participated. Common reasons for non-participation were "MRI-related inconveniences" and "anxiety regarding the result of supplemental screening". In case of future implementation, availability of precise evidence on benefits and harms might reduce this anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S V de Lange
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P H M Peeters
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - P K de Koekkoek-Doll
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M J C M Rutten
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, P.O. Box 90153, 5200 ME 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - R H C Bisschops
- Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, P.O. Box 444, 3300 AK Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Veltman
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), P.O. Box 7600, 7600 SZ Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - K M Duvivier
- Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Karssemeijer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R M Pijnappel
- LRCB - Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, PO Box 6873, 6503 GJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wanders JOP, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N, Holland K, Kallenberg M, Peeters PHM, Nielsen M, Lillholm M. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 2018; 20:36. [PMID: 29720220 PMCID: PMC5932877 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Texture patterns have been shown to improve breast cancer risk segregation in addition to area-based mammographic density. The additional value of texture pattern scores on top of volumetric mammographic density measures in a large screening cohort has never been studied. Methods Volumetric mammographic density and texture pattern scores were assessed automatically for the first available digital mammography (DM) screening examination of 51,400 women (50–75 years of age) participating in the Dutch biennial breast cancer screening program between 2003 and 2011. The texture assessment method was developed in a previous study and validated in the current study. Breast cancer information was obtained from the screening registration system and through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed at the first available digital screening examination were excluded. During a median follow-up period of 4.2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–6.2) years, 301 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. The associations between texture pattern scores, volumetric breast density measures and breast cancer risk were determined using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Discriminatory performance was assessed using c-indices. Results The median age of the women at the time of the first available digital mammography examination was 56 years (IQR 51–63). Texture pattern scores were positively associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95% CI 2.16–4.62) (p value for trend <0.001), for quartile (Q) 4 compared to Q1). The c-index of texture was 0.61 (95% CI 0.57–0.64). Dense volume and percentage dense volume showed positive associations with breast cancer risk (HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.32–2.59) (p value for trend <0.001) and HR 2.17 (95% CI 1.51–3.12) (p value for trend <0.001), respectively, for Q4 compared to Q1). When adding texture measures to models with dense volume or percentage dense volume, c-indices increased from 0.56 (95% CI 0.53–0.59) to 0.62 (95% CI 0.58–0.65) (p < 0.001) and from 0.58 (95% CI 0.54–0.61) to 0.60 (95% CI 0.57–0.63) (p = 0.054), respectively. Conclusions Deep-learning-based texture pattern scores, measured automatically on digital mammograms, are associated with breast cancer risk, independently of volumetric mammographic density, and augment the capacity to discriminate between future breast cancer and non-breast cancer cases. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna O P Wanders
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nico Karssemeijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Katharina Holland
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Kallenberg
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biomediq A/S, Fruebjergvej 3, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Petra H M Peeters
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place W2 1PG, London, UK
| | - Mads Nielsen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biomediq A/S, Fruebjergvej 3, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lillholm
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biomediq A/S, Fruebjergvej 3, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schulz-Wendtland R, Jud SM, Fasching PA, Hartmann A, Radicke M, Rauh C, Uder M, Wunderle M, Gass P, Langemann H, Beckmann MW, Emons J. A Standard Mammography Unit - Standard 3D Ultrasound Probe Fusion Prototype: First Results. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77:679-685. [PMID: 28713173 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The combination of different imaging modalities through the use of fusion devices promises significant diagnostic improvement for breast pathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality and clinical feasibility of a prototype fusion device (fusion prototype) constructed from a standard tomosynthesis mammography unit and a standard 3D ultrasound probe using a new method of breast compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Imaging was performed on 5 mastectomy specimens from patients with confirmed DCIS or invasive carcinoma (BI-RADS ™ 6). For the preclinical fusion prototype an ABVS system ultrasound probe from an Acuson S2000 was integrated into a MAMMOMAT Inspiration (both Siemens Healthcare Ltd) and, with the aid of a newly developed compression plate, digital mammogram and automated 3D ultrasound images were obtained. RESULTS The quality of digital mammogram images produced by the fusion prototype was comparable to those produced using conventional compression. The newly developed compression plate did not influence the applied x-ray dose. The method was not more labour intensive or time-consuming than conventional mammography. From the technical perspective, fusion of the two modalities was achievable. CONCLUSION In this study, using only a few mastectomy specimens, the fusion of an automated 3D ultrasound machine with a standard mammography unit delivered images of comparable quality to conventional mammography. The device allows simultaneous ultrasound - the second important imaging modality in complementary breast diagnostics - without increasing examination time or requiring additional staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Rauh
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hanna Langemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Timmermans L, Bleyen L, Bacher K, Van Herck K, Lemmens K, Van Ongeval C, Van Steen A, Martens P, De Brabander I, Goossens M, Thierens H. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:3810-3819. [PMID: 28289944 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4757-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate if direct radiography (DR) performs better than screen-film mammography (SF) and computed radiography (CR) in dense breasts in a decentralized organised Breast Cancer Screening Programme. To this end, screen-detected versus interval cancers were studied in different BI-RADS density classes for these imaging modalities. METHODS The study cohort consisted of 351,532 women who participated in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme in 2009 and 2010. Information on screen-detected and interval cancers, breast density scores of radiologist second readers, and imaging modality was obtained by linkage of the databases of the Centre of Cancer Detection and the Belgian Cancer Registry. RESULTS Overall, 67% of occurring breast cancers are screen detected and 33% are interval cancers, with DR performing better than SF and CR. The interval cancer rate increases gradually with breast density, regardless of modality. In the high-density class, the interval cancer rate exceeds the cancer detection rate for SF and CR, but not for DR. CONCLUSIONS DR is superior to SF and CR with respect to cancer detection rates for high-density breasts. To reduce the high interval cancer rate in dense breasts, use of an additional imaging technique in screening can be taken into consideration. KEY POINTS • Interval cancer rate increases gradually with breast density, regardless of modality. • Cancer detection rate in high-density breasts is superior in DR. • IC rate exceeds CDR for SF and CR in high-density breasts. • DR performs better in high-density breasts for third readings and false-positives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Timmermans
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, QCC-Gent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Luc Bleyen
- Centrum voor Preventie en Vroegtijdige Opsporing van Kanker, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Klaus Bacher
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, QCC-Gent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Herck
- Centrum voor Preventie en Vroegtijdige Opsporing van Kanker, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kim Lemmens
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Andre Van Steen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Hubert Thierens
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, QCC-Gent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162:541-548. [PMID: 28161786 PMCID: PMC5332492 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4137-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Fibroglandular tissue may mask breast cancers, thereby reducing the sensitivity of mammography. Here, we investigate methods for identification of women at high risk of a masked tumor, who could benefit from additional imaging. Methods The last negative screening mammograms of 111 women with interval cancer (IC) within 12 months after the examination and 1110 selected normal screening exams from women without cancer were used. From the mammograms, volumetric breast density maps were computed, which provide the dense tissue thickness for each pixel location. With these maps, three measurements were derived: (1) percent dense volume (PDV), (2) percent area where dense tissue thickness exceeds 1 cm (PDA), and (3) dense tissue masking model (DTMM). Breast density was scored by a breast radiologist using BI-RADS. Women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts were considered at high masking risk. For each masking measure, mammograms were divided into a high- and low-risk category such that the same proportion of the controls is at high masking risk as with BI-RADS. Results Of the women with IC, 66.1, 71.9, 69.2, and 63.0% were categorized to be at high masking risk with PDV, PDA, DTMM, and BI-RADS, respectively, against 38.5% of the controls. The proportion of IC at high masking risk is statistically significantly different between BI-RADS and PDA (p-value 0.022). Differences between BI-RADS and PDV, or BI-RADS and DTMM, are not statistically significant. Conclusion Measures based on density maps, and in particular PDA, are promising tools to identify women at high risk for a masked cancer.
Collapse
|
47
|
Wanders JOP, Holland K, Veldhuis WB, Mann RM, Pijnappel RM, Peeters PHM, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 162:95-103. [PMID: 28012087 PMCID: PMC5288416 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine to what extent automatically measured volumetric mammographic density influences screening performance when using digital mammography (DM). METHODS We collected a consecutive series of 111,898 DM examinations (2003-2011) from one screening unit of the Dutch biennial screening program (age 50-75 years). Volumetric mammographic density was automatically assessed using Volpara. We determined screening performance measures for four density categories comparable to the American College of Radiology (ACR) breast density categories. RESULTS Of all the examinations, 21.6% were categorized as density category 1 ('almost entirely fatty') and 41.5, 28.9, and 8.0% as category 2-4 ('extremely dense'), respectively. We identified 667 screen-detected and 234 interval cancers. Interval cancer rates were 0.7, 1.9, 2.9, and 4.4‰ and false positive rates were 11.2, 15.1, 18.2, and 23.8‰ for categories 1-4, respectively (both p-trend < 0.001). The screening sensitivity, calculated as the proportion of screen-detected among the total of screen-detected and interval tumors, was lower in higher density categories: 85.7, 77.6, 69.5, and 61.0% for categories 1-4, respectively (p-trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Volumetric mammographic density, automatically measured on digital mammograms, impacts screening performance measures along the same patterns as established with ACR breast density categories. Since measuring breast density fully automatically has much higher reproducibility than visual assessment, this automatic method could help with implementing density-based supplemental screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna O P Wanders
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katharina Holland
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Postbus 6873, 6503 GJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra H M Peeters
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place W2 1PG, London, UK
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nico Karssemeijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|