A prospective randomized pilot study evaluating an ERAS protocol versus a standard protocol for patients treated with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer

Does the Administration of Intravenous Fluid Matter in the Context of the Incidence of Postoperative Complications After Radical Cystectomy?

Introduction: Intravenous fluid management is integral to perioperative care, particularly under enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. In radical cystectomy (RC), which carries high risks of complications and mortality, optimizing fluid management poses a significant challenge due to the absence of definitive guidelines. Aim: the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intravenous fluid administration on postoperative complications in patients undergoing RC. Material and methods: This study involved 288 patients who underwent laparoscopic RC and urinary diversion from 2018 to 2022. ERAS protocols were implemented for all patients. Participants were divided into four groups based on the type of urinary diversion (ureterocutaneostomy vs. ileal conduit) and the intraoperative fluid volume input (less than 1000 mL vs. more than 1000 mL). Postoperative complications were evaluated at 30 and 90 days post-surgery using the Clavien-Dindo scale. The fluid management effectiveness was measured using the absolute Vascular Bed Filling Index (aVBFI) and the adjusted Vascular Bed Filling Index (adjVFBI). Results: The UCS is associated with a lower risk of increased severity of postoperative complications. The administration of more than 1000 mL of fluids was associated with a higher risk of complications (p = 0.035). However, after adjusting for the duration of the surgery and BMI, this association did not hold statistical significance, indicating that fluid volume alone is not a direct predictor of postoperative complications. At aVBFI values between zero and eight, urinary diversion using the UCS method is associated with a lower risk of complications compared to the IC. When aVBFI equals eight, the differences in the severity of complications between the UCS and the IC are minimal. However, when aVBFI exceeds eight, the IC is associated with fewer complications during the 30 days post-operation compared to the UCS. The correlation between the adjVFBI (B = -0.27; 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.08; p = 0.005) and the severity of complications up to 30 days postoperatively is similar to that seen with the aVBFI. Similarly, the correlation of the adjVFBI with the method of urinary diversion (B = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.43; p = 0.011) resembles that of the aVBFI. The volume of fluids administered and the indices aVBFI and adjVFBI did not influence the occurrence of complications 90 days postoperatively. Conclusions: The volume of fluids administered is not a factor directly affecting the occurrence of complications following RC when the ERAS protocol is used. The amount of intraoperative fluid administration should be adjusted according to the intraoperative blood loss. Our findings endorse the utility of aVBFI and adjVFBI as valuable tools in guiding fluid therapy within the framework of ERAS protocols. However, further multicenter randomized trials are needed to definitively determine the best fluid therapy regimen for patients undergoing RC.

Identification of key risk factors for venous thromboembolism in urological inpatients based on the Caprini scale and interpretable machine learning methods

PURPOSE

To identify the key risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in urological inpatients based on the Caprini scale using an interpretable machine learning method.

METHODS

VTE risk data of urological inpatients were obtained based on the Caprini scale in the case hospital. Based on the data, the Boruta method was used to further select the key variables from the 37 variables in the Caprini scale. Furthermore, decision rules corresponding to each risk level were generated using the rough set (RS) method. Finally, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and backpropagation artificial neural network (BPANN) were used to verify the data accuracy and were compared with the RS method.

RESULTS

Following the screening, the key risk factors for VTE in urology were "(C1) Age," "(C2) Minor Surgery planned," "(C3) Obesity (BMI > 25)," "(C8) Varicose veins," "(C9) Sepsis (< 1 month)," (C10) "Serious lung disease incl. pneumonia (< 1month) " (C11) COPD," "(C16) Other risk," "(C18) Major surgery (> 45 min)," "(C19) Laparoscopic surgery (> 45 min)," "(C20) Patient confined to bed (> 72 h)," "(C18) Malignancy (present or previous)," "(C23) Central venous access," "(C31) History of DVT/PE," "(C32) Other congenital or acquired thrombophilia," and "(C34) Stroke (< 1 month." According to the decision rules of different risk levels obtained using the RS method, "(C1) Age," "(C18) Major surgery (> 45 minutes)," and "(C21) Malignancy (present or previous)" were the main factors influencing mid- and high-risk levels, and some suggestions on VTE prevention were indicated based on these three factors. The average accuracies of the RS, RF, SVM, and BPANN models were 79.5%, 87.9%, 92.6%, and 97.2%, respectively. In addition, BPANN had the highest accuracy, recall, F1-score, and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

The RS model achieved poorer accuracy than the other three common machine learning models. However, the RS model provides strong interpretability and allows for the identification of high-risk factors and decision rules influencing high-risk assessments of VTE in urology. This transparency is very important for clinicians in the risk assessment process.

Safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery among patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) method has been widely used in surgery and anesthesia worldwide and has been applied to a wide range of surgical specialties, including colorectal surgery, gynecology, liver surgery, breast surgery, urology, and spinal surgery. An increasing number of studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy in various fields. The safety and effectiveness of ERAS for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remain controversial. This study aimed to review the safety and effectiveness of ERAS for PCNL.

METHODS

The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full Text Database (VIP), Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies published until 19 September 2022. Outcome measures included postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, postoperative indwelling nephrostomy tube time, catheter encumbrance time, and nursing satisfaction. All analyses were performed using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Clinical heterogeneity was treated with subgroup, sensitivity, or descriptive analyses only when clinical heterogeneity was not excluded. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Twenty-five studies (1545 observational patients and 1562 controls) were included.

RESULTS

The ERAS group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD=-2.59, 95% CI=(-3.04, -2.14), P <0.001], total hospital stay [WMD=-2.59, 95% CI=(-3.04, -2.14), P <0.001], and lower complication rate [RR=0.36, 95% CI=(0.29-0.43), P <0.001] than the control group. The ERAS group had a shorter surgery time [WMD=-3.57, 95% CI=(-5.88, -1.26), P =0.003], postoperative indwelling nephrostomy tube time [WMD=-1.94, 95% CI=(-2.69, -1.19), P <0.001], catheter encumbrance time [WMD=-2.65, 95% CI=(-4.83, -0.46), P =0.02], and higher satisfaction [RR=1.15, 95% CI=(1.05-1.25), P =0.001] than the control group. The difference in the stone-free rate between the two groups was not statistically significant [RR=1.03, 95% CI=(0.97-1.09), P =0.38], but the stone-free rate of the observation group (ERAS group) in each study was higher than that of the control group.

CONCLUSION

ERAS not only ensures the safety of PCNL but also promotes postoperative rehabilitation of patients (shorter surgery time, postoperative indwelling nephrostomy tube time, postoperative hospital time, and lower complication rate). At the same time, differences in the stone-free rate were not statistically significant, but the stone-free rate of ERAS in each study was higher than that of the usual care for PCNL patients.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Reduces Hospital Costs and Length of Hospital Stay in Radical Cystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols challenge the conventional and rigid methods of surgery and anesthesia and bring about novel changes that are quite drastic. The core principle of the protocol is to minimize the metabolic disturbance caused by surgical injury, facilitate the restoration of functions in a brief period, and promote the resumption of normal activity at the earliest. To compare the outcomes of ERAS and standard protocol for patients who have undergone radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion. This prospective randomized controlled study was performed between 2015 and 2023. The 77 patients were divided into two groups ERAS (n=39) and Standard (n=38) by sequential randomization. These two groups are divided according to protocols of bowel preparation, anesthesia, and postoperative nutrition. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were recorded. Perioperative findings, the degree of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the total cost of treatment were recorded and analyzed. Length of hospital stay (18.82±9.25 day vs 27.34±15.05 day), and cost of treatment (2168,2±933$ 2879±1806$) were higher in the standard group. The rate of nausea and vomiting and the use of antiemetics were higher in the ERAS group compared to the standard group. In patients undergoing RC, the ERAS protocol was found to shorten the duration of hospitalization and reduce the total cost of hospital stay.

Ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block anesthesia for percutaneous endoscopic laser unroofing treatment of symptomatic simple renal cysts-An innovative ambulatory surgery mode

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of percutaneous ureteroscopy laser unroofing as an ambulatory surgery for symptomatic simple renal cysts under multilevel paravertebral nerve block anesthesia.

Methods

From December 2015 to September 2017, 33 simple renal cyst patients who had surgical indications were enrolled. Under ultrasound guidance, the T10/T11, T11/T12, and T12/L1 paravertebral spaces were identified, and 7-10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected at each segment. Then a puncture needle was placed inside the cyst cavity under ultrasonic monitoring. A guidewire was introduced followed by sequential dilation up to 28/30 Fr. The extra parenchymal portion of the cyst wall was dissociated and incised using a thulium laser, and a pathological examination was performed.

Results

Sensory loss to pinprick from T8 to L1 and sensory loss to ice from T6 to L2 were observed in all patients. None of the patients complained of pain during surgery. No serious complications occurred perioperatively. After the surgery, all patients recovered their lower limb muscle strength quickly, got out of bed, resumed oral feeding, and left the hospital within 24 h of admission. The pathologic diagnosis of all cyst walls was a simple renal cyst. The mean follow-up was 35.8 months. At the end of follow-up, the cyst units were reduced in size by more than 50% compared to the preoperative size, and no patient experienced a recurrence.

Conclusion

Multi-level paravertebral nerve block for percutaneous ureteroscopy laser unroofing as an ambulatory surgery mode is feasible, safe, and effective for the treatment of simple renal cysts in selected patients.

Impact of interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital admission on quality-of-life following discharge: linked-evidence synthesis

Objectives

To understand the impact of multicomponent interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital treatment, we conducted two systematic reviews, one of quantitative and one of qualitative evidence, and an overarching synthesis. These aimed to: • understand the effect of multicomponent interventions which aim to enhance recovery and/or reduce length of stay on patient-reported outcomes and health and social care utilisation • understand the experiences of patients, carers and staff involved in the delivery of interventions • understand how different aspects of the content and delivery of interventions may influence patient outcomes.

Review methods

We searched bibliographic databases including MEDLINE ALL, Embase and the Health Management Information Consortium, CENTRAL, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, conducted forward and backward citation searching and examined reference lists of topically similar qualitative reviews. Bibliographic database searches were completed in May/June 2021 and updated in April 2022. We sought primary research from high-income countries regarding hospital inpatients with a mean/median age of minimum 60 years, undergoing planned surgery. Patients experienced any multicomponent hospital-based intervention to reduce length of stay or improve recovery. Quantitative outcomes included length of stay and any patient-reported outcome or experience or service utilisation measure. Qualitative research focused on the experiences of patients, carers/family and staff of interventions received. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool or an adapted version of the Wallace checklist. We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesise quantitative data where appropriate, meta-ethnography for qualitative studies and qualitative comparative analysis for the overarching synthesis.

Results

Quantitative review: Included 125 papers. Forty-nine studies met criteria for further synthesis. Enhanced recovery protocols resulted in improvements to length of stay, without detriment to other outcomes, with minimal improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for patients admitted for lower-limb or colorectal surgery. Qualitative review: Included 43 papers, 35 of which were prioritised for synthesis. We identified six themes: 'Home as preferred environment for recovery', 'Feeling safe', 'Individualisation of structured programme', 'Taking responsibility', 'Essential care at home' and 'Outcomes'. Overarching synthesis: Intervention components which trigger successful interventions represent individualised approaches that allow patients to understand their treatment, ask questions and build supportive relationships and strategies to help patients monitor their progress and challenge themselves through early mobilisation.

Discussion

Interventions to reduce hospital length of stay for older adults following planned surgery are effective, without detriment to other patient outcomes. Findings highlight the need to reconsider how to evaluate patient recovery from the perspective of the patient. Trials did not routinely evaluate patient mid- to long-term outcomes. Furthermore, when they did evaluate patient outcomes, reporting is often incomplete or conducted using a narrow range of patient-reported outcome measures or limited through asking the wrong people the wrong questions, with lack of longer-term evaluation. Findings from the qualitative and overarching synthesis will inform policy-making regarding commissioning and delivering services to support patients, carers and families before, during and after planned admission to hospital.

Study registration

This trial is registered as PROSPERO registration number CRD42021230620.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 130576) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

A randomized controlled trial investigating rectus sheath catheters following radical cystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether rectus sheath catheter (RSC) insertion may be an alternative to thoracic epidural (TE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a non-blinded, single-centre, non-inferiority study, patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were randomized 1:1 to receive either a TE or surgically placed RSC. The primary endpoint was cumulative opiate use (median oral morphine equivalent [OME]) in the first 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale pain scores, measures of postoperative recovery including mobility and time to regular diet, and complications.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were randomized (51 TE, 46 RSC). The median OME was 103 (77.5-132.5) mg in the TE arm and 161.75 (117.5-187.5) mg in the RSC arm. A Mann-Whitney U-test confirmed non-inferiority of RSC to TE at a threshold of 15 mg OME (P = 0.002). When comparing pain scores for the first three postoperative days, an early difference was observed that favoured the TE group during post-anaesthesia care unit stay, which was lost after postoperative day 1. Patient satisfaction with analgesia on the third postoperative day was similar in the two arms (P = 0.47). There were no statistically significant differences between arms with respect to the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes from this prospective randomized trial demonstrated non-inferiority of RSC insertion compared to TE with respect to 72-h opiate use. Patient satisfaction with pain control on postoperative day 3 was the same for each group.

Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Meta-regression Analysis

CONTEXT

Radical cystectomy is considered a procedure of high complexity with a relative high complication rate.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically summarize the literature regarding the complications of radical cystectomy and the factors that contribute to them.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on complications related to radical cystectomy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 3766 studies were screened, and 44 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Complications following radical cystectomy are quite common. The most common complications were gastrointestinal complications (20%), infectious complications (17%), and ileus (14%). The majority of complications occurring were Clavien I-II (45%). Specific measurable patient factors are related to certain complications and can be used to stratify risk and assist in preoperative counseling, while proper design of high-quality RCTs may better reflect real-life complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, RCTs with a low risk of bias had higher complication rates than studies with a high risk of bias, underlining the need for further improvement on complication reporting in order to refine surgical outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Radical cystectomy is usually followed by high complication rates, which affect patients and are, in turn, strongly associated with patients' preoperative health status.

Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Evidence supports that enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) reduce length of stay and complications; however, these measures may not reflect the perspective of patients who are the main stakeholders in the recovery process. This systematic review aimed to appraise the evidence regarding the impact of ERPs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Five databases (Medline, Embase, Biosis, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the impact of ERPs on PROs after abdominal surgery. We focused on distinct periods of recovery: early (within 7 days postoperatively) and late (beyond 7 days). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2.0. Results were appraised descriptively as heterogeneity hindered meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.

RESULTS

Fifty-six RCTs were identified [colorectal (n = 18), hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) (n = 11), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) (n = 10), gynecological (n = 7), urological (n = 7), general surgery (n = 3)]. Most trials had 'some concerns' (n = 30) or 'high' (n = 25) risk of bias. In the early postoperative period, ERPs improved patient-reported general health (colorectal, HPB, UGI, urological; very low to low certainty), physical health (colorectal, gynecological; very low to low certainty), mental health (colorectal, gynecological; very low certainty), pain (all specialties; very low to moderate certainty), and fatigue (colorectal; low certainty). In the late postoperative period, ERPs improved general health (HPB, UGI, urological; very low certainty), physical health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low to low certainty), mental health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low certainty), social health (gynecological; very low certainty), pain (gynecological, urological; very low certainty), and fatigue (gynecological; very low certainty).

CONCLUSION

This review supports that ERPs may have a positive impact on patient-reported postoperative health status (i.e., general, physical, mental, and social health) and symptom experience (i.e., pain and fatigue) after abdominal surgery; however, data were largely derived from low-quality trials. Although these findings contribute important knowledge to inform evidence-based ERP implementation, there remains a great need to improve PRO assessment in studies focused on postoperative recovery.

Application of a protocol for enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy: a before-and-after cohort study

PURPOSE

Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is a major urological surgery burdened both by a high rate of short- and long-term complications and by a high emotional and psychological impact. Post-operative recovery is extremely important and the application of ERAS protocols can facilitate the return to functional autonomy. The aim of the present study was to verify the efficacy of our ERAS programme on outcomes of recovery after surgery of patients undergoing radical cystectomy with various urinary diversions.

METHODS

This is a before-after study comparing the historical group (n. 77) of radical cystectomies following a peri-operative standard of care with the prospective observational group (n. 83) following our ERAS programme. Recovery after surgery outcomes evaluated were length of stay, re-admission rate at 30-90/days and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Patients treated following the ERAS protocol presented less intra-operative blood loss (p < 0.001) and less intra-operative fluid infusions (p < 0.001). Time of first flatus was shorter in the ERAS group, though no difference was found in timing of nasogastric tube removal and defecation. Removal of drainage was done significantly earlier in the ERAS group. The median length of stay decreased from 12 to 9 days (p = 0.003) with a significant reduction also in re-admission rates at 30 and long-term complications at 90 days from surgery.

CONCLUSION

The application of an opioid-free ERAS protocol to patients undergoing open radical cystectomy was associated, as compared with prior traditional care, with significant reductions of recovery time and length of stay, number of total in-hospital complications, in particular functional ileus and re-admissions by 30 and 90 days after surgery.

The effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery program on radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Bladder cancer is the ninth most common malignant tumor worldwide. As an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is practiced in many surgical disciplines. However, the function of ERAS after radical cystectomy remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to research the impact of ERAS on radical cystectomy.

Methods

A systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted in April 2022 to identify the studies that performed the ERAS program in radical cystectomy. Studies were selected, data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, and quality was assessed using a random effects model to calculate the overall effect size. The odds ratio and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) served as the summary statistics for the meta-analysis. A sensitivity analysis was subsequently performed.

Results

A total of 25 studies with 4,083 patients were enrolled. The meta-analysis showed that the complications (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63-0.90), transfusion rate (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.90), readmission rate (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96), length of stay (SMD = -0.79; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.17), and time to first flatus (SMD = -1.16; 95% CI: -1.58 to -0.74) were significantly reduced in the ERAS group. However, no significance was found in 90-day mortality and urine leakage.

Conclusion

The ERAS program for radical cystectomy can effectively decrease the risk of overall complications, postoperative ileus, readmission rate, transfusion rate, length of stay, and time to first flatus in patients who underwent radical cystectomy with relative safety.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202250075.

The Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol Implementation on Postoperative Pain Management in the Era of Opioid Crisis: The Postchemotherapy Open RPLND Experience

AIM

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been proven to optimize postoperative outcomes; however, misuse of opioid analgesics can still hinder postoperative recovery due to related side effects and potential complications.

INTRODUCTION

To determine if the implementation of ERAS protocol in post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) patients could help with reducing postoperative pain and opioid use.

METHODS

A case-control study of consecutive testicular cancer patients with indications for PCRLPND, who were offered Conventional Post-operative Management (CPM) or ERAS protocol. Outcomes of interest included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-assessed pain level at postoperative days 3, 7, and 30, and Morphine-Equivalent Doses (MEDs)/postoperative day. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative complications were recorded. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 100 opioid-naïve PC-RPLND patients were studied. CPM and ERAS groups (36 and 64 patients, respectively) had similar demographic and baseline clinical characteristics). ERAS group patients had significantly lower blood loss (p = 0.005), blood transfusion rate (p < 0.001), and duration of the procedure (p < 0.001). Post-operative complications were comparable between groups. Nausea and bowel disorders were numerically but not statistically more frequent in the CPM group. ERAS patients had shorter mean hospital stay (5.3 ± 1.4 vs. 7.4 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001), lower daily MEDs (4.73 ± 2.63 vs. 7.04 ± 2.29, p < 0.001), and lower VAS scores on post-operative day 7 (3.89 ± 1.07 vs. 4.67 ± 1.17, p = 0.001). Post-operative pain was similar between groups on post-operative days 3 and 30.

CONCLUSION

Systematic implementation of ERAS protocol after PC-RPLND improves pain management, optimizes patient recovery, and prevents over-prescription of opioid analgesics.

Evaluating outcomes of patient-centered enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: An initial experience

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of patient-centered enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in -percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for staghorn stones.

Patients and methods

A retrospective analysis of 106 patients with staghorn calculi who underwent PCNL treatment at the Third Xiangya Hospital from October 01, 2018 to September 30, 2021 was performed. The patients were divided into the ERAS group (n = 56) and traditional group (n = 50). The ERAS program focused on a patient-centered concept, with elaboration on aspects, such as patient education, nutritional support, analgesia, body warming, early mobilization, nephrostomy tube removal, and strict follow-up.

Results

The total stone free rate and total complication rate were similar in both groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) 6 h after surgery, ambulation off bed time, indwelling fistula time, indwelling catheter time, and postoperative hospital stays were lower in the ERAS group than in the traditional group (P < 0.05). The multiple session rate in the ERAS group (19, 28.57%) was lower than that in the traditional group (30, 60%) (P = 0.007). The 1-year stone recurrence rate in the ERAS group (7, 17.5%) was lower than that in the traditional group (14, 38.9%) (P = 0.037).

Conclusion

The patient-centered ERAS in PCNL for staghorn stones accelerated rehabilitation by relieving postoperative pain, shortening hospitalization time, accelerating early ambulation, and reducing multiple session rate and 1-year stone recurrence rate, which have socioeconomic benefits.

Enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was done and 33 studies included 6596 subjects submitted to surgery for radical cystectomy at the start of the study; 3143 of them received enhanced pharmaceutical recovery after surgery and 3453 were controls. The studies reported relationships about the effects of enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effects of enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy using the dichotomous and continuous methods with a random or fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Enhanced pharmaceutical recovery after surgery had significantly lower length of hospital stay (MD, -2.78; 95% CI, -3.59 to -1.97, p < 0.001), complications (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01), readmission within 30 days (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007), and time to defecation (MD, -1.30; 95% CI, -2.22 to -0.37, p = 0.006) compared to control in subjects submitted to radical cystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced pharmaceutical recovery after surgery may reduce the length of hospital stay, complications, readmission within 30 days, and time to first bowel movement compared to control in subjects with surgery for radical cystectomy. Furthers studies are required to validate these findings.

Neobladder "Function": Tips and Tricks for Surgery and Postoperative Management

Orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction is a continent urinary diversion procedure increasingly used in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer following radical cystectomy (RC). It represents a valid alternative to the ileal duct in suitable patients who do not prefer a stoma and are motivated to undergo adequate training of the neobladder. Careful patient selection, taking into account the absolute and relative contraindications for ONB as well as an adequate recovery protocol after surgery are integral to the success of this procedure and the oncological and functional outcomes. The objective of this review is to summarize the current data on RC with ONB in terms of patient selection, preoperative preparation, surgical techniques and functional (continence and sexual activity) and oncological outcomes, with particular attention to the management of complications and the impact on quality of life (QoL).

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology: Review of literature

Objective

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are patient-centered, evidence-based pathways designed to reduce complications, promote recovery, and improve outcomes following surgery. These protocols have been successfully applied for the management of head and neck cancer, but relatively few studies have investigated the applicability of these pathways for other outpatient procedures in otolaryngology. Our goal was to perform a systematic review of available evidence reporting the utility of ERAS protocols for the management of patients undergoing outpatient otolaryngology operations.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and gray literature. We identified studies that evaluated ERAS protocols among patients undergoing otologic, laryngeal, nasal/sinus, pediatric, and general otolaryngology operations. We assessed the outcomes and ERAS components across protocols as well as the study design and limitations.

Results

A total of eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Types of procedures evaluated with ERAS protocols included tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, and septoplasty. A reduction in postoperative length of stay and hospital costs was reported in two and three studies, respectively. Comparative studies between ERAS and control groups showed persistent improvement in pre- and postoperative anxiety and pain levels, without an increase in postoperative complications and readmission rates.

Conclusions

A limited number of studies discuss implementation of ERAS protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology. These clinical pathways appear promising for these procedures as they may reduce length of stay, decrease costs, and improve pain and anxiety postoperatively.

Role of prehabilitation following major uro-oncologic surgery: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Functional status and physical independence play a key role in terms of quality of life, access to treatment, and continuity of care. Surgery, a central component of cancer treatments, leads to detrimental effects on functional capacity, which can be peculiarly relevant in vulnerable patients undergoing major procedures. Prehabilitation is a multidisciplinary intervention that uses the preoperative period to prevent or attenuate treatment-related functional decline and its subsequent consequences. This paper narratively reviews the rationale and the evidence of prehabilitation for uro-oncologic surgery.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted in August 2020, aiming to: (1) identify and discuss the impact of modifiable determinants of postoperative outcomes in urology and (2) review randomized controlled trials (RCT) exploring the role of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions in uro-oncologic surgery.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs on preoperative conditioning interventions met the inclusion criteria, focusing on radical cystectomy for bladder cancer (RC) and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (RP). There is strong evidence that poor physical, nutritional and psychosocial status negatively impacts on surgical outcomes. Single modality interventions, such as preoperative exercise or nutrition alone, had no effect on 'traditional' surgical outcomes as length of stay or complication. However, multimodal approaches targeting postoperative functional status have shown to be effective and safe.

CONCLUSION

There is initial evidence on the effectiveness and safety of multimodal prehabilitation in preserving functional capacity following RC and RP. However, to date, outcomes such as complications and length of stay seem to be not affected by prehabilitation.

Association between use of ERAS protocols and complications after radical cystectomy

PURPOSE

Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in cystectomy patients has significantly changed the perioperative course of this major operation. This paper summarizes evidence based interventions to enhance the postoperative course of radical cystectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed and also the results of our institutional enhanced recovery protocol were discussed.

RESULTS

One of the major advantages of such changes is the reduced rate of postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) complications especially postoperative ileus which could be contributed to several components of these protocols. However, Alvimopan is the only component which its use is supported by level I evidence. Although there are some evidence suggesting the decreased rate of urinary tract infection with the use of prophylactic antibiotics and wound complications by the use of negative wound pressure devices, their clear benefit is yet to be shown. Although robotic approach has proven advantages in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative blood transfusion rate, surgical team's experience and dedicated infrastructure seem to be more influential in optimized outcome than just the surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

current evidence suggests that such protocols have not only reached the goal of maintaining complication rate while decreasing length of hospital stay, but it might have caused a decrease in the rate of low-grade complications, especially GI complications.

[Do's and Dont's for radical cystectomy and urinary diversion - how to minimise postoperative complications]

Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion is a challenging surgical intervention. There is significant risk of postoperative complications, particularly linked to urinary diversion and the patient's comorbidities. The surgeon and the multidisciplinary team need to be familiar with all potential complications. In order to achieve optimal oncological and functional outcomes, multiple factors have to be considered during perioperative management, including the adherence to evidence-based guidelines, standardised concepts of enhanced recovery and best surgical practice for RC and urinary diversion. All measures should aim to minimise complication rates after RC and to accelerate recovery. We summarise essential Dos and Don'ts when performing RC with different forms of urinary diversion.

Opiate Prescriptions Vary among Common Urologic Procedures: A Claims Dataset Analysis

Objectives: This study aimed to better understand differences in the total days’ supply and fills of common opiates following urologic procedures. Materials and Methods: The Truven Health MarketScan® database was used to extract CPT codes from adults 18 years or older who underwent a urologic procedure with 90-day follow-up from 2012−2015 within the Austin−Round Rock, Texas metropolitan service area. A multivariate analysis and first hurdle modeling with a logistic outcome for any opiates was used to (1) assess differences in opioid prescribing patterns, (2) investigate opioid prescription outcomes, and (3) explore variability among opiate prescription patterns across seven urologic procedure categories. Results: Among the 2312 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 23.7% received an opiate, with an average total day’s supply of 6.20 (range 2.61−10.59). The proportion of patients receiving opiates varied significantly by procedure type (p = 0.028). Patients that had reconstructive procedures had the highest proportion of any opiates and the highest number of mean opiate prescriptions among the seven procedure categories (42% received opiates, p = 0.028, mean opiate prescriptions were 1.0 among all patients, p = 0.026). After adjustments, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing reconstructive procedures filled more opiate prescriptions (odds ratio (OR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00−3.50, p = 0.05) compared to other subcategories. Of those that received opiates, reconstructive patients had a shorter time to fills (mean −18.4 days, CI −8.40 to −28.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients undergoing reconstructive procedures are prescribed and fill more opiates compared to other common urological procedures. The standardization and implementation of postoperative pain regimens may help curtail this variability.

High-Normal Preoperative Potassium Level Is Associated with Reduced 30-Day Morbidity and Shorter Hospital Stay after Radical Cystectomy

Background: Radical cystectomy has high complication rates and, consequently, a high socioeconomic burden. The association between preoperative electrolyte levels and postoperative outcomes after radical cystectomy has not been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between preoperative potassium level and clinical (30-day morbidity) and economical (length of hospital stay) postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data of 317 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether preoperative patient clinical factors influence clinical (30-day morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) and economical (length of hospital stay) postoperative outcomes. Results: In univariate analysis, low Charlson comorbidity score (p = 0.011), low ASA score (p = 0.015), no aspirin intake (p = 0.048) and high-normal preoperative potassium level (p = 0.034) were associated with reduced 30-day morbidity. In multivariate analysis, only high preoperative potassium remained an independent predictive factor for a reduced risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval (0.48, 0.92), p = 0.014). Furthermore, high-normal preoperative potassium was the only preoperative factor associated with a shorter hospital stay ≤21 days (p = 0.007). Conclusions: High-normal preoperative potassium level was associated with better clinical (lower 30-day morbidity) and economical (shorter hospital stay) outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. We recommend that a randomized controlled trial be performed to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between preoperative potassium supplementation and postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

Preoperative immunonutrition and carbohydrate loading associated with improved bowel function after radical cystectomy

BACKGROUND

Preoperative malnourishment has been consistently associated with poor outcomes after radical cystectomy and other major abdominal surgeries. Most enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) studies have examined preoperative nutrition and its relationship to outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery. Although numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of using an ERAS protocol, this study in unique in comparing 2 ERAS protocols, with and without a nutrition component.

METHODS

A formalized preoperative nutrition protocol (PNP) recommending use of preoperative immunonutrition and carbohydrate drink was introduced in June 2018. A total of 78 consecutive patients who drank both beverages were compared with 92 historical controls. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were sequentially performed to determine if preoperative nutrition was associated with binary outcome variables (30-day complication, infectious complication, and readmission within 30 days).

RESULTS

The preoperative nutrition group and control group were statistically similar in distribution of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, clinical stage, and body mass index. Return of bowel function was found to occur earlier in the preoperative nutrition group than in the control group (3.12 vs 3.74 days; relative risk, 0.82; CI, 0.73-0.93; P = .0029). Complications within 30 days were similar in both groups (63.6% vs 55.4%; P = 0.36). Infectious complications (42.9% vs 37%; P = .53) and readmission within 30 days (22.1% vs 15.2%; P = .34) were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a PNP including immunonutrition and carbohydrate drink may be associated with earlier return of bowel function after radical cystectomy.

Better clinical benefits and potential cost saving of an enhanced recovery pathways for laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have been demonstrated to be clinically and economically effective for colorectal surgery. However, data are lacking to support the cost-effectiveness of ERPs for laparoscopic adrenalectomy, as well as potential economic loss. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of ERPs vs. conventional care (CC) for patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

METHODS

A single centered retrospective case-control study was performed. Patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy from January 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled. One inpatient ward used ERPs, whereas the other did not. Case control was used for matching (53 patients for each group). Postoperative outcomes were recorded up to 30 days after surgery. ERPs-specific costs were integrated into the model. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative real costs were collected for each patient via the hospital administration, which were reported in Renminbi. A bootstrap independent t-test was used for comparison.

RESULTS

The two groups were matched in terms of demographics and surgical details. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERPs group (2.54 days, P<0.001). The rate of complications was lower in the ERPs group (1 vs. 7 patients, P=0.031), there was no severe complications or morbidity. ERPs-specific costs were ¥656 per patient. The self-payment cost difference per patient between the two groups was ¥3,154.52 in favor of the ERPs group, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.113). The mean direct saving per patient in the ERPs group was ¥8,326.00, the total costs saving including indirect and potential overhead per patient was ¥18,247.60.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced recovery is cost-effective compared with conventional perioperative management for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Savings were noted in disposable materials, medicine and medical services, radiology and laboratory costs, with no increase in morbidity or duration.

Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway that provides evidence-based guidance for improving perioperative care and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. In 2013, the ERAS society released its original guidelines for radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC), adopting much of its supporting data from colorectal literature. In the last decade, growing interest in ERAS has increased RC-specific ERAS research, including prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Collective data suggest ERAS contributes to improved complication rates, decreased hospital length-of-stay, and/or time to bowel recovery. Various institutions have adopted modified versions of the ERAS pathway, yet there remains a lack of consensus on the efficacy of specific ERAS items and standardization of the protocol. In this review, we summarize updated evidence and practice patterns of ERAS pathways for RC since the introduction of the original 2013 guidelines. Novel target interventions, including use of immunonutrition, prehabilitation, alvimopan, and methods of local analgesia are reviewed. Finally, we discuss barriers to implementing and future steps in advancing the ERAS movement.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize patient recovery after major surgery. Our study was to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve patient outcomes after radical cystectomy.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane from January 2005 to January 2021 without language restrictions.

Eligibility Criteria

Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies implementing ERAS measuring its interventions on rates of postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS) and bowel function after radical cystectomy.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two members of the investigating team independently selected studies and evaluated bias using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Meta-analysis of all comparative studies used inversed-weighted, fixed- effects models and random effects models to pool results. Publication bias was graphically assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger’s test of funnel plot symmetry.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in our meta-analysis; we observed that ERAS decreased the time for the first bowel movement (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –1.30, 95% CI −1.90 to −0.70, P<0.00001) and shortened the length of stay (LOS) ([SMD]: –0.49, 95% CI −0.77 to −0.20, (P < 0.00001)); however, 30-day readmission (risk ratio [RR]: 0.97,95% [CI] 0.73 to 1.28, P=0.52) and the overall postoperative complication rate (risk ratio [RR]: 0.98,95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.09, P= 0.41) showed no significant difference.

Epidural Analgesia Is Associated with Prolonged Length of Stay After Open HPB Surgery in Over 27,000 Patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of epidural analgesia (EA) on postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS) after HPB surgery remains to be determined. These specific outcomes have been highlighted by the implementation of multiple enhanced recovery pathways (ERAS). The authors hypothesized that EA in the current environment may be associated with LOS and other outcomes.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) databases from 2014 to 2017 for patients undergoing open hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery were included in a retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score matching (PSM) comparing EA with control.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven thousand two hundred eighteen patients underwent open HPB surgery, of which 6048 (22%) received EA. There was an increase use of EA over time (from 19.3 to 25.5%, p = 0.001). On PSM, EA was associated with more than half of a day increase in LOS for both pancreatic (p < 0.001) and hepatic surgery (p < 0.001). Furthermore, for pancreatic surgery, there was an increase in urinary tract infection (2.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.018), time to drain removal (7.8 vs. 8.7 days, p < 0.001), and discharge to rehabilitation (2.9% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.029). For hepatic surgery, there was an increase in blood transfusion requirements (17% vs. 20%, p = 0.019). There were no differences in overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of over 27,000 patients with granular surgical details, there was a significant increase in LOS associated with EA after HPB surgery, along with increased procedure-specific UTI and blood transfusion. With the ever-increasing need for standardized and efficient patient care pathways that reduce LOS, alternative analgesic adjuncts may be considered to optimize patient outcomes.

Implementation of ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols for radical cystectomy patients: The pathway to standardization. A systematic review

CONTEXT

The development of ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols in patients undergoing major surgery has brought perioperative benefits in several disciplines. Its main application in urology is focused on patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE

Systematic review of the available literature on ERAS protocols applied to patients undergoing radical cystectomy in terms of perioperative outcomes as well in the analysis of their implementation.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A bibliographic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus, using the terms «Cystectomy», «Enhanced Recovery After Surgery» and «Fast-Track». Randomized and non-randomized studies that compared the implementation of an ERAS protocol versus a traditional protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy were selected.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

869 articles were identified; 25 were selected for final analysis: 22 non-randomized and 3 randomized studies. No differences were observed in terms of demographic characteristics between studies. Statistically significant differences were identified in favor of the ERAS protocol: length of hospital stay, major complication rate, time to first ambulation and return of bowel function. In the analysis of protocols, a high variability was detected in the number of items and in the implementation method.

CONCLUSIONS

The multidisciplinary nature and the number of items of the ERAS protocols imply a high heterogeneity in their implementation. Further randomized studies, standardized reporting and analyzing results, as well as a systematic analysis of subsequent adherence are required to increase comparability between groups.

[Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) after radical cystectomy-current data]

BACKGROUND

Radical cystectomy is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Based on the solid evidence in colorectal surgery, fast-track/ERAS® (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols have been developed to improve the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and guidelines and evaluate the evidence regarding the different components of ERAS® protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systemic literature search and evaluation of relevant guidelines.

RESULTS

The majority of ERAS® recommendations for radical cystectomy are based on extrapolations of abdominal surgery studies. Four randomized, controlled trials and one ERAS® guideline were published for radical cystectomy. ERAS® seems to shorten length of stay without increasing the complication rate. Key elements are no bowel preparation, no nasogastric tube, optimized fluid substitution, multimodal pain management, early mobilization, and oral diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ERAS® requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Individualization of an ERAS® program, identification of the most important components and adaption to the specific needs of radical cystectomy patients are future goals.

Nursing Implication of People Treated by Radical Cystectomy Postsurgery and Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to summarize existing evidence about nursing interventions to selected symptoms experienced by patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) to maintain or return to their daily life activities.

DATA SOURCES

A non-systematic narrative review was conducted. A search in PubMed and CINAHL was conducted eliciting evidence about frequent symptoms experienced after RC. The following search terms were used: radical cystectomy and/or nursing interventions, pain, distress, fatigue, urinary dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, loss of appetite, sleep disturbance, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

CONCLUSION

Evidence in the ERAS pathway is still lacking regarding the effect of preoperative education and counseling of the patient and the most difficult part to implement is related to preoperative optimization of the patient such as lifestyle changes. Most nursing interventions to alleviate symptoms in the rehabilitation period after RC are still practice based.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Priority should be given to implementation of the ERAS protocol. To improve the management of symptoms experienced by patients in the RC rehabilitation period it is essential that validated screening tools to identify the symptoms be used. Accepted and effective strategies for treating the individual symptoms should be initiated and clear treatment outcomes should be defined. Urology nurse researchers should investigate the concept of symptom clusters to clarify whether there are more efficient methods to identify symptoms or symptom clusters and if so would the use of symptom clusters knowledge improve patient care.

Radical cystectomy: a review of techniques, developments and controversies

Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion is considered the standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). As one of the most challenging surgical techniques performed by urologists, RC was described many decades ago, and yet patient morbidity rates have remained stagnant over the years. This review outlines the most recent indications and techniques for RC and analyses the current landscape of complications after cystectomy. There is significant room for improvement with respect to both oncologic and functional outcomes after RC. Future efforts will need to focus on unifying reporting methodology, optimal patient selection criteria, enhanced surgical techniques and peri-operative care pathways, and technological advances to improve patient outcomes.

Enhanced recovery after surgery of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for patients diagnosed with muscle invasive bladder cancer, but is associated with significant morbidity and long hospital stays. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is based on a variety of interventions during the peri-treatment stage. It is designed to improve morbidity, enhance recovery, and reduce hospital stays after RC. The study provides an overview of the key elements of the ERAS protocol recommended for patients undergoing RC and directions for further research. We have analyzed the rationale for 15 key elements related to the ERAS protocol: preoperative patient counseling and education, preoperative medical optimization and nutrition, mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative fasting and carbohydrate loading, pre-anesthetic medication, thromboembolic prophylaxis, minimally invasive surgical approach, resection-site drainage, preventing intraoperative hypothermia, perioperative fluid management, perioperative analgesia, urinary drainage, prevention of postoperative ileus, nausea and vomiting, early oral feeding, and early mobilization. Several studies have shown that ERAS improves the recovery of RC patients. Evidence suggests that ERAS facilitates the recovery of RC patients. However, additional randomized controlled studies or large prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of ERAS in RC patients.

Postoperative outcomes of Fast-Track-enhanced recovery protocol in open radical cystectomy: comparison with standard management in a high-volume center and Trifecta proposal

BACKGROUND

We aimed at comparing perioperative outcomes in patients submitted to radical cystectomy followed by Fast Track (FT) protocol or standard management, and propose a definition of Trifecta, to improve standardized quality assessment for RC.

METHODS

We considered 191 patients submitted to RC between January 2017 and January 2019. Patients followed FT or standard management according to surgeon's preference. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics, alongside with postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Trifecta was defined as follows: in-hospital stay (HS) ≤ 10 days, time to defecation (TtD) below the overall mean and no major (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade III) complications. Finally, Trifecta achievement rates were assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (39%) followed the FT protocol and 116 (61%) standard management. The two groups were homogeneous for preoperative, intraoperative and pathological characteristics. Patients in the FT group had shorter TtD (5 vs. 6 days P=0.006), HS (12 vs. 14 days P=0.008) and lower readmission rate (8% vs. 19% P=0.04). Early complication rates and grades were similar, while less late complications were found in FT group (6.7% vs. 21.6% P=0.006). Trifecta achievement rate was higher for FT group (31% vs. 8% P<0.001). Single-item failure percentages for HS, TtD and major grade complications were respectively 90%, 60% and 19%, with no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

FT protocol can safely consent faster bowel recovery and earlier discharge after RC, plus reducing readmission rates. Using a Trifecta incorporating essential perioperative outcomes, could improve standardized quality assessment for RC.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy

Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been widely used in clinical surgery. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS vs. conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, based on the PICOS strategy. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were further surveyed for relevant publications. Results: Our search yielded seven RCTs containing 813 patients. The ERAS group was found to have better performance in the following parameters: length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) = -1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.80 to -0.45, P = 0.001], time to first flatus (MD = -0.70, 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.41, P < 0.00001), and time to regular diet (MD = -0.12, 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.28, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.34, P = 0.64], readmission (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.01, P = 0.63), ileus (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.28, P = 0.29), wound infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.01, P = 0.05), mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.99, P = 0.49), or time to first bowel movement (MD = -0.55, 95% CI: -1.62 to 0.53, P = 0.32). Conclusion: ERAS reduced the length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and time to regular diet after cystectomy. Compared to CRAS protocols, ERAS protocols do not increase the risk of adverse events.

Impact of Perioperative Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Pathway on Early Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of incorporating physical rehabilitation, nutrition and psychosocial care as part of the "NEEW" (Nutrition, Exercise, patient Education and Wellness) on perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

METHODS

Patients were divided into 2 groups: pathway group (NEEW in addition to enhanced recovery after surgery), vs prepathway group, before NEEW initiation (enhanced recovery after surgery only). Propensity score matching was performed (ratio 1:2 ratio). Perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared. Multivariate analyses were modeled to assess for association between NEEW pathway and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and niney-two were included in the study: 64 patients (33%) in the pathway group vs 128 patients (67%) in the prepathway group. Pathway group had shorter median inpatient stay (5 vs 6 days, P <.01), faster bowel recovery (3 vs 4 days, P <.01), and better pain scores, and demonstrated fewer 30-day high grade complications (5% vs 16%, P = .02). On multivariate analysis, the NEEW pathway was associated with shorter hospital stay (1.75 days shorter), faster bowel recovery (1 day faster), longer functional mobility time (4 minutes longer) and less pain scores (average 1 point less).

CONCLUSION

Standardized perioperative pathway with weekly multidisciplinary team meeting was associated with improved short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

Clinical efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery for patients treated with radical cystectomy and ileal urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and ileal urinary diversion (IUD). We performed a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and three main Chinese databases (WANFANG, CNKI and VIP) in December 2019 without language restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies, evaluated methodological quality and extracted data using Cochrane Collaboration’s tools. Efficacy was assessed by the time to first flatus, first bowel movement, and hospitalization time. Safety was assessed by 30-day readmission and complications after surgery. Our searches identified 6 studies, including 628 patients. A total of 323 (51%) patients took ERAS. We observed that ERAS reduced the time to first flatus [standard mean difference (SMD): −1.65, 95% CI: −2.63 to −0.68, P=0.0009], first bowel movement (SMD: −1.14, 95% CI: −1.78 to −0.50, P=0.0005), and hospitalization time (MD: −4.09, 95% CI: −6.34 to −1.85, P=0.0004). We did not detect significant difference in terms of 30-day readmission [relative risk (RR): 1.33, 95% CI: 0.61–2.88, P=0.48] and postoperative complications (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.65–1.26, P=0.56) between ERAS and conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS). Our findings indicated that ERAS protocols throughout the perioperative period of RC with IUD might reduce hospitalization expenses and contribute to higher turnover ward, more efficient utilization of medical resources and lower risk of nosocomial infection as a result of shorter length of stay. Besides, early rehabilitation of gastrointestinal function might not only facilitate wound healing and early mobilization, thereby reducing the incidence of basic complications such as cardiopulmonary disease, but also improve patients’ psychological trauma and stress response, increase self-confidence and motivation in treatments, and then lead to unexpected benefits. Further large volume, multicenter randomized controlled studies are warranted before making the final clinical guidelines.

Defining postoperative ileus and associated risk factors in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication of radical cystectomy (RC), occurring in 1.6-23.5% of cases. It is defined heterogeneously in the literature. POI increases hospital length of stay and postoperative morbidity. Factors such as age, epidural use, length of procedure, and blood loss may impact POI. In this study, we aimed to evaluate risk factors that contribute to POI in a cohort of patients managed with a comprehensive Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RC from March 2015 to December 2016 at Vancouver General Hospital was performed. POI was defined a priori as insertion of nasogastric tube for nausea or vomiting, or failure to advance to a solid diet by the seventh postoperative day. To illustrate heterogeneity in previous studies, we also evaluated POI using other previously reported definitions in the RC literature. The influence of potential risk factors for POI, including patient comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, gender, age, prior abdominal surgery or radiation, length of operation, diversion type, extent of lymph node dissection, removal date of analgesic catheter, blood loss, and fluid administration volume was analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (27%) of 136 patients developed POI. Using other previously reported definitions for POI, the incidence ranged from <1-51%. Node-positive status and age at surgery were associated with POI on univariate analysis but not multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A large range of POI incidence was observed using previously published definitions of POI. We advocate for a standardized definition of POI when evaluating RC outcomes. POI occurs frequently even with a comprehensive ERAS protocol, suggesting that additional measures are needed to reduce the rate of POI.

Critical analysis of quality of life and cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patient's undergoing urologic oncology surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented across a variety of disciplines to improve outcomes. Herein we describe the impact of ERAS on quality of life (QOL) and cost for patients undergoing urologic oncology surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Clinictrials.gov, and Cochrane Review databases for studies published between 1946 and 2020 was conducted. Articles were reviewed and assigned a risk of bias by two authors and were included if they addressed ERAS and either QOL or cost-effectiveness for patients undergoing urologic oncology surgery.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded a total of 682 studies after removing duplicates, of which 10 (1.5%) were included in the review. Nine articles addressed radical cystectomy, while one addressed ERAS and QOL for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Six publications assessed the impact of ERAS on QOL domains. Questionnaires used for assessment of QOL varied across studies, and timing of administration was heterogeneous. Overall, ERAS improved patient QOL during early phases of recovery within the realms of bowel function, physical/social/cognitive functioning, sleep and pain control. Costs were assessed in 4 retrospective studies including 3 conducted in the United States and one from China all addressing radical cystectomy. Studies demonstrated either decreased costs associated with ERAS as a result of decreased length of stay or no change in cost based on ERAS implementation.

CONCLUSION

While limited studies are published on the subject, ERAS implementation for radical cystectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy improved patient-reported QOL during early phases of recovery. For radical cystectomy, there was a decreased or neutral overall financial cost associated with ERAS. Further studies assessing QOL and cost-effectiveness over the entire global period of care in a variety of urologic oncology surgeries are warranted.

A combination of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation pathways improves perioperative outcomes and costs for robotic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway has shown benefit in oncologic surgery. However, literature is scarce regarding the impact of this pathway, alone or combined with prehabilitation (PreHab) programs, on outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHODS

Included in this study were 507 consecutive patients undergoing RARP from 2014 to 2019. The primary endpoint was duration of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, readmission rate, and overall costs. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed according to the ERAS and PreHab program status.

RESULTS

ERAS patients had shorter hospital stays (P < .001), reduced operative times (P < .001), and decreased blood loss (P < .001) in comparison with non-ERAS patients. Shorter hospital stays were not associated with an increased readmission rate (7.9% [stable over time]; P = .757). Patients from an ERAS-/PreHab- group had a longer hospital stay (4.7 days) than those from an ERAS+/PreHab- group (3.5 days) and those from an ERAS+/PreHab+ group (1.6 days; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, operative time and perioperative pathway (odds ratio for ERAS, 0.144; P < .001; odds ratio for ERAS and PreHab, 0.025; P < .001) were independently predictive for a prolonged length of stay (P < .001). Costs significantly decreased when ERAS and PreHab pathways were combined.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of ERAS and PreHab programs significantly changes the postoperative course of patients and may synergistically optimize RARP outcomes. The combination of these pathways improves patient recovery and is associated with reduced lengths of stay, blood loss, operative times, and costs without an increase in the postdischarge readmission rate.

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients with soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing surgery for soft tissue sarcoma have high morbidity rates, particularly after preoperative radiation therapy (RT). An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme may improve perioperative outcomes in abdominal surgery. This study reported outcomes of an ERAS programme tailored to patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

A prospective ERAS protocol was implemented in 2015 at a high-volume sarcoma centre. Patients treated within the ERAS programme from 2015 to 2018 were case-matched retrospectively with patients treated between 2012 and 2018 without use of the protocol, matched by surgical site, surgeon, sarcoma histology and preoperative RT treatment. Postoperative outcomes, specifically wound complications and duration of hospital stay, were reported.

RESULTS

In total, 234 patients treated within the ERAS programme were matched with 237 who were not. The ERAS group had lower wound dehiscence rates overall (2 of 234 (0·9 per cent) versus 31 of 237 (13·1 per cent); P < 0·001), after preoperative RT (0 of 41 versus 11 of 51; P = 0·004) and after extremity sarcoma surgery (0 of 54 versus 6 of 56; P = 0·040) compared with the non-ERAS group. Rates of postoperative ileus or obstruction were lower in the ERAS group (21 of 234 (9·9 per cent) versus 40 of 237 (16·9 per cent); P = 0·016) and in those with retroperitoneal sarcoma (4 of 36 versus 15 of 36; P = 0·007). Duration of hospital stay was shorter in the ERAS group (median 5 (range 0-36) versus 6 (0-67) days; P = 0·003).

CONCLUSION

Treatment within an ERAS protocol for patients with soft tissue sarcoma was associated with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery-Based Perioperative Protocol for Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction

Objectives

Evaluate an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)–based free flap management protocol implemented at our center.

Study Design

Prospective cohort study of patients after implementation of an ERAS-based perioperative care protocol for patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the head and neck as compared with a historical control group.

Setting

Tertiary care academic medical center.

Participants and Methods

All patients undergoing free flap reconstruction were prospectively enrolled in the ERAS protocol group. A retrospective control group was identified by randomly selecting an equivalent number of patients from a records search of those undergoing free flap surgery between 2009 and 2015. Blood transfusion, complications, 30-day readmission rates, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, and costs of hospitalization were compared.

Results

Sixty-one patients were included in each group. Patients in the ERAS group underwent less frequent flap monitoring by physicians and had lower rates of intraoperative (70.5% vs 86.8%, P = .04) and postoperative (49.2% vs 27.2%, P = .026) blood transfusion, were more likely to be off vasopressors (98.3% vs 50.8%, P < .01) and ventilator support (63.9% vs 9.8%, P < .01) at the conclusion of surgery, and had shorter ICU stays (2.11 vs 3.39 days, P = .017). Length of stay, readmissions, and complication rates did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusion

ERAS-based perioperative practices for head and neck free flap reconstruction can reduce time on the ventilator and in the ICU and the need for vasopressors, blood transfusions, and labor-intensive flap monitoring, without adverse effects on outcomes.

Randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes with and without the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

Introduction:

Very few randomized controlled trials are available globally to support routine use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol after radical cystectomy (RC), and none so far has been conducted in the Indian subcontinent. The aim of the present study was to evaluate hospital stay and 30-day perioperative outcomes following RC with the implementation of the ERAS protocol.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty-four patients undergoing open RC were randomized to ERAS versus conventional surgical care (CSC) at our center from April 2017 to May 2018. Key interventions included avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, early nasogastric tube removal, early enteral feeding, and early obligatory ambulation. Follow-up was done till 30-day postoperatively or till discharge, whichever longer.

Results:

Twenty-seven patients in each group were analyzed. The demographic profile of the groups was similar. Length of stay in each group (8 days [5–57] ERAS vs. 9 days [5–31] CSC group, P = 0.390) was similar, with time to recovery of bowel function being significantly less in ERAS group (12 h [12–108] vs. 36 h [12–60] for bowel sounds [P = 0.001], 48 h [12–108] vs. 72 h [36–156] for passage of flatus [P = 0.001], and 84 h [36–180] vs. 96 [60–156] for passage of stools [P = 0.013]). Perioperative complication rate (12 patients (44.4%) vs. 14 (51.9%), P = 0.786) was similar.

Conclusions:

ERAS protocol leads to faster bowel recovery compared to conventional care in patients undergoing open RC but fails to demonstrate a shorter length of stay and lower complication rate.