Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies

Factors affecting the thermal effects of lasers in lithotripsy: A literature review

Objective

The use of lasers has been an important part of urology in the treatment of stone and prostate disease. The thermal effects of lasers in lithotripsy have been a subject of debate over the years. The objective of this review was to assess the current state of knowledge available on the thermal effects of lasers in lithotripsy, as well as explore any new areas where studies are needed.

Methods

In August 2022, a keyword search on Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus for all papers containing the phrases "thermal effects" AND "laser" AND "lithotripsy" AND "urology" was done followed by citation jumping to other studies pertaining to the topic and 35 relevant papers were included in our study. The data from relevant papers were segregated into five groups according to the factor studied and type of study, and tables were created for a comparison of data.

Results

Temperature above the threshold of 43 °C was reached only when the power was >40 W and when there was adequate irrigation (at least 15-30 mL/min). Shorter lasing time divided by lithotripsy time or operator duty cycles less than 70% also resulted in a smaller temperature rise.

Conclusion

At least eight factors modify the thermal effects of lasers, and most importantly, the use of chilled irrigation at higher perfusion rates, lower power settings of <40 W, and with a shorter operator duty cycle will help to prevent thermal injuries from occurring. Stones impacted in the ureter or pelvi-ureteric junction further increase the probability of thermal injuries during laser firing.

Temperature profile during endourological laser activation: introducing the thermal safety distance concept

PURPOSE

To examine temporal-spatial distribution of heat generated upon laser activation in a bench model of renal calyx. To establish reference values for a safety distance between the laser fiber and healthy tissue during laser lithotripsy.

METHODS

We developed an in-vitro experimental setup employing a glass pipette and laser activation under various intra-operative parameters, such as power and presence of irrigation. A thermal camera was used to monitor both temporal and spatial temperature changes during uninterrupted 60-second laser activation. We computed the thermal dose according to Sapareto and Dewey's formula at different distances from the laser fiber tip, in order to determine a safety distance.

RESULTS

A positive correlation was observed between average power and the highest recorded temperature (Spearman's coefficient 0.94, p < 0.001). Irrigation was found to reduce the highest recorded temperature, with a maximum average reduction of 9.4 °C at 40 W (p = 0.002). A positive correlation existed between average power and safety distance values (Spearman's coefficient 0.86, p = 0.001). A thermal dose indicative of tissue damage was observed at 20 W without irrigation (safety distance 0.93±0.11 mm). While at 40 W, irrigation led to slight reduction in mean safety distance (4.47±0.85 vs. 5.22±0.09 mm, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Laser settings with an average power greater than 10 W deliver a thermal dose indicative of tissue damage, which increases with higher average power values. According to safety distance values from this study, a maximum of 10 W should be used in the ureter, and a maximum of 20 W should be used in kidney in presence of irrigation.

Safety and Efficacy of "Dusting and Pop-Dusting" with High-Power Laser for Treatment of Large Pediatric Stones with Ureteroscopy and Lasertripsy: Prospective Outcomes from a University Teaching Hospital

Introduction: The wide use of high-power laser has changed the landscape of ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (URSL). We wanted to look at the role and outcomes of high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for URSL in pediatric stone disease. Methods: A prospective analysis of consecutive pediatric patients treated with "Dusting and Pop-dusting" using a high-power laser was done between January 2016 and March 2022. The project was registered with our audit committee. Data were analyzed for patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative details, procedural outcomes, and complications. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as fragments ≤2 mm on postoperative ultrasound imaging 2-3 months after the procedure. Results: A total of 35 patients underwent 43 procedures (1.2 procedure/patient) during the study period with a mean age of 9.4 years (range 1-16 years) and a male:female ratio of 13:22. The stone location was in the kidney in 32 (91.4%) patients of which 8 were in multiple renal locations. The mean stone size was 18 mm (range 10-39 mm), with the pre- and post-stent rates of 37% and 56%, respectively. An access sheath was used in 19 (44%) procedures. The overall SFR on ultrasound scan was 94% (n = 33) with no procedural complications noted in our series and a mean length of stay of 0.9 days. Conclusion: Pediatric URSL using a high-power laser achieves a high SFR even for large and multiple renal stones with no complications noted in our prospective series. Parents must, however, be counseled about the need for staged procedures, which might be needed for large stones.

Prevention of complications in endourological management of stones: What are the basic measures needed before, during, and after interventions?

Objective

This narrative review aims to describe measures to minimise the risk of complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Methods

A literature search was conducted from the PubMed/PMC database for papers published within the last 10 years (January 2012 to December 2022). Search terms included "ureteroscopy", "retrograde intrarenal surgery", "PCNL", "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "complications", "sepsis", "infection", "bleed", "haemorrhage", and "hemorrhage". Key papers were identified and included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and primary research. The references of these papers were searched to identify any further relevant papers not included above.

Results

The evidence is assimilated with the opinions of the authors to provide recommendations. Best practice pathways for patient care in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative periods are described, including the identification and management of residual stones. Key complications (sepsis and stent issues) that are relevant for any endourological procedure are then be discussed. Operation-specific considerations are then explored. Key measures for PCNL include optimising access to minimise the chance of bleeding or visceral injury. The role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in this regard is discussed. Key measures for ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery include planning and technique to minimise the risk of ureteric injury. The role of anaesthetic assessment is discussed. The importance of specific comorbidities on each step of the pathway is highlighted as examples.

Conclusion

This review demonstrates that the principles of meticulous planning, interdisciplinary teamworking, and good operative technique can minimise the risk of complications in endourology.

WATTS happening? Evaluation of thermal dose during holmium laser lithotripsy in a high-fidelity anatomic model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the thermal profiles of the holmium laser at different laser parameters at different locations in an in vitro anatomic pelvicalyceal collecting system (PCS) model. Laser lithotripsy is the cornerstone of treatment for urolithiasis. With the prevalence of high-powered lasers, stone ablation efficiency has become more pronounced. Patient safety remains paramount during surgery. It is well recognized that the heat generated from laser lithotripsy has the potential to cause thermal tissue damage.

METHODS

Utilizing high-fidelity, 3D printed hydrogel models of a PCS with a synthetic BegoStone implanted in the renal pelvis, laser lithotripsy was performed with the Moses 2.0 holmium laser. At a standard power (40 W) and irrigation pressure (100 cm H2O), we evaluated operator duty cycle (ODC) variations with different time-on intervals at four different laser settings. Temperature was measured at two separate locations-at the stone and away from the stone.

RESULTS

Temperatures were highest closest to the laser tip with a decrease away from the laser. Fluid temperatures increased with longer laser-on times and higher ODCs. Thermal doses were greater with increased ODCs and the threshold for thermal injury was reached for ODCs of 75% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

Temperature generation and thermal dose delivered are greatest closer to the tip of the laser fiber and are not dependent on power alone. Significant temperature differences were noted between four laser settings at a standardized power (40 W). Temperatures can be influenced by a variety of factors, such as laser-on time, operator duty cycle, and location in the PCS.

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of urolithiasis: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training-Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group

PURPOSE

To identify laser lithotripsy settings used by experts for specific clinical scenarios and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications.

METHODS

After literature research to identify relevant questions, a survey was conducted and sent to laser experts. Participants were asked for preferred laser settings during specific clinical lithotripsy scenarios. Different settings were compared for the reported laser types, and common settings and preventive measures were identified.

RESULTS

Twenty-six laser experts fully returned the survey. Holmium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) was the primary laser used (88%), followed by thulium fiber laser (TFL) (42%) and pulsed thulium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) (23%). For most scenarios, we could not identify relevant differences among laser settings. However, the laser power was significantly different for middle-ureteral (p = 0.027), pelvic (p = 0.047), and lower pole stone (p = 0.018) lithotripsy. Fragmentation or a combined fragmentation with dusting was more common for Ho:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG lasers, whereas dusting or a combination of dusting and fragmentation was more common for TFL lasers. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG lasers to short pulse modes for TFL lasers. Thermal injury due to temperature development during lithotripsy is seriously considered by experts, with preventive measures applied routinely.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser settings do not vary significantly between commonly used lasers for lithotripsy. Lithotripsy techniques and settings mainly depend on the generated laser pulse's and generator settings' physical characteristics. Preventive measures such as maximum power limits, intermittent laser activation, and ureteral access sheaths are commonly used by experts to decrease thermal injury-caused complications.

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group

PURPOSE

To highlight and compare experts' laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists.

METHODS

Following a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities.

CONCLUSION

Ho:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.

Lasers for stone lithotripsy: advantages/disadvantages of each laser source

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article was to make a narrative review of the literature in search of all articles regarding thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG), thulium laser fiber (TFL) and holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) for lithotripsy from 2020 to 2023. A selection of articles of special interest and best evidence was made in order to give a better perspective on their advantages and disadvantages.

RECENT FINDINGS

New Ho:YAG technologies of as high power, high frequency and pulsed modulations have shown promising results for lithotripsy by reducing retropulsion with good ablation efficiency. High peak power makes it particularly good for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. High intrarenal temperatures and correct setting are still concerning points.TFL has arrived to be one of the main players in flexible ureteroscopy. Being highly efficient and quick, and by producing micro-dusting the laser is quickly heading to become a gold standard. The new pulsed Thulium YAG is the newest laser. For now, only in-vitro studies show promising results with efficient lithotripsy. As the peak power lies between Ho:YAG and TFL it may be able to adequately perform when needing and low power lithotripsy.

SUMMARY

Several new technologies have been developed in the last years for stone lithotripsy. All being efficient and safe if well used. Different advantages and disadvantages of each laser must be taken into consideration to give each laser the proper indication.

Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones - Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment options available, and how outcomes are influenced by the angle.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is clear the lower pole angle definition varies widely depending on described technique and imaging modality. However, it is clear that outcomes are worse with a steeper angle, especially for shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has similar reported outcomes to RIRS, and there is limited evidence it may be superior for steeper angles over RIRS. Lower pole stones can be technically challenging and adequate assessment prior to choosing operative approach is key.

Comparison of Low-Power vs High-Power Holmium lasers in pediatric RIRS outcomes

OBJECTIVES

to compare the outcomes of using low-power (up to 30W) vs high-power (up to 120W) holmium lasers in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in children and to analyse if lasering techniques and the use of access sheath have any influence on the outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 9 centres of children who underwent RIRS with holmium laser for the treatment of kidney stones between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: high-power and low-power holmium laser. Clinical, perioperative variables and complications were analysed. Outcomes were compared between groups using Student's T-test for continuous variables, and Chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was also performed.

RESULTS

314 patients were included. A high-power and low-power holmium laser was used in 97 and 217 patients, respectively. Clinical and demographic variables were comparable between both groups, except for stone size where the low-power group treated larger stones (mean 11.11 mm vs 9.70 mm; p 0.018). In the high-power laser group, a reduction in surgical time was found (mean 64.29 min vs 75.27 min; p 0.018) with a significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (mean 81.4% vs 59%; p <0.001). We found no statistical differences in complication rates. The multivariate logistic regression model showed lower SFR in the low-power holmium group, especially with larger (p = 0.011) and multiple stones (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our real-world pediatric multicenter study favours high-power holmium laser and establishes its safety and efficacy in children.  .

Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers

PURPOSE

We looked into the Thulium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (TM:YAG), Thulium Fibre laser (TFL) and Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) thermal laser tissue effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) search.

RESULTS

During lithotripsy, the Ho:YAG generated temperatures from 24 to 68.7 °C at powers < 20 W, the Tm:YAG from 43.7 °C at 30 W to 68 °C at powers < 20 W, and the TFL from 33 to 40.46 °C. During ablation, the Ho:YAG and continuous wave (cw) Tm:YAG tissue incision depths ranged from 0.08 to 2.26 mm, and from 0.28 to 3.22 mm. The Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG vaporization areas ranged from 0.044 to 0.078 mm² and from 0.050 to 0.078 mm³ and their coagulation zones were 0.075 mm² and 0.125 mm³ respectively. Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG laser damage zones ranged from 0.093 to 2.6 mm³ and from 0.207 to 0.98 mm³ respectively. The TFL incision depth ranged from 0.04 to 5.7 mm. The cw and SuperPulsed (SP) vaporization volumes ranged from 8 to 28.2 mm³/s and from 4 to 11 mm³/s. TFL coagulation depth and coagulation zone ranged from zero to 1.1 mm, 2.2 to 5.1 mm³ in SP mode and from 7.7 to 18.1 mm³ in cw mode.

CONCLUSION

During lithotripsy all lasers caused similar temperature changes and had a safe temperature profile at < 40 W. During tissue ablation, Ho:YAG has a deeper incision depth, while cwTm:YAG and cwTFL have broader coagulation and total laser areas.