Radiation therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer: risks and benefits

Safety of Pelvic and Abdominal Radiation Therapy for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Dosimetric Analysis of Acute Bowel Toxicity

PURPOSE

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been considered a relative contraindication to radiation therapy (RT) because of the potential greater risk of RT-induced toxicities. This study aimed to assess acute toxicity outcomes in patients with IBD treated with abdominal/pelvic RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After institutional review board approval, patients with IBD who received RT to the abdomen/pelvis were identified from an institutional research repository, and their electronic medical records were reviewed. The IBD cohort was matched 1:1 with controls according to all of the following: RT, gender, disease site, age, and year of RT. Acute toxicity was defined as toxicity occurring within 3 months of RT. Primary outcomes were assessed via univariable logistic regression models and the predicted probability of acute toxicity and acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were plotted for the most significant covariates. IBD and control cohorts were compared on demographic and toxicity variables using χ2/Fisher exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests where appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 62 patients with a median age of 64 years (IQR, 54-70 years) who received RT from 2006 to 2022. Patients were treated with intensity modulated RT (38; 61.3%), 3-dimensional conformal RT (12; 19.4%), and stereotactic body RT/brachytherapy (12; 19.4%). After RT, 28 (45.2%) and 23 (37.1%) patients experienced grade ≥2 acute (any) and acute GI toxicity, respectively. Higher overall RT dose and RT dose to small bowel were found to be significantly associated with increased risk of grade ≥2 acute toxicities (OR, 1.041 per unit Gy; 95% CI, 1.005-1.084; P = .034 and OR, 1.046; 95% CI, 1.018-1.082; P = .003, respectively). Between IBD and control cohorts, there were no significant differences in grade ≥2 acute (any) and acute GI toxicities (P = .710 and P = .704, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IBD treated with abdominal/pelvic RT for malignancy, RT was effective and well-tolerated. RT treatment planning should carefully consider the location(s) of IBD inflammation and dose to bowel structures, in particular, dose to the small bowel.

Rectal Cancer and Radiation in Colitis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. When IBD patients develop a rectal cancer, this should be treated with the same oncological principles and guidelines as the general population. Rectal cancer treatment includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). Many IBD patients will require a total proctocolectomy with an ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and others, restoration of intestinal continuity may not be feasible or advisable. The literature is scarce regarding outcomes of IPAA after RT. In the present review, we will summarize the evidence regarding RT toxicity in IBD patients and review surgical strategies and outcomes of IPAA after RT.

Complications after bowel resection for inflammatory bowel disease associated cancer: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) associated colorectal cancer represents the 1-2% of all patients affected by colorectal carcinoma, but it is frequent responsible for death in these patients. Aim of this systematic review was to report the complications after bowel resection in patients with IBD associated cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases. A total of 54,084 articles were found. Of these 38,954 were eliminated because were duplicates between the searches. Of the remaining 15,130 articles, 14,888 were excluded after screening title and abstract.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Two-hundred-forty-two articles were fully analyzed, and 239 further articles were excluded. Finally, three articles were included for a total of 63 patients. Overall, 38 early postoperative complications (60.3%) were observed. Of these, anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (20.6%). The indication for surgery was ulcerative colitis in 52 patients (82.5%), Crohn's disease in 8 patients (12.7%) and indeterminate colitis in 3 patients (4.8%). Intraoperative complications, readmission and postoperative mortality were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rate after bowel resection for IBD associated cancer is not different from complication rate after colorectal surgery for other diseases. Given the high probability of developing a cancer and the time correlated occurrence of malignancy in IBD patients, it should be debated if a surgical resection should be performed as soon as dysplasia is detected in IBD patients or earlier in their life.

Chemoradiotherapy for fistula-related perianal squamous cell carcinoma with Crohn's disease

The reports of chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma with Crohn's disease are few. Severe toxicity related to radiotherapy is concerned in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We report a case of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced fistula-related perianal squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with long-standing Crohn's disease which was controlled by a maintenance therapy. The patient completed standard chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy without severe toxicity, and achieved complete remission. Standard chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy may be feasible and effective treatment for this population when Crohn's disease is controlled.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in men with underlying inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Historically, IBD has been thought to increase the underlying risk of radiation related toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer. In the modern era, contemporary radiation planning and delivery may mitigate radiation-related toxicity in this theoretically high-risk cohort. This is the first manuscript to report clinical outcomes for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and underlying IBD curatively treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A large institutional database of patients (n = 4245) treated with SBRT for adenocarcinoma of the prostate was interrogated to identify patients who were diagnosed with underlying IBD prior to treatment. All patients were treated with SBRT over five treatment fractions using a robotic radiosurgical platform and fiducial tracking. Baseline IBD characteristics including IBD subtype, pre-SBRT IBD medications, and EPIC bowel questionnaires were reviewed for the IBD cohort. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated using the CTCAE version 5.0.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were identified who had underlying IBD prior to SBRT for the curative treatment of prostate cancer. The majority (n = 18) were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and were being treated with local steroid suppositories for IBD. No biochemical relapses were observed in the IBD cohort with early follow up. High-grade acute and late toxicities were rare (n = 1, grade 3 proctitis) with a median time to any GI toxicity of 22 months. Hemorrhoidal flare was the most common low-grade toxicity observed (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

To date, this is one of the largest groups of patients with IBD treated safely and effectively with radiation for prostate cancer and the only review of patients treated with SBRT. Caution is warranted when delivering therapeutic radiation to patients with IBD, however modern radiation techniques appear to have mitigated the risk of GI side effects.

Should inflammatory bowel disease be a contraindication to radiation therapy: a systematic review of acute and late toxicities

Background:

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [i.e., Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)] has been considered a relative contraindication for radiation therapy (RT) to the abdomen or pelvis, potentially preventing patients with a diagnosis of IBD from receiving definitive therapy for their malignancy.

Method:

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) conventions, a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search was conducted using the keywords RT, brachytherapy, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and toxicity.

Results:

A total of 1,206 publications were screened with an addition of 8 studies identified through hand searching. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. The total population across all studies was 497 patients, 50·5% having UC, 37% having CD and an additional 12·5% having unspecified IBD. Primary gastrointestinal malignancy (55%) followed by prostate cancer (40%) composed the bulk of the population. Acute and late grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal specific toxicity ranged from 0–23% to 0–13% respectively for those patients with IBD treated with RT to the abdomen or pelvis. In the literature reviewed, RT does not appear to increase fistula or stricture formation or IBD flares; however, one study did note RT to be a statistically significant risk factor for subsequent IBD flare on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

A review of reported acute and late toxicities suggests that patients with IBD should still be considered for definitive radiotherapy. Patient characteristics including IBD distribution relative to the irradiated field, inflammatory activity at the time of radiation, overall disease severity and disease phenotype in the case of CD (fistulising versus stricturing versus inflammatory only) should be considered on an individual basis when evaluating potential patients. When possible, advanced techniques with strict organ at risk dose constraints should be employed to limit toxicity in this patient population.

The Complex Interplay Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Both the chronic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and its treatment, can increase the risk of malignancy. There is also an increasing number of patients with current and prior cancer who require IBD treatment. Thus, there is a complex interplay between immunosuppressive treatment and monitoring for new and recurrent cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab have not been shown to increase the risk of malignancy. Transplant data shows a potential risk with tofacitinib although rheumatoid arthritis data does not. IBD patients have been shown to tolerate chemotherapy, specifically with cytotoxic compared with hormonal chemotherapy. Patients with prior cancer are at increased risk of new or recurrent cancers; however, immunosuppression appears to be safe. Emerging treatments for IBD have demonstrated acceptable safety profiles for malignancy risk, and immunosuppression appears to be safe for use in patients with current and prior malignancy. More data is still needed to assess long-term risk of malignancy in these patients, especially with newer treatments.

Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Who Develop Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the USA. Interestingly, recent studies suggest that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing prostate cancer. Importantly, patients with IBD who develop prostate cancer require thoughtful care when using immunosuppressants to treat the IBD in the setting of malignancy. Further, consideration must be given to the proximity of the prostate to the gastrointestinal tract when treating with radiation where there is concern for the effects of inadvertent exposure of radiation to the diseased bowel. In general, management of immunosuppression after diagnosis of prostate cancer is contingent on the specific immunosuppressive agents, the duration of cancer remission and/or plans for cancer treatment, and the potential risks and benefits of stopping or altering the administration of those agents. Concerns that patients with IBD would have increased risk of disease exacerbation and gastrointestinal toxicity have previously limited the use of radiation. While currently no consensus has been reached regarding the safety of radiation therapy in patients with IBD, recent studies suggest that radiation therapy may be used safely in patients with IBD who develop prostate cancer, especially brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy which may have less bowel toxicity compared to conventional methods of external beam radiation therapy. A multidisciplinary team approach including gastroenterologists, urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists should be undertaken to best treat patients with IBD and prostate cancer.

A Matched Case-Control Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Rectal Cancer Treated With Pelvic Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a known risk factor for rectal cancer, and RT is often an important part of therapy for these patients. Previously published studies have raised concerns for increased rates of RT toxicity in patients with IBD. We performed a matched case-control analysis to assess RT-related toxicity in a large sample of U.S. veterans afflicted with IBD and rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 186 veterans with rectal cancer (71 Patients with IBD treated with RT, 71 matched controls without IBD treated with RT, and 44 nonmatched controls with IBD treated without RT) diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. We analyzed short- and long-term toxicity and mortality in multivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray, and frailty models, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

When comparing patients with and without IBD treated with RT there were no differences in RT breaks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-4.76; P = .49) or the need for antidiarrheal medication during RT (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.70-3.35; P = .29). There was a trend toward higher risk of hospital admission during RT for RT + patients with IBD (aOR, 2.69; 95% CI, 0.88-8.22; P = .08). There were higher rates of small bowel obstruction (OR, 15; 95% CI, 1.9-115; P = .009) and a trend toward higher rates of abdominopelvic adhesions (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.98-13; P = .05) in the RT + IBD cohort. However, compared with a nonmatched cohort of patients with IBD treated without RT there were no differences in long-term complications. No differences were found in other acute or long-term toxicities. Rectal cancer-specific mortality appeared similar across all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

RT does not appear to increase the rates of acute or long-term toxicity in patients with IBD and should be considered a standard part of therapy when otherwise indicated.

[Radiation therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A review]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are multifactorial diseases characterized by a chronic intestinal inflammation. Abdominal and pelvic irradiation can result in acute or chronic digestive toxicity. A few old studies on small population samples have suggested an increase of gastro-intestinal toxicities in patients with IBD in case of irradiation. Nevertheless, the physiopathology is unknown. More recent studies, including new irradiation techniques, have shown less toxicity events in these patients with IBD. There are no recommendations for irradiation in patients with IBD. This review aims to report recent data on this topic and discuss them regarding radiation parameters.

Colon Cancer: Inflammation-Associated Cancer

Colitis-associated cancer is a relatively rare form of cancer with an unclear pathogenesis. Colitis-associated cancer serves as a prototype of inflammation-associated cancers. Advanced colonoscopic techniques are considered standard of care for surveillance in patients with long-standing colitis, especially those with other risk factors, including sclerosing cholangitis and a family history of colorectal cancer. When colitis-associated cancer is diagnosed, the standard operation involves total proctocolectomy. Restorative procedures and surveillance after colectomy require special considerations. In these contexts, new 3-dimensional human models may be used to usher in personalized medicine.

Acute toxicity and surgical complications after preoperative (chemo)radiation therapy for rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

Preoperative therapy reduces local recurrences and may facilitate surgery in rectal cancer patients. However, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) this treatment is often withheld due to the perceived risk of excessive side-effects, even though evidence is limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of preoperative therapy on acute toxicity and post-operative complications in IBD patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

The Dutch pathology registry (PALGA) was searched for patients with IBD and rectal cancer treated between January 1991 and May 2010. Histopathology and clinical charts were reviewed to confirm IBD diagnosis and evaluate clinical and pathological characteristics.

RESULTS

Out of 161 patients, 66 received preoperative therapy (41%), including short-course radiation therapy (SC-RT), long course radiation therapy (LC-RT), and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in 32, 13, and 21 patients respectively. Grade≥3 acute toxicity occurred in 0 patients (0.0%), 1 patient (7.7%), and 6 patients (28.6%) respectively (p=0.004). Systemic corticosteroids were used by 10.5% of patients at time of treatment. Grade≥3 post-operative 30-day complication rate (28.1% overall) was not associated with type of preoperative therapy.

CONCLUSION

Results did not show excessive rates of toxicity or post-operative complications and support the use of standard preoperative therapies for rectal cancer (especially SC-RT) in IBD patients with relatively indolent disease. Caution is warranted in patients with active IBD, since the exact impact of active bowel inflammation could not be determined retrospectively. Prospective studies should investigate the influence of active IBD on acute and late toxicity in patients receiving pelvic irradiation.

Effects of HMGA2 siRNA and doxorubicin dual delivery by chitosan nanoparticles on cytotoxicity and gene expression of HT-29 colorectal cancer cell line

Objective

Over-expressions of HMGA2, vimentin and MMP-9 and downregulation of E-cadherin occur on colorectal cancer cells followed by a reduction in let-7 as a regulatory factor. In this study, we first used carboxymethyl dextran (CMD)–chitosan nanoparticles (ChNPs) platform to encapsulate HMGA2 siRNA and doxorubicin (DOX), and then, we evaluated the efficacy of the simultaneous delivery of siRNA/drug on viability and gene expression of HT-29 cell lines.

Methods

ChNPs characteristics were determined by a dynamic light scattering and zeta sizer. Morphology of loaded ChNPs was assessed by scanning electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to confirm the conjugation of ChNP/siRNA/DOX/CMD. Cell viability and relative mRNA expression were evaluated by MTT assay and real-time PCR, respectively.

Key finding

The prepared ChNPs had high efficiency for siRNA and drug encapsulation (78% and 75%) and were stable against serum and heparin. ChNP/siRNA/DOX/CMD was more effective to induce tumour cell death and also could significantly reduce the expressions of HMGA2, vimentin as well as MMP-9 and increase E-cadherin expression.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results revealed that dual delivery of a key gene siRNA and appropriate anticancer drug have great impact on the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Use of biologics and chemotherapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases and cancer

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have an additional risk of developing cancer compared with the general population. This is due to local chronic inflammation that leads to the development of gastrointestinal cancers and the use of thiopurines, associated with a higher risk of lymphoproliferative disorders, skin cancers, or uterine cervical cancers. Similar to the general population, a previous history of cancer in inflammatory bowel disease patients increases the risk of developing a secondary cancer. Large studies have not shown an increased risk of cancer in patients treated with biologics. In this review we discuss the prevention and treatment of cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Acute and Late Bowel Toxicity in Radiotherapy Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease has traditionally been considered a relative contraindication for radiotherapy due to a perceived increased risk of disease exacerbation and bowel toxicity. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current literature regarding rates of radiotherapy-induced acute and late bowel toxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and to compare these data with those of patients without the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Ovid Medline search was conducted to identify original articles pertaining to the review question. Using the PRISMA convention a total of 442 articles screened, resulting 8 articles which were suitable for inclusion in the review.

RESULTS

In general, the grading of toxicity was scored using either the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scoring systems. It was found that acute bowel toxicity of ≥ grade 3 occurred in 20% of patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and in 7% of patients receiving brachytherapy. Late bowel toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 15% of EBRT patients and in 5% of patients receiving brachytherapy. Brachytherapy was shown to have similar rates of toxicity and EBRT produced a moderate increase in both acute and late toxicity when compared with individuals without inflammatory bowel disease.

CONCLUSION

In view of these results, we suggest that brachytherapy should be considered as a suitable treatment option for treating pelvic malignancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, whereas EBRT should be used with caution.