Use of intravenous iron therapy in colorectal cancer patient with iron deficiency anemia: a propensity-score matched study

Postoperative Results After Patient Blood Management with Intravenous Iron Treatment Implementation for Preoperative Anemia: Prospective Cohort Study of 1294 Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background: PA is frequent in CRC patients and known to be detrimental to surgical outcomes. PBM systems promote rational use of blood products and PA treatment with IVI, which could potentially improve postoperative results and the need for RBCT. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Intravenous Iron (IVI) within a Patient Blood Management (PBM) pathway in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) patients with Preoperative Anemia (PA). To analyze surgical results after treatment and the need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion (RBCT) after surgery. Methods: Cohort study of CRC patients between 2012 and 2018, divided into groups: non-anemic patients (Hemoglobin Hb > 13 g/dL, Group 1), mildly anemic patients (Hb 12-13 mg/dL, Group 2), and patients treated with IVI (Hb < 12 mg/dL or Hb 12-13 mg/dL with risk factors, Group 3). Effectiveness of IVI treatment measured based on differences in Hb changes. Surgical complications were assessed and compared among groups, as well as the RBCT rate. The latter was also compared between Group 3 patients and those receiving preoperative RBCT. Results: Group 3 presented with a baseline Hb of 9.9 (±1.5) mg/dL with an increase of 1.2 (±1.9) mg/dL after treatment, which endured until discharge. Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications were 6.5%, and 30-day Mortality was 1.4% in all the series, without differences among Groups. RBCT rate in Group 3 patients was 21.6%, significantly lower than that of patients receiving preoperative RBCT (32.6%). Conclusions: IVI is a safe and effective measure for a fast PA correction in CCR patients and could potentially reduce postoperative RBCT rates.

Efficacy and safety of preoperative intravenous iron versus standard care in colorectal cancer patients with iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anemia, particularly iron deficiency (ID) anemia, is common in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, affecting up to 58% of individuals. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of preoperative intravenous iron (IVI) with standard care (no iron or oral iron) in CRC patients with ID anemia.

Methods

A systematic search across multiple databases identified studies comparing IVI versus no iron or oral iron in CRC patients with ID anemia. Pooled data were analyzed for changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, need for red blood cell transfusions (RBCT), overall mean number of transfused RBC units, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and complications.

Results

The authors analyzed data from 11 studies with 2024 patients and found that IVI significantly increased Hb levels at crucial time points: preoperative (MD=1.17, 95% CI [0.95-1.40], P<0.01), postoperative day one (MD=1.32, 95% CI [0.89-1.76], P<0.01), hospital discharge (MD=0.76, 95% CI [0.28-1.24], P=0.002), and 30 days postoperative (MD=1.57, 95% CI [1.27-1.87], P<0.01). IVI significantly decreased the overall need for RBCT, particularly in the postoperative period (RR=0.69, 95% CI [0.52-0.92], P=0.01). It also reduced the mean number of transfused RBC units, total complications, and wound dehiscence. However, there were no significant differences in total death, hospital stay, infections, paralytic ileus, OS, or DFS.

Conclusion

Preoperative IVI significantly increased Hb levels at critical time points and markedly reduced the overall need for RBCT, complications, and wound dehiscence. To further validate these findings and ensure robust conclusions, more well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Elective Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative anemia can impact postoperative outcomes, but its importance in gastrointestinal cancer patients, and significance of anemia etiology remains unclear. We aimed to characterize the frequency and impact of preoperative anemia, and iron-deficiency anemia (IDA), on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative RBC transfusion. Secondary outcomes included 90-day postoperative major morbidity, ICU admission, and 90-day hospital readmission. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between preoperative anemia and IDA and outcomes.

RESULTS

Preoperative anemia was present in 55.5% of patients (n = 15 414), and 58.3% of anemic patients were iron deficient. Preoperative anemia was independently associated with increased risk of RBC transfusion (RR 2.88, 95% CI 2.60-3.20), and secondary outcomes. For every preoperative hemoglobin decrease of 1 g/dL, the adjusted risk of perioperative RBC transfusion increased by 40% (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.37-1.42).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative anemia is prevalent, and an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. Decreases in preoperative hemoglobin levels elevate the risk of transfusion and adverse outcomes, supporting further study to optimize management of treatable causes of preoperative anemia including IDA.

Streamlined Preoperative Iron Deficiency Screening and IV Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Patients beyond Clinical Trials

Background/objectives: Iron deficiency anemia is common in patients with colorectal cancer and affects postoperative outcomes. Preoperative intravenous iron supplementation corrects anemia effectively; however, the effect on the postoperative clinical course is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of implementing a screening program for iron deficiency anemia and correction in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective single-institutional quality-assurance study that included patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2019 and December 2021. On 1 March 2020, screening for iron deficiency was implemented. Anemia was corrected by intravenous ferricarboyxmaltose. Patients with hemoglobin <7mmol/L and ferritin <30 µg/L or ferritin 30-100 µg/L and TSAT < 0.2 were divided into iron- and non-iron groups. The primary outcome was a change in hemoglobin concentration, and secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, complications, length of stay, mortality, and implementation efficacy. Data from the patients were extracted from digital patient charts and entered into a database. Results: A total of 532 patients were included, of which 177 patients (33.3%) were anemic, 63 were in the iron group, and 114 were in the non-iron group. Adherence to the screening program was 86.3%. Hemoglobin (iron group) increased from a mean of 5.7 mmol/L (SD 0.8) to 6.9 (0.8) mmol/L, p < 0.001. Iron treatment decreased transfusion rates from 27.7% to 9.1%, p = 0.007, and increased the rate of patients without complications from 53.2% to 79.6%, p < 0.001, which held true after controlling for confounding. In addition, 90-day mortality was lower in the iron group; however, this was not significant. Conclusions: Administration of intravenous iron increased hemoglobin, leading to reduced use of blood transfusion and fewer complications.

Intravenous iron and iron deficiency anemia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a prevalent hematological complication associated with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers due to an increased loss of iron and decreased iron absorption. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the use of parenteral iron to treat IDA in patients with GI cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINHAL and Scopus were searched from January 1, 2010 to September 29, 2023 with no language restrictions. We excluded editorials, case reports, abstracts, conference papers, and poster presentations. Studies were included if they discussed IDA, GI neoplasms, use of iron supplementation (with or without erythropoietin-stimulating agents [ESAs]), defined anemia and had an adult patient population. We assessed the efficacy of parenteral iron in comparison to other iron supplementation methods when treating IDA in patients with GI cancer. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tools were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Moreover, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization data collection form was used to collect pertinent study information.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 3,969 studies across all databases. Twenty-one studies were included (6 randomized control trials; 15 non-randomized studies). Of the 15 studies evaluating hemoglobin (Hb) response, seven studies found an increase in Hb levels when patients were treated with IV iron. The 14 studies evaluating red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates found conflicting differences in RBC transfusion needs when treated with IV iron. Studies analyzing health related outcomes typically found an increase in quality of life and decreased post-operative complications.

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrates improved outcomes of IDA in patients with GI cancer treated with IV iron instead of other iron supplementation methods. Timely diagnosis and appropriate IDA management can greatly improve quality of life in this patient population, especially if myelosuppressive chemotherapy is required.

Patient blood management in major digestive surgery: Recommendations from the Italian multisociety (ACOI, SIAARTI, SIdEM, and SIMTI) modified Delphi consensus conference

Patient blood management (PBM) is defined as the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain a surgical patient’s hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve the outcomes. PBM is able to reduce mortality up to 68%, reoperation up to 43%, readmission up to 43%, composite morbidity up to 41%, infection rate up to 80%, average length of stay by 16%–33%, transfusion from 10% to 95%, and costs from 10% to 84% after major surgery. It should be noticed, however, that the process of PBM implementation is still in its infancy, and that its potential to improve perioperative outcomes could be strictly linked to the degree of adherence/compliance to the whole program, with decoupling and noncompliance being significant factors for failure. Therefore, the steering committees of four major Italian scientific societies, representing general surgeons, anesthesiologists and transfusion medicine specialists (Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani; Società Italiana di Anestesia, Analgesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva; Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare; Società Italiana di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia), organized a joint modified Delphi consensus conference on PBM in the field of major digestive surgery (upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, and hepato-biliopancreatic resections), whose results and recommendations are herein presented.

Iron Surveillance and Management in Gastro-Intestinal Oncology Patients: A National Physician Survey

PURPOSE

Iron deficiency (ID) is a complication of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers that may manifest as iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Serum ferritin monitoring and oral iron supplementation have the limitations of being falsely elevated and poorly absorbed, respectively. This study aims to assess the discordance in surveillance, treatment practices, and awareness of ID/IDA in GI cancer patients by Canadian physicians treating these patients.

METHODS

From February 2020 to September 2021, a 22-question electronic survey was sent to medical oncologists (MOs), surgical oncologists (SOs), and gastroenterologists (GEs). The survey collected information about four domains: physician demographics, surveillance practices, treatment practices, and awareness of ID/IDA in GI cancer patients and ASCO/ASH guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 108 (34 MOs, 19 SOs, and 55 GEs) of the 872 (12.4%) invited physicians completed the survey. Of these, 26.5% of MOs, 36.8% of SOs, and 70.9% of GEs measured baseline iron parameters, with few continuing surveillance throughout treatment. Ferritin was widely measured by MOs (88.9%), SOs (100%), and GEs (91.4%). Iron was supplemented if ID/IDA was identified pre-treatment by 66.7% of MOs, 85.7% of SOs, and 94.2% of GEs. Parenteral iron was prescribed by SOs (100%), while oral iron was prescribed by MOs (83.3%) and GEs (87.9%). Only 18.6% of physicians were aware of the ASCO/ASH guidelines regarding erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with parenteral iron for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia.

CONCLUSION

Results illustrate variations in practice patterns for IDA management across the different physician specialties. Moreover, there appeared to be gaps in the knowledge and care surrounding evidence-based IDA management principles which may contribute to poor clinical outcomes.

What we should consider to facilitate recovery of the hematological profile in all patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the role of preoperative intravenous iron treatment

BACKGROUND

In pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the duodenum and upper jejunum responsible for iron absorption are removed, which can lead to massive hemorrhage during surgery and cause iron deficiency anemia after PD. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall changes in hematologic profiles of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Effect of preoperative intravenous iron treatment on recovery of anemia after surgery was also investigated.

METHODS

From March 2021 to December 2021, patients who underwent curative PD at our institution due to periampullary lesions were enrolled. They were divided into two groups according to whether or not iron was administered before surgery. In the IV iron group, all patients had been routinely administered with 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose intravenously once about 3-7 days before the operation day. Contrarily, patients in the control group did not receive intravenous iron before PD. Changes in hematological profile were measured preoperatively and at 5, 14, and 30 days postoperatively. Clinical results of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was performed for selected non-anemic patients who had preoperative hemoglobin level of 12.0 g/dl or higher to compare changes in hematologic profiles between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty patients of the IV iron group and 34 patients of the control group were analyzed. Although no difference was observed in postoperative complications or mortality, hemoglobin and iron levels were recovered significantly faster at two weeks postoperatively in the IV iron group than in the control group. Iron levels were significantly higher in the IV iron group throughout the postoperative period. In subgroup analysis conducted for non-anemic patients, hemoglobin levels were recovered significantly faster and maintained higher in the IV iron group throughout the postoperative period, although baseline levels of hemoglobin were similar between the two groups. In addition, the length of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in the IV iron group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative intravenous iron treatment might be effective in facilitating recovery of hematologic profiles of patients during the recovery period after PD regardless of the presence of preoperative anemia, thus preventing postoperative iron deficiency anemia.

Adverse events of iron and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in preoperatively anemic elective surgery patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Iron supplementation and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) administration represent the hallmark therapies in preoperative anemia treatment, as reflected in a set of evidence-based treatment recommendations made during the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management. However, little is known about the safety of these therapies. This systematic review investigated the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) during or after treatment with iron and/or ESAs.

METHODS

Five databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Transfusion Evidence Library, Web of Science) and two trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP) were searched until 23 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies investigating any AE during or after iron and/or ESA administration in adult elective surgery patients with preoperative anemia were eligible for inclusion and judged using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. The GRADE approach was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Data from 26 RCTs and 16 cohort studies involving a total of 6062 patients were extracted, on 6 treatment comparisons: (1) intravenous (IV) versus oral iron, (2) IV iron versus usual care/no iron, (3) IV ferric carboxymaltose versus IV iron sucrose, (4) ESA+iron versus control (placebo and/or iron, no treatment), (5) ESA+IV iron versus ESA+oral iron, and (6) ESA+IV iron versus ESA+IV iron (different ESA dosing regimens). Most AE data concerned mortality/survival (n=24 studies), thromboembolic (n=22), infectious (n=20), cardiovascular (n=19) and gastrointestinal (n=14) AEs. Very low certainty evidence was assigned to all but one outcome category. This uncertainty results from both the low quantity and quality of AE data due to the high risk of bias caused by limitations in the study design, data collection, and reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

It remains unclear if ESA and/or iron therapy is associated with AEs in preoperatively anemic elective surgery patients. Future trial investigators should pay more attention to the systematic collection, measurement, documentation, and reporting of AE data.

The Dark Side of Iron: The Relationship between Iron, Inflammation and Gut Microbiota in Selected Diseases Associated with Iron Deficiency Anaemia—A Narrative Review

Iron is an indispensable nutrient for life. A lack of it leads to iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), which currently affects about 1.2 billion people worldwide. The primary means of IDA treatment is oral or parenteral iron supplementation. This can be burdened with numerous side effects such as oxidative stress, systemic and local-intestinal inflammation, dysbiosis, carcinogenic processes and gastrointestinal adverse events. Therefore, this review aimed to provide insight into the physiological mechanisms of iron management and investigate the state of knowledge of the relationship between iron supplementation, inflammatory status and changes in gut microbiota milieu in diseases typically complicated with IDA and considered as having an inflammatory background such as in inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer or obesity. Understanding the precise mechanisms critical to iron metabolism and the awareness of serious adverse effects associated with iron supplementation may lead to the provision of better IDA treatment. Well-planned research, specific to each patient category and disease, is needed to find measures and methods to optimise iron treatment and reduce adverse effects.

Preoperative intravenous iron treatment reduces postoperative complications and postoperative anemia in preoperatively anemic patients with colon carcinoma

PURPOSE

Anemia is common among patients with colorectal cancer and is associated with an increased risk of complications and poorer survival rate. The main objective of our study was to determine the effect of preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy on the need for red blood cell transfusions, other postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay in colon cancer patients undergoing colon resection.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from medical records of all 549 colon carcinoma patients who underwent a colon resection in Helsinki University Hospital during the years 2017 and 2018. The patients were divided into two cohorts: one with anemic patients treated with preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy (180 patients) and one with anemic patients without preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy (138 patients). Non-anemic patients and patients requiring emergency surgery were excluded (231 patients).

RESULTS

Patients treated with intravenous iron had less postoperative complications (33.9% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.045) and a lower prevalence of anemia at 1 month after surgery (38.7% vs. 65.3%, p < 0.01) when compared with patients without preoperative iv iron treatment. No difference was found in the amount of red blood cell transfusions, length of stay, or mortality between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study demonstrating a significant decrease in postoperative complications in anemic colon cancer patients receiving preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy. This treatment also diminishes the rate of postoperative anemia, which is often associated with a facilitated recovery.

Iron Supplementation Effectively Ameliorates Anemia and Reduces the Need for Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Anemia is common and harmful in patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Blood transfusion (BT) is used to treat anemia, but results in a poor oncology prognosis. Iron supplementation may be effective in improving anemia and reducing the need for BT, however, the results remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of iron supplementation in improving hemoglobin concentrations (Hb) and reducing the need for BT.

METHODS

Up to February 10, 2021, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating the effects of iron supplementation on CRC surgery patients. Meta-analysis was conduct using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seven trials with 879 participants in total were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled findings suggested that iron supplementation effectively increased Hb (MD 0.41; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.69, P = 0.006) and reduced the risk of BT (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45, 0.78, P = 0.0002) compared with the control group. In addition, subgroup analyses showed that these benefits were observed with both oral and intravenous iron supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Iron supplementation is effective in ameliorating anemia and reducing the need for BT in CRC surgery patients.

The dynamic effects of preoperative intravenous iron in anaemic patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe the dynamic changes in blood work following individual adjusted dosage of intravenously administered iron(III) isomaltoside in a 4-week period prior to surgery in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, observational cohort study with prospectively collected data, including patients with colorectal cancer receiving preoperative treatment with iron(III) isomaltoside. Blood samples were taken at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after initial treatment. Sixty-two patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included for final analysis. The mean increase in haemoglobin was 0.77 g/dl (95% CI 0.52-1.03 g/dl, P < 0.0001) at week 1, 1.5 g/dl (95% CI 1.21-1.80 g/dl, P < 0.0001) at week 2 and 2.13 g/dl (95% CI 1.71-2.55 g/dl, P < 0.0001) at week 4. Patients with severe anaemia (<9.02 g/dl) showed the largest increase in haemoglobin during the treatment course (2.92 g/dl, 95% CI 2.27-3.58 g/dl, P < 0.0001). Patients with mild anaemia (>10.31 g/dl) did not show a significant increase (0.66 g/dl, 95% CI -0.29-1.61 g/dl, P = 0.17). The mean of transferrin saturation after 4 weeks was 8% (95% CI 6%-10%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

After intravenously administered iron, patients with severe anaemia had the most substantial increase in haemoglobin, and the increase was largest after 4 weeks. Patients with mild anaemia did not have an increase in haemoglobin during the treatment course. The vast majority of patients still had iron deficiency at surgery 4 weeks after the initial treatment.

Oral iron supplementation after antibiotic exposure induces a deleterious recovery of the gut microbiota

BACKGROUND

Oral iron supplementation is commonly prescribed for anemia and may play an important role in the gut microbiota recovery of anemic individuals who received antibiotic treatment. This study aims to investigate the effects of iron supplementation on gut microbiota recovery after antibiotics exposure.

RESULTS

Mice were subjected to oral antibiotic treatment with neomycin and metronidazole and were fed diets with different concentrations of iron. The composition of the gut microbiota was followed throughout treatment by 16S rRNA sequencing of DNA extracted from fecal samples. Gut microbiota functions were inferred using PICRUSt2, and short-chain fatty acid concentration in fecal samples was assessed by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry. Iron supplementation after antibiotic exposure shifted the gut microbiota composition towards a Bacteroidetes phylum-dominant composition. At the genus level, the iron-supplemented diet induced an increase in the abundance of Parasutterella and Bacteroides, and a decrease of Bilophila and Akkermansia. Parasutterella excrementihominis, Bacteroides vulgatus, and Alistipes finegoldii, were more abundant with the iron excess diet. Iron-induced shifts in microbiota composition were accompanied by functional modifications, including an enhancement of the biosynthesis of primary bile acids, nitrogen metabolism, cyanoamino acid metabolism and pentose phosphate pathways. Recovery after antibiotic treatment increased propionate levels independent of luminal iron levels, whereas butyrate levels were diminished by excess iron.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral iron supplementation after antibiotic therapy in mice may lead to deleterious changes in the recovery of the gut microbiota. Our results have implications on the use of oral iron supplementation after antibiotic exposure and justify further studies on alternative treatments for anemia in these settings.

The Ideal Time for Iron Administration in Anemia Secondary to Blood Loss-An Experimental Animal Model

BACKGROUND

Anemia and iron deficiency are two of the main public health problems worldwide, associated with negative outcomes in surgical patients. This experimental study aimed to create a model of acute iron deficiency with anemia through blood loss and extensive surgery. Afterwards, intravenous iron was administered to correct the iron deficiency and to improve the hematological parameters in distinct moments regarding the surgical time. To assess the optimum time for therapeutic intervention, experimental subjects were compared, performing clinical, paraclinical, and histological examinations, as well.

METHODS

Male rats (n = 35), aged 11-13 months, were randomly designated into six groups. Anemia and iron deficiency were obtained through a 15% blood volume loss, followed by major surgical intervention (femur fracture and osteosynthesis using Kirschner wire). Therapeutic intervention was obtained with an intravenous ferric carboxymaltose infusion, as follows: group II: intraoperative (n = 7), group III: 48 h after surgery (n = 7), group IV: 48 h before surgery (n = 5), and group V: seven days before surgery (n = 6). Group I (n = 5) was left anemic, while group 0 (n = 5) was nonanemic without therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In group I, serum iron lower than in group 0 (27.04 ± 6.92 μg/dL versus 60.5 ± 2.34 μg/dL), as well as hemoglobin (10.4 ± 0.54 g/dL versus 14.32 ± 2.01 g/dL) and ferritin values (22.52 ± 0.53 ng/mL versus 29.86 ± 3.97 ng/mL), validated the experimental model. Regarding wound healing after surgical trauma, we observed that neovascularization was more significant in group III, followed by group V, with fewer neutrophils, a well-represented and rich in lymphomonocytes inflammatory infiltrate associated with the biggest collagen fiber dimensions. The periosteal reaction and callus area presented thicker trabeculae in groups II and III compared to the anemic group.

CONCLUSIONS

This original experimental study assessed the effect of perioperative intravenous iron administration at a specific time by comparing the weight, hematological, and iron status-defining parameters, as well as histological characteristics of the included subjects. The present findings highlight that correcting the iron deficiency in emergency settings through intravenous iron administration intraoperatively or 48 h postoperatively could determine the improved bioumoral parameters, as well as a better evolution of the postoperative wound and bone healing compared to the anemic group or subjects that received therapeutic intervention 48 h before surgery.

Need for preoperative anemia management clinics in Japan: initiatives at a university hospital in the USA

Untreated preoperative anemia increases the risk of morbidity and mortality and there is increasing evidence that early intervention for preoperative anemia improves outcomes after major surgery. Accordingly, anemia management clinics have been established in various institutions in the USA. As an example, the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics outpatient clinic treats pre-surgical anemic patients, who undergo major surgery with anticipated blood loss of more than 500 mL, by providing effective standardized care in a timely manner. This standardized care is an integral part of patient blood management to reduce perioperative blood transfusion and improve patient outcomes. The importance of preoperative anemia management has not yet been sufficiently recognized in Japan. Timely intervention for preoperative anemia should be incorporated into routine pre-surgical patient care in Japan.

Preoperative iron status is a prognosis factor for stage II and III colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia is represented in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Iron surplus load to increase non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI), and NTBI promotes cancer progression and influences microbiota. This study investigated whether preoperative serum iron status was associated with prognosis after CRC resection.

METHODS

We evaluated preoperative iron and transferrin saturation (TSAT), which was calculated as iron divided by total iron-binding capacity, in 327 patients who underwent surgery for Stage II-III CRC. Fe < 60 μg/dl and TSAT > 40% were defined as low and high iron, respectively. The associations between iron status and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 327 patients, 179 (54.7%), 124 (37.9%) and 24 (7.3%) had low, normal and high iron, respectively. In univariate analysis, low iron was associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.821, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.451-5.485, P = 0.002). High iron was also associated with shorter OS (HR 3.396, 95% CI 1.359-8.489, P = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, high age (P = 0.002), depth of invasion pT4 (P = 0.012), lymph-node metastasis presence (P = 0.035), low albumin (P = 0.011), low iron (HR 2.282, 95% CI 1.163-4.478, P = 0.016) and high iron (HR 3.757, 95% CI 1.486-9.494 P = 0.005) were independently associated with shorter OS. High iron was associated with the amount of intratumoral Fusobacterium nucleatum compared with normal iron.

CONCLUSION

Both low and high preoperative iron in Stage II-III CRC patients were associated with unfavorable OS in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Iron deficiency, immunology, and colorectal cancer

Excessive gut luminal iron contributes to the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer. However, emerging evidence suggests that reduced iron intake and low systemic iron levels are also associated with the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. This is important because patients with colorectal cancer often present with iron deficiency. Iron is necessary for appropriate immunological functions; hence, iron deficiency may hinder cancer immunosurveillance and potentially modify the tumor immune microenvironment, both of which may assist cancer development. This is supported by studies showing that patients with colorectal cancer with iron deficiency have inferior outcomes and reduced response to therapy. Here, we provide an overview of the immunological consequences of iron deficiency and suggest ensuring adequate iron therapy to limit these outcomes.

Flipside of the Coin: Iron Deficiency and Colorectal Cancer

Iron deficiency, with or without anemia, is the most frequent hematological manifestation in individuals with cancer, and is especially common in patients with colorectal cancer. Iron is a vital micronutrient that plays an essential role in many biological functions, in the context of which it has been found to be intimately linked to cancer biology. To date, however, whereas a large number of studies have comprehensively investigated and reviewed the effects of excess iron on cancer initiation and progression, potential interrelations of iron deficiency with cancer have been largely neglected and are not well-defined. Emerging evidence indicates that reduced iron intake and low systemic iron levels are associated with the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, suggesting that optimal iron intake must be carefully balanced to avoid both iron deficiency and iron excess. Since iron is vital in the maintenance of immunological functions, insufficient iron availability may enhance oncogenicity by impairing immunosurveillance for neoplastic changes and potentially altering the tumor immune microenvironment. Data from clinical studies support these concepts, showing that iron deficiency is associated with inferior outcomes and reduced response to therapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Here, we elucidate cancer-related effects of iron deficiency, examine preclinical and clinical evidence of its role in tumorigenesis, cancer progression and treatment response. and highlight the importance of adequate iron supplementation to limit these outcomes.

Preoperative Anemia Treatment with Intravenous Iron Therapy in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Preoperative anemia is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. As a result of the increased incidence of chronic blood loss and iron deficiency anemia in abdominal surgery patients and its impact on patient outcomes, we systematically evaluated the quality of evidence for preoperative intravenous (IV) administration of iron to patients with anemia undergoing major abdominal surgery with the focus on clinical outcomes.

Methods

In this systematic review, PubMed, Cochrane, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web Of Science, and Excerpta Medica Database databases were searched up to 2019 using specific keywords. Inclusion criteria were patients that were over 18 years of age, underwent abdominal surgery, and received an IV iron treatment in the preoperative setting.

Results

The nine studies included in the final systematic review do not provide consistent evidence of a reduced incidence of allogeneic blood transfusions with preoperative IV iron administration. However, IV iron administration did consistently cause a significant increase in hemoglobin levels relative to oral iron therapy or no iron.

Conclusion

Overall, these findings are consistent in that IV iron administration is highly effective at rapidly increasing hemoglobin levels in patients with iron deficiency anemia undergoing major abdominal surgery. Unfortunately, there is currently no evidence of reduced incidence of allogeneic blood transfusions or other enhanced outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01628-7.

Anaesthesia as an influence in tumour progression

Purpose

Tumour growth and the formation of metastases are essential elements in the progression of cancer. The centre of treatment is the surgical resection of primary solid tumours. But even if the tumour can be removed without microscopic residual cells, local recurrences and distant metastases occur and determine the patient’s fate. During the operation, tumour cells are shed from the primary tumour and released into the circulation. These circulating tumour cells might play an important role in the formation of new tumour sites. Therefore, a functional innate and adaptive immune system is essential, especially in this perioperative period. Anaesthesia influences consciousness and pain perception and interacts directly with the immune system and tumour cells.

Methods

Review of the current literature concerning intra- and postoperative anaesthetic decisions and tumour progression.

Results

There are beneficial aspects for patient survival associated with total intravenous anaesthesia, the use of regional anaesthetics and the avoidance of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions. Alternatives such as irradiated intraoperative blood salvage and preoperative iron supplementation may be advantageous in cases where transfusions are limited or not wanted. The immunosuppressive properties of opioids are theoretical, but strong evidence to avoid them does not exist. The application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis do not impair the patient’s survival and may even have a positive effect on tumour regression.

Conclusion

Anaesthesia does play an important part in the perioperative period in order to improve the cancer-related outcome. Further research is necessary to make more concrete recommendations.