Desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1-mutant: clinical, histopathological and molecular characterization of a pineal region tumor encountered in adolescents and adults

New CNS tumor classification: The importance in pediatric neurosurgical practice

Background

The management of the central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the pediatric population is crucial in neurosurgical practice. The World Health Organization (WHO) has evolved its classification of CNS tumors from the 19th century to the 5th edition, published in 2021, incorporating molecular advancements. This transition from morphology to molecular characterization is ongoing.

Methods

This manuscript analyzes the modifications introduced in the 5th edition of WHO's CNS tumor classification, particularly focusing on pediatric tumor families. The paper integrates clinical, morphological, and molecular information, aiming to guide pediatric neurosurgeons in their daily practice and interdisciplinary discussions.

Results

The 5th edition of the WHO classification introduces a hybrid taxonomy that incorporates both molecular and histological components. The terminology shifts from "entity" to "type" and "subtype," aiming to standardize terminology. Tumor grading experiences changes, integrating molecular biomarkers for prognosis. The concept of integrated layered diagnosis is emphasized, where molecular and histological information is combined systematically.

Conclusion

The 5th edition of the WHO CNS classification signifies a paradigm shift toward molecular characterization. The incorporation of molecular advances, the layered diagnostic approach, and the inclusion of clinical, morphological, and molecular information aim to provide comprehensive insights into pediatric CNS tumors. This classification offers valuable guidance for pediatric neurosurgeons, aiding in precise diagnosis and treatment planning for these complex neoplasms.

Current status of DNA methylation profiling in neuro-oncology as a diagnostic support tool: A review

Over the last 2 decades, high throughput genome-wide molecular profiling has revealed characteristic genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with different types of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. DNA methylation profiling has emerged as an important molecular platform for CNS tumor classification with improved diagnostic accuracy and patient risk stratification in comparison to the standard of care histopathological analysis and any single molecular tests. The emergence of DNA methylation arrays have also played a crucial role in refining existing types and the discovery of new tumor types or subtypes. The adoption of methylation data into neuro-oncology has been greatly aided by the development of a freely accessible machine learning-based classifier. In this review, we discuss methylation workflow, address the utility of DNA methylation profiling in CNS tumors in a routine diagnostic setting, and provide an overview of the methylation-based tumor types and new types or subtypes identified with this platform.

Pineal/germ cell tumors and pineal parenchymal tumors

INTRODUCTION

Pineal region tumors (PRTs) are tumors arising from the pineal gland and the paraspinal structures. These tumors are rare and heterogeneous that account for 2.8-10.1% and 0.6-3.2% of tumors in children and in all ages, respectively. Almost all types and subtypes of CNS tumors may be diagnosed in this region. These tumors come from cells of the pineal gland (pinealocytes and neuroglial cells), ectopic primordial germ cells (PGC), and cells from adjacent structures. Hence, PRTs are consisted of pineal parenchyma tumors (PPTs), germ cell tumors (GCTs), neuroepithelial tumors (NETs), other miscellaneous types of tumors, cystic tumors (epidermoid, dermoid), and pineal cyst in addition. The symptoms of PRTs correlate to the increased intracranial cranial pressure due to obstructive hydrocephalus and dorsal midbrain compression. The diagnostic imaging studies are mainly MRI of brain (with and without gadolinium) along with a sagittal view of whole spine. Serum and/or CSF AFP/β-HCG helps to identify GCTs. The treatment of PRTs is consisted of the selection of surgical biopsy/resection, handling of hydrocephalus, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy according to age, tumor location, histopathological/molecular classification, grading of tumors, staging, and threshold value of markers (for GCTs) in addition.

METHODS

In this article, we review the following focus points: 1. Background of pineal region tumors. 2. Pineal GCTs and evolution of management. 3. Molecular study for GCTs and pineal parenchymal tumors. 4. Review of surgical approaches to the pineal region. 5. Contribution of endoscopy. 6. Adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combination). 7.

FUTURE DIRECTION

RESULTS

In all ages, the leading three types of PRTs in western countries were PPTs (22.7-34.8%), GCTs (27.3-34.4%), and NETs (17.2-28%). In children and young adults, the leading PRTs were invariably in the order of GCTs (40-80.5%), PPTs (7.6-21.6%), NETs (2.4-37.5%). Surgical biopsy/resection of PRTs is important for precision diagnosis and therapy. Safe resection with acceptable low mortality and morbidity was achieved after 1970s because of the advancement of surgical approaches, CSF shunt and valve system, microscopic and endoscopic surgery. Following histopathological diagnosis and classification of types and subtypes of PRTs, in PPTs, through molecular profiling, four molecular groups of pineoblastoma (PB) and their oncogenic driver were identified. Hence, molecular stratified precision therapy can be achieved.

CONCLUSION

Modern endoscopic and microsurgical approaches help to achieve precise histopathological diagnosis and molecular classification of different types and subtypes of pineal region tumors for risk-stratified optimal, effective, and protective therapy. In the future, molecular analysis of biospecimen (CSF and blood) along with AI radiomics on tumor imaging integrating clinical and bioinformation may help for personalized and risk-stratified management of patients with pineal region tumors.

Pediatric pineal region tumors: institutional experience of surgical managements with posterior interhemispheric transtentorial approach

PURPOSE

Resecting pineal region tumors in children is often challenging. Several approaches have been proposed and practiced. A personal series of pediatric pineal region tumors resected through craniotomy with posterior interhemispheric occipital transtentorial (OT) approach are reviewed. We present the surgical techniques, pitfalls, and their results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty patients ranging in age from 3 months to 21 years old, and treated over 3 decades were reviewed. Hydrocephalus caused the main presenting symptoms and was noted in 74 patients. It was treated prior to the craniotomy for tumor resection with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in 33, external ventricular drainage in 26, and precraniotomy shunt in 15. Nine patients had ETV together with endoscopic biopsy. All patients had a parieto-occipital craniotomy in a prone position. Through a tentorial section, a gross total resection of the tumor was attempted except for germinomas.

RESULTS

The tumor pathology showed 32 germ cell tumors (GCT), 22 benign astrocytomas, 13 pineal parenchymal tumors, 5 ATRTs, 3 papillary tumors, and 5 others. Of GCTs, 18 were teratomas. The extent of resection consisted of 55 gross total resections, 13 subtotal resections, 10 partial, and 2 biopsies with one postoperative death. Hemiparesis in 2, cerebellar ataxia in another 2, and hemiballismus in 1 were transient and improved over time. One had permanent hemisensory loss and another patient had bilateral oculomotor palsy. Postoperative homonymous hemianopia occurred in 2 patients but subsided over a short period of time. Parinaud's sign was noted in 24 patients, of which 16 were transient.

CONCLUSION

The posterior interhemispheric OT approach provides a safe route and comfortable access to the pineal region in children. A great majority of postoperative neurological complications are the results of direct manipulations of the midbrain at tumor resection. Identification and preservation of the tumor-brain interface are of paramount importance. GCTs other than teratomas are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and may eliminate the need for craniotomy. Exophytic midbrain JPAs are amenable to resection.

A Radiologist's Guide to the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System Tumor Classification: Part 2-Newly Described and Revised Tumor Types

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), published in 2021, introduces major shifts in the classification of brain and spine tumors. These changes were necessitated by rapidly increasing knowledge of CNS tumor biology and therapies, much of which is based on molecular methods in tumor diagnosis. The growing complexity of CNS tumor genetics has required reorganization of tumor groups and acknowledgment of new tumor entities. For radiologists interpreting neuroimaging studies, proficiency with these updates is critical in providing excellent patient care. This review will focus on new or revised CNS tumor types and subtypes, beyond infiltrating glioma (described in part 1 of this series), with an emphasis on imaging features.

Epigenetic Regulation in Primary CNS Tumors: An Opportunity to Bridge Old and New WHO Classifications

Originally approved in 1979, a specific grading classification for central nervous system (CNS) tumors was devised by the World Health Organization (WHO) in an effort to guide cancer treatment and better understand prognosis. These "blue books" have since undergone several iterations based on tumor location, advancements in histopathology, and most recently, diagnostic molecular pathology in its fifth edition. As new research methods have evolved to elucidate complex molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis, a need to update and integrate these findings into the WHO grading scheme has become apparent. Epigenetic tools represent an area of burgeoning interest that encompasses all non-Mendelian inherited genetic features affecting gene expression, including but not limited to chromatin remodeling complexes, DNA methylation, and histone regulating enzymes. The SWItch/Sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex is the largest mammalian family of chromatin remodeling proteins and is estimated to be altered in 20-25% of all human malignancies; however, the ways in which it contributes to tumorigenesis are not fully understood. We recently discovered that CNS tumors with SWI/SNF mutations have revealed an oncogenic role for endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), remnants of exogenous retroviruses that integrated into the germline and are inherited like Mendelian genes, several of which retain open reading frames for proteins whose expression putatively contributes to tumor formation. Herein, we analyzed the latest WHO classification scheme for all CNS tumors with documented SWI/SNF mutations and/or aberrant ERV expression, and we summarize this information to highlight potential research opportunities that could be integrated into the grading scheme to better delineate diagnostic criteria and therapeutic targets.

Newly Recognized CNS Tumors in the 2021 World Health Organization Classification: Imaging Overview with Histopathologic and Genetic Correlation

In 2021, the World Health Organization released an updated classification of CNS tumors. This update reflects the growing understanding of the importance of genetic alterations related to tumor pathogenesis, prognosis, and potential targeted treatments and introduces 22 newly recognized tumor types. Herein, we review these 22 newly recognized entities and emphasize their imaging appearance with correlation to histologic and genetic features.

Review of the Recent Changes in the WHO Classification for Pediatric Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors

BACKGROUND

Periodic updates to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for central nervous system (CNS) tumors reflect advances in the pathological diagnosis, categorization, and molecular underpinnings of primary brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerve tumors. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors was published in 2021. This review discusses the guiding principles of the revision, introduces the more common new diagnostic entities, and describes tumor classification and nomenclature changes that are relevant for pediatric neurological surgeons.

SUMMARY

Revisions to the WHO CNS tumor classification system introduced new diagnostic entities, restructured and renamed other entities with particular impact in the diffuse gliomas and CNS embryonal tumors, and expanded the requirements for incorporating both molecular and histological features of CNS tumors into a unified integrated diagnosis. Many of the new diagnostic entities occur at least occasionally in pediatric patients and will thus be encountered by pediatric neurosurgeons. New nomenclature impacts the terminology that is applied in communication between pathologists, surgeons, clinicians, and patients. Requirements for molecular information in tumor diagnosis are expected to refine diagnostic categories while also introducing practical considerations for intraoperative consultation, preliminary histological evaluation, and triaging of neurosurgical tissue samples for histology, molecular testing, and clinical trial requirements.

KEY MESSAGES

Pediatric brain tumor diagnosis and clinical management are a multidisciplinary effort that is rapidly advancing in the molecular era. Interdisciplinary collaboration is critical for providing the best care for pediatric CNS tumor patients. Pediatric neurosurgeons and their local neuropathologists and neuro-oncologists must work collaboratively to put the most current CNS tumor diagnostic guidelines into standard practice.

Renal Medullary Carcinomas Harbor a Distinct Methylation Phenotype and Display Aberrant Methylation of Genes Related to Early Nephrogenesis

Renal medullary carcinomas (RMC) are rare aggressive tumors of the kidneys, characterized by a loss of SMARCB1. Characteristically, these tumors arise in patients with sickle cell trait or other hemoglobinopathies. Recent characterization efforts have unraveled oncogenic pathways that drive tumorigenesis. Among these, gene sets that characterize replicative stress and the innate immune response are upregulated in RMCs. Despite comprehensive genetic and transcriptomic characterizations, commonalities or differences to other SMARCB1 deficient entities so far have not been investigated. We analyzed the methylome of seven primary RMC and compared it to other SMARCB1 deficient entities such as rhabdoid tumors (RT) and epithelioid sarcomas using 850 K methylation arrays. Moreover, we evaluated the differential gene expression of RMC using RNA-sequencing in comparison to other rhabdoid tumors. In accordance with previous gene expression data, we found that RMCs separate from other SMARCB1 deficient entities, pointing to a potentially different cell of origin and a role of additional genetic aberrations that may drive tumorigenesis and thus alter the methylome when compared to rhabdoid tumors. In a focused analysis of genes that are important for nephrogenesis, we particularly detected genes that govern early nephrogenesis such as FOXI1 to be hypomethylated and expressed at high levels in RMC. Overall, our analyses underscore the fact that RMCs represent a separate entity with limited similarities to rhabdoid tumors, warranting specific treatment tailored to the aggressiveness of the disease.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pineal Region Tumors in Adults: A EURACAN Overview

Simple Summary

Pineal region tumors are rare intracranial tumors. A deeper knowledge of these tumors’ molecular mechanisms has been gained in recent years, which has led to a new classification and new potential systemic treatments. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, while radiotherapy and systemic therapy depend on histological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. This paper highlights recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.

Abstract

Pineal region tumors are rare intracranial tumors, accounting for less than 1% of all adult intracranial tumor lesions. These lesions represent a histologically heterogeneous group of tumors. Among these tumors, pineal parenchymal tumors and germ cell tumors (GCT) represent the most frequent types of lesions. According to the new WHO 2021 classification, pineal parenchymal tumors include five distinct histotypes: pineocytoma (PC), pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR), pinealoblastoma (PB), and desmoplastic myxoid tumor of the pineal region, SMARCB1-mutant; GCTs include germinoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma, teratoma, mixed GCTs. Neuroradiological assessment has a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up, surgical planning, and follow-up of patients with pineal masses. Surgery can represent the mainstay of treatment, ranging from biopsy to gross total resection, yet pineal region tumors associated with obstructive hydrocephalus may be surgically managed via ventricular internal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Radiotherapy remains an essential component of the multidisciplinary treatment approach for most pineal region tumors; however, treatment volumes depend on the histological subtypes, grading, extent of disease, and the combination with chemotherapy. For localized germinoma, the current standard of care is chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose whole ventricular irradiation plus a boost to the primary tumor. For pinealoblastoma patients, postoperative radiation has been associated with higher overall survival. For the other pineal tumors, the role of radiotherapy remains poorly studied and it is usually reserved for aggressive (grade 3) or recurrent tumors. The use of systemic treatments mainly depends on histology and prognostic factors such as residual disease and metastases. For pinealoblastoma patients, chemotherapy protocols are based on various alkylating or platinum-based agents, vincristine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and are used in association with radiotherapy. About GCTs, their chemosensitivity is well known and is based on cisplatin or carboplatin and may include etoposide, cyclophosphamide, or ifosfamide prior to irradiation. Similar regimens containing platinum derivatives are also used for non-germinomatous GCTs with very encouraging results. However, due to a greater understanding of the biology of the disease’s various molecular subtypes, new agents based on targeted therapy are expected in the future. On behalf of the EURACAN domain 10 group, we reviewed the most important and recent developments in histopathological characteristics, neuro-radiological assessments, and treatments for pineal region tumors.

Major Changes in 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors

The World Health Organization (WHO) published the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5) in 2021, as an update of the WHO central nervous system (CNS) classification system published in 2016. WHO CNS5 was drafted on the basis of recommendations from the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) and expounds the classification scheme of the previous edition, which emphasized the importance of genetic and molecular changes in the characteristics of CNS tumors. Multiple newly recognized tumor types, including those for which there is limited knowledge regarding neuroimaging features, are detailed in WHO CNS5. The authors describe the major changes introduced in WHO CNS5, including revisions to tumor nomenclature. For example, WHO grade IV tumors in the fourth edition are equivalent to CNS WHO grade 4 tumors in the fifth edition, and diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant, is equivalent to midline glioma, H3 K27-altered. With regard to tumor typing, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant glioblastoma has been modified to IDH-mutant astrocytoma. In tumor grading, IDH-mutant astrocytomas are now graded according to the presence or absence of homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis, as well as the clinical characteristics and imaging features of the tumor types newly recognized in WHO CNS5, are summarized. Given that WHO CNS5 has become the foundation for daily practice, radiologists need to be familiar with this new edition of the WHO CNS tumor classification system. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

A simplified overview of the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors 2021

Background:

Building on the 2016 updated fourth edition and the work of consortium to inform molecular and practical approach to CNS tumor taxonomy, the major dramatic change occurs in 2021 fifth edition by advancing the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification. The present review summarizes the major general changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification and the specific changes in each taxonomic category.

Methods:

The review was designed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Articles published in PubMed Central, Medline, and Embase databases till now were all searched. Only nonexperimental and nonanimal clinical studies were included in the study. Articles written only in the English language were considered.

Results:

All IDH mutant diffuse astrocytic tumors are considered in a single type “astrocytoma IDH mutant” and then graded as CNS WHO Grades 2–4. Pediatric-type diffuse gliomas are now classified as separate entity. Anatomical site is also taken into consideration to classify ependymoma. The “Desmoplastic myxoid tumor of the pineal region, SMARCB1 mutant” and “Atypical neurofibromatous neoplasm of unknown biological potential” are new tumor type added to pineal and neurofibroma group, respectively. Mesenchymal tumor is now termed as only solitary fibrous tumor. Adamantinomatous and papillary subtype of craniopharyngioma are now classified as distinct tumor type. The new term “Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor” has been coined for pituitary adenoma.

Conclusion:

The WHO CNS-5 introduces a new knowledge into the classification with progressive manner by introducing newly recognizing entities, by obsoleting tumor type, and by adjusting the taxonomic structure.

The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: What Neuroradiologists Need to Know

Neuroradiologists play a key role in brain tumor diagnosis and management. Staying current with the latest classification systems and diagnostic markers is important to provide optimal patient care. Publication of the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System introduced a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of CNS neoplasms. For the first time, both histologic features and genetic alterations were incorporated into the diagnostic framework, classifying and grading brain tumors. The newly published 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, May 2021, 5th edition, has added even more molecular features and updated pathologic diagnoses. We present, summarize, and illustrate the most salient aspects of the new 5th edition. We have selected the key "must know" topics for practicing neuroradiologists.

DNA methylation profiling of central nervous system hemangioblastomas identifies two distinct subgroups

Hemangioblastomas (HBs) of the central nervous system are highly vascular neoplasms that occur sporadically or as a manifestation of von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease. Despite their benign nature, HBs are clinically heterogeneous and can be associated with significant morbidity due to mass effects of peritumoral cysts or tumor progression. Underlying molecular factors involved in HB tumor biology remain elusive. We investigated genome‐wide DNA methylation profiles and clinical and histopathological features in a series of 47 HBs from 42 patients, including 28 individuals with VHL disease. Thirty tumors occurred in the cerebellum, 8 in the brainstem and 8 HBs were of spinal location, while 1 HB was located in the cerebrum. Histologically, 12 HBs (26%) belonged to the cellular subtype and exclusively occurred in the cerebellum, whereas 35 HBs were reticular (74%). Unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction of DNA methylation profiles revealed two distinct subgroups. Methylation cluster 1 comprised 30 HBs of mainly cerebellar location (29/30, 97%), whereas methylation cluster 2 contained 17 HBs predominantly located in non‐cerebellar compartments (16/17, 94%). The sum of chromosomal regions being affected by copy‐number alterations was significantly higher in methylation cluster 1 compared to cluster 2 (mean 262 vs. 109 Mb, p = 0.001). Of note, loss of chromosome 6 occurred in 9/30 tumors (30%) of methylation cluster 1 and was not observed in cluster 2 tumors (p = 0.01). No relevant methylation differences between sporadic and VHL‐related HBs or cystic and non‐cystic HBs could be detected. Deconvolution of the bulk DNA methylation profiles revealed four methylation components that were associated with the two methylation clusters suggesting cluster‐specific cell‐type compositions. In conclusion, methylation profiling of HBs reveals 2 distinct subgroups that mainly associate with anatomical location, cytogenetic profiles and differences in cell type composition, potentially reflecting different cells of origin.

SMARCB1-deficient and SMARCA4-deficient Malignant Brain Tumors With Complex Copy Number Alterations andTP53Mutations May Represent the First Clinical Manifestation of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a malignant central nervous system tumor predominantly affecting infants. Mutations ofSMARCB1or (rarely)SMARCA4causing loss of nuclear SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 protein expression are characteristic features, but further recurrent genetic alterations are lacking. Most AT/RTs occur de novo, but secondary AT/RTs arising from other central nervous system tumors have been reported. Malignant gliomas, IDH wild-type, arising in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome typically show somatic mutations ofTP53as well as complex copy number alterations, but little is known about the loss of SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 protein expression in this context. Here, we report 2 children in whom malignant supratentorial brain tumors with SMARCB1 deficiency, complex copy number alterations, and somaticTP53mutations lead to the discovery of pathogenic/likely pathogenicTP53variants in the germline. Screening of the molecularneuropathology.org dataset for cases with similar genetic and epigenetic alterations yielded another case with SMARCA4 deficiency in a young adult with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. In conclusion, SMARCB1-deficient or SMARCA4-deficient malignant brain tumors with complex copy number alterations and somaticTP53mutations in children and young adults may represent the first clinical manifestation of Li-Fraumeni syndrome and should prompt genetic counseling and investigation forTP53germline status.

Evaluation and Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Embryonal Tumors (Non-Medulloblastoma)

Since the 1990s, the sheer number of defined central nervous system (CNS) embryonal tumor entities has continuously increased, with the trend accelerating in the most recent editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the CNS. The introduction of increasingly specific tumor groups is an effort to create more internally homogeneous categories, to allow more precise prognostication, and potentially to develop targeted therapies. However, these ever-smaller categories within an already rare group of tumors pose a challenge for pediatric pathologists. In this article we review the current categorization of non-medulloblastoma CNS embryonal tumors (including atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, cribriform neuroepithelial tumor, embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, CNS neuroblastoma, FOXR2-activated, and CNS tumor with BCOR internal tandem duplication) and provide an overview of available ancillary techniques to characterize these tumors. We provide a practical approach to workup and development of an integrated diagnosis for CNS embryonal tumors.

[The 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system]

Rapid technical advances in molecular biology allowed for the identification of key genetic alterations in central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Our ever-expanding knowledge of brain tumor genetics and the development of new technologies, such as DNA-methylation profiling, required an update of the 2016 fourth edition of the WHO classification of CNS tumors. Updates were regularly published by the Consortium to Inform Molecular Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy-Not Official WHO (c-IMPACT-NOW) until the publication of the fifth edition of the WHO classification of CNS tumors in 2021. In that edition, new types and subtypes are introduced and criteria for histo-molecular diagnostic and grading are refined, especially for diffuse gliomas. The definition of a broad category "diffuse glioma, pediatric subtype" (low or high grade) is a major improvement of the classification. Moreover, the nomenclature was simplified and aligned with that of other blue books. The 2021 edition truly advances the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification. Methyloma profiling may become a cornerstone of CNS tumor diagnostic. The new WHO classification will lead to better management of brain tumor patients.

In and around the pineal gland: a neuroimaging review

Lesions arising in or around the pineal gland comprise a heterogeneous group of pathologies ranging from benign non-neoplastic cysts to highly malignant neoplasms. Pineal cysts are frequently encountered as an incidental finding in daily radiology practice but there is no universal agreement on the criteria for, frequency of, and duration of follow-up imaging. Solid pineal neoplasms pose a diagnostic challenge owing to considerable overlap in their imaging characteristics, although a combination of radiological appearances, clinical findings, and tumour markers allows for narrowing of the differential diagnosis. In this review, we describe the radiological anatomy of the pineal region, clinical symptoms, imaging appearances, and differential diagnosis of lesions arising in this area, and highlight the clinical management of these conditions.

DNA Methylation Profiling: An Emerging Paradigm for Cancer Diagnosis

Histomorphology has been a mainstay of cancer diagnosis in anatomic pathology for many years. DNA methylation profiling is an additional emerging tool that will serve as an adjunct to increase accuracy of pathological diagnosis. Genome-wide interrogation of DNA methylation signatures, in conjunction with machine learning methods, has allowed for the creation of clinical-grade classifiers, most prominently in central nervous system and soft tissue tumors. Tumor DNA methylation profiling has led to the identification of new entities and the consolidation of morphologically disparate cancers into biologically coherent entities, and it will progressively become mainstream in the future. In addition, DNA methylation patterns in circulating tumor DNA hold great promise for minimally invasive cancer detection and classification. Despite practical challenges that accompany any new technology, methylation profiling is here to stay and will become increasingly utilized as a cancer diagnostic tool across a range of tumor types. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, Volume 17 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

DNA methylation profiling as a model for discovery and precision diagnostics in neuro-oncology

Recent years have witnessed a shift to more objective and biologically-driven methods for central nervous system (CNS) tumor classification. The 2016 world health organization (WHO) classification update ("blue book") introduced molecular diagnostic criteria into the definitions of specific entities as a response to the plethora of evidence that key molecular alterations define distinct tumor types and are clinically meaningful. While in the past such diagnostic alterations included specific mutations, copy number changes, or gene fusions, the emergence of DNA methylation arrays in recent years has similarly resulted in improved diagnostic precision, increased reliability, and has provided an effective framework for the discovery of new tumor types. In many instances, there is an intimate relationship between these mutations/fusions and DNA methylation signatures. The adoption of methylation data into neuro-oncology nosology has been greatly aided by the availability of technology compatible with clinical diagnostics, along with the development of a freely accessible machine learning-based classifier. In this review, we highlight the utility of DNA methylation profiling in CNS tumor classification with a focus on recently described novel and rare tumor types, as well as its contribution to refining existing types.

A case of an atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with distinctive histology in the pineal region in an adult patient

A 31‐year‐old man suffered from headaches and presented at a hospital after the symptom worsened. Obstructive hydrocephalus and a pineal tumor were identified, and he was transferred to our hospital for further investigation and treatment. Cranial computed tomography revealed a hypodense mass lesion on the right of the pineal region, and calcifications and enlargement of the lateral and third cerebral ventricles were also evident. Blood tests were negative for all tumor markers. Laparoscopic biopsy and third‐ventricle fenestration were performed that day as an emergency surgery to treat the obstructive hydrocephalus. Postoperative cranial magnetic resonance imaging revealed a solid tumor that was hypointense on T1‐weighted imaging, hyperintense on T2‐weighted imaging, and heterogeneously enhanced by Gd. Subsequently, the tumor increased in size, and craniotomy and tumorectomy were performed. Histologically, the tumor proliferated as round or short spindle‐shaped cells in a myxoid matrix, forming arrays that surrounded the blood vessels. As a few cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm were also present and immunostaining for INI‐1 was negative, the patient was diagnosed with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT). AT/RT of the pineal region in adults is rare, and herein, we report the morphological characteristics of this case and reviewed the relevant literature.

The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, is the sixth version of the international standard for the classification of brain and spinal cord tumors. Building on the 2016 updated fourth edition and the work of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy, the 2021 fifth edition introduces major changes that advance the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification. At the same time, it remains wedded to other established approaches to tumor diagnosis such as histology and immunohistochemistry. In doing so, the fifth edition establishes some different approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading and it emphasizes the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. New tumor types and subtypes are introduced, some based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. The present review summarizes the major general changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification and the specific changes in each taxonomic category. It is hoped that this summary provides an overview to facilitate more in-depth exploration of the entire fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.

Transposable element insertion as a mechanism of SMARCB1 inactivation in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a malignant brain tumor predominantly occurring in infants. Biallelic SMARCB1 mutations causing loss of nuclear SMARCB1/INI1 protein expression represent the characteristic genetic lesion. Pathogenic SMARCB1 mutations comprise single nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions, large deletions, which may be also present in the germline (rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 1), as well as somatic copy-number neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH). In some SMARCB1-deficient AT/RT underlying biallelic mutations cannot be identified. Here we report the case of a 24-months-old girl diagnosed with a large brain tumor. The malignant rhabdoid tumor showed loss of nuclear SMARCB1/INI1 protein expression and the diagnosis of AT/RT was confirmed by DNA methylation profiling. While FISH, MLPA, Sanger sequencing and DNA methylation data-based imbalance analysis did not disclose alterations affecting SMARCB1, OncoScan array analysis revealed a 28.29 Mb sized region of copy-number neutral LOH on chromosome 22q involving the SMARCB1 locus. Targeted next-generation sequencing did also not detect a single nucleotide variant but instead revealed insertion of an AluY element into exon 2 of SMARCB1. Specific PCR-based Sanger sequencing verified the Alu insertion (SMARCB1 c.199_200 Alu ins) resulting in a frame-shift truncation not present in the patient's germline. In conclusion, transposable element insertion represents a hitherto not widely recognized mechanism of SMARCB1 disruption in AT/RT, which might not be detected by several widely applied conventional diagnostics assays. This finding has particular clinical implications, if rhabdoid predisposition syndrome 1 is suspected, but germline SMARCB1 alterations cannot be identified.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) with SMARCA4 mutation are molecularly distinct from SMARCB1-deficient cases

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) are very aggressive childhood malignancies of the central nervous system. The underlying genetic cause are inactivating bi-allelic mutations in SMARCB1 or (rarely) in SMARCA4. ATRT-SMARCA4 have been associated with a higher frequency of germline mutations, younger age, and an inferior prognosis in comparison to SMARCB1 mutated cases. Based on their DNA methylation profiles and transcriptomics, SMARCB1 mutated ATRTs have been divided into three distinct molecular subgroups: ATRT-TYR, ATRT-SHH, and ATRT-MYC. These subgroups differ in terms of age at diagnosis, tumor location, type of SMARCB1 alterations, and overall survival. ATRT-SMARCA4 are, however, less well understood, and it remains unknown, whether they belong to one of the described ATRT subgroups. Here, we examined 14 ATRT-SMARCA4 by global DNA methylation analyses. We show that they form a separate group segregating from SMARCB1 mutated ATRTs and from other SMARCA4-deficient tumors like small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) or SMARCA4 mutated extra-cranial malignant rhabdoid tumors. In contrast, medulloblastoma (MB) samples with heterozygous SMARCA4 mutations do not group separately, but with established MB subgroups. RNA sequencing of ATRT-SMARCA4 confirmed the clustering results based on DNA methylation profiling and displayed an absence of typical signature genes upregulated in SMARCB1 deleted ATRT. In summary, our results suggest that, in line with previous clinical observations, ATRT-SMARCA4 should be regarded as a distinct molecular subgroup.

Desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1-mutant: a new variant of SMARCB1-deficient tumor of the central nervous system preferentially arising in the pineal region

Desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT), SMARCB1-mutant is a recently proposed brain tumor that occurs in the pineal region of adults. This tumor is characterized by desmoplastic stroma and various degrees of myxoid matrix. Tumor cells with low-grade morphology show polyphenotypic immunoreactivity, and rhabdoid cells are rare. We herein present a case with some uncommon features such as no myxoid stroma and slightly elevated proliferating activity. To date, knowledge on the variety of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors of the central nervous system is gradually increasing, encompassing highly aggressive to slow-growing varieties. DMT, SMARCB1-mutant seems to be relatively benign, but careful attention is necessary because SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency is generally a genetic signature of concern.

CNS Low-grade Diffusely Infiltrative Tumors With INI1 Deficiency, Possessing a High Propensity to Progress to Secondary INI1-deficient Rhabdoid Tumors

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs) are highly malignant tumors of the central nervous system that predominantly occur in infants, and are characterized by the presence of rhabdoid cells and inactivation of INI1 or (rarely) BRG1. Most AT/RT are identified as primary tumors; however, rare AT/RT or INI1-deficient RTs arising from other primary tumors have been reported. Here, we report 3 cases of hitherto unclassifiable low-grade tumors with loss of INI1 nuclear expression, for which we propose the designation of central nervous system low-grade diffusely infiltrative tumors with INI1 deficiency (CNS LGDIT-INI1), 2 of which progressed to secondary RT. All 3 CNS LGDIT-INI1 exhibited a similar histology: diffusely distributed small tumor cells with round to oval or irregular nuclei and scant cytoplasm were admixed with degenerative neurons and large reactive astrocytes in an edematous, myxoid, or collagenous background. Mitotic figures were absent. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the tumor cells in all 3 CNS LGDIT-INI1 and 2 RT were negative for INI1. Genetically, total or partial homozygous deletions of the INI1 gene were detected in all CNS LGDIT-INI1 and RT excluding 1 CNS LGDIT-INI1 without sufficient DNA quality and quantity. Despite the loss of INI1 expression, these low-grade lesions were clearly distinguishable from AT/RT by their low proliferative activity, diffusely infiltrative growth pattern, and lack of rhabdoid cells and polyphenotypic immunoreactivity. In conclusion, CNS LGDIT-INI1 may represent a rare group of tumors that are clinically indolent but have a high propensity to progress to RT.

A case of desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1 mutant, in the pineal region

Desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT), SMARCB1 mutant is a recently proposed new entity that mainly occurs in the pineal region and has epigenetic features similar to those of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT)-MYC and poorly differentiated chordomas. Herein, we present a new case of a 33-year-old man with headaches, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and blurred vision, who was initially found to have a suspicious germinoma on imaging. After surgical removal of the lesion, the postoperative pathological diagnosis was DMT, SMARCB1 mutant. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in China. Our findings also extend the range of the immunohistochemical phenotype of this rare tumor.