1
|
Yamaguchi D, Tanaka Y, Nomura T. Over-the-scope clip rescue method of endoscopic hemostasis for severe acute colonic diverticular bleeding. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:506-507. [PMID: 38353173 DOI: 10.1111/den.14764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Watch a video of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Nomura
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suzuki H, Morisaki N, Nagashima S, Matsunaga T, Matsushita S, Iino A, Tanaka Y, Nishimori H, Munakata S, Kemmochi M, Murakami Y, Sato M, Toyokuni K, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Morita H, Fukuie T, Yamada Y, Ohtsuka Y, Arai K, Ohya Y, Saito H, Matsumoto K, Nomura I. A nationwide survey of non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergies in neonates and infants. Allergol Int 2024; 73:264-274. [PMID: 37914545 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergies (non-IgE-GIFAs) seem to be increasing rapidly worldwide. However, nationwide studies have been limited to food-protein-induced enterocolitis (FPIES) and food-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), with little attention to other non-IgE-GIFA subgroups. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical features of all patients with non-IgE-GIFAs, not just certain subgroups. METHODS We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of non-IgE-GIFAs in Japan from April 2015 through March 2016. A questionnaire was sent to hospitals and clinics throughout Japan. The questionnaire asked about the number of physician-diagnosed non-IgE-GIFA patients, the status of fulfillment of the diagnostic criteria, tentative classification into 4 clusters based on the initial symptoms, the day of onset after birth, complications, and the suspected offending food(s). RESULTS The response rate to that questionnaire was 67.6% from hospitals and 47.4% from clinics. Analyses were conducted about "diagnosis-probable" patient cohort (n = 402) and the "diagnosis-confirmed" patients (n = 80). In half of the reported non-IgE-GIFA patients, onset occurred in the neonatal period. The patients were evenly distributed among 4 non-IgE-GIFA clusters. In Cluster 1, with symptoms of vomiting and bloody stool, the onset showed a median of 7 days after birth, which was the earliest among the clusters. Cow's milk was the most common causative food. CONCLUSIONS In half of the patients, the onset of non-IgE-GIFAs was in the neonatal period. This highlights the importance of studying the pathogenesis in the fetal and neonatal periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Suzuki
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Division of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders, Tokyo, Japan; Todachuo General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Saitama, Japan
| | - Naho Morisaki
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Department of Social Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Saori Nagashima
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Division of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shoko Matsushita
- Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Department of Allergy, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Iino
- Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Department of Allergy, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Department of General Pediatrics and Interdisciplinary Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Nishimori
- Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Mie, Japan
| | - Shun Munakata
- Nagano Children's Hospital, Department of Neonatology, Nagano, Japan
| | - Manabu Kemmochi
- Kitasato University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Murakami
- Ehime Prefectural Imabari Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Ehime, Japan
| | - Miori Sato
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Allergy Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Toyokuni
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Allergy Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hideaki Morita
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Fukuie
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Allergy Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Yamada
- Tokai University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Ohtsuka
- Juntendo University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Arai
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Allergy Center, Tokyo, Japan; National Center for Child Health and Development, Division of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Ohya
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Allergy Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirohisa Saito
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Matsumoto
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Nomura
- National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Division of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders, Tokyo, Japan; National Center for Child Health and Development, Allergy Center, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suzuki H, Kametaka J, Nakahori S, Tanaka Y, Iwahara M, Lin H, Manzhos S, Kyaw AKK, Nishikawa T, Hayashi Y. N-DMBI Doping of Carbon Nanotube Yarns for Achieving High n-Type Thermoelectric Power Factor and Figure of Merit. Small Methods 2024:e2301387. [PMID: 38470210 DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202301387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
The application of carbon nanotube (CNT) yarns as thermoelectric materials for harvesting energy from low-grade waste heat including that generated by the human body, is attracting considerable attention. However, the lack of efficient n-type CNT yarns hinders their practical implementation in thermoelectric devices. This study reports efficient n-doping of CNT yarns, employing 4-(1, 3-dimethyl-2, 3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazole-2-yl) phenyl) dimethylamine (N-DMBI) in alternative to conventional n-dopants, with o-dichlorobenzene emerging as the optimal solvent. The small molecular size of N-DMBI enables highly efficient doping within a remarkably short duration (10 s) while ensuring prolonged stability in air and at high temperature (150 °C). Furthermore, Joule annealing of the yarns significantly improves the n-doping efficiency. Consequently, thermoelectric power factors (PFs) of 2800, 2390, and 1534 µW m-1 K-2 are achieved at 200, 150, and 30 °C, respectively. The intercalation of N-DMBI molecules significantly suppresses the thermal conductivity, resulting in the high figure of merit (ZT) of 1.69×10-2 at 100 °C. Additionally, a π-type thermoelectric module is successfully demonstrated incorporating both p- and n-doped CNT yarns. This study offers an efficient doping strategy for achieving CNT yarns with high thermoelectric performance, contributing to the realization of lightweight and mechanically flexible CNT-based thermoelectric devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroo Suzuki
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
- Faculty of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Jun Kametaka
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Shinya Nakahori
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Mizuki Iwahara
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Haolu Lin
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Sergei Manzhos
- School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan
| | - Aung Ko Ko Kyaw
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China
| | - Takeshi Nishikawa
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
- Faculty of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Hayashi
- Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
- Faculty of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu HA, Baik C, Kim DW, Johnson ML, Hayashi H, Nishio M, Yang JCH, Su WC, Gold KA, Koczywas M, Smit EF, Steuer CE, Felip E, Murakami H, Kim SW, Su X, Sato S, Fan PD, Fujimura M, Tanaka Y, Patel P, Sternberg DW, Sellami D, Jänne PA. Translational insights and overall survival in the U31402-A-U102 study of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00047-4. [PMID: 38369013 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) is broadly expressed in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is the target of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd), an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a HER3 antibody attached to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. U31402-A-U102 is an ongoing phase I study of HER3-DXd in patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC that progressed after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) who received HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks had a confirmed objective response rate (cORR) of 39%. We present median overall survival (OS) with extended follow-up in a larger population of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and an exploratory analysis in those with acquired genomic alterations potentially associated with resistance to HER3-DXd. PATIENTS AND METHODS Safety was assessed in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC previously treated with EGFR TKI who received HER3-DXd 5.6 mg/kg; efficacy was assessed in those who also had prior PBC. RESULTS In the safety population (N = 102), median treatment duration was 5.5 (range 0.7-27.5) months. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 76.5% of patients; the overall safety profile was consistent with previous reports. In 78/102 patients who had prior third-generation EGFR TKI and PBC, cORR by blinded independent central review (as per RECIST v1.1) was 41.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30.0% to 52.7%], median progression-free survival was 6.4 (95% CI 4.4-10.8) months, and median OS was 16.2 (95% CI 11.2-21.9) months. Patients had diverse mechanisms of EGFR TKI resistance at baseline. At tumor progression, acquired mutations in ERBB3 and TOP1 that might confer resistance to HER3-DXd were identified. CONCLUSIONS In patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after EGFR TKI and PBC, HER3-DXd treatment was associated with a clinically meaningful OS. The tumor biomarker characterization comprised the first description of potential mechanisms of resistance to HER3-DXd therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A Yu
- Department of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
| | - C Baik
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA
| | - D-W Kim
- Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - M L Johnson
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, USA
| | | | - M Nishio
- The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J C-H Yang
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City
| | - W-C Su
- National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - K A Gold
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, San Diego
| | | | - E F Smit
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C E Steuer
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - E Felip
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - S-W Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - X Su
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - S Sato
- Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - P-D Fan
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | | | - Y Tanaka
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - P Patel
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | | | - D Sellami
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - P A Jänne
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maehara K, Esaki M, Sumida Y, Yamaguchi D, Nishioka K, Homma H, Inada T, Shiotsuki K, Fukuda SI, Akiho H, Nomura T, Mizuta Y, Ishida S, Fujimoto S, Kimura S, Tanaka Y, Hata K, Shiga N, Iwasa T, Kimura Y, Nakamura N, Suzuki Y, Minoda Y, Hata Y, Ogino H, Tagawa K, Ihara E, Ogawa Y. Comparison of hemostatic ability between spray coagulation and forced coagulation modes in endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial (Spray-G trial). Trials 2024; 25:53. [PMID: 38225659 PMCID: PMC10788983 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07852-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric neoplasms (EGN). Controlling intraoperative bleeding is crucial for ensuring safe and reliable procedures. ESD using the spray coagulation mode (SCM-ESD) has been developed to control bleeding more effectively than ESD using the conventional forced coagulation mode (FCM-ESD). This study aims to compare the hemostatic efficacies of SCM-ESD and FCM-ESD. METHODS This multicenter, prospective, parallel, randomized, open-label superiority trial will be conducted in five Japanese institutions. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intramucosal EGC will be randomized to undergo either SCM-ESD or FCM-ESD. The primary outcome measure is the completion of ESD with an electrosurgical knife alone, without the use of hemostatic forceps. Secondary outcomes include the number and duration of hemostasis using hemostatic forceps, procedure time, curability, and safety. A total of 130 patients will be enrolled in this study. DISCUSSION This trial will provide evidence on the hemostatic efficacy of SCM-ESD compared with FCM-ESD in patients with intramucosal EGN, potentially improving the safety and reliability of ESD procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial has been registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registration (UMIN-CTR) as UMIN000040518. The reception number is R000054009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Maehara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Esaki
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Harasanshin Hospital, 1-8, Taihaku-Cho, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yorinobu Sumida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Kei Nishioka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital, 3-13-1 Yumachi, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Homma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Taisuke Inada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuo Shiotsuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichiro Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hirotada Akiho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, 2-1-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Nomura
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yumi Mizuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Shun Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Shunichiro Kimura
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Kaori Hata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital, 3-13-1 Yumachi, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Noriko Shiga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital, 3-13-1 Yumachi, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Iwasa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital, 3-13-1 Yumachi, Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kimura
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Norimoto Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka Central Hospital, 2-6-11 Yakuin, Chuo-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Suzuki
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yosuke Minoda
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Hata
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Haruei Ogino
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koshiro Tagawa
- Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Eikichi Ihara
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiro Ogawa
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yamaguchi D, Shimoda R, Miyahara K, Yukimoto T, Sakata Y, Takamori A, Mizuta Y, Fujimura Y, Inoue S, Tomonaga M, Ogino Y, Eguchi K, Ikeda K, Tanaka Y, Takedomi H, Hidaka H, Akutagawa T, Tsuruoka N, Noda T, Tsunada S, Esaki M. Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:40-48. [PMID: 37079002 DOI: 10.1111/den.14573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was performed to evaluate whether the use of CAD EYE (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) for colonoscopy improves colonoscopy quality in gastroenterology trainees. METHODS The patients in this multicenter randomized controlled trial were divided into Group A (observation using CAD EYE) and Group B (standard observation). Six trainees performed colonoscopies using a back-to-back method in pairs with gastroenterology experts. The primary end-point was the trainees' adenoma detection rate (ADR), and the secondary end-points were the trainees' adenoma miss rate (AMR) and Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy (ACE) tool scores. Each trainee's learning curve was evaluated using a cumulative sum (CUSUM) control chart. RESULTS We analyzed data for 231 patients (Group A, n = 113; Group B, n = 118). The ADR was not significantly different between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lower AMR (25.6% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.033) and number of missed adenomas per patient (0.5 vs. 0.9, P = 0.004) than Group B. Group A also had significantly higher ACE tool scores for pathology identification (2.26 vs. 2.07, P = 0.030) and interpretation and identification of pathology location (2.18 vs. 2.00, P = 0.038). For the CUSUM learning curve, Group A showed a trend toward a lower number of cases of missed multiple adenomas by the six trainees. CONCLUSION CAD EYE did not improve ADR but decreased the AMR and improved the ability to accurately locate and identify colorectal adenomas. CAD EYE can be assumed to be beneficial for improving colonoscopy quality in gastroenterology trainees. TRIAL REGISTRATION University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000044031).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Ryo Shimoda
- Department of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Koichi Miyahara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yukimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Sakata
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Ayako Takamori
- Clinical Research Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Yumi Mizuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yutaro Fujimura
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Suma Inoue
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Michito Tomonaga
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Yuya Ogino
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Kohei Eguchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Kei Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Hironobu Takedomi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Hidenori Hidaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Takashi Akutagawa
- Department of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Nanae Tsuruoka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Takahiro Noda
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Seiji Tsunada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Motohiro Esaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanaka Y, Ota R, Hirata A, Yokoyama S, Nakagawa C, Uno T, Hosomi K. Effect of baseline urinary glucose levels on the relationship between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and serum uric acid in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmazie 2023; 78:238-244. [PMID: 38178282 DOI: 10.1691/ph.2023.3602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), controlling serum uric acid (SUA) and blood glucose levels is important. Moreover, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors decrease SUA levels by accelerating urinary uric acid excretion. We investigated the effect of baseline urinary glucose levels on the relationship between SGLT2 inhibitors and SUA levels. We conducted a retrospective observational study using the electronic medical records of patients with T2DM of Kindai University Nara Hospital (April 2013 to March 2022). We divided the patients into two groups according to their baseline urinary glucose levels: the N-UG group, which included patients with negative urinary glucose strip test results (-), and the P-UG group, which included patients with positive urinary glucose strip test results (± or more). The changes in SUA levels before and after SGLT2 inhibitor administration were investigated. For comparison, the changes in SUA levels before and after the prescription of antidiabetic agents, excluding SGLT2 inhibitors, were also investigated. Our results revealed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the SUA levels in patients in the N-UG group but tended to decrease its levels in those in the P-UG group. Regardless of the urinary glucose status at baseline, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors may be useful for patients with T2DM to prevent the complications of hyperuricemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Tanaka
- Division of Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka; Department of Pharmacy , Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - R Ota
- Department of Pharmacy, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - A Hirata
- Department of Pharmacy, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - S Yokoyama
- Division of Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka
| | - C Nakagawa
- Division of Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka; Department of Pharmacy , Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - T Uno
- Division of Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka
| | - K Hosomi
- Division of Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hirata H, Hinoda Y, Shahryari V, Deng G, Tanaka Y, Tabatabai ZL, Dahiya R. Editorial Expression of Concern: Genistein downregulates onco-miR-1260b and upregulates sFRP1 and Smad4 via demethylation and histone modification in prostate cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:735. [PMID: 37507546 PMCID: PMC10421853 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02365-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Hirata
- Department of Urology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Y Hinoda
- Department of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - V Shahryari
- Department of Urology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - G Deng
- Department of Urology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Y Tanaka
- Department of Urology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Z L Tabatabai
- Department of Pathology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - R Dahiya
- Department of Urology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kurahara Y, Kanaoka K, Tanaka Y, Maeda Y, Kobayashi T, Takeuchi N, Kagawa T, Tachibana K, Yoshida S, Tsuyuguchi K. Management of dysphonia caused by amikacin liposome inhalation in M. avium complex pulmonary disease. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2023; 27:872-873. [PMID: 37880889 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.23.0275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kurahara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, and, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka
| | - K Kanaoka
- Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka
| | - Y Tanaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, and
| | - Y Maeda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
| | - T Kobayashi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | - K Tachibana
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka
| | - S Yoshida
- Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka
| | - K Tsuyuguchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, and, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Otsuka P, Chinbe R, Tomoda M, Matsuda O, Tanaka Y, Profunser D, Kim S, Jeon H, Veres I, Maznev A, Wright O. Imaging phonon eigenstates and elucidating the energy storage characteristics of a honeycomb-lattice phononic crystal cavity. Photoacoustics 2023; 31:100481. [PMID: 37214426 PMCID: PMC10192931 DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
We extend gigahertz time-domain imaging to a wideband investigation of the eigenstates of a phononic crystal cavity. Using omnidirectionally excited phonon wave vectors, we implement an ultrafast technique to experimentally probe the two-dimensional acoustic field inside and outside a hexagonal cavity in a honeycomb-lattice phononic crystal formed in a microscopic crystalline silicon slab, thereby revealing the confinement and mode volumes of phonon eigenstates-some of which are clearly hexapole in character-lying both inside and outside the phononic-crystal band gap. This allows us to obtain a quantitative measure of the spatial acoustic energy storage characteristics of a phononic crystal cavity. We also introduce a numerical approach involving toneburst excitation and the monitoring of the acoustic energy decay together with the integral of the Poynting vector to calculate the Q factor of the principal in-gap eigenmode, showing it to be limited by ultrasonic attenuation rather than by phonon leakage to the surrounding region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P.H. Otsuka
- Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
| | - R. Chinbe
- Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
| | - M. Tomoda
- Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
| | - O. Matsuda
- Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
| | - Y. Tanaka
- Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
| | - D.M. Profunser
- Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
| | - S. Kim
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - H. Jeon
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - I.A. Veres
- Research Center for Non-Destructive Testing GmbH, Altenberger Str. 69, Linz 4040, Austria
| | - A.A. Maznev
- Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, United States of America
| | - O.B. Wright
- Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 2-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samejima J, Okami J, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi S, Kimura T, Mukai M, Nagao T, Matsuoka H, Tsuboi M. 159P Optimization and validation of a circulating microRNA biomarker panel for early detection of lung cancer in a Japanese population. J Thorac Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s1556-0864(23)00413-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
12
|
Idei H, Sakaguchi M, Mishra K, Onchi T, Ikezoe R, Watanabe O, Tanaka Y, Saito T, Ido T, Hanada K. 8.56-GHz quasi-optical launcher system with incident-mode selectivity on the QUEST spherical tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
13
|
Hayashi K, Tanaka Y, Tsuda T, Nomura A, Fujino N, Furusho H, Sakai N, Iwata Y, Usui S, Sakata K, Kato T, Tada H, Kusayama T, Usuda K, Kawashiri MA, Passman RS, Wada T, Yamagishi M, Takamura M, Fujino N, Nohara A, Kawashiri MA, Hayashi K, Sakata K, Yoshimuta T, Konno T, Funada A, Tada H, Nakanishi C, Hodatsu A, Mori M, Tsuda T, Teramoto R, Nagata Y, Nomura A, Shimojima M, Yoshida S, Yoshida T, Hachiya S, Tamura Y, Kashihara Y, Kobayashi T, Shibayama J, Inaba S, Matsubara T, Yasuda T, Miwa K, Inoue M, Fujita T, Yakuta Y, Aburao T, Matsui T, Higashi K, Koga T, Hikishima K, Namura M, Horita Y, Ikeda M, Terai H, Gamou T, Tama N, Kimura R, Tsujimoto D, Nakahashi T, Ueda K, Ino H, Higashikata T, Kaneda T, Takata M, Yamamoto R, Yoshikawa T, Ohira M, Suematsu T, Tagawa S, Inoue T, Okada H, Kita Y, Fujita C, Ukawa N, Inoguchi Y, Ito Y, Araki T, Oe K, Minamoto M, Yokawa J, Tanaka Y, Mori K, Taguchi T, Kaku B, Katsuda S, Hirase H, Haraki T, Fujioka K, Terada K, Ichise T, Maekawa N, Higashi M, Okeie K, Kiyama M, Ota M, Todo Y, Aoyama T, Yamaguchi M, Noji Y, Mabuchi T, Yagi M, Niwa S, Takashima Y, Murai K, Nishikawa T, Mizuno S, Ohsato K, Misawa K, Kokado H, Michishita I, Iwaki T, Nozue T, Katoh H, Nakashima K, Ito S, Yamagishi M. Correction: Characterization of baseline clinical factors associated with incident worsening kidney function in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry. Heart Vessels 2023; 38:412. [PMID: 36508013 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-022-02218-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenshi Hayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiro Tanaka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.,Center for Arrhythmia Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Toyonobu Tsuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Akihiro Nomura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Noboru Fujino
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Furusho
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.,Department of Cardiology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, 2-1, Kuratsuki-higashi, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Norihiko Sakai
- Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yasunori Iwata
- Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Soichiro Usui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Kenji Sakata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Hayato Tada
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Takashi Kusayama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Keisuke Usuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Masa-Aki Kawashiri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | - Rod S Passman
- Center for Arrhythmia Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Takashi Wada
- Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamagishi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.,Osaka University of Human Sciences, Settsu, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masayuki Takamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsukamoto S, Takahama T, Mavrogenis AF, Tanaka Y, Tanaka Y, Errani C. Clinical outcomes of medical treatments for progressive desmoid tumors following active surveillance: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 2023; 107:7-18. [PMID: 35150408 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-022-00738-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 80% of desmoid tumors (DTs) show spontaneous regression or disease stabilization during first-line active surveillance. Medical treatment can be considered in cases of disease progression. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of each medical treatment by reviewing only the studies that included progressive disease as the inclusion criterion. We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases to identify published studies for progressive DTs. The disease control rates of the medical treatments, such as low-dose chemotherapy with methotrexate plus vinblastine or vinorelbine, imatinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, nilotinib, anlotinib, doxorubicin-based agents, liposomal doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, and oral vinorelbine for progressive DTs were 71-100%, 78-92%, 67-96%, 84%, 88%, 86%, 89-100%, 90-100%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Low-dose chemotherapy, sorafenib, pazopanib, nilotinib, anlotinib, and liposomal doxorubicin had similar toxicities. Sorafenib and pazopanib were less toxic than imatinib. Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was associated with the highest toxicity. Hydroxyurea and oral vinorelbine exhibited the lowest toxicity. Stepwise therapy escalation from an initial, less toxic treatment to more toxic agents is recommended for progressive DTs. Sorafenib and pazopanib had limited on-treatment side effects but had the possibility to induce long-term treatment-related side effects. In contrast, low-dose chemotherapy has some on-treatment side effects and is known to have very low long-term toxicity. Thus, for progressive DTs following active surveillance, low-dose chemotherapy is recommended in young patients as long-term side effects are minor, whereas therapies such as sorafenib and pazopanib is recommended for older patients as early side effects are minor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Tsukamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
| | - T Takahama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, 630-0293, Japan
| | - A F Mavrogenis
- First Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 41 Ventouri Street, Holargos, 15562, Athens, Greece
| | - Y Tanaka
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Y Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - C Errani
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fujita H, Makino S, Hasegawa T, Saima Y, Tanaka Y, Nagashima S, Kakehashi A, Kaburaki T. Thyroid eye disease following administration of the BNT162B2 COVID-19 vaccine. QJM 2023; 116:130-132. [PMID: 36448695 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcac265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Fujita
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan
| | - S Makino
- Inoda Eye Clinic, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi-ken, Japan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi-ken, Japan
| | - T Hasegawa
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan
| | - Y Saima
- Division of Ophthalmology, Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Tanaka
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan
| | - S Nagashima
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan
| | - A Kakehashi
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan
| | - T Kaburaki
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tanaka Y, Yamakana A, Motoyama Y, Kusunoki T. Is Hen's Egg Allergy Decreasing Among Japanese Children in Nurseries? J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2023; 33:47-49. [PMID: 35261340 DOI: 10.18176/jiaci.0805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Y Tanaka
- Laboratory of Child Health and Nutrition, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Shiga, Japan
| | - A Yamakana
- Laboratory of Child Health and Nutrition, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Shiga, Japan
| | - Y Motoyama
- Laboratory of Child Health and Nutrition, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Shiga, Japan
| | - T Kusunoki
- Laboratory of Child Health and Nutrition, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Shiga, Japan.,Department of Pediatrics, Shiga Medical Center for Children, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yamaguchi D, Ishida S, Nomura T, Mizuta Y, Fujimoto S, Tanaka Y, Tsunada S. Endoscopic hemostasis of spurting colonic diverticular bleeding using the combination of self-assembling peptide solution and endoscopic band ligation. Endoscopy 2023; 55:E418-E419. [PMID: 36758630 PMCID: PMC9911289 DOI: 10.1055/a-2008-0599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Nomura
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yumi Mizuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Shun Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Seiji Tsunada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mitsui Y, Chang I, Fukuhara S, Hiraki M, Arichi N, Yasumoto H, Hirata H, Yamamura S, Shahryari V, Deng G, Wong DK, Majid S, Shiina H, Dahiya R, Tanaka Y. Correction: CYP1B1 promotes tumorigenesis via altered expression of CDC20 and DAPK1 genes in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:813. [PMID: 35879687 PMCID: PMC9310497 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09907-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
19
|
Ando Y, Ono Y, Sano A, Fujita N, Ono S, Tanaka Y. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pheochromocytoma crisis: a literature review of 200 cases. J Endocrinol Invest 2022; 45:2313-2328. [PMID: 35857218 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01868-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pheochromocytoma crisis is a life-threatening endocrine emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Because of its rarity, sudden onset, and lack of internationally uniform and validated diagnostic criteria, pheochromocytoma crisis remains to be fully clarified. Therefore, we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of pheochromocytoma crisis through a literature review. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE database, Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi (Japanese database), and Google Scholar to identify case reports of pheochromocytoma crisis published until February 5, 2021. Information was extracted and analyzed from the literature that reported adequate individual patient data of pheochromocytoma crisis in English or Japanese. Cases were also termed as pheochromocytoma multisystem crisis (PMC) if patients had signs of hyperthermia, multiple organ failure, encephalopathy, and labile blood pressure. RESULTS In the 200 cases of pheochromocytoma crisis identified from 187 articles, the mean patient age was 43.8 ± 15.5 years. The most common symptom was headache (39.5%). The heart was the most commonly damaged organ resulting from a complication of a pheochromocytoma crisis (99.0%), followed by the lungs (44.0%) and the kidney (21.5%). PMC accounted for 19.0% of all pheochromocytoma crisis cases. After excluding 12 cases with unknown survival statuses, the mortality rate was 13.8% (26/188 cases). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that nausea and vomiting were significantly associated with a higher mortality rate. CONCLUSION Pheochromocytoma can present with different symptomatology, affecting different organ systems. Clinicians should be aware that patients with nausea or vomiting are at a higher risk of death because of pheochromocytoma crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Ando
- Department of General Medicine, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan
- Department of Family Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Ono
- Department of General Medicine, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.
| | - A Sano
- Department of General Medicine, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan
| | - N Fujita
- Department of General Medicine, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan
| | - S Ono
- Department of Eat-Loss Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Tanaka
- Department of General Medicine, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yamaguchi D, Morisaki T, Sakata Y, Mizuta Y, Nagatsuma G, Inoue S, Shimakura A, Jubashi A, Takeuchi Y, Ikeda K, Tanaka Y, Yoshioka W, Hino N, Ario K, Tsunada S, Esaki M. Usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy: a propensity score-matched study of the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system and the modified Aldrete score. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:445. [PMCID: PMC9635164 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02549-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy by comparing the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (MPADSS) and the modified Aldrete score. Methods We prospectively enrolled 376 outpatients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy under midazolam sedation; 181 outpatients were assessed regarding discharge after sedative endoscopy using the MPADSS (group M), and 195 patients were assessed by the modified Aldrete score (group A). The clinical characteristics, types of endoscopy, endoscopic outcomes, and anesthesia outcomes were evaluated between the two groups. We compared discharge score, recovery time, and adverse events using propensity-score matching. Results Propensity-score matching created 120 matched pairs. The proportion of patients who had a recovery time within 60 min after endoscopy was significantly higher in group A than that in group M (42.5% versus 25.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). The proportion of patients who required > 120 min of recovery time after endoscopy was significantly lower in group A than that in group M (0.0% versus 5.0%, respectively; P = 0.03). However, significantly more patients had drowsiness at discharge in group A compared with group M (19.1% versus 5.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the adverse event rate within 24 h of discharge between the groups. Conclusions Patients assessed by the modified Aldrete score were allowed to discharge earlier than those assessed by the MPADSS. However, a patient’s level of consciousness should be assessed carefully, especially in patients who visit the hospital alone. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02549-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yamaguchi
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan ,grid.412339.e0000 0001 1172 4459Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, 849-8501 Japan
| | - Tomohito Morisaki
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan ,Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health care Organization Isahaya General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Sakata
- grid.412339.e0000 0001 1172 4459Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, 849-8501 Japan
| | - Yumi Mizuta
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Goshi Nagatsuma
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Suma Inoue
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Akane Shimakura
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Amane Jubashi
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yuki Takeuchi
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Kei Ikeda
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Wataru Yoshioka
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Hino
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ario
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Seiji Tsunada
- grid.440125.6Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Motohiro Esaki
- grid.412339.e0000 0001 1172 4459Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, 849-8501 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yamazaki N, Kiyohara Y, Sato M, Endo S, Song B, Tanaka Y, Kambe A, Sato Y, Uhara H. 407P A post-marketing surveillance of the real-world safety and effectiveness of avelumab in patients with curatively unresectable Merkel cell carcinoma in Japan. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
|
22
|
Kikuno N, Shiina H, Urakami S, Kawamoto K, Hirata H, Tanaka Y, Place RF, Pookot D, Majid S, Igawa M, Dahiya R. Retraction Note: Knockdown of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 inhibits prostate cancer progression through upregulation of FOXO3a activity. Oncogene 2022; 41:4981. [PMID: 36261628 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-022-02501-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Kikuno
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - H Shiina
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - S Urakami
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - K Kawamoto
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - H Hirata
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Y Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - R F Place
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D Pookot
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Majid
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - M Igawa
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - R Dahiya
- Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Matsunaga D, Tanaka Y, Tajima T, Seyama M. Optimization of a Stacked-design Core-body-temperature Sensor for Long-period Human Trials. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2022; 2022:1258-1261. [PMID: 36086560 DOI: 10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We fabricated a wearable sensor that can be attached to the skin surface and continuously measure core body temperature (CBT) wirelessly over a long period. CBT is calculated from skin-surface temperature and heat flux passing through the sensor. Since heat flux is lost to the surroundings of the probe, the slightest change in convection in daily life will degrade the measurement accuracy of the sensor. Accordingly, we previously proposed a heat-flux-path control structure to reduce the absolute amount of heat-flux loss. To make wearable sensors for long-term human trials, we proposed an integrated design in which a sensor probe, a circuit board, and a battery are stacked. We optimized the proposed design by computer simulation and evaluated the fabricated sensor by a phantom experiment in which the convectional state was changed. The evaluation results demonstrate that the sensor has limits of agreement (LOA) of [-0.13; 0.03]°C under 1-m/s-wind convection. Moreover, a preliminary human trial conducted under daily-life conditions (including convectional changes) demonstrated that the sensor has LOA of [-0.18; 0.22]°C. These results demonstrate that the fabricated sensor is suitable for CBT measurement.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tanaka Y, Kamioka E, Ishizuka B, Kawamura K. P-603 Presence of an asymmetrical response to ovarian stimulation in patients with low ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Does ovarian reserve decline with a symmetrical manner between right and left ovaries in poor responders (POR) with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)?
Summary answer
Asymmetrical ovarian response to ovarian stimulation with the left-side dominance was found in POR with DOR.
What is known already
Ovarian follicles are produced during fetal stage and not regenerated after birth. Thus, the number of ovarian follicles declines with age, resulting in infertile POR with DOR. In the morphometric study of human neonatal ovaries, no significant difference was found in the number of follicles between the right and left ovaries in the same individual. A previous study demonstrated that there is a difference in the number of follicles between right and left ovaries in patients with normal ovarian reserve with the right-side dominance, suggesting the asymmetrical activation and growth of follicles.
Study design, size, duration
A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with POR with DOR based on the Bologna Criteria. Inclusion criteria was patients who received more than five times of ovarian stimulations followed by oocyte retrievals. Data were obtained from a total of 265 participants who received IVF-ET treatments from April 2015 to March 2021 after receiving written informed consents under an approval from the institutional ethical committee. Patients with the history of previous ovarian surgery were excluded.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
The enrolled patients were received ovarian simulation under short or GnRH antagonist protocols for oocyte retrieval. We collected the data of retrieved oocyte number as well as the outcome of IVF from medical chart. We defined the right-left asymmetry of ovarian reserve (%) based on the number of retrieved oocytes from dominant side ovary per total number of retrieved oocytes. Statistical significance was determined using Dunnett or chi-square tests, with P < 0.05 being statistically significant.
Main results and the role of chance
The average age of participants was 37.2±5.99 years of age exhibiting low serum AMH levels (average 0.09±0.20 ng/ml). We analyzed 2,181 cycles of ovarian stimulation (average 8.3±3.9 cycles/patient). The number of retrieved oocytes were 3, 882 in total cycles (average 12.8±7.1/patient). Among participants, 22 cases (8.4%) showed left and right equal in the number of retrieved oocytes, whereas >70% asymmetry was observed in 107 cases (40.7%) and >80% asymmetry was detected in 60 cases (22.8%). In 18 cases (6.9%), oocytes were collected from one side ovary only showing 100% asymmetry. In the cases with >70 and 100% asymmetry, the left-side dominance was 1.3-fold and 5.0-fold higher than right-side dominance, respectively. In cases with 100% asymmetry, there was no difference in the number of cryopreserved high-quality embryos between left and right sides of ovary.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Although we enrolled POR with DOR patients who received ovarian stimulations more than five times, the duration of ovarian stimulation was different among patients. It affects the numbers of ovarian stimulation cycles and retrieved oocytes in each patient.
Wider implications of the findings
Considering the finding of right-side dominance in the number of follicles with normal ovarian reserve, the activation and development of follicles might be accelerated in the right side due to asymmetric blood supply to the ovaries, and thus follicles are likely remained in the left-side ovary with low ovarian reserve.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Tanaka
- Juntendo University Graduated School, Obstetrics and Gynecology , Tokyo, Japan
| | - E Kamioka
- Rose Ladies Clinic , Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - B Ishizuka
- Rose Ladies Clinic , Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kawamura
- International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology , Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hasegawa R, Arakawa T, Fujita K, Tanaka Y, Ookawa Z, Sakamoto S, Takasaki H, Ikeda M, Yamagami A, Mitsuda N, Nakano T, Ohme-Takagi M. Arabidopsis homeobox-leucine zipper transcription factor BRASSINOSTEROID-RELATED HOMEOBOX 3 regulates leaf greenness by suppressing BR signaling. Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo) 2022; 39:209-214. [PMID: 35937537 PMCID: PMC9300418 DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.0128a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Brassinosteroid (BR) is a phytohormone that acts as important regulator of plant growth. To identify novel transcription factors that may be involved in unknown mechanisms of BR signaling, we screened the chimeric repressor expressing plants (CRES-T), in which transcription factors were converted into chimeric repressors by the fusion of SRDX plant-specific repression domain, to identify those that affect the expression of BR inducible genes. Here, we identified a homeobox-leucine zipper type transcription factor, BRASSINOSTEROID-RELATED-HOMEOBOX 3 (BHB3), of which a chimeric repressor expressing plants (BHB3-sx) significantly downregulated the expression of BAS1 and SAUR-AC1 that are BR inducible genes. Interestingly, ectopic expression of BHB3 (BHB3-ox) also repressed the BR inducible genes and shorten hypocotyl that would be similar to a BR-deficient phenotype. Interestingly, both BHB3-sx and BHB3-ox showed pale green phenotype, in which the expression of genes related photosynthesis and chlorophyll contents were significantly decreased. We found that BHB3 contains three motifs similar to the conserved EAR-repression domain, suggesting that BHB3 may act as a transcriptional repressor. These results indicate that BHB3 might play an important role not only to the BR signaling but also the regulation of greenings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reika Hasegawa
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Tomoki Arakawa
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Fujita
- RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
| | - Zen Ookawa
- Plant Gene Regulation Research Group, Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
| | - Shingo Sakamoto
- Plant Gene Regulation Research Group, Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
| | - Hironori Takasaki
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Miho Ikeda
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Ayumi Yamagami
- Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mitsuda
- Plant Gene Regulation Research Group, Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakano
- Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
| | - Masaru Ohme-Takagi
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
- Institute of Tropical Plant Science and Microbiology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hasegawa R, Fujita K, Tanaka Y, Takasaki H, Ikeda M, Yamagami A, Mitsuda N, Nakano T, Ohme-Takagi M. Arabidopsis zinc finger homeodomain transcription factor BRASSINOSTEROID-RELATED HOMEOBOX 2 acts as a positive regulator of brassinosteroid response. Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo) 2022; 39:185-189. [PMID: 35937534 PMCID: PMC9300435 DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.0115a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The brassinosteroid (BR) phytohormone is an important regulator of plant growth. To identify novel transcription factors that regulate BR responses, we screened chimeric repressor gene silencing technology (CRES-T) plants, in which transcription factors were converted into chimeric repressors by the fusion of SRDX plant-specific repression domain, with brassinazole (Brz), an inhibitor of BR biosynthesis. We identified that a line that expressed the chimeric repressor for zinc finger homeobox transcription factor, BRASSINOSTEORID-RELATED-HOMEOBOX-2 (BHB2-sx), exhibited Brz-hypersensitive phenotype with shorter hypocotyl under dark, dwarf and round and dark green leaves similar to BR-deficient phenotype. Similar to BHB2-sx plants, bhb2 knockout mutant also exhibited Brz hypersensitive phenotype. In contrast, ectopic expression of BHB2 (BHB2-ox) showed hypocotyl elongation phenotype (BR excessive), showing decrease to Brz sensitivity. The expression of the DWF4 and CPD BR biosynthesis genes was repressed in BHB2-sx plants, whereas it was enhanced in BHB2-ox plants. The BR deficient-like phenotype of BHB2-sx plants was partially restored by treatment with brassinolide (BL), indicating that the BR deficient phenotype of BHB2-sx plant may be due to suppression of BR biosynthesis. Our results indicate that BHB2 is a positive regulator of BR response may be due to the promotion of BR biosynthesis genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reika Hasegawa
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Fujita
- RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
| | - Hironori Takasaki
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Miho Ikeda
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
| | - Ayumi Yamagami
- Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mitsuda
- Plant Gene Regulation Research Group, Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakano
- Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
| | - Masaru Ohme-Takagi
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
- Institute of Tropical Plant Science and Microbiology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mcinnes I, Coates L, Landewé RBM, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Gossec L, Gottlieb AB, Warren RB, Ink B, Assudani D, Coarse J, Bajracharya R, Merola JF. LB0001 BIMEKIZUMAB IN BDMARD-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: 24-WEEK EFFICACY & SAFETY FROM BE OPTIMAL, A PHASE 3, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, ACTIVE REFERENCE STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.5016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundBimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A.ObjectivesAssess BKZ efficacy and safety vs PBO in bDMARD-naïve pts with active PsA to Wk 24 of BE OPTIMAL.MethodsBE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203) comprises 16 wks double-blind PBO-controlled and 36 wks treatment-blind. Pts were ≥18 yrs, bDMARD-naïve, with adult-onset, active PsA, ≥3 tender and ≥3 swollen joints. Pts randomised 3:2:1, subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg Q4W:PBO:adalimumab (ADA; reference arm) 40 mg Q2W. From Wk 16, PBO pts received BKZ 160 mg Q4W. Primary endpoint: ACR50 at Wk 16.Results821/852 (96.4%) pts completed Wk 16 and 806 (94.6%) Wk 24. Mean age 48.7 yrs, BMI 29.2 kg/m2; since diagnosis: 5.9 yrs; 46.8% male. BL characteristics comparable across arms. Primary endpoint met (Wk 16 ACR50: 43.9% BKZ vs 10.0% PBO, p<0.001; ADA: 45.7%; Figure 1). All ranked secondary endpoints met at Wk 16 (Table 1). As early as Wk 2, ACR20 was higher in BKZ vs PBO (27.1% vs 7.8%, nominal p<0.001; ADA: 33.6%). Outcomes continued to improve at Wk 24 (Table 1). To Wk 16, pts with ≥1 TEAE, BKZ: 59.9%; PBO: 49.5%; ADA: 59.3%. SAE rate low (1.6%; 1.1%; 1.4%). Most frequent (≥5%) AEs for all arms: nasopharyngitis (9.3%; 4.6%; 5.0%), URTI (4.9%; 6.4%; 2.1%), increased ALT (0.7%; 0.7%; 5.0%). Candida infections: 2.6%, 0.7%, 0%; no systemic candidiasis. 2 malignancies (BKZ: basal cell carcinoma; PBO: breast cancer stage 1); no MACE, uveitis, IBD or deaths.Table 1.Wk 16 and 24 efficacyBLWk 16Wk 24PBO N=281BKZ 160 mg Q4W N=431ADA 40 mg Q2W N=140†PBO N=281BKZ 160 mg Q4W N=431ADA 40 mg Q2W N=140†p value (BKZ vs PBO)PBO→ BKZ 160 mg Q4WaN=281BKZ 160 mg Q4W N=431ADA 40 mg Q2W N=140†Ranked endpointsbACR50 [NRI],–––28189 (43.9)64<0.00110119666n (%)-10-45.7(35.9)(45.5)-47.1HAQ-DI CfB [MI],0.890.820.86−0.09 (0.03)−0.26 (0.02)−0.33<0.001c−0.28−0.30−0.34mean (SE)-0.04-0.03-0.05(0.04)(0.03)(0.02)(0.05)PASI90d [NRI],–––4133 (61.3)f28<0.00186 (61.4)e158 (72.8)f32n (%)(2.9)e(41.2)g(47.1)gSF-36 PCS CfB [MI],36.938.137.62.36.36.8<0.001c6.27.37.3mean (SE)-0.6-0.5-0.7-0.5-0.4-0.8-0.5-0.4-0.8MDA [NRI],51413719463<0.00110620967n (%)-1.8-3.2-0.7-13.2(45.0)-45(37.7)(48.5)-47.9vdHmTSS CfB (subgroup)h [MI], mean (SE)15.67 (1.80)i15.56 (1.69)j17.39 (2.89)k0.36 (0.10)i−0.01 (0.04)j−0.06 (0.08)k<0.001c–––vdHmTSS CfB [MI],mean (SE)13.31 (1.56)l13.44 (1.47)m14.55 (2.44)n0.31 (0.09)l0(0.04)m−0.03 (0.07)n0.001c–––Other endpointsACR20 [NRI],–––6726896<0.001o17528299n (%)-23.8(62.2)-68.6(62.3)(65.4)-70.7ACR70 [NRI],–––1210539<0.001o5312642n (%)-4.3(24.4)-27.9-18.9(29.2)-30PASI100d [NRI],–––3103f14<0.001o6012226n (%)(2.1)e(47.5)(20.6)g(42.9)e (56.2)f(38.2)gTJC CfB [MI],17.116.817.5−3.2−10.0−10.9<0.001o−9.4−11.5−11.8mean (SE)-0.7-0.6-1.1(0.7) (0.5)-1(0.7)(0.5)-0.9SJC CfB [MI],9.599.6−3.0 (0.5)−6.6 (0.3)−7.5<0.001o−6.8 (0.4)−7.2 (0.3)−7.9mean (SE)-0.4-0.3-0.6-0.6-0.6Randomised set. Interim results.†Reference arm; study not powered for statistical comparisons of ADA to BKZ or PBO.aPBO→BKZ pts received PBO to Wk 16, switched to BKZ 160 mg Q4W through Wk 24 (8 wks BKZ);bResolution of enthesitis/dactylitis in pts with LEI>0/LDI>0 at BL pooled with BE COMPLETE (Wk 16 LEI=0 BKZ: 124/249 [49.8%], PBO: 37/106 [34.9%], p=0.008; LDI=0 BKZ: 68/90 [75.6%], PBO: 24/47 [51.1%], p=0.002);cContinuous outcome p values calculated with RBMI data;dPts with PSO and ≥3% BSA at BL;en=140;fn=217;gn=68;hPts with hs-CRP ≥6 mg/L and/or bone erosion at BL;in=221;jn=357;kn=108;ln=261;mn=416;nn=131;oNominal, not powered for multiplicity.ConclusionDual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with BKZ in bDMARD-naïve pts with active PsA resulted in rapid, clinically relevant improvements in musculoskeletal and skin outcomes vs PBO. No new safety signals observed.1,2References[1]Ritchlin CT Lancet 2020;395(10222):427–40; 2. Coates LC Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:779–80(POS1022).Disclosure of InterestsIain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, UCB Pharma, Laura Coates Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Domain, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Robert B.M. Landewé Consultant of: Abbott, Ablynx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Centocor, GSK, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, BMS, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, Philip J Mease Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen and UCB Pharma, Yoshiya Tanaka Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Sanofi, and Taisho, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Akihiko Asahina Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Taiho Pharma, Torii Pharmaceutical, and UCB Pharma, Laure Gossec Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB Pharma, Alice B Gottlieb Consultant of: Amgen, AnaptsysBio, Avotres Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, and XBiotech, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, and XBiotech: all funds go to Mount Sinai Medical School, Richard B. Warren Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Astellas, Avillion, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma, Paid instructor for: Astellas, DiCE, GSK, and Union, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Barbara Ink Shareholder of: GSK, UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Deepak Assudani Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Jason Coarse Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Rajan Bajracharya Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma, Paid instructor for: Amgen, Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma
Collapse
|
28
|
Isojima S, Yajima N, Yanai R, Miura Y, Fukuma S, Kaneko K, Fujio K, Oku K, Matsushita M, Miyamae T, Wada T, Kaneko Y, Tanaka Y, Nakajima A, Murashima A. POS0734 THE CLINICAL JUDGMENT FOR THE ACCEPTABILITY OF PREGNANCY IN PATIENTS WITH SEROLOGICALLY ACTIVE SLE IN JAPAN: A NATIONWIDE ONLINE SURVEY FROM THE VIGNETTE STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe risk of pregnancy complications, such as gestational hypertension is high in pregnancies with SLE. In addition, the risk of flare is elevated if pregnancy occurs during the high disease activity. The EULAR recommendation provides a checklist for preconception counseling, in which patients with SLE desiring pregnancy were required the condition that the disease activity prior to pregnancy should be stable for 6-12 months in terms of serological activity (1). However, it does not provide specific criteria for serological activity so that physicians should evaluate the risk of pregnancy in each case by their clinical intuitions.ObjectivesIn order to uncover the present clinical situation for the acceptability of pregnancy in patients with SLE, we performed questionnaire survey to physicians regarding to the degree of serological activity.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed to physicians registered with the Japanese College of Rheumatology from December 2020 to January 2021 using the online survey. The questionnaire asked about the characteristics of physicians, facilities and the permission of pregnancies with SLE using vignette scenarios. In this study, data from vignettes of women visiting a regular outpatient clinic were used. The vignettes varied in age (28 or 35 years), duration of stable disease and serological activity. Analysis methods were descriptive statistics, chi-square test. generalized estimating equations (GEE) was performed to investigate the relationship between the determining permission for pregnancy and the scenario patient’s characteristics (age, period of stable disease, titer of anti ds-DNA antibody)ResultsThe questionnaire was distributed to 4946 physicians, and 463 responded. Completion rate (ratio agreed to participate/finished survey) of survey was 91.1%. The median age of physicians was 46 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-10). The specialty was rheumatology (84.9%), other internal medicine (8%), and pediatrics (5.6%). There were no significant differences in patient’s age about the acceptability of pregnancy (coeffficianet -0.02, 95% CI -0.17 -0.01, p=0.42). Case who had been stable for 6 months were more tolerant of pregnancy than case who had been stable for 3 months (coeffficianet 0.12, 95% CI 0.09-0.15, P<0.001) Pregnancy was not allowed in case with mild or high serological activity (mild: coefficient -0.49, 95% CI -0.29- -0.22, p <0.001, high: -0.64, 95% CI -0.65 - -0.61, p <0.001). In contrast, as many as 92 (19.2%) physicians tolerated pregnancy even in the presence of residual high anti ds-DNA antibody titers. Female physicians are significantly more cautious about pregnancy than male when patients have a serologically high activity (12% vs 37.5%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in specialty status or clinical experience.ConclusionWe found that even mild serological activity alone had a significant negative effect on the physician’s decision to allow pregnancy. We conclude that current physicians make cautious decisions about pregnancies of patients with SLE following the recommendation. On the other hand, an additional investigation should be performed about the results of pregnancies in patients with serological abnormalities, since there are some physicians who thought that pregnancy may be acceptable for patients with only serological abnormalities if the clinical symptoms are stable.References[1]Ann Rheum Dis.2017 Mar;76(3):476-485AcknowledgementsI would like to express my gratitude to the members of Japan College of Rheumatology who cooperated in filling out the questionnaire.Disclosure of InterestsSakiko Isojima: None declared, Nobuyuki Yajima: None declared, Ryo Yanai: None declared, Yoko Miura: None declared, Shingo Fukuma: None declared, Kayoko Kaneko: None declared, Keishi Fujio: None declared, Kenji Oku: None declared, Masakazu Matsushita: None declared, Takako Miyamae: None declared, Takashi Wada: None declared, Yuko Kaneko: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Y. Tanaka has received speaking fees and/or honoraria from Gilead, Abbvie, Behringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Amgen, YL Biologics, Eisai, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Astra-Zeneca, Grant/research support from: Y. Tanaka has received research grants from Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Takeda, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kowa, Behringer-Ingelheim, and consultant fee from Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie., Ayako Nakajima: None declared, ATSUKO MURASHIMA: None declared
Collapse
|
29
|
Aletaha D, Westhovens R, Combe B, Gottenberg JE, Buch MH, Caporali R, Gómez-Puerta JA, Van Hoek P, Rajendran V, Stiers PJ, Hendrikx T, Burmester GR, Tanaka Y. POS0676 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FILGOTINIB IN PATIENTS AGED ≥75 YEARS: A POST HOC SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF THE FINCH 4 LONG-TERM EXTENSION (LTE) STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundFilgotinib (FIL) is a Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA)1. The recommended dose for adults with RA is 200 mg (FIL200); however, a starting dose of 100 mg (FIL100) is recommended for those aged ≥75 years (y) in view of limited clinical experience1. An important consideration is the generally higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the elderly due to comorbidities.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of FIL100 and FIL200 in patients with RA aged ≥75 y.MethodsFINCH 4 (NCT03025308) is an ongoing phase 3 open-label LTE study of FIL100 and FIL200 for RA. Eligible patients completed a prior phase 3 randomized double-blind study of FIL lasting 52 weeks (FINCH 1 or 3) or 24 weeks (FINCH 2). In this post hoc analysis, safety and efficacy were assessed in patients aged <75 and ≥75 y in FINCH 4. Efficacy measures were American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) ≤10/≤2.8, disease activity score (DAS)28 <2.6/≤3.2 and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI).ResultsAt LTE Week 48, 52% and 44% of patients aged <75 and ≥75 y, respectively, were on methotrexate. In both age groups, response rates for key efficacy measures at LTE Week 48 were generally maintained from LTE baseline (Figure 1) in patients with and without prior FIL exposure in FINCH 1–3, and were numerically higher with FIL200 vs FIL100. Mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI with FIL200 and FIL100 was 0.61 and 0.74 in those aged <75 y and 1.04 and 0.98 in those aged ≥75 y, respectively.Figure 1.The exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) of serious AEs and AEs of special interest (AESI) was generally higher in patients aged ≥75 y than <75 y. In those aged ≥75 y, the EAIR of AEs leading to premature study discontinuation, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), and serious TEAEs was higher with FIL200 vs FIL100; the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thrombotic and embolic events, serious infections, herpes zoster and malignancies was low in both dose groups (Table 1). Three patients died, all from the FIL200 group; each had a medical history relevant to the cause of death.Table 1.Exposure-adjusted incidence rate (95% CI) of AEs at Week 48 as events per 100 years of exposureFIL200FIL100Age, years<75≥75<75≥75n=1469n=61n=1136n=63(PYE 2253.9)(PYE 92.2)(PYE 1753.7)(PYE 98.4)With prior FIL exposure, n (%)1142 (77.7)53 (86.9)830 (73.1)33 (52.4)TEAE48.3 (45.5, 51.3)55.3 (42.1, 72.8)48.7 (45.5, 52.1)42.7 (31.6, 57.8)Serious TEAE6.8 (5.8, 8.0)17.4 (10.6, 28.3)7.4 (6.2, 8.7)14.2 (8.4, 24.0)AE leading to premature study discontinuation2.9 (2.3, 3.7)9.8 (5.1, 18.8)3.9 (3.1, 5.0)4.1 (1.5, 10.8)AE leading to death0.5 (0.3, 0.9)3.3 (0.7, 9.5)*0.3 (0.2, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 3.8)Infections28.8 (26.6, 31.1)29.3 (20.1, 42.7)27.4 (25.0, 29.9)26.4 (18.0, 38.8)Serious infections1.6 (1.2, 2.2)2.2 (0.5, 8.7)1.7 (1.1, 2.4)3.1 (1.0, 9.5)Herpes zoster1.6 (1.2, 2.3)2.2 (0.5, 8.7)1.0 (0.6, 1.6)3.1 (1.0, 9.5)Adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event0.4 (0.2, 0.7)2.2 (0.5, 8.7)0.5 (0.2, 0.9)1.0 (0.1, 7.2)Venous thrombotic and embolic events0.3 (0.1, 0.6)2.2 (0.5, 8.7)0.2 (0.1, 0.5)1.0 (0.1, 7.2)Malignancy excluding NMSC0.7 (0.4, 1.2)4.3 (1.6, 11.6)0.7 (0.4, 1.2)3.1 (1.0, 9.5)NMSC0.4 (0.2, 0.8)1.1 (0.0, 6.0)0.2 (0.1, 0.6)0.0 (0.0, 3.8)*Cause of death: esophageal carcinoma; cardiovascular; unknown. FIL(100/200), filgotinib (100/200 mg); NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer; PYE, patient years of exposure; (TE)AE, (treatment-emergent) adverse eventConclusionIn the ≥75 y group, response rates for key efficacy measures remained stable to Week 48 and were generally higher with FIL200 vs FIL100. The incidence of serious AEs and AESI was higher in those aged ≥75 than <75 y. Patient numbers/exposure time may have been insufficient to show potential between-group differences in safety/efficacy outcomes.References[1]Filgotinib SmPCAcknowledgementsThe FINCH studies were funded by Gilead Sciences (Foster City, CA, United States). We thank the physicians and patients who participated in the studies. Medical writing support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc (Aspire Scientific Ltd, Bollington, UK) and funded by Galapagos NV (Mechelen, Belgium).Disclosure of InterestsDaniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, and Sanofi, Rene Westhovens Speakers bureau: Celltrion, Galapagos, and Gilead, Consultant of: Celltrion, Galapagos, and Gilead, Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, and Roche-Chugai, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: BMS and Pfizer, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Gilead and Pfizer, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius-Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB, José A Gómez-Puerta Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Consultant of: GSK, Roche, and Sanofi, Paul Van Hoek Employee of: Galapagos, Vijay Rajendran Employee of: Galapagos, Pieter-Jan Stiers Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Thijs Hendrikx Employee of: Galapagos, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Sanofi, and Taisho, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda
Collapse
|
30
|
Miyagawa I, Nakayamada S, Ueno M, Miyazaki Y, Tanaka Y. POS1014 IMPACT OF SERUM INTERLEUKIN 22 AS A BIOMARKER FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL USE OF MOLECULAR TARGETED DRUGS FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough each bDMARD target different molecules, no optimal drug selection method has been established. Because studies directly comparing TNF-i and IL-17-i have shown that these drugs are equally effective, the establishment of an optimal selection method for these drugs can contribute to better patient outcomes. We reported the possibility of stratification of patients by peripheral blood lymphocytes phenotyping and precision medicine based on the selective use of bDMARDs in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, since peripheral blood lymphocytes phenotyping is complex, the development of simple methods using biomarkers to stratify patients and simple treatment strategies based on such methods is needed to promote precision medicine in a real-world clinical setting.ObjectivesWe explored whether serum cytokines could be used as biomarkers for optimal use TNF-i and IL-17-i in patients with PsA.MethodsIn cohort 1 (IL-17-i [n=23] or TNF-i [n=24] for ≥1 year), we identified serum cytokines that predicted the achievement of DAPSA remission (REM), PASI 90 and Minimal Disease Activity after 1 year of TNF-i or IL-17-i therapy. Subsequently, we developed treatment strategies based on the identified cytokines. In cohort 2, treatment responses were compared between the strategic treatment group (n=17), which was treated based on the treatment strategies, and the mismatched treatment group (n=17) to verify the validity of the treatment strategies developed using serum cytokines as biomarkers.ResultsIn cohort 1, serum IL-22 concentrations were statistically identified as a predictor of DAPSA remission after 1 year of IL-17-i therapy. However, no baseline serum cytokines were identified as factors contributing to achievement of DAPSA-REM in the TNF-i-treated group or achievement of PASI90 and Minimal Disease Activity in either group. Using a cut-off value of 0.61376 (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 91.7%; area under the curve, 0.848) determined by a ROC analysis, we stratified 47 patients into the IL-22 high group (n=25) (0.61376<) and the IL-22 low group (n=22) (< 0.61376). Serum IL-17 concentrations were significantly higher in both the IL-22 high and IL-22 low groups than in the healthy control (HC), whereas no significant difference was observed between the IL-22 high and IL-22 low groups. The serum TNF-α concentrations did not significantly differ between the IL-22 low and HC; however, they were significantly higher in the IL-22 high group than in the HC and IL-22 low groups. Based on these results, we created treatment strategies using TNF-i and IL-17-i based on serum IL-22 concentrations, that is, initiation of IL-17-i therapy in patients with low IL-22 concentrations and TNF-i therapy in patients with high IL-22 concentrations. To validate the efficacy of the treatment strategies, we retrospectively compared the efficacy of the bDMARDs at 1 year between the following groups in cohort 2. The strategic treatment group (n=17) included patients with low IL-22 concentrations who were treated with IL-17-i and those with high IL-22 concentrations who were treated with TNF-i. The mismatched treatment group (n=17) included patients with low IL-22 concentrations who were treated with TNF-i and those with high IL-22 concentrations who were treated with IL-17-i. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in baseline characteristics at the initiation of bDMARD. After initiation of bDMARD, tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, CRP, DAPSA, and PASI were significantly improved in both groups. When the treatment responses over 1 year were compared between the two groups, the rate of achieving DAPSA-REM (58.8% vs. 25.3%, P=0.0399) and Minimal Disease Activity (82.3% vs. 41.2%, P=0.0162) at M12 was significantly higher in the strategic treatment group. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of achieving PASI75 or PASI90 at M 6 or 12.ConclusionWe verified that serum IL-22 can be used as a simple biomarker for the proper selection of TNF-i and IL-17-i.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the study participants, without whom this study could not have beenaccomplished, and all medical staff at all participating institutions for providing the data,especially Ms. Hiroko Yoshida, Ms. Youko Saitou, Ms. Machiko Mitsuiki and Ms. AyumiMaruyama for the excellent data management. The authors thank Ms. M.Hirahara for providing excellent technical assistance. We also thank Dr Kazuyoshi Saito atTobata General Hospital; Dr Kentaro Hanami and Dr Shunsuke Fukuyo at Wakamatsu Hospitalof the University of Occupational and Environmental Health; Dr Keisuke Nakatsuka at FukuokaYutaka Hospital, and all staff members at Kitakyushu General Hospital and ShimonosekiSaiseikai Hospital. Nakama Municipal Hospital, and Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital for theirengagement in data collection.Disclosure of InterestsIppei Miyagawa: None declared, Shingo Nakayamada Speakers bureau: consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Bristol-Myers, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Astellas, Asahi-kasei, and Boehringer Ingelheim and research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Novartis., Masanobu Ueno: None declared, Yusuke Miyazaki: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: speaking fees and/or honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, and Janssen, Consultant of: consultant fees from Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, and Abbvie., Grant/research support from: research grants from Abbvie, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Asahi-Kasei, Eisai, Takeda, and Daiichi-Sankyo
Collapse
|
31
|
Emery P, Fleischmann R, Wong R, Lozenski K, Tanaka Y, Bykerk V, Bingham C, Huizinga T, Citera G, Elbez Y, Perera V, Murthy B, Maxwell K, Passarell J, Hedrich W, Williams D. POS0579 ABSENCE OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ABATACEPT EXPOSURE LEVELS AND INITIAL INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH RA: A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF THE RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED AVERT-2 STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundInfections are the most commonly reported AE observed in patients with RA treated with immunosuppressive therapies and can be clinically significant. A recent review reported differences in the risk of infection for some biologics such as tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors.1 Abatacept selectively modulates T-cell co-stimulation and is approved for the treatment of RA. In patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, no association was found between higher serum abatacept exposure and the incidence of infection.2 This has not been evaluated for adult patients with RA.ObjectivesTo determine if higher serum abatacept exposure during treatment with SC abatacept was associated with increased risk of infection in adult patients with RA.MethodsAVERT-2 (Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment-2) was a randomized, placebo-controlled study of SC abatacept + MTX vs abatacept placebo + MTX in MTX-naive, anti-citrullinated protein antibody–positive patients with early, active RA.3 A post hoc population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed using PK-evaluable patient data from the induction period (year 1) of AVERT-2. Association between steady-state abatacept exposure (min plasma concentration [Cmin], max plasma concentration [Cmax], and average plasma concentration [Cavg]) and first infection was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier plots of probability vs time on treatment by abatacept exposure quartiles and Cox proportional-hazards models.ResultsPK of SC abatacept was defined as a linear 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. The findings of the updated PK analysis were consistent with those reported in prior population analyses of abatacept PK in adults with RA. The final model included effects of baseline body weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate, sex, age, albumin, MTX use, NSAID use, SJC, and race on abatacept clearance. The only covariate with a clinically relevant effect was higher body weight, which caused an increase in clearance and volume. Infections occurred in a total of 330/693 (47.6%; serious, 1.6%) patients treated with abatacept, and 134/301 (44.5%; serious, 1.3%) with placebo during the first year of AVERT-2. In patients taking abatacept, the mean (SD) study exposure to abatacept was 376 (60) days, while mean (SD) prednisone equivalent dose was 6.7 (3.8) mg/day and mean (SD) MTX dose was 9.6 (3.0) mg/week. No exposure–response relationship was observed between the probability of first infection and steady-state abatacept exposure quartiles (Cavg, Cmin, and Cmax), or compared with placebo (Figure 1A–C). Kaplan–Meier assessment also showed no increase in risk of infection with concomitant use of MTX and glucocorticoids.ConclusionNo association was found between initial infection and steady-state abatacept exposure (Cavg, Cmin, Cmax) or MTX and glucocorticoid use in patients with RA treated with SC abatacept.References[1]Jani M, et al. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2019;31:285–92.[2]Ruperto N, et al. J Rheumatol 2021;48:1073–81.[3]Emery P, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71(suppl 10):L11.AcknowledgementsThis study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Writing and editorial assistance were provided by Fiona Boswell, PhD, of Caudex, and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Support was provided by Sandra Overfield as Protocol Manager, and Prema Sukumar and Renfang Hwang as Data Science Leads.Disclosure of InterestsPaul Emery Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Roy Fleischmann Consultant of: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Amgen, AbbVie, Arthrosi, Biosplice, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, TEVA, UCB, Robert Wong Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Karissa Lozenski Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mitsubishi Tanabe, YL Biologics, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Taisho, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Takeda, Vivian Bykerk Consultant of: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genzyme Corporation, Gilead, Regeneron, UCB, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genzyme Corporation, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi Aventis, UCB, Clifton Bingham Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Thomas Huizinga Speakers bureau: Abblynx, Abbott, Biotest AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Crescendo Bioscience, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Galapagos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi- Aventis, UCB, Consultant of: Abblynx, Abbott, Biotest AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Crescendo Bioscience, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Galapagos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi- Aventis, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abblynx, Abbott, Biotest AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Crescendo Bioscience, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Galapagos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi- Aventis, UCB, Gustavo Citera Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Signifience, Vidya Perera Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Bindu Murthy Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Kelly Maxwell Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Cognigen Corporation, Julie Passarell Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Cognigen Corporation, William Hedrich: None declared, Daphne Williams Consultant of: Black Diamond Network, Joule, Syneos, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb.
Collapse
|
32
|
Dörner T, Tanaka Y, Mosca M, Bruce IN, Cardiel M, Morand EF, Petri MA, Silk M, Dickson C, Meszaros G, Issa M, Zhang L, Wallace DJ. POS0714 POOLED SAFETY ANALYSIS OF BARICITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: RESULTS FROM THREE RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, CLINICAL TRIALS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundBaricitinib (BARI), an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2 approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and atopic dermatitis, has been evaluated in clinical studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).ObjectivesTo assess the safety profile of BARI in patients with SLE.MethodsPatients with SLE receiving stable background therapy were randomised 1:1:1 to BARI 2-mg, 4-mg, or placebo (PBO) once daily in one 24-week, phase 2 (NCT02708095) and two 52-week, phase 3, PBO controlled studies (NCT03616912 and NCT03616964).ResultsA total of 1,849 patients were included in this pooled analysis, representing 1,463.5 patient years of exposure (PYE). The incidence rates per 100 PYR at risk (IR/100 PYR) for serious adverse events (SAEs) were 9.5, 14.7, and 14.1 respectively for PBO, BARI 2-mg, and BARI 4-mg. There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatment groups for discontinuations due to AEs or death (Table 1).Table 1.Overview of safety measures of baricitinib in patients with SLESafety measurePBOBARI 2-mgBARI 4-mgPooled-BARIN=614N=621N=614N=1235PYE=488.1PYE=494.0PYE=481.4PYE=975.4n(%)n(%)n(%)n(%)PYRPYRPYRPYR[IR; 95%CI][IR; 95%CI][IR; 95%CI][IR; 95%CI]SAEs45 (7.3)70 (11.3)*65 (10.6)*135 (10.9)*473.2476.6461.9938.5[9.5; 6.9, 12.7][14.7; 11.5, 18.6][14.1; 10.9, 17.9][14.4; 12.1, 17.0]Discontinuation of study drug due to AE48 (7.8)58 (9.3)57 (9.3)115 (9.3)485.3492.3480.6973.0[9.9; 7.3, 13.1][11.8; 8.9, 15.2][11.9; 9.0, 15.4][11.8; 9.8, 14.2]Death4 (0.7)1 (0.2)4 (0.7)5 (0.4)488.2494.0481.5975.5[0.8; 0.2, 2.1][0.2; 0.0, 1.1][0.8; 0.2, 2.1][0.5; 0.2, 1.2]Serious infections12 (2.0)22 (3.5)28 (4.6)*50 (4.0)*484.3487.2472.5959.7[2.5; 1.3, 4.3][4.5; 2.8, 6.8][5.9; 3.9, 8.6][5.2; 3.9, 6.9]Herpes Zoster18 (2.9)17 (2.7)29 (4.7)46 (3.7)481.1486.5468.6955.1[3.7; 2.2, 5.9][3.5; 2.0, 5.6][6.2; 4.1, 8.9][4.8; 3.5, 6.4]VTEs#6 (1.2)3 (0.6)1 (0.2)4 (0.4)444.0450.2438.1888.3[1.4; 0.5, 2.9][0.7; 0.1, 1.9][0.2; 0.0, 1.3][0.5; 0.1, 1.2]MACE#01 (0.2)3 (0.6)4 (0.4)443.9450.1438.1888.3[0.0; NA, 0.8][0.2; 0.0, 1.2][0.7; 0.1, 2.0][0.5; 0.1, 1.2]Malignancy excluding NMSC2 (0.3)3 (0.5)2 (0.3)5 (0.4)488.0494.1481.4975.5[0.4; 0.0, 1.5][0.6; 0.1, 1.8][0.4; 0.1, 1.5][0.5; 0.2, 1.2]NMSC2 (0.3)000*486.7494.0481.4975.4[0.4; 0.0, 1.5][0.0; NA, 0.7][0.0; NA, 0.8][0.0; NA, 0.4]Data are n (%) patients PYR [IR; 95% CI]. #Phase 2 study data not included. AE=adverse event; CI=confidence interval; MACE=major adverse cardiac event; NMSC=non-melanoma skin cancers; VTE=venous thrombotic event (includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism); IR=incidence rate (100 times the number of patients reporting an adverse event divided by the event-specific exposure to treatment); N=number of patients in the analysis population; n=number of patients in the specified category; PYE=patient-year of exposure; PYR=patient years at risk; SAE=serious adverse event. *p≤0.05 vs placebo.The IR/100 PYR for serious infections were 2.5, 4.5, and 5.9 respectively for PBO, BARI 2-mg, and BARI 4-mg. The risk of Herpes Zoster was higher in BARI 4-mg (4.7%) vs PBO (2.9%) (Table 1).The IR/100 PYR for positively adjudicated venous thrombotic events (VTEs) were 1.4, 0.7, and 0.2 respectively for PBO, BARI 2-mg, and BARI 4-mg. The IR/100 PYR for positively adjudicated major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was numerically higher in BARI 2-mg (0.2) and BARI 4-mg (0.7) vs PBO (0.0), however the pooled-BARI IR/PYR (0.5) was within the range of background disease (1). No increased risk for malignancies was observed.ConclusionThe safety profile of BARI in SLE patients was consistent with the known BARI safety profile. There was no increased risk of VTE in BARI treatment groups.References[1]Barbhaiya M, Feldman CH, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(9):1823-31.Disclosure of InterestsThomas Dörner Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly and Company and Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Samsung and UCB, Grant/research support from: Chugai, Janssen, Novartis and Sanofi, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Gilead, Abbvie, Behringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Amgen, YL Biologics, Eisai, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Astra-Zeneca, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Takeda, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kowa, Behringer-Ingelheim, Marta Mosca Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, GSK, Astra Zeneca, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, GSK, Astra Zeneca, Ian N. Bruce Speakers bureau: GSK, Astra Zeneca, UCB, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, GSK, UCB, BMS, Merck Serono, Astra Zeneca, IL-TOO, Aurinia, Grant/research support from: GSK, Janssen, Mario Cardiel Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Eric F. Morand Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Consultant of: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Asahi Kasei, Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb, Capella, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Neovacs, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Wolf, Grant/research support from: Janssen, AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Michelle A Petri Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: Eli Lilly, Maria Silk Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, christina dickson Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Gabriella Meszaros Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Maher Issa Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Lu Zhang Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Daniel J. Wallace Consultant of: Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono and Pfizer
Collapse
|
33
|
Combe B, Tanaka Y, Buch MH, Burmester GR, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Han L, Emoto K, Kano S, Hendrikx T, Aletaha D. POS0704 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FILGOTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO METHOTREXATE, WITH 4 OR <4 POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS: A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF THE FINCH 1 STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.5051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundPatients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and poor prognostic factors1 (PPF) are at risk for progression without adequate treatment. Filgotinib (FIL) is a once daily Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor. In FINCH 1 (NCT02889796), FIL 200 mg (FIL200) was effective vs placebo (PBO) and noninferior to adalimumab (ADA) in pts with RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR); FIL200 and FIL 100 mg (FIL100) were well tolerated.2ObjectivesThis post hoc, exploratory analysis examined efficacy and safety of FIL in MTX-IR pts with 4 or <4 PPF.MethodsThe FINCH 1 52-week (W), double-blind trial randomised MTX-IR pts with moderate–severe RA to FIL200 or FIL100, ADA, or PBO; all received background MTX. PBO pts were rerandomised, blinded, at W24 to FIL200 or FIL100. We examined pts with 4 PPF at baseline (BL): erosions on X-ray, seropositivity for rheumatoid factor or anticyclic citrullinated peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥6 mg/L, and disease activity score in 28 joints with CRP (DAS28[CRP]) >5.1, along with those with <4 PPF. Efficacy included DAS28(CRP) <2.6 and modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) change from baseline (CFB). Fisher’s exact test was used for DAS28(CRP); the mixed-effects model was used to generate least squares mean mTSS CFB. P values were nominal, not adjusted for multiplicity.ResultsAt BL, of 1755 randomized, treated pts, 687 had 4 PPF, and 1068 had <4 PPF. Among pts with <4PPF, 804 [75%] had erosions, 810 [76%] were seropositive, 377 [35%] had hsCRP ≥6 mg/L, 638 [60%] had DAS28[CRP] >5.1). Pts with 4 vs <4 PPF were aged 53 vs 52 years, had RA duration 8.3 vs 7.4 years, DAS28(CRP) 6.3 vs 5.4, and SDAI 45.6 vs 37.7. In pts with 4 or <4 PPF, higher proportions receiving FIL200 or FIL100 achieved DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at W12 vs PBO (nominal P <.001); proportions with DAS28(CRP) <2.6 increased with FIL200, FIL100, or ADA at W52 (Figure 1). DAS28(CRP) responses for FIL200 at W52 were similar in 4 vs <4 PPF pts; FIL100 and ADA responses were numerically higher in <4 vs 4 PPF pts. At W24, mTSS CFB in pts with 4 PPF was 0.21, 0.23, 0.30, and 0.66 for FIL200, FIL100, ADA, and PBO (P <.05 for FIL200 and FIL100 vs PBO); corresponding changes in <4 PPF pts were 0.08, 0.10, 0.11, and 0.24 (P >.05). At W52, mTSS CFB in 4 PPF pts was 0.29, 0.84, and 0.80 for FIL200, FIL100, and ADA, respectively, and 0.14, 0.25, and 0.53 in <4 PPF pts. Rates of adverse events (AEs), including AEs of interest, were comparable for pts with 4 PPF and <4 PPF for all treatment arms (Table 1).Table 1.AEs and AEs of interest in BL 4 PPF and <4 PPF subgroups4 PPF<4 PPFFIL200FIL100ADAPBO beforeFIL200FIL100ADAPBO(n = 191)(n = 189)(n = 126)W24 switch (n = 181)(n = 284)(n = 291)(n = 199)before W24 switch (n = 294)All AEs146 (76.4)136 (72.0)85 (67.5)90 (49.7)206 (72.5)214 (73.5)154 (77.4)164 (55.8)AEs of interestSerious infectious AE5 (2.6)4 (2.1)6 (4.8)2 (1.1)8 (2.8)9 (3.1)4 (2.0)2 (0.7)Opportunistic infections001 (0.8)0001 (0.5)0Active tuberculosis0000001 (0.5)0Herpes zoster1 (0.5)1 (0.5)1 (0.8)05 (1.8)3 (1.0)1 (0.5)2 (0.7)Hepatitis B or C01 (0.5)001 (0.5)01 (0.5)0MACE01 (0.5)01 (0.6)01 (0.3)1 (0.5)1 (0.3)VTE001 (0.8)1 (0.6)1 (0.4)001 (0.3)DVT001 (0.8)1 (0.6)0001 (0.3)PE00001 (0.4)000Malignancy0003 (1.7)2 (0.7)2 (0.7)2 (1.0)0(non-NMSC)GI perforation00001 (0.4)000Values are n (%). ADA, adalimumab; AE, adverse event; BL, baseline; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; FIL100, filgotinib 100 mg; FIL200; filgotinib 200 mg; GI, gastrointestinal; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer; PBO, placebo; PE, pulmonary embolism; PPF, poor prognostic factor; VTE, venous thromboembolism; W, week.ConclusionIn high-risk (4 PPF) pts with MTX-IR RA, FIL200 and FIL100 showed similar reductions in disease activity vs PBO at W12 as in pts with <4 PPF; mTSS in FIL200 pts changed little from W24 to W52. Tolerability was comparable across treatment arms, regardless of presence of 4 or <4 PPF.References[1]Smolen JS et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–99.[2]Combe B et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:848–58.AcknowledgementsThis study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Medical writing support was provided by Rob Coover, MPH, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA, and was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Funding for this analysis was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. The sponsors participated in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the research.Disclosure of InterestsBernard Combe Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Grant/research support from: Pfizer and Roche-Chugai, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Behringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Behringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., Beatrix Bartok Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ling Han Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Kahaku Emoto Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences K.K., Shungo Kano Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences K.K., Thijs Hendrikx Employee of: Galapagos BV, Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and UCB; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi/Genzyme., Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi/Genzyme; Janssen, Grant/research support from: from AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche
Collapse
|
34
|
Kalunian KC, Tanaka Y, Hupka I, Zhang LJ, Shroff M, Werther S, Abreu G, Lindholm C, Tummala R. POS0708 EVALUATING THE HYPERSENSITIVITY PROFILE OF ANIFROLUMAB AND THE NEED FOR PREINFUSION PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH SLE. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundAnifrolumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), is approved in Canada, Japan, and the United States for the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on results from the phase 2b MUSE and the phase 3 TULIP-1/-2 trials.1–3 Anaphylactic reactions (ARs), hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), and infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are risks of mAb infusions, so physicians prescribing anifrolumab may wish to understand the hypersensitivity profile and whether prophylactic pretreatments are required to mitigate HSR/IRRs.ObjectivesTo evaluate the hypersensitivity profile of anifrolumab and the need for pretreatment.MethodsPooled data were analyzed from patients with moderate to severe SLE despite standard therapy who received intravenous infusions (every 4 weeks, 48 weeks) of anifrolumab or placebo in the randomized, 52-week MUSE (NCT01438489),1 TULIP-1 (NCT02446912),2 and TULIP-2 (NCT02446899)3 trials. An AR (analyzed in the anifrolumab 150/300/1000 mg and placebo groups) was defined as acute illness onset within minutes to several hours of infusion with involvement of skin and/or mucosal tissue, and/or respiratory compromise, and/or reduced blood pressure, and/or persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. HSRs and IRRs were analyzed in the anifrolumab 300 mg group (as this is the approved dose) and the placebo group. An HSR was defined as acute illness onset with involvement of skin and/or mucosal tissue during infusion (not meeting the AR definition); IRR was defined as any other reaction occurring during/within 24 hours of infusion. Patients did not receive pretreatment unless they had experienced a previous IRR/HSR in the program. Pretreatment was assumed if a patient received prophylactic antihistamine, corticosteroid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and/or dopamine antagonist 1 day before/on the day of infusion.ResultsOf patients who received anifrolumab 300 mg (n=459), anifrolumab 1000 mg (n=105), or placebo (n=466), none experienced ARs; 1 patient who received anifrolumab 150 mg (n=93) experienced an AR. HSRs occurred in 3% (n=12) of anifrolumab 300 mg-treated patients (of whom 4 had a history of HSRs) vs 1% (n=3) in the placebo group. IRRs occurred in 9% (n=43) of anifrolumab-treated patients vs 7% (n=33) in the placebo group. All HSRs and IRRs were mild/moderate in intensity. There were no discontinuations due to HSRs or IRRs in the anifrolumab group, while there were 2 in the placebo group (HSR: n=1; IRR: n=1). In the anifrolumab 300 mg and placebo groups, more patients experienced HSR/IRRs with the initial (1–6) vs later infusions (Figure 1). In the anifrolumab group, the median (median absolute deviation) time to first HSR or IRR was 30.5 (29.5) days or 27.0 (26.0) days, respectively. Of the 12 anifrolumab-treated patients with ≥1 HSR, 3 received subsequent pretreatment, and none had any HSR after the use of pretreatment. Of the 43 anifrolumab-treated patients with ≥1 IRR, 2 received pretreatment, of whom 1 had an IRR after pretreatment and anifrolumab dosage remained unchanged.ConclusionFollowing anifrolumab infusion, ARs were uncommon, and few (3%) patients experienced HSRs. HSRs and IRRs with the approved anifrolumab 300 mg dose were mild to moderate, occurred early in treatment, did not lead to discontinuation, and only rarely required pretreatment. Our data support a safe and manageable hypersensitivity profile for anifrolumab.References[1]Furie R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:376–86.[2]Furie R, et al. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019;1:e208–19.[3]Morand E, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:211–21.AcknowledgementsWriting assistance was provided by Rosie Butler, PhD, of JK Associates Inc., part of Fishawack Health. This study was sponsored by AstraZeneca.Disclosure of InterestsKenneth C Kalunian Consultant of: Aurinia, Equillium, Kezar, BMS, Chemocentryx, Eli Lilly, Biogen, Roche/Genentech, Grant/research support from: Horizon, UCB, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Gilead, Abbvie, Behringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Amgen, YL Biologics, Eisai, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Astra-Zeneca, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Takeda, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kowa, Behringer-Ingelheim, Ihor Hupka Employee of: AstraZeneca, Lijin (Jinny) Zhang Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Manish Shroff Employee of: AstraZeneca, Shanti Werther Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Gabriel Abreu Employee of: AstraZeneca AB, Catharina Lindholm Employee of: AstraZeneca, Raj Tummala Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca
Collapse
|
35
|
Morand EF, Tanaka Y, Furie R, Vital E, van Vollenhoven R, Kalunian K, Mosca M, Dörner T, Wallace DJ, Silk M, Dickson C, De La Torre I, Meszaros G, Jia B, Crowe B, Petri MA. POS0190 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BARICITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: RESULTS FROM TWO RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP, PHASE 3 STUDIES. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundIn a 24-week, phase 2 clinical study (NCT02708095) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), baricitinib (BARI), an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2 approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and atopic dermatitis, inhibited the type l interferon gene signature, multiple other cytokine pathways, and improved disease activity (1) (2).ObjectivesTo further evaluate the efficacy and safety of BARI in patients with SLE.MethodsPatients with active SLE receiving stable background therapy were randomised 1:1:1 to BARI 2-mg, 4-mg, or placebo (PBO) once daily in two identically designed, 52-week, phase 3 randomised, PBO-controlled studies. In SLE-BRAVE-I (NCT03616912) and -II (NCT03616964), 760 and 775 patients, respectively were enrolled in a balanced manner across regions, although different countries per region participated in each study. The primary endpoint for both studies was the proportion of patients achieving an SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response at week 52. Glucocorticoid tapering was encouraged but not required per protocol.ResultsThe mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) at baseline was 10.1 for both SLE-BRAVE-I and -II participants; musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous domains were the most common domains involved at baseline. In SLE-BRAVE-I, the proportion of SRI-4 responders at week 52 among patients treated with BARI 4-mg (56.7%), but not BARI 2-mg (49.8%), was significantly greater than in patients treated with PBO (45.9%, p = 0.016) (Table 1). No difference was seen in SLE-BRAVE-II (47.1%, 46.3%, and 45.6%, BARI 4-mg, 2-mg, and PBO, respectively). None of the key secondary endpoints, including glucocorticoid tapering or time to first severe flare (SFI), were met in either study. The proportions of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) were 7.1% and 8.6% for PBO, 9.4% and 13.4% for BARI 2-mg and 10.3% and 11.2% for BARI 4-mg in SLE-BRAVE-I and II, respectively.Table 1.Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with SLE-BRAVE-I and -IISLE-BRAVE-ISLE-BRAVE-IIEfficacy measurePBO (N=253)BARI 2-mg (N=255)BARI 4-mg (N=252)PBO (N=256)BARI 2-mg (N=261)BARI 4-mg (N=258)SRI-4 (W52)116 (45.9)126 (49.8)142 (56.7)*116 (45.6)120 (46.3)121 (47.1)SRI-4 (W24)99 (39.1)114 (44.8)117 (46.5)98 (38.6)104 (40.0)108 (42.1)Severe Flares (n, events)38 (15.0)34 (13.3)26 (10.3)26 (10.2)29 (11.1)29 (11.2)HR for time to first severe flare (SFI) HR [CI]NA0.8 [0.52, 1.32]0.65 [0.40, 1.08]NA1.1 [0.65, 1.89]1.1 [0.67, 1.94]Glucocorticoid sparing36 (30.8)31 (29.2)36 (34.0)33 (31.7)34 (29.8)36 (34.3)LLDAS (W52)66 (26.2)65 (25.7)74 (29.7)59 (23.2)62 (24.0)65 (25.4)Safety measureTEAE210 (83.0)210 (82.4)208 (82.5)198 (77.3)199 (76.2)200 (77.5)SAE18 (7.1)24 (9.4)26 (10.3)22 (8.6)35 (13.4)29 (11.2)Data are n (%) patients, unless otherwise indicated. BARI=baricitinib; CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio compared with PBO; LLDAS=lupus low disease activity state; N=number of patients in the analysis population; n=number of patients in the specified category; PBO=placebo; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event; SAE=serious adverse event; W=week. *p≤0.05 vs PBO.ConclusionAlthough phase 2 data suggested BARI as a potential treatment for patients with SLE (2), the SLE-BRAVE-I and -II phase 3 study results were discordant for the primary outcome measure, with only SLE-BRAVE-I positive, making it difficult to elucidate benefit. Additional analyses are being performed to understand this discordance. No new safety signals were observed.References[1]Dörner T, Tanaka Y, et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2020;7(1).[2]Wallace DJ, Furie RA, et al. Lancet. 2018;392(10143):222-31.Disclosure of InterestsEric F. Morand Speakers bureau: Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Consultant of: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Asahi Kasei, Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb, Capella, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, Janssen, Neovacs, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Wolf, Grant/research support from: Janssen, AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Gilead, Abbvie, Behringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Amgen, YL Biologics, Eisai, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Astra-Zeneca, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Takeda, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kowa, Behringer-Ingelheim, Richard Furie Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Edward Vital Consultant of: Eli Lilly (consultant and honoraria), Ronald van Vollenhoven Consultant of: Abbvie, Biotest, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Eli Lilly and Company, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Kenneth Kalunian Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Marta Mosca Consultant of: Eli Lilly, GSK, Astra Zeneca, Thomas Dörner Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, BMS, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, BMS, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Daniel J. Wallace Consultant of: Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, and Pfizer, Maria Silk Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, christina dickson Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Inmaculada De La Torre Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Gabriella Meszaros Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Bochao Jia Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Brenda Crowe Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Michelle A Petri Consultant of: Eli Lilly
Collapse
|
36
|
Winthrop K, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Kivitz A, Genovese MC, Pechonkina A, Matzkies F, Bartok B, Chen K, Jiang D, Tiamiyu I, Besuyen R, Strengholt S, Burmester GR, Gottenberg JE. POS0235 INTEGRATED SAFETY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR FILGOTINIB (FIL) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) RECEIVING TREATMENT OVER A MEDIAN OF 2.2 YEARS (Y). Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe preferential Janus kinase-1 inhibitor FIL significantly improved signs and symptoms of RA in Phase 2 and 3 trials.1–5 FIL is approved for treatment of moderate to severe active RA in Europe and Japan. Integrated safety analysis of FIL with patient data through 2019 was presented at the 2020 ACR virtual meeting.6ObjectivesTo report updated, as-treated data from the FIL integrated safety analysis with increased study drug exposure.MethodsData were integrated from 2 Phase 2 (NCT01668641, NCT01894516), 3 Phase 3 (NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728), and 2 long-term extension (LTE) (NCT02065700, NCT03025308) trials. Phase 2 and 3 LTE data were through Nov 2020 and Jan 2021, respectively. The as-treated analysis set included all available data for pts receiving ≥1 dose FIL 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100), including those rerandomized to FIL for LTE. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR)/100 patient-y exposure (PYE) of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; onset after first dose and no later than 30 days after last dose or new drug first dose date −1 day) and TEAEs of special interest (AESIs) are presented.Results3691 pts received FIL200 or FIL100 for 8085.1 PYE (median 2.2, maximum 6.8 y). In the as-treated set, 61% of FIL200 and 45% of FIL100 pts received FIL for ≥2 y, 19% and 5% for ≥3 y, and 11% and 0.5% for ≥4.5 y, respectively. EAIR for TEAEs was higher with FIL100 than FIL200; EAIRs for deaths were 0.5 and 0.3 for FIL200 and FIL100 (Figure 1). Incidences of infections and serious infections were numerically greater for FIL100 vs FIL200, while EAIRs for other AESIs were comparable between doses (Table 1). EAIRs for AESIs tended to decrease since the previous update, except for venous thromboembolism (total FIL 0.1 to 0.2) and malignancies excluding NMSC (total FIL 0.5 to 0.6).Table 1.TEAEs of special interest, as-treated setTEAE, n (%) and EAIR per 100 PYE (95% CI)FIL 200 mgn=2267PYE=5302.5FIL 100 mgn=1647PYE=2782.6Total FILN=3691PYE=8085.1Infectious AEs1206 (53.2)747 (45.4)1927 (52.2)EAIR21.1 (19.7, 22.5)30.2 (26.8, 34.0)21.0 (19.9, 22.3)Serious infectious AEs80 (3.5)57 (3.5)137 (3.7)EAIR1.5 (1.1, 1.9)2.7 (1.9, 3.9)1.6 (1.3, 2.0)Opportunistic infections5 (0.2)4 (0.2)9 (0.2)EAIR0.1 (0, 0.2)*0.1 (0.1, 0.4)*0.1 (0.1, 0.2)*Active tuberculosis03 (0.2)3 (<0.1)EAIR00.1 (0, 0.3)*0 (0, 0.1)*Herpes zoster84 (3.7)30 (1.8)114 (3.1)EAIR1.6 (1.2, 2.0)1.1 (0.8, 1.5)*1.4 (1.1, 1.7)Major adverse cardiovascular eventsa19 (0.8)14 (0.9)33 (0.9)EAIR0.3 (0.2, 0.5)0.5 (0.3, 0.8)*0.4 (0.2, 0.6)Venous thromboembolismb11 (0.5)4 (0.2)15 (0.4)EAIR0.2 (0.1, 0.4)*0.1 (0.1, 0.4)*0.2 (0.1, 0.3)*Atrial systemic thrombotic eventsa1 (<0.1)1 (<0.1)2 (<0.1)EAIR0 (0, 0.1)0 (0, 0.3)0 (0, 0.1)Malignancy excluding NMSC32 (1.4)17 (1.0)49 (1.3)EAIR0.6 (0.4, 0.9)0.6 (0.4, 1.0)*0.6 (0.4, 0.8)NMSC15 (0.7)5 (0.3)20 (0.5)EAIR0.3 (0.2, 0.5)*0.2 (0.1, 0.4)*0.2 (0.2, 0.4)*Gastrointestinal perforations3 (0.1)1 (<0.1)4 (0.1)EAIR0.1 (0, 0.2)*0 (0, 0.3)*0 (0, 0.1)**Except when any study had 0 event within the treatment, the Poisson model was not adjusted by study. PYE was defined as (last dose date − first dose date + 1)/365.25.aPositively adjudicated.bAdjudicated as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancerConclusionWith 1 additional year of exposure since the 2020 report, FIL continues to be well tolerated with no new safety concerns emerging. EAIRs of TEAEs, including deaths, and AESIs remained stable or decreased since the 2020 report, except for slight increases in rates of NMSC and malignancies excluding NMSC. In the context of demonstrated efficacy, both FIL doses had an acceptable risk/benefit profile.References[1]Westhovens R et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:998–1008.[2]Kavanaugh A et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1009–19.[3]Combe B et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:848–58.[4]Genovese MC et al. JAMA 2019;322:315–25.[5]Westhovens R et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:727–38.[6]Winthrop K et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(suppl 10); abstract 0229.AcknowledgementsFunding for DARWIN 1 and 2 was provided by Galapagos NV, and funding for DARWIN 3, FINCH 1, 2, 3, and 4 was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Funding for this analysis was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. The sponsors participated in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the research. Medical writing support was provided by Gregory Bezkorovainy, MA, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA; and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA.Disclosure of InterestsKevin Winthrop Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Co., Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Roche, Regeneron, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Chugai, AbbVie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-Kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead Sciences, Inc., and Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Taisho, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AYUMI, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer Japan, and Sanofi, Consultant of: Astellas, Chugai, and Eli Lilly Japan, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Shionogi, Takeda, and UCB Japan, Alan Kivitz Shareholder of: Amgen, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Sanofi, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Flexion, Genzyme, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi, Paid instructor for: Celgene, Genzyme, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Genzyme, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Mark C. Genovese Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Beigene, Eli Lilly and Co., Genentech, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Sanofi Genzyme, RPharm, and SetPoint, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Franziska Matzkies Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Beatrix Bartok Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Kun Chen Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Deyuan Jiang Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Iyabode Tiamiyu Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Robin Besuyen Shareholder of: Galapagos BV, Employee of: Galapagos BV, Sander Strengholt Shareholder of: Galapagos BV, Employee of: Galapagos BV, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Co., Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Co., Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., and Pfizer, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Co., Galapagos BV, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB, Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer
Collapse
|
37
|
Golder V, Kandane-Rathnayake R, Louthrenoo W, Chen YH, Cho J, Lateef A, Hamijoyo L, Luo SF, Jan Wu YJ, Navarra S, Zamora L, LI Z, An Y, Sockalingam S, Katsumata Y, Harigai M, Hao Y, Zhang Z, Basnayake B, Chan M, Kikuchi J, Takeuchi T, Bae SC, O’neill S, Goldblatt F, Oon S, Gibson K, Ng K, Law A, Tugnet N, Kumar S, Tee C, Tee M, Tanaka Y, Lau CS, Nikpour M, Hoi A, Morand EF. OP0142 COMPARISON OF ATTAINMENT AND PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF THE LUPUS LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED VERSUS ESTABLISHED SLE - A MULTICENTRE PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundLupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) attainment has been reported to be associated with reduced damage accrual, flare, and mortality, as well as improved quality of life, in cohorts of SLE patients with established disease. Whether these associations are present in recent-onset disease is less well known.ObjectivesTo evaluate the associations of LLDAS attainment with outcomes in patients with recent onset SLE.MethodsData from a 13-country longitudinal SLE cohort (ACR/SLICC criteria) were collected prospectively between 2013 and 2020 using standard templates. Organ damage and flare were captured using SLICC Damage Index and SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index, respectively. LLDAS was defined as Golder et al., 2019 [1]. An inception cohort was defined based on duration since SLE diagnosis<1 year at enrolment. Patient characteristics between inception and non-inception cohorts were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum (continuous variables) or Pearson’s Chi-squared tests (categorical variables). Survival analyses were performed to examine the association between LLDAS attainment and damage accrual and flare.ResultsThe study cohort included 4,106 patients of whom 680 (16%) were recruited within 1 year of SLE diagnosis (inception cohort). Compared to the non-inception cohort, inception cohort patients were significantly younger, had higher disease activity (SLEDAI-2K and physician global assessment), used more glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants but had less organ damage at enrolment and only 88 (13.6%) patients accrued damage during a median 2.2 years follow-up (Table 1).Table 1.Non-inception cohortInception cohortp-valuen=3426n=680Age at enrolment (years), median [IQR]40 [31, 51]33 [25, 44]<0.001Age at diagnosis (years), median [IQR]28 [21, 38]33 [25, 43]<0.001SLE duration at enrolment (years), median [IQR]10 [5, 16]1 [0, 1]<0.001Study duration (years), median [IQR]2.5 [1.0, 5.4]2.2 [0.9, 3.7]<0.001Females, n (%)3155 (92.1%)623 (91.6%)0.68Asian ethnicity, n (%)3037 (89.1%)595 (88.1%)0.49Prednisolone (PNL) use - ever, n (%)2865 (83.6%)620 (91.2%)<0.001Time adjusted mean (TAM)-PNL, median [IQR]5.0 [2.2, 8.6]6.2 [3.2, 10.3]<0.001Cumulative PNL (g), median [IQR]3.4 [0.5, 9.7]3.8 [1.1, 8.5]0.26Anti-Malarial use - ever, n (%)2669 (77.9%)569 (83.7%)<0.001Immunosupressant use -ever, n (%)2367 (69.1%)521 (76.6%)<0.001AMS (TAM-SLEDAI-2K), median [IQR]2.8 [1.2, 4.6]3.1 [1.6, 5.0]0.002TAM-PGA, median [IQR]0.4 [0.2, 0.7]0.4 [0.3, 0.8]<0.001Mild/moderate/severe flare ever, n (%)1789 (52.2%)391 (57.5%)0.012Organ damage accrual, n (%)629 (20.8%)88 (13.6%)<0.001LLDAS at baseline, n (%)1730 (50.5%)195 (28.7%)<0.001LLDAS-ever (at least once), n (%)2637 (78.2%)492 (73.9%)0.014≥50% time in LLDAS (LLDAS-5), n (%)1612 (50.6%)256 (41.1%)<0.001Significantly fewer inception cohort patients were in LLDAS at enrolment than the non-inception cohort (29% vs. 51%, p<0.001). However, 74% of inception and 78% of non-inception cohort patients achieved LLDAS at least once during follow-up. Limiting analysis only to patients not in LLDAS at enrolment, time to first LLDAS attainment was assessed: inception cohort patients were 60% more likely to attain their first LLDAS (HR = 1.60 (95%CI: 1.40, 1.82), p<0.001) than non-inception cohort patients. LLDAS attainment was significantly protective against flare in the inception (HR, 95% CI) and non-inception (HR, 95% CI) cohorts. Trends towards protection against damage accrual in association with LLDAS in the inception cohort were not significant.ConclusionLLDAS attainment is protective from flare in recent onset SLE. Significant protection from damage accrual was not observed, due to low rates of damage accrual in the first years after SLE diagnosis.References[1]Golder, V., et al., Lupus low disease activity state as a treatment endpoint for systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective validation study. The Lancet Rheumatology, 2019. 1(2): p. e95-e102.AcknowledgementsWe thank all patients participating in the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) cohort, and all data collectors for their ongoing support for APLC research activities.The APLC has received unrestricted project grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lily, Janssen, Merck Serono, and UCB to support data collection contributing to this work.Disclosure of InterestsVera Golder: None declared, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake: None declared, Worawit Louthrenoo: None declared, Yi-Hsing Chen Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra and Zeneca, Sanofi, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Yes. Clinical trials and/or research grants from Pfizer, Norvatis, BMS, Abbevie, Johnson & Johnson, Roche,Sanofi, Guigai, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, MSD, Astra-Zeneca,Astellas, Gilead, Jiacai Cho: None declared, Aisha Lateef: None declared, Laniyati Hamijoyo Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbot, Shue Fen Luo: None declared, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Astellas, Grant/research support from: Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Leonid Zamora: None declared, Zhanguo Li Speakers bureau: Eli, Lilly, Novartis, GSK, AbbVie, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Roche, Johnson, Consultant of: Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Yuan An: None declared, Sargunan Sockalingam Speakers bureau: Yes. Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Roche and Novartis, Yasuhiro Katsumata Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Glaxo-Smithkline K.K., and Sanofi K.K., Masayoshi Harigai Speakers bureau: MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc.,Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd, Consultant of: MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. and Teijin Pharma., Grant/research support from: MH has received research grants from AbbVie Japan GK, Asahi Kasei Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc.,Eisai Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Sekiui Medical, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Yanjie Hao: None declared, Zhuoli Zhang Speakers bureau: Norvatis, GSK, Pfizer, BMDB Basnayake: None declared, Madelynn Chan Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant of: Advisory Board member for Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Jun Kikuchi: None declared, Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corp. Bristol-Myers Squibb Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Eisai Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp. Pfizer Japan Inc. Sanofi K.K., Consultant of: Astellas Pharma, Inc. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Grant/research support from: AbbVie Asahikasei Pharma Corp. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp. Sanofi K.K, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Sean O’Neill Paid instructor for: Advisory board member for GSK, Fiona Goldblatt: None declared, Shereen Oon: None declared, Kathryn Gibson Speakers bureau: UCB, Consultant of: Novartis – co-chair for NSW and steering committee member for ARISE meeting Feb 2021Janssen Pharmaceuticals – advisory board, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Kristine Ng Speakers bureau: speaker fees and advisory board (Abbvie, Novartis, Janssen), Annie Law: None declared, Nicola Tugnet: None declared, Sunil Kumar: None declared, Cherica Tee: None declared, Michael Tee: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, Janssen, C.S. Lau Shareholder of: Pfizer, Sanofi and Janssen, Mandana Nikpour Speakers bureau: Actelion, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: UCB, Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Certa Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Actelion, Astra Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, UCB, Alberta Hoi Consultant of: AH is on the advisory board for Abbvie and GSK, Grant/research support from: AH has received research support from AstraZeneca, GSK, BMS, Janssen, and Merck Serono, Eric F. Morand Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, Paid instructor for: Eli Lilly, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Janssen
Collapse
|
38
|
Bjørkekjær HJ, Bruni C, Carreira P, Airò P, Simeón-Aznar CP, Truchetet ME, Giollo A, Balbir-Gurman A, Martin M, Denton CP, Gabrielli A, Fretheim H, Barua I, Bitter H, Midtvedt Ø, Broch K, Andreassen A, Tanaka Y, Riemekasten G, Müller-Ladner U, Matucci-Cerinic M, Castellví I, Siegert E, Hachulla E, Distler O, Hoffmann-Vold AM. POS0387 RISK STRATIFICATION APPROACHES PERFORM DIFFERENTLY IN SSc-ASSOCIATED PAH IN EUSTAR. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a major clinical challenge in systemic sclerosis (SSc), and is associated with high mortality. Risk stratification provides an estimate for individual patient risk of 1-year mortality. The aim is to detect patients with the worst prognosis to optimize management strategies. Nine risk stratification approaches have been proposed in PAH, but have not been validated in SSc-PAH.ObjectivesTo assess four risk stratification models and their performance to predict 1- and 3- year mortality and to identify the best risk assessment approach for SSc-PAH.MethodsWe included all patients with SSc diagnosed with PAH by right heart catheterization (RHC) from the European scleroderma trial and research (EUSTAR) database from 2001 to February 2021. PAH was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤15mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3 Wood units (WU) in the absence of significant interstitial lung disease. We applied four different approaches for risk stratification at time of PAH diagnosis. Risk parameters included New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), NT-proBNP or BNP, and echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters with cut-off values based on the 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines. Model 1 and 2 stratified patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories; while Model 3 and 4 stratified the patients into four categories (low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high and high).Model 1: Patients with ≥ 1 high-risk parameter were considered at high risk; with ≥ 1 intermediate-risk parameter at intermediate risk, otherwise at low risk1Model 2: Each variable was graded from 1 to 3 representing low to high risk. The mean of available risk parameters was rounded to the nearest integer to define the risk category2Model 3: Equals Model 2, but the intermediate risk group was divided into intermediate-low and intermediate-high based on the mean score3Model 4: Stratifies patients into four risk categories based on the proportion of low-risk parameters3We performed analysis of 1- and 3- year mortality in patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 and 3 years, respectively.ResultsOf 911 patients who conducted RHC, 273 (30%) were diagnosed with SSc-PAH according to the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Median follow-up time was 2.8 years (IQR 1.3-5.3). The models varied in their ability to predict mortality (Figure 1). Model 1 and 4 either over- or underestimated mortality. Model 2 stratified patients according to the expected 1-year mortality of <5%, 5-10% and >10% suggested by the ESC/ERS Guidelines. Model 3, which divided the intermediate risk group in two different risk groups, segregated the risk of mortality further within this group.Table 1.Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients segregated by risk stratification (Model 3)NAll patients (n=273)Low-risk (n=78)Intermediate-low (n=118)Intermediate-high (n=56)High-risk (n=21)Age, years (SD)27365 (10.7)65 (10.3)65 (10.7)65 (10.8)67 (12.8)Female sex, n (%)273230 (84)64 (82)98 (83)48 (86)20 (95)lcSSc, n (%)263221 (84)60 (80)99 (86)47 (90)15 (71)NYHA 3 or 4, n (%)261155 (59)12 (16)75 (68)49 (89)19 (95)NT-proBNP, pg/ml (IQR)1111941 (230-1485)215 (103-377)763 (325-1418)1926 (1051-5681)3314 (1129-6553)6MWD, m (SD)196321 (124.1)404 (119.7)314 (99.9)262 (128.6)215 (96.0)RHC:- mPAP, mmHg (SD)27340 (11.0)35 (8.8)41 (11.5)41 (10.8)45 (11.6)- PAWP, mmHg (SD)2739 (3.2)9 (3.0)9 (3.4)9 (3.2)8 (3.1)- Cardiac index, l/min/m2(SD)2602.8 (0.8)3.2 (0.7)2.7 (0.8)2.6 (1.0)2.0 (0.5)- PVR, WU (SD)2737.4 (4.1)5.3 (2.8)7.9 (4.0)7.9 (4.2)11.3 (4.7)Figure 1.1- and 3-year mortality according to risk category in the four different modelsConclusionModel 3 provides signals for a better risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed SSc-PAH, with progressively increasing mortality across the categories. This may provide guidance for optimized management in clinical practice.References[1]Hoffmann-Vold, Rheum 2018[2]Kylhammar, Eur Heart J 2018[3]Kylhammar, ERJ open 2021AcknowledgementsThe authors thank all EUSTAR collaborators.Disclosure of InterestsHilde Jenssen Bjørkekjær: None declared, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Patricia Carreira: None declared, Paolo Airò Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Roche, Janssen, CSL Behring, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar Speakers bureau: Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim and MSD, Consultant of: Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Alessandro Giollo: None declared, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman: None declared, Mickael Martin: None declared, Christopher P Denton Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim; Janssen, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim; GSK; Corbus; Sanofi; Roche; Horizon; CSL Behring; Acceleron, Grant/research support from: CSL Behring; Horizon; GSK; Servier, Armando Gabrielli: None declared, Håvard Fretheim Consultant of: Bayer, GSK, Actelion, Imon Barua: None declared, Helle Bitter Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Øyvind Midtvedt: None declared, Kaspar Broch: None declared, Arne Andreassen: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Gilead, Abbvie, Behringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Amgen, YL Biologics, Eisai, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Astra-Zeneca, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Takeda, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kowa, Behringer-Ingelheim, Gabriela Riemekasten: None declared, Ulf Müller-Ladner: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared, Ivan Castellví: None declared, Elise Siegert: None declared, Eric Hachulla Speakers bureau: Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi-Genzyme, Grant/research support from: CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi-Genzyme, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Medscape, Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, 4P Science, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur, Grant/research support from: Kymera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Boehringer Ingelheim, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Speakers bureau: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jansen, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Consultant of: Actelion, ARXX, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jansen, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim
Collapse
|
39
|
Ishikawa Y, Tanaka N, Asano Y, Kodera M, Shirai Y, Akahoshi M, Hasegawa M, Matsushita T, Kazuyoshi S, Motegi S, Yoshifuji H, Yoshizaki A, Kohmoto T, Takagi K, Oka A, Kanda M, Tanaka Y, Ito Y, Nakano K, Kasamatsu H, Utsunomiya A, Sekiguchi A, Niro H, Jinnin M, Makino K, Makino T, Ihn H, Yamamoto M, Suzuki C, Takahashi H, Nishida E, Morita A, Yamamoto T, Fujimoto M, Kondo Y, Goto D, Sumida T, Ayuzawa N, Yanagida H, Horita T, Atsumi T, Endo H, Shima Y, Kumanogoh A, Hirata J, Otomo N, Suetsugu H, Koike Y, Tomizuka K, Yoshino S, Liu X, Ito S, Hikino K, Suzuki A, Momozawa Y, Ikegawa S, Tanaka Y, Ishikawa O, Takehara K, Torii T, Sato S, Okada Y, Mimori T, Matsuda F, Matsuda K, Imoto I, Matsuo K, Kuwana M, Kawaguchi Y, Ohmura K, Terao C. OP0112 THE EVER-LARGEST ASIAN GWAS FOR SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS AND TRANS-POPULATION META-ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED SEVEN NOVEL LOCI AND A CANDIDATE CAUSAL SNP IN A CIS-REGULATORY ELEMENT OF THE FCGR REGION. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified 29 disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) regions (1-7). While these GWASs have clarified genetic architectures of SSc, study subjects were mainly Caucasians limiting application of the findings to Asians.ObjectivesThe study was conducted to identify novel causal variants for SSc specific to Japanese subjects as well as those shared with European population. We also aimed to clarify mechanistic effects of the variants on pathogenesis of SSc.MethodsA total of 114,108 subjects comprising 1,499 cases and 112,609 controls were enrolled in the two-staged study leading to the ever-largest Asian GWAS for SSc. After applying a strict quality control both for genotype and samples, imputation was conducted using the reference panel of the phase 3v5 1,000 genome project data combined with a high-depth whole-genome sequence data of 3,256 Japanese subjects. We conducted logistic regression analyses and also combined the Japanese GWAS results with those of Europeans (6) by an inverse-variance fixed-effect model. Polygenicity and enrichment of functional annotations were evaluated by linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC), Haploreg and IMPACT programs. We also constructed polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict SSc development.ResultsWe identified three (FCRLA-FCGR, TNFAIP3, PLD4) and four (EOMES, ESR1, SLC12A5, TPI1P2) novel loci in Japanese GWAS and a trans-population meta-analysis, respectively. One of Japanese novel risk SNPs, rs6697139, located within FCGR gene clusters had a strong effect size (OR 2.05, P=4.9×10-11). We also found the complete LD variant, rs10917688, was positioned in cis-regulatory element and binding motif for an immunomodulatory transcription factor IRF8 in B cells, another genome-wide significant locus in our trans-ethnic meta-analysis and the previous European GWAS. Notably, the association of risk allele of rs10917688 was significant only in the presence of the risk allele of the IRF8. Intriguingly, rs10917688 was annotated as one enhancer-related histone marks, H3K4me1, in B cells, implying that FCGR gene(s) in B cells may play an important role in the pathogenesis of SSc. Furhtermore, significant heritability enrichment of active histone marks and a transcription factor C-Myc were found in B cells both in European and Japanese populations by LDSC and IMPACT, highlighting a possibility of a shared disease mechanism where abnormal B-cell activation may be one of the key drivers for the disease development. Finally, PRS using effects sizes of European GWAS moderately fit in the development of Japanese SSc (AUC 0.593), paving a path to personalized medicine for SSc.ConclusionOur study identified seven novel susceptibility loci in SSc. Downstream analyses highlighted a novel disease mechanism of SSc where an interactive role of FCGR gene(s) and IRF8 may accelerate the disease development and B cells may play a key role on the pathogenesis of SSc.References[1]F. C. Arnett et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010.[2]T. R. Radstake et al. Nat Genet, 2010.[3]Y. Allanore et al. PLoS Genet, 2011.[4]O. Gorlova et al. PLoS Genet, 2011.[5]C. Terao et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017.[6]E. López-Isac et al. Nat Commun, 2019.[7]W. Pu et al. J Invest Dermatol, 2021.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
40
|
Combe B, Tanaka Y, Emery P, Pechonkina A, Kuo A, Gong Q, Van Beneden K, Rajendran V, Schulze-Koops H. POS0679 CLINICAL OUTCOMES UP TO WEEK (W) 48 IN THE ONGOING FILGOTINIB (FIL) LONG-TERM EXTENSION (LTE) TRIAL OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) PATIENTS (pts) WITH INADEQUATE RESPONSE (IR) TO METHOTREXATE (MTX) INITIALLY TREATED WITH FIL OR ADALIMUMAB (ADA) DURING THE PHASE 3 PARENT STUDY (PS). Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe preferential Janus kinase-1 inhibitor FIL is approved for treatment of moderate to severe active RA in Europe and Japan.ObjectivesEfficacy and safety of FIL were assessed in pts with IR to MTX who completed a Phase 3 trial (NCT02889796)1 and enrolled in an LTE (NCT03025308).MethodsPts completing the PS1 on study drug were eligible to enter the LTE (data cutoff: June 1, 2020). Median exposure: 2.2 years (y). Efficacy data to W48 are reported for 4 treatment groups (all with background MTX): pts receiving FIL 200 mg (FIL200) or FIL 100 mg (FIL100) in the PS and continuing their dose in LTE (FIL200/FIL200, FIL100/FIL100) and ADA pts rerandomized, double blind, to FIL200 or FIL100 for LTE (ADA/FIL200, ADA/FIL100); safety data are reported.ResultsAs of June 1, 2020, 522/571 (91%) FIL200/FIL200, 502/570 (88%) FIL100/FIL100, 118/128 (92%) ADA/FIL200, and 115/130 (89%) ADA/FIL100 pts remained on study drug. LTE baseline disease characteristics were similar between groups: mean duration of RA approximately 8.7 y; DAS28(CRP) 2.55, and mean concurrent MTX dosage was 15.0 mg/week. Proportions of pts achieving ACR20/50/70, DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2, <2.6, and CDAI ≤10, ≤2.8 were generally maintained in all LTE groups through W48 (Figure 1). Numerically greater proportions of pts met response criteria at W48 in the FIL200 groups vs FIL100, regardless of PS treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAE), serious AEs, and AEs Grade ≥3 were largely comparable between groups and lowest in ADA/FIL100. There were 10 deaths (Table 1). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs)/100 pt-y of exposure for deaths were lower for FIL/FIL vs ADA/FIL.Table 1.EAIRs of TEAEs in LTE, as of June 1, 20201TEAE, n (%)3FIL200+MTX → FIL200+MTX6ADA+MTX → FIL200+MTX9FIL100+MTX → FIL100+MTX12ADA+MTX → FIL100+MTX2EAIR (95% CI)4n=5717n=12810n=57013n=1305PYE=859.48PYE=197.811PYE=852.314PYE=192.6TEAE429 (75.1)91 (71.1)443 (77.7)88 (67.7)49.9 (45.4, 54.9)46.0 (37.5, 56.5)52.0 (47.4, 57.0)45.7 (37.1, 56.3)TEAE Grade ≥364 (11.2)15 (11.7)72 (12.6)7 (5.4)7.4 (5.8, 9.5)7.6 (4.6, 12.6)8.4 (6.7, 10.6)3.6 (1.7, 7.6)TE serious AE52 (9.1)13 (10.2)60 (10.5)9 (6.9)6.1 (4.6, 7.9)6.6 (3.8, 11.3)7.0 (5.5, 9.1)4.7 (2.4, 9.0)Death3 (0.5)2 (1.6)3 (0.5)2 (1.5)0.3 (0.1, 1.1)1.0 (0.3, 4.0)0.4 (0.1, 1.1)1.0 (0.3, 4.2)TE infections243 (42.6)52 (40.6)249 (43.7)43 (33.1)28.3 (24.9, 32.1)26.3 (20.0, 34.5)29.2 (25.8, 33.1)22.3 (16.6, 30.1)TE serious infections7 (1.2)2 (1.6)13 (2.3)1 (0.8)0.8 (0.4, 1.7)1.0 (0.3, 4.0)1.5 (0.9, 2.6)0.5 (0.1, 3.7)Opportunistic infections2 (0.4)02 (0.4)00.2 (0, 0.8)0 (0, 1.9)0.2 (0, 0.8)0 (0, 1.9)TE herpes zoster16 (2.8)5 (3.9)13 (2.3)1 (0.8)1.9 (1.1, 3.0)2.5 (1.1,6.1)1.5 (0.9, 2.6)0.5 (0.1, 3.7)TE MACE (adjudicated)1 (0.2)03 (0.5)3 (2.3)01 (0, 0.6)0 (0, 1.9)0.4 (0.1, 1.1)1.6 (0.5, 4.8)TE DVT/PE (adjudicated)3 (0.5)03 (0.5)00.3 (0.1, 1.0)0 (0, 1.9)0.4 (0.1, 1.0)0 (0, 1.9)Malignancies (excluding NMSC)5 (0.9)3 (2.3)4 (0.7)00.6 (0.2, 1.4)1.5 (0.5, 4.7)0.5 (0.1, 1.2)0 (0, 1.9)NMSC3 (0.5)02 (0.4)00.3 (0.1, 1.0)0 (0, 1.9)0.2 (0, 0.8)0 (0, 1.9)DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer; PE, pulmonary embolism; TE, treatment-emergentFigure 1.ConclusionDuring the LTE through W48, response rates generally were maintained for FIL/FIL and ADA/FIL pts. Though there were differences between LTE groups, safety was largely comparable and consistent with PS observations1 and previously reported results from 7 trials2: rates of AEs of special interest were low; all confidence intervals were overlapping. Limitation: the LTE was not formally randomized for comparison between FIL/FIL and ADA/FIL treatment groups, the groups were of unequal size, and the switch from ADA to FIL for LTE was by design, rather than based on disease activity.References[1]Combe B et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:848–58.[2]Winthrop K et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(suppl 10); abstract 0229.AcknowledgementsThis study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Medical writing support was provided by Claudine Bitel, PhD, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA; and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA.Disclosure of InterestsBernard Combe Speakers bureau: BMS, Eli Lilly & Co., Gilead Sciences, Inc., MSD, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly & Co., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and YL Biologics, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Sanofi, and Taisho, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Paul Emery Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Samsung, and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and Samsung, Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Albert Kuo Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Qi Gong Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos NV, Employee of: Galapagos NV, Vijay Rajendran Shareholder of: Galapagos NV, Employee of: Galapagos NV, Hendrik Schulze-Koops Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and Novartis
Collapse
|
41
|
Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Aletaha D, Landewé RBM, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Yin Z, Han L, Emoto K, Kano S, Rajendran V, Takeuchi T. POS0664 RADIOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND ESTIMATED BASELINE YEARLY PROGRESSION ≥5 OR <5: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF TWO PHASE 3 TRIALS OF FILGOTINIB. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundIn some patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), especially those with joint damage early in the disease, first-line methotrexate (MTX) treatment may not suffice to prevent further rapid radiographic progression (RRP).1 In FINCH 1 (NCT02889796), filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) and 100 mg (FIL100) reduced change in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) vs placebo (PBO) in pts with RA and inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR).2 In FINCH 3 (NCT02886728), FIL200 and FIL100 reduced change in mTSS vs MTX monotherapy (MTX mono) in MTX-naïve pts.3ObjectivesTo evaluate, via post hoc analysis of 2 trials, filgotinib’s effects on radiographic progression vs MTX mono in pts with estimated baseline (BL) yearly progression ≥5 or <5 mTSS units/year.MethodsThe double-blind 52-week (W) FINCH 1 study randomised MTX-IR pts with moderate–severe active RA to FIL200 or FIL100, subcutaneous adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg, or PBO; at W24, PBO pts were rerandomised blinded to FIL200 or FIL100; all took stable background MTX.2 In FINCH 3, MTX-naïve pts were randomised, blinded, to FIL200 + MTX, FIL100 + MTX, FIL200 alone, or MTX mono for up to W52.3 This analysis examined subgroups by estimated BL yearly progression (BL mTSS/duration in years of RA diagnosis), based on ≥5 or <5 mTSS units/year,4 a threshold commonly used to define RRP. We assessed effects of filgotinib vs ADA or PBO in mTSS change from BL (CFB) at W24/W52 (using a mixed model for repeated measures) and percentages with no W24 progression (mTSS change ≤0, ≤0.5, ≤smallest detectable change [SDC], using Fisher’s exact test).ResultsAt BL, 558/1755 MTX-IR and 787/1249 MTX-naïve pts had BL estimated yearly progression ≥5. Median mTSS in pts with BL yearly progression ≥5 and <5 was 53.25 vs 5.00 respectively in the MTX-IR trial and 6.00 vs 2.50 in the MTX-naïve trial. At W24, the mTSS CFB in pts with BL yearly progression ≥5 and <5 was 0.84 and 0.22 in MTX-IR pts taking PBO + MTX, and 0.67 and 0.25 in MTX-naïve pts taking MTX mono. At W52, in pts with BL yearly progression ≥5, FIL200 + MTX reduced mTSS change vs PBO + MTX in the MTX-IR trial and vs MTX mono in the MTX-naïve trial (Figure 1). At W24, among pts with estimated BL yearly progression ≥5, FIL200 + MTX increased odds of no progression (≤0.5 or ≤0) vs PBO + MTX in MTX-IR pts and vs MTX mono in MTX-naïve pts (Table 1).Table 1.Ratio of no radiographic progression at W24FINCH 1: MTX-IRFIL200 + MTXFIL100 + MTXADA + MTXPBO + MTXBL yearly progression≥5(n = 138)<5(n = 267)≥5(n = 139)<5(n = 265)≥5(n = 91)<5(n = 180)≥5(n = 101)<5(n = 250)% with no progression (≤0.5)87.797.088.592.587.993.976.291.6OR2.22*2.97*2.40*1.12††††% with no progression (≤0)80.491.881.388.380.289.467.386.4OR2.00*1.752.11*1.19††††% with no progression (≤SDC [1.36])91.398.192.196.692.395.681.294.0OR2.43*3.35*2.70*1.82††††FINCH 3: MTX-naïveFIL200 + MTXFIL100 + MTXFIL200 monoMTXBL yearly progression≥5<5≥5<5≥5<5≥5<5(n = 221)(n = 134)(n = 121)(n = 63)(n = 115)(n = 58)(n = 224)(n = 132)% with no progression (≤0.5)86.994.083.593.789.689.778.687.9OR1.81*2.171.382.032.34*1.20††% with no progression (≤0)78.783.672.784.180.087.967.980.3OR1.75*1.251.261.31.89*1.79††% with no progression (≤SDC [1.53])93.797.891.796.895.796.689.395.5OR1.772.081.331.452.641.33††MTX-IR ORs are FIL vs PBO + MTX; MTX-naïve are FIL vs MTX. *Nominal P<.05. †Not applicable.ADA, adalimumab; FIL, filgotinib; IR, inadequate response; mTSS, modified total Sharp score; MTX, methotrexate; OR, odds ratio; SDC, smallest detectable change; W, week.ConclusionThese data suggest filgotinib’s inhibition of radiographic progression was numerically greater than MTX monotherapy in RA pts with high estimated BL yearly progression. In those with a more moderate estimated rate of progression, filgotinib suppressed progression comparably to ADA and/or MTX.References[1]Smolen J et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1566–1572.[2]Combe B et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:848–858.[3]Westhovens R et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:727–738.[4]Vastesaeger N et al. Rheumatology. 2009;48:1114–1121.AcknowledgementsThis study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Medical writing support was provided by Rob Coover, MPH, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA; and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Funding for this analysis was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. The sponsors participated in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the research.Disclosure of InterestsYoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Behringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Tatsuya Atsumi Paid instructor for: Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Mitsubishi Tanabe; Chugai; Astellas Pharma; Takeda; Pfizer; AbbVie: Eisai; Daiichi Sankyo; Bristol-Myers Squibb; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and Alexion Inc., Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Mitsubishi Tanabe; Chugai; Astellas Pharma; Takeda; Pfizer; AbbVie: Eisai; Daiichi Sankyo; Bristol-Myers Squibb; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and Alexion Inc., Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: AbbVie; Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Medac; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sandoz; and Sanofi/Genzyme; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and UCB, Consultant of: Janssen; AbbVie; Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Medac; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sandoz; and Sanofi/Genzyme, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche, Robert B.M. Landewé Paid instructor for: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos NV, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos NV, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Beatrix Bartok Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc, Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Zhaoyu Yin Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ling Han Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Kahaku Emoto Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences K.K., Shungo Kano Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences K.K., Vijay Rajendran Employee of: Galapagos BV, Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer Japan, Sanofi, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., Consultant of: Astellas, Chugai, and Eli Lilly Japan, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Shionogi, Takeda, and UCB Japan
Collapse
|
42
|
Merola JF, McInnes I, Ritchlin CT, Mease PJ, Landewé RBM, Asahina A, Tanaka Y, Warren RB, Gossec L, Gladman DD, Behrens F, Ink B, Assudani D, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Coates L. OP0255 BIMEKIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO TUMOUR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITORS: 16-WEEK EFFICACY & SAFETY FROM BE COMPLETE, A PHASE 3, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMISED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundBimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A. BKZ has shown sustained efficacy and tolerability up to 152 wks in a phase 2b study in patients (pts) with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1,2ObjectivesTo assess efficacy and safety of BKZ vs placebo (PBO) in pts with active PsA and prior inadequate tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) response in the 16-wk pivotal phase 3 study, BE COMPLETE.MethodsBE COMPLETE (NCT03896581) comprises a 16-wk double-blind, PBO-controlled period. Pts were aged ≥18 yrs, had a diagnosis of adult-onset, active PsA with ≥3 tender joints and ≥3 swollen joints, and inadequate response or intolerance to treatment with 1 or 2 TNFi. Pts were randomised 2:1 to BKZ 160 mg Q4W or PBO. From Wk 16, pts were eligible to enter an open-label extension, receiving BKZ 160 mg Q4W. The primary endpoint was a ≥50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50) at Wk 16. Primary and ranked secondary efficacy endpoints were assessed at Wk 16.ResultsOf 400 randomised pts (BKZ: 267; PBO: 133), 388 (97.0%) completed Wk 16 (BKZ: 263 [98.5%]; PBO: 125 [94.0%]). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups: mean age 50.5 yrs, weight 86.0 kg, BMI 29.8 kg/m2, time since diagnosis 9.5 yrs; 47.5% pts were male.At Wk 16, the primary endpoint (ACR50: 43.4% BKZ vs 6.8% PBO; p<0.001; Figure 1) and all ranked secondary endpoints (HAQ-DI CfB, PASI90, SF-36 PCS CfB and MDA response) were met (all p<0.001; Table 1). The ACR50 response was rapid with separation from PBO observed from Wk 4 (nominal p<0.001). Additional outcomes, including ACR20/70, TJC and SJC CfB, and PASI75/100, demonstrated numerical improvement with BKZ compared to PBO at Wk 16 (all nominal p<0.001; Table 1).Table 1.Disease characteristics at baseline and efficacy at Wk 16PBO N=133BKZ 160 mg Q4W N=267p valueBaseline characteristicsTJCmean (SD)19.3 (14.2)18.4 (13.5)-SJCmean (SD)10.3 (8.2)9.7 (7.5)-PtGA-PsAmean (SD)63.0 (22.0)60.5 (22.5)-PtAAPmean (SD)61.7 (24.6)58.3 (24.2)-Psoriasis BSAn (%)<3%45 (33.8)91 (34.1)-≥3 to ≤10%63 (47.4)109 (40.8)->10%25 (18.8)67 (25.1)-PASIamean (SD)8.5 (6.6)b10.1 (9.1)c-Prior TNFin (%)Inadequate response to 1 TNFi103 (77.4)204 (76.4)-Inadequate response to 2 TNFi15 (11.3)29 (10.9)-Intolerance to TNFi15 (11.3)34 (12.7)-Current cDMARDsn (%)63 (47.4)139 (52.1)-Ranked endpoints in hierarchical orderACR50* [NRI] n (%)9 (6.8)116 (43.4)<0.001HAQ-DI CfB† [RBMI] mean (SE)–0.1 (0.0)–0.4 (0.0)<0.001PASI90†a [NRI]n (%)6 (6.8)b121 (68.8)c<0.001SF-36 PCS CfB† [RBMI]mean (SE)1.4 (0.7)7.3 (0.5)<0.001MDA Response† [NRI]n (%)8 (6.0)118 (44.2)<0.001Other endpointsACR20† [NRI]n (%)21 (15.8)179 (67.0)<0.001‡ACR70† [NRI] n (%)1 (0.8)71 (26.6)<0.001‡TJC CfB [MI] mean (SE)–2.4 (0.9)–10.9 (0.8)<0.001‡SJC CfB [MI] mean (SE)–2.0 (0.5)–7.0 (0.4)<0.001‡PASI75a [NRI]n (%)9 (10.2)b145 (82.4)c<0.001‡PASI100a [NRI]n (%)4 (4.5)b103 (58.5)c<0.001‡Randomised set (N=400). *Primary endpoint; †Secondary endpoint; ‡Nominal p value. aIn patients with ≥3% BSA with PSO at BL; bn=88; cn=176.Over 16 wks, 107/267 (40.1%) pts on BKZ had ≥1 TEAE vs 44/132 (33.3%) pts on PBO; the three most frequent TEAEs on BKZ were nasopharyngitis (BKZ: 3.7%; PBO: 0.8%), oral candidiasis (BKZ: 2.6%; PBO: 0%) and upper respiratory tract infection (BKZ: 2.2%; PBO: 1.5%). Incidence of SAEs was low (BKZ: 1.9%; PBO: 0%); none led to discontinuation. 2 pts on BKZ discontinued due to a TEAE (BKZ: 0.7%; PBO: 0%). No systemic candidiasis, cases of IBD, MACE, uveitis, VTE or deaths were reported.ConclusionDual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with BKZ in pts with active PsA and prior inadequate TNFi response resulted in rapid, clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in efficacy outcomes vs PBO. No new safety signals were observed.1,2References[1]Ritchlin C.T. Lancet 2020;395(10222):427–40; 2. Coates L.C. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:779–80(POS1022).AcknowledgementsThis study was funded by UCB Pharma. Editorial services were provided by Costello Medical.Disclosure of InterestsJoseph F. Merola Paid instructor for: Amgen, Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: Amgen, Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, UCB Pharma, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: Amgen, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen and UCB Pharma, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma, Robert B.M. Landewé Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, BMS, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, Consultant of: Abbott, Ablynx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Centocor, GSK, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, Akihiko Asahina Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Taiho Pharma, Torii Pharmaceutical, and UCB Pharma, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Sanofi, and Taisho, Grant/research support from: Asahi-Kasei, AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Richard B. Warren Paid instructor for: Astellas, DiCE, GSK, and Union, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Astellas, Avillion, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Laure Gossec Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, and Sandoz, Dafna D Gladman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Frank Behrens Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Barbara Ink Shareholder of: GSK, UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Deepak Assudani Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Rajan Bajracharya Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Jason Coarse Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Laura Coates Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma
Collapse
|
43
|
Nakano M, Ishiyama H, Kawakami S, Sekiguchi A, Kainuma T, Tsumura H, Hashimoto M, Hasegawa T, Tanaka Y, Katakura T, Murakami Y. PO-1788 Radiomic and dosiomic prediction of biochemical failure after Iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03752-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
44
|
Shikata R, Suzuki H, Hayashi Y, Hasegawa T, Shigeeda Y, Inoue H, Yajima W, Kametaka J, Maetani M, Tanaka Y, Nishikawa T, Maeda S, Hayashi Y, Hada M. Enhancement of the mechanical and thermal transport properties of carbon nanotube yarns by boundary structure modulation. Nanotechnology 2022; 33:235707. [PMID: 35196260 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac57d5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) exhibit extremely high nanoscopic thermal/electrical transport and mechanical properties. However, the macroscopic properties of assembled CNTs are significantly lower than those of CNTs because of the boundary structure between the CNTs. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the relationship between the nanoscopic boundary structure in CNTs and the macroscopic properties of the assembled CNTs. Previous studies have shown that the nanoscopic phonon transport and macroscopic thermal transport in CNTs are improved by Joule annealing because of the improved boundary Van-der-Waals interactions between CNTs via the graphitization of amorphous carbon. In this study, we investigate the mechanical strength and thermal/electrical transport properties of CNT yarns with and without Joule annealing at various temperatures, analyzing the phenomena occurring at the boundaries of CNTs. The obtained experimental and theoretical results connect the nanoscopic boundary interaction of CNTs in CNT yarns and the macroscopic mechanical and transport properties of CNT yarns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Shikata
- Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hiroo Suzuki
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuta Hayashi
- Graduate School of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Taisuke Hasegawa
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
- Research and Services Division of Materials Data and Integrated System (MaDIS), National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yuho Shigeeda
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Inoue
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Wataru Yajima
- Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Jun Kametaka
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mitsuaki Maetani
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nishikawa
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Maeda
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
- Research and Services Division of Materials Data and Integrated System (MaDIS), National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan
- Institute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Hayashi
- Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masaki Hada
- Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
- Tsukuba Research Center for Energy Materials Science (TREMS), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Uchida M, Ito H, Takasuna H, Goto T, Takumi I, Fukano T, Hagiwara Y, Tanaka Y. Initial Experience with Left Transradial Neurointerventions for Cerebral Aneurysms Using the 6-French Simmons Guiding Sheath. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 31:106350. [PMID: 35152132 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of a transradial approach utilizing a Simmons-shaped catheter for neurointervention has been steadily increasing. Although the right radial artery is commonly used, in interventional cardiology, the left transradial approach offers clear clinical benefits for right-handed patients. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have examined intracranial aneurysm embolization with the routine use of the left transradial approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of left transradial intracranial aneurysm embolization. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective database of consecutive patients who had undergone left transradial intracranial aneurysm coiling using a 6-French Simmons guiding sheath between January and August 2021. The following outcome variables were then analyzed: whether the catheterization was successful, the angiographical results, and the presence of any procedure-related complications. RESULTS In total, 25 patients underwent left transradial coiling for 15 anterior and 10 posterior circulation aneurysms. The Simmons guiding sheath could be successfully shaped and cannulated into the targeted vessel in all patients. All aneurysms were completely embolized without any complications. Immediate postoperative angiograms showed Raymond 1 in 10 aneurysms (40.0%), Raymond 2 in 12 (48.0%), and Raymond 3a in 3 (12.0%). None of the patients required crossover to the right radial or femoral arteries, and no radial artery spasms or occlusions were observed. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that the left transradial approach for intracranial aneurysm coiling is not only safe, effective, and technically feasible, but also provides improved comfort to right-handed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Uchida
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hidemichi Ito
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Takasuna
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Goto
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takumi
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takayuki Fukano
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuta Hagiwara
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yamaguchi D, Hidaka H, Matsunaga T, Akutagawa T, Tanaka Y, Jubashi A, Takeuchi Y, Tsuruoka N, Sakata Y, Miyahara K, Tominaga N, Kawakubo H, Takamori A, Shimoda R, Noda T, Ogata S, Tsunada S, Esaki M. Efficacy of elobixibat as bowel preparation agent for colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multi-center study. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:171-179. [PMID: 33971037 PMCID: PMC9290049 DOI: 10.1111/den.14010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Elobixibat is a novel ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the combination of elobixibat and 1 L of polyethylene glycol formulation containing ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) solution versus the combination of sodium picosulfate and 1-L PEG-Asc solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. METHODS This multi-center, randomized, observer-blinded, non-inferiority study recruited 210 outpatients who were assigned to either the elobixibat plus 1-L PEG-Asc group (group A) or the sodium picosulfate plus 1-L PEG-Asc group (group B). The quality of the bowel cleansing level was assessed by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and compared the bowel cleansing level between the groups. Data regarding bowel preparation time, patients' tolerability, and adverse events were also analyzed. RESULTS Data for 196 patients (99 in group A and 97 in group B) were analyzed finally. BBPS was comparable between group A and B (8.3 ± 0.9 vs. 8.3 ± 0.7; P = 0.88). Consequently, the adequate bowel preparation rate in groups A and B was 95.0% and 99.0%, respectively (-4.0%, 95% CI -9.3 to 1.5). Bowel preparation time in group A was similar to that in group B (348.2 ± 79.8 min vs. 330.8 ± 82.5 min; P = 0.13), whereas, sleep disturbance was significantly less frequent in group A than in group B (10.2% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The combination of elobixibat and 1-L PEG-Asc can be considered an alternative bowel preparation for colonoscopy considering the equivalent bowel cleansing effect and less frequent sleep disturbance. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs41180026).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yamaguchi
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical CenterSagaJapan,Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineSaga UniversitySagaJapan
| | - Hidenori Hidaka
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Takuya Matsunaga
- Department of GastroenterologySaga‐ken Medical Centre KoseikanSagaJapan
| | - Takashi Akutagawa
- Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineSaga UniversitySagaJapan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical CenterSagaJapan,Department of Internal MedicineImari‐Arita Kyoritsu HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Amane Jubashi
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical CenterSagaJapan
| | - Yuki Takeuchi
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical CenterSagaJapan
| | - Nanae Tsuruoka
- Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineSaga UniversitySagaJapan
| | - Yasuhisa Sakata
- Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineSaga UniversitySagaJapan
| | - Koichi Miyahara
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Naoyuki Tominaga
- Department of GastroenterologySaga‐ken Medical Centre KoseikanSagaJapan
| | - Hiroharu Kawakubo
- Department of Internal MedicineImari‐Arita Kyoritsu HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Ayako Takamori
- Clinical Research CenterSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Ryo Shimoda
- Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineSaga UniversitySagaJapan
| | - Takahiro Noda
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Shinichi Ogata
- Department of GastroenterologySaga‐ken Medical Centre KoseikanSagaJapan
| | - Seiji Tsunada
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical CenterSagaJapan
| | - Motohiro Esaki
- Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineSaga UniversitySagaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tanaka Y, Maekawa T, Eura R, Hasegawa Y, Kubota M. Neurogenic bladder as a lurking complication in Moebius syndrome. Brain Dev 2022; 44:73-76. [PMID: 34400011 DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Moebius syndrome (MBS) is a congenital disorder characterized by facial and abducens palsy, sometimes accompanied with other cranial nerve palsies and comorbid conditions. Anatomical anomalies of the brainstem are assumed to be major etiologies of MBS. Its phenotypic presentation can be variable. We report a female patient with MBS who presented with neurogenic bladder (NB). She was born via normal vaginal delivery. At birth, she showed bilateral abducens palsy and right facial palsy. We diagnosed MBS by cranial computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging. She had recurrent urinary tract infection. Hydronephrosis was noted on ultrasonography and bilateral vesicoureteral reflux (grade 5) on voiding cystourethrography. Urodynamic investigation showed detrusor overactivity and detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, which follow the pattern of NB resulting from infrapontine-suprasacral lesions. Patients with MBS have lower brainstem dysfunction, and accordingly we should be aware of NB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of General Pediatrics and Interdisciplinary Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Takanobu Maekawa
- Department of General Pediatrics and Interdisciplinary Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rumiko Eura
- Department of Urology, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hasegawa
- Division of Pediatric Urology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Kubota
- Department of General Pediatrics and Interdisciplinary Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Usami Y, van de Ven B, Mathew DG, Chen T, Kotooka T, Kawashima Y, Tanaka Y, Otsuka Y, Ohoyama H, Tamukoh H, Tanaka H, van der Wiel WG, Matsumoto T. In-Materio Reservoir Computing in a Sulfonated Polyaniline Network. Adv Mater 2021; 33:e2102688. [PMID: 34533867 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202102688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A sulfonated polyaniline (SPAN) organic electrochemical network device (OEND) is fabricated using a simple drop-casting method on multiple Au electrodes for use in reservoir computing (RC). The SPAN network has humidity-dependent electrical properties. Under high humidity, the SPAN OEND exhibits mainly ionic conduction, including charging of an electric double layer and ionic diffusion. The nonlinearity and hysteresis of the current-voltage characteristics progressively increase with increasing humidity. The rich dynamic output behavior indicates wide variations for each electrode, which improves the RC performance because of the disordered network. For RC, waveform generation and short-term memory tasks are realized by a linear combination of outputs. The waveform task accuracy and memory capacity calculated from a short-term memory task reach 90% and 33.9, respectively. Improved spoken-digit classification is realized with 60% accuracy by only 12 outputs, demonstrating that the SPAN OEND can manage time series dynamic data operation in RC owing to a combination of rich dynamic and nonlinear electronic properties. The results suggest that SPAN-based electrochemical systems can be applied for material-based computing, by exploiting their intrinsic physicochemical behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Usami
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 5600043, Japan
- Department of Human Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
- Research Center for Neuromorphic AI Hardware, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
| | - Bram van de Ven
- NanoElectronics Group, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and BRAINS Center for Brain-Inspired Nano Systems, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede, 7500 AE, The Netherlands
| | - Dilu G Mathew
- NanoElectronics Group, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and BRAINS Center for Brain-Inspired Nano Systems, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede, 7500 AE, The Netherlands
| | - Tao Chen
- NanoElectronics Group, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and BRAINS Center for Brain-Inspired Nano Systems, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede, 7500 AE, The Netherlands
| | - Takumi Kotooka
- Department of Human Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
| | - Yuya Kawashima
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 5600043, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tanaka
- Department of Human Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
- Research Center for Neuromorphic AI Hardware, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
| | - Yoichi Otsuka
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 5600043, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ohoyama
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 5600043, Japan
| | - Hakaru Tamukoh
- Department of Human Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
- Research Center for Neuromorphic AI Hardware, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Tanaka
- Department of Human Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
- Research Center for Neuromorphic AI Hardware, Kyushu Institute of Technology (Kyutech), 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu, 8080196, Japan
| | - Wilfred G van der Wiel
- NanoElectronics Group, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and BRAINS Center for Brain-Inspired Nano Systems, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede, 7500 AE, The Netherlands
| | - Takuya Matsumoto
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 5600043, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Miyauchi H, Tanaka Y, Takahashi K, Nakano M, Hasegawa T, Hashimoto M, Hashimoto T, Oguchi M, Yoshioka Y. Development of Novel Image Processing System Using Super-Resolution to Reduce Cone-Beam CT Imaging Dose in Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
50
|
Tanaka Y, Iwata Y, Saito K, Fukushima H, Watanabe S, Hasegawa Y, Akiyama M, Sugiura K. Cutaneous ischemia-reperfusion injury is exacerbated by IL-36 receptor antagonist deficiency. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 36:295-304. [PMID: 34699104 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loss-of-function homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in IL36RN, which encodes interleukin-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra), has been implicated in the pathogenesis of skin disorders. However, the pathogenic role of IL-36Ra in cutaneous ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury remains unclear. OBJECTIVES We investigated the role of IL36Ra in cutaneous I/R injury. METHODS We examined I/R injury in Il36rn-/- mice. The area of wounds, numbers of infiltrated cells, apoptotic cells and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation were assessed. The expression levels of various genes were analysed using real-time RT-PCR. The expression of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), an endogenous toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 ligand, was confirmed using immunohistology, and serum HMGB1 levels were measured by ELISA. Cytokine production by stimulated cultured J774A.1 and HaCaT cells was examined. RESULTS IL-36Ra deficiency resulted in significantly delayed wound healing and increased neutrophil and macrophage infiltration into the wound tissues. Il36rn-/- mice had increased mRNA expression levels of CXCL1, CXCL2, CCL4, TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-36γ relative to wild-type mice. Apoptosis was identified in keratinocytes by TUNEL assay. HMGB1 expression in the I/R site was decreased in both keratinocytes and adnexal cells, while serum HMGB1 levels were significantly elevated after reperfusion. The mRNA levels of various cytokines, including IL-1β, were elevated in J774A.1 cells through TLR4 signalling by HMGB1 stimulation. In addition, HaCaT cells stimulated with IL-1β showed significantly increased CXCL1, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-36β and IL-36γ mRNA expression. Furthermore, NET formation was increased by IL-36Ra deficiency. Finally, either the blockade of TLR4 signalling by TAK-242 or inhibition of NET formation by Cl-amidine normalized exacerbated I/R injury in Il36rn-/- mice. CONCLUSIONS This study indicated that IL-36Ra deficiency exacerbates cutaneous I/R injury due to excessive inflammatory cell recruitment, NET formation, and excessive cytokine and chemokine production via the TLR4 pathway by HMGB1 released from epidermal apoptotic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Tanaka
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Y Iwata
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - K Saito
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - H Fukushima
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - S Watanabe
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Y Hasegawa
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - M Akiyama
- Department of Dermatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - K Sugiura
- Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|