Gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes

Greater risk of type 2 diabetes progression in multifetal gestations with gestational diabetes: the impact of obesity

BACKGROUND

The relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes in multifetal pregnancies is complex and controversial. Moreover, limited research has focused on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus specifically in multifetal pregnancies, resulting in conflicting results from existing studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus between singleton and multifetal pregnancies in a large cohort of parturients with a 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted on a prospective cohort of pregnant individuals with pregnancies between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, followed up to 5 years after delivery. Glucose levels during pregnancy were obtained from the Meuhedet Health Maintenance Organization laboratory system and cross-linked with the Israeli National Diabetes Registry. The cohort was divided into 4 groups: singleton pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus, multifetal pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, and multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gestational diabetes mellitus was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria using the 2-step strategy. Univariate analyses, followed by survival analysis that included Kaplan-Meier hazard curves and Cox proportional-hazards models, were used to assess differences between groups and calculate the adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Among 88,611 parturients, 61,891 cases met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 6.5% in the singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group and 9.4% in the multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group. Parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus, regardless of plurality, were older and had higher fasting plasma glucose levels in the first trimester of pregnancy. The rates of increased body mass index, hypertension, and earlier gestational age at delivery were significantly higher in the gestational diabetes mellitus group among patients with singleton pregnancies but not among patients with multifetal pregnancies. Survival analysis demonstrated that gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with adjusted hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes mellitus of 4.62 (95% confidence interval, 3.69-5.78) in singleton pregnancies and 9.26 (95% confidence interval, 2.67-32.01) in multifetal pregnancies (P<.001 for both). Stratified analysis based on obesity status revealed that, in parturients without obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies increased the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 10.24 (95% confidence interval, 6.79-15.44; P<.001) compared with a nonsignificant risk in multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-90.22; P=.059). Among parturients with obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus for both singleton and multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.66; [95% confidence interval, 2.81-4.67; P<.001] and 9.31 [95% confidence interval, 2.12-40.76; P=.003], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal pregnancies doubles the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. This effect is primarily observed in patients with obesity. Our findings underscore the importance of providing special attention and postpartum follow-up for patients with multifetal pregnancies and gestational diabetes mellitus, especially those with obesity, to enable early diagnosis and intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies-a pathology requiring treatment or a benign physiological adaptation?

There is level-1 evidence that screening for and treating gestational diabetes in singleton pregnancies reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity. However, similar data for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies are currently lacking. Consequently, the current approach for the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is based on the same diagnostic criteria and glycemic targets used in singleton pregnancies. However, twin pregnancies have unique physiological characteristics, and many of the typical gestational diabetes-related complications are less relevant for twin pregnancies. These differences raise the question of whether the greater increase in insulin resistance observed in twin pregnancies (which is often diagnosed as diet-treated gestational diabetes) should be considered physiological and potentially beneficial in which case alternative criteria should be used for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. In this review, we summarize the most up-to-date evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical consequences of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies and review the available data on twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes. Although twin pregnancies are associated with a higher incidence of diet-treated gestational diabetes, diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is less likely to be associated with adverse outcomes and accelerated fetal growth than in singleton pregnancies and may reduce the risk for intrauterine growth restriction. In addition, there is currently no evidence that treatment of diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies improves outcomes, whereas preliminary data suggest that strict glycemic control in such cases might increase the risk for intrauterine growth restriction. Overall, these findings provide support to the hypothesis that the greater transient increase in insulin resistance observed in twin pregnancies is merely a physiological exaggeration of the normal increase in insulin resistance observed in singleton pregnancies (that is meant to support 2 fetuses) rather than a pathology that requires treatment. These data illustrate the need to develop twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes to avoid overdiagnosis of gestational diabetes and to reduce the risks associated with overtreatment of diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. Although data on twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria are presently scarce, preliminary data suggest that the optimal screening and diagnostic criteria in twin pregnancies are higher than those currently used in singleton pregnancies.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes, but its effects on maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies remain conflicting.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all primipara who delivered twin pregnancies at a single tertiary perinatal center between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022. Excluded were those who had a single pregnancy, twin pregnancies with pre-existing diabetes, missing information on GDM screening, a delivery before gestational 28 weeks, complications related to monochorionic placentation, multifetal reduction, fetal anomalies, and monochorionic monoamniotic twins. Maternal outcomes included preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, hypothyroidism, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM), placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and oligohydramnios. Neonatal outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA), large-for-gestational-age (LGA), birthweight, Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR), and neonatal hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

A total of 3269 twins were delivered, with 897 women (27.4%) diagnosed with GDM during pregnancies; moreover, 72 (8.0%) of these women received insulin treatment. The GDM group showed a significantly higher maternal age at delivery (≥35 years), as well as incidences of overweight and obesity. These factors also elevated the odds of insulin treatment in GDM women with twin pregnancies (OR = 1.881, 95% CI = 1.073-3.295, P = 0.027; OR = 2.450, 95% CI = 1.422-4.223, P < 0.001; OR = 4.056, 95% CI = 1.728-9.522, P < 0.001, respectively). Chronic hypertension prior to pregnancy was identified as a risk factor for GDM during twin pregnancies (OR = 1.896, 95% CI = 1.290-2.785, P < 0.001), although it did not increase the proportion of women requiring insulin treatment (P = 0.808). Aside from a higher incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks in insulin-treated GDM twins (OR = 2.096, 95% CI = 1.017-4.321, P = 0.045), there were no significant difference in other maternal outcomes (preterm birth before 34 weeks, pre-eclampsia, hypothyroidism, PROM, placental abruption, placenta previa, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and oligohydramnios) between the GDM group and non-GDM group, and between insulin-treated GDM and non-insulin-treated GDM. The rate of newborns with birthweight <1500 g was significantly lower among twins born to GDM women, but the prevalence of EUGR was notably higher. Additionally, the risk of EUGR was elevated in insulin-treated GDM twins (OR = 3.170, 95% CI = 1.639,6.131, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the GDM group and non-GDM group, or between insulin-treated GDM and non-insulin-treated GDM group in terms of mean birthweight, newborn sex ratio, and incidences of other adverse neonatal outcomes, including gestational age at delivery, LGA, birth weight <2500 g, and 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age ≥35 years, overweight or obesity, and chronic hypertension are significant risk factors for GDM during twin pregnancies. Women with GDM during twin pregnancies may achieve similar outcomes compared to those without GDM. However, the women with GDM during twin pregnancies receiving insulin therapy may have a higher risk of preterm birth and EUGR.

Perinatal Outcomes of Twin Gestations with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Existing data suggest that obstetric outcomes for individuals with twin gestations, who have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), may be comparable to those who do not have GDM, yet studies are limited by small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to examine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes of individuals with twin gestations based on presence of GDM.

METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of individuals giving birth to twins in the United States between 2012 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were live births (≥24 weeks) and available information on GDM status; individuals with pregestational diabetes were excluded. Participants were categorized as either having had or not had GDM. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the independent association of GDM with adverse maternal outcomes, whereas generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate associations with neonatal outcomes to account for clustering.

RESULTS

Of 173,196 individuals meeting inclusion criteria, 13,194 (7.6%) had GDM. Individuals with GDM were more likely to be older, identify as Hispanic or Asian race and ethnicity, married, college educated, privately insured, and obese than those without GDM. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, those with GDM were more likely to have hypertensive disorders (18.0 vs. 10.2%) and undergo cesarean delivery (51.2 vs. 47.3%). Neonates born to individuals with GDM were more likely to require mechanical ventilation for greater than 6 hours (6.5 vs. 5.6%) and experience neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (41.1 vs. 36.2%), but were less likely to be low birth weight or have small for gestational age status (16.2 vs. 19.5%). Findings were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of neonates born at 32 weeks of gestation or greater.

CONCLUSION

Odds of poor obstetric and neonatal outcomes are increased for individuals with twin gestations complicated by GDM.

KEY POINTS

· Individuals with GDM and twin gestation have higher odds of developing hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and of undergoing cesarean delivery.. · Neonates of such pregnancies are less likely to be low birth weight or small for gestational age.. · Neonates of pregnancies complicated by GDM and twin gestation are more likely to require mechanical ventilation and experience NICU admission..

Maternal diabetes following gestational diabetes: Does multiple gestation multiply the risk?

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the risk for future diabetes is higher among women diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GD) during twin versus singleton gestations.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed including all women who delivered at a tertiary medical center between the years 1991 and 2021 and had at least one GD diagnosis. The first GD diagnosis per women was defined as the index pregnancy. Women diagnosed with GD during multiple gestations were compared with women diagnosed with GD during singleton gestations. The outcomes included first hemoglobin A1C (Hba1C) level > 6.4 mg/dL post partum, and the highest level measured during the follow-up period of up to 30 years. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional analysis were used to compare the risk between the two groups while adjusting for confounding variables.

RESULTS

The current study included 13 770 mothers, with 458 patients (3.3%) diagnosed with GD during twin gestations and 13 312 (96.7%) during singleton gestations. The mean follow-up was 12.25 ± 9.3 years. Mothers of both groups did not differ in age at index pregnancy; however, mothers of twins were more likely to conceive following fertility treatments. Incidence of diabetes and prediabetes (defined as Hba1C > 6.4 and >5.7, respectively) were lower among the twin-gestation group, both during the 6-month postpartum period (for diabetes: 15.5% vs 22.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.91]) and during the long-term follow-up (for diabetes: 31.8% vs 40.7%; OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52-0.88]). These results remained significant in the multivariable analysis, while accounting for age, ethnicity, and fertility treatments.

CONCLUSION

GD diagnosis during multiple versus singleton gestations is associated with a lower risk for future diabetes.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal complications between twin and singleton pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes mellitus and the respective group without gestational diabetes mellitus (controls).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from January 1980 to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational studies reporting maternal and perinatal outcomes in singleton and/or twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus vs controls were included.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were generated to determine the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes between twin and singleton pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated in the model and expressed using the I2 statistic. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. The meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan Web). Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. Meta-regression was used to compare relative risks between singleton and twin pregnancies. The addition of multiple covariates into the models was used to address the lack of adjustments.

RESULTS

Overall, 85 studies in singleton pregnancies and 27 in twin pregnancies were included. In singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared with controls, there were increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.01), induction of labor (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.77), cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.38), large-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-1.77), preterm birth (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.46), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-1.49). In twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared with controls, there were increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (relative risk, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.90), cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.13), large-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.60), preterm birth (relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.32), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.32) and reduced risks of small-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97) and neonatal death (relative risk, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.65). When comparing relative risks in singleton vs twin pregnancies, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that twin pregnancies have a lower relative risk of cesarean delivery (P=.003), have sufficient adjustment for confounders, and have lower relative risks of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (P=.005), stillbirths (P=.002), and neonatal death (P=.001) than singleton pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

In both singleton and twin pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. In twin pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus may have a milder effect on some adverse perinatal outcomes and may be associated with a lower risk of neonatal death.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Globally, the incidence of twin pregnancies is rising owing to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), emigration and deferment of pregnancy until advanced maternal age (AMA). While twin pregnancies have higher absolute risks of adverse outcomes, including miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death and preterm delivery, the impact of specific exposures and risk factors related to these outcomes may differ between twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies. Regarding modifiable factors, data are sometimes based on evidence extrapolated from singleton or whole obstetric populations. Therefore, targeted evidence is required to provide care tailored to twin pregnancies to prevent adverse outcomes. We aimed to comprehensively review the association between different risk factors and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies, including data on chorionicity, and to compare these to singletons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review examines the risks associated with chorionicity, AMA, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities, maternal smoking, use of ART, maternal perception of fetal movement, and maternal comorbidities, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Adverse outcomes reported were preterm birth, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), stillbirth and neonatal mortality. As such, fetal mortality and morbidity will be under-represented, as pregnancy loss before 22-24 weeks is omitted.

RESULTS

Monochorionicity increases the risk of stillbirth, NICU admission, and preterm delivery in twin pregnancy. AMA predisposes twin pregnancies to higher risks of mortality, admission to the NICU, and preterm birth than singleton pregnancies do. Conversely, the impact of BMI, socioeconomic inequalities, smoking, ART, and HDP on adverse outcomes appears to be lower in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies. This attenuation might be explained by the higher baseline risk of adverse outcomes such as preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Some exposures, such as ART use and GDM, appear to be "protective" against perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies, despite being established risk factors for adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies, potentially related to access to specialist care. There is a paucity of evidence available to counsel mothers of twin pregnancies regarding reduced fetal movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes differ between twin and singleton pregnancies. This highlights the need for further studies to examine the association between risk factors and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies. The resulting data would facilitate tailored guidance for twin pregnancies, contribute to improved antenatal care, and inform wider public health strategies.

The adverse effect of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on maternal-perinatal outcomes among singleton and twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study (2011-2019)

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the predominant pregnancy complications among singleton and twin pregnancies worldwide. Our primary objective was to explore the adverse effect of GDM and HDP on maternal-perinatal outcomes compared with non-GDM and non-HDP in singleton and twin pregnancies. The secondary objective was to find the risk of adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP in Hubei, China.

Methods

A tertiary hospital-based retrospective study was conducted at Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Hubei Province, China, from 2011 to 2019. A chi-square test was used to determine the difference in adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes between singleton and twin pregnancies. A multiple binary logistic regression model and a joinpoint regression model were used to determine the association of GDM and HDP with adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes and GDM and HDP temporal trend among singleton and twin pregnancies.

Results

The trend of HDP [average annual percentage change (AAPC) 15.1% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 5.3, 25.7)] among singleton pregnancies and GDM [AAPC 50.4% (95%CI: 19.9, 88.7)] among twin pregnancies significantly increased from 2011 to 2019. After adjusting for confounding factors, GDM is associated with an increased risk of C-section (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.5; 95%CI: 1.3, 1.6) and macrosomia (aOR, 1.3; 95%CI: 1.1, 1.6) in singleton and preterm birth (PTB) (aOR, 2.1; 95%CI: 1.2, 3.3) in twin pregnancies compared with non-GDM. HDP was associated with a higher risk of C-section, PTB, perinatal mortality, and low birth weight (LBW) in both singleton and twin pregnancies compared with the non-HDP. Compared with singleton pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP, twin pregnancies showed higher odds of C-section [(aOR, 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1, 2.7), (aOR, 4.6; 95%CI: 2.5, 8.7), respectively], PTB [(aOR, 22.9; 95%CI: 14.1, 37.3), (aOR, 8.1; 95%CI: 5.3, 12.3), respectively], LBW [(aOR, 12.1; 95%CI: 8.2, 18.1), (aOR, 5.1; 95%CI: 3.6, 7.4), respectively], and low Apgar score [(aOR, 8.2; 95%CI: 4.4, 15.1), (aOR, 3.8; 95%CI: 2.4, 5.8), respectively] complicated with GDM and HDP.

Conclusion

In conclusion, GDM showed an increased risk of a few adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes and HDP is associated with a higher risk of several adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies compared to non-GDM and non-HDP. Moreover, twin pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP showed higher odds of adverse maternal-neonatal outcomes compared with singleton pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP.

Different subtypes of gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with distinct perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies

AIMS

To determine whether different gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) subtypes are associated with distinct perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.

MATERIALS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled women with twin pregnancies who gave birth at a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and December 2022. GDM was diagnosed by the IADPSG diagnostic criteria. Three subtypes of GDM were defined as only abnormal fasting glucose (OAFG) values, only abnormal post-load glucose (OAPG) values and abnormal combined fasting and post-load glucose (ACFPG) values. Logistic regression or generalized estimation equation models were used to test the correlation of subtypes of GDM and perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

GDM with OAPG had a slightly higher risk for preterm delivery (PTD) at <37 gestational weeks (aOR 1.22, 95 %CI 1.01-1.47) and neonatalintensivecareunit (NICU) admission (aOR 1.31, 95 %CI 1.09-1.57). GDM with ACFPG were associated with PTD at <37 gestational weeks (aOR 1.42, 95 %CI 1.06-1.89) and PTD at <34 gestational weeks (aOR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.14-2.39). GDM with OAFG had a lower risk of being small-for-gestational age (SGA) (aOR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.26-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Different subtypes of GDM are associated with distinct perinatal outcomes. Only abnormal fasting glucose levels may be responsible for reduced the risk of SGA neonates.

Association between One Abnormal Value on 3-Hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Twin Gestation

AIM

To investigate whether women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the diagnostic 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are at an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study of women with twin gestation, comparing four groups: (1) normal 50-g screening, (2) normal 100-g 3-hour OGTT, (3) one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT, and (4) GDM. Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for maternal age, gravidity, parity, previous CDs, fertility treatments, smoking, obesity and chorionicity were used.

RESULTS

The study included 2,597 women with twin gestations, of which 79.7% had a normal screen, and 6.2% had one abnormal value on the OGTT. In adjusted analyses, women with one abnormal value were found to have higher rates of preterm delivery <32 weeks, large for gestational age neonates, and composite neonatal morbidity of at least one fetus, however, similar maternal outcomes as those with a normal screen.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence that women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT are at an increased risk of unfavorable neonatal outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariable logistic regressions. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions such as nutritional counseling, blood glucose monitoring, and treatment with diet and medication would improve perinatal outcomes in this population.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Worsen Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy

The specific effects of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on twin pregnancy outcomes, which are at high risk per se, are unclear. The present study analyzes outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by GDM (n = 227) by comparing them with GDM singleton pregnancies (n = 1060) and with twin pregnancies without GDM (n = 1008), all followed up at Sant'Anna Hospital, Turin (Italy), between January 2010 and March 2020. The prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies (n = 1235) was 18.4%. Compared to GDM singletons, GDM twins had higher rates of preeclampsia (aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.8), cesarean section (aOR 7.5; 95% CI 5.2-10.8), and neonatal hypoglycemia (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.3). They had a higher incidence of abnormal 2 h OGTT values (aOR 7.1; 95% CI: 3.2-15.7) and were less likely to require insulin therapy (aOR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7). In comparison with twin pregnancies without GDM, women with GDM twins were significantly older (35.0 vs. 33.0 years; p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (23.0 versus 22.0 kg/m²; p < 0.001); they had a higher incidence of LGA newborns (aOR 5.3; 95% CI 1.7-14.8), and lower incidence of low APGAR scores (0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9). Overall, GDM does not worsen outcomes of twin pregnancy, which is per se at high risk for adverse outcomes.

Twins versus singletons-Long-term health outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Multiple gestations are a risk factor for most pregnancy complications. The current study aimed to study whether offspring born after twin pregnancies are at increased risk for long-term health complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a large medical center, including all offspring born between the years 1991-2021, which were followed-up until 18 years of age. Hospital-based diagnoses of the offspring were categorized into main groups of morbidities: cardiac, respiratory, infectious, neurological, malignancy, and metabolic. Incidence of hospitalization with diagnoses from each main group was compared between twins and singletons, as well as time to first hospitalization. Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the association between twins versus singletons and hospitalizations by grouped morbidities, while adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity and gender, besides maternal recurrence in the cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 369 478 offspring were included in the analysis; of these 11 986 (3.2%) were twins and 357 492 (96.8%) were singletons. Twins were more likely to be delivered preterm (odds ratio = 17.65, 95% CI: 16.74-18.60), by cesarean delivery and following infertility treatments. Incidence of hospitalizations with all morbidity groups was slightly, some significantly, higher among twins, including cardiac: 1.9% versus 1.5%, respiratory; 8.4% versus 7.1%, neurological: 7.7% versus 7.4%, infectious: 26.0% versus 24.1%, and malignancies: 0.7% versus 0.4%. The risk remained higher in the multivariable analyses (adjusted hazard ratios ranging between 1.09-1.75). When stratifying by gestational age at delivery, the risk for most morbidities was lower among twins versus singletons born in similar gestational ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Twins as compared to singletons are at increased risk for most morbidities due to their risk of being born earlier.

Impact of Gestational Diabetes and Hypertension Disorders of Pregnancy on Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the co-existence of gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertension disorders of pregnancy (HDP) on neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies based on chorionicity.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 1398 women with twin pregnancies was performed between January 2016 and December 2021. The effects of GDM and HDP on neonatal outcomes were assessed by logistic regression models. An additional stratified analysis was conducted to estimate the effects based on chorionicity (monochorionic (MC) and dichorionic (DC)).

RESULTS

The incidence of the co-existence of GDM and HDP was 3.8%. The presence of GDM increased the likelihood of HDP only in women with MC twin pregnancies (OR, 2.13; 95% CI 1.08-4.19). After adjustments, co-existence of GDM and HDP was positively associated with gestational age (β, 1.06; 95% CI 0.43-1.69) and birthweight (β, 174.90; 95% CI 8.91-340.89) in MC twin pregnancies, while no associations were found between co-existence of GDM and HDP and neonatal outcomes in DC twin pregnancies. However, HDP was negatively associated with birthweight (β, -156.97; 95% CI (-257.92, -56.02)) and positively associated with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI 1.02-4.03) and discordant twins (OR, 2.83; 95% CI 1.78-4.48) in DC twin pregnant women without GDM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that GDM leads to an increased risk of HDP only in MC twin pregnancies, but GDM seemed to attenuate the adverse effects of HDP on perinatal outcomes in both MC and DC twin pregnancies. Further investigation is needed to explain these intriguing findings.

Comparing the course and delivery outcomes of Japanese twin pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus: a single-center retrospective analysis

Singleton pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Multiple pregnancies are associated with increased risks of perinatal complications; however, the impact of GDM on maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies is unknown, and there are currently few reports on GDM status in twin pregnancies. This study aimed to compare the background and perinatal outcomes between Japanese twin pregnancies with and without GDM at a perinatal center in Japan. Additionally, the clinical course of GDM was investigated. In this retrospective cohort study, women with twin pregnancies underwent GDM screening at Yokohama City University Medical Center from January 2011 to December 2016. Overall, 307 twin pregnancies were divided into GDM (47 cases, 15.3%) and non-GDM (260 cases, 84.7%) groups. GDM-associated pregnancy complications, GDM status, and pregnancy outcomes were ascertained. Women with GDM were older and had a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index than those without GDM. Glycemic control was good in all patients, and there was no difference in delivery outcomes between the two groups. Gestational weight gain was lower in pregnant women with GDM (+8.0 kg) than in those without GDM (+11.8 kg), suggesting the impact of strict nutritional guidance on twin pregnancies with GDM. In conclusion, twin pregnancies with GDM did not have different delivery outcomes compared to those without GDM. To manage twin pregnancies with GDM, this study suggests that it is important to monitor patients' weight and blood glucose levels.

The effect of maternal gestational diabetes on maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diabetes and twin pregnancies are known risk factors for poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. However, the effects of these two entities occurring together are still unclear. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched in a systematic manner to identify observational studies among twin pregnancies, which documented the association of gestational diabetes with maternal and neonatal outcomes. All the analysis was done using STATA software. The meta-analysis included 21 studies, of which majority were retrospective data based. Mothers with gestational diabetes had higher risks of hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, caesarean section, large for gestational age baby, NICU admission and neonatal hypoglycaemia compared to mothers without gestational diabetes. Diabetic mothers were at reduced risk of small for gestational age baby and low APGAR score. No statistically significant differences in the risk of low birth weight, mean birth weight, prematurity and neonatal death were noted. This meta-analysis observed increased risks of detrimental maternal, neonatal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes, underscoring the need for the early detection and management of gestational diabetes.

Gestational diabetes in twin pregnancy: A predictor of adverse fetomaternal outcomes?

AIM

To compare fetomaternal outcomes between GDM pregnant women with twin versus singleton pregnancies and then between women with GDM versus non-GDM twin pregnancies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including GDM pregnant women with both twin and singleton pregnancies followed in our tertiary center between 2011 and 2018. The fetomaternal characteristics of each group were compared. We then compared women with GDM twin pregnancy followed at our institution between 2011 and 2018 to non-GDM twin pregnant women giving childbirth in 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 1127 GDM pregnant women were evaluated: 42 with twin pregnancy and 1085 with singleton pregnancy. Preeclampsia (14.3% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) and cesarean delivery (76.2% vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001) were more frequent among women with twin pregnancy. Neonatal morbidity was also more common among neonates delivered from twin pregnant women, including preterm labor (73.8% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001), hypoglycemia (6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.043), hyperbilirubinemia (33.3% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001), RDS (28.6% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), admission in NICU (32.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001) and SGA (19.0% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.001). Overall there were no significant differences in fetomaternal morbidity parameters between GDM (n = 42) versus non-GDM (n = 83) twin pregnancies, although SGA infants were more frequent in the latter group (33.9% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In GDM pregnant women, twin pregnancy seems to be associated with an increased prevalence of neonatal morbidity when compared to singleton pregnancy. On the other hand, in twin pregnancy, diagnosis of GDM does not seem to be associated with poorer fetomaternal outcomes. GDM seems to be protective for the occurrence of SGA neonates in twin pregnancies.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies according to changes in its diagnostic criteria from National Diabetes Data Group criteria to Carpenter and Coustan criteria: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with or without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before and after changes in GDM diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,764 twin pregnancies including 130 women with GDM (GDM group) and 1,634 women without GDM (non-GDM group). Patients with pregestational diabetes, unknown GDM status, and fetal death at < 24 gestational weeks were excluded. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups by two periods: period 1 (1995-2005) and period 2 (2005-2018) when National Diabetes Data Group criteria and Carpenter and Coustan criteria were used for diagnosis of GDM, respectively.

RESULTS

The incidence of GDM in twin pregnancies increased from 4.0% in period 1 to 9.3% in period 2. Composite obstetric complications rate was significantly higher in the GDM group than that in the non-GDM group during period 1 (72.0% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.009). However, it became comparable during period 2 (60.0% vs. 57.4%, P = 0.601). Interaction between GDM and period indicated a significant differential effect of GDM by period on the rate of composite obstetric complications. The rate of composite neonatal complications was similar between the two groups during both periods. The interaction between GDM and period was not significant.

CONCLUSION

After changes of GDM diagnostic criteria, the incidence of GDM increased more than twice, and the rate of composite obstetric complications decreased, but the rate of composite neonatal complications did not change significantly.

Gestational diabetes and fetal growth in twin compared with singleton pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with accelerated fetal growth in singleton pregnancies but may affect twin pregnancies differently because of the slower growth of twin fetuses during the third trimester of pregnancy and their greater predisposition to fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with longitudinal fetal growth in twin pregnancies and to compare this association with that observed in singleton pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton or twin pregnancy who were followed up at a single tertiary referral center between January 2011 and April 2020. Data on estimated fetal weight and individual fetal biometric indices were extracted from ultrasound examinations of eligible women. Generalized linear models were used to model and compare the change in fetal weight and individual biometric indices as a function of gestational age between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies and between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies. The primary outcome was estimated fetal weight as a function of gestational age. The secondary outcomes were longitudinal growth of individual fetal biometric indices and the rate of small for gestational age and large for gestational age at birth.

RESULTS

A total of 26,651 women (94,437 ultrasound examinations) were included in the analysis: 1881 with a twin pregnancy and 24,770 with a singleton pregnancy. The rate of gestational diabetes mellitus in the twin and singleton groups was 9.6% (n=180) and 7.6% (n=1893), respectively. The estimated fetal weight in singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was significantly higher than that in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus (P<.001) starting at approximately 30 weeks of gestation. The differences remained similar after adjusting for maternal age, chronic hypertension, nulliparity, and neonatal sex (P<.001). In twin pregnancies, fetal growth was similar between pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (P=.105 and P=.483 for unadjusted and adjusted models, respectively). The findings were similar to the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with the risk of large for gestational fetuses and the growth of each biometric index. When stratified by type of gestational diabetes mellitus treatment, twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with accelerated fetal growth only in the subgroup of women with medically treated gestational diabetes mellitus (P<.001), which represented 12% (n=21) of the twin pregnancy group with gestational diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to singleton pregnancies, twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus is less likely to be associated with accelerated fetal growth. This finding has raised the question of whether the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus and the blood glucose targets in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus should be individualized for twin pregnancies.

Risk factors and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes for women with dichorionic twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cross-sectional study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

The association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies remains unclear. This study was undertaken to highlight risk factors for GDM in women with dichorionic (DC) twins, and to determine the association between GDM DC twins and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in a large homogeneous Taiwanese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 645 women with DC twins, excluding pregnancies complicated by one or both fetuses with demise (n = 22) or congenital anomalies (n = 9), who gave birth after 28 complete gestational weeks between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018. Univariable and multiple logistic regression analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Maternal age >34 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval 1.25-5.07) and pre-pregnancy body mass index >24.9 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.47-5.46) were independent risk factors for GDM in women with DC twins. Newborns from women with GDM DC twins were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.72) than newborns from women with non-GDM DC twins. Other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced maternal age and pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity are risk factors for GDM in women with DC twins. Except for a nearly twofold increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission of newborns, the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes for women with GDM DC twins are similar to those for women with non-GDM DC twins.

Perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes in singleton pregnancies increases the risk for large for gestational age infants, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and neonatal morbidity. Compared with singleton gestations, twin gestations are at increased risk for fetal growth abnormalities, hypertensive disorders, and neonatal morbidity. Whether gestational diabetes further increases the risk for these outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the relationship between gestational diabetes and the risk for preeclampsia, fetal growth abnormalities, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions in a large cohort of women with twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a retrospective cohort of all twin gestations that were delivered at our institution from 1998 to 2013. We excluded pregnancies delivered before 24 weeks' gestation, monochorionic-monoamniotic twins, and patients with preexisting diabetes for a final cohort of 2573 twin deliveries. Gestational diabetes was defined as 2 abnormal values on a 100 g, 3-hour glucose challenge test as defined by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria or a 1-hour value of 200 mg/dL after a 50 g glucose test. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the associations between gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, small for gestational age infants, large for gestational age infants, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit after adjusting for prepregnancy body mass index, maternal race, maternal age, parity, use of in vitro fertilization, prepregnancy smoking status, and chronic hypertension as confounders.

RESULTS

The unadjusted incidence of gestational diabetes was 6.5% (n=167). Women with gestational diabetes were more likely to be aged 35 years or older, living with obesity, and have conceived via in vitro fertilization than women without gestational diabetes. Preeclampsia was more common among women with twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes (31%) than among women with twin pregnancies without gestational diabetes (18%) (adjusted risk ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.1). A diagnosis of small for gestational age infant was less common among women with gestational diabetes (17%) than among women without gestational diabetes (24%), although the results were imprecise (adjusted risk ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.1). There was no association between gestational diabetes and the incidence of large for gestational age neonates or neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Among women with gestational diabetes who reached 35 weeks' gestation, 62% (n=60) required medical management.

CONCLUSION

Gestational diabetes is a risk factor for preeclampsia among women with twin pregnancies. Close blood pressure monitoring and patient education are critical for this high-risk group. The association between gestational diabetes and neonatal outcomes among women with twin pregnancies is less precise, although it may reduce the incidence of small for gestational age infants. Prospective studies to determine if glycemic control decreases the risk for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes are needed.

Trends in Prevalence of Diabetes among Twin Pregnancies and Perinatal Outcomes in Catalonia between 2006 and 2015: The DIAGESTCAT Study

The aims of our study were to evaluate the trends in the prevalence of diabetes among twin pregnancies in Catalonia, Spain between 2006 and 2015, to assess the influence of diabetes on perinatal outcomes of twin gestations and to ascertain the interaction between twin pregnancies and glycaemic status. A population-based study was conducted using the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set. Cases of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pre-existing diabetes were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. Data from 743,762 singleton and 15,956 twin deliveries between 2006 and 2015 in Catalonia was analysed. Among twin pregnancies, 1088 (6.82%) were diagnosed with GDM and 83 (0.52%) had pre-existing diabetes. The prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies increased from 6.01% in 2006 to 8.48% in 2015 (p < 0.001) and the prevalence of pre-existing diabetes remained stable (from 0.46% to 0.27%, p = 0.416). The risk of pre-eclampsia was higher in pre-existing diabetes (15.66%, p = 0.015) and GDM (11.39%, p < 0.001) than in normoglycaemic twin pregnancies (7.55%). Pre-existing diabetes increased the risk of prematurity (69.62% vs. 51.84%, p = 0.002) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (20.9% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.001) in twin gestations. An attenuating effect on several adverse perinatal outcomes was found between twin pregnancies and the presence of GDM and pre-existing diabetes. As a result, unlike in singleton pregnancies, diabetes did not increase the risk of all perinatal outcomes in twins and the effect of pre-existing diabetes on pre-eclampsia and LGA appeared to be attenuated. In conclusion, prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies increased over the study period. Diabetes was associated with a higher risk of pre-eclampsia, prematurity and LGA in twin gestations. However, the impact of both, pre-existing diabetes and GDM, on twin pregnancy outcomes was attenuated when compared with its impact on singleton gestations.

Perinatal outcomes and offspring growth profiles in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: A longitudinal cohort study

AIMS

To evaluate the influence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies and its impact on fetal growth profiles of twin offspring from 6 weeks to 12 months of corrected age.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted among pregnant women with twins and their twin offspring. All information on perinatal outcomes and child growth trajectories from 6 weeks to 12 months of corrected age were obtained and analyzed using a general linear model and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

GDM was not correlated with adverse perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies; however, in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA), but not dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies, GDM was correlated with gestational hypertension disorder and a fetus being small for gestational age (OR, 2.68; 95% CI 1.16-6.04 and OR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.76, respectively). In both MCDA and DCDA groups, GDM was positively associated with a higher risk of childhood overweight at 6 months of corrected age (2.32 [1.05, 5.09] and 2.00 [1.13, 3.53]).

CONCLUSIONS

GDM had a greater impact on MCDA twin pregnancies in terms of maternal gestational hypertension disease and small for gestational age of newborns. Additionally, twin offspring exposed to GDM had a higher risk of being overweight at 6 months of corrected age irrespective of chorionicity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-OOC-16008203.

Burden, associated risk factors and adverse outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies in Al Ain, UAE

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in singleton pregnancies represent a high-risk scenario. The incidence, associated factors and outcomes of GDM in twin pregnancies is not known in the UAE.

Methods

This was five years retrospective analysis of hospital records of twin pregnancies in the city of Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Relevant data with regards to the pregnancy, maternal and birth outcomes and incidence of GDM was extracted from two major hospitals in the city. Regression models assessed the relationship between socio-demographic and pregnancy-related variables and GDM, and the associations between GDM and maternal and fetal outcomes at birth.

Results

A total of 404 women and their neonates were part of this study. The study population had a mean age of 30.1 (SD: 5.3), overweight or obese (66.5%) and were majority multiparous (66.6%). High incidence of GDM in twin pregnancies (27.0%). While there were no statistical differences in outcomes of the neonates, GDM mothers were older (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06–1.4) and heavier (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00 -1.04). They were also likely to have had GDM in their previous pregnancies (aOR: 7.37, 95% CI: 2.76–19.73). The prognosis of mothers with twin pregnancies and GDM lead to an independent and increased odds of cesarean section (aOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.03–5.30) and hospitalization during pregnancy (aOR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.16–2.20).

Conclusion

More than a quarter of women with twin pregnancies were diagnosed with GDM. GDM was associated with some adverse pregnancy outcomes but not fetal outcomes in this population. More studies are needed to further investigate these associations and the management of GDM in twin pregnancies.

The Association between Glucose Levels and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Nondiabetic Twin Pregnancies

Objective  The aim of this study is to determine if hyperglycemia in twin pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design  Retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies in a single Maternal-Fetal Medicine practice between 2005 and 2019 who underwent two-step GDM screening at 24 to 28 weeks. We excluded women with pregestational or gestational diabetes. We examined the association between maternal glycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Glycemia was defined as the 1-hour GCT in all women, and each of the four values of the 3-hour OGTT in women who failed the GCT (≥130 mg/dL). Primary outcomes were preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and neonatal hypoglycemia in either twin. Statistical tests used included Pearson's correlation, Student's t -test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test for trend, and logistic regression. Results  A total of 847 women underwent a GCT and 246 women underwent an OGTT. Increasing maternal glucose levels had no positive association with adverse outcomes. Women with preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and neonatal hypoglycemia did not have higher mean GCT or OGTT values than women without these outcomes. There was no increased risk of adverse outcomes with increasing quartiles of the GCT or OGTT values. Conclusion  In women with twin pregnancies without GDM, elevated maternal glucose levels are not associated with preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, or neonatal hypoglycemia. The altered physiology of twin gestations may modify the effect of maternal hyperglycemia on perinatal outcomes as compared with singleton pregnancies. Current approaches to screening for and treating GDM during pregnancy might not adequately account for these unique considerations among twins.

Long-term risk for maternal cardiovascular morbidities in twin pregnancies complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus - a retrospective cohort study†

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) results in an increased risk for maternal and neonatal complications in singletons. In twin pregnancies, however, scarce data exist regarding its implications.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a diagnosis of GDM in twin gestation poses a risk for subsequent maternal long-term cardiovascular morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN

A population-based cohort study was conducted, comparing the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity within a group of women with and without a diagnosis of GDM who delivered twins in a tertiary medical center, between the years 1991 and 2014. Mothers with pregestational diabetes mellitus, triplet or higher-order multiples, patients lacking prenatal care, patients with known cardiovascular morbidities prior to or during the current pregnancy and fetal malformations or/and chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. Kaplan-Meier's survival curve was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the adjusted HRs for cardiovascular morbidity.

RESULTS

Of 4256 twin deliveries that met the inclusion criteria, 336 (7.9%) occurred in patients that were diagnosed with GDM. During a follow-up period of more than 10 years, with a median of 3431 (0-9172) days in total, patients with GDM had higher rates of simple cardiovascular events as compared to women without diagnosis of GDM (incidence = 7, 2.1%. OR = 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-6.12, p = .03). Total cardiovascular hospitalizations were comparable between the groups. There was no difference between the two groups in the rate of complex cardiovascular events, noninvasive or invasive cardiac diagnostic procedures. In a Cox proportional hazards model, which is adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, hypertensive disorders, and fertility treatments, GDM in twin pregnancies was not found to be associated with long-term cardiovascular morbidity (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.77-2.58, p = .26).

CONCLUSIONS

While GDM during twin pregnancy might be associated with long-term maternal simple cardiovascular events, the complex, as well as the total morbidities, are comparable to patients without GDM.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin gestations complicated by gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;34:720-724. [PMID: 31096815 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1614160]

Objective: Gestational diabetes (GDM) in singleton pregnancies is known to be associated with an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The data are mixed regarding the effect of GDM on the risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin gestations. The objective of our study was to assess the rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin gestations complicated by GDM.Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial in which twin gestations were assigned to weekly intramuscular injections of progesterone in order to reduce the rate of preterm birth. We included all twin pregnancies with and without GDM. Women with pregestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, twin pregnancies complicated by twin to twin transfusion syndrome and congenital fetal anomalies were excluded. Our primary outcome was the rate of hypertensive disorders in twin pregnancies complicated by GDM. Our secondary outcomes included the rate of cesarean section, number of neonates who were small for gestational age, Apgar scores, and a composite adverse neonatal outcome. Logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding variables.Results: Six hundred fourteen twin pregnancies were included, 570 (93%) without GDM and 44 (7%) with GDM. The group with GDM had a significantly higher prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and maternal age, and were more likely to have undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF). The rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the GDM group was significantly higher when compared to the non-GDM group (31.8 versus 17.9%, p = .033, RR 1.78 [95% CI = 1.11-2.84]); however, after adjusting for maternal age, IVF treatment and prepregnancy BMI, this association lost its statistical significance (aRR = 1.36 [95% CI = 0.83-2.21]). The cesarean section rate was higher in the GDM group as compared to the non-GDM group and after adjusting for confounders, the rate of cesarean section was still higher in the GDM group (77.3 versus 61.1%, p = .003, aRR = 1.27 [95% CI = 1.06-1.50]). Neonates born to women in the GDM group were more likely to experience the adverse composite outcome (26.4 versus 8.2%, p = 0.02, RR = 1.81 [95% CI = 1.09-2.99]).Conclusion: In this prospective cohort of twin pregnancies, the rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy did not differ between women with and without gestational diabetes after adjusting for maternal age, IVF treatment, race, and prepregnancy BMI. To better target complications associated with GDM in twin gestations, large prospective studies evaluating the effect of GDM on outcomes specifically in twin pregnancies are warranted.

Does Gestational Diabetes Cause Additional Risk in Twin Pregnancy?

It has been suggested that the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies is exacerbated by concomitant gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to assess the risk incurred by twin pregnancy and by a diagnosis of GDM, separately, on the development of poor perinatal outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all pregnant women at a tertiary center between 2016 and 2017. The impact of GDM and twin pregnancies on perinatal outcomes — birth weight above the 90th centile for gestational age, cesarean delivery, clinical neonatal hypoglycemia, and premature delivery (before 37 weeks’ gestation) — was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, 13,527 women were eligible for the study; 11,915 were uncomplicated singleton pregnancies; 1379 of these had GDM; 194 were twin pregnancies, and 39 of these had GDM. Univariate analyses showed that twin pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of all perinatal outcomes except macrosomia. In the multivariate analyses, twin pregnancy was a much higher predictor of cesarean delivery (OR 8.40, 95% CI [6.25, 11.49], p < .0001) and preterm birth (OR 58.82, 95% CI [31.25, 125], p < .0001) compared to GDM but GDM was a higher predictor of neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 4.87, 95% CI [3.74, 6.29], p < .0001). Twin pregnancy is more strongly associated with all adverse perinatal outcomes except macrosomia. GDM does not increase risk of adverse perinatal outcomes except for neonatal hypoglycemia.

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Among singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse outcomes. In twin pregnancies, this association may be attenuated, given the higher rate of prematurity and the a priori increased risk of some of these complications.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to test the hypothesis that gestational diabetes mellitus is less likely to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin compared with singleton gestations.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study comprised all twin and singleton live births in Ontario, Canada, 2012-2016. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between women with vs without gestational diabetes mellitus, analyzed separately for twin and singleton births. Adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were generated using modified Poisson regression, adjusting for maternal age, nulliparity, smoking, race, body mass index, preexisting hypertension, and assisted reproductive technology.

RESULTS

A total of 270,843 women with singleton (n = 266,942) and twin (n = 3901) pregnancies met the inclusion criteria. In both the twin and singleton groups, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with (adjusted risk ratio, [95% confidence interval]) cesarean delivery (1.11 [1.02-1.21] and 1.20 [1.17-1.23], respectively) and preterm birth at <37^0/7 weeks (1.21 [1.08-1.37] and 1.48 [1.39-1.57]) and at <34^0/7 weeks (1.45 [1.03-2.04] and 1.25 [1.06-1.47]). In singletons, but not twins, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with gestational hypertension (1.66 [1.55-1.77]) and preeclampsia. With respect to neonatal outcomes, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with birthweight greater than the 90th percentile in both twins and singletons, with the risk being 2-fold higher in twins (2.53 [1.52-4.23] vs 1.18 [1.13-1.23], respectively, P = .004). Gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with jaundice in both twins (1.56 [1.10-2.21]) and singletons (1.49 [1.37-1.62) but was associated with the following complications only in singletons: neonatal intensive care unit admission (1.44 [1.38-1.50]), respiratory morbidity (1.09 [1.02-1.16]), and neonatal hypoglycemia (3.20 [3.01-3.40]).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus in twins was not associated with hypertensive complications and certain neonatal morbidities. Still, the current study highlights that gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with some adverse pregnancy outcomes including accelerated fetal growth also in twin pregnancies.

Incidence and risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in twin versus singleton pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence and risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) between women with twin and singleton pregnancies.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all women who had a twin or singleton birth in Ontario (2012-2016). Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs for GDM (stratified by type of treatment) were adjusted for relevant confounding variables. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for GDM in twin and singleton gestations.

RESULTS

Of 270,843 women who met inclusion criteria, 266,942 (98.6%) and 3901 (1.4%) had a singleton and a twin pregnancy, respectively. Women with twins had a significantly higher risk for overall GDM (aRR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.28) and diet-treated GDM (aRR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42) while the association with insulin-treated GDM was not significant (aRR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.89-1.28). Maternal age ≥ 35 years, non-Caucasian ethnicity and BMI > 30 kg/m² were independent risk factors for GDM among women with twins and singletons, and the magnitude of the association of these factors with GDM was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with twins are at increased risk of GDM, mainly due to a higher rate of diet-treated GDM. Despite higher baseline risk of GDM in women with twins, the effect of known risk factors for GDM is similar to that observed in singletons.

Outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in singleton pregnancy is associated with large for gestational age neonates and adverse perinatal outcomes; however, the impact of GDM in twin pregnancy is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by GDM by performing a meta-analysis of observational studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Studies investigating GDM in twin pregnancy were identified through an online search of three databases: Medline, Embase and Web of Science. Selection criteria comprised full paper observational studies (retrospective or prospective) published in English that examined GDM in twin pregnancy compared with non-GDM twin pregnancy and reported on birth weight and/or adverse perinatal outcomes. Random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting were used to calculate standardized mean differences and unadjusted odds ratios. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine the impact of possible maternal confounders (body mass index and age) and GDM diagnostic criteria on perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen observational studies were included. GDM twins were born at the same gestation as non-GDM twins, with marginally lower birth weight. There was no difference in the incidence of large or small for gestational age neonates. Although there was no correlation between GDM in twin pregnancy and respiratory distress, neonatal hypoglycemic or low Apgar score, GDM twins had a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 1.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.10, 2.02; P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Identification and subsequent treatment of GDM in twin pregnancy demonstrates a similar risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with non-GDM twin pregnancies.

Twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a single centre cohort study

AIMS

In women with a twin pregnancy, to determine the incidence of, risk factors for and outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus, and assess how these have changed with a change in gestational diabetes screening.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of women with a twin pregnancy attending an Australian tertiary hospital, 2002-2013. Information on gestational diabetes status, gestational diabetes risk factors and pregnancy outcomes was ascertained. Pregnancy outcomes included hypertensive disorders, twin birthweight centile and a composite adverse pregnancy outcome. Analysis was stratified pre/post screening protocol change (epoch 1: 2002-2009, epoch 2: 2010-2013) and by gestational diabetes status.

RESULTS

Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 86/982 (8.8%) women, increasing from 4.4% to 14.7% between epochs (P = 0.0001). The proportion of women with hypertensive disorders increased (11.7% vs. 13.4%, P = 0.009), but the proportion of infant's birthweight > 90th centile decreased (11.0% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.02) between epochs. Overall, 33.6% of women had ≥ 1 risk factors for gestational diabetes. Three-quarters (73.7%) of women overall had an adverse pregnancy outcome, with a slightly higher proportion in women with gestational diabetes compared with those with no gestational diabetes (79.7% vs. 73.1%, P = 0.06). The rate of the adverse pregnancy outcome did not change by epoch, after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy risk factors (adjusted odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 1 in 10 women with a twin pregnancy were diagnosed with gestational diabetes, with the incidence of gestational diabetes increasing threefold with a new screening protocol. The pregnancy outcomes of women with a twin pregnancy did not change with increased detection and treatment for gestational diabetes.

Does gestational diabetes affect fetal growth and pregnancy outcome in twin pregnancies?

BACKGROUND

Women with twin pregnancies are at increased risk for fetal growth restriction, which might be attributed to the limited maternal resources that are being shared by >1 fetus. Based on that, it may be hypothesized that the fetal effects of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with respect to accelerated fetal growth may be less pronounced in twin gestations or alternatively may even have a beneficial role in decreasing the risk of fetal growth restriction in these pregnancies. However, available data are conflicting and are limited by the fact that many of the complications associated with GDM are less relevant for twin gestations, and that all women with GDM included in previous studies were monitored and treated to control maternal blood glucose levels.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the impact of GDM and milder degrees of glucose intolerance on fetal growth and pregnancy outcome in twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with twin pregnancies who underwent screening for GDM in a single tertiary referral center from October 2003 through December 2014. The diagnosis of GDM during the study period was based on the 2008 Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines, which involve universal screening with a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) followed by a diagnostic 2-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Fetal growth and pregnancy outcome were compared among 4 groups of women with increasing degree of glucose intolerance: (1) GCT-NEGATIVE, negative 50-g GCT; (2) OGTT-NEGATIVE, positive 50-g GCT followed by a negative 75-g OGTT; (3) GDM-IADPSG, positive 50-g GCT followed by a positive 75-g OGTT according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria but not the 2008 CDA criteria-because these women were not considered to have GDM during the study period they were not subjected to any form of treatment; and (4) GDM-CDA, positive 50-g GCT followed by a positive 75-g OGTT according to the 2008 CDA criteria.

RESULTS

Overall 1393 women were eligible for the study: 1021 (73.3%) in the GCT-NEGATIVE group, 184 (13.2%) in the OGTT-NEGATIVE group, 99 (7.1%) in the GDM-IADPSG group, and 89 (6.4%) in the GDM-CDA group. There was a continuous relationship between the degree of glucose intolerance and fetal growth as reflected by a right shift of the distribution curve of birthweight percentiles and a greater likelihood of high birthweight percentile: OGTT-NEGATIVE = odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.2; GDM-IADPSG = OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6; and GDM-CDA = OR, 1.9, 95% CI, 1.3-3.1 (using the GCT-NEGATIVE group as reference). Fetuses of women with glucose intolerance were more likely to experience asymmetric growth as reflected by an elevated abdominal circumference to head circumference ratio.

CONCLUSION

GDM and milder degrees of glucose intolerance in twin pregnancies are associated with an increased risk of asymmetric overgrowth in a manner that is related to the degree of glucose intolerance.

Pregestational diabetes is associated with adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies: a regional register-based study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of pregnancies complicated by twinning and diabetes is increasing in the UK. This is a worrying trend as both diabetes and twin gestations are associated with a high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The few studies that have specifically addressed how twinning and pregestational diabetes in the same pregnancy may affect outcome have reported conflicting results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed data on 27 women with a twin pregnancy and pregestational diabetes (54 babies) and 6407 women with a twin pregnancy without diabetes (12 814 babies) from the Northern Survey of Twin and Multiple Pregnancy during 1998-2010. A composite adverse pregnancy outcome (comprising fetal loss before 24 weeks, termination of pregnancy, stillbirth, infant death or any major congenital anomaly), extended perinatal mortality (stillbirths and neonatal deaths) and major congenital anomaly were the main outcome measures. Adjusted rate ratios were estimated using generalized estimating equations for Poisson regression controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Mothers with twin pregnancies with diabetes were older (p = 0.001) and had higher body mass indices (p < 0.0001) than those without diabetes. Their twins were more likely to be delivered earlier (p = 0.026), be delivered by cesarean section (80.4% vs. 49.7%; p < 0.0001), be large-for-gestational-age (p < 0.0001) and require admission to a special care baby unit (p < 0.0001). Pregestational diabetes was associated with significantly increased rates of the composite adverse outcome and major congenital anomalies in twins (adjusted rate ratios 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.14-6.20 and adjusted rate ratios 3.51, 95% confidence interval 1.31-9.40, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Maternal pregestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is associated with a significantly increased risk of an adverse pregnancy outcome.

Outcomes of singleton and twin pregnancies complicated by pre-existing diabetes and gestational diabetes: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada, 2005-11

BACKGROUND

We assessed the prevalence and pregnancy outcomes of pre-existing diabetes mellitus (pre-DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Alberta, Canada, 2005-11.

METHODS

327 198 singleton and 5552 twin pregnancies resulting in live births or stillbirths were included. The odds ratios of adverse outcomes were evaluated comparing pre-DM with no diabetes and GDM with no diabetes, controlling for maternal characteristics.

RESULTS

Diabetes complicated 6.3% of pregnancies, with 88% being GDM. In singleton pregnancies, pre-DM and GDM were associated with increased risks of pre-eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.38 and 1.83, respectively), cesarean delivery (aOR 2.53, 1.55), spontaneous preterm (aOR 4.20, 1.71), and labor-induced preterm (aOR 3.82, 2.00) in the mother, and macrosomia (aOR 2.11, 1.30), shoulder dystocia (aOR 1.54, 1.32), congenital anomalies (aOR 1.61, 1.20), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (aOR 3.81, 1.60) in the infants. In addition, pre-DM was associated with an increased likelihood of stillbirth (aOR 3.73) and neonatal death (aOR 2.00) compared with non-diabetic pregnancies. In twin pregnancies, pre-DM was associated with increased risks of spontaneous (aOR 3.54) and labor-induced (aOR 3.57) preterm births, large for gestational age (LGA) infants (aOR 3.73), congenital anomalies (aOR 3.05) and NICU admissions (aOR 2.91); GDM was associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia (aOR 1.54), cesarean delivery (aOR 1.57), and LGA infants (aOR 1.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-existing diabetes confers higher risks than GDM. Diabetes is associated with adverse outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies, and the increased risks are generally similar or less in twins, probably due to their higher "baseline" risks and closer clinical monitoring.