Use of oral contraceptives in BRCA mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review

Assessment of knowledge and awareness about ovarian cancer and its risk factors among women in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fourth leading cancer form in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. However, limited awareness and delayed healthcare-seeking behaviors might negatively impact screening uptake and early diagnosis. This study aimed to assess awareness and knowledge of OC, and related risk factors among the female population of Jazan region, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted asking questions about the general awareness, knowledge, and awareness of risk factors associated with OC using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Pearson's correlation analysis were used to analyze the data and a p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 465 participants, 433 completed the questionnaire (response rate = 93%). Internal reliability of questionnaire sections was found acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.794, 0.738, and 0.816). Alarmingly, a significant majority of respondents exhibited poor general awareness (85%), poor knowledge (89.1%), and poor awareness of risk factors (86.1%). Only a small tested population showed good to moderate awareness (14.9%), knowledge (10.9%), and awareness of risk factors (13.8%). Significant positive correlations were observed between OC awareness and knowledge (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), OC awareness and risk factor awareness (r = 0.515, p < 0.01), as well as between knowledge and risk factor awareness (r = 0.634, p < 0.01). Limited awareness of OC and its risk factors were noted in the women population of Jazan region which highlights the importance and critical need for targeted educational initiatives aimed to improve the general public understanding and to promote preventive and screening measures.

Estrogens and breast cancer

Estrogens have been associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. Yet emerging clinical and experimental evidence points to progestogens [endogenous progesterone or synthetic progesterone (progestin)] as the primary hormonal driver underlying seemingly estrogen-associated breast cancer risk. Estrogens may contribute to breast cancer risk indirectly by induction of the progesterone receptor and thus amplifying progesterone signaling. Large studies of hormonal contraceptives suggest that the small increase in breast cancer risk from hormonal contraceptives is mainly attributable to progestins, not estrogens. Estrogen-plus-progestin hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has consistently shown an increase in breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women, whereas estrogen-alone HRT has little impact on breast cancer risk in naturally or surgically menopausal women. In particular, the long-term follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trials suggests a benefit of estrogen alone. Recent data further indicate that endogenously elevated estrogen during assisted reproductive technology (ART) exhibits little adverse effect on or potentially a reduction in breast cancer risk and recurrence. Also, accumulating evidence suggests that inhibition of progesterone signaling is a critical mechanism underlying the risk-reducing and therapeutic effects of antiestrogens. Estrogen HRT has shown an array of proven benefits, including ameliorating menopausal symptoms and improving bone health. Collective evidence thus suggests that estrogen HRT is likely to offer health benefits to perimenopausal or postmenopausal women, including breast cancer survivors, as well as young BRCA1/2 carriers with prophylactic oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.

Current Science and Practice of Surgical and Nonsurgical Opportunities for Ovarian Cancer Prevention

Due to improved understanding of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, we have an unprecedented chance to decrease the burden of disease by maximizing opportunities for prevention. Innovations in surgical options for prevention stem from the discovery that many cases directly or indirectly arise from the fallopian tube. Surgical prevention with salpingectomy alone decreases risk by ≥50%. Effective hormonal and nonhormonal chemopreventive agents are also available. Risk stratification is key to ensuring that options for prevention are appropriately matched to individual risk profile. This evidence-based review provides a critical appraisal of the translational health research endeavors supporting ovarian cancer prevention in clinical practice.

Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review

Background

Contraceptives play a crucial role in women's reproductive health, their hormonal components may be linked to cancer risks, specifically breast, and gynecological cancers. Given the high usage rates of hormonal contraceptives, it is vital to systematically evaluate their potential impact on cancer outcomes, especially among women with a family history of gynecological cancers.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the evidence on the association between modern contraceptive use and the risk of breast and reproductive cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer) among women of reproductive age, to inform healthcare providers, women, and program managers about cancer outcomes related to contraceptive use.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in databases such as CINAHL, OVID Medline, EMBASE, and more from inception to February 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared cancer outcomes between contraceptive users and non-users. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analyses were conducted following predefined protocols. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses examined variations in contraceptive methods, doses, and duration.

Results

A total of 51 studies were included, comprising 2 RCTs and 49 observational studies. The review identified a significant reduction in ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence among contraceptive users. Hormonal contraceptive users had a 36% lower risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68), with specific reductions seen in combined oral contraceptive users (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68) and hormonal IUD users (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96). The rate ratio of cervical cancer was higher among non- users compared to hormonal contraceptive users when we pooled the results (1.28, 95% CI 1.21, 1.35). No significant association was found between contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among healthy women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06). However, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers using oral contraceptives showed a heightened risk of breast cancer (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15-1.67).

Conclusion

This systematic review highlights the protective effects of modern contraceptives against ovarian and endometrial cancers while identifying an increased risk of cervical. No significant breast cancer risk was found for healthy women, but BRCA1/2 mutation carriers faced increased risks. These findings underscore the need for personalized contraceptive counselling that considers cancer risk factors. Further research is needed to explore contraceptive impacts across different genetic profiles and dosing regimens.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Prospero (CRD42022332647).

The risk of endocrine interventions in carriers of a genetic predisposition for breast and gynecologic cancers: recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

To support doctors in counselling women with genetic predisposition for breast or gynecologic cancers on endocrine interventions.

METHODS

Evidence on the safety of endocrine interventions for fertility treatment, contraception, hormone replacement therapy after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) or treatment of symptoms during peri- and postmenopause was analysed for carriers of probably pathogenic and pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2-pV), in other breast and ovarian cancer genes and the Lynch Syndrome. Cancer risks were compared with data on risks for the general population.

RESULTS

Data on risk modulation of endocrine interventions in women with genetic predisposition is limited. Ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility treatment may be performed. Oral contraceptives should not be used to reduce ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2-pV carriers. Premenopausal BRCA1/2-pV carriers and carriers of pV in Lynch Syndrome genes should be offered hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after RRSO, to prevent diseases caused by estrogen deficiency.

CONCLUSION

Effect direction and strength of risk modulation by endocrine interventions is similar to the general population. Participation of individuals at risk in prospective registries is recommended.

Sexual Function in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) predisposes women to an increased risk mainly of breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. The aim of the study is to investigate whether being diagnosed with HBOC syndrome is itself a risk factor for sexual dysfunction.

METHODS

An ad hoc questionnaire, including baseline demographic and clinical data, and the Sexual Function Questionnaire 28 (SFQ28) were administered to HBOC female carriers (study group) and to a control group.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (1:1), we enrolled 202 women, 101 in the study group and 101 in the control group. In a multivariate analysis, we finally found that menopausal status was the only risk factor for a significant low score in the domains Desire (HR 0.66; CI95% 0.47-0.93; p = 0.017), Arousal (Lubrication) (HR 0.52; CI95% 0.34-0.80; p = 0.003), Arousal (Cognitive) (HR 0.64; CI95% 0.44-0.95; p = 0.027), and Orgasm (HR 0.33; CI95% (0.16-0.70; p = 0.004), independent of risk-reducing surgery for gynecological malignancy. Psycho-oncology support is a protective factor for the Enjoyment domain (HR 1.38; CI95% 1.05-1.81; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

HBOC syndrome itself does not affect SFQ28 domains, while menopausal status significantly influences sexual health, with potential mitigating effects of psycho-oncological support.

Ovarian Cancer Risk-Reduction and Screening in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Objective: To determine the utilization of risk-reducing strategies and screening protocols for ovarian cancer in female BRCA1/2 carriers. Methods: This study was a sub-analysis of female participants from a larger multicenter, cross-sectional survey of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers unaffected by cancer. The questionnaire was administered electronically via email at four institutions located in the northeast United States. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Results: The survey was completed by 104 female BRCA mutation carriers. BRCA subtypes included 54.3% BRCA2, 41.0% BRCA1, and 2.9% both. The age at which patients underwent genetic testing varied 21.2% were 18-24 years, 25.0% were 25-34 years, 29.8% were 35-44 years, and 24.0% were 45 years or older. Nearly, all respondents (97.1%) reported that a provider had discussed risk-reducing surgeries. Of the 79 females who underwent genetic testing before 45 years of age, 53.2% reported that a health care provider recommended taking combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) to reduce their risk of ovarian cancer, and, of these women, 88.1% chose to use them. COCs were offered at higher rates among women who were younger at the age of genetic testing (18-24: 86%, 25-34: 62%, 35-44: 23%; p < 0.0001). Approximately half (55.8%) of the respondents reported having been offered increased screening for possible early detection of ovarian cancer, of which 81.0% chose to undergo screening. The majority utilized a combination of transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 measurements. There were no differences observed in screening utilization based on BRCA mutation type. Conclusion: In our cohort of female BRCA mutation carriers, risk-reducing surgery was offered to almost all women, whereas only half were offered risk-reducing medication and/or increased screening. Further investigation is needed to identify barriers to the utilization of risk-reducing strategies among this high-risk population.

DNA Damage Responses in Tumors Are Not Proliferative Stimuli, but Rather They Are DNA Repair Actions Requiring Supportive Medical Care

BACKGROUND

In tumors, somatic mutagenesis presumably drives the DNA damage response (DDR) via altered regulatory pathways, increasing genomic instability and proliferative activity. These considerations led to the standard therapeutic strategy against cancer: the disruption of mutation-activated DNA repair pathways of tumors.

PURPOSE

Justifying that cancer cells are not enemies to be killed, but rather that they are ill human cells which have the remnants of physiologic regulatory pathways.

RESULTS

1. Genomic instability and cancer development may be originated from a flaw in estrogen signaling rather than excessive estrogen signaling; 2. Healthy cells with genomic instability exhibit somatic mutations, helping DNA restitution; 3. Somatic mutations in tumor cells aim for the restoration of DNA damage, rather than further genomic derangement; 4. In tumors, estrogen signaling drives the pathways of DNA stabilization, leading to apoptotic death; 5. In peritumoral cellular infiltration, the genomic damage of the tumor induces inflammatory cytokine secretion and increased estrogen synthesis. In the inflammatory cells, an increased growth factor receptor (GFR) signaling confers the unliganded activation of estrogen receptors (ERs); 6. In breast cancer cells responsive to genotoxic therapy, constitutive mutations help the upregulation of estrogen signaling and consequential apoptosis. In breast tumors non-responsive to genotoxic therapy, the possibilities for ER activation via either liganded or unliganded pathways are exhausted, leading to farther genomic instability and unrestrained proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the real character and behavior of human tumors at the molecular level suggests that we should learn the genome repairing methods of tumors and follow them by supportive therapy, rather than provoking additional genomic damages.

Involvement of Protease-Activated Receptor2 Pleckstrin Homology Binding Domain in Ovarian Cancer: Expression in Fallopian Tubes and Drug Design

Studying primordial events in cancer is pivotal for identifying predictive molecular indicators and for targeted intervention. While the involvement of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in cancer is growing, GPCR-based therapies are yet rare. Here, we demonstrate the overexpression of protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2), a GPCR member in the fallopian tubes (FTs) of high-risk BRCA carriers as compared to null in healthy tissues of FT. FTs, the origin of ovarian cancer, are known to express genes of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STICs), a precursor lesion of high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). PAR2 expression in FTs may serve as an early prediction sensor for ovarian cancer. We show now that knocking down Par2 inhibits ovarian cancer peritoneal dissemination in vivo, pointing to the central role of PAR2. Previously we identified pleckstrin homology (PH) binding domains within PAR1,2&4 as critical sites for cancer-growth. These motifs associate with PH-signal proteins via launching a discrete signaling network in cancer. Subsequently, we selected a compound from a library of backbone cyclic peptides generated toward the PAR PH binding motif, namely the lead compound, Pc(4-4). Pc(4-4) binds to the PAR PH binding domain and blocks the association of PH-signal proteins, such as Akt or Etk/Bmx with PAR2. It attenuates PAR2 oncogenic activity. The potent inhibitory function of Pc(4-4) is demonstrated via inhibition of ovarian cancer peritoneal spread in mice. While the detection of PAR2 may serve as a predictor for ovarian cancer, the novel Pc(4-4) compound may serve as a powerful medicament in STICs and ovarian cancer. This is the first demonstration of the involvement of PAR PH binding motif signaling in ovarian cancer and Pc(4-4) as a potential therapy treatment.

The causal relationship between ankylosing spondylitis and the risk of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential causal relationship between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We conducted analyses utilizing publicly available pooled statistical data sets from genomewide association studies (GWAS) involving individuals of European ancestry. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with AS and use them as instrumental variables to assess the causal relationship between AS and ovarian cancer. We employed three statistical methods for two-sample Mendelian randomization: inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger regression. Network MR Analysis revealed the mediating role of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 21 between ankylosing spondylitis and ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

From the GWAS on AS, we selected 23 instrumental SNPs that exhibited genome-wide significance. Our findings consistently demonstrated an association between AS and ovarian cancer using multiple statistical methods (IVW: odds ratio (OR) 1.147, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.022-1.287; weighted median estimator: OR 1.177, 95% CI 1.009-1.373; MR-Egger regression: OR 1.166, 95% CI 0.958-1.418). These results indicate a positive correlation, suggesting that AS is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Furthermore, there was no evidence to suggest that the observed causal effect between AS and the risk of osteoarthritis was influenced by genetic pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept = -0.0010644, P = 0.8433359). In addition, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 21 mediated 10.2% of the total effect size in the development of ankylosing spondylitis on ovarian cancer risk.

CONCLUSION

Our Mendelian randomization analysis provides strong evidence supporting a potential causal relationship between AS and ovarian cancer risk, with ankylosing spondylitis clearly associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 21 as a mediator involved in the occurrence and development of these two diseases.

Natural products derived from medicinal plants and microbes might act as a game-changer in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical studies

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent neoplasm among women. Genetic and environmental factors lead to BC development and on this basis, several preventive - screening and therapeutic interventions have been developed. Hormones, both in the form of endogenous hormonal signaling or hormonal contraceptives, play an important role in BC pathogenesis and progression. On top of these, breast microbiota includes both species with an immunomodulatory activity enhancing the host's response against cancer cells and species producing proinflammatory cytokines associated with BC development. Identification of novel multitargeted therapeutic agents with poly-pharmacological potential is a dire need to combat advanced and metastatic BC. A growing body of research has emphasized the potential of natural compounds derived from medicinal plants and microbial species as complementary BC treatment regimens, including dietary supplements and probiotics. In particular, extracts from plants such as Artemisia monosperma Delile, Origanum dayi Post, Urtica membranacea Poir. ex Savigny, Krameria lappacea (Dombey) Burdet & B.B. Simpson and metabolites extracted from microbes such as Deinococcus radiodurans and Streptomycetes strains as well as probiotics like Bacillus coagulans and Lactobacillus brevis MK05 have exhibited antitumor effects in the form of antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity, increase in tumors' chemosensitivity, antioxidant activity and modulation of BC - associated molecular pathways. Further, bioactive compounds like 3,3'-diindolylmethane, epigallocatechin gallate, genistein, rutin, resveratrol, lycopene, sulforaphane, silibinin, rosmarinic acid, and shikonin are of special interest for the researchers and clinicians because these natural agents have multimodal action and act via multiple ways in managing the BC and most of these agents are regularly available in our food and fruit diets. Evidence from clinical trials suggests that such products had major potential in enhancing the effectiveness of conventional antitumor agents and decreasing their side effects. We here provide a comprehensive review of the therapeutic effects and mechanistic underpinnings of medicinal plants and microbial metabolites in BC management. The future perspectives on the translation of these findings to the personalized treatment of BC are provided and discussed.

Risk-reducing surgery for individuals with cancer-predisposing germline pathogenic variants and no personal cancer history: a review of current UK guidelines

Identifying healthy carriers of germline pathogenic variants in high penetrance cancer susceptibility genes offers the potential for risk-reducing surgery. The NHS England National Genomic Test Directory offers germline and somatic testing to patients with certain cancers or rare and inherited diseases, or, in some cases, to their relatives. This review summarises current UK guidelines for risk-reducing surgical interventions available for individuals with no personal history of cancer, who are determined to carry germline pathogenic variants. An electronic literature search of NICE guidelines and PubMed citable articles was performed. NICE guidelines are available for bilateral mastectomy and are currently in development for risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Guidelines developed with affiliation to, or through relevant British Surgical Societies or international consensus, are available for risk-reducing hysterectomy, polypectomy, gastrectomy, and thyroidectomy. There is a disparity in the development and distribution of national guidelines for interventions amongst tumour types. Whilst we are focusing on UK guidelines, we anticipate they will be relevant much more generally and so of interest to a wider audience including where there are no national guidelines to refer to. We suggest that, as genetic testing becomes rapidly more accessible, guideline development for interventions should be more closely aligned to those for testing.

Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Given the challenges with achieving effective and durable treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer, primary prevention is highly desirable. Fortunately, decades of research have provided evidence for several strategies that can be deployed to optimize risk reduction. These include surgery, chemoprevention, and lifestyle factor modifications. These broad categories vary in terms of the magnitude of risk reduction possible, the possible short-term and long-term side effects, the degree of difficulty, and acceptability. Thus, the concept of a risk-based model to personalize preventive interventions is advocated to guide discussion between care providers and women at risk. For women with inherited major gene mutations that greatly increase risk of ovarian cancer, surgical approaches have favorable risk to benefit ratios. Chemoprevention and lifestyle factor modifications portend a lower degree of risk reduction but confer lower risk of undesirable side effects. Since complete prevention is not currently possible, better methods for early detection remain a high priority.

Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention awarded funding to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to develop educational materials for clinicians on gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines as a first step toward developing evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about ovarian cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at a virtual meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in February 2022. This article is the executive summary of the relevant literature and existing recommendations to guide clinicians in the prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of ovarian cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.

Contraceptives and cancer risks in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of BReast CAncer (BRCA) 1 or 2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers, who have an inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer, are being identified. Among these women, data regarding the effects of contraception on cancer risks are unclear and various guidelines provide various recommendations.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We aim to optimize counselling regarding contraception for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We investigated the risk ratio for developing breast cancer or ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-PV carriers who have used any form of contraception versus non-users. Second, we analysed breast and ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/2-PV carriers as influenced by the duration of contraceptive use and by the time since last use. In addition, we provide an overview of all relevant international guidelines regarding contraceptive use for BRCA1/2-PV carriers.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic search in the Medline database and Cochrane library identified studies describing breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2-PV carriers as modified by contraception until June 2021. The search included medical subject headings, keywords and synonyms related to BRCA and contraceptives (any kind). PRISMA guidance was followed. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessments were performed. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled effects for breast and ovarian cancer risk separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted for BRCA1 versus BRCA2 and for the various contraceptive methods.

OUTCOMES

Results of the breast cancer risk with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) analysis depended on the outcome measure. Meta-analyses of seven studies with 7525 women revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.76) and of four studies including 9106 women resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.90-1.25), heterogeneity (I2) 0% and 52%, respectively. Breast cancer risk was still increased in ever-users compared with never-users >10 years after last OCP use. In contrast, ovarian cancer risk was decreased among OCP users: HR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.74) based on two studies including 10 981 women (I2: 0%), and OR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38-0.63) based on eight studies including 10 390 women (I2: 64%). The protective effect vanished after cessation of use. Tubal ligation also protects against ovarian cancer: one study including 3319 women (I2: 0%): HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and three studies with 7691 women (I2: 44%): OR: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.53-1.03). Data regarding other contraceptives were unavailable. No differences were observed between BRCA1 and BRCA2-PV carriers. The quality of evidence was either low or very low.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The OCP potentially increases breast cancer risk, while ovarian cancer risk decreases with either the OCP and tubal ligation in BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Counselling of BRCA1/2-PV carriers should be personalized; the genetic and non-genetic factors (like prior risk-reducing surgeries, prior breast cancer and age) and patients' preferences (reversibility, ease of use, reliability and effect on menstrual cycle) should be balanced. To further optimize counselling for high-risk women, future research should focus on other (commonly used) contraceptive methods and cancer risks in this specific population, and on the potential impact of changing formulations over time.

Pediatric and Adolescent Breast Conditions: A Review

Breast conditions in pediatric and adolescent patients vary from benign congenital changes to pathological findings. Although most breast conditions are benign, there are rare cases of malignancy that are important to identify during development. As such, it is critical to understand the classification and management of the different pediatric and adolescent breast conditions that might present to clinicians who care for pediatric and adolescent patients. In this review, congenital, benign, and malignant pediatric/adolescent breast conditions are discussed.

Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival of Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Frequently, patients treated for Ovarian Cancer (OC) undergo menopause with subsequent symptoms. This review scrutinised the impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) on the Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of patients diagnosed with OC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the most popular English databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select publications that evaluate OS and PFS in these patients. End-point analysis targeted values of log(HR) and its Standard Error (SE). Results: Up to 1 September 2022, 11 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Eight publications, totalling 4191 patients, were included in the meta-analyses. Eight studies were considered for the OS analysis and pooled an HR of 0.66 with respective 95% CI between 0.57 and 0.76, with a p-value < 0.00001 at a Z value of 5.7, in favour of the HRT group. Results for PFS showed an overall HR of 0.73 in favour of the HRT group; CI between 0.57 and 0.95, p = 0.02 at a Z value of 2.36. Further subgroup analyses highlighted the non-inferiority of this treatment. Conclusions: Patients treated for OC that receive HRT for menopausal symptoms after various treatments appeared to have better OS than never-users.

Contraceptive use and contraceptive counselling interventions for women of reproductive age with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A lack of clarity exists regarding contraceptive uptake and counselling among women with cancer, despite these women having unique family planning needs. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature and produce an overall summary estimate of contraceptive use and counselling among women with cancer across the cancer care continuum.

METHODS

A systematic search of articles reporting on contraceptive counselling and/or contraceptive use among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) with cancer across the cancer care continuum (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, survivorship) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers conducted the data screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analyses were conducted to summarise the key findings.

RESULTS

We included 21 articles involving 3835 participants in this review. Studies varied according to the cancer population and time along the cancer care continuum it was assessed. Of the studies that reported the overall contraceptive prevalence among women diagnosed with cancer (n = 8), contraceptive use ranged from 25 to 92%. Of the four studies that focused on cancer survivors, the contraceptive prevalence ranged from 47 to 84%. When the prevalence of these studies was pooled, a crude summary prevalence of 64% (62% among women with cancer versus 68% among cancer survivors) was found. The rate of contraceptive counselling was assessed in ten studies. A pooled prevalence of 50% (44% among women with cancer versus 58% among cancer survivors) was found, with the prevalence ranging from 12 to 78% among individual studies depending on the point in the cancer care continuum that it was provided. When contraceptive counselling was provided, it was found to significantly increase contraceptive use although biases were identified in its application.

CONCLUSIONS

Contraceptive counselling interventions as part of standard cancer care have the potential to not only empower women with cancer and cancer survivors to make informed choices regarding their reproductive health but also provide the ability to plan future pregnancies for times of better health.

Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case–Control Studies

Oral contraceptive use is one of the major modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. To investigate the effect of oral contraceptive taking on breast cancer risk by BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation status, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-controlled studies. Therefore, English language articles were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to August 2021. Data were pooled from none case–control studies, comprising a total of 33,162 subjects, including 23,453 who had never used oral contraceptives. Overall meta-analysis indicated a statistically insignificant risk reduction: OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.06, p = 0.1594. However, increased breast cancer risk was associated with age at first use of OCs ≥20 years: OR = 1.21, 95% CI:1.07 to 1.36, p = 0.002. Multivariable meta-regression with covariates of age of first OC use (β = 0.21, 95% CI: −0.25 to 0.67, p = 0.3767), duration of OC use (β = −0.08, 95% CI; −0.51 to 0.34, p = 0.7093), and time since last OC use (β = 0.32, 95% CI: −0.22 to 0.85, p = 0.2461) did not have a significant effect on the breast cancer risk. This meta-analysis suggests a diverse effect of oral contraceptive use against breast cancer in BRCA carrier mutation. The association between OC use and breast and ovarian cancers needs more investigation.

Contraception and Hormone Replacement Therapy in Healthy Carriers of Germline BRCA1/2 Genes Pathogenic Variants: Results from an Italian Survey

Several myths and misconceptions exist about hormones in women with familial predisposition to cancer, and there are few real-life data on their prescription and uptake. To better understand how they are prescribed and accepted in healthy carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variant, an online survey was uploaded on Google Forms and shared through social media closed groups of patients' associations, aBRCAcadabra and ACTO Campania. A total of 241 questionnaires were collected. Sexual quality of life was considered of the utmost importance by most of the respondents (mean score of 7 ± 2.8/10), but they felt the counseling they received by healthcare professionals on the topic was insufficient (4.9 ± 3.2/10). Only 57 women out of 233 (24.5%) had used hormonal contraception after being diagnosed as carriers of a BRCA pathogenetic variant, and 42 out of 148 (28.4%) underwent menopause hormonal therapy. The majority of women (53.6% for contraception and 61.5% for menopause) reported being dissatisfied with the counseling received, and 58.2% were not aware of the protective effect of hormonal contraception on the risk of ovarian cancer. An educational effort is desirable to guarantee healthy BRCA carriers reliable contraception and evidence-based menopause counseling.

Ovarian cancer in Lebanese women: a 12-year comparative epidemiological study and trend analysis

Purpose

Over the last decade, Lebanon has experienced an increase in the rate of cancer patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence rates of ovarian cancer in Lebanese women over a period of 12 years and to compare them to other countries.

Methods

Data were collected from the Lebanese National Cancer Registry for the time period 2005-2016 (inclusive). Data from other countries were retrieved from an online database 'Cancer Incidence in Five Continents'. The age-specific and age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) were calculated and analysed using Joinpoint regression.

Results

Ovarian cancer ranked seventh among the commonest cancers in Lebanese women in the studied time frame. Approximately 189 new cases were reported every year, with an average age-standardised incidence rate of 7.88 (per 100,000 women). Ovarian cancer showed a significantly decreasing trend in the 12 years of study. Lebanon had one of the highest ASIR for ovarian cancer among regional countries and randomly selected countries.

Conclusion

Lebanon presented a high ASIR for ovarian cancer compared to regional countries, and was placed among the top ASIRs compared to countries worldwide. However, with the decreasing ovarian cancer trends, it is important to implement efficacious awareness in order to detect all OC cases.

Pharmacogenetic Review: Germline Genetic Variants Possessing Increased Cancer Risk With Clinically Actionable Therapeutic Relationships

As our understanding of genomics and genetic testing continues to advance, the personalization of medical decision making is progressing simultaneously. By carefully crafting medical care to fit the specific needs of the individual, patients can experience better long-term outcomes, reduced toxicities, and improved healthcare experiences. Genetic tests are frequently ordered to help diagnose a clinical presentation and even to guide surveillance. Through persistent investigation, studies have begun to delineate further therapeutic implications based upon unique relationships with genetic variants. In this review, a pre-emptive approach is taken to understand the existing evidence of relationships between specific genetic variants and available therapies. The review revealed an array of diverse relationships, ranging from well-documented clinical approaches to investigative findings with potential for future application. Therapeutic agents identified in the study ranged from highly specific targeted therapies to agents possessing similar risk factors as a genetic variant. Working in conjunction with national standardized treatment approaches, it is critical that physicians appropriately consider these relationships when developing personalized treatment plans for their patients.

Oral Contraceptive Use in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Absolute Cancer Risks and Benefits

BACKGROUND

To help BRCA1 and 2 mutation carriers make informed decisions regarding use of combined-type oral contraceptive preparation (COCP), absolute risk-benefit estimates are needed for COCP-associated cancer.

METHODS

For a hypothetical cohort of 10 000 women, we calculated the increased or decreased cumulative incidence of COCP-associated (breast, ovarian, endometrial) cancer, examining 18 scenarios with differences in duration and timing of COCP use, uptake of prophylactic surgeries, and menopausal hormone therapy.

RESULTS

COCP use initially increased breast cancer risk and decreased ovarian and endometrial cancer risk long term. For 10 000 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 10 years of COCP use from age 20 to 30 years resulted in 66 additional COCP-associated cancer cases by the age of 35 years, in addition to 625 cases expected for never users. By the age of 70 years such COCP use resulted in 907 fewer cancer cases than the expected 9093 cases in never users. Triple-negative breast cancer estimates resulted in 196 additional COCP-associated cases by age 40 years, in addition to the 1454 expected. For 10 000 BRCA2 mutation carriers using COCP from age 20 to 30 years, 80 excess cancer cases were estimated by age 40 years in addition to 651 expected cases; by the age of 70 years, we calculated 382 fewer cases compared with the 6156 cases expected. The long-term benefit of COCP use diminished after risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by menopausal hormone therapy use.

CONCLUSION

Although COCP use in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers initially increases breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer risk, it strongly decreases lifetime cancer risk. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and menopausal hormone therapy use appear to counteract the long-term COCP-benefit.

Risk-Reducing Options for High-Grade Serous Gynecologic Malignancy in BRCA1/2

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of death among women with gynecologic malignancy. Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene 1 (BRCA 1) and Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene 2 (BRCA 2) germline mutations confer an estimated 20 to 40 times increased risk of OC when compared to the general population. The majority of BRCA-associated OC is identified in the late stage, and no effective screening method has been proven to reduce mortality. Several pharmacologic and surgical options exist for risk-reduction of gynecologic malignancy in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers. This review summarizes up-to-date research on pharmacologic risk-reducing interventions, including the oral contraceptive pill, acetylsalicylic acid/nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (ASA/NSAID) therapy, and denosumab, and surgical risk-reducing interventions, including risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, and hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Molecular mechanisms of platinum‑based chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (Review)

Cisplatin is one of the most effective chemotherapy drugs for ovarian cancer, but resistance is common. The initial response to platinum‑based chemotherapy is as high as 80%, but in most advanced patients, final relapse and death are caused by acquired drug resistance. The development of resistance to therapy in ovarian cancer is a significant hindrance to therapeutic efficacy. The resistance of ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapeutic mechanisms is rather complex and includes multidrug resistance, DNA damage repair, cell metabolism, oxidative stress, cell cycle regulation, cancer stem cells, immunity, apoptotic pathways, autophagy and abnormal signaling pathways. The present review provided an update of recent developments in our understanding of the mechanisms of ovarian cancer platinum‑based chemotherapy resistance, discussed current and emerging approaches for targeting these patients and presented challenges associated with these approaches, with a focus on development and overcoming resistance.

What are the mechanisms of action of the different contraceptive methods to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer?

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the deadliest gynaecologic malignancy. Knowing that OvCa, as a disease, has different origins has allowed us to relate them to the mechanisms of action of different contraceptive methods with the aim of evaluating the possibility of their use in reducing risk.

STUDY DESIGN

This commentary review article will instead focus on the recent findings on the role of contraceptive methods in preventing of OvCa.

RESULTS

Combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) use is an effective method of chemoprevention for OvCa in the general population and in women with genetic disorders. Salpingectomy, better than tubal ligation, should be offered for ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer prevention. Progestogen-only methods can decrease the risk of OvCa via reduced menstrual bleeding and by changes in the hormonal environment that surrounds the ovary. IUDs of any type, through different mechanisms, decrease the risk of OvCa. Barrier methods prevent the passage of germs into the tubes and ovaries and the inflammatory state they produce.

CONCLUSIONS

Most contraceptive methods have a mechanism of action that may favour a reduction in the risk of OvCa. The theories of incessant ovulation, retrograde menstruation, and that the fallopian tubes are the site of origin of a proportion of high-grade serous OvCa, have led to the recommendation that anovulatory methods, those that decrease menstrual bleeding, and those that blocked tubes, or even better, 'opportunistic salpingectomy' are a current approach to prevent OvCa in the population general and, above all, in the population at risk.

Contraceptive Challenges in Women With Common Medical Conditions

Women have the opportunity to meet personal contraceptive goals with convenient, highly reliable, and easily reversible methods. Long-acting reversible contraception represents an increasingly popular option for most women throughout the reproductive lifespan. Nonetheless, many women and their health care providers are challenged by coexisting medical issues. We aim to help clinicians individualize contraception and use shared decision-making to enhance patient satisfaction and continuation with their method.