1
|
Xu Y, Zhang E, Wei L, Dai Z, Chen S, Zhou S, Huang Y. NINJ1: A new player in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis and potential therapeutic target. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 141:113021. [PMID: 39197295 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by demyelination. Current treatment options for MS focus on immunosuppression, but their efficacy can be limited. Recent studies suggest a potential role for nerve injury-induced protein 1 (NINJ1) in MS pathogenesis. NINJ1, a protein involved in cell death and inflammation, may contribute to the infiltration and activation of inflammatory cells in the CNS, potentially through enhanced blood-brain barrier crossing; enhancing plasma membrane rupture during cell death, leading to the release of inflammatory mediators and further tissue damage. This review explores the emerging evidence for NINJ1's involvement in MS. It discusses how NINJ1 might mediate the migration of immune cells across the blood-brain barrier, exacerbate neuroinflammation, and participate in plasma membrane rupture-related damage. Finally, the review examines potential therapeutic strategies targeting NINJ1 for improved MS management. Abbreviations: MS, Multiple sclerosis; CNS, Central nervous system; BBB, Blood-brain barrier; GSDMD, Gasdermin-D; EAE, Experimental autoimmune encephalitis; HMGB-1, High mobility group box-1 protein; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase; PMR, Plasma membrane rupture; DMF, Dimethyl fumarate; DUSP1, Dual-specificity phosphatase 1; PAMPs, Pathogen-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs, Danger-associated molecular patterns; PRRs, Pattern recognition receptors; GM-CSF, Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor; IFN-γ, Interferon gamma; TNF, Tumor necrosis factor; APCs, Antigen-presenting cells; ECs, Endothelial cells; TGF-β, Transforming growth factor-β; PBMCs, Peripheral blood mononuclear cells; FACS, Fluorescence-activated cell sorting; MCP-1, Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; NLRP3, Pyrin domain-containing 3; TCR, T cell receptor; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; AP-1, Activator protein-1; ANG1, Angiopoietin 1; BMDMs, Bone marrow-derived macrophages; Arp2/3, actin-related protein 2/3; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; LIMK1, LIM domain kinase 1; PAK1, p21-activated kinases 1; Rac1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; β-cat, β-caten; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88; TIRAP, Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing adapter protein; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; IRAKs, interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinases; TRAF6, TNF receptor associated factor 6; TAB2/3, TAK1 binding protein 2/3; TAK1, transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ERK1/2, Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase 1/2; IKK, inhibitor of kappa B kinase; IκB, inhibitor of NF-κB; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-B; AP-1, activator protein-1; ASC, Apoptosis-associated Speck-like protein containing a CARD; NEK7, NIMA-related kinase 7; NLRP3, Pyrin domain-containing 3; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinbin Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China
| | - Enhao Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China
| | - Liangzhe Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China
| | - Zifeng Dai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China
| | - Siqi Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China
| | - Shengjun Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China.
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Nervous System and Brain Function, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Atherosclerotic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silva BA, Heriz A, Ayerbe J, Lázaro L, Casas M, López P, Tkachuk V, Balbuena ME, Nadur D, Liwacki S, Luetic G, Burgos M, Casales F, Piedrabuena A, Carnero Contentti E, Zárate A, Zanga G, Steinberg J, Mainella C, Tavolini D, Hryb J, Leguizamón F, Pagani Cassará F, José G, Carrizo P, Nofal P, Luis B, Pita C, Míguez J, Alonso R. Cladribine use trend in Latin America: the changes in patient profile impact in the drug effectiveness. Neurol Sci 2024:10.1007/s10072-024-07763-7. [PMID: 39259243 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07763-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cladribine was approved for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in our country in 2018. A previous study by our group showed that its use among high efficacy therapies options has been increasing along the years. OBJECTIVE to analyze the cladribine use trend across time since its approval. METHOD A retrospective cohort study was performed. People with MS (pwMS) treated with cladribine were included. Two periods were defined: P1 = 2018 - 2020 and P2 = 2021 - 2023. A comparative analysis was carry out between P1 and P2 to assess the trend of use, clinical/demographic characteristics, and effectiveness. RESULTS One hundred ninety- seven people with MS (pwMS) were included, mean EDSS: 2.2 ± 3.08, 72.6% female, mean age: 35.2 ± 9 years, mean disease duration: 6.6 ± 5.6 years, mean time lapse under cladribine: 26.1 ± 12.4 months. Regarding patient profile, we found significant differences between P1 and P2 in the MS evolution (p = 0.001) and EDSS ( p = 0.018) prior to initiation of cladribine. In the individualized analysis by year, we found a decrease in relapse number in the year prior to starting cladribine (p = 0.02). A higher proportion of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) was found in patients treated at P2 compared to those treated at P1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION An earlier use of cladribine achieved a significant increase in reaching NEDA. This learning curve in the use of cladribine allows a better identification of the candidate patient and influences the treatment effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berenice A Silva
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Sección Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Hospital Ramos Mejía, CABA, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Alejandra Heriz
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Sección Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jeremías Ayerbe
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Sección Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luciana Lázaro
- Hospital Ramos Mejía, CABA, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Magdalena Casas
- Hospital Ramos Mejía, CABA, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pablo López
- Hospital Alemán, Unidad de Neuroinmunología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Verónica Tkachuk
- Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Clínica de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Eugenia Balbuena
- Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Clínica de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Débora Nadur
- Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Clínica de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Susana Liwacki
- Hospital de Córdoba, Servicio de Neurología, Córdoba, Argentina
- Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola Servicio de Neurología, Córdoba, Argentina
| | | | | | - Federico Casales
- Sanatorio de Los Arcos, Servicio de Neurología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | - Judith Steinberg
- Hospital Británico, Servicio de Neurología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Javier Hryb
- Hospital Durand, Consultorio de Neuroinmunología Clínica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Felisa Leguizamón
- Hospital Álvarez, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Hospital Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Pedro Nofal
- Hospital de Clínicas Nuestra Señora del Carmen, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
| | - Belén Luis
- Hospital Güemes, Sección Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Cecilia Pita
- Hospital Ramos Mejía, CABA, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- INEBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jimena Míguez
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Sección Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ricardo Alonso
- Hospital Ramos Mejía, CABA, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Hospital de Clínicas Nuestra Señora del Carmen, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li R, Zhou J, Wu H, Wang Y, Chen J. Sustained Effectiveness and Safety Over Time of Teriflunomide in Chinese Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in the Greater Bay Area of China: Insights from Real-World Data. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:1117-1133. [PMID: 38753124 PMCID: PMC11263525 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00599-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The real-world data on the medium- to long-term effectiveness and safety of teriflunomide in Chinese patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited. Therefore, this study aims to assess the treatment outcomes of teriflunomide in Chinese patients with MS over a medium- to long-term period. METHODS This cohort study was carried out in three tertiary hospitals and regional MS centers located in the Greater Bay Area of China. We obtained the historical clinical data of patients who underwent teriflunomide treatment for at least 6 months. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 status, which is characterized by the absence of relapses, confirmed disability worsening, and new or enlarging MRI lesions, over time. Secondary objectives included assessing the proportion of patients meeting each NEDA-3 criterion, changes in motor and cognitive function, as well as the incidence of adverse events and treatment discontinuations. RESULTS A total of 160 patients with MS were enrolled, including 125 patients treated with teriflunomide for at least 1 year (≥ 1-year completers) and 71 patients treated for at least 2 years (≥ 2-year completers). A total of 85.63% of the overall population achieved clinical NEDA-3 status at 6 months of teriflunomide treatment, and 71.20% of ≥ 1-year completers achieved NEDA-3 status at 12 months of teriflunomide treatment. The median timed 25-foot walk test (T25FW), nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), and paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) results were relatively stable before and after treatment. CONCLUSION Medium- to long-term MS disease activity, as indicated by NEDA-3 status, is well controlled in patients treated with continuous teriflunomide treatment in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Li
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Haotian Wu
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuge Wang
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Juanjuan Chen
- Department of Neurology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patterson J, Tatonetti N. KG-LIME: predicting individualized risk of adverse drug events for multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:1693-1703. [PMID: 38964369 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this project was to create time-aware, individual-level risk score models for adverse drug events related to multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy and to provide interpretable explanations for model prediction behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used temporal sequences of observational medical outcomes partnership common data model (OMOP CDM) concepts derived from an electronic health record as model features. Each concept was assigned an embedding representation that was learned from a graph convolution network trained on a knowledge graph (KG) of OMOP concept relationships. Concept embeddings were fed into long short-term memory networks for 1-year adverse event prediction following drug exposure. Finally, we implemented a novel extension of the local interpretable model agnostic explanation (LIME) method, knowledge graph LIME (KG-LIME) to leverage the KG and explain individual predictions of each model. RESULTS For a set of 4859 patients, we found that our model was effective at predicting 32 out of 56 adverse event types (P < .05) when compared to demographics and past diagnosis as variables. We also assessed discrimination in the form of area under the curve (AUC = 0.77 ± 0.15) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR = 0.31 ± 0.27) and assessed calibration in the form of Brier score (BS = 0.04 ± 0.04). Additionally, KG-LIME generated interpretable literature-validated lists of relevant medical concepts used for prediction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Many of our risk models demonstrated high calibration and discrimination for adverse event prediction. Furthermore, our novel KG-LIME method was able to utilize the knowledge graph to highlight concepts that were important to prediction. Future work will be required to further explore the temporal window of adverse event occurrence beyond the generic 1-year window used here, particularly for short-term inpatient adverse events and long-term severe adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Patterson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Nicholas Tatonetti
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guger M, Enzinger C, Leutmezer F, Di Pauli F, Kraus J, Kalcher S, Kvas E, Berger T. Early intensive versus escalation treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria. J Neurol 2024; 271:3142-3152. [PMID: 38430270 PMCID: PMC11136709 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12256-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of early intensive treatment (EIT) versus escalation treatment (ESC) in a nationwide observational cohort of almost 1000 people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS The EIT cohort started with alemtuzumab (AZM), cladribine (CLAD), fingolimod (FTY), natalizumab (NTZ), ocrelizumab (OCR), or ozanimod (OZA); whereas, the ESC cohort was escalated from dimethylfumarate (DMF) or teriflunomide (TERI) to AZM, CLAD, FTY, NTZ, OCR, or OZA within the Austrian MS Treatment Registry. Patients had to stay on therapy for at least 3 months and up to 16 years. The EIT cohort included 743 and the ESC cohort 227 RRMS patients. We used multinomial propensity scores for inverse probability weighting in generalized linear (GLM) and Cox proportional hazards models to correct for the bias of this non-randomized registry study. RESULTS Estimated mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) were 0.09 for EIT and 0.4 for ESC patients. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) in the GLM model for relapses showed a decreased relapse probability of 78% for the EIT versus ESC cohort [IRR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.16-0.30), p < 0.001]. Analyzing the time to the first relapse by Cox regression, a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.17 [95% CI (0.13-0.22), p < 0.001] revealed a decreased risk of 83% for the EIT group. Regarding sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression for 12 weeks, a HR of 0.55 [95% CI (0.40-0.76), p < 0.001] showed a decreased probability of 45% for the EIT cohort. CONCLUSIONS ESC treatment after DMF and TERI revealed a higher relapse and EDSS progression probability compared to EIT in Austrian RRMS patients. Therefore, an early intensive treatment should be started in patients with an active or highly active disease course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Guger
- Department of Neurology, Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen Hospital Steyr, Sierninger Straße 170, 4400, Steyr, Austria.
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
| | | | - Fritz Leutmezer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franziska Di Pauli
- Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jörg Kraus
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University and Salzburger Landeskliniken, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yaseri A, Roozbeh M, Kazemi R, Lotfinia S. Brain stimulation for patients with multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of therapeutic efficacy. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:2549-2559. [PMID: 38289559 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07365-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis patients often experience various symptoms that can greatly impact their quality of life. There are various brain stimulation techniques that have been evaluated for their ability to reduce the symptoms of multiple sclerosis. However, there is inconsistency in the specific stimulation methods used and the symptoms targeted in the existing research. This umbrella review conducted in order to evaluate the effectiveness of brain stimulation and identify limitations and gaps for further research. In this umbrella review, we conducted a searched on Web of Knowledge, PubMed, and Scopus database. We specifically looked for reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that have investigated the effects of brain stimulation methods on symptoms of multiple sclerosis. All articles were examined by AMSTAR 2 (A Measure Tool to Assess Systematic Review 2). We identified 155 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Of those, five were qualitative studies and nine were meta-analyses. Among the included studies, four examined the use of deep brain stimulation, while ten investigated the therapeutic potential of noninvasive brain stimulation. Considering the heterogeneity of studies, the current evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be effective in treating pain and improving motor function, while transcranial direct current stimulation may be useful in alleviating fatigue and enhancing certain aspects of cognitive performance. Deep brain stimulation, on the other hand, appears to be effective in reducing tremors. However, further research is warranted to validate these findings and address the existing limitations in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aram Yaseri
- School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Roozbeh
- Brain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Kazemi
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahab Lotfinia
- Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Papukchieva S, Kahn M, Eberl M, Friedrich B, Joschko N, Ziemssen T. Data on Ocrelizumab Treatment Collected by MS Patients in Germany Using Brisa App. J Pers Med 2024; 14:409. [PMID: 38673036 PMCID: PMC11051290 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With a rising number of multiple sclerosis (MS) cases and increasing pressure on health systems, digital companion apps like Brisa, designed specifically for people with MS, can play an important role in the patient journey. These apps enable the collection of real-time longitudinal data that are critical to our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of MS. METHODS This retrospective, descriptive analysis consists of data from Brisa users who registered between 6 August 2021 and 8 September 2022. Of the unique users, 37.7% (n = 1593) fulfilled the inclusion criteria including information about medication and demographics and tracked one or more symptoms and/or patient-reported outcomes. Users were classified as moderate-efficacy treatment users, high-efficacy treatment users and ocrelizumab users, and the reporting frequency and scores of symptoms and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The largest cohort of Brisa users (405) reported treatment with ocrelizumab and were mostly diagnosed 2-5 years before the survey. The most reported MS symptoms were similar between OUs (ocrelizumab users), HETUs (high-efficacy treatment users) and METUs (moderate-efficacy treatment users). OUs on average reported symptoms and answered questionnaires more frequently. Baseline scores between HETUs and OUs were similar, whereas baseline scores of METUs were slightly lower in comparison. In a further analysis of OUs, disability scores increased with age; users aged 26-45 years had higher pain scores than 18-25-year-olds. No significant differences were found in quality of life, bowel control and vision between age groups. CONCLUSION These findings show that the characteristics of the Brisa cohort are similar to the results of other studies and registries and can provide a representative overview of everyday disease management. Thereby, these results can bridge the gap between clinical research and real patient experience, but they also raise new questions, such as how often the hard-and-early therapy approach is already used and whether baseline characteristics and reasons for choosing a particular treatment contribute to the different outcomes over time. Answering these questions requires further research and analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Kahn
- Temedica GmbH, 80687 Munich, Germany; (S.P.)
| | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus & Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Papukchieva S, Stratil AS, Kahn M, Neß NH, Hollnagel-Schmitz M, Gerencser V, Rustemeier J, Eberl M, Friedrich B, Ziemssen T. Shifting from the treat-to-target to the early highly effective treatment approach in patients with multiple sclerosis - real-world evidence from Germany. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2024; 17:17562864241237857. [PMID: 38525488 PMCID: PMC10960977 DOI: 10.1177/17562864241237857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background While evidence highlights the effectiveness of initiating disease-modifying therapy with a high-efficacy medication for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with poor prognostic factors, it remains unclear whether this approach has been adopted by a broad range of MS providers in Germany yet. Objective To assess the adoption of the early highly effective treatment (EHT) compared to the treat-to-target treatment approach with the option of escalating treatment efficacy over time in Germany based on real-world evidence data. Design Patient-level pharmacy dispensing data from the Permea platform were analysed from 2020 to 2022. Methods In total, 29,529 therapy beginners (>18 years) were included to analyse shifts in treatment approaches over time and switching behaviour. Medication classification adhered to the German Society of Neurology guidelines and designated fumarates, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and interferons as low-efficacy category 1 medications; cladribine and S1P-modulators as medium-efficacy category 2 medications; and alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and rituximab (off-label) as high-efficacy category 3 medications. Results Our results show that 70.0% of patients redeemed their first prescription for category 1 medication, 16.3% for category 2 and 13.7% for category 3 medications. The proportion of prescriptions filled shifted from 2020 to 2022 with a decrease of 14.7% for category 1 drugs and an increase of 12.5% for category 3 drugs. 93.2% of patients stayed on their initially prescribed medication category. 3.2% of category 1 and 3.7% of category 2 therapy beginners escalated to category 3 medication. 3.4% of category 3 medication users de-escalated their treatment to category 1 or category 2. Conclusion While most individuals started their treatment according to the treat-to-target approach and remained on their initially prescribed medication category, there has been a steadily increasing shift towards the EHT approach since 2020. These insights demonstrate that, while not officially recommended by German guidelines, MS providers increasingly adopt the EHT approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Guerra T, Patti F, Cocco E, De Luca G, Brescia Morra V, Pozzilli C, Zaffaroni M, Ferraro D, Gasperini C, Salemi G, Bergamaschi R, Lus G, Inglese M, Romano S, Bellantonio P, Di Monte E, Maniscalco GT, Conte A, Lugaresi A, Vianello M, Torri Clerici VLA, Di Sapio A, Pesci I, Granella F, Totaro R, Marfia GA, Danni MC, Cavalla P, Valentino P, Aguglia U, Montepietra S, Ferraro E, Protti A, Spitaleri D, Avolio C, De Riz M, Maimone D, Cavaletti G, Gazzola P, Tedeschi G, Sessa M, Rovaris M, Di Palma F, Gatto M, Cargnelutti D, De Robertis F, Logullo FO, Rini A, Meucci G, Ardito B, Banfi P, Nasuelli D, Paolicelli D, Rocca MA, Portaccio E, Chisari CG, Fenu G, Onofrj M, Carotenuto A, Ruggieri S, Tortorella C, Ragonese P, Nica M, Amato MP, Filippi M, Trojano M. Evaluation of drivers of treatment switch in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a study from the Italian MS Registry. J Neurol 2024; 271:1150-1159. [PMID: 38135850 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-12137-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS) are currently defined as "relapsing MS" (RMS). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess drivers of treatment switches due to clinical relapses in a population of RMS patients collected in the Italian MS and Related Disorders Register (I-MS&RD). METHODS RRMS and SPMS patients with at least one relapse in a time window of 2 years before of data extraction were defined as RMS. Factors associated with disease-modifying therapy (DMT) switching due to clinical activity were assessed through multivariable logistic regression models in which treatment exposure was included as the last recorded DMT and the last DMT's class [moderate-efficacy (ME), high-efficacy (HE) DMTs and anti-CD20 drugs]. RESULTS A cohort of 4739 RMS patients (4161 RRMS, 578 SPMS) was extracted from the I-MS&RD. A total of 2694 patients switching DMTs due to relapses were identified. Switchers were significantly (p < 0.0001) younger, less disabled, more frequently affected by an RR disease course in comparison to non-switcher patients. The multivariable logistic regression models showed that Alemtuzumab (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.37), Natalizumab (0.48, 0.30-0.76), Ocrelizumab (0.1, 0.02-0.45) and Rituximab (0.23, 0.06-0.82) exposure was a protective factor against treatment switch due to relapses. Moreover, the use of HE DMTs (0.43, 0.31-0.59), especially anti-CD20 drugs (0.14, 0.05-0.37), resulted to be a protective factor against treatment switch due to relapses in comparison with ME DMTs. CONCLUSIONS More than 50% of RMS switched therapy due to disease activity. HE DMTs, especially anti-CD20 drugs, significantly reduce the risk of treatment switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Iaffaldano
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences-DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucisano
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences-DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | - Tommaso Guerra
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences-DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Patti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche E Chirurgiche E Tecnologie Avanzate, GF Ingrassia, Università di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
- UOS Sclerosi Multipla, AOU Policlinico G Rodolico-San Marco, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cocco
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari/Centro Sclerosi Multipla, ATS Sardegna, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giovanna De Luca
- Centro Sclerosi MultiplaClinica Neurologica, Policlinico SS Annunziata, Università "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Brescia Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Center, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Zaffaroni
- Neuroimmunology Unit and Multiple Sclerosis Center, ASST Della Valle Olona, Hospital of Gallarate, Via Pastori 4, 21013, Gallarate, VA, Italy
| | - Diana Ferraro
- Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Civile di BaggiovaraAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Salemi
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 141, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Lus
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Matilde Inglese
- Dipartimento di NeuroscienzeRiabilitazioneOftalmologiaGenetica e Scienze Materno-Infantili (DINOGMI), Universita' di Genova, Genova, Italy
- IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Romano
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Di Monte
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Hospital ASL 4 "Madonna delle Grazie", 75100, Matera, Italy
| | | | - Antonella Conte
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Neurophysiopatology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - Alessandra Lugaresi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marika Vianello
- MS Unit, OU Neurology "Ca' Foncello" Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | | | - Alessia Di Sapio
- Department of Neurology, Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Center, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilaria Pesci
- Neurology Unit, Ospedale Vaio-Fidenza, Parma, Italy
| | - Franco Granella
- Unit of Neurosciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Rocco Totaro
- Centro Malattie Demielinizzanti-Clinica Neurologica, Ospedale San Salvatore, L'Aquila, Coppito, Italy
| | - Girolama Alessandra Marfia
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Maura Chiara Danni
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Paola Cavalla
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla e Neurologia 1 D.U, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Valentino
- Istituto di neurologia, Università Magna Graecia Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Sara Montepietra
- MS Centre, SMN Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Carlo Avolio
- MS Center, University of Neurology, Foggia, Italy
| | - Milena De Riz
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla-Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Maimone
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla, ARNAS Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Paola Gazzola
- SC Neurologia, Ospedale P. Antero Micone-ASL 3 Genovese, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- I Division of Neurology, Universita della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Sessa
- Centro Provinciale Sclerosi Multipla, ASST papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco Rovaris
- MS Center, Scientific Institute Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Di Palma
- SM Center Neurology Department, ASST Lariana S. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Maurizia Gatto
- Centro Malattie Demielinizzanti, Ospedale Generale Regionale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Augusto Rini
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Ospedale A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Meucci
- Ambulatorio Sclerosi MultiplaUnita' Operativa di Neurologia e Neurofisiopatologia, Spedali Riuniti di Livorno, Livorno, Italy
| | - Bonaventura Ardito
- Centro Sclerosi Mutipla UOC di Neurologia, Ospedale Della Murgia Fabio Perinei, Altamura, Italy
| | - Paola Banfi
- Dipartimento di Neurologia, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Davide Nasuelli
- ASST Della Valle Olona Presidio Ospedaliero di Saronno Ambulatorio Sclerosi Multipla, Saronno, Italy
| | - Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences-DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Rocca
- Neurology Unit and Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Emilio Portaccio
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, Florence, Italy
| | - Clara Grazia Chisari
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche E Chirurgiche E Tecnologie Avanzate, GF Ingrassia, Università di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
- UOS Sclerosi Multipla, AOU Policlinico G Rodolico-San Marco, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fenu
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari/Centro Sclerosi Multipla, ATS Sardegna, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marco Onofrj
- Centro Sclerosi MultiplaClinica Neurologica, Policlinico SS Annunziata, Università "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Antonio Carotenuto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Center, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Serena Ruggieri
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Carla Tortorella
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Ragonese
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 141, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, Florence, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Units, Neurophysiology Service, Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- School of Medicine, University "Aldo Moro" Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miller D, Okai A, Scott K, Reynolds SS. Cognitive Symptom Awareness Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Using a Mobile Application. Rehabil Nurs 2024; 49:24-29. [PMID: 38082491 DOI: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cognitive impairment is a common complication in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Using a mobile application has been shown to improve patient's awareness of cognitive symptoms. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve awareness of cognitive symptoms in adult patients with MS using a mobile application. DESIGN A pre/post-implementation quality improvement design was used. METHODS Patients were instructed to download the application MS Care Connect. Patients completed a pre/post-questionnaire regarding their awareness of cognitive symptoms and if they were likely to discuss symptoms with providers. They were instructed to use the application to rate the severity of their cognitive symptoms at least weekly. RESULTS Thirty-two patients completed both pre- and post-implementation questionnaires. No significant change in awareness of cognitive symptoms was found; however, patients were more likely to discuss cognitive changes with their healthcare team. In the 18 patients who used the application, a total of 60 cognitive symptom ratings were reported. CLINICAL RELEVANCE TO THE PRACTICE OF REHABILITATION NURSING Nurses may recommend use of a mobile application for patients to track their cognitive symptoms; however, further research is needed. CONCLUSION This project showed that adding a mobile application did not change awareness of patients' cognitive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena Miller
- North Texas Institute of Neurology and Headache, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Annette Okai
- North Texas Institute of Neurology and Headache, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Kathleen Scott
- North Texas Institute of Neurology and Headache, Plano, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Spelman T, Magyari M, Butzkueven H, Van Der Walt A, Vukusic S, Trojano M, Iaffaldano P, Horáková D, Drahota J, Pellegrini F, Hyde R, Duquette P, Lechner-Scott J, Sajedi SA, Lalive P, Shaygannejad V, Ozakbas S, Eichau S, Alroughani R, Terzi M, Girard M, Kalincik T, Grand'Maison F, Skibina O, Khoury SJ, Yamout B, Sa MJ, Gerlach O, Blanco Y, Karabudak R, Oreja-Guevara C, Altintas A, Hughes S, McCombe P, Ampapa R, de Gans K, McGuigan C, Soysal A, Prevost J, John N, Inshasi J, Stawiarz L, Manouchehrinia A, Forsberg L, Sellebjerg F, Glaser A, Pontieri L, Joensen H, Rasmussen PV, Sejbaek T, Poulsen MB, Christensen JR, Kant M, Stilund M, Mathiesen H, Hillert J. Predictors of treatment switching in the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1274194. [PMID: 38187157 PMCID: PMC10771327 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1274194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment switching is a common challenge and opportunity in real-world clinical practice. Increasing diversity in disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) has generated interest in the identification of reliable and robust predictors of treatment switching across different countries, DMTs, and time periods. Objective The objective of this retrospective, observational study was to identify independent predictors of treatment switching in a population of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network of national clinical registries, including the Italian MS registry, the OFSEP of France, the Danish MS registry, the Swedish national MS registry, and the international MSBase Registry. Methods In this cohort study, we merged information on 269,822 treatment episodes in 110,326 patients from 1997 to 2018 from five clinical registries. Patients were included in the final pooled analysis set if they had initiated at least one DMT during the relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) stage. Patients not diagnosed with RRMS or RRMS patients not initiating DMT therapy during the RRMS phase were excluded from the analysis. The primary study outcome was treatment switching. A multilevel mixed-effects shared frailty time-to-event model was used to identify independent predictors of treatment switching. The contributing MS registry was included in the pooled analysis as a random effect. Results Every one-point increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at treatment start was associated with 1.08 times the rate of subsequent switching, adjusting for age, sex, and calendar year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.08; 95% CI 1.07-1.08). Women were associated with 1.11 times the rate of switching relative to men (95% CI 1.08-1.14), whilst older age was also associated with an increased rate of treatment switching. DMTs started between 2007 and 2012 were associated with 2.48 times the rate of switching relative to DMTs that began between 1996 and 2006 (aHR 2.48; 95% CI 2.48-2.56). DMTs started from 2013 onwards were more likely to switch relative to the earlier treatment epoch (aHR 8.09; 95% CI 7.79-8.41; reference = 1996-2006). Conclusion Switching between DMTs is associated with female sex, age, and disability at baseline and has increased in frequency considerably in recent years as more treatment options have become available. Consideration of a patient's individual risk and tolerance profile needs to be taken into account when selecting the most appropriate switch therapy from an expanding array of treatment choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Spelman
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- MSBase Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melinda Magyari
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- MSBase Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- MS and Neuroimmunology Research, Central Clinical School, Alfred and Box Hill Hospitals, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anneke Van Der Walt
- MSBase Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Centre des Neurosciences de Lyon, L'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale 1028 et Centre national de la recherche scientifique joint research units5292, Lyon, France
- Faculté de Médicine Lyon-Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Pietro Iaffaldano
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, DiBraiN, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Dana Horáková
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Jirí Drahota
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Fabio Pellegrini
- Biogen International GmbH, Zug, Switzerland
- Biogen Digital Health, Biogen Spain, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Pierre Duquette
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre and Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jeannette Lechner-Scott
- University Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Hunter New England Health, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Seyed Aidin Sajedi
- Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gogan, Iran
| | - Patrice Lalive
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Sara Eichau
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Raed Alroughani
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Sharq, Kuwait
| | - Murat Terzi
- Medical Faculty, 19 Mayis University, Samsun, Türkiye
| | - Marc Girard
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre and Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tomas Kalincik
- Clinical Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Olga Skibina
- MS and Neuroimmunology Research, Central Clinical School, Alfred and Box Hill Hospitals, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samia J. Khoury
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bassem Yamout
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maria Jose Sa
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal
| | - Oliver Gerlach
- Academic MS Center Zuyderland, Department of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Yolanda Blanco
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Ayse Altintas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aysun Soysal
- Bakirkoy Education and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | - Nevin John
- Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Leszek Stawiarz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ali Manouchehrinia
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Forsberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna Glaser
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Luigi Pontieri
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Hanna Joensen
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Tobias Sejbaek
- Department of Neurology, Southwest Jutland Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Mai Bang Poulsen
- Department of Neurology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Romme Christensen
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Matthias Kant
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, University of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Morten Stilund
- Department of Neurology, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- NIDO | Centre for Research and Education, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | - Henrik Mathiesen
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, København, Denmark
| | - Jan Hillert
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oh J, Airas L, Harrison D, Järvinen E, Livingston T, Lanker S, Malik RA, Okuda DT, Villoslada P, de Vries HE. Neuroimaging to monitor worsening of multiple sclerosis: advances supported by the grant for multiple sclerosis innovation. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1319869. [PMID: 38107636 PMCID: PMC10722910 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1319869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Key unmet needs in multiple sclerosis (MS) include detection of early pathology, disability worsening independent of relapses, and accurate monitoring of treatment response. Collaborative approaches to address these unmet needs have been driven in part by industry-academic networks and initiatives such as the Grant for Multiple Sclerosis Innovation (GMSI) and Multiple Sclerosis Leadership and Innovation Network (MS-LINK™) programs. We review the application of recent advances, supported by the GMSI and MS-LINK™ programs, in neuroimaging technology to quantify pathology related to central pathology and disease worsening, and potential for their translation into clinical practice/trials. GMSI-supported advances in neuroimaging methods and biomarkers include developments in magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ocular imaging, and machine learning. However, longitudinal studies are required to facilitate translation of these measures to the clinic and to justify their inclusion as endpoints in clinical trials of new therapeutics for MS. Novel neuroimaging measures and other biomarkers, combined with artificial intelligence, may enable accurate prediction and monitoring of MS worsening in the clinic, and may also be used as endpoints in clinical trials of new therapies for MS targeting relapse-independent disease pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Laura Airas
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Daniel Harrison
- Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Baltimore VA Medical Center, VA Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Elina Järvinen
- Neurology and Immunology, Medical Unit N&I, Merck OY (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Espoo, Finland
| | - Terrie Livingston
- Patient Solutions and Center of Excellence Strategic Engagement, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, United States
| | - Stefan Lanker
- Neurology & Immunology, US Medical Affairs, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Billerica, MA, United States
| | - Rayaz A. Malik
- Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Research Division, Doha, Qatar
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Darin T. Okuda
- Department of Neurology, Neuroinnovation Program, Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Imaging Program, Clinical Center for Multiple Sclerosis, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Pablo Villoslada
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helga E. de Vries
- MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Amsterdam UMC), Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aungsumart S, Turongkaravee S, Youngkong S, Apiwattanakul M, Thakkinstian A, Chaikledkaew U. Rituximab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Thailand: an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1096. [PMID: 37833729 PMCID: PMC10571281 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10099-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelination process in the central nervous system (CNS) causing neurological disability and poor quality of life. Currently, Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved disease-modifying therapy is costly, and most patients with multiple sclerosis are ineligible for treatment in Thailand as previous studies have challenged its cost-effectiveness. Off-label use of rituximab is inexpensive and highly effective in treating multiple sclerosis, but evidence of its cost-effectiveness in Thailand is yet to be collected. METHODS This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility and budget impact of rituximab for multiple sclerosis treatment compared with best supportive care, the standard practice in Thailand to treat the disease. A Markov model with a one-month cycle length and lifetime horizon was applied to compare the costs and outcomes of rituximab and best supportive care based on a societal perspective. Accordingly, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate parameter uncertainty. In addition, the Markov model was used to assess the 5-year budget impact from the government perspective. RESULTS A rituximab biosimilar demonstrated higher effectiveness and lower associated costs, compared to best supportive care, with the highest probability of being cost-effective (96%). The probability of relapse was the most sensitive parameter according to the one-way sensitivity analysis. The calculated budget impact of treating patients with multiple sclerosis in Thailand was 26,360,000 Thai baht (THB) or 844,255 United States dollars (USD) in the first fiscal year, and approximately 20,810,000-23,080,000 THB (666,608-739,388 USD) in the next four fiscal years. CONCLUSION In Thailand, a rituximab biosimilar would reduce the overall costs of multiple sclerosis treatment and should, therefore, be included in the National List of Essential Medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saharat Aungsumart
- Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Saowalak Turongkaravee
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sitaporn Youngkong
- Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Metha Apiwattanakul
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Usa Chaikledkaew
- Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Voigt I, Inojosa H, Wenk J, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Building a monitoring matrix for the management of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2023; 22:103358. [PMID: 37178996 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a longitudinal and heterogeneous course, with an increasing number of therapy options and associated risk profiles, leading to a constant increase in the number of parameters to be monitored. Even though important clinical and subclinical data are being generated, treating neurologists may not always be able to use them adequately for MS management. In contrast to the monitoring of other diseases in different medical fields, no target-based approach for a standardized monitoring in MS has been established yet. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a standardized and structured monitoring as part of MS management that is adaptive, individualized, agile, and multimodal-integrative. We discuss the development of an MS monitoring matrix which can help facilitate data collection over time from different dimensions and perspectives to optimize the treatment of people with MS (pwMS). In doing so, we show how different measurement tools can combined to enhance MS treatment. We propose to apply the concept of patient pathways to disease and intervention monitoring, not losing track of their interrelation. We also discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the quality of processes, outcomes, and patient safety, as well as personalized and patient-centered care. Patient pathways allow us to track the patient's journey over time and can always change (e.g., when there is a switch in therapy). They therefore may assist us in the continuous improvement of monitoring in an iterative process. Improving the monitoring process means improving the care of pwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Voigt
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hernan Inojosa
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Judith Wenk
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patil SA, Joseph B, Tagliani P, Sastre-Garriga J, Montalban X, Vidal-Jordana A, Galetta SL, Balcer LJ, Kenney RC. Longitudinal stability of inter-eye differences in optical coherence tomography measures for identifying unilateral optic nerve lesions in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2023; 449:120669. [PMID: 37167654 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and ganglion cell+inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness inter-eye differences (IEDs) are robust measurements for identifying clinical history acute ON in people with MS (PwMS). This study investigated the utility and durability of these measures as longitudinal markers to identify optic nerve lesions. METHODS Prospective, multi-center international study of PwMS (with/without clinical history of ON) and healthy controls. Data from two sites in the International MS Visual System Consortium (IMSVISUAL) were analyzed. Mixed-effects models were used to compare inter-eye differences based on MS and acute ON history. RESULTS Average age of those with MS (n = 210) was 39.1 ± 10.8 and 190 (91%) were relapsing-remitting. Fifty-nine (28.1%) had a history of acute unilateral ON, while 9/210 (4.3%) had >1 IB episode. Median follow-up between OCT scans was 9 months. By mixed-effects modeling, IEDs were stable between first and last visits within groups for GCIPL for controls (p = 0.18), all PwMS (p = 0.74), PwMs without ON (p = 0.22), and PwMS with ON (p = 0.48). For pRNFL, IEDs were within controls (p = 0.10), all PwMS (p = 0.53), PwMS without ON history (p = 0.98), and PwMS with history of ON (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION We demonstrated longitudinal stability of pRNFL and GCIPL IEDs as markers for optic nerve lesions in PwMS, thus reinforcing the role for OCT in demonstrating optic nerve lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachi A Patil
- Departments of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Binu Joseph
- Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Paula Tagliani
- Neurology Department, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Neurology Department, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Neurology Department, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Angela Vidal-Jordana
- Neurology Department, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Steven L Galetta
- Departments of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Laura J Balcer
- Departments of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rachel C Kenney
- Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borgonetti V, Galeotti N. Posttranscriptional Regulation of Gene Expression Participates in the Myelin Restoration in Mouse Models of Multiple Sclerosis: Antisense Modulation of HuR and HuD ELAV RNA Binding Protein. Mol Neurobiol 2023; 60:2661-2677. [PMID: 36696009 PMCID: PMC10039839 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-023-03236-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Neuropathic pain is the most difficult-to-treat pain syndrome in multiple sclerosis. Evidence relates neuropathic pain to demyelination, which often originates from unresolved neuroinflammation or altered immune response. Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression might play a fundamental role in the regulation of these processes. The ELAV RNA-binding proteins HuR and HuD are involved in the promotion of inflammatory phenomena and in neuronal development and maintenance, respectively. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of HuR and HuD in demyelination-associated neuropathic pain in the mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model. HuR resulted overexpressed in the spinal cord of MOG35-55-EAE and PLP139-151-EAE mice and was detected in CD11b + cells. Conversely, HuD was largely downregulated in the MOG-EAE spinal cord, along with GAP43 and neurofilament H, while in PLP-EAE mice, HuD and neuronal markers remained unaltered. Intranasal antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) delivery to knockdown HuR, increased myelin basic protein expression, and Luxol Fast Blue staining in both EAE models, an indication of increased myelin content. These effects temporally coincided with attenuation of pain hypersensitivity. Anti-HuR ASO increased the expression of HuD in GAP43-expressing cells and promoted a HuD-mediated neuroprotective activity in MOG-EAE mice, while in PLP-EAE mice, HuR silencing dampened pro-inflammatory responses mediated by spinal microglia activation. In conclusion, anti-HuR ASO showed myelin protection at analgesic doses with multitarget mechanisms, and it deserves further consideration as an innovative agent to counteract demyelination in neuropathic pain states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittoria Borgonetti
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), Section of Pharmacology, University of Florence, Viale G. Pieraccini 6, I-50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Galeotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), Section of Pharmacology, University of Florence, Viale G. Pieraccini 6, I-50139, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kantor D, Pham T, Patterson-Lomba O, Swallow E, Dua A, Gupte-Singh K. Cost Per Relapse Avoided for Ozanimod Versus Other Selected Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United States. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:849-861. [PMID: 37000386 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00463-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ozanimod compared with commonly used disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and safety data were obtained from a network meta-analysis (NMA) of clinical trials of RRMS treatments including ozanimod, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate. ARR-related number needed to treat (NNT) relative to placebo and annual total MS-related healthcare costs was used to estimate the incremental annual cost per relapse avoided with ozanimod vs each DMT. ARR and adverse event (AE) data were combined with drug costs and healthcare costs to manage relapses and AEs in order to estimate annual cost savings with ozanimod vs other DMTs, assuming a 1 million USD fixed treatment budget. RESULTS Treatment with ozanimod was associated with lower incremental annual healthcare costs to avoid a relapse, ranging from $843,684 vs interferon beta-1a (30 μg; 95% confidence interval [CI] - $1,431,619, - $255,749) to $72,847 (95% CI - $153,444, $7750) vs fingolimod. Compared with all other DMTs, ozanimod was associated with overall healthcare cost savings ranging from $8257 vs interferon beta-1a (30 μg) to $2178 vs fingolimod. Compared with oral DMTs, ozanimod was associated with annual cost savings of $6199 with teriflunomide 7 mg, $4737 with teriflunomide 14 mg, $2178 with fingolimod, and $2793 with dimethyl fumarate. CONCLUSION Treatment with ozanimod was associated with substantial reductions in annual drug costs and total MS-related healthcare costs to avoid relapses compared with other DMTs. In the fixed-budget analysis, ozanimod demonstrated a favorable cost-effective profile relative to other DMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kantor
- Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Penn Center for Global Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Komal Gupte-Singh
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08640, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marrodan M, Piedrabuena MA, Gaitan MI, Fiol MP, Ysrraelit MC, Carnero Conttenti E, Lopez PA, Peuchot V, Correale J. Performance of McDonald 2017 multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria and evaluation of genetic ancestry in patients with a first demyelinating event in Argentina. Mult Scler 2023; 29:559-567. [PMID: 36942953 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231157276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information on performance of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria is scarce for populations from Latin America, Asia, or the Caribbean. OBJECTIVE To assess performance of revised 2017 McDonald criteria as well as evaluate genetic ancestry in a group of MS patients from Argentina experiencing a debut demyelinating event. METHODS Demographic and clinical characteristics, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and new T2 lesions were recorded at baseline and during relapses. Diagnostic accuracy in predicting conversion to clinically defined MS (CDMS) based on initial imaging applying revised 2017 criteria was evaluated and genetic ancestry-informative markers analyzed. RESULTS Of 201 patients experiencing their first demyelinating event (median follow-up 60 months), CDMS was confirmed in 67. We found 2017 diagnostic criteria were more sensitive (84% vs 67%) and less specific (14% vs 33%) than 2010 criteria, especially in a group of patients revised separately, presenting positive oligoclonal bands (88% vs 8%). Genetic testing performed in 128 cases showed 72% of patients were of European ancestry and 27% presented genetic admixture. CONCLUSION 2017 McDonald criteria showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared with 2010 criteria, shortening both time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marcela P Fiol
- Departamento de Neurología, Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Edgar Carnero Conttenti
- Unidad de Neuroinmunología, Departamento de Neurociencias, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pablo Adrian Lopez
- Unidad de Neuroinmunología, Departamento de Neurociencias, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jorge Correale
- Departamento de Neurología, Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina/Instituto de Química y Fisicoquímica Biológicas (IQUIFIB), CONICET/Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Countermovement Jumps Detect Subtle Motor Deficits in People with Multiple Sclerosis below the Clinical Threshold. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11030774. [PMID: 36979753 PMCID: PMC10044802 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS), there are currently no sensitive assessments to evaluate complex motor functions. The countermovement jump (CMJ), a high-challenge task in form of a maximal vertical bipedal jump, has already been investigated as a reliable assessment in healthy subjects for lower extremity motor function. The aim was to investigate whether it is possible to use CMJ to identify subthreshold motor deficits in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). All participants (99 pwMS and 33 healthy controls) performed three maximal CMJs on a force plate. PwMS with full motor function and healthy controls (HC) did not differ significantly in age, disease duration, Body Mass Index and the Expanded Disability Scale Score. In comparison to HC, pwMS with full motor function demonstrated a significantly decreased CMJ performance in almost all observed kinetic, temporal and performance parameters (p < 0.05). With increasing disability in pwMS, it was also observed that jump performance decreased significantly. This study showed that the CMJ, as a high challenge task, could detect motor deficits in pwMS below the clinical threshold of careful neurological examination. Longitudinal studies are pending to evaluate whether the CMJ can be used as a standardized measure of disease progression.
Collapse
|
20
|
Guger M, Enzinger C, Leutmezer F, Di Pauli F, Kraus J, Kalcher S, Kvas E, Berger T. Effects of horizontal versus vertical switching of disease-modifying treatment after platform drugs on disease activity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria. J Neurol 2023; 270:3103-3111. [PMID: 36862148 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11644-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare in a nationwide observational cohort the effectiveness, frequency and reasons for treatment interruption of dimethylfumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide (TERI) (horizontal switchers) versus alemtuzumab (AZM), cladribine (CLAD), fingolimod (FTY), natalizumab (NTZ), ocrelizumab (OCR) and ozanimod (OZA) (vertical switchers) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) and prior interferon beta (IFN-beta) or glatiramer-acetate (GLAT) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS The "horizontal switch cohort" included 669 and the "vertical switch cohort" 800 RRMS patients. We used propensity scores for inverse probability weighting in generalized linear (GLM) and Cox proportional hazards models to correct for bias in this non-randomized registry study. RESULTS Estimated mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) were 0.39 for horizontal and 0.17 for vertical switchers. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) in the GLM model showed an increased relapse probability of 86% for horizontal versus vertical switchers (IRR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.38-2.50; p < 0.001). Analyzing the time to the first relapse after treatment switch by Cox regression, a hazard ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 1.24-2.02; p < 0.001) indicated an increased risk of 58% for horizontal switchers. The hazard ratios for treatment interruption comparing horizontal versus vertical switchers were 1.78 (95% CI 1.46-2.18; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Horizontal switching after a platform therapy resulted in a higher relapse and interrupt probability and was associated with a trend towards less EDSS improvement comparing to vertical switching in Austrian RRMS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Guger
- Department of Neurology, Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen Hospital Steyr, Sierninger Straße 170, 4400, Steyr, Austria.
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
| | | | - Fritz Leutmezer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franziska Di Pauli
- Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jörg Kraus
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University and Salzburger Landeskliniken, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aungsumart S, Apiwattanakul M. Clinical and fringe benefits of rituximab in multiple sclerosis treatment in a poor resource setting: Case series and cost analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 73:104673. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023]
|
22
|
Rispoli MG, D'Apolito M, Pozzilli V, Tomassini V. Lessons from immunotherapies in multiple sclerosis. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 193:293-311. [PMID: 36803817 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85555-6.00013-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
The improved understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS) neurobiology alongside the development of novel markers of disease will allow precision medicine to be applied to MS patients, bringing the promise of improved care. Combinations of clinical and paraclinical data are currently used for diagnosis and prognosis. The addition of advanced magnetic resonance imaging and biofluid markers has been strongly encouraged, since classifying patients according to the underlying biology will improve monitoring and treatment strategies. For example, silent progression seems to contribute significantly more than relapses to overall disability accumulation, but currently approved treatments for MS act mainly on neuroinflammation and offer only a partial protection against neurodegeneration. Further research, involving traditional and adaptive trial designs, should strive to halt, repair or protect against central nervous system damage. To personalize new treatments, their selectivity, tolerability, ease of administration, and safety must be considered, while to personalize treatment approaches, patient preferences, risk-aversion, and lifestyle must be factored in, and patient feedback used to indicate real-world treatment efficacy. The use of biosensors and machine-learning approaches to integrate biological, anatomical, and physiological parameters will take personalized medicine a step closer toward the patient's virtual twin, in which treatments can be tried before they are applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna G Rispoli
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB) and Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; MS Centre, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria D'Apolito
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB) and Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; MS Centre, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Valeria Pozzilli
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB) and Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; MS Centre, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Valentina Tomassini
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB) and Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; MS Centre, SS. Annunziata University Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Multiple sclerosis diagnostic delay and its associated factors in Upper Egyptian patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2249. [PMID: 36754987 PMCID: PMC9908930 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28864-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The earlier the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), the sooner disease-modifying treatments can be initiated. However, significant delays still occur in developing countries. We aimed to identify factors leading to delayed diagnosis of MS in Upper Egypt. One hundred forty-two patients with remitting relapsing MS (RRMS) were recruited from 3 MS units in Upper Egypt. Detailed demographic and clinical data were collected. Neurological examination and assessment of the Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were performed. The mean age was 33.52 ± 8.96 years with 72.5% of patients were females. The mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 18.63 ± 27.87 months and the median was 3 months. Seventy-two patients (50.7%) achieved diagnosis within three months after the first presenting symptom (early diagnosis), while seventy patients (49.3%) had more than three months delay in diagnosis (delayed diagnosis). Patients with a delayed diagnosis frequently presented in the period before 2019 and had a significantly higher rate of initial non-motor presentation, initial non-neurological consultations, prior misdiagnoses, and a higher relapse rate. Another possible factor was delayed MRI acquisition following the initial presentation in sixty-six (46.5%) patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that earlier presentation, initial non-neurological consultation, and prior misdiagnosis were independent predictors of diagnostic delay. Despite advances in MS management in Egypt, initial non-neurological consultation and previous misdiagnoses are significant factors responsible for delayed diagnosis in Upper Egypt.
Collapse
|
24
|
Swallow E, Pham T, Patterson-Lomba O, Yin L, Gomez-Lievano A, Liu J, Tencer T, Gupte-Singh K. Comparative efficacy and safety of ozanimod and ponesimod for relapsing multiple sclerosis: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 71:104551. [PMID: 36791623 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ozanimod and ponesimod are sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Given that no head-to-head trials have assessed these two treatments, we performed a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to compare efficacy and safety outcomes between ozanimod and ponesimod for MS. METHODS A MAIC compared efficacy and safety of ozanimod and ponesimod at 2 years. Outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) and percentage change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) as well as rates of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (AEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and other safety outcomes. Individual patient-level data were obtained for ozanimod from the RADIANCE-B trial, while aggregate-level patient data were obtained for ponesimod from the OPTIMUM trial. The MAIC was not anchored owing to lack of a common comparator across the two trials. The following characteristics were matched between the trials' populations: age, sex, time since MS symptom onset, relapses in prior year, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, disease-modifying therapies received in the prior 2 years, absence of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions, and percentage of patients from Eastern Europe. RESULTS After matching, key baseline characteristics were balanced between patients receiving ozanimod and ponesimod. Compared with ponesimod, ozanimod had a numerically lower ARR (rate ratio: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.57, 1.10]) and was associated with a significant reduction in BVL (% change difference: 0.20 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.36]). Additionally, ozanimod was associated with a significantly lower risk of TEAEs (risk difference: -11.9% [95% CI: -16.8%, -7.0%]), AEs leading to discontinuation (-6.1% [95% CI: -8.9%, -3.4%]), and lymphocyte count <0.2 K/μL (-2.3% [95% CI: -4.2%, -0.5%]). There were no statistically significant differences in the other safety outcomes. CONCLUSION The MAIC results suggest that, compared with ponesimod, ozanimod is more effective in preserving brain volume, is comparable in terms of reducing relapse rates, and has a favorable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse Swallow
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave., 14th floor, Boston, MA 02199, United States of America.
| | - Timothy Pham
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ 08648, United States of America
| | - Oscar Patterson-Lomba
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave., 14th floor, Boston, MA 02199, United States of America
| | - Lei Yin
- Analysis Group, Inc., 333 S. Hope St., #27, Los Angeles, CA 90071, United States of America
| | - Andres Gomez-Lievano
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave., 14th floor, Boston, MA 02199, United States of America
| | - Jingyi Liu
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave., 14th floor, Boston, MA 02199, United States of America
| | - Tom Tencer
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ 08648, United States of America
| | - Komal Gupte-Singh
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ 08648, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy in MS patients over 60 years old and its impact on relapse rate and disease progression. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 225:107612. [PMID: 36701940 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND / AIMS The benefit of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is unclear for older patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), namely those who have not experienced clinical disease activity for a prolonged time. We aimed to compare baseline differences and clinical outcomes between DMT discontinuers and continuers in a cohort of MS patients older than 60 years. METHODS Retrospective, observational study identifying MS patients aged over 60 years, stable on DMT> 24 months. Additional inclusion criteria were a previous diagnosis of relapsing MS and a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Differences between groups (continuers/discontinuers) were assessed. For risk of relapse and of confirmed disability worsening at follow up, a time to outcome survival model was constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression, testing for possible risk predictors. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were included (68.6% female), with a mean age at diagnosis of 42.1 ( ± 9.5) years and a median EDSS score of 3 (IQR 2) at the age of 60 years (baseline). Thirteen patients discontinued DMT after baseline, in a mean follow-up time of 77.1 months ( ± 40.2). No differences were found between DMT continuers vs discontinuers. DMT discontinuation did not predict risk to relapse (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.04-3.80, p = 0.408) or disability worsening at follow-up (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.31-2.22, p = 0.712). MRI gadolinium-enhancing lesions and EDSS score > 3 at baseline were found to be independent predictors of risk to relapse and disability worsening at follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION DMT discontinuation did not seem to influence clinical outcome, equating with the perceived limited effect of continued immunomodulation on older stable and/or progressive patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen Q, Hattori T, Tomisato H, Ohara M, Hirata K, Yokota T. Turning and multitask gait unmask gait disturbance in mild-to-moderate multiple sclerosis: Underlying specific cortical thinning and connecting fibers damage. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 44:1193-1208. [PMID: 36409700 PMCID: PMC9875928 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes gait and cognitive impairments that are partially normalized by compensatory mechanisms. We aimed to identify the gait tasks that unmask gait disturbance and the underlying neural correlates in MS. We included 25 patients with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale score: median 2.0, interquartile range 1.0-2.5) and 19 healthy controls. Fast-paced gait examinations with inertial measurement units were conducted, including straight or circular walking with or without cognitive/motor tasks, and the timed up and go test (TUG). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to distinguish both groups by the gait parameters. The correlation between gait parameters and cortical thickness or fractional anisotropy values was examined by using three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging, respectively (corrected p < .05). Total TUG duration (>6.0 s, sensitivity 88.0%, specificity 84.2%) and stride velocity during cognitive dual-task circular walking (<1.12 m/s, 84.0%, 84.2%) had the highest discriminative power of the two groups. Deterioration of these gait parameters was correlated with thinner cortical thickness in regional areas, including the left precuneus and left temporoparietal junction, overlapped with parts of the default mode network, ventral attention network, and frontoparietal network. Total TUG duration was negatively correlated with fractional anisotropy values in the deep cerebral white matter areas. Turning and multitask gait may be optimal to unveil partially compensated gait disturbance in patients with mild-to-moderate MS through dynamic balance control and multitask processing, based on the structural damage in functional networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingmeng Chen
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Takaaki Hattori
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Tomisato
- Radiology Center, Division of Integrated FacilitiesTokyo Medical and Dental University HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Masahiro Ohara
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Kosei Hirata
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Takanori Yokota
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Constantinescu V, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Current status and new developments in sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor antagonism: fingolimod and more. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2022; 18:675-693. [PMID: 36260948 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2022.2138330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fingolimod was the first oral disease-modifying treatment approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) that serves as a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) agonist. The efficacy is primarily mediated by S1PR subtype 1 activation, leading to agonist-induced down-modulation of receptor expression and further functional antagonism, blocking the egression of auto-aggressive lymphocytes from the lymph nodes in the peripheral compartment. The role of S1P signaling in the regulation of other pathways in human organisms through different S1PR subtypes has received much attention due to its immune-modulatory function and its significance for the regeneration of the central nervous system (CNS). The more selective second-generation S1PR modulators have improved safety and tolerability profiles. AREAS COVERED This review has been carried out based on current data on S1PR modulators, emphasizing the benefits of recent advances in this emergent class of immunomodulatory treatment for MS. EXPERT OPINION Ongoing clinical research suggests that S1PR modulators represent an alternative to first-line therapies in selected cases of MS. A better understanding of the relevance of selective S1PR pathways and the ambition to optimize selective modulation has improved the safety and tolerability of S1PR modulators in MS therapy and opened new perspectives for the treatment of other diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Constantinescu
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dardiotis E, Perpati G, Borsos M, Nikolaidis I, Tzanetakos D, Deretzi G, Koutlas E, Kilidireas C, Mitsikostas DD, Hadjigeorgiou G, Grigoriadis N. Real-World Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Teriflunomide for Two Years: Patient-Reported Outcomes from the AURELIO Study in Greece. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:1375-1390. [PMID: 35829919 PMCID: PMC9338205 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00384-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a real-world clinical setting can provide detailed information about MS from the patient's perspective. PROs were used here to assess quality of life (QoL), treatment satisfaction, clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes in a Greek cohort of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients treated with oral teriflunomide (14 mg/day). METHODS AURELIO was a 2-year, prospective, observational study whose QoL primary endpoint was assessed with the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29). Secondary endpoints included analyses of Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), annualized relapse rate (ARR), adherence, and safety outcomes. RESULTS AURELIO enrolled 282 patients (62.8% female; mean age 44.8 [SD ± 11] years; EDSS 2.0 [SD ± 1.6]; 44.6% treatment-naïve), with 212 patients (75%) remaining on treatment at study end. MSIS-29 total scores remained stable, while the MSIS-29 psychological scale showed significant improvement (p = 0.0015) at 2 years vs. baseline. TSQM scores at 2 years showed significant improvements in effectiveness (+ 6.6, p = 0.0001), convenience (+ 1.9, p = 0.0256), and global satisfaction (+ 8.1, p = 0.0001) vs. baseline. Disease progression was stable as indicated by non-significant changes in PDDS and EDSS vs. baseline. The ARR was low at 0.065, with a slightly higher ARR in previously treated (0.070) vs. naïve patients (0.058). Adherence was high at > 90%. Overall, 91 patients (32.3%) in the study reported a total of 215 safety events (32 serious, of which 21 were classified as mild-moderate). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS These data highlight the importance of PROs to facilitate personalized treatment strategies in MS. In line with other teriflunomide studies, AURELIO showed stable QoL, efficacy and safety outcomes, and good treatment satisfaction both in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients in this Greek cohort of patients with RRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efthymios Dardiotis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Mariann Borsos
- AdWare Research Development and Consulting Ltd, Balatonfüred, Hungary
| | - Ioannis Nikolaidis
- 2nd Neurology Department, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tzanetakos
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Deretzi
- Neurology Clinic, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Constantinos Kilidireas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Hadjigeorgiou
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Grigoriadis
- 2nd Neurology Department, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yamamoto T, Lacheret C, Fukutomi H, Kamraoui RA, Denat L, Zhang B, Prevost V, Zhang L, Ruet A, Triaire B, Dousset V, Coupé P, Tourdias T. Validation of a Denoising Method Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction to Quantify Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Load on Fast FLAIR Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:1099-1106. [PMID: 35902124 PMCID: PMC9575422 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Accurate quantification of WM lesion load is essential for the care of patients with multiple sclerosis. We tested whether the combination of accelerated 3D-FLAIR and denoising using deep learning-based reconstruction could provide a relevant strategy while shortening the imaging examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-eight patients with multiple sclerosis were prospectively examined using 4 implementations of 3D-FLAIR with decreasing scan times (4 minutes 54 seconds, 2 minutes 35 seconds, 1 minute 40 seconds, and 1 minute 15 seconds). Each FLAIR sequence was reconstructed without and with denoising using deep learning-based reconstruction, resulting in 8 FLAIR sequences per patient. Image quality was assessed with the Likert scale, apparent SNR, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Manual and automatic lesion segmentations, performed randomly and blindly, were quantitatively evaluated against ground truth using the absolute volume difference, true-positive rate, positive predictive value, Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and F1 score based on the lesion count. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and 2-way ANOVA were performed. RESULTS Both image-quality evaluation and the various metrics showed deterioration when the FLAIR scan time was accelerated. However, denoising using deep learning-based reconstruction significantly improved subjective image quality and quantitative performance metrics, particularly for manual segmentation. Overall, denoising using deep learning-based reconstruction helped to recover contours closer to those from the criterion standard and to capture individual lesions otherwise overlooked. The Dice similarity coefficient was equivalent between the 2-minutes-35-seconds-long FLAIR with denoising using deep learning-based reconstruction and the 4-minutes-54-seconds-long reference FLAIR sequence. CONCLUSIONS Denoising using deep learning-based reconstruction helps to recognize multiple sclerosis lesions buried in the noise of accelerated FLAIR acquisitions, a possibly useful strategy to efficiently shorten the scan time in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Yamamoto
- From the Institut de Bio-imagerie (T.Y., H.F., L.D., V.D., T.T.), University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Lacheret
- Neuroimagerie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique (C.L., V.D., T.T.)
| | - H Fukutomi
- From the Institut de Bio-imagerie (T.Y., H.F., L.D., V.D., T.T.), University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - R A Kamraoui
- Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (R.A.K., P.C.), University Bordeaux, Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bordeaux Institut National Polytechnique, Talence, France
| | - L Denat
- From the Institut de Bio-imagerie (T.Y., H.F., L.D., V.D., T.T.), University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - B Zhang
- Canon Medical Systems Europe (B.Z.), Zoetermeer, the Netherlands
| | - V Prevost
- Canon Medical Systems (V.P., B.T.), Tochigi, Japan
| | - L Zhang
- Canon Medical Systems China (L.Z.), Beijing, China
| | - A Ruet
- Service de Neurologie (A.R.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - B Triaire
- Canon Medical Systems (V.P., B.T.), Tochigi, Japan
| | - V Dousset
- From the Institut de Bio-imagerie (T.Y., H.F., L.D., V.D., T.T.), University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Neuroimagerie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique (C.L., V.D., T.T.).,NeurocentreMagendie (V.D., T.T.), University of Bordeaux, L'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - P Coupé
- Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (R.A.K., P.C.), University Bordeaux, Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bordeaux Institut National Polytechnique, Talence, France
| | - T Tourdias
- From the Institut de Bio-imagerie (T.Y., H.F., L.D., V.D., T.T.), University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France .,Neuroimagerie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique (C.L., V.D., T.T.).,NeurocentreMagendie (V.D., T.T.), University of Bordeaux, L'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Niiranen M, Koikkalainen J, Lötjönen J, Selander T, Cajanus A, Hartikainen P, Simula S, Vanninen R, Remes AM. Grey matter atrophy in patients with benign multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav 2022; 12:e2679. [PMID: 35765699 PMCID: PMC9304852 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain atrophy appears during the progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) and is associated with the disability caused by the disease. METHODS We investigated global and regional grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes, WM lesion load, and corpus callosum index (CCI), in benign relapsing-remitting MS (BRRMS, n = 35) with and without any treatment and compared those to aggressive relapsing-remitting MS (ARRMS, n = 46). Structures were analyzed by using an automated MRI quantification tool (cNeuro®). RESULTS The total brain and cerebral WM volumes were larger in BRRMS than in ARRMS (p = .014, p = .017 respectively). In BRRMS, total brain volumes, regional GM volumes, and CCI were found similar whether or not disease-modifying treatment (DMT) was used. The total (p = .033), as well as subcortical (p = .046) and deep WM (p = .041) lesion load volumes were larger in BRRMS patients without DMT. Cortical GM volumes did not differ between BRRMS and ARRMS, but the volumes of total brain tissue (p = .014) and thalami (p = .003) were larger in patients with BRRMS compared to ARRMS. A positive correlation was found between CCI and whole-brain volume in both BRRMS (r = .73, p < .001) and ARRMS (r = .80, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Thalamic volume is the most prominent measure to differentiate BRRMS and ARRMS. Validation of automated quantification of CCI provides an additional applicable MRI biomarker to detect brain atrophy in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja Niiranen
- Neuro Center, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | | | - Tuomas Selander
- Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Antti Cajanus
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Hartikainen
- Neuro Center, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sakari Simula
- Department of Neurology, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Radiology, Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Stefano N, Barkhof F, Montalban X, Achiron A, Derfuss T, Chan A, Hodgkinson S, Prat A, Leocani L, Schmierer K, Sellebjerg F, Vermersch P, Wiendl H, Keller B, Roy S. Early Reduction of MRI Activity During 6 Months of Treatment With Cladribine Tablets for Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: MAGNIFY-MS. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2022; 9:9/4/e1187. [PMID: 35701185 PMCID: PMC9197134 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives The onset of action for high-efficacy immunotherapies in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important parameter. This study (MAGNIFY-MS) evaluates the onset of action of cladribine tablets by observing changes in combined unique active (CUA) MRI lesion counts during the first 6 months of treatment in patients with highly active relapsing MS. Methods MRI was performed at screening, baseline, and at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 after initiating treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. CUA lesion counts, defined as the sum of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions and new or enlarging active T2 lesions (without T1 Gd+), were compared between postbaseline and the baseline period and standardized to the period length and the number of MRIs performed. Results Included in this analysis were 270 patients who received ≥1 dose of cladribine tablets. After treatment initiation, significant reductions in mean CUA lesion counts were observed from month 1 onward compared with the baseline period (−1.193 between month 1 and month 6, −1.500 between month 2 and month 6, and −1.692 between month 3 and month 6; all p < 0.0001). Mean T1 Gd+ lesion counts were decreased from month 2 onward compared with baseline (−0.857 at month 2, −1.355 at month 3, and −1.449 at month 6; all p < 0.0001), whereas the proportion of patients without any CUA lesions increased from 52.0% between month 1 and month 6 to 80.5% between month 3 and month 6. Discussion Findings suggest an early onset of action for cladribine tablets, with an increasing reduction in active MRI lesions over time. Trial Registration Information NCT03364036; Date registered: December 06, 2017. Classification of Evidence Using frequent MRI assessments of the brain over the first 6 months of the MAGNIFY-MS study (NCT03364036), we aimed to determine the onset of action of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in adult patients with highly active relapsing MS. This study provides Class IV evidence that, in such patients, treatment with cladribine tablets is associated with an early onset of action with reductions in active MRI lesion counts from month 2 (day 60) onward, with an increasing reduction in such lesions over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de Stefano
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Xavier Montalban
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Anat Achiron
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Tobias Derfuss
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Andrew Chan
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Suzanne Hodgkinson
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Alexandre Prat
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Letizia Leocani
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Klaus Schmierer
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Patrick Vermersch
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Birgit Keller
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Sanjeev Roy
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Involvement of the Intestinal Microbiota in the Appearance of Multiple Sclerosis: Aloe vera and Citrus bergamia as Potential Candidates for Intestinal Health. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14132711. [PMID: 35807891 PMCID: PMC9269320 DOI: 10.3390/nu14132711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological and inflammatory autoimmune disease of the Central Nervous System in which selective activation of T and B lymphocytes prompts a reaction against myelin, inducing demyelination and axonal loss. Although MS is recognized to be an autoimmune pathology, the specific causes are many; thus, to date, it has been considered a disorder resulting from environmental factors in genetically susceptible individuals. Among the environmental factors hypothetically involved in MS, nutrition seems to be well related, although the role of nutritional factors is still unclear. The gut of mammals is home to a bacterial community of about 2000 species known as the “microbiota”, whose composition changes throughout the life of each individual. There are five bacterial phylas that make up the microbiota in healthy adults: Firmicutes (79.4%), Bacteroidetes (16.9%), Actinobacteria (2.5%), Proteobacteria (1%) and Verrucomicrobia (0.1%). The diversity and abundance of microbial populations justifies a condition known as eubiosis. On the contrary, the state of dysbiosis refers to altered diversity and abundance of the microbiota. Many studies carried out in the last few years have demonstrated that there is a relationship between the intestinal microflora and the progression of multiple sclerosis. This correlation was also demonstrated by the discovery that patients with MS, treated with specific prebiotics and probiotics, have greatly increased bacterial diversity in the intestinal microbiota, which might be otherwise reduced or absent. In particular, natural extracts of Aloe vera and bergamot fruits, rich in polyphenols and with a high percentage of polysaccharides (mostly found in indigestible and fermentable fibers), appear to be potential candidates to re-equilibrate the gut microbiota in MS patients. The present review article aims to assess the pathophysiological mechanisms that reveal the role of the microbiota in the development of MS. In addition, the potential for supplementing patients undergoing early stages of MS with Aloe vera as well as bergamot fibers, on top of conventional drug treatments, is discussed.
Collapse
|
33
|
Proteomics in Multiple Sclerosis: The Perspective of the Clinician. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23095162. [PMID: 35563559 PMCID: PMC9100097 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23095162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the inflammatory demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects approximately 2.8 million people worldwide. In the last decade, a new era was heralded in by a new phenotypic classification, a new diagnostic protocol and the first ever therapeutic guideline, making personalized medicine the aim of MS management. However, despite this great evolution, there are still many aspects of the disease that are unknown and need to be further researched. A hallmark of these research are molecular biomarkers that could help in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of the disease. Proteomics, a rapidly evolving discipline of molecular biology may fulfill this dire need for the discovery of molecular biomarkers. In this review, we aimed to give a comprehensive summary on the utility of proteomics in the field of MS research. We reviewed the published results of the method in case of the pathogenesis of the disease and for biomarkers of diagnosis, differential diagnosis, conversion of disease courses, disease activity, progression and immunological therapy. We found proteomics to be a highly effective emerging tool that has been providing important findings in the research of MS.
Collapse
|
34
|
Marshall CR, Noyce AJ, Neligan A, Dobson R. Brain health: The hidden casualty of a humanitarian crisis. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2022; 15:100374. [PMID: 35531495 PMCID: PMC9072995 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R. Marshall
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Neurology Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Alastair J. Noyce
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Neurology Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Aidan Neligan
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Neurology Department, Homerton University Hospital, London E9 6SR, UK
| | - Ruth Dobson
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Neurology Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nociti V, Romozzi M, Mirabella M. Update on Multiple Sclerosis Molecular Biomarkers to Monitor Treatment Effects. J Pers Med 2022; 12:549. [PMID: 35455665 PMCID: PMC9024668 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system characterized by broad inter- and intraindividual heterogeneity. The relapse rate, disability progression, and lesion load assessed through MRI are used to detect disease activity and response to treatment. Although it is possible to standardize these characteristics in larger patient groups, so far, this has been difficult to achieve in individual patients. Easily detectable molecular biomarkers can be powerful tools, permitting a tailored therapy approach for MS patients. However, only a few molecular biomarkers have been routinely used in clinical practice as the validation process, and their transfer into clinical practice takes a long time. This review describes the characteristics of an ideal MS biomarker, the challenges of establishing new biomarkers, and promising molecular biomarkers from blood or CSF samples used to monitor MS treatment effects in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Nociti
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.R.); (M.M.)
- Centro di Ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Romozzi
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.R.); (M.M.)
| | - Massimiliano Mirabella
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.R.); (M.M.)
- Centro di Ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Biernacki T, Kokas Z, Sandi D, Füvesi J, Fricska-Nagy Z, Faragó P, Kincses TZ, Klivényi P, Bencsik K, Vécsei L. Emerging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis in the Blood and the CSF: A Focus on Neurofilaments and Therapeutic Considerations. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23063383. [PMID: 35328802 PMCID: PMC8951485 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common immune-mediated chronic neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) affecting young people. This is due to the permanent disability, cognitive impairment, and the enormous detrimental impact MS can exert on a patient's health-related quality of life. It is of great importance to recognise it in time and commence adequate treatment at an early stage. The currently used disease-modifying therapies (DMT) aim to reduce disease activity and thus halt disability development, which in current clinical practice are monitored by clinical and imaging parameters but not by biomarkers found in blood and/or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Both clinical and radiological measures routinely used to monitor disease activity lack information on the fundamental pathophysiological features and mechanisms of MS. Furthermore, they lag behind the disease process itself. By the time a clinical relapse becomes evident or a new lesion appears on the MRI scan, potentially irreversible damage has already occurred in the CNS. In recent years, several biomarkers that previously have been linked to other neurological and immunological diseases have received increased attention in MS. Additionally, other novel, potential biomarkers with prognostic and diagnostic properties have been detected in the CSF and blood of MS patients. AREAS COVERED In this review, we summarise the most up-to-date knowledge and research conducted on the already known and most promising new biomarker candidates found in the CSF and blood of MS patients. DISCUSSION the current diagnostic criteria of MS relies on three pillars: MRI imaging, clinical events, and the presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF (which was reinstated into the diagnostic criteria by the most recent revision). Even though the most recent McDonald criteria made the diagnosis of MS faster than the prior iteration, it is still not an infallible diagnostic toolset, especially at the very early stage of the clinically isolated syndrome. Together with the gold standard MRI and clinical measures, ancillary blood and CSF biomarkers may not just improve diagnostic accuracy and speed but very well may become agents to monitor therapeutic efficacy and make even more personalised treatment in MS a reality in the near future. The major disadvantage of these biomarkers in the past has been the need to obtain CSF to measure them. However, the recent advances in extremely sensitive immunoassays made their measurement possible from peripheral blood even when present only in minuscule concentrations. This should mark the beginning of a new biomarker research and utilisation era in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Biernacki
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Zsófia Kokas
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Dániel Sandi
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Judit Füvesi
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Zsanett Fricska-Nagy
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Péter Faragó
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Tamás Zsigmond Kincses
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Péter Klivényi
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - Krisztina Bencsik
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
| | - László Vécsei
- Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Neurology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; (T.B.); (Z.K.); (D.S.); (J.F.); (Z.F.-N.); (P.F.); (T.Z.K.); (P.K.); (K.B.)
- MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +36-62-545-356; Fax: +36-62-545-597
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. The need for a strategic therapeutic approach: multiple sclerosis in check. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2022; 13:20406223211063032. [PMID: 35070250 PMCID: PMC8777338 DOI: 10.1177/20406223211063032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune neurological disease. Its therapeutic management has drastically evolved in the recent years with the development of specific disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Together with the established injectables, oral and intravenous alternatives are now available for MS patients with significant benefits to modulate the disease course. Certain drugs present with a higher efficacy than the others, profiles and frequencies of adverse events differentiate as well. Thus due to the several and different treatment alternatives, the therapeutic approach adopted by neurologists requires a tactical focus for a targeted, timed, and meaningful treatment decision. An integration of rational and emotional control with proper communication skills is necessary for shared decision-making with patients. In this perspective paper, we reinforce the necessary concept of strategic MS treatment approach using all available therapies based on scientific evidence and current experience. We apply a didactic analogy to the strategic game chess. The opening with oriented attack (i.e. already in early disease stages as clinical isolated syndrome), a correct choice of chess pieces to move (i.e. among the several DMTs), a re-assessment reaction to different scenarios (e.g. sustained disease activity, adverse events, and family planning) and the advantage of real-world data are discussed to try the best approach to ultimately successfully approach the best personalized MS treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernan Inojosa
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Undine Proschmann
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Koeditz D, Frensch J, Bierbaum M, Ness NH, Ettle B, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Adlard N, Tiwari S, Ziemssen T. Comparing the long-term clinical and economic impact of ofatumumab versus dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A cost-consequence analysis from a societal perspective in Germany. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2022; 8:20552173221085741. [PMID: 35371535 PMCID: PMC8969034 DOI: 10.1177/20552173221085741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence suggests that early highly efficacious therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis is superior to escalation strategies. Objective A cost-consequence analysis simulated different treatment scenarios with ofatumumab (OMB), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and glatiramer acetate (GA): immediate OMB initiation as first treatment, early switch to OMB after 1 year on DMF/GA, late switch after 5 years or no switch. Methods An EDSS-based Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was applied. Cycle transitions included EDSS progression, improvement or stabilization, treatment discontinuation, relapse or death. Input data were extracted from OMB trials, a network meta-analysis, published literature, and publicly available sources. Results The late switch compared to the immediate OMB scenario resulted in a lower proportion of patients with EDSS 0-3 (Δ - 7.5% DMF; Δ - 10.3% GA), more relapses (Δ + 0.72 DMF; Δ + 1.23 GA) and lower employment rates (Δ - 4.0% DMF; Δ - 5.6% GA). The same applies to late versus early switches. No switch scenarios resulted in worse outcomes. Higher drug acquisition costs in the immediate OMB and early switch scenarios were almost compensated by lower costs for patient care and productivity loss. Conclusion Immediate OMB treatment and an early switch improves clinical and productivity outcomes while remaining almost cost neutral compared to late or no switches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Zentrum für klinische Neurowissenschaften, Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hiew S, Nguemeni C, Zeller D. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in people with multiple sclerosis: a review. Eur J Neurol 2021; 29:648-664. [PMID: 34725881 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease causing a wide range of symptoms including motor and cognitive impairment, fatigue and pain. Over the last two decades, non-invasive brain stimulation, especially transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has increasingly been used to modulate brain function in various physiological and pathological conditions. However, its experimental applications for people with MS were noted only as recently as 2010 and have been growing since then. The efficacy for use in people with MS remains questionable with the results of existing studies being largely conflicting. Hence, the aim of this review is to paint a picture of the current state of tDCS in MS research grounded on studies applying tDCS that have been done to date. METHODS A keyword search was performed to retrieve articles from the earliest article identified until 14 February 2021 using a combination of the groups (1) 'multiple sclerosis', 'MS' and 'encephalomyelitis' and (2) 'tDCS' and 'transcranial direct current stimulation'. RESULTS The analysis of the 30 articles included in this review underlined inconsistent effects of tDCS on the motor symptoms of MS based on small sample sizes. However, tDCS showed promising benefits in ameliorating fatigue, pain and cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSION Transcranial direct current stimulation is attractive as a non-drug approach in ameliorating MS symptoms, where other treatment options remain limited. The development of protocols tailored to the individual's own neuroanatomy using high definition tDCS and the introduction of network mapping in the experimental designs might help to overcome the variability between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Hiew
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carine Nguemeni
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zeller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cerebrospinal Fluid IgM and Oligoclonal IgG Bands in Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Prognosis. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11111444. [PMID: 34827444 PMCID: PMC8615995 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of intrathecal IgM synthesis (ITMS) has been associated with an aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical course. In the present systematic review, we aimed at assessing the prevalence of ITMS among different MS phenotypes. Moreover, we aimed at quantifying the risk of a second relapse in ITMS positive and oligoclonal IgG bands (OCGBs)-positive patients. We selected clinical studies reporting the ITMS prevalence assessed as oligoclonal IgM Bands (OCMBs), lipid-specific OCMBs (LS-OCMBs), and/or as an intrathecal IgM production > 0% (IgMLoc, Reiber formula). The overall prevalence of ITMS was higher in relapsing-remitting (RR) than clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients (40.1% versus 23.8%, p < 0.00001), while was in line with that detected in primary progressive MS (PPMS, 26.7%). Almost all patients (98%) with ITMS had also OCGBs. The risk of having a second relapse was higher in OCGBs positive patients (HR = 2.18, p = 0.007) but much higher in ITMS positive patients (HR = 3.62, p = 0.0005). This study revealed that the prevalence of ITMS is higher in RRMS patients. It suggests that the risk of having a second relapse, previously ascribed to OCGBs, may, to a certain extent, be related to the presence of intrathecal IgM.
Collapse
|
41
|
Schriefer D, Haase R, Ness NH, Ziemssen T. Cost of illness in multiple sclerosis by disease characteristics - A review of reviews. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 22:177-195. [PMID: 34582300 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2022.1987218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: In light of the increasing number of economic burden studies and heterogeneity in methodology and reporting standards, there is a need for robust evidence synthesis on an umbrella review level.Areas covered: We performed the first review of reviews of cost-of-illness studies in multiple sclerosis. Focusing on disaggregated costs by disease characteristics (disability level, relapse, disease course), we also characterized the underlying methodological evidence base of individual (primary) studies.Expert Commentary: We identified 17 reviews encompassing 111 unique primary studies, and a high degree of overlap across reviews. Costs were substantial, rising with disability level, relapse episodes, and disease progression. Disability was the key cost driver. Compared to mild disability, total costs for moderate disability were 1.4-2.3-fold higher and 1.8-2.9-fold higher for severe disability. With escalating disability, the share of costs outside the health system (indirect costs, informal care) increasingly outweighed the share of direct medical costs. Of all 111 primary studies, 72% gathered resource use/loss data by patient self-report. Associated costs were mostly reported by disability level (75%), followed by relapse (48%) and disease course (21%). In conclusion, although heterogeneity can make in-depth comparisons of costs across studies impossible, important patterns are broadly apparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Schriefer
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rocco Haase
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cristiano E, Abad P, Becker J, Carrá A, Correale J, Flores J, Fruns M, Garcea O, Garcia Bónitto J, Gracia F, Hamuy F, Navas C, Patrucco L, Rivera V, Velazquez M, Rojas JI. Multiple sclerosis care units in Latin America: Consensus recommendations about its objectives and functioning implementation. J Neurol Sci 2021; 429:118072. [PMID: 34509134 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.118072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Currently, there are several reasons to promote worldwide the concept of multiple sclerosis care units (MSCU) for a better management of affected patients. Ideally, the MSCU should have some human and technical resources that distinguish and improve the care of affected patients; however, local, and regional aspects should be considered when recommending how these units should operate. The objective of these consensus recommendations was to review how MSCU should work in Latin America to improve long-term outcomes in MS patients. METHODS A panel of neurology experts from Latin America dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients gathered virtually during 2019 and 2020 to carry out a consensus recommendation about objectives and functioning implementation of MSCU in Latin America. To achieve consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used. RESULTS Recommendations focused on the objectives, human and technical resources, and the general functioning that MSCU should have in Latin America. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations of these consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the health care and management of MS patients by setting how MSCU should work in our region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgardo Cristiano
- Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Patricio Abad
- Servicio Neurologia, Hospital Metropolitano de Quito, Ecuador, Profesor de Neurología PUCE, Ecuador
| | - Jefferson Becker
- Brain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Adriana Carrá
- MS Section Hospital Britanico Buenos Aires, Argentina; Neurociencias Fundación Favaloro/INECO, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - José Flores
- Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Ciudad de México, Mexico; Centro Neurológico ABC Santa Fé, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | | - Orlando Garcea
- Clínica de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Fernando Gracia
- Clinica de Esclerosis Multiple, Servicio de Neurologia Hospital Santo Tomas, Panama. Universidad Interamericana de Panama, Panama
| | - Fernando Hamuy
- Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital IMT, Paraguay; Departamento de Neurologia de Diagnóstico Codas Thompson, Paraguay
| | - Cárlos Navas
- Clinica Enfermedad Desmielinizante Clinica Universitaria Colombia, Colombia
| | - Liliana Patrucco
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Juan Ignacio Rojas
- Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario de CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Spelman T, Magyari M, Piehl F, Svenningsson A, Rasmussen PV, Kant M, Sellebjerg F, Joensen H, Hillert J, Lycke J. Treatment Escalation vs Immediate Initiation of Highly Effective Treatment for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Data From 2 Different National Strategies. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:1197-1204. [PMID: 34398221 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Importance Treatment strategies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) vary markedly between Denmark and Sweden. The difference in the association of these national strategies with clinical outcomes is unknown. Objective To investigate the association of national differences in disease-modifying treatment (DMT) strategies for RRMS with disability outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data on 4861 patients from the Danish and Swedish national multiple sclerosis (MS) registries from the date of index DMT initiation (between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016) until the last recorded visit at time of data extraction (October 2, 2019). Exposures All MS-specific DMTs initiated during the observation period were included in the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary study outcome was time to 24-week confirmed disability worsening. Secondary outcomes were 24-week confirmed disability improvement, milestone Expanded Disability Status Scale scores of 3 and 4, annualized relapse rate, time to first relapse, and treatment switching. Data were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting-based models using a propensity score to weight and correct the comparison for the imbalance of confounders observed at baseline between the 2 countries. Results A total of 2700 patients from the Swedish MS registry (1867 women [69.2%]; mean [SD] age, 36.1 [9.5] years) and 2161 patients from the Danish MS registry (1472 women [68.1%]; mean [SD] age, 37.3 [9.4 years]) started a first DMT between 2013 and 2016, were included in the analysis, and were observed for a mean (SD) of 4.1 (1.5) years. A total of 1994 Danish patients (92.3%) initiated a low to moderately effective DMT (teriflunomide, 907 [42.0%]) and 165 (7.6%) initiated a highly effective DMT, whereas a total of 1769 Swedish patients (65.5%) initiated a low to moderately effective DMT (teriflunomide, 64 [2.4%]) and 931 (34.5%) initiated a highly effective DMT. The Swedish treatment strategy was associated with a 29% reduction in the rate of postbaseline 24-week confirmed disability worsening relative to the Danish treatment strategy (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90; P = .004). The Swedish treatment strategy was also associated with a 24% reduction in the rate of reaching an expanded disability status scale score of 3 (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.97; P = .03) and a 25% reduction in the rate of reaching an expanded disability status scale score of 4 (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P = .01) relative to Danish patients. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that there is an association between differences in treatment strategies for RRMS and disability outcomes at a national level. Escalation of treatment efficacy was inferior to using more efficacious DMT as initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Spelman
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Melinda Magyari
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fredrik Piehl
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Svenningsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Matthias Kant
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic Southern Denmark, Department of Brain and Nerve Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Brain & Nerve Diseases, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Odense, Denmark
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanna Joensen
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Hillert
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Lycke
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Guler S. Factors determining the treatment ineffectiveness in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res 2021; 44:177-185. [PMID: 34396921 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2021.1967680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the suboptimal response should be well evaluated at every step of treatment. REVIEW SUMMARY Determining patients with moderate or high activity and suboptimal response to treatment (clinical variables, MRI activity, perception of the patient and physician, side effects, serious risks, etc.) and timely intervention in the treatment are very important in achieving the desired effectiveness in the long term. Within the early stages, there is a limited time interval for effective treatment of MS patients. During this time, intervention is critical to achieve long-term positive results. After diagnosis, an early and individualized specific treatment for MS, depending on the severity of the disease, can prevent radiological and physical disability in the medium/long term. CONCLUSIONS With the emergence of a number of new treatments each with their own benefits and risks, a change in the nature of interactions between patients and MS physicians has been anticipated and will be required in the patient-related clinical decision-making process in the developing MS landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Guler
- Department of Neurology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
López PA, Alonso R, Silva B, Carnero Contentti E. Natalizumab subcutaneous injection for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis patients: A new delivery route. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 55:103179. [PMID: 34339931 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo A López
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alem´an, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Ricardo Alonso
- Neurology Department, Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple (CUEM), J.M. Ramos Mejía Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Berenice Silva
- Neurology Department, Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple (CUEM), J.M. Ramos Mejía Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Edgar Carnero Contentti
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alem´an, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Voigt I, Inojosa H, Dillenseger A, Haase R, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 2021; 12:669811. [PMID: 34012452 PMCID: PMC8128142 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.669811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
An individualized innovative disease management is of great importance for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to cope with the complexity of this chronic, multidimensional disease. However, an individual state of the art strategy, with precise adjustment to the patient's characteristics, is still far from being part of the everyday care of pwMS. The development of digital twins could decisively advance the necessary implementation of an individualized innovative management of MS. Through artificial intelligence-based analysis of several disease parameters - including clinical and para-clinical outcomes, multi-omics, biomarkers, patient-related data, information about the patient's life circumstances and plans, and medical procedures - a digital twin paired to the patient's characteristic can be created, enabling healthcare professionals to handle large amounts of patient data. This can contribute to a more personalized and effective care by integrating data from multiple sources in a standardized manner, implementing individualized clinical pathways, supporting physician-patient communication and facilitating a shared decision-making. With a clear display of pre-analyzed patient data on a dashboard, patient participation and individualized clinical decisions as well as the prediction of disease progression and treatment simulation could become possible. In this review, we focus on the advantages, challenges and practical aspects of digital twins in the management of MS. We discuss the use of digital twins for MS as a revolutionary tool to improve diagnosis, monitoring and therapy refining patients' well-being, saving economic costs, and enabling prevention of disease progression. Digital twins will help make precision medicine and patient-centered care a reality in everyday life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Engel S, Protopapa M, Steffen F, Papanastasiou V, Nicolaou C, Protopapas M, Zipp F, Bittner S, Luessi F. Implications of extreme serum neurofilament light chain levels for the management of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2021; 14:17562864211001977. [PMID: 33959194 PMCID: PMC8060778 DOI: 10.1177/17562864211001977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a promising biomarker to complement the decision-making process in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, although sNfL levels are able to detect disease activity and to predict future disability, the growing evidence has not yet been translated into practicable recommendations for an implementation into clinical routine. METHODS The observation of a patient with extensive inflammatory activity in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along with an extremely high sNfL level in the absence of any clinical symptoms prompted us to investigate common characteristics of our MS patients with the highest sNfL levels in a retrospective cohort study. The 97.5th percentile was chosen as a cut-off value because the mean sNfL level of the resulting extreme neurofilament light chain (NfL) cohort corresponded well to the sNfL level of the presented case. Patient characterization included clinical and MRI assessment with a focus on disease activity markers. sNfL levels were determined by single molecule array. RESULTS The 97.5th percentile of our MS cohort (958 sNfL measurements in 455 patients) corresponded to a threshold value of 46.1 pg/ml. The mean sNfL level of the extreme sNfL cohort (n = 24) was 95.6 pg/ml (standard deviation 68.4). Interestingly, only 15 patients suffered from a relapse at the time point of sample collection, whereas nine patients showed no signs of clinical disease activity. sNfL levels of patients with and without relapse did not differ [median 81.3 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 48.0-128) versus 80.2 pg/ml (IQR 46.4-97.6), p = 0.815]. The proportion of patients with contrast-enhancing lesions was high and also did not differ between patients with and without relapse (92.9% versus 87.5%, p = 0.538); 78.9% of the patients not receiving a high-efficacious therapy had ongoing disease activity during a 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION Extremely high sNfL levels are indicative of subclinical disease activity and might complement treatment decisions in ambiguous cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinah Engel
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program
Translational Neuroscience (FTN), and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine-Main
Neuroscience Network (rmn), University Medical Center of the
Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Protopapa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program
Translational Neuroscience (FTN), and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine-Main
Neuroscience Network (rmn), University Medical Center of the
Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Falk Steffen
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program
Translational Neuroscience (FTN), and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine-Main
Neuroscience Network (rmn), University Medical Center of the
Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program
Translational Neuroscience (FTN), and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine-Main
Neuroscience Network (rmn), University Medical Center of the
Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stefan Bittner
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program
Translational Neuroscience (FTN), and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine-Main
Neuroscience Network (rmn), University Medical Center of the
Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Felix Luessi
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program
Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn²),
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz,
Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz 55131, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Freedman MS, Coyle PK, Comi G, L Scarberry S, Damian D, Hyvert Y, Dangond F, Galazka A, Jack D, Lebson LA, Leist TP. Early MRI outcomes in participants with a first clinical demyelinating event at risk of multiple sclerosis in the ORACLE-MS study. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2021; 7:2055217321990852. [PMID: 33717501 PMCID: PMC7925953 DOI: 10.1177/2055217321990852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the Phase 3, 96-week ORACLE-MS study, cladribine tablets 10 mg (3.5 or 5.25 mg/kg cumulative dosage over two years) significantly reduced lesions associated with multiple sclerosis versus placebo in participants following a first clinical demyelinating event (FCDE). Objective To determine the timing of effects of cladribine tablets on lesion activity assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of cladribine tablets versus placebo in ORACLE-MS on secondary MRI endpoints including T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+), new or enlarging T2 lesions, and combined unique active lesions assessed on MRI scans performed at screening and every 3 months thereafter. Results Compared to placebo, cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg treatment appeared to lead to a trend of reductions in the mean number of T1 Gd+ lesions by Week 13 (first post-baseline scan: 0.37 vs. 1.00), new or enlarging T2 (0.20 vs. 1.01) and combined unique active (0.29 vs. 1.91) lesions by Week 24. Low lesion counts were maintained with cladribine tablets throughout 96 weeks. Similar results were observed with the 5.25 mg/kg dosage. Conclusion In participants with an FCDE, cladribine tablets appeared to reduce lesion numbers within 13 weeks (time of first evaluation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Freedman
- Department of Medicine and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Patricia K Coyle
- Department of Neurology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Institute of Experimental Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Doris Damian
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Fernando Dangond
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | - Lori A Lebson
- EMD Serono, Inc, Rockland, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas P Leist
- Comprehensive Multiple Sclerosis Center, Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ziemssen T, Albrecht H, Haas J, Klotz L, Lang M, Lassek C, Schmidt S, Ettle B, Schulze-Topphoff U. Descriptive Analysis of Real-World Data on Fingolimod Long-Term Treatment of Young Adult RRMS Patients. Front Neurol 2021; 12:637107. [PMID: 33763018 PMCID: PMC7982917 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.637107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fingolimod (Gilenya®) is approved for adult and pediatric patients with highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Objectives: The objective was to describe the effectiveness of fingolimod in young adults compared to older patients in clinical practice. Methods: PANGAEA is the largest prospective, multi-center, non-interventional, long-term study evaluating fingolimod in RRMS. We descriptively analyzed demographics, MS characteristics, and severity in two subgroups of young adults (≤20 and >20 to ≤30 years) and older patients (>30 years). Results: Young adults had lower Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores compared to older patients (1.8 and 2.3 vs. 3.2) at baseline. The mean EDSS scores remained stable over 5 years in all subgroups. Young adults had higher annual relapse rates (2.0 and 1.7 vs. 1.4) at study entry, which were reduced by approximately 80% in all subgroups over 5 years. The proportion of patients with no clinical disease activity in year 4 was 52.6 and 73.4 vs. 66.9% in patients ≤20, >20 to ≤30 years and >30 years, respectively. The symbol digit modalities test score increased by 15.25 ± 8.3 and 8.3 ± 11.3 (mean ± SD) from baseline in patients >20 to ≤30 and >30 years. Conclusions: Real-world evidence suggests a long-term treatment benefit of fingolimod in young RRMS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjalf Ziemssen
- Zentrum für klinische Neurowissenschaften, Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Judith Haas
- Zentrum für Multiple Sklerose, Juedisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Klotz
- Klinik für Allgemeine Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Lang
- Nervenärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Lassek
- Neurologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Kassel und Vellmar, Kassel, Germany
| | - Stephan Schmidt
- Neurologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Schmidt, Neudecker, Viebahn & Kronenberger, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression? Front Neurol 2021; 11:628542. [PMID: 33551982 PMCID: PMC7859270 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.628542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The presence of disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important hallmark for MS patients in the course of their disease. The transition from relapsing remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive forms of the disease (SPMS) represents a significant change in their quality of life and perception of the disease. It could also be a therapeutic key for opportunities, where approaches different from those in the initial phases of the disease can be adopted. The characterization of structural biomarkers (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging or neurofilament light chain) has been proposed to differentiate between both phenotypes. However, there is no definite threshold between them. Whether the risk of clinical progression can be predicted by structural markers at early disease phases is still a focus of clinical research. However, several theories and pathological evidence suggest that both disease phenotypes are part of a continuum with common pathophysiological mechanisms. In this case, the clinical evaluation of the patients would play a preponderant role above destruction biomarkers for the early identification of disability progression and SPMS. For this purpose, the use of clinical tools beyond the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) should be considered. Besides established functional tests such as the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), patient's neurological history or digital resources may help neurologists in the decision-taking. In this article, we discuss arguments for the use of clinical markers in the detection of secondary progressive MS and the characterization of progressive disease activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernan Inojosa
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Undine Proschmann
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|