Mixed ductal-endocrine carcinomas of the pancreas and ductal adenocarcinomas with scattered endocrine cells: characterization of the endocrine cells

Pancreatic mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma with intraductal growth: A case report with radiologic-pathologic correlations

Pancreatic mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare malignant tumors of the pancreas. They are composed histologically of both acinar and neuroendocrine cells. The pancreatic duct is known to be an important site of tumor growth for acinar cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors, and intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms. To the best of our knowledge, there has been only 1 report of a mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma growing into the pancreatic duct and no reports detailing imaging findings with this tumor. We here report a 69-year-old man who presented with worsening glycemic control. Multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed mass with poor contrast enhancement in the pancreatic tail region of the pancreatic duct. The intraductal mass showed diffusion restriction on magnetic resonance imaging. These imaging findings are consistent with the expansive, smooth-surfaced polypoid tumor of low vascularity and high cellularity that was diagnosed pathologically. Mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas should be included in the differential diagnosis of intraductal tumors of the pancreas with poor contrast enhancement and diffusion restriction.

Solid pancreatic masses in children: A review of current evidence and clinical challenges

Pancreatic tumors in children are infrequently encountered in clinical practice. Their non-specific clinical presentation and overlapping imaging characteristics often make an accurate preoperative diagnosis difficult. Tumors are categorized as epithelial or non-epithelial, with epithelial tumors further classified as tumors of the exocrine or endocrine pancreas. Although both are tumors of the exocrine pancreas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm is the most prevalent solid pancreatic tumor in children, while pancreatoblastoma is the most common malignant tumor. Insulinoma is the most common pediatric pancreatic tumor of the endocrine pancreas. Malignant tumors require a complete, often radical, surgical resection. However, pancreatic parenchyma-sparing surgical procedures are utilized for benign tumors and low-grade malignancy to preserve gland function. This review will discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical and diagnostic characteristics, and management options associated with both common and rare solid pancreatic masses in children. We will also discuss current challenges encountered in their evaluation and treatment.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: diagnosis and pitfalls

Common to neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas is their expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and/or INSM1. They differ, however, in their histological differentiation and molecular profile. Three groups can be distinguished: well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine carcinomas), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the expression of synaptophysin and, to a lesser extent, also chromogranin A is not restricted to the neuroendocrine neoplasms, but may also be in a subset of non-neuroendocrine epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms. This review provides the essential criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms including diagnostic clues for the distinction of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine carcinomas and an algorithm avoiding diagnostic pitfalls in the delineation of non-neuroendocrine neoplasms with neuroendocrine features from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Tumor-insular Complex in Neoadjuvant Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Higher Residual Tumor

The tumor microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) plays a vital role in treatment response, and therefore, patient survival. We and others have observed an intimate association of neoplastic ductal cells with non-neoplastic islet cells, recapitulating the ductoinsular complex. We define this phenomenon as tumor-insular complex (TIC). Herein, we describe the clinicopathologic characteristics of TIC in neoadjuvant treated PDAC cases for the first time. We retrospectively reviewed the pathology of 105 cases of neoadjuvant treated PDAC resected at our institution. TIC was noted in 35 cases (33.3%), the mean tumor bed size was 2.7±1.0 cm, mean percentage of residual tumor 40±28% and mean Residual Tumor Index (RTI) (an index previously established as a prognostic parameter by our group) was 1.1±1.0. TIC was significantly associated with perineural invasion (P=0.001), higher tumor bed size (P=0.007), percentage of residual tumor (P=0.009), RTI (P=0.001), ypT stage (P=0.045), and poor treatment response, grouped by a previously established criteria (P=0.010). Using our prior binary reported prognostic cutoff for RTI of ≤0.35 and >0.35, TIC was associated with a RTI >0.35 (P=0.002). Moreover, patients who did not receive neoadjuvant radiation were associated with a higher frequency of TIC (P=0.003). In this cohort, RTI but not TIC was also shown to be a significant independent prognosticator for recurrence-free survival and overall survival on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, TIC is significantly associated with a more aggressive neoplasm which shows a poor treatment response. Further studies will be needed to better understand the tumor biology of TICs.

Smad4 induces cell death in HO-8910 and SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma cell lines via PI3K-mTOR involvement

IMPACT STATEMENT

This study investigated the effect and mechanism of Smad4 in ovarian carcinoma (OC) cell viability and demonstrated that Smad4 acted as a tumor suppressor in OC, which may contribute to the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying OC occurrence and progression. Smad4 expression was decreased in the OC specimens, but Smad4 recovery in the OC cell lines impaired the survival and viability of OC cells by increasing autophagy and apoptosis. Further investigation showed that Smad4 interacted with the P85 subunit of PI3K and caused deactivation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway. Therefore, Smad4 could be considered as a target in cancer therapy due to its regulatory effect in OC carcinogenesis.

Mixed ductal-acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: A case report

Mixed carcinoma of the pancreas is defined as the concurrent existence of pancreatic ductal carcinoma, acinar cell carcinoma, and/or islet cell carcinoma within the same neoplasm. We herein report a rare case of mixed ductal-acinar cell carcinoma in a 74-year-old man who was undergoing treatment for hypertension and diabetes at another hospital. After an abrupt worsening of his blood glucose control, the patient was referred to our hospital for further evaluation. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor with a multilocular cystic lesion in the head of the pancreas. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed obstruction of the main pancreatic duct and dilation of the dorsal pancreatic duct; in addition, adenocarcinoma was detected in the pancreatic juice cytology. Based on the abovementioned findings, the patient was diagnosed with carcinoma of the pancreatic head and underwent subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Based on the histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, the patient was diagnosed with mixed ductal-acinar cell carcinoma. The patient was prescribed TS-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy upon discharge. However, treatment was discontinued 2 months later due to marked general malaise, and the patient succumbed to tumor recurrence in the residual pancreas 12 months after the surgery.

Neoplasms of the Neuroendocrine Pancreas: An Update in the Classification, Definition, and Molecular Genetic Advances

This review focuses on discussing the main modifications of the recently published 2017 WHO Classification of Neoplasms of the Neuroendocrine Pancreas (panNEN). Recent updates separate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors into 2 broad categories: well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC), and incorporates a new subcategory of "well-differentiated high-grade NET (G3)" to the well-differentiated NET category. This new classification algorithm aims to improve the prediction of clinical outcomes and survival and help clinicians select better therapeutic strategies for patient care and management. In addition, these neuroendocrine neoplasms are capable of producing large quantity of hormones leading to clinical hormone hypersecretion syndromes. These functioning tumors include, insulinomas, glucagonomas, somatostatinomas, gastrinomas, VIPomas, serotonin-producing tumors, and ACTH-producing tumors. Although most panNENs arise as sporadic diseases, a subset of these heterogeneous tumors present as parts on inherited genetic syndromes, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau, neurofibromatosis type 1, tuberous sclerosis, and glucagon cell hyperplasia and neoplasia syndromes. Characteristic clinical and morphologic findings for certain functioning and syndromic panNENs should alert both pathologists and clinicians as appropriate patient management and possible genetic counseling may be necessary.

Gene expression analysis of embryonic pancreas development master regulators and terminal cell fate markers in resected pancreatic cancer: A correlation with clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Despite the recent introduction of new drugs and the development of innovative multi-target treatments, the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains very poor. Even when PDAC is resectable, the rate of local or widespread disease recurrence remains particularly high. Currently, reliable prognostic biomarkers of recurrence are lacking. We decided to explore the potential usefulness of pancreatic developmental regulators as biomarkers of PDAC relapse.

METHODS

We analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR the mRNA of selected factors involved either in pancreatic organogenesis (ISL1, NEUROD1, NGN3, NKX2.2, NKX6.1, PAX4, PAX6, PDX1 and PTF1α) or associated with terminally committed pancreatic cells (CHGA, CHGB, GAD2, GCG, HNF6α, INS, KRT19, SYP) in 17 PDAC cell lines and in frozen tumor samples from 41 PDAC patients.

RESULTS

High baseline levels of the ISL1, KRT19, PAX6 and PDX1 mRNAs in PDAC cell lines, were risk factors for time-dependent xenograft appearance after subcutaneous injection in CD1-Nude mice. Consistently, in human PDAC samples, high levels of KRT19 mRNA were associated with reduced overall survival and earlier recurrence. Higher levels of PDX1 or PAX6 mRNAs were instead associated with a higher frequency of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that selected factors associated with pancreas development or its terminal differentiation might be implicated in mechanisms of PDAC progression and/or metastatic spread and that the measurement of their mRNA in tumors might be potentially used to improve patient prognostic stratification and prediction of the relapse site.

Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): Unifying the Concept of a Heterogeneous Group of Neoplasms

The wide application of immunohistochemistry to the study of tumors has led to the recognition that epithelial neoplasms composed of both a neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine component are not as rare as traditionally believed. It has been recommended that mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are classified as only those in which either component represents at least 30 % of the lesion but this cutoff has not been universally accepted. Moreover, since their pathogenetic and clinical features are still unclear, mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are not included as a separate clinicopathological entity in most WHO classifications, although they have been observed in virtually all organs. In the WHO classification of digestive tumors, mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm is considered a specific type and is defined as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, a definition that has not been accepted for other organs. In fact, this term does not adequately convey the morphological and biological heterogeneity of digestive mixed neoplasms and has created some misunderstanding among both pathologists and clinicians. In the present study, we have reviewed the literature on mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms reported in the pituitary, thyroid, nasal cavity, larynx, lung, digestive system, urinary system, male and female genital organs, and skin to give the reader an overview of the most important clinicopathological features and morphological criteria for diagnosing each entity. We also propose to use the term "mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN)" to define and to unify the concept of this heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which show different characteristics mainly depending on the type of neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine components.

Long-term acquired everolimus resistance in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours can be overcome with novel PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors

Background:

The mTOR-inhibitor everolimus improves progression-free survival in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs). However, adaptive resistance to mTOR inhibition is described.

Methods:

QGP-1 and BON-1, two human PNET cell lines, were cultured with increasing concentrations of everolimus up to 22 weeks to reach a dose of 1 μM everolimus, respectively, 1000-fold and 250-fold initial IC₅₀. Using total DNA content as a measure of cell number, growth inhibitory dose–response curves of everolimus were determined at the end of resistance induction and over time after everolimus withdrawal. Response to ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitors OSI-027 and AZD2014, and PI3K-mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 was studied. Gene expression of 10 PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway-related genes was evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR (RT–qPCR).

Results:

Long-term everolimus-treated BON-1/R and QGP-1/R showed a significant reduction in everolimus sensitivity. During a drug holiday, gradual return of everolimus sensitivity in BON-1/R and QGP-1/R led to complete reversal of resistance after 10–12 weeks. Treatment with AZD2014, OSI-027 and NVP-BEZ235 had an inhibitory effect on cell proliferation in both sensitive and resistant cell lines. Gene expression in BON-1/R revealed downregulation of MTOR, RICTOR, RAPTOR, AKT and HIF1A, whereas 4EBP1 was upregulated. In QGP-1/R, a downregulation of HIF1A and an upregulation of ERK2 were observed.

Conclusions:

Long-term everolimus resistance was induced in two human PNET cell lines. Novel PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway-targeting drugs can overcome everolimus resistance. Differential gene expression profiles suggest different mechanisms of everolimus resistance in BON-1 and QGP-1.

Ductulo-insular pancreatic endocrine tumor with amyloid deposition: report of a case

We report a case of ductulo-insular pancreatic endocrine tumor (DI-PET) in a 50-year-old woman. The patient presented with symptoms and signs of hypoglycemia, and a small tumor in the uncus of the pancreas was extirpated. The tumor predominantly consisted of a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of grade 2, which surrounded a minor component of ductular proliferation accompanied by a desmoplastic stroma. Both components were largely juxtaposed but admixed with each other in small areas. The NET component was immunoreactive for insulin and accompanied by the marked deposition of amyloid in the stroma. The ductular component consisted of a haphazard proliferation of ductules showing mildly atypical cytological features and immunoreactivities for cytokeratins 7 and 19. DI-PET is a rare composite neoplasm that should be distinguished from mixed ductal-neuroendocrine carcinoma because of the marked differences in treatment modalities and prognoses between the tumors. DI-PET associated with stromal amyloid deposition has not been reported to date. The 'transdifferentiation' of NET cells into ductular cells is considered as the most plausible histogenetic mechanism of this tumor, although other possibilities, such as an origin from a primitive endodermal stem cell or the induction of ductular proliferation by stimulation with NET-derived humoral factors, cannot be excluded.

Collision of extensive exocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 revealed by cytogenetic analysis of loss of heterozygosity: a case report

The combination of exocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms is rarely found in the pancreas. These combined lesions vary from a clonal tumor with mixed differentiation to the incidental co-existence of two or more independent tumors, but the differential diagnosis is sometimes difficult. Here we report a case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) with extensive ductal and neuroendocrine neoplastic changes. These two types of tumors admixed markedly in some parts, which made it difficult to determine the pathological diagnosis based on histological findings. Cytogenetic analysis showed that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the MEN1 locus exists in neuroendocrine but not in exocrine neoplasms, indicating that independent mechanisms of tumorigenesis may occur in these two types of tumors. This case shows the usefulness of cytogenetic analysis for the diagnosis of combined tumors of the pancreas. Extensive exocrine neoplastic change, including pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) in virtually all pancreatic ducts and a focus of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with focal invasion, was a distinguishing feature of the present case. The possible association of ductal tumorigenesis and a MEN1 background is discussed.

Synchronous epithelial and neuroendocrine cancers of the pancreas: case series of a rare occurrence

The presence of neuroendocrine cells in adenocarcinomas is not an unusual finding and is well described in gastrointestinal tract cancers, eg, colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. Genetic analysis of such tumors has suggested a common multipotent progenitor stem cell origin. The prognostic significance of neuroendocrine cells in adenocarcinoma cells is unclear. There is a scant literature on synchronous pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreas neuroendocrine tumors. We report 2 cases with a purpose of discussing management strategies, prognosis, and potential etiologies of this rare presentation.

Mixed ductal-endocrine carcinoma of pancreas

Mixed ductal-endocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are extremely rare and show morphologically separate ductal adenocarcinoma and endocrine components. Prognostically, they are more aggressive than pure endocrine neoplasms. These are true 'mixed' neoplasms and are distinct from ductal adenocarcinomas with scattered endocrine cells (in which the endocrine component is non-neoplastic). A mixed ductal endocrine carcinoma in a 73-year-old male is reported.

Smad4/Smad7 balance: a role of tumorigenesis in gastric cancer

Smad signaling pathway plays an important role in tumorigenesis and progression in cancer (Halder, S.K., Rachakonda, G., Deane, N.G., Datta, P.K., 2008. Smad7 induces hepatic metastasis in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 99, 957-965). The protein level of Smad is associated with growth, inhibition, and metastasis in different cancers. It is unclear if the differentiation, metastasis and apoptosis are reduced by Smad expression pattern in gastric cancer. To determine the effect of Smad on gastric cancer cells, we investigated the relationship of Smad4/Smad7 expression, and differentiation, metastasis, and apoptosis in different gastric cancer. The results show that Smad4 expression in the gastric cancer tissue was dramatically lower than that in the peritumoral tissue. A lower expression of Samd4 was significantly lower in the poorly differentiated tissue than that in the well and middle differentiated tissues (P<0.01). In contrast, Smad7 expression in gastric cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in the peritumoral tissue. Smad7 was overexpressed in poorly differentiated tissue, also higher than those in the middle, and well differentiated tissues (P<0.05). The Smad4 or Smad7 expression obviously related with the lymphatic metastasis in gastric cancer. There were 45 cases with lymphatic metastasis in all 78 patients. Smad4 expression in the cases with lymphatic metastasis was lower than the cases without metastasis (P<0.01), whereas Smad7 expression in the cases with lymphatic metastasis was much higher than the case without metastasis (P<0.01). To better understand the mechanisms involved in tumorigenesis of gastric cancer, we established SGC7901 gastric cancer cell lines transduced with Smad4 or Smad7 plasmid DNA. Apoptosis and survival of cancer cells was induced after Smad4 and Smad7 transduction. This effect is concentration and time dependent. Thus, this study provides a mechanism by which a balance between Smad4 and Smad7 in human gastric cancer is critical for differentiation, metastasis, and apoptosis of tumor cells.

Chronic Pancreatitis and the Differential Diagnosis Versus Pancreatic Cancer

Context.—Distinguishing chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a well-known challenge, at both the clinical and the morphologic level.

Objective.—To focus on the histopathologic findings that are diagnostic or suggestive of PDAC.

Data Sources.—Findings that are specific to PDAC are the presence of duct structures in perineural and vascular spaces and (“naked”) ducts in fatty tissue. However, these findings are only observed in specimens containing extrapancreatic tissue. The features that are suggestive of PDAC in specimens from the pancreas include haphazard distribution of ductlike structures (ie, loss of a lobular pattern), markedly irregular ductal contours, ruptured ducts, nuclear enlargement, pleomorphism and hyperchromatism, and mitotic figures. Immunohistologic markers that are helpful are carcinoembryonic antigen, MUC1, p53, and Ki-67/ MIB1.

Conclusions.—There are a few features that are diagnostic and a number that are suggestive of PDAC. Therefore, a combination of several features may be required to clearly distinguish chronic pancreatitis from invasive PDAC.

Somatostatin, cortistatin and their receptors in tumours

Somatostatin (SS) and its synthetic analogs have a role in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours both in terms of symptoms control and antiproliferative activities. These effects are mediated by five SS receptors, widely expressed in both human neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumours, which were demonstrated to be diagnostically and therapeutically valuable targets. Cortistatin (CST), a brain cortex peptide, partially homologous to SS and having similar functions is also expressed in peripheral tissues and tumours. CST binds all SS receptors, and, differently from SS, also the ghrelin receptor GHSR1a and the CST specific receptor MrgX2. The expression profile of CST is mostly restricted to neuroendocrine tumours (gastrointestinal, pancreas, lung, parathyroid, thyroid, adrenal). In these tumours, CST probably acts via the SS or ghrelin receptor, the MrgX2 receptor being absent. Thus, in comparison to SS analogs, CST synthetic analogs may represent additional diagnostic/therapeutic tools in those tumours expressing the receptors for SS, for ghrelin or for both peptides.

Mixed ductal-endocrine carcinoma derived from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas identified by human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression

We report a case of mixed ductal-endocrine carcinoma derived from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. The tumor presented intermingled exocrine and endocrine carcinomatous components and expressed intense human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), further confirming the malignant features. This pathologically unique tumor is the first case of mixed ductal-endocrine carcinoma derived from pancreatic IPMN and telomerase activation could play a potential role in the neoplastic progression of mixed ductal-endocrine carcinomas of the pancreas.

Immunoelectron study of pancreatic carcinomas using antibodies to gastrointestinal hormones

The aim of this study was to investigate the ultrastructural appearance of pancreatic adenocarcinoma combined with glucagon and gastrin/cholecystokinin (CCK) expression. The authors investigated the ultrastructure and the immunocytochemistry of 12 human pancreatic cancer specimens and used 3 chronic pancreatitis samples and 6 adjacent histological normal pancreatic tissues (away from the tumor) as controls. The ultrastructural study revealed that chronic pancreatitis tissues were characterized by alterations of the secretory cells. The enzymic and secretory changes were confirmed by electron immunogold results. Glucagon appeared to be located not only in islet alpha cells but also in intermediate alpha acinar cells. The changes were more significant in adenocarcinoma cases. Abnormality in the immunoreaction of the peptides was indicated not only in the tumor area but also in the islets near the cancer. Cells immunoreactive with antibodies were found in all 12 adenocarcinoma cases. Abnormal co-location of both hormones in the same type of endocrine cell was also found. Moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were poorly granulated compared with differentiated tumors. Increased and ectopic gastrin/CCK expression was correlated with pancreatic adenocarcinomas exhibiting poor histological grade and neoplastic endocrine cells, providing a potential marker for pancreatic adenocarcinomas with aggressive behavior.

Immunohistochemical analysis of nestin and c-kit and their significance in pancreatic tumors

The purpose of the present study was to clarify the difference of expression of two stem cell markers, nestin and c-kit, among various pancreatic epithelial tumors and evaluate their utility. Immunohistochemistry was done for 99 surgically resected pancreatic tumor specimens, including 20 ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC), two undifferentiated carcinomas (UC), 31 intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), six mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), five serous cystadenomas (SCA), six acinar cell carcinomas, two pancreatoblastoma (PB), eight solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN), and 19 endocrine neoplasms (EN). Nestin was widely expressed in four SPN, one PB, one SCA, sarcoma areas in two UC, one MCN, and one DAC, and an area of oncocytic component in one IPMN. Some of these SPN, SCA and sarcomatous or oncocytic components in which nestin was expressed, also coexpressed c-kit. Additionally, partial (scattered) expression of c-kit was observed in ductal elements of 16 DAC, eight IPMN, five MCN, and one UC, one SCA, and three EN. The eight c-kit-positive IPMN included four of 23 adenoma-to-border lesions and four of eight non-invasive-to-invasive carcinomas. The three EN were all carcinomas. These indicate that expression of two stem cell markers is different by tumor type, but the utility of judging direction or degree of differentiation and malignant grade on the basis of their expression status is suggested.

Neoplastic endocrine differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a metastatic lymph node: report of a case

The occurrence of non-neoplastic, scattered endocrine cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is thought to be a general phenomenon. Conversely, neoplastic endocrine differentiation (NED) of pancreatic DAC is extremely unusual. We report a case of NED in a metastatic lymph node from pancreatic DAC. This case is distinct because the main tumor of the pancreas was composed purely of DAC without endocrine differentiation, and the NED was found in only one of four metastatic peripancreatic lymph nodes. To our knowledge, no other such case has ever been reported. The patient was a 61-year-old woman who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer. Some authors reported that pancreatic DAC with endocrine differentiation was associated with a better prognosis than DAC without endocrine differentiation. However, more cases must be studied to investigate the impact of NED of metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic DAC.

Poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma and intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: Description of an unusual case

Neuroendocrine tumors and intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms constitute histologically distinctive but relatively rare entities among pancreatic tumors. Collision of these tumors is extremely rare and causes several diagnostic problems regarding the histopathologic differential diagnosis of other pancreatic epithelial tumors. The question of whether the neoplastic populations originate from common progenitor cell or whether they represent only a fortuitous association has not been sufficiently explained. Here, we describe a new case of poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma combined with an intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm. To disclose the relationship between the two histologic components, neuroendocrine differentiation was studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy using double immunofluorescence labeling with chromogranin-A and CD57 antibodies. Our results revealed a co-localization of both antigens in neuroendocrine cells of the intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm. The finding has previously been described in non-neoplastic neuroendocrine cells. Cells forming poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma showed a wide heterogeneity in immunoreactions. Our results do not indicate a potential histogenetic similarity between these two neoplasms, which are dissimilar histologically, and underline the previous thesis that cells in intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm revealing neuroendocrine differentiation represent only a non-neoplastic cell admixture.

Goblet cell carcinoids and other mixed neuroendocrine/nonneuroendocrine neoplasms

Within the spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors arising in different organs, intermediate and controversial entities exist displaying a coexistence of neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine cell populations, and that are grouped under terms such as "goblet cell carcinoid", "mixed endocrine-exocrine carcinoma", "combined carcinomas", or "adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation". These tumors may display variable amounts of the two components, potentially ranging from 1 to 99%, and variable structural patterns, ranging from single scattered neuroendocrine cells to a well-defined neuroendocrine tumor cell component organized in typical organoid, trabecular, or solid growth patterns. Although variably included in the site-specific World Health Organization classification schemes, clear definitions and diagnostic features are still missing, as well as a definite knowledge of their biological properties and histogenesis. In the present report, the main characteristics of tumors showing mixed neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine features will be described, using morphological patterns and site of origin as schematic guidelines. Moreover, molecular and clinical aspects, which might help to understand their possible histogenesis and biological behavior, will be reviewed.

The grey zone between pure (neuro)endocrine and non-(neuro)endocrine tumours: a comment on concepts and classification of mixed exocrine-endocrine neoplasms

Terms such as "mixed endocrine-exocrine carcinoma" (MEEC) and "adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation" (ADC-NE) identify tumours belonging to the spectrum of neoplasms with divergent exocrine and (neuro)endocrine differentiation. These tumours display variable quantitative extent of the two components, potentially ranging from 1 to 99%, and variable structural patterns, ranging from single scattered NE cells to a well-defined NE tumour cell population organized in organoid, trabecular or solid growth patterns. In the present report, the grey zone of tumours/carcinomas with mixed NE and non-NE features is explored for various organs. From a practical point of view, MEECs differ from carcinomas with focal NE differentiation by (1) the extension of each component (more than 30%) and (2) the structural pattern of the NE component, either organoid for well-differentiated or solid/diffuse for poorly differentiated cases. In MEECs, the most aggressive cell population drives the clinical behaviour. Conversely, ADC-NE generally do not show a different clinical outcome, compared to the corresponding conventional forms, except for prostatic adenocarcinoma, in which NE cells are a negative prognostic factor. The recognition of MEECs may be of relevance for a targeted therapeutic strategy, foreseeing the use of biotherapies similar to those proposed for pure NE tumours.

[Mixed endocrine tumors]

Mixed endocrine tumors are tumors composed of at least two distinct tumor populations, one of which is endocrine. Because of their rarity and unusual presentation, endocrine mixed tumors raise many problems of diagnosis, management and therapy. Three main types of endocrine mixed tumors are recognized: The existence of these various types has been confirmed by recent molecular studies, even if the same studies have also shown that the histogenesis of a mixed endocrine tumor cannot be predicted from its histological features. Composite tumors are the less rare mixed tumors. The recent WHO classification recommends to restrict the term of composite endocrine tumor to the epithelial tumors containing at least 30% of obviously tumoral endocrine cells; some authors recommend to use higher thresholds, of at least 50%, in order to avoid overdiagnosis. The endocrine component is usually well differentiated, easily identified by its suggestive histological features; the endocrine nature of tumor cells is confirmed by the immunodetection of specific endocrine and neuro-endocrine markers (such as chromogranin A and synaptophysin). In some cases, the endocrine component is poorly differentiated: the demonstration of neuro-endocrine markers is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Mixed tumors can occur in every anatomical site; they are more frequent in organs containing endocrine cells in the normal state (especially the digestive tract and the pancreas), but they can also be observed in organs devoid of endocrine cells (such as the mammary gland). The management of mixed endocrine tumors must take into account the more aggressive component. Mixed tumors containing a well differentiated endocrine component and an adenocarcinomatous component are to be treated like adenocarcinomas. Mixed tumors containing a poorly differentiated endocrine component must be considered as poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas.

Multihormonality and entrapment of islets in pancreatic endocrine tumors

We analyzed pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) from 200 patients for the incidence of multihormonality and entrapped islets and correlated the results with clinicopathological features. Our series included 86 cases (43%) of functioning PET and 114 cases (57%) of nonfunctioning PET. Classified according to the WHO classification, there were 32 well-differentiated benign PETs, 85 well-differentiated PETs with uncertain behavior, and 83 well-differentiated malignant PETs. All tumors were immunostained for pancreatic hormones (insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and pancreatic polypeptide) and for additional hormones such as gastrin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, calcitonin, seratonin, and adrenocorticotropic hormone. Multihormonality was found in 34% of all PETs and it was a frequent finding in the tumors of the uncertain behavior (38.8%) group. Islet entrapment was found in 57 tumors (28.5%) and was significantly more frequent in PETs with uncertain and malignant behavior than benign ones (p=0.01). In 57 cases, we also investigated whether ductule entrapment accompanied islet entrapment. Of these 57 tumors, 45 (79%) tumors had accompanying ductule entrapment. Ductule entrapment did not show significant correlation with malignancy and was a more frequent finding in nonfunctioning tumors. We conclude that the incidence of multihormonality in PETs is not as high as suggested previously and islet entrapping may reflect aggressive tumor growth and may be a complementary criterion for predicting the biological behavior of PETs.

Historical, current and future perspectives on gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors are neoplasms of which the pathogenesis is not completely understood and of which the clinical behavior is difficult to predict. Originally, Masson suggested that the cell of origin was an endocrine cell derived from the gastrointestinal epithelium. However, Pearse showed that the endocrine cells throughout the body shared various features, among others the amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) capacity, and postulated the neural crest as the common origin for all APUD cells, a hypothesis that received support from the scientific community for many years. Now, biologists start to elucidate the various transcription factors that drive gastrointestinal development, and it has become evident that Masson was presumably right. Transcription factors relevant for development may also operate during tumorigenesis, and their expression may determine tumor biology. With other genetic factors, they may play a role in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors, and perhaps, their expression will turn out to be of prognostic or therapeutic value. In this review, current knowledge on the development of endocrine cells, hypotheses on the origin of endocrine tumors, genetic alterations, and prognostic factors are discussed. It is suggested that the increasing understanding of the normal development of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine cells, the accumulating data on genetic alterations in endocrine tumors and the reappraisal of the hypotheses on their pathogenesis formulated in the past may help in elucidating their pathogenesis and in more accurately predicting prognosis.

Endocrine tumor and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a fortuitous association?

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas are rare diseases of the pancreas. Cases of association of endocrine and exocrine neoplasms of the pancreas have been reported, corresponding to mixed or amphicrine tumors. The aim of this report is to describe a series of 6 patients with an original association of IPMN and PET of the pancreas.

METHODS

Among 108 and 103 patients operated on in our center between January 1997 and December 2003 for PETs and IPMNs, respectively, we identified 6 patients with both PET and IPMN, diagnosed on pathologic examination with an immunohistochemical study.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnosis was unspecified pancreatic tumor (n = 1), IPMN (n = 2), and association of PET and IPMN (n = 3). IPMN involved the main pancreatic duct in 4 patients and was classified as benign (n = 4), borderline (n = 1), or malignant noninvasive (n = 1). PETs measured 1.1 to 3 cm and were malignant in 1 patient (lymph node invasion). When analyzed by immunohistochemistry, 2 cases expressed glucagon, 1 expressed somatostatin, and 1 expressed insulin.

CONCLUSION

This study describes a new aspect of endocrine-exocrine pancreatic neoplasm association. The frequency of the association of PET and IPMN is too large to be fortuitous. Further studies are needed to understand its mechanism.

The pathology of ductal-type pancreatic carcinomas and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: insights for clinicians

The phenotypic classification of pancreatic neoplasms is based on their cellular lineage. Thus, tumors with a ductal, acinar, and endocrine phenotype can be distinguished. Most pancreatic neoplasms show a ductal phenotype and can be classified as ductal adenocarcinomas. Less common tumors with a ductal phenotype are the variants of ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (including colloid carcinoma), mucinous cystic neoplasm, medullary carcinoma, and other rare tumors. Ductal adenocarcinomas most likely develop from ductal proliferative lesions arising in the pancreatic duct system. A recently adopted classification system for these lesions distinguishes between three grades of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). Molecular studies have revealed that PanIN-2 and PanIN-3 lesions represent a distinct step toward invasive carcinoma.

Ductuloinsular tumors of the pancreas: endocrine tumors with entrapped nonneoplastic ductules

Rare pancreatic neoplasms have been reported that show both endocrine and exocrine differentiation in the neoplastic components. In addition, pancreatic endocrine tumors may contain small, cytologically bland ductules intimately admixed with the endocrine component. It was recently suggested that these ductules represent an intrinsic part of the tumor, ie, that the ductules are neoplastic, and the term "ductulo-insular tumors of the pancreas" was proposed. In the present study, the nature of the ductular component of 16 cases of ductule-containing pancreatic endocrine tumors was investigated at the molecular level. Molecular genetic changes often present in ductal pancreatic neoplasms were not found by immunohistochemistry for DPC4, p53, and ERBB2 and by sequence analysis of KRAS codon 12. An X-chromosome inactivation clonality assay of one such tumor from a female patient indicated that the neuroendocrine component was monoclonal, contrasting with the ductular component that was polyclonal. The lymph node and liver metastases from three patients only contained the neuroendocrine component, and no ductules were observed. Although certain morphologic features of ductule-containing endocrine tumors are reminiscent of the embryonic development of the human pancreas, none of the tumors expressed PDX-1, a transcription factor essential in pancreatic organ development. Based on our results, it is suggested that the ductular component occasionally found in pancreatic endocrine tumors is the result of entrapment of preexisting nonneoplastic ductules and that the tumors are otherwise not distinctive from conventional pancreatic endocrine tumors. Although the phenomenon is rare, it is important to recognize and to distinguish these tumors from true mixed ductal-endocrine neoplasms, which are generally more clinically aggressive. "Pancreatic endocrine tumors with entrapped ductules" would be the preferred nomenclature since it better reflects the nonneoplastic nature of the ductules.

Serous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: an immunohistochemical analysis revealing alpha-inhibin, neuron-specific enolase, and MUC6 as new markers

Serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) of the pancreas include serous microcystic adenoma (SMA), serous oligocystic ill-demarcated adenoma (SOIA), solid serous adenoma (SSA), von Hippel-Lindau-associated cystic neoplasm (VHL-CN), and serous cystadenocarcinoma (SCC). These neoplasms are histologically similar but differ in their localization, gross appearance, gender distribution, and biology. A centroacinar origin is assumed but has not been proven. To clarify whether the various subtypes of SCN may be distinguished from each other by marker profiles that might also provide evidence of their origin, the immunoprofiles of 38 SCNs (21 SMAs, 13 SOIAs, 2 VHL-CNs, 1 SSA, and 1 SCC) were defined by applying antibodies against cytoskeletal, neuroendocrine, hormone receptor, and mucin markers. In addition, we examined the expression of calretinin and alpha-inhibin. The various types of SCN showed a very similar immunoprofile, characterized by positivity for cytokeratins and neuron-specific enolase and negativity for vimentin and synaptophysin. Further markers that were commonly expressed in SCNs were alpha-inhibin (SMAs: 76%, SOIAs: 92%, VHL-CNs: 100%), MUC6 (SMAs: 60%, SOIAs: 85%, VHL-CNs: 100%), and MUC1 (SMAs: 24%, SOIAs: 38%, VHL-CNs: 50%). Western blot analysis in one SMA revealed a distinct band that stained with neuron-specific enolase antiserum. Alpha-inhibin was only expressed in 4 of 11 acinar cell carcinomas and not in five ductal adenocarcinomas, five neuroendocrine tumors, one mixed ductal-endocrine carcinoma, and one acinar cell cystadenoma of the pancreas. These results suggest that, despite their biologic differences, the various types of SCNs are composed of the same (or a very similar) cell type and may therefore have a common direction of differentiation. This notion is further supported by the finding that neuron-specific enolase, alpha-inhibin, and MUC6, which may be regarded as new markers for this pancreatic tumor type, were also expressed in most SCNs. Because a number of SCNs share MUC1 and MUC6 expression with the pancreatic centroacinar cells, the possibility of a histogenetic relationship has to be considered.

Clinicopathological significance and molecular regulation of maspin expression in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

We evaluated the biological relevance of maspin expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and studied regulatory mechanisms of maspin gene activation in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Maspin expression was immunohistochemically detected in a series of 57 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 51 (90%) of which were classified as high-expressers. In lymph node metastases, maspin expression was somewhat decreasingly found in 39/49 (80%). Maspin high-expressers showed predominantly a low histological grade (p=0.013). Moreover, maspin expression was found in two mixed ductal-endocrine carcinomas, but not in 10 endocrine tumors and the surrounding normal pancreatic tissues. Using a luciferase reporter system, maspin promoter activity was induced in the maspin-positive pancreatic cancer cell lines as well as maspin-negative PANC-1 cells. Additionally, treatment with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-aza-2' deoxycytidine, and histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, led to re-expression of maspin mRNA in PANC-1 cells. Our results indicate that maspin expression is up-regulated in most if not all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and may be related to the development and differentiation, and that DNA methylation and histone deacetylation may suppress maspin gene activation in pancreatic cancer cells.