Comparison of PD-L1 expression between paired cytologic and histologic specimens from non-small cell lung cancer patients

Programmed Death Ligand-1 and Tumor Mutation Burden Testing of Patients With Lung Cancer for Selection of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Pulmonary Pathology Society, and LUNGevity Foundation

CONTEXT.—

Rapid advancements in the understanding and manipulation of tumor-immune interactions have led to the approval of immune therapies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Certain immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies require the use of companion diagnostics, but methodologic variability has led to uncertainty around test selection and implementation in practice.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations for the testing of immunotherapy/immunomodulatory biomarkers, including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutation burden (TMB), in patients with lung cancer.

DESIGN.—

The College of American Pathologists convened a panel of experts in non-small cell lung cancer and biomarker testing to develop evidence-based recommendations in accordance with the standards for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines established by the National Academy of Medicine. A systematic literature review was conducted to address 8 key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, recommendations were created from the available evidence, certainty of that evidence, and key judgments as defined in the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework.

RESULTS.—

Six recommendation statements were developed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This guideline summarizes the current understanding and hurdles associated with the use of PD-L1 expression and TMB testing for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy selection in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and presents evidence-based recommendations for PD-L1 and TMB testing in the clinical setting.

A Combined Cyto- and Histopathological Diagnostic Approach Reduces Time to Diagnosis and Time to Therapy in First Manifestation of Metastatic Spinal Disease: A Cohort Study

Malignant spinal lesions (MSLs) are frequently the first manifestation of malignant disease. Spinal care, diagnostic evaluation, and the initiation of systemic therapy are crucial for outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. However, histopathology (HP) may be time consuming. The additional evaluation of spinal lesions using cytopathology (CP) has the potential to reduce the time to diagnosis (TTD) and time to therapy (TTT). CP and HP specimens from spinal lesions were evaluated in parallel in 61 pts (CP/HP group). Furthermore, 139 pts in whom only HP was performed were analyzed (HP group). We analyzed the TTD of CP and HP within the CP/HP group. Furthermore, we compared the TTD and TTT between the groups. The mean TTD in CP was 1.7 ± 1.7 days (d) and 8.4 ± 3.6 d in HP (p < 0.001). In 13 pts in the CP/HP group (24.1%), specific therapy was initiated based on the CP findings in combination with imaging and biomarker results before completion of HP. The mean TTT in the CP/HP group was 21.0 ± 15.8 d and was significantly shorter compared to the HP group (28.6 ± 23.3 d) (p = 0.034). Concurrent CP for MSLs significantly reduces the TTD and TTT. As a result, incorporating concurrent CP for analyzing spinal lesions suspected of malignancy might have the potential to enhance pts' quality of life and prognosis in advanced cancer. Therefore, we recommend implementing CP as a standard procedure for the evaluation of MSLs.

PD-L1 expression and its correlation with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Little is known about the relationship between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and histologic and genetic features in real-world Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients. From November 2017 to June 2019, tumor tissues were collected from 2674 non-small cell lung cancer patients. PD-L1 expression was detected with immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 and SP263 antibodies, and patients were stratified into subgroups based on a tumor proportion score of 1%, 1% to 49%, and ≥ 50%. Genetic alterations were profiled using targeted next-generation sequencing. In the total population, 50.5% had negative PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score < 1%), 32.0% had low-positive expression (1%-49%), and 17.5% had high-positive expression (≥50%). The PD-L1 positive rate was 39.0% in squamous cell carcinomas and 53.6% in adenocarcinomas. PD-L1 expression was higher in squamous cell carcinomas (P < .001) and lower in adenocarcinomas (P < .001). Of the overall patient population, 11.2% had Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations, 44.9% had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 2.1% had BRAF V600E mutations, 0.3% had MET exon 14 skipping mutations, 5.4% had anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocations, and 0.9% had ROS proto-oncogene 1 translocations. Patients carrying ROS proto-oncogene 1 translocations (P = .006), KRAS (P < .001), and MET (P = .023) mutations had significantly elevated expression of PD-L1, while those harboring EGFR (P < .001) mutations had lower PD-L1 expression. In our study, PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinomas and lower in adenocarcinomas, and was positively associated with MET and KRAS mutations, as well as the wild-type EGFR gene state. Nonetheless, additional studies are needed to further validate those associations and determine the clinical significance for immune checkpoint inhibitors of these factors.

The Role of Checkpoint Inhibitor Expression Directly on Exfoliated Cells from Bladder Cancer: A Narrative Review

Bladder cancer (BCa) is a common type of cancer that affects the urinary bladder. The early detection and management of BCa is critical for successful treatment and patient outcomes. In recent years, researchers have been exploring the use of biomarkers as a non-invasive and effective tool for the detection and monitoring of BCa. One such biomarker is programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which is expressed on the surface of cancer cells and plays a crucial role in the evasion of the immune system. Studies have shown that the PD-L1 expression is higher in BCa tumors than in healthy bladder tissue. Additionally, PD-L1 expression might even be detected in urine samples in BCa patients, in addition to the examination of a histological sample. The technique is being standardized and optimized. We reported how BCa patients had higher urinary PD-L1 levels than controls by considering BCa tumors expressing PD-L1 in the tissue specimen. The expression of PD-L1 in urinary BCa cells might represent both a diagnostic and a prognostic tool, with the perspective that the PD-L1 expression of exfoliate urinary cells might reveal and anticipate eventual BCa recurrence or progression. Further prospective and longitudinal studies are needed to assess the expression of PD-L1 as a biomarker for the monitoring of BCa patients. The use of PD-L1 as a biomarker for the detection and monitoring of BCa has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by allowing for earlier detection and more effective management of the disease.

PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing: A review with reference to cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy based on disruption of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is standard of care for many high stage malignancies including melanomas, non-small cell carcinomas of the lung, triple negative breast carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Eligibility for immunotherapy requires immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1 expression. Currently, many high stage malignancies are diagnosed by cytology and cytologic material is the only specimen available for ancillary testing. Formal guidelines do not currently exist defining the optimal specimen type, antibody to be used or the best scoring system for cytologic material. Significant information has been published for PD-L1 testing of pulmonary specimens but much less data exists for the reproducibility, accuracy and best practices for material obtained from other body sites and types of malignancy.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed data base for manuscripts relating to PD-L1 testing of cytologic specimens. The search period was between 2016 and 2022. The search terms used were PD-L1, cytology, FNA, immunotherapy, immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, cytology-histology correlation. Cross referencing techniques were used to screen for the most relevant manuscripts. The abstracts of these were then reviewed for final data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were identified conforming to study relevancy. These were reviewed in their entirety by two authors (LJL, TZ) for extraction of data. The majority of studies involved pulmonary specimens (79) with three relating to PD-L1 testing of head and neck cytologic specimens and one each for PD-L1 testing of cytology specimens from melanomas, pancreas, pleural fluids, and triple negative breast carcinomas. While smears could be used, most studies found cell blocks optimal for testing.

SUMMARY

Currently, four drugs are approved for immunotherapy based on PD-L1 status. These drugs require specific antibody clones as well as scoring systems. Scoring systems and cut points vary with the type of neoplasm being treated. Cytology specimens from the lung, head and neck and melanomas can all be used for PD-L1 testing with good agreement with corresponding histology specimens.

Program death ligand-1 immunocytochemistry in lung cancer cytological samples: A systematic review

In this era of personalized medicine, targeted immunotherapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) blocking the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/program death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis have become an integral part of treating advanced stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and many other cancer types. Multiple monoclonal antibodies are available commercially to detect PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As most clinical trials initially required tumor biopsy for PD-L1 detection by IHC, many of the currently available PD-1/PD-L1 assays have been developed and validated on formalin fixed tissue specimens. The majority (>50%) of lung cancer cases do not have a surgical biopsy or resection specimen available for ancillary testing and instead must rely primarily on fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens for diagnosis, staging and ancillary tests. Review of the literature shows multiple studies exploring the feasibility of PD-L1 IHC on cytological samples. In addition, there are studies addressing various aspects of IHC validation on cytology preparations including pre-analytical (e.g., different fixatives), analytical (e.g., antibody clone, staining platforms, inter and intra-observer agreement, cytology-histology concordance) and post-analytical (e.g., clinical outcome) issues. Although promising results in this field have emerged utilizing cytology samples, many important questions still need to be addressed. This review summarizes the literature of PD-L1 IHC in lung cytology specimens and provides practical tips for optimizing analysis.

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: heterogeneity by pathologic types, tissue sampling and metastasis

Background

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a predictive marker of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy response. Intra-tumour heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but comprehensive studies regarding the determination of PD-L1 expression in different materials are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare PD-L1 expression in paired tumour samples and in different specimen types.

Methods

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, 35 biopsy specimens and 54 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples were performed PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing using the 22C3 assay. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the tumour proportion score (TPS) and categorized into three levels: negative (TPS <1%), low expression (TPS 1–49%) and high expression (TPS ≥50%).

Results

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, including 852 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 150 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); 35 paired biopsy and resected samples; 54 paired cell block and biopsy samples; 53 paired blocks from the same resected tissue and 49 paired primary and metastatic lesion samples were included in this study. Interestingly, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more frequent in poorly differentiated subtypes than in well-differentiated subtypes in the ADC subgroup (P<0.001). In the SCC subgroup, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more associated with the nonkeratinizing type than the keratinizing type (P=0.001). PD-L1 expression differed between cell blocks and matched biopsy specimens (discordance rate =11.1%, 6/54) and between biopsy and matched resected specimens (discordance rate =31.4%, 11/35). PD-L1 expression differed between different paraffin blocks from the same resected specimen (discordance rate =35.8%, 19/53), and the discordance rate of PD-L1 expression between primary tumours and matched lymph node metastases was 28.6% (14/49).

Conclusions

Discordant PD-L1 expression is not uncommon in NSCLC and warrants additional studies and serious consideration when interpreting PD-L1 test results. Initial negative test results may lead to repeat PD-L1 testing in additional samples or the use of a different clone if necessary.

PD-L1 Testing in Cytological Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: A Comparison with Biopsies and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is used for treatment prediction in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While cytology may be the only available material in the routine clinical setting, testing in clinical trials has mainly been based on biopsies.

METHODS

We included 2 retrospective cohorts of paired, concurrently sampled, cytological specimens and biopsies. Also, the literature on PD-L1 in paired cytological/histological samples was reviewed. Focus was on the cutoff levels ≥1 and ≥50% positive tumor cells.

RESULTS

Using a 3-tier scale, PD-L1 was concordant in 40/47 (85%) and 66/97 (68%) of the paired NSCLC cases in the 2 cohorts, with kappa 0.77 and 0.49, respectively. In the former cohort, all discordant cases had lower score in cytology. In both cohorts, concordance was lower in samples from different sites (e.g., biopsy from primary tumor and cytology from pleural effusion). Based on 25 published studies including about 1,700 paired cytology/histology cases, the median (range) concordance was 81-85% (62-100%) at cutoff 1% for a positive PD-L1 staining and 89% (67-100%) at cutoff 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall concordance of PD-L1 between cytology and biopsies is rather good but with significant variation between laboratories, which calls for local quality assurance.

PD-L1 in Cytological Samples: A Review and a Practical Approach

With a growing number of predictive biomarkers needed to manage patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there has been a paradigm shift in care and handling of diagnostic samples. Among the various testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most cost- effective and widely available. Furthermore, over the past decade immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments. In this scenario IHC is the most used testing method available for PDL-1/PD1 immunotherapy. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathways have been integrated into standard-of-care treatments of a wide range of cancer types, once provided evidence of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Since currently available PD-L1 assays have been developed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) histological specimens, a growing body of research is being dedicated to confirm the feasibility of applying PDL-1 assays also to cytological samples. Albeit promising results have been reported, several important issues still need to be addressed. Among these are the type of cytological samples, pre-analytical issues, cyto-histological correlation, and inter-observer agreement. This review briefly summarizes the knowledge of the role of cytopathology in the analysis of PD-L1 by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and future directions of cytopathology in the immunotherapy setting.

PD-L1 and beyond: Immuno-oncology in cytopathology

Over the past decade, immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have been integrated into standard-of-care treatments for a wide range of cancer types. Although all the available PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed on formalin-fixed histological specimens, a growing body of research has recently suggested the feasibility of PD-L1 testing on cytological samples. Although promising results have been reported, several important issues still need to be addressed. Among these are pre-analytical issues, cyto-hystological correlation, and inter-observer agreement. This review will briefly summarise the knowledge gaps and future directions of cytopathology in the immuno-oncology scenario.

Challenges of ICC and FISH in the Field of Targeted Therapies from Cell Block to Smears

In the era of personalized medicine, there is an increasing demand for comprehensive and complex diagnosis using minimally invasive techniques. Nowadays, it is mandatory to integrate biomarkers in the diagnostic process, as well as in the treatment and clinical management of many cancer patients. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), for instance, are frequently diagnosed in advanced stages, at a point when only cytological material or small biopsies can be obtained. This pathology constitutes an interesting challenge for the testing of biomarkers in cytology. Furthermore, there is a growing development of imaging techniques that guide non-invasive approaches to obtain small biopsies or cytological samples. This has allowed fine needle aspiration cytology and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAC, FNAB) to become front-line procedures in the management of patients with NSCLC. It is well known that the list of biomarkers to be tested in these patients continues to increase. Nevertheless, there are several of essential biomarkers that should always be analyzed in all patients with NSCLC, not only in non-squamous but also in some squamous carcinomas (SqCC). Some of them, such as PDL1, are tested by immunocytochemistry (ICC), while others, mainly ALK and ROS1, can be tested by ICC and confirmed using other techniques such a Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Other biomarkers, namely EGFR and BRAF mutations, are currently evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). In this review, we will address the particularities and challenges that ICC and FISH pose in different types of cytological samples from an eminently practical point of view.

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) as a predictive marker for immunotherapy in solid tumours: a guide to immunohistochemistry implementation and interpretation

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is well established as an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma. The list of approved indications for treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors is growing rapidly as clinical trials continue to show their efficacy in patients with a wide range of solid tumours. Clinical trials have used a variety of PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays to evaluate PD-L1 expression on tumour cells, immune cells or both as a potential biomarker to predict response to immunotherapy. Requests to pathologists for PD-L1 testing to guide choice of therapy are rapidly becoming commonplace. Thus, pathologists need to be aware of the different PD-L1 assays, methods of evaluation in different tumour types and the impact of the results on therapeutic decisions. This review discusses the key practical issues relating to the implementation of PD-L1 testing for solid tumours in a pathology laboratory, including evidence for PD-L1 testing, different assay types, the potential interchangeability of PD-L1 antibody clones and staining platforms, scoring criteria for PD-L1, validation, quality assurance, and pitfalls in PD-L1 assessment. This review also explores PD-L1 IHC in solid tumours including non-small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck carcinoma, triple negative breast carcinoma, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, gastric and gastroesophageal carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and endometrial carcinoma. The review aims to provide pathologists with a practical guide to the implementation and interpretation of PD-L1 testing by immunohistochemistry.

Reliability of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) on cytological smears in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective validation study

Introduction:

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment is mandatory for the single agent pembrolizumab treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 testing has been validated and is currently certified only on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded materials but not on cytological smears. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of patients, having only cytological material available, cannot be tested for PD-L1 and treated with pembrolizumab. In this study, we aimed to validate PD-L1 IHC on cytological smears prospectively by comparing clone SP263 staining in 150 paired histological samples and cytological smears of NSCLC patients.

Methods:

We prospectively enrolled 150 consecutive advanced NSCLC patients. The clone SP263 was selected as, in a previous study of our group, it showed higher accuracy compared with clones 28-8 and 22-C3, with good cyto-histological agreement using a cut-off of 50%. For cyto-histological concordance, we calculated the kappa coefficient using two different cut-offs according to the percentage of PD-L1 positive neoplastic cells (<1%, 1–49% and ⩾50%; <50%, ⩾50%).

Results:

The overall agreement between histological samples and cytological smears was moderate (kappa = 0.537). However, when the cyto-histological concordance was calculated using the cut-off of 50%, the agreement was good (kappa = 0.740). With the same cut-off, and assuming as gold-standard the results on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded materials, PD-L1 evaluation on smears showed specificity and negative predictive values of 98.1% and 93.9%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Cytological smears can be used in routine clinical practice for PD-L1 assessment with a cut-off of 50%, expanding the potential pool of NSCLC patients as candidates for first-line single agent pembrolizumab therapy.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/thyroid transcription factor-1 double immunohistochemical staining facilitates scoring of tumor PD-L1 expression in cytopathology specimens from lung adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has revolutionized lung adenocarcinoma therapy. Treatment with antibodies against the immune checkpoint molecules programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) can induce a durable response in a subset of patients. Immunohistochemistry characterization of tumor PD-L1 expression using either a histopathology specimen or a cytopathology specimen has been shown to correlate with treatment response. However, the current practice relies on pathologists' visual estimation of tumor PD-L1 staining, which can be variable in certain conditions. Highlighting tumor cells via double immunostaining with PD-L1 and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) may improve estimation accuracy.

METHODS

We performed PD-L1 single staining and PD-L1/TTF-1 double staining in 42 pairs of cytopathology and histopathology specimens from lung adenocarcinoma patients. An experienced pathologist visually estimated PD-L1 expression in each case and placed tumor PD-L1 expression into 1 of 3 categories: <1%, 1%-49%, or ≥50%. A medical technologist also performed estimations of the same cases based on a count of 200 tumor cells, and the results were compared.

RESULTS

PD-L1/TTF-1 double immunohistochemistry could better identify the PD-L1-positive tumor cells in cytopathology specimens compared with PD-L1 single staining. The concordance of PD-L1 expression categorization between the pathologist's visual estimation and the medical technologist's counting was increased by double staining in cytopathology specimens (Cohen's weighted kappa: single stain, 0.784; double stain, 0.880). Double staining reduced possible error in the pathologist's visual estimation of PD-L1 expression from 9.5% to 4.8%. The benefit was not observed in histopathology specimens.

CONCLUSION

A simple PD-L1/TTF-1 double immunohistochemistry technique can be applied successfully to cytopathology specimens in better identifying patients who can potentially benefit from immune checkpoint blockade treatment.