Novel RGAG1-BCOR gene fusion revealed in a somatic soft tissue sarcoma with a long follow-up

BCOR-rearranged sarcomas: In silico insights into altered domains and BCOR interactions

BCOR (BCL-6 corepressor) rearranged small round cell sarcoma (BRS) represents an uncommon soft tissue malignancy, frequently characterized by the BCOR::CCNB3 fusion. Other noteworthy fusions include BCOR::MAML3, BCOR::CLGN, BCOR::MAML1, ZC3H7B::BCOR, KMT2D::BCOR, CIITA::BCOR, RTL9::BCOR, and AHR::BCOR. The BCOR gene plays a pivotal role in the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1), essential for histone modification and gene silencing. It interfaces with the Polycomb group RING finger homolog (PCGF1). This study employed comprehensive in silico methodologies to investigate the structural and functional effects of BCOR fusion events in BRS. The analysis revealed significant alterations in the domain architecture of BCOR, which resulted in the loss of BCL6-regulated transcriptional repression. Furthermore, IUPred3 prediction indicated a significant increase in disorder in the C-terminal regions of the BCOR in the fusion proteins. A detailed analysis of the physicochemical properties by ProtParam revealed a decrease in isoelectric point, stability, and hydrophobicity. The analysis of protein structures predicted by AlphaFold3 using the PRODIGY algorithm revealed statistically significant deviations in binding affinities for BCOR-PCGF1 dimers and a non-canonical PRC1 variant tetramer compared to the wild-type BCOR. The findings provide a comprehensive summary and elucidation of the fusion proteome associated with BRS, suggesting a substantial impact on the stability and functionality of the fusion proteins, thereby contributing to the oncogenic mechanisms underlying BRS. In this study, we provide the first compilation and comparative analysis of the known BCOR fusions of BRS and introduce a new in silico approach to enhance a better understanding of the molecular basis of BRS.

The Extensive Case Series of 21 CIC::DUX4, 18 BCOR::CCNB3 and 148 Ewing's Sarcomas From a Single Center

In this study, we aimed to reclassify "round cell sarcomas" identified in the Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, between 2013 and 2023, using an immunohistochemical panel including CD99, NKX2.2, ETV4, WT1, DUX4, BCOR, CCNB3, and SS18-SSX antibodies, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). A total of 148 Ewing's sarcomas, 21 CIC::DUX4 sarcomas, and 18 BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas were diagnosed. Histopathologic features such as pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli, wide clear/eosinophilic cytoplasm, myxoid/pink hyaline stroma, and spindle cell components were useful for differentiating the other two sarcomas from Ewing sarcoma. The intensity of CD99 antibody staining in CIC::DUX4 and BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas varied. The NKX2.2 antibody was diffuse nuclear positive in 93% of Ewing sarcomas and negative in CIC::DUX4 and BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas. The DUX4 antibody was diffuse nuclear positive in all CIC:DUX4 sarcomas. Survival in CIC::DUX4 sarcomas tended to be lower than in the other groups, although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. The histopathologic regression response, indicating the histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy according to the Ewing sarcoma regimen, was similar among all three groups. For BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas, the histopathologic regression response in patients treated with the Ewing regimen was as low as 30%, whereas those treated with non-Ewing regimens showed a higher histopathologic regression response of 70%. A tumor size of 5 cm and above was found to be a statistically significant negative factor for survival. Age, sex, and tumor location were not significant factors for survival.

Updates on WHO classification for small round cell tumors: Ewing sarcoma vs. everything else

The WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours currently recognizes four categories of undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma: Ewing sarcoma, round cell sarcoma with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions including NFATc2 and PATZ1, CIC-rearranged sarcoma, and sarcoma with BCOR genetic alterations. These neoplasms frequently pose significant diagnostic challenges due to rarity and overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical findings. Further, molecular testing, with accompanying pitfalls, may be needed to establish a definitive diagnosis. This review summarizes the clinical, histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of these neoplasms. In addition, differential diagnosis and areas of uncertainty and ongoing investigation are discussed.

The utility of FISH analysis in the diagnosis of BCOR-rearranged sarcomas

BACKGROUND

A BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) gene alteration is a genetic signature of rare subsets of sarcomas. The identification of this alteration has recently contributed to the definition of new entities in the current WHO (2020) classification of soft tissue and bone tumours. We retrospectively examined cases of BCOR-rearranged sarcoma (BRS) to assess the reliability of the BCOR FISH analysis using an IVD (in vitro diagnostic) probe.

METHODS

We investigated and compared the molecular diagnostic strategies and features by collecting 17 data from patients with a BCOR gene rearrangement detected using quantitative-Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRTPCR), Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

We describe fourteen BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas, one spindle cell sarcoma with a novel BCOR::MAML1 fusion, one spindle cell sarcoma with a novel BCOR::AHR fusion, and one ossifying fibromyxoid tumour with a BCOR::ZC3H7B fusion. FISH analysis of all, except one, BCOR::CCNB3 sarcoma, showed a FISH break-apart pattern with mild signal separation. The MAML1::BCOR sarcoma showed large-space split signals, while in the two patients with AHR::BCOR and ZC3H7B::BCOR fusions, no BCOR rearrangement was observed using FISH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that BCOR FISH analysis using an IVD probe, may be useful to detect the presence of a BCOR rearrangement, including both translocations and inversions; however, negative results, in some cases, can occur.

Molecular Identification and In Silico Protein Analysis of a Novel BCOR-CLGN Gene Fusion in Intrathoracic BCOR-Rearranged Sarcoma

BCOR (BCL6 corepressor)-rearranged sarcomas (BRSs) are a heterogeneous group of sarcomas previously classified as part of the group of "atypical Ewing" or "Ewing-like" sarcomas, without the prototypical ESWR1 gene translocation. Due to their similar morphology and histopathological features, diagnosis is challenging. The most common genetic aberrations are BCOR-CCNB3 fusion and BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD). Recently, various new fusion partners of BCOR have been documented, such as MAML3, ZC3H7B, RGAG1, and KMT2D, further increasing the complexity of such tumor entities, although the molecular pathogenetic mechanism remains to be elucidated. Here, we present an index case of intrathoracic BRS that carried a novel BCOR-CLGN (calmegin) gene fusion, exhibited by a 52-year-old female diagnosed initially by immunohistochemistry due to the positivity of a BCOR stain; the fusion was identified by next-generation sequencing and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. In silico protein analysis was performed to demonstrate the 3D structure of the chimera protein. The physicochemical properties of the fusion protein sequence were calculated using the ProtParam web-server tool. Our finding further broadens the fusion partner gene spectrum of BRS. Due to the heterogeneity, molecular ancillary tests serve as powerful tools to discover these unusual variants, and an in silico analysis of the fusion protein offers an appropriate approach toward understanding the exact pathogenesis of such a rare variant.

Soft Tissue and Visceral Organ Sarcomas With BCOR Alterations

Sarcomas with BCOR alteration are a heterogenous group characterized by changes including internal tandem duplications (ITDs) and recurring fusions with CCNB3, ZC3H7B, and other rare partners. With widespread genomic testing, these alterations are now associated with histologies such as Ewing-like sarcoma (BCOR::CCNB3), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ZC3H7B::BCOR), and clear cell sarcoma of kidney (BCOR-ITD). BCOR altered sarcomas of soft tissues and organs were identified through PubMed using keywords "Sarcoma (AND) BCOR" from 2005 through October 2021. Summary statistics and outcome data were calculated using STATA v12.1. Forty-one publications described 190 patients with BCOR altered soft tissue or organ sarcomas. BCOR-ITD was most common, followed by BCOR::CCNB3, ZC3H7B::BCOR. BCOR-ITD tumors occurred mainly in infants, BCOR::CCNB3 commonly occurred in adolescent young adults, and ZC3H7B::BCOR only in adults. The most common site for BCOR::CCNB3 fused tumors was extremity, BCOR-ITD kidney and ZC3H7B::BCOR uterus. Metastasis was rare in patients with BCOR::CCNB3. While most underwent resection and chemotherapy, few received radiation. Median follow-up of survivors was 24 months. Five year overall survival for patients with BCOR::CCNB3 fusions was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46%-83%). Patients with BCOR-ITD and ZC3H7B::BCOR had worse prognoses with 5 years overall survival of 35% (95% CI: 15%-56%) and 41% (95% CI: 11%-71%), respectively, demonstrating need for collaborative efforts identifying optimal treatments to improve outcomes.