Insulinoma-associated-1 (INSM1) expression in thymic squamous cell carcinoma

Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM-1) is a useful diagnostic marker for the evaluation of primary thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 27 cases

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) immunohistochemistry has been established as a sensitive and reliable immunohistochemical marker for detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in tumors across various organ systems. However, this marker has not been adequately investigated in primary thymic neuroendocrine tumors. We have studied a series of 27 cases of primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the thymus, including 3 typical carcinoids, 18 atypical carcinoids, 4 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and 2 small cell carcinomas. Immunostaining on whole tissue sections for INSM-1 was evaluated. Results of immunostaining for chromogranin and synaptophysin were also evaluated. 26/27 tumors (96%) demonstrated nuclear positivity for INSM1. 18 tumors (67%) showed strong and diffuse nuclear staining (3 +), 3 tumors (11%) moderate (2 +) nuclear staining, and 5 tumors (19%) showed weak (1 +) nuclear staining. The average percentage of tumor cells positive for INSM1 was 76%. Only one tumor, a small cell carcinoma, was negative. All tumors were positive for synaptophysin, and 26/27 (96%) were positive for chromogranin A. This study confirms that INSM1 immunohistochemistry is a sensitive marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms and demonstrates similar performance characteristics compared to other organ systems. The nuclear staining with this marker offers the advantage of eliminating some of the ambiguity in the interpretation sometimes encountered with other markers. An added advantage is the consistent staining across the entire spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors of this organ.

Insulinoma-Associated Protein-1 Expression in Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma of the Thymus: A Potential Pitfall for Diagnosis With Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Thymus

CONTEXT.—

Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM1) is a recently developed immunohistochemical marker claimed to be highly specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine malignancies. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that this marker can also be expressed in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms including squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus.

OBJECTIVE.—

To examine INSM1 expression in lymphoepithelial thymic carcinomas.

DESIGN.—

Thirty-four cases of lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the thymus were examined by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD5, CD117, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small ribonucleic acid (EBER), and Ki-67. Basic clinical information was abstracted from the medical record.

RESULTS.—

The patients were 14 women and 20 men, aged 20 to 85 years. The tumors arose in the anterior mediastinum without any previous history or evidence of malignancy at other sites. Immunohistochemical staining showed moderate to strong positivity of the tumor cells for INSM1 in 65% of cases (22 of 34), focal weak positivity in 20% (7 of 34), and negative staining in 5 cases. Chromogranin staining was focally and weakly positive in 1 case, and synaptophysin showed only focal weak positivity in scattered tumor cells in 12 cases. No significant correlation could be identified between the pattern and intensity of staining for INSM1 and staining for CD5, CD117, and Ki-67.

CONCLUSIONS.—

INSM1 positivity in lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the thymus may represent a pitfall for diagnosis, particularly in small biopsy samples. Awareness of this finding may be of importance to avoid misdiagnosis of neuroendocrine malignancy.

Expression of CD5 in salivary gland tumors: an ancillary marker for carcinoma showing thymus-like differentiation (CASTLE) of the major salivary gland

Recently, cases of carcinoma showing thymus-like differentiation (CASTLE) occurring in major salivary glands have been identified. To assess the diagnostic value of CD5 immunohistochemistry in distinguishing salivary CASTLE from other types of salivary gland tumors, we evaluated CD5 expression in 109 salivary gland tumors, encompassing 23 different histological types, including salivary CASTLE. In addition, we reviewed 10 previously reported cases of salivary CASTLE. Most salivary CASTLE cases (10/11, 91%) showed strong CD5 expression. In contrast, 104 of 108 (96%) non-salivary CASTLE tumors were negative for CD5, while the remaining four tumors (3.7%), all of which were histologically Warthin tumors, showed focal positivity for CD5 with weak to moderate intensity. In conclusion, the findings in this study support the potential use of CD5 immunohistochemistry for distinguishing salivary CASTLE from other histological types of salivary gland tumors. Aberrant CD5 expression in this tumor may be linked to the tumor microenvironment.

Thymic Carcinoma: Unraveling Neuroendocrine Differentiation and Epithelial Cell Identity Loss

BACKGROUND

The histogenesis of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) has been a subject of debate. Recent technological advancements have revealed that thymic carcinomas often exhibit a phenotype akin to tuft cells, which is a subset of medullary TECs. Here, we further explored the gene expression signatures of thymic carcinomas in relation to tuft cells and their kinships-ionocytes and neuroendocrine cells (neuroendocrine group).

METHODS

We analyzed a single-cell RNA sequencing dataset from the normal human thymus. Concurrently, we examined publicly available datasets on the mRNA expression and methylation status of TECs and lung cancers. Real-time quantitative PCR was also conducted with our tissue samples.

RESULTS

Thymic carcinomas displayed a neuroendocrine phenotype biased toward tuft cells and ionocytes. When exploring the possible regulators of this phenotype, we discovered that HDAC9 and NFATC1 were characteristically expressed in the neuroendocrine group in adult TECs and thymic carcinomas. Additionally, the pan-thymic epithelium markers, exemplified by PAX9 and SIX1, were significantly suppressed in thymic carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Thymic carcinomas might be characterized by unique neuroendocrine differentiation and loss of identity as thymic epithelial cells. Future studies investigating the role of HDAC9 and NFATC1 in thymic epithelium are warranted to explore their potential as therapeutic targets in TETs.

Histogenetic and disease-relevant phenotypes in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs): The potential significance for future TET classification

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) encompass morphologically various subtypes. Thus, it would be meaningful to explore the expression phenotypes that delineate each TET subtype or overarching multiple subtypes. If these profiles are related to thymic physiology, they will improve our biological understanding of TETs and may contribute to the establishment of a more rational TET classification. Against this background, pathologists have attempted to identify histogenetic features in TETs for a long time. As part of this work, our group has reported several TET expression profiles that are histotype-dependent and related to the nature of thymic epithelial cells (TECs). For example, we found that beta5t, a constituent of thymoproteasome unique to cortical TECs, is expressed mainly in type B thymomas, for which the nomenclature of cortical thymoma was once considered. Another example is the discovery that most thymic carcinomas, especially thymic squamous cell carcinomas, exhibit expression profiles similar to tuft cells, a recently discovered special type of medullary TEC. This review outlines the currently reported histogenetic phenotypes of TETs, including those related to thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis, summarizes their genetic signatures, and provides a perspective for the future direction of TET classification.