Neuroanatomical asymmetry in the canine brain

Left-Right Brain-Wide Asymmetry of Neuroanatomy in the Mouse Brain

Left-right asymmetry of the human brain is widespread through its anatomy and function. However, limited microscopic understanding of it exists, particularly for anatomical asymmetry where there are few well-established animal models. In humans, most brain regions show subtle, population-average regional asymmetries in thickness or surface area, alongside a macro-scale twisting called the cerebral petalia in which the right hemisphere protrudes past the left. Here, we ask whether neuroanatomical asymmetries can be observed in mice, leveraging 6 mouse neuroimaging cohorts from 5 different research groups (∼3,500 animals). We found an anterior-posterior pattern of volume asymmetry with anterior regions larger on the right and posterior regions larger on the left. This pattern appears driven by similar trends in surface area and positional asymmetries, with the results together indicating a small brain-wide twisting pattern, similar to the human cerebral petalia. Furthermore, the results show no apparent relationship to known functional asymmetries in mice, emphasizing the complexity of the structure-function relationship in brain asymmetry. Our results recapitulate and extend previous patterns of asymmetry from two published studies as well as capture well-established, bilateral male-female differences in the mouse brain as a positive control. By establishing a signature of anatomical brain asymmetry in mice, we aim to provide a foundation for future studies to probe the mechanistic underpinnings of brain asymmetry seen in humans - a feature of the brain with extremely limited understanding.

Functional mapping of the somatosensory cortex using noninvasive fMRI and touch in awake dogs

Dogs are increasingly used as a model for neuroscience due to their ability to undergo functional MRI fully awake and unrestrained, after extensive behavioral training. Still, we know rather little about dogs' basic functional neuroanatomy, including how basic perceptual and motor functions are localized in their brains. This is a major shortcoming in interpreting activations obtained in dog fMRI. The aim of this preregistered study was to localize areas associated with somatosensory processing. To this end, we touched N = 22 dogs undergoing fMRI scanning on their left and right flanks using a wooden rod. We identified activation in anatomically defined primary and secondary somatosensory areas (SI and SII), lateralized to the contralateral hemisphere depending on the side of touch, and importantly also activation beyond SI and SII, in the cingulate cortex, right cerebellum and vermis, and the sylvian gyri. These activations may partly relate to motor control (cerebellum, cingulate), but also potentially to higher-order cognitive processing of somatosensory stimuli (rostral sylvian gyri), and the affective aspects of the stimulation (cingulate). We also found evidence for individual side biases in a vast majority of dogs in our sample, pointing at functional lateralization of somatosensory processing. These findings not only provide further evidence that fMRI is suited to localize neuro-cognitive processing in dogs, but also expand our understanding of in vivo touch processing in mammals, beyond classically defined primary and secondary somatosensory cortices.