Ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of prior immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies: a multicenter retrospective study

Prompt initiation of durvalumab and tremelimumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic active hepatitis B: a phase 2 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an etiology of HCC, but clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) usually exclude patients with chronic active hepatitis B (serum HBV viral load > 2000 IU/mL). This study examined the safety and efficacy of concurrently administering the ICI and anti-HBV medications in this patient population.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase 2 clinical trial, we enrolled patients with advanced HCC and untreated chronic active hepatitis B. Patients received 1500 mg of durvalumab every 4 weeks alone or in combination with 300 mg of tremelimumab on day 1 (the STRIDE regimen). Anti-HBV treatment with entecavir was simultaneously initiated. The primary endpoint was the rate of HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 30 patients, whose mean baseline HBV viral load was 770,986 IU/mL. No patients experienced HBV reactivation or HBV-associated hepatitis. Hepatitis flare was noted in 8 (26.7%) patients, but none of them were associated with HBV reactivation. The objective tumor response rate was 10% and 25% for the durvalumab treatment alone and the STRIDE regimen, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For patients with chronic active hepatitis B, ICI therapy could be promptly initiated as long as anti-HBV medications were administered simultaneously.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04294498.

Systemic Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Surgeon's Perspective

In recent years, the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed dramatically due to the emergence of potent systemic treatment options. These advanced therapies have led to increased survival benefits for patients with advanced or intermediate-stage HCC. Advancements in HCC treatments also offer the possibility of conversion therapy for initially unresectable HCC. However, the treatment of HCC is becoming increasingly complex, due to the expanding availability of systemic therapies, their use in combination with locoregional therapies, and their perioperative applications. Patient characteristics such as liver function, esophageal and gastric variceal status, and treatment goal (downstaging resection or long-term maintenance treatment), are the most critical factors when selecting a systemic treatment strategy. Consequently, the necessity to tailor a personalized and comprehensive treatment strategy for individual patients is growing. This review briefly summarizes the current systemic treatment regimens for HCC from a surgeon's perspective. It is based on results from clinical studies as well as personal experience and introduces the concept of a patient-centered, treatment goals-driven, individualized systemic treatment strategy for managing HCC.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori on Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Immunomodulating effects of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) have been shown to inhibit antitumor immunity. Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies is common among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess the effect of H. pylori on the outcomes of ICI in patients with HCC.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter study in patients with HCC across a broad range of treatments. Patients received either ICI-based combination regimens or sorafenib-based therapy. H. pylori serostatus and virulence factors were determined and correlated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety across the treatment modalities.

RESULTS

180 patients with HCC were included; among these, 64 were treated with ICI-based regimen and 116 with sorafenib-based regimen. In patients treated with ICI, median OS was shorter in H. pylori-positive patients (10.9 months in H. pylori-positive vs. 18.3 months; p = 0.0384). H. pylori positivity was associated with a shorter PFS in ICI recipients (3.9 months vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.0499). In patients treated with sorafenib, median OS was not shorter among H. pylori-positive patients (13.4 months in H. pylori-positive vs. 10.6 months; p = 0.3353). Immune-related adverse events and rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were comparable between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients.

CONCLUSION

H. pylori seropositivity was linked to poorer outcomes in patients with HCC treated with ICI. This association was not observed among patients receiving sorafenib-based therapies.

Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced HCC, resulting in prolonged response and improved survival. With these results, a pressing question arises: what is the optimal treatment following first-line immunotherapy? Despite the benefits of immunotherapy, most patients will experience disease progression within six months and will require subsequent therapies. International guidelines recommend second-line multi-kinase inhibitors following progression on immunotherapy; however, this recommendation is primarily based on expert consensus rather than high-quality evidence. Nevertheless, real-world data indicate that these agents demonstrate similar efficacy and safety when used as first-line treatments. Conversely, it remains unclear whether continuing immunotherapy after progression is beneficial. In some cases, adding anti-CTLA-4 as salvage therapy has shown effectiveness. Molecular-directed therapies have also been tested, showing some initial promise, but further data is needed to confirm the benefits of this approach. Emerging evidence suggests that patients experiencing oligoprogression may benefit from local or locoregional therapies while continuing immunotherapy. In this review, we will discuss treatment strategies following progression after first-line immunotherapy.

Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Fragment Linked to Tumor-Targeting Lipid Nanoparticle Can Eliminate Cancer and Its Metastasis via Photoimmunotherapy

Effective cancer therapy aims to treat primary tumors and metastatic and recurrent cancer. Immune checkpoint blockade-mediated immunotherapy has shown promising effects against tumors; however, its efficacy in metastatic or recurrent cancer is limited. Here, based on the advantages of nanomedicine, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that can target tumors are synthesized for photothermal therapy (PTT) and immunotherapy to treat primary and metastatic recurrent cancer. These LNPs, termed piLNPs, are encapsulated with indocyanine green and incorporated with the antigen (Ag)-binding fragment of the anti-PD-L1 antibody for targeting tumors and immunotherapy. Intravenously injected piLNPs in 4T1 breast tumor-bearing BALB/c mice effectively target the 4T1 tumor and are suitable for performing PTT using a near-infrared laser. Moreover, lung metastatic 4T1 tumor growth is completely prevented in mice previously cured of the 4T1 breast tumor by piLNP treatment and rechallenged with lung 4T1 metastatic cancer. Blockage of the second challenged metastatic 4T1 breast cancer by piLNP is due to the activation of Ag-specific T cells. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes from piLNP-cured mice selectively attack 4T1 breast cancer cells. Therefore, piLNP can be used as a multifunctional breast cancer treatment composition that can target tumors, treat primary tumors, and prevent metastasis and recurrence.

Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma as Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge Following Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab Treatment

BACKGROUND

While guidelines recommend immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge as second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), data supporting this remain limited, particularly regarding a standard regimen for first- and second-line treatments. Tremelimumab/durvalumab was recently approved but data on ICI rechallenge are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early efficacy and safety of tremelimumab/durvalumab for HCC as an ICI rechallenge following initial ICI therapy with atezolizumab/bevacizumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with HCC who underwent treatment with tremelimumab/durvalumab, with relevant available clinical information. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of tremelimumab/durvalumab as ICI rechallenge following initial treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. We analyzed the outcomes in patients who underwent tremelimumab/durvalumab as an ICI rechallenge and those who received tremelimumab/durvalumab as their initial ICI therapy RESULT: A total of 45 patients treated with tremelimumab/durvalumab were included, with 55.6% (25/45) undergoing ICI rechallenge. The objective-response and disease-control rates in patients who underwent ICI rechallenge were 14.3% (3/21) and 47.6% (10/21), respectively, similar to those in patients initially treated with tremelimumab/durvalumab. All patients (n = 3) who experienced the best response to progressive disease (PD) with initial atezolizumab/bevacizumab experienced PD during ICI rechallenge. The incidence rates of adverse events were similar between patient groups treated with tremelimumab/durvalumab as ICI rechallenge and initial ICI. Among patients experiencing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with atezolizumab/bevacizumab, 75% (3/4) encountered similar irAEs during ICI rechallenge.

CONCLUSION

Early safety and efficacy profiles of durvalumab/tremelimumab as ICI rechallenge are satisfactory.

The Impact of Infections in Patients Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: The therapeutic landscape of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) continues to evolve. Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), in combination with bevacizumab, has substantially improved outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in patients who develop infections while receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for uHCC. Methods: Patients who received atezolizumab and bevacizumab for uHCC at a single hospital network were included. Types and rates of infections were reported. Covariates compared among infected and non-infected cohorts included age, sex, race, comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, immunosuppressive use, chronic infections, number of cycles of ICIs given, antibiotic or antiviral therapies at ICI initiation, and line of therapy (first-line, second-line, greater than second-line). Results: Out of 810 evaluable patients, 34 uHCC patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The mean ± SD age was 66.29 ± 9.39; 28 (82.35%) were males. There were 17 (50%) patients with reported infection, with bacterial infection occurring in 12 (70.59%) patients and COVID-19 in 4 (23.5%). Of the infected patients, eight (47.06%) had one infection, five (29.41%) had two infections, and two (11.76%) had three or more infections. Infected and non-infected patients received a median of 12 (IQR: 5-17) and 4 (IQR: 3-12) ICI cycles (p = 0.18), respectively. Infections did not negatively impact OS or PFS but resulted in treatment delays and discontinuation in 11 (64.71%) and 7 (41.18%) patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, 19 (55.88%) patients died, 9 (52.94%) in the non-infected group vs. 10 (58.82%) in the infected group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: While a broad array of infections occurred in 50% of the patients in this cohort, it did not negatively impact survival outcomes. However, it did impact morbidity, with more all-cause admissions and treatment delays.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Among primary liver cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common pathological type. Its onset is insidious, and most patients have no obvious discomfort in the early stage, so it is found late, and the opportunity for surgical radical treatment is lost, resulting in a poor prognosis. With the introduction of molecular-targeted drugs represented by sorafenib, patients with middle- and late-stage liver cancer have regained the light of day. However, their therapeutic efficacy is relatively low due to the limited target of drug action, toxic side effects, and other reasons. At this time, the emergence of immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) well breaks this embarrassing situation, which mainly achieves the anti-tumor purpose by improving the tumor immune microenvironment. Currently, ICI monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, has been widely used in the clinic, further prolonging the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This article reviews the development of monotherapy and combination therapy for ICIs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the latest research progress.

Second-Line Treatment after Failure of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Retrial of Immunotherapy, or Locoregional Therapy?

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy such as atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab became mainstream first-line systemic treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients since remarkably superior efficacy of ICI-based therapy compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was reported in two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (IMbrave150, HIMALAYA). However, the optimal second-line therapy after treatment failure of first-line ICI-based therapy remains unknown as no RCT has examined this issue.

Summary

Therefore, at present, most clinicians are empirically treating patients with TKIs or retrial of ICI or locoregional treatment (LRT) modality such as transarterial therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and radiation therapy in this clinical setting without solid evidence. In this review, we will discuss current optimal strategies for second-line treatment after the failure of first-line ICI-based therapy by reviewing published studies and ongoing prospective trials.

Key Messages

Clinicians should consider carefully whether to treat the patients with TKI, other ICI-based therapy, or LRT in this situation by considering several factors including liver function reserve, performance status, adverse events of previous therapy, and presence of lesion that can consider LRT such as oligoprogression and vascular invasion. In the meantime, we await the results of ongoing prospective trials to elucidate the best management options.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: 5-year results from CheckMate 040

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated promising clinical activity and durable responses in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the CheckMate 040 study at 30.7-month median follow-up. Here, we present 5-year results from this cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to arm A [nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)] or arm B [nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)], each followed by nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or arm C (nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W). The primary objectives were safety, tolerability, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST version 1.1.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were randomized across treatment arms. At 60-month minimum follow-up (62.6-month median follow-up), the ORR was 34% (n = 17), 27% (n = 13), and 29% (n = 14) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The median DOR was 51.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.6 months-not estimable (NE)], 15.2 months (95% CI 7.1 months-NE), and 21.7 months (95% CI 4.2 months-NE), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.2 months (34/50; 95% CI 9.4-54.8 months) in arm A, 12.5 months (38/49; 95% CI 7.6-16.4 months) in arm B, and 12.7 months (40/49; 95% CI 7.4-30.5 months) in arm C; 60-month OS rates were 29%, 19%, and 21%, respectively. In an exploratory analysis of OS by response (6-month landmark), the median OS was meaningfully longer for responders versus nonresponders for all arms. No new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up. There were no new discontinuations due to immune-mediated adverse events since the primary analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the primary analysis, the arm A regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful responses and long-term survival benefit, with no new safety signals in patients with advanced HCC following sorafenib treatment, further supporting its use as a second-line treatment in these patients.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To update an evidence-based guideline to assist in clinical decision-making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to update the 2020 guideline on systemic therapy for HCC. The panel updated the systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through October 2023 and updated recommendations.

RESULTS

Ten new RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were added to the evidence base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) or durvalumab + tremelimumab (durva + treme) may be offered first-line for patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Where there are contraindications to these therapies, sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab may be offered first-line. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), ramucirumab (for patients with alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] ≥400 ng/mL), durva + treme, or nivolumab + ipilimumab (nivo + ipi) may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with durva + treme, second-line therapy with a TKI is recommended. Following first-line treatment with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, ramucirumab (AFP ≥400 ng/mL), nivo + ipi, or durvalumab; atezo + bev or durva + treme may be considered for patients who did not have access to these therapies in the first-line setting, and do not have contraindications. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Third-line therapy may be considered in Child-Pugh class A patients with good PS, using one of the agents listed previously that has a nonidentical mechanism of action with previously received therapy. A cautious approach to systemic therapy is recommended for patients with Child-Pugh class B advanced HCC. Further guidance on choosing between options is included within the guideline.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Multifaceted Relationship with Its Microenvironment: Attacking the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Defensive Fortress

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a malignant tumor that originates from hepatocytes in an inflammatory substrate due to different degrees of liver fibrosis up to cirrhosis. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the role played by the complex interrelationship between hepatocellular carcinoma and its microenvironment, capable of influencing tumourigenesis, neoplastic growth, and its progression or even inhibition. The microenvironment is made up of an intricate network of mesenchymal cells, immune system cells, extracellular matrix, and growth factors, as well as proinflammatory cytokines and translocated bacterial products coming from the intestinal microenvironment via the enterohepatic circulation. The aim of this paper is to review the role of the HCC microenvironment and describe the possible implications in the choice of the most appropriate therapeutic scheme in the prediction of tumor response or resistance to currently applied treatments and in the possible development of future therapeutic perspectives, in order to circumvent resistance and break down the tumor's defensive fort.

Relevant Aspects of Combined Protocols for Prevention of N(M)AFLD and Other Non-Communicable Diseases

Obesity is a global health issue characterized by the excessive fat accumulation, leading to an increased risk of chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), which can progress from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, there are no approved pharmacological protocols for prevention/treatment of MAFLD, and due the complexity lying beneath these mechanisms, monotherapies are unlikely to be efficacious. This review article analyzes the possibility that NCDs can be prevented or attenuated by the combination of bioactive substances, as they could promote higher response rates, maximum reaction results, additive or synergistic effects due to compounds having similar or different mechanisms of action and/or refraining possible side effects, related to the use of lower doses and exposures times than monotherapies. Accordingly, prevention of mouse MAFLD is observed with the combination of the omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid with the antioxidant hydroxytyrosol, whereas attenuation of mild cognitive impairment is attained by folic acid plus cobalamin in elderly patients. The existence of several drawbacks underlying published monotherapies or combined trials, opens space for adequate and stricter experimental and clinical tryouts to achieve meaningful outcomes with human applicability.

Two Cases of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Responded Well to the Combination of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab After Disease Progression During Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Therapy Under Bevacizumab Withdrawal

Many systemic chemotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are now available for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. On the other hand, it is often difficult to continue administration of angiogenesis inhibitors in these patients due to various side effects. In the two cases described in this paper, following the introduction of combination therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev), it was difficult to continue bevacizumab treatment due to side effects, such as proteinuria and fluid retention, with disease control in the two patients being ultimately poor. However, both patients experienced treatment success after switching Atezo/Bev to a regimen that included durvalumab, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody (anti-PD-L1 antibody) similar to atezolizumab, plus tremelimumab, an anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) in situations where the continuation of bevacizumab was difficult. The efficacy of subsequent drug sequencing from ICI to another ICI after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which is the standard first-line treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, has not yet been established. We consider that the two cases described in this paper provide valuable information worthy of the report.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: emerging challenges in clinical practice

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma has expanded at an unprecedented pace over the past 5 years. After tyrosine kinase inhibitors dominated the field for more than a decade, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies have become the main component in systemic first-line treatment of this cancer. Delivery of immunotherapy in routine clinical practice recognises several challenges. In this Viewpoint, we discuss the major gaps in knowledge around the role of ICI-based therapies in patients with Child-Pugh class B. We discuss the challenges in individuals with rare histological subtypes of primary liver cancer, including combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, and sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma. We also review data on ICI rechallenge in patients previously treated with ICIs, and discuss atypical patterns of progression related to immunotherapy (ie, hyperprogressive disease and pseudoprogression).

A case of nearly complete response in hepatocellular carcinoma with disseminated lung metastasis by combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab after treatment failure of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

Recently, the efficacy of immuno-oncologic agents for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been proven in several trials. In particular, atezolizumab with bevacizumab (AteBeva), as a first-line therapy for advanced HCC, has shown tremendous advances in the IMBrave150 study. However, second or third-line therapy after treatment failure with AteBeva has not been firmly established. Moreover, clinicians have continued their attempts at multidisciplinary treatment that includes other systemic therapy and radiotherapy (RT). Here, we report a case that showed a near complete response (CR) of lung metastasis to nivolumab with ipilimumab therapy after achieving a near CR of intrahepatic tumor using sorafenib and RT in a patient with advanced HCC who had experienced treatment failure of AteBeva.