Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major venous resection and reconstruction: anterior superior mesenteric artery first approach

Multimodal treatment combining neoadjuvant therapy, laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic neck-body cancer: Case series

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer involving the pancreas neck and body often invades the retroperitoneal vessels, making its radical resection challenging. Multimodal treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant therapy, surgery, and postoperative adjuvant therapy, are contributing to a paradigm shift in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This strategy is also promising in the treatment of pancreatic neck-body cancer.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a multimodal strategy for the treatment of borderline/locally advanced pancreatic neck-body cancer.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2021, we reviewed the demographic characteristics, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment data, intraoperative and postoperative variables, and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent multimodal treatment for pancreatic neck-body cancer in a prospectively collected database of our hospital. This investigation was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients with pancreatic neck-body cancer were included in this study, of whom 6 patients were borderline resectable and 5 were locally advanced. Through multidisciplinary team discussion, all patients received neoadjuvant therapy, of whom 8 (73%) patients achieved a partial response and 3 patients maintained stable disease. After multidisciplinary team reassessment, all patients underwent laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy and portal vein reconstruction and achieved R0 resection. Postoperatively, two patients (18%) developed ascites, and two patients (18%) developed pancreatic fistulae. The median length of stay of the patients was 11 days (range: 10-15 days). All patients received postoperative adjuvant therapy. During the follow-up, three patients experienced tumor recurrence, with a median disease-free survival time of 13.3 months and a median overall survival time of 20.5 months.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal treatment strategy combining neoadjuvant therapy, laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy, and adjuvant therapy is safe and feasible in patients with pancreatic neck-body cancer.

Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major venous resection and reconstruction for pancreatic cancer (with video recordings)

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with superior mesenteric/portal vein (SMV/PV) resection and reconstruction was the most technically challenging procedure and had been rarely reported. However, single-incision plus one-port LPD (SILPD +1) with SMV/PV resection and reconstruction has never been reported. In this study, we will demonstrate the feasibility, safety, key surgical procedure, and long-term outcomes for SILPD +1 with SMV/PV resection and reconstruction using video evidence. Two cases of SILPD +1 with SMV/PV wedge resection were carried out by the authors. There was no tumor recurrence during the one-year follow-up. It is worth noting that skilled laparoscopic technicians are necessary to safely complete the procedure with good short-term and long-term outcomes.

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with combined venous vascular resection: A comparative analysis with open approach

Backgrounds/Aims

This study aimed to compare the minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with venous vascular resection (MI-PDVR) and open pancreatoduodenectomy with venous vascular resection (O-PDVR) for periampullary cancer.

Methods

Data of 124 patients who underwent PDVR (45 MI-PDVR, 79 O-PDVR) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2023, was retrospectively reviewed.

Results

MI-PDVR is significantly better than O-PDVR in terms of perioperative outcomes (median operation time [452.69 minutes vs. 543.91 minutes; p = 0.004], estimated blood loss [410.44 mL vs. 747.59 mL; p < 0.01], intraoperative transfusion rate [2 cases vs. 18 cases; p = 0.01], and hospital stay [18.16 days vs. 23.91 days; p = 0.008]). The complications until the discharge day showed no significant difference between the two groups (Clavien-Dindo < 3, 84.4% vs. 82.3%; Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, 15.6% vs. 17.7%; p = 0.809). In terms of long-term oncological outcomes, there was no statistical difference in overall survival (OS, 51.55 months [95% CI: 35.95-67.14] vs. median 49.92 months [95% CI: 40.97-58.87]; p = 0.340) and disease-free survival (DFS, median 35.06 months [95% CI: 21.47-48.65] vs. median 38.77 months [95% CI: 29.80-47.75]; p = 0.585), between the two groups. Long-term oncological outcomes for subgroup analysis focusing on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma also showed no statistical differences in OS (40.86 months [95% CI: 34.45-47.27] vs. 48.48 months [95% CI: 38.16-58.59]; p = 0.270) and DFS (24.42 months [95% CI: 17.03-31.85] vs. 34.35 months, [95% CI: 25.44-43.27]; p = 0.740).

Conclusions

MI-PDVR can provide better perioperative outcomes than O-PDVR, and has similar oncological impact.

Artificial intelligence automated surgical phases recognition in intraoperative videos of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is one of the most challenging operations and has a long learning curve. Artificial intelligence (AI) automated surgical phase recognition in intraoperative videos has many potential applications in surgical education, helping shorten the learning curve, but no study has made this breakthrough in LPD. Herein, we aimed to build AI models to recognize the surgical phase in LPD and explore the performance characteristics of AI models.

METHODS

Among 69 LPD videos from a single surgical team, we used 42 in the building group to establish the models and used the remaining 27 videos in the analysis group to assess the models' performance characteristics. We annotated 13 surgical phases of LPD, including 4 key phases and 9 necessary phases. Two minimal invasive pancreatic surgeons annotated all the videos. We built two AI models for the key phase and necessary phase recognition, based on convolutional neural networks. The overall performance of the AI models was determined mainly by mean average precision (mAP).

RESULTS

Overall mAPs of the AI models in the test set of the building group were 89.7% and 84.7% for key phases and necessary phases, respectively. In the 27-video analysis group, overall mAPs were 86.8% and 71.2%, with maximum mAPs of 98.1% and 93.9%. We found commonalities between the error of model recognition and the differences of surgeon annotation, and the AI model exhibited bad performance in cases with anatomic variation or lesion involvement with adjacent organs.

CONCLUSIONS

AI automated surgical phase recognition can be achieved in LPD, with outstanding performance in selective cases. This breakthrough may be the first step toward AI- and video-based surgical education in more complex surgeries.

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined With Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction: Inferior-Posterior "Superior Mesenteric Artery-First" Approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and reconstruction is increasingly performed. We aimed to introduce a safe and effective surgical approach and share our clinical experience with LPD with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction.

METHODS

We reviewed data for the patients undergoing LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction at the First Hospital of Jilin University between April 2021 and May 2023. The inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach was used. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the 2 groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection.

RESULTS

A cohort of 37 patients with periampullary and pancreatic tumors underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction, consisting of 21 LPDs and 16 OPDs. The LPD group had a longer operation time (322 vs. 235 min, P =0.039), reduced intraoperative bleeding (152 vs. 325 mL, P =0.026), and lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (19.0% vs. 50.0%, P =0.046) compared with the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly shorter operation times in end-to-end anastomosis (26 vs. 15 min, P =0.001) and artificial grafts vascular reconstruction (44 vs. 22 min, P =0.000) compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in the rate of R0 resection (100% vs. 87.5%, P =0.096). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (15 vs. 18 d, P =0.636 and 2.5 vs. 4.5 d, P =0.726, respectively). However, the postoperative hospital stay in the LPD group was notably shorter compared with the OPD group (11 vs. 16 d, P =0.007). Postoperative complication rates, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade A/B, biliary leakage, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), were similar between the two groups (38.1% vs. 43.8%, P =0.729). In addition, 1 patient in each group developed thrombosis, with vascular patency improving after anticoagulation treatment.

CONCLUSION

LPD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction can be easily and safely performed using the inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach in cases of venous invasion. Further studies are required to evaluate the procedure's long-term outcomes.

Textbook oncologic outcomes are associated with increased overall survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Textbook oncologic outcomes (TOO) have been used to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but not laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of TOO for patients with pancreatic head cancer undergoing LPD and discuss the risk factors associated with achieving TOO.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent LPD in West China Hospital from January 2015 to May 2022 were consecutively enrolled. TOO was defined as achieving R0 resection, examination of ≥ 12 lymph nodes, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmission/death, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of a TOO on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors of a TOO. The rates of a TOO and of each indicator were compared in patients who suffered or not from delayed gastric emptying (DGE).

RESULTS

A total of 44 (25.73%) patients achieved TOO which was associated with improved median OS (TOO 32 months vs. non-TOO 20 months, P = 0.034) and a better RFS (TOO 19 months vs. non-TOO 13 months, P = 0.053). Patients suffering from DGE [odds ratio (OR) 4.045, 95% CI 1.151-14.214, P = 0.029] were independent risk factors for TOO. In addition, patients with DGE after surgery had a significantly lower rate of TOO (P = 0.015) than patients without DGE.

CONCLUSIONS

As there were significant differences between patients who achieved TOO or not, TOO is a good indicator for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing LPD. DGE is the risk factor for achieving TOO, so it is important to prevent the DGE after LPD to improve the rate of TOO.

A comparative study of the "superior mesenteric artery first" approach versus the conventional approach in short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in pancreatic head cancer remains controversial, and an appropriate surgical approach can help improve perioperative safety and oncological outcomes. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of the superior mesenteric artery first (SMA-first) approach in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing LPD.

METHODS

The data of 91 consecutive PDAC patients who underwent LPD from June 2014 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups, the modified SMA-first approach group, using a combined posterior and anterior approach, and the conventional approach group. Perioperative outcomes, pathologic results, and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The number of lymph nodes harvested was greater in the SMA-first approach group (19 vs. 15, P = 0.021), as did the results in the matched cohort (21 vs. 15, P = 0.046). No significant difference was observed in the R0 resection rate (93.3% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.197), but the involvement of the SMA margin was indeed lower in the SMA-first approach group (0 vs. 13%). There were no obvious variances between the two groups in terms of intraoperative bleeding, operative time, overall and major postoperative complication rates, and mortality in either the original cohort or matched cohort. The median OS was 21.8 months in the SMA-first group, whereas it was 19.8 months in the conventional group (P = 0.900). Survival also did not differ in the matched cohort (P = 0.558). TNM stage, resection margin, overall complications, and adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors affecting OS.

CONCLUSION

The modified SMA-first approach is safe and feasible for PDAC patients undergoing LPD. It had a slight advantage in specimen quality, but OS was not significantly prolonged.

Major Venous Repair or Reconstruction During Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery: A Single Center's Experience

Background: In pancreatic cancer surgery, tumor violation of blood vessels is often considered a contraindication to surgery, especially laparoscopic surgery. We have completed 17 cases of major venous repair or reconstruction during laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, and we believe that this surgical method may be safe and feasible based on the skilled laparoscopic techniques. Materials and Methods: Between January 2014 and March 2022, a prospective cohort of 17 patients underwent major venous repair or reconstruction in our department. Among them, 15 cases underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, 1 case underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, and 1 case underwent laparoscopic central pancreatectomy. In all of these cases, the pancreatic tumor invaded either portal veins (PV) or superior mesenteric veins. Given these clinical situations, 13 cases accepted laparoscopic venous resection and reconstruction, and 4 cases underwent venous repair. Results: Ten of 17 patients (58.8%) were male. The mean age was 67.1 (range 57-81). All patients' operations were successfully completed without transit to open. The average blocking time of venous resection and reconstruction was 30.1 (range 15-41) minutes and the average time of venous wedge resection and stitching was 24.0 (range 18-30) minutes. After surgeries, there were no complications such as PV stenosis, bleeding, thrombosis, and liver failure. Thirteen patients died within 2 years because of the tumor recurrence, and 4 patients are currently followed by outpatient visits, with no obvious signs of tumor recurrence. Conclusion: Studies have shown that the reconstruction or repair of the major veins under laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective. We recommended that surgeons need to have the basics of open surgery in case laparoscopic surgery cannot be continued, and have proficient laparoscopic surgery techniques combined with extensive training to achieve a learning curve for vascular anastomosis. Clinical Trial Registration number: KY2021SL152-01.

The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction (LPD-MPVRs) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. The aim of present study was to explore the short- and long-term outcomes of different type of LPD-MPVRs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LPD-MPVRs in 14 Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers between June 2014 and December 2020 were selected and compared.

RESULTS

In total, 142 patients were included and were divided into primary closure (n = 56), end-end anastomosis (n = 43), or interposition graft (n = 43). Median overall survival (OS) and median progress-free survival (PFS) between primary closure and end-end anastomosis had no difference (both P > 0.05). As compared to primary closure and end-end anastomosis, interposition graft had the worst median OS (12 months versus 19 months versus 17 months, P = 0.001) and the worst median PFS (6 months versus 15 months versus 12 months, P < 0.000). As compared to primary closure, interposition graft had almost double risk in major morbidity (16.3 percent versus 8.9 percent) and about triple risk (10 percent versus 3.6 percent) in 90-day mortality, while End-end anastomosis had only one fourth major morbidity (2.3 percent versus 8.9 percent). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperation hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of positive lymph nodes had negative impact on OS, while R0, R1 surgical margin had protective effect on OS. Postoperative hospital stay had negative impact on PFS, while primary closure, end-end anastomosis, short-term vascular patency, and short-term vascular stenosis positively related to PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In LPD-MPVRs, interposition graft had the worst OS, the worst PFS, the highest rate of major morbidity, and the highest rate of 90-day mortality. While there were no differences in OS and PFS between primary closure and end-end anastomosis.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic cancer: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction has been applied in pancreatic cancer patients with tumor infiltration or adherence. However, it is controversial whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction is feasible. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LPD with major vascular resection compared with OPD with major vascular resection.

METHODS

We reviewed data for all pancreatic cancer patients undergoing LPD or OPD with vascular resection at Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between February 2018 and May 2022. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the two groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction, including 25 LPDs and 38 OPDs. The LPD group had less intraoperative blood loss (200 vs. 400 mL, P < 0.001), lower proportion of intraoperative blood transfusion (16.0% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.047), longer operation time (390 vs. 334 min, P = 0.004) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11 vs. 14 days, P = 0.005). There was no perioperative death in all patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total postoperative complications, grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying and abdominal infection between the two groups. No postpancreatectomy hemorrhage nor bile leakage occurred during perioperative period. There was no significant difference in R0 resection rate and number of lymph nodes harvested between the two groups. Patency of reconstructed vessels in the two groups were 96.0% and 92.1%, respectively (P = 0.927).

CONCLUSIONS

LPD with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction was safe, feasible and oncologically acceptable for selected patients with pancreatic cancer, and it can achieve similar or even better perioperative results compared to open approach.

Postoperative complications and short-term prognosis of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has been accepted worldwide for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), it is a very technical and challenging procedure. Also, it is unclear whether LPD is superior to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). This study summarized the experience and efficacy of LPD for treating PDA in our medical center.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with PDA admitted at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University from October 2019 and January 2021. Patients received either LPD or OPD. Clinical outcomes (operation time, duration of anesthesia, intraoperative hemorrhage), postoperative complications, and short-term outcomes were compared. Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among the PDA patients, 101 patients underwent surgical treatment, 4 patients converted from LPD to OPD, and 7 of them received conservative treatment. Forty-six patients were cured of LPD, and 1 of them died shortly after the operation. Moreover, 44 patients received OPD, and there were 2 postoperative deaths. There were significant differences in the location of the operation time, duration of anesthesia, postoperative hemorrhage, abdominal infections, and postoperative pneumonia between the two groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that LPD was an independent factor negatively correlated with the incidence of pneumonia (relative risk (RR) = 0.072, 95%CI: 0.016-0.326, p = 0.001) and abdominal infection (RR = 0.182, 95%CI: 0.047-0.709, p = 0.014). Also, there were no differences in OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46, 95%CI: 0.60-3.53, p = 0.40) and PFS (HR = 1.46, 95%CI: 0.64-3.32, p = 0.37) at 12 months between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LPD could be efficacy and feasible for managing selected PDA patients. Also, LPD has a better effect in reducing postoperative pneumonia and abdominal infection compared to OPD.

Preliminary experience on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenal combined with major venous resection and reconstruction anastomosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to summarize our experience in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) combined with major venous resection and reconstruction, as well as to evaluate its safety and discuss the surgical approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 14 cases of patients diagnosed with pancreatic tumors invaded the superior mesenteric vein or portal vein who had undergone LPD combined with major venous resection and reconstruction in our center from May 2016 to May 2020. Clinical data of these 14 patients were collected and analyzed, including general information (age, gender, pathological diagnosis, body mass index, etc.), intraoperative data (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, transit rate, blood transfusion, tumor diameter, R0 resection rate, cleaning lymph node number, removal vessel length, venous reconstruction time), and postoperative results (gastrointestinal function recovery, postoperative hospital time, complications, and fatality rate). Patients were followed up after surgery, and data were collected for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients (9 males and 5 females) received LPD combined with major venous resection and reconstruction by arterial approach. The mean age was 52.5 (43-74) years old. Three of these 14 patients had routine wedge resection, 9 had opposite-to-end anastomosis after venous resection, 2 had artificial venous replacement, and the average length of removal vessel was 3.1 (2-4.5) cm. The operation time was 395 (310-570) min; the venous blocking time was 29.7 (26-50) min; the hospitalization stay was 13.6 (9-39) days. There was no grade B or C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) that occurred, only one patient had biochemical fistula. One patient had upper gastrointestinal bleeding after subcutaneous injection of low molecular weight (LMW) heparin, and the condition was alleviated after conservative treatment, and one had pulmonary infection. The 12-month disease-free survival rate was 85.7%, and the 12-month overall survival rate was 92.8%. No patients had 30-day re-admission or death.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the surgeon's proficiency in open pancreatoduodenectomy combined with venous resection and reconstruction and standard LPD, the arterial approach for LPD combined with major venous resection and reconstruction is safe and feasible.

Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: surgical and oncological outcomes from pilot experience

PURPOSE

Venous resection and reconstruction (VR) is a feasible surgical technique to achieve optimal outcomes in selected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who undergo open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). However, data regarding patient outcomes in patients who undergo VR in robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) are scarce.

METHODS

All patients with a diagnosis of PDAC who underwent upfront open or robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with VR in a high-volume institution for pancreatic surgery between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the RPD and OPD cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included in the final analysis, 14 patients underwent RPD with VR and 70 who had OPD with VR. Reconstructed venous patency, postoperative 30-day morbidity, and 90-day mortality were comparable; however, lymph node resection rates were lower in the RPC cohort (p = 0.029). No difference was identified in 3-year survival rates between the two groups (34.0% versus 25.7% respectively, p = 0.667).

CONCLUSION

RPD with VR is a feasible approach for patients with PDAC and venous invasion. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes compared to the open approach.

Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has recently been safely performed by experts, and various methods for resection have been reported. This review summarizes the literature describing surgical approaches for MIPD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE) was conducted for studies reporting robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; the reference lists of review articles were searched. Of 444 articles yielded, 23 manuscripts describing the surgical approach to dissect around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), including hand-searched articles, were assessed.

RESULTS

Various approaches to dissect around the SMA have been reported. These approaches were categorized according to the direction toward the SMA when initiating dissection around the SMA: anterior approach (two articles), posterior approach (four articles), right approach (16 articles), and left approach (three articles). Thus, many reports used the right approach. Most articles provided a technical description. Some articles showed the advantage of their method in a comparison study. However, these were single-center retrospective studies with a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Various approaches for MIPD have been reported; however, few authors have reported the advantage of their methods compared to other methods. Further discussion is needed to clarify the appropriate surgical approach to the SMA during MIPD.

International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM-HBP surgery project

BACKGROUND

The anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD.

METHODS

Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.

RESULTS

Three clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

MIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD.

A comparison of minimally invasive vs open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Owing to concerns regarding adequate oncological outcomes and perioperative complications, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited generalizability. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of MIDP compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for resectable PDAC after propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

The patients who underwent MIDP and ODP for PDAC between January 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, pathological outcomes, and overall and disease-free survival data were collected to compare MIDP and ODP. After PSM, perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 156 MIDP patients were compared with 156 ODP patients for resectable PDAC after PSM. Tumor size, TNM stage, differentiation, harvested lymph nodes, and positive lymph nodes were not different except for R1 resection and lymphovascular invasion between the MIDP and ODP groups. Operation times, overall complications, POPF, and adjuvant treatment were also not different between the two groups. The MIDP group had shorter hospital stays (10.0 vs 13.4 days, P < 0.001) and shorter interval times from surgery to adjuvant treatment (37.6 days vs 46.0 days, P = 0.002) than the ODP group. The MIDP group had better overall survival (34.9 vs 24.5 months, P = 0.012) and disease-free survival (16.2 vs 10.3 months, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy has advantages with respect to postoperative hospital stay, interval between surgery, and adjuvant treatment. MIDP is associated with the possibility of improved survival rate for resectable PDAC.

Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in Vietnamese patients with periampullary of Vater malignancies: A single-institution prospective study

Introduction

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is a technically complex technique, that is being used to treat periampullary malignancy. We provide our experience with laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD) with statistics on the outcomes of periampullary cancer patients.

Material and method

Thirty patients underwent surgery between June 1, 2016 and May 30, 2020, with 21 undergoing classical PD and 9 undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Prospectively gathered data on surgical outcomes and long-term oncological results are given.

Results

The median operative time was 277.5 min (range, 258.7–330 min), and the median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 319.5 mL (range, 241.2–425 mL). The rate of conversion to OPD, surgical reintervention, and mortality was 20%, 13.3%, and 10% respectively. Cumulative surgery-related morbidity was 33.4%, including bleeding (n = 4), severe POPF (n = 4), biliary fistula (n = 1), DGE (n = 2), and intestinal obstruction (n = 1). Pathologic diagnoses were AoV cancer (n = 23), distal CBD cancer (n = 4), PDAC (n = 2), and AoV NET (n = 1). The mean survival time of the LAPD group was 29.9 months. The long-term survival time of the N0 group was 36.8 months, which was significantly longer than that of the N1 group. The long-term survival times of stages I–B, II-A, and II-B were 36.9, 26.5, and 15.7 months, respectively (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

LAPD has a high rate of conversion to OPD, morbidity, and mortality. However, LPD is feasible technique for highly selected patients. Lymph node metastasis and stage of disease are the risk factors for long-term survival.

•

Most of tumours that develop in the periampullary of the Vater region are malignant.

•

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) remains the most challenging procedure in laparoscopic surgery with the rate of conversion to OPD, morbility, and mortality was 0–40%, 3.8%–50%, and 1.6%–8%, respectively.

•

In the first 30 cases, LAPD has a high rate of complications, conversion to OPD, and mortality. However, LAPD is feasible method and can provide acceptable oncological results with careful patient selection.

•

Experience, learning curve, and high-volume centre might have influenced the results.

A Case-matched Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is technically demanding, but may offer benefits over open surgery [open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD)]. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches at a tertiary cancer center from the Middle East.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent LPD (n=12) and OPD (n=38) between 2015 and 2018 were considered. One surgeon performed LPD for "all comers," while 3 other surgeons performed open surgery. Patients were randomly matched on a 1:2 basis for pathology (benign vs. malignant), malignancy size (±1 cm), and whether the pancreatic duct was dilated (>3 mm).

RESULTS

Six patients were excluded, leaving 44 patients, of whom 33 were matched (LPD n=11, OPD n=22). The groups were comparable for age (57 vs. 63 y, P=0.123) and sex distribution (female; 55% vs. 45%, P=0.721), tumor size (3 cm in each group), frequency of pancreatic duct dilatation (45% in each group), and malignant pathology (82% in each group). There were no conversions to open surgery. Although the operating time for LPD was significantly longer (680 vs. 313 min, P<0.0001), LPD was associated with significantly shorter primary (4.7 vs. 7.8 d, P<0.0001) and total hospital stay that included readmissions (4.7 vs. 8.9 d, P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in blood loss (200 vs. 325 mL, P=0.082), overall complication rate (36.4% vs. 59.1%, P=0.282), or clinically significant complications (9.1% vs. 22.2%, P=0.643) and readmissions (0 vs. 4 patients). In patients with malignant disease, there were no differences with regard to the number of lymph nodes retrieved (18 vs. 12, P=0.095) and frequency of R0 resections (77.8% in each group).

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, the laparoscopic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy seems to offer advantages over open surgery in terms of reduction in hospital stay while maintaining an equivalent oncologic resection.

Learning curve of three European centers in laparoscopic, hybrid laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

There are limited numbers of high-volume centers performing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) routinely. Several approaches to MIPD have been described. Aim of this analysis was to show the learning curve of three different approaches to MIPD. Focus was on determining the number of cases necessary to obtain proficient level in MIPD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study wherein outcomes of 300 consecutive patients at three centers-at each center the initial 100 consecutive patients undergoing MIPD for malignant and benign tumors of the head of the pancreas and perimpullary area, performed by three experienced surgeons were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 300 patients after MIPD were included: the three different cohorts (laparoscopic n = 100, hybrid n = 100, robotic n = 100). CUSUM analysis of operating time in each center demonstrated that the plateau for laparoscopic PD was n = 61, for hybrid PDes was n = 32 and for robotic PD was n = 68. Median operative time for laparoscopic, hybrid, and robotic approaches was 395 min, 404 min, 510 min, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss for laparoscopic PD, hybrid PD, and robotic PD was 250 ml, 250 ml, and 413 ml, respectively. Delayed gastric emptying occurred 12% in laparoscopic cohort, 10% in hybrid, and 53% in robotic cohort. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) rate for laparoscopic PD, hybrid PD, and robotic PD was 32%, 37%, and 22% with 5% death in each cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This analysis of the learning curve of three European centers found a shorter learning curve with hybrid PD as compared to laparoscopic and robotic PD. In implementation of a MIPD program, a stepwise approach might be beneficial.

Designing the European registry on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a pan-European survey

BACKGROUND

The recent Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) advise all centers that perform MIPS to participate in multicenter registries to safeguard optimal outcomes and patient safety. During the design phase of a pan-European registry on MIPS, the European consortium of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS) sought input from European HPB surgeons.

METHODS

An anonymous online questionnaire with 23 questions on MIPS practice was sent to all member centers of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and E-MIPS.

RESULTS

Completed questionnaires were obtained from 98 centers in 23 countries, of which 75 (76.5%) were academic centers. Centers had a median annual pancreatoduodenectomy volume of 45. The most-performed MIPS procedure was laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (93.9% of centers). Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 49% of all centers. Some 25 centers already participated in an ongoing national registry, and were willing to share their data with the European registry on MIPS. The most mentioned (45.4%) maximum time for processing one patient's data into the registry was 10-15 min.

CONCLUSION

This European survey showed considerable support for the European registry on MIPS.

Laparoscopic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy: Initial single center experience

Backgrounds/Aims

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the gold standard for the treatment of periampullary tumors. Many specialized centers have adopted the totally laparoscopic or hybrid laparoscopic PD (LPD). However, this procedure has not yet been standardized and serious debate is taking place towards its safety and feasibility. Herein, we report our recent experience whit hybrid-LPD.

Methods

During 2019 in our department 56 PD were performed and 21 (37.5%) underwent hybrid-LPD. We have retrospectively reviewed the short-term outcomes of these patients.

Results

Main indication was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (71,4%). The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were respectively 425 min (range, 226 to 576) and 317 ml (range 60 to 800 ml). Conversion to an open procedure was required in 4 patients (19%): 2 with suspected vein involvement, 1 for mesenteric panniculitis and 1 for biliary injury. The post-operative complication rate was 42.8% (9/21). Regarding post-operative pancreatic fistula, three patients (14.2%) had grade B and 1 grade C (4.7%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 9-23) and 90- days mortality was 4.7%. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 17.7 (range 12 to 26). The rate of margins R0 was 80%; R1 ＞0<1 mm was 10.5% and R1 0 mm was 9.5%.

Conclusions

Hydrid-LPD is safe and feasible. Careful patient selection and increasing experience can reduce the risk of post-operative complications.

Hepatic Arterial Variations and Its Implication During Pancreatic Cancer Surgeries

PURPOSE

Aberrant hepatic artery anatomy is a considerable challenge during pancreatic surgery as it warrants extreme caution for the preservation of vascular supply as well as achievement of R0 resection margin.

METHOD

We reviewed the literature about the aberrant anatomical variations of the hepatic artery and its relevance during pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.

RESULT

Preoperative deliberation of peri-pancreatic vascular anatomy using advanced imaging methods is crucial for surgeons. At the same time, intra-operative suspicion and early identification of aberrant anatomy may help to prevent vascular injury and related complications. Yet, vascular reconstruction may be needed in many situations; several techniques like pre-operative embolization provide new options for management in specific situations.

CONCLUSION

We have provided here an overview of the anatomical variants of the hepatic artery and their implication during pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.

Robotic-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Total pancreatectomy (TP) is a complex surgical procedure with significant postoperative morbidity. Despite the narrowed range of indications for TP, the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the increasing complexity of surgical resections performed in high-volume centers has increased the number of annually performed TPs, especially regarding malignant disease. The introduction of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery has provided a novel and minimally invasive approach for TP, yet the feasibility of this technique is still unknown. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy (RTP) compared to conventional open total pancreatectomy (OTP).

METHODS

All patients who underwent TP between March 2015 and July 2019 in a high-volume institution for pancreatic surgery were included in this retrospective study. Clinical data and perioperative outcomes were derived from the prospectively maintained institutional database. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method was utilized to compare the RTP and OTP cohorts to minimize bias.

RESULTS

A standardized surgical protocol was utilized for RTP following a learning curve of RPD and RDP. The median operative time for patients who underwent RTP was significantly decreased compared to those who underwent OTP [300 (IQR, 250-360) vs. 360 min (IQR, 300-525), P=0.031]. Additionally, en bloc resection and spleen-preserving rates were also higher in the RTP cohort. Major 30-day morbidity (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa) and 90-day mortality were similar between the two cohorts. After a median follow-up time of 15 (IQR, 8-24) months, both the RTP and OTP cohorts had a comparable quality of life regarding exocrine and endocrine insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

RTP appears to be safe and feasible when utilized in high-volume centers for the indicated management of benign and highly selected malignant pancreatic disease. However, further prospective randomized studies are needed to assess the feasibility of this approach.

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Artificial Vascular Graft Reconstruction for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) technique with artificial vascular graft reconstruction for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer has been rarely reported since it is a very challenging technique. However, preliminary experience for the technique has been reported at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.1,2 The rising popularity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients may result in the increase of operative difficulty due to tissue edema and many other factors caused by the chemotherapy. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and key surgical procedure for LPD using video evidence.

METHODS

A three-dimensional upper abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan done to a 51-year-old man brought to the center with upper abdominal pain showed a mass in the uncinate process of the pancreas, with over 180-degree involvement of the superior mesenteric vein. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) was performed to reduce jaundice while endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) were done to confirm the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using albumin-bound paclitaxel gemcitabine + program. The chemotherapy helped in significantly relieving the symptoms where CA 199 reduced from 586.7 IU/ml to 36.73 IU/ml, and the tumor maximum diameter was reduced from 4.3 cm to 2.2 cm. The violated superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and the tumor were en bloc resected, and a 4.0-cm artificial vascular graft was placed for reconstruction. Bing's anastomosis was performed using pancreaticojejunostomy3 while cholangiojejunostomy was performed using continuous stitching. The gastroduodenal artery (GDA) stump was wrapped with ligamentum teres hepatis after the completion of gastrointestinal anastomosis. The specimen was then removed through the extended umbilical incision (4 cm) and the operation was completed after the drainage tube was placed.

RESULTS

The length of intraoperative excisional SMV, duration of artificial vascular graft reconstruction, operation time, and volume of intraoperative blood loss were 4.0 cm, 30 min, 520 min, and 800 mL, respectively. Histopathological examination of ypT2N1 indicated that 1 of the 27 lymph nodes was positive. Pathological results showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with all margins being negative.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the feasibility of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection and artificial vascular graft reconstruction in properly selected cases of pancreatic cancer with vein involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It is worth noting that skilled laparoscopic technicians and effective teamwork are necessities for safe completion of the procedure.

Combination of anterior superior mesenteric vein-first and right posterior superior mesenteric artery-first approaches for uncinate process dissection in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Uncinate process dissection is a key step in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD), including laparoscopic and robotic procedures, which increase the intraoperative blood loss and operative time and decrease the R0 resection rate if improperly handled. However, few studies have reported the operative skills in detail.

Methods

We performed uncinate process dissection using a combination of the anterior superior mesenteric vein (SMV)-first approach and the right posterior superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach in MIPD for 138 patients with periampullary tumors between March 2017 and October 2019. The demographic and perioperative data of all the patients were collected to evaluate the efficacy of this method.

Results

All patients underwent an uneventful operation. An assistant incision was performed to separate extensive adhesion between the tumor and the SMV in 3 patients. The combined approach had a notably shorter operation time and resection time, less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the traditional approach (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in conversion rate, numbers of harvested lymph node or postoperative complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, postoperative bleeding and reoperation between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no deaths during the perioperative period.

Conclusions

The combination of the anterior SMV-first approach and the right posterior SMA-first approach is a safe and feasible technique for uncinate process dissection in MIPD.

Is Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Feasible for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?

Margin-negative radical pancreatectomy is the essential condition to obtain long-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. With the investigation for early diagnosis, introduction of potent chemotherapeutic agents, application of neoadjuvnat chemotherapy, advancement of open and laparoscopic surgical techniques, mature perioperative management, and patients' improved general conditions, survival of the resected pancreatic cancer is expected to be further improved. According to the literatures, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is also thought to be good alternative strategy in managing well-selected resectable pancreatic cancer. LPD with combined vascular resection is also feasible, but only expert surgeons should handle these challenging cases. LPD for pancreatic cancer should be determined based on surgeons' proficiency to fulfil the goals of the patient's safety and oncologic principles.

The Effect of Age on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of age on outcomes with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical data of consecutive patients with PDAC undergoing LPD from January 2012 to April 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to age at admission for LPD: younger than 70 and 70 years or older.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included (<70 years, n = 96; ≥70 years, n = 51). The elderly LPD patients had lower serum albumin levels (mean, 37.9 [standard deviation, 4.8] g/L vs 40.7 [standard deviation, 6.8] g/L, P = 0.004) and a larger frequency of comorbidities (62.7% vs 36.5%, P = 0.002) than younger patients. The short-term outcomes showed no significant differences. The median overall survival time of the younger patients was not significantly greater than that of the elderly patients (20.0 [95% confidence interval, 16.1-23.9] months vs 19.0 [95% confidence interval, 13.8-24.2] months, P = 0.902).

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with PDAC after LPD were similar to those of younger patients, despite a higher prevalence of multiple chronic illnesses and poorer nutritional conditioning among the elderly patients. These results show that LPD can be applied safely to elderly patients.

Robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Description of the surgical technique and analysis of early outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite the potential benefits, the adoption of the minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is still in the initial phase. We investigated the safety and feasibility of the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection/reconstruction (RPD SMV/PV).

METHODS

Since March 2013 to October 2019, a total of 73 RPD and 10 RPD SMV/PV were performed. The two groups were case-matched according to the preoperative characteristics.

RESULTS

Mean operative times and estimated blood loss were less in the RPD group in comparison to that in the RPD with SMV-PV group (525 vs 642 min, p = 0.003 and 290 vs 620 ml, p = 0.002, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay was similar in the RPD group in comparison to that in the RPD with SMV-PV group (10 days vs 13 days, p = 0.313). The two groups had similar overall postoperative morbidity rate (57.5% vs 60%, p = 0.686), although the severe complication rate was lower in the RPD group (11% vs 40%, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

RPD with SMV-PV is associated with increased operative time, estimated blood loss, higher major complication rate compared with RPD.

3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric or portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy with synchronous vein resection for pancreatic cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and describe the surgical technique of 3d-laparoscopic pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (3dLPD) with venous resection for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with 26 patients [male/female 11/15; median age 68 (range 45-83) years] who underwent 3dLPD with stented pancreaticogastrostomy and superior mesenteric or portal vein resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between November 2016 and June 2019. Median follow-up time after surgery was 12 months (range 3-32).

RESULTS

Median operating time was 340 min (range 240-420) and intra-operative blood loss was 100 mL (range 0-1000). Type of venous resection and reconstruction was wedge-resection with primary closure (n = 22), wedge-resection with reconstruction using a peritoneal patch (n = 3), and segmental resection with primary end-to-end reconstruction (n = 1). Laparoscopy was converted to open surgery in 4 (15%) patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 (38%) patients including severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2) in 4 (15%). Postoperative mortality was zero. R0 resection was achieved in 21 (81%) patients. Median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 25 (range 10-45). Venous patency was observed in 23 (88%) patients with a median patency duration of 11 months (range 0-31).

CONCLUSIONS

3dLPD with simultaneous venous resection for pancreatic cancer results in acceptable reconstruction patency and adequacy of surgical oncology without compromising clinical outcomes.

International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

IMPORTANCE

While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is being adopted with increasing enthusiasm worldwide, it is still challenging for both technical and anatomical reasons. Currently, there is no consensus on the technical standards for LPD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this consensus statement is to guide the continued safe progression and adoption of LPD.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statements were produced upon reviewing the literature and assessed by the members of the expert panel. The literature search and its critical appraisal were limited to articles published in English during the period from 1994 to 2019. The Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials databases were searched, The search strategy included, but was not limited to, the terms 'laparoscopic', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy, 'pancreatoduodenectomy', 'Whipple's operation', and 'minimally invasive surgery'. Reference lists from the included articles were manually checked for any additional studies, which were included when appropriate. Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument was applied to assess the methodological quality and externally validate the final statements. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting at the 1st Summit on Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery in Wuhan, China.

FINDINGS

Twenty-eight international experts from 8 countries constructed the expert panel. Sixteen statements were produced by the members of the expert panel. At least 80% of responders agreed with the majority (80%) of statements. Other than three randomized controlled trials published to date, most evidences were based on level 3 or 4 studies according to the AGREE II-GRS Instrument.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The Wuhan international expert consensus meeting on LPD has produced a set of clinical practice statements for the safe development and progression of LPD. LPD is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. More robust randomized controlled trial and registry study are essential to proceed with the assessment of LPD.

ARTERY-FIRST APPROACH FOR PANCREATODUODENAL RESECTIONS. SAFETY AND ONCOLOGICAL BENEFIT (LITERATURE REVIEW)

The results of treatment of patients with malignant neoplasms of the biliopancreatoduodenal zone remain unsatisfactory. With this localization, pancreatoduodenal resection (PDR) remains the only radical surgical intervention. It is more advisable to start with non-surgical treatment, in the presence of arterial invasion of magistral vessels. This served as an impetus for the development of approaches to determine the presence of tumor invasion in the superior mesenteric artery at the early stage of the operation. The surgical goal of PDR remains to minimize contact with the tumor prior to mobilization and ligation of the supply vessels, as well as to increase the edge of the resection around the superior mesenteric artery. To achieve this goal, a number of researchers have proposed various approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during pancreatoduodenal resection, combined “artery-first approach”.An analysis of the existing artery-first techniques for pancreatoduodenal resections, as well as their effect on the treatment results of patients with periampullary malignant neoplasms, is carried out. When conducting literary searches, the databases Pubmed, Сochrane, EMBASE were used using the MESH keywords “Pancreaticoduodenectomy” in combination with the phrase “artery first”. During this search, 157 articles were found. After further analysis, 53 scientific papers were included in the literature review.Modern studies show a decrease in intraoperative blood loss, a decrease in the frequency of postoperative pancreatic fistulas and gastrostasis, as well as an increase in the frequency of R0 resection when this approach is followed. An unambiguous conclusion about the effectiveness of the artery first accesses when performing pancreatoduodenal resection requires further well-planned randomized clinical trials with a large number of patients.

Laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: an important link in the process of transition from open to total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

The safety of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy still remains controversial. Laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD) may be an alternative selection. The purpose of the present study is to compare a consecutive cohort of LAPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) from a single surgeon.

Methods

A comparison was conducted between LAPD and OPD from January 2013 to December 2018. Perioperative outcomes and short-term oncological results were compared. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations among variables.

Results

133 patients were enrolled, 36 patients (27.1%) underwent LAPD and 97 (72.9%) underwent OPD. No 30-day and 90-day mortality occurred. LAPD was associated with decreased intraoperative estimated blood loss (300 versus 500 ml; P = 0.002), longer operative time (372 versus 305 min; P < 0.001) compared with OPD. LAPD had a conversion rate of 16.7%, and wasn’t associated with an increased grade B/C pancreatic fistula rate, major surgical complications, intraoperative blood transfusion, reoperation rate or length of hospital stay after surgery. In the subset of 58 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, R0 resection rate, median total harvested lymph node or lymph nodes ≥12 did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

LAPD could be performed with non-inferior short-term perioperative and oncologic outcomes achieved by OPD in selected patients.

The 'TRIANGLE Operation' by Laparoscopy: Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer

BACKGROUND

It has recently been shown that the 'triangle operation'1 may be associated with margin-free resection in selected patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Such a procedure consists of en bloc removal, following the adventitial plane of the whole mesopancreas from the triangular space delimited by the superior mesenteric artery, hepatic artery, and portal vein.2-11 In this video, we show how to safely perform this procedure by laparoscopy.

METHODS

A 70-year-old male with persistent back pain and significant loss of weight underwent a computed tomography that showed a 3 cm mass of the uncinate process of the pancreas with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery and venous axis. The biopsy, performed at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, showed an adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 was in the normal range. The patient received eight cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX). The chemotherapy induced a major tumoral radiological response with tumoral shrinkage, however the preoperative computed tomography showed persistent infiltration of the mesopancreas behind the superior mesenteric artery and venous axis. A radical laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection was performed, including the complete clearing of the superior mesenteric artery and the right side of the celiac trunk, as in the 'triangle operation'. Venous reconstruction was achieved with an end-to-end 5/0 polypropylene running suture with growth factor, while intestinal reconstruction was achieved with an end-to-side hepaticojejunal anastomosis, a double purse-string pancreaticogastrostomy, and side-to-side mechanical linear gastrojejunostomy. The specimen was removed via a short Pfannenstiel incision.

RESULTS

Operative time was 7 h and 15 min, and blood loss was 150. Frozen sections of the superior mesenteric artery margins were negative for tumoral cells. On postoperative day 5, the patient had a hematemesis with bleeding from the pancreaticogastrostomy, which was treated endoscopically. Hospital stay was 16 days. Histopathological examination showed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas [ypT3 N1 (3/36) R0].

CONCLUSION

The 'triangle operation' for borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer can be achieved safely by laparoscopy in carefully selected patients.1-11 Proven experience in both open and laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is mandatory.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery in fifty-one cases: experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) for splenic benign space-occupying lesions has been reported by many researchers; however, few studies have described methods to control intraoperative bleeding. Trustworthy experience in LPS with a satisfactory intraoperative hemorrhage control technique is therefore necessary. The current study aims to present our experience in LPS with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery for controlling intraoperative bleeding with a large sample of 51 cases and to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and reproducibility of this technique.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients from August 2014 to April 2019 who underwent LPS in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical techniques were described in detail.

RESULTS

All patients had successfully undergone LPS with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery. Conversions to open surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomies, or blood transfusions were not needed. The operative time was 94.75 ± 18.91 min, the estimated blood loss was 71.13 ± 53.87 ml, and the volume of resected spleen was 34.75 ± 12.19%. The range of postoperative stays was 4-14 days. One female patient (2%, 1/51) suffered from postoperative complications. No perioperative mortality, incision infections, postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs), splenic infarctions, or portal/splenic vein thromboembolic events occurred.

CONCLUSION

LPS is an effective spleen-preserving surgery. Although there are many other bleeding control methods, temporarily occluding the trunk of the splenic artery was found to be a safe, feasible, and reproducible technique in LPS. The outcomes of this technique and the efficacy of splenic parenchyma preservation are acceptable.

Pitfalls for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Need for a stepwise approach

Because of today's advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management skills, surgeons are beginning to explore the usefulness of the laparoscopic approach in managing periampullary tumors. However, as a result of its innate complexity and associated high surgery-related complications, its applicability to the general surgical community remains controversial. To date, only retrospective data from high-volume centers support the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (Lap PD) for the treatment of benign conditions and malignant periampullary tumors. In addition, various surgical techniques in terms of port placement, dissection, and reconstruction have evolved in different centers depending on the preferred method commonly used by the surgeon through accumulated experience. In our center, we used a stepwise approach and standardized our surgical technique to overcome this technically demanding procedure. A collaborative implementation of video review and analysis, practice training and simulation, operating room didactics, and strict adherence to our stepwise approach in Lap PD, might potentially improve the surgical skills of young hepatobiliary surgeons and possibly overcome the volume-based learning curve of Lap PD.

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft: Case series

RATIONALE

With the development of laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was applied in various indications including pancreatic cancer. Here, we share our experience of venous resection and reconstruction with interposition graft in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in these patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We reviewed data of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection and reconstruction in patients with pancreatic cancer between the dates of October 2010 and November 2017.

OUTCOMES

Ten patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft. The mean operative time was 547 min. The mean blood loss was 435 ml. The mean length of venous defect after resection was 5.4 cm. R0 resection was achieved in nine patients (90%). There was one patient who suffered from severe postoperative complication. There was no 30-day mortality in this study. The long-term patency was achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrate the initial experience of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with long venous resection and reconstruction. Although applied in small number of patients, it could be another option for well-selected patients with reasonable morbidity and mortality as well as long-term outcomes in experienced minimally invasive surgical team.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with segmental resection of superior mesenteric vein-splenic vein-portal vein confluence in pancreatic head cancer: can it be a standard procedure?

The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in the treatment of pancreatic cancer is still disputed. However, advances in surgical technique and accumulating experience have led to the use of LPD with combined vascular resection and reconstruction as a safe and feasible procedure, especially in pancreatic cancer with major vascular involvement. A 64-year-old woman presented with obstructive jaundice secondary to pancreatic head cancer. Contrast abdominopelvic computed tomography revealed a pancreatic head tumor measuring approximately 22 mm in diameter that was abutting the first jejunal branch of the superior mesenteric vein at an angle of <180°. The patient underwent LPD, which failed to resect the pancreatic head tumor invading the superior mesenteric vein. Consequently, segmental resection of the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein, splenic vein, and portal vein (SMV/SV/PV) was completely performed in laparoscopic approach without complication. The patient recovered without any event and was discharged on postoperative day 9. LPD combined with vascular resection and reconstruction is feasible in cases involving major blood vessels. Further surgical expertise and education are required before LPD can be used as a standard procedure.