Same day discharge following elective, minimally invasive, colorectal surgery : A review of enhanced recovery protocols and early outcomes by the SAGES Colorectal Surgical Committee with recommendations regarding patient selection, remote monitoring, and successful implementation

Use of Digital and Telemedicine Tools for Postoperative Pain Management at Home: A Scoping Review of Health Professionals' Roles and Clinical Outcomes

Postoperative pain management after hospital discharge remains one of the main clinical challenges. The use of digital and telemedicine tools offers new opportunities for the continuous monitoring of, and timely intervention in, patients discharged and followed at home. This scoping review, conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, analyzed 26 studies selected through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria comprised studies published between 2015 and 2025 that involved patients discharged home after surgery, that used digital or telemedicine tools for pain management, and that included active involvement of healthcare professionals and reported clinical outcomes. Studies show the use of a variety of digital tools, including mobile applications, web platforms, wearable sensors, automated messaging systems, and virtual reality technologies, alternating across settings for the assessment and management of pain at home, educational and therapeutic support, and to enhance communication between healthcare professionals and patients. Most reported outcomes focus on improved home-based pain control, a reduction in opioid consumption, and a high level of patient satisfaction. However, some challenges remain, particularly the low level of digital literacy among certain segments of the population. In conclusion, the implementation of telemedicine and digital technologies for managing postoperative pain at home proves to be a promising strategy. Nonetheless, it requires further scientific investigation and, from policymakers, significant investments in professional training and technological infrastructure to ensure an increasingly equitable and sustainable distribution of home healthcare services.

Monitoring early discharge after laparoscopic colon surgery: an interventional study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has improved patient outcomes by promoting faster recovery, reducing pain, and lowering the risk of complications. However, increasing demand on hospital capacity for clinical admissions and the shortage of healthcare professionals remains challenging. Home monitoring after surgical procedures and early discharge offers a potential solution. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction with early discharge following elective colorectal surgery using continuous monitoring of vital signs and questionnaires.

METHODS

A prospective, single-centre, interventional study. Patients who meet the discharge criteria could leave on day one or two after surgery, monitored at home with sensors for vital signs and health questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients, 30 (58.8%) were discharged early. The results show successful early discharge in 80% (24 out of 30 patients) with a readmission rate of 20% of which 13.3% due to problems with the monitoring system. None of these readmissions were due to deviations in vital sign measurement at home. The patient satisfaction was high ranging between 6 and 7 (out of 7).

CONCLUSION

Early discharge with continue monitoring is feasible for a selected group of colorectal surgery patients. No patients were readmitted because of serious complications. Further research should focus on expending the sample size and investigating the impact of early discharge without continuous monitoring.

Do Patients Sleep Better at Home or in the Hospital Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Despite increasing primary total joint arthroplasty [TJA] (total knee [TKA] and hip arthroplasty [THA]) rates in the United States, research on its impact on sleep quality is limited. The potential benefits of same-day discharge (SDD) post-TJA on sleep quality remain unexplored. This study examined whether patients undergoing SDD or overnight hospitalization experienced better sleep on the first night after surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing THA or TKA were stratified by discharge status: SDD or overnight. The first postoperative night's sleep was assessed using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Fitbit-derived total sleep time (TST). Group differences were evaluated using analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), anesthesia type, and baseline ISI.

RESULTS

For THA, SDD was associated with higher RCSQ scores across several domains, including Total Score (d = 0.84, P = 0.0058), Sleep Depth (d = 0.82, P = 0.005), and Noise Disturbance (d = 1.22, P < 0.0001). Postoperative ISI was lower in SDD patients (d = 0.62, P = 0.010), and TST was longer (d = 1.03, P = 0.010). Higher postoperative ISI scores were strongly correlated with lower RCSQ and TST values. For TKA, SDD patients reported modest improvements in Sleep Depth (d = 0.59, P = 0.04) and Noise Disturbance (d = 0.97, P = 0.012), but no differences in total RCSQ, ISI, or TST (all P-values > 0.05). Associations between ISI, RCSQ, and TST were weak.

CONCLUSION

An SDD was associated with better early postoperative sleep after THA, including higher perceived quality and longer duration. While sleep benefits after TKA were more domain-specific, reductions in environmental disturbances suggest meaningful improvements in select aspects of rest. These findings support sleep as a modifiable perioperative outcome and support incorporating sleep quality into discharge planning.

Readmission and Adoption of Early Discharge After Colectomy Using ACS-NSQIP: Is It Time for Widespread Adoption?

INTRODUCTION

The timing of post-operative discharge following colectomy procedures remains a subject of debate among colorectal surgeons. Prior studies have demonstrated the safety and adoption of early discharge within 24 h after elective colectomy in carefully selected patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the American COllege of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2021. Adult patients undergoing elective partial colectomy with primary anastomosis and documented length of stay were included. Patients were stratified into early (< 24) and non early (≥24 h) discharge groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline demographics and non-modifiable risk factors. Primary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates and adoption trends of early discharge over time.

RESULTS

A total of 282,037 patients met inclusion criteria of which 6364 (2.3%) were discharged within 24 h. On propensity score matching the early discharge cohort had a statistically significantly lower rate of readmission (5.5% versus 7.3%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the early discharge group had a significantly reduced rate of anastomotic leak (1.0 versus 2.6%), ileus (2.0% versus 7.6%), and rate of reoperation (1.2% versus 4.0%) (P < 0.001). The proportion of early discharge colectomies increased from 0.8% in 2012 to 3.6% in 2021 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In carefully selected patients, early discharge after colectomy with primary anastomosis does not increase the risk of readmission, reoperation, or 30-d complication rates. Furthermore, the increasing trend in utilization of early discharge after colectomy suggests an increasing acceptance of this practice, though it remains a minority of all colectomies performed among institutions participating in ACS-NSQIP.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in stoma reversal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stoma reversal surgery is known for relatively high complication rates. While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are extensively validated for colorectal surgery, their use in stoma reversal remains underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates clinical outcomes of stoma reversal surgery under ERAS protocols compared to standard care (SC) practices. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for studies that compared clinical outcomes of stoma reversal surgery under ERAS protocols versus SC practices. The endpoints of interest were length of stay (LOS), ileus, wound infection, anastomotic leak, time to first stool, overall, minor, and major postoperative complications, readmission rates, and reoperation rates. Mean difference (MD) was calculated for continuous variables and Odds Ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables. Statistical analysis was performed with R version 4.4.0. We included eight studies comprising 1322 patients. Among these, 603 (45.6%) followed an ERAS protocol, while 719 (54.4%) received SC practices. ERAS was associated with a significant decrease in LOS (MD -1.83; 95% CI -2.55 to -1.12; p < 0.01), wound infection (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.97; p = 0.041), and time to first stool (MD -1.02; 95% CI -1.22 to -0.81; p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding ileus, anastomotic leak, overall, minor, and major postoperative complications, readmission rates, or reoperation rates. The implementation of ERAS protocols in stoma reversal procedures should be considered, as it was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay without increasing morbidity, and may even reduce complications such as wound infections.

Remote monitoring after elective colorectal surgery, a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have demonstrated safety of short stay after colorectal resections. Remote patient monitoring may allow earlier discharge home after surgery. Remote patient monitoring feasibility after elective colorectal surgery in a largely rural state was evaluated.

METHODS

A pilot study was undertaken May-August 2023 for patients >18 years of age, fluent in English, with compensated medical morbidities who underwent elective minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Patients were monitored at home with pulse oximetry, heart rate, blood pressure, and weight for 2 weeks. A remote nurse assessed and escalated to the colorectal surgery department as needed. Patients answered daily surveys on pain, ostomy/incision, bowel function, and oral intake. Patient satisfaction was surveyed on days 5 and 12 using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were enrolled preoperatively. The average length of stay was 3.0 days (1-9), 43% for malignancy, and 25% for inflammatory bowel disease. In 25% of cases, conversion to open surgery was required. The average home monitoring system set-up time was 53 minutes. Two patients were noncompliant. A third patient had a late loss of digital services. The remote nurse detected 2 complications: port site infection and delayed ileus. One required readmission. Patient satisfaction scores were high for the entire study period. Operation by third party failed in all attempted cases.

CONCLUSION

Remote home monitoring is a safe, feasible, and well-liked option for patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery in rural areas. Complex disease, compensated morbidities, and conversion to open surgery were not contraindications to early discharge.

Same-day Ileostomy Closure Discharge Reduces Costs Without Compromising Outcomes: An Economic Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the costs of a same-day discharge (SDD) enhanced recovery pathway for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure compared with a standard institutional enhanced recovery protocol.

BACKGROUND

Every year, 50,155 patients in the United States undergo temporary stoma reversal. While ambulatory stoma closure has shown promise, widespread adoption remains slow. This study builds on previous research, focusing on the costs of a novel SDD protocol introduced in 2020.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, and Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, comparing patients undergoing SDD DLI closure from August 2020 to February 2023 to those in a matched cohort receiving standard inpatient enhanced recovery protocol. Patients were matched based on age, sex, american society of anesthesiologists score, surgery period, and hospital. Primary outcomes included direct hospitalization and additional costs in the 30 days postdischarge.

RESULTS

The SDD group (n = 118) demonstrated a significant reduction in median index episode hospitalization and 30-day postoperative costs compared with the inpatient group (n = 236), with savings of $4827 per patient. Complication rates were similar, and so were readmission and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the SDD for DLI closure is associated with substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes. The study advocates for a shift towards SDD protocols, offering economic benefits and potential improvements in health care resource utilization.

Rethinking hospital postoperative resource use: A national analysis of pediatric appendectomy patients admitted to children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

The increased use of remote monitoring and telemedicine support may help alleviate the need for some of the postoperative inpatient hospital care and reduce health care costs, but little is known about current postoperative hospital resource use patterns. We aim to describe hospital resources use patterns in pediatric patients postappendectomy for complicated appendicitis and to evaluate the potential of earlier discharge with remote monitoring.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database for patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Health care use/costs (antibiotics, intravenous fluids [proxy for diet], analgesics, laboratory studies, and imaging tests) were determined using administrative billing data. Potentially avoidable days were defined as nondischarge days without codes for intravenous opioid pain medication or intravenous fluids. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

In total, 24,165 patients were included: 8,300 patients (34.3%) had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day, totaling 13,970 days or 14.2% of all hospitalization days. Median hospitalization cost was $19,434 [$15,658-$25,157], with accommodation and operating room being the greatest contributors. Public insurance and minority races and ethnicities were associated with greater odds of potentially avoidable days. More than 80% of hospitalized patients had intravenous antibiotics through 10 days postoperatively. More than 20% received opioids daily.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one third of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis could have had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day. Remote monitoring and telemedicine support should be explored and could help with earlier discharge and lower costs.

Safety and factors associated with early discharge in revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: analysis of the MBSAQIP database

BACKGROUND

Improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes have prompted policy initiatives that explore shifting bariatric surgery toward outpatient procedures. While the safety of early discharge after primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been reported, its safety for revisional LRYGB remains uncertain. Our study aimed to investigate the safety and patient factors associated with early discharge in patients undergoing revisional LRYGB compared with primary LRYGB.

METHODS

We identified adult patients who underwent primary and revisional LRYGB from 2020 to 2022 in the MBSAQIP database. Patients discharged early, i.e., same-day discharge (SDD) and next-day discharge (NDD) were compared to inpatients. Outcomes included 30-day complications (minor = Clavien-Dindo 1-2; major = Clavien-Dindo 3-4), mortality, readmissions, and reoperations. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative time were fitted to assess the study outcomes.

RESULTS

SDD rate was similar after primary (3,422/137,406; 2.5%) and revisional LRYGB (781/32,721; 2.4%), while NDD rate was higher in primary LRYGB (59.8% vs 54.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). SDD patients had lower odds of major complications compared to inpatients following primary (2% vs 7%, aOR: 0.30, 95%CI 0.24-0.38) and revisional LRYGB (3.7% vs 9.3%, aOR: 0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.62, respectively). NDD patients had similarly lower odds of morbidity outcomes. ASA Classification IV/V was associated with lower odds of SDD compared to Class I/II (Primary: 0.9% vs. 3%, aOR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78; Revisions: 0.9% vs. 3%, aOR: 0.24, 95%CI 0.10-0.55).

CONCLUSION

Early discharge after revisional LRYGB, particularly after an overnight stay, can be accomplished safely in carefully selected patients. However, SDD rates remain low limiting its safety assessment. Further, almost half of the patients stay more than 48 h in the hospital suggesting that policy initiatives toward outpatient management after bariatric surgery may be inappropriate for this patient population.

Same-Day Discharge After a Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Successful Approach to Patient Selection

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to decrease inpatient length of stay (LOS) and improve surgical outcomes in elective abdominal colorectal procedures. Discharging a patient home after a minimally invasive colectomy on the same calendar day is a multifactorial decision that takes into account the patient's decision and baseline condition, social factors, intraoperative findings, and postoperative recovery status. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) following minimally invasive colectomy within an ERAS protocol in a community hospital setting in Houston, Texas.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive elective cases were performed by a single surgeon from April 2022 to April 2023. This retrospective analysis aims to report a single senior surgeon's experience of the safety, feasibility, and benefits of same-day discharge after minimally invasive colectomy in preselected patients. Same-day discharge was defined as a discharge on the same calendar day without an overnight stay. Differences between specific groups were compared using the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Of 86 non-emergent colectomies, 41 patients (47.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day. The median age of the patients was 63.50 years (interquartile range (IQR) 18). The cohort included 37 females (43%) and 49 males (57%). The median LOS was one day. The median operating time was 148.50 minutes (IQR 68.25). The median intraoperative fluid usage was 1500 mL (IQR 36.25), and the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 25 mL (IQR 36.25). No readmissions among the SDD patients (0%), while three readmissions were reported in patients who stayed overnight (3.4%).  Conclusion: Same-day discharge after a minimally invasive colectomy is feasible when there is a well-established ERAS protocol and there is adequate education for patients and staff. Adequate patient selection is crucial. Patients with multiple comorbidities and a lack of a support network are not suitable candidates.

Early discharge after enhanced recovery rectal resection does not increase emergency department visits and readmissions: a single institution analysis

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4-7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1-2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1-3, POD-4-5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1-3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1-3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1-3 group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.

Validity of the I‑FEED classification in assessing postoperative gastrointestinal impairment in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery with general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The I-FEED classification, scored 0-8, was reported to accurately describe the clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal impairment after colorectal surgery. Therefore, it is interesting to determine whether the I-FEED scoring system is also applicable to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were enrolled, and the I-FEED score was measured for 4 days after surgery. The I-FEED scoring system incorporates five elements: intake (score: 0, 1, 3), feeling nauseated (score: 0, 1, 3), emesis (score: 0, 1, 3), results of physical exam (score: 0, 1, 3), and duration of symptoms (score: 0, 1, 2). Daily I-FEED scores were summed, and the highest overall score is used to categorize patients into one of three categories: normal (0-2 points), postoperative gastrointestinal intolerance (POGI; 3-5 points), and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD; 6 + points). The construct validity hypothesis testing determines whether the I-FEED category is consistent with objective clinical findings relevant to gastrointestinal impairment, namely, the longer length of hospital stay (LOS), higher inhospital medical cost, more postoperative gastrointestinal medical treatment, and more postoperative non-gastrointestinal complications.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were enrolled, and 25.0% of patients were categorized as normal, 49.4% POGI, and 25.6% POGD. Patients with higher I-FEED scores agreed with the four validity hypotheses. Patients with POGD had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (1 day longer median stay; p = 0.049) and more inhospital medical costs (approximately 500 Taiwanese dollars; p = 0.037), and more patients with POGD required rectal laxatives (10.3% vs. 32.5% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.026). In addition, more patients with POGD had non-gastrointestinal complications (5.1% vs. 11.7% vs. 30.0%; p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This study contributes preliminary validity evidence for the I-FEED score as a measure for postoperative gastrointestinal impairment after elective lumbar spine surgery.

Ambulatory Robotic Colectomy: Factors Affecting and Affected by Postoperative Opioid Use

BACKGROUND

The ongoing opioid crisis demands an investigation into the factors driving postoperative opioid use. Ambulatory robotic colectomies are an emerging concept in colorectal surgery, but concerns persist surrounding adequate pain control for these patients who are discharged very early. We sought to identify key factors affecting recovery room opioid use (ROU) and additional outpatient opioid prescriptions (AOP) after ambulatory robotic colectomies.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective review of ambulatory robotic colon resections performed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were included if they discharged on the same day (SDD) or postoperative day 1 (POD1). Outcomes of interest included ROU [measured in parenteral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)], AOP (written between PODs 2 to 7), postoperative emergency department presentations, and readmissions.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen cases were examined, 48 of which underwent SDD. The mean ROU was 29.4 MME, and 8.7% of patients required AOP. Between SDD and POD1 patients, there were no differences in postoperative emergency department presentations, readmissions, recovery opioid use, or additional outpatient opioid scripts. Older age was associated with a lower ROU (-0.54 MME for each additional year). Older age, a higher body mass index, and right-sided colectomies were also more likely to use zero ROU. Readmissions were strongly associated with lower ROU. Among SDD patients, lower ROU was also associated with higher rates of AOP.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory robotic colectomies and SDD can be performed with low opioid use and readmission rates. Notably, we found an association between low ROU and more readmission, and, in some cases, higher AOP. This suggests that adequate pain control during the postoperative recovery phase is a crucial component of reducing these negative outcomes.

Predictive Factors for Successful Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy and Stoma Reversal

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery is a safe, effective practice in specific patients that can enhance the efficiency of enhanced recovery pathways.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictive factors associated with success or failure of same-day discharge.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study from January 2020 to March 2023.

SETTINGS

Tertiary colorectal center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients eligible for same-day discharge with remote postdischarge follow-up included those with minimal comorbidities, residing near the hospital, having sufficient home support, and owning a mobile device.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were discharged on the day of surgery upon meeting specific criteria, including adequate pain control, tolerance of oral intake, independent mobility, urination, and the absence of complications. Successful same-day discharge was defined as discharge on the day of surgery without unplanned visits in the first 72 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Factors associated with successful or failed same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients (85.3%) were discharged on the day of surgery, with 14 patients (8%) having an unplanned visit within 72 hours. Overall, 161 patients (78.5%) were categorized as same-day discharge success and 44 patients (21.5%) as same-day discharge failure. The same-day discharge failure group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.7 vs 2.8, p = 0.03). Mean length of stay (0.8 vs 3.0, p = 0.00), 30-day complications (10% vs 48%, p = 0.00), and readmissions (8% vs 27%, p = 0.00) were higher in the same-day discharge failure group. Regression analysis showed that failed same-day discharge was associated with higher comorbidities (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95) and prolonged postanesthesia care unit time (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). Individuals who received a regional nerve block (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-14) and those who did not consume postoperative opioids (OR 4.6; 95% CI, 1-21) were more likely to have successful same-day discharge.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that comorbidities and prolonged postanesthesia care unit stays were associated with same-day discharge failure, whereas regional nerve blocks and minimal postoperative opioids were related to success. These factors may inform future research aiming to enhance colorectal surgery recovery protocols. See Video Abstract .

FACTORES PREDICTIVOS PARA UN ALTA EXITOSA EL MISMO DA DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA Y REVERSIN DEL ESTOMA

ANTECEDENTES:El alta el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva es una práctica segura y eficaz en pacientes específicos que puede mejorar la eficiencia de las vías de recuperación mejoradas.OBJETIVO:Identificar factores predictivos asociados con el éxito o fracaso del alta el mismo día.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospectivo del 01/2020 al 03/2023.AJUSTES:Centro colorrectal terciario.PACIENTES:Los pacientes adultos elegibles para el alta el mismo día con seguimiento remoto posterior al alta incluyeron aquellos con comorbilidades mínimas, que residían cerca del hospital, tenían suficiente apoyo en el hogar y poseían un dispositivo móvil.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía al cumplir con criterios específicos, incluido un control adecuado del dolor, tolerancia a la ingesta oral, movilidad independiente, micción y ausencia de complicaciones. El alta exitosa el mismo día se definió como el alta el día de la cirugía sin visitas no planificadas en las primeras 72 horas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Factores asociados con el alta exitosa o fallida el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva.RESULTADOS:Un total de 175 (85,3%) pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía y 14 (8%) pacientes tuvieron una visita no planificada dentro de las 72 horas. En total, 161 (78,5%) pacientes se clasificaron como éxito del alta el mismo día y 44 (21,5%) pacientes como fracaso del alta el mismo día. El grupo de fracaso del alta el mismo día tuvo un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más alto (3,7, 2,8, p = 0,03). La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria (0,8, 3,0, p = 0,00), las complicaciones a los 30 días (10%, 48%, p = 0,00) y los reingresos (8%, 27%, p = 0,00) fueron mayores en el mismo día grupo de fallo de descarga. El análisis de regresión mostró que el alta fallida el mismo día se asoció con mayores comorbilidades (OR 0,79; IC del 95 %: 0,66; 0,95) y tiempo prolongado en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos (OR 0,99; IC del 95 %: 0,99; 0,99). Las personas que recibieron un bloqueo nervioso regional (OR 4,1; IC del 95 %: 1,2, 14) y aquellos que no consumieron opioides posoperatorios (OR 4,6, IC del 95 %: 1-21) tuvieron más probabilidades de tener éxito en el mismo día -descarga.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros hallazgos indican que las comorbilidades y las estancias prolongadas en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos se asociaron con el fracaso del alta el mismo día, mientras que los bloqueos nerviosos regionales y los opioides postoperatorios mínimos se relacionaron con el éxito. Estos factores pueden informar investigaciones futuras destinadas a mejorar los protocolos de recuperación de la cirugía colorrectal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Quality indicators for ambulatory colectomy: literature search and expert consensus

BACKGROUND

Care for patients undergoing elective colectomy has become increasingly standardized using Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP). ERP, encorporating minimally invasive surgery (MIS), decreased postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). However, disruptive changes are needed to safely introduce colectomy in an ambulatory or same-day discharge (SDD) setting. Few research groups showed the feasibility of ambulatory colectomy. So far, no minimum standards for the quality of care of this procedure have been defined. This study aims to identify quality indicators (QIs) that assess the quality of care for ambulatory colectomy.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify recommendations for ambulatory colectomy. Based on that search, a set of QIs was identified and categorized into seven domains: preparation of the patient (pre-admission), anesthesia, surgery, in-hospital monitoring, home monitoring, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. This list was presented to a panel of international experts (surgeons and anesthesiologists) in a 1 round Delphi to assess the relevance of the proposed indicators.

RESULTS

Based on the literature search (2010-2021), 3841 results were screened on title and abstract for relevant information. Nine papers were withheld to identify the first set of QIs (n = 155). After excluding duplicates and outdated QIs, this longlist was narrowed down to 88 indicators. Afterward, consensus was reached in a 1 round Delphi on a final list of 32 QIs, aiming to be a comprehensive set to evaluate the quality of ambulatory colectomy care.

CONCLUSION

We propose a list of 32 QI to guide and evaluate the implementation of ambulatory colectomy.

Early Discharge after Enhanced Recovery Colectomy Does Not Increase Emergency Department Visits and Readmissions: A Single Institution Analysis

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after colorectal surgery in enhanced recovery pathways is increasing. This study aimed to determine if discharge on postoperative days (POD) one or two is associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions after left and right colectomy.

METHODS

Single institution retrospective analysis of prospective institutional colorectal surgery database between 07/01/2018 and 07/15/2022. Primary outcomes were ED visit and readmission rates for enhanced recovery open and minimally invasive right and left colectomy using logistic regressions models.

RESULTS

820 patients met inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in discharge-day by diagnosis-58.5% of patients with Crohn's disease were discharged on POD ≥4 and 21.6% with benign colon neoplasia were discharged on POD-0-1 (P < .001). ED visits occurred in 12.9% of the study population and were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (P = .096). Overall readmission rate was 8.5% and significantly different between discharge-day groups (0% POD-0 vs 8.3% POD-1 vs 5.8% POD-2 vs 6.9% POD-3 vs 12.9% POD ≥4, P = .041). Logistic regression showed that ED visits and readmissions for longer discharge-days (POD-2, POD-3, POD ≥4) were not significantly different than POD-0-1. Readmission diagnoses for the study population were higher for ileus (17.1%) and surgical site infection (SSI) type-III (22.9%) than for acute kidney injury (1.4%) and SSI type-I/II (1.4%).

CONCLUSION

Early discharge after left and right colectomy is not associated with increased rates of ED visits and readmissions. Same-day discharge may be feasible in selected enhanced recovery patients. Standardized post-discharge resources that safely allow same-day discharge require further investigation.

Short-Stay Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND

Advances in surgical practices have decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) after surgery. This study aimed to determine the safety of short-stay (≤24-hour) left colectomy for colon cancer patients in the US.

STUDY DESIGN

Adult colon cancer patients who underwent elective left colectomies were identified using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2012 to 2021). Patients were categorized into 4 LOS groups: LOS 1 day or less (≤24-hour short stay), 2 to 4, 5 to 6, and 7 or more. Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative overall and serious morbidity. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to explore the association between LOS and overall and serious morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 15,745 patients who underwent left colectomies for colon cancer were identified with 294 (1.87%) patients undergoing short stay. Short-stay patients were generally younger and healthier with lower 30-day overall morbidity rates (LOS ≤1 day: 3.74%, 2 to 4: 7.38%, 5 to 6: 16.12%, and ≥7: 37.64%, p < 0.001). Compared with patients with LOS 2 to 4 days, no differences in mortality and readmission rates were observed. On adjusted analysis, there was no statistical difference in the odds of overall (LOS 2 to 4 days: odds ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.60, p = 0.049) and serious morbidity (LOS 2 to 4 days: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.76, p = 0.672) between the short-stay and LOS 2 to 4 days groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although currently performed at low rates in the US, short-stay left colectomy is safe for a select group of patients. Attention to patient selection, refinement of clinical pathways, and close follow-up may enable short-stay colectomies to become a more feasible reality.

TOGA Therapeutic Oxygen for Gastrointestinal Atony

Background and Aims

Ileus, mechanical bowel obstruction, and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction are characterized by distension of the intestines with accumulated bowel gas. Current treatments are not completely satisfactory.

Methods

By manipulating the partial pressures of oxygen and nitrogen in the trapped air with a novel 6-hour treatment with 100% oxygen via nonrebreather mask, the bowel can be successfully decompressed, facilitating resolution of the underlying condition.

Results

A positive clinical response was seen in 7/8 [87.5%] patients after therapeutic oxygen for gastrointestinal atony. Maximal lumen diameter decreased by an average of 1.14 ± 0.87 cm [16%].

Conclusion

In this first clinical report of therapeutic oxygen for gastrointestinal atony, the provision of 100% oxygen via nonrebreather mask is a useful therapy. It decreased the diameter of the intestinal lumen and enhanced resolution of ileus, acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, and bowel obstruction. This is a low-morbidity, low-cost treatment of gastrointestinal luminal distension.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03386136.st.

Having Outpatient Major Elective (HOME) Robotic Colon Resection Protocol: A Safe Approach to Ambulatory Colon Resection

BACKGROUND

Within the past decade, colorectal surgery length of stay (LOS) has decreased from an average of 5-6 days to 2-3 days. However, elective colon resections have yet to become a common procedure with the potential for same-day discharge. During the COVID pandemic, hospital capacity was exceptionally strained and colon resections were delayed due to the lack of inpatient beds available.

PURPOSE

We sought to create a protocolized ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) pathway that would allow for safe and feasible ambulatory colon resections as well as decreasing overall hospital inpatient burden.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Between November 2020 and March 2022, 15 patients were offered same-day discharges under the HOME protocol. Of the 15 patients, 11 patients agreed to be discharged home the day of surgery and followed prospectively for 30 days. All procedures were performed robotically.

STUDY SAMPLE

Patients were selected based on level of preoperative health (ASA class 1 and 2), low-risk for loss to follow-up, ability for close family supervision for 3 days postoperatively, and type of procedure (partial colectomy). Close follow-up was achieved with daily telephonic or televideo visits for 3 days post-operatively, as well as a 2-week outpatient clinic follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION

A total of 11 patient underwent same-day surgery utilizing the protocol, 5 females and 6 males, between the ages of 34 and 62. All patients were ASA class 2. Indications for colon resection were cecal volvulus (1), recurrent sigmmoid diverticulitis (9), and Crohn's disease (1). Primary outcome was readmission rates within the 30-days.

RESULTS

There were no readmissions or complications during the perioperative 30-day period. There was one emergency department return for pain who was not admitted. Average operative time was 132.1 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Using a novel enhanced recovery protocol, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of ambulatory partial colectomy in a highly select small subset of patients.

Can Colorectal Surgery Be Performed as an Outpatient Surgery?

The potential to discharge patients safely within the same day after colorectal surgery has developed over time with concurrent advances in concepts of enhanced recovery pathways, along with minimally invasive techniques available to surgeons. The advent of planned same-day discharges after elective colectomy is made possible by research establishing improved length of stay with minimal morbidity in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery and especially minimally invasive surgery in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. In tracing the timeline of research and development of knowledge in this setting, the safety of outpatient colorectal surgery can be established.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence supporting its use, many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations remain poorly adhered to and barriers to ERAS implementation persist. In this second updated ERAS® Society guideline, a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic oncology surgery is presented, with a specific emphasis on implementation challenges.

METHODS

Based on the gaps identified by clinician stakeholder groups, nine implementation challenge topics were prioritized for review. A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed (2018-2023). Studies on each topic were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded by an international panel according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS implementation challenge topics are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated evidence base and recommendations for stakeholder derived ERAS implementation challenges in gynecologic oncology are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.

Beyond enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): Evolving minimally invasive colectomy from multi-day admissions to same-day discharge

INTRODUCTION

Early discharge is increasingly important in the resource-limited COVID era. Some groups have reported early experiences with same day discharge (SDD) after colectomy. We implemented a routine SDD protocol and report the evolution in our program's outcomes.

METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of robotic colorectal surgeries from 2016 to 2022. Colectomies were analyzed as a sub-group and stratified by year.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 535 cases, of which 483 were colectomies. Annual case volume increased from 58 to 180 cases (p < 0.001). Operative console time concordantly decreased by 33% (p < 0.001). Average length of stay decreased from five to one days. By 2022, 58% of colectomies were selectively discharged on the same day of surgery. Complication and readmission rates remained constant.

CONCLUSIONS

SDD is feasible and safe in selected patients. We illustrate the practical evolution of a surgical practice toward routine SDD, and discuss the factors we found critical to this transition.