Prevention of postoperative pneumonia by perioperative oral care in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery: a multicenter retrospective study of 775 patients

Expert Consensus on Perioperative Physician-Pharmacist Airway Co-Management

BACKGROUND

Airway management during the perioperative period is a vital component of perioperative care. However, there is a lack of consensus on the selection of medications, timing of administration, and the management of airway complications. This consensus aimed to promote a more rational and standardized application of airway management medications.

METHODS

Clinical medical and pharmaceutical experts were invited to participate in this study using the modified Delphi method. Participants completed two rounds of online surveys, with the second round based on the responses from the first round.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 42) reached a consensus on 11 clinical issues and formed 11 recommendations for clinical practice, each with a consensus degree of more than 80%. The recommendations covered aspects of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors evaluation, along with crucial points of medication monitoring in preventing and treating perioperative pulmonary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Delphi method resulted in consensus recommendations for the perioperative physician-pharmacist airway co-management. We hope this consensus will prevent pulmonary complications and improve patient outcomes through collaborative discussions between physicians and pharmacists.

Comparison of the inhibitory effects of tooth brushing and povidone-iodine mouthwash on salivary bacterial counts in patients undergoing surgery for malignant solid tumors other than head and neck cancers

Background/purpose

Infectious complications after invasive surgeries may originate from oral sources through either hematogenous infection or direct exposure to salivary bacteria. Perioperative oral management aims to remove oral foci of infection. However, the type of oral care that can reduce the salivary bacterial load remains unclear. This study aimed to identify factors influencing salivary bacterial counts during the perioperative period in patients with malignant tumors and to evaluate the effectiveness of tooth brushing and povidone-iodine mouthwash in reducing oral bacterial counts.

Materials and methods

Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery under general anesthesia for malignant solid tumors other than head and neck cancer were included. Participants were randomly assigned to the brushing or povidone-iodine mouthwash groups. Factors such as sex, age, primary disease, preoperative blood-test results, oral functional metrics, and salivary bacterial counts were analyzed. Saliva samples were collected before and on the day after surgery, both before and after oral-care interventions. The total bacterial and streptococcal counts were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and delayed real-time PCR was used to determine the viable bacterial count.

Results

Postoperatively, the salivary bacterial counts increased slightly. Significant factors affecting postoperative bacterial counts included high preoperative counts and postoperative fasting status. Brushing increased salivary bacterial counts, whereas the povidone-iodine mouthwash decreased them.

Conclusion

Poor preoperative oral hygiene and postoperative fasting were significantly associated with increased salivary bacterial counts. The povidone-iodine mouthwash reduced postoperative bacterial counts, indicating its effectiveness as a perioperative oral-care method.

Oral care methods to reduce salivary bacteria in infants undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background/purpose

Complications, such as postoperative pneumonia, can occur after pediatric cardiac surgery; however, studies on related changes in perioperative oral bacterial counts are scarce. Herein, we investigated the changes in oral bacterial counts before and after surgery in infants who underwent cardiac surgery, as well as after oral care using an antiseptic mouthwash.

Materials and methods

A total of 102 infants who underwent congenital heart disease surgery were enrolled in this study. Preoperative oral care was provided using water and a sponge brush. Bacterial cultures were used to determine salivary bacterial counts before and after oral care. Postoperatively, the infants were randomized into a water group (WA group), benzethonium chloride mouthwash group (BZ group), or povidone-iodine mouthwash group (PV-I group), and their salivary bacterial counts, before and after oral care, were measured.

Results

The preoperative salivary bacterial colony counts did not change after oral care; however, the postoperative bacterial counts were significantly lower, possibly because of the use of systemic antibiotics. Bacterial counts before and after oral care were not significantly different between the WA and BZ groups; however, bacterial counts were significantly decreased in the PV-I group after oral care.

Conclusion

Overall, the results of this study show that systemic administration of antibiotics reduces postoperative salivary bacterial counts in infants undergoing cardiac surgery, and oral care with PV-I can further reduce bacterial counts.

Dental and oral management in the perioperative period of surgery: A scoping review

Dental and oral management (DOM) is a long-established treatment modality. This scoping review aimed to narratively review previous studies, examine the effects of perioperative DOM, and identify the available evidence. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed electronic database for studies published between January 1, 2000, and March 8, 2022. The search yielded 43 studies, most of which were published in the last 10 years. The results of this study confirmed that improved perioperative oral hygiene is effective in preventing postoperative pneumonia. Our results also suggested that preoperative DOM is effective in preventing postoperative surgical site infections. Perioperative DOM is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative pneumonia, SSI, and postsurgical complications. Further studies are needed to elucidate the various mechanism of DOM and to examine efficient intervention methods and timing.

Preoperative and Postoperative Salivary Bacterial Counts in Infants Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pneumonia may develop in infants after cardiac surgery; however, only a few reports are available on perioperative oral bacteria in infants. This study aimed to examine preoperative and postoperative salivary bacterial counts in infants undergoing cardiac surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The number of bacteria in the saliva of 105 infants (average age: 20 months) who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease was determined by culturing before and after surgery. Factors associated with changes in the bacterial count were further examined. Patients received systemic antimicrobials for an average of four days immediately before surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperative salivary bacterial counts were higher in older patients, who had erupting teeth and had longer surgical times. The average number of colonies before surgery was 104.53 CFU/mL; on the day after surgery, this number significantly decreased to 103.68 CFU/mL. The rate of reduction was especially high in infants without tooth eruption. The total number of bacterial colonies in saliva decreased after surgery, most likely because of the use of systemically administered antibiotics, and the rate of decrease was particularly high in infants without tooth eruptions.

CONCLUSION

This study examined the preoperative and postoperative salivary bacterial counts in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. In the future, we would like to further examine bacterial flora and the effects of perioperative oral care. This study provides insights into the development of new strategies for preventing and treating surgical site infections and pneumonia in children.

Status of the oral environment in patients with digestive system tumors during the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an important treatment modality for patients with digestive system tumors, and perioperative management is crucial for the patients' recovery and quality of life. During the perioperative period, significant changes can occur in the oral environment of patients, such as dry mouth, mucosal ulceration, and oral infections. These issues not only cause discomfort to the patients but may also affect postoperative recovery and treatment outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to investigate and analyze the oral environment during the perioperative period in patients with digestive system tumors.

AIM

This study aims to investigate the oral health status in patients with digestive system tumors during the perioperative period and analyze the influencing factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 242 patients with digestive system tumors admitted to The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University from September 2021 to June 2023 were selected as the study population (patient group). During the same period, 245 healthy volunteers who received oral examinations were selected as the healthy group. The study compared the oral hygiene environment of the two groups, including the Dental Plaque Index (DI), Calculus Index (CI), and Periodontal Disease Index (PDI). Measurements were taken at admission (T0), 1 hour before surgery (T1), and 3 days after surgery (T2). Based on the PDI index, the patient group was divided into a periodontal disease group (PDI ≥ 3, n = 196) and a periodontal healthy group (PDI < 3, n = 46). The risk factors for the development of periodontal disease in digestive system tumor patients were analyzed, considering variables such as gender, age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption frequency, monthly income, tumor type, oral self-care habits, low-grade inflammation, and nutritional status.

RESULTS

The DI, CI and PDI indexes in patient group were higher than those in healthy group (3.23±0.64 vs 1.46±0.43, 1.92±0.46 vs 1.21±0.41, 3.83±0.79 vs 2.65±0.69, all P < 0.05). DI index, CI index and PDI index at T1 and T2 were significantly lower than those at T0 (P < 0.05), and these indices at T2 were slightly higher than T1, but the difference was not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Multivariate analyses identified high levels of high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein [OR: 15.070 (1.611-140.951)], low levels of hemoglobin [OR: 0.239 (0.058-0.981)], and presence of dental caries [OR: 246.737 (1.160-52464.597)] as risk factors associated with periodontal disease in patients with digestive system tumors.

CONCLUSION

It is important to enhance the attention and management of the oral environment during the perioperative period for patients with digestive system tumors.

Effect of oral function and postoperative eating patterns on salivary bacterial counts in gastrointestinal tract surgery patients: A preliminary study

Background/purpose

Perioperative oral care is widely provided to prevent postoperative pneumonia and surgical site infections in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. However, there is a lack of clarity regarding the kind of oral care that should be provided for different patients. The purpose of this study was to clarify the factors that influence the increase in salivary bacterial counts before and after gastrointestinal surgery to identify patients with a particular need for oral care.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were examined before surgery for denture use, number of remaining teeth, regular dental care, Oral Hygiene Index-Simplfied tongue coating, tongue pressure, bite pressure, masticatory efficiency, and dry mouth. Saliva samples were collected before surgery, in the fasting period after surgery, and in the oral feeding period. Total bacterial counts were determined by real-time PCR, and factors associated with bacterial counts were investigated.

Results

Patients with decreased oral functions, such as tongue pressure, bite pressure, and masticatory efficiency, tended to have higher salivary bacterial counts in the preoperative, fasting, and oral feeding periods. Regarding the pre- and postoperative changes, salivary bacterial counts increased in the fasting period compared to the pre-operative period and returned to preoperative values in the oral feeding period.

Conclusion

Perioperative oral care is important for patients with reduced oral function because the number of bacteria in saliva tends to be higher in such patients. As the number of bacteria in saliva increases during the fasting period, oral care is important, and oral feeding should be restarted as soon as possible.

Effect of perioperative oral care on postoperative infections in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of non-pharmacologic perioperative oral hygiene care on reduced incidence of postoperative pneumonia (PP), surgical site infection (SSI), and the length of hospital stay in patients with cancer, and to describe the details of oral hygiene care.

METHODS

We searched seven databases. Eligibility criteria were based on perioperative oral hygiene care provided by healthcare professionals to patients aged ≥18 years who were surgically treated under general anesthesia and were evaluated for the incidence of PP and SSI. We reported risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes for PP and SSI using a fixed-effects model of meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 850 articles, among which two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 21 were observational studies. Most studies indicated that dentists and medical care providers performed a combination of oral cleaning, and oral hygiene instructions. In RCTs, perioperative oral hygiene care significantly reduced the incidence of PP (RR, 0.86; p = .60), while in observational studies, perioperative oral hygiene care significantly reduced the incidence of PP (RR, 0.55; p < .001) and SSI (RR, 0.47; p < .001). The length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced (p < .05). However, the effectiveness of nursing intervention was not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative oral hygiene care implemented by healthcare professionals prevented PP and SSI and reduced length of hospital stays for patients after cancer surgery. As daily perioperative oral hygiene care is performed by nurses, it is necessary to research the effects of oral hygiene by nurses in the future.

Relationship of oral bacterial number with medical hospitalization costs in analysis of Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from single institution in Japan

Oral bacteria are known to be associated with perioperative complications during hospitalization. However, no presented reports have clarified the relationship of oral bacterial number with medical costs for inpatients. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database system used in Japan provides clinical information regarding acute hospital patients. The present study was conducted to determine the association of oral bacterial numbers in individual patients treated at a single institution with length of hospital stay and medical costs using DPC data. A total of 2369 patients referred by the medical department to the dental department at Hiroshima University Hospital were divided into the low (n = 2060) and high (n = 309) oral bacterial number groups. Length of hospital stay and medical costs were compared between the groups, as well as the associations of number of oral bacteria with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)-related diseases in regard to mortality and disease severity. There was no significant difference in hospital stay length between the low (24.3 ± 24.2 days) and high (22.8 ± 20.1 days) oral bacterial number groups. On the other hand, the daily hospital medical cost in the high group was significantly greater (US$1456.2 ± 1505.7 vs. US$1185.7 ± 1128.6, P < 0.001). Additionally, there was no significant difference in CCI score between the groups, whereas the daily hospital medical costs for patients in the high group treated for cardiovascular disease or malignant tumors were greater than in the low number group (P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis was also performed, which showed that oral bacterial number, age, gender, BMI, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, malignant tumor, and hospital stay length were independently associated with daily hospitalization costs. Monitoring and oral care treatment to lower the number of oral bacteria in patients affected by cardiovascular disease or cancer may contribute to reduce hospitalization costs.

Brushing Methods for Patients Unable to Use a Mouthwash: A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Moisturizing Gel and Povidone-Iodine in Healthy Volunteers

INTRODUCTION

 Brushing older adults or intubated patients who are unable to rinse can transmit bacteria from dental plaque into the oral cavity and increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, this study examined brushing methods to prevent the spread of bacteria in the oral cavity.  Methods: Three types of brushing methods were performed on five volunteers by dental hygienists (water group: brushing with toothbrush bristles soaked in water; gel group: brushing with a moisturizing gel placed on the toothbrush; PV-I group: brushing with toothbrush bristles dipped in povidone-iodine). Neither group spat out the saliva or gargled during brushing but brushed while wiping the water/gel/PV-I solution with a sponge brush. The same five volunteers served as subjects for the three methods. Saliva was collected before and after brushing, and the number of colonies was determined using bacterial culture.  Results: The water group demonstrated a significantly increased number of bacteria in the saliva owing to the spread of bacteria from the dental plaque. The gel group prevented the spread of the bacteria. The PV-I group showed a significant decrease in the number of bacteria in the saliva after brushing.

CONCLUSIONS

 Brushing with toothbrush bristles dipped in a povidone-iodine solution is recommended for intubated or older adult patients who cannot gargle.

Efficacy of perioperative oral care management in the prevention of surgical complications in 503 patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable malignant tumor: A multicenter retrospective analysis using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy has been associated with a high mortality rate and significant postoperative morbidity. Recently, perioperative oral care management has been reported to be effective in preventing postoperative pneumonia and surgical site infection. In this study, we examined the effect of perioperative oral care management in reducing complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, including surgical site infection.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 503 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at 8 facilities between January 2014 and December 2016. Among these, 144 received perioperative oral management by dentists and dental hygienists (oral management group), whereas the remaining 359 did not (control group). The oral care management program included oral health instructions, removal of dental calculus, professional mechanical tooth cleaning, removal of tongue coating, denture cleaning, instructions for gargling, and tooth extraction. The participants were matched using propensity scores to reduce background bias. Various factors were examined for correlation with the development of complications.

RESULTS

The incidence of organ/space surgical site infection was significantly lower in the oral management group than in the control group (8.0% vs 19.6%, P = .005). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that hypertension and lack of perioperative oral management were independent risk factors for organ/space surgical site infection. Lack of perioperative oral management had an odds ratio of 2.847 (95% confidence interval 1.335-6.071, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative oral care management reduces the occurrence of surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy and should be recommended as a strategy to prevent infections in addition to antibiotic use.

Impact of oral/dental disease burden on postoperative infective complications: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the association between dental disease burden and postoperative infective complications (POICs) in patients undergoing major surgical procedures under general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Pre-surgical dental assessment was undertaken on patients planned for major surgery. Demographic and surgical variables including putative risk factors for POICs and POIC status were documented. The univariable association between POIC status and each factor was examined. Those variables associated at P value ≤ 0.2 were candidates for inclusion in multiple logistic regression models. Backward stepwise variable selection was used to identify the independent predictors for POIC in the best fitting logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to quantify the model's global classification performance.

RESULTS

Among the 285 patients, 49 patients (17.2%) had POICs. The independent predictors for POIC were expected length of hospital stay (4-6 days; odds ratio [OR] = 4.80, 95% confidence internal [CI]: 1.30-17.70, P = 0.018, 7-9 days; OR = 5.42, 95% CI: 1.51-19.41, P = 0.009, ≥ 10 days; OR = 28.80, 95% CI: 4.12-201.18, P < 0.001), four or more decayed teeth (OR = 6.03, 95% CI: 2.28-15.94, P < 0.001) and visible tongue plaque (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.54-6.70, P = 0.002). The AUC was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) indicating good discrimination. A simple screening tool for POIC was developed.

CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In addition to systemic/surgical factors, this study identified clinically detected decayed teeth and visible tongue plaque as independent predictors for POICs. Preoperative dental assessment/care might be beneficial to assess risk for POICs and improve postoperative outcomes.

A novel method for determining viable bacteria from a mixture of dead and viable bacteria: Delayed real-time PCR (DR-PCR) method

Aspiration pneumonia can occur in perioperative and older patients, and various oral care methods have been used to prevent it. To validate the effective oral care methods, measuring bacterial counts before and after oral care is necessary. However, isolating and quantifying viable bacteria from those that are inactivated by agents used in oral care is not possible. In this study, we developed a novel method, Delayed real-time PCR (DR-PCR), that can quantify only viable bacteria from mixed samples of viable and dead bacteria. This method takes advantage of the fact that dead bacteria do not grow but viable bacteria do. When the samples were incubated in a liquid medium for 4 hours, the higher the percentage of viable bacteria, the higher the rate of increase in the number of bacteria. This method showed that povidone‑iodine mouthwashing reduced the number of viable bacteria to approximately 1/4 of that before mouthwashing. Although DR-PCR is slightly more time consuming than real-time PCR, it is effective for studying changes in bacterial counts before and after oral care.

Oral care reduces incidence of pneumonia after esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Post-operative pneumonia after esophagectomy is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have demonstrated a link between the presence of pathologic oral flora and the development of aspiration pneumonia. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of pre-operative oral care on the incidence of post-operative pneumonia after esophagectomy.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed on September 2, 2022. Screening of titles and abstracts, full-text articles, and evaluation of methodological quality was performed by two authors. Case reports, conference proceedings, and animal studies were excluded. A meta-analysis of peri-operative oral care on the odds of post-operative pneumonia after esophagectomy was performed using Revman 5.4.1 with a Mantel-Haenszel, random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 736 records underwent title and abstract screening, leading to 28 full-text studies evaluated for eligibility. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in post-operative pneumonia among patients undergoing pre-operative oral care intervention compared to those without an oral care intervention (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.74, p < 0.0001; I² = 49%).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative oral care interventions have significant potential in the reduction of post-operative pneumonia after esophagectomy. North American prospective studies, as well as studies on the cost-benefit analysis, are required.

General Factors and Dental-Related Risk Factors for Postoperative Pneumonia or Infectious Complications: A Retrospective Study

Numerous studies report that perioperative oral care decreases the frequency of postoperative pneumonia or infection. However, no studies have analyzed the specific impact of oral infection sources on the postoperative course, and the criteria for preoperative dental care differ among institutions. This study aimed to analyze the factors and dental conditions present in patients with postoperative pneumonia and infection. Our results suggest that general factors related to postoperative pneumonia, including thoracic surgery, sex (male > female), the presence or absence of perioperative oral management, smoking history, and operation time, were identified, but there were no dental-related risk factors associated with it. However, the only general factor related to postoperative infectious complications was operation time, and the only dental-related risk factor was periodontal pocket (4 mm or higher). These results suggest that oral management immediately before surgery is sufficient to prevent postoperative pneumonia, but that moderate periodontal disease must be eliminated to prevent postoperative infectious complication, which requires periodontal treatment not only immediately before surgery, but also on a daily basis.

Nursing management of patients receiving interstitial brachytherapy for head and neck malignancies

Brachytherapy is a type of radiation therapy in which the radioactive source is directly delivered to the tumor and is used to treat a variety of malignancies. Although the local control effect of brachytherapy is higher than that of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), it is often the case that brachytherapy is more invasive than conventional EBRT. As a result, patients receiving head and neck brachytherapy confront several physical, nutritional, and pain management issues. The nurses caring for patients with head and neck cancer receiving high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) should have a thorough understanding of radiation therapy principles, technology, applicator management, and the acute and chronic side effects of ISBT. However, there are no appropriate textbooks or review articles regarding nursing care for head and neck patients undergoing ISBT. The purpose of this article is to provide radiation oncologists and nurses who want to start head and neck ISBT with a comprehensive guide regarding nursing care and to help the wide spread of this treatment strategy.

Impact of postoperative physical activity on the development of pneumonia in the subacute phase after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Physical activity is important to improve recovery following surgery. This study investigated the impact of physical activity on the development of pneumonia after radical esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer in the subacute phase from postoperative day 11 to hospital discharge.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 83 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 2016 and 2022. Physical activity was measured using an activity tracker, and the average number of steps between postoperative days 8 and 10 was examined. The primary outcome was pneumonia (Clavien-Dindo classification 2 or higher) developing between postoperative day 11 and hospital discharge. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to calculate the optimal cutoff value of physical activity that can predict the development of pneumonia and define low physical activity. We used logistic regression analysis to investigate the impact of low physical activity on postoperative pneumonia.

RESULTS

Pneumonia developed in 10 patients (12.0%) during the observation period. The optimal cutoff value of physical activity for predicting pneumonia was 1494 steps per day (sensitivity: 60.0%, specificity: 89.0%, area under the curve: 0.743). In multivariate analysis, low physical activity was an independent predictor of incident pneumonia [odds ratio: 12.10, 95% confidence interval: 2.21-65.90, p = 0.004], with adjustment for age, gastric tube reconstruction route, and postoperative recurrent nerve palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical activity following radical esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer was an independent predictor of the development of pneumonia in the subacute phase after radical esophagectomy.

Preoperative evaluation of oral hygiene may predict the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Previously, the association between tooth loss and prognosis after esophagectomy was reported; however, the presence of periodontal disease has not been assessed. This study investigated the association between the degree of oral hygiene, as evaluated by tooth loss and periodontal disease, and the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 163 esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery with perioperative oral care and examination were enrolled. We assessed the periodontal pocket depth for the presence of periodontal disease and established a periodontal pocket index, defined as the sum of the periodontal pocket depth of the remaining tooth divided by the total count of the remaining teeth. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index < 3.67); Group B (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index ≥ 3.67); and Group C (tooth loss ≥ 13). Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were analyzed, and a multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates between the groups (A:B:C = 74.8%:62.8%:50.5%; p = 0.0098), but not in the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates (A:B:C = 80.2%:64.2%:62.2%; p = 0.0849). In multivariate analysis, oral hygiene (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index ≥ 3.67 + tooth loss ≥ 13; p = 0.041) was a significant independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral evaluation, focusing on tooth loss and periodontal disease, is meaningful in predicting the long-term prognosis of postoperative esophageal cancer patients.

Difficult intubation and postoperative aspiration pneumonia associated with Moebius syndrome: a case report

Background

Moebius syndrome is a rare congenital disorder characterized by non-progressive palsy of the abducens (VI) and facial (VII) cranial nerves. Its common features include dysfunctions associated with other cranial nerves, orofacial abnormalities, skeletal muscle hypotonia, and other systemic disorders of differing severities. There are several concerns in the perioperative management of patients with Moebius syndrome.

Case presentation

We present a report on the management of general anesthesia of a 14-year-old male patient with Moebius syndrome who was scheduled for mandibular cystectomy. The patient was diagnosed with Moebius syndrome at the age of 7 years based on his clinical manifestations of nerve palsy since birth and cranial nerve palsy of the trigeminal (V), facial (VII), glossopharyngeal (IX), vagus (X), and sublingual nerves (XII). The patient’s oral morphological abnormalities made intubation difficult. He also experienced dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia on a daily basis. Oral secretions were frequently suctioned postoperatively. However, after discharge, the patient developed aspiration pneumonia and was readmitted to the hospital.

Conclusions

The main problem arising when administering general anesthesia to patients with this syndrome is difficult airway management. The oral abnormalities in these patients, such as small jaw and extreme dental stenosis, make mask ventilation and intubation difficult. Furthermore, this syndrome often involves respiratory impairment and dysphagia due to cerebral nerve palsy, so there is a high risk of postoperative respiratory complications. Since multiple organs are affected in patients with Moebius syndrome, appropriate perioperative management strategies must be prepared for these patients.

Association between masseter muscle sarcopenia and postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal cancer

Sarcopenia affects the swallowing and chewing muscles, such as the masseter muscle. However, the significance of masseter muscle loss in pneumonia remains unclear. We investigated the effects of masseter muscle sarcopenia (MMS) on postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal cancer. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the data of 86 patients who underwent esophagectomy for stage I-III esophageal cancer at our hospital between March 2013 and October 2021. The primary endpoint was postoperative pneumonia within 3 months of surgery. MMS was defined as a (1) masseter muscle index (MMI) that was less than the sex-specific MMI cutoff values, and (2) sarcopenia diagnosed using the L3-psoas muscle index (L3-PMI). Postoperative pneumonia was noted in 27 (31.3%) patients. In multivariate analysis, FEV1.0 < 1.5 L (odds ratio, OR: 10.3; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.56-67.4; p = 0.015), RLNP (OR: 5.14; 95%CI 1.47-17.9; p = 0.010), and MMS (OR: 4.83; 95%CI 1.48-15.8; p = 0.009) were independent risk factors for postoperative pneumonia. The overall survival was significantly worse in patients with pneumonia (log-rank: p = 0.01) than in those without pneumonia. Preoperative MMS may serve as a predictor of postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal cancer.

Oral Microbiota Variation: A Risk Factor for Development and Poor Prognosis of Esophageal Cancer

Recent studies have shown that oral microbiota play an important role in the esophageal cancer (EC) initiation and progression, suggesting that oral microbiota is a new risk factor for EC. The composition of the microbes inhabiting the oral cavity could be perturbed with continuous factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and inflammation. The microbial alteration involves the decrease of beneficial species and the increase of pathogenic species. Experimental evidences suggest a significant role of oral commensal organisms in protecting hosts against EC. By contrast, oral pathogens, especially Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum, give rise to the risk for developing EC through their pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic activities. The presences of oral dysbiosis, microbial biofilm, and periodontitis in EC patients are found to be associated with invasive cancer phenotypes and poor prognosis. The mechanism of oral bacteria in EC progression is complex, which involves a combination of cytokines, chemokines, oncogenic signaling pathways, cell surface receptors, the degradation of extracellular matrix, and cell apoptosis. From a clinical perspective, good oral hygiene, professional oral care, and rational use of antibiotics bring positive impacts on oral microbial balance, thus helping individuals reduce the risk of EC, inhibiting postoperative complications among EC patients, and improving the efficiency of chemoradiotherapy. However, current oral hygiene practices mainly focus on the oral bacteria-based predictive and preventive purposes. It is still far from implementing microbiota-dependent regulation as a therapy for EC. Further explorations are needed to render oral microbiota a potential target for treating EC.

Efficacy of 3% hydrogen peroxide solution in cleaning tongue coating before and after surgery: a randomized phase II study

Background

Increased bacterial presence in the tongue coating and thereby, the saliva, may be a risk factor for postoperative complications such as surgical site infection or postoperative pneumonia after cancer surgery. However, no method for cleaning tongue coating has been established experimentally. The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of brushing with 3% hydrogen peroxide on suppression of the number of bacteria in tongue coating.

Methods

Sixteen patients with gastric cancer or colorectal cancer undergoing surgery were randomly allocated to control and intervention groups. In the control group, the tongue was brushed for 30 s with a water-moistened toothbrush, while in the intervention group, the tongue was brushed for 30 s with a toothbrush moistened with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Bacterial counts on tongue coating were measured before and 30 s after cleaning the tongue coating using the Rapid Oral Bacteria Quantification System.

Results

In the control group, the number of bacteria on the tongue did not decrease significantly after tongue cleaning on the day before surgery, but did on the day after surgery. In contrast, in the intervention group, the number of bacteria on the tongue decreased significantly after tongue cleaning both on the day before and the day after surgery. Furthermore, when comparing the control and intervention groups, the intervention group had a greater reduction effect.

Conclusions

Tongue brushing with 3% hydrogen peroxide is a useful method to reduce the number of bacteria on the tongue in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery.

Trial registrationjRCTs071200020 (July 3, 2020).

Number of Bacteria in Saliva in the Perioperative Period and Factors Associated with Increased Numbers

Perioperative oral management is performed to prevent postoperative complications, but its indication and management method are unclear. This study aimed to investigate salivary bacterial counts pre-and postoperatively, and factors related to increased bacterial count postoperatively. We included 121 patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia and perioperative oral management. The bacterial count in saliva was determined preoperatively, and first and seventh days postoperatively using the dielectrophoresis and impedance measurement methods. The relationships between salivary bacterial count and various variables were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The salivary bacterial count increased significantly on the first day postoperatively but decreased on the seventh day. Multivariate analysis showed that age (p = 0.004, standardized coefficient β = 0.283) and xerostomia (p = 0.034, standardized coefficient β = 0.192) were significantly correlated with increased salivary bacterial count preoperatively. Salivary bacterial count on the day after surgery was significantly increased in patients with a large number of bacterial counts on the day before surgery after preoperative oral care (p = 0.007, standardized coefficient β = 0.241) and postoperative fasting (p = 0.001, standardized coefficient β = −0.329). Establishing good oral hygiene before surgery and decreasing salivary bacterial count are necessary in patients with a high risk of postoperative surgical site infection or pneumonia, especially in older adults or postoperative fasting.

Perioperative oral care can prevent surgical site infection after colorectal cancer surgery: A multicenter, retrospective study of 1,926 cases analyzed by propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection is a common postoperative complication of colorectal cancer surgery, and surgical site infection increases medical costs, prolongs hospitalization, and worsens long-term prognosis. Perioperative oral care has been reported to be effective in preventing postoperative pneumonia, although there are only a few reports on its effectiveness in preventing surgical site infection. This study aimed to determine the role of perioperative oral care in surgical site infection prevention after colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

In this study, 1,926 patients with colorectal cancer from 8 institutions were enrolled; 808 patients (oral care group) received perioperative oral care at the hospital's dental clinic, and 1,118 (control group) did not receive perioperative oral care. The data were matched by propensity score to reduce bias. Ultimately, a total of 1,480 patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the oral care group than in the control group (8.4% vs 15.7%, P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed 4 independent risk factors for surgical site infection: low albumin level, rectal cancer, blood loss, and lack of perioperative oral care. Lack of perioperative oral care had an odds ratio of 2.100 (95% confidence interval 1.510-2.930, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that perioperative oral care can reduce the incidence of surgical site infection after colorectal cancer resection. Perioperative oral care may have an important role in the future perioperative management of colorectal cancer as a safe and effective method of surgical site infection prevention, although further validation in prospective studies is needed.

Impact of Dental Referral Prior to Elective Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Oral bacteria may contribute to postoperative infectious complications including postoperative pneumonia or surgical site infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of preoperative dental care on postoperative outcomes among surgical patients under general anesthesia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed clinical records of major surgical patients at a university hospital between 2016 and 2018. Subjects were categorized into either the preoperative dental care group, those being referred to dentists by their surgeons based on an individual surgeon's judgment for dental care before surgery, or the control group.

METHODS

The primary outcome was postoperative infectious complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative inflammation markers (C-reactive protein and fever), and economic outcomes (postoperative length of hospital stay and medical expenses). As the main analysis, the average treatment effects of the preoperative dental care were obtained from the augmented inverse-probability weighting (AIPW) method with consideration of demographics and perioperative risk factors to estimate causal effect of the intervention from the observational data. Then, stratified analyses by age and surgical sites were conducted with the inverse-probability weighting and linear regression methods, respectively.

RESULTS

In the AIPW estimation, compared with the control group, the care group saw a significantly lower rate of postoperative infection (average treatment effect -3.02) and shorter fever duration (-2.79 days). The stratified analysis by age revealed significant positive impact of dental care in all age groups, including the highest treatment effects observed among patients younger than 60. Also, treatment effect was observed in wider surgical sites than previously known.

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS

This study indicates a significant impact of preoperative dental care on preventing postoperative infection and inflammation. Along with old age or certain types of surgeries in which advantages of dental referral have been already known, preoperative dental referral could be beneficial for broader types of patients.

A nomogram for predicting postoperative pulmonary infection in esophageal cancer patients

Background

Although postoperative pulmonary infection (POI) commonly occurs in patients with esophageal cancer after curative surgery, a patient-specific predictive model is still lacking. The main aim of this study is to construct and validate a nomogram for estimating the risk of POI by investigating how perioperative features contribute to POI.

Methods

This cohort study enrolled 637 patients with esophageal cancer. Perioperative information on participants was collected to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting postoperative pulmonary infection in esophageal cancer. Predictive accuracy, discriminatory capability, and clinical usefulness were evaluated by calibration curves, concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that length of stay, albumin, intraoperative bleeding, and perioperative blood transfusion were independent predictors of POI. The nomogram for assessing individual risk of POI indicated good predictive accuracy in the primary cohort (C-index, 0.802) and validation cohort (C-index, 0.763). Good consistency between predicted risk and observed actual risk was presented as the calibration curve. The nomogram for estimating POI of esophageal cancer had superior net benefit with a wide range of threshold probabilities (4–81%).

Conclusions

The present study provided a nomogram developed with perioperative features to assess the individual probability of infection may conducive to strengthen awareness of infection control and provide appropriate resources to manage patients at high risk following esophagectomy.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Perioperative Oral Management after Cancer Surgery and an Examination of the Reduction in Medical Costs Thereafter: A Multicenter Study

In April 2012, perioperative oral management (POM) was approved for inclusion in the national health insurance system of Japan to prevent the occurrence of pneumonia, a major complication in cancer patients. The subsequent decrease in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia indicated the prophylactic effect of POM. The constant increase in health expenditure necessitates a cost-effectiveness analysis. In addition, the effect of reducing healthcare costs owing to health technologies must be evaluated. In the present multi-institutional study, the cost-effectiveness analysis of POM was conducted by comparing the incidence of postoperative pneumonia and the healthcare costs between patients who received surgery for malignant tumors before (n = 11,886) and after (n = 13,668) the introduction of POM. Additionally, the effect of reducing healthcare costs was evaluated. Reductions in the number of patients who developed pneumonia, duration of hospitalization, and number of deaths were observed after the introduction of POM. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 111,927 yen, hence the prevention of postoperative pneumonia needs 111,927 yen per patient in healthcare costs. Consequently, a maximum reduction of 250,368,129 yen in healthcare costs was observed between the incremental costs for pneumonia treatment and the cost of POM. These findings indicate that improvements in cost-effectiveness can be expected in the future through the development of procedure and system for POM.

Association between perioperative chlorhexidine oral care and postoperative pneumonia in non-cardiac surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia is the third most common complication after surgery, and its occurrence is associated with a poor prognosis in patients. Perioperative chlorhexidine oral care has been reported to reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, whether perioperative chlorhexidine oral care can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in noncardiac surgical patients is still unknown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the association between perioperative chlorhexidine oral care and postoperative pneumonia in noncardiac surgical patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search of PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure was conducted to include studies from the inception of each database through March 2021. The reference lists of all included studies were also searched by hand. Eligible studies were published and unpublished randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating the effect of perioperative chlorhexidine oral care on the reported incidence of postoperative pneumonia. Relative risks or odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated and risk of bias was assessed for eligible studies.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials with a total of 1,773 patients and 3 observational studies with a total of 12,528 noncardiac surgical patients were included. A total of 621 and 5,904 patients received perioperative chlorhexidine oral care in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. Six (85%) randomized controlled trials had a high risk of bias, and 2 (67%) observational studies had a high quality. Perioperative chlorhexidine oral care significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in randomized controlled trials (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.80; P < .001) and observational studies (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.90; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative chlorhexidine oral care led by a nurse significantly decreases the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in noncardiac surgical patients and may be more convenient and economical compared with dental professional-led perioperative oral care.

Using NSQIP Data to Reduce Institutional Postoperative Pneumonia Rates in Non-ICU Patients: A Plan-Do-Study-Act Approach

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) is a program designed to measure and improve surgical care quality. In 2015, the study institution formed a multidisciplinary team to address the poor adult postoperative pneumonia performance (worst decile).

STUDY DESIGN

The study institution is a 450+ bed tertiary care center that performs 12,000+ surgical procedures annually. From January 2016 to December 2019, the institution abstracted surgical cases and assigned postoperative pneumonia as a complication per the NSQIP operations manual. Using a plan-do-study-act approach, a multidisciplinary postoperative pneumonia prevention team implemented initiatives regarding incentive spirometry education, anesthetic optimization, early mobility, and oral care. The team measured the initiatives' success by analyzing semiannual reports (SAR) provided by the ACS NSQIP and regional adjusted percentile rankings provided by the Georgia Surgical Quality Collaborative (GSQC).

RESULTS

The 2015 SAR postoperative pneumonia rate was 4.20% (odds ratio [OR] 3.86, confidence interval [CI] 2.92-5.11). After project initiation, the postoperative pneumonia rates decreased for all NSQIP cases, from 2.51% (OR 2.67, CI 1.89-3.77) in 2016 to 2.08% (OR 2.61, CI 1.82-3.74) in 2017, to 0.85% (OR 1.10, CI 0.69-1.75) in 2018, and then increased slightly to 1.14% (OR 1.27, CI 0.84-1.92) in 2019. The institution's adjusted percentile regional rank of participating regional ACS NSQIP hospitals' postoperative pneumonia rate improved from 14/14 (July 2015-June 2016) to 6/14 (July 2018-June 2019).

CONCLUSIONS

The multidisciplinary postoperative pneumonia prevention team successfully decreased the postoperative pneumonia rate, therefore improving surgical patients' outcomes. Furthermore, this quality improvement project also saved valuable revenue for the hospital.

Dental Hygienists' Practice in Perioperative Oral Care Management According to the Japanese Dental Hygienists Survey 2019

Perioperative oral care management is effective in the prevention of postoperative complications, and dental hygienists play an important role. The aim of this study was to elucidate the practice and substantial role of dental hygienists in perioperative oral care management. The Japan Dental Hygienists Association conducted a survey of the employment status of Japanese dental hygienists in 2019. Questionnaires were distributed to all 16,722 members, and 8932 were returned (collection rate: 53.4%). A total of 3560 dental hygienists were working at dental clinics and 1450 (38.2%) were performing perioperative oral care management. More than 90% of them implemented conventional oral care practice. Less than half of the dental hygienists implemented treatment concerning oral functions. Only 9.9% of dental hygienists recognized shortened hospital stay as an effect of perioperative oral care management. Dental hygienists who implemented both nutritional instruction and training of swallowing function or mouth rinsing instructions recognized the shortened hospital stay effect. Overall implementation of perioperative oral care management led to shortened hospital stay. Implementation of perioperative oral care management required knowledge and skills related to systemic health conditions. A stepwise educational program is necessary for perioperative oral care management to become commonplace for dental hygienists.

Predictors of early postoperative pneumonia after oncologic surgery with the patients receiving professional oral health care: A prospective, multicentre, cohort study

This study was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study on 685 patients who had undergone oncologic surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of postoperative pneumonia. The two groups were compared with respect to their background, index operation, food eaten, oral condition, contents of oral care and dental treatment, laboratory data, and bacterial flora. All postoperative pneumonias occurred in six cases within four days postoperatively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative serum C-reactive protein was the strongest predictor of postoperative pneumonia. In addition, decreased postoperative Candida albicans colonies was an effective predictor of postoperative pneumonia. For patients with predictors of postoperative pneumonia, perioperative strategies for its prevention should be considered in addition to professional oral health care. This study was approved by the National Hospital Organization's Central Ethics Review Board and was also approved by the directors of the participating institutions.