Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study

Adjacent Segment Motion of Stand-Alone ALIF Versus TLIF in the Degenerative Spine: A Biomechanical Study

Study DesignBiomechanical human cadaveric study.ObjectivesTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a well-established procedure for treating degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. However, posterior fixation has been reported to accelerate adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Posterior fixation can be omitted in screw-anchored stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The present study aimed to compare the cranial adjacent segment motion of ALIF vs TLIF in specimens with reduced bone mineral density (BMD).MethodsSixteen fresh-frozen lumbosacral spines with reduced BMD (donors' age 71 ± 13years, BMD 95.7 ± 34.5 mg HA/cm3) were used. Range of motion (ROM) and Neutral Zone (NZ) of the cranial adjacent segment were analyzed in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation in native state and after TLIF or stand-alone screwed ALIF instrumentation.ResultsNo significant differences between TLIF and stand-alone screwed ALIF were observed for both absolute ROM and NZ of the cranial adjacent segment in instrumented state across all tested motion directions (P  ≥ .267). Decreased relative ROM of the fused segment - normalized to the corresponding segmental ROM in native state - resulted in compensatory increased relative ROM of the cranial adjacent segment after instrumentation. However, the relative adjacent segment ROM did not differ significantly between TLIF and stand-alone screwed ALIF (P ≥ .172).ConclusionsThis study found no clinically significant difference in adjacent segment motion when comparing TLIF with stand-alone screwed ALIF. Hence, both techniques appear to have a negligible impact on adjacent segment motion in poor bone quality. This suggests that neither TLIF nor stand-alone screwed ALIF increase the risk of ASD due to compensatory motion resulting from an operated adjacent segment.

Mechanical complications in adult deformity surgery: behavioral patterns

BACKGROUND

Mechanical complications after adult deformity surgery are typically considered as a composite variable. This study aims to differentiate their characteristics and analyze their behavioral patterns based on time-to-onset and predisposing factors.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study analyzed patients from a prospective multicenter database. Operated patients were analyzed for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), pseudarthrosis (PA), rod breakage (RB), and no complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression models encompassing clinical, biological, radiographic, and surgical parameters were utilized to identify complication-related factors.

RESULTS

Among 1,505 patients analyzed, 260 (17.3%) developed mechanical complications: PJK (65), PJF (43), PA (56), and RB (96). Similar time-to-event patterns were observed for PJK and PJF (Log-Rank test p = 0.446) (160 days [Q1 = 72; Q3 = 492]), and PA and RB (Log-Rank test p = 0.782) (695 days [Q1 = 371; Q3 = 1059]), clustering them in pairs. Proximal junctional problems (PJK/PJF) and failure of fusion (PA/RB) demonstrated different survival curves (Log-Rank test p < 0.001). Multivariate models associated (p < 0.05) proximal junctional problems with age (OR = 1.039), SF36-PCS (OR = 0.963), number of instrumented levels (OR = 1.123), and immediate postoperative alignment (Relative Lumbar Lordosis [OR = 1.025] and Relative Spinopelvic Alignment [OR = 1.064]). Failure of fusion occurrence was associated (p < 0.05) with number of instrumented levels (OR = 1.127) and 1-year postoperative: age (OR = 1.017), body mass index (OR = 1.044), SF36-PCS (OR = 0.975) and Relative Spinopelvic Alignment (OR = 1.034).

CONCLUSION

Time-to-onset differed between proximal junctional problems and failure of fusion, and predisposing factors overlap. Nevertheless, the former was associated with immediate postoperative lumbar and global sagittal misalignment, the latter with mid-term biological factors and global sagittal misalignment.

Unsupervised Clustering of Adult Spinal Deformity Patterns Predicts Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether different radiographic clusters of adult spinal deformity identified using artificial intelligence-based clustering are associated with distinct surgical outcomes.MethodsPatients were classified based on the results of a previously conducted analysis that examined clusters of deformity, including Moderate Sagittal (Mod Sag), Severe Sagittal (Sev Sag), Coronal, and Hyper-Thoracic Kyphosis (Hyper-TK). The surgical data, HRQOL, and complication outcomes of these clusters were then compared.ResultsThe final analysis included 1062 patients. Similar to published results on a different patient sample, Mod Sag and Sev Sag patients were older, more likely to have a history of previous spine surgery, and more disabled. By 2-year, all clusters improved in HRQOL and reached a similar rate of minimal clinically important difference (MCID).The Sev Sag cluster had the highest rate major complications (53% vs 34-40%), and complications leading to reoperation (29% vs 17-23%), implant failures (20% vs 8-11%), and operative complications (27% vs 10-17%). Coronal patients had the highest rate of pulmonary complications (9% vs 3-6%) but the lowest rate of X-ray imbalance (10% vs 19-21%). No significant differences were found in neurological complications, infection rate, gastrointestinal, or cardiac events (all P > .1). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a lower time to first complications for the Sev Sag cluster.ConclusionsAll clusters of adult spinal deformity benefit similarly from surgery as they all achieved similar rates of MCID. Although the rates of complications varied among the clusters, the types of complications were not significantly different.

How to Reduce the Risk of Mechanical Failures in Adult Deformity Surgery: Comparing GAP Score and Roussouly Type Restoration

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesTo assess long-term alignment descriptors correlating with mechanical complications.MethodsThe study included adult spinal deformity cases older than 18, with a minimum of four instrumented levels and a 5-year follow-up. Exclusions: previous spinal fusion, neuromuscular/rheumatic diseases, active infections, tumors, or incomplete radiographic exams. Collected data: demographic, surgical, pre- and post-operative spinopelvic parameters, and post-operative complications. The GAP score, original Roussouly type restoration, Schwab's criteria, and Odontoid to hip axis angle were evaluated using machine learning and logistic regression. Complications were evaluated with a Kaplan-Meier curve.ResultsTwo hundred and twelve patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The observed rate of revision surgery for mechanical complications was 40.6% (86 out of 212 patients). Higher post-operative GAP scores were associated with increased risks of revision for junctional failure (AUC = 0.72 [IC 95%] 0.62-0.80). The inability to restore the original Roussouly spinal shape was statistically associated with higher mechanical failure rates. A machine-learning approach and subsequent logistic regression found that the GAP score and original Roussouly type restoration are the most important predictors for mechanical failure, and GAP score lordosis distribution index and relative pelvic version are the most important factors to predict the risk of mechanical failure.ConclusionsIn our series, a proper post-operative GAP Score and the restoration of the original Roussouly type significantly minimize mechanical complication rates. We observed that junctional failure tends to occur earlier among complications, while implant failure occurs later in the follow-up.

An update on improvement and innovation in the management of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a spectrum of abnormalities of the thoracic and lumbar spine and has an increasing prevalence. It is associated with significant physical and mental disability in symptomatic patients. Given the increased rates and the morbidity associated with this disease, novel innovation in the diagnosis and treatment of such deformity is required. The SRS-Schwab classification system described coronal scoliotic deformity with sagittal modifiers. Other parameters, such as the sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, T1 pelvic angle, pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis attempted to quantify global sagittal balance. More recently, a focus on more patient specific parameters has been targeted to improve patient outcomes. The Roussouly classification system attempted to predict sagittal alignment parameters based on fixed parameters of the pelvis. Others determined the parameters based on patient age. Technological advances have also enhanced our understanding of ASD. Long cassette films and automated analyses have allowed standardization of these measurements across physicians. 3D printing has been used as an adjunct for both surgical planning and implants, both generic and patient specific, to improve outcomes. With these, advances in minimally invasive approaches have allowed ASD correction with lower complications and blood loss. Intraoperative navigation and the use of robotics has allowed improved accuracy in the care of these patients. Development of complex osteotomies have allowed for correction of advanced deformity. Fusion, however, is the ultimate goal of surgical ASD correction. Advances in biologics such as the use of recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 have been used to improve fusion rates and combat pseudoarthrosis. Finally, post-operative advances in ASD patient care with emphasis on enhanced recovery after surgery has allowed improvements in hospital length of stay and pain scores. ASD is becoming a more ubiquitous diagnosis for spine surgeons with an increasing aging population. Improvement in the understanding of the diagnosis, spinopelvic parameters, imaging techniques, and post operative care are all aimed toward helping patients in whom care can be extremely difficult. Further study in ASD patient care will target advanced innovation to provide optimal treatment to these patients and allow for best possible outcomes.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the "Current" and "Theoretical" Roussouly Classification Systems in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS)

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To classify spinal morphology using the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly systems and assess sagittal alignment in an asymptomatic cohort.

METHODS

467 asymptomatic volunteers were recruited from 5 countries. Radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. "Current" and "theoretical" Roussouly classification was assigned with sagittal whole spine imaging using sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and the lumbar apex. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare subject characteristics across Roussouly types, followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Volunteers were categorized into 4 groups (Types 1-4) and 1 subgroup (Type 3 AP) using the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly systems. The mean PI in "current" Roussouly groups was 40.8° (Type 1), 43.6° (Type 2), 52.4° (Type 3), 62.4° (Type 4), and 43.7° (Type 3AP). The mean PI in "theoretical" Roussouly groups was 36.5° (Type 1), 39.1°(Type 2), 52.5° (Type 3), 67.3° (Type 4), and 51.0° (Type 3AP). The difference in PI between "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly types was significant for Type 1 (P = .02), Type 2 (P < .001), Type 4 (P < .001), and Type 3AP (P < .001). 34.7% of subjects had a "current" Roussouly type different from the "theoretical" type. Type 3 theoretical shape had the most frequent mismatch, constituting 61.1% of the mismatched subjects. 51.5% of mismatched Type 3 become "current" Type 4.

CONCLUSION

The distribution of Roussouly types differs depending on whether the "current" or "theoretical" classification are employed. A sizeable proportion of volunteers exhibited current and theoretical type mismatch, highlighting the need to interpret sagittal alignment cautiously when utilizing the Roussouly system.

Anatomical landmark detection on bi-planar radiographs for predicting spinopelvic parameters

INTRODUCTION

Accurate landmark detection is essential for precise analysis of anatomical structures, supporting diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring in patients with spinal deformities. Conventional methods rely on laborious landmark identification by medical experts, which motivates automation. The proposed deep learning pipeline processes bi-planar radiographs to determine spinopelvic parameters and Cobb angles without manual supervision.

METHODS

The dataset used for training and evaluation consisted of 555 bi-planar radiographs from un-instrumented patients, which were manually annotated by medical professionals. The pipeline performed a pre-processing step to determine regions of interest, including the cervical spine, thoracolumbar spine, sacrum, and pelvis. For each ROI, a segmentation network was trained to identify vertebral bodies and pelvic landmarks. The U-Net architecture was trained on 455 bi-planar radiographs using binary cross-entropy loss. The post-processing algorithm determined spinal alignment and angular parameters based on the segmentation output. We evaluated the pipeline on a test set of 100 previously unseen bi-planar radiographs, using the mean absolute difference between annotated and predicted landmarks as the performance metric. The spinopelvic parameter predictions of the pipeline were compared to the measurements of two experienced medical professionals using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and mean absolute deviation (MAD).

RESULTS

The pipeline was able to successfully predict the Cobb angles in 61% of all test cases and achieved mean absolute differences of 3.3° (3.6°) and averaged ICC of 0.88. For thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence, the pipeline produced reasonable outputs in 69%, 58%, 86%, 85%, 84%, and 84% of the cases. The MAD was 5.6° (7.8°), 4.7° (4.3°), 2.8 mm (3.0 mm), 4.5° (7.2°), 1.8° (1.8°), and 5.3° (7.7°), while the ICC was measured at 0.69, 0.82, 0.99, 0.61, 0.96, and 0.70, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations in patients with severe pathologies and high BMI, the pipeline automatically predicted coronal and sagittal spinopelvic parameters, which has the potential to simplify clinical routines and large-scale retrospective data analysis.

The Thoracolumbar Inflection Point in a Population of Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To show population variance in the Inflection Point (IP) and its role in defining maximum Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL).

METHODS

468 asymptomatic adult volunteers were included in the Multi-Ethnic Normative Alignment Study (MEANS). To find parameters correlating with IP, the vertebrae and discs were numbered such that C7 was 0, T1 was 1, with T1-T2 disc being 1.5, etc. Statistical analysis was performed by a correlation matrix for IP and the 9 other selected parameters along with linear regressions.

RESULTS

The overall mean IP was 12.44 approximately corresponding to T12-L1 disc with the median being 12.50, range was T8-L4. The cohort was then stratified by sex and ethnicity, but there was no significant difference in IP between groups. IP in younger subjects was 13 (L1), compared to 12.5 (T12-L1 disc) in older subjects (P < .05). IP was moderately correlated with the TK apex (r = .66). No strong correlation was found between IP and LL magnitude or apex, TK magnitude, sacral slope, or Pelvic Incidence (PI). In terms of other sagittal parameters, PI and LL demonstrated a significant positive correlation. PI and TK did not have a strong association.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean IP was at the T12-L1 disc, however IP ranged from T8 to L4. Older subjects tended to have a relatively more cephalad IP. No radiographic variable was found to be a strong predictor of the IP. TK apex was found to have a moderate correlation.

Maintenance of intraoperative correction with multi-rod constructs in adult long construct spine fusion surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for loss of intraoperative correction, as measured by lumbar lordosis (LL), with an emphasis on rod characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective study identified patients at least 50 years of age who underwent instrumented fusion with an upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (T1-T6) or thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2) to the pelvis. Inclusion criteria included intraoperative x-rays that allowed for LL measurement, postop standing x-rays, and a minimum follow up of 24 months with the original rods still in place.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients (69 % women) were included with an average (SD) follow up of 58 months (29). Twenty-two patients (20 %) had a 10° change in LL from intraoperative to postoperative, and risk factors included a two-rod compared to multi rod (>2) construct (23 % vs 0 %, p = 0.04), male sex (34 % vs 13 %, p = 0.02), UIV near the thoracolumbar junction (28 % vs 8 %, p = 0.02), and higher L4-S1 intraoperative lordosis (41° vs 36°, p = 0.024). Forty-one patients (37 %) had a 10° change in LL at two years, and risk factors included male sex (60 % vs 26 %, p < 0.001) and a UIV near the thoracolumbar junction (48 % vs 21 %, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for loss of LL between intraoperative and postoperative alignment include two-rod constructs, male sex, lower UIV, and greater intraoperative LL. Multi-rod (3 +) constructs may be a modifiable surgical technique that better maintains the spinal alignment that was achieved in the operating room.

The effect of degenerative scolioisis on segmental thoracolumbar sagittal alignment compared to age- and pelvic incidence-matched reference values

INTRODUCTION

In asymptomatic subjects, variations of sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence (PI) has been reported. The aim of this observational study was to describe thoraco-lumbar sagittal alignment in patients with degenerative scoliosis and to compare them to asymptomatic individuals, seeking for the specific effect of deformity in similar age and PI groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Full spine radiographs of 235 asymptomatic subjects and 243 scoliosis patients were analyzed: cervico-thoracic inflexion point (CTIP), thoraco-lumbar inflexion point (TLIP), lumbar lordosis (LL) L1-S1, LL (TLIP-S1), LL superior arch (TLIP-lumbar apex), LL inferior arch (lumbar apex-S1), PI, thoracic kyphosis (TK) T5-T12, TK T1-T12, number of vertebrae CTIP-TLIPandTLIP-S1. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between reference (R) and pathologic (P) groups were matched according to age (40-60 years; >60 years) and PI (< 45°; 45-60°; >60°).

RESULTS

LL L1-S1 was significantly lower in the P-group (Pr = 1.0), decreased with age (Pr > 0.99) and increased with PI (Pr < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant decrease with age for LL (TLIP-S1) or LL (superior arch) (respectively Pr < 0.92 and Pr > 0.19). LL in the inferior arch was significantly lower in the P-group (Pr = 1.0) and decreased with age (Pr = 0.99). The number of vertebrae TLIP-S1 was significantly lower in the P-group compared to the reference group (Pr < 0.001).Thoracic kyphosis T1-T12 was significantly lower in the P-group (Pr < 0.001), without significant influence of age or PI. The number of vertebrae CTIP-TLIP increased significantly in the P-group (Pr < 0.001) and with PI (Pr < 0.004).

CONCLUSION

This observational study highlights specific thoraco-lumbar sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative scoliosis, matched on age and PI. Beyond the decrease in LL due to aging, degenerative scoliosis leads to a distal migration of the TLIP, an increase in the number of vertebrae in TK and a decrease in LL. This phenomenon was linked to kyphosis at the thoraco-lumbar junction due to scoliosis and was more important in high PI.

Is There a Relation Between High Pelvic Incidence and Sagittal Angle of Posterior Lumbar Facets?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several studies have shown the presence of a linear correlation between the pelvic incidence (PI) and spondylolisthesis. However, no study has attempted to investigate a potential association between facet sagittal angle and spinopelvic parameters, especially PI in the normal population.

METHODS

Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans were collected. Inclusion criteria included age less than 40 years and CT done for non-orthopedic diagnostic purposes. All cases with any spinal pathology were excluded. Spinopelvic and lumbar spinal parameters were collected using the KEOPS software (SMAIO, Lyon, France), and the facet sagittal angle were evaluated on axial CT images from L1-L2 to L5-S1 using the institution PACS system (GE Centricity, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

A total of 450 patients' imaging were analyzed, with a mean age of 31.3 years (±4.9). Facet sagittal angle was found to be significantly correlated to an increase in PI but only at the L5-S1 level (odds ratio = 2.3). The effect of sex on sagittal angle of facet joints was found to be non-significant compared with high PI. Finally, at the L5-S1 level, facet tropism was associated with a higher PI but was not found to play a direct role in the angle of facet joints.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI seems to be correlated to the other spondylolisthesis risk factors: facet tropism and female sex. It carries the heaviest load in the progression towards sagittally oriented facet joints, which might lead to segmental instability and eventual spinal pathologies.

The predictive power of the Roussouly classification on mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the increasing prevalence of adult spinal deformity (ASD) in the aging population, the need for corrective surgery has surged, highlighting the importance of preventing mechanical complications (MC) such as junctional kyphosis/failure and rod breakage. The Roussouly classification, which categorizes natural variations in spinal posture, may hold predictive value in assessing the risk of these complications, as it guides the restoration of sagittal alignment based on a patient's preoperative spinal shape.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2024 to find articles comparing the incidence of mechanical complications between patients who were matched and mismatched to their ideal Roussouly shape after surgery for ASD. Extracted data consisted of the risk of mechanical complications, and the risk of reoperations.

RESULTS

10 retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 1454 patients divided into 2 groups, the first group matching Roussouly classification (716 patients, 49%) and the second unmatched (738 patients, 51%). A 5-times lower rate of mechanical complication (Odds-Ratio = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.12-0.41, p < 0.001) was found in the matched group at an average follow-up of 3.6 years. Furthermore, when examining specific mechanical complications, there were higher rates of both PJK (Odds-Ratio = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.38, p = 0.02) and rod breakages (Odds-Ratio = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.15-2.66, p = 0.01) in the unmatched group. However, no difference in the rate of reoperations was observed between the two groups (Odds-Ratio = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.18-1.28, p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Matching patients to their ideal Roussouly type in adult spinal deformity surgery significantly reduces mechanical complications making it a secure and efficient method. Future studies should compare the Roussouly classification to other alignment models to determine optimal alignment for ASD correction surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Risk factors for mechanical complications in degenerative lumbar scoliosis with concomitant thoracolumbar kyphosis: does the selection of the upper instrumented vertebra matter?

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) represents a distinct subset of adult spinal deformity, frequently co-occurring with thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) in the sagittal plane. TLK is typically viewed as detrimental in degenerative spinal conditions and has been linked to increased pain severity and a higher prevalence of mechanical complications (MC) as previously reported. The present study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the development of MC in patients with DLS and concomitant TLK.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 65 DLS patients with a TLK > 20°. During follow-up, MC events were recorded, and patients were categorized into MC and non-MC groups. Spinopelvic parameters were assessed pre- and post-surgery. The locations of the kyphotic apex (KA) and the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) were documented. Clinical and radiographic data were compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was employed to analyze the independent risk factors for MC.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (44.6%) patients developed at least one MC at final follow-up. At baseline, patients in the MC group exhibited lower bone mineral density (P = 0.002), lower distal lumbar lordosis (DLL, P = 0.025), and higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA, P = 0.005). Post-surgery, the KA shifted cranially with an average vertebral displacement of 2.6 ± 1.8. The proportion of UIV located in the postoperative KA area significantly increased (P < 0.001). The MC group had a higher incidence of Roussouly type mismatch (P = 0.023) and UIV located in the KA area (P = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that UIV located in the KA area (OR = 3.798, P = 0.043), increased preoperative SVA (OR = 1.017, P = 0.016) and osteoporosis (OR = 6.713, P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for MC.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of UIV in the KA area, preoperative sagittal imbalance, and osteoporosis were identified as significant risk factors for MC in patients with DLS and concomitant TLK. The spinal morphological characteristics of TLK must be taken into account during surgical planning to prevent placing the UIV within the kyphotic region.

Radiological analysis of the sagittal profile of the Indian population according to the theoretical Roussouly classification

Background

Pierre Roussouly et al. classified four distinct types of sagittal profiles in normal individuals based on their sacral slope (SS). It was modified by Laouissat et al., (theoretical) including a fifth type.

Study Design

The study design was a cross-sectional study.

Objective

The objective of this study was to identify and classify the types of sagittal alignment present in an asymptomatic Indian population using the parameters established by Roussouly et al. and modified by Laouissat et al.

Methods

The inclusion criteria were asymptomatic adults between 18 and 50 years old, without history of spinal surgery or significant musculoskeletal disorders. The sagittal profile was classified according to the Roussouly modified (theoretical) classification. The spinopelvic parameters were measured using Surgimap and the correlation analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results

A total of 104 participants (62 females and 42 males) were recruited and it was observed 26 (25%) participants with Type 1, 12 (11.5%) with the Type 2, 26 (25%) with Type 3, 30 (28.8%) Type 3AP, and 10 (9.6%) participants with the Type 4. Furthermore, the study showed that the Type 3 anteverted pelvic (AP) had similar characteristics compared with the Laouissat's study. The pelvic incidence shows a correlation with SS (r = 0.602, P = 0.001) and pelvic tilt (r = 0.613, P = 0.001). SS is also correlated with lumbar lordosis (r = 0.734, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The analysis of the study showed that the Type 3 AP is the sagittal profile more frequency according to the theoretical Roussouly classification in the asymptomatic Indian population.

Use of the kickstand rod improves coronal alignment and maintains correction compared to control at 2 year follow-up

PURPOSE

To assess and compare coronal alignment correction at 2 year follow-up in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients treated with and without the kickstand rod (KSR) construct.

METHODS

ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a single-center with a preoperative coronal vertical axis (CVA) ≥ 3 cm and a minimum of 2 year clinical and radiographic follow-up were identified. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with a KSR and those who were not. Patients were propensity score-matched (PSM) controlling for preoperative CVA and instrumented levels to limit potential biases that my influence the magnitude of coronal correction.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients were identified (KSR = 42, Control = 74). There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics (p > 0.05). At baseline, the control group presented with a greater LS curve (29.0 ± 19.6 vs. 21.5 ± 10.8, p = 0.0191) while the KSR group presented with a greater CVA (6.3 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.8, p = 0.0036). After 40 PSM pairs were generated, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline patient and radiographic characteristics. Within the matched cohorts, the KSR group demonstrated greater CVA correction at 1 year (4.7 ± 2.4 cm vs. 2.9 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.0012) and 2 year follow-up (4.7 ± 2.6 cm vs. 3.1 ± 2.6 cm, p = 0.0020) resulting in less coronal malalignment one (1.5 ± 1.3 cm vs. 2.4 ± 1.6 cm, p = 0.0056) and 2 year follow-up (1.6 ± 1.0 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5 cm, p = 0.0110). No statistically significant differences in PROMs, asymptomatic mechanical complications, reoperations for non-mechanical complications were observed at 2 year follow-up. However, the KSR group experienced a lesser rate of mechanical complications requiring reoperations (7.1% vs. 24.3%. OR = 0.15 [0.03-0.72], p = 0.0174).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with a KSR had a greater amount of coronal realignment at the 2 year follow-up time period and reported less mechanical complications requiring reoperation. However, 2 year patient-reported outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine

Background: Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or failure (PJF) may demonstrate disparate outcomes and recovery when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Few studies have distinguished the reoperation and recovery abilities of patients with PJK or PJF when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Methods: Adult spine deformity patients ≥ 18 yrs with preoperative and 5-year (5Y) data fused to the sacrum/pelvis were included. The rates of PJK, PJK revision, and radiographic PJF were compared between patients with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (UT; T1-T7) and lower thoracic spine (LT; T8-L1). Mean differences were assessed via analyses of covariance, factoring in any differences between cohorts at baseline and any use of PJF prophylaxis. Backstep logistic regressions assessed predictors of achieving Smith et al.'s Best Clinical Outcomes (BCOs) and complications, controlling for similar covariates. Results: A total of 232 ASD patients were included (64.2 ± 10.2 years, 78% female); 36.3% were UT and 63.7% were LT. Postoperatively, the rates of PJK for UT were lower than LT at 1Y (34.6 vs. 50.4%, p = 0.024), 2Y (29.5 vs. 49.6% (p = 0.003), and 5Y (48.7 vs. 62.8%, p = 0.048), with comparable rates of PJF. In total, 4.0% of UT patients underwent subsequent reoperation, compared to 13.0% of LT patients (p = 0.025). A total of 6.0% of patients had recurrent PJK, and 3.9% had recurrent PJF (both p > 0.05). After reoperation, UT patients reported higher rates of improvement in the minimum clinically important difference for ODI by 2Y (p = 0.007) and last follow-up (p < 0.001). While adjusted regression revealed that, for UT patients, the minimization of construct extension was predictive of achieving BCOs by last follow-up (model p < 0.001), no such relationship was identified in LT patients. Conclusions: Patients initially fused to the lower thoracic spine demonstrate an increased incidence of PJK and lower rates of disability improvement, but are at a lessened risk of neurologic complications if reoperation is required.

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact

BACKGROUND

Our understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity registry was queried for patients who underwent fixation from the T1-T5 region to the sacrum and had 2-year radiographic follow-up. Normal sagittal alignment was defined as previously described for normal spines: L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°, and T4-L1PA mismatch = 0°. Mechanical failure was defined as severe proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), displaced rod fracture, or reoperation for junctional failure, pseudarthrosis, or rod fracture within 2 years. Multivariable nonlinear logistic regression was used to define target ranges for L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch that minimized the risk of mechanical failure. The relationship between changes in T4PA and changes in global sagittal alignment according to the C2-pelvic angle (C2PA) was determined using linear regression. Lastly, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between initial postoperative C2PA and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year, adjusting for preoperative scores and age.

RESULTS

The median age of the 247 included patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 57 to 69 years), and 202 (82%) were female. Deviation from a normal L1PA or T4-L1PA mismatch in either direction was associated with a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure, independent of age. Risk was minimized with an L1PA of PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°) and T4-L1PA mismatch between -3° and +1°. Changes in T4PA and in C2PA at the time of final follow-up were strongly associated (r 2 = 0.96). Higher postoperative C2PA was independently associated with more disability, more pain, and worse self-image at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

We defined sagittal alignment targets using L1PA (relative to PI) and the T4-L1PA mismatch, which are both directly modifiable during surgery. In patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum, realignment based on these targets may lead to fewer mechanical failures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lumbar scoliosis and stenosis: What outcomes for which treatment? Analysis of three surgical techniques in 154 patients with minimum two-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicentric study.

OBJECTIVE

This study goal was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lumbar stenosis and scoliosis (LSS) patients, treated with lumbar decompression (LD), short fusion and decompression (SF) or long fusion with deformity correction (LF).

HYPOTHESIS

Procedures without correction lead to poorer long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with two-year minimum follow-up, older than 50, with lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle>15°), and symptomatic lumbar stenosis were included. Age, gender, Lumbar and Radicular Visual Analog Scale, ODI, SF12 and SRS30 were collected. Main and adjacent curves Cobb angles, C7 coronal tilt (C7CT), spinopelvic parameters, and spino-sacral angle (SSA) were measured preoperatively, at one and two years. Patients were sorted into surgery type groups.

RESULTS

In total, 154 patients were included, with respectively 18, 58 and 78 patients in LD, SF and LF groups. Mean age was 69, 85% were women. Clinical scores improved in each group at one year, but only LF group exhibited persistent improvement at 2years. A significant fractional Cobb angle increase was noted in the SF group at 2years (from 12±11° to 18±14°). C7CT significantly increased in the LD group at 2years (from 2.5±1.3° to 5.1±3.5°). LF group presented the highest complication rate (45%, 19% for SF and 0% for LD). The overall revision rate was 14% in SF group and 30% in LF group.

CONCLUSION

LSS is a complex pathology requiring custom-made surgical treatment. LD, SF and LF allow satisfactory clinical outcome, with a better and more sustained clinical improvement for LF despite higher complication and revision rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Readmission rate after adult scoliosis surgery on primary cases over 45 years-old with long term follow-up

PURPOSE

Scoliosis surgery is becoming increasingly frequent. Rate of readmission is little discussed in the literature. It is an interesting data for the patient's information and for public authorities to calculate cost-effectiveness. Aim of the study was to evaluate rate and causes of short and long-term readmissions in patients > 45 years old operated on for a scoliosis primary cases, then to look for predictors of these readmissions.

METHODS

In this monocentric retrospective cohort study, over 45 years-old scoliosis primary cases operated on between 2015 and 2018 and with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were included. The number of readmissions and their causes were analyzed. Rehospitalized patients (RH) were then compared to non-rehospitalized patients (NRH). Risk factors were sought using a multivariate analysis by logistic regression.

RESULTS

105 patients were included (90% female; 64 ± 8 years). 56% were readmitted at least once. Main cause of readmission as pseudarthrosis (70%). Among the RH patients, fifty-eight required at least one revision. We found no significant difference between RH and NRH, apart from the rate of immediate post-operative medical complications which was significantly higher in RH (17% (n = 11) vs. 4% (n = 2), p = 0.04). According to multivariate analysis, BMI and age were found as predictors of readmission of mechanical origin, and BMI for readmissions of septic origin.

CONCLUSION

The readmission rate after scoliosis surgery was 56%. The main cause was pseudarthrosis. Rehospitalized patients had more immediate post-operative medical complications. The elderly and overweight patients are more likely to be readmitted for mechanical or septic reasons.

Motor function and gait decline in individuals with cerebral palsy during adulthood: a narrative review of potential physiological determinants

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common childhood-onset disability. The evolution of gait according to severity is well known amongst children and thought to peak between 8 and 12 years of age among those walking without assistive devices. However, among adults, clinical experience as well as scientific studies report, through clinical assessments, questionnaires and interviews, increasing walking difficulties leading to an increased dependency of assistive devices in everyday ambulation. For many individuals with CP, this change will occur around 30-40 years, with the risk of losing mobility increasing with age. This narrative review aims to first provide objective evidence of motor function and gait decline in adults with CP when ageing, and then to offer mechanistic hypotheses to explain those alterations. Many studies have compared individuals with CP to the typically developing population, yet the evolution with ageing has largely been understudied. Comorbid diagnoses comprise one of the potential determinants of motor function and gait decline with ageing in people with CP, with the first manifestations happening at an early age and worsening with ageing. Similarly, ageing appears to cause alterations to the neuromuscular and cardiovascular systems at an earlier age than their typically developing (TD) peers. Future studies should, however, try to better understand how the physiological particularities of CP change with ageing that could pave the way for better strategies for maintaining function and quality of life in people with CP.

Analysis of the reliability of KEOPS version 2 for the measurement of coronal and sagittal parameters in spinal deformity

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the updated version of this software in patients with various spinal deformity.

METHODS

Sixty patients were included in this study and were divided into three categories: 20 patients with AIS, 20 patients with ASD, and 20 patients having undergone corrective surgery for spinal deformity. The measurements were performed by two senior and two junior orthopedic surgery residents, and were done at two points in time separated by a 3-week interval with the cases being randomized every time to reduce the risk of memory bias. Measured parameters included coronal, sagittal, global alignment parameters, and pelvic parameters.

RESULTS

When assessing the inter- and intra-observer reliability across all the groups of patients, none of the coefficients was smaller than 0.8 with a very high level of agreement. The standard error ranged from 0.7° to 1.5° demonstrating a high level of accuracy. Fairly similar results were seen when the groups were divided into the three categories except for the post-operative groups where a strong and not perfect level of agreement was reported.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to assess the reproducibility of the new version of KEOPS, showing a very high agreement in all measurements. In the post-operative group, although it showed a strong agreement, the lower performance can be explained by the presence of surgical material making it harder to identify the anatomical landmarks accurately. Nevertheless, we can recommend the usage of this software in a clinical setting.

Spinopelvic morphology impacts on postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis in congenital scoliosis with thoracolumbar hemivertebrae

PURPOSE

It aims to investigate the lumbar and pelvic morphology in congenital scoliosis with thoracolumbar hemivertebrae and its impact on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) incidence after hemivertebra resection and short fusion.

METHODS

23 congenital scoliosis patients with thoracolumbar hemivertebra aged between 10 and 18 years were enrolled in the retrospective study. Spinopelvic sagittal parameters were analyzed on whole-spine standing lateral radiographs preoperatively, one-week postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Pearson correlations were calculated for local kyphosis (LK), lumbar and pelvic morphology parameters. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the risk factors for PJK.

RESULTS

Thoracolumbar hemivertebra caused LK of 29.2° ± 17.3°, an increased lumbar lordosis (LL) (-64.7° ± 16.3°), lower LL apex (52.2% at L5), and small pelvic incidence (PI) (36.8° ± 6.6°). LK was correlated with lumbar morphology parameters, including LL (r = - 0.837), upper arc of LL (LLUA) (r = - 0.879), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) (r = 0.933), thoracic kyphosis (TK) (r = 0.762) and TK apex (TKA) (r = - 0.749). Surgical treatment improved the lumbar morphology, but not pelvic morphology. At the final follow-up, LL had returned to its preoperative value (p = 0.158). PJK occurred in 30.4% of cases as a compensatory mechanism. Preoperatively, significant differences of parameters between non-PJK and PJK groups were observed in LK and TLK. Binary logistic regression identified three independent risk factors for PJK: preoperative LLA (OR = 0.005, 95%CI = 0.000-0.287, p = 0.011), preoperative TLK (OR = 1.134, 95%CI = 1.001-1.286, p = 0.048), and preoperative lumbar lordosis morphology type (OR = 5.507, 95%CI = 1.202-25.227, p = 0.028). However, residual LK after surgery was not correlated with PJK incidence. ROC curve analysis verified that preoperative TLK > 22.59° was associated with increased PJK incidence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar morphology changes as a compensatory mechanism beneath the thoracolumbar hemivertebra. However, a stable pelvis tends to allow the LL to return to its preoperative value. PJK occurred as a cranial compensatory mechanism for increasing LL and corrected TLK. A larger TLK (> 22.59°) was an independent risk factor for PJK incidence in patients with type 2 and 3A lumbar lordosis morphology.

How Good Are Surgeons at Achieving Their Preoperative Goal Sagittal Alignment Following Adult Deformity Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES

Malalignment following adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery can impact outcomes and increase mechanical complications. We assess whether preoperative goals for sagittal alignment following ASD surgery are achieved.

METHODS

ASD patients were prospectively enrolled based on 3 criteria: deformity severity (PI-LL ≥25°, TPA ≥30°, SVA ≥15 cm, TCobb≥70° or TLCobb≥50°), procedure complexity (≥12 levels fused, 3-CO or ACR) and/or age (>65 and ≥7 levels fused). The surgeon documented sagittal alignment goals prior to surgery. Goals were compared with achieved alignment on first follow-up standing radiographs.

RESULTS

The 266 enrolled patients had a mean age of 61.0 years (SD = 14.6) and 68% were women. Mean instrumented levels was 13.6 (SD = 3.8), and 23.2% had a 3-CO. Mean (SD) offsets (achieved-goal) were: SVA = -8.5 mm (45.6 mm), PI-LL = -4.6° (14.6°), TK = 7.2° (14.7°), reflecting tendencies to undercorrect SVA and PI-LL and increase TK. Goals were achieved for SVA, PI-LL, and TK in 74.4%, 71.4%, and 68.8% of patients, respectively, and was achieved for all 3 parameters in 37.2% of patients. Three factors were independently associated with achievement of all 3 alignment goals: use of PACs/equivalent for surgical planning (P < .001), lower baseline GCA (P = .009), and surgery not including a 3-CO (P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons failed to achieve goal alignment of each sagittal parameter in ∼25-30% of ASD patients. Goal alignment for all 3 parameters was only achieved in 37.2% of patients. Those at greatest risk were patients with more severe deformity. Advancements are needed to enable more consistent translation of preoperative alignment goals to the operating room.

A Geometrical Explanation for Change in Pelvic Tilt (or Lack of Change) Following Long Spinal Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the relationship between compensatory pelvic retroversion, positive sagittal imbalance (measured by C2 tilt), and the C2 pelvic angle (C2PA) in patients before long spinal fusions; and to determine the association between changes in C2PA and pelvic tilt (PT) following long spinal fusions.

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity surgical goals often include a PT target, yet patients frequently demonstrate persistent compensatory pelvic retroversion following surgery.

METHODS

Adults above 18 years old undergoing long spinal fusions (>4 levels) with standing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were included. To examine drivers of preoperative sagittal balance, regression models were fit to estimate the association between preoperative C2PA and pelvic incidence with preoperative PT and C2 tilt. To predict postoperative change in PT, multivariable regression was used to estimate change in PT, adjusting for change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients identified, the median age was 61 (IQR: 45-72) and 46 (58%) were female. The median number of levels fused was 10 (IQR: 8-13) and 55 (69%) were instrumented to the sacrum/pelvis. Preoperative C2PA had a significant nonlinear association with preoperative PT ( r2 =0.81, P <0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt ( r2 =0.41, P =0.002). Postoperative change in PT was strongly associated with change in C2PA (β=0.81; P <0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt (β=0.55; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Following long spinal fusions, change in PT (or lack thereof) can be reliably predicted based on change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. In patients with normal preoperative C2 tilt, the change in C2PA is nearly equivalent to the change in PT, but in patients with more positive C2 tilt (sagittal imbalance), a greater change in C2PA will be required to achieve an equivalent change in PT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores.

METHODS

Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P <0.05.

RESULTS

In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries ( P =0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older ( P =0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) ( P <0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt ( P <0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope ( P <0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch ( P <0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt ( P <0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Instrumented L5-S1 interbody graft with IFUSE implant using the reverse Bohlman technique

BACKGROUND

In case of high sacral slope, anterior lumbosacral fusions can be performed by retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach using a reversed Bohlman technique with an autologous corticocancellous fibular graft. The use of a trans-lumbosacral implant can avoid the iatrogenic effects but currently, there is no implant specifically designed for this fusion technique. Could the IFUSE implant from SI BONE replace a fibular graft to avoiding the iatrogenic effect induced by sampling during a Reverse Bohlman technique?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present the case of a 38-year-old woman with L5S1 interbody pseudarthrosis after posterior fixation for grade 2 L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with isthmic lysis of L5, and that of a 69-year-old woman who underwent a posterior T4 fusion to the pelvis for degenerative scoliosis. Both required a trans-lumbosacral instrumented fusion via an anterior approach using the reverse Bohlman technique. Surgical technique was described.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. At 6 months, the patients reported a decrease in lumbar and radicular symptomatology. There were no infectious, neurological or vascular complications. CT-scans confirmed the good position and stability of the IFUSE implant.

DISCUSSION

We present an innovative interbody grafting technique adapted to spines with high pelvic incidence. The surgical technique is safe, minimally invasive, and reduces surgical iatrogeny. The short and medium-term results are positive but require longer-term follow-up and a larger cohort.

Spinopelvic fixation failure in the adult spinal deformity population: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite modern fixation techniques, spinopelvic fixation failure (SPFF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery ranges from 4.5 to 38.0%, with approximately 50% requiring reoperation. Compared to other well-studied complications after ASD surgery, less is known about the incidence and predictors of SPFF.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

Given the high rates of SPFF and reoperation needed to treat it, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report the incidence and failure mechanisms of SPF after ASD surgery.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The literature search was executed across four databases: Medline via PubMed and Ovid, SPORTDiscus via EBSCO, Cochrane Library via Wiley, and Scopus. Study inclusion criteria were patients undergoing ASD surgery with spinopelvic instrumentation, report rates of SPFF and type of failure mechanism, patients over 18 years of age, minimum 1-year follow-up, and cohort or case-control studies. From each study, we collected general demographic information (age, gender, and body mass index), primary/revision, type of ASD, and mode of failure (screw loosening, rod breakage, pseudarthrosis, screw failure, SI joint pain, screw protrusion, set plug dislodgment, and sacral fracture) and recorded the overall rate of SPF as well as failure rate for each type. For the assessment of failure rate, we required a minimum of 12 months follow-up with radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

Of 206 studies queried, 14 met inclusion criteria comprising 3570 ASD patients who underwent ASD surgery with pelvic instrumentation (mean age 65.5 ± 3.6 years). The mean SPFF rate was 22.1% (range 3-41%). Stratification for type of failure resulted in a mean SPFF rate of 23.3% for the pseudarthrosis group; 16.5% for the rod fracture group; 13.5% for the iliac screw loosening group; 7.3% for the SIJ pain group; 6.1% for the iliac screw group; 3.6% for the set plug dislodgement group; 1.1% for the sacral fracture group; and 1% for the iliac screw prominence group.

CONCLUSION

The aggregate rate of SPFF after ASD surgery is 22.1%. The most common mechanisms of failure were pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and iliac screw loosening. Studies of SPFF remain heterogeneous, and a consistent definition of what constitutes SPFF is needed. This study may enable surgeons to provide patient specific constructs with pelvic fixation constructs to minimize this risk of failure.

Which sagittal plane assessment method is most predictive of complications after adult spinal deformity surgery?

PURPOSE

Different methods of sagittal alignment assessment compete for predicting adverse events after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. We wanted to study which method provides greater benefit.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 391 patients operated for ASD, with > 6 instrumented levels, fused to the pelvis, and 2 years of follow-up. Three alignment methods were analyzed 6-week postoperatively: (1) Roussouly mismatch; (2) GAP score/GAP categories; (3) T4-L1-Hip axis. Binary logistic regression generated models that best predict the following adverse events: mechanical complications (MC): in general and isolated (PJK, PJF, rod breakage); reinterventions (in general and after MC); and readmissions. ROC/AUC analysis was also implemented. In a second regression round, we added different variables that were selected on univariate analysis-demographic, surgical, and radiographic-to complete the models.

RESULTS

The best predictor parameters in most models were T4-L1PA mismatch and GAP score; we could not prove a predictive ability of the Roussouly mismatch. The T4-L1PA mismatch best predicted general MC, PJK, PJK + PJF, and readmission, while the GAP score best predicted PJF and reinterventions (for MC and for any complication). However, the variance explained by these models was limited (Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.031-0.113), with odds ratios ranging from 1.070 to 1.456. ROC curves plotted an AUC between 0.57 and 0.70. Introducing additional variables (demographic, surgical, and radiographic) improved prediction in all the models (Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.082-0.329) and allowed predicting rod breakage.

CONCLUSION

The T4-L1-Hip axis and GAP score show potential in predicting adverse events, surpassing the Roussouly method. Despite partial efficacy in complication anticipation, recognizing postoperative sagittal alignment as a key modifiable risk factor, the crucial need arises to integrate diverse variables, both modifiable and non-modifiable, for enhanced predictive accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Sex-dependent evolution of whole-body postural alignment with age

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to explore sex-related variations of global alignment parameters and their distinct evolution patterns across age groups.

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiographs in free-standing position. All radiographic data were collected from 3D reconstructions: global and lower limb parameters, pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS). Lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and cervical lordosis (CL) were also assessed as well as the lumbar and thoracic apex, and thoracolumbar inflexion point. The population was divided into five 5 age groups: Children, Adolescents, Young, Middle-Aged and Seniors.

RESULTS

This study included 861 subjects (53% females) with a mean age of 34 ± 17 years. Mean PI was 49.6 ± 11.1 and mean LL was - 57.1 ± 11.6°. Females demonstrated a PI increase between Young and Middle-Aged groups (49 ± 11° vs. 55 ± 12°, p < 0.001) while it remained stable in males. SS and LL increased with age in females while remaining constant in males between Children and Middle-aged and then significantly decreased for both sexes between Middle-Aged and Seniors. On average, lumbar apex, inflexion point, and thoracic apex were located one vertebra higher in females (p < 0.001). After skeletal maturity, males had greater TK than females (64 ± 11° vs. 60 ± 12°, p = 0.04), with significantly larger CL (-13 ± 10° vs. -8 ± 10°, p = 0.03). All global spinal parameters indicated more anterior alignment in males.

CONCLUSION

Males present more anteriorly tilted spine with age mainly explained by a PI increase in females between Young and Middle-Aged, which may be attributed to childbirth. Consequently, SS and LL increased before decreasing at senior age.

Surgical treatment of Roussouly type 1 with realigning Roussouly spinal shape and improving SRS-Schwab modifier: effect on minimal clinically important difference

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of choosing different Roussouly shapes and improving in Schwab modifiers for surgical Roussouly type 1 patients.

METHODS

Baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) clinical data of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients presenting with Roussouly type 1 sagittal spinal alignment were isolated in the single-center spine database. Patients were grouped into Roussouly type 1, 2 and 3 with anteverted pelvis (3a) postoperatively. Schwab modifiers at BL and 2Y were categorized as follows: no deformity (0), moderate deformity (+), and severe deformity (++) for pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL). Improvement in SRS-Schwab was defined as a decrease in the severity of any modifier at 2Y.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients (69.9 years, 72.9% female, 25.2 kg/m2) were included. At 2Y, there were 34 type 1 backs, 60 type 2 backs and only 2 type 3a. Type 1 and type 2 did not differ in rates of reaching 2Y minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores (all P > 0.05). Two patients who presented with type 3a had poor HRQOL scores. Analysis of Schwab modifiers showed that 41.7% of patients improved in SVA, 45.8% in PI-LL, and 36.5% in PT. At 2Y, patients who improved in SRS-Schwab PT and SVA had lower Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores and significantly more of them reached MCID for ODI (all P < 0.001). Patients who improved in SRS-Schwab SVA and PI-LL had more changes of VAS Back and Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcomes questionnaire physical component summary (SF-36 PCS), and significantly more reached MCID (all P < 0.001). By 2Y, type 2 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for VAS back and ODI at the highest rate (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively), and type 1 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for SF-36 PCS at the highest rate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For ASD patients classified as Roussouly type 1, postoperative improvement in SRS-Schwab grades reflected superior patient-reported outcomes while type 1 and type 2 did not differ in clinical outcomes at 2Y. However, development of type 3a should be avoided at the risk of poor functional outcomes. Utilizing both classification systems in surgical decision-making can optimize postoperative outcomes.

Sagittal alignment of diverse mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the sagittal alignment of patients with diverse mechanical complications (MCs) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with that of patients without MCs.

METHODS

A total of 371 patients who underwent ASD surgery were enrolled. The sagittal spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively and at the 6-month and last follow-up, and the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was calculated. The subjects were divided into non-MC and MCs groups, and the MCs group was further divided into rod fracture (RF), screw breakage (SB), screw dislodgement (SD) and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) subgroups.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the RF group had greater thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) and relative upper lumbar lordosis (RULL); the SB group had the largest pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL); the SD group had the least global sagittal imbalance; and the PJK group had the highest thoracic kyphosis (TK), TLK and RULL. At the last follow-up, the RF and SB groups featured a large PI minus LL (PI-LL), while the PJK group featured a prominent TK; all the MCs subgroups had sagittal malalignment and a higher GAP score, and the SB group had the most severe cases. Logistic regressions showed that the relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) score was correlated with RF, SB and SD, while the RSA and age scores were associated with PJK.

CONCLUSION

Each patient with MCs had individual characteristics in the sagittal plane following ASD surgery, which may be helpful to understand the pathophysiology of poor sagittal alignment with its subsequent MCs and guide an eventual revision strategy.

Roussouly classification of adult spinal deformity

With an estimated prevalence of 68% among healthy adults without a previous diagnosis of scoliosis, adult spinal deformities are a growing concern as the population ages. Our understanding of this growing concern has been historically guided by previous studies performed on the pediatric population. Over time, different classifications have been developed with their own respective limitations. The Roussouly classification was the first classification to describe the shapes of an asymptomatic spine. It considers lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and the inflection point from lumbar lordosis to thoracic kyphosis to attempt to stratify the shapes of an asymptomatic spine. This classification aims to guide treatment, provide information regarding prognosis, allow stratification for research, and be highly reproducible. Overall, the Roussouly classification is a novel way to think about sagittal malalignment, considering the patient's individual anatomy, while allowing for communication between surgeons. Additionally, it has proven to be a reliable system that provides prognostic value for clinicians and may minimize complications when a patient's sagittal alignment is optimized using this classification system.

Sagittal Section Hounsfield Units of the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Vertebral Fractures Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine an accurate and convenient screening method for predicting proximal junctional fractures (PJFr) following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using computed tomography (CT)-based measurement of Hounsfield units (HUs).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

CT-based measurement of HUs is an alternative tool for assessing bone mineral density. However, the optimal method for predicting adjacent vertebral fractures following spinal fusion using HUs remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 42 patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for ASD. Elliptical regions of interest (ROIs) on the axial section and rectangular ROIs on the sagittal section were placed at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), UIV+1, and UIV+2. In addition, the HU value of the L2 vertebra was used as the representative.

RESULTS

PJFr occurred in 28.6% of patients within 2 years following surgery. The HU values obtained from the axial sections of L2, UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 were not significantly associated with the incidence of PJFr within 2 years, except for the ROI set in the lower region of the L2 vertebra. However, the HU value of the anterior third of the UIV in the sagittal section was significantly lower in the PJFr group than in the nonPJFr group (87.0 vs. 160.3, p =0.001). A UIV HU value of <100 was associated with a higher incidence of PJFr than an HU vaue of >100 (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of HU in the anterior one-third of the UIV in the sagittal section demonstrated predictive ability for PJFr following ASD surgery. A UIV HU value of <100 emerged as a risk factor for PJFr.

Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal alignment in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a method for decreasing the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis

PURPOSE

Although the Roussouly classification has been widely used in surgical planning for adult scoliosis patients, little is known about whether it can be used to guide sagittal correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the Roussouly classification could be used to help surgeons restore the ideal sagittal alignment for AIS patients to avoid the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, eighty-seven patients with Lenke 5 AIS who underwent surgery from January 2010 to August 2020 were enrolled and divided into two groups: the PJK group and the non-PJK group. All patients were classified into "current types" and "ideal types" according to two versions of the Roussouly classification, and the mismatch rate was evaluated in terms of the consistency between their current type and ideal type. Student's t test, Mann‒Whitney U test, Pearson's Chi-square test, and others were used to compare the two groups regarding patient demographic characteristics (age, sex, Risser sign, etc.) and radiographic parameters (sagittal vertical axis [SVA]; thoracic kyphosis [TK]; thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis [TLK]; lumbar lordosis [LL]; pelvic incidence [PI]; pelvic tilt [PT]; sacral slope [SS]; upper instrumented vertebra [UIV]; lower instrumented vertebra [LIV]; etc.). Multivariate logistic regression with backwards stepwise selection was performed to identify the risk factors for PJK.

RESULTS

PJK was observed in 16 out of 87 patients (18.4%) until the final follow-up. The incidence of PJK was significantly higher in the patients not matching their ideal type than in those who did after surgery (60.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.000). The patients with ideal Type 1 had the highest incidence of PJK, while the lowest incidence was observed in patients with ideal Type 2 (50.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.000). The PJK group had greater TK, LL, and PI-LL than the non-PJK group before and after surgery. The postoperative PJA in the PJK group was also larger than that in the non-PJK group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that postoperative Roussouly type mismatch was significantly associated with the occurrence of PJK (OR = 64.2, CI = 9.6-407.1, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The Roussouly classification could serve as a prognostic tool for PJK in Lenke 5 AIS patients. Corrective surgery should restore sagittal alignment with respect to the patient's ideal sagittal profile (according to the Roussouly classification based on the PI) to decrease the incidence of PJK in AIS patients.

Restoration of the sagittal profile according to the Roussouly classification reduces mechanical complications and revision surgery in older patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD)

PURPOSE

The mechanical complications related to ASD remain a concern due to their morbidity and associated revision surgery. Restoration of each patient's Roussouly profile may reduce these. Our aim was to examine if the restoration of the Roussouly profile reduced these complications and revision rates in older patients operated for degenerative ASD.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a single-centre, 2-year minimum follow-up patient database. All patients undergoing corrective surgery (≥ 4 levels) for ASD were included with analysis of demographic data, operative records, restoration of Roussouly sagittal profile, mechanical complications and revision rates. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included (mean age was 72.3 years, average follow-up 56.3 months). Twenty-six patients had a "restored" profile (50%) and 26 an "unrestored" profile (50%). The incidence of mechanical complications was 7 (27%) and 23 (88%) for the restored and unrestored groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Revision rates were 4 (15.4%) and 18 (69.2%), respectively (p < 0.000), in the restored and unrestored profiles. Univariate analysis determined that profile restoration and BMI were associated with mechanical complications and revision surgery, whilst only the profile restoration status maintained its statistical power in multivariate analysis (p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, respectively). Age was not a significant factor in univariate analysis. The relative risk for mechanical failure and revision surgery was 5.6 times (CI 1.929-16.39) and 3.08 times (CI 1.642-5.734) greater if the profile was not restored.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving each patient's ideal Roussouly profile is associated with a reduced incidence of mechanical complications and revision rates in the older population after surgery for degenerative ASD.

Validation of Roussouly classification in predicting the occurrence of adjacent segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent studies demonstrated that restoring sagittal alignment to the original Roussouly type can remarkably reduce complication rates after adult spinal deformity surgery. However, there is still no data proving the benefit of maintaining ideal Roussouly shape in the lumbar degenerative diseases and its association with the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Thus, this study was performed to validate the usefulness of Roussouly classification to predict the occurrence of ASD after lumbar fusion surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent 1- or 2-level fusion surgery. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between ASD and non-ASD groups. The patients were classified by both "theoretical" [based on pelvic incidence (PI)] and "current" (based on sacral slope) Roussouly types. The patients were defined as "matched" if their "current" shapes matched the "theoretical" types and otherwise as "mismatched". The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with ASD. Finally, clinical data and spinopelvic parameters of "theoretical" and "current" types were compared.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up duration of 70.6 months, evidence of ASD was found in the 68 cases. Postoperatively, ASD group had more "current" shapes classified as type 1 or 2 and fewer as type 3 than the non-ASD group (p < 0.001), but the distribution of "theoretical" types was similar between groups. Moreover, 80.9% (55/68) of patients with ASD were mismatched, while 48.2% (80/166) of patients without ASD were mismatched (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.058)], 2-level fusion (OR = 2.9830), postoperative distal lordosis (DL, OR = 0.949) and mismatched Roussouly type (OR = 4.629) as independent risk factors of ASD. Among the four "theoretical" types, type 2 had the lowest lumbar lordosis, DL, and segmental lordosis. When considering the "current" types, current type 2 was associated with higher rates of 2-level fusion, worse DL, and greater pelvic tilt compared with other current types.

CONCLUSIONS

DL loss and mismatched Roussouly type were significant risk factors of ASD. To decrease the incidence of ASD, an appropriate value of DL should be achieved to restore sagittal alignment back to the ideal Roussouly type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Effects of dynamic and rigid implantation on biomechanical characteristics of different sagittal alignment lumbar after single- or double-level spinal fixations: a finite-element modeling study

BACKGROUND

Although it is critical to understand the accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments after fusion, the biomechanical properties of the spine have not been thoroughly studied after various fusion techniques. This study investigates whether four Roussouly's sagittal alignment morphotypes have different biomechanical characteristics after different single- or double-level spinal fixations.

METHODS

The parametric finite element (FE) models of Roussouly's type (1-4) were developed based on the radiological data of 625 Chinese community population. The four Roussouly's type models were reassembled into four fusion models: single-level L4-5 Coflex fixation model, single-level L4-5 Fusion (pedicle screw fixation) model, double-level Coflex (L4-5) + Fusion (L5-S1) model, and double-level Fusion (L4-5) + Fusion (L4-5) model. A pure moment of 7.5 Nm was applied to simulate the physiological activities of flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.

RESULTS

Both single-level and double-level spinal fixation had the greatest effect on lumbar range of motion, disc pressure, and annulus fibrosis stress in flexion, followed by lateral bending, extension, and axial rotation. In all models, the upper adjacent segment was the most influenced by the implantation and bore the most compensation from the fixed segment. For Type 2 lumbar, the L4-L5 Coflex effectively reduced the disc pressure and annulus fibrosis stress in adjacent segments compared to the L4-L5 Fusion. Similarly, the L4-L5 Coflex offered considerable advantages in preserving the biomechanical properties of adjacent segments for Type 1 lumbar. For Type 4 lumbar, the L4-L5 Coflex did not have superiority over the L4-L5 Fusion, resulting in a greater increase in range of motion at adjacent segments in flexion and extension. The difference between the two fixations was not apparent in Type 3 lumbar. Compared to the single-level Fusion, the changes in motion and mechanics of the lumbar increased after both the double-level Coflex + Fusion and Fusion + Fusion fixations, while the differences between two double-level fixation methods on adjacent segments of the four lumbar models were similar to that of the single-level fixation.

CONCLUSION

Type 3 and Type 4 lumbar have good compensatory ability and therefore allow for a wider range of surgical options, whereas surgical options for small lordotic Type 1 and Type 2 lumbar are more limited and severe.

Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment

Background

The incidence of correctional surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. Pelvic incidence, an angular measurement, is the gold standard pelvic parameter and is used to classify spinal shapes into Roussouly types. Current literature states that restoration of the spine to its original Roussouly classification optimizes outcomes. We propose a new pelvic parameter, pelvic index, as a length measurement to complement pelvic incidence in more accurately characterizing Roussouly types.

Methods

This study is a retrospective evaluation of sagittal spinal radiographs of 208 patients who were assessed by a single fellowship trained orthopedic spine surgeon between January and December 2020. Measurements included pelvic incidence, sacroacetabular distance, and L5 vertebral height. Pelvic index was calculated as the ratio of sacroacetabular distance to L5 height. Each spine was also classified into one of the Roussouly types: 1, 2, 3 anteverted pelvis (AP), 3, or 4. The 2 pelvic parameters were compared between groups to assess their ability to differentiate between Roussouly types.

Results

Of the 208 patients included, 103 (49.5%) were female and 105 (50.5%) were male. The mean pelvic incidence was 54.9 ± 12.3° and the mean pelvic index was 3.99 ± 0.38. The difference in mean pelvic index was statistically significant between types 1 and 2 (0.15; p=.046) and between types 1 and 3 AP (0.19; p=.029). It was not statistically significant between types 3 and 4 (0.05; p=.251). However, in terms of pelvic incidence, the mean difference was statistically significant only between types 3 and 4 (10.4; p<.001).

Conclusions

Pelvic index is the ratio of the sacroacetabular distance to the height of the L5 vertebra. In conjunction with pelvic incidence, pelvic index can help to distinguish between Roussouly types 1 and 2 and between types 1 and 3 AP, the low-pelvic incidence types.

L1-pelvic angle: a convenient measurement to attain optimal deformity correction

PURPOSE

(1) Evaluate the associations between L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) and both sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA), and (2) assess the clinical impact of L1PA.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2013 to 2017. Ideal L1PA was defined as (0.5xPelvic Incidence)-21. Pearson correlation was performed to compare L1PA, SVA, and T1PA. Univariate/multivariate regression was performed to assess the effect of L1PA on mechanical complications, controlling for age, BMI, and postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI/LL). Due to the overlapping nature of patients with pseudarthrosis and rod fracture, these patients were analyzed together.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included. Mean preoperative L1PA, SVA, and T1PA were 15.5 ± 8.9°, 90.7 ± 66.8 mm, and 27.1 ± 13.0°, respectively. Mean postoperative L1PA, SVA, and T1PA were 15.0 ± 8.9°, 66.7 ± 52.8 mm, and 22.3 ± 11.1°, respectively. Thirty-six (24.8%) patients achieved ideal L1PA. Though the correlation was modest, preoperative L1PA was linearly correlated with preoperative SVA (r2 = 0.16, r = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.22-0.60, p < 0.001) and T1PA (r2 = 0.41, r = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.46-0.76, p < 0.001). Postoperative L1PA was linearly correlated with postoperative SVA (r2 = 0.12, r = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.18-0.56, p < 0.001) and T1PA (r2 = 0.40, r = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.45-0.74, p < 0.001). Achieving ideal L1PA ± 5° was associated with a decreased risk of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis on univariate and multivariate regression (OR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.12-0.86, p = 0.024). No association between achieving ideal L1PA and patient-reported outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSION

L1PA was modestly correlated with SVA and T1PA, and achieving ideal L1PA was associated with lower rates of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. Future studies are warranted to better define the clinical implications of achieving a normal L1PA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Proximal and distal mechanical repercussions of instrumentation by double rods and interbody grafts in adult scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Correction of adult scoliosis by instrumentation with double rods and interbody grafts aims to reduce the risk of pseudarthrosis with rod fracture. An increase in instrumentation rigidity can lead to an increase in stresses at the proximal and distal ends of the construct. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical repercussions of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF) and iliac screw loosening.

MATERIEL AND METHODS

An analysis of patients operated on for adult scoliosis with instrumentation to the pelvis using 4 rods and interbody cages was carried out from a prospective register. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) clinical scores and radiological parameters were collected preoperatively, postoperatively at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. The appearance of PJK, PJF or distal screw loosening was sought; the clinical impact and the risk factors were analyzed by Bayesian inference.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a mean age of 64.5 years were included. The clinical scores improved significantly (Pr>0.95) at 2 years: VAS back 6.9 versus 2.6, VAS leg 4.9 versus 2.5, ODI 48.2 versus 25.4, SRS-22 2.4 versus 3.5. The radiological parameters were corrected (Pr>0.95): Cobb angle 63.9° versus 22.8°, spinosacral angle (SSA) 112.4° versus 118.8°, T1-pelvic angle (TPA) 24, 8° versus 20.8°, lumbar lordosis 43.8° versus 51.0°, thoracic kyphosis 45.2° versus 53.6°. Thirteen patients (25.5%) presented with PJK and 11 (21.6%) with PJF. Seven patients (13.7%) presented with iliac screw loosening. None of these complications was associated with a significant deterioration in clinical scores. Cranial migration of the lumbar apex increased the risk of distal screw loosening: Odds-Ratio 10.31 (Pr>0.999). Two patients were re-operated on for PJF and one patient for iliac screw loosening (5.9%). No rod fracture with pseudarthrosis was found.

CONCLUSION

Instrumentation with double rods and interbody grafts was associated with a rate of 47.1% of mechanical repercussions at the extremity of the construct. However, these complications were not associated with a significant deterioration in clinical scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of complications, revisions, spinopelvic parameters, and health-related quality of life after posterior spinal fusion using multiple-rod constructs or two-rod constructs for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of mechanical complications is high in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adult spinal deformity (ASD), especially for cases with severe sagittal malalignment or a prior spinal fusion requiring three-column osteotomy (3-CO) or spinopelvic fixation (SPF). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the complications, revisions, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and surgical data of PSF using multiple-rod constructs to those of two-rod constructs for the treatment of ASD.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Complications, revisions, spinopelvic parameters, HRQoL, and surgical date were compared between patients with ASD who underwent PSF using multiple-rod constructs (multi-rod group) and two-rod constructs (two-rod group).

RESULTS

Ten studies, comprising 797 patients with ASD (399 in the multi-rod group and 398 in the two-rod group), were included. All these studies were retrospective cohort studies. There were no significant differences in the surgical, wound-related, and systemic complications between the groups. In the multi-rod group, we noted a significantly lower incidence of rod fracture (RR, 0.43; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.57, P < 0.01), pseudoarthrosis (RR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.53, P < 0.01), and revisions (RR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.58, P < 0.01); a superior restoration of PI-LL (WMD, 3.96; 95% CI 1.03 to 6.88, P < 0.01) and SVA (WMD, 31.53; 95% CI 21.16 to 41.90, P < 0.01); a better improvement of ODI score (WMD, 6.82; 95% CI 2.33 to 11.31, P < 0.01), SRS-22 total score (WMD, 0.44; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.83, P = 0.02), and VAS-BP score (WMD, 1.02; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.73, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the two-rod constructs, PSF using multiple-rod constructs was associated with a lower incidence of mechanical complications, a lower revision rate, a superior restoration of sagittal alignment, and a better improvement of HRQoL, without increasing surgical invasiveness. Multiple-rod constructs should be routinely considered to for ASD patients, especially for cases with severe sagittal malalignment or a prior spinal fusion requiring 3-CO or SPF.

Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Case of Spine Surgery

Personalized medicine has made a tremendous impact on patient care. Although initially, it revolutionized pharmaceutical development and targeted therapies in oncology, it has also made an important impact in orthopaedic surgery. The field of spine surgery highlights the effect of personalized medicine because the improved understanding of spinal pathologies and technological innovations has made personalized medicine a key component of patient care. There is evidence for several of these advancements to support their usage in improving patient care. Proper understanding of normative spinal alignment and surgical planning software has enabled surgeons to predict postoperative alignment accurately. Furthermore, 3D printing technologies have demonstrated the ability to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with free-hand techniques. Patient-specific, precontoured rods have shown improved biomechanical properties, which reduces the risk of postoperative rod fractures. Moreover, approaches such as multidisciplinary evaluations tailored to specific patient needs have demonstrated the ability to decrease complications. Personalized medicine has shown the ability to improve care in all phases of surgical management, and several of these approaches are now readily available to orthopaedic surgeons.

Is lower screw density associated with mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery?

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of screw density on: (1) rod fracture/pseudarthrosis, (2) proximal/distal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/DJK/PJF), and (3) deformity correction judged by sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA).

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken. Screw density was calculated by dividing the number of screws placed by the total instrumented levels. Screw density was then dichotomized at our calculated mean density to ≥ 1.65 and < 1.65. Outcomes consisted of mechanical complications and the amount of correction obtained.

RESULTS

145 patients underwent ASD surgery with 2-year follow-up. Mean screw density (range) was 1.6 ± 0.3 (1.00-2.00). The most common levels with missing screws were L2 (n = 59, 40.7%), L3 (n = 57, 39.3%) and L1 (n = 51, 35.2%), located mainly along the concavity in 113(80.0%) patients and apices in 98 (67.6%) patients. Rod fracture/pseudarthrosis: 23/32 (71.8%) patients with rod fracture and 35/46 (76.0%) with pseudarthrosis had missing screws within two levels of the rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. Logistic regression showed no significant association between screw density and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis.

PJK/F

15/47 (31.9%) patients with PJK and 9/30 (30.0%) with PJF had missing screws within three levels of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV). Logistic regression showed no significant association between screws density and PJK/F. Correction obtained: linear regression failed to show any significant association between screw density and SVA or T1PA correction.

CONCLUSION

These findings showed that no significant association was found between screw density and mechanical complications or the amount of correction obtained, though approximately 3 out of 4 patients with rod fracture/pseudarthrosis had missing screws at or within two levels of the pathology. The prevention of mechanical complications is likely multifactorial and subject to both patient's characteristics and surgical techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Sagittal realignment: surgical restoration of the global alignment and proportion score parameters: a subgroup analysis. What are the consequences of failing to realign?

INTRODUCTION

The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score incorporates three domains directly modified with surgery (relative pelvic version-RPV, relative lumbar lordosis-RLL, lumbar distribution index-LDI) and one indirectly restored (relative spinopelvic alignment-RSA). We analyzed our surgical realignment performance and the consequences of domain-specific realignment failure on mechanical complications and PROMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From an adult spinal deformity prospective multicenter database, we selected patients: fused to pelvis, upper instrumented vertebra at or above L1, and 2 years of follow-up. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were employed.

RESULTS

The sample included 333 patients. RLL-6w showed the highest success rate (58.3% aligned), but 16.5% of patients were classified in the "Severe hypolordosis" and "Hyperlordosis" subgroups. RPV-6w was the most challenging to realign, with 51.6% moderate or severe retroversion. Regarding RSA-6w, 21.9% had severe positive malalignment. Correct alignment of RPV-6w (p = 0.025) and RSA-6w (p = 0.002) proved to be protective factors against the development of mechanical complications. Severe pelvic retroversion (p = 0.026) and severe positive malalignment (p = 0.007) were risk factors for mechanical complications. RSA-6w "Severe positive malalignment" was associated with less improvement in PROMs: ∆ODI (8.83 vs 17.2; p = 0.011), ∆SRS-22 total (0.54 vs 0.87; p = 0.007), and ∆SF-36PCS (3.47 vs 7.76; p = 0.04); MCID for ODI (37.0 vs 55.5%; p = 0.023), and SRS-22 (40.8 vs 60.1%; p = 0.015); and PASS for ODI (17.6 vs 31.7%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

RPV was the most underperformed modifiable parameter. Severe pelvic retroversion and severe positive malalignment influenced the occurrence of mechanical complications. Severe positive malalignment affected PROMs improvement.

Lumbar Lordosis Distribution in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: A Systematic Review

Background

Restoring lumbar lordosis is important for adult spinal deformity surgery. Several reports have suggested that lumbar lordosis distribution has a significant impact on the outcome of surgery, including lumbar distribution index (LDI), proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL), and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL). The features of lumbar lordosis distribution are inconclusive in asymptomatic adults.

Questions/Purposes

We sought to evaluate the variation of lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI, PLL, and DLL) and to identify associated factors in asymptomatic adult volunteers.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the Embase and Medline databases to identify studies in asymptomatic adult volunteers to evaluate lumbar lordosis distribution including LDI, PLL, and DLL.

Results

Twelve articles met eligibility criteria and were included in our review. The respective pooled estimates of mean and variance, respectively, were 65.10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.61-67.58) and 13.70% in LDI, 16.51° (95% CI: 5.54-27.49) and 11.46° in PLL, and 35.47° (95% CI: 32.79-38.18) and 9.10° in DLL. Lumbar lordosis distribution was associated with race, age, sex, body mass index, pelvic incidence, and Roussouly classification.

Conclusions

This systematic review found that despite a wide variation in LDI and PLL, DLL is maintained in a narrower range in asymptomatic adult volunteers, especially in white populations. Distal lumbar lordosis may be a more reliable radiographic parameter to restore the lumbar lordosis distribution in preoperative planning.

The dynamic sagittal balance: Definition of dynamic spino-pelvic parameters using a method based on gait analysis

Introduction

Evaluation of sagittal balance parameters is a standard assessment before spine surgery. However, these parameters can change during walking. We aimed to describe the behavior of spino-pelvic parameters during walking in healthy subjects.

Material and methods

Analyses were performed in 60 healthy subjects. Static spinal sagittal balance parameters were assessed. We performed gait analysis and we used SMART-DX 500® to analyze parameters aimed at defining dynamic sagittal balance, including pelvic tilt angle (PTA), sagittal trunk shift (STS), and trunk angle (TA). We considered rotational and obliquity movements of the pelvis, flexo-extension movements of the hip, trunk, and knees. Analyses were performed in a standing posture and during walking.

Results

PTA-cycle, PTA-stance, PTA-swing, STS-cycle, STS-stance, and STS-swing showed good-to-excellent internal reliability (ICC = 0.867; ICC = 0.700; ICC = 0.817, respectively). The parameters with the lowest variability were radiographic PI (CV = 16.53%), PTA-stance (CV = 9.55%), and PTA-swing (CV = 17.22%). PT was directly related to PTA-cycle (r = 0.534, p = .027). PI was inversely correlated with trunk flexo-extension range of motion (r = -0.654, p = .004) and dynamic PT (r = -0.489, p = .047). LL and SS were directly related to knee flexo-extension (r = 0.505, p = .039; r = 0.493, p = .045, respectively). SVA was correlated with the trunk obliquity in dynamics (r = 0.529, p = .029). PTA-cycle was directly related to trunk obliquity (r = 0.538, p = .049). STS and TA in the three phases of step were related to the kinematic parameters of the pelvis. TA was related to flexo-extension of the hip and knee.

Conclusions

Variations of dynamic spino-pelvic parameters occur during walking and modify sagittal balance from a static to a dynamic condition.

An Analysis of Whether a New Formula Can Predict Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Global Kyphosis

OBJECTIVE

A new formula containing terms for age and sagittal curvature reported by the International Spine Study Group is ideal lumbar lordosis (iLL) = pelvic incidence - 0.3 thoracic kyphosis - 0.5Age + 10. However, there are no reports of whether proximal junctional failure (PJF) can be predicted using this formula. We assessed the utility of this formula in PJF in patients with adult spinal deformity with global kyphosis using the Roussouly classification.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with adult spinal deformity global kyphosis (mean age 70.0 years) who underwent multiple levels of lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior instrumentation were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: PJF and non-PJF. Demographic, surgical, and radiological parameters were compared. The iLL was calculated according to the new formula, and spinal parameters were compared preoperatively, immediately after, and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

PJF occurred in 11 of 44 (25.0%) patients. Patients with PJF had a large preoperative and postoperative TK, but there was no statistically significant difference in iLL between PJF and non-PJF patients (33.4° vs. 30.2°, P = 0.357). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in LL and iLL changes (ΔiLL) immediately after surgery (19.0° vs. 23.4°, P = 0.379). Furthermore, there was no correlation between ΔiLL immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up and the proximal junctional angle at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of ΔiLL suggest that overcorrection needs to be addressed but that this new formula, including age adjustment, may not predict PJF.

Association between sagittal alignment and loads at the adjacent segment in the fused spine: a combined clinical and musculoskeletal modeling study of 205 patients with adult spinal deformity

PURPOSE

Sagittal malalignment is a risk factor for mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Spinal loads, modulated by sagittal alignment, may explain this relationship. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationships between: (1) postoperative changes in loads at the proximal segment and realignment, and (2) absolute postoperative loads and postoperative alignment measures.

METHODS

A previously validated musculoskeletal model of the whole spine was applied to study a clinical sample of 205 patients with ASD. Based on clinical and radiographic data, pre-and postoperative patient-specific alignments were simulated to predict loads at the proximal segment adjacent to the spinal fusion.

RESULTS

Weak-to-moderate associations were found between pre-to-postop changes in lumbar lordosis, LL (r =  - 0.23, r =  - 0.43; p < 0.001), global tilt, GT (r = 0.26, r = 0.38; p < 0.001) and the Global Alignment and Proportion score, GAP (r = 0.26, r = 0.37; p < 0.001), and changes in compressive and shear forces at the proximal segment. GAP score parameters, thoracic kyphosis measurements and the slope of upper instrumented vertebra were associated with changes in shear. In patients with T10-pelvis fusion, moderate-to-strong associations were found between postoperative sagittal alignment measures and compressive and shear loads, with GT showing the strongest correlations (r = 0.75, r = 0.73, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal loads were estimated for patient-specific full spinal alignment profiles in a large cohort of patients with ASD pre-and postoperatively. Loads on the proximal segments were greater in association with sagittal malalignment and malorientation of proximal vertebra. Future work should explore whether they provide a causative mechanism explaining the associated risk of proximal junction complications.

The postoperative course of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery

PURPOSE

(a) Describe the time course of each mechanical complication, and (b) compare radiographic measurements and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among each mechanical complication type.

METHODS

A single-institution case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2009-2017. Exposure variables included patient demographics, operative variables, radiographic measurements, and preoperative PROMs, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale Back/Leg-pain scores (NRS-Back/Leg), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The primary outcomes were occurrence of a mechanical complication and time to complication. Due to overlapping occurrence, rod fracture and pseudarthrosis were grouped into one composite category.

RESULTS

145 patients underwent ASD surgery and were followed for at least 2 years. 30/47 (63.8%) patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) required reoperation, whereas 27/31 (87.1%) patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture required reoperation (63.8% vs. 87.1%, Χ² = -0.23, 95% CI -0.41, -0.05, p = 0.023). Cox regression showed no significant difference in time to reoperation between PJK and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.11, p = 0.686). Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) (N = 3; 2 reoperation) and implant failures (N = 4; 0 reoperations) were rare. Patients with PJK had significantly lower Hounsfield Units preoperatively compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture (138.2 ± 43.8 vs. 160.3 ± 41.0, mean difference (MD) =  -22.1, 95% CI -41.8, -2.4, p = 0.028), more prior fusions (51.1% vs. 25.8%, Χ² = 0.253, 95% CI 0.41, 0.46, p = 0.026), fewer instrumented vertebrae (9.2 ± 2.6 vs. 10.7 ± 2.5, MD =  -1.5, 95% CI -2.7, -0.31, p = 0.013), and higher postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) (46.3 ± 12.7 vs. 34.9 ± 10.6, MD = 11.4, 95% CI 5.9, 16.9, p < 0.001). Higher postoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) did not achieve a significant difference (80.7 ± 72.1 vs. 51.9 ± 57.3, MD = 28.8, 95% CI -1.9, 59.5, p = 0.066). No differences were seen in preoperative PROMs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture had a higher reoperation rate compared to those with PJK with similar time to reoperation. Moreover, patients with PJK had higher postoperative TK, lower Hounsfield Units, more prior fusions, and fewer instrumented levels compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture. The results of this single-institution study suggest that even though mechanical complications are often analyzed as a single group, important differences may exist between them.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.