Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility

Integration of Spinal Musculoskeletal System Parameters for Predicting OVCF in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Predictive Model

Study DesignSystematic literature review.ObjectivesTo develop a predictive model for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in the elderly, utilizing current tools that are sensitive to bone and paraspinal muscle changes.MethodsA retrospective analysis of data from 260 patients from October 2020 to December 2022, to form the Model population. This group was split into Training and Testing sets. The Training set aided in creating a nomogram through binary logistic regression. From January 2023 to January 2024, we prospectively collected data from 106 patients to constitute the Validation population. The model's performance was evaluated using concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) for both internal and external validation.ResultsThe study included 366 patients. The Training and Testing sets were used for nomogram construction and internal validation, while the prospectively collected data was for external validation. Binary logistic regression identified nine independent OVCF risk factors: age, bone mineral density (BMD), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), vertebral bone quality (VBQ), relative functional cross-sectional area of psoas muscles (rFCSAPS), gross and functional muscle fat infiltration of multifidus and psoas muscles (GMFIES+MF and FMFIES+MF), FMFIPS, and mean muscle ratio. The nomogram showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 for the C-index, with internal and external validation AUCs of 0.90 and 0.92. Calibration curves and DCA indicated a good model fit.ConclusionsThis study identified nine factors as independent predictors of OVCF in the elderly. A nomogram including these factors was developed, proving effective for OVCF prediction.

Optimizing the clinical adoption of total joint replacement of the lumbar spine through imaging, robotics and artificial intelligence

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this article is to assess the potential of imaging, robotics, and artificial intelligence (AI) to significantly improve spine care, preoperative planning and surgery.

AREAS COVERED

This article describes the development of lumbar total joint replacement (TJR) of the spine (MOTUS, 3Spine, Chattanooga, TN, U.S.A.). We discuss the evolution of intra-operative imaging, robotics, and AI and how these trends can intersect with lumbar TJR to optimize the safety, efficiency, and accessibility of the procedure.

EXPERT OPINION

By preserving natural spinal motion, TJR represents a significant leap forward in the treatment of degenerative spinal conditions by providing an alternative to fusion. This transformation has already occurred and is continuing to evolve in the primary synovial joints such as hip, knee, shoulder and ankle where arthroplasty outcomes are now so superior that fusion is considered a salvage procedure. The convergence of imaging, robotics and AI is poised to reshape spine care by enhancing precision and safety, personalizing treatment pathways, lowering production costs, and accelerating adoption. However, the key challenges include ensuring continued collaboration between surgeons, researchers, manufacturers, and regulatory bodies to optimize the potential of TJR.

Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly applied to the domain of spine surgery. We present a review of AI in spine surgery, including its use across all stages of the perioperative process and applications for research. We also provide commentary regarding future ethical considerations of AI use and how it may affect surgeon-industry relations.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed articles that examined applications of AI during the pre-, intra-, or postoperative spine surgery process. We also discussed the relationship among AI, spine industry partners, and surgeons.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, AI has been mainly applied to image analysis, patient diagnosis and stratification, decision-making. Intraoperatively, AI has been used to aid image guidance and navigation. Postoperatively, AI has been used for outcomes prediction and analysis. AI can enable curation and analysis of huge datasets that can enhance research efforts. Large amounts of data are being accrued by industry sources for use by their AI platforms, though the inner workings of these datasets or algorithms are not well known.

CONCLUSIONS

AI has found numerous uses in the pre-, intra-, or postoperative spine surgery process, and the applications of AI continue to grow. The clinical applications and benefits of AI will continue to be more fully realized, but so will certain ethical considerations. Making industry-sponsored databases open source, or at least somehow available to the public, will help alleviate potential biases and obscurities between surgeons and industry and will benefit patient care.

Spine Trauma Classifications: Historical, Current, and Emerging Perspectives for Radiologists

The spine serves as a protective, load-bearing, and stabilizing axis for the body. Trauma can cause significant damage to spinal structures, potentially resulting in severe neurological dysfunction and disabilities such as paraplegia or quadriplegia. Early and accurate diagnosis of these injuries is important, with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging being important for recognizing these injuries and guiding timely treatment to minimize disability. Radiologists play a critical role in assessing spine trauma to determine stability, which informs the need for nonoperative or operative management. Trauma classification systems are vital for uniform communication between radiologists and surgeons, aiding in decision-making. Various classifications exist for cervical, thoracolumbar, and sacral trauma, each with advantages and limitations. Understanding these classification systems is essential for guiding diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication. Over the years, these systems have evolved, reflecting advancements in medical knowledge, imaging technology, and clinical practices. Contemporary classification systems have addressed the limitations of previous systems. Vaccaro et al proposed the “Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS)” in 2005 and the “Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System” in 2007. These classifications focus on injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex or discoligamentous complex, and the patient's neurologic status. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) founded the “Spine Classification Group” to review the “AO-Magerl classification” and create an extensive system for the whole spine. This system focuses on fracture morphology, neurological status, clinical modifiers, and facet joint injury. The TLICS system is straightforward and easy to use in clinical practice, while the AOSpine system is more comprehensive and reliable. As classification systems evolve, collaboration among radiologists, spine surgeons, and researchers will be essential. By embracing advancements in imaging technology and incorporating new clinical data, the field of spine trauma classification can achieve greater accuracy and consistency, ultimately enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Prevention and management of degenerative lumbar spine disorders through artificial intelligence-based decision support systems: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide with a significant socioeconomic burden; artificial intelligence (AI) has proved to have a great potential in supporting clinical decisions at each stage of the healthcare process. In this article, we have systematically reviewed the available literature on the applications of AI-based Decision Support Systems (DSS) in the clinical prevention and management of Low Back Pain (LBP) due to lumbar degenerative spine disorders.

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed and Scopus databases was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Studies reporting the application of DSS to support the prevention and/or management of LBP due to lumbar degenerative diseases were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were assessed for each study.

RESULTS

Twenty five articles met the inclusion criteria. Several different machine learning and deep learning algorithms were employed, and their predictive ability on clinical, demographic, psychosocial, and imaging data was assessed. The included studies mainly encompassed three tasks: clinical score definition, clinical assessment, and eligibility prediction and reached AUC scores of 0.93, 0.99 and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-based DSS applications showed a high degree of accuracy in performing a wide set of different tasks. These findings lay the foundation for further research to improve the current understanding and encourage wider adoption of AI in clinical decision-making.

Feasibility of generating sagittal radiographs from coronal views using GAN-based deep learning framework in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Minimizing radiation exposure is crucial in monitoring adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as valuable tools being able to generate high-quality synthetic images. This study explores the use of GANs to generate synthetic sagittal radiographs from coronal views in AIS patients.

METHODS

A dataset of 3,935 AIS patients who underwent spine and pelvis radiographic examinations using the EOS system, which simultaneously acquires coronal and sagittal images, was analyzed. The dataset was divided into training-set (85%, n = 3,356) and test-set (15%, n = 579). GAN model was trained to generate sagittal images from coronal views, with real sagittal views as reference standard. To assess accuracy, 100 subjects from the test-set were randomly selected for manual measurement of lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) by two radiologists in both synthetic and real images.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine synthetic images were considered assessable. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged 0.93-0.99 for measurements in real images, and from 0.83 to 0.88 for synthetic images. Correlations between parameters of real and synthetic images were 0.52 (LL), 0.17 (SS), 0.18 (PI), and 0.74 (SVA). Measurement errors showed minimal correlation with scoliosis severity. Mean ± standard deviation absolute errors were 7 ± 7° (LL), 9 ± 7° (SS), 9 ± 8° (PI), and 1.1 ± 0.8 cm (SVA).

CONCLUSION

While the model generates sagittal images visually consistent with reference images, their quality is not sufficient for clinical parameter assessment, except for promising results in SVA.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

AI can generate synthetic sagittal radiographs from coronal views to reduce radiation exposure in monitoring adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, while these synthetic images appear visually consistent with real ones, their quality remains insufficient for accurate clinical assessment.

KEY POINTS

AI can be exploited to generate synthetic sagittal radiographs from coronal views. Dataset of 3,935 subjects was used to train and test AI-model; spinal parameters from synthetic and real images were compared. Synthetic images were visually consistent with real ones, but quality was generally insufficient for accurate clinical assessment.

Machine learning can predict surgical indication: new clustering model from a large adult spine deformity database

PURPOSE

The choice of the best management for Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) is challenging. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), comorbidities, symptoms and spine geometry, along with surgical risk and potential residual disability play a role, and a definite algorithm for patient management is lacking. Machine learning allows to analyse complex settings more efficiently than other available statistical tools. Aim of this study was to develop a machine-learning algorithm that, based on baseline data, would be able to predict whether an ASD patient would undergo surgery or not.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Demographic data, HRQoL and radiographic parameters were collected. Two clustering methods were performed to differentiate groups of patients with similar characteristics. Three models were then used to identify the most relevant variables for management prediction.

RESULTS

Data from 1319 patients were available. Three clusters were identified: older subjects with sagittal imbalance and high PI, younger patients with greater coronal deformity and no sagittal imbalance, older patients with moderate sagittal imbalance and lower PI. The group of younger patients showed the highest error rate for the prediction (37%), which was lower for the other two groups (20-27%). For all groups, quality of life parameters such as the ODI and the SRS 22 and the Cobb angle of the major curve were the strongest predictors of surgical indication, albeit with different odds ratios in each group.

CONCLUSION

Three clusters could be identified along with the variables that, in each, are most likely to drive the choice of management.

Spino-Plastic Surgery: Addressing Spinal Tumors with New Techniques

Background/Objectives: Spino-plastic surgery describes a specialized, multidisciplinary approach to addressing various spinal pathologies. The field is the innovative product of a multidisciplinary collaboration between plastic and reconstructive, orthopedic, and neurosurgery. Over the last few decades, this collaboration has borne promising surgical techniques and treatment plans geared toward restoring form, function, and aesthetics in patients with a variety of spinal conditions, including failed fusions, pseudoarthrosis, and the need for oncologic reconstruction. This paper explores the application of spino-plastic surgery in the context of post-sarcoma resection reconstructions, focusing on the efficacy in addressing the unique challenges posed by extensive tissue loss and structural deformities. Methods: Our study reviews a series of cases wherein spino-plastic techniques were utilized in patients with sarcomas of the spine and adjacent structures. We also discuss the technical considerations, including preoperative planning, intraoperative challenges, and overall patient care, that are crucial for the success of spino-plastic procedures. Results: The outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in patient mobility, pain reduction, and overall quality of life. Most notably, spino-plastic surgical techniques help facilitate the restoration of functional anatomy by leveraging vascularized bone grafts and muscle flaps, thereby enhancing long-term stability and reducing the risk of complications such as nonunion or infection. Conclusions: Spino-plastic collaboration represents a pivotal advancement in oncologic treatment, spinal care, and reconstructive surgery, offering new hope for patients undergoing post-sarcoma reconstruction. Further research and refinement of the techniques will only expand their application and improve outcomes for a broader range of patients in the future.

Applications of artificial intelligence for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: mapping the evidence

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity with varying progression, complicating treatment decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly prominent in orthopedic care, aiding in diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment guidance. This scoping review outlines AI applications in AIS.

METHODS

This study followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included articles that reported the development, use, or validation of AI models for treating, diagnosing, or predicting clinical outcomes in AIS.

RESULTS

40 full-text articles were included, with most studies published in the last 5 years (77.5%). Common ML techniques were convolutional neural networks (55%), decision trees and random forests (15%), and artificial neural networks (15%). Most AI applications in AIS were for imaging analysis (25/40; 62.5%), focusing on automatic measurement of Cobb angle, and axial vertebral rotation (13/25; 52%) and curve classification/severity (13/25; 52%). Prediction was the second most common application (15/40; 37.5%), with studies predicting curve progression (9/15; 60%), and Cobb angles (9/15; 60%). Only 15 studies (37.5%) reported clinical implementation guidelines for AI in AIS management. 52.5% of studies reported model accuracy, with an average of 85.4%.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the applications of AI in AIS care, notably including automatic radiographic analysis, curve type classification, prediction of curve progression, and AIS diagnosis. However, the current lack of clear clinical implementation guidelines, model transparency, and external validation of studied models limits clinician trust and the generalizability and applicability of AI in AIS management.

Utilizing a comprehensive machine learning approach to identify patients at high risk for extended length of stay following spinal deformity surgery in pediatric patients with early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patient diversity makes outcome prediction challenging. Machine learning offers an innovative approach to analyze patient data and predict results, including LOS in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

Children under 10 with EOS were chosen from the American College of Surgeon's NSQIP database. Extended LOS, defined as over 5 days, was predicted using feature selection and machine learning in Python. The best model, determined by the area under the curve (AUC), was optimized and used to create a risk calculator for prolonged LOS.

RESULTS

The study included 1587 patients, mostly young (average age: 6.94 ± 2.58 years), with 33.1% experiencing prolonged LOS (n = 526). Most patients were female (59.2%, n = 940), with an average BMI of 17.0 ± 8.7. Factors influencing LOS were operative time, age, BMI, ASA class, levels operated on, etiology, nutritional support, pulmonary and neurologic comorbidities. The gradient boosting model performed best with a test accuracy of 0.723, AUC of 0.630, and a Brier score of 0.189, leading to a patient-specific risk calculator for prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning algorithms accurately predict extended LOS across a national patient cohort and characterize key preoperative drivers of increased LOS after PSIF in pediatric patients with EOS.

Determining Prior Authorization Approval for Lumbar Stenosis Surgery With Machine Learning

STUDY DESIGN

Medical vignettes.

OBJECTIVES

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition with a high prevalence in the elderly population, that is associated with a significant economic burden and often requires spinal surgery. Prior authorization of surgical candidates is required before patients can be covered by a health plan and must be approved by medical directors (MDs), which is often subjective and clinician specific. In this study, we hypothesized that the prediction accuracy of machine learning (ML) methods regarding surgical candidates is comparable to that of a panel of MDs.

METHODS

Based on patient demographic factors, previous therapeutic history, symptoms and physical examinations and imaging findings, we propose an ML which computes the probability of spinal surgical recommendations for LSS. The model implements a random forest model trained from medical vignette data reviewed by MDs. Sets of 400 and 100 medical vignettes reviewed by MDs were used for training and testing.

RESULTS

The predictive accuracy of the machine learning model was with a root mean square error (RMSE) between model predictions and ground truth of .1123, while the average RMSE between individual MD's recommendations and ground truth was .2661. For binary classification, the AUROC and Cohen's kappa were .959 and .801, while the corresponding average metrics based on individual MD's recommendations were .844 and .564, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that ML can be used to automate prior authorization approval of surgery for LSS with performance comparable to a panel of MDs.

Preoperative factors predict prolonged length of stay, serious adverse complications, and readmission following operative intervention of proximal humerus fractures: a machine learning analysis of a national database

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are a common injury, predominantly affecting older adults. This study aimed to develop risk-prediction models for prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), serious adverse complications, and readmission within 30 days of surgically treated proximal humerus fractures using machine learning (ML) techniques.

Methods

Adult patients (age >18) who underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, or total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture between 2016 and 2021 were included. Preoperative demographic and clinical variables were collected for all patients and used to establish ML-based algorithms. The model with optimal performance was selected according to area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating curve (ROC) curve and overall accuracy, and the specific predictive features most important to model derivation were identified.

Results

A total of 7473 patients were included (72.1% male, mean age 66.2 ± 13.7 years). Models produced via gradient boosting performed best for predicting prolonged LOS and complications. The model predicting prolonged LOS demonstrated good discrimination and performance, as indicated by (Mean: 0.700, SE: 0.017), recall (Mean: 0.551, SE: 0.017), accuracy (Mean: 0.717, SE: 0.010), F1-score (Mean: 0.616, SE: 0.014), AUC (Mean: 0.779, SE: 0.010), and Brier score (Mean: 0.283, SE: 0.010) Preoperative hematocrit, preoperative platelet count, and patient age were considered the strongest predictive features. The model predicting serious adverse complications exhibited comparable discrimination [precision (Mean: 0.226, SE: 0.024), recall (Mean: 0.697, SE: 0.048), accuracy (Mean: 0.811, SE: 0.010), F1-score (Mean: 0.341, SE: 0.031)] and superior performance relative to the LOS model [AUC (Mean: 0.806, SE: 0.024), Brier score (Mean: 0.189, SE: 0.010), noting preoperative hematocrit, operative time, and patient age to be most influential. However, the 30-day readmission model achieved the weakest relative performance, displaying low measures of precision (Mean: 0.070, SE: 0.012) and recall (Mean: 0.389, SE: 0.053), despite good accuracy (Mean: 0.791, SE: 0.009).

Conclusion

Predictive models constructed using ML techniques demonstrated favorable discrimination and satisfactory-to-excellent performance in forecasting prolonged LOS and serious adverse complications occurring within 30 days of surgical intervention for proximal humerus fracture. Modifiable preoperative factors such as hematocrit and platelet count were identified as significant predictive features, suggesting that clinicians could address these factors during preoperative patient optimization to enhance outcomes. Overall, these findings highlight the potential for ML techniques to enhance preoperative management, facilitate shared decision-making, and enable more effective and personalized orthopedic care by exploring alternative approaches to risk stratification.

Sagittal Full-Spine vs. Sectional Cervical Lateral Radiographs: Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?

(1) Background: This study assessed the relationship between cervical spine parameters taken on standing full-spine lateral radiographic images compared to sectional lateral cervical radiographs. (2) Methods: Full-spine (FS) and sectional lateral cervical (LC) radiographs from four spine treatment facilities across the USA retrospectively provided data collected on 220 persons to assess the comparison of three sagittal cervical radiographic measurements between the two views. The measures included cervical lordosis using the absolute rotation angle from C2-C7, sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7, and atlas plane angle to horizontal. Linear correlation and R2 models were used for statistical comparison of the measures for the two views. (3) Results: The mean values of the three measurements were statistically different from each other: C2-C7 translation (FS = 19.84 ± 11.98 vs. LC = 21.18 ± 11.8), C2-C7 lordosis (FS = -15.3 ± 14.63 vs. LC = -18.32 ± 13.16), and atlas plane (FS = -19.99 ± 8.88 vs. LC = -22.56 ± 8.93), where all values were p < 0.001. Weak-to-moderate-to-strong correlations existed between the full-spine and sectional lateral cervical radiographic variables. The R2 values varied based on the measurement were R2 = 0.768 (p < 0.001) for sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7 (strong), R2 = 0.613 (p < 0.001) for the absolute rotation angle C2-C7 (moderate), and R2 = 0.406 (p < 0.001) for the atlas plane line (weak). Though a linear correlation was identified, there were consistent intra-person differences between the measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views, where the full-spine view consistently underestimated the magnitude of the variables. (4) Conclusion: Key sagittal cervical radiographic measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views show striking intra-person differences. The findings of this study confirm that full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views provide different biomechanical magnitudes of cervical sagittal alignment, and caution should be exercised by health care providers as these are not interchangeable. We recommend the LC view for measurement of cervical sagittal alignment variables.

Are large language models valid tools for patient information on lumbar disc herniation? The spine surgeons' perspective

Introduction

Generative AI is revolutionizing patient education in healthcare, particularly through chatbots that offer personalized, clear medical information. Reliability and accuracy are vital in AI-driven patient education.

Research question

How effective are Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT and Google Bard, in delivering accurate and understandable patient education on lumbar disc herniation?

Material and methods

Ten Frequently Asked Questions about lumbar disc herniation were selected from 133 questions and were submitted to three LLMs. Six experienced spine surgeons rated the responses on a scale from "excellent" to "unsatisfactory," and evaluated the answers for exhaustiveness, clarity, empathy, and length. Statistical analysis involved Fleiss Kappa, Chi-square, and Friedman tests.

Results

Out of the responses, 27.2% were excellent, 43.9% satisfactory with minimal clarification, 18.3% satisfactory with moderate clarification, and 10.6% unsatisfactory. There were no significant differences in overall ratings among the LLMs (p = 0.90); however, inter-rater reliability was not achieved, and large differences among raters were detected in the distribution of answer frequencies. Overall, ratings varied among the 10 answers (p = 0.043). The average ratings for exhaustiveness, clarity, empathy, and length were above 3.5/5.

Discussion and conclusion

LLMs show potential in patient education for lumbar spine surgery, with generally positive feedback from evaluators. The new EU AI Act, enforcing strict regulation on AI systems, highlights the need for rigorous oversight in medical contexts. In the current study, the variability in evaluations and occasional inaccuracies underline the need for continuous improvement. Future research should involve more advanced models to enhance patient-physician communication.

Applications of artificial intelligence in anesthesia: A systematic review

This review article examines the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in anesthesia, with a focus on recent developments and future directions in the field. A total of 19,300 articles were available on the given topic after searching in the above mentioned databases, and after choosing the custom range of years from 2015 to 2023 as an inclusion component, only 12,100 remained. 5,720 articles remained after eliminating non-full text. Eighteen papers were identified to meet the inclusion criteria for the review after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The applications of AI in anesthesia after studying the articles were in favor of the use of AI as it enhanced or equaled human judgment in drug dose decision and reduced mortality by early detection. Two studies tried to formulate prediction models, current techniques, and limitations of AI; ten studies are mainly focused on pain and complications such as hypotension, with a P value of <0.05; three studies tried to formulate patient outcomes with the help of AI; and three studies are mainly focusing on how drug dose delivery is calculated (median: 1.1% ± 0.5) safely and given to the patients with applications of AI. In conclusion, the use of AI in anesthesia has the potential to revolutionize the field and improve patient outcomes. AI algorithms can accurately predict patient outcomes and anesthesia dosing, as well as monitor patients during surgery in real time. These technologies can help anesthesiologists make more informed decisions, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. However, the implementation of AI in anesthesia also presents challenges, such as the need to address issues of bias and privacy. As the field continues to evolve, it will be important to carefully consider the ethical implications of AI in anesthesia and ensure that these technologies are used in a responsible and transparent manner.

Bone cement reinforcement improves the therapeutic effects of screws in elderly patients with pelvic fragility factures

BACKGROUND

Pelvic fragility fractures in elderly individuals present significant challenges in orthopedic and geriatric medicine due to reduced bone density and increased frailty associated with aging.

METHODS

This study involved 150 elderly patients with pelvic fragility fractures. The patients were divided into two groups, the observation group (Observation) and the control group (Control), using a random number table. Artificial intelligence, specifically the Tianji Orthopedic Robot, was employed for surgical assistance. The observation group received bone cement reinforcement along with screw fixation using the robotic system, while the control group received conventional screw fixation alone. Follow-up data were collected for one-year post-treatment.

RESULTS

The observation group exhibited significantly lower clinical healing time of fractures and reduced bed rest time compared to the control group. Additionally, the observation group experienced less postoperative pain at 1 and 3 months, indicating the benefits of bone cement reinforcement. Moreover, patients in the observation group demonstrated significantly better functional recovery at 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-surgery compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of bone cement reinforcement and robotic technology resulted in accelerated fracture healing, reduced bed rest time, and improved postoperative pain relief and functional recovery.

Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

This systematic review summarizes existing evidence and outlines the benefits of artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery. The popularity of artificial intelligence has grown significantly, demonstrating its benefits in computer-assisted surgery and advancements in spinal treatment. This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), a set of reporting guidelines specifically designed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, including "MeSH (Artificial intelligence)," "Spine" AND "Spinal" filters, in the last 10 years, and English- from January 1, 2013, to October 31, 2023. In total, 442 articles fulfilled the first screening criteria. A detailed analysis of those articles identified 220 that matched the criteria, of which 11 were considered appropriate for this analysis after applying the complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria. Analysis of these studies revealed the types of artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery. No evidence suggests the superiority of assisted spine surgery with or without artificial intelligence in terms of outcomes. In terms of feasibility, accuracy, safety, and facilitating lower patient radiation exposure compared with standard fluoroscopic guidance, artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery produced satisfactory and superior outcomes. The incorporation of artificial intelligence with augmented and virtual reality appears promising, with the potential to enhance surgeon proficiency and overall surgical safety.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Spinal Injury: A Narrative Review of Algorithms in Diagnosis and Prognosis

Spinal injuries, including cervical and thoracolumbar fractures, continue to be a major public health concern. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning technologies offer exciting prospects for improving both diagnostic and prognostic approaches in spinal injury care. This narrative review systematically explores the practical utility of these computational methods, with a focus on their application in imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as in structured clinical data. Of the 39 studies included, 34 were focused on diagnostic applications, chiefly using deep learning to carry out tasks like vertebral fracture identification, differentiation between benign and malignant fractures, and AO fracture classification. The remaining five were prognostic, using machine learning to analyze parameters for predicting outcomes such as vertebral collapse and future fracture risk. This review highlights the potential benefit of machine learning and deep learning in spinal injury care, especially their roles in enhancing diagnostic capabilities, detailed fracture characterization, risk assessments, and individualized treatment planning.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Spine Care

BACKGROUND

 With the rapid development of science and technology, artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used in the diagnosis and prognosis of various spine diseases. It has been proved that AI has a broad prospect in accurate diagnosis and treatment of spine disorders.

METHODS

 On May 7, 2022, the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database was used to identify the documents on the application of AI in the field of spine care. HistCite and VOSviewer were used for citation analysis and visualization mapping.

RESULTS

 A total of 693 documents were included in the final analysis. The most prolific authors were Karhade A.V. and Schwab J.H. United States was the most productive country. The leading journal was Spine. The most frequently used keyword was spinal. The most prolific institution was Northwestern University in Illinois, USA. Network visualization map showed that United States was the largest network of international cooperation. The keyword "machine learning" had the strongest total link strengths (TLS) and largest number of occurrences. The latest trends suggest that AI for the diagnosis of spine diseases may receive widespread attention in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

 AI has a wide range of application in the field of spine care, and an increasing number of scholars are committed to research on the use of AI in the field of spine care. Bibliometric analysis in the field of AI and spine provides an overall perspective, and the appreciation and research of these influential publications are useful for future research.

A deep learning-based technique for the diagnosis of epidural spinal cord compression on thoracolumbar CT

PURPOSE

To develop a deep learning (DL) model for epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) on CT, which will aid earlier ESCC diagnosis for less experienced clinicians.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected CT and MRI data from adult patients with suspected ESCC at a tertiary referral institute from 2007 till 2020. A total of 183 patients were used for training/validation of the DL model. A separate test set of 40 patients was used for DL model evaluation and comprised 60 staging CT and matched MRI scans performed with an interval of up to 2 months. DL model performance was compared to eight readers: one musculoskeletal radiologist, two body radiologists, one spine surgeon, and four trainee spine surgeons. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, specificity and AUC.

RESULTS

Overall, 3115 axial CT slices were assessed. The DL model showed high kappa of 0.872 for normal, low and high-grade ESCC (trichotomous), which was superior compared to a body radiologist (R4, κ = 0.667) and all four trainee spine surgeons (κ range = 0.625-0.838)(all p < 0.001). In addition, for dichotomous normal versus any grade of ESCC detection, the DL model showed high kappa (κ = 0.879), sensitivity (91.82), specificity (92.01) and AUC (0.919), with the latter AUC superior to all readers (AUC range = 0.732-0.859, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A deep learning model for the objective assessment of ESCC on CT had comparable or superior performance to radiologists and spine surgeons. Earlier diagnosis of ESCC on CT could reduce treatment delays, which are associated with poor outcomes, increased costs, and reduced survival.

Artificial intelligence-aided lytic spinal bone metastasis classification on CT scans

PURPOSE

Spinal bone metastases directly affect quality of life, and patients with lytic-dominant lesions are at high risk for neurological symptoms and fractures. To detect and classify lytic spinal bone metastasis using routine computed tomography (CT) scans, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2125 diagnostic and radiotherapeutic CT images of 79 patients. Images annotated as tumor (positive) or not (negative) were randomized into training (1782 images) and test (343 images) datasets. YOLOv5m architecture was used to detect vertebra on whole CT scans. InceptionV3 architecture with the transfer-learning technique was used to classify the presence/absence of lytic lesions on CT images showing the presence of vertebra. The DL models were evaluated via fivefold cross-validation. For vertebra detection, bounding box accuracy was estimated using intersection over union (IoU). We evaluated the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve to classify lesions. Moreover, we determined the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. We used the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technique for visual interpretation.

RESULTS

The computation time was 0.44 s per image. The average IoU value of the predicted vertebra was 0.923 ± 0.052 (0.684-1.000) for test datasets. In the binary classification task, the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC value for test datasets were 0.872, 0.948, 0.741, 0.832, and 0.941, respectively. Heat maps constructed using the Grad-CAM technique were consistent with the location of lytic lesions.

CONCLUSION

Our artificial intelligence-aided CAD system using two DL models could rapidly identify vertebra bone from whole CT images and detect lytic spinal bone metastasis, although further evaluation of diagnostic accuracy is required with a larger sample size.

Daring discourse: artificial intelligence in pain medicine, opportunities and challenges

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are currently expanding their influence within healthcare. For pain clinics, unfettered introduction of AI may cause concern in both patients and healthcare teams. Much of the concern stems from the lack of community standards and understanding of how the tools and algorithms function. Data literacy and understanding can be challenging even for experienced healthcare providers as these topics are not incorporated into standard clinical education pathways. Another reasonable concern involves the potential for encoding bias in healthcare screening and treatment using faulty algorithms. And yet, the massive volume of data generated by healthcare encounters is increasingly challenging for healthcare teams to navigate and will require an intervention to make the medical record manageable in the future. AI approaches that lighten the workload and support clinical decision-making may provide a solution to the ever-increasing menial tasks involved in clinical care. The potential for pain providers to have higher-quality connections with their patients and manage multiple complex data sources might balance the understandable concerns around data quality and decision-making that accompany introduction of AI. As a specialty, pain medicine will need to establish thoughtful and intentionally integrated AI tools to help clinicians navigate the changing landscape of patient care.

Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Case of Spine Surgery

Personalized medicine has made a tremendous impact on patient care. Although initially, it revolutionized pharmaceutical development and targeted therapies in oncology, it has also made an important impact in orthopaedic surgery. The field of spine surgery highlights the effect of personalized medicine because the improved understanding of spinal pathologies and technological innovations has made personalized medicine a key component of patient care. There is evidence for several of these advancements to support their usage in improving patient care. Proper understanding of normative spinal alignment and surgical planning software has enabled surgeons to predict postoperative alignment accurately. Furthermore, 3D printing technologies have demonstrated the ability to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with free-hand techniques. Patient-specific, precontoured rods have shown improved biomechanical properties, which reduces the risk of postoperative rod fractures. Moreover, approaches such as multidisciplinary evaluations tailored to specific patient needs have demonstrated the ability to decrease complications. Personalized medicine has shown the ability to improve care in all phases of surgical management, and several of these approaches are now readily available to orthopaedic surgeons.

Digital Pathology: Transforming Diagnosis in the Digital Age

In the context of rapid technological advancements, the narrative review titled "Digital Pathology: Transforming Diagnosis in the Digital Age" explores the significant impact of digital pathology in reshaping diagnostic approaches. This review delves into the various effects of the field, including remote consultations and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis, revealing the ongoing transformation taking place. The investigation explores the process of digitizing traditional glass slides, which aims to improve accessibility and facilitate sharing. Additionally, it addresses the complexities associated with data security and standardization challenges. Incorporating AI enhances pathologists' diagnostic capabilities and accelerates analytical procedures. Furthermore, the review highlights the growing importance of collaborative networks facilitating global knowledge sharing. It also emphasizes the significant impact of this technology on medical education and patient care. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of digital pathology's transformative and innovative potential, highlighting its disruptive nature in reshaping diagnostic practices.

An Automated Deep Learning Approach for Spine Segmentation and Vertebrae Recognition Using Computed Tomography Images

Spine image analysis is based on the accurate segmentation and vertebrae recognition of the spine. Several deep learning models have been proposed for spine segmentation and vertebrae recognition, but they are very computationally demanding. In this research, a novel deep learning model is introduced for spine segmentation and vertebrae recognition using CT images. The proposed model works in two steps: (1) A cascaded hierarchical atrous spatial pyramid pooling residual attention U-Net (CHASPPRAU-Net), which is a modified version of U-Net, is used for the segmentation of the spine. Cascaded spatial pyramid pooling layers, along with residual blocks, are used for feature extraction, while the attention module is used for focusing on regions of interest. (2) A 3D mobile residual U-Net (MRU-Net) is used for vertebrae recognition. MobileNetv2 includes residual and attention modules to accurately extract features from the axial, sagittal, and coronal views of 3D spine images. The features from these three views are concatenated to form a 3D feature map. After that, a 3D deep learning model is used for vertebrae recognition. The VerSe 20 and VerSe 19 datasets were used to validate the proposed model. The model achieved more accurate results in spine segmentation and vertebrae recognition than the state-of-the-art methods.