Japan society of clinical oncology/Japanese society of medical oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors, cooperated by the Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology

Current management of neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive sarcoma: an updated review

In recent years, pembrolizumab has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating tumors characterized by a high tumor mutational burden and high microsatellite instability. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have shown considerable efficacy against tumors harboring neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion genes, highlighting the growing importance of personalized medicine in cancer treatment. Advanced sequencing technologies enable the rapid analysis of numerous genetic abnormalities in tumors, facilitating the identification of patients with positive biomarkers. These advances have increased the likelihood of providing effective, tailored treatments. NTRK fusion genes are present in various cancer types, including sarcomas, and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib have been effectively used for these malignancies. Consequently, the treatment outcomes for NTRK fusion-positive tumors have improved significantly, reflecting a shift toward more personalized therapeutic approaches. This review focuses on NTRK fusion-positive sarcomas and comprehensively evaluates their epidemiology, clinical features, and radiological and histological characteristics. We also investigated the treatment landscape, including the latest methodologies involving TRK inhibitors, and discussed the long-term efficacy of these inhibitors, and their optimal order of use. Notably, larotrectinib has demonstrated a high response rate in infantile fibrosarcoma, and its efficacy has been confirmed even in advanced cases. However, further research is warranted to optimize treatment duration and subsequent management strategies. The accumulation of clinical cases worldwide will play a pivotal role in refining the treatment approaches for tumors associated with NTRK fusion genes.

Review of Novel Surgical, Radiation, and Systemic Therapies and Clinical Trials in Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite an established standard of care including surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, GBM unfortunately is associated with a dismal prognosis. Therefore, researchers are extensively evaluating avenues to expand GBM therapy and improve outcomes in patients with GBM. In this review, we provide a broad overview of novel GBM therapies that have recently completed or are actively undergoing study in clinical trials. These therapies expand across medical, surgical, and radiation clinical trials. We additionally review methods for improving clinical trial design in GBM.

Diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies using an overnight-stored pancreatic juice cell block specimen

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreatic juice cytology is useful for diagnosing pancreatic duct strictures and cystic lesions. However, some cases cannot be diagnosed using cytology. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the overnight-stored pancreatic juice cell block (CB) method for diagnosing pancreatic disease.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 32 patients who presented with pancreatic duct strictures or cystic lesions between 2018 and 2024. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CB method and single/multiple pancreatic juice cytology were compared to evaluate the utility of the CB.

RESULT

An endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube was placed in the main pancreatic duct, and pancreatic juice was collected to create a CB specimen. The median amount of pancreatic juice collected was 180(30-200) mL, and the median number of cytological examinations was three(2-8). Of the 32 cases, 13 were malignant, and 19 were benign (non-malignant). The sensitivity was significantly higher for the CB method (62 %) than for single cytology(15 %, P = 0.0414), and there was no significant difference between CB and multiple cytology(54 %, P = 1.0). The specificity and accuracy were not significantly different between the CB method and single or multiple cytology. When multiple cytology and CB were combined, sensitivity improved to 77 %. The pathological findings of the CB specimens were similar to the surgical specimens, including immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSION

The overnight-stored pancreatic juice CB method was more effective than single cytology, with similar sensitivities to multiple cytology and can also be used for immunohistochemistry. The pancreatic juice CB method is useful for pancreatic juice assessment.

NTRK gene fusion testing and management in lung cancer

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are recurrent oncogenic drivers found in a variety of solid tumours, including lung cancer. Several tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been developed to treat tumours with NTRK gene fusions. Larotrectinib and entrectinib are first-generation TRK inhibitors that have demonstrated efficacy in patients with TRK fusion lung cancers. Genomic testing is recommended for all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer for optimal drug therapy selection. Multiple testing methods can be employed to identify NTRK gene fusions in the clinic and each has its own advantages and limitations. Among these assays, RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be considered a gold standard for detecting NTRK gene fusions; however, several alternatives with minimally acceptable sensitivity and specificity are also available in areas where widespread access to NGS is unfeasible. This review highlights the importance of testing for NTRK gene fusions in lung cancer, ideally using the gold-standard method of RNA-based NGS, the various assays that are available, and treatment algorithms for patients.

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor markers, 2nd edition review part 1

With advances in gene and protein analysis technologies, many target molecules that may be useful in cancer diagnosis have been reported. Therefore, the "Tumor Marker Study Group" was established in 1981 with the aim of "discovering clinically" useful molecules. Later, the name was changed to "Japanese Society for Molecular Tumor Marker Research" in 2000 in response to the remarkable progress in gene-related research. Currently, the world of cancer treatment is shifting from the era of representative tumor markers of each cancer type used for tumor diagnosis and treatment evaluation to the study of companion markers for molecular-targeted therapeutics that target cancer cells. Therefore, the first edition of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines, which summarizes tumor markers and companion markers in each cancer type, was published in 2016. After publication of the first edition, the gene panel testing using next-generation sequencing became available in Japan in June 2019 for insured patients. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been indicated for a wide range of cancer types. Therefore, the 2nd edition of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines was published in September 2021 to address the need to revise the guidelines. Here, we present an English version of the review (Part 1) of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines, Second Edition.

NTRK gene aberrations in triple-negative breast cancer: detection challenges using IHC, FISH, RT-PCR, and NGS

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is usually an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are cancer type-agnostic emerging biomarkers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the selection of patients for targeted therapy. The main aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK aberrations, i.e. fusions, gene copy number gain, and amplification, in a series of TNBC using different methods. A total of 83 TNBCs were analyzed using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). Of 83 cases, 16 showed pan-TRK positivity although no cases had NTRK-fusions. Indeed, FISH showed four cases carrying an atypical NTRK1 pattern consisting of one fusion signal and one/more single green signals, but all cases were negative for fusion by NGS and RT-PCR testing. In addition, FISH analysis showed six cases with NTRK1 amplification, one case with NTRK2 copy number gain, and five cases with NTRK3 copy number gain, all negative for pan-TRK IHC. Our data demonstrate that IHC has a high false-positive rate for the detection of fusions and molecular testing is mandatory; there is no need to perform additional molecular tests in cases negativity for NTRK by IHC. In conclusion, the NTRK genes are not involved in fusions in TNBC, but both copy number gain and amplification are frequent events, suggesting a possible predictive role for other NTRK aberrations.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with high tumor mutational burden tumors

The development of novel antitumor agents and accompanying biomarkers has improved survival across several tumor types. Previously, we developed recommendations for tumor-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficient or neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusions. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patient with tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) solid tumors and have been established as a third tumor-agnostic agent, making it necessary to develop the guideline prioritized for these patients. Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), and Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology (JSPHO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. The current guideline describes three clinical questions and seven recommendations for whom, when, and how TMB should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. In this guideline, the committee proposed seven recommendations for performing TMB testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Systematic review of NTRK 1/2/3 fusion prevalence pan-cancer and across solid tumours

NTRK gene fusions are rare somatic mutations found across cancer types with promising targeted therapies emerging. Healthcare systems face significant challenges in integrating these treatments, with uncertainty in prevalence and optimal testing methods to identify eligible patients. We performed a systematic review of NTRK fusion prevalence to inform efficient diagnostic screening and scale of therapeutic uptake. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 31/03/2021. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting fusion rates in solid tumours, English language, post-2010 publication and minimum sample size. Critical appraisal was performed using a custom 11-item checklist. Rates were collated by cancer type and pooled if additional synthesis criteria were met. 160 studies were included, with estimates for 15 pan-cancer and 429 specific cancer types (63 paediatric). Adult pan-cancer estimates ranged 0.03-0.70%, with higher rates found in RNA-based assays. In common cancers, rates were consistently below 0.5%. Rare morphological subtypes, colorectal microsatellite instability, and driver mutation exclusion cancers had higher rates. Only 35.6% of extracted estimates used appropriate methods and sample size to identify NTRK fusions. NTRK fusion-positive cancers are rare and widely distributed across solid tumours. Small-scale, heterogeneous data confound prevalence prediction. Further large-scale, standardised genomic data are needed to characterise NTRK fusion epidemiology.

Latest Advances in the Management of Pediatric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, usually found in elderly adults. It is infrequent among pediatric patients and usually differs biologically from adult-type diseases presenting mutations of KIT and PDGFR genes. In this population, more frequent is the wild-type GIST possessing SDH, TRK, RAS, NF1 mutations, among others. Both tumor types require individualized treatment with kinase inhibitors that are still being tested in the pediatric population due to the different neoplasm biology. We review the latest updates to the management of pediatric gastrointestinal tumors with a particular focus on the advances in molecular biology of the disease that enables the definition of possible resistance. Emerging treatment with kinase inhibitors that could serve as targeted therapy is discussed, especially with multikinase inhibitors of higher generation, the effectiveness of which has already been confirmed in the adult population.

Expert Panel Consensus Recommendations on the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Comprehensive genomic profiling is increasingly used to facilitate precision oncology based on molecular stratification. In addition to conventional tissue comprehensive genomic profiling, comprehensive genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA has become widely utilized in cancer care owing on its advantages, including less invasiveness, rapid turnaround time, and capturing heterogeneity. However, circulating tumor DNA comprehensive genomic profiling has some limitations, mainly false negatives due to low levels of plasma circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid and false positives caused by clonal hematopoiesis. Nevertheless, no guidelines and recommendations fully address these issues. Here, an expert panel committee involving representatives from 12 Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan was organized to develop expert consensus recommendations for the use of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid‐based comprehensive genomic profiling. The aim was to generate guidelines for clinicians and allied healthcare professionals on the optimal use of the circulating tumor DNA assays in advanced solid tumors and to aid the design of future clinical trials that utilize and develop circulating tumor DNA assays to refine precision oncology. Fourteen clinical questions regarding circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid comprehensive genomic profiling including the timing of testing and considerations for interpreting results were established by searching and curating associated literatures, and corresponding recommendations were prepared based on the literature for each clinical question. Final consensus recommendations were developed by voting to determine the level of each recommendation by the Committee members.

Evaluation of the Cell Block Method Using Overnight-Stored Bile for Malignant Biliary Stricture Diagnosis

The specimen collection and subsequent pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture (MBS) are difficult. This study aimed to determine whether the cell block (CB) method using overnight-stored bile is useful in the diagnosis of MBS. This trial was a single-arm prospective study involving a total of 59 patients with suspected MBS. The primary endpoint was cancer detectability and accuracy using the CB method, and a comparison with the detectability and accuracy achieved with bile cytology was made. The immunohistochemical sensitivity for maspin and p53 was also investigated in the CB and surgical specimens. We were able to collect bile from all 59 patients, and 45 of these patients were clinically diagnosed with MBS. The cancer detectability using the CB method (62.2%) was significantly higher than that using cytology (37.8%) (p = 0.0344). When CB was combined with biopsy, the rates of cancer detectability (75.6%) and accuracy (81.4%) increased. In eight patients who received surgical therapy, maspin- and p53-immunohistochemistry was applied to the surgical and CB specimens, and cancer cells in both specimens showed positive cytoplasmic and nuclear staining for maspin and nuclear staining for p53. The CB method is, thus, useful for detecting malignancy (UMIN000034707).

Pan-tumor screening for NTRK gene fusions using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and RNA NGS fusion panel testing

Targetable NTRK gene fusions can be detected across tumor types using methodologies such as pan-TRK IHC, DNA or RNA NGS testing, or FISH. Challenges for implementation of clinical testing for NTRK fusions may arise due to the range in NTRK fusion prevalence across tumors, endogenous levels of TRK expression in tissues, and the large number of potential fusion partners. In this study, we examined our experience evaluating driver mutation negative lung, urothelial or cholangiocarcinoma cases, in addition to cases with positive, equivocal, or weak staining by pan-TRK IHC for NTRK fusions. 63/127 (49.6%) of these cases were positive for pan-TRK IHC, of which 71.4% showed weak or focal staining, potentially due to physiologic or non-specific TRK expression. Of these 127 cases, 4 harbored a NTRK fusion (1 fusion was seen in two separate samples from the same patient) as confirmed by RNA fusion panel testing. Pan-TRK IHC was positive in 1 case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, equivocal in 1 case with GOLGA4-NTRK3 fusion, and negative in 2 samples with ADAM19-NTRK3 fusion. Our findings show that we were able to successfully identify NTRK fusions that resulted in targeted therapy. However, our results suggest limited sensitivity of pan-TRK IHC for NTRK3 fusions, and that the reduced specificity for pan-TRK IHC in tumors with physiologic or non-specific TRK expression, results in false positive samples that require confirmatory testing by RNA based NGS.

Evaluation of NTRK Gene Fusion by Five Different Platforms in Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma

Triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) is an aggressive disease that has a poor prognosis since it lacks effective treatment methods. Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion genes are excellent candidates for targeted RTK inhibitor therapies and there are available targeted therapy drugs for the treatment of TRK fusion-positive tumors in a tumor agnostic pattern. Our study was designed to investigate the NTRK gene fusion status in TNBC patients and to determine whether RTK-targeted therapies are suitable for TNBC patients. A total of 305 TNBC patients were enrolled in our study. IHC was employed as a prescreening method, and IHC positive cases were further submitted for evaluation by FISH, RT-PCR, and NGS methods. NTRK IHC was evaluated successfully in 287 of the 305 cases, and there were 32 (11.15%) positive cases. FISH was carried out in the 32 IHC positive cases. There were 13 FISH-positive cases if the threshold was set as >15% of the 100 counted tumor cells having a split orange and green signal with more than one signal diameter. There were only 2 FISH-positive cases if the cutoff value was defined as >15% of the counted tumor cells having a split signal with more than two signal diameter widths. One of the FISH-positive cases had a separate NTRK3 FISH signal in 88% of the tumor cells, and its IHC result was strong nuclear staining in all the tumor cells. After evaluation of the morphology, it was re-diagnosed as secretory breast carcinoma, and the NGS result confirmed that it had a NTRK3-ETV6 fusion gene. The other FISH-positive cases were all negative for NTRK gene fusion in the NGS or RT-PCR examination. The NTRK gene fusion rate was low in our TNBC cohort. NTRK gene fusion may be a rare event in TNBC. The high false-positive rate of NTRK gene fusion detected by IHC questions its role as a prescreening method in TNBC. More data may be needed to determine a suitable threshold for NTRK FISH in TNBC in the future. More studies are needed to confirm whether RTK-targeted therapies are appropriate treatments for TNBC patients.

Identification of NTRK gene fusions in lung adenocarcinomas in the Chinese population

The molecular profile of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK) gene fusions in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is not fully understood. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and pan-tyrosine kinase receptor (TRK) immunohistochemistry (IHC) are powerful tools for NTRK fusion detection. In this study, a total of 4,619 LUAD formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were collected from patients who underwent biopsy or resection at the Shanghai Chest Hospital during 2017-2019. All specimens were screened for NTRK1 rearrangements using DNA-based NGS. Thereafter, the cases with NTRK1 rearrangements and cases negative for common driver mutations were analyzed for NTRK1/2/3 fusions using total nucleic acid (TNA)-based NGS and pan-TRK IHC. Overall, four NTRK1/2 fusion events were identified, representing 0.087% of the original sample set. At the DNA level, seven NTRK1 rearrangements were identified, while only two TPM3-NTRK1 fusions were confirmed on TNA-based NGS as functional. In addition, two NTRK2 fusions (SQSTM1-NTRK2 and KIF5B-NTRK2) were identified by TNA-based NGS in 350 'pan-negative' cases. Two patients harboring NTRK1/2 fusions were diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma, while the other two were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. All four samples with NTRK fusions were positive for the expression of pan-TRK. The two samples with NTRK2 fusions showed cytoplasmic staining alone, while the other two samples with NTRK1 fusions exhibited both cytoplasmic and membranous staining. In summary, functional NTRK fusions are found in early-stage LUAD; however, they are extremely rare. According to this study's results, they are independent oncogenic drivers, mutually exclusive with other driver mutations. We demonstrated that NTRK rearrangement analysis using a DNA-based approach should be verified with an RNA-based assay.

NTRK fusions and Trk proteins: what are they and how to test for them

The NTRK genes include a family of three genes, NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3, which are associated with fusions with a variety of partner genes, leading to upregulation of three proteins, TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC. NTRK fusions occur in a variety of solid tumors: at high incidence in secretory carcinoma of the breast and salivary glands, congenital mesoblastic nephroma, and infantile fibrosarcoma; at intermediate incidence in thyroid carcinoma, particularly postradiation carcinomas and a subset of aggressive papillary carcinomas, Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms, pediatric midline gliomas (particularly pontine glioma), and KIT/PDGFRA/RAS negative gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas; and at a low incidence in many other solid tumors. With new FDA-approved treatments available and effective in treating patients whose tumors harbor NTRK fusions, testing for these fusions has become important. A variety of technologies can be used for testing, including FISH, PCR, DNA, and RNA-based next-generation sequencing, and immunohistochemistry. RNA-based next-generation sequencing represents the gold standard for the identification of NTRK fusions, but FISH using break-apart probes and DNA-based next-generation sequencing also represent adequate approaches. Immunohistochemistry to detect increased levels of Trk protein may be very useful as a screening technology to reduce costs, although it alone does not represent a definitive diagnostic methodology.

[Diagnosis and therapy of tumors with NTRK gene fusion]

NTRK-Genfusionen sind seltene genetische Alterationen, die tumorentitätenübergreifend vorkommen können. Während sie in den meisten soliden Tumoren nur sehr niederfrequent vorkommen, lassen sie sich in bestimmten Tumoren wie dem infantilen Fibrosarkom, dem kongenitalen mesoblastischen Nephrom und dem sekretorischen Mamma- oder Speicheldrüsenkarzinom jedoch häufig nachweisen. NTRK-Genfusionen bzw. TRK-Fusionsproteine gelten als starke onkogene Treiber. Bei Nachweis von NTRK-Genfusionen können TRK-Inhibitoren unabhängig von der Tumorentität eingesetzt werden. Vertreter sind Entrectinib und Larotrectinib. Bislang ist nur Larotrectinib in der Europäischen Union zugelassen. Für beide wurden Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit in Phase-I- und Phase-II-Studien gezeigt. Die Seltenheit der TRK-Fusionstumoren stellt diagnostische und klinische Prozesse vor große Herausforderungen: Einerseits sollen alle Patienten mit TRK-Fusionstumoren identifiziert werden, andererseits sind epidemiologische und histologische Aspekte sowie Ressourcen zu berücksichtigen. Basierend auf diesen Punkten möchten wir einen Diagnosealgorithmus für TRK-Fusionstumoren vorschlagen, außerdem stellen wir aktuelle Daten zu den TRK-Inhibitoren vor.

Druggable targets meet oncogenic drivers: opportunities and limitations of target-based classification of tumors and the role of Molecular Tumor Boards

The therapeutic landscape of cancer is changing rapidly due to the growing number of approved drugs capable of targeting specific genetic alterations. This aspect, together with the development of noninvasive methods for the assessment of somatic mutations in the peripheral blood of patients, generated a growing interest toward a new tumor-agnostic classification system based on ‘predictive’ biomarkers. The current review article discusses this emerging alternative approach to the classification of cancer and its implications for the selection of treatments. It is suggested that different types of cancers sharing the same molecular profiles could benefit from the same targeted drugs. Although recent clinical trials have demonstrated that this approach cannot be generalized, there are also specific examples that demonstrate the clinical utility of this alternative vision. In this rapidly evolving scenario, a multidisciplinary approach managed by institutional Molecular Tumor Boards is fundamental to interpret the biological and clinical relevance of genetic alterations and the complexity of their relationship with treatment response.

•

The identification of oncogenic drivers offers the opportunity to develop target-specific drugs.

•

The inhibition of crucial pathways realizes the principle of druggable target to exploit cancer vulnerability.

•

The approval of new anticancer agents based on target-based concept represents a paradigm shift in cancer therapy.

•

However, only few drugs have been approved so far on an agnostic basis and the concept of biomarker cannot be generalized.

•

Tumor Molecular Boards will have an increasing role in the identification of new therapeutic options in selected patients.

NTRK Fusions and TRK Inhibitors: Potential Targeted Therapies for Adult Glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary central nervous (CNS) system malignancy with a poor prognosis. The standard treatment for GBM is neurosurgical resection, followed by radiochemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Predictive biomarkers, such as methylation of the promoter region of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, can successfully distinguish subgroups with different prognosis after temozolomide chemotherapy. Based on multiomics studies, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), BRAF V600E mutation, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions and other potential therapy targets have been found.

METHODS

We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence for NTRK fusions and TRK inhibitors therapy in cancers with NTRK fusions in pan-cancer and gliomas.

RESULTS

Several NTRK1/2/3 fusions have been reported in GBM and preclinical studies have proven that NTRK fusions are potential driver mutations in some high-grade gliomas. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have shown efficacy as targeted therapies for extracranial tumors with NTRK fusions in recent clinical trials, with potential CNS tolerability and activity. However, whether NTRK gene fusions can affect survival status, the efficacy and resistance of TRK inhibitors in GBMs are lacking high-level evidences.

CONCLUSIONS

For GBM patients, NTRK fusions and TRK inhibitors are potential target therapy strategy but remain biological mechanism and clinical significance unclarified. More clinical data and future clinical trials are needed to provide more evidence that supports targeted therapy for GBM with NTRK fusions.

Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A review of implications for patients, clinicians and healthcare services

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) inhibitors represent the latest advancement as a treatment option in targeted therapies for malignant disease. NTRK gene fusions involving NTRK1, 2 or 3 are implicated as genetics drivers for a number of tumour types which arise within adult and paedatric patients. NTRK inhibitors (Larotrectinib and Entrectinib) are effective agents which have demonstrated clinical benefit in the treatment of NTRK fusion positive solid tumours. Larotrectinib represents the first targeted agent to receive approval from international authorisation and commissioning bodies for the treatment of a specific genetic expression indiscriminate of the site from which the tumour has arisen. As such NTRK inhibitors could pave the way for international healthcare bodies to adopt a similar approach for future targeted therapies thereby altering the manner in which healthcare providers and patients are able to access and utilise innovative, targeted treatment options in future. The potential implications of this new approach are likely to impact upon several aspects of the traditional authorisation and commissioning pathways with potential changes to the design of clinical trials, the review and approval process by regulatory bodies and immunohistopathology services.