Meta-analysis: the impact of nutritional status on the immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in chronic kidney disease

Impaired Hepatitis B and COVID-19 vaccination responses show strong concordance in hemodialysis patients with end stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis are at increased risk for infection and impaired vaccination responses. We analyzed overlap and influencing factors of vaccination responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODS

SARS-CoV-2 and HBV vaccination response was assessed in a cohort of German ESRD hemodialysis patients. Anti-HBs- and SARS-CoV-2 anti-S-IgG were analyzed by ELISA. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from clinical files.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients with complete information on HBV and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses were included. More than one-third (35.4%) of non-responders upon HBV vaccination were identified. Unresponsiveness after HBV and poor response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed strong overlap, and overall, 70.3% of patients were classified into concordant HBV/SARS vaccination response groups. HBV vaccination non-responsiveness, but not poor SARS-CoV-2 post-vaccination immunity was associated with obesity, while poor SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses were associated increased age.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm previous reports on impaired vaccination response in hemodialysis patients and show that post-vaccination humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 and HBV display strong overlap in this vulnerable patient group. These results may help to adapt vaccination strategies in this highly vulnerable population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Registry, DRKS00021152.

Increase of Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Levels After Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients: An Important Single-Center Observation

BACKGROUND

The effects of COVID-19 vaccines on immunocompromised people such as hemodialysis (HD) patients are an important topic that should be addressed. This study reports an observation of the effect of the third dose of the Sinopharm vaccine (SphV3) on the level of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) in HD patients, and the differences between anti-HBs titers before and after SphV3 were analytically evaluated.

METHODS

This single-center observational study involved all HD patients presented to Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from February 2021 to March 2022. All patients received three doses of the Sinopharm vaccine over 8 months. The anti-HBs level is measured every 6 months as the routine evaluation against HBV infection for all HD patients. Three months before (anti-HBs-B3) and 3 months after (anti-HBs-A3) SphV3 were the routine times to measure the anti-HBs titer during this study.

RESULTS

Twenty-five HD patients were enrolled. Overall, the anti-HBs-A3 was significantly higher than anti-HBs-B3 (p = 0.001). The anti-HBs levels before and after SphV3 were not statistically remarkable in patients with diabetes and ischemic heart disease. The patients with a history of kidney transplant and those with a history of COVID-19 had significant differences between anti-HBs-B3 and anti-HBs-A3 (p = 0.002, p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that inactivated COVID-19 vaccine may be involved in the humoral immune response to hepatitis B in HD patients. It may be novel and have significant implications for the vaccination protocol for immunocompromised patients, including those undergoing HD and transplant recipients.

The Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients Is Correlated with Nutritional Status

Hemodialysis patients are highly susceptible to poor nutritional status. Our objective was to investigate whether poor nutritional status during mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is correlated with impaired vaccine responses. This retrospective study was conducted in two hospital-based dialysis units. The nutritional status of hemodialysis patients was assessed, using a malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) at the time of their first BNT162b2 vaccine dose. One month after the second vaccine dose, we performed a quantitative assessment of antibodies against the spike protein (anti-S1 IgG). A total of 115 hemodialysis patients, with an average age of 72 were enrolled in the study. Among them, 39 (33.9%) were female, and 67 (58.2%) had diabetes mellitus. In 43/115 (37.4%) patients, moderate to severe malnutrition (MIS > 5) was detected. Comparatively, malnourished patients showed a lower log-transformed mean level of anti-S1 IgG compared to those with normal nutrition (2.91 ± 0.83 vs. 3.25 ± 0.72, respectively, p = 0.024). In a multivariable analysis that adjusted for age, sex, and KT/V, the nutritional status assessed by an MIS remained inversely associated with an anti-S1 IgG response [B; -0.066 (-0.117 to -0.015)]. In conclusion, moderate to severe malnutrition in hemodialysis patients is associated with reduced humoral responses to BNT162b2 vaccination.

Waning Humoral Response 6 Month after Double Vaccination with the mRNA-BNT162b2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction

Although most hemodialysis patients (HDP) exhibit an initial seroresponse to vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), studies have shown this response to be lower compared to healthy subjects. This fact raised concerns regarding the durability of the immune response and effective protection against severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in this vulnerable population. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change in antibody levels over time in HDP population.

Materials and Methods

We performed a prospective multicenter study, evaluating antibody response among HDP at 2 and at 6 months after complete two-dose vaccination course with the mRNA-BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. The study was performed in 14 hemodialysis units of a private dialysis provider in Lithuania. The serum samples of 189 HDP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG against the Spike glycoprotein.

Results

189 HDP participated in the study. Patients were 64.3±15.7 years of age, 116 (61.4%) were males and 73 (38.6%) were females. Among them, 183 (96.8%) were seropositive for anti-S IgG at 2 months after the second immunization dose. Six months after the second dose only 145 (76.7%) of study participants had positive anti-S IgG titers. The median level of anti-S IgG titers after 2 months was 383.1 BAU/mL (166.2-995.6) and after 6 months this level significantly decreased to 51.4 BAU/mL (22.0-104.0) (p<0.001). Seroresponses at both time points inversely correlated with increasing patient's age. Risk factor for absent response after 2 months included oncologic disease. Systemic autoimmune disease and a history of myocardial infarction increased risk to be seronegative 6 months after the second vaccine dose.

Conclusions

The majority of hemodialysis patients seroresponded after BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination, but vaccine-induced humoral immunity wanes over time.

Humoral Response to Hepatitis B and COVID-19 Vaccine among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients have impaired immunological responses to pathogens and vaccines. In this study, we compared the humoral response to HBV and COVID-19 vaccines in a cohort of MHD patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics of vaccine responders and non-responders were also compared, and the association between the humoral responses to both vaccines was evaluated. The cohort included 94 MHD patients who were vaccinated at least once for HBV and twice for COVID-19. Among the 94 patients, 28 (29.8%) did not develop protective titers to HBV. Hypertension, coronary heart disease, and heart failure were more common in non-responders. Among MHD patients, 85% had positive IgG anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 levels 6 months after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/Biotech) vaccine. Age and immunosuppressive therapy were the main predictors of humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine. We did not find any association between non-responders to HBV and non-responders to COVID-19 vaccine. There was no difference in IgG anti-spike titers between HBV responders and non-responders (505 ± 644 vs. 504 ± 781, p = 0.9) Our results suggest that reduced humoral response to hepatitis B is not associated with reduced response to COVID-19 vaccine. Different risk-factors were associated with poor immune response to HBV and to COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccines, Microbiota and Immunonutrition: Food for Thought

Vaccines are among the most effective health measures and have contributed to eradicating some diseases. Despite being very effective, response rates are low in some individuals. Different factors have been proposed to explain why some people are not as responsive as others, but what appears to be of critical importance is the presence of a healthy functioning immune system. In this respect, a key factor in modulating the immune system, both in its adaptive and innate components, is the microbiota. While microbiota can be modulated in different ways (i.e., antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics), an effective and somewhat obvious mechanism is via nutrition. The science of nutrients and their therapeutic application is called immunonutrition, and it is increasingly being considered in several conditions. Our review will focus on the importance of nutrition and microbiota modulation in promoting a healthy immune system while also discussing the overall impact on vaccination response.

EVALUATION OF SOME BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS AND THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO HEPATITIS B VACCINE IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

OBJECTIVE

The aim: The goal of this study was to assess the immune response to the HB vaccine (the level of anti-HBs titer), as well as the prevalence of serum creatinine, urea, CRP, and serum albumin levels, and the relationship between these and immune response to the vaccine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: 127 patients with chronic renal disease on hemodialysis (HD) were compared to 40 healthy people in Iraqi dialysis center, Baghdad. Antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were detected using the ARCHITECT SYSTEM and the Anti-HBs titer, HBs Ag, Anti-HCV determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

Results: When compared to the poor and non-responder groups, the mean value of anti-HBs titer increased considerably in the good responder group. The good responder and control groups, on the other hand, showed no significant changes. The anti-HBs titer was found to have the strongest negative correlation with serum creatinine, blood urea, and C-reactive protein levels. There was a considerable positive connection between anti-HBs titer and albumin levels.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The responses of HD patients to the HB vaccine revealed the significant negative relation between serum creatinine, blood urea levels, and CRP, as well as a significant positive correlation between serum albumin.

Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2-Vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in Patients on Hemodialysis

mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines offer a preventive strategy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections that is of interest in the care of patients on hemodialysis (HDP). We measured humoral immune responses in 72 HDP after standard vaccination with two doses of the mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). Antibody responses were evaluated with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ChemiLuminescent ImmunoAssay (CLIA) two weeks after the second dose. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 IgG was determined in a control of 16 healthy healthcare workers (HCW). The control group of HCW has shown a strong antibody response with a median (MD (Q1; Q3)) antibody titer of 800.0 AU/mL (520.5; 800.0). In comparison to HCW, HDP under 60 years of age responded equally (597.0 AU/mL (410.5; 800.0), p = 0.051). However, the antibody responses of the HDP negatively correlated with age (r2 = 0.2954 p < 0.0001), leading to significantly lower antibody titers in HDP over 60 years (280.0 AU/mL (45.7; 477.0), p < 0.0001). To thoroughly understand the immunogenicity of the new mRNA-based vaccines in HDP, longitudinal data on the effectiveness and durability of antibody responses are needed. Modifications of immunization schedules should be considered in HDP with low or without antibody responsiveness after standard vaccination to boost immune reactivity and prolong protective effects in these vulnerable patients.

Hepatitis B virus vaccine and chronic kidney disease. The advances

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B is an important agent of liver disease in patients with chronic kidney disease and chronic HBV infection promotes the development of CKD in the adult general population. Patients with CKD have a suboptimal response to various vaccines, and it remains unclear how we boost the immune response of CKD patients to HB vaccine.

STUDY AIMS AND DESIGN

We performed a narrative review to assess the mechanisms of lower immunogenicity of HBV vaccine in CKD population; multiple approaches to improve the response rate of CKD patients to HBV vaccine have been reported. This is a very important topic for nephrologists who often serve as primary case providers for patients with CKD.

RESULTS

The recommended vaccine schedule for CKD patients including those on maintenance dialysis is based on recombinant vaccine, four doses (month 0,1,2, and 6; 40mcg each) by intramuscular route (deltoid muscle). According to RCTs or observational studies, some recombinant vaccines with adjuvants (i.e., HBV-AS02 and HBV-AS04) look promising. HBV-AS04 showed to give better seroprotection rates and durable immune response over extended follow-ups compared with licensed HBV vaccine in CKD patients. The seroprotection rate was 95% (97/102) and 82% (202/248) in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients, respectively, one month after completing vaccine schedule with HBV-AS04. HBV-AS02 was superior to licensed vaccine in terms of seroprotection rate, 76.9% vs. 37.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest adjuvanted recombinant (HBV-AS04) vaccine (0,1,2 and 3 months; 20 mcg each dose) and post vaccination testing of anti-HBs antibody after vaccination. Booster doses to patients whose anti-HBs titers fall below the seroprotection level (<10IU/mL) during the follow-up are appropriate. The patho-physiologic mechanisms responsible for the poor immunogenicity of HBV vaccine in CKD patients are under active investigation.

Hepatitis B virus vaccine and chronic kidney disease. The advances

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B is an important agent of liver disease in patients with chronic kidney disease and chronic HBV infection promotes the development of CKD in the adult general population. Patients with CKD have a suboptimal response to various vaccines, and it remains unclear how we boost the immune response of CKD patients to HB vaccine.

STUDY AIMS AND DESIGN

We performed a narrative review to assess the mechanisms of lower immunogenicity of HBV vaccine in CKD population; multiple approaches to improve the response rate of CKD patients to HBV vaccine have been reported. This is a very important topic for nephrologists who often serve as primary case providers for patients with CKD.

RESULTS

The recommended vaccine schedule for CKD patients including those on maintenance dialysis is based on recombinant vaccine, four doses (month 0,1,2, and 6; 40mcg each) by intramuscular route (deltoid muscle). According to RCTs or observational studies, some recombinant vaccines with adjuvants (i.e., HBV-AS02 and HBV-AS04) look promising. HBV-AS04 showed to give better seroprotection rates and durable immune response over extended follow-ups compared with licensed HBV vaccine in CKD patients. The seroprotection rate was 95% (97/102) and 82% (202/248) in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients, respectively, one month after completing vaccine schedule with HBV-AS04. HBV-AS02 was superior to licensed vaccine in terms of seroprotection rate, 76.9% vs. 37.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest adjuvanted recombinant (HBV-AS04) vaccine (0,1,2 and 3 months; 20 mcg each dose) and post vaccination testing of anti-HBs antibody after vaccination. Booster doses to patients whose anti-HBs titers fall below the seroprotection level (<10IU/mL) during the follow-up are appropriate. The patho-physiologic mechanisms responsible for the poor immunogenicity of HBV vaccine in CKD patients are under active investigation.

The SENIEUR protocol and the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination in healthy elderly persons by age, gender, and vaccine route

BACKGROUND

Reduced response to hepatitis B vaccines is associated with aging, confounding and comorbid conditions, as well as inadvertent subcutaneous (SC) inoculation. We hypothesized that the antibody and T cell-mediated immune responses (T-CMI) of elderly adults to a vaccine intended for intramuscular (IM) administration would be attenuated when deposited into SC fat, independent of confounding conditions.

RESULTS

Fifty-two healthy, community dwelling elderly adults (65-82 years), seronegative for HBV, were enrolled in the SENIEUR protocol as a strictly healthy population. These seniors were randomized to receive a licensed alum-adjuvanted recombinant HBV vaccine either SC or IM, with the inoculum site verified by imaging. The response rates, defined as hepatitis B surface antibodies (HBsAb) ≥10 IU/L, were significantly lower in the elderly than in young adults, a group of 12, healthy, 21-34-year-old volunteers. Moreover, elderly participants who received the vaccine IM were significantly more likely to be responders than those immunized SC (54% versus 16%, p = 0.008). The low seroconversion rate in the IM group progressively declined with increasing age, and responders had significantly lower HBsAb titers and limited isotype responses. Moreover, T-CMI (proliferation and cytokine production) were significantly reduced in both percentage of responders and intensity of the response for both Th1 and Th2 subsets in the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate the blunted immunogenicity of SC inoculation as measured by peak titers and response rates. Further, the qualitative and quantitative deficits in B- and T-CMI responses to primary alum adjuvanted protein antigens persisted even in strictly healthy elderly populations with verified IM placement compared to younger populations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04162223. Registered 14 November 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Vaccination practices in dialysis patients: A narrative review

In a period of turmoil concerning vaccination practices, there is a serious conflict between scientifically reasonable, evidence-based guidelines and the far-fetched rumors or misconceptions concerning the vaccination practices in the general population. When a significant portion of the medical and paramedical personnel may be deliberately unvaccinated against common biological agents, achieving effective vaccination rates in the dialysis population may be complicated. Vaccination rates are unacceptably low in dialysis patients and seroconversion rates are even lower; further, serological follow-up is generally poor. The particularly anergic immune system of the advanced chronic kidney disease patients is partly a cause of both high rates of infection and low rates of seroconversions. This narrative review is an effort to summarize current knowledge concerning the vaccination practices in dialysis patients with some specific recommendations based on these facts. Of particular interest is a new vaccine, the Zoster Recombinant, Adjuvanted Vaccine (Shingrix), which we will include in our discussion.

Primary seroresponses to double-dose compared with standard-dose hepatitis B vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clinical guidelines recommend double-dose hepatitis B vaccination for patients requiring dialysis, due to an increased risk of hepatitis B infection and reduced vaccine responsiveness. There are no recommendations for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) prior to dialysis.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing efficacy (seroresponses) and harms of double-dose compared with standard-dose hepatitis B vaccination in patients with CKD, including those requiring dialysis. A systematic literature search (CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE) was performed using a predetermined search strategy. Relative risks were calculated from pooled data using a random-effects model with subgroup analysis by dialysis requirement and vaccine type.

Results

Seven studies (501 patients) fulfilled review criteria: four in patients receiving dialysis and three in patients not receiving dialysis. The incidence of seroconversion was not increased with double-dose vaccination overall [risk ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.39], by dialysis requirement or vaccine type. The incidence of seroprotection (reported by only four studies) was increased with double-dose vaccination overall (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.17-2.00) but not by dialysis requirement. Adverse events were not reported by treatment arm, precluding comparison. The overall quality of included studies was moderate to low.

Conclusions

The current data do not support clinical guideline recommendations for administering double-dose vaccination for patients with CKD as seroconversion was not improved and seroprotection was inadequately assessed. Large high-quality studies are required to overcome the current evidence gap regarding vaccine dosing in CKD.

Response to active hepatitis B vaccination and mortality in incident dialysis patients

All patients with advanced chronic kidney disease or on renal replacement therapy should receive active hepatitis B vaccination. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the association between the immune response to hepatitis B vaccination and all-cause, cardiovascular or infection-related mortality in incident dialysis patients starting dialysis between 2001 and 2008 (n=426) in two Austrian dialysis centers. Vaccination response was defined as follows: absent anti-HBs antibody titer or a titer <10IU/L was classified as non-response, seroconversion (SC) was defined as a titer ⩾10IU/L, and seroprotection (SP) as a titer ⩾100IU/L. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Models were used to determine the association between vaccination response and all-cause, cardiovascular and infection-related mortality. Of all patients 207 (48.6%) were non-responders, SC was observed in 219 (51.4%), SP in 118 (27.7%) patients. During a median follow-up of 51.2 months 228 (53.5%) patients died. Patients with SP and SC showed a significantly lower all-cause (p<0.001 for both) and cardiovascular mortality (p=0.006 for SP, p=0.01 for SC). SP and SC were independently associated with a significant risk reduction for all-cause mortality (SP: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97, p=0.03; SC: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95, p=0.02). In conclusion, achieving seroconversion and seroprotection after active hepatitis B vaccination is associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality in incident dialysis patients. This simple and readily available tool allows estimation of patient survival independently of other well-known key parameters such as age, gender, the presence of diabetes and markers of malnutrition and inflammation.

Undernutrition and malaria in pregnancy - a dangerous dyad?

BACKGROUND

In low-resource settings, malaria and macronutrient undernutrition are major health problems in pregnancy, contributing significantly to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. Affected pregnancies may result in stillbirth and neonatal death, and surviving children are at risk of poor growth and infection in infancy, and of non-communicable diseases in adulthood. Populations exposed to macronutrient undernutrition frequently reside in malaria-endemic areas, and seasonal peaks of low food supply and malaria transmission tend to coincide. Despite these geographic and temporal overlaps, integrated approaches to these twin challenges are infrequent.

DISCUSSION

This opinion article examines the current evidence for malaria-macronutrition interactions and discusses possible mechanisms whereby macronutrient undernutrition and malaria may interact to worsen pregnancy outcomes. Macronutrient undernutrition dysregulates the immune response. In pregnant women, undernutrition may worsen the already increased susceptibility to malarial infection and could impair development of protective immunity to malaria, and is likely to exacerbate the impact of placental malaria on fetal growth. Malarial infection, in turn, can drive nutritional depletion; poor gestational weight gain and weight loss in pregnancy increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite a commendable number of studies and trials that, in isolation, attempt to address the challenges of malaria and undernutrition in pregnancy, few dare to venture beyond the 'single disease - single solution' paradigm. We believe that this may be a lost opportunity: researching malaria-nutrition interactions, and designing and implementing integrated interventions to prevent and treat these commonly co-existing and intertwining conditions, may markedly reduce the high burden of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction in affected areas.

CONCLUSION

We call for more collaboration between researchers studying malaria and nutrition in pregnancy, and propose a research agenda to address this important twin health problem.

Novel Perspectives on the Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine in the Chronic Kidney Disease Population

Background

The prevalence and incidence rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) among patients undergoing maintenance dialysis in developed countries have declined over the last 2 decades thanks to the implementation of numerous infection control procedures in dialysis units, including the hepatitis B vaccine. It is well known that the immune response against HBV vaccine is unsatisfactory in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. The seroprotection rate after the HB vaccine schedule is low and the anti-HB titers are reduced, falling logarithmically over time.

Purpose

We did an extensive review of the medical literature on the mechanisms underlying the reduced response rate towards the HBV vaccine in patients with CKD. The efficacy and safety of HBV vaccines for use in the CKD population was also evaluated.

Results

Currently available vaccines against HBV are mostly plasma-derived or manufactured by recombinant DNA technology (yielding the S protein of the HBV envelope). The most promising strategy to enhance the immune response toward the HBV vaccine in the dialysis population is given by adjuvanted vaccines. Second-generation recombinant HB vaccines provided with a novel adjuvant (AS04, made of 3- O-4′-desacyl-monophosphoryl lipid A adsorbed on aluminum phosphate) demonstrated improved immunogenicity but a number of patients with an unsatisfactory response still occurs. Additional second-generation vaccines containing nonaluminum-based adjuvant systems such as AS02 (3- O-desacyl-4′-monophoshoryl lipid A and QS21) or 1018 (a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist) have shown higher immunogenicity and acceptable safety in the CKD population. The evidence in patients with end-stage renal disease is extremely limited on the use of third-generation vaccines, recombinant HBV vaccines expressed in mammalian cells containing S/Pre-S antigens.

Conclusions

The immunogenicity of HBV vaccines in patients with CKD is suboptimal but novel technologies promise to give better results in the near future.

Serostatus following live attenuated vaccination administered before pediatric liver transplantation

After liver transplantation (LT), live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) are generally contraindicated. LAVs are recommended before LT for patients ≥ 6 months of age. However, the evidence supporting this practice is limited. Patients were enrolled before and after LT. Clinical data for patients were obtained from medical records. Serum antibody titers were evaluated at the time of enrollment and prospectively. Serum antibody titers were measured with a hemagglutination inhibition test for measles and rubella and with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for varicella and mumps. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the factors that affect the serostatus. Serological analyses of 49 patients immunized before LT (median age, 45 months; male, 35%) were performed. Underlying diseases were biliary atresia (n = 27; 55%), metabolic diseases (n = 13; 27%), fulminant hepatic failure (n = 5; 10%), and others (n = 4; 8%). The seropositivity rate after each vaccine was 46.9% (measles), 89.4% (rubella), 67.5% (varicella), and 48.8% (mumps). Factors independently associated with seronegativity were a vaccination age < 12 months for measles (P = .002), a lower body weight for varicella (P = 0.01), and underlying diseases other than biliary atresia for mumps (P = .004). No serious adverse event was observed during the study period. The immunogenicity of LAVs before LT was high for rubella but low for the others. Before LT, further vaccination strategies are needed for patients. In addition, serological follow-up may be indicated for patients with factors associated with seronegativity.

The ABC of pneumococcal infections and vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

In the general population, pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines (PPV) decrease the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) whereas the impact on the prevention of noninvasive pneumococcal disease is less clear. As compared with PPV, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) provoke a higher, longer-lasting immune response resulting in a 45% decreased incidence in vaccine-type pneumonia, and a 75% decrease in vaccine-type IPD.

Methods

Literature review on pneumococcal vaccination in end-stage renal disease.

Results

As compared with the general population, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) suffer increased mortality and morbidity from pneumococcal disease (PD), being up to 10-fold for those treated with dialysis. Numerous, usually small and methodological heterogeneous studies demonstrate that PPV provokes a serological response in dialysis patients, kidney transplant recipients, children with nephrotic syndrome and CKD patients receiving immunosuppressive medication. This response is of less intensity and duration than in healthy controls. Similar observations were made for the PCV. The protective value of these vaccine-elicited anti-pneumococcal antibodies in the CKD population remains to be substantiated. For patients treated with dialysis, epidemiological data demonstrate a correlation—which does not equal causality—between pneumococcal vaccination status and a slightly decreased total mortality. Clinical outcome data on the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in the prevention of morbidity and mortality in the CKD population are lacking.

Conclusions

Awaiting better evidence, pneumococcal vaccination should be advocated in all patients with CKD, as early in their disease course as possible. The ACIP schedule recommends a PCV-13 prime vaccination followed by a PPV-23 repeated vaccine at least 8 weeks later in pneumococcal non-vaccinated patients, and a PCV-13 vaccine at least 1 year after the latest PPV vaccine in previously vaccinated patients. In the UK, vaccination with PPV-23 only is recommended. There exist no good data supporting re-vaccination after 5 years in the dialysis population.

Old and new adjuvants for hepatitis B vaccines

The safety and immunogenicity profiles of currently available recombinant hepatitis B vaccines are excellent. However, it remains a real challenge to induce protective immunity in the target groups that respond poorly or not at all to conventional vaccines. Ideally, a hepatitis B vaccine can be developed that conveys lifelong protection against infection rapidly after the injection of a single dose. Although this goal is far from being reached, important improvements have been made. Novel vaccine adjuvants have been developed that enhance the immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccines while maintaining a good safety profile. The different adjuvants and adjuvant systems that are discussed herein have all been thoroughly evaluated in clinical trials and some have reached or are close to reach the market.

Enhanced immune response to hepatitis B vaccination through immunization with a Pre-S1/Pre-S2/S vaccine

Efficacy and safety of recombinant yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccines for prevention of hepatitis B have been demonstrated unequivocally worldwide as reflected in reduction in HBsAg carrier rates and hepatocellular carcinoma. A new generation of recombinant HBV vaccines expressed in mammalian cells containing Pre-S/S epitopes has been developed in several countries. Such vaccines are useful in special risk groups, i.e., in non-responders to conventional HBV vaccines including older adults, obese people, health care workers, patients with renal failure and on dialysis, transplant patients, patients with HIV as well as travelers on short notice to HBV endemic regions. The future of such vaccines depends on their enhanced immunogenicity and cost profile. Sci-B-Vac™ is a mammalian cell-derived recombinant Pre-S1/Pre-S2/S hepatitis B vaccine which has been shown to be highly immunogenic, inducing faster and higher seroprotection rates against HBV with higher anti-HBs levels at lower HBsAg doses as compared to conventional yeast-derived vaccines. Recently, it has been suggested that such Pre-S/S vaccines against HBV might be efficacious not only for prevention but also for intervention in persistent HBV infection. Data obtained in a recent clinical trial conducted in Vietnam in patients with chronic hepatitis B suggest that repeated monthly i.m. injections of the Sci-B-Vac™ co-administered with daily oral lamivudine treatment can suppress HBV replication and lead to anti-HBs seroconversion in ~50 % of treated patients. Optimization of protocols and efficacy of such an intervention, intended to bypass T cell exhaustion and immune tolerance to HBV remains to be explored.

Effect of liver cirrhosis on metastasis in colorectal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the liver metastasis risk among colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

This was a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2973 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis and 11 892 age-sex matched controls enrolled in Taiwan between 2000 and 2010. The cumulative risk by Kaplan-Meier method, hazard ratio by the multivariate Cox proportional model and the incidence density were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median time interval from the colorectal cancer diagnosis to the liver metastasis event was 7.42 months for liver cirrhosis group and 7.67 months for non-liver cirrhosis group. The incidence density of liver metastasis was higher in the liver cirrhosis group (61.92/1000 person-years) than in the non-liver cirrhosis group (47.48/1000 person-years), with a significantly adjusted hazard ratio of 1.15 (95% CI = 1.04-1.28, P = 0.007). The 10-year cumulative risk of liver metastasis for the liver cirrhosis and the non-liver cirrhosis group was 27.1 and 23.6%, respectively (P = 0.006). For early cancer stage with locoregional disease patients receiving surgery alone without adjuvant anti-cancer treatments, patients with liver cirrhosis (10-year cumulative risk 23.9 vs. 15.7%, P < 0.001) or cirrhotic symptoms (10-year cumulative risk 25.6 vs. 16.6%, P = 0.009) both still had higher liver metastasis risk compared with their counterparts. For etiologies of liver cirrhosis, the 10-year cumulative risk for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, other causes and non-liver cirrhosis were 29.5, 28.9, 27.5, 26.7 and 23.4%, respectively, (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that liver metastasis risk was underestimated and even higher in colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis.

Factors affecting effectiveness of vaccination against hepatitis B virus in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global health problem. Despite the success of the general measures against blood transmitted infections in hemodialysis (HD) units, the prevalence of HBV infection among the HD patients is still high. Thus vaccination against HBV is indicating in this population. However, compared with the general population the seroprotection achieved in HD patients remains relatively low, at about 70%. In this review patient, HD procedure and vaccine-associated factors that affect the efficacy of HBV vaccination are analyzed. Also alternative routes of HBV vaccine administration as well as new and more immunogenic vaccine formulations are discussed. However, besides scientific progress, vigilance of HD physicians and staff regarding the general measures against the transmission of blood borne infections and the vaccination against HBV is also required for reducing the prevalence of this viral infection.

Interaction of nutrition and infections globally: an overview

The interaction of nutrition and infections is known by experience by generations of medical doctors. Before the era of antibiotics, diet was an integral part of the management of infections. Now, it is necessary to take a fresh look at this interaction as the understanding of immune response has expanded considerably. Comparatively little research has addressed the impact of nutrition interventions on the management of infectious diseases. Most observations of the interaction between nutrition and infections are epidemiological in character. This holds especially true for measles as well as for tuberculosis. In AIDS, the deterioration of the nutritional status is an indicator of disease progression. Infections in undernourished children are a common cause of death, and taking this finding into account helps to reduce the case fatality rate in severely malnourished patients. Regarding the immune response, cellular as well as soluble components are affected by deficiencies of single nutrients or general undernutrition. The immunosuppressive effect of undernutrition starts during intrauterine life already: maternal nutrition status has been shown to impact on immune function in adult animals. Recent research suggests that not only undernutrition but also caloric overnutrition impacts on immune response to infections and immunization. This is partly due to the chronic inflammatory activity of the adipose tissue and partly due to neuroendocrine alterations. Infectious diseases also impact on the nutritional status, either specifically or through unspecific mechanisms, such as anorexia, tachypnea, and vomiting.

Immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccination among HIV-1 infected and uninfected adults in Kenya

BACKGROUND

In studies from high-income countries, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected persons have diminished responses to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, compared with HIV-1-uninfected persons, but data from other settings are limited.

METHODS

We compared the immune response to HBV vaccination among HIV-1-infected and HIV-1-uninfected Kenyan adults and assessed the response of HIV-1-infected initial nonresponders to revaccination with a standard HBV vaccine series.

RESULTS

Of 603 participants, 310 (51.4%) were HIV-1-infected, for whom the median CD4(+) T-cell count was 557 cells/μL (interquartile range, 428-725 cells/μL); none were receiving antiretroviral therapy. Nonresponse to HBV vaccine was higher among HIV-1-infected participants, compared with HIV-1-uninfected participants (35.8% vs 14.3%; odds ratio, 3.33; P < .001). Of 102 HIV-1-infected initial nonresponders, 88 (86.3%) responded to revaccination, for an overall response, including to revaccination, of 94.9%. Among HIV-1-infected individuals, lower CD4(+) T-cell counts and male sex were independent predictors of nonresponse to initial vaccination, and lower body mass index, higher plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, and longer time to revaccination predicted nonresponse to revaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Kenyan adults had similar HBV vaccination responses as persons from high-income countries. Timely revaccination of HIV-1-infected nonresponders increased response to the vaccine to 95%.

Future prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection

Vaccination for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and treatment for chronic hepatitis B, while effective for primary prevention and control of the disease, still have their limitations. Global coverage of HBV immunization needs improvement. Several patient populations are noted to have suboptimal seroprotective rates after HBV vaccination. There are currently several potential new vaccines undergoing animal and human studies, most notably vaccines containing immunostimulatory DNA sequences. Long-term nucleoside analogue therapy is necessary in achieving permanent virologic suppression. Potential new treatments explore new mechanisms of action, including the inhibition of hepatitis B surface antigen release, targeting antifibrotic mechanism, and immunomodulation through novel interferons and therapeutic vaccines. The clinical application of potential new vaccines and therapies would enhance the prevention of HBV infection and treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Predictors and prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Background

Tuberculosis is a common infectious disease in long-term dialysis patients. The prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in this population is unclear, particularly in those receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study investigated the prevalence of LTBI in patients receiving either hemodialysis (HD) or PD to determine predictors of LTBI and indeterminate results of interferon-gamma release assay.

Methods

Patients receiving long-term (≥3 months) HD or PD from March 2011 to February 2012 in two medical centers were prospectively enrolled. QuantiFERON-Gold in tube (QFT) test was used to determine the status of LTBI after excluding active tuberculosis. The LTBI prevalence was determined in patients receiving different dialysis modes to obtain predictors of LTBI and QFT-indeterminate results.

Results

Of 427 patients enrolled (124 PD and 303 HD), 91 (21.3%) were QFT-positive, 316 (74.0%) QFT-negative, and 20 (4.7%) QFT-indeterminate. The prevalence of LTBI was similar in the PD and HD groups. Independent predictors of LTBI were old age (OR: 1.034 [1.013–1.056] per year increment), TB history (OR: 6.467 [1.985–21.066]), and current smoker (OR: 2.675 [1.061–6.747]). Factors associated with indeterminate QFT results were HD (OR: 10.535 [1.336–83.093]), dialysis duration (OR: 1.113 [1.015–1.221] per year increment), anemia (OR: 8.760 [1.014–75.651]), and serum albumin level (OR: 0.244 [0.086–0.693] per 1 g/dL increment).

Conclusion

More than one-fifth of dialysis patients have LTBI. The LTBI prevalence is similar in PD and HD patients but is higher in the elderly, current smokers, and those with prior TB history. Such patients require closer follow-up. Repeated or alternative test may be required for malnutrition patients who received long length of HD.